2004-12-15 - Plan Commission - Minutes Board or Commission: ❑ Plan Commission
Document Type: 0 A e
g nda 0 Minutes
Meeting ate: 12/15/2004
Type of Meeting: ❑ Regular Meeting
REGULAR MEETING
BUFFALO GROVE PLAN COMMISSION
December 15, 2004
Gateway Center, 1500 Busch Parkway—Rezoning to B-3
Planned Business Center District and approval of a
Preliminary Plan—Workshop #2
Prestige Automobile Leasing, 88 Dundee Road—Rezoning to the
B-4 District and approval of a Preliminary Plan —Workshop #1
Chairman Ottenheimer called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. in the Village Council Chambers,
Buffalo Grove Municipal Building, 50 Raupp Boulevard, Buffalo Grove, Illinois.
Commissioners present: Chairman Ottenheimer
Mr. Samuels
Mr. Smith
Ms. Bocek
Ms. Kenski-Sroka
Mr. Khan
Mr. Teplinsky
Mr. Stark
Mr. Cohn
Commissioners absent: None
Also present: Mr. Harold Francke, Piper Rudnick
Mr. Mark Hopkins, HKM Architects
Mr. Mark Kurensky, HKM Architects
Mr. Donald O'Hara, Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona
Mr. John Schiess, Architect
Mr. Jamil Bou-Saab, Terra Engineering
Mr. Robert Pfeil, Village Planner
Mr. Greg Summers, Associate Village Planner
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Moved by Commissioner Teplinsky, seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve the minutes
of the regular meeting of November 3, 2004. All Commissioners were in favor of the motion
and the motion passed unanimously with Commissioner Kenski-Sroka abstaining.
Moved by Commissioner Samuels, seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve the minutes of
the regular meeting of November 17, 2004. Chairman Ottenheimer noted that his statement
under Chairman's Report on page 8 should read as follows: "Chairman Ottenheimer noted that
he does not want to get engaged in an adversarial dialogue with the public during workshop
sessions. There should also be a grammatical correction to the third line of that paragraph. All
Commissioners were in favor of the amended motion and the motion passed unanimously with
Commissioner Teplinsky abstaining.
COMMITTEE AND LIAISON REPORTS
Commissioner Samuels noted he attended the Village Board meeting on December 6, 2004
which was a budget meeting and there were no referrals to the Plan Commission.
GATEWAY CENTER, 1500 BUSCH PARKWAY — REZONING TO B-3 PLANNED
BUSINESS CENTER DISTRICT AND APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAN —
WORKSHOP 92
Mr. Harold Francke stated their intent is to walk through the changes that have been made to the
plan to address the issues that were raised at the first workshop. The Plan Commission had
asked for some greater refinement to the site plan, issues on parking and ingress and egress,
additional information on landscaping and lighting and input from the Fire Department as well as
handicapped accessibility. He stated they have submitted some additional materials prior to this
evening's workshop which is included in the packet, although they have only recently some
comments from the Fire Department and building commissioner.
Mr. Mark Hopkins stated they have begun to refine the office building design and conceptualize
it in such a way that it begins to integrate with the rest of the architecture on the site. The retail
concept for the retail and bank architecture is a modulation of urban facades on a pedestrian
scale which is something the Plan Commission had noted the office building did not do.
Mr. Hopkins reviewed the newest update of the office building noting that it takes the building
and modulates it in the same way as the other architecture. The Staples building is to the right
and to the left is the hotel building. They have disintegrated the mass into smaller components,
each with an individual visual identity. This is in order to market the building and be able to
lease it to various tenants both retail on the first and second floor and major office users. This is
part and parcel of the whole signage request issue which is basic to the idea of being able to
lease this site. The echelon and staggered visibility issue and design has to do with being able to
see these various tenants from Milwaukee Avenue and as you approach the site from the east and
the southeast. The office building then is broken up into a series of architectural facades like the
retail building and the outlot retail building. In lieu of having one overall image it is small
enough to start to address the pedestrian user and start to relate to the other buildings on the site.
There is a variety of building materials on the building and a variety of window patterns. The
various masses project away from the main body of the building and this occurs on all four
facades.
Mr. Hopkins reviewed the building elevation sketches which have different masses, materials
and heights. He noted they tried to add interest to the north side of the building so they have the
three different components on the north side broken by the glass. They have tried to add some
architectural excitement to every side of the building. It is a unique building for a unique case.
