2011-05-17 - Zoning Board of Appeals - Minutes 12 OD
/4ims
5 Sue•11ITT
REGULAR MEETING (o Jai 1
.J BUFFALO GROVE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MAY 17, 2011
Chairman Entman called the Zoning Board of Appeals regular meeting to order at 7:32
P.M. on Tuesday, May 17, 2011 in the Council Chambers of the Village Hall, 50 Raupp
Boulevard.
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present: Commissioner Cesario
Commissioner Steingold
Commissioner Windecker
Commissioner Lesser
Commissioner Shapiro
Chairman Entman
Commissioners Absent: Commissioner Au
Also Present: Brian Sheehan, Deputy Building Commissioner
William Raysa, Village Attorney
Trustee Les Ottenheimer
/
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
April 12, 2011 minutes:
Com. Windecker made a motion to approve the minutes of the Zoning Board of Appeals
regular meeting held on Tuesday, April 12, 2011. Corn. Shapiro seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote: AYE — Steingold, Windecker, Shapiro, Entman
NAY — None
ABSTAIN — Cesario, Lesser
Motion Passed 4 to 0, 2 Abstentions. Minutes approved as submitted.
OLD BUSINESS
301 NORTH RIVERWALK DRIVE, RIVERWALK PLACE APARTMENTS —
REVIEW OF STATUS OF THE EXISTING FOR RENT, SALE, LEASE, SIGNS
Mr. Tim Beechick, Hamilton Partners, 1130 Lake Cook Road, Suite 190, Buffalo Grove,
Illinois 60089, was present and sworn in.
Mr. Beechick explained that these are marketing signs to help identify the apartment
project at 301 North Riverwalk Drive. One (1) of the critical signs will be addressed later
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MAY 17, 2011
PAGE 1 of 11
V
V
on the agenda. There are two (2) signs that need to be addressed. One (1) sign is located
at the corner of North Riverwalk Drive and Riverwalk Drive as you come in off of
Milwaukee Avenue. This is a directional sign that allows traffic to be directed to the
building. They are requesting that this sign be allowed to continue for an extended period
of time. The sign is important to direct traffic to the project. The second sign is located on
the 2150 Lake Cook Road monument sign off of Lake Cook Road at the Milwaukee
Avenue exit ramp. This is sign directs traffic onto Riverwalk Drive from Lake Cook
Road. Once people see that sign they know to make the turn into the property. They are
requesting the continuance of the two (2) sign to help send traffic in the right direction.
Corn. Lesser asked about the current occupancy of the apartments. Mr. Beechick stated
that he believes that there may be one (1) unit that is available, but the leasing has been
strong recently. Com Lesser asked how many signs are really needed for the development
given that the project is nearly one hundred (100) percent occupied. The ZBA is receptive
to signage to help market when there is a high vacancy. Mr. Beechick stated that the issue
with apartments is a continuous marketing effort. Leases are typically signed for a year
and as a result of that there is constant turnover. They have been fortunate to fill units as
they become available. Unlike the office or business leasing field the apartment business
is much more short term and as a result the marketing signage is critical to them. Also the
location of the property is removed from the main thoroughfare. As a result of that,
without the signage, many people miss the turn. One year leases turn constantly on the
property. They are continually marketing this project.
Mr. Sheehan stated that a public hearing that is scheduled for later on the agenda will
address off-premises directional signs for the project. He suggested the ZBA address the
two (2) directional signs; the sign at 185 Milwaukee Avenue would be an off-premise
directional sign; The second directional sign that is located on the property would be an
oversized directional sign; the third sign is the only sign that is actually a leasing sign.
This leasing sign could be handled under this request and the two (2) directional signs
could possibly be allowed as a variance.
Ch. Entman stated that he would like to move to the other agenda item, since the
discussion has begun on these signs.
NEW BUSINESS ITEM B
185 MILWAUKEE AVENUE, HAMILTON PARTNERS — SIGN CODE,
SECTIONS 14.20.030; 14.20.070; AND 14.40.145, TO ALLOW A SECOND
GROUND SIGN ON THE PROPERTY, WHICH WOULD BE AN OFF-
PREMISES DIRECTIONAL GROUND SIGN. SAID GROUND SIGN WOULD BE
LOCATED CLOSER TO THE PROPERTY LINE THAN PERMITTED, AND
WOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN 250 FEET OF AN EXISTING GROUND SIGN
LOCATED ON THE SAME PARCEL
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MAY 17, 2011
PAGE 2 of 11
Mr. Tim Beechick, Hamilton Partners, 1130 Lake Cook Road, Suite 190, Buffalo Grove,
Illinois 60089, was present and sworn in. The pubic hearing notice published in the Daily
Herald on April 29, 2011 was read.
