2007-07-02 - Village Board Regular Meeting - Agenda Packet VILLAGE OF VILLAGE OF
�/ NAuffalo
• BUFFALO GROVE UPDATED Grout
Fifty Raupp Blvd.
Buffalo Grove,IL 60089-2100 Phone 847-459-2518 Meeting of the Village of Buffalo Grove Board of Trustees
Fax 847-459-7906 Regular Meeting
July 2, 2007
7:30 PM
I. Call to Order
II. Pledge of Allegiance
Ill. Roll Call
IV. Approval of Minutes
A. Minutes of the June 18, 2007 Village Board Meeting
V. Approval of Warrant
A. Warrant #1076
VI. Village President Report
VII. Reports from the Trustees
VIII. Village Manager's Report
IX. Special Business
A. Public Hearing: Annexation and Development Agreement concerning the proposed
Aptakisic Creek Corporate Park, south side of Aptakisic Road north and west of the
Leider Greenhouses (President Hartstein)
X. Questions from the Audience
Discussion on questions from the audience will be limited to 10 minutes. Presentations
before the Village Board should be scheduled through the Village Manager's Office five
days prior to each meeting. -
Xl. Consent Agenda
None
XII. Ordinances and Resolutions
XIII. Old Business
XIV. New Business
A. Plan Commission Referral: Special Use in the Industrial District for outside storage,
Peerless of America property, 15823 W. Aptakisic Road (Trustee Berman)
B. Appeal of the Zoning Board of Appeals decision to deny the request made by John
S. Swift Company, 999 Commerce Court, for variation of Zoning Ordinance, Section
17.48.020.F.6
XV. Executive Session
A. Appointment or Removal Public Officers
B. Litigation
XVI. Adjournment: Approximately 10:30 p.m.
The Village Board will make every effort to accommodate all items on the agenda by 10:30
p.m. The Board, does, however, reserve the right to defer consideration of matters to
another meeting should the discussion run past 10:30 p.m.
The Village of Buffalo Grove, in compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Ac4 requests that persons with disabilities,
who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the
accessibility of the meeting or facilities, contact the ADA Coordinator at 459-2518 to allow the Village to make reasonable
accommodations for those persons.
Meeting of the Village of Buffalo Grove Board of Trustees
Regular Meeting
July 2, 2007
7:30 PM
I. Call to Order
II. Pledge of Allegiance
III. Roll Call
IV. Approval of Minutes
V. Approval of Warrant
VI. Village President Report
VII. Reports from the Trustees
Vill. Village Manager's Report
IX. Special Business
X. Questions from the Audience
Discussion on questions from the audience will be limited to 10 minutes. Presentations
before the Village Board should be scheduled through the Village Manager's Office five
days prior to each meeting.
XI. Consent Agenda
None
XII. Ordinances and Resolutions
XIII. Old Business
XIV. New Business
XV. Executive Session
XVI. Adjournment: Approximately 10.30 p.m.
The Village Board will make every effort to accommodate all items on the agenda by 10.30
p.m. The Board, does, however, reserve the right to defer consideration of matters to
another meeting should the discussion run past 10.30 p.m.
The Village of Buffalo Grove, in compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities,
who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the
accessibility of the meeting or facilities, contact the ADA Coordinator at 459-2518 to allow the Village to make reasonable
accommodations for those persons.
Consent Agenda
July 2, 2007
7:30 PM
XI. Ordinances and Resolutions
None
New Business
None
Old Business
None
11879
06/18/2007
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE VILLAGE BOARD OF THE VILLAGE OF
BUFFALO GROVE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
50 RAUPP BOULEVARD,BUFFALO GROVE,ILLINOIS ON MONDAY,
JUNE 18,2007
CALL TO ORDER
President Hartstein called the meeting to order at 7:34 P.M. Those present stood and pledged allegiance to the
Flag.
ROLL CALL
Roll call indicated the following present: President Hartstein;Trustees Braiman,Glover,Berman,Kahn,and
Trilling. Trustee Rubin was absent.
Also present were: William Brimm,Village Manager;William Raysa,Village Attorney;Ghida Neukirch,
Deputy Village Manager;Leisa Niemotka, Management Assistant;Scott Anderson,Director of Finance;
Gregory Boysen,Director of Public Works;Ed Schar,Director of Building&Zoning;Robert Pfeil,Village
Planer;and Richard Kuenkler,Village Engineer.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Moved by Glover,seconded by Trilling,to approve the minutes of the June 4,2007 Regular Meeting.Upon roll,
Trustees voted as follows:
AYES: -5—Braiman,Glover,Berman,Kahn,Trilling
NAYS: 0—None
ABSENT: 1 —Rubin
Motion declared carried.
WARRANT#1075
Mr.Anderson read Warrant#1075. Moved by Kahn,seconded by Glover,to approve Warrant#1075 in the
amount of$3,729,414.34,authorizing payment of bills listed. Upon roll call,Trustees voted as follows:
AYES: 5—Braiman,Glover,Berman,Kahn,Trilling
NAYS: 0—None
ABSENT: 1 —Rubin
Motion declared carried.
VILLAGE PRESIDENT'S REPORT
President Hartstein urged residents to join in Buffalo Grove's July 4'h celebration,with a concert featuring the
Buffalo Grove Symphonic Band at 7:00 P.M.on the Rotary Village Green,followed by a spectacular fireworks
display at approximately 9:15 P.M. sponsored by Hamilton Partners.
At the request of the Fire Department,President Hartstein reminded residents that all fireworks,including
sparklers,are illegal in Buffalo Grove,and pointed out that thousands of adults and children are seriously injured
each year in fireworks related incidents,thereby urging everyone to leave the handling of fireworks to the
professionals.
President Hartstein commended the community,as well as the students from Stevenson and Buffalo Grove High
Schools,for the terrific response to the American Cancer Society Relay for Life held this past weekend at
Buffalo Grove High School.
11880
06/18/2007
President Hartstein reminded everyone that the Buffalo Grove Fine Art Festival will take place July 14-15,
2007 at the Buffalo Grove Town Center. There is a special edition of People, Places Issues that will air every
day at 6:00 P.M.that will present an overview of the Festival,including preview of the art.
TRUSTEE REPORTS
Trustee Berman reported that the Village has just been advised that a portion of Dundee Road in Northbrook
will experience a full closure at the railroad crossing near the post office from June 20-29,2007.
Beginning June 20,2007 through October 12,2007,Cook County has also planned a construction project that
will directly affect Lake Cook Road,extending from Hicks Road to Lexington Drive.
Trustee Berman thanked and congratulated the staff and elected officials for the tremendous support for the
Relay for Life at Buffalo Grove High School last Friday. It was a resounding success,and he was informed
today by the American Cancer Society that there were over 90 teams involved,and over$100,000 was raised to
fight this disease.
Trustee Kahn thanked everyone for their support at the Blood Drive last weekend;Village associates donated 20
units at Village Hall,and 56 residents donated at the drive at the Alcott Center. Trustee Kahn pointed out that
each one of these donations is able to help three people.
The Fire&Police Departments raised nearly$1,300 at the Scoops for Charity event over Memorial Day
weekend at the Continental Restaurant;the funds raised will go to Special Olympics and the Muscular
Dystrophy Association. Trustee Kahn extended the appreciation of the Village Board to the Continental
Restaurant for their support in this endeavor.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Mr.Brimm noted the submittal and posting of the Monthly Management Report for the month of May,2007;
there were no questions on this report.
PUBLIC HEARING—VILLAS AT HIDDEN LAKE
At 7:46 P.M.,President Hartstein called to order the Public Hearing for consideration of the third amendment of
the Annexation Agreement for Buffalo Properties LLC concerning the Planned Unit Development(PUD)in the
R-4 District for the Villas at Hidden Lake,northeast corner of Deerfield Parkway/Buffalo Grove Road.
Sam Mulay,representing the petitioner,introduced Steven Greenberg,Charles Murphy,after which President
Hartstein swore them in to give testimony. Mr.Mulay then made a presentation reviewing the request of the
petitioner,details of which are contained in Mr.Murphy's memo to Mr.Brimm of June 4,2007.
Trustee Glover disclosed that one of the agents in her office,ReMax Experts,is helping to market this property,
however, since she does not personally have any interest in the project,the Village Attorney has advised her that
there is no conflict of interest.
In answer to a question from Trustee Glover,Mr.Brimm confirmed that the sidewalk on the eastern side of the
property will be public and will be the responsibility of and maintained by the Village. There will be standard
sidewalks along Deerfield Parkway and Buffalo Grove Road.
Trustee Glover likes the idea of adding more ranches,so she does not have any problem with the proposal.
Trustee Braiman reviewed the obligations of the association.
In answer to a question from Trustee Trilling,Mr.Greenberg reviewed the lot lines,and confirmed that the
developer will install the landscaping pursuant to design that has been approved by the Village. Mr.Brimm
noted that the only fencing will be along Deerfield Parkway;there will be no interior fencing. Mr. Greenberg
11881
06/18/2007
stated that he does not believe that anything has changed relative to the construction of decks. Mr.Pfeil stated
that he believes that overall the changes are positive,and not at all detrimental to the development
President Hartstein asked if there were any comments or questions from any other public bodies or members of
the audience.
Denice Bocek,Plan Commissioner wants to be sure that the landscaping that was approved is maintained or
improved upon. Mr.Brimm stated that condition remains,and has actually been improved.
Trustee Glover confirmed with Mr.Brimm that the only fence allowed under the proposed ordinance is along
Deerfield Parkway.
In answer to a question from Trustee Braiman,Mr.Raysa confirmed that the developer has to provide a final
landscape plan and insert the landscaping pursuant to that plan.
Trustee Braiman suggested that the Annexation Agreement include that lot owners be restricted from erecting
fences or removing any landscaping that was installed by the developer without the consent of the Village of
Buffalo Grove.
Mr.Greenberg stated that this is an association-driven subdivision,and both public and private areas are being
held to a certain quality level.
Trustee Braiman stated that he believes this restriction should be included in the Annexation Agreement.
Trustee Braiman stated we may not be in a position to go further at this point until there is more discussion
between the developer and staff to determine a mechanism to place restrictions on the landscaping.
Mr.Greenberg stated that they want the homeowners to feel that they may enhance their property,but
restrictions may be put in place so that any material changes made would have to be approved by the association
and the Village.
Mr.Raysa stated that he would want to see this restriction spelled out in the Annexation Agreement.
Mr.Raysa stated that there is nothing stating that the association has to maintain the degree of landscaping that is
put in place by the developer.
President Hartstein clarified that the Village Attorney has indicated that anything that is approved tonight should
be subject to the receipt and approval by the Village of the Preliminary Site Plan and the final Landscape Plan.
Trustee Braiman stated that the Village does not want to get into the business of approving every flower,but he
would ask that the developer must provide a mechanism within the association for review and approval for the
removal of landscaping.
The developer stated that they would have no objection to Trustee Braiman's suggestion.
Trustee Berman doesn't have a problem with allowing the association to monitor the landscaping changes,and
he believes that the Village Attorney can work out the appropriate language with the developer.
Mr.Pfeil answered several questions from Trustee Trilling.
At 8:31 P.M.President Hartstein adjourned the Public Hearing until the item is on the agenda later on in the
meeting.
QUESTIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE
President Hartstein asked if there were any questions from the audience on items not on the agenda;there were
none.
it
11882
06/18/2007
CONSENT AGENDA
President Hartstein explained the Consent Agenda,stating that any member of the audience or the Board could
request that an item be removed for full discussion;there were no such requests. The Village Clerk read a brief
synopsis of each of the items on the Consent Agenda.
After Mr.Brimm answered a question for Trustee Braiman,it was moved by Braiman,seconded by Glover,to
approve the Consent Agenda.
ORDINANCE#2007-36—WHITE HEN PANTRY
Motion to pass Ordinance#2007-36,amending Chapter 5.20,Liquor Controls,Class D,White Hen Pantry.
ORDINANCE#2007-37—TASTE OF TOKYO
Motion to pass Ordinance#2007-37,amending Chapter 5.20,Liquor Controls,Class B,Taste of Tokyo.
ORDINANCE#2007-38—SURPLUS VILLAGE PROPERTY
Motion to pass Ordinance#2007-38,authorizing the disposal of surplus Village personal property.
RESOLUTION#2007-19—BIKE PATH
Motion to pass Resolution#2007-19,approving an amendment to an Intergovernmental Agreement with Cook
County related to ROW Acquisition for a Section of Bike Path related to the Lake Cook Road Overpass
Improvement at the Wisconsin Central Railroad.
RESOLUTION#2007-20—ELEVATOR SAFETY PROGRAM
Motion to pass Resolution#2007-20,approving the Illinois Elevator Safety Program Agreement.
900 DEERFIELD PARKWAY
Motion to approve a Development Improvement Agreement&Final Plat,900 Deerfield Parkway.
MAIN STREET UTILITIES
Motion to approve Certificate of Initial Acceptance&Approval—Main Street Utilities.
Upon roll call,Trustees voted as follows on the Consent Agenda:
AYES: 5—Braiman,Glover,Berman,Kahn,Trilling
NAYS: 0—None
ABSENT: 1 —Rubin
Motion declared carried.
ORDINANCE#2007-39—VILLAS AT HIDDEN LAKE
Moved by Trilling,seconded by Kahn,to pass Ordinance#2007-39,approving the third amendment of the
Annexation Agreement for Buffalo Properties LLC concerning the Planned Unit Development(PUD)for the
Villas at Hidden Lake,northeast corner of Deerfield Parkway/Buffalo Grove Road.
Mr.Raysa requested that the motion be subject to the receipt and approval by the Village of Preliminary Site
Plan Exhibit C as referenced in the Annexation Agreement,receipt and approval of a new Exhibit D which
would be the final Landscape Plan,and adding language pursuant to the Board's direction as far as a mechanism
in the Annexation Agreement whereby the association would have landscaping approval as far as future changes
to the landscaping,both on the parcels and the common elements.
11883
06/18/2007
Trustees Trilling and Kahn both agreed to Mr. Raysa's amendment to the motion.
Upon roll call,Trustees voted as follows on the amended motion.
AYES: 5—Braiman,Glover,Berman,Kahn,Trilling
NAYS: 0—None
ABSENT: 1 —Rubin
Motion declared carried.
The Public Hearing was adjourned.
RESOLUTION#2007-21—VILLAGE PRESIDENT
Trustee Berman presented the following introductory statement regarding the proposed resolution,after which he
proceeded to read the proposed resolution:
"The other members of the Board have asked me to read this Resolution. Before I do so,however,I think it is
appropriate,indeed essential,to make a few introductory comments.
This measure has not been brought forward impulsively,but instead as a final resort and with a sense of sadness
and profound frustration;a disappointment that this issue has reached the point where formal,public action is
even necessary.
Perhaps the best kept secret in this community is the fact that the Village President does not and really never has
communicated,collaborated or worked together with the other members of this Board on a regular basis. Time
and again,over the course of years,members of this Board have attempted to remediate the Village President's
unilateralism and his actions which effectively usurped the Board's policy role. He has been repeatedly asked,
urged,and cajoled to respect the limits of his authority,as well as the policy-making role of the Board,and to
work with us. But,it was done behind the scenes,in individual private conversations with him,and in other
forms of proper but non-public communications directed to him. All done without public confrontation in the
hope of inducing a productive response and to avoid detracting from the work we must do together as a Board in
the public's interest. Unfortunately,those earlier efforts,driven by optimism and perhaps a slightly misplaced
sense of decorum,have been unavailing. He has neither altered his conduct nor refrained from exceeding his
authority on policy matters.
This Resolution,and indeed all of the efforts leading up to it,is necessary only because the Village President
participates in outside entities such as the Northwest Municipal Conference specifically as Village President,as
our representative to those organizations,and not merely as an individual member of the public. The question is
not whether he is a good advocate under the right circumstances,or even advocates for what he believes are
good causes;he is and he does. However,by law,the Board and not the Village President, is the policy-making
branch of Village government. Since he operates in a representative capacity,the Village President has an
obligation to communicate with and obtain input from the Board on matters affecting policy that are raised by or
to the conferences,caucuses,and leagues in which he participates. When he instead acts without first conferring
with the Board, or worse,in direct contravention of an express policy determination,he exceeds his authority. In
this instance,the Board provided him with specific directions and imposed limitations on his discretion,which
he apparently disregarded.
To the extent there is any possible assertion of misunderstandings or miscalculations,this Resolution contains
terms sufficiently clear and unambiguous so as to leave no prospect of doubt. And,despite a general reluctance
to undertake such formal and forceful action,I am hopeful Mr. President that this Resolution will serve a
remedial purpose,rather than be used as an excuse to further extend the chasm between you and the rest of the
Board.
Mr.President, communication is not capitulation, collaboration is not defeat,and an acknowledgment by you
that your conduct in this matter,even if well-intended,went astray,is not submission or surrender,but merely a
measure of good and proper governance. Neither obstinacy nor antagonism will further the public interest.
Therefore,Mr.President,even as I proceed to read this Resolution,I again urge you to respond constructively,
not just in your comments here tonight but through your actions over time. Choose to seize this moment as an
11884
06/18/2007
opportunity. I do not believe there is anyone sitting on this dais tonight that would reject a genuine effort to
establish some common ground. I hope we will see it.
And now,with that said,I will read the Resolution."
Moved by Berman,seconded by Kahn,to pass Resolution#2007-21,reprimanding Village President Elliott
Hartstein.
President Hartstein read the following statement responding to the proposed resolution:
"Though I hate to dignify this proposed Resolution with any comment,I feel compelled to point out the facts
which substantiate quite clearly that there are distortions and omissions of fact which demonstrate why there is
no rational basis for this resolution.
FACTS RE VILLAGE BOARD MEETING OF MAY 21
On May 21"there was a resolution on the Village Board Agenda relating to supporting a proposal on
Educational Funding Reform for the State which the week before had come before the legislative committee of
the Northwest Municipal Conference. At the legislative committee,the NWMC scheduled a special meeting for
May 23`d to take up the issue since there was a desire to get a position before the May 31 target date for
completion of the current General Assembly in Springfield. Both myself and Trustee Braiman asked that the
subject be placed on our Board agenda for May 21 so it could be dealt with before the May 23 Special meeting.
On May 21"there was an extended discussion by the board where all trustees expressed concern about taking a
position of the Metro mayors proposal even on a conceptual level,either because they had not had adequate time
to review the concepts proposed or because they felt this was not a subject the Village should be taking a
position on since it was the province of the school boards and not the Village Board.
After listening to that discussion I stated'In the absence of further direction from the Board I will abstain on the
NWMC vote on the Mayors Caucus recommendation on Educational Funding reform'.
Trustee Braiman was only one who made a comment on my proposed action after I made that statement,and he
said he agreed that it was preferable to cast an abstention since it would not reflect that the village was against
the proposal.
No motion was made whatsoever and no further directive comments were made by any trustees after I said the
abstention would be what I would do absent further direction. No motion was ever made regarding the
resolution on the Board agenda. I have reviewed our minutes and the tape of the meeting to confirm said facts.
FACTS RE MAY 23RD NWMC Meeting
I attended the May 23 Special meeting of the NWMC at Oakton Community College.
During the early part of the discussion at the meeting I pointed out to those in attendance that a couple days
earlier the APlus Illinois Group and Metropolitan planning council had come out with a proposal that made no
mention of property tax relief whatsoever. I did make a statement at that time that I thought that made it all the
more compelling for there to be a Mayors Caucus position since it provided for significant property tax relief for
our residents in addition to meaningful funding for education.And I went on to say in these exact words: `I
personally strongly believe in this. I believe in the work of the committee. I believe in the work of the caucus
on the issues to be addressed. This is my personal individual opinion and unfortunately not the official position
of my community.' The tape of the meeting confirms that I qualified my statement in that regard.
Later in the meeting as those in attendance were grappling with how to formulate a position statement that did
not include the specific monetary recommendations of the Metro Mayors Caucus I jotted down a few phrases
and showed them to a couple of my colleagues who were sitting next to me. The words I jotted down were as
follows trying to capture some of the suggestions, and good ones,which were made by trustees at our May 21
meeting about seeking more input from schools and communities. The exact words were'The NWMC applauds
the work of the Metro Mayors Caucus for their hard work on Educational Funding reform and goes on record in
11885
06/18/2007
support of the following key concepts' (I did not list any concepts since those were being debated still). I then
put down the following words'and encourages further input from municipalities and the educational community
to further refine details of these proposals with the legislature'. My colleagues encouraged me to share those
framework phrases with the group which I then read to those in attendance. The tape of the meeting confirms
that my suggestions on the statement for the conference included these ideas which I just described. Shortly
thereafter someone made a motion to use those phrases in the conference position statement with others
suggesting specifically which proposals concepts should be included such as increased special education funding
to benefit all schools and property tax relief as had been in the original Metro Mayors proposal.
The question was then called with most in attendance saying aye. I did not say anything waiting for opportunity
to go on record as an abstention. The chair then asked if there were any nays and Elk Grove responded. And
then the chair asked if there were any abstentions and I stated'per direction of my Board'and the chair then
acknowledged for the record that Buffalo Grove,Barrington and Winnetka had abstained.
On May 25`h I e-mailed the Village manager with copies to the board to confirm what the vote had been and that
I had abstained. At our last village board meeting upon inquiry I confirmed once again that I had abstained.
The facts demonstrate that I did exactly what I represented to the Board I would do,namely abstain. There were
no directives nor any motion to take any particular action. When I made a statement saying that I supported the
work of the Caucus on this issue I made it perfectly clear that was my personal opinion and not the official
position of our community. When I jotted down some suggested phrases for the conference statement I was
trying to incorporate some of the thoughts from this Board about the need to get further input from
municipalities and schools. I am proud of my conduct and my participation and have nothing to be embarrassed
about. I have every right to speak out and share my personal ideas all the more so when I make clear they are
my own thoughts and not the official position of the village. And when casting votes on behalf of the village in
any forum I stand committed to adhering to the positions and policies of the village as I always do or to abstain if
that is the will of this Board as I did in the instant case.
Though I personally am not embarrassed and am in fact proud of my conduct,I am embarrassed for the Village
that such a resolution was even put on this agenda,all the more so when such a resolution was placed on this
agenda without a call or e-mail to me to make any inquiry about any questions anyone may have had about my
participation in the NWMC meeting which is addressed in the resolution. The facts speak for themselves."
Trustee Braiman responded to President Hartstein's comments as follows:
"It is truly unfortunate that we need to present this Resolution tonight. It is personally troublesome and
repugnant to me because for years I have read about Village Boards in other communities where there have been
political squabbling and infighting among the Board and I have prided myself and our Board with being above
such political infighting. I have always looked at our Board as being extremely professional and we have always
attempted to resolve any individual or political differences privately and not in the public forum. We have done
so in an attempt not to look petty,or to appear that our differences may be personal or political. Over the past
eight years members of the Board individually and as a whole have had differences with the Village President.
We have attempted to forge a relationship and we have requested,cajoled,pleaded and begged you to
communicate with the Board and try to form unified policies that could be adhered to by the Village and for the
betterment of the Village. We have done so individually and collectively through one-on-one and group
discussions. Unfortunately,those attempts have always been rebuked by you and you insist on doing it your
way, often contrary to our needs and desires as a Village Board as a group. If there were another way to
accomplish our collective goal,we would have done so,however,private attempts have been futile,future
attempts would similarly be futile and impracticable. The law,specifically the Open Meetings Act,prohibits us
from private group discussions. Therefore we have been forced to bring this to a public forum.
Before we go further,we need to define the issue. This action tonight is not about the Metropolitan Mayors
Caucus proposal. It is not about education, it is not about education funding, it is not about our children, it is not
about tax reform. Those matters were discussed and resolved by the Board on the 21st when we gave direction
to you regarding the Village's vote at the Northwest Municipal Conference meeting. We told you how we felt.
We told you that we wanted you to convey our feelings to them. The issue before us and the reason for the
presentation of the Resolution is caused solely by your actions and failings at that Northwest Municipal
Conference meeting to convey those ideas and those concepts to them.
11886
06/18/2007
Two meetings ago, we first learned as a group that you had been involved in the Metropolitan Mayors Caucus
and their attempt to create a proposal to the State Assembly for school funding. At that time,we raised questions
relating to your failure to keep us informed,the timing of the request for approval,whether we even had a right
to or should be involved in school funding,the failure to seek the advice of our local School Boards and the
effect of the proposal on our community economically. The Board discussed those issues and decided as a
Village Board NOT to support the proposal for various reasons. We had a long discussion about those and we
explained them to you. In an attempt to allow you to save face,we did not instruct you to vote in the negative,
but rather to abstain. We also asked and instructed you to explain our position,to let the conference understand
that we were not against school funding,that we were not against education that we were not against tax reform,
but why we were taking this vote.
At the last meeting I asked you specifically to report back to the Board and Village what occurred at the meeting.
I specifically asked you if you conveyed our thoughts to the Conference and if you told them why we instructed
you to abstain on the vote. You assured us that you did,but feigned ignorance as to what you actually said
merely one week earlier—you couldn't recall.
Concerned that our positions were not properly conveyed,a member of the Board listened to the tape of the
meeting. That tape revealed that not only were you an active participant,you were an outspoken advocate for
the Metropolitan Mayors'Caucus proposal,contrary to our stated direction. In fact,you were so vocal in your
efforts to pass the proposal that you were asked on several occasions not to interrupt and to allow others to
speak. Additionally,at the meeting you even drafted a portion of the resolution supporting the Metropolitan
Mayors' Caucus resolution.
Elliott,it is your sworn duty to this Board and to the Village to conform your actions to the will of this Board,
whether you agree with it or not. Nothing in the State Statutes or Village Ordinances gives you any right to act
contrary to the specific instructions and positions of this Board. Those specific instructions and positions were
pretty clear. Other people have come to me and told me that they saw the meeting and it was clear to them as
well.
You violated your responsibilities to this Board and the Village by superimposing your personal interests over
the stated position of the Board. Had you been silent and merely abstained without explanation,I would have
accepted it. Had you asked one of us or Bill Brimm to represent the Village at the meeting so that you could
speak,not as a Village representative,but as a private citizen,I would have accepted that. But you were there
and seated as the Village President. You were with the apparent authority to speak for the Village. The fact that
you said that`I personally feel that way' does not mean that you were not conveying the Village's position. You
violated your trust by acting and speaking contrary to our direction and that unfortunately is unacceptable."
Trustee Berman noted that Trustee Braiman covered most of what he would have said in response to President
Hartstein's statement.Trustee Berman stated that President Hartstein spoke at the May 23`d meeting no less than
13 times,totaling more than 12 minutes of discussion;he spoke forcefully, artfully and persuasively on behalf of
the Metropolitan Mayors' Caucus and the concepts behind this;he cajoled his fellow mayors that it was essential
that they take action,and challenged those mayors by stating"if we as mayors don't advocate for it,who will"
and further urged that"it is important that we take a stand". This was not spoken as an individual or a member
of the public,and was not conveying the policy position of this Village Board.
Trustee Berman stated that it is true that President Hartstein did not receive a phone call prior to placing this
resolution on the agenda,but was given an opportunity at the last Village Board meeting to explain to the Board
what happened at the May 23`d meeting,however,he chose not to.
Trustee Berman again stated that he is saddened that this had to come forward,and reiterated his invitation to
work with this Board constructively to find a way to move forward on a positive basis;no one on this Board
would reject the opportunity to find common ground with President Hartstein,but unfortunately,he does not
hear anything yet tonight that suggests that that is going to happen.