It is designed for the streetscape they are trying to create.
Mr. Mark Kurensky reviewed the landscape concept noting there had been a comment about
Busch Parkway. He stated the landscape concept is to basically take the concept of the whole
street. There is a narrow window along Milwaukee Avenue and they are trying to create a very
strong street wall. A variety of architecture drawing the visual and physical aspects into the far
west edge of the site. Busch Parkway is the main street which is accented with all of the variety
of architecture going on and all the site amenities. There are banners on the building, bollards,
pots that can be moved around and a bench. They are all picking up on either the stone character
or silver and natural metal looks picking up the strength of the architecture. The landscape starts
at the pylon sign next to the plaza and water flowing underneath the plaza. There is a people
space with benches there and that is instead of just having a pylon sign just sitting out on a lawn.
This is relating to the water, there is a weir and it is the real main visual draw along Milwaukee
Avenue. That is the main play in terms of access A. Access B is the curve which is the first
access off of Busch Parkway. It gets you and leads you right into the east side of the parking
structure. All the islands have not only deciduous shrubs but perennials as well for seasonal
interest. They have honey locusts in the parking lot as well.
Mr. Kurensky noted the Plan Commission had commented that they usually have bank drive
throughs facing away from the street. They are actually facing them toward the street because
they are trying to have the bank entrance relating to the rest of the retail. He reviewed the
screening package for the drive throughs and noted they are not trying to make a complete wall
as there is always a safety issue with drive throughs. They are trying to have low screening to
screen the main bulk of the car and have a gap with all ornamentals and screening above while
still providing a gap to get the signage for the bank itself.
Mr. Kurensky stated one of the cornerstones of the sight is that there is identification of the wall
at the corner of Milwaukee and Busch Parkway. There would be a low sign identifying the
project at the whole corner and then water activity and noise happening off of that. He noted
they also extended the landscape further to the west.
Commissioner Cohn stated he liked the way the B shops were connected to the medical office
building with a pedestrian walkway and he would like to see if it is possible to do the same thing
with the bank. It seems as if you could connect a sidewalk of some sort of pedestrian walkway
on the far eastern side of the parking lot and have a pedestrian connection all the way to the
bank.
Mr. Kurensky stated they can look into that. If people are going to use it, it would be a benefit.
If people are not going to use it he would prefer to have more lawn along Milwaukee Avenue.
Commissioner Cohn stated it seems as if there are more sidewalk features in front of the medical
office building than there are in front of the A shops area and he wonders if more sidewalk
features can put where people will sit.
Mr. Kurensky stated they have actually dashed in potential outdoor dining all along there.
Mr. Kurensky stated the first couple of comments in the staff memo regarding handicapped
ramps and such will certainly be taken care of as part of final engineering. The drive through
areas do bring up a request for a variance in terms of the amount of stacking space. The property
to the north with EPA involvement and the landfill will have a long term solution in terms of
distance to their property. He stated they have 20 feet to the north property line and they do not
believe that there will be a building there. If and when future development occurs to the north,
this plan will not have a negative impact at all on that area. Therefore they feel the parking deck
is in a very appropriate location not only for this project but for any potential future development
to the north.
Mr. Kurensky stated the hardest comment is on the redesign of the hotel building. He stated they
agree that they must work with staff and Plan Commission in terms of redesigning that building
in terms of providing safety and access on the appropriate sides. They will work with the Fire
Department to redesign to come up with a more accurate plan.
Mr. Greenberg reviewed more information regarding the site to the north with the landfill and
the industrial building to the west of this site. He reviewed the site plan along the front 500 feet
of the Land & Lakes area. He noted behind that is an area that was permitted that goes all the
way back to City Park which is the boundary that was set by the EPA when this was established
about 30 years ago. The landfill slopes at one point and the EPA never wants that area
developed in any way because it is a sloping feature of the landfill. He stated the reason he
reviewed this site is to show that there will always be a wide setback.
Mr. Greenberg stated the industrial building is oriented now toward Busch Parkway and the
entrance is actually along the west side of the property. The rear of the property is set back
about 107 feet from the property line already and the proposed plan faces their truck docks. He
stated he has spoken to the owners of this property several times as well as sent the proposed
plan and they are very excited about the development. They full understand that it is their
intention to build a five story hotel and they have not noted any problems.
