Loading...
1991-11-19 - Zoning Board of Appeals - Minutes ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE , ILLINOIS TUESDAY , NOVEMBER 19 , 1991 I . CALL TO ORDER Chairman Richard Heinrich called the meeting to order at 8 : 08 PM on Tuesday , November 19 , 1991 at the Village Hall , 50 Raupp Blvd . II . ROLL CALL Commissioners Present : M . Kearns , B . Entman , L . Windecker and R . Heinrich . H . Fields arrived - 8 : 25 PM Commissioners Absent : J . Paul and L . Arbus Bldg . Dept . Liaison : Edward Schar , Deputy Bldg . Commissioner Village Attorney : Tom Dempsey III . APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 15 , 1991 - Com . Entman made a motion to approve . Com . Kearns seconded the motion . No additions or corrections . �./ Roll Call Vote : AYE - Kearns , Entman , Windecker , Heinrich NAY - None Motion Passed - 4 to 0 Minutes of October 15 , 1991 approved as submitted . IV . OLD BUSINESS A . 77 Woodridge Lane , Robert Clar Fence Code , Section 15 . 20 . 040 Construction of five foot ( 5 ' ) scalloped picket fence past the building line along Dunhill Drive . Com . Kearns made a motion to remove from Table . Com . Windecker seconded the motion . Voice Vote : AYE Unanimously The item was tabled to permit further consultation with the Village Engineer about placement of proposed fence . Robert Clar was present and stated he has been in contact with Richard Kuenkler , Village Engineer . Mr . Kuenkler informed him that the original recommended setback of ten feet ( 10 ' ) from the sidewalk would not be reduced because the abutting property is a near-side driveway . Mr . Clar said he has explained the situation to all their neighbors again and none of them object to having the fence just inside the row of apple trees , seven feet (7 ' ) from the sidewalk. Mr . Clar added that the size of the yard will be reduced if the fence is set back ten feet ( 10 ' ) from the sidewalk and it will be costly to change the landscaping. They have made a lot of improvements to the property and they want to have a nice home . Ch. Heinrich explained that the ZBA is bound by the Village Engineer ' s recommendations for safety reasons to protect both the Village and the property owners. There could be a legal problem if an accident should occur because of an obstructed line-of-sight . There is no ordinance regarding placement of trees and shrubs . Mr . Clar said there is an evergreen tree in the side yard and requested that the fence be located forward of the rear of the house about six feet to enclose the tree . Ch. Heinrich and the commissioners had no objections . The petition will be amended on its face to locate the proposed fence ten feet ( 10 ' ) from the sidewalk along Dunhill Drive and six feet (6 ' ) toward the front of the house from the rear of the building. No comments from the audience . Com. Kearns made the following motion: I move we approve the petition of Robert Clar of Woodridge Lane for variance of the Fence Code , Section 15 . 20 .040 , pertaining to Residential Districts , for the purpose of erecting a five foot (5 ' ) scalloped picket fence past the building line along Dunhill Drive . Said fence to be located ten feet ( 10' ) from the sidewalk and no more than six feet (6 ' ) from the rear of the building . Said fence will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare . Com . Lewandowski seconded the motion. Roll Call Vote : AYE - Entman, Windecker , Kearns , Heinrich NAY - None Motion Passed - 4 to 0 . Findings of Fact Attached . Permit may be issued after 15 days - December 5 , 1991 . ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS November 19 , 1991 - Page Two B. 635 Buckthorn Court , Larry and Robin Walovitch Zoning Ordinance , Section 17 . 40. 050 - Pertaining to: Area, Height , Bulk and Placemei}t Regulations Cy Doren of Space Home Improvements , 365 W. Northwest Hwy . , Palatine , IL 60056 (392-9200) was present . He explained that the petitioner called him to inform him that Mr . Walo- vitch' s mother passed away and asked him to represent them. Mrs . Walovitch also called the Building Department and said they would not be able to attend the ZBA meeting . She asked that Space Homes be permitted to represent them. Because of the circumstances , Mr . Dempsey suggested that Cy Doren be permitted to make the presentation with the stipulation that the Walovitchs submit a letter to the Building Department naming Mr . Doren their agent . Ch. Heinrich informed Mr . Doren. that 4 votes are necessary to grant a petition and there are only 4 commissioners present . Com. Fields arrived shortly thereafter at 8 : 25 PM. The Public Hearing Notice was read . Cy Doren was sworn in. He is president of Space Home Improvements and has been retained to construct the addition. Mr . Doren summarized the reasons for requesting a variance for the purpose of constructing an addition that would encroach a distance of nine feet (9 ' ) into the required rear yard setback: 1 . Mr . Walovitch' s parents have been very ill and were expected to move in with them. 2 . The Walovitchs have recently adopted two children. They need more living space , but they cannot afford to buy a larger house . 3 . The house has a very small kitchen and family room. It has no basement . The 5 ' x 23 ' addition will enlarge the kitchen and incorporate it with the family room. 4 . All the materials will match the existing structure : White siding , gable roof with matching shingles . The Village Engineer ' s Review , dated November 4 , 1991 , states : "The proposed addition will not alter the existing drainage pattern. " Questions from Commissioners : Com . Kearns - No objections . ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS November 19 , 1991 - Page Three Com. Entman - Asked if the addition will cover the existing patio? Mr . Doren said the patio will be removed and the addition is approximately the same size as the patio. Com. Entman - No objections . The lot is large and there is a lot of room in the side yard . The neighbor has a nice fence. No objectors are present . Mr . Doren said the Walovitchs have talked to their neighbors including the neighbors to the rear . None of them object . Com. Fields - No objections . The addition will be located on the street side of the yard. Com. Windecker - No objections . Asked if there will be a new patio beyond the addition? Answer was "no. " Com. Windecker made the following motion: I move we grant the variance requested by Larry and Robin Walovitch, 635 Buckthorne Terrace , for variance of the Zoning Ordinance , Section 17 . 40.050 , pertaining to Area , Height , Bulk and Placement Regulations , for the purpose of constructing an addition at the rear of the house that would encroach a distance of nine feet (9 ' ) into the required rear yard setback of 35 feet . Materials are to match the existing construction in like kind and quality . The addition to be constructed pursuant to plans submitted to and approved by the Village of Buffalo Grove . Petitioner has exhibited hardship and unique circum- stances . Proposed addition will not be detrimental to the essential character of the neighborhood. Condition: No alterations to the grade within five feet of any swale or any rear or side lot line . Variance is subject to a letter of agency naming Space Home Improvement as the petitioners agent . Com. Fields seconded the motion. Roll Call Vote : AYE - Kearns , Entman, Fields , Windecker and Heinrich NAY - None Motion Passed - 5 to 0 . Findings of Fact Attached. Permit may be issued after 15 days - December 5 , 1991 . ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS November 19 , 1991 - Page Four VI . ANNOUNCEMENTS On October 15 , 1991 the ZBA recommended that the Village Board grant the petition of Gerald Colbert , 1370 Mill Creek Drive , to permit construction of a screened porch that would exceed the 20% rear yard coverage limitation with a condition imposed by the Village Engineer that the tie wall with the fill is to be removed and relocated five feet (5 ' ) back from the rear property line . A ordinance , granting the variance , was adopted on Nov . 4 , 1991 . Richard Kuenkler , Village Engineer , amended his recommendation. A memo , dated October 29 , 1991 , states that after a follow-up meeting with petitioner , Mr . Kuenkler has agreed to permit the tie wall to be relocated four feet (4 ' ) from the property line instead of five feet (5 ' ) . Ch. Heinrich said he discussed the situation with Mr . Kuenkler and , given the facts at this location, he has no objections . Mr . Dempsey said he would have to prepare a new ordinance , and directed that a new affirmative recommendation be made by the ZBA ratifying the Village Engineer ' s amendment . Com. Entman made the following motion: I move we recommend to the Village Board that an amended ordinance be prepared and signed to modify Ordinance 91-88 , such that the variance granted to petitioner Gerald Colbert . 1370 Mill Creek Drive , pertaining to Zoning Ordinance , Section 17 . 32 . 020 , is amended to permit the tie wall to be placed four feet (4 ' ) from the rear property line , rather than five feet (5 ' ) as originally proposed by the Villge Engineer , pursuant to the modified recommendation of the Village Engineer . Com. Windecker seconded the motion Voice Vote - AYE Unanimously . Mr . Dempsey announced that a memo has been prepared to inform all the Village boards that legal briefings will be held to inform commissioners about Village Ordinances , Findings of Fact , and new zoning developments , etc . Mr . Raysa will be present . The briefing will possibly be scheduled for the December meeting. Staff is drafting changes to the Sign Code and Zoning Ordinance . The Zoning Board will be asked to review the revisions after the Village Manager and Village Board have seen the proposals . Ch. Heinrich asked that variance authority regarding placement of air conditioners on corner lots be. reviewed . It should not be necessary for ordinances to be drafted for such a minor item. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS November 19 , 1991 - Page Five Mr . Dempsey asked the Commissioners to submit any suggested changes to the Building Department for consideration. Regarding the variance recommended for a detached garage to be constructed at 229 Cottonwood Road , a letter from IDOT has been received stating that the flood plan map is in error , but the Engineering Department is still waiting for a letter from FEMA. The petitioner , Terry Weber , has been informed that the ordinance will not be prepared until both letters have been submitted. The six month time period will not begin until the Village Board adopts the ordinance . The ordinance should be clarified with regard to the actual time a petitioner has in which to begin construction. The Zoning Ordinance specifies that the permit must be issued within six (6) months , but the permit application also allows construction to begin within six (6) months . This could be interpreted that construction may be started within twelve ( 12) months . A draft of the proposed changes could be ready in February 1992. VII . ADJOURNMENT Com. Fields made a motion to adjourn. Com. Entman seconded. Voice Vote - AYE Unanimously. • Ch. Heinrich adjourned the meeting at 8 :45 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Shirley ates Recording Secretary sb ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS November 19 , 1991 - Page Six