President Hartstein stated that he remains committed to serving this community and advocating for everyone in
this community,and always adhering to the policies of this Board. At no time has he ever taken a position
inconsistent with the policies of the Village Board, or those things which are implicit. President Hartstein stated
that he has listened to the tape of the May 2 1"Village Board meeting,as well as the tape of the Northwest
11887
06/18/2007
Municipal Conference,and he assures everyone that there is not one statement in the entire record directing him
to do anything or to convey anything other than what he did,which was to abstain,and that abstention reflected
the position of the Village of Buffalo Grove,and he made perfectly clear when he made his personal statements
that they were his individual opinions.
President Hartstein stated that he has a constitutional right to speak,and he was sworn to uphold the
Constitution,which ironically calls for full funding of education,which he was speaking on behalf of,so he was
upholding the duties and responsibilities that he was sworn to uphold.
In terms of working with the Village Board,President Hartstein stands committed to try and work with this
Board in a collaborative manner in any way possible;he cannot change their perceptions and beliefs;he noted
that from a policy standpoint on issues that come before the Board,he is quite proud of the fact that we do have a
cohesive Board and we do have a Board that is not fractional;the current issue is personal;he has been elected
by the people of the community,and anyone wishing to challenge him is free to do so;he will continue to speak
out on behalf of the people of the community,and at the same time, always commit himself to adhere to the
policies and procedures of the Village Board.
Trustee Trilling stated that he is greatly saddened that President Hartstein does not see anything that the Board is
trying to convey to him;he has not said anything that attempts to understand what it is the Board is trying to say;
if there were any for him to begin to understand the things that the Board is trying to convey to him,it would be
a great improvement,but he does not see that happening right now.
Trustee Kahn stated that Trustee Trilling noted most of what he wanted to say;he understands that President
Hartstein believes that he is serving the community, and he does believe that in his heart,he is,however,
President Hartstein would not be invited to attend various meetings and speak as a member of the public were it
not for the fact that he is the Village President. Trustee Kahn stated that the Board has reached out on numerous
occasions in various venues,and there has not been a perceptible change in his demeanor,attitude or
communications skills to and with the Board. The troubling instance of dealing with this in a public venue is
because it is the only hope of making a change.
Trustee Berman stated that the NWMC meeting was not a public meeting,yet he spoke at great length contrary
to the general will of the Village Board. The reason for the proposed resolution is to bring it forward and spell it
out in terms so clear and unambiguous that there can be no doubt as to the will of the Village Board. Trustee
Berman urged President Hartstein to think very carefully how we can constructively move forward from today.
With regard to upholding the Constitution of the State of Illinois,that document requires that the Legislature
provide funding for education at a certain level,and President Hartstein is not a member of the Legislature.
Trustee Berman read the following e-mail from Trustee Rubin: I regret that,due to illness,I am unable to attend
tonight's Village Board meeting. I have requested that Trustee Berman read this e-mail into the record. "I,
Trustee Brian Rubin concur with the resolution reprimanding Village President Elliott Hartstein. If I were
present, it was my intention to vote aye in favor of the resolution. I sincerely believe the Village President to be
a good and decent man,however,all of the numerous attempts to resolve this matter,short of a formal
resolution,have regretfully failed."
Trustee Braiman replied to some of the comments made by President Hartstein. Trustee Braiman stated that the
discussion that took place on May 2151 was extensive and made the position of the Board very clear, and both he
and Trustee Berman specifically asked him to convey the position of the Board at the May 23`d meeting. As far
as duty being fulfilled by the abstention,the position of the abstention was not told to the board prior to the
discussions,but only after the votes were cast,and after President Hartstein advocated very vocally in favor of
the position,allowing those in attendance to believe that both President Hartstein and the Village Board were in
favor of the proposal. What the Board is asking is that President Hartstein actually convey the direction or
policy position of the Village Board to the proper parties.
Trustee Glover said that it has always been a sense of pride that this Village Board has worked well together.
There have been issues,but they were all handled behind the scenes so that there was no public confrontation.
When the Village Board firmly made their comments known at the May 2 1"meeting,they were told that they
had their heads in the sand. When the Board directed President Hartstein to abstain,she would think that,with
that abstention,he would not then advocate for the passage of the NWMC resolution. The Village Board asked
11888
06/18/2007
that President Hartstein relay to the meeting the reason that they were hesitant on this resolution,and he did not
convey that to them,thereby making two things that the Village Board asked president Hartstein to do that he did
not do. Each member of the Board is saddened to bring this issue to a public forum because it does not look
good for either President Hartstein or the Village Board,but it was caused because President Hartstein did not
listen to what the Village Board asked,and he still does not believe that he did anything wrong.
President Hartstein stated that he takes to heart anything that anyone shares with him from the Board or the
community;he is committed to communicating and reaching out to the Board;he remains proud of the way he
has conducted himself as Village President;he loves Buffalo Grove and he wants to work with the Village
Board,and he is committed to share more with the Trustees,although he does not believe that he did anything
wrong. President Hartstein noted that he does not look back,but always looks forward,and he urges the Village
Board to reach out to work with him just as they are urging him to reach out and work with them.
Trustee Braiman said entire Board attempted to reach out to President Hartstein since the day after the election 8
years ago.
Trustee Trilling stated that his comments are directed at President Hartstein,and not the public. There needs to
be communication between the Village Board and the Village President. Trustee Trilling questioned why the
direction of the Village Board and reason behind the abstention were never communicated at the May 23`d
meeting.
President Hartstein stated that he made perfectly clear in one-on-one conversations with other attendees that the
Village Board did not feel it was appropriate to support the proposal,and he stated that everyone with whom he
spoke knew that he was going to abstain from voting. President Hartstein stated that he listened to the entire tape
of the May 2 1"meeting,and there was no direction to him to explain or convey the thoughts of the Village
Board, and he believes that he did what he said he was going to do,and what he was directed to do,which was to
abstain. If he did not convey as much as the Village Board would have liked him to,he apologizes for that.
Trustee Trilling stated that, although he may not speak as much as others on the Board,he does listen,and it was
clear to him from the other people who spoke what needed to be conveyed at the May 23`d meeting,and he is
song that President Hartstein did not pick up on that. Although he acknowledges that President Hartstein felt
passionately about the subject,and he did convey his personal thoughts,he was not there in a personal capacity,
but as a representative of the Village,and he would have hoped that he would have conveyed the feelings of the
Village Board when they did ask him to abstain from voting.
Trustee Berman stated that if President Hartstein walked out of the May 2 1"meeting and did not understand that
the Village Board intended for him not to advocate on behalf of that resolution,then he was the only person in
the room that did not understand that. Trustee Berman stated that he had written out his comments beforehand
and specifically stated several times that President Hartstein should refrain from further participation and
advocacy on behalf of the Mayors' Caucus proposal,and after he spoke,other Trustees indicated their
concurrence with his statements.
Upon roll call,Trustees voted as follows on the motion:
AYES: 5—Braiman,Glover,Berman,Kahn,Trilling
NAYS: 0—None
ABSENT: 1 —Rubin
Motion declared carried.
VIDEO SERVICES
Mr. Brimm reviewed the proposal for video services,details of which are contained in the Village Board
Meeting Agenda Item Overview prepared by Mrs.Niemotka.
Moved by Trilling,seconded by Kahn,to award bid for video services,referencing memo dated June 18,2007,
to Take One Productions for the amount shown on the sheet.
11889
06/18/2007
Discussion took place with regard to a cancellation clause,and Mr.Brimm stated that staff will ensure that such
a clause is within the agreement.
Mrs.Niemotka noted that she had checked references with other communities where Take One Products is
currently providing service. Mrs.Niemotka reiterated that this is not a reflection on our current provider,who
has done a very good job for the Village,but merely an opportunity to go to the market to see what was
available.
Trustee Berman stated that he wants to be sure that this is not just a qualified,responsible bidder,but in fact one
that staff is comfortable will provide the level of service and quality that the Village has come to expect.
In answer to a question from Trustee Braiman,Mark Zyburt of Take One Productions,confirmed that he had
blocked the dates for Village Board Meetings are blocked out and they will be available. Mr.Zyburt stated that
he has been affiliated with Unique Video Productions,and he gained a great deal of knowledge by working with
Ron covering the Village Board meetings.
Trustee Braiman thanked Ron and Unique Video for the admirable job that has been done in covering the
Village Board meetings,and noted that the Village appreciates all of their efforts.
Trustee Glover and President Hartstein also echoed Trustee Braiman's comments about Ron and Unique Video
for the admirable job that has been done over the years.
Mr.Zyburt again thanked Ron for the knowledge that he has shared with him.
Upon roll call,Trustees voted as follows on the motion:
AYES: 5—Braiman,Glover,Berman,Kahn,Trilling
NAYS: 0—None
ABSENT: 1 —Rubin
Motion declared carried.
ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Kahn,seconded by Braiman,to adjourn the meeting. Upon voice vote,the motion was declared
carried,and the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 P.M.
Janet M. Sirabian,Village Clerk
APPROVED BY ME THIS 2nd DAY OF July,2007
Village President
VILLAGE OF 13JFFALO GROVE WARRANT 01076
2-Jul-07
Corporate Fund:
Reimbursements & Fund T ansfers 151,632.26
Reserve for Capital Repl ment Autos 1,530.00
Reserve for Capital Repla ent-MIS 10,718.36
Revenue Reimbursements 96,131.15
Legislative 29107.00
Office of Village Manager 10,076.95
Management Information S stems 1,443.40
Legal 841.75
Finance & General Services 8,511.13
Human Resources 4,724.49
Fire Services 80213.03
Police Services 6,505.64
Building &Zoning 723.61
Engineering Services 85.35
Building & Grounds 20,225.94
Street& Bridge Operations 11,596.22
Street & Bridge Administration 1,915.99
Forestry 489.33
Central Garage 5,674.45
Drainage System 1,525.11
ESDA 1,652.71
Transfer/Non Operating 216,310.31
Total 562,534.18
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund: 0.00
Parking Lot Fund: 9,337.74
Motor Fuel Tax Fund:
Capital Projects-Facilities: 196.50
Capital Projects-Streets: 0.00
Health Insurance Expense 43,484.63
Facilities Development Debt Service Fund: 0.00
Police Pension Fund: 0.00
Fire Pension Fund: 2,234.00
R.H.S. 0.00
Water Fund:
Reimbursements & Refun 0.00
Water Operations 5,130.76
Sewer Operations 162,436.36
Total 167,567.12
Buffalo Grove Golf Fund:
Reimbursements & Refunds: 0.00
Golf Operations 26,234.12
Total 26,234.12
Arboretum Golf Fund:
Reimbursements 0.00
Golf Operations 250514.58
Total 25,514.58
Refuse Service Fund: 860412.84
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 06/24/07 922,246.35
TOTAL WARRANT#1076 1,845,762.06
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, ILLIN IS
Village Clerk Village President
0 2M1V7 Adj Bonus(July) Balance
Net Earnings 580,216.19 580,216.19
Federal W/H PENMO 945 14,833.29 14,833.29
Federal W/H BW 941 82,878.00 82,878.00
Federal W/H MO 941 373.61 373.61
Credit Union 25,450.53 25,450.53
State W/H 17,835.20 _
State W/H Wisc 853.68 853.68
United Way 391.00 391.00
Bright Directions 380.00 380.00
AFLAC 17.30 17.30
Fire Pension/Sup 29.54 29.54
Pohoe Pension 18,987.29 18,987.29
Fire Pension 17,869.55 17,869.55
Flex Savings 4,207.91 4,207.91
Dependent Care 1,068.43 1,088.43
Retiree Health Sav 1,844.72
ICMA Employee 29,766.20 2,786.20
ICMA Employer 2,426.68 2,426.68
PPO Premium Deduct 9,808.39 9,808.39
IPSC/Retirees 7,346.95 7,346.95
FICA 19,493.90 19,493.90 38,987.80
FOP 70.00 70.00
Medicare 9,224,99 9,224.99 18,449.98
57,437.78
Fire Dues 1,532.00 1,532.00
Life Insurance 267.00 267.00
PC Purchase 1,126.18 1,126.18
Garnishments 3,755.62 3,755.62
Suspension 0.00
General Fund Fire 241.00 241.00
Sub-total 852,295.15 0.00 0.00 852,29 .15 881014.04
IMRF-Supplement 114.55 114.55
IMRF-Employee 12,708.13 12,708.13
IMRF-Employer 28 409.63 28,409.63
Gross Payroll a93,527.46 0.00 0.00 893, 922 246.
Bank Transfer
Equals total of
Payd Dist by Org
ee Pay Adjustment Register, Current Employer Expense
Payroll Gross 922,246.35 Bank Sheets should always=this#
Water/Sewer 29,619.01
Police Pension 112,539.83
Fire Pension 23,055.61
BG Golf 27,759.33
Arb Goff 26,663.93 Difference between Pyrl Gross 702,578.64
Total Other Funds 219,667.71 less water/golf/pension
Dat 7 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Pa�e: 1
Use EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
-_ Warrant Date 07/02/07
FU 000010
z
DE 000010 CORPORATE FUND
VE VENDOR NAME I
IN "'VOUCHER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
I
7,f' ICE PENSION FUND
0701 091978 214 POLICE PENSION 89299.4
*TOTAL VENDOR POLICE PENSION FUND 8, 99.45+
PENSION FUND
0701 091979 215 FIRE PENSION 2,572.73
*TOTAL VENDOR FIRE PENSION FUND 2,57 .73
r ' 'PAGE POINT TSRF AGENT
0701' 091980 218 ICMA/RC-BONUS 7,500.0
*TOTAL VENDOR VANTAGE POINT TSRF 7, 00.00
k
F
070191981 217 IMRF 3,067.50
0701 91981 217 IMRF 6,857.59 j
*TOTAL VENDOR IMRF 9,925.09-
5 ,SAP SOFTWARE
3661 ' 1943 229 RES CAP REP MIS 10,718.36
. ,
*TOTAL VENDOR ASAP SOFTWARE 10,71 .36
;DAMES J BENES&ASSOC INC
5250f` 791 224 DEP DIA 1,486.62
*TOTAL VENDOR JAMES J BENES&ASS 1,4 .62
ON PUSATERI
17
20524W 935 224 DEP DIA 1,000.00
*TOTAL VENDOR->ONE-TIME VENDORS 1,00.00
12 ;"CATCHING FLUIDPOWER
526 1792 223 RES CAP REPLACE 250.21
*TOTAL VENDOR CATCHING FLUIDPOWER 250.21
2 Z-LINER INDUSTRIES
448 1910 223 RES CAP REP AUTO 89.79
`TOTAL VENDOR EZ-LINER INDUSTRIES 8�.79
75 RAZING HILLS NURSERY
43420T1815 223 RES CAP REP 1,190.00
*TOTAL VENDOR ROLLING HILLS NURSE 1,#90.00
90 �fi VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
6/28/8' 9204� 136 PERS PROP REP TAX 7,261.00
*TOTAL VENDOR VILLAGE OF BUFFALO 79 61.00
i
Date.- Q7 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 2
User.''Y EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FU 000010
g�x
DE 000010 CORPORATE FUND
s
VE' VENDOR NAME
INV VOUCHER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
90 wVILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
7C0 j tl!91964 224 FUND TRANSFER 70,878.80
*TOTAL VENDOR VILLAGE OF BUFFALO 70,878.80
90 k' BG-FAC DEV DEBT SERV FND
6/26 040 128 PERS PROP REP TAX 12,073.53
6/26 040 128 PERS PROP REP TAX 40,273.23
6/26! 040 128 PERS PROP REP TAX 337.72
6/26/� 040 128 PERS PROP REP TAX 18,321.36
*TOTAL VENDOR VBG-FAC DEV DEBT SE 71,005.84
**TOTAL CORPORATE FUND 192,177.89
f.25?.2 >>
Al
/G38da. G �
<r
sew:
4
Date-, 7 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 3
User:: EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FU 000010
DE . 000210 CORPORATE REVENUE
VE VENDOR NAME
INV , ,- VOUtVER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
9999 �°`! IFIM SARNOV
r:
17786 960 1081 PASS REG 60.00
23731 ;, 91946 1081 PASS REG 50.00
31984 ►091915 1259 AMB TRANSP SERV 192.73
209707 =" 1846 1299 MISC EXP 150.00
4902 1951 1081 PASS REG 40.00
209787 1`01846 1091 MISC EXP 266.67
209710" $1846 1097 MISC EXP 20.00
2097t 9184b 1096 MISC EXP 250.00
15603 91999 1081 PASS REG 25.00
r *TOTAL VENDOR->ONE-TIME VENDORS 1,054.40
3 lIDWARD HINES LUMBER CO
AP _#991976 1053 SALES&HOME RULE 47,314.50
AP 091976 1073 SALES&HOME RULE 47,314.50
*TOTAL VENDOR EDWARD HINES LUMBER 94,629.00
418 KIL STATE POLICE
6/13/ . 1969 1299 ALL OTHER EXP 336.00
*TOTAL VENDOR IL STATE POLICE 336.00
654 '+I?PTICSPLANET,INC.
321 930 1299 OTHER INC./DUE AS 111.75
*TOTAL VENDOR OPTICSPLANET,INC. 111.75
**TOTAL CORPORATE REVENUE 95,795.15 336.00
Date• 7 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 4
User ' `'a EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUNS? O. 000010
DEP` ,,1K 000401 LEGISLATIVE
VE VENDOR NAME
INVJ VOUCHER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
369"j' IkMERICAN CHARGE SERVICE
6/19/0 µ1983 4942 SR CIT TAXI 47.50
*TOTAL VENDOR AMERICAN CHARGE SER 47.50
32694; #TOWARD GREEN
0623 1 '1955 3722 BG SYMP 1,000.00
*TOTAL VENDOR HOWARD GREEN 1,000.00
84 303 TAXI
1546 ; �-�02003 4942 SR CIT TAXI SERV 177.50
*TOTAL VENDOR 303 TAXI 177.50
881070, 'UNIQUE VIDEO PRODUCTIONS
4154 `` �002004 4941 CABLE TV PROG 845.00
*TOTAL VENDOR UNIQUE VIDEO PRODUC 845.00
903230'VBG VIEL MGRS OFFICE
6/27/07' 2005 4935 MISC EXP 27.00
6/27/01f ft 105 3215 MISC EXP 10.00
*TOTAL VENDOR VBG VIL MGRS OFFICE 37.00
**TOTAL LEGISLATIVE 2,107.00
Date: 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 5
User EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUNK . 000010
DEP `40. 00040$OFC VLG MANAGER
VEX" VENDOR NAME
INVVOUCHER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
1 M BUSINESS PRINTERS
n
8013 941 3220 VILLAGE NEWSLETTE 8,000.00
*TOTAL VENDOR AIM BUSINESS PRINTE 8,000.00
1202` CALL ONE
44"1A`9t°'07 091824 3211 TELEPHONE 86.57
*TOTAL VENDOR CALL ONE 86.57
3756" ICSC
OCT O� " 092009 3112 PRO TRNG 460.00
*TOTAL VENDOR ICSC 460.00
6 .GHIDA NEUKIRCH
619 1'804 31'12 TRAVEL TRAINING 465.60
619 1804 3112 TRAVEL TRAINING 35.00
619-6 01804 32b TRAVEL TRAINING 59.00
*TOTAL VENDOR GHIDA NEUKIRCH 559.60
6051a. NEXTEL`&OMMUNICATIONS
0064 164t8O5 3211 TELEPHONE 141.07
"TOT&VENDOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIO 141.07*
605 6 LEISA NIEMOTKA
61 *801 3t TRAVEL TRAINING 466.92
61 3113 TRAVEL TRAINING 142.59
*TOTAL VENDOR LEISA NIEMOTKA 609.51
611795`NO'IL REAL ESTATE MAG
706216 091194 4935 ALL OTHER EXP 75.00
*TOTAL VENDOR NO IL REAL ESTATE M 75.00
611971 NORTHERN IL UNIV
MULTIPLE 091995 3218 SUB/PUB 32.00
MULTI E OM''95 3218 SUB/PUB 32.00
*TOTAL VENDOR NORTHERN IL UNIV 64.00
810 +3`r STAPLES BUS ADV
MUL 09142 3240 OFFICE SUPPLIES 29.64
*TOTAL VENDOR STAPLES BUS ADV 29.64
903230" G VIL MGRS OFFICE
6/27%Of `#"005`4915 MISC EXP 28.71
6/27/01 692005 3ii5 MISC EXP 16.91
Date {,_/07 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 6
User:~ sa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUNV,'NQ,. 000010
DEPT`NO. 000405'OFC VLG MANAGER
V VENDOR NAME
IN-- VOO MER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
6/27/07 02005 3240 MISC EXP 5.94
*TOTAL VENDOR VBG VIL MGRS OFFICE 51.56
**TOTAL OFC VLG MANAGER 9,616.95 460.00
Date ` �'� 7 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 7
User'r._, g EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUNI)IfO. 000010
DEPT Ate: 000407 MIS
VE VENDOR NAME
INV VOUCHER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
12007— .j CALL ONE
4499 . 7091824 3211 TELEPHONE 29.63
*TOTAL VENDOR CALL ONE 29.63
1520WI, CDW GOVERNMENT,INC
MULIT: 091947 4313 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 295.98
*TOTAL VENDOR CDW GOVERNMENT,INC 295.98
375776 IL CENTURY NETWORK/
23126 Q91956 3211 TELEPHONE 246.25
*TOTAL VENDOR IL CENTURY NETWORK/ 246.25
605120':'NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0064 "05 3211 TELEPHONE 234.04
*TOTAL VENDOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIO 234.04
7 1MV00 TECH INTEG
2704 ' ' 01959 3221 COMPUTER SERV 637.50
*TOTAL VENDOR RMS INFO TECH INTEG 637.50
*"TOTAL MIS 1,443.40
Date:( ,, , 7 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 8
User: "a EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUWNO. 000010
DEPT Nip. 000408 LEGAL SERVICES
VE VENDOR NAME
INV VOUCftR ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
200412 DYNAMEX
148479 091987 3617 MSGR SERV 158.75
*TOTAL VENDOR DYNAMEX 158.75
512800 'LAKE CO RECORDER
56235 R091834 3615 RECORDING FEES 89.00
*TOTAL VENDOR LAKE CO RECORDER 89.00
68770. PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS,INC.
MUL 4 E 091958 3615 LEG NOTICE 573.00
MUL1*1 1E 091958 3615 LEG NOTICE 21.00
*TOTAL VENDOR PADDOCK PUBLICATION 594.00
**TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES 841.75
Date:. ` 7 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 9
User:4wha EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NQ. 000010
DEPT .'000410 FIN&GEN SERVICES
V VENDOR NAME
INV V0fi14tHER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
48200 SCOTT ANDERSON
6/9-13MI 092012 3213 TRAVEL 668.20
*TOTAL VENDOR SCOTT ANDERSON 668.20
5900 AT&T WIRELESS LONG DIST
7275'i&",Y 0 091944 3211 TELEPHONE 27.67
*TOTAL VENDOR AT&T WIRELESS LONG 27.67
58181 AT&T
4993 MAY 091945 3211 TELEPHONE 17.45
*TOTAL VENDOR AT&T 17.45
"SM THE BLUE LINE
2343 00006 3714 FIRE&POLICE COM 447.00
*TOTAL VENDOR THE BLUE LINE 447.00
103501 ;BOTTLE-FREE WATER,LLC
5104 , 0017" 3216 MAIN CON 36.95
*TOTAL VENDOR BOTTLE-FREE WATER, 36.95
12",t CALL ONE
4499VY 07 091824 3211 TELEPHONE 3,503.32
44"MY 07 091824 3211 TELEPHONE 964.09-
*TOTAL VENDOR CALL ONE 2,539.23
163120 CULLIGAN
14572"0 091949 4935 ALL OTHER EXP 5.65
*TOTAL VENDOR CULLIGAN 5.65
270000 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP.