Commissioner Teplinsky stated his question concerns the adequacy of the amount of parking.
Village code apparently requires there to be 749 parking spaces for the project and there either
653 spaces being proposed or 634 spaces.
Mr. Donald O'Hara stated each and every land use within the code has a specific demand. He
stated where they are looking for the shared opportunity is the offset of the demand by hour of
use. When does that peak hour occur? You will find that peak demand for parking for the hotel
happens between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. During the other hours of the day the volume of
parking required is less. Each and every land use reviews the required code but they are looking
at the offset based on the actual need of the particular use because it is mixed use and all sitting
together on one parcel. However, the code requires them to look at 100 percent occupancy for
example on the hotel. That is the demand and on top of that demand they have an additional
requirement of approximately 5 percent that is required for people searching for the last space or
a car that parks on an angle. What is shown in the table is exactly that and looking at the
differentiation between each hour of the day for each of the land uses. He stated that makes a lot
of sense relative to coming up with adequate parking but also addressing the issue relative to the
code. When you have multiple uses on one parcel with a large parking area, it certainly makes
sense to take advantage of the offset of the differential time.
Commissioner Stark asked if there would be sufficient parking if the office building becomes
more medical offices than expected.
Mr. Green stated they did build a safety factor in and it is considerable. The site is providing
634 spaces in total and they actually only peak at 575 spaces so they have a built in cushion of
50 spaces should he end up doing more medical office.
Commissioner Khan asked if the parking would require a variance since it is different from what
is required in the ordinance.
Mr. Pfeil noted that the petitioner would submit a parking demand study, which would become
an exhibit to the P.U.D. ordinance for the development. The study would include an analysis of
parking demand and provide documentation that the peak demand for uses could be
accommodated by the amount of proposed parking.
Commissioner Samuels asked if the developer is considering any kind of overhang at the
medical offices building so that someone could be dropped off.
Mr. Hopkins showed a street level perspective of the side of that building between the Staples
and the medical office building where a canopy is being considered.
Ms. Bocek asked if any thought had been given to integrating parking into some of the building,
for example the medical office or possibly the hotel.
Mr. Hopkins stated they consider the first floor space in both the hotel and the medical office
building to be the most valuable space and there is the benefit when they have a one story
parking structure because it works nicely for them because 50 percent of the cars in that deck are
completely protected and they are conceptualizing a covered connection between the medical
office building and the deck.
Commissioner Bocek stated her concern is that she is not convinced that the additional cars are
not needed.
Mr. Hopkins stated they do not think they need it but the next approach would be to add cars to
the structure and go up or do that in partial fashion until they get the number they determined
was needed.
Chairman Ottenheimer stated he agrees with Commissioner Bocek and that he is not convinced
there will be enough parking here. He stated he understands the concept of shared parking with
mixed use but there seems to be such a huge difference between what the code requires and what
is proposed. He stated he would like the developer to bridge the gap somewhat.
Mr. Greenberg stated he feels there is actually a cushion here because of timing. He further
noted the experts in his industry tell him that this is appropriate. Perhaps the Village would like
to hire a third party expert to confirm the numbers.
Commissioner Smith stated he understands the concept of shared parking and in this instance he
will agree with Mr. Greenberg because if the tenants have a problem, the developer will have a
problem leasing their spaces.
Commissioner Cohn stated he feels the parking is adequate and if not, they can always build
another story onto the deck.
Mr. Khan stated he would encourage the use of a third party consultant.
Mr. Kurensky stated the standard code is for a 63 foot bay for parking and he is proposing a 61
foot bay for parking in order to put more open space onto the plan. He stated it has been their
experience for these types of uses and for parking that 61 feet works well.
Mr. Gordon White stated he is very familiar with the subdivision because he designed it 20 years
ago. As part of the drainage they provided stormwater detention basins throughout the
subdivision at intervals and used the stormsewer system to either drain it towards the creek or a
portion of the site is affected directly by the Des Plaines River flood plain. He noted a recent
change in elevation due to a new study performed on the Des Plaines River about eight years
ago. They have taken those conditions and the little revisions that occur to the flood plain and
have provided the storage that was necessary to accommodate those and have prepared the
calculations and they have been presented to Mr. Kuenkler for review who is satisfied they have
provided enough additional stormwater detention to accommodate the revisions and changes that
have been made to the plan regarding the changes over the last 20 years.