Mr. Beechick explained that the proposed sign is paramount in getting people off of
Milwaukee Avenue. Riverwalk Drive is the main access point to the project. The location
of this sign is critical for them to get people to be aware of that apartment project is there.
They have been before the ZBA several times for review of status for the leasing sign.
There are two signs they would request be allowed to exist by variance: one (1)
permanent directional sign located at North Riverwalk Drive and Riverwalk Drive. The
second sign would be a permanent directional sign at the corner of Riverwalk Drive and
Milwaukee Avenue. They have reduced the size of the sign at 185 Milwaukee Avenue.
They brought it down to three (3) feet by eight (8) feet with a one (1) foot brick base so
the sign would be smaller than the temporary leasing sign that exists there now. The
proposed sign also addresses Mr. Kim's concerns of the sign being too tall at the corner
and blocking the view of his sign. They reduced the size of the sign and gave it a
horizontal look. They also submitted a revised site plan showing the location of the
proposed sign off the public right-of-way while still being located on green space within
Mr. Kim's property. Hamilton Partners would like to follow Mr. Sheehan's suggestion
and include the directional temporary ground sign located at North Riverwalk Drive and
Riverwalk Drive in the variance request.
Ch. Entman read the Village Engineer's memorandum addressed to Brian Sheehan dated
May 2, 2011, which states: "It appears that the existing sign is located in the right of way
and although no location is indicated for the proposed sign it would appear that it is also
in the right of way."
After this issue was brought forward to Mr. Beechick, the site plan was revised and
resubmitted to the Village. The Village Engineer reviewed the revised proposal and
submitted an email concerning same.
Ch. Entman read the Village Engineer's memorandum addressed to Julie Kamka dated
May 13, 2011 which states: "I have no comments on the revised proposal."
Ch. Entman read a letter addressed to Tim Beechick, Hamilton Partners, from Mr.
Hanyoo Kim, Wooil Restaurant, dated April 20, 2011, marked as Exhibit "I" that grants
approval for the proposed off-premises directional sign.
Ch. Entman advised that he is tenant in the Hamilton Partners Buffalo Grove Business
Park but this will not affect his decision.
There were no additional questions or comments from the Commissioners. There were no
questions or comments from the audience.
301 NORTH RIVERWALK DRIVE, RIVERWALK PLACE — FOR RENT, SALE,
LEASE, SIGNS
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MAY 17, 2011
PAGE 3 of 11
Corn. Shapiro made a motion to allow the existing off-premises "For Rent, Sale, Lease"
sign located on the monument sign at 2150 Lake Cook Road to remain for Riverwalk
Place Apartments, 301 North Riverwalk Drive. Hamilton Partners shall appear at the
November 15, 2011 Zoning Board of Appeals regular meeting to review the status of the
temporary sign. Corn. Windecker seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote: AYE—Cesario, Steingold, Windecker, Lesser, Shapiro, Entman
NAY—None
ABSTAIN—None
Motion Passed 6 to 0. Item to appear on the November 15, 2011 Zoning Board of
Appeals agenda.
NEW BUSINESS ITEM B - 185 MILWAUKEE AVENUE, HAMILTON PARTNERS
Corn. Lesser made the following motion:
I move we recommend to the Village Board to grant the request made by Hamilton
Partners, 1130 Lake Cook Road, Suite 190, Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089, for variance of
Sign Code, Section 14.20.030, pertaining to Business Districts; Section 14.20.070,
pertaining to Ground Signs; Section 14.20.130 pertaining to Directional Signs and
Section 14.40.145, pertaining to Off-Premises Signs, for the purpose of allowing the
oversized directional ground sign located at North Riverwalk Drive and Riverwalk Drive;
and to allow a second ground sign on the property at 185 Milwaukee Avenue, which
would be on off-premises directional ground sign. Said ground sign would be located
closer to the property line than permitted, and would be located within two hundred fifty
(250) feet of an existing ground sign located on the same parcel for the property located
at 185 Milwaukee Avenue.