2104 0t1 091953 3212 POSTAGE 14.13
*TOTAL VENDOR FEDERAL EXPRESS COR 14.13
417871 ILLINOIS PAPER CO.
421151 091957 3240 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107.16
*TOTAL VENDOR ILLINOIS PAPER CO. 107.16
599520 MUN CLKS OF LAKE CO
5108 091833 3113 MEMBERSHIP/DUES 20.00
5/08 001'833 3113 MEMBERSHIP/DUES 20.00
*TOTAL VENDOR MUN CLKS OF LAKE CO 40.00
605128 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
Date, � 7 1212 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 10
User- ttsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 000010
DEPT NO. 000410 FIN&GEN SERVICES
VE. VENDOR NAME
INV °VOUCHER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
0064 891805 3211 TELEPHONE 190.97
*TOTAL VENDOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIO 190.97
8846$0 SOUND INCORPORATED
MULMLE 091840 3211 TELEPHONE 420.66
MULTIPLE 091848 3211 TELEPHONE 1,865.55
*TOTAL VENDOR SOUND INCORPORATED 2,286.21
809360 STANDARD COFFEE SERV
31946"S2 091%1 4935 ALL OTHER EX 12.70
*TOTAL VENDOR STANDARD COFFEE SER 12.70
81 STAPLES BUS ADV
E 091962 3240 OFFICE SUPPLIES 21.12
MUL'�Lhr 091%2 3240 OFFICE SUPPLIES 458.82
*TOTAL VENDOR STAPLES BUS ADV 479.94
841600 THIRD MILLENNIUM ASSOC
7646 092002 4913 CONS FEES OTHER 1,575.42
*TOTAL VENDOR THIRD MILLENNIUM AS 1,575.42
903125"VBG-FIRE DEPT PETTY CASH
6/14/07 091843 3212 MISC EXP 28.59
*TOTAL VENDOR VBG-FIRE DEPT PETTY 28.59
903220 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
6/20/0 041942 4935 MISC EXP 33.86
*TOTAL VENDOR VILLAGE OF BUFFALO 33.86
**TOTAL FIN&GEN SERVICES 8,511.13
Date: 7 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 11
User. liuiisa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND:NO. 000010
DEPT N ?. 000411 HUMAN RESOURCES
VENP
# VENDOR NAME
INV VOUCHER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
82250 BRIAN BARNA
WINT '-07 091905 3118 TUIT REIM 1,800.00
*TOTAL VENDOR BRIAN BARNA 1,800.00
239050 ENH OMEGA
61507 091909 3714 FIRE&POLICE COM 558.00
61307 091952 3714 FIRE POLICE COM 117.00
*TOTAL VENDOR ENH OMEGA 675.00
322150 GOVPERS TEST SERV INC
6104 091954 3714 FIRE&POLICE 700.00
*TOTAL VENDOR GOV PERS TEST SERV 700.00
589370 JEFF MORRIS
SPI614G 07 091801 3118 TUITION REIMB 490.00
*TOTAL VENDOR JEFF MORRIS 490.00
700072 PERSONNEL STRATEGIES
6/13107 091912 3714 FIRE&POLICE COM 500.00
*TOTAL VENDOR PERSONNEL STRATEGIE 500.00
8516226 RONALD TWO BULLS
SP07 091938 3118 TUITION REIMB 543.00
*TOTAL VENDOR RONALD TWO BULLS 543.00*
903220 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
6/20/07 091842 3213 MISC EXP 16.49
*TOTAL VENDOR VILLAGE OF BUFFALO 16.49*
**TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES 4,724.49
Date: 06/28/07 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 12
User: huntsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 000010
DEPT NO. 000421 FIRE SERVICES
VENDOR# VENDOR NAME
INVOICE# VOUCHER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
52355 ASAP SOFTWARE
3657244 091822 4111 M&R DEPT EQUIP 393.58
*TOTAL VENDOR ASAP SOFTWARE 393.58
120072 CALL ONE
4499 MY 07 091824 3211 TELEPHONE 1,386.23
*TOTAL VENDOR CALL ONE 1,386.23
153460 CONNECTIONS UNLIMITED
61345 091826 3115 CLOTH ALLOW 50.95
*TOTAL VENDOR CONNECTIONS UNLIMIT 50.95
283250 FIRE INVEST. STRIKE FORCE
0508 091796 3113 MEMBERSHIP 60.00
*TOTAL VENDOR FIRE INVEST.STRIKE 60.00
284255 FIVE ALARM FIRE& SAF EQ
MULTIPLE 091912 4316 OPER EQ DEPT/SMAL 601.65
MULTIPLE 091912 3824 OPER EQ DEPT/SMAL 172.60
*TOTAL VENDOR FIVE ALARM FIRE&S 774.25
422000 ISFSI
SASHKO 08 091916 3113 MEMBERSHIP/DUES 75.00
*TOTAL VENDOR ISFSI 75.00
565350 MED-TECH RESOURCE,INC
28372 091836 4316 OPER EQ DEPT 49.90
*TOTAL VENDOR MED-TECH RESOURCE, 49.90
569807 GEORGE MICHEHL
6/2-7/07 091923 3213 PER DIEM/TRAVEL 1,062.65
6/2-7/07 091923 3214 PER DIEM/TRAVEL 124.35
*TOTAL VENDOR GEORGE MICHEHL 1,187.00
572007 LINDE GAS LLC
MULTIPLE 091800 3216 MAIN CONTRACTS 102.30
MULTIPLE 091800 3216 MAIN CONTRACTS 55.80
MULTIPLE 091018 3250 MISC SUPP 149.39
*TOTAL VENDOR LINDE GAS LLC 307.49
577600 MOHAWK STAMP CO.
104278 091925 3250 MISC SUPP 19.40
*TOTAL VENDOR MOHAWK STAMP CO. 19.40
Date:'06128l07 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 13
User: huntsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND;NO. 000010
DEPT NO, 000421 FIRE SERVICES
VENHQR# VENDOR NAME
INVO* # VOUCHER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
583911 F E MORAN
34369 091902 32116 MAINT CON 350.00
*TOTAL VENDOR F E MORAN 350.00
605128; NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0064 09tW5 3211 TELEPHONE 511.48
*TOTAL VENDOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIO 511.48
620321 `OCE FINANCIAL SERV INC
487938 091807 3217 EQUIP RENT 479.00
*TOTAL VENDOR OCE FINANCIAL SERV 479.00
687707 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS
MULTIPLE 091933 3218 SUB/PUB 39.60
*TOTAL VENDOR PADDOCK PUBLICATION 39.60
903125 VBG-FIRE DEPT PETTY CASH
6/1"1 091943 3240 MISC EXP 71.81
6/14/07 091843 4935 MISC EXP 148.11
6/14d07 001843 3924 MISC EXP 14.61
6/14167 "001$43 M17 MISC EXP 27.50
6/14/07 09843 3824 MISC EXP 37.49
6/14/07 '091843 3112 MISC EXP 98.00
6/14MI 091643 4923 MISC EXP 71.29
*TOTAL VENDOR VBG-FIRE DEPT PETTY 468.81
9034515 VERIZON WIRELESS
980462340-09184 3217 EQUIP RENTAL 60.03
*TOTAL VENDOR VERIZON WIRELESS 60.03
949077 WORLD POINT ECC
4169'74 091844 '3016 SAL SPEC DUTY PAY 1,989.26
*TOTAL VENDOR WORLD POINT ECC 1,989.26
980700 ZIMMERMAN HARDWARE
MULTIPLE 091821 4923 MISC EXP 11.05
*TOTAL VENDOR ZIMMERMAN HARDWARE 11.05
**TOTAL FIRE SERVICES 8,213.03
Date: 06/28/07 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 14
User: huntsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 000010
DEPT NO. 000431 POLICE SERVICES
VENDOR# VENDOR NAME
INVOICE# VOUCHER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
52355 ASAP SOFTWARE
3658977 091984 4316 OPER EQ DEPT 105.18
*TOTAL VENDOR ASAP SOFTWARE 105.18
120072 CALL ONE
4499 MY 07 091824 3211 TELEPHONE 522.26
*TOTAL VENDOR CALL ONE 522.26
139499 CITICORP VENDOR FIN. INC
70624 091967 4313 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 892.93
*TOTAL VENDOR CITICORP VENDOR FIN 892.93
175000 THOMAS DATTILO
6/25/07 092014 3112 PRO TRNG 48.00
*TOTAL VENDOR THOMAS DATTILO 48.00
312815 GLOBAL TECH. SYSTEMS,INC
43046 091797 3346 SUPPLIES COMM 664.01
*TOTAL VENDOR GLOBAL TECH.SYSTEM 664.01
422960 IPPFA
6/30/08 091832 4935 ALL OTHER EXP 750.00
*TOTAL VENDOR IPPFA 750.00
433300 INTOXIMETERS,INC.
222331 091798 3351 SUPP DETENTION 38.00
*TOTAL VENDOR INTOXIMETERS,INC. 38.00
512250 LAKE CO CHIEF OF POL ASSN
6/7/07 091971 4935 ALL OTHER EXP 170.00
*TOTAL VENDOR LAKE CO CHIEF OF PO 170.00
611920 N E MULTI-REG.TRNG.
95111 091806 3112 TRAINING 150.00
*TOTAL VENDOR N E MULTI-REG.TRNG 150.00
611999 NORTHWESTERN UNIV
6/11/07 091972 3112 PRO TRNG 1,550.00
*TOTAL VENDOR NORTHWESTERN UNIV 1,550.00
654135 OPTICSPLANET,INC.
321484 091930 4318 OTHER INC./DUE AS 213.90
*TOTAL VENDOR OPTICSPLANET,INC. 213.90
Date:",' /67,12:12; Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 15
User:harts EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO ,000010
DEPT-NO. 000431 POLICE SERVICES
VE?Q)OR# VENDOR NAME
INVi*6 VOUCHER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
654250 ORPHANS OF THE STORM
MAY2607 091809 4918 ANIMAL CONTROL 67.50
*TOTAL VENDOR ORPHANS OF THE STOR 67.50
709020 .PITNEY BOWES
JN07 092029 3355 OPE EQ RECORDS 56.00
*TOTAL VENDOR PITNEY BOWES 56.00
72ON3 PURCHASE ADVANTAGE CARD
XV76L9 091814 4919 PRISIONER CONT 26.23
*TOTAL VENDOR PURCHASE ADVANTAGE 26.23
759942 JULIE RUSSELL
6/25/07 092032 3112 PRO TRNG 37.37
*TOTAL VENDOR JULIE RUSSELL 37.37
8679" SQUAD-FITTERS
1'50402 0911106 4318 DUE ASSMNT PURCH 415.00
*TOTAL VENDOR SQUAD-FITTERS 415.00
80829; UNIFORMITY INC
MULTI!LE 091817 3115 CLOTH ALLOW 278.50
MULTIPLE 091817 3115 CLOTH ALLOW 67.00
118223 0992038 3115 CLOTH ALLOW 82.50
MULTIPLE 0917 3115 CLOTH ALLOW 186.00
*TOTAL VENDOR UNIFORMITY INC 614.00
881424t UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
6/27/07 0004 405 ALL OTHER EXP 22.74
*TOTAL VENDOR UNITED PARCEL SERVI 22.74
903220 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
062y07 091b 449 MISC EXP 34.49
6/20t07 691-842 3 46 MISC EXP 32.71
062707 091966 3352 MISC EXP 26.97
6/2"7 091842 4935 MISC EXP 13.42
062107 091%6 3213 MISC EXP 14.00
062707 091966 3$46 MISC EXP 21.28
*TOTAL VENDOR VILLAGE OF BUFFALO 142.87
917660 WAREHOUSE DIRECT
MULTIPLE 091M 3347 SUPP RECORDS 19.65
*TOTAL VENDOR WAREHOUSE DIRECT 19.65
k
4 GS
P4te: 16
APPOI3YALB LI9T
SNRVWU
E
sanvw
d �a hit 3 yx�r �t t I
n pry 7
lY#fi' R� N a
11 it
RI
2 C
hs
tV
i
r
bfi' 4
1 t�
gg
J
r t',
ka
k
t u.
�k
DaW 06/M07 1242 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 17
User: 6antse EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 00000
DEPT NO. 00OM.BUILDING&ZONING
VEN _ R NAME
I V R ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
32263 ALLEG A PRINT&IMAGING
43146 091788 3119 PRINTING 212.00
*TOTAL VENDOR ALLEGRA PRINT&IMA 212.00
120072: CALL ONE
44"'MY 07 091824 3211 TELEPHONE 30.93
*TOTAL VENDOR CALL ONE 30.93
3%259 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
10007M23 4090"3240 OFFICE SUPP 59.99
*TOTAL VENDOR IKON OFFICE SOLUTIO 59.99
605128 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0064 091005' 3Z11 TELEPHONE 316.89
*1)6T,AL VENDOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIO 316.89
687707 PAMOCK PUBLICATIONS
62407-8180 091811 '3218 SUB PUB 28.80
*TOTAL VENDOR PADDOCK PUBLICATION 28.80*
842000 THOMPON ELEVATOR INSP.
07-1973 092037 4913 CONS FEES OTHER 75.00
*TOTAL VENDOR THOMPSON ELEVATOR I 75.00*
**T6UL,BUILDING&ZONING 723.61
Date.06/29/07 12,32 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 18
User:Itubtsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND,NO. M010
DEPT NO. , "ENGINEERING SERVICES
VE , VER NAME
a ;t
INV V6 R ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
903220 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
6/20/07 09t 2 4935 MISC EXP 14.09
*TOTAL VENDOR VILLAGE OF BUFFALO 14.09
903220 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
6/20/07 091842 3213 MISC EXP 1.25
6/2 7 091"2 3.$13 MISC EXP 15.05
6/2#M7 09"42 3240 MISC EXP 17.39
6/20/07 09,042 3,2M MISC EXP 37.57
*TO!f,AL VENDOR VILLAGE OF BUFFALO 71.26
**TG1 AL ENGINEERING SERVICES 85.35
t
Date.06/28/47 12J2 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 19
User:buotsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 00001,0
DEPT NO. 000451 BUILDING SERVICES
VENDOR# VENWR NAME
INVb1C6V0 ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
9210 ADVANC- ELECT SUPP CO
MULTIPLE 091845 3916 M&R BLDG&FAC 177.44
*TOTAL VENDOR ADVANCE ELECT SUPP 177.44
9210 ADVANCE ELECT SUPP CO
MULTIPLE 091945 3916 M&R BLDG&FAC 181.03
*TOTAL VENDOR ADVANCE ELECT SUPP 181.03
36720 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN
660905 091789 3112 TRAINING 160.00
*TOTAL VENDOR AMERICAN WATER WORK 160.00
103;55 BONESTROO
Mtk,'* ME 091#i 3216 MAINT CONTR/SYS I 560.00
MOCTIMLE 091 3216 C/P SYS IMP-MAINT 350.00
MULTIPLE 0910" 6 3216 C/P SYS IMP-MAINT 130.00
*TOTAL VENDOR BONESTROO 1,040.00
152700 COM ED
MULTIPLE 091793 3825 ELETRIC FAC 4,506.08
MULTIPLE 091'43 3825 ELETRIC FAC 1,153.78
*TOTAL VENDOR COM ED 5,659.86
152750 COIV MWMEALTH EDISON
MMTIPLE 091* 3925 ELETRIC FAC 179.52
MULTIPPLE 091794 3825 ELETRIC FAC 204.44
MUITIPLE 091744 3825 ELETRIC FAC 7.70
*TOTAL VENDOR COMMONWEALTH EDISON 391.66
15$034 CORPORATE EXPRESS
MULTIPLE 091996 3240 OFF SUPP 3.76
794/6307 091907°'3240 OFFICE SUPP 77.35
*TOTAL VENDOR CORPORATE EXPRESS 81.11
211"W FLOLO CORP
47JO 091927 3916 M&R BLDG&FAC 82.53
*TOTAL VENDOR FLOLO CORP 82.53
20"M FOX VALLEY FIRE&SAFETY
MULTIPLE 091#29 3216 MAINT CONTR 1,225.00
M[ 43PLE 491,0019 3216 MAINT CONTR 1,760.00
38139 091981 3216 MAINT CONTR 145.00
*TOTAL VENDOR FOX VALLEY FIRE&S 3,130.00
Date:06129W 12.12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 20
User:`lluntsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 008010
DEPTNO. 0004511 BUILDING SERVICES
VIA ?R# VE, R NAME
IN�Ck# V01 R ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
306910 G&K SERVICES NO CHICAGO
MULTIPLE 09990 3114 UNIF RENTAL 60.36
MULTIPLE 091929 3114 UNIF RENTAL 60.36
*TOTAL VENDOR G&K SERVICES NO C 120.72
5021" MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO.
330P457 09190 ' 916 M&R DEPT EQUIP 31.09
*TOTAL VENDOR MC MASTER-CARR SUPP 31.09
6195128 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0064 091805 3211 TELEPHONE 135.47
*TOTAL VENDOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIO 135.47
6%079 NORTH SHORE GAS#1211
121 VMAY 0 091907 3812 GAS FAC 118.58
*"TOTAL VENDOR NORTH SHORE GAS#12 118.58
696M NORTH SHORE GAS#6135
6136 MAY 0 091837 3812 GAS FAC 44.22
*T&AL VENDOR NORTH SHORE GAS#61 44.22
6%092 NORTH SHORE GAS#3520
3520'1NAY 0 091998`3812 GAS FAC 41.79
*TOTAl,VENDOR NORTH SHORE GAS#35 41.79
646093 NORT*SHORE GAS#2832
2832 MAY 0 00"f 3812 GAS FAC 176.82
*TOTAL VENDOR NORTH SHORE GAS#28 176.82
606110 PETERSON`ROOFING,INC
5726 092008 3216 MAINT CONTR 2,500.00
*TOTAL VENDOR PETERSON ROOFING,I 2,500.00
6 07 P1 kVtCT CLEANING SERV INC
26511 091934 3216 MAINT CONTR 5,223.00
26528 091838 3216 MAINT CONTR 125.00
*TOTAL VENDOR PERFECT CLEANING SE 5,348.00
841270 TEMPERATURE EQUIP.CORP.
MULTIPLE 091841 3916 M&R DEPT EQUIP 182.80
Mt fill'LE d918+11"3916 M&R DEPT EQUIP 382.28
*TOfiAL VENDOR TEMPERATURE EQUIP. 565.08
Date:Ob1 S/07 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 21
User;#uatsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. OW10
DEPT NO. 000451 BUILDING SERVICES
VENDOR# VEN. R NAME
INibfCE# VOtA--'ft' R ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
900220 'VILLAGE!OF BUFFALO GROVE
6/2W07 69MI 2 $112 MISC EXP 12.00
*TOTAL VENDOR VILLAGE OF BUFFALO 12.00
9"700 Z +IAN HARDWARE
MUCTIPLE 09I$41 3916 MISC EXP 228.54
*TOTAL VENDOR ZIMMERMAN HARDWARE 228.54
**TOTAL BUILDING SERVICES 20,225.94
Date:06/28/07 12,12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 22
Usar:buftsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. OW10
D 'T NO: 0004661 STREET OPERATIONS
R NAME
vwy1`1=_ R ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
159034 CORPORATE EXPRESS
79486307 091907 3240 OFFICE SUPP 77.35
*TOTAL VENDOR CORPORATE EXPRESS 77.35
155034 CORPORATE EXPRESS
MULTIPLE 091"6 3240 OFF SUPP 3.76
*TOTAL VENDOR CORPORATE EXPRESS 3.76
239060 ENl'4IS'PAINT,INC
95745 091795 422 TRAF ST SIGNS 7,238.06
*TOTAL VENDOR ENNIS PAINT,INC 7,238.06
3069i 10 G&K'SERVICES NO CHICAGO
MUTIPLE 091829 3114 UNIF RENTAL 48.87
MULTIPLE 091990 3114 UNIF RENTAL 48.87
*TOTAL VENDOR G&K SERVICES NO C 97.74
%9900 MEYER MATERIAL CO.
398497 091922 MI M&R SWLKS,CRUBS,B 44.50
*TOTAL VENDOR MEYER MATERIAL CO. 44.50
606128 NEXTLL"COMMUNICATIONS
00" 092 3 3211 TELEPHONE 58.84
*TOTAL VENDOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIO 58.84
654139 ORANGE CRUSH,LLC.
MULTIPLE 091869 3912 M&R S&H 960.30
MULTIPLE '091931 3912 M&R STS&HWYS 1,035.90
MULTIPLE 09180 3912 M&R S&H 1,008.00
*TOTAL VENDOR ORANGE CRUSH,LLC. 3,004.20*
71O0 SAVIMCO)RPORATION
910025 OO M7 3'216 MAINT CONTR 265.63
*'t`6tAL VENDOR SAVIN CORPORATION 265.63*
9950 VULCAN MAT FIN CO
131MS 09109 3912 M&R STREETS&HWY 607.96
*TOTAL VENDOR VULCAN MAT FIN CO 607.96
90700 ZIMMERMAN HARDWARE
MUL-TIPLE .f?91'$It3250 MISC EXP 198.18
*TOCAL VENDOR ZIMMERMAN HARDWARE 198.18
4
t
ty �
r ,
Pop: 23
r
VSKO"C-CM ITXI43<'928CHVTION MAMOUNT HAND43SUND
id
11,M22
ik d,
��4 ,
�e
, f (
L *`5 PtK
k t
f
sw z
f
D ." ;SA 11f1,t Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 24
US614 htt tsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 00 '0'
DRPT NO. 000°46 PUB WRKS ADM
Vl(pm# R NAME
I 1 . R ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
13W2 ,CALL ONE
44W,'MY i7 0$181C 3211 TELEPHONE 29.62
*TO' `AL VENDOR CALL ONE 29.62
159034 CORPORATE EXPRESS
MULTIPLE 001086 3240 OFF SUPP 19.94
*TOTAL VENDOR CORPORATE EXPRESS 19.94
419023 OCE IM4GISTICS INC.
71OH7350 091028 313 OFFICE EQUIP 156.35
*TOTAL VENDOR OCE IMAGISTICS INC. 156.35
50770 1V1 LM ENTERPRISES
061341 091414" 3 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 677.54
*TOTAL VENDOR MICROFILM ENTERPRIS 677.54
605128 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0064 091805 J 11 TELEPHONE 31.97
*TOtAL VENDOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIO 31.97
6 321 01ft flIftNCIAL SERV INC
490614
# 09'116 =+ 13 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 187.00
*TOTAL VENDOR OCE FINANCIAL SERV 187.00
62W, OEC BUSINESS INTERIORS
504#02 091847' 12 OFFICE FURNITURE 709.14
*TOTAL VENDOR OEC BUSINESS INTERI 709.14
687707 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS
MULTIPLE 091933 3218 SUB/PUB 47.60
*TOTAL VENDOR PADDOCK PUBLICATION 47.60
963220 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
6/2U7 091042 3112 MISC EXP 22.00
6/27 091442 3112 MISC EXP 26.20
6/20&7 0 1* 40 MISC EXP 8.63
*T&AL VENDOR VILLAGE OF BUFFALO 56.83
*'*TOTAL PUB WRKS ADM 1,915.99
Daw.06/28/07 12.0 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 25
Used:"htsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
?Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO.
D r NO. 000463'FORESTRY
VINDM# VENDOR NAME
IN4`01CP"# VOU", R ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
155034- CORPORATE EXPRESS
79496307 091907 3240 OFFICE SUPP 77.35
*TOTAL VENDOR CORPORATE EXPRESS 77.35
155034 COUPOkATE EXPRESS
MKTIP .E $"M 3240 OFF SUPP 3.76
*,TOTAL VENDOR CORPORATE EXPRESS 3.76
306940 G&K'SKRVICES NO CHICAGO
MU.TIPLE 04440 3114 UNIF RENTAL 60.89
MULTIPLE 001829 3114 UNIF RENTAL 60.89
*T`dTAL VENDOR G&K SERVICES NO C 121.78
5218M LEROY'S LAWN EQUIP.
972 949/2 09190 3250 MISC SUPP/AUTO PA 42.45
*TOTAL VENDOR LEROY'S LAWN EQUIP. 42.45
6Q5128 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0084 691 '321j" TELEPHONE 136.98
*T&AL VENDOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIO 136.98
911"S ALEX WARD
6/25/07 0919440 3115 CLOTH ALLOW 44.76
*TOTAL VENDOR ALEX WARD 44.76
966929 BRAD VOS
6/20/07 091939 '3115 CLOTH ALLOW 60.00
*TOTAL VENDOR BRAD VOS 60.00
9W700 ZIMM RMAN HARDWARE
MULTIPLE 001121,3250 MISC EXP 2.25
*713tAL"VENDOR ZIMMERMAN HARDWARE 2.25
**TOTAL FORESTRY 489.33
Da14:+�6t8/07 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 26
U9—fibikisa, EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
.Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 00t O
DIIPT NO. 000465,CENTRAL GARAGE
VENDOR# VER NAME
II1C1#1 VOk R ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
,05 A&A W1 O Y SHOP,INC.
39148 "06 4 "18 CONT AUTO SERV 1,439.32
*TOTAL VENDOR A&A BODY SHOP,IN 1,439.32
61140 AUTO TECH CENTERS,INC
18961 091823 #213 AUTO PARTS 646.62
*TOTAL VENDOR AUTO TECH CENTERS, 646.62
1O3807 BP
9209270 092013 4211 GASOLINE 76.10
*'f0 AL VENDOR BP 76.10
134595 CERTU' D FLEET SERVICES
MOLTIPLE 4213 AUTO PARTS 28.65
Mt.TIPLE 091SS 4213' AUTO PARTS 116.03
MULTIPLE '001R' 5 4213 AUTO PARTS 123.25
*TEAL VENDOR CERTIFIED FLEET SER 267.93
1M34 CORPORATE EXPRESS
79 7 091,007 32240 OFFICE SUPP 77.35
WiLTIPLE 091966 3240 OFF SUPP 3.76
*'CO "AL VENDOR CORPORATE EXPRESS 81.11
2ww, EL-Cft�WDUSTRIES,INC
MtLITtPLE 041004213 AUTO PARTS/NIISC S 105.65
MtjLTIPLE 09140-3250 AUTO PARTS/NHSC S 93.00
MOtTIPLE 091968 4213 AUTO PARTS/NHSC S 406.33
*TOTAL VENDOR EL-COR INDUSTRIES, 604.98
293465 FIRESTONE
89323 091911 4113 AUTO PARTS 167.96
*TOTAL VENDOR FIRESTONE 167.96
366910 G&IK SERVICES NO CHICAGO
MULTIPLE 091"6 3114 UNIF RENTAL 50.39
MIX' TIPLE 001010 3114 UNIF RENTAL 50.39
*TOTAL VENDOR G&K SERVICES NO C 100.78
348514 HASTTEROCK AUTO DETAILING
101* 091M .4 18 CONT AUTO SERV 240.00
*T T;kL VENDOR HASTEROCK AUTO DETA 240.00
410930 IL STATE POLICE
Date:06/28/07 12 11 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 27
User-liumUa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO.,00HO
D1tV7 NO. 01*65iCENTRAL GARAGE
I13V ,"opt# 10OR NAME
1"✓E# V0 7 ,0 ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
6/11/07 091970 4218 CONT SERVICE 78.00
*TOTAL VENDOR IL STATE POLICE 78.00
522800 LEROY'S LAWN EQUIP.
9722949/2 091g17 4213 MISC SUPP/AUTO PA 199.54
*TOTAL VENDOR LEROY'S LAWN EQUIP. 199.54
551800`' MCALLISTER EQUIPMENT CO
139"4 0918M -42' 3 AUTO PARTS 192.60
*TO*'
VENDOR MCALLISTER EQUIPMEN 192.60
60$128 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0064 091965 32'11 TELEPHONE 141.43
*TOTAL VENDOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIO 141.43
612140 N W FIRE`EXT.&SERV CO
53519 091427 213 AUTO PARTS/AUTO S 27.95
53579 091927 4218 AUTO PARTS/AUTO S 116.95
*TOTAL VENDOR N W FIRE EXT.&SER 144.90
717165`P 1I�rCWON SERV.&PARTS
MULTIPLE Oi"r3 4213 AUTO PARTS 190.05
MULTIPLE 091813 4213 AUTO PARTS 94.50
*TOTAL VENDOR PRECISION SERV.&P 284.55
7$9903 RUBBER INC
392267 091839`3824 SMALL EQUIP&TOO 140.00
MULTIPLE 619$6 4213 AUTO PARTS 19.06
MULTIPLE 091936 4213 AUTO PARTS 68.13
*ToT_'WL VENDOR RUBBER INC 227.19
77M1 SEC-Y.OP;STATE
6/1"7 09103 4i18 CONT AUTO SERV 80.00
*TOTAL VENDOR SECY OF STATE 80.00
811118 BILL STASEK CHEVROLET
7237 MAY 0 092001 4213 AUTO PARTS 594.47
*TOTAL VENDOR BILL STASEK CHEVROL 594.47
9700 'ZIMMEAN HARDWARE
MULTIPLE 011 ji'3250 MISC EXP 72.09
MULTIPLE 0 4213 MISC EXP 15.27
MttTIPLE 0 461 4111 MISC EXP 19.61
*TOTAL VENDOR ZIMMERMAN HARDWARE 106.97
M
g!fed *ASO _ PAWtAi 1 i7r'n : 26
�1'i ALS i.e
GAAAGE
Yn
4GAAAGE 5AI6.45 258.E
. .
lk
V
{
ISM^{
- �r L�g
IN
+ ,
}
N-
i
4 ON,
{
a
4
Aq a
Date.0612 7 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 29
User:huntsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
*rrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 0006
DEFT NO. DRAINAGE SYSTEM
NAME
I 4 A'CCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
low CO ATE EXPRESS
79406301 001907 3240 OFFICE SUPP 82.86
*TOTAL VENDOR CORPORATE EXPRESS 82.86
155034 CORPORATE EXPRESS
MULTIPLE 0919M 3240 OFF SUPP 4.04
*TOTAL VENDOR CORPORATE EXPRESS 4.04
30MID G&K XKVICES NO CHICAGO
Mt jC�,E ilool 3114 UNIF RENTAL 15.45
M1]`UIPLE i < 3114 UNIF RENTAL 15.45
*' bOl VENDOR G&K SERVICES NO C 30.90*
419M IL EPA-FISC SERV SECT
6/30/07 091831 4611 C/P BLDG IMP 1,000.00
*TOTAL VENDOR IL EPA-FISC SERV SE 1,000.00*
SW'70 NEENAH FOUNDRY CO.
