Loading...
2009-03-17 - Zoning Board of Appeals - Minutes DD E-, REGULAR MEETING sue*CTTE,b BUFFALO GROVE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS tar la 9 MARCH 17, 2009 Chairman Entman called the Zoning Board of Appeals regular meeting to order at 7:32 P.M. on Tuesday, March 17, 2009 in the Council Chambers of the Village Hall, 50 Raupp Boulevard. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Commissioner Stein Commissioner Dunn Commissioner Lesser Commissioner Au Chairman Entman Commissioners Absent: Commissioner Windecker Commissioner Shapiro Also Present: Brian Sheehan, Deputy Building Commissioner William Raysa, Village Attorney DeAnn Glover, Village Trustee APPROVAL OF MINUTES February 17, 2009 minutes: Corn. Stein made a motion to approve the minutes of the Zoning Board of Appeals regular meeting held on Tuesday, February 17, 2009. Corrections were submitted by Com. Dunn. Corn. Dunn seconded the motion. Roll Call Vote: AYE — Stein, Dunn, Au, Entman NAY — None ABSTAIN — Lesser Motion Passed 4 to 0, 1 Abstention. Minutes approved as corrected. OLD BUSINESS 400 W. DUNDEE ROAD, VILLAGE PLAZA — SIGN CODE, SECTIONS 14.20.030; 14.20.070; AND 14.40.025, FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING A GROUND SIGN THAT WOULD BE LOCATED CLOSER THAN THE 13.5' TO THE PROPERTY LINE AS REQUIRED BASED UPON THE SIGN HEIGHT AND MAY CONTAIN CHANGEABLE COPY FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 400 W. DUNDEE ROAD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 1 of 11 — MARCH 17, 2009 Mr. Barry Millman, Horizon Realty Services, 1130 Lake Cook Road, Suite 280, Buffalo Grove, Illinois, was present and sworn in. The public hearing notice published in the Daily Herald on February 25, 2009 was read. Corn. Stein recused himself from the public hearing due to a possible conflict of interest and left the room. Mr. Millman reviewed the previous request for a new sign for the Village Plaza Shopping center. At that time, they indicated that the tenants are looking for every edge possible in order to sustain their businesses. The property is not suffering terribly from the standpoint of tenants going out of business, but that is because they have allowed each of their tenants to reduce their rent in order to stay in business. Each tenant has asked if there is any way possible for them to be identified to the traffic traveling east and west along Dundee Road. For some time, they did have a sign in front of the property that just said "Village Plaza 400 W Dundee Road". That sign has always been a bone of contention for leasing as well as retention because the tenants say as people drive by, there is no stop light or stop sign and people tend to miss the center. This is especially true now that they have obtained a few new tenants. The tenants are saying that their customers cannot locate their new location. At the last meeting he presented a full tenant directory which would list all fourteen (14) tenants in the center as well as the four (4) office tenants. The board felt that would be too many. The Board felt that the sign size and the sign position were alright, but having all the tenants listed was not appropriate. He then suggested they could provide fewer tenant panels. They provided a new proposal with six (6) tenant panels, which would be interchangeable. The sign is designed in such a way that they can open the side panel and replace it with a different tenant. They would work with each of the tenants to determine a rotating basis so each tenant would have a period of time on the sign. Mr. Millman submitted additional documentation including photographs and a letter addressed to the Zoning Board of Appeals dated March 6, 2009. This was accepted and marked as Exhibit "F". Mr. Millman explained the photographs show shopping center ground signs along Dundee Road that have all the center tenants listed on the ground sign. The tenants feel that they are being put into a second class status because this is the only shopping center on Dundee Road that does not have a full tenant listing. They are not asking for a full tenant listing,just six (6)tenants. He advised that they are starting to lose tenants here and there to another shopping center across the street, in Arlington Heights. That center has a full tenant listing. Chase Staffing relocated there because of the sign. The documentation also includes signatures of each of the tenants indicating that they support the request. Ch. Entman read the Village Engineer's memorandum addressed to Brian Sheehan and dated February 2, 2009 which states: "I have no comments on the proposal." Ch. Entman read the email sent by Kenny and Sandra Holm addressed to the Building Department dated February 27, 2009. Com. Dunn asked about the color and illumination of the panels. Mr. Millman explained that the panels would be internally illuminated on a