Subject to the Village Engineer's memorandum dated May 13, 2011. Pursuant to Exhibit
"E"and the revised site plan marked Exhibit"A2"dated May 10, 2011.
Pursuant to Sign Code, Section 14.44.010, Subsection B.
Com. Windecker seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote: AYE—Cesario, Steingold, Windecker, Lesser, Shapiro, Entman
NAY—None
ABSTAIN—None
Motion Passed 6 to 0. Item to appear on the June 20, 2011 Village Board agenda.
185 MILWAUKEE AVENUE, WOOIL RESTAURANT — SIGN CODE,
SECTIONS 14.20.030 AND 14.20.070, TO REFACE THE EXISTING GROUND
SIGN
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MAY 17, 2011
PAGE 4 of 11
Mr. Hanyoo Kim, Wooil Restaurant, 185 Milwaukee Avenue, was present and sworn in.
`../ The public hearing notice published in the Daily Herald on April 29, 2011 was read.
Mr. Kim explained that they have an existing ground sign that was used by the previous
restaurant. They would like to reface that ground sign. They have already started to
prepare the pole to be repainted. They found out that a variance would be required just to
put a new face on the existing sign. They looked at placing a combination sign with the
new Hamilton Partners sign at the corner but that was not large enough. They looked at
other areas on the property, but there is not enough green space to place a new ground
sign. There is also no space for a wall sign on the building due to the awning. He also
inquired about a roof sign, but was advised that would also require a variance. He has no
choice but to ask to use the existing ground sign.
Ch. Entman read the Village Engineer's memorandum addressed to Brian Sheehan dated
May 2, 2011 which states: "I have no comments on the proposal."
Ch. Entman also read the ART minutes dated May 3, 2011. The ART recommended
painting the pole and submitting a landscaping plan to the Village. Mr. Sheehan stated
that the Village has not received an official landscaping plan. He has spoke with Mr. Kim
about what can be done. They have a unique situation in that there is pavement all around
the sign so there is nothing they can really do with the exception of possibly putting in
planters. Mr. Kim has already purchased some planters that he was going to hang from
the awning in that area to make it look a little nicer.
Ch. Entman noted a revised site plan submitted detailing the location of the existing sign
and the distance to the property lines.
Ch. Entman confirmed with Mr. Sheehan the height to the bottom of the sign box. Mr.
Sheehan stated that it is twelve (12) feet to the bottom of the sign and the height of the
sign box is six (6) feet. It is eighteen (18) feet to the top of the sign but the pole is a little
higher.
Com. Windecker asked Mr. Sheehan if he had verified with the Fire Department the
clearance requirement for the bottom of the sign box. Mr. Sheehan stated that Deputy
Fire Marshal Michehl confirmed that the Fire Department would not be using that front
access drive if there was a fire, they would park on Milwaukee Avenue.
There were no additional questions or comments from the Commissioners. There were no
questions or comments from the audience.
Com. Windecker made the following motion:
I move we recommend to the Village Board to grant the request made by Wooil
Restaurant, 185 Milwaukee Avenue, for variance of Sign Code, Section 14.20.030,
pertaining to Business Districts; and Section 14.20.070, pertaining to Ground Signs, for
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MAY 17, 2011
PAGE 5 of 11
the purpose of refacing the existing ground sign pursuant to Exhibit "E" submitted with
\-1 the application.
Subject to the Village Engineer's memorandum dated May 2, 2011 and the ART minutes
dated May 3, 2011. The Petitioner shall paint the pole base of the sign and provide a
landscaping plan for review and approval by the Village.
Pursuant to Sign Code, Section 14.44.010, Subsection B.
Corn. Lesser seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote: AYE—Cesario, Steingold, Windecker, Lesser, Shapiro, Entman
NAY—None
ABSTAIN—None
Motion Passed 6 to 0. Item to appear on the June 20,2011 Village Board agenda.