827*51 :091993 4017 STORM SEWERS 241.50
*TCITAL VENDOR NEENAH FOUNDRY CO. 241.50
6i612$ NIKkUL COMMUNICATIONS
0064 WOO Aft TELEPHONE 65.94
*TOE#AL VENDOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIO 65.94
988700 ZIMM9RMAN HARDWARE
MULTIPLE 091021 3250 MISC EXP 99.87
*TOTAL VENDOR ZIMMERMAN HARDWARE 99.87
"TOTAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM 1,525.11
D :B68/f#7",..11 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 30
Usti.,1061mg EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
*arrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. OW10
DWT NO. 0004I ESDA
VXN,0QR# VIQR NAME
' k9*'IN Vt #R ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
36791 Abl�1AN MESSAGING
UI1°72204H1r 091042 3211 TELEPHONE 402.06
*TOTAL VENDOR AMERICAN MESSAGING 402.06
12 CAMONE
449 A�I'Y'07 6+314'3211 TELEPHONE 31.25
*TOTAL VENDOR CALL ONE 31.25
152801 COMMUNICATIONS DIRECT INC
89197 091948'430 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 182.40
*TOTAL VENDOR COMMUNICATIONS DIRE 182.40
749M RMS'INEb TECH INTEG
519.033 00 11 4316 OPER EQ DEPT 937.00
*TOTAL VENDOR RMS INFO TECH INTEG 937.00
**TOTAL ESDA 1,552.71
DaW,06/2"7 12.12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 31
Uso,liutttsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 0W10
DEPT NO. 08 1 TRANSFER NON-OPER
VIN120 # It NAME
INOI # VCt ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
983140 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
6/28167 M642 4823 PERS PROP REP TAX 102,836.05
*TOTAL VENDOR VILLAGE OF BUFFALO 102,836.05
903240 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
6/28107 092041 4822 PERS PROP REP TAX 113,474.26
*TOTAL VENDOR VILLAGE OF BUFFALO 113,474.26
**TOTAL TRANSFER NON-OPER 216,310.31
***TOTAL CORPORATE FUND 587,241.78 3,589.67
,Joss Ay 0/I 428 a972))
ss� 90W. si
Data:06128/07 12r12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 32
unity tuft sa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 0 i,
DOT NO. 0MOSPEC REVENUE-PARKING LOT
VENDOR# VENDOR NAME
INVOICE# VOUCR ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
189715 DISCLOSURE VIDEO SYSTEMS
061807 091!OA 1916 M&R B&F 8,477.92
-TOTAL VENDOR DISCLOSURE VIDEO SY 8,477.92
570210 MI11' ST FORESTREE PROD.
38092 8920I6 6 M&R DEPT EQ 349.82
*TO AL VENDOR MIDWEST FORESTREE P 349.82
737242 JERKY REINERT
NNE 07 092' 0 3216 MAINT CONTR 510.00
*TOTAL VENDOR JERRY REINERT 510.00
**TOTAL SPEC REVENUE-PARKING LOT 8,987.92 349.82
***TOTAL PARKING LOT FUND 8,987.92 349.82
Date:06/28/07 12:12- Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 33
User: huntsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 000021
DI9PT NO. f 11 SAP PROJ-FACILITIES
V>rNDO VE"OR NAME
IN # � *ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
103255 RMENTROO,
142121 09260T 4682 WHITE PINE DRAINA 196.50
*TOTAL VENDOR BONESTROO 196.50
**TOTAL CAP PROJ-FACILITIES 196.50
***TOTAL CAP PROJ-FACILITIES 196.50
° g a � 4
i`
—Amok" � j : 34
� A14VIOVALS L ST
TOK WT C-C TRM DCSCMWgWN R "AMOUNT HAND-
A"01MA VW 2^00
2pRW
"
FUND 2AX"
T �t
ft)x
� $ j
t
S� 4
.�fZ j dyy} '���M•,
Tt S
i
M1� �
A�
Al
I
y d ,43
' a
s
ro-
# S
1^ �
}
D 7"1241 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 35
Uset:Trnnlaa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 00W49
DEPT NO. 000339 HEALTH INSURANCE EXPENSE
VZWR# VENDOR NAME
INVCti # ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
%07 AETNA
619923 JUN 0 1"Z 3124 LIFE INSURANCE 2,862.36
*TOTAL VENDOR AETNA 2,862.36
69M1;10 PBA'INC.
JLY 07 091932 3140 INS PREM 9,891.65
JLY 07 091932 3141 INS PREM 30,730.62
*TOTAL VENDOR PBA,INC. 40,622.27
**TOTAL HEALTH INSURANCE EXPENSE 43,484.63
***TOTAL HEALTH INSURANCE RESERVE 43,484.63
Date:06/28/01 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 36
User:luntsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 04 051
D19,PT-NO. 00MI WATER OPERATIONS
V09010 =7 _'
NAME
1?446i1 i# VOkCCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
60715 AUTOMATION DIRECT
MULTIPLE 10919N 4412 C/P SYS IMP 1,282.50
*TOTAL VENDOR AUTOMATION DIRECT 1,282.50
120072 CALL ONE
44"MY 07 001824 3211 TELEPHONE 230.33
*TOTAL VENDOR CALL ONE 230.33
1"034 ,C0,0tPO9ATE EXPRESS
79O 3E17 00"7 3240 OFFICE SUPP 82.87
MULTIPLE 691986 3240 OFF SUPP 4.03
*TOTAL VENDOR CORPORATE EXPRESS 86.90
306910 GA K SERVICES NO CHICAGO
MULTIPLE ' 00194 3114 UNIF RENTAL 44.12
MULTIPLE 091,829 3114 UNIF RENTAL 44.12
*TOTAL VENDOR G&K SERVICES NO C 88.24
695128 NE,V1'EL COMMUNICATIONS
0064 091 32l1 TELEPHONE 155.43
IWTOTAL VENDOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIO 155.43
903100 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
06j401 0014-63 A15 EMP CON PENS 3,287.36
*TOTAL VENDOR VILLAGE OF BUFFALO 3,287.36
**TOTAL WATER OPERATIONS 5,130.76
Datie:06r=07,11.12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 37
Usal"t kutitsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 0O0051
DEPT NO. 000542'SEWER OPERATIONS
VENDOR# VENDOR NAME
INV610E# VOUCH`ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
103255: BONESTRW
MULTIPLE 091406 4412 C/P SYS IMP-MAINT 2,426.05
*TOTAL VENDOR BONESTROO 2,426.05
1103255 BONESTROO
MULTIPLE '091015 4412 MAINT CONTR/SYS I 4,981.75
*TOTAL VENDOR BONESTROO 4,981.75
117791 BURNS&IVICDONNELL
45870-1 091485 4412 SYS IMP 5,170.00
*TOTAL VENDOR BURNS&MCDONNELL 5,170.00
120072 CALL ONE
4409:MY`07 091824 3211 TELEPHONE 1,120.93
441t9 MY 07 041824 3r211 TELEPHONE 305.09
*TOTA'L VENDOR CALL ONE 1,426.02
I55034 ;CORPORATE EXPRESS
79486M7 091907 3240 OFFICE SUPP 77.35
MULTIPLE 09198E 3240 OFF SUPP 3.76
*TOTAL VENDOR CORPORATE EXPRESS 81.11
298730 JOSEPH 0, FOREMAN COMPANY
214305 091 88 1`7 STORM SEWERS 116.00
*TOTAL VENDOR JOSEPH D.FOREMAN C 116.00
306910 G&K SERVICES NO CHICAGO
MOL' LE 1191 3114 UNIF RENTAL 32.80
MULTIPLE Q9toii 3114 UNIF RENTAL 32.80
*TOTAL VENDOR G&K SERVICES NO C 65.60
325M GRAINGER,INC.
9380944125 01991 4018 LIFT STATIONS 477.60
*TOTAL VENDOR GRAINGER,INC. 477.60
5125M LAKE CO'PUBLIC WORKS DEPT
APWMAY 07`49 622 3819 TREATMENT FEES 145,521.63
*TOTAL VENDOR LAKE CO PUBLIC WORK 145,521.63
605128 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0064 091W 3211 TELEPHONE 155.43
*TOTAL.VENDOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIO 155.43
e of Buffalo Grove Page: 38
NIIITURE APPROVALS LIST
iitlhte 07/02/07
E OPERATIONS
,f, x � ME
T#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
-11UFFAL0 GROVE
EMP CON PENS 1,929.36
ODOR VILLAGE OF BUFFALO 1,929.36
HARDWARE
MISC EXP 65.43
MISC EXP 20.38
` R ZIMMERMAN HARDWARE 85.81
R OPERATIONS 162,436.36
* - �LWATER&SEWER FUND 167,567.12
D*1j:86128AI7' 12142 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 39
Usk: !r#tt tsa -EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
U(Af rant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 0ows
DEPT NO. :GOLF OPERATION-BGGC
VE19DO t# VENDOR NAME
INVOICE#R V6U6"ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
120072 CALL ONE
4499 MY'07 0"824 3211 TELEPHONE 357.25
*TOTAL VENDOR CALL ONE 357.25
315040 GOLF CHICAGO
07-422 092646 3j91 AD/PROMO 1,250.00
*TOTAL VENDOR GOLF CHICAGO 1,250.00
349075 H•ARRIS 00LF CARTS
MAY 07 09I913 3380 GOLF CART RENTAL 7,303.75
*TOTAL VENDOR HARRIS GOLF CARTS 7,303.75
348511 HARTW+'I L INDUSTRIES,INC
413495-01 00017 3114 UNIFORM RENTAL 542.70
*TOTAL VENDOR HARTWELL INDUSTRIES 542.70
417720 IL DEPt"OF REVENUE
MAY 07 0044 3395 STATE SALES TAX 912.84
*TOTAL VENDOR IL DEPT OF REVENUE 912.84
467999 KURT JORGENSEN
060507 091799 411i M&R DEPT EG 60.50
*TOTAL VENDOR KURT JORGENSEN 60.50
495235 KNOX SWAN&DOG LLC
MULTIPLE :092019 3917 M&R GOLF COURSE 1,500.00
MULTIPLE W019 3917 M&R GOLF COURSE 1,500.00
*TQ VENDOR KNOX SWAN&DOG LLC 3,000.00
495612 KONICA MINOLTA BUS SOL
20M63763 092020 3160 SUPP GOLF COURSE 246.96
iT6Tt1:L VENDOR KONICA MINOLTA BUS 246.96
551557 MDA
12017 092624 3370 MERCH PURCH 336.00
*TOTAL VENDOR MDA 336.00
562177 MCGLADREY&PULLEN
M-2546347-091920 3230 AUDIT FEES 1,125.00
*TOTAL VENDOR MCGLADREY&PULLEN 1,125.00
568288 METRO MOF PROD INC
MULTIPLE 092025 3240 OFFICE SUPP 248.40
Date: 06/28/07 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 40
User: huntsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 000055
DEPT NO. 000546 GOLF OPERATION-BGGC
VENDOR# VENDOR NAME
INVOICE# VOUCHER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
MULTIPLE 092025 3240 OFFICE SUPP 220.71
*TOTAL VENDOR METRO PROF PROD INC 469.11
598600 NCS
1117440 092027 3240 OFFICE SUPP 55.33
*TOTAL VENDOR NCS 55.33
605128 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0064 091805 3211 TELEPHONE 96.77
*TOTAL VENDOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIO 96.77
699900 PGA OF AMERICA
YEAR 07 092030 3113 MEMBERSHIP/DUES 2,063.00
*TOTAL VENDOR PGA OF AMERICA 2,063.00
708510 PIONEER-PRESS
705036227 092031 3391 AD/PROMO 1,125.00
*TOTAL VENDOR PIONEER-PRESS 1,125.00
802150 SONITROL CHICAGOLAND NO
MULTIPLE 092034 3916 MAINT CONTR 618.00
*TOTAL VENDOR SONITROL CHICAGOLAN 618.00
805560 SPARKLING IMAGE OF
MULTIPLE 092035 3916 MAINT CONTR 668.00
*TOTAL VENDOR SPARKLING IMAGE OF 668.00
820710 SUBURBAN TRIM&GLASS
129119 092036 4111 M&R DEPT EQUIP 575.70
*TOTAL VENDOR SUBURBAN TRIM&GLA 575.70
881100 UNITED RADIO COMM.INC
15806500 092039 4111 M&R DEPT EQUIP 370.24
*TOTAL VENDOR UNITED RADIO COMM. 370.24
903100 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
062407 091965 3125 EMP CON PENS 4,224.94
*TOTAL VENDOR VILLAGE OF BUFFALO 4,224.94
948500 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
MULTIPLE 092044 3390 DRIV RANGE EXP 778.70
*TOTAL VENDOR WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 778.70
of Buffalo Grove Page. 41
APPROVALS LIST
si
M date 07/02/07
OPERATION-BGGC
TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
RDWARE
1 SMALL EQ/OFF SUPP 54.33
FOR ZIMMERMAN HARDWARE 54.33
GOLF OPERATION-BGGC 25,321.28 912.84
w0WALO GROVE GOLF CLUB 25,321.28 912.84
N; �x
�uvf'
i
F
P y,
�T*R
x}T�$Wr
5'lW�y
KRAIL,
x fir.
t7 r
4N
t
T
Dat#.0dl28f4I .t2tsft ' Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 42
tsa „` EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUNI))'NO. 000037'
DEPT NO. 00054GOLF OPERATIONS-AGC
VENt,R# V0,0OR,NAME
INV�fCE# VbU 0R ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
9219 ADVAN +'ELECT SUPP CO
S16t98+ 0 092011 4111 M&R DEPT EQUIP 88.44
*1'f1I?#L VENDOR ADVANCE ELECT SUPP 88.44
128072 CALL 0E
44"MY 07 0�"1��lI TELEPHONE 357.26
*T0*kL VENDOR CALL ONE 357.26
288710 FOREFRONT
MOIL V LE 6OWS 3370 AD/PROMO/MERCH 92.54
MVLTIPLE 0926 3391 AD/PROMO/MERCH 14.50
MULIP'LE '02- 6t 3OP91 AD/PROMO/MERCH 742.80
VENDOR FOREFRONT 849.84
3 1 HAI,R G0LF CARTS
MAY 0 041'0i . GOLF CART RENTAL 7,413.70
*TOTAL VENDOR HARRIS GOLF CARTS 7,413.70
313301 BRUCE 1OUDEK
MAY 07 092011 ,3370 MERCH PURCH 1,500.00
*TOTAL VENDOR BRUCE HOUDEK 1,500.00
417720 IL,12EftOF REVENUE
MAY 07 09 :395 STATE SALES TAX 547.16
*TO AT.VENDOR IL DEPT OF REVENUE 547.16
495613, KONI -31NOLTA BUS SOL
70625' 092021 OFFICE SUPP 792.90
*To: k :`VENDOR KONICA-MINOLTA BUS 792.90
$27336 LOG$IbN OFFICE SUPPLY
MULTIPLE 0 20;t3`1240 OFFICE SUPP 209.89
MULTIPLE 092t�3 3240 OFFICE SUPP 10.86
*TOTAL VENDOR LOGSDON OFFICE SUPP 220.75
546026 MARQUETTE BANK
#4 091919 33 GPS EXP 4,478.83
*TOT'AL VENDOR MARQUETTE BANK 4,478.83
562138 MCT COMM SERV
0277 MAY 0,091921' 3211 TELEPHONE 13.20
*TOTAL VENDOR MCI COMM SERV 13.20
Date: 06/28/07`12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 43
User: huntsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 000057
DEPT NO. 000548 GOLF OPERATIONS-AGC
VENDOR# VENDOR NAME
INVOICE# VOUC14ER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
562177 MCGLADREY&PULLEN
M-2546347-091920 3230 AUDIT FEES 1,125.00
*TOTAL VENDOR MCGLADREY&PULLEN 1,125.00
573700 MINUTEMAN PRESS
MULTIPLE 092026 3240 OFFICE SUPP 72.75
MULTIPLE 092026 3240 OFFICE SUPP 60.00
MULTIPLE 092026 3240 OFFICE SUPP 398.00
*TOTAL VENDOR MINUTEMAN PRESS 530.75
605128 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0064 091805 3211 TELEPHONE 96.78
*TOTAL VENDOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIO 96.78
687705 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS
5/31/07 092028 3391 AD/PROMO 1,864.00
*TOTAL VENDOR PADDOCK PUBLICATION 1,864.00
696094 NORTH SHORE GAS#9957
9957 MAY 0 091926 3812 GAS FAC 663.23
*TOTAL VENDOR NORTH SHORE GAS#99 663.23
699900 PGA OF AMERICA
YEAR 07 092030 3113 MEMBERSHIP/DUES 1,056.00
*TOTAL VENDOR PGA OF AMERICA 1,056.00
798920 SMG SECURITY SYSTEMS,INC
141443 092033 3916 M&R BLDG&FAC 277.50
*TOTAL VENDOR SMG SECURITY SYSTEM 277.50
903100 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
062407 091965 3125 EMP CON PENS 3,538.92
*TOTAL VENDOR VILLAGE OF BUFFALO 3,538.92
988700 ZIMMERMAN HARDWARE
1627 MAY 0 092045 3240 SMALL EQ/OFF SUPP 100.32
*TOTAL VENDOR ZIMMERMAN HARDWARE 100.32
**TOTAL GOLF OPERATIONS-AGC 24,967.42 547.16
***TOTAL ARBORETUM GOLF CLUB FUND 24,967.42 547.16
All
t� t
�.o
F.
f "grow Pao; 44
AMVWALS Llgr
wpow
OPNKAIIM
t 'C-CM rM*DBE i EXPAMOUNT MWWMMD
"284
OU A8 F N W 12.84
., TONS 86,412.84
SMVIM FUND W411.84
yp z
dy a U
4�
w
.. ' 19 r r
'tl
vy
i v
llw-
as ;� � �•�`s
� r
} azL
f
s
2
Date:06/28/07 12:12 Village of Buffalo Grove Page: 45
User.huotsa EXPENDITURE APPROVALS LIST
-Warrant Date 07/02/07
FUND NO. 000059
DEPT NO. 000550REFUSE SERVICE OPERATIONS
VENDOR# VENDOR NAME
INVOICE# VOUCHER ACCT#TSK OPT C-CTR ITEM DESCRIPTION EXP AMOUNT HAND-ISSUED
****TOTAL BILLS 946,413.49 5,399.49
ss Arm
Sid
Board Agenda Item Submittal LVA
Requested By: Robert E Pfeil Entered By: Robert E Pfeil
Agenda Item Title:
Public Hearing:Annexation and Development Agreement concerning the proposed Aptakisic Creek Corporate Park,
south side of Aptakisic Road north and west of the Leider Greenhouses
Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested:
Requested: Department:
0 Consent Agenda
06/27/2007 07/02/2007 Regular Agenda Planning
0 None
Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be
relate to another additional reference required to present
item on the info separate from the this item to the
agenda? Board packet? board?
0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No
Item Description
Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 NO
funds?
Additional Notes regarding Expenditures:
Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank.
Bridge Peerless LLC is requesting annexation with Industrial zoning for the Peerless property,
15823 W. Aptakisic Road and Preliminary Plan approval for the Peerless property and the vacant
parcel north of the Leider Greenhouses, 855 Aptakisic Road.
The Plan Commission conducted a public hearing on May 16, 2007, and voted 7 to 0 to
recommend approval of the Preliminary Plan. The Commission's recommendation was subject to
staff review of the revised site plan concerning driveway design and traffic access.
The overall site area is 28.7 acres, including the unincorporated Peerless parcels (18.9 acres) and
the vacant parcel (9.8 acres) north of the Leider Greenhouses.
The Peerless property is zoned Limited Industrial by Lake County. The vacant parcel north of
Leider is zoned Industrial by Buffalo Grove. The proposed warehouse and office uses are
permitted in the Village's Industrial District. The Village's Comprehensive Plan designates the
site for industrial development. The boundary agreement between Buffalo Grove and
Lincolnshire designates the area for office & research and industrial uses.
The site plan proposes to retain the existing Peerless building (173, 000 sq. ft.) and to construct a
new warehouse building (Facility #1, 187,598 sq.ft.) on the parcel to the north. A warehouse
building (146,250 sq. ft.)is proposed for the parcel north or the Leider Greenhouses.
The site plan provides a right-of-way dedication of 20 feet for Aptakisic Road. The Industrial
District requires a landscaped setback of 50 feet in width along major streets. The site plan
proposes that a portion of a parking lot circulation aisle for Facility #1, and a row of parking
stalls for Facility #2 be located within the required 50-foot landscaped setback abutting
Aptakisic Road. A zoning variation is requested to allow these encroachments.
The petitioner is requesting variations of the Village Development Ordinance concerning the
side slopes of the two stormwater management ponds that will be constructed.
Access to the site is currently provided by a private road between the Peerless building and the
Leider Greenhouses. The petitioner should review current and projected traffic flow in the area,
including possible connection to Industrial Drive west of the Peerless property, and access to the
private road for the Laidlaw school bus facility. The draft annexation and development
agreement requires Bridge Peerless LLC to construct a traffic signal on Aptakisic Road.
The Appearance Review Team (ART) had two meetings to discuss the two proposed buildings.
The ART worked with the petitioner to enhance the appearance of the building walls facing
Aptakisic Road to provide architectural details and attractive landscape screening. The building
walls will extend approximately 610 feet (Facility #1) and 560 feet(Facility #2) along Aptakisic
Road, so it is important that wall areas have architectural detailing and landscape screening to
avoid a monotonous appearance.
The exhibits to the annexation agreement will be distributed to the Village Board on June 29.
The draft annexation and development agreement, a location map and minutes of the May 16,
2007 Plan Commission hearing are attached.
Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized
Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files
Aptak Creek Corp Park—Staff memo_6-29-2007.pdf Exhibit I.PDF Exhiibit H.PDF
Aptakisic Creek Corp Park—Annex Agrmt_6-29-2007_A.pdf Exhibit B.PDF Exhibit D.PDF
Notice_Vill Bd_Aptakisic Creek Corp Park_6-13-2007.pdf Exhibit E.PDF Exhibit F.PDF
�I
Apatakisic Creek Corp Park_Certif of publcation Vill Bd hearing_6-1 6-2007.pdf Exhibit G.PDF
Approval Section: Draft
Name: Date and Time:
Submitted By:
Pre-Approved By:
Approved By:
Published to Web:
TO BE PUBLISHED 6/16/2007 APTAKISIC CREEK CORPORATE PARK ATAINFIld0i
VILLAGE OF APTAKISIC ROAD(SOUTH SIDE)WEST r
BUFFALO GROVE AND NORTH OF THE LEIDER GREENHOUSES ■
RauG)p Biva.
,3i,ac Grove !L 6008c 21,i(
a5�-25X NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Village
President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Buffalo Grove on Monday, July 2, 2007 at
7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Buffalo Grove Municipal Building, 50 Raupp Boulevard,
Buffalo Grove, IL concerning the following matter:
SUBJECT: Petition to the Village of Buffalo Grove for consideration of an annexation
agreement for annexation of the unincorporated tract described below with zoning in the
Industrial District, and approval of a Preliminary Plan for the entire property including the
unincorporated tract (approximately 19 acres) and incorporated tract(approximately 9.8 acres) as
described below, with the following variations pursuant to the proposed Preliminary Plan:
ZONING ORDINANCE - Section 17.48.020.F.5.a - To allow a thirty-foot (30) landscaped
setback,including a 10-foot wide public bike path,from the future Aptakisic Road right-of-way,
instead of fifty-feet. The proposed Preliminary Plan provides a dedication of twenty (20) feet of
right-of-way along the south side of Aptakisic Road as required by the Lake County
Department of Department of Transportation; DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE - Section
16.50.040.C.4 (Stormwater Detention Facilities) - To allow wetland bottom detention basins
with: (i) native wetland plantings, (ii) water that is approximately six inches deep, with deeper
sections at the locations of inlet and outlet pipes for the pond; (iii) side slopes of 4:1 between the
Normal Water Level ("NWL") and the High Water Level ("HWL"); (iv) retaining walls,between
the NWL and the HWL to accommodate the required detention amounts; and (v) decorative
safety fences around the entire perimeter to prevent pedestrian access; Section 16.50.040.D - To
allow the truck docks associated with Facility #2 to be one foot below the high water line of
Detention Basin B, instead of one foot above the high water line. Ponding will occur in the 100-
year storm event and only affect the wheel well area of the trailers.
The petitioner proposes to construct two new buildings (Facility #1 [approximately 187,598
square feet] and Facility # 2 [approximately 146,250 square feet]) and related site improvements,
and to renovate the existing Peerless of America building at 15823 W. Aptakisic Road.
APPLICANT: Bridge Peerless, LLC
c/o Danielle Cassel, Esq.
DLA Piper
203 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1900
Chicago, IL 60601
SUBJECT PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Unincorporated tract(approximately 19 acres):
THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27,TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH,RANGE 11,EAST
OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER,A DISTANCE OF 2650.80 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST
HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH
LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 415.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL
WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A
DISTANCE OF 680.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE
Page 2 of 3
SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 273.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWARD
(ON A COURSE THAT IF EXTENDED WOULD INTERSECT THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER AT A POINT BEING 571.75 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER),A DISTANCE OF 480.0 FEET;
THENCE WEST AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A
DISTANCE OF 390.0 FEET; THENCE NORTHWARD A DISTANCE OF 480.0 FEET; THENCE EAST AND
PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 116.09 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,IN LAKE COUNTY,ILLINOIS.
TOGETHER WITH
THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27,TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH,RANGE 11,EAST
OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 2650.80 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SAID
WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE EAST ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 415.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL WITH THE
EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE
OF 680.68 FEET; THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,
273.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1973.45 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER, SAID POINT BEING 571.75 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF
OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE,
571.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART THEREOF
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP
43 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER;THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST
HALF OF THE SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; A DISTANCE OF 2650.80 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF THE SAID WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 415.0
FEET;THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF
SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 680.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
EAST AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF
273.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWARD (ON A COURSE THAT IF EXTENDED WOULD INTERSECT THE
SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER AT A POINT BEING 571.75 FEET EAST OF THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER), A DISTANCE OF 480.0 FEET; THENCE WEST AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 390.0 FEET; THENCE NORTHWARD, A DISTANCE OF
480.0 FEET; THENCE EAST AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 116.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALSO EXCEPTING THAT
PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27 AFORESAID, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER, WHICH IS 1087.50 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID LINE 337.42 FEET; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE
PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 656.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
337.85 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER,636.85 FEET EAST OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL
LINE 636.85 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALSO EXCEPTING FROM THE FOREGOING, THAT
PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF
THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE
NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 1087.50 FEET; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 636.85 FEET TO A POINT ON THE MOST
EASTERLY LINE OF LANDS CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 1557315; THENCE
SOUTH ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 1088.86 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTH LINE 571.75 FEET
EAST OF SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER;THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE,571.75 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING, ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PART THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY OF THE
Page 3 of 3
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF APTAKISIC ROAD AS DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC ROAD
PURPOSES BY DOCUMENT 598568),IN LAKE COUNTY,ILLINOIS.
TOGETHER WITH
THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27,TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH,RANGE 11,EAST
OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON
THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 415.0 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH
PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER, 680.68 FEET; THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER, 273.91 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 657.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE "OLD" CENTERLINE
OF APTAKISIC ROAD (SAID OLD CENTERLINE BEING THAT WHICH EXISTED PRIOR TO THE RIGHT-
OF-WAY DEDICATION RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1946 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 598568), SAID POINT
BEING 156.93 FEET EASTERLY OF THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTERLINE OF ROAD WITH THE
NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF
ROAD, 156.93 FEET TO THE AFOREMENTIONED INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER, THENCE WEST ALONG NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,
158.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, (EXCEPTING THAT PART THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY
OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID APTAKISIC ROAD AS DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC
ROAD PURPOSES BY DOCUMENT 598568)IN LAKE COUNTY,ILLINOIS.
Incorporated tract(approximately 9.8 acres,within the Village of Buffalo Grove):
THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27,TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH,RANGE 11,EAST
OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TO WIT: COMMENCING AT A
POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AFORESAID, SAID POINT BEING 571.75
FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHERLY 2630.63 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF
APTAKISIC ROAD, SAID POINT BEING 156.93 FEET EASTERLY OF THE INTERSECTION OF SAID
CENTERLINE OF ROAD WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27,
TOWNSHIP AND RANGE AFORESAID; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID
APTAKISIC ROAD, 769.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 2527.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE
OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 27, SAID POINT BEING 571.75 FEET EAST OF THE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER,
571.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, (EXCEPTING THAT PART OF THE AFOREDESCRIBED
TRACT LYING SOUTH OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT A POINT 657.17 FEET
SOUTHERLY (AS MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT) FROM THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT;THENCE EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID WESTERLY LINE
TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT, AND ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PART OF THE
AFOREDESCRIBED TRACT LYING NORTH OF THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF APTAKISIC
ROAD AS DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC ROAD PURPOSES BY DOCUMENT 598568), IN LAKE COUNTY,
ILLINOIS.