Mr. White stated they are showing along the hotel building, where the distance from the high
water level is less than the Village ordinance requires, a change was made in the annexation
agreement. However, Mr. Kuenkler noted that had expired and so there is a variance required
for the distance from the hotel building to the high water level of the detention basin.
Mr. White stated they also prepared a preliminary utility plan providing sewer and water to the
sight proposing an extension in the water main along Milwaukee Avenue providing sanitary
sewer through the middle of the site servicing all the facilities and buildings within the park.
Commissioner Samuels noted it looks like the detention pond is butting right up against the
pedestrian walk at the far southwest corner at Busch Parkway. He asked what will happen there.
Mr. White stated the high water level at the detention basin in terms of the walkway in Busch
Parkway is about 8 feet away which is similar to the existing conditions with the detention
facilities that have been provided and constructed within the corporate grove.
Commissioner Samuels asked if the opportunity to do a substantial amount of stormwater
detention under the parking lot would be available if they have to provide additional circulation
around the west side of the hotel.
Mr. White stated at this point they have avoided doing any stormwater detention in the parking
lot. The preference is always not to detain in the parking lot which is how the original park was
set up. If they needed additional room along the backside of the hotel building that might be an
alternative they would have to discuss or pursue.
Mr. Greenberg stated they will work with the fire department to find out what they need to do.
However, one of the things they might be able to do is put the public use building that is in front
of the building might be put on the first floor of the hotel and put the room up above it which
would allow them to potentially move the hotel further forward giving them some room along
the back.
Commissioner Khan asked how they are permitted to store the water beyond the property line as
he noted the west pond is outside the limits of their property.
Mr. White stated the detention basins were designed based on an impervious surface ratio of .95
and a pervious ratio of .5 for a combination of .8. If roughly 70 percent of this site was made
impervious the detention basins were sized to accommodate that and intentionally sized to allow
for a lot of building and parking. The detention basins were part of a subdivision improvement
for the entire corporate grove. The Village engineer still has the records on file and they have
checked where the boundaries were established relative to what areas can drain to these
individual detention basins. He stated they also checked the actual volumes relative to the
design volumes of 20 years ago and found that the actual volumes were constructed in
accordance with the proposed volumes of 20 years ago.
Commissioner Stark asked how many retail spaces and stores will be in the retail/medical office
building.
Mr. Greenberg stated this is a two part development and the first immediate development will be
the Staples building and shops A. Those are what they are locking down on tightly. They are
willing to be bound in basic principle to the architecture for the bank as well as shops B. The
design for the office building is being done so that the commission can understand what the
signage package is all about. The office building will not be built until he gets 30-35 percent
pre-leased or pre-sold. What is being shown for the office building is still preliminary and they
are reserving the right to somewhat modify in the future with the understanding that this is a
concept that is tied into the bulk of the building and a basic signage which is why they took the
step to develop the architecture as much as they have. As far as the exact mix, they have just
presented what they think is an estimated mix of this building.
Mr. Greenberg noted there is a possibility of a change of plans in the future. He stated they
thought long and hard about how this will actually be feasible. He stated he feels he is
introducing a unique product to the market with the ability to attract certain tenants that are not
being served in the market that need identity and want to be here. However, he needs to go out
with this concept to the market. He stated that he believes that if an office building will be built,
this represents his best guess as to what it could be.
Commissioner Stark asked what the plans would be if a bank could not be brought in.
Mr. Greenberg stated it would be a retail area with a low parking usage.
Commissioner Kenski-Sroka asked about a 10 foot wide bikepath on the west side of Milwaukee
Avenue.
Mr. Greenberg stated it is their intention to add the bikepath on the next draft.
Mr. Kurensky stated there is room on the plan to add that. He noted they had discussed if it
would be like the path to the bank and they can add it if desired.
Commissioner Kenski-Sroka asked if it is conceptually possible they would come back with a
single level strip mall there if the medical office building does not materialize.
Mr. Greenberg stated it is possible that it could be single story or two stories. He stated this is
his best guess as to what he would like to see happen. It is his intention to go out into the market
for a substantial period of time and put the right tenants together.