white background and black or bronze lettering. He is not yet certain as to the exact color of the lettering. Corn. Dunn asked if there would be any ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 2 of 11 —MARCH 17,2009 pictures or logos. Mr. Millman stated that at this point, it would only be letters. Com. Dunn asked if it would be a problem if the Board restricted the lettering to one (1) color. Mr. Millman would prefer not to,but it is important that he receives approval for the sign. Corn. Dunn asked if it would be a problem if the Board restricted the panels to lettering only. Mr. Millman would prefer not to. He would like to be as flexible as possible. Many national tenants, such as Subway, will not come to a property unless they are allowed to put their own logos and colors on the sign. He has one (1) tenant right now in the center that does require in his lease that the lettering used in his signage at least be in his logo type. He could accept no pictures. If there will be a restriction he would agree to no pictures and no specific logo but would allow tenants to use their trademarked logo type. Corn. Dunn asked about the font on the signs. Mr. Millman advised that they would be all the same size font. Corn. Lesser was not present at the last meeting but did read the minutes. He stated that he would like to restrict the hours of illumination of the sign. The center is adjacent to a residential area and he does not want the sign to be on all night. The businesses are not operating in the wee hours of the night. He asked if the existing wall signs above the tenant space would remain. Mr. Millman stated that the ground sign would be in additional to the wall signs. Corn. Lesser asked if the tenants are permitted to have logos above their spaces. He does not see a need to duplicate if the signage above the space already has logos. He would also like to see a standard for the color of the lettering and the font size on the panels. Mr. Millman asked about the hours of illumination. Corn. Lesser stated he feels that 10:30 P.M. or 11:00 P.M. would be sufficient. The businesses should be closed well in advance of that time. Mr. Millman stated that should not be a problem. Ch. Entman asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak. Mr. Kenny Holm, 401 Chenault Road, Buffalo Grove, Illinois, was present and sworn in. Mr. Holm stated that the homes were built before the shopping center. When the center was built, the elevation was not level and there was a gradual slope going down. There is a four (4) foot drop two (2) homes down from him. The lights from vehicles come right into the yard. There were bushes installed, a live fence, along the rear as part of the agreement when the center was built. Two (3) or three (3) years ago the bushes were taken out. The Village was not aware that the bushes were removed. They want the live fence put back in. This has been on ongoing issue for two (2) years. They continue to receive excuses from the management company such as, they had to wait for bids for new bushes; they had to choose one; it was too hot to plant bushes; it was too late in the season to plant bushes. They had finally put some bushes in. However, the bushes were twigs, not a live fence. They were planted six (6) feet on center and they did not get the approval from Rick Kuhl, Village Forester. They were supposed to be kept up to date on what was happening. No one ever called. The bushes planted will not provide adequate screening. He planted similar bushes three (3) feet on center. He feels that two (2) years is too long to wait to resolve the matter. He wants the center to be in compliance by May 31, 2009. If the center is not in compliance by then a fine should be imposed for every day that matter continues. Ch. Entman asked if Mr. Holm had any issues with the sign that is being proposed. Mr. Holm stated that he feels the Board should not consider anything being done with the sign until the ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 3 of 11 —MARCH 17, 2009 bush issue is resolved. Ch. Entman asked if Mr. Holm has any objection to the sign. Mr. Holm stated his issue is regarding the bushes. Ch. Entman explained that the issue of the bushes is not something that is in the purview of the Zoning Board of Appeals. He explained that the Zoning Board of Appeals can impose conditions concerning the sign, but not that matter of the bushes. Mr. Holm asked who would address the issue of the bushes. Mr. Sheehan stated that Mr. Holm can contact him to discuss the matter of the bushes. Mr. Ted Albers, 393 Chenault Road, Buffalo Grove, Illinois, was present and sworn in. Mr. Albers explained that he hopes that Mr. Millman was using Subway as a metaphor because food services are not a permitted use at this center. He is concerned about the lighting. He lives directly behind the center and has to