SUBJECT PROPERTY COMMON DESCRIPTION: The approximately 28.8-acre tract, on the
south side of Aptakisic Road (including the Peerless of America building, 15823 W. Aptakisic
Road) west and north of the Leider Greenhouses, Aptakisic Road.
Documents submitted by the applicant for the public hearing concerning this petition are on file
with the Village Clerk and the Division of Planning Services, 50 Raupp Boulevard, and may be
examined by any interested persons.
All persons present at the Public Hearing will be given the opportunity to be heard.
Dated this 131h day of June, 2007.
Janet M. Sirabian, Village Clerk
Village of Buffalo Grove, IL
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION
Paddock Publications, Inc.
Daily Herald
Corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois,
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that it is the publisher of the DAILY HERALD.
That said DAILY HERALD is a secular newspaper and has been circulated daily in the
Village(s) of Algonquin, Arlington Heights, Barrington, Barrington Hills,
Lake Barrington, North Barrington, South Barrington, Bartlett, Batavia, Buffalo Grove,
Burlington, Carpentersville, Cary, Deer Park, Des Plaines, South Elgin, East Dundee,
Elburn, Elgin, Elk Grove Village, Fox Lake,Fox River Grove,Geneva, Gilberts,Grayslake,
Gurnee,Hampshire,Hainesville,Hanover Park,Hawthorn Woods,Hoffman Estates, Huntley,
Inverness,Island Lake,Kildeer,Lake Villa,Lake in the Hills,Lake Zurich,Libertyville,
Lincolnshire, Lindenhurst, Long Grove, Mt. Prospect, Mundelein, Palatine,
Prospect Heights, Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, Sleepy Hollow, St. Charles, Streamwood,
Tower Lakes,Vernon Hills,Volo,Wauconda,Wheeling,West Dundee,Wildwood,Green Oaks
County(ies) of Cook, Kane, Lake, McHenry
and State of Illinois, continuously for more than one year prior to the date of the first
publication of the notice hereinafter referred to and is of general circulation throughout said
Village(s), County(ies) and State.
I further certify that the DAILY HERALD is a newspaper as defined in "an Act to revise
the law in relation to notices" as amended in 1992 Illinois Compiled Statutes, Chapter 715,
Act 5, Section 1 and 5. That a notice of which the annexed printed slip is a true copy, was
published June 16, 2007 in said DAILY HERALD.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, the said PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, Inc.,
has caused this certificate to be signed by, this authorized agent, at Arlington Heights,
Illinois.
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, INC.
DAILY HERALD NEWSPAPERS
BY A ►C..J�� ,►
Auth rized Agent
Control # T3941050
n- NOTICE 04�PUBLIC HEARING TOGETHER WITH
!A
In
PUBLIC NOTICE IS H£ROGY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Village THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 43
°f Presidentand Board of Trusteesof the Village of Buffalo Groveon Monday,July 2,2007at NORTH,RANGE II,EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS
'Y 7:30 P.M.in The Council Chambers,Buffalo Grove Municipal Building,50 Raupp Boule- FOLLOWS:COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTH-
s'- vard,Buffalo Grove,IL concerning the following matter: WEST QUARTER,415.0 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST
s- HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER;THENCE SOUTH
n
SUBJECT:Petition to the Village of Buffalo Grove for consideration of an annexation - PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF -itagreement for annexation of the unincorporated tract described below with zoning in the SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,680.68 FEET;THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE
Industrial District,and approval of a Preliminary Pion for the entire property including SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,273.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH- '
•e the unincorporated tract (approximately 19 acres) and incorporated tract (approxi- I ERLY 657.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE"OLD"CENTERLINE OF APTAKISIC ROAD
)f mately 9.8 acres)as described below,with the following variations pursuant To The pro- (SAID OLD CENTERLINE BEING THAT WHICH EXISTED PRIOR TO THE RIGHT-
;, posed Preliminary Plan:ZONING ORDINANCE-Section 1 To allow a i OF-WAY DEDICATION RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1946 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER
I. thirty-foot(30)landscaped setback,including al0-fool-wt3 public I�bfrommefu- I 598568),SAID POINT BEING 156.93 FEET EASTERLY OF THE INTERSECTION OF
]- ture Aptakisic Road right-of-way,instead of fifty-feet.The proposed Preliminary Plan I SAID CENTERLINE OF ROAD WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST
�- provides a dedication of twenty(20)feet of right-of-way along the south side of Aptakisic QUARTER; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROAD, 156.93
Road as required by the Lake County Department of Department of Transportation;DE- FEET TO THE AFOREMENTIONED INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF
iVELOPMENT ORDINANCE-Section 1650 (Stormwater Detention Facilities)- SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, THENCE WEST ALONG NORTH LINE OF SAID
To allow wetland bottom detention basins w I native wetland plantings,(ii)water NORTHWEST QUARTER,158.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,(EXCEPT-
a that is approximately six inches deep,with deeper sections at the locations of inlet and ING THAT PART THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-
it outlet pipes for The pond; (iii) side slopes of 4:1 between The Normal Water Level WAY LINE OF SAID APTAKISIC ROAD AS DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC ROAD PUR-
d ("NWL")and the High Water Level"HWL");(iv)retainingwalls,between the NWL and - POSES BY DOCUMENT 598568)IN LAKE COUNTY,ILLINOIS.
r the HWL to accommodate the required detention amounts;and(v)decorative safety
ff fences around the entire perimeter to prevent pedestrian access;Section 16.50.040.D-To Incorporated tract(approximately 9.8 acres,within the Village of Buffalo Grove):
e allow the truck docks associated with Facility#2 to be one foot below the high water line 0f THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 43
Detention Basin B,instead of one foot above The high water line.Ponding will occur in the
100-vear storm event and only affect the wheel well area of the trailers. NORTH,RANGE 11,EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS
- FOLLOWS: TO WIT: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
The petitioner proposes to construct two new buildings (Facility#1 [approximately NORTHWEST QUARTER AFORESAID,SAID POINT BEING 571.75 FEET EAST OF
187,598 square feet]and Facility#'2(approximately 146,250 square feet])and related site - THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE
improvements,and To renovate The existing Peerless of America building at ISS23 W.Ap- NORTHWEST QUARTER;THENCE NORTHERLY 2630.63 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
takisic Road. CENTERLINE OF APTAKISIC ROAD,SAID POINT BEING 156.93 FEET EASTERLY
OF THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTERLINE OFROAD W ITH THE NORTH LINE
APPLICANT:Bridge Peerless,LLC ' OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27,TOWNSHIP AND RANGE AFORE-
c/o Danielle Cassel,Esq. SAID;THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID APTAKISIC ROAD,
DLA Piper 769.57 FEET;THENCE SOUTHERLY 2527.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE
203 N.LaSalle Street,Suite 1900 OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 27,SAID POINT BEING 571.75
Chicago,IL 60601 FEET EAST OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH
LINE OF. THE NORTHWEST QUARTER,571.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGIN-
SUBJECT PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: NING, (EXCEPTING THAT PART OF THE AFOREDESCRIBED TRACT LYING
Unincorporated tract(approximately 19 acres): SOUTH OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT A POI NT 657.17 FEET SOUTH-
ERLY(AS MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT)FROM THE
THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 43 NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; THENCE EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO
NORTH,RANGE 11,EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS SAID WESTERLY LINE TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT,
FOLLOWS:COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF AND ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PART OF THE AFOREDESCRIBED TRACT LYING
THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER;THENCE NORTH ALONG THE NORTH OF THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF APTAKISIC ROAD AS DEDI-
EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWESTQUAR- CATED FOR PUBLIC ROAD PURPOSES BY DOCUMENT 598568),IN LAKE COUNTY,
TER,A DISTANCE OF 2650.80 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST ILLINOIS.
HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE EAST
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,A DISTANCE OF 415.0 I SUBJECT PROPERTY COMMON DESCRIPTION:The approximately 28.8-acre tract,
FEET;THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF on the south side of Aptakisic Road(including the Peerless of America building,15823 W.
THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,A DISTANCE OF 660.68 FEET Aptakisic Road)west and north of the Leider Greenhouses,Aptakisic Road.
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,A DISTANCE OF 273.91 FEET; THENCE Documents submitted by the applicant for the Public hearing concerning this Petition are
SOUTHWARD (ON A COURSE THAT IF EXTENDED WOULD INTERSECT THE on file with The Village Clerk and the Division of Planning Services,50 Raupp Boulevard,
SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER AT A POINT BEING 571.75 and may be examined by any interested Persons.
FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST
HALF OF THE SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER), A DISTANCE OF 480.0 FEET; All Persons present at the Public Hearing will be given the opportunity To be heard.
THENCE WEST AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER,A DISTANCE OF 390.0 FEET;THENCE NORTHWARD A DISTANCE OF Dated This 13th day of June,2007.
480.0 FEET; THENCE EAST AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID Janet M.Sirobion,Village Clerk
NORTHWEST QUARTER,A DISTANCE OF 116.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGIN- Village of Buffalo Grove,IL
NING,IN LAKE COUNTY,ILLINOIS. Published in the Daily Herald June 16,2007(3941050)N
TOGETHER WITH
THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 43
NORTH,RANGE 11,EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF
THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER;THENCE NORTH ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER,A DISTANCE OF 2650.80 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE
SAID WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,415.0
FEET;THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF
THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,A DISTANCE OF 690.68 FEET;
THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUAR-
TER,273.91 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 1973.45 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,SAID POINT BEING 571.75 FEET EAST OF THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTH-
WEST QUARTER;THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE,571.75 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING(EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART THEREOF DE-
SCRI BED AS FOLLOWS:THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
27,TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH,RANGE 11,EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE
NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE .
SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER;A DISTANCE OF 2650.80 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF THE SAID WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SAID NORTH-
WEST QUARTER;THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER,A DISTANCE OF 415.0 FEET;THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL WITH THE
EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUAR-
TER,A DISTANCE OF 680.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE EAST
AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,A DIS-
TANCE OF 273.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWARD (ON A COURSE THAT IF EX-
TENDED WOULD INTERSECT THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER AT A POINT BEING 571.75 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER),A
DISTANCE OF 480.0 FEET; THENCE WEST AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,A DISTANCE OF 390.0 FEET; THENCE
NORTHWARD,A DISTANCE OF 480.0 FEET;THENCE EAST AND PARALLEL WITH
THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,A DISTANCE OF 116.09 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PART OF THE NORTH-
WEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27 AFORESAID,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:BEGIN-
NING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF
SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,WHICH IS 1087.50 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER;THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID LINE 337.42
FEET;THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER,656.45 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 337.85 FEET TO A POINT ON
A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,
636.85 FEET EAST OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE WEST ALONG SAID
PARALLEL LINE 636.85 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,ALSO EXCEPTING
FROM THE FOREGOING,THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SEC- _
TION 27,TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH,RANGE 11,EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL ME-
RIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST
HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER,A DISTANCE OF 1087.50 FEET;THENCE
EAST ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER,A DISTANCE OF 636.85 FEET TO A POINT ON THE MOST EASTERLY
THENCOE SOUTH ALONG SAID EASTERLYDLINE,1088 8E6 RECORDED
A POINT ON SAID
SOUTH LINE 571.75 FEET EAST OF SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER;THENCE WEST
ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE,571.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,ALSO EX-
CEPTING THAT PART THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF APTAKISIC ROAD AS DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC ROAD
PURPOSES BY DOCUMENT 598568),IN LAKE COUNTY,ILLINOIS.
Benda Item IX.A.—July 2.2007
MEMO
TO: William H. Brimm, Village Manager
FROM: Robert E. Pfeil, Village Planner
DATE: June 29, 2007
SUBJECT: Aptakisic Creek Corporate Park—revised annexation agreement
A revised draft of the annexation and development agreement and the exhibits are attached.
On June 28`h Village staff (William Brimm, Ghida Neukirch and Robert Pfeil) discussed the
6/26/07 draft of the agreement with Steve Poulos of Bridge Development Partners and Danielle
Cassel, his attorney. Mr. Poulos indicated that he is very concerned that the cost of constructing
and maintaining the traffic signal on Aptakisic Road would be paid completely by the proposed
Aptakisic Creek Corporate Park.
Mr. Poulos believes that it would be more equitable if the all costs related to the traffic signal
were shared proportionally by all properties that use the signal, including future development in
Lincolnshire on the north side of Aptakisic Road.
Village staff has advised Mr. Poulos that the Village will consider appropriate ways to address his
concerns about sharing the costs of the traffic signal. Staff will meet on July 2nd to discuss
possible actions that the Village could take concerning cost sharing, and these concepts will be
presented to the Village Board for direction.
The Village Engineer has commented the revised engineering plan will need further revisions
since the wall design of the east stormwater detention facility has not been modified as
recommended by the Plan Commission, a median needs to be added to the private road to ensure
safe traffic movements at the right-in driveway serving the proposed west building (Facility # 1
on the site plan), and details concerning off-site sanitary sewer(e.g. sizes of the pipes)need to be
corrected.
Village staff will work with the developer to resolve outstanding issues concerning the
annexation agreement and revisions to the engineering plans, and then present the final draft of
the agreement, mutually acceptable to the Village and the developer, to the Village Board for
formal consideration. The public hearing concerning the agreement should be continued to the
July 16`h Village Board meeting.
Robert E.Pfeil,1 lage Planner
6/29/07_A
New text shades
ANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Aptakisic Creek Corporate Park
This agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") made and entered into this
day of , 2007, by and between the VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE (hereinafter
referred to as "Village") by and through the President and Board of Trustees of the Village
(hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Corporate Authorities") and Peerless of America,
Incorporated,an Illinois corporation,and Chicago Title Land Trust Company,not individually but as
successor to American National Bank and Trust Company,as Trustee under Trust Agreement dated
April 27, 1998 and known as Trust Number 124048-02 (hereinafter collectively referred to as
"Owner") and Peerless Bridge, LLC an Illinois limited liability company(hereinafter referred to as
'Developer").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS,the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule Unit by virtue of the provisions of
the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970; and,
WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of a certain tract of property(hereinafter referred to as the
"Property") comprising approximately 28.8 acres legally described and identified in the Legal
Description,attached hereto as Exhibit A-1 and made a part hereof.The Property is comprised of the
following two parcels: (i) the approximately 9.8-acre parcel legally described and identified in the
Legal Description attached hereto as Exhibit A-2 and made a part hereof(the"Incorporated Parcel"),
which parcel is within the corporate limits of the Village, and(ii) the approximately 19-acre parcel
2
legally described and identified in the Legal Description attached hereto as Exhibit A-3 (the
"Unincorporated Parcel") and made a part hereof,which parcel is contiguous to the corporate limits
of the Village; and,
WHEREAS, a Plat of Annexation is attached hereto as EXHIBIT B, which depicts a total
area of 18.942 acres to be annexed; and,
WHEREAS, Owner and Developer desire and propose pursuant to the provisions and
regulations applicable to the Industrial District of the Village Zoning Ordinance to develop the
Property in accordance with and pursuant to a certain Preliminary Plan prepared by Cornerstone
Architects Ltd. and dated as last revised June 6, 2007, and also a certain Preliminary Engineering
Plan prepared by Manhard Consulting, Ltd. and dated as last revised June 26, 2007, (hereinafter
jointly referred to as "Preliminary Plan") a copy of which Preliminary Plan is attached hereto as
Exhibits D and E and incorporated herein, and subject to all other exhibits attached hereto or
incorporated by reference herein. Said development of the Property shall consist of the construction
of two new buildings (Facility #1 [approximately 188,215 square feet] and Facility # 2
[approximately 146,850 square feet])and related site improvements,and the renovation and re-use of
the existing Peerless of America building at 15823 W. Aptakisic Road; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5111-15.1-1 et seq., of the Illinois
Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5111-15.1-1 et seq.) and as the same may have been modified by the
Village's Home Rule powers,a proposed Annexation and Development Agreement was submitted to
the Corporate Authorities and a public hearing was held thereon pursuant to notice as provided by
Statute; and,
3
WHEREAS,pursuant to due notice and advertisement,the Plan Commission of the Village
has held a public hearing and made its recommendations with respect to the requested zoning
classification in the Industrial District and variations of the Village Development Ordinance and
Zoning Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS,the President and Board of Trustees after due and careful consideration
have concluded that the annexation of Unincorporated Parcel(legally described in Exhibit A-3) to
the Village, and its zoning and development and the development of the Incorporated Parcel on the
terms and conditions herein set forth would further enable the Village to control the development of
the area and would serve the best interests of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, mutual covenants and agreements
herein set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Applicable Law. This Agreement is made pursuant to and in accordance with the
provisions of Section 5111-15.1-1 et seq., of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5111-15.1-1 et
seq.) and as the same may have been modified by the Village's Home Rule powers. The preceding
Whereas clauses are hereby made a part of this Agreement.
2. Agreement:Compliance and Validity. The Owner has filed with the Village Clerk of
the Village a proper petition pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of Section 5/7-1-8 of
the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/7-1-8) and as the same may have been modified by the
Village's Home Rule powers, conditioned on the execution of this Agreement and the compliance
with the terms and provisions contained herein,to annex the Unincorporated Parcel to the Village. It
is understood and agreed that this Agreement in its entirety,together with the aforesaid petition for
4
annexation, shall be null,void and of no force and effect unless the Developer,within 60 days of the
Village's adoption of the Ordinance approving this Annexation and Development Agreement,
delivers written notice to the Village that the Developer has acquired the Property (the "Closing
Notice'), and the Unincorporated Parcel is validly annexed to the Village and is validly zoned and
classified in the Industrial District, all as contemplated in this Agreement. The foregoing 60-day
period may be mutually extended by the Village and Developer without a written amendment to this
Agreement.,
Except as set forth in Paragraph 25 hereof,no portion of the Property shall be disconnected
from the Village without the prior written consent of its Corporate Authorities.
3. Enactment of Annexation Ordinance. The Corporate Authorities,within twenty-one
(21) days of receiving the Closing Notice, will execute this Agreement and enact an ordinance
(hereinafter referred to as the "Annexation Ordinance") annexing the Unincorporated Parcel to the
Village. Said Annexation Ordinance shall be recorded at the Lake County Recorder's Office along
with the Plat of Annexation (attached hereto as Exhibit B).
4. Enactment of Zoning Ordinance. Within twenty-one (21) days after the passage of
the Annexation Ordinance, the Corporate Authorities shall enact an ordinance zoning the
Unincorporated Parcel of the Property in the Industrial District subject to the restrictions further
contained herein and all applicable ordinances of the Village of Buffalo Grove as amended from time
to time. Said zoning shall be further conditioned on the development of the Property in accordance
with the Preliminary Plan(Exhibits D and E) and other exhibits attached hereto or incorporated by
reference herein.
5
5. Approval of Plans. The Corporate Authorities hereby approve the Preliminary Plan
(Exhibits D and E)pursuant to the provisions of the Development Ordinance for the Property. The
Corporate Authorities agree to approve a Development Plan(including plats of subdivision)based on
final versions of the plans and drawings of the development of the Property as submitted by the
Owner or Developer provided that the Development Plan shall:
a) conform to the approved Preliminary Plan, and
b) conform to the terms of this Agreement and all applicable Village Ordinances
as amended from time to time; and
C) conform to the approved Development Improvement Agreement as amended
from time to time.
6. Compliance with Applicable Ordinances. The Owner and Developer agree to comply
with all ordinances of the Village of Buffalo Grove as amended from time to time in the
development of the Property,provided that all new ordinances, amendments,rules and regulations
relating to zoning,building and subdivision of land adopted after the date of this Agreement shall not
be arbitrarily or discriminatorily applied to the Property but shall be equally applicable to all property
similarly zoned and situated to the extent possible. Developer,in the development of the Property,
shall comply with the standards set forth in the Village of Buffalo Grove Development Ordinance as
amended from time to time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Village shall not apply new
ordinances or regulations to the Property to the extent that the ordinances or regulations would
prevent development of the Preliminary Plan approved herein.
7. Amendment of Plan. If the Developer desires to make changes to
to the Preliminary Plan, as herein approved, the parties agree that such changes to the Preliminary
6
Plan will require, if the Village so determines, the submission of amended plats or plans, together
with proper supporting documentation,to the Plan Commission and/or the Corporate Authorities to
consider such changes to the Preliminary Plan. The Corporate Authorities may, in their sole
discretion,require additional public hearings and may review the commitments of record contained
in this Agreement,including,but not limited to fees,prior to final consideration of any change to the
Preliminary Plan. The Village Manager is hereby authorized to approve such minor changes as he
deems appropriate, provided that no such changes:
a) involves a reduction of the area set aside for common open space
b) increases by more than two percent(2%)the floor area proposed for nonresidential use
c) increases by more than two percent(2%) the total ground area covered by buildings
8. Building Permit Fees. The building permit fees may be increased from time to time
so long as said permit fees are applied consistently to all other developments in the Village to the
extent possible. In the event a conflict arises between the Owner or Developer and the Village on
any engineering and technical matters subject to this Agreement, the Village reserves the right to
pass along any and all additional expenses incurred by the use of consultants in the review and
inspection of the development from time to time. Owner or Developer shall pay any non-
discriminatory new or additional fees hereinafter charged by the Village to owners and developers of
properties within the Village.
9. Water Provision. The Developer shall be permitted and agrees to tap on to the
Village water system at points recommended by the Village Engineer which points to the extent
shown on Exhibit E are hereby approved by the Village. It is understood, however, that changes to
7
the Preliminary Engineering Plan may be required at the time of Final Engineering. The Developer
further agrees to pay to the Village such fees in accordance with the applicable Village Ordinances at
the time of the issuance of the water and sewer permits. The Developer agrees to accept any increase
in water rates and tap on fees provided such rates and fees apply consistently to all other similar
users in the Village to the extent possible. Following such tap on, the Village agrees to provide to
the best of its ability and in a non-discriminatory manner water service to all users on the Property in
accordance with the Preliminary Plan. Watermains serving the Property and those approved as part
of the development shall be installed by the Developer and, except for service connections to the
buildings shall,upon installation and acceptance by the Village through formal acceptance action by
the Corporate Authorities,be dedicated to the Village and become a part of the Village water system
maintained by the Village.
10. Storm and Sanitary Sewer Provisions.
a) The Corporate Authorities agree to cooperate with the Developer and to use
their best efforts to aid Owner/Developer in obtaining such permits from governmental agencies
having jurisdiction as may be necessary to authorize connection from the proposed development to
the Lake County Department of Public Works for the collection of sewage and to the Lake County
Division of Transportation as may be appropriate. The Developer shall construct on-site and off-site
sanitary sewers as may be necessary to service the Property, in accordance with Exhibit E. It is
understood,however,that changes to the Preliminary Engineering Plan may be required at the time
of Final Engineering. Upon installation and acceptance by the Village through formal acceptance
action by the Corporate Authorities, the Corporate Authorities agree to operate and maintain such
8
systems,except for sanitary sewer service connections. The Developer agrees to accept any increase
in sewer rates and tap on fees,provided that such fees and rates are applied consistently to all similar
users in the Village to the extent possible.
b) The Developer shall also construct any storm sewers which may be
necessary to service the Property, in accordance with Exhibit E. It is understood, however, that
changes to the Preliminary Engineering Plan may be required at the time of Final Engineering.
11. Drainage Provisions. The Developer shall fully comply with any request of the
Village Engineer related to the placement of buildings on lots, to preserve drainage standards. The
Developer shall install any storm sewers and/or inlets which are required to eliminate standing water
or conditions of excess sogginess which may,in the opinion of the Village Engineer,be detrimental
to the growth and maintenance of lawn grasses.
12. Developer Recapture of Utility Costs. It is further understood and agreed that
a portion of the sanitary sewer to be constructed and installed by the Developer to serve the proposed
development on the Property(hereinafter referred to as"Owner's Improvements")maybe required by
the Village to be so located and/or oversized as to benefit vacant neighboring properties not owned
by the Developer, thus making such utility service available thereto. The Corporate Authorities
agree to adopt an ordinance to permit the Developer to recapture from such vacant neighboring
property owners as may be benefited by the Owner's Improvements,that portion of the actual costs of
oversizing the construction and installation of Owner's Improvements,in such proportionate amounts
from such neighboring property owners as may be so benefited as determined by the Village. Said
recapture ordinance shall only be enforceable for seven(7)years from its passage. The Village and
9
Developer agree to use their best efforts to cooperate to achieve the most practical and feasible route
to the off-site utilities connection points. The Village agrees to cooperate with the Owner/Developer
in effectuating recapture from future developers and property owners as appropriate.
The Village shall be entitled to a five percent(5%) fee from any amounts recaptured as and
for its collection efforts.
13. Payment of Recapture Fees Owed. Any amount of recapture required to be paid by
this Property shall be due and payable to the Village upon final platting of the first plat of
subdivision of any portion of the Property.
14. Security for Public and Private Site Improvements. Security for public and private
site improvements shall be provided in accordance with the Development Ordinance, and the
Development Improvement Agreement (Exhibit C) as amended from time to time. Any letter of
credit issued for such improvements shall be drawn on a financial institution of net worth reasonably
satisfactory to the Village Attorney. The issuer may have an equitable or lending interest in the
Property provided that the letter of credit,either by its own terms or by separate written assurances of
the issuer, shall be honored irrespective of that interest. The Village shall have the right to draw up
to the full amount of the letter of credit in order to complete, and have formal acceptance of, all
improvements secured by the letter of credit.
15. Right of Way Dedication. The Owner and Developer acknowledge that the Lake
County Division of Transportation requires a dedication of 20 feet along Aptakisic Road as depicted
on Exhibit E hereto. At the request of the Village,but no later than upon approval of the first plat of
subdivision of any portion of the Property, Owner and Developer agree to dedicate the property
10
required to achieve said dedication.
16. Exhibits. The following Exhibits, some of which were presented in testimony
given by the Developer or the witnesses during the hearings held before the Plan Commission and
the Corporate Authorities prior to the execution of this Agreement, are hereby incorporated by
reference herein, made a part hereof and designated as shown below.
EXHIBIT A-1 Legal Description
EXHIBIT A-2 Legal Description
EXHIBIT A-3 Legal Description
EXHIBIT B Plat of Annexation dated as last revised April 18, 2007 by Manhard
Consulting, Ltd.
EXHIBIT C Development Improvement Agreement
EXHIBIT D Preliminary Plan (site plan) dated as last revised June 6, 2007 by
Cornerstone Architects, Ltd.
EXHIBIT E Preliminary Engineering Plan dated as last revised June 26, 2007 by
Manhard Consulting, Ltd.
EXHIBIT F Preliminary Landscape Plan dated as last revised June 25, 2007 by
Allen L. Kracower& Associates
EXHIBIT G Site photometric plan dated as last revised June 26, 2007 by ABCO
Electrical Construction and Design LLC
EXHIBIT H Architectural Rendering by Cornerstone Architect, Ltd.
EXHIBIT I Exterior building elevations by Cornerstone Architect, Ltd.
17. Building,Landscaping and Aesthetics Plans. Developer will submit exterior building
elevations and landscaping plans (which elevations and landscaping plans shall conform to the
11
appearance package for the Property recommended by the Village Appearance Review Team and
Village Plan Commission) for final approval by the Village before commencing construction of
buildings. Lighting and signage shall be compatible with surrounding areas as approved by the
Village.Phases not under construction or completed shall be maintained in a neat and orderly fashion
as determined by the Village Manager.