1500 ABBOTT COURT, TWIN RINKS ICE PAVILION—SIGN CODE, SECTION
14.40.025, VILLAGE BOARD DEFRREAL BACK TO THE ZBA FOR APPEAL
OF THE ZBA DECISION TO DENY THE REQUEST
Mr. Tom Wood, White Way Sign Company, 451 Kingston Court, Mount Prospect,
Illinois 60056; Ms. Jessica Heath-Bolden, White Way Sign Company, 451 Kingston
Court, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60089; and Mr. Gary Pivar, Twin Rinks Ice Pavilion,
1500 Abbott Court,were present and sworn in.
Ch. Entman explained that after the Petitioners spoke with the Village Board they
recommended that the Petitioner come back to the ZBA. Updated materials were
distributed to the ZBA; an email dated May 13, 2011 from Jessica Heath-Bolden to Brian
Sheehan; a letter dated May 12, 2011 from Gary Pivar to the Village of Buffalo Grove;
and a memorandum dated September 25, 2007 from the U.S. Department of
Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
Mr. Wood explained that after speaking with the Village Board, they obtained new
information from the Federal Highway Administration. He provided the memorandum as
to how they recommend changing electronic message signs. This is based on studies that
they conducted on highway traffic and speeds and different letter sizes. One item is a
memo that on page 2 of 3 discusses duration of messages on highways. Duration of each
message display is generally between four (4) and ten (10) seconds, eight (8) seconds is
recommended. The duration between the display of two (2) phases of messages should
not exceed .3 seconds. They recommend using four(4) to five (5) words per phase or per
slide. They also recommend that there are no more than four(4)pieces of information.
Mr. Wood stated that Mr. Pivar is willing to abide by those terms. They are looking to do
static graphics on the sign as well, such as logos for high school teams or other different
graphics depending on what is going on at the ice rink. The change rate between displays
that they are asking for is ten(10) seconds. That is based on some of the information that
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MAY 17, 2011
PAGE 6 of 11
they provided and that they did not have at the last ZBA meeting. After speaking with the
Village of Buffalo Grove, he had sent someone out to take a look at the Village of Mount
Prospect sign. The light levels there were about 1,000 nits at night and 7,500 nits during
the day. He also brought a demo electronic message center to show the ZBA differences
in nit levels. They will abide by what the Board recommended which is 500 nits at night
and 7,500 nits during the day as a maximum.
Mr. Wood reiterated that the idea was to amend the existing variance because they are
having an issue getting the information out of all the aspects that go on with an ice rink
including information regarding ice shows, adult hockey, kids' hockey, club hockey,high
school hockey, etc. There are two (2) rinks with the facility not to mention skate
sharpening and the pro shop. They have a party room as well. The purpose of the sign is
to put messages out to the public to let them know that the rink exists and what is going
on within the facility. The project was first discussed when last year the Blackhawks won
the Stanley Cup. They were trying to grasp onto the hockey rage in this area.
Mr. Raysa asked Mr. Wood if there is an instrument that actually measures a nit. Mr.
Wood replied that there is, it is called a photometer. You hold the instrument about a foot
away from the sign to measure the nit level. Nits are measured in candelabra per square
meter from a distance of one (1) meter away. A candelabra is like the arm of a menorah.
The measurement is the amount of candle brightness levels. When you say 7,500 nits it is
like having 7,500 nits in a candle from a distance of one (1) meter away. The further
away you are the level of nits would be less because as you get further away it gets
�.J dimmer.
Ch. Entman stated that he knows that the Village Board has certain comments, questions,
recommendations or suggestions. He would like to review them to see if the Petitioner
has addressed them. He noted that at least four (4) of the Trustees supported a twenty
(20) second time interval. The Petitioner is proposing ten (10) seconds. One (1) Trustee
was of the opinion that the Appearance Review Team (ART) recommendation was in
order, which called for thirty (30) second time interval between screen changes. The
petitioner is proposing 7,500 nits during the day and 500 nits at night. It was requested to
set up a digital display at the site. Then the Village received communication that said that
the sign company's onsite digital display was not available. Mr. Wood stated that he
brought a demo digital display to the meeting. Ch. Entman stated that he believed that
there was a comment at the Village Board meeting regarding providing some type of
overlay that would show how the sign lighting would affect the surrounding
neighborhood. Mr. Wood stated that he provided a light intensity reference sheet initially.
Ch. Entman asked about limiting the color to one (1) color. Mr. Wood stated that he
explained at the last meeting that when you have a sign it can get monotonous.