look at a big ugly building, door number 14, door number 15, that are lit up all different hours of the night. Snow gets shoveled at midnight. He would like to see a restriction on the illumination. He is also concerned about the bushes. Mr. Scott Kamish, 365 Chenault Road, Buffalo Grove, Illinois, was present and sworn in. He lives on the east side of the center. He has concerns about the timing of the lights. He is not sure if the sign will be located on the east side or the west side of the center. Because the bushes are not that tall, the light shines through from the center into his property. There have been a lot of things going on the last few years and he would like the Board to make sure that things are carried out properly. They have had to call the Village numerous times on things throughout the years. Mr. Bill Raysa explained that the Zoning Board of Appeals is an appointed Board by the Village Board. He gets the impression that some believe that this is the elected Board, the Trustees of the Village. This is not the Village Board. This is a subsidiary Commission of the Village Board. It only has certain authority. The Zoning Board of Appeals can not go outside of that authority. Ch. Entman stated that he recalls that the size of the sign was an issue last month. He remembers discussing that he was not in favor of the size of the sign as it was proposed at thirteen and one- half (13-1/2) feet high. He also remembers discussing a possibility of the limited number of tenant panels. He recalls discussing three (3) tenant panels that would be rotated on a periodic basis as determined by the tenants and Mr. Millman. He continues to have an issue with the height of the sign. He also has seen that national tenants are stuck on their logos and colors. They have not allowed that. There have been some circumstances in the past where a national tenant agreed to change their signage. They have allowed national tenants in the Village. He is not aware of any national tenants in this center now. If a national chain does come into the center, the Board could look at it individually. He agrees with the comments concerning the color of the panels. He also agrees with the comments concerning logos. He is not in favor of approving anything right now that would allow multiple colors or multiple logos. As far as the tenants claiming that they are treated as a second class status, he has no idea of what that means. He cannot believe that the type of sign they have will somehow implicate the nature of their business or somehow impugn their ability to provide their goods or their services. He has not been convinced of that before. If tenants are moving, as a landlord, that would bother him. He also finds it hard to believe that tenants are leaving because of their sign identification. The cost of moving alone would prohibit them from moving if they didn't have to. The photographs submitted as Exhibit "F" show long standing centers in the Village. The signs are just as old as ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 4 of 11 —MARCH 17,2009 the centers. If these signs are proof of the types of signs allowed, that would not be relevant. These signs were not reviewed or approved by this Board any time recently. Mr. Millman explained that the photograph on the lower left side is a brand new sign. Ch. Entman is not in favor of the newly proposed sign. He would have liked to see something smaller and limited to less tenant panels. These businesses are not impulse locations. Mr. Millman stated that the neighbors caught him off guard. He apologized for not being prepared to respond to each item mentioned. He can report that they are in communication on a regular basis with the Building Department and the Village Forester. He is not familiar with the terms used regarding the spacing of the bushes. They are trying to and have a plan to correct the problem. They know that they are obligated to do so. The plan has been submitted to the Village, which has been accepted. He will be happy to meet with the homeowners individually to discuss their concerns. They want to be good neighbors. Mr. Millman also stated that they were told that the height of the sign was alright because it is a replacement of a previously existing sign. He would like to know what size sign the Board would approve. They thought that since they are replacing the sign, they would improve it by putting a limited tenant directory on it. There are sixteen (16) tenants in the building in eleven hundred (1100) to twenty-four(2400) square feet spaces. It is hard to depict which three (3) would get on the sign. It would be much easier to do with six (6) tenant panels. He wants to be fair to the tenants. It would not be worth it if they could only have three (3) panels. He disagrees with the comment that signs do not generate business. He manages one million three