18. Declaration of Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions. The Property shall be subject
to a declaration of covenants,conditions and restrictions("Declaration")which shall include but not
by way of limitation a provision whereby the Village shall have the right,but not the obligation, to
enforce covenants or obligations of the Owner,Developer or association and/or owners of the units
of the Property as defined and provided with the Declaration, and further shall have the right, upon
thirty(30) days prior written notice specifying the nature of a default,to enter upon the Property and
cure such default, or cause the same to be cured at the cost and expense of the Owner,Developer or
association of the Property. The Village shall also have the right to charge or place a lien upon the
Property for repayment of such costs and expenses,including reasonable attorneys'fees in enforcing
such obligations.
The Declaration shall include,but not by way of limitation,covenants and obligations to own
and maintain the stormwater ponds and drainage system depicted on Exhibit E. The Declaration
shall also include the obligation that the association shall provide snow removal for private
driveways and public sidewalks and shall store excess snow in appropriate off-street locations, and
shall not in any way impede the Village's snow removal operations on public streets.
12
The Declaration shall also provide that the Property shall be used and developed in
accordance with Village ordinances,codes and regulations applicable thereto,including ordinance(s)
enacted pursuant to this Agreement. The Declaration shall be submitted to the Village for review and
approval,and shall further provide that the provisions relative to the foregoing requirements may not
be amended without the prior approval of the Village.
The Declaration shall also provide that the Village may enforce its ordinances,including but
not by way of limitation traffic ordinances,on the Property,including private property and common
areas.
19. Annexation to the Buffalo Grove Park District. The Owner and Developer agree, at
the request of the Buffalo Grove Park District, to annex all of the subject Property to said Park
District. Said annexation shall be completed within sixty days (60) days of the request of the Park
District.
20. Facilitation of Development. Time is of the essence of this Agreement,and all parties
will make every reasonable effort to expedite the subject matters hereof. It is further understood and
agreed that the successful consummation of this Agreement and the development of the Property is
in the best interests of all the parties and requires their continued cooperation. The Owner and
Developer do hereby evidence their intention to fully comply with all Village requirements, their
willingness to discuss any matters of mutual interest that may arise,and their willingness to assist the
Village to the fullest extent possible. The Village does hereby evidence its intent to cooperate in the
resolution of mutual problems and its willingness to facilitate the development of the Property, as
contemplated by the provisions of this Agreement.
13
21. Enforceability of the Agreement. This Agreement shall be enforceable in any court of
competent jurisdiction by any of the parties or by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure
the performance of the covenants herein described. If any provision of this Agreement is held
invalid, such provision shall be deemed to be excised herefrom and the invalidity thereof shall not
affect any of the other provisions contained herein.
22. Term of Agreement. This Agreement is binding upon the Property,the parties hereto
and their respective grantees, successors and assigns for a term of twenty(20)years from the date of
this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be assigned without prior written consent of the Village.
This Agreement may be amended by the Village and the owner of record of a portion of the Property
as to the provisions applying thereto, without the consent of the owners of other portions of the
Property.
23. Corporate Capacities. The parties acknowledge and agree that the individuals that
are members of the group constituting the Corporate Authorities are entering into this Agreement
in their official capacities as members of such group and shall have no personal liability in their
individual capacities.
24. Notices. Any notice required pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement shall be in
writing and be sent by certified mail to the following addresses until notice of change of address is
given and shall be deemed received on the fifth business day following deposit in the U.S. Mail.
If to Developer: Bridge Peerless, LLC
233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 375
Chicago, IL 60606
14
Copy to: Danielle Meltzer Cassel
DLA Piper US LLP
203 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1900
Chicago, IL 60601
If to Village: Village Clerk
Village of Buffalo Grove
50 Raupp Boulevard
Buffalo Grove, IL 60089
Copy to: William G. Raysa, Esq.
Raysa& Zimmermann, LLC.
22 S. Washington Ave
Park Ridge, IL 60068
25. Default.
a) In the event Owner or Developer default in performance of their obligations
set forth in this Agreement,then the Village may,upon notice to Owner or Developer,allow Owner
or Developer sixty(60)days to cure default or provide evidence to the Village that such default will
be cured in a timely manner if it cannot be cured during said period. If Owner or Developer fail to
cure such default or provide such evidence as provided above, then, with notice to Owner or
Developer, the Village may begin proceedings to disconnect from the Village any portion of the
Property upon which obligations or development have not been completed or at the option of the
Village, to rezone such Property to the Residential Estate District. In such event, this Agreement
shall be considered to be the petition of the Owner or Developer to disconnect such portion of the
Property, or at the option of the Village, to rezone such Property to the Residential Estate District
b) In addition to sub-paragraph a) hereof, it is recognized by the parties hereto
that there are obligations and commitments set forth herein which are to be performed and provided
by the Developer not by the Owner. The Village agrees that the Owner as such is exculpated from
15
any personal liability or obligation to perform the commitments and obligations set forth herein and
that the Village will look solely to the Developer for such performance,except that to the extent that
the Owner or successor thereto shall become a developer or shall designate or contract with a
developer other than Peerless Bridge, LLC. In that case, the Owner or the new designee shall be
subject to the liabilities,commitments and obligations of this Agreement. In the event the Developer
defaults in its obligations created under this Agreement, the Village may enforce such obligations
against the Property Owner.
26. Liti_ate
a) The Owner and Developer,at their cost, shall be responsible for any litigation
which may arise relating to the annexation, zoning and development of the Property. Owner and
Developer shall cooperate with the Village in said litigation but Owner/Developer's counsel will
have principal responsibility for such litigation.
b) The Owner and Developer shall reimburse the Village for reasonable
attorneys'fees, expenses and costs incurred by the Village resulting from litigation relating to the
annexation,zoning and development of the Property or in the enforcement of any of the terms of this
Annexation and Development Agreement upon a default by the Owner or Developer.
c) Owner and Developer hereby indemnify and hold the Village harmless from
any actions or causes of action which may arise as a result of development activities for which the
Owner or Developer is responsible.
27. Special Conditions.
a) The following variation of the Village Zoning Ordinance is hereby granted:
16
Section 17.48.020.F.5.a—To allow a thirty-foot(30)landscaped setback,including a
10-foot wide public bike path,from the future Aptakisic Road right-of-way,instead of fifty-feet.The
proposed Preliminary Plan provides a dedication of twenty(20)feet of right-of-way along the south
side of Aptakisic Road as required by the Lake County Department of Department of
Transportation.
b) The following variations of the Village Development Ordinance are hereby
granted:
Section 16.50.040.C.4 (Stormwater Detention Facilities)—To allow wetland bottom
detention basins with: (i)native wetland plantings,(ii)water that is approximately six inches deep,
with deeper sections at the locations of inlet and outlet pipes for the pond; (iii) side slopes of 4:1
between the Normal Water Level("NWL")and the High Water Level("HWL");(iv)retaining walls,
between the NWL and the HWL to accommodate the required detention amounts; and (v)
decorative safety fences around the entire perimeter to prevent pedestrian access;
Section 16.50.040.D—To allow the truck docks associated with Facility#2 to be one
foot below the high water line of Detention Basin B,instead of one foot above the high water line.
Ponding will occur in the 100-year storm event and only affect the wheel well area of the trailers.
C) It is understood and agreed that the Village of Buffalo Grove levies a real
estate transfer tax on all conveyances of real property in the Village. From and after the execution of
this"'Agreement, any transfer of the;Property shall be subject to the payment of such real estate
transfer tax or an equivalent cash payment to the;Village, notwithstanding that the Property is not
annexed to the Village.Said payment shall be due prior to the approval of the first plat of subdivision
for any portion of the Property.
17
d) It is understood and agreed that upon annexation the Village will issue new
street address(es) for building(s) on the Property to ensure proper identification for provision of
services, and Owner shall use said Village address(es) in place of current address(es) assigned by
Lake County. Owner is also required to contact the Buffalo Grove Post Office and submit a change
of address(es)requesting use of the address(es) as assigned by the Village.
e) Owner(and Developer)represent and warrant that the only mortgagee, lien
holder or holder of any security interest affecting title to the Property or any part thereof is
X X by its written approval of this Agreement acknowledges
that this Agreement is superior to its security interest in the Property.
OR
Owner (and Developer) represent and warrant that there are no mortgages, liens or other
security interest affecting title to the Property or any part thereof.
f) Owner shall deposit with the Village the amount necessary to reimburse the
Village for any real estate tax payments made by the Village to the Long Grove Rural Fire Protection
District concerning the Property pursuant to Section 705/20 of the Illinois Fire Protection Act(70
ILCS 705/20). Said deposit, as determined by the Village, shall be made by the Owner within sixty
(60) days of the date of this Agreement.
g) Traffic Enforcement Agreement—The Owner shall, at the request of the
Village, enter into an agreement for the enforcement of Village traffic ordinances and other
ordinances on the Subject Property.
18
h) Owner and Developer shall provide a reservation of land on the Property for
the addition of an outbound lane at the intersection of the private road on the Property and Aptakisic
Road, and the location and size of said reservation shall be provided as approved by the Village
Engineer. Upon a determination by the Village that an outbound lane needs to be implemented,
Owner and Developer shall construct same and shall provide a public ingress and egress easement
necessary for the outbound lane. Developer shall install a traffic signal on Aptakisic Road at the
intersection with the private road serving the Property within one year of the date of the approval of
the first plat of subdivision for any portion of the Property. Developer shall pay for the cost of said
installation and Developer shall pay the costs of the repair,replacement,upgrading,modernization,
maintenance and energy for said signal, and Developer shall execute an agreement with the Village
concerning payment of said costs.
i) Developer shall pay a fire equipment impact fee of$0.75 per gross square
foot of building area for any new building constructed on the Unincorporated Parcel. Said fee shall
be paid at the time of issuance of building permits.
j) Developer shall make best efforts to secure an easement providing access for
emergency vehicles and equipment from the property adjoining the Property to the west for use of
the "crash gate emergency entrance" as depicted on Exhibit D.
k) Developer shall allow access to the private road serving the Property for other
properties south of the Property subject to appropriate conditions agreed to by the respective property
owners,
19
1) Any revisions to the existing ingress and egress easements that have been
recorded on the Property shall be subject to review and approval of the Village.
m) Any signs proposed for the Property are subject to the provisions of the
Village Sign Code and are not approved by this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporate Authorities, Owner and Developer have caused this
instrument to be executed by their respective proper officials duly authorized to execute the same on
the day and the year first above written.
VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
By
ELLIOTT HARTSTEIN, Village President
ATTEST:
By
VILLAGE CLERK
20
OWNER:
By
DEVELOPER:
By
This document prepared by:
Mail to:
Village Clerk
Village of Buffalo Grove
50 Raupp Boulevard
Buffalo Grove, IL 60089
MX-,ANNV�39 01 AH011HU31A0 dVvw
................
. ..........
101a
-—------ 'Pj�� twIllisuoo
NOISRAPOUNr)*Wd SS-3NllSfiaA93tj3 DISIAVldv
.......... ............SION111111Ao"I'Dolv
pjequeW� ...... ........
..........
F.
U'�
WI
CD
>
CD
Gad
2-A
z
z
Lm
g",
LU lU A
x ui
w >
yw
Z 0
0 U.
CC ()
o LL,
o
LU >1
lw
ILL 7-
Ji
CL 0
z
A
WIN AWS
ww
6 . 2190160
3+ t XI.r¢^,d wW d 4 ^'C'•W tq^Xb �,1*N KI.,CKn�n T I'""' ��dJ`��'J4&C.0,�y)d h..d
I
P Y' Cx
P L�1'�w..a �' w��L v�'�J J«,� if
n` r r,n. 3
... a P"' Y
Wr ,Ci I ,q, •m k �4 r P � �''�C&0. O ;
� *P m r .a^�+Z- �,
NWJGw �"
It U
un
/ « r r Lu M¢my "Y'o d ta".',,y+r,,,;,
'�.ry tw v ax
g
wsa .� i ..1
ur J�"a 1, ma
�' � ��r•* Le,'� f t,✓ n +n ds-.y^ �1 n MIS
wti„� ✓
cw:-.d m ✓" N Vwm, w X X�," s, r r'«r*z°d°.. r F cm,e •rr„' .:�
ue�^� � � wtm��"fu?� wr rT
OWN
�
w ot
RRP
4 Ni
ul
'gym" Iw II
—Ala
!
r/
a
II I
.e
r X
A
f
n Lu
� _ .. �m..
ou
w. .. u. w
»m,r
r CUMFFFTTVf]T' if CTf��"�16Cci 1�1�°161 EiP�Tfw1`°a
TV I
E
+ edne•�err, awacndw ;s
r r ........�,t� �hr sr r�w
.,w
.4b ✓a � r✓��sd
..............
7
'v
m; u
Uj
Lu
cf-
71@'
l
y
,m
u I
1 �
}
fr
ttM h� d
u
if ae�waw¢e ui� ti itiH ,". r '`
w�
ku
�...
I4 lf� l�1
C, �G���� p a 4r I �rvr�d �'�a�: � + e�,,. ✓.r
� I �� �r l�a�) r�'`� ����a�� V�C��r id✓j �wd°3:ndi i r�,, arrant x ;. .. �
+ irwa " rvr
rva !
P1tW
r �..
nr
A dwrvn c w•""
x� ® vim- )I�� 6d S7'N �ritlr"W'iNA ver
tlITFw
cr
� d
LL4 9d i 1,
`yl'
uwi
„ a fh x nl l d f C Ski u, "
r J f•»F ti�l .dk�
w
U�LL
Lu g, 'i - �o- LI } 7roi a 11 I reap d ,n' p 4,r May
CC s '
131
pb I cr a � i
� i r
mu ,,,�
I
I
r
� r
—
x�
a°
t
1 >
,...." �.. .".�. a4
"�'�+r,�rwurwr
µ ° ✓ �✓iV'�u'IX"i'w� Al✓C I .,,,,,, ... "NA,i�9 e.�w MG�k40P 41hM'Y�NwV
a�aro^.a asp p
rvn - �� �,a Adh IWII'YPQk� IVAA OMN'�d'ht�'�19N'R+'r/4d3tYiWd1U"WN'1 IY�dI * ��
•� jj uilIn uaa ,#paleque X sv u a ��aa
. :w.._ ._...W_ _._
+; a
11
✓^r
I n!
°
YhWfLk YNJ W I IX II'JtIJ'�4TNI" � r� I
14 �I
.-auM �• �u._....�,',.._..fin." ",�":m aE_...."w..�,,,�.'�^ ,�+,,, w +.,yu;1,Mal.�br, ++,,�w. '�},.y - � ��
«
LL
°
l n � 0 I �
a
i
ZLu
cc
°(J
ar •;
CL
,..l.,
'� � -'✓`� ,rr tea~ &ffi �l ���� t.
s
A.
2 I
f N
cr
< 0 �
I
a
L'-UJ J "w
r �) LL k
jo
k
�.W
t �
O MWJ TP40~Y AWaAmw
a nxrvm — .. .. era« - .� i LSV3 kIAMIS NM�#WS�IWV'BkNIOVHU Ak�'�Mtl14Wll'ud
7
... ,m: pil °IAA j.nsuo o i m i I� �dlW a I � i izw rLdaVIP
r�7
;i r„,.,i V
;
. k �.,
..... -- _...,... —
,.
14,
ti
Ir � �£Try
Y� t
I
u ,
0 fi
Owl
�k
�llJ
law
AL
La
f w
r
P
www�4w uMw ww�ww M
, .
M0U4VW0WM&OW-I 2MA
p;j BuilIn uo pjlequ�o wawa r.. ......
....__ I
V
�'r rfFRf�ape 1r�G�+P,ifilfi?"FIFp�3 �4�LFpCT �r7 � C+T��T.�r� �^
B �. ,.r+"
a
p
u
o
tip^ WPM VOre
�matm�
u ^i
F
a
a t i
i
( N MMM
� m� �, �.�� ....�`.0 4rt�1� � � I �➢/
"till
�7
� Lppµ
F w... jJ'" n✓'Y ,'y','a ` .;;,�'r y!",r'W
w � i
i
ap,r J
... ..........._
7g� I i
9
u
ppAk
F
MKdY1W'HadN1'.$'AM1G'�7 Ati'.�'.ti 3 thffi`TW n'vyMtv4'J°"C'����ad'
L , ".. iruariuu�riunu� ��vmamro��nMdna� ir ,... { l l. .,.
y ryry ��yyLo
pim
mew
V,J I,ib� �...�La�n..d' rc,k..:°u 58k�'V'rll A6n id l'hk�C�D A3381 � a
: + iV14V
.__....� .. _.....
r
-' � - '�uWNavHsaie
w
r�
ry
�1 I f _ J
777 T
,.
17777-1
{ ,
Ts
10
� I'P
.�,�•.�. ' III r �l i + '�:�`r z ! ,.,
w
,1_f
y
kil y mmII
Jd Irli.. " 4n.. m mr
{
uu
r
so
Ix
I � rU
I
� J
f
u�
I qq !r m,R
PY
j pp
A mp w"�5
m
rr+ 1
"GIHU
k q �
r a
MCI
r w.:
W wxy y 7r4 6 �, Fr 1
10
0
.X G�� e, ;r✓.Y, � d .a,,r ,,;s� YF';7 �. �„( rinr .Y`` R
,
YP'9 iw<.n ?rrr,�LU
Gk
z EL
EL
ui
.
W
LL
u u
f i
'"p
U— < lYa j
_ a
qr
1
��ryry yy � 4dN
I j
1
E + Cl)
( 4Y
LU
ui
uj
FI ». ayy k
mW
r 1°
r
e�
II
�`r"4f{p{yY'kY) IVtfl l ir;QM/A�.C.InJb V h P.f'M'hVIY il"G 1A I -- '� � d
k
,
t �q
21
IN
�
—w@i
IOL
<jz
�
16
ly
P n19
� .
rJ� lk
m,r
71
uj
1
a
7
�r
r
"a w rl
mmyy
4 r-
6
CJ
W-.grY'7 Uklh iPdxlprd ��" w's. �l�
V
µlay
1 j�PAFp.E E'V{aF MdW'Pui�d d'�!'nlCt>n'71 A2YVfYWIN°dl Pil7B+t ,..... ✓
- ------I--,'........... ..............
Mti
.............
p _ _
66�� II
. .... . ...............
Vi wy
UjI Y ��d
f(^rd d iP
1 _J
u 5 �
oilt
8 <
4
a
M �x" , r wit
rwti
r
f
a �..
1 ✓
4 �
x
mod( �.. ..,
i
ui
ui
w y
,,,, dxUPsti V . �y1'F;L!"S"f C7 '4
a'.N r a w. R
U IR IrM^If!' Id ;/dP P Id (:( lMld 1t9 F °�
Imo' C,5
9;
ww. �air � �• �,
� .w rvrr'Wrrr � vr'
,,a
r
Y(dnuNI1°w td GNi IV 1 d,
Vd '-:]1, ' dW0 NA3180 3lSNVicJV
I�
L?vdbllkdY.1M Mod n�,u0d'�":w";t„pY•pW1.F�,9wdlhduYMbl llYk9r� � ,� •..
&ORpµ:
� µ
ii iz TMpfuu
11 l p
iLLJ '� rlH
P
r
Y
r �
9 r
1
f
f
f
r ,
w4�{v
\ I j i
Jf(JI( 7J(+t
r
x�
f f
9 t �J
it 1d u
Y ff
-
I v�h y1 +pJ — A
i
JTZ
o - p
6rlJl cC'
4 I R I y 1
rf ,htA`JNrkx YfWrvfT['� �W�„w, SIOM 11 '3- A0 0 11P J Ra
............-
-
IN
6uj
ku r
y.:
.—M
1121,
1 I f.1: "y,4 r" � "�r ,✓; —. ,f n,_ � n,., .,4,.,i+.�" w,��i � �r
n ✓o i� i le, � i'f i� `�� �i ` 1 a
Iu' A
_fl a. 11 {� W C'P
[r 'Rlry
I ��9p��pp 11 jpryl
„
fi N
(
( n
�1 f N
1
UT
I
" 34CL
ti^
If
ui
I L �
rt �xi 4, 5 f
(o
i I
� ('�
u.n
l M
'CD�
uj
.. ..as~(,,,� .��.�I�].:�;�w�wlw,,J„1.�,4�.�� ,1��. r"'�Y,�' W„w�d��j.•"r,.r��� �"�7w� �rGw����, n�s�r f ,,
DAING w8isnIGN1
mrca
.....
au��EucvrlaY-sr,,Tis"israai,r
lfP
a
r
,4
I »s
pq
uj U"+Y ,
'r Egli p + ash
n
Ir * � rtR " t� ��
M'
q�
e
u r
HIM,
t i e ,6 ,", ,�,u°'� �+�i.x'.U .4�„ �{ ,i� �,�, x} �✓�, ��r� „t? '�M '"�' �� Y �''..� Y�� y�r
ur �y
HOP
�a
u,
f
r
l
IN Pop lil
Wry J
uj
4
z'
,J
Lu
cr
CL
z ,
a
M ' P J Wr
.....--- .. ....... ...... .,, .. _....._ _....
lui
�
r OISIAVidV
ui
» , „ ..
°
IN
Zz
w �,yyyyy
w."auww� .mw ,wi
�dw „
"
Z
x
„
"
D C"?
r
` 'L *
t �M
0
iu 5
q
n�
r b
" b
u
ro f"g F W
„
'ba v n 9 M b ... .__..___ _
ti
rvx 1
4
o Wn'9I � � b W%4ty W'�F�y L,d• � y�
u"
� 1
b a
ig
m.
9
w. Y
Fr
�.W
.wW
ci
C:
Y �
uu
n
IU
�uuuu
im
1`1 f
fr i f
I u
r a I
i
r
e
l
U/
Lu
J�
r
IZ
i
Lu
4Y 1 m:
y O .
w
N 09
1
HIP
Rill
Alan NOW
ill
fill,
-77
c _a
4.
m' 1
r�
r Lul
m . .
Lul
�ry
Board Agenda Item Submittal xIV A
Requested By: Robert E Pfeil Entered By: Robert E Pfeil
Agenda Item Title:
Plan Commission Referral:Special Use in the Industrial District for outside storage, Peerless of America property,
15823 W. Aptakisic Road
Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested:
Requested: Department:
0 Consent Agenda
06/27/2007 07/02/2007 Regular Agenda Planning
0 None
Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be
relate to another additional reference required to present
item on the info separate from the this item to the
agenda? Board packet? board?
0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No
Item Description
Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 NO
funds?
Additional Notes regarding Expenditures:
Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank.
Peerless Bridge LLC has petitioned for a special use for outside storage in the Industrial District.
The property is the unincorporated Peerless of America building at 15823 W. Aptakisic Road.
The property is zoned Limited Industrial by Lake County, and is currently being considered for
annexation to Buffalo Grove with Industrial zoning. The Peerless building is located on proposed
Lot 3 of the proposed Aptakisic Creek Corporate Park.
Peerless Bridge LLC is the contract purchaser of the property. Prime Source Building Products
would be the building tenant and user of the outside storage area. The attached narrative by the
petitioner provides details concerning the proposed outside storage area, and addresses the
special use criteria of the Village Zoning Ordinance.
At the referral meeting, the petitioner should explain the proposed fence, including the height
and type of construction, and appearance from Aptakisic Road.
The petitioner's packet is attached. The packet includes the Petition for Concept and
Preliminary Plan Review, a narrative concerning the use and a concept plan.
Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized
Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files
Approval Section: Draft
Name: Date and Time:
Submitted By:
Pre-Approved By:
Approved By:
Published to Web:
Board Agenda Item Submittal xIv B
Requested By: Edward Schar Entered By: Julie C Kamka
Agenda Item Title:
Appeal of the Zoning Board of Appeals decision to deny the request made by John S.Swift Company,999 Commerce
Court,for variation of Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.48.020.F.6
Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested:
Requested: Department:
06/26/2007 07/02/2007 0 Consent Agenda g&Z
Regular Agenda
0 None
Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be
relate to another additional reference required to present
item on the info separate from the this item to the
agenda? Board packet? board?
0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No
Item Description
Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 No
funds?
Additional Notes regarding Expenditures:
Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank.
Request was made by John S. Swift Company, 999 Commerce Court, for variation of Zoning Ordinance,
Section 17.48.020.F.6,pertaining to Industrial Districts,for the purpose of allowing a twenty foot (20')
encroachment into the required sixty foot (60')Transitional Yard (rear yard) setback for the purpose of
constructing an addition to the building.
Public hearings were held on Tuesday, May 15, 2007 and Tuesday, June 19, 2007. Mr. Mike Ford,
President, Mr. Robert Masters,Vice President of Operations, and Mr. Dean Fraiser,Vice President of
Production,John S. Swift Company, 999 Commerce Court,testified at the public hearing and presented
documentary evidence.
The following objectors appeared at the hearing: Mr. Dennis Grant, 769 Horatio Boulevard, Buffalo
Grove, Illinois 60089; Mr. Alan Kolesky, 747 Horatio Boulevard, Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089; Cary
Rosenbloom, 741 Horatio Boulevard, Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089; Dave Bieber, 753 Horatio
Boulevard, Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089; and Sue Rosenblatt, 737 Horatio Boulevard, Buffalo Grove,
Illinois 60089.
The Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously voted to deny the request. The Commissioners found that the
Petitioner did not meet the burden of presenting sufficient evidence to show that the proposed addition
would not allow the property to yield a reasonable return;that the proposed addition would not be
detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare and would not alter the essential character of the
neighborhood. The Findings of Fact are attached.
Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized
Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files
999 Commerce Ck Mins&Findings.pdf
Approval Section: Draft
Name: Date and Time:
Submitted By:
Pre-Approved By:
Approved By:
Published to Web:
Join S. SWIFT Co.,inc.
999 COMMERCE COO INT • B141FAL0 GROvF • IL 60089-2375
June 25, 2007 PHONE: 847.465.3300 • F x: 847.465.3309
WEI3:www.johnswiftprint.com
Village of Buffalo Grove
50 Raupp Boulevard
Buffalo Grove, IL 60089
RE: Appeal of Decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals
Requested Variation
John S. Swift Co., Inc. is requesting a variance to allow us to erect a building addition 40
feet from our rear property line instead of the 60 feet as stipulated in the village building
code. This addition will be designed in a manner that is consistent with village guidelines
and enhance our current building. The approximate size of the addition will be 223' x
88' x 25'.
Unique circumstances pertaining to our request:
When we presented information to the ZBA on June 19, 2007 we had two plans: one that
required a zoning variation and a smaller alternative that did not. The following
information presents our case as to why a zoning variance is critical for our business and
why we believe it is best for our neighbors.
The need for a variance to code is based on the hardship and unacceptable financial
returns that reduced space would cause to the operation of our printing company. The
combination of equipment, material storage, and the space required to stage and move
materials necessitates a substantial amount of floor space. Limiting this space causes
significant excess costs, and inefficiencies in our production cycle, these include:
• Outside storage costs
• Increased transportation costs
• Increased costs for multiple receiving and loading of roll stock
• Increased traffic and vehicle pollution
• Need to manage multiple inventories
• Increased production time and labor costs
At this time, our company needs to grow and add additional capabilities to remain
competitive. We moved into our current facility, in Buffalo Grove, in 1993 with the
understanding that our property was expandable up to 30' from the property line.
Because of the nature of the printing business, our company would undergo undue
financial hardship if we are required to operate with less than the needed space. In
addition, relocating current operations to a new building is also not a viable option.
OFFSET PRINTING
I3i rr�i.0 GRu�r; CiNCiNNAT] SINCE 1912 EmEizvviu,E JOHN S. SWIFT PRINT
IL UH CA or'NJ, INC.