Commissioner Cohn stated he is very interested in the developability of the Land and Lakes
property to the north and he would like to get an understanding of the big picture of Milwaukee
Avenue here. He noted there are two areas labeled future possible link to adjacent property to
the northeast and northwest of the junior anchor. He noted that north of the parking deck is the
landfill which is the area where the EPA has designated this area as waste material. To the east
of the parking deck is the area owned by Land-o-Lakes but is not landfill.
Mr. Greenberg stated that was correct. He noted the area in front is covered under their permit
but it was not part of the landfill.
Commissioner Cohn stated when landfills are closed they are usually turned into things like golf
courses. However, this site is not that big. It seems the landfill area would be a nice recreational
type use and the frontage property would be a nice commercial use. He asked if that was their
vision.
Mr. Greenberg stated yes.
Commissioner Cohn asked where Land and Lakes is in this picture. He asked if there is any
probability that that would actually occur.
Mr. Greenberg stated he believes that if all the governmental authorities, including Buffalo
Grove, Riverwoods, Lincolnshire, and the corporate entities were to press Lake County noting
they were tired of having the smell and the trucks in and out and the waste and noise associated
with the site, not to renew their permit then Land and Lakes would be very interested in having
the site developed.
Commissioner Cohn asked if the land is valuable enough more so for development than its
current use.
Mr. Greenberg stated Land and Lakes perspective in his view is based upon their comfort with
their current business operation.
Commissioner Khan noted that IDOT may eventually be taking Milwaukee Avenue from two
lanes to three lanes in each direction and he does not think they have the right of way available
to them at this time. Staff recommendation is that the developer dedicate 20 feet of right of way
at this time to avoid any business disruption in the future. He stated it would be wise to consider
dedicating that right of way at this time.
Mr. Greenberg stated it is his general understanding of this site and the setbacks is that while it is
not dedicated it is already taken into account in terms of their planning. The way they planned it
is to eventually take that into account.
Mr. Kurensky stated there is an easement directly along that area as well. It is their intention to
plan all of their landscape and amenities in that area to stay out of there so that any potential
future taking would not disrupt their ponds and landscaping and everything else. They would
plan for any potential future taking.
Mr. Greenberg stated the most efficient way to take up the offer of a third party consultation
would be to take the work done by his consultant and review it and evaluate its merit.
The Plan Commission agreed the project was ready for a public hearing.
PRESTIGE AUTOMOBILE LEASING, 88 DUNDEE ROAD — REZONING TO THE B-4
DISTRICT AND APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAN—WORKSHOP 91
Mr. John Schiess stated they are looking to convert an existing medical office building into the
Prestige leasing facility. He stated the east and north of the building is presently zoned B-2. The
west is zoned B-3 and the south side of Dundee Road is zoned B-2. He noted they have
modified the site plan from the original and the modifications mainly include aisle and stall
width dimensions to conform to Village code. He noted they have additional conversations with
George Michehl, Village Deputy Fire Marshal, regarding emergency vehicle access and their
engineer will incorporate the required turning radii. Mr. Michehl commented that it is important
that emergency vehicles be able to get to the southeast and north sides of the building; he is less
concerned about access to the west side of the building.
Mr. Schiess stated they are taking the front third of the upper level and replacing it with a steel
frame structure that has some masonry that matches the existing masonry that is mainly glass and
frame structure with a curving roof and a sign pylon that is integral to the building. It would be
something to create a look for the building that says it is, in fact, a showroom. He noted they are
not looking to expand the boundaries of the building but are looking at this as a renovation of an
existing building that only takes a portion of the walls and roof of the building and replaces it.
Mr. Schiess stated another feature in order to retrofit this medical building into the leasing
facility requires six service bays in the rear of the building. This would service cars that are
leased by Prestige and are prepped. In addition there are some support and two offices on the
lower level. He stated they are basically redistributing some of the spaces that are currently
there. There are quite a few rooms down there that now fit the medical office building that
would be redistributed.
Mr. Schiess stated they are proposing a concrete pad for display of an automobile with a
showroom, a set of doors to go through to a reception area, waiting room, restrooms, children's
play area and various offices for the agents that work for Prestige. Mr. Schiess stated they are
not changing any of the exits of the building.
Mr. Schiess stated the hours of operation will be Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 8:00
p.m. and Saturdays from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. He stated deliveries would occur between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. on weekdays only. 90 percent of those deliveries would be on
two car flat bed trucks. The other 10 percent are single car drive-ins. He further noted they
would look to upgrade the standards of the exterior lighting to be compliant with the code.
Further the lights would be kept on until about 12:00 at a dim level to provide security. Mr.
Schiess stated there will not be any PA system to generate noise to adjacent neighbors. All of
the attendants are on a cell phone or walkie-talkie type of phones.
Mr. Schiess stated Prestige does the majority of their business via repeat customers who
purchase cars that are predetermined. The customers that do come in are generally referrals.
Any test drives are done with a Prestige employee in the car that guides them along a route.
Generally the routes are on major thoroughfares and not through neighborhoods. Mr. Schiess
noted that currently Prestige sells between 70-100 vehicles per month and with this new facility
they would look to double that volume.
Mr. Schiess stated the only maintenance done on site are fluid top offs, oil changes for Prestige
customers only. There is no body work, no electrical systems work and such as that is usually
referred to dealers.
Mr. Schiess stated they are requesting a rezoning from a B-3 to B-4 and approval of a
preliminary plan.
Commissioner Stark asked what happens if this facility is outgrown in a few years.
Mr. Schiess stated at that point it may make sense for separate facilities because of the regional
nature of the service.
Commissioner Teplinsky stated he needs to focus on how the use will blend in the area and is
something to be discussed.
Mr. Schiess stated some of the blending issues may relate to impact and they will address those.
Commissioner Khan asked how important it is for the business to have the oil change at this
location.
Mr. Schiess noted it is not important at all as it is a matter of the customer's choice. It is clearly
something they offer as a service to their customers but they can clearly go to anyone they want.
Mr. Arthur Friedman stated it is more a matter of convenience for the customers. The service
bays will give them the opportunity to do detailing on cars and that kind of thing which is
something they are lacking now.
Commissioner Khan asked if any other mechanical service is provided.
Mr. Friedman noted tire rotation and flat tires and things like that would be a part of the service
but they would not be doing anything like engine overhauls which they are not equipped for is
not part of their business.
Commissioner Khan asked where the detention is located.
Mr. Jamil Bou-Saab stated they have been in communication with the Village Engineer and he
has heard there is no drainage problem on the site. They are pretty much leaving the existing
conditions and any impervious area changing to pervious area will use grasscrete or impervious
surface to park some of the cars and there is no requirement so far for detention. However, if
some detention was required just to compensate for some of the impervious area they put in, they
will provide underground detention.
Commissioner Bocek noted the plan looks much better than the prior property. Preliminary
review of the building looks great. She asked if any fencing was planned on the property to
separate this property from the adjacent property.
Mr. Schiess stated there is currently a fence along the south property line and it is the only one
they have considered so far.
Mr. Robert Luchene stated he represents the Board of Directors of the Arlington Club Condo
Association who noted they are concerned with the traffic on Buffalo Grove Road. He noted that
any time between 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. it is literally impossible coming out of Huntington
Drive to get through especially left turns. He stated the other concern is about test driving cars.
He stated they have about a one mile loop on the Arlington Club with access via Cobbler Lane
off of Buffalo Grove Road and access from Huntington onto Dundee Road.
Mr. Schiess stated they will look at the traffic route as it relates to the test driving and they will
obviously be conducting a traffic study so that if it turns out that making left turns out of here is
problematic, they would bring that forward along with a potential solution to that. He stated they
will work with the operators to work out a designated route for test drives.
Commissioner Kenski-Sroka asked how many customers do take test drives.
Mr. Friedman stated the impact will be very minimal as there are perhaps 15-20 percent at most
that test drive cars.
The Plan Commission agreed another workshop is required.
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT—None
FUTURE AGENDA SCHEDULE
Mr. Pfeil said the next meeting is scheduled for January 5, 2005.
PUBLIC COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS—None
STAFF REPORT—None
NEW BUSINESS—None
ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Commissioner Teplinsky, seconded by Commissioner Samuels and carried
unanimously to adjourn. Chairman Ottenheimer adjourned the meeting at 9:44 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Fay Rubin, Recording Secretary
APPROVED BY:
LESTER OTTENHEIMER, Chair