hundred thousand (1,300,000) square feet of properties. He leases seventy (70) centers. He has been doing this for many years. Even though the Board feels that signage is not important, the retailers believe that signage is everything and has an impact on their business. Ch. Entman advised that most of the tenants in this center are not retailers. There may be a few, but the majority of the center is non-retail. He is not saying that businesses don't need signage. He is saying that this is not the type of center that is an impulse location by seeing a sign. Mr. Millman responded that the tenants are complaining that their clients cannot locate the center. There were no additional questions or comments from the Commissioners. There were no additional questions or comments from the audience. Com. Dunn made the following motion: I move we recommend to the Village Board to grant the request made by Horizon Management, 1130 Lake Cook Road, Suite 280, Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089, for variance of Sign Code, Section 14.20.030, pertaining to Business Districts; Section 14.20.070, pertaining to Ground Signs; and Section 14.40.025, pertaining to Changeable Copy Signs, for the purpose of installing a ground sign that would be located closer than the thirteen and one half (13.5) feet to the property line as required based upon the sign height and may contain changeable copy for the property located at 400 W. Dundee Road. Sign to be constructed pursuant to Exhibit "E2" submitted with the variation application. Subject to the Village Engineer's memorandum dated ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 5 of 11 —MARCH 17, 2009 February 2, 2009. The color of the font on the panels to be one color, black; to be in the same font as the Village Plaza; is limited to a single line of copy; no pictures, logos, or symbols; and hours of illumination limited to 7:00 A.M. until 10:30 P.M. Pursuant to Sign Code, Section 14.44.010, Sub-section B. Com. Lesser seconded the motion. Roll Call Vote: AYE—Lesser, Au NAY—Dunn, Entman ABSTAIN—None Motion DENIED 2 to 2. The Petitioner was notified of their right to appeal the decision to the Village Board. 14 UNIVERSITY COURT, ROBERT AND CAROL CLARK — ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 17.40.020, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING A SCREEN PORCH THAT WOULD ENCROACH A DISTANCE FOUR (4) FEET INTO THE REQUIRED THIRTY (30) FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK Mr. Robert Clark and Mrs. Carol Clark, 14 University Court, were present and sworn in. The public hearing notice published in the Daily Herald on February 25, 2009 was read. Mr. Clark explained that they would like to have a screened porch to enjoy the outdoors. The size of the room would be twelve (12) feet by fourteen (14) feet and would extend over a staircase that is four(4) feet in width. The room is their 50th wedding anniversary gift. Ch. Entman read the Village Engineer's memorandum addressed to Brian Sheehan dated February 27, 2009 which states: "I have no comments on the proposal." Com. Lesser does not have an issue with the request but would like more information on what the screen porch would look like. Julie Kamka, Recording Secretary, advised that the construction drawings with permit application are in the Building Department and asked if the Board would like to see them. Corn. Lesser asked to see them. A break was taken so the plans could be retrieved. Corn. Lesser reviewed the construction plans and confirmed that the materials would match the existing home. He asked if the room would be heated. Mr. Clark advised that the screen room would not have heat. There will be electric in the room. Com Lesser did not have any issues. Corn. Au asked if the screen room is being placed to purposely enclose the staircase. Mr. Clark advised that it is their intention to enclose the staircase. There were no additional questions or comments from the Commissioner. There were no questions or comments from the audience. • ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 6 of 11 —MARCH 17, 2009 Com. Lesser made the following motion: I move we grant the request made by Robert and Carol Clark, 14 University Court, for variance of Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.40.020, pertaining to Area, Height, Bulk and Placement Regulations, for the purpose of constructing a screen porch that would encroach a distance of four(4) feet into the required thirty(30) foot rear yard setback. Subject to the Village Engineer's memorandum dated February 27, 2009. Materials to match the existing construction in like kind and quality. The Petitioner has demonstrated hardship and unique circumstances. The proposed screen room will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare and will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Corn. Stein seconded the motion. Roll Call Vote: AYE—Stein, Dunn, Lesser, Au, Entman NAY—None ABSTAIN—None Motion Passed 5 to 0. Findings of Fact attached. Permit may be issued in fifteen (15) days — April 2, 2009. 