Mr. Wood presented an electronic demonstration of what the sign would look like with
screen changes at ten (10) second intervals. The demonstration will show how colors can
separate the messages. If the messages are all white it becomes difficult to distinguish
one (1) message from another and is difficult to read. The demonstration included text
and logos. They had calculated how fast a car would be moving as well as looking at the
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MAY 17, 2011
PAGE 7 of 11
angles that the sign has. Typically a sign has a viewing angle of approximately one
hundred forty (140) degrees. Based on the information from the Federal Highway
Administration they do not want more than two (2) screens for the same message with
trying to use less than four (4) pieces (words/logos) per screen. The demonstration also
showed how difficult it is separate messages when they are all one (1) color. It would be
nice distinguish between messages. That is the benefit of colors. Colors also help with
graphics as well.
Ch. Entman asked the Petitioner to clarify what exactly is being proposed. Mr. Wood
stated that the sign would comply with the nit levels that the Village imposes. They also
agreed to have static graphics. They would make the message static at 10:30 p.m. The
sign would not change from 10:30 p.m. on. The sign turn off at 1:00 a.m. The nit levels
would be lowered after 10:30 p.m. if that is something that the Village would require.
The sign has to compete with the sun during the day and ambient light at night. They are
asking for ten(10) second screen changes.
Corn. Windecker advised that the memorandum from the Federal Highway
Administration states in part: "The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance
to Division Realty Professional concerning off-premises changeable message signs
adjacent to routes subject to requirements for effective control under Highway
Beautification Act (HBA) codified at 23 U.S.C. 131."He added that Weiland Road is not
a Federal highway. He added that there is another study published that recommends
twenty(20) seconds between screen changes. The hours of operation of the sign that were
previously discussed were 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. with the screen changes and 10:00
p.m. to 1:00 a.m. with the sign static. Mr. Wood stated that they agree to that and they are
also willing to dim the sign from 10:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. Com. Windecker stated that
during the ART meeting it was discussed that the messages would be limited to Twin
Rink activities only with no advertising of products or services. Mr. Wood stated that
they will limit the messages to activities that occur on the premises. Com. Windecker
stated that he does not want the sign to advertise any products or services. Mr. Wood
agreed. Corn. Windecker asked if they will limit the logos to the teams that utilize Twin
Rinks only. Mr. Wood agreed.
Com. Windecker asked Mr. Sheehan if the Village had received any comments from the
residents surrounding the facility. Mr. Sheehan stated that the Village sent out an
expanded mailing and he has not received a single call.
Com. Windecker stated that he believes that everything that was discussed at the Village
Board has now been covered except the number of lines of copy. He stated that he would
like to see the sign limited to three (3) lines of copy. Mr. Wood stated that three (3) lines
of copy are what is recommended by the Federal Highway Administration. Mr. Pivar
inquired about when the sign goes static having four (4) lines of copy. Corn. Windecker
stated that he would not have an issue with that.
Com. Cesario stated that it seems to him that the only major issue is the changing rate of
messages. He stated that is something that should be easy to address. It seems that there is
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MAY 17,2011
PAGE 8 of 11
strong support from the Village Board to support a change rate of twenty (20) seconds.
He understands that is not what the Petitioner wants. Someone driving by will get one (1)
or two (2) screens depending on where they are in the cycle. It seems like ten(10) second
screen changes is similar to eight(8) second screen changes and eight(8) seconds did not
have a lot of support. This is not a highway. He asked the Petitioner if they would be
amenable to requesting twenty (20) second screen changes and then coming back to the
Board if there is a change of circumstance, if Weiland Road expands or if the Petitioner's
experience is excellent. If nobody complains over a couple of years he believes that
would diffuse a lot of concerns. Mr. Pivar asked if there have been a lot of complaints
with the JCYS sign changing every five (5) seconds. Corn. Cesario stated that he saw the
reference to that sign in the minutes and there is still the issue of eight (8) seconds versus
twenty(20) seconds. Mr. Pivar asked that if the characteristics of Weiland Road changes
and there have not been any complaints coming back in a couple years and asking for ten
(10) second screen changes. Mr. Pivar stated that he is amenable to that.
Corn. Shapiro stated that ten (10) second screen changes does not seem unreasonable to
him. He asked to see what 500 nits would look like.
Com. Lesser would also like a demonstration of the light intensity.
Mr. Wood started the demo sign for the ZBA. He advised that the daytime light levels
will look extremely bright because there is no sun. Even the mid range levels will look
very bright. Light gets dim as you get a distance away but with LED's as you get to an
angle,the light gets dimmer as well.
Com. Lesser asked Mr. Wood if there is a way to have a sensor built into the sign to
adjust the nit level based on whether it is a sunny day or a cloudy day. Mr. Wood stated
that he is not aware of anything like that being available.
Com. Steingold asked the Petitioner what the hardship is, other than advertisement that is
being experienced. Mr. Pivar stated that he is trying to get the message out to the public.
The current sign they have is very difficult to change information on in a timely matter. It
is also hard to read because they are limited to the size font that fits into the tracks of the
changeable letters. Com. Steingold asked what the size of the lettering would be on the
digital display sign. Mr. Wood stated that it would be a minimum of eight (8) pixels,
which would be between six (6) and seven(7) inch letters. You can technically put six (6)
lines of copy on the sign but he recommend using ten (10) to eleven (11) inch letters for
visibility purposes. Then you can get three (3) lines of copy. A bolder letter is easier to
read then a thinner letter. Arial font would be easier to read then Times New Roman.
Corn. Steingold asked what the size of the letters are on the current sign. Mr. Wood stated
the they are six (6) inches currently.
Ch. Entman stated that he is not sure exactly what the Petitioner is asking for at this
point. He asked the Petitioner to review their amended request in detail for the ZBA.
.J
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MAY 17,2011
PAGE 9 of 11
Mr. Wood stated that the Petitioner has amended their request as follows: To allow all
colors; to limit the graphics to team logos; the sign would be static after 10:00 p.m.; the
sign would be turned off at 1:00 a.m.; the night time light intensity level would be 500
nits and day time 7,500 nits; they are willing to reduce the night time nit level to below
500 nits after 10:00 p.m. if the Village deems it necessary; screen changes at twenty(20)
second intervals; three (3) lines of copy and four (4) lines after 10:00 p.m.; no
advertisement of products and services; and the logos would be limited to the sports
teams that utilize the rink.
Com. Lesser asked if the Petitioner would be willing to turn the sign off at midnight
instead of the 1:00 a.m. Mr. Pivar agreed to turn the sign off at midnight.
There were no further questions or comments from the Commissioners. There were no
questions or comments from the audience.
Com. Windecker made the following motion:
I move we recommend to the Village Board to grant the amended request made by Twin
Rinks Ice Pavilion, 1500 Abbott Court, for variance for Sign Code, Section 14.40.025,
pertaining to Changeable Copy Signs, for the purpose of replacing the existing manual
changeable copy portion of the ground sign with an LED digital display.
The variance is subject to the following:
1. Pursuant to Exhibit"E"submitted with the application;
2. Screen changes at twenty(20) second intervals;
3. To allow all colors on the digital display;
4. To limit the graphics to team logos that utilize Twin Rinks Ice Pavilion;
5. The hours of operation would be 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. with the sign being static
after 10:00 p.m.;
6. The sign is limited to the promotion of Twin Rink Ice Pavilion activities, no
advertisement of products or services;
7. Three (3) lines of copy between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. and four
(4) lines of copy from 10:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m.;
8. The light intensity level would be 7,500 nits during the day and 500 nits at night;
and
9. The nit level to be reduced below 500 nits after 10:00 p.m. if the Village, in its
sole discretion, deems it necessary.
Corn. Shapiro seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote: AYE—Cesario, Windecker, Lesser, Shapiro
NAY—Steingold,Entman
ABSTAIN—None
Motion Passed 4 to 2. Item to appear on the June 20, 2011 Village Board agenda.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MAY 17,2011
PAGE l0 of 11
ANNOUCEMENTS
Mr. Sheehan advised that the Village Board approved the amendment to the Fence Code
at the May 16, 2011 Village Board meeting.
Mr. Sheehan advised that Quality Car Center amended their Sign Code variance to reflect
the correct height of the sign.
Mr. Sheehan advised that Biz Solutions was remanded back to the ZBA.
Mr. Sheehan advised that there is a proposal for several new Walgreens signs for the 15
Buffalo Grove Road Walgreens Store which will be on an upcoming ZBA agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion to adjourn the meeting was made by Com. Lesser and seconded by Corn.
Windecker. Voice Vote—AYE was unanimous.
Ch. Entman adjourned the meeting at 9:08 P.M.
Submitted by,
C
Ju a Kamka
Recording Secretary
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MAY 17, 2011
PAGE 11 of 11