Relocation would result in damaging business interruptions and extremely high costs to
relocate large printing equipment. The costs to move from this facility down the road
could easily cost in excess of$1 million. From a positive standpoint, the above means
that we are here to stay, but it also means we need your support of the variance to
continue to generate acceptable business returns.
Printing is a very competitive business and we need this variance to remain a viable
business in our marketplace. By approving the requested code variance, we are able to
position our business with the space required to meet our needs going forward. We also
avoid undue hardship that would be caused by either operating with less than the required
floor space, or incurring the costs and business interruptions associated with a move to a
new building.
We also believe that our plan, which includes the variance, creates a far superior
environment for not only the John S. Swift Company, but also for our residential
neighbors and the city of Buffalo Grove. The plan as proposed includes:
• The addition of 13 evergreens to the existing landscape buffer to create a year-
round buffer.
• Reduced roof height from 30 feet to 25 feet to reduce the sightline of the building.
• Improvements to the appearance of the building's west wall by using a finished
precast concrete versus the current painted cynder block.
• No regularly used doors or windows on the west wall. This will virtually
eliminate the noise and foot traffic on the west side of our building.
• No employee parking along the west wall.
The only other option to our plan with the variance results in a sixteen car employee
parking lot that is only 30' from the residential property line and would include the
required lighting and employee entrances which are sure to increase the visibility and
noise related to the normal operation of a commercial business. The following compares
our proposed plan with the variance versus the alternative plan that requires no variance:
Proposed Plan (w/Variance) Alternative Plan(w/o variance)
Setback 40' to building 30' to parking lot, 60 to building
Parking None on west wall 16 car parking on west
Landscaping 13 new evergreens Existing only
Doors No regular doors on West wall Employee doors to parking
Lighting None on West wall Lighting on west wall for parking
Roof Height 25' 30'
In short, we believe a 40' well maintained and well landscaped grassy area is far more
desirable to the typical residential home owner, when you compare it to an option that
results in an employee parking lot only 30' from their property line with the
accompanying engine noises and foot traffic. When comparing our plans options, we
believe our plan with the variance provides a much more neighbor friendly outcome.
Lastly, the John S. Swift Company has been in business since 1912. We have been
headquartered in Buffalo Grove for 14 years (since 1993). We are confident that the
requested variance will position John S. Swift Company to prosper long into the future
and remain a contributing member of the Buffalo Grove community. We feel on all
fronts that our request represents the best use of the property for the neighborhood and
for the City of Buffalo Grove.
Specific reasons for disagreeing with the Zoning Board of Appeals decision:
• The ZBA did not feel that the smaller space had a significant impact on our
business. The difference between what we can build with a variance and without
a variance is only 2,085 square feet which seems relatively small, but it has a
tremendous impact on how we are able to operate. To begin with it changes the
building space to long and narrow which is a more difficult shape to layout
equipment, storage and workflow. As a direct result it dramatically reduces the
amount of storage and material handling space from 5,575 square feet to 3,575
square feet, a loss of 2,000 square feet of storage. For example, in 5,575 square
feet we can store approximately 1,000 rolls of paper. In the smaller 3,575 square
foot area we can store approximately 600 rolls of paper—reducing our storage
capacity by 400 (40% less) rolls. These 400 rolls of paper will need to be stored
offsite at an estimated cost of$2,700/month. This cost includes storage,
transportation and handling expenses. This added cost directly impacts the cost of
the jobs that we produce. A 1% increase in the cost of producing a given job can
cause us to lose the job to a competitor. In addition, printing is a very low margin
business with industry net margins averaging 2%. Any lost sales and added costs
for a commercial printer can mean the difference between survival and going out
of business. In addition to costs, time is critical in the printing industry. If we
have to store our materials offsite, we will not be able to provide the quick turn on
jobs that our competitors are able to offer. This will again result in lost sales.
Excess storage costs, increased production time, and lost sales will threaten the
viability of any commercial printer.
• The ZBA made the point that granting a variance is permanent and there are no
guarantees what future occupants of our building would do. First, any subsequent
owners would need to abide by the code just like we do now and keep noise,
pollutants, dirt, etc. to a minimum. Second, we stand firmly committed to
staying in this building for the long term. We are making an investment of$1.5 to
$2.0 million to build an addition. We are going to spend approximately $500,000
to move the presses and paper into this facility. Investments of this magnitude are
substantial for a family owned business of our size. As we stated earlier, the costs
to move from this facility down the road could easily cost in excess of$1 million.
We have a great deal of large equipment that would need to be broken down,
moved and reassembled. Besides the cost factors,there are substantial deterrents
to moving caused by the inevitable disruption in the continuity of our business
that would be caused by a move. As you can see, we have a lot of money at stake
to stay in this building for the long run. The large investment we make, in
conjunction with the variance, will insure our long-term presence and allow us to
prosper in a very competitive environment; the smaller addition poses a great
threat to the viability and future of our company.
Over the past 14 years, the John S. Swift Company has enjoyed being a part of the strong
community here in Buffalo Grove. With operations in New Jersey, Cincinnati, and
California; we are proud to have our corporate headquarters in Buffalo Grove. We look
forward to a long future in Buffalo Grove. We are eager to invest further in our
operations located here, and feel our proposal is the best outcome for our company, our
neighbors, and the community of Buffalo Grove.
Please consider investing in us by approving our variance request. Thank you for your
time and for considering our request.
Respectively yours,
z
Robert Masters
Vice President of Operations
John S. Swift Co., Inc.
Mrs. Muvva explained that they have small children that play in the backyard and they would
like to have the fence for safety reasons. They live on a corner lot. They do not want their
children running into the road.
Ch. Entman read the Village Engineer's memorandum addressed to Edward Schar dated May 1,
2007 which states: "The proposed fence should be setback 10 feet from the sidewalk. The
abutting property has a near side driveway."
Ch. Entman read the Building Commissioner's memorandum dated May 3, 2007.
Ch. Entman asked about the type of fence that would be installed. Mrs. Muvva was not sure of
the type of fence. She believed it would be white plastic.
Com. Windecker stated that the fence would be one half the distance from the house. He has no
objection.
Com. Stein stated that he would like to see what type of fence will be installed.
Ch. Entman would also like to see the type of fence.
Mrs. Muvva asked to Table the request in order to supply the information the Commissioners are
requesting.
Com. Lesser made a motion to Table the request made by Venkata Kancharla, 1011 Hilldale
Lane, to the next regular meeting scheduled for June 19, 2007. Com. Dunn seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote: AYE—Stein, Dunn, Windecker, Lesser, Entman
NAY—None
ABSTAIN—None
Motion Passed 5 to 0. Item to appear on the June 19, 2007 Zoning Board of Appeals agenda.
999 COMMERCE COURT, JOHN S. SWIFT III — ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION
17.48.020.F.6, TO ALLOW A 20' ENCROACHMENT INTO THE REQUIRED 60'
TRANSITIONAL YARD (REAR YARD) SETBACK FOR THE PURPOSE OF
CONSTRUCTING AN ADDITION TO THE BUILDING
Mr. Robert Masters, Vice President of Operations, John S. Swift Company, 999 Commerce
Court, was present and sworn in. The public hearing notice was published in the Daily Herald on
April 26, 2007.
Mr. Masters explained that John S. Swift Company is a commercial printing company that is
requesting a variance to construct a building addition forty feet (40') from the rear property line
instead of the sixty feet (60') that is stipulated in the current Zoning Ordinance. They need to
better utilize the land space in order to add web printing to their portfolio of capabilities. The
current building footprint is too small to accommodate the addition of web printing presses and
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
PAGE 2 of 9—MAY 15, 2007
to provide the flexibility that they need to maintain profits. They also need additional storage
space for printing materials.
Ch. Entman read the Village Engineer's memorandum addressed to Edward Schar dated May 1,
2007 which states: "I have no comments on the building expansion proposal."
Ch. Entman stated that he is hesitant due to the residential neighborhood located behind the
building.
Com. Lesser questioned the reference in the letter submitted by the Petitioner dated April 17,
2007 to the setback for the building located at 951 Commerce Court. The setback for the
building at 951 Commerce Court adjacent to Horatio Boulevard is maintained at sixty feet (60')
and the setback adjacent to the unincorporated property is forty feet(40').
Mr. Schar advised that the required setback would be sixty feet(60')whether it was incorporated
or not, if it is a Residential District. He believes that a variation was granted approximately eight
to ten years ago.
Mr. Masters advised that he measured that distance from the building at 951 Commerce Court to
the fence adjacent to the properties on Horatio Boulevard, which was sixty feet (60'). He also
measured the distance from the building to the unincorporated properties, which is forty feet
(40'). Com. Lesser advised that he resides in this neighborhood, although he does not abut the
Industrial-zoned property. He stated that if the property was not adjacent to a Residential District
he would not have any issues granting the variation. But in this situation, he does not support the
request.
Mr. Masters replied that they are not adding any additional noise and will be enhancing that side
of the building. Com. Lesser responded that the sixty foot(60') setback was put in place to create
a buffer between residential uses and commercial uses. He has not heard any compelling
evidence to meet the criteria to grant the variation.
Mr. Mike Ford, President, John S. Swift Company, 999 Commerce Court, was present and sworn
in. Mr. Ford stated that in order to be viable they need to continue to grow the business. One of
the issues they are facing is having to provide multiple capabilities to their customers. Right now
they do sheet-fed, but the majority of their competitors have web capabilities. The viability of
their business depends on them being able to bring web presses into the facility. Without the
variance, they do not have the room to bring in that equipment. They have mature landscaping
behind the building and the neighbors are seeing trees, not looking out onto a building. This
addition would not disrupt the neighbors. He asked Com. Lesser what type of criteria needs to be
met.
Com. Lesser responded that there are unique circumstances that need to be met and they need to
show that the addition would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. He believes
that the addition would impact the character of the neighborhood.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
PAGE 3 of 9—MAY 15, 2007
Mr. Ford added that they have been in Buffalo Grove since 1993. They do not believe that the
addition would have an impact on the four of five houses adjacent to the property that are
separated by mature landscaping. The addition is critical to the viability of the business.
Ch. Entman asked about the possibility to reconfigure the current space with some type of
addition. Mr. Ford explained that they are proposing the addition to be wider in order to avoid
having to expand back even further. The web presses are large pieces of equipment and need a
certain amount of space. There is also paper storage and work flow issues that necessitate the
square footage they need. Mr. Masters added that the current building is maxed out on space.
Com. Stein asked how much time are they anticipating until they will need to expand again. Mr.
Ford stated that this addition would cover them for the foreseeable future. Com. Stein
commented that the parking lot would be closer to the residential properties than the addition.
Mr. Ford replied that there would not be any parking in the rear in the building, only on the side
and that the existing trees are approximately thirty feet (30') tall. Com. Stein asked about the
distance of the proposed parking to the residential properties. Mr. Ford was not sure but believed
it to be twenty feet(20')to thirty feet(30') away.
Com. Dunn asked if the twenty-five foot(25') landscape buffer is included in the forty feet(40')
that would remain. Mr. Ford advised that it would.
Com. Windecker stated that the exhibit depicting the setbacks at 951 Commerce Court is not to
scale. He believes that if the addition was built to be in line with the rear of the building at 951
Commerce Court there would be room for a web press. Mr. Ford stated that they are building for
the future and that they need more than one web press which requires that extra space. Com.
Windecker asked if they would consider expanding to the setback line as opposed to expanding
beyond the setback line. Mr. Ford stated that they would not have the room for the equipment or
the storage that they need. Mr. Masters added that at least thirty percent(30%) of the addition is
to accommodate storage. A lot of paper would go through those presses. This is a multi-use
facility. Com. Windecker asked if there is sufficient storage in the current building. Mr. Masters
advised that they are currently storing paper and supplies in the loading docks.
Com. Lesser stated that the testimony given is that the addition is needed to accommodate the
additional presses and understands that no one wants to move presses due to the cost. He does
not believe that the addition would be a real term solution. He is concerned that if the variation
was granted, that in five to seven years from now the space will again be too small and the
company will relocate to a new building. Then the next occupant of the building may not be as
good of a neighbor.
Mr. Ford replied that this addition would position this facility to be viable long term. He does not
see a need to expand again or moving to another facility. They also have facilities in New Jersey
and Cincinnati. Mr. Masters added that this is a third generation business. Swift came to Chicago
and opened a building on Loomis and Madison in the early 1900's. They stayed in that building,
which is smaller than what they have now, until 1993.
Ch. Entman asked if there any questions or comments from the audience.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
PAGE 4 of 9—MAY 15, 2007
Mr. Allen Kolesky, 747 Horatio Boulevard, was present and sworn in. Mr. Kolesky stated that
when they purchased their homes, they knew that the properties backed up to a business park.
They did so relying on the fact that the Village's zoning code would continue to protect our quiet
enjoyment through the setback buffer and performance standards. They are there to oppose the
request and to request that it be denied. The request should be denied because it does not meet
any of the criteria for variation listed in the Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.52.070, and if granted
would be contrary to the public interest and would violate the criteria set forth in Section
17.52.020. It would negatively impact the character of the neighborhood and the value of many
of the homes on the east side of Horatio Boulevard that back up to the business park. The
property has not had a prolonged vacancy and has been occupied and has been operated within
the code for many years. The owner has no unique circumstances other than to save money at the
expense of the marketability and values of their homes. They bought their homes with the
knowledge of the business park behind them. He bought or leased the building with the
knowledge that the rear yard setback was to remain sixty feet (60'). The residential property
owners adjacent to industrial properties are the ones with unique circumstances. The variation
would alter the essential character of the neighborhood and granting the variance would be
forever. Would the Board want an industrial building located forty feet (40') or sixty feet (60')
from their back door that would include the following: noise from employees cars in and out of
the parking lot; noise from the employees talking and yelling to each other as they arrive in the
morning and leave at night; noise from machinery and products in the building; and noise from
employees radios blasting in the warehouse, especially in the warming months. There have been
several homes for sale on the block of Horatio Boulevard during the past year. There have been
three on the east side of Horatio and two on the west side. Of the three on the east side, two have
been on the market for over a year with one finally selling last month. The realtors have
indicated that the homes on the east side take much longer to sell because they back up to the
business park. If the variance is granted, the business will be brought closer to their back yards
and impacting the marketability, value, and quiet enjoyment of their homes.
Cary Rosenbloom, 741 Horatio Boulevard, was present and sworn in. There are two trees located
behind his house. He brought a photograph taken on his cellular phone that was shown to the
Commissioners. The photograph shows that the building at 999 Commerce Court can clearly be
seen from his property.
Sue Rosenblatt, 737 Horatio Boulevard, was present and sworn in. Her home is one of two
homes for sale on the east side of Horatio Boulevard and has been on the market for the least
amount of time. She has had approximately fifty showings of her home and the feedback that she
receives from agents is always the industrial property in back. People are very nervous abut
buying a property adjacent to a business park. She has lived here for thirteen and a half years and
has put up a lot of landscaping. Her property is located at the south end of the Swift property and
overlooks the parking lot. Buyers are concerned with trucks going in and out.
Dave Bieber, 753 Horatio Boulevard, was present and sworn in. He lives directly behind the
building. The landscaping is not that tall and full. There have been a few storms over that past
few years that have actually taken a few trees down. He would welcome any members of the
committee to meet with him and see his perspective of the landscaping. The huge gray building
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
PAGE 5 of 9—MAY 15, 2007
can clearly be seen from any of the backyards. It is not that private. There is a lot of noise that
comes from the property including roof top units and employees in the parking lot late at night.
Dennis Grant, 769 Horatio Boulevard, was present and sworn in. The noise is a problem. They
are not abutting another industrial property; they are abutting a residential property. He is
concerned that during construction the workers would begin early and work until late hours.
Mr. Allen Kolesky asked if a plan was available to view. Will the height of the addition be the
same as the current building.
Ch. Entman advised that plans are available to view at the Building and Zoning Department and
asked the Petitioner to answer concerning the height of the building. Mr. Masters advised that the
addition would be thirty feet(30')tall.
Ch. Entman asked the objecting neighbors if sufficient landscaping were put on the property,
would that alleviate concerns or are the concerns beyond being able to see the building through
the current landscaping. Mr. Kolesky advised that it is still an encroachment from an industrial
park into a residential neighborhood.
Mr. Dean Fraiser, Vice President of Production, John S. Swift Company, 999 Commerce Court,
was present and sworn in. He stated that they do not believe that the noise level will increase at
all. They are not adding any additional docks. The plans show the current dock would be blocked
even more because the building would extend beyond that dock. There would be no parking
behind the building. They currently have one shift. There is no noise at night. The building
would block some of the parking. They can plant more trees, such as pine trees. He currently has
a house on the market that has been for over a year. It is just a bad real estate market. If the
variance is not granted, they would need to move from this location sooner. The twenty feet(20')
that they are requesting would maintain two presses.
Com. Dunn asked how many employees are there currently. Mr. Fraiser responded they currently
have forty employees and there is one and a half shifts working. They would need to add
approximately fifteen to twenty new employees.
Com. Stein asked if the Petitioner anticipates any other equipment to be removed. Mr. Fraiser
replied they do not. Com. Stein asked if they could shift any of the work to other facilities. Mr.
Fraiser replied they will not and that this will be the only facility with web capacity.
He added that their facility in Des Plaines, Des Plaines Publishing Company, backs up to about
eight houses to the north. There is the building and parking lot. The cars pull up to the fence that
separates the facility from the residential homes. In the thirty-five years he has been employed
there, there has never been a complaint from the residents due to noise. At the Buffalo Grove
location, the presses cannot be heard from outside and the back wall of the proposed addition
will not have any windows.
Com. Stein asked Mr. Schar how close the parking lot can get to the residential area. Mr. Schar
replied that there is a thirty foot (30') required setback for parking. Com. Stein asked if the
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
PAGE 6 of 9—MAY 15, 2007
addition could be wider instead of deeper and provide parking in the rear of the building. Mr.
Fraiser responded they would not be able to get around the building if the addition were to be
wider. He also believes that parking in the rear would be less desirable to the residents.
Mr. Fraiser stated that the drawings for the addition that were given to Mr. Swift at the time of
purchase of the building showed a thirty foot(30') rear yard setback. They do not know when it
was changed to sixty feet(60').
Ch. Entman confirmed that the Petitioner will be adding seven new parking spaces on the north
side of the building.
Com. Lesser asked if they have looked at other buildings that could accommodate the additional
presses. Mr. Ford responded that they have not pursued other locations because they bought this
building with the intent to expand and it would be too expensive to move. Mr. Fraiser added that
they could control the construction start times. The back wall is currently constructed of cinder
block. They are proposing a prefabricated concrete that can designed to look like brick or stone.
They feel that the addition would look better than the current building.
Ch. Entman stated that he would like to see color renderings of the proposed addition, a
landscape plan, and any alternative floor plans.
Com. Stein would like to know if the thirty foot (30') rear yard setback ever existed. Mr. Schar
advised that he would look into the matter and provide the information to the Commissioners
prior to the next meeting.
Mr. Masters asked to Table their request to the next regular meeting of the Zoning Board of
Appeals in order to provide the requested information. He also offered to meet with the
neighbor's prior to the next meeting.
Com. Stein made a motion to Table the request to the next regular Zoning Board of Appeals
meeting scheduled for June 19, 2007. Com. Windecker seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote: AYE—Stein, Dunn, Windecker, Lesser, Entman
NAY—None
ABSTAIN—None
Motion Passed 5 to 0. Item to appear on the June 19, 2007 Zoning Board of Appeals regular
meeting agenda.
1200 N. ARLINGTON HEIGHTS ROAD, SHELL OIL COMPANY—SIGN CODE,
SECTIONS 14.20.030, 14.20.070,AND 14.40.025, TO REPLACE THE SIGN FACES ON
THE THREE (3) EXISTING GROUND SIGNS WITH NEW SHALL LOGO, PRICE
SIGN,V-POWER PANELS,AND MC DONALDS SIGN PANELS
Mr. Ron Ambrose, Warren Johnson Architects, 19 N. Greeley Street, Palatine, Illinois, 60067,
was present and sworn in. The public hearing notice published in the Daily Herald on April 20,
2007 was read.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
PAGE 7 of 9—MAY 15, 2007
999 COMMERCE COURT, JOHN S. SWIFT III — ZONING ORDINANCE,
SECTION 17.48.020.F.6, TO ALLOW A 20' ENCROACHMENT INTO THE
REQUIRED 60' TRANSITIONAL YARD (REAR YARD) SETBACK FOR THE
PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING AN ADDITION TO THE BUILDING
Mr. Mike Ford, President, John S. Swift Company, 999 Commerce Court, and Mr. Robert
Masters, Vice President of Operations, John S. Swift Company, 999 Commerce Court,
were present and sworn in.
Mr. Ford explained the reasons for requesting the variation. They have looked at their
space requirements, looked at enhancing the landscaping, and looked at the appearance of
the proposed addition. They held two (2) open house events for the residential neighbors.
One was held on June 7, 2007 and the other was held on June 12, 2007. Mr. Ford
described the proposed addition and the proposed floor layout of the addition. The
interior layout of the proposed addition is needed to accommodate three (3) web presses
and a large portion of the remaining space is for paper roll storage. The web presses use a
lot of paper and they need to store paper on site. They can reduce the height of the
proposed addition from thirty feet (30') to twenty-five feet (25') in height. He also
reviewed a proposed landscape plan. There are currently ten (10) evergreens. They are
proposing to add thirteen (13) evergreens to provide more screening to the residential
neighbors.
Mr. Ford also described Plan B. The proposed addition in Plan B would not require a
variation. This addition would be 16,400 square feet, which is less than what they need.
There would be a need to add parking in the rear of the building. This would add traffic
and noise. They would also have to add windows, doors, and lighting in the rear to
accommodate the employees. Most of the paper roll storage would need to be off-site. An
interior layout of Plan B was described.
He added that this type of business calls for a quick turn around time and having
materials stored off-site creates a problem for them. They believe that less space would
create more costs for outside storage, transportation trucking and receiving back and
forth, and the time factor creates the hardship, which is the basis for their variation
request.
They will use a pre-cast concrete finish for the exterior of the proposed addition. The roof
top units that will need to be added would be set back on the lower part of the existing
building to create a noise buffer and eliminates the view of the units.
Ch. Entman asked about the number of required parking spaces. They currently have
sixty-three (63) parking spaces. He understands the need for the additional space.
Although, once granted, the addition would remain forever. He is not sure if he wants
that.
Draft Minutes
Zoning Board of Appeals
June 19, 2007
Page 1 of 4
Com. Sandler asked about the hours of operation currently. Mr. Ford stated that they
currently have one and a half shifts that end mostly by eleven P.M. Com. Sandler asked
about the noise level of the web presses. Mr. Ford stated that you should not be able to
hear any noise if you were standing outside the building. Com. Sandler asked if people
inside the building have to wear ear plugs. Mr. Ford stated that the employees have to
wear ear plugs. Com. Sandler asked if all three presses would be operating until
approximately eleven P.M. Mr. Ford advised that it would depend on the volume.
Com. Lesser asked about the current paper storage and if it is roll stock. Mr. Ford advised
that all the current paper storage is in-house and it is roll stock. Com. Lesser asked about
the dimensions of the paper rolls and how it is stacked. Mr. Ford replied that the
dimensions of each roll are forty-five inches (45") wide by thirty-four inches (34") high
and they stack them to a total height of twenty-six feet (26'). Each roll weights two
thousand pounds.
Com. Windecker asked how many presses they have and how do they store their paper
currently. Mr. Ford advised they currently have two (2) presses and they store 6,000
square feet off-site. Two (2) of the presses are currently being run in Des Plaines and the
third is being rebuilt. They do not have any web presses at this location currently. Com.
Windecker asked how many rolls of paper will last how many days if running to capacity.
Mr. Ford stated that the paper storage shown on the interior layout of Plan A would be
approximately three weeks worth of production storage. The paper storage for Plan B
would be approximately one week of production storage. Com. Windecker asked if there
are any exits on the side of the proposed addition. Mr. Masters advised that currently they
have dock doors and exits, one at each corner that face the sides of the building, not the
rear. There would need to be doors added onto the addition, but they would not add any
along the west elevation. If they have to add parking in the rear of the building, they
would need to add exits along the west elevation.
Mr. Dennis Grant, 769 Horatio Boulevard, was present and sworn in. Mr. Grant advised
that his house his on the north end of the Swift Company property. He met with Swift
Company and would prefer the variance be granted so parking would not be added to the
rear of the building with parking lot lighting. He does not believe that would be a
problem with noise from inside the building.
Mr. Alan Kolesky, 747 Horatio Boulevard, was present and sworn in. Mr. Kolesky stated
that he lives directly behind Swift Company. He is opposed to the variance request. In
five (5) years, they could be out of business, they could move, or they could be running
twenty-four hours a day. He is also concerned with the property value of his home. He
also indicated that Option B seems to be a threat or a worst case scenario.
Cary Rosenbloom, 741 Horatio Boulevard, was present and sworn in. He is located
behind Swift Company. He believes that the new landscaping may block the existing
building now, but by moving the building eight-eight feet (88') closer and adding to the
Draft Minutes
Zoning Board of Appeals
June 19, 2007
Page 2 of 4
height of the building, the landscaping will not block the view of the building. He is also
concerned with his property value.
Dave Bieber, 753 Horatio Boulevard, was present and sworn in. He lives directly behind
the building. He is opposed to the request as well. He believes that the height of any
addition should not extend beyond the height of the existing building and he is concerned
with the proposed height of the addition. He is concerned with the landscaping. He does
not believe that they need as much parking. Any type of lighting for the parking lot
would be regulated. They could put the entrance door around the corner of the building in
lieu of along the rear of the building. There were questions concerning the loss of paper
storage.
Mr. Ford advised that a significant amount of paper would need to be stored off-site if
they had to go with Plan B.
Mr. Dean Fraiser, Vice President of Production, John S. Swift Company, 999 Commerce
Court, was present and sworn in. He advised that they currently store approximately one
million pounds of paper off-site, which equals 6,000 square feet. That is approximately a
forty-five (45) day supply of paper.
Sue Rosenblatt, 737 Horatio Boulevard, was present and sworn in. She is opposed to the
variance request. Her home has been on the market since February. The main feedback is
that the property is adjacent to an industrial property. She is also concerned with the
property values. Two houses across the street sold for approximately fifty thousand
dollars more because they are across the street.
Mr. Bieber asked if the exterior material and the landscaping would still be regulated if
the variation was not granted. Ch. Entman advised that the Zoning Board of Appeals has
no say if the addition falls within the Zoning Ordinance regulations.
Mr. Grant added that the property values would be lowered if a parking lot was closer to
the residential home in lieu of the back of the building and landscaping.
Com. Lesser asked if the off-site paper storage would be moved to on-site. Mr. Ford
replied that Swift Company stores all their paper on-site. The web presses that were
purchased currently require off-site paper storage. They would eliminate the off-site
storage and have everything stored on-site.
Com. Windecker asked if the plant in Des Plaines will be closed. Mr. Ford stated that all
the equipment is being moved into the Buffalo Grove location.
Com. Windecker commented that the homeowners should have been aware of the
industrial building when they purchased their homes.
Draft Minutes
Zoning Board of Appeals
June 19, 2007
Page 3 of 4
Mr. Ford clarified that they do not want Plan B. They do not want Plan B to be deemed as
a threat. They want to make it clear that they will be expanding the building whether they
expand west or north.
Lengthy discussion took place concerning the required number of parking spaces and
possible future parking issues.
Ch. Entman still has an issue with the permanency of the addition and would prefer
having parking in the rear of the building in lieu of a building. He is also not convinced
that the additional parking is necessary. He is not supportive of the request.
Com. Sandler is not supportive of the request because of the proximity to the residential
neighbors.