388 LAUREN LANE, THERESA PRINDIVILLE — ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTIONS 17.32.020 AND 17.40.020, TO CONSTRUCT A 1-1/2 STORY ADDITION THAT WOULD REDUCE THE REQUIRED SEPARATION OF THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE AND THE DETACHED GARAGE TO FIVE (5) FEET AND TO CONSTRUCT A ROOFED- OVER FRONT PORCH THAT WOULD ENCROACH THREE (3) FEET SIX (6) INCHES INTO THE REQUIRED TWENTY-FIVE (25) FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK Mr. Michael Sayers, 27 S. Pistakee Lake Road, Fox Lake, Illinois, was present and sworn in. The public hearing notice published in the Daily Herald on February 25, 2009 was read. Mr. Sayers distributed a packet of the information to the Commissioners. This was marked as Exhibit"E". Ch. Entman asked if the Petitioner was present. Mr. Sayers explained that Theresa Prindiville was not present but that her son Raymond Prindiville was present. Mr. Sayers explained that two (2) variances are being requested. The first variance is to add a roofed-over front porch that would encroach into the front yard setback. They currently have a simple eve. It is a very modest house. She is looking to add a return gable that would allow her guests and visitors to step outside under the roof for protection from the elements. Curb appeal is important and she wants to dress up the front of the house. Mr. Sayers explained that the second variance is for the distance between a proposed addition and the existing detached garage. Cost is a huge consideration for this customer and they are trying to keep it simple and maintain as much backyard as possible. It also has a direct relation as to how they can use the existing house. Mr. Sayers directed the Commissioner to the last page of ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 7 of 11 —MARCH 17,2009 Exhibit "E" and reviewed the layout of the proposed addition. The location of the addition and the layout from right to left is very important. Ch. Entman read the Village Engineer's memorandum addressed to Brian Sheehan dated March 3, 2009 which states: "I have no comments on either of the proposals at this location." Ch. Entman would like a letter of authorization from the Petitioner to allow Mr. Sayers and Raymond Prindiville to represent the owner. Corn. Dunn asked about the materials for the addition. Mr. Sayers stated that the house is currently aluminum sided and the owner will do a complete update, replace windows and reside the house. The house will be completely resided in either aluminum or vinyl. Corn. Dunn asked about the roof. Mr. Sayers stated that the roof will match. The roof is fairly new so they will match the existing shingle for the addition. There were no additional questions or comments from the Commissioners. There were no questions or comments from the audience. Com. Stein made the following motion: I move we grant the request made by Theresa Prindiville, 388 Lauren Lane, for variance of Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.40.020, pertaining to Area, Height, Bulk and Placement Regulations, for the purpose of constructing a roofed-over front porch that would encroach a distance of three (3) feet six (6) inches into the required twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback subject to a letter of authorization being submitted. Subject to the Village Engineer's memorandum dated March 3, 2009. Materials to the match the existing construction in like kind and quality. Pursuant to plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the Village. The Petitioner's agent has demonstrated hardship and unique circumstances. The proposed roofed-over front porch will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare and will not alter the existing character of the neighborhood. Corn. Dunn seconded the motion. Roll Call Vote: AYE—Stein, Dunn, Lesser, Au, Entman NAY—None ABSTAIN—None Motion Passed 5 to 0. Findings of Fact attached. The permit can be issued in fifteen (15) days — April 2, 2009. Corn. Stein made the following motion: I move we recommend to the Village Board to grant the request made by Theresa Prindiville, 388 Lauren Lane, for variance of Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.32.020, pertaining to Location of Accessory Buildings and Structures, for the purpose of constructing a one and a half(1-1/2) story ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 8 of 11 —MARCH 17, 2009 addition on the rear of the home that would reduce the separation of the principal structure and the detached garage to five(5) feet subject to a letter of authorization being submitted. Subject to the Village Engineer's memorandum dated March 3, 2009. Materials to the match the existing construction in like kind and quality. Pursuant to plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the Village. The Petitioner's agent has demonstrated hardship and unique circumstances. The proposed reduced separation will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare and will not alter the existing character of the neighborhood. Corn. Dunn seconded the motion. Roll Call Vote: AYE—Stein, Dunn, Lesser, Au, Entman NAY—None ABSTAIN—None Motion Passed 5 to 0. Findings of Fact attached. This item will appear on the April 6, 2009 Village Board agenda. 301 NORTH RIVERWALK DRIVE,HAMILTON PARTNERS -REVIEW OF THE STATUS OF THE THREE (3)EXISTING LEASING SIGNS FOR RIVERWALK PLACE APARTMENTS Mr. Kirk Hamilton, Hamilton Partners, 1130 lake Cook Road, Suite 190, Buffalo Grove, Illinois was present and sworn in. Mr. Hamilton explained that they had leased eighty-seven(87) of the ninety(90)units. But they are facing fourteen(14) move outs by the end of April. They are requesting an extension for the three(3) signs. Ch. Entman asked if the leases are typically for one(1) year. Mr. Hamilton explained that they are typically for one(1) year. Ch. Entman does not have any issues with granting an extension for six (6)months. There were no additional questions or comments from the Commissioners. There were no questions or comments from the audience. Corn. Stein made a motion to allow the three(3)existing"For Rent, Sale, Lease"signs to remain located at Riverwalk Place Apartments, 301 North Riverwalk Drive. Hamilton Partners shall appear at the September 2009 Zoning Board of Appeals regular meeting to review the status of the temporary signs. Com. Dunn seconded the motion. Roll Call Vote: AYE—Stein, Dunn, Lesser, Au, Entman NAY—None ABSTAIN—None Motion Passed 5 to 0. Item to appear on the September 2009 Zoning Board of Appeals agenda for status review. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 9 of 11 —MARCH 17,2009 BUFFALO GROVE BUSINESS PARK, HAMLITON PARTNERS — REVIEW OF THE EXISTING LEASING SIGNS LOCATED AT 135 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS ROAD AND 1110 LAKE COOK ROAD Ms. Valerie Loughman, Hamilton Partners, 1130 Lake Cook Road, Buffalo Grove, Illinois, was present and sworn in. Ch. Entman stated that he is a tenant in the 1130 Lake Cook Road building, but this will not affect his decision. Ms. Loughman explained that they are requesting the extension to allow the leasing signs along Lake Cook Road and Arlington Heights Road to remain due to the economy. Photographs of the existing signs and leasing information were reviewed by the Commissioners. Ch. Entman stated that the percentage of occupancy has been steady for about the year. Ms. Loughman stated that the lease for the 1120 Lake Cook Road building is up in April and they have not heard anything about renewing. Ch. Entman believes that the signs should be reviewed in six (6)months. There were no additional questions or comments from the Commissioners. There were no questions or comments from the audience. Corn. Dunn made a motion to allow the two (2) existing temporary signs to remain located at 135 Arlington Heights Road and 1110 Lake Cook Road. Hamilton Partners shall appear at the September 2009 Zoning Board of Appeals regular meeting to review the status of the temporary signs. Corn. Stein seconded the motion. Roll Call Vote: AYE—Stein, Dunn, Lesser, Au, Entman NAY—None ABSTAIN—None Motion Passed 5 to 0. Item to appear on the September 2009 Zoning Board of Appeals agenda for status review. PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO FENCE CODE, SECTION 15.20.110, PERTAINING TO VARIANCE—AUTHORITY TO GRANT Mr. Raysa explained that the brackets were removed and this was added to the agenda as requested. There were no additional questions or comments from the Commissioners. Com. Lesser made a motion to recommend to the Village Board to approve the proposed text amendment to Fence Code, Section 15.20.110 concerning the Fence Code Criteria as drafted and dated February 27, 2009. Corn. Dunn seconded the motion. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 10 of 11 —MARCH 17, 2009 Roll Call Vote: AYE — Stein, Dunn, Lesser, Au, Entman NAY — None ABSTAIN — None Motion Passed 5 to 0. Item to appear on the April 6, 2009 Village Board agenda. ANNOUNCEMENTS A new photograph of the Zoning Board of Appeals will be taken at the May 19, 2009 meeting. A reminder will be sent out in advance. If you are aware that you cannot attend the May 19, 2009 meeting, please advise Julie Kamka. ADJOURNMENT Motion to adjourn the meeting was made by Corn. Lesser and seconded by Com. Stein. Voice Vote — AYE was unanimous. Ch. Entman adjourned the meeting at 8:57 P.M. Submitted by, c--) ttacaLL J ie Kamka ecordin Secretary ary ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 11 of 11 — MARCH 17, 2009