There were no additional questions or comments from the audience. There were no
additional questions or comments from the audience.
Com. Sandler made the following motion:
I move we grant the request made by John S. Swift III, 999 Commerce Court, for
variance of Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.48.020.F.6,pertaining to Industrial Districts, to
allow a twenty foot (20') encroachment into the required sixty foot (60') Transitional
Yard(rear yard) setback for the purpose of constructing an addition to the building.
Subject to the Village Engineer's memorandum dated May 1, 2007. The property may
not be able to yield a reasonable return unless a variation is granted. The Petitioner has
demonstrated hardship and unique circumstances. The proposed addition will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare and will not alter the essential
character of the neighborhood.
Com. Lesser seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote: AYE—None
NAY—Dunn, Windecker, Sandler, Lesser, Entman
ABSTAIN—None
Motion Denied 5 to 0. Findings of Fact attached. Petitioner was advised of their right to
appeal this decision to the Village Board.
Draft Minutes
Zoning Board of Appeals
June 19, 2007
Page 4 of 4
VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - FINDINGS OF FACT
ZONING VARIATION
THE BUFFALO GROVE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS HEREBY MAKES THE
FOLLOWING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS:
I. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY:
A. Petitioner: John S. Swift Company
B. Property: 999 Commerce Court
C. Legal Description: as set forth in Exhibit"A" attached hereto and made a
part hereof
D. Zoning District: I- Industrial
E. Lot Size: Front: 329.81 Feet
Side: 405.00 Feet
Rear: 308.00 Feet
Side: 419.00 Feet
1. Characteristics of Lot: Irregular rectangular shaped lot located in a
cul de sac.
2. Characteristics of Building: One-story existing office/warehouse
building.
3. Anything distinguishing about the house and lot: The rear of the
property is adjacent to Residentially Zoned property.
IL CHARACTERISTICS OF SURROUNDING AREA:
A. Location: Lot 2 in Covington Corporate Center second Resubdivision, of
Lot 68 through 83, inclusive, in Covington Corporate Center Unit 2
B. Similar Buildings and Lots: The buildings located in the Covington
Corporate Center are similar in size and construction.
C. Public Rights of Way: Commerce Court
Public Sidewalk and Public Parkway
Findings of Fact
John S. Swift Company,999 Commerce Court
June 19,2007
Page 1 of 3
D. Adjacent Lots:
1. Line of Sight: N/A
III. VARIATION SOUGHT:
A. Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.48.020.F.6,pertaining to Industrial
Districts, for the purpose of allowing a twenty foot(20') encroachment
into the required sixty foot(60') Transitional Yard (rear yard) setback for
the purpose of constructing an addition to the building.
B. Exhibits Depicting Variation:
1. Exhibit"A" -Plat of Survey
2. Exhibit"D"—Letter dated April 17, 2007
3. Exhibit"E"—Proposed Addition Elevations
4. Exhibit"F"—Letter dated June 7, 2007
5. Exhibit"I"—Booklet"Request for Zoning Variance April 17,
2007"
6. Group Exhibit"J"—Proposed Landscaping Plan, Site Plans A &
B, Interior Layout Plans A & B, Photographs of Proposed Pre Cast
Concrete Finish.
IV. PUBLIC HEARING
After due notice, as required by law, a copy of said publication notice being
attached hereto as Exhibit"B", the Zoning Board of Appeals held public hearings
on Tuesday, May 15, 2007 and June 19, 2007. The petitioner, Mr. Mike Ford,
President, Mr. Robert Masters, Vice President of Operations, and Mr. Dean
Fraiser, Vice President of Production, John S. Swift Company, 999 Commerce
Court, testified at the public hearing and presented documentary evidence.
The following individual(s) testified on behalf of the applicants: None.
The following objectors appeared at the hearing:
Mr. Dennis Grant, 769 Horatio Boulevard, Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089
Mr. Alan Kolesky, 747 Horatio Boulevard, Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089
Cary Rosenbloom, 741 Horatio Boulevard, Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089
Dave Bieber, 753 Horatio Boulevard, Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089
Sue Rosenblatt, 737 Horatio Boulevard, Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089
The following written objections were received: None.
Findings of Fact
John S. Swift Company,999 Commerce Court
June 19,2007
Page 2 of 3
V. FINDINGS:
A. The Zoning Board of Appeals finds that the Petitioner's request for a
variation for the purpose of constructing a building addition meets the
criteria, set forth in Section 17.52.070, in that:
1. The plight of the owner is due to hardship and unique
circumstances
2. The proposed variation will not alter the essential character of the
neighborhood.
3. The property cannot yield a reasonable return if the variation is not
granted.
B. Conditions or restrictions imposed:
1. Subject to the Village Engineer's memorandum dated May 1,
2007.
C. Attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit"J" are the minutes of
the Zoning Board of Appeals public hearings of Tuesday, May 15, 2007
and June 19, 2007.
VI. CONCLUSION:
Accordingly, by a vote of 5 to 0, the Buffalo Grove Zoning Board of Appeals
hereby DENIES the request made by John S. Swift III, 999 Commerce Court, for
variance of Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.48.020.F.6,pertaining to Industrial
Districts, to allow a twenty foot(20') encroachment into the required sixty foot
(60') Transitional Yard (rear yard) setback for the purpose of constructing an
addition to the building.
DATED —June 19, 2007
VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, IL
BRUCE R. ENTMAN, CHAIRMAN
Zoning Board of Appeals
Findings of Fact
John S. Swift Company,999 Commerce Court
June 19,2007
Page 3 of 3
PUBLIC NEARING
NOTICE
PUBLIC NOTICE is hrrebv
given that the Buffalo Grove
Zoning Board of Appeals
will hold a Public Hearing at
7i30 P.M.on Tuesday,May
15,2007 in the Council Cham.
bers of the Village Hall,50
Raupp Boulevard.
Request is beingg made by
John S.Swift-l l l.,999 Cofn-
me�r�cepCourt,for variance of
1748�02017.61nPertainiing to
TO: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS COMMISSIONERS Industrial Districts,the re-
a ow
a twenty foot (209 en-
croachment .into the re-
quired sixty foot(601)Tran-
sitional Yard (rear Yard)
setback for the purpose of
constructing an addition to
FROM: EDWARD SCHAR the building.
� Legal Description:
Building Commissioner o to oving an Corpo-
rate Center second Resubdi-
vision,of Lot 68 through 83,
inclusive,in Covington or-
rat April 27 2007 a Subdivision
Center Unit 2,being
> of Section 27 and the north lh
of Section 34, Township 43
north,Range 11 east of the
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 Third Principe{ ovem n,
according to the Plat
thereof recorded November
21,
7:30 P.M. —Council Chambers, Village Hall nois1988 as Document Na.
2742331,In Lake County,Illi-
50 Raupp Boulevard Buffalo Grove Illinois VILLAGE OF
> > BUFFALO GROVE,IL
Bruce Entmon,Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
RE: 999 Commerce Court, John Swift III PublishA�rl2CI�H7erald
Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.48.020.F.6 (3916839)N
Attached please find the documents and exhibits that have been submitted for the following
variance:
Request is being made by John S. Swift III, 999 Commerce Court, for variance of Zoning
Ordinance, Section 17.48.020.F.6, pertaining to Industrial Districts, to allow a twenty foot(20')
encroachment into the required sixty foot (60') Transitional Yard (rear yard) setback for the
purpose of constructing an addition to the building.
Notice of this public hearing was published in the Daily Herald.
If you have any questions regarding this matter do not hesitate to contact me at 459-2530.
Edward Schar
ES/jk
Attachments
VILLAGE OF
BUFFALO GROVE '
Department of Building&Zoning
Fifty Raupp Blvd.
Buffalo Grove,IL 60089-2196
Phone 847-459-2530
Fax 847-459-7944
May 30, 2007
Mr. Robert Masters
John S. Swift Company
999 Commerce Court
Buffalo Grove, IL 60089
Dear Mr. Masters,
This is to inform you that the Zoning Board of Appeals public hearing relative to your request
for variance of the Zoning Ordinance, to allow a 20' encroachment into the required 60'
Transitional Yard setback, has been rescheduled for Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 7:30 P.M. in the
Council Chambers of the Village Hall, 50 Raupp Boulevard.
A copy of the Agenda is enclosed. You, or an authorized representative, must attend the meeting
to answer any questions the Zoning Board Commissioners may have.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (847) 459-2530.
Sincerely,
4��2 '14-�
Edward Schar
Building Commissioner
ES/jk
Enclosure
/VILLAGE OF '
BUFFALO GROVE
Department of Building&Zoning
Fifty Raupp Blvd.
Buffalo Grove,IL 60089-2196
Phone 847-459-2530
Fax 847-459-7944 APPLICATION FOR VARIATION
APPLICANT John S. Swift III
ADDRESS 999 Commerce Court
TELEPHONE NUMBER 8 4 7-4 6 5-3 3 0 0
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 999 Commerce Court
PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE Z ZONING DISTRICT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: SU I r M
* SECTION OF MUNICIPAL CODE FROM WHICH VARIANCE IS REQUESTED:
PURPOSE OF VARIANCE: Corporate Expansion
Applicant must submit a letter stating what the practical difficulties or particular hardships are in carrying out
the strict letter of the Zoning Ordinance and describing the proposed work or change in use.
A plat of survey or plot plan,drawn to scale,must be attached hereto and made a part of this application.
Petitioner must submit proof of ownership such as a deed,title insurance policy,trust agreement,etc.
I(we)hereby certify that the legal title of the premises being the subject of this application is vested in
J o h n S. S w i f t C o. I n c. and that all statements contained in this application are true and correct.
I(we)further understand that any misrepresentation in connection with this matter may result in a denial of
the relief sought. Furthermore,I(we)have attached a list containing the names and addresses of all
contiguous property owners if requesting a fence variation,OR a list of all property owners within two hundred
fifty(250)feet in each direction of the subject property for all other variations; exclusive of public ways,as
such are recorded in the Officer of the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County and/or Lake County.
APPLICANT
OWNER, = X
(Strike out all but applicable designation)
If signed by an Agent,a written instrument executed by the owner,establishing the agency,must accompany
this application.
FILING FEE MUST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION
FEE PAID $ I ,` � RECEIPT NUMBER DATE /7 r.'
FA V" L4ot)e,ty ptemcls Ad-ist'atim q*t*s Yak* Rewts &lp
16-34-101 IY27 lsomo N'"41 to pm.lent Adi- Brows* '),I COWERCLAA.IMPROM
'k��o!
Ak-FIN Address
PIN
Owen
Parcel Irjumabon ................... .... .
Pace]ID: 1534-101-027 All FIN: 115-34401-027
Patent Parcel 115-27308-907 City: BUFFALO GR...
.1wit6chom 049 soctwvpw
Area. 016 Rasing Nuaw.
Dwttict Avsem Paicet
x
,_j P,,Wal Plus ^ ome,Wonviot, Pwcel Ackhen
I Mailer ce JOHN S SWIFT COMPANY INC 999 COMMERCE CLBUFFAL
'j BUFFALO GROVE.IL SOM
9"COMMERCE CT 00FALO
Tablft
j Utiky
Public Irq*, w cefkiliedvakes
< > valuatmmeftd C.0 Land $914476
Posted Date. 1 W2W.11m BL*Jg $2,011,008
Chew Reasar'. SA EQUALIZATION Total $2-823-404
Effective Date. 01/01/2006 LafdAtwmd S270.790
iCaM 4229 NowoRwAed 10/23/2006 BukloVAuemed $670,269
C01,16"aw. TOalAstossod $941,067
8110,B/8 DECREASE
CmW 45617 rwerg Transfer Ido
CW004,417769
Grar,to: Dee. Bets Page Vak*,
Euted Land Info
A,,,eaga. 0 Legal Sq,Fee 0
Legal 0-0-
TE CENTER UCT�22 LOT f
jc
lT
AM S. SOJIfT CO.,inc.
t4 W
4 C/�1
April 17, 2007 /
999 Comm:arF:Coi in, • 131 FFALo GUM E • IL 60089-2375
PHONE: 847.465 3300 • Fnx: 847.465.3309
WEB:www.joYnlswifLprint..com
Zoning Board of Appeals
Village of Buffalo Grove
50 Raupp Boulevard ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 EXHIBIT_
RE: Application for building variation
Background
John S. Swift Co., Inc. is a family owned and operated commercial printing&
binding company that has been in business since 1912. Originally founded in St. Louis,
Missouri, the company expanded its operations to Chicago, Cincinnati and John S. Swift
Company of New Jersey. The company specializes in one to five color saddle stitch&
soft cover perfect bound books,personalized printing, and mailing & fulfillment services.
One of our competitive advantages is our bindery where we have a complement of high-
speed folders, saddle stitching and perfect binding lines. In all aspects of our business we
maintain a leading edge and look for ways to continually incorporate new technology and
processes.
The company moved from Chicago to Buffalo Grove in 1993 and decided on the
current location for a number of key reasons, the most important being the opportunity
this site presented for future expansion. An addition with a 30' setback was part of the
Site Plan that was shown to the Swift's when they were looking to purchase this property.
Request
John S. Swift Co., Inc. is requesting a variance to allow us to erect a building addition
40 feet from our rear property line instead of the 60 feet as stipulated in the village
building code. This addition will be designed in a manner that is consistent with village
guidelines and enhance our current building. The approximate size of the addition will
be 223" x 88' x 30".
This addition is necessary for many reasons: First, we have exceeded the space
capacity of our current building. Secondly, we are planning to expand our manufacturing
capabilities into the area of web printing. These web presses will be used for the
production of specialty newspapers and commercial applications such as village
newsletters.. park district newsletters and programs as well as financial prospectuses and
other financial reports. These presses require a sizable amount of floor space to operate
efficiently and would occupy about 30% of the available floor space. The third purpose
for the addition is paper storage. In order to operate efficiently we need to maintain a
substantial amount of paper inventory on our floor that is readily accessible. This storage
will occupy approximately 30% of the floor space as well. The remaining floor space
will be used for material flow, general working areas and a couple small offices.
nvVSET PRINTIN,O,,
% A MEMO.,
"O\is 0WINNAfI EMENYVILLE JOHN S. Svy1UT PRINT
IL 0I1 SINCE 1912 CA of NJ,INC.
Reasons to request variance
• Operating Space. As stated earlier, the combination of equipment and storage
require a substantial amount of floor space in which to efficiently operate.
Without a variance we can add on approximately 14,000 square feet of space.
With a variance we can add on approximately 18,000 square feet, a 28% gain in
floor space. A smaller addition will be a serious detriment in our ability to
operate our business. It will limit the amount of paper we are able to inventory;
limit the space needed for equipment; restrict the open space necessary for staging
and moving jobs in the shop.
• Growth. We are in a position to grow our company by entering into new
markets. While we may be able to operate in the smaller space without the
variance for the time being, it will definitely be a limiting factor in our ability to
grow in the next three to five years. This future growth is necessary to justify the
substantial investment necessary to build this addition, and for the viability of this
company.
If this variance is denied, we will need to re-evaluate our growth plans. This
could cause us to decide to relocate our entire operation to a new facility.
However, in doing so we would incur tremendous costs to move and setup our
existing equipment, which could easily cost as much as it would to build this
addition.
• Cost. The incremental cost to build a larger addition is much more reasonable
than building a smaller addition and adding on to it at a later time. In our
situation, it just makes economic sense to build the largest possible structure,
since we anticipate growing into this space and expect to be fully utilized in three
to five years.
• Precedence. The building at 951 Commerce Ct. was expanded several years ago
and has approximately a 40' setback to the residential neighborhood they are
adjacent to.
Impression on local area
• To our knowledge, we have been a good neighbor for the past 13 years. None of
our neighbors have been inconvenienced or disturbed by our presence. Actually a
couple neighbors in the homes adjacent to us cut through our yard to get to and
from the train station.
• We run a quiet operation. The equipment we use can be barely heard outside
even with the doors open.
• We run a clean operation. The type of printing we do is environmentally friendly
with no toxic emissions. We utilize a dust collection system to reduce the dust in
our shop and surrounding area.
• While we run a two-shift operation, our second shift is considerably smaller and
typically finishes work around 11PM.
Thank you for considering our request. We trust if there are further requirements you
will advise us at your earliest convenience.
Respectively yours,
Robert Masters
Vice President of Operations
John S. Swift Co., Inc.
TO: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TRUSTEE LIAISIONS
FROM: EDWARD SCHAR
BUILDING COMMISSIONER
DATE: JUNE 4, 2007
SUBJECT: 999 COMMERCE COURT, JOHN S. SWIFT COMPANY
An alternative site plan has been submitted(copy attached) by the Petitioner.
In researching the question raised concerning a possible 30' building setback being in
place at one point for this property, I have found that the required 60' building setback
and 30' parking setback has been consistent in the Zoning Ordinance dating back to
1961.
MaY .30. 2007 2:53PM Sievert Group No•0210 P. 2
. - 1
New Facijit.y
I i0u;n1 c cTA*rKm PRTXTTN6 r,�p.rn ;• D�IT&-IN
V Yi t
Ruff�tio Grove, IF,ii 110i
.a
a
{li 75 L+II�'SG.fK�c�cc
! r-
I
wo
r1 I
1 � I
b
P_
I ; I
I EXls !J
OFFICE /WAR wAt20Npv$F
I!I 52.ie7 son. I —j
I �!
`• LL .
999 COUNIA01 4oU�T-�1��� r
(H j_..S.I� 7 E P L A N
1
I
I
J o+i n S. SWIFT Co.,inc.
aJ
c.
June 7, 2007 999 Comnw iwf:Cot a • Bi ri.m,o GItoyc. • IL 60089-2375
PHONE: 847.465.*W0 • F,Ax: 847.465.*W9
WEii:www.johnswiftptinL.con1
Zoning Board of Appeals
Village of Buffalo Grove
50 Raupp Boulevard ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 EXHIBIT F
RE: Follow-up to application for building variation
Background
At the ZBA meeting on May 15, you asked us for additional information before you would
consider our variation application. The three major issues that you wanted addressed were:
alternative design plans, clarification of aesthetics and landscaping. We were able to comply
with all of these.
Our original request was to erect a building addition 40 feet from the rear property line
instead of the 60 feet as stipulated in the village building code. The approximate size of the
addition will be 223' x 88' x 30' which is approximately 18,500 square feet.
Amended Request
We have included drawings and plans that represent a change from our original request. This
change is to reduce the height of the building from 30 feet to 25 feet. We feel that this change
will be less of an impact to our neighbors. Please note, that by lowering the height from 30
feet to 25 feet will result in an 8,000 square foot reduction of vertical storage space for paper.
Special Considerations
• Precast concrete panels that are colored to enhance our building.
• Reduce building height from 30 feet to 25 feet.
• There will be no doors along the west wall.
• Working with Land Design Collaborative we have developed a landscape plan that
includes 13 evergreens in addition to our 10 existing evergreens bringing the total to
26 evergreens for year round color and enhanced privacy from our building. This plan
includes Norway Spruce, Douglas Fir and White Spruce trees that grow quickly,
adding new growth upwards of two feet per year. Actual plan is attached.
Basis of Hardship Variance
The need for a variance to code is based on the hardship and unfavorable financial returns that
reduced space would cause to the operation of our printing company. The combination of
equipment, material storage, and the space required to stage and move materials necessitates a
substantial amount of floor space. Limiting this space causes damaging excess costs and
inefficiencies in our production cycle, these include:
• Outside storage costs
01;hgET PRINTING
13l PI'VL[i (iR�>A-4: (;I\,('.INN.-ATI EMI'16VILLE JOHN S. SWIFT PRINT
IL OH SINCE 1912 CA or NJ,INC.
• Increased transportation costs
• Increased costs for multiple receiving and loading
• Increased traffic and vehicle pollution
• Need to manage multiple inventories
• Increased production time and labor costs
At this time, our company needs to grow and add additional capabilities to remain
competitive. We moved into our current facility in Buffalo Grove in 1993 with the
understanding that our property was expandable. Because of the nature of the printing
business, our company would undergo undue hardship, if either we are required to operate
with less than the needed space (resulting in significant labor cost increases and production
slowdowns), or if we needed to relocate current operations to a new building (resulting in
damaging business interruptions and extremely high costs to relocate large printing
equipment).
Printing is a very competitive business. We need this variance to remain a viable business in
our marketplace. By approving the requested code variance, we are able to position our
business with the space required to meet our needs going forward. We avoid undue hardship
that would be caused by either operating with less than the required floor space, or incurring
the costs and business interruptions associated with a move to a new building.
Alternative Plan B
We have worked with our architect to develop this alternative plan B which will not need a
variance to build. We believe this plan is less desirable for both our neighbors and especially
our operation. The revised addition is 258' x 69' x 30' which is approximately 16,415 square
feet. This is 2,085 square feet smaller than our preferred plan. 16 parking spaces will be
added along the west side of the building to make up for the parking that is lost on the north
side of the building. With this parking we will be required light the parking area for safety.
In this plan, the building is 34 feet longer than the preferred plan. Additionally, this plan does
not require any improvement to our landscape buffer and may require us to remove some
trees.
Thank you for considering our request.
Respectively yours,
Z
Robert Masters
Vice President of Operations
John S. Swift Co., Inc.
Dick K Kuenkler/VOBG To Edward Schar/VOBG@VOBG
05/01/2007 07:00 AM cc
bcc
Subject ZBA-May 2007
999 Commerce Court
I have no comments on the building expansion proposal.
Site Location : 999 commerce ct .
------------------- -----------\,�
401
1051
90
�975
801 �
1035
920
i
a CD o D 409 825 Q
411
ARVINS WAY 413
O 415cj� 1001-
o 1023
u cc co 00 o o D m 00 779 �0 851/855 887
LV n E2 n �D
J
837
842 -774 z 775 762 > 769
843 901
849 1 848 768 769 758 m 763
852 762 763 752 757
853 858 758 759 746 753 999 —+
Parkchester 859 864 752 753 742 747
SITE
MA865 868 746 747 736 741
869 O 874 742 7q3 730 737 9111913 LOCATION
p 875 Q 980 736 W 737 726 731 951
881 2 884 730 �O 510 720
725 c—
RD. 721
1r) U-) Ln n Ln in �n Ln un n 715 2 38
-110 = 425 M v n p o cu M v
Y v 208 2081
�j 2 17 20 8 0817 0818 2081 2083 tj
0 2 OS 20 06 0805 0806 208 2080 W 805 > L A
CL (U C'l U7 o cU c''] V Q Q � 2 00 Q
Ln tY 2079 0794 207 3 207 4 72 2079 2078
NEWTOWN DR. O 2 71 207 2 0779 772 o
�C n u u u n to in to Ln v7 n o 760 IS 8 15 8 m ^ ^°
'M (U M Ln �D f- cc o (LJ M V 892 Ln Ln v7 0
v v Ln in u� 207 207 N
A AVE.
2 47207 6 7412 40 0741 740 2074 IS 5 20 46
207 w 20729 X7,212072 207 207 5 2 34 5 5 0734 15 5 5/9
97 20 0 7331 33 j
0716 207 207 20 6 717 207 8 2072 20722 207 1 207 721 22
20710 207 1
2 08 0707 708 20705 0704 2070 20704 20 9 20 0 0709 0710 2070 2071 207 9 20 2 0701
206 2069 20 206 2 93 20 2 0688 206 206 2068 206 v
2068 6832 84 0681 680 20681 0680 2068 206 675 2 76 675 698 ;20680 5 677666 206 2066 206 206 2 65 20 66 663 650 2066 2066 20 3 206 <20667668
p o Xn - o 206 <
r o m o v u u in o Q
o n o u o o N o N o In 0 3 20 46 0647 v U
`D n Cu 5788 472
P E B ^ D. 470 �
471 472 1iJ
M n ^ p
0 60a o o w t594 m oo Ln m a ^ 468 469 470CC) Q 469
2 88 oRu587 466 467 468 467
20584/ 20 1 205 2 81 20 581 Z21'3 2057 = 20 7 2 75 2 78 2057 464 465 466 z 465
20 2 0573 74 X�� 2p57p 205 20 4 w 575 0564 2056 /25,6z 2 63 462 w 463 464 M205720558 205 92055 w 59563 0552 205 Y54 Q 2 53 W 0553 460 = 461 462 Qs47 2 Se 20547 558 20 0 53 --3 20541 J 2p 1 458 Q 459 460 u 459
2 40 Q 540 20 41 w
20538 C).._ �_�nS ��„ 2052 20r 9 ?05.. 0 coo driF. 4S7 4`-iS4 FP.
VILLAGE OF '
BUFFALO GROVE
Department of Building&Zoning
Fifty Raupp Blvd.
Buffalo Grove, IL 60089-2 i 96
Phone 847-459-2530
Fax 847-459-7944
April 27, 2007
Dear Property Owner,
This is to inform you that a public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals is being
scheduled for Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Village Hall,
50 Raupp Boulevard.
Request is being made by John S. Swift III, 999 Commerce Court, for variance of Zoning
Ordinance, Section 17.48.020.F.6, pertaining to Industrial Districts, to allow a twenty foot(20')
encroachment into the required sixty foot (60') Transitional Yard (rear yard) setback for the
purpose of constructing an addition to the building.
Notice of this public hearing was published in the Daily Herald.
As a neighboring property owner, you are hereby notified of the public hearing and invited to
attend if you wish to be heard. A copy of the Agenda is enclosed for your convenience.
If you have any questions pertaining to this matter,please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Edward Schar
Building Commissioner
ES/jk
Enclosure
EXHIBITS
The following Exhibits are included for your review:
Exhibit "A"—Plat of Survey.
Exhibit "D"—Letter dated April 17, 2007 submitted by Mr. Robert Masters, John S. Swift
Company.
Exhibit "E"—Proposed Building Elevations.
Exhibit"F"—Letter dated June 7, 2007 submitted by Mr. Robert Masters, John S. Swift
Company.
Exhibit"I"—Booklet "request for Zoning Variance April 17, 2007".
Group Exhibit "J"—Proposed Landscaping Plan, Site Plans A&B, Interior Layout Plans A
&B, Photographs of Proposed Pre Cast Concrete Finish.
Board Agenda Item Submittal xv A
Requested By: William H Brimm Entered By: Ghida Neukirch
Agenda Item Title:
Executive Session: To discuss the discipline,performance or removal of an occupant of a public office in accordance
with Section 2(c)(3)of the Illinois Open Meetings Act.
Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested:
Requested: Department:
06/25/2007 07/02/2007 0 Consent Agenda OVM
0 Regular Agenda
0 None
Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be
relate to another additional reference required to present
item on the info separate from the this item to the
agenda? Board packet? board?
0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No
Item Description
Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 No
funds?
Additional Notes regarding Expenditures:
Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank.
Executive Session to discuss the discipline,performance or removal of an occupant of a public office in
accordance with Section 2(c)(3) of the Illinois Open Meetings Act.
Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized
Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files
Approval Section: Draft
Name: Date and Time:
Submitted By:
Pre-Approved By:
Approved By:
Published to Web:
Board Agenda Item Submittal xv B
Requested By: Ghida Neukirch Entered By: Ghida Neukirch
Agenda Item Title:
Executive Session: Litigation in accordance with Section 2 c(11)of the Illinois Open Meetings Act.
Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested:
Requested: Department:
06/27/2007 07/02/2007 0 Consent Agenda OVM
0 Regular Agenda
0 None
Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be
relate to another additional reference required to present
item on the info separate from the this item to the
agenda? Board packet? board?
0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No
Item Description
Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 No
funds?
Additional Notes regarding Expenditures:
Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank.
Executive Session: Litigation in accordance with Section 2 c (11) of the Illinois Open Meetings Act.
Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized
Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files
Approval Section: Draft
Name: Date and Time:
Submitted By:
Pre-Approved By:
Approved By:
Published to Web: