The URL can be used to link to this page

2019-08-07 - Planning and Zoning Commission - Agenda Packet Meeting of the Village of Buffalo Grove Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting August 7, 2019 at 7:30 PM Fifty Raupp Blvd Buffalo Grove, IL 60089-2100 Phone: 847-459-2500 I. Call to Order II. Public Hearings/Items For Consideration 1. Consider a Variation for Fence at 5 Brucewood Court (Trustee Johnson) (Staff Contact: Chris Stilling) 2. Consider Approval of a Fence Variation for 460 Raphael Ave (Trustee Weidenfeld) (Staff Contact: Chris Stilling) 3. Consider Approval of a Rezoning to B3 Planned Business Center District; a Special Use for a Planned Unit Development; Approval to Allow for a Health Club Greater Than 10,000 Square Feet in Area as Part of the Planned Unit Development Request; and a Preliminary Plan for the Property at 15-45 E Dundee Road, Buffalo Grove IL (Cambridge Commons Shopping Center) (Trustee Weidenfeld) (Staff Contact: Chris Stilling) III. Regular Meeting A. Other Matters for Discussion B. Approval of Minutes 1. Planning and Zoning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jul 17, 2019 7:30 PM C. Chairman's Report D. Committee and Liaison Reports E. Staff Report/Future Agenda Schedule F. Public Comments and Questions IV. Adjournment The Planning and Zoning Commission will make every effort to accommodate all items on the agenda by 10:30 p.m. The Board, does, however, reserve the right to defer consideration of matters to another meeting should the discussion run past 10:30 p.m. The Village of Buffalo Grove, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilit ies, contact the ADA Coordinator at 459-2525 to allow the Village to make reasonable accommodations for those persons. Updated: 8/2/2019 2:34 PM Page 1 Action Item : Consider a Variation for Fence at 5 Brucewood Court Recommendation of Action Staff recommends approval, subject to the conditions in the staff report. The Petitioner is requesting to have a six (6) foot solid white vinyl fence in the rear yard. Pursuant to the fence code, any fence greater than five (5) feet must be of an open design. As the Petitioner is proposing a solid fence greater than five (5) feet, a variation is required. ATTACHMENTS:  Staff Report (DOCX)  Plan Set (PDF) Trustee Liaison Staff Contact Johnson Chris Stilling, Community Development Wednesday, August 7, 2019 2.1 Packet Pg. 2 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: August 7, 2019 SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION: 5 Brucewood Court PETITIONER: Benjamin Antao PREPARED BY: Rati Akash, Village Planner REQUEST: A variation to have a six (6) foot solid fence in the rear yard. EXSITING LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is improved with a single-family home currently zoned R3A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The approved Village Comprehensive Plan calls for this property and the immediate neighborhood to be single family detached. PROJECT BACKGROUND The Petitioner is requesting to have a six (6) foot solid white vinyl fence in the rear yard. Pursuant to the fence code, any fence greater than five (5) feet must be of an open design. As the Petitioner is proposing a solid fence greater than five (5) feet, a variation is required. There is an existing six (6) foot semi-open fence in the rear yard. Recently, a section on the North side of the fence fell down and the Petitioner replaced this section with the proposed six (6) foot solid vinyl fence. Only after this portion of the fence was replaced did the Petitioner find out that they were required to apply for a fence permit and variance for the six (6) foot solid fence. PLANNING & ZONING ANALYSIS  There is an existing six (6) foot semi-open fence enclosing the rear yard marked in red on Image A which is in a bad condition.  The Petitioner is requesting to have a six (6) foot solid white vinyl fence on the North, Northwest and West portion of the rear yard.  The North portion of the fence marked in blue on Image A has been replaced by the proposed six (6) solid Image A 2.1.a Packet Pg. 3 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( C o n s i d e r a V a r i a t i o n f o r F e n c e a t 5 B r u c e w o o d C o u r t ) white vinyl fence without a permit. The Northwest and West portion of the fence has not been replaced by the proposed six (6) solid fence.  The Petitioner has mentioned he reached out to the adjoining neighbors when the North section of the fence was replaced, and they were in support to replace the fence.  The Petitioner has an existing five (5) foot solid wooden fence with a gate marked in yellow on Image A connecting the home with the garage. This fence meets Code and would remain. For consistency, staff suggests that this fence also be replaced to match the other new fence.  Other than the variation for the height, the proposed fence meets all outlined fence code requirements. VARIATIONS REQUESTED A fence height variation from Section 15.20.090.C from the Buffalo Grove fence code states that fencing material that is over five feet in height shall be of a design that is open so as to allow visibility. The following is a list of approved fence height variations in the rear yard: Address Year Approved Approved Fence Height Material and Type 605 Patton Dr 2019 6' Solid wood fence 466 Raphael Ave 2019 6' Solid wood fence 23 Columbus Pkwy 2018 6' Solid wood fence 5 Cambridge Ct 2016 6' Solid vinyl fence 6 Strathmore 2015 6' Solid wood fence 7 Strathmore Ct 2015 6' Solid vinyl fence DEPARTMENTAL REVIEWS Village Department Comments Engineering The Village Engineer has reviewed the proposed fence location and does not have any engineering or line of sight concerns or objections with the proposed location of this fence. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Village Code, the contiguous property owners were notified and a public hearing sign was posted on the subject property. The posting of the public hearing sign and the mailed notifications were completed within the prescribed timeframe as required. As of the date of this Staff Report, the Village has received no calls inquiring about the proposed fence. STANDARDS The Planning & Zoning Commission is authorized to grant variations of the Fence Code based on the following criteria: 1. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; 2. The proposed variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; 2.1.a Packet Pg. 4 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( C o n s i d e r a V a r i a t i o n f o r F e n c e a t 5 B r u c e w o o d C o u r t ) 3. There are practical difficulties or particular hardships in carrying out the strict letter of this Chapter which difficulties or hardships have not been created by the person presently having an interest in the property; and, 4. The proposed variation will not be detrimental to the public health safety and welfare. The petitioner has provided a written response to the standards for a variation which are included in this packet. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Village staff recommends approval of a variation for a six (6) foot solid white vinyl fence for the property at 5 Brucewood Court, subject to the following condition: 1) The fence shall be installed in accordance with the documents and plans submitted as part of this petition. 2) The existing five (5) foot solid wooden fence with a gate marked in yellow on Image A as part the staff report shall be replaced to match the propsed new fence. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) shall open the public hearing and take public testimony concerning the variation. The PZC shall make a final decision on whether or not to approve the variation. 2.1.a Packet Pg. 5 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( C o n s i d e r a V a r i a t i o n f o r F e n c e a t 5 B r u c e w o o d C o u r t ) To whom it may concern, My wife and I purchased our first home in the spring of 2016; 5 Brucewood Ct, Buffalo Gove, IL 60089. From the moment we become owners, we have been have been making our house into our own. Our next project is to fix/repair/replace the old wooden fence. And in the past three years, we have seen our family grow with a child that just turned one in early June and our three year old “puppy”. Our current fence is primarily a 6ft wooden fence that has began to rot and show its age. It is at the point where we need to keep our dog on a lead each time we let her out in back. Over the years, we have seen a number of “critters” roaming in our back yard on a regular basis. At times, racoons have come right up to our back door. In 2018, it came to the point were we hired an animal control company to relocate a family of racoons. After 5 racoons in 5 days, the animal control owner recommended that he stop, as he felt that this would continue. It was his thought that due to the nearby creek and the back portion of our garage having a void underneath that the racoons, skunks and other critters would continue to come. There are a number of spots around the yard where the critters continue crawl through, under or up and over. The only thing that comes before the safety of our dog, is the safety of our little ones and regular visitors of our nieces. Our house is a common meeting place for our family who also live in the neighborhood. Thus, we have 3 children under the age of three roaming the yard. Keeping them safe from critters and broken fence pieces and sections is a priority. In the fall of 2018, I worked to replace the west portion of our fence as half of it had fallen during a wind storm. We chose a fence at the same height, but vinyl. (Only 6ft vinyl is sold at Menards) We chose vinyl for the durability, appearance and the hope that it would limit the number of critters that would attempt to climb up and walk across the top. After that first weekend of work, the project stalled and waited till this spring. Early this spring, my wife and I saw that the neighbor across the cul-de-sac was installing a fence and they had a permit in their window. This is the point where I reached out to the village to confirm if I needed a permit or not. Come to find out, the 6ft vinyl “privacy” fence is against village regulations unless a variance is granted. At this point in this process, while we wait for the variance to be approved, as we have all of the materials sitting in our garage. Please give me a call at any point to discuss our variance request. Ben Antao 309-781-4918 Benjamin.Antao@gmail.com Benjamin.Antao@bp.com 2.1.b Packet Pg. 6 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a V a r i a t i o n f o r F e n c e a t 5 B r u c e w o o d C o u r t ) 2.1.b Packet Pg. 7 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a V a r i a t i o n f o r F e n c e a t 5 B r u c e w o o d C o u r t ) 1) The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances : a. Our current fence is primarily a 6ft wooden fence that has 8ft sections that have blown over, slats broken and posts rotted. We are looking to replace this fence with a 6ft vinyl fence (Purchased from Menards). We feel this will be a deterrent for the numerous critters that currently climb up and across the wooden fence that pose a danger to our children and pets. In addition, we feel this will add to the value/appeal of the property and neighborhood. 2) The proposed variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood : a. If anything, the new vinyl fence will improve the character of the neighborhood. Currently, the fence is old and rotting and has been an eye sore for people that have a clear line of sight to it. 3) There are practical difficulties or particular hardships in carrying our the strict letter of this chapter which difficulties or hardships have not been created by the person presently having an interest in the property: a. The practical difficulties and hardships are as follows: i. Due to critters in the neighborhood, the vinyl fence would serve as a deterrent. Improving the safety to my family and pets. ii. Already purchased fence. 4) The Proposed variation will not be detrimental to the public health safety and welfare: a. The proposed variation will improve the safety of the neighborhood and property. In addition it will improve the property appearance and property value. 2.1.b Packet Pg. 8 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a V a r i a t i o n f o r F e n c e a t 5 B r u c e w o o d C o u r t ) 2.1.b Packet Pg. 9 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a V a r i a t i o n 2.1.b Packet Pg. 10 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a V a r i a t i o n 2.1.b Packet Pg. 11 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t 2.1.b Packet Pg. 12 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a V a r i a t i o n f o r F e n c e a t 5 B r u c e w o o d Updated: 8/2/2019 2:51 PM Page 1 Action Item : Consider Approval of a Fence Variation for 460 Raphael Ave Recommendation of Action Staff recommends approval, subject to the condition in the staff report. The Petitioner installed a six (6) foot solid wood fence in the rear yard in Ma y, 2019. The Petitioner was unaware at that time a fence permit was required to construct a fence. The Petitioner is requesting to keep the six (6) solid fence in the rear yard. Pursuant to the fence Code any fence greater than five (5) feet must be of an open design. As the Petitioner has installed a solid fence greater than five (5) feet, a variation is required. ATTACHMENTS:  Staff Report_460 Raphael (DOCX)  Plan Set (PDF) Trustee Liaison Staff Contact Weidenfeld Chris Stilling, Community Development Wednesday, August 7, 2019 2.2 Packet Pg. 13 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: August 7, 2019 SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION: 460 Raphael Avenue PETITIONER: Martin Diaz PREPARED BY: Rati Akash, Village Planner REQUEST: A variation for an existing six (6) foot solid fence installed in the rear yard. EXSITING LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is improved with a single-family home currently zoned R5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The approved Village Comprehensive Plan calls for this property and the immediate neighborhood to be single family detached. PROJECT BACKGROUND The Petitioner installed a six (6) foot solid wood fence in the rear yard in May, 2019. The Petitioner was unaware at that time a fence permit was required to construct a fence. The Petitioner is requesting to keep the six (6) solid fence in the rear yard. Pursuant to the fence Code any fence greater than five (5) feet must be of an open design. As the Petitioner has installed a solid fence greater than five (5) feet, a variation is required. PLANNING & ZONING ANALYSIS Project Timeline  In May 2019, a complaint was received regarding a fence without a permit. The petitioner was notified to apply for a permit.  Subsequent to the notice, the Petitioner applied for a six (6) foot shadow box fence in the rear yard located on the property lines which is permitted by Code.  In June, it was determined that fence was located on the neighbor’s property. As a result, the Village’s inspector requested that the fence be moved onto their property. At the time, the inspector did not realize the fence was actually 2.2.a Packet Pg. 14 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t _ 4 6 0 R a p h a e l ( C o n s i d e r A p p r o v a l o f a F e n c e V a r i a t i o n f o r 4 6 0 R a p h a e l A v e ) a 6-foot solid fence, which is not permitted. Therefore, the inspector did not notify the property owner to revise the fence design, per the permit application.  While the fence was moved to be on the petitioner’s property, it was not until the final inspection that the Village realized that a six (6) foot solid fence was installed instead of a six (6) foot shadow box fence as described in the permit application. The fence inspection failed, and Petitioner was requested to cut the fence to a five (5) foot solid fence to comply with Code or apply for a fence variation.  Staff would like to note that as part of our inspections, the Village noticed several property maintenance violations. The property owner has been notified of the violations and staff is seeking compliance. At this time, the property maintenance violations are independent of the requested variation. Fence location and type  The Petitioner is requesting to keep the existing six (6) foot solid fence enclosing the rear yard on all three sides.  The Petitioner has noted that the six (6) foot solid fence is for privacy.  Other than the variation for the height, the proposed fence meets all outlined fence Code requirements. VARIATIONS REQUESTED A fence height variation from Section 15.20.090.C from the Buffalo Grove fence Code states that fencing material that is over five feet in height shall be of a design that is open so as to allow visibility. The following is a list of approved fence height variations in the rear yard: Address Year Approved Approved Fence Height Material and Type 605 Patton Dr 2019 6' Solid vinyl fence 466 Raphael Ave 2019 6' Solid vinyl fence 23 Columbus Pkwy 2018 6' Solid wood fence 5 Cambridge Ct 2016 6' Solid vinyl fence 6 Strathmore 2015 6' Solid wood fence 7 Strathmore Ct 2015 6' Solid vinyl fence On February 13, 2019, the Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) approved a six (6) foot solid white vinyl fence in the rear yard three houses north of the subject property located at 466 Raphael Avenue. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEWS Village Department Comments Engineering The Village Engineer has reviewed the proposed fence location and does not have any engineering or line of sight concerns or objections with the proposed location of this fence. 2.2.a Packet Pg. 15 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t _ 4 6 0 R a p h a e l ( C o n s i d e r A p p r o v a l o f a F e n c e V a r i a t i o n f o r 4 6 0 R a p h a e l A v e ) SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Village Code, the contiguous property owners were notified and a public hearing sign was posted on the subject property. The posting of the public hearing sign and the mailed notifications were completed within the prescribed timeframe as required. As of the date of this Staff Report, the Village has received one call inquiring about the fence variation and has raised concerns with the six (6) foot solid fence. Additionally, the complainant has raised other property maintenance issues which are being addressed by the Village. STANDARDS The Planning & Zoning Commission is authorized to grant variations of the Fence Code based on the following criteria: 1. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; 2. The proposed variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; 3. There are practical difficulties or particular hardships in carrying out the strict letter of this Chapter which difficulties or hardships have not been created by the person presently having an interest in the property; and, 4. The proposed variation will not be detrimental to the public health safety and welfare. The petitioner has provided a written response to the standards for a variation which are included in this packet. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Village staff recommends approval for this variation to allow for an existing six (6) foot solid wood fence installed in the rear yard of the subject property. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) shall open the public hearing and take public testimony concerning the variation. The PZC shall make a final decision on whether or not to approve the variation. 2.2.a Packet Pg. 16 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t _ 4 6 0 R a p h a e l ( C o n s i d e r A p p r o v a l o f a F e n c e V a r i a t i o n f o r 4 6 0 R a p h a e l A v e ) 2.2.b Packet Pg. 17 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r A p p r o v a l o f a F e n c e V a r i a t i o n f o r 4 6 0 R a p h a e l A v e ) 2.2.b Packet Pg. 18 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r A p p r o v a l o f a F e n c e V a r i a t i o n f o r 4 6 0 R a p h a e l A v e ) 2.2.b Packet Pg. 19 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r A p p r o v a l o f a F e n c e V a r i a t i o n f o r 4 6 0 R a p h a e l A v e ) 2.2.b Packet Pg. 20 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r A p p r o v a l o f a F e n c e V a r i a t i o n f o r 4 6 0 R a p h a e l A v e ) 2.2.b Packet Pg. 21 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r A p p r o v a l o f a F e n c e V a r i a t i o n f o r 4 6 0 R a p h a e l A v e ) Updated: 8/2/2019 2:35 PM Page 1 Action Item : Consider Approval of a Rezoning to B3 Planned Business Center District; a Special Use for a Planned Unit Development; Approval to Allow for a Health Club Greater Than 10,000 Square Feet in Area as Part of the Planned Unit Development Request; and a Preliminary Plan for the Property at 15-45 E Dundee Road, Buffalo Grove IL (Cambridge Commons Shopping Center) Recommendation of Action The PZC shall reopen the public hearing for any additional questions and comments. The PZC shall then make a recommendation to the Village Board. Staff recommends approval, subject to the conditions in the attached staff memorandum dated August 2, 2019. The existing Cambridge Commons Shopping Center is approximately 4.6 acres in area and is improved with a 48,000 square foot retail building built in the 1960s. The owners of the center have recently submitted plans for an entirely new facade, landscaping and signage to accommodate a prospective tenant (24 Hour Fitness). The proposed changes would require a rezoni ng to B3 as well as a special use for a Planned Development to accommodate the new tenant and improvements. ATTACHMENTS:  Staff Memo 8.2.19 (DOCX)  Staff Report (DOCX)  Plan Set (PDF)  Traffic Study (PDF)  April 3, 2019 PZC Minutes (DOC) Trustee Liaison Staff Contact Weidenfeld Chris Stilling, Community Development Wednesday, August 7, 2019 2.3 Packet Pg. 22 Page 1 of 2 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE MEMORANDUM DATE: August 2, 2019 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Christopher Stilling, Deputy Village Manager SUBJECT: Cambridge Commons BACKGROUND The existing Cambridge Commons Shopping Center is approximately 4.6 acres in area and is improved with a 48,000 square foot retail building built in the 1960s. The owners of the center have recently submitted plans for an entirely new façade, landscaping and signage to accommodate a prospective tenant (24 Hour Fitness). The proposed changes would require a rezoning to B3 as well as a special use for a Planned Development to accommodate the new tenant and improvements. July 17, 2019 PZC Meeting The Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) opened the public hearing on this item on July 17, 2019. As part of the public hearing, a few items were raised by the public. 1. Concern was raised about parking lot lighting. The petitioner indicated that they were planning to maintain the same lighting locations that currently exists today. While Village Code does not specify standards for maximum lumens adjacent to a property, it does state that lighting shall not present a nuisance to adjoining properties. To address this concern, staff suggests that a condition be added that states: a. “A photometric plan for parking lot lighting shall be provided in a manner acceptable to the Village.” 2. A concern was raised about the drainage and maintenance of the detention pond located southeast of the subject parcel. Staff researched the matter and determined that the pond is owned and maintained by the Park District. Village engineering staff has begun dialog with representatives from Cambridge on the Lakes HOA to learn more about the issues. Based on staff’s research, any drainage issues appear not to be part of the petitioner’s property or project. 3. Residents expressed concern about the existing landscaping and vegetation along the eastern property line. To address this concern, staff suggests that a condition be added that states: a. “The existing landscaping along the eastern and southern portions of the property shall be improved and maintained in a manner acceptable to the Village”. At the request of staff, this item was continued to the August 7th PZC meeting. It should be noted that staff did send out an updated notice to all property owners within 250’ of the subject property. 2.3.a Packet Pg. 23 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f M e m o 8 . 2 . 1 9 ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Page 2 of 2 ACTION REQUESTED The PZC shall reopen the public hearing for any additional questions and comments. The PZC shall then make a recommendation to the Village Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of: (1) a rezoning to B3 Planned Business Center District; (2) a special use for a Planned Unit Development; (3) approval to allow for a Health Club greater than 10,000 square feet in area as part of the Planned Unit Development request; and (4) a Preliminary Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed development shall be developed in substantial conformance to the plans attached as part of the petition. 2. The petitioner and 24 Hour Fitness develop a plan to ensure that parking during the overnight hours is encouraged in the north parking lot area to minimize impacts on the adjacent residential development to the east in a manner acceptable to the Village. This can include signage and educational materials to clients. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the existing vehicle storage shall cease. In the future, no offsite vehicle storage shall be permitted. 4. The approval of the health club shall solely be granted to 24 Hour Fitness. Any change to the fitness user shall require the approval of the Village. 5. Future permitted and special uses on the property shall comply with the B3 Planned Business Center District. 6. A photometric plan for parking lot lighting shall be provided in a manner acceptable to the Village. 7. The existing landscaping along the eastern and southern portions of the property shall be improved in a manner acceptable to the Village. 2.3.a Packet Pg. 24 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f M e m o 8 . 2 . 1 9 ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: July 17, 2019 SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION: 15-45 E Dundee Road, Buffalo Grove IL (Cambridge Commons Shopping Center) PETITIONER: Svigos Asset Management, Inc. PREPARED BY: Chris Stilling, Deputy Village Manager REQUEST: Petition to the Village of Buffalo Grove for approval of: (1) a rezoning to B3 Planned Business Center District; (2) a special use for a Planned Unit Development; (3) approval to allow for a Health Club greater than 10,000 square feet in area as part of the Planned Unit Development request; and (4) a Preliminary Plan. EXSITING LAND USE AND ZONING: Commercial Strip Center Zoned B2 Business District COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The approved Village Comprehensive Plan calls for this property to be commercial. PROJECT BACKGROUND The existing Cambridge Commons Shopping Center is approximately 4.6 acres in area and is improved with a 48,000 square foot retail building built in the 1960s. The owners of the center have recently submitted plans for an entirely new façade, landscaping and signage to accommodate a prospective tenant (24 Hour Fitness). The proposed changes would require a rezoning to B3 as well as a special use for a Planned Development to accommodate the new tenant and improvements. PLANNING & ZONING ANALYSIS Property History  The site is currently zoned B2 and was originally built to accommodate a Kohl’s Foodstore which later became Dominick’s.  Dominick’s subsequently relocated into a larger store in the early 2000’s and Rogan’s Shoes occupied the anchor space until to 2013.  The existing center has remained mostly vacant since 2013, with the exception of a dentist office. Workshop Discussion  On April 3, 2019, the PZC held a workshop with the petitioner to discuss the proposed plans. Minutes from the discussion are attached. 2.3.b Packet Pg. 25 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r )  Overall, the PZC was supportive of the concept and requested that during the public hearing, additional information be provided concerning the 24 hour operation of the fitness user. Proposed Changes (Site Plan and Landscaping)  The owner is seeking to upgrade the center to accommodate their prospective tenant (24 Hour Fitness), who would occupy 35,000 square feet.  As part of the improvements, the owner will be making enhancements to the existing parking lot and landscaping.  The overall area of the parking lot will remain unchanged, however the parking lot will be resurfaced and restriped.  Furthermore, the walkway on the north side of the building will be increased in size to accommodate 24 Hour Fitness as well as a prospective restaurant user on the corner. The proposed corner unit will accommodate an outdoor dining area for a future restaurant user.  The petitioner is also adding some additional landscaping throughout the parking lot area. It should be noted that significant landscaping exists to east (as shown on the attached photo), adjacent to the Cambridge on Lakes development. That area will remain unchanged as part of the improvements. There is also an existing wood fence that will remain. Proposed Use/Rezoning  As proposed, the anchor tenant for the development will be 24 Hour Fitness, who will occupy approximately 35,000 square feet.  24 Hour Fitness would be making significant investments into the interior of the space to offer a full service health club that would include a pool and half basketball court.  Their operation is very similar to the likes of X Sport Fitness further to the west on Dundee Road in Arlington Heights,which is also open 24 hours/day.  Currently, the B2 Zoning District only allows for health clubs up to 10,000 square feet in area.  As part of the request, the petitioner is seeking a rezoning to the B3 Planned Business District along with a Special Use for a Planned Development to allow for the 35,000 square foot health club.  The landlord has also hired Jones Lang LaSalle to help market the balance of the space. They are trying to target food/restaurant users, especially for the corner unit. 2.3.b Packet Pg. 26 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r )  The existing cars from Lux Motors would be moved off the property. This will remain as a condition. Parking  The existing development currently has 275 parking spaces for the 48,000 square foot development. The zoning Ordinance requires 193 parking spaces for the entire center.  As part of the improvements, the petitioner will be removing a few spaces to accommodate the parking lot improvements and restriping. As a result, the proposed plan will have 267 parking spaces, still exceeding the minimum code requirements.  Included with the petition is a traffic and parking analysis from their engineer. The findings show that even during peak times, the entire center (once fully occupied) would require approximately 223 parking spaces. Furthermore, the average peak parking for 24 Hour Fitness would be approximately 147 parking spaces.  Overall, the consultant finds that sufficient parking will be provided for the entire project including the health club and any future restaurant and retail users.  Based on data provided by 24 Hour Fitness, their existing facilities average a total of 117 clients between the hours of 10PM-5AM or approximately 16.7 people/hour.  As a condition, staff recommends that the petitioner and 24 Hour Fitness develop a plan to ensure that parking during the overnight hours is encouraged in the north parking lot area to minimize impacts on the adjacent residential development to the east. This can include signage and educational materials to clients. Traffic  The petitioner’s traffic study also indicates that the existing site can adequately accommodate the proposed traffic generated by the new development.  As shown, it is anticipated the proposed mix of uses (health club and restaurant/retail) would generate 84 fewer trips during the weekday AM peak hour and 203 fewer trips during the weekday PM peak hour than the former site uses (grocery store and retail).  On a daily basis, the proposed development would generate 1,710 fewer trips than the former site uses. Façade Improvements  The owner is seeking to make substantial improvements to the exterior of the existing northern and western portion of the building. 2.3.b Packet Pg. 27 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r )  The proposed improvements include the removal of the wood finish and replace it with a combination of cladding and wood grain finishes. A new roof would also be installed.  The existing red CMU brick along the east and south elevations would remain.  Overall, staff finds that the proposed changes are an improvement to the existing property. Proposed Signage  The petitioner is proposing to replace the existing freestanding sign.  The proposed new sign would be relocated closer to the intersection. The existing evergreen trees at the corner would be removed to accommodate the new sign. New foundation landscaping would be provided around the new sign.  The sign would be 10’ high and 113 square feet in area. The maximum allowed is 120 square feet and no more than 15’ high.  The proposed sign will be setback 10’ from the front lot line. Code requires a minimum setback 10’. Overall, the proposed freestanding sign would meet Village Code.  Building signage would be channel lettering. As tenants occupy spaces, signage would have to meet Village Code. STANDARDS Zoning Ordinance (Special Use Standards) 1. The special use will serve the public convenience at the location of the subject property; or the establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare; 2. The location and size of the special use, the nature and intensity of the operation involved in or conducted in connection with said special use, the size of the subject property in relation to such special use, and the location of the site with respect to streets giving access to it shall be such that 2.3.b Packet Pg. 28 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) it will be in harmony with the appropriate, orderly development of the district in which it is located; 3. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property for the purposes already permitted in such zoning district, nor substantially diminish and impair other property valuations with the neighborhood; 4. The nature, location and size of the buildings or structures involved with the establishment of the special use will not impede, substantially hinder or discourage the development and use of adjacent land and buildings in accord with the zoning district within which they lie; 5. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and/or other necessary facilities have been or will be provided; 6. Parking areas shall be of adequate size for the particular special use, which areas shall be properly located and suitably screened from adjoining residential uses, and the entrance and exit driveways to and from these parking areas shall be designed so as to prevent traffic hazards, eliminate nuisance and minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. The petitioner has provided a response to the standards (attached). Zoning Ordinance (Planned Development Standards) 1. All planned unit developments shall meet the following general standards: a. Have the minimum areas as set forth in Section 17.16.060. b. The uses permitted in such development are not of such a nature or so located as to exercise an undue detrimental influence or effect upon the surrounding neighborhood; c. The plan effectively treats the developmental possibilities of the subject property, making appropriate provisions for the preservation of streams, wooded areas, scenic views, floodplain areas, and similar physical features; d. All requirements pertaining to commercial, residential, institutional or other uses established in the planned unit development conform to the requirements for each individual classification as established elsewhere in this Title, except as may be specifically varied for the proper planning of the planned unit development; e. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall determine that the area and width of the lot shall be sufficient for the proposed use, and that the development of the property in the proposed manner creates no outlots which will be difficult to develop in an appropriate manner. The petitioner has provided a response to the standards (attached) PUBLIC COMMENTS Pursuant to Village Code, the contiguous property owners were notified and a public hearing sign was posted on the subject property. The posting of the public hearing sign and the mailing of the notifications were both completed within the required timeframe. As of the date of this staff report, staff has received numerous inquires, however no specific concerns were raised. Please note that staff did receive a few calls from individuals stating that they received the mailing, however there was no notice in the envelope. Given the volume of notices that were sent out, it is possible that a few notices were not included in the 2.3.b Packet Pg. 29 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) envelopes. As a result, staff recommends that the PZC open the public hearing and allow the developer to make their presentation as well as take any public comments. Rather than closing the hearing, staff recommends that the public hearing be continued to the August 7, 2019 PZC meeting. Staff will then send out revised notices for the additional meeting on August 7, 2019. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of: (1) a rezoning to B3 Planned Business Center District; (2) a special use for a Planned Unit Development; (3) approval to allow for a Health Club greater than 10,000 square feet in area as part of the Planned Unit Development request; and (4) a Preliminary Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed development shall be developed in substantial conformance to the plans attached as part of the petition. 2. The petitioner and 24 Hour Fitness develop a plan to ensure that parking during the overnight hours is encouraged in the north parking lot area to minimize impacts on the adjacent residential development to the east in a manner acceptable to the Village. This can include signage and educational materials to clients. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the existing vehicle storage shall cease. In the future, no offsite vehicle storage shall be permitted. 4. The approval of the health club shall solely be granted to 24 Hour Fitness. Any change to the fitness user shall require the approval of the Village. 5. Future permitted and special uses on the property shall comply with the B3 Planned Business Center District. Staff recommends that the PZC open the public hearing and allow the developer to make their presentation as well as take any public comments. Rather than closing the hearing, staff recommends that the public hearing be continued to the August 7, 2019 PZC meeting. Staff will then send out revised notices for the additional meeting on August 7, 2019. 2.3.b Packet Pg. 30 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) 1 W. Dundee • Suite 200 • Buffalo Grove • IL • 60089 • t (847) 735 – 0656 • f (847) 735 – 8060 • www.svigos.com Svigos Asset Management Property Development & Asset Management Village of Buffalo Grove June 4, 2019 Community Development Attn: Chris Stilling 50 Raupp Blvd Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 Cambridge Commons Zoning Change Request Applicant is requesting a zoning change from B2 - Business District, General Retail to B3 - Planned Business Center District. Cambridge Commons (“Cambridge”) consists of a 48,284 s/f building on a 4.642 acre lot at the southeast corner of Buffalo Grove Road and Dundee Road. Cambridge was constructed in the 1960's originally as a Kohl's Foodstore and subsequently anchored by Dominicks Finer Foods in later years. During the early 2000's, Dominicks relocated from Cambridge Commons across the street to 770 S. Buffalo Grove, Road as part of an economic incentive package offered by the Village of Buffalo Grove. Dominicks did not give up the lease of their former location at 45 E. Dundee. To prevent a competitor from moving in to Dominicks former location they left the premises vacant for years and eventually sublet their space to a low traffic regional shoe retailer, Rogan Shoes. Cambridge has suffered from inconsistent tenancy and low traffic, making it historically difficult to attract quality tenants. Upon Dominicks’ lease expiration in 2013, Svigos began redevelopment plans for Cambridge to include Fresh Farms International Market. During the entitlement process Dominicks Finer Foods announced the closure of all 72 Chicagoland locations on December 28, 2013. The grocery store landscape drastically changed and Fresh Farms International Market paused their development of Cambridge. When all the viable Dominicks locations had been absorbed, Fresh Farms International Market unsuccessfully attempted to re-start the Cambridge Commons development. The center has been vacant since 2013 except for a 2,000 square foot dentist. We have been unable to attract any new credit worthy tenants without a traffic generating anchor. Despite countless showings we have been unable to obtain any realistic tenant offers except for vape shops, building supply recyclers, laser tag, thrift stores, and indoor soccer users. Unfortunately, these users could not offer to pay enough rent to cover the center’s real estate taxes. The center needs an anchor tenant which drives traffic to the smaller tenants to be viable. We are excited to have 24 Hour Fitness as a tenant at Cambridge Commons. 24 Hour Fitness is a high-quality California based health club with 400 nationwide 2.3.c Packet Pg. 31 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) 1 W. Dundee • Suite 200 • Buffalo Grove • IL • 60089 • t (847) 735 – 0656 • f (847) 735 – 8060 • www.svigos.com locations and opening several more locations in the Chicagoland area. We are requesting that the Village of Buffalo Grove grant a zoning change from B2 Business District General Retail to B3 Planned Business Center District to accommodate a fitness user at 45 E. Dundee Rd premises. The retail landscape has drastically changed in the last five years. The number of retailers that require large spaces have dwindled with the bankruptcy of Sears, Kmart, Carson Pierre Scott, Toys R Us, Babys R Us, Gymboree, HH Gregg, Dominicks Finer Foods, Treasure Island Foods, several Joe Caputos & Sons locations, and numerous others. More brands have recently sought bankruptcy protection due to the changing retail landscape making it unlikely they will open any new locations in the near future – Mattress Firm, Brookstone, David’s Bridal, Rockport Group (shoes), Nine West, Claires Stores, Payless, Inc. Lastly, Moodys has placed the following names on their bankruptcy watch list– J.C. Penney, Pier 1 Imports, Lord & Taylor, Neiman Marcus, Toms Shoes, and J. Crew. Vacancy rates of medium to large box retail spaces will continue to increase with the ongoing popularity of e-tailors such as Amazon and the continued dominance of giant retailers such as Costco, Target, and Walmart. Demand for brick and mortar shopping centers is forecasted to continue its decline. We believe that fitness users may be the only viable option for Cambridge. Medium to large retail spaces will be dominated entertainment-based concepts (sky diving, gun ranges, indoor go-carts, swim schools) as well as health and fitness. The agreement with 24 Hour Fitness requires significant renovation of the entire shopping center costing approximately $4,000,000 -/+. As part of the 24-Hour Fitness lease agreement the following exterior items will be renovated: 1. New façade/canopy over the West and North Facing Storefront. The existing wood cladding will be re-cladded to resemble the provided renderings using an aluminum panel system or a James Hardie cement board system. These products can be narrowed down upon the completion of full architectural and or structural plans for the center. The building’s structure will dictate the weight and determine which systems we can use. 2. The Corner Retail Space will receive an enlarged patio outdoor café area to encourage a food user on the premises. The corner retail space will also receive a new architectural feature that will attract shoppers and highlight the retail spaces on the Center’s west end. 3. 24 Hour Fitness’ space at 45 E. Dundee will receive dual pane insulated glass on their storefront with a new center entrance. The arched barrel roof facia will be updated to compliment the Center’s new appearance and materials. 4. 24 Hour Fitness will receive a new white or gray colored roof over their entire space including the barrel section. 5. The Center’s landscaping will be updated and supplemented with new plantings throughout. Additionally, landscaping will be cut into the sidewalks in front of the retail spaces. We had originally showed planters but we have been advised to build the beds into the actual ground to better ensure the plants’ survival. Cutting the concrete and digging down 2.3.c Packet Pg. 32 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) 1 W. Dundee • Suite 200 • Buffalo Grove • IL • 60089 • t (847) 735 – 0656 • f (847) 735 – 8060 • www.svigos.com is a costlier approach but will ensure the Center’s beautifications will be long lasting. 6. 45 E. Dundee will receive new thermo-pane storefront glass and a new center entrance. 7. The Center will receive a new Monument sign in a new location on the corner of the property 8. The parking lot will be completely seal coated and re-striped as well as repaired with pavement replacement as needed 9. The concrete walkway in front of storefronts will be enlarged to provide more room and a more comfortable experience for the customers. 10. The parking lot lights will receive LED retrofit bulbs and we will add additional lighting if needed. 11. In addition to the exterior renovations 24 Hour Fitness and Svigos will be performing a complete gut-rehab of 45 E. Dundee to include the typical features of an A-Class health club including a pool and half basketball court. Svigos Development will be renovating and reinventing Cambridge Commons Shopping Center. The addition of 24 Hour Fitness along with the Center’s improvements will put Cambridge Commons in the best position to attract retail tax generating retailers on the west shops. We look forward to revitalizing the Center for long term growth and success. 2.3.c Packet Pg. 33 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) P/H # 182615 7/10/19 www.pappageorgehaymes.com pappageorge haymes partners Svigos Asset Management developer 15-45 W. Dundee Rd. Buffalo Grove, IL Site Plan(Existing) Scale: 1" = 20' Cambridge Commons © C O P Y R I G H T P A P P A G E O R G E H A Y M E S P A R T N E R S 20 1 9 These plans are schematic and are subject to further refinement for compliance with code required exiting, life safety improvements and coordination with existing systems. 50 ' - 3 1/ 4 " 71 ' - 6 " 58 ' - 1 1 7/ 8 " 62 ' - 0 " 52 ' - 2 3/ 4 " 17 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 6 3/ 8 " 16 ' - 8 3/ 8 " 24'-01/8"8'-73/4" 24'-0" 19 ' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 31'-0" 20 ' - 3 5/ 8 " 7'- 3 5/ 8 " 20 ' - 1 1 3/ 8 " 16 ' - 9 " 21'-0"21'-0"9' - 0 " 10'-0" 15'-0" 15 ' - 0 " 16'-0" 9' - 0 " T y p . 79'-27/8" 22'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0" Min. 24'-0" FH FH FH FH 10ft Sign Setback Line (BG 14.16.030 B) Property Line Pr o p e r t y L i n e Pr o p e r t y L i n e 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) Ex i s t i n g C o n c r e t e C u r b 2.3ft Bumper OH Zone (60º Pkg) 2.3ft Bumper OH Zone (60º Pkg) 27 Pkg Stalls, 60º 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) 24 Pkg Stalls, 60º 22 Pkg Stalls, 60º 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) Existing Ramp 2.3ft Bumper OH Zone (60º Pkg)2.3ft Bumper OH Zone (60º Pkg) 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) Existing Planter Island & Light Pole & Trees 13 Pkg Stalls, 64º 4 Pkg Stalls, 64º7 Pkg Stalls, 64º HC S i g n HC S i g n 11 Pkg Stalls, 64º Sign Total Concrete Walk Area EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX Existing Pylon Sign 27 . 2 1 ' 558.0' 597.11' 35 0 . 0 ' 18 5 . 0 ' 15 1 . 7 2 ' A r c EXEX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EXEX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX Existing Conc Walk Existing Conc Walk 11 Pkg Stalls, 64º 11 Pkg Stalls, 64º Existing Planter Island & Trees 13 Pkg Stalls, 64º 13 Pkg Stalls, 64º 14 Pkg Stalls, 64º 14 Pkg Stalls, 64º 14 Pkg Stalls, 90º 2ft Bumper OH Zone (90º Pkg)2ft Bumper OH Zone (90º Pkg) 14 Pkg Stalls 31 P k g S t a l l s , 9 0 º North Lot 80 Parking Spaces Incl. 4HC Stalls East Lot 156 Parking Spaces Incl. 0 HC Stalls West Lot 31 Parking Spaces Incl. 3HC Stalls 17 P k g S t a l l s , 9 0 º 12 P k g S t a l l s , 9 0 º 48,284 sf Building Per Survey 4 Cars per 1000sf = 193 Spaces Min. 275 Parking Spaces Actual Incl. 8 HC (Min HC per IAC Table 208.2 = 7) Loading Loading Loading 7 P k g S t a l l s , 9 0 º Existing Curb Cut & Apron Existing Curb Cut & Apron Ex i s t i n g C u r b Cu t & A p r o n Ex i s t i n g C u r b Cu t & A p r o n EX EX EX Bu f f a l o G r o v e R d . 4'-8"17'-0"4'-0"18'-0"4'-0"18'-0"4'-0" 24'-0"28'-0"26'-4" 4'-0"18'-0"\XMO 4'-8" 22'-2" 8' - 5 " 5' - 5 " 8' - 5 " 5' - 5 " 101'-0"22'-2"1 A2.2 294 sq ft Existing Site Plan 2.3.c Packet Pg. 34 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) P/H # 182615 5/1/19 www.pappageorgehaymes.com pappageorge haymes partners Svigos Asset Management developer 45 W. Dundee Rd.Buffalo Grove, IL Site Plan Scale: 1:0.56 Cambridge Commons © C O P Y R I G H T P A P P A G E O R G E H A Y M E S P A R T N E R S 2 0 1 9 These plans are schematic and are subject to further reﬁnement for compliance with coderequired exiting, life safety improvements and coordination with existing systems. Site Plan Proposed Site Plan 2.3.c Packet Pg. 35 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) P/H # 182615 7/10/19 www.pappageorgehaymes.com pappageorge haymes partners Svigos Asset Management developer 15-45 W. Dundee Rd. Buffalo Grove, IL Site Plan(Proposed) Scale: 1" = 20' Cambridge Commons © C O P Y R I G H T P A P P A G E O R G E H A Y M E S P A R T N E R S 20 1 9 These plans are schematic and are subject to further refinement for compliance with code required exiting, life safety improvements and coordination with existing systems. 16'-0"24'-0"9' - 0 1/ 8 " T y p i c a l 10'-43/4" 1 9 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 33 ' - 7 1/ 4 " 24 ' - 0 " 17 ' - 1 0 3/ 4 " 16 ' - 8 3/ 8 " 28'-53/8"40'-81/2" 19 ' - 4 " 50 ' - 3 1/ 4 " 71 ' - 6 " 58 ' - 1 1 7/ 8 " 62 ' - 0 " 52 ' - 2 3/ 4 " 17 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 6 3/ 8 " 16 ' - 8 3/ 8 " 38'-51/8" 24'-01/8"8'-73/4" 24'-0" 51 ' - 4 3/ 4 " 40 ' - 9 5/ 8 " 16'-0" 9' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 19 ' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 16 ' - 9 5/ 8 " 31'-0" 9'-0" 20 ' - 3 5/ 8 " 7'- 3 5/ 8 " 20 ' - 1 1 3/ 8 " 16 ' - 9 " 21'-0"21'-0"9' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 16'-0" 16'-0"27'-21/8"16'-0" 12 ' - 2 1/ 4 " 24 ' - 1 1/ 8 " 22'-13/8" 42 ' - 0 1/ 2 " 6'-4" 10 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 10'-0" 15'-0" 15 ' - 0 " 16'-0" 9' - 0 " T y p . 79'-27/8" 72'-83/4" 13 0 ' - 0 7/ 8 " 22'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0" Min. 24'-0" 10 ' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 12 ' - 3 1/ 2 " 8' - 0 " 12 ' - 3 1/ 2 " 8' - 0 " 12 ' - 3 1/ 2 " 8' - 0 " 12 ' - 3 1/ 2 " 8' - 0 " 12 ' - 3 1/ 2 " 8' - 0 " 12 ' - 3 1/ 2 " 8' - 0 " 5' - 0 " 40'-101/2" 390 sq ft 390 sq ft 6,584 sq ft 257 sq ft Addition FH FH FH FH 10ft Sign Setback Line (BG 14.16.030 B) Property Line Pr o p e r t y L i n e Pr o p e r t y L i n e 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) Ex i s t i n g C o n c r e t e C u r b 2.3ft Bumper OH Zone (60º Pkg) 2.3ft Bumper OH Zone (60º Pkg) 27 Pkg Stalls, 60ºMtrcyc 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) 24 Pkg Stalls, 60º 22 Pkg Stalls, 60º Si g n 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) Existing Ramp 2.3ft Bumper OH Zone (60º Pkg)2.3ft Bumper OH Zone (60º Pkg) 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) Si g n Sign Sign Existing Planter Island & Light Pole & Trees 13 Pkg Stalls 4 Pkg Stalls, 64º7 Pkg Stalls, 64º Ha n d o i c a p S t a l l & a d j a c e n t A c c e s s Ai s l e s h a l l n o t b e S l o p e d i n e x c e s s of 1 : 4 8 . HC S i g n HC S i g n Ha n d o i c a p S t a l l & a d j a c e n t A c c e s s Ai s l e s h a l l n o t b e S l o p e d i n e x c e s s of 1 : 4 8 . HC S i g n HC S i g n HC S i g n Handoicap Stall & adjacent Access Aisle shall not be Sloped in excess of 1:48. Si g n Sign Si g n Total Concrete Walk Area Existing Raised Planter Existing Raised Planter New Primary Tenant Entrance Si g n EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX T y p . 4 " w . W h i t e T r a f ﬁ c P a i n t S t r i p e Typ. 4" w. Yellow Warning Trafﬁc Paint Stripe Typ. 4" w. Yellow Warning Trafﬁc Paint Stripe Remove Existing Pylon Sign, Supports and Foundation. Disconnect wiring at CB Panel Remove two pine trees and their stumps. Ne w S i n g l e F a c e M o n u m e n t S i g n . 1 0 f t H . Se e D e t a i l s . 27 . 2 1 ' 558.0' 597.11' 35 0 . 0 ' 18 5 . 0 ' 15 1 . 7 2 ' A r c EXEX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EXEX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX Existing Conc Walk Existing Conc Walk 11 Pkg Stalls Existing Planter Island & Trees 2ft Bumper OH Zone (90º Pkg)2ft Bumper OH Zone (90º Pkg) 14 Pkg Stalls 31 P k g S t a l l s , 9 0 º North Lot 80 Parking Spaces Incl. 4HC Stalls East Lot 156 Parking Spaces Incl. 0 HC Stalls West Lot 31 Parking Spaces Incl. 3HC Stalls 17 P k g S t a l l s , 9 0 º 12 P k g S t a l l s , 9 0 º 48,284 sf Building Per Survey 257 SF Bldg Addition 4 Cars per 1000sf = 193 Spaces Min. 267 Parking Spaces Actual Incl. 7 HC (Min HC per IAC Table 208.2 = 7) Loading Loading Loading HC S i g n 7 P k g S t a l l s , 9 0 º New Ramp 1:20 Existing Curb Cut & Apron Existing Curb Cut & Apron Ex i s t i n g C u r b Cu t & A p r o n Ex i s t i n g C u r b Cu t & A p r o n Bu f f a l o G r o v e R d . EX T-1 Iron Railing, 18" high, typical of four planters. 11 Pkg Stalls 13 Pkg Stalls 13 Pkg Stalls 14 Pkg Stalls 14 Pkg Stalls 14 Pkg Stalls 11 Pkg Stalls Ex . R a m p New wall ﬁnish and vertical extension - See Elevations. Sawcut and remove paving. 4'-8"17'-0"4'-0"18'-0"4'-0"18'-0"4'-0" 24'-0"28'-0"26'-4" 4'-0"18'-0"\XMO 4'-8" 8' - 5 " 5' - 5 " 8' - 5 " 5' - 5 " A2.2 294 sq ft 0 10'20'40' SCALE: 1" = 20'1 Site Plan (Proposed) Proposed Site Plan 2.3.c Packet Pg. 36 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) P/H # 182615 7/10/19 www.pappageorgehaymes.com pappageorge haymes partners Svigos Asset Management developer 15-45 W. Dundee Rd. Buffalo Grove, IL Landscaping Plan(Proposed) Scale: 1" = 20' Cambridge Commons © C O P Y R I G H T P A P P A G E O R G E H A Y M E S P A R T N E R S 20 1 9 These plans are schematic and are subject to further refinement for compliance with code required exiting, life safety improvements and coordination with existing systems. 10'-43/4" 1 9 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 38'-51/8" 24'-01/8"8'-73/4" 24'-0" 16 ' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 9'-0" 16 ' - 9 " 16 ' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 16'-0" 12 ' - 2 1/ 4 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 16'-0" 9' - 0 " T y p . 22'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0" Min. 24'-0" 390 sq ft 390 sq ft 6,584 sq ft 257 sq ft Addition FH FH FH FH 10ft Sign Setback Line (BG 14.16.030 B) Property Line Pr o p e r t y L i n e Pr o p e r t y L i n e 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) Ex i s t i n g C o n c r e t e C u r b 2.3ft Bumper OH Zone (60º Pkg) 2.3ft Bumper OH Zone (60º Pkg) 27 Pkg Stalls, 60ºMtrcyc 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) 24 Pkg Stalls, 60º 22 Pkg Stalls, 60º Si g n 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) Existing Ramp 2.3ft Bumper OH Zone (60º Pkg)2.3ft Bumper OH Zone (60º Pkg) 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) 2f t B u m p e r O H Z o n e ( 9 0 º P k g ) Si g n Sign Sign Existing Planter Island & Light Pole & Trees 13 Pkg Stalls 4 Pkg Stalls, 64º7 Pkg Stalls, 64º Ha n d o i c a p S t a l l & a d j a c e n t A c c e s s Ai s l e s h a l l n o t b e S l o p e d i n e x c e s s of 1 : 4 8 . HC S i g n HC S i g n Ha n d o i c a p S t a l l & a d j a c e n t A c c e s s Ai s l e s h a l l n o t b e S l o p e d i n e x c e s s of 1 : 4 8 . HC S i g n HC S i g n HC S i g n Handoicap Stall & adjacent Access Aisle shall not be Sloped in excess of 1:48. Si g n Sign Si g n Total Concrete Walk Area Existing Raised Planter Existing Raised Planter New Primary Tenant Entrance Si g n EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX T y p . 4 " w . W h i t e T r a f ﬁ c P a i n t S t r i p e Typ. 4" w. Yellow Warning Trafﬁc Paint Stripe Typ. 4" w. Yellow Warning Trafﬁc Paint Stripe Remove Existing Pylon Sign, Supports and Foundation. Disconnect wiring at CB Panel Remove two pine trees and their stumps. Ne w S i n g l e F a c e M o n u m e n t S i g n . 1 0 f t H . Se e D e t a i l s . 27 . 2 1 ' 558.0' 597.11' 35 0 . 0 ' 18 5 . 0 ' 15 1 . 7 2 ' A r c EXEX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EXEX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX Existing Conc Walk Existing Conc Walk 11 Pkg Stalls Existing Planter Island & Trees 2ft Bumper OH Zone (90º Pkg)2ft Bumper OH Zone (90º Pkg) 14 Pkg Stalls 31 P k g S t a l l s , 9 0 º North Lot 80 Parking Spaces Incl. 4HC Stalls East Lot 156 Parking Spaces Incl. 0 HC Stalls West Lot 31 Parking Spaces Incl. 3HC Stalls 17 P k g S t a l l s , 9 0 º 12 P k g S t a l l s , 9 0 º 48,284 sf Building Per Survey 257 SF Bldg Addition 4 Cars per 1000sf = 193 Spaces Min. 267 Parking Spaces Actual Incl. 7 HC (Min HC per IAC Table 208.2 = 7) Loading Loading Loading HC S i g n 7 P k g S t a l l s , 9 0 º New Ramp 1:20 Existing Curb Cut & Apron Existing Curb Cut & Apron Ex i s t i n g C u r b Cu t & A p r o n Ex i s t i n g C u r b Cu t & A p r o n E. Dundee Rd. Bu f f a l o G r o v e R d . EX T-1x1 B-1x2 T-1x1 T-1 T-2x1 B-1x 8 B-2x 7 P-1x20 T-1x1 B-1x 8 B-2x 7 P-1x20 B-1x 12 T-2 T-2 x1 T-2x1 B-1x 4 B-1x2 T-1x1 B-1x 2 P-1x6 B-1x2 T-1x1 P-1x6 B-1x2 T-1x1 P-1x6 P-1x6 Iron Railing, 18" high, typical of four planters. 11 Pkg Stalls 13 Pkg Stalls 13 Pkg Stalls 14 Pkg Stalls 14 Pkg Stalls 14 Pkg Stalls 11 Pkg Stalls Ex . R a m p B-1x2 B-1x2 B-1x2 B-1x2 B-1x2 B-1x2 B-1x2 New in ground planter w/ 6x6 timber border. Sawcut and remove paving. Excavate to 3ft and backﬁll with app'd soil mix. Apply 3" mulch cover. Typ 7 planters. New wall ﬁnish and vertical extension - See Elevations. Sawcut and remove paving. IV-1x2 IV-1x2 IV-1x2 IV-1x2 IV-1x2 IV-1x2 IV-1x2261 sq ft 1-Story Addition Qty.Key Common Name Botanical Name VIF EX Existing Tree to remain Verify Species in Feild 7 T-1 Common Locust Robinia pseudoacacia 3 T-2 Princeton Elm Ulmus americana 'Princeton' B-1 Korean Dwarf Lilac Syringa meyeri 'Palibin' B-2 Sumac, Low Grow Botanical Name P-1 Allium 'Summer Beauty' Caliper/Remarks Trim Dead wood, branches less than 12 ft when above pavement 4" 2.5" #5 Container, 36" OC #5 Container, 36" OC 'Summer Beauty' Onion #1 Container, 18" OC CAMBRIDGE COMMONS PLANT SCHEDULE Note: At all planting areas provide min 3" bark chip much cover over exposed earth; Mound much 12" high ft dia at all trees IV-1 Boston Ivy #3 Container, 24" OC 4'-8"17'-0"4'-0"18'-0"4'-0"18'-0"4'-0" 24'-0"28'-0"26'-4" 4'-0"18'-0"\XMO 4'-8" 8' - 5 " 5' - 5 " 8' - 5 " 5' - 5 " A2.2 294 sq ft 0 10'20'40' SCALE: 1" = 20'1 Landscaping Plan (Proposed) 2.3.c Packet Pg. 37 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) P/H # 182615 7/10/19 www.pappageorgehaymes.com pappageorge haymes partners Svigos Asset Management developer 15-45 W. Dundee Rd. Buffalo Grove, IL North & West Elevations Scale: 1:1.13, 1' = 1'-0" Cambridge Commons © C O P Y R I G H T P A P P A G E O R G E H A Y M E S P A R T N E R S 20 1 9 These plans are schematic and are subject to further refinement for compliance with code required exiting, life safety improvements and coordination with existing systems. SCALE: 1:1.131Proposed North Elevation Alterations SCALE: 1' = 1'-0"2 Proposed West Elevation Alterations 5 4 3 1 6 78 9 9 10 11 5 14 13 810 12 1 11 1515 16 11 105 5 4 122 17 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 KEY NOTES 1. Existing Aluminum & Clear Glass Storefront - No Changes (VIF). 2. New Thermally Broken Aluminum & Insulated Clear Glass Storefront. Safety glass at all doors and lites adjacent to doors. Nom 2" x 4" ptd. framing w/ receptor. 3. Painted Aluminum Wall Cap Flashing. 5. Surface mounted, individual mounted and internally lit or back lit tenant signage letters in compliance with Village of Buffalo Grove Ordinance Section 14.16.070 6. New tree planter with curb & painted iron rail. 7. New concrete walkway paving. 8. New or reﬁnished masonry, raised planter to replace existing. 9. New store addition beyond. 10. New aluminum wall cladding w/ wood grain ﬁnish. 11. New painted aluminum trellis canopy assembly. 12. New Tenant signage (by Tenant). 13. New Aluminum doorway assembly installed in place of existing ﬁxed window system. 14. Existing Ptd Steel & Clear Glass Storefront - No Changes Unless noted otherwise (VIF). 15. Existing glazed vestibule to be removed and closed off. 16. Existing roof surface to be recoated in approved color for monolithic tone. 17. Decorative hooded lighting ﬁxture for illumination of signage. 18. Existing ribbed split face CMU w/ red- brown ﬁnish to remain. 19. Existing metal doors, railings and iron work to be scraped and painted. 4. New Painted Sofﬁt Cladding. Horizontal modular panels w/ reveal edge. 2.3.c Packet Pg. 38 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) P/H # 182615 7/10/19 www.pappageorgehaymes.com pappageorge haymes partners Svigos Asset Management developer 15-45 W. Dundee Rd. Buffalo Grove, IL East & South Elevations Scale: 1' = 1'-0", 1:1.11, 1:0.90 Cambridge Commons © C O P Y R I G H T P A P P A G E O R G E H A Y M E S P A R T N E R S 20 1 9 These plans are schematic and are subject to further refinement for compliance with code required exiting, life safety improvements and coordination with existing systems. SCALE: 1' = 1'-0"1 East Elevation SCALE: 1:1.112South Eelevation 18 20 10 8 16 4 19 18 18 19 18 1 19 19 20 KEY NOTES 1. Existing Aluminum & Clear Glass Storefront - No Changes (VIF). 2. New Thermally Broken Aluminum & Insulated Clear Glass Storefront. Safety glass at all doors and lites adjacent to doors. Nom 2" x 4" ptd. framing w/ receptor. 3. Painted Aluminum Wall Cap Flashing. 4. New Painted Sofﬁt Cladding. Horizontal modular panels w/ reveal edge. 5. Surface mounted, individual mounted and internally lit or back lit tenant signage letters in compliance with Village of Buffalo Grove Ordinance Section 14.16.070 6. New tree planter with curb & painted iron rail. 7. New concrete walkway paving. 8. New or reﬁnished masonry, raised planter to replace existing. 9. New store addition beyond. 10. New aluminum wall cladding w/ wood grain ﬁnish. 11. New painted aluminum trellis canopy assembly. 12. New Tenant signage (by Tenant). 13. New Aluminum doorway assembly installed in place of existing ﬁxed window system. 14. Existing Ptd Steel & Clear Glass Storefront - No Changes Unless noted otherwise (VIF). 15. Existing glazed vestibule to be removed and closed off. 16. Existing roof surface to be recoated in approved color for monolithic tone. 17. Decorative hooded lighting ﬁxture for illumination of signage. 18. Existing ribbed split face CMU w/ red- brown ﬁnish to remain. 19. Existing metal doors, railings and iron work to be scraped and painted. 20. In ground planter for new landscaping along building wall. 2.3.c Packet Pg. 39 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) P/H # 182615 7/10/19 www.pappageorgehaymes.com pappageorge haymes partners Svigos Asset Management developer 15-45 W. Dundee Rd. Buffalo Grove, IL Signage &Landscaping Details Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0", 1" = 10' Cambridge Commons © C O P Y R I G H T P A P P A G E O R G E H A Y M E S P A R T N E R S 20 1 9 These plans are schematic and are subject to further refinement for compliance with code required exiting, life safety improvements and coordination with existing systems. 113 sq ft 10 ' - 0 " 6" 5' - 8 " 8" 3' - 2 " 10'-0" 14'-111/4" 2'-75/8"8'-83/4"3'-67/8" 2' - 1 0 1/ 8 " 2' - 6 1/ 4 " 1' - 8 " 4' - 0 " 1' - 5 " 1' - 9 " 1' - 5 " 1' - 5 " 1' - 4 " 2' - 8 " Tenant Tenant Tenant Tenant Tenant Tenant Sign Face Area Alum. Cap Concealled sign frame and bracing Internal LED lighting and mounting aparatus Interior of sign box painted white Sign body joinery tight ﬁtting and sealed weather tight and to prevent light leaks. Coordinate electrical service passage through footing and base plate Ground Rod and sign body grounding per local codesExtend footings as necessary to ﬁnd solid bearing in undisturbed soil. Remove tree roots and organic matter encountered. Concrete footings Front Face Rear Face Side Section Alum plate or extruded chanel Box Painted Alum Sign face for push thruogh back lit polycarbonate lettering. Ribbed Metal sign face to match approved building sofﬁt material. Metal cap Contrasting 1" Reveal Plan View Alum plate or extruded chanel Box Provide outdoor rated electrcal diconnect swithch mounted to side face of sign assembly. Color to match adjacent surface Flush Mtd. W.P. GFIC Protected 120V Recept NOTE: Comply with Village of Buffalo Grove rules and regulations as they pertain to allowable sign construction, size and location on lot including maximum heights and set-back distances from lot line. Owner shall obtain building permits. Sign fabricator shall obtain all permits associated with sign including permits to install sign and obtain variances(if any) associated. Cambridge Commons Tenant Tenant Width 22'-6" Tenant Width 22'-6" Tenant Width 29'-2" Li n t e l H t . Si g n B a n d 8' - 6 " Ma x S i g n Ht . 4 ' - 3 " Max Sign W. 7'-5" Tenant Width 45ft Max Sign W. 15ft Tenant Width 73'-9" Max Single Sign W. 24'-4" Tenant TenantTenant Sign Tenant Sign Max Sign W. 7'-5"Max Sign W. 9'-7" 10 f t Tenant Width 190'-5" Tenants do not have Ground sign or Roof Sign (Corner Store) Sign Width 33'-0" Si g n H t . 7' - 9 " Si g n H t . 6' - 0 " Sign Width 25'-0" Tenant Tenants do not have Ground sign or Roof Sign Tenant Tenant Tenant Tenant Illinois DENTAL CENTER 23 E.19E Dundee 15E Tenant Width 22'-6" Tenant Width 22'-6" Tenant Width 39'-10" Max Sign W. 7'-5" Tenant Width 41'-9" Max Sign W. 13'-8" Tenant Width 73'-9" Max Single Sign W. 24'-4" Max Sign W. 7'-5"Existing Sign - No Changes (Corner Store) Max Sign W. 7'-5" Tenant Width 22'-6" Max Sign W. 6'-3" Tenant Width 18'-10" Max Sign W. 6'-3" Tenant Width 18'-10" Max Sign W. 14'-0" Tenant Width 42'-0" 25 E.27 E. Tenant Width 37'-1" Max Sign W. 12'-0" Li n t e l H t . Si g n B a n d 8' - 6 " Ma x S i g n Ht . 4 ' - 3 " Li n t e l H t . Si g n B a n d 9' - 8 " 10 f t 29 E. Tenant SignMa x S i g n Ht . 4 ' - 1 0 " SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 Monument Sign Details SCALE: 1" = 10'2 North Wall Signage Elevation SCALE: 1" = 10'3 West Wall Signage Elevation 2.3.c Packet Pg. 40 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) P/H # 182615 5/1/19 www.pappageorgehaymes.com pappageorge haymes partners Svigos Asset Management developer 45 W. Dundee Rd.Buffalo Grove, IL Buffalo Gr. Rd. View Scale: 1:0.56 Cambridge Commons © C O P Y R I G H T P A P P A G E O R G E H A Y M E S P A R T N E R S 2 0 1 9 These plans are schematic and are subject to further reﬁnement for compliance with coderequired exiting, life safety improvements and coordination with existing systems. Outdoor Cafe 2.3.c Packet Pg. 41 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) P/H # 182615 5/1/19 www.pappageorgehaymes.com pappageorge haymes partners Svigos Asset Management developer 45 W. Dundee Rd.Buffalo Grove, IL Parking Scale: 1:0.56 Cambridge Commons © C O P Y R I G H T P A P P A G E O R G E H A Y M E S P A R T N E R S 20 1 9 These plans are schematic and are subject to further reﬁnement for compliance with coderequired exiting, life safety improvements and coordination with existing systems. Parking 2.3.c Packet Pg. 42 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) CAMBRIDGE COMMONS BUFFALO GROVE, IL 2.3.c Packet Pg. 43 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s P/H # 182615 7/10/19 www.pappageorgehaymes.com pappageorge haymes partners Svigos Asset Management developer 15-45 W. Dundee Rd. Buffalo Grove, IL Survey Plat Scale: 1:0.70 Cambridge Commons © C O P Y R I G H T P A P P A G E O R G E H A Y M E S P A R T N E R S 20 1 9 These plans are schematic and are subject to further refinement for compliance with code required exiting, life safety improvements and coordination with existing systems. 2.3.c Packet Pg. 44 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) 2.3.c Packet Pg. 45 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) REAL ESTATE: AMENITIES 2.3.c Packet Pg. 46 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................... MYSTORE ........................................................................................................................... KIDS’ CLUB ........................................................................................................................ INDUSTRY-LEADING EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................... PERSONAL TRAINING AREA .................................................................................................. LOCKER ROOM .................................................................................................................... SPORTS COURTS ................................................................................................................. POOLS AND SAUNAS ........................................................................................................... GROUP EXERCISE ROOMS .................................................................................................... CONTACT US ....................................................................................................................... CONTENTS 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 pg 2 2.3.c Packet Pg. 47 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s Our clubs feature state-of-the-art amenities, so our members can enjoy the best possible fitness experience, in a space they are proud to call their own. AMENITIES: OVERVIEW pg 3 2.3.c Packet Pg. 48 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s Our clubs include a convenient, one-stop shop for our members with fitness lifestyle essentials such as: • Supplements • Accessories • Nutrition bars & snacks • Drinks • Apparel AMENITIES: MYSTORE San Clemente, CA Yorba Linda, CA pg 4 2.3.c Packet Pg. 49 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s We offer fun and interactive babysitting services, so members can work out when they want, worry free. Our kids club rooms feature: • Supportive and caring team members • Fun electronic gaming systems • Sport courts for active play AMENITIES: KIDS’ CLUB Chino, CA Nanuet, NY Tysons, VA pg 5 2.3.c Packet Pg. 50 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s We provide a huge variety of equipment made by the leading brands in fitness, and we continuously upgrade our machines to keep pace with the latest trends and standards. • Great selection and variety of state-of-the-art cardio equipment • Large free weight area and choices of strength equipment • Dedicated personal training area AMENITIES: INDUSTRY-LEADING EQUIPMENT Chino, CA Paramus, NJ pg 6 2.3.c Packet Pg. 51 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s Our certified personal trainers work one-on-one with members in a dedicated area equipped with all the best training tools. • TRX Suspension Training System • Functional training equipment: kettle bells, medicine balls, stability balls and more • Dedicated strength equipment AMENITIES: PERSONAL TRAINING AREA UTC (La Jolla), CA San Clemente, CARedmond, WA pg 7 2.3.c Packet Pg. 52 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s We provide a gratifying environment from the moment members walk in the door, to the moment they leave. Having a clean, relaxing place to change sustains our members’ sense of exhilaration from pre- to post- workout. • Clean and well maintained • Average 1500-2500 square feet • Spacious with ample lockers for everyone AMENITIES: LOCKER ROOM Fontana, CA Kirkland, WA Costa Mesa, CA pg 8 2.3.c Packet Pg. 53 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s When it comes to sports, we’re on top of our game. Our well-maintained courts attract and retain highly committed members, and provide great gathering space for member and community events. • Basketball courts, ranging from high school to NBA regulation size • Volleyball courts, when ceiling height is 25’ or more • Racquetball courts when square footage allows AMENITIES: SPORTS COURTS Falls Church, VA Paramus, NJBurbank, CA pg 9 2.3.c Packet Pg. 54 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s Our lap pools, steam rooms and saunas add a touch of luxury to any club, while offering a fantastic low-impact workout alternative. Aqua-aerobic classes and lap training draw members of all fitness levels, from seniors to triathletes. • 22-25 meter pools with 3-4 lanes • Spacious, 14-18 person occupancy whirlpools • Steam room and dry sauna to relax after a great workout AMENITIES: POOLS AND SAUNAS Bothell, WA Walnut Creek, CA pg 10 2.3.c Packet Pg. 55 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s We offer the latest group exercise classes free to our members, ensuring they have a place to connect, a commitment on their calendar, and an inspiring instructor to keep them motivated and having fun. • Dedicated cycle rooms with state-of-the-art bikes • Equipment for all the most popular formats, including Les Mills and Zumba • Free classes and fun events to drive member and community engagement AMENITIES: GROUP EXERCISE ROOMS UTC (La Jolla), CA Fontana, CA pg 11 2.3.c Packet Pg. 56 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s EMAIL: real_estate@24hourfit.com Northern California, Pacific Northwest, Colorado & Hawaii Craig Hardy 11798 Oswego St Englewood, CO 80112 303.662.0984 ext 5605 chardy@24hourfit.com Southern California & Nevada Dennis Linville 27921 La Paz Road - Suite B Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 949.851.0024 ext 5267 dinville@24hourfit.com New York, New Jersey & Mid-Atlantic Ray Dewhirst 3 Bailey Avenue Milton MA 02186 617-831-5475 rdewhirst@24hourfit.com CONTACT US! pg 21 To learn more visit 24hourfitness.com/realestate 2.3.c Packet Pg. 57 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s Criterial for Special Use (17.28.040) A. All special uses shall meet the following criteria: 1. The special use will serve the public convenience at the location of the subject property; or the establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare; The Cambridge Commons Shopping Center is improved with a 48,000 square foot building and is the site of a former Dominick’s store which has remained mostly vacant and unproductive since 2013 with the exception of a dentist’s office. The proposed 24 Hour Fitness facility, which will occupy approximately 35,000 square feet, will provide a new facade, landscaping, signage, upgraded parking, and a new roof, and will revitalize the property by providing an A class health club with a swimming pool and a half basketball court, as well as providing an anchor which will attract retail uses for the balance of the center. This significant redevelopment of the property will serve the public convenience, and the establishment and operation of the special use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. 2. The location and size of the special use, the nature and intensity of the operation involved in or conducted in connection with said special use, the size of the subject property in relation to such special use, and the location of the site with respect to streets giving access to it shall be such that it will be in harmony with the appropriate, orderly development of the district in which it is located; As indicated in the Traffic and Parking Study prepared for the project by Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc., the subject property is well located at the signalized intersection of Dundee and Buffalo Grove Roads, providing left turn lanes in all directions, as well as westbound and southbound right turn lanes. The Study concludes that the development is anticipated to have minimal effect on the operation of the area roadway network, and that the existing site access driveways are adequate to accommodate the proposed site traffic. The Study further concludes that the proposed parking supply is adequate to accommodate the anticipated parking demand of the proposed mixed uses. As such, the location and size of the special use, the nature and intensity of the operation involved in or conducted in connection with said special use, the size of the subject property in relation to such special use, and the location of the site with respect to streets giving access to it, are such that it will be in harmony with the appropriate, orderly development of the district in which the property is located. 3. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property for the purposes already permitted in such zoning district, nor substantially diminish and impair other property valuations with the neighborhood; In addition to the foregoing responses regarding the adequacy of the site with respect to traffic and parking, the Study also commented favorably on Applicant’s proposal to dim the lights within the eastern parking lot after 10:00 pm, in order to minimize the impact of 2.3.c Packet Pg. 58 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) light on adjacent residents. The Study also concluded that parking demand for the proposed 24-Hour Fitness use is anticipated to be minimal during off peak hours (9:00 pm to 5:00 am), and is anticipated to be readily accommodated within the parking field directly to the north of the building. As such, the special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property for the purposes already permitted in the zoning district, nor substantially diminish and impair other property valuations with the neighborhood. 4. The nature, location and size of the buildings or structures involved with the establishment of the special use will not impede, substantially hinder or discourage the development and use of adjacent land and buildings in accord with the zoning district within which they lie; Given the reuse of the existing building, the nature, location, and size of the building involved with the establishment of the special use will not impede, substantially hinder or discourage the development and use of adjacent land and buildings in accord with the zoning district within which it lies. 5. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and/or other necessary facilities have been or will be provided; The existing improvements on the property are already served by adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and any other necessary facilities, all of which will continue to be provided. 6. Parking areas shall be of adequate size for the particular special use, which areas shall be properly located and suitably screened from adjoining residential uses, and the entrance and exit driveways to and from these parking areas shall be designed so as to prevent traffic hazards, eliminate nuisance and minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. As concluded in the Traffic and Parking Study, the parking areas are of adequate size for the proposed special use, and as shown on the site plan, are properly located and suitably screened from adjoining residential uses. As concluded by the Study, the driveways to and from the parking areas are adequate to serve the proposed uses and are designed so as to prevent traffic hazards, eliminate nuisance and minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. B. The special use shall in all other respects conform to the applicable regulations of the zoning district in which it is located, except as such regulations may be varied. Notwithstanding the foregoing, business planned unit developments shall conform with Section 17.44.040(D) unless varied. Applicant is proposing that the subject property be rezoned from B2 to B3, Planned Business District, which would accommodate the proposed fitness center by the granting of a special use for planned development to allow a fitness use greater than 10,000 square feet. If approved, the special use would in all other respects conform to the applicable 2.3.c Packet Pg. 59 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) regulations of the B3 district, and would conform with the regulations of Section 17.44.04(D) regarding planned unit developments. 2.3.c Packet Pg. 60 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Planned Unit Development (17.28.050) D. General Standards: 1. All planned unit developments shall meet the following general standards: a. Have the minimum areas as set forth in Section 17.16.060. The subject property, along with adjacent properties which are zoned B3, exceed the 5-acre minimum requirement for a planned unit development in the B-3 District. b. The uses permitted in such development are not of such a nature or so located as to exercise an undue detrimental influence or effect upon the surrounding neighborhood; The uses permitted in the development will consist of a health/fitness facility in excess of 10,000 square feet and compatible retail uses, all of which will be compatible with the prior use of the property for retail and compatible surrounding commercial uses. c. The plan effectively treats the developmental possibilities of the subject property, making appropriate provisions for the preservation of streams, wooded areas, scenic views, floodplain areas, and similar physical features; As a previously developed site, which does not include any streams, wooded areas, scenic views, floodplain areas, or similar physical features, all of which are not applicable to this site. d. All requirements pertaining to commercial, residential, institutional or other uses established in the planned unit development conform to the requirements for each individual classification as established elsewhere in this Title, except as may be specifically varied for the proper planning of the planned unit development; Upon the granting of the requested special use permit, which would allow a fitness facility in excess of 10,000 square feet, all of the proposed uses, including additional compatible retail uses which are contemplated for the balance of the development, will conform to the requirements of the B-3 District. e. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall determine that the area and width of the lot shall be sufficient for the proposed use, and that the development of the property in the proposed manner creates no outlots which will be difficult to develop in an appropriate manner. The Traffic and Parking Study provided by Applicant, concludes that the area and size of the property and the existing and contemplated improvements thereon have been designed so that all traffic and parking will be appropriately accommodated. The proposed development will create no outlots. Accordingly, the area and width of the lot is sufficient for the proposed use. 2.3.c Packet Pg. 61 At t a c h m e n t : P l a n S e t ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Memorandum To: Nick Vittore Svigos Development, Inc. From: Lynn M. Means, P.E., PTOE Senior Transportation Engineer Date: May 2, 2019 Subject: Cambridge Commons 45 W. Dundee Road Buffalo Grove, Illinois Part I. Introduction and Project Context Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. (GHA) has conducted a Traffic and Parking Summary for the proposed site modifications to the Cambridge Commons development located at 45 W. Dundee Road (IL Route 68) in Buffalo Grove, Illinois. The site is located on the southeast quadrant of Dundee Road and Buffalo Grove Road and contains an approximately 48,000 square-foot shopping center, served by 262 parking spaces, including 8 accessible spaces. The shopping center is vacant except for one 2,000 square-foot tenant space occupied by Illinois Dental Center. The shopping center was formerly anchored by an approximately 35,000 square-foot Dominick’s grocery store until 2001. From 2005 until the end of 2013 this space was occupied by Rogan’s Shoes. Access to the site is provided via four driveways: two full access driveways on Dundee Road and two full access on Buffalo Grove Road. As proposed, the development consists of redeveloping the shopping center to be anchored by an approximately 35,000 square-foot 24-Hour Fitness facility. The health club would be open 24-hours a day and include a swimming pool and basketball court. The remaining vacant space is anticipated to be occupied by general retail / restaurant space. The proposed development will also include a new façade, landscaping, signage and parking lot improvements. Access to the site will be maintained via the existing access driveways on Dundee Road and Buffalo Grove Road. The following provides a summary of site traffic characteristics and the analysis conducted, which includes a qualitative analysis of the development’s impact on the surrounding roadway network and parking analysis. Exhibits and Appendices referenced are in the Technical Addendum at the end of this document. Part II. Background Information Site Location Map and Roadway Inventory Exhibit 1 provides a location map of the site vicinity. Pertinent comments to the adjacent roadways include: Dundee Road Dundee Road (IL Route 68) is an east-west principal arterial roadway, providing a five-lane cross-section (two travel lanes in each direction and a center turn lane) in the site vicinity. At its signalized intersection with Buffalo Grove Road, a left-turn lane is provided in both the eastbound and westbound directions and a right-turn lane is provided in the westbound direction. Dundee Road is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) and has a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour (mph). 2.3.d Packet Pg. 62 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Cambridge Commons Buffalo Grove, Illinois Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. – Page 2 Buffalo Grove Road Buffalo Grove Road is a north-south roadway, providing a five-lane cross-section (two travel lanes in each direction and a center turn lane) in the site vicinity. It is classified as a major collector south of Dundee Road and a minor arterial roadway north of Dundee Road. At its signalized intersection with Dundee Road, a left-turn lane is provided in both the northbound and southbound directions and a right-turn lane is provided in the southbound direction. Buffalo Grove Road is under the jurisdiction of the Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways and has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities A sidewalk is provided along both sides of Dundee Road and Buffalo Grove within the study area. A crosswalk, along with pedestrian signals, is provided on all four legs of the nearby signalized intersection of Buffalo Grove Road and Dundee Road. Public Transportation The site is also well served by public transportation. Pace operates multiple existing bus routes in the site vicinity: 234 – Wheeling – Des Plaines and 604 – Wheeling - Schaumburg. Existing Traffic Exhibit 2 summarizes the existing weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes. Peak period turning movement counts were conducted by GHA in October 2017 at the intersection of Dundee Road and Buffalo Grove Road. Based on these counts, the weekday morning and evening peak hours occurred from 7:30 to 8:30 AM and 5:15 to 6:15 PM, respectively. Exhibit 2 also provides the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) along Dundee Road and Buffalo Grove Road (year 2017) obtained from IDOT’s website: www.gettingaroundillinois.com. Summaries of the GHA traffic counts can be found in Appendix A. Part III. Traffic Evaluation Proposed Plan The preliminary Site Plan is provided in Appendix B. As currently proposed, the development consists of redeveloping the 48,284 square-foot shopping center to include an approximately 35,000 square-foot fitness facility. The remaining space (13,284 square-feet) is anticipated to be occupied by general retail / restaurant space. Access to the site will be maintained via the four existing access driveways: two on Dundee Road and two on Buffalo Grove Road. Trip Generation and Directional Distribution Trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the 10th Edition of the Manual Trip Generation were used to determine the anticipated traffic from the proposed mix of site uses (see Appendix C). The number of vehicle trips anticipated during the weekday morning peak hour (one hour between 7:00 and 9:00 AM) and weekday evening peak hour (one hour between 4:00 and 6:00 PM) is displayed in Table 1 and includes all traffic attributed to the proposed development. 2.3.d Packet Pg. 63 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Cambridge Commons Buffalo Grove, Illinois Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. – Page 3 Table 1: Estimated Trip Generation Land Use / Size ITE Land Use Code Weekday AM Peak HourA Weekday PM Peak HourB Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Health/Fitness Club / 35,000 SF 492 C 23 23 46 71 53 124 576 576 1,152 Fast Casual Restaurant / 3,000 SF 930 4 2 6 23 19 42 473 473 946 Shopping Center / 10,284 SF 820 D 6 4 10 19 20 39 194 194 388 Total Trips 33 29 62 113 94 207 1,243 1,243 2,486 A One hour between 7:00 and 9:00 AM. B One hour between 4:00 and 6:00 PM. C Weekday daily not available for the health/fitness club use in the 10th Edition; therefore, data available in the 9th Edition was used for this land use. D ITE average rates used in the calculations due to the small building size. As shown in Table 1, it is expected that the proposed mixed-use development will generate approximately 2,500 total trips on a typical weekday. During the peak hours, the development is expected to generate approximately 62 bi-directional vehicle trip (33 entering and 29 exiting) during the weekday AM and 207 bi-directional trips (113 entering and 94 exiting) during the weekday PM. Notes: 1. Although the health club is anticipated to be open 24-hours, based on historical hourly distribution of health club usage obtained from the client (see Appendix D), site traffic during off-peak hours (9PM- 5AM) is minimal. On average, approximately 15 percent of the total site traffic is anticipated during this timeframe. Based on the ITE daily traffic estimates, this would represent a total of approximately 180 trips (combined entering and existing) during these off-peak hours, with 44 vehicles total (combined entering and exiting) or less anticipated, on average, per hour. 2. Not all vehicle trips expected to be generated by the proposed project represent new trips on the study area roadway system, studies have shown that for retail and restaurant developments, a substantial portion of the site-generated vehicle trips are already present in the adjacent passing stream of traffic or are diverted from another route to the proposed site. Based on data presented in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, the average pass-by trip percentage for a restaurant use is between 43 and 44 percent and for a retail use is between 26 and 34 percent. However, to provide a conservative analysis, a reduction for pass-by traffic was not applied. As previously indicated, the site formerly contained an approximately 35,000 square foot grocery store and approximately 13,000 square-feet of supporting retail use. Therefore, a comparison was made between what the site would generate if it were operating as the former versus proposed site uses. A summary of this trip generation comparison is provided in Table 2. Table 2: Trip Generation Comparison Land Use / Size ITE Land Use Code Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Previous Site Use Grocery Store / 35,000 SF 850 80 54 134 182 175 357 1,847 1,847 3,694 Shopping Center / 13,284 SF 820 A 7 5 12 24 27 51 251 251 502 Total Previous Use Trips 87 59 146 206 202 408 2,098 2,098 4,196 Proposed Use Health Club, Restaurant & Retail / 48,284 SF B 33 29 62 113 94 207 1,243 1,243 2,486 Net Change in Site Trips C -54 -30 -84 -93 -110 -203 -855 -855 -1,710 A ITE average rates used in the calculations due to the small building size. B From Table 1. C Proposed use less previous site use. 2.3.d Packet Pg. 64 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Cambridge Commons Buffalo Grove, Illinois Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. – Page 4 As shown in Table 2, it is anticipated the proposed mix of uses (health club and restaurant/retail) would generate 84 fewer trips during the weekday AM peak hour and 203 fewer trips during the weekday PM peak hour than the former site uses (grocery store and retail). On a daily basis, the proposed development would generate 1,710 fewer trips than the former site uses. The anticipated trip distribution of site traffic is summarized in Table 3. This was based on current travel patterns, the operational characteristics of the street system and site access. Table 3: Trip Distribution Site Traffic Assignments Exhibit 3 illustrates the traffic assignments for the site vehicle trips, which are based on the traffic characteristics summarized in Tables 1 and 3 and assigned to the area roadways. Site and Existing traffic (Exhibits 2 and 3) were combined to develop Total Traffic, which is illustrated on Exhibit 4. Traffic Increases As shown on Exhibit 3, the total (including both entering and exiting traffic) weekday AM and PM peak hour vehicle trips of 62 and 207, respectively, are expected on the roadways leading beyond the study area, or approximately one to three additional vehicle every minute. Based on the adjacent signalization intersection of Dundee Road and Buffalo Grove Road cycle length of 140 seconds during the weekday AM and PM peak periods, these increases represent approximately 1 to 4 additional vehicles every cycle through this intersection, representing both entering and exiting traffic. On a daily basis, based on the anticipated directional distribution of traffic, volume increases in the range of 372 to 746 vehicles (total both entering and exiting) are expected on the study area roadways. This represents an approximately 3 percent increase on Buffalo Grove Road and Dundee Road. However, as previously noted, the above increases are based on a very conservative analysis scenario, as they do not include a reduction for pass-by (traffic already traveling on the adjacent traffic stream), as well as do not consider traffic associated with the previous site use. Accordingly, the amount of site-generated traffic is expected to have minimal effects on the operations of the external street network. Dundee Road East of Site West of Buffalo Grove Road Buffalo Grove Road North of Dundee Road South of Site Totals =100% Route & Direction Percent Route To/From Site 30% 30% 25% 15% 2.3.d Packet Pg. 65 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Cambridge Commons Buffalo Grove, Illinois Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. – Page 5 Part IV. Parking Evaluation Parking Demand Requirements Based on the parking requirements outlined in the Village of Buffalo Grove Code of Ordinance (Section 17.36.040), 193 parking spaces are required for the site. The Village’s parking requirements are summarized in Table 4. Table 4: Village Parking Requirements Use Size Parking Requirement Parking Spaces Required Provided Commercial / Retail 48,284 SF 1 space per 250 SF floor area 193 262 Parking Demand Projections In order to project the peak parking demand for the proposed development, GHA referenced the following sources providing peak parking demand:  Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation, 5th Edition (see Appendix E).  Parking counts conducted by GHA in April 2019 at 3 similar health/fitness club uses in the Chicagoland area (see Appendix F). The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation, 5th Edition publication provides a compilation of parking demand surveys from across the country for a wide variety of land uses. ITE Land Use Codes 492, Health/Fitness Club, 930 Fast Casual Restaurant and 820, Shopping Center were referenced for the proposed development (see Appendix E). Using the ITE data, Table 5 presents a summary of the projected peak parking demand for the proposed development on a weekday and weekend. Table 5: Projected Peak Parking Demand: ITE – Parking Generation Land Use ITE LUC Size Average Peak Parking Demand Provided Weekday Weekend Rate/Unit Spaces Rate/Unit Spaces Health/Fitness Club 492 35,000 SF 4.73 166 3.26 114 262 Restaurant 930 3,000 SF 9.93 30 8.75 26 Retail 820 10,284 SF 2.61 27 2.91 30 Total -- 223 -- 170 Based on recent surveys conducted at similar health/fitness clubs (ranging in size from 40,000 to 45,000 square feet), the peak parking demand did not exceed 200 spaces, with an average peak parking demand of 178 spaces. As shown in Table 6, using the local parking demand rates (calculated per 1,000 square-feet of gross floor area, see Appendix F), the peak parking demand for the proposed health/fitness club use is not anticipated to exceed 170 spaces, with the average peak parking demand not to exceed 147 spaces. Table 6: Parking Demand – Similar Existing Facilities Land Use / Size Rate / 1,000 SF GFA Peak Parking Demand (Spaces) Health/Fitness Club / 35,000 SF Peak 4.85 170 Average Peak 4.19 147 2.3.d Packet Pg. 66 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Cambridge Commons Buffalo Grove, Illinois Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. – Page 6 Furthermore, the proposed development consists of three different uses, with peak hours that do not all coincide. Based on data contained in the ITE Parking Generation, 5th Edition and the Urban Land Institute Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, the following timeframes represent the peak periods for each use:  General Retail: Weekday 12:00 and 6:00 PM; Weekend 11:00 AM and 5:00 PM.  Fast Casual Restaurant: Weekday 12:00 and 1:00 PM; Weekend 6:00 and 7:00 PM.  Health Club: Weekday 5:00 and 7:00 PM; Weekend 11:00 AM and 5:00 PM. It is also reasonable to assume that some patrons of the proposed retail or restaurant uses may also be a member at the health club. Accordingly, the development will provide adequate parking for the proposed mix of site uses. Note: As previously described, parking demand for the health/club fitness use is anticipated to be minimal during off-peak hours (9PM to 5AM) and is anticipated to be readily accommodated within the parking field directly to the north of the building. It is our understanding the developer proposes to dim the lights within the eastern parking lot after 10PM to minimize light pollution/impacts to the adjacent residents. Part V. Recommendations and Conclusions A traffic and parking analysis was performed for the proposed site modifications to the Cambridge Commons development located at the southeast corner of Dundee Road and Buffalo Grove Road in Buffalo Grove, Illinois. Overall, the development is anticipated to have minimal effect on the operations of the area roadway network. The existing site access driveways are adequate to accommodate the proposed site traffic. And, based on the parking analysis, it can be concluded the proposed parking supply is adequate to accommodate the anticipated parking demand for the proposed mix of uses. Part VI. Technical Addendum The following Exhibits and Appendices were previously referenced. They provide technical support for our observations, findings and recommendations discussed in the text. Exhibits 1. Location Map 2. Existing Traffic 3. Site Traffic 4. Total Traffic Appendices A. Traffic Count Summaries B. Site Plan C. ITE Trip Generation Excerpts D. Historical Health/Fitness Club Hourly Usage E. ITE Parking Generation Excerpts F. Local Health/Fitness Club Parking Survey Data 5537.900_Cambridge Commons_Buffalo Grove.05.02.19.docx 2.3.d Packet Pg. 67 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Technical Addendum 2.3.d Packet Pg. 68 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Exhibits 2.3.d Packet Pg. 69 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) 2.3.d Packet Pg. 70 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s Not to Scale XX 22,700 26,400 13 , 2 0 0 21 , 6 0 0 2.3.d Packet Pg. 71 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s Not to Scale 2.3.d Packet Pg. 72 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s Not to Scale 2.3.d Packet Pg. 73 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s Appendix A Traffic Count Summaries 2.3.d Packet Pg. 74 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Bu f f alo G ro ve /D u n d e e - T MC T ue O ct 1 7 , 201 7 Fu ll Le n g th (6 :3 0 AM-9:3 0 AM, 1 1 AM-1 PM, 3 :3 0 PM-6:30 PM) All C las s e s (Lig hts and Mo to r cy cle s , He av y) All Mo v e m e nt s I D: 4 596 5 1 , Lo catio n : 42.138 8 5 7 , -8 7.9 58 5 8 1 Pr o vid e d by : Ge walt Ham ilt on As s o ciate s I nc. 6 2 5 For e s t Ed g e Dr iv e , Ve r n o n Hills , I L, 60 0 6 1 , US Le g D u n d e e Rd D u n d e e Rd Bu ffa lo G r o ve Rd Bu ffa lo G r o ve Rd D ir e c tio n Ea s tb o u n d We s tb o u n d No r th b o u n d So u th b o u n d T im e L T R U Ap p L T R U App L T R U App L T R U App In t 2 0 17 -10 -17 6 :3 0 AM 6 6 2 2 6 8 0 3 0 0 5 6 9 18 0 9 2 8 5 7 13 0 7 8 3 1 3 1 10 0 7 2 5 4 2 6 :4 5 AM 8 5 2 8 4 15 0 3 8 4 4 10 2 10 0 116 12 8 4 11 0 10 7 3 4 3 1 18 0 8 3 6 9 0 Ho u r ly T o ta l 15 1 5 10 2 3 0 6 8 4 9 17 1 2 8 0 2 0 8 2 0 14 1 2 4 0 18 5 6 5 6 2 2 8 0 15 5 12 3 2 7 :0 0 AM 6 9 2 7 5 10 0 3 5 4 7 9 8 2 3 0 12 8 2 2 118 19 0 15 9 2 1 4 5 3 0 0 9 6 7 3 7 7 :15 AM 10 7 3 6 5 12 0 4 8 4 2 0 13 8 2 3 0 18 1 2 2 8 9 2 5 0 13 6 2 3 3 6 2 8 0 8 7 8 8 8 7 :3 0 AM 112 3 17 10 0 4 3 9 19 113 17 0 14 9 3 4 15 1 2 2 0 2 0 7 4 2 6 4 4 2 0 14 8 9 4 3 7 :4 5 AM 14 0 3 18 11 0 4 6 9 14 17 2 3 4 0 2 2 0 3 3 14 0 2 4 0 19 7 2 0 5 1 4 4 0 115 10 0 1 Ho u r ly T o ta l 4 2 8 12 7 5 4 3 0 17 4 6 6 0 5 2 1 9 7 0 6 7 8 111 4 9 8 9 0 0 6 9 9 10 6 19 6 14 4 0 4 4 6 3 5 6 9 8 :0 0 AM 9 4 3 15 13 0 4 2 2 2 0 13 8 17 0 17 5 2 9 12 3 2 1 0 17 3 4 4 4 6 4 8 0 13 8 9 0 8 8 :15 AM 10 3 3 3 3 18 0 4 5 4 2 5 115 3 4 0 17 4 2 1 113 2 5 0 15 9 3 9 4 6 2 4 0 10 9 8 9 6 8 :3 0 AM 6 9 3 5 0 14 0 4 3 3 11 13 6 3 5 0 18 2 2 2 8 4 2 8 0 13 4 3 1 4 8 3 7 0 116 8 6 5 8 :4 5 AM 8 7 2 6 4 2 3 0 3 7 4 17 12 2 2 2 0 16 1 3 2 12 7 2 2 0 18 1 4 6 6 2 4 4 0 15 2 8 6 8 Ho u r ly T o ta l 3 5 3 12 6 2 6 8 0 16 8 3 7 3 5 11 10 8 0 6 9 2 10 4 4 4 7 9 6 0 6 4 7 16 0 2 0 2 15 3 0 5 15 3 5 3 7 9 :0 0 AM 7 8 2 2 5 15 0 3 18 12 13 6 2 7 0 17 5 2 8 9 2 2 2 0 14 2 4 4 3 9 3 1 0 114 7 4 9 9 :15 AM 6 3 14 8 18 0 2 2 9 12 118 2 8 0 15 8 2 1 8 8 13 0 12 2 2 6 5 7 3 2 0 115 6 2 4 Ho u r ly T o ta l 14 1 3 7 3 3 3 0 5 4 7 2 4 2 5 4 5 5 0 3 3 3 4 9 18 0 3 5 0 2 6 4 7 0 9 6 6 3 0 2 2 9 13 7 3 11:0 0 AM 5 7 14 7 11 0 2 15 14 15 7 2 8 0 19 9 2 1 5 5 12 0 8 8 3 4 3 5 2 7 0 9 6 5 9 8 11:15 AM 5 3 13 0 12 0 19 5 13 13 1 3 0 0 17 4 2 9 6 6 14 0 10 9 4 4 5 7 3 6 0 13 7 6 15 11:3 0 AM 3 8 15 7 17 0 2 12 14 17 5 3 0 0 2 19 2 4 6 1 14 0 9 9 2 7 6 2 4 0 0 12 9 6 5 9 11:4 5 AM 5 1 14 6 16 0 2 13 2 3 14 7 18 0 18 8 2 5 5 9 11 0 9 5 3 3 5 0 4 1 0 12 4 6 2 0 Ho u r ly T o ta l 19 9 5 8 0 5 6 0 8 3 5 6 4 6 10 10 6 0 7 8 0 9 9 2 4 1 5 1 0 3 9 1 13 8 2 0 4 14 4 0 4 8 6 2 4 9 2 12 :0 0 P M 7 2 14 1 17 0 2 3 0 12 17 2 4 2 0 2 2 6 2 4 5 3 13 0 9 0 4 5 6 6 5 7 0 16 8 7 14 12 :15 P M 5 8 12 9 15 0 2 0 2 15 15 8 3 0 0 2 0 3 3 5 5 6 18 0 10 9 4 9 7 5 6 0 0 18 4 6 9 8 12 :3 0 P M 5 2 15 2 2 2 0 2 2 6 2 3 15 2 3 4 0 2 0 9 2 1 6 9 10 0 10 0 4 5 6 4 5 0 0 15 9 6 9 4 12 :4 5 P M 6 5 15 1 13 0 2 2 9 14 15 5 2 9 0 19 8 2 4 6 8 15 0 10 7 4 3 6 1 6 3 0 16 7 7 0 1 Ho u r ly T o ta l 2 4 7 5 7 3 6 7 0 8 8 7 6 4 6 3 7 13 5 0 8 3 6 10 4 2 4 6 5 6 0 4 0 6 18 2 2 6 6 2 3 0 0 6 7 8 2 8 0 7 3 :3 0 P M 5 9 18 5 2 5 0 2 6 9 2 3 2 6 9 3 0 0 3 2 2 2 8 7 6 2 5 1 13 0 6 2 9 4 5 7 0 2 13 9 3 4 3 :4 5 P M 5 9 15 8 17 0 2 3 4 3 8 2 4 6 2 4 0 3 0 8 3 8 9 0 2 0 0 14 8 6 7 116 6 4 0 2 4 7 9 3 7 Ho u r ly T o ta l 118 3 4 3 4 2 0 5 0 3 6 1 5 15 5 4 0 6 3 0 6 6 16 6 4 5 1 2 7 8 12 9 2 10 12 1 0 4 6 0 18 7 1 4 :0 0 P M 6 0 17 3 2 4 0 2 5 7 14 2 15 3 2 0 2 6 1 3 8 8 2 11 0 13 1 4 7 8 5 6 6 0 19 8 8 4 7 4 :15 P M 7 0 16 7 18 0 2 5 5 17 2 8 4 3 2 0 3 3 3 3 9 10 6 16 0 16 1 5 4 9 7 6 8 0 2 19 9 6 8 4 :3 0 P M 7 0 18 2 2 3 0 2 7 5 17 3 0 3 4 6 0 3 6 6 2 9 9 3 13 0 13 5 5 1 12 4 8 2 0 2 5 7 10 3 3 4 :4 5 P M 6 2 17 4 2 2 0 2 5 8 2 2 3 19 4 4 0 3 8 5 4 3 114 18 0 17 5 4 9 10 7 6 5 0 2 2 1 10 3 9 Ho u r ly T o ta l 2 6 2 6 9 6 8 7 0 10 4 5 7 0 112 1 15 4 0 13 4 5 14 9 3 9 5 5 8 0 6 0 2 2 0 1 4 13 2 8 1 0 8 9 5 3 8 8 7 5 :0 0 P M 7 7 15 6 2 6 0 2 5 9 2 4 2 7 7 3 9 0 3 4 0 3 2 10 5 3 0 0 16 7 4 7 13 3 7 8 0 2 5 8 10 2 4 5 :15 P M 7 5 2 0 9 2 1 0 3 0 5 4 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 4 0 6 3 1 9 5 17 0 14 3 4 0 12 0 6 3 0 2 2 3 10 7 7 5 :3 0 P M 6 3 17 2 2 7 0 2 6 2 3 4 2 8 4 4 0 0 3 5 8 4 9 8 9 2 1 0 15 9 6 8 15 2 7 7 0 2 9 7 10 7 6 5 :4 5 P M 8 9 2 0 2 3 1 0 3 2 2 3 2 2 6 0 3 0 0 3 2 2 4 9 10 5 2 1 0 17 5 3 7 12 1 5 9 0 2 17 10 3 6 Ho u r ly T o ta l 3 0 4 7 3 9 10 5 0 114 8 13 3 115 4 13 9 0 14 2 6 16 1 3 9 4 8 9 0 6 4 4 19 2 5 2 6 2 7 7 0 9 9 5 4 2 13 6 :0 0 P M 7 8 18 6 3 4 0 2 9 8 2 3 2 8 0 3 8 0 3 4 1 4 7 10 5 16 0 16 8 5 2 12 2 8 0 0 2 5 4 10 6 1 6 :15 P M 8 6 19 8 2 5 0 3 0 9 3 0 2 5 4 4 4 0 3 2 8 3 7 116 19 0 17 2 5 7 9 7 8 1 0 2 3 5 10 4 4 Ho u r ly T o ta l 16 4 3 8 4 5 9 0 6 0 7 5 3 5 3 4 8 2 0 6 6 9 8 4 2 2 1 3 5 0 3 4 0 10 9 2 19 16 1 0 4 8 9 2 10 5 T o ta l 2 3 6 7 6 7 3 5 5 8 3 0 9 6 8 5 6 11 6 0 2 8 9 5 8 0 7 5 9 7 9 4 7 2 9 2 9 5 7 9 1 4 4 5 6 13 5 2 2 3 9 4 16 0 2 0 5 3 4 8 2 7 0 8 6 % Ap pr o a c h 2 4 .4 %6 9 .5 %6 .0 %0 %-8 .0 %7 9 .3 %12 .6 %0 %-2 1.3 %6 5 .7 %13 .0 %0 %-2 5 .3 %4 4 .8 %3 0 .0 %0 %-- % T o ta l 8 .7 %2 4 .9 %2 .2 %0 %3 5 .8 %2 .3 %2 2 .3 %3 .5 %0 %2 8 .0 %3 .5 %10 .8 %2 .1%0 %16 .5 %5 .0 %8 .8 %5 .9 %0 %19 .7 %- Lig hts a n d Mo to r c yc le s 2 3 2 5 6 5 3 5 5 5 1 0 9 4 11 5 8 9 5 8 6 3 9 4 1 0 7 3 9 3 9 0 1 2 8 8 9 5 4 7 0 4 3 3 7 13 3 1 2 3 6 7 15 7 5 0 5 2 7 3 2 6 4 14 % Lig h ts a n d Mo to r c yc le s 9 8 .2 %9 7 .0 %9 4 .5 %0 %9 7 .2 %9 6 .4 %9 7 .3 %9 8 .2 %0 %9 7 .3 %9 5 .1%9 8 .6 %9 4 .5 %0 %9 7 .3 %9 8 .4 %9 8 .9 %9 8 .3 %0 %9 8 .6 %9 7 .5 % He a vy 4 2 2 0 0 3 2 0 2 7 4 2 2 16 5 17 0 2 0 4 4 6 4 0 3 2 1 119 2 1 2 7 2 7 0 7 5 6 7 2 % He a vy 1.8 %3 .0 %5 .5 %0 %2 .8 %3 .6 %2 .7 %1.8 %0 %2 .7 %4 .9 %1.4 %5 .5 %10 0 %2 .7 %1.6 %1.1%1.7 %0 %1.4 %2 .5 % *L: Le ft, R: Rig h t, T : T h r u , U: U-T u r n 1 of 8 Appendix A - Page1 2.3.d Packet Pg. 75 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Bu f f alo G ro ve /Du nd e e - T MC T u e O ct 1 7 , 2 01 7 AM Pe ak (7 :3 0 AM - 8 :3 0 AM) All C las s e s (Lig h ts an d Motor cycle s , He av y) All Mo ve m e n t s I D: 4 5 9 651 , Locatio n : 4 2.1 388 5 7 , -8 7.9 585 8 1 Pr o vid e d b y: Ge walt Ham ilto n As s o ciate s I n c. 6 2 5 Fo r e s t Ed g e Dr iv e , Ve r no n Hills , I L, 6 0 061 , US Le g D u n d e e Rd D u n d e e Rd Bu ffa lo G r o ve Rd Bu ffa lo G r o ve Rd D ir e c tio n Ea s tb o u n d We s tb o u n d No r th b o u n d So u th b o u n d T im e L T R U App L T R U Ap p L T R U App L T R U App Int 2 0 17 -10 -17 7 :3 0 AM 112 3 17 10 0 4 3 9 19 113 17 0 14 9 3 4 15 1 2 2 0 2 0 7 4 2 6 4 4 2 0 14 8 9 4 3 7 :4 5 AM 14 0 3 18 11 0 4 6 9 14 17 2 3 4 0 2 2 0 3 3 14 0 2 4 0 19 7 2 0 5 1 4 4 0 115 10 0 1 8 :0 0 AM 9 4 3 15 13 0 4 2 2 2 0 13 8 17 0 17 5 2 9 12 3 2 1 0 17 3 4 4 4 6 4 8 0 13 8 9 0 8 8 :15 AM 10 3 3 3 3 18 0 4 5 4 2 5 115 3 4 0 17 4 2 1 113 2 5 0 15 9 3 9 4 6 2 4 0 10 9 8 9 6 T o ta l 4 4 9 12 8 3 5 2 0 17 8 4 7 8 5 3 8 10 2 0 7 18 117 5 2 7 9 2 0 7 3 6 14 5 2 0 7 15 8 0 5 10 3 7 4 8 % Ap p r o a c h 2 5 .2 %7 1.9 %2 .9 %0 %-10 .9 %7 4 .9 %14 .2 %0 %-15 .9 %7 1.6 %12 .5 %0 %-2 8 .4 %4 0 .6 %3 1.0 %0 %-- % T o ta l 12 .0 %3 4 .2 %1.4 %0 %4 7 .6 %2 .1%14 .4 %2 .7 %0 %19 .2 %3 .1%14 .1%2 .5 %0 %19 .6 %3 .9 %5 .5 %4 .2 %0 %13 .6 %- P HF 0 .8 0 2 0 .9 6 3 0 .7 2 2 -0 .9 5 1 0 .7 8 0 0 .7 8 2 0 .7 5 0 -0 .8 16 0 .8 6 0 0 .8 7 3 0 .9 2 0 -0 .8 8 9 0 .8 2 4 0 .8 0 9 0 .8 2 3 -0 .8 6 1 0 .9 3 6 Lig h ts a nd Mo to r c yc le s 4 4 4 12 5 2 4 9 0 17 4 5 7 3 5 11 9 9 0 6 8 3 10 8 5 2 0 8 4 0 7 12 14 1 2 0 5 15 2 0 4 9 8 3 6 3 8 % Lig hts a nd Mo to r c yc le s 9 8 .9 %9 7 .6 %9 4 .2 %0 %9 7 .8 %9 3 .6 %9 5 .0 %9 7 .1%0 %9 5 .1%9 2 .3 %9 8 .7 %9 1.3 %0 %9 6 .7 %9 7 .2 %9 9 .0 %9 6 .2 %0 %9 7 .6 %9 7 .1% He a vy 5 3 1 3 0 3 9 5 2 7 3 0 3 5 9 7 8 0 2 4 4 2 6 0 12 110 % He a vy 1.1%2 .4 %5 .8 %0 %2 .2 %6 .4 %5 .0 %2 .9 %0 %4 .9 %7 .7 %1.3 %8 .7 %0 %3 .3 %2 .8 %1.0 %3 .8 %0 %2 .4 %2 .9 % *L: Le ft, R : Rig ht, T : T h r u , U: U-T ur n 3 of 8 Appendix A - Page2 2.3.d Packet Pg. 76 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Bu f f alo G ro ve /Du nd e e - T MC T u e O ct 1 7 , 2 01 7 PM Pe ak (5 :15 PM - 6 :1 5 PM) - O v e r all Pe ak Hour All C las s e s (Lig h ts an d Motor cycle s , He av y) All Mo ve m e n t s I D: 4 5 9 651 , Locatio n : 4 2.1 388 5 7 , -8 7.9 585 8 1 Pr o vid e d b y: Ge walt Ham ilto n As s o ciate s I n c. 6 2 5 Fo r e s t Ed g e Dr iv e , Ve r no n Hills , I L, 6 0 061 , US Le g D u n d e e Rd D u n d e e Rd Bu ffa lo G r o ve Rd Bu ffa lo G r o ve Rd D ir e c tio n Ea s tb o u n d We s tb o u n d No r th b o u n d S o u th b o u n d T im e L T R U App L T R U App L T R U App L T R U Ap p Int 2 0 17 -10 -17 5 :15 P M 7 5 2 0 9 2 1 0 3 0 5 4 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 4 0 6 3 1 9 5 17 0 14 3 4 0 12 0 6 3 0 2 2 3 10 7 7 5 :3 0 P M 6 3 17 2 2 7 0 2 6 2 3 4 2 8 4 4 0 0 3 5 8 4 9 8 9 2 1 0 15 9 6 8 15 2 7 7 0 2 9 7 10 7 6 5 :4 5 P M 8 9 2 0 2 3 1 0 3 2 2 3 2 2 6 0 3 0 0 3 2 2 4 9 10 5 2 1 0 17 5 3 7 12 1 5 9 0 2 17 10 3 6 6 :0 0 P M 7 8 18 6 3 4 0 2 9 8 2 3 2 8 0 3 8 0 3 4 1 4 7 10 5 16 0 16 8 5 2 12 2 8 0 0 2 5 4 10 6 1 T o ta l 3 0 5 7 6 9 113 0 118 7 13 2 115 7 13 8 0 14 2 7 17 6 3 9 4 7 5 0 6 4 5 19 7 5 15 2 7 9 0 9 9 1 4 2 5 0 % Ap p r o a c h 2 5 .7 %6 4 .8 %9 .5 %0 %-9 .3 %8 1.1%9 .7 %0 %-2 7 .3 %6 1.1%11.6 %0 %-19 .9 %5 2 .0 %2 8 .2 %0 %-- % T o ta l 7 .2 %18 .1%2 .7 %0 %2 7 .9 %3 .1%2 7 .2 %3 .2 %0 %3 3 .6 %4 .1%9 .3 %1.8 %0 %15 .2 %4 .6 %12 .1%6 .6 %0 %2 3 .3 %- P HF 0 .8 5 7 0 .9 2 0 0 .8 3 1 -0 .9 2 2 0 .7 6 7 0 .8 6 9 0 .8 6 3 -0 .8 7 9 0 .8 9 8 0 .9 3 8 0 .8 9 3 -0 .9 2 1 0 .7 2 4 0 .8 4 7 0 .8 7 2 -0 .8 3 4 0 .9 8 7 Lig h ts a nd Mo to r c yc le s 3 0 2 7 6 3 111 0 117 6 13 1 114 9 13 8 0 14 18 17 3 3 9 2 7 3 0 6 3 8 19 5 5 15 2 7 9 0 9 8 9 4 2 2 1 % Lig hts a nd Mo to r c yc le s 9 9 .0 %9 9 .2 %9 8 .2 %0 %9 9 .1%9 9 .2 %9 9 .3 %10 0 %0 %9 9 .4 %9 8 .3 %9 9 .5 %9 7 .3 %0 %9 8 .9 %9 9 .0 %10 0 %10 0 %0 %9 9 .8 %9 9 .3 % He a vy 3 6 2 0 11 1 8 0 0 9 3 2 2 0 7 2 0 0 0 2 2 9 % He a vy 1.0 %0 .8 %1.8 %0 %0 .9 %0 .8 %0 .7 %0 %0 %0 .6 %1.7 %0 .5 %2 .7 %0 %1.1%1.0 %0 %0 %0 %0 .2 %0 .7 % *L: Le ft, R : Rig ht, T : T h r u , U: U-T ur n 7 of 8 Appendix A - Page3 2.3.d Packet Pg. 77 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Appendix B Site Plan 2.3.d Packet Pg. 78 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) 2.3.d Packet Pg. 79 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Appendix C ITE Trip Generation Excerpts 2.3.d Packet Pg. 80 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Health/Fitness Club (492) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:6 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA:44 Directional Distribution:51% entering, 49% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.31 0.30 -2.00 0.64 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= **** Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 10 20 30 40 500 20 40 60 80 100 35 46 Appendix C - Page1 2.3.d Packet Pg. 81 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Health/Fitness Club (492) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:8 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA:37 Directional Distribution:57% entering, 43% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.45 1.48 -8.37 1.57 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.67 Ln(X) + 2.44 R²= 0.67 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 20 40 600 50 100 150 200 35 121 124 Appendix C - Page2 2.3.d Packet Pg. 82 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Appendix C - Page3 2.3.d Packet Pg. 83 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Fast Casual Restaurant (930) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:1 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA:3 Directional Distribution:67% entering, 33% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.07 2.07 -2.07 * Data Plot and Equation Caution –Small Sample Size X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= **** Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 2 4 6 8 100 2 4 6 8 10 Appendix C - Page4 2.3.d Packet Pg. 84 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Fast Casual Restaurant (930) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:15 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA:3 Directional Distribution:55% entering, 45% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 14.13 5.94 -34.83 7.72 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= **** Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 1 2 3 4 5 60 50 100 150 200 3 42 Appendix C - Page5 2.3.d Packet Pg. 85 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Fast Casual Restaurant (930) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a:Weekday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:1 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA:3 Directional Distribution:50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 315.17 315.17 -315.17 * Data Plot and Equation Caution –Small Sample Size X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= **** Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 2 4 6 8 100 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 Appendix C - Page6 2.3.d Packet Pg. 86 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Shopping Center (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:84 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA:351 Directional Distribution:62% entering, 38% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.94 0.18 -23.74 0.87 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.50(X) + 151.78 R²= 0.50 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 500 1,000 1,5000 500 1,000 1,500 1010 157 Appendix C - Page7 2.3.d Packet Pg. 87 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Shopping Center (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:261 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA:327 Directional Distribution:48% entering, 52% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.81 0.74 -18.69 2.04 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.74 Ln(X) + 2.89 R²= 0.82 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,0000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10101 Appendix C - Page8 2.3.d Packet Pg. 88 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Shopping Center (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a:Weekday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:147 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA:453 Directional Distribution:50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 37.75 7.42 -207.98 16.41 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.68 Ln(X) + 5.57 R²= 0.76 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 500 1,000 1,5000 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 10 1280 Appendix C - Page9 2.3.d Packet Pg. 89 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Supermarket (850) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:14 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA:40 Directional Distribution:60% entering, 40% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.82 1.17 -9.35 1.89 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= **** Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 20 40 600 100 200 300 35 134 Appendix C - Page10 2.3.d Packet Pg. 90 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Supermarket (850) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:73 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA:55 Directional Distribution:51% entering, 49% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 9.24 3.53 -20.30 3.69 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.75 Ln(X) + 3.21 R²= 0.57 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 50 100 150 2000 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 35 323 357 Appendix C - Page11 2.3.d Packet Pg. 91 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Supermarket (850) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a:Weekday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:5 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA:34 Directional Distribution:50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 106.78 68.67 -170.24 37.56 Data Plot and Equation Caution –Small Sample Size X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 70.89(X) + 1212.64 R²= 0.70 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 10 20 30 40 50 600 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 35 3737 3694 Appendix C - Page12 2.3.d Packet Pg. 92 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Shopping Center (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:84 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA:351 Directional Distribution:62% entering, 38% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.94 0.18 -23.74 0.87 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.50(X) + 151.78 R²= 0.50 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 500 1,000 1,5000 500 1,000 1,500 1312 158 Appendix C - Page13 2.3.d Packet Pg. 93 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Shopping Center (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:261 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA:327 Directional Distribution:48% entering, 52% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.81 0.74 -18.69 2.04 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.74 Ln(X) + 2.89 R²= 0.82 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,0000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 1351 122 Appendix C - Page14 2.3.d Packet Pg. 94 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Shopping Center (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a:Weekday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:147 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA:453 Directional Distribution:50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 37.75 7.42 -207.98 16.41 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.68 Ln(X) + 5.57 R²= 0.76 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 500 1,000 1,5000 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 13501 1523 Appendix C - Page15 2.3.d Packet Pg. 95 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Appendix D Historical Health/Fitness Club Hourly Usage 2.3.d Packet Pg. 96 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Average Useage by Hour Note: In persons not Vehicles Average usage by club Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Average % of Daily 12:00 AM - 1:00 AM 9 9 13 13 13 12 10 11 0.8% 1:00 AM - 2:00 AM 4 5 6 7 6 6 5 6 0.4% 2:00 AM - 3:00 AM 3 5 6 6 6 6 4 5 0.4% 3:00 AM - 4:00 AM 4 13 15 14 13 12 5 11 0.7% 4:00 AM - 5:00 AM 7 35 39 37 34 30 10 28 1.9% 5:00 AM - 6:00 AM 15 66 76 71 66 59 21 55 3.7% 6:00 AM - 7:00 AM 29 67 74 73 67 64 41 60 4.1% 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM 54 71 75 73 70 70 73 70 4.8% 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 82 98 98 97 93 97 107 96 6.6% 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM 93 101 96 98 92 97 112 98 6.7% 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM 93 93 87 89 83 87 112 92 6.3% 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM 80 91 86 86 81 81 95 85 5.8% 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM 66 77 73 72 69 68 75 71 4.9% 1:00 PM - 2:00 PM 60 68 64 64 60 61 64 63 4.3% 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM 56 71 68 68 64 62 60 64 4.4% 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM 57 89 87 83 77 71 56 74 5.1% 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 57 120 117 111 100 81 53 92 6.3% 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 51 154 146 139 123 86 47 108 7.4% 6:00 PM - 7:00 PM 48 144 139 129 118 77 43 100 6.9% 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM 47 123 116 111 99 62 42 86 5.9% 8:00 PM - 9:00 PM 47 99 95 92 83 54 39 73 5.0% 9:00 PM - 10:00 PM 38 71 70 69 63 43 33 56 3.8% 10:00 PM - 11:00 PM 26 44 43 43 40 30 23 36 2.4% 11:00 PM - 12:00 AM 15 23 23 24 22 18 15 20 1.4% Total 1,040 1,734 1,713 1,669 1,546 1,335 1,148 1,461 100.0% 2.3.d Packet Pg. 97 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s Appendix E ITE Parking Generation Excerpts 2.3.d Packet Pg. 98 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Health/Fitness Club (492) Peak Period Parking Demand vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a:Weekday (Monday -Friday) Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Peak Period of Parking Demand:5:00 -7:00 p.m. Number of Studies:26 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA:30 Peak Period Parking Demand per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Standard Deviation (Coeff. of Variation) 95% Confidence Interval 33rd / 85th PercentileRange of Rates 4.73 1.91 (40%)4.00 -5.46/8.873.931.97 -10.56 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: P = 3.33(X) + 42.58 R²= 0.58 Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 20 40 60 800 100 200 300 35 166 159 Appendix E - Page1 2.3.d Packet Pg. 99 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Health/Fitness Club (492) Peak Period Parking Demand vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a:Saturday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Peak Period of Parking Demand:9:00 a.m. -12:00 p.m. Number of Studies:6 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA:40 Peak Period Parking Demand per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Standard Deviation (Coeff. of Variation) 95% Confidence Interval 33rd / 85th PercentileRange of Rates 3.26 1.28 (39%)***/5.672.592.34 -5.79 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(P) = 0.89 Ln(X) + 1.56 R²= 0.75 Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 20 40 600 100 200 300 35 114 113 Appendix E - Page2 2.3.d Packet Pg. 100 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Shopping Center -Non-December (820) Peak Period Parking Demand vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a:Weekday (Monday -Thursday) Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Peak Period of Parking Demand:12:00 -6:00 p.m. Number of Studies:46 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA:218 Peak Period Parking Demand per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Standard Deviation (Coeff. of Variation) 95% Confidence Interval 33rd / 85th PercentileRange of Rates 1.95 0.75 (38%)1.73 -2.17/3.681.991.27 -7.98 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: P = 1.49(X) + 100.32 R²= 0.97 Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 1,000 2,000 3,0000 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 10 116 Appendix E - Page3 2.3.d Packet Pg. 101 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Shopping Center -Non-December (820) Peak Period Parking Demand vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a:Friday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Peak Period of Parking Demand:12:00 -6:00 p.m. Number of Studies:37 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA:174 Peak Period Parking Demand per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Standard Deviation (Coeff. of Variation) 95% Confidence Interval 33rd / 85th PercentileRange of Rates 2.61 0.67 (26%)2.39 -2.83/3.782.371.34 -5.25 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: P = 2.67(X) -11.49 R²= 0.96 Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 200 400 600 800 1,0000 1,000 2,000 3,000 1027 Appendix E - Page4 2.3.d Packet Pg. 102 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Shopping Center -Non-December (820) Peak Period Parking Demand vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a:Saturday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Peak Period of Parking Demand:11:00 a.m. -5:00 p.m. Number of Studies:58 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA:313 Peak Period Parking Demand per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Standard Deviation (Coeff. of Variation) 95% Confidence Interval 33rd / 85th PercentileRange of Rates 2.91 0.74 (25%)2.72 -3.10/3.742.271.15 -4.72 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: P = 2.78(X) + 39.26 R²= 0.95 Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,0000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 1068 Appendix E - Page5 2.3.d Packet Pg. 103 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Shopping Center -Non-December (820) Peak Period Parking Demand vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a:Sunday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Peak Period of Parking Demand:12:00 -3:00 p.m. Number of Studies:11 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA:201 Peak Period Parking Demand per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Standard Deviation (Coeff. of Variation) 95% Confidence Interval 33rd / 85th PercentileRange of Rates 1.89 0.30 (16%)***/2.271.811.47 -2.75 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: P = 1.75(X) + 27.11 R²= 0.98 Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 200 400 600 8000 500 1,000 1,500 1019 45 Appendix E - Page6 2.3.d Packet Pg. 104 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Fast Casual Restaurant (930) Peak Period Parking Demand vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a:Weekday (Monday -Friday) Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Peak Period of Parking Demand:12:00 -1:00 p.m. Number of Studies:4 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA:3.0 Peak Period Parking Demand per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Standard Deviation (Coeff. of Variation) 95% Confidence Interval 33rd / 85th PercentileRange of Rates 9.93 1.23 (12%)***/11.038.868.57 -11.03 Data Plot and Equation Caution –Small Sample Size X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: P = 8.92(X) + 3.08 R²= 0.93 Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 1 2 3 4 50 10 20 30 40 50 3 30 30 Appendix E - Page7 2.3.d Packet Pg. 105 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Fast Casual Restaurant (930) Peak Period Parking Demand vs:1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a:Saturday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Peak Period of Parking Demand:2:00 p.m.; 6:00 p.m. Number of Studies:2 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA:3.9 Peak Period Parking Demand per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Standard Deviation (Coeff. of Variation) 95% Confidence Interval 33rd / 85th PercentileRange of Rates 8.75 ******/******7.42 -11.03 Data Plot and Equation Caution –Small Sample Size X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: ***R²= *** Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 1 2 3 4 50 10 20 30 40 3 26 Appendix E - Page8 2.3.d Packet Pg. 106 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Appendix F Local Health/Fitness Club Parking Survey Data 2.3.d Packet Pg. 107 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) Weekday Peak Period (5 to 7 PM) Approximate Building Size Parking Demand Rate (Square-Feet)Maximum Observed Volume (VPD)Year 1,000 SF GFA Xsport Fitness 45,000 138 114-138 29,900 2017 3.07 1163 S. Milwaukee Ave (IL 21) Xsport Fitness 42,000 200 178-200 24,400 2017 4.76 960 Dundee Road (IL 68) Xsport Fitness 40,000 194 188-194 32,500 2017 4.85 1421 W. Lake Street (US 20) Peak Parking Demand Rate / 1,000 SF GFA 4.85 170 Weighted Average Peak Parking Demand Rate / 1,000 SF GFA 4.19 147 Proposed Site - 35,000 SF Peak Parking Demand = Ave Parking Demand = Appendix F Location Parking Demand Annual Average Daily Traffic Health/Fitness Club Data Summary - April 2019 2.3.d Packet Pg. 108 At t a c h m e n t : T r a f f i c S t u d y ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s 04/3/2019 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 50 RAUPP BOULEVARD, BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS ON WEDNESDAY, APRIL 3, 2019 Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 7:34 PM by Chairman Frank Cesario Regular Meeting Other Matters for Discussion 1. Workshop- Proposed Improvements to Cambridge Commons Shopping Center (Trustee Ottenheimer) (Staff Contact: Chris Stilling) Mr. Lawrence Freedman, Ash, Anos, Freedman & Logan, 77 West Washington Street, Suite 1211, Chicago, IL 60602; Ken DeMuth, Pappageorge Haymes Partners, 640 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 400, Chicago, IL 60654; Nick Vittore, Svigos Asset Management, 1 Dundee Road, Suite 200, Buffalo Grove, IL 60089; and Ray Dewhirst, Senior Director Real Estate, 24 Hour Fitness, were present and sworn in. Mr. Freedman gave a brief overview of the history of the shopping center. The proposal will require the center to be re-zoned from the B2 business district, general retail to the B3 planned business center district with a special use for planned development to allow a fitness user greater than 10,000 square feet. Mr. DeMuth reviewed the property and proposed plan as detailed in t he packet. Mr. Dewhirst reviewed the company background. He advised that their typical prototype is approximately 30,000-40,000 square feet and includes a swimming pool and basketball court. 24 Hour Fitness currently does not operate any other Chicagoland locations yet. They plan to open 2 to 4 locations within the next 12 months. Ch. Cesario asked what the overall height of the building will be with the exterior improvements. Mr. Vittore responded that the building would not exceed the current overall height of approximately 30’. Com. Moodhe advised that there was some discussion at the Village Board regarding providing screening for the Cambridge on the Lake residents. Mr. Freedman stated that the main concern was regarding lighting. When they proceed to the public hearing, they will provide a parking study. They are aware of the issue and they will address any potential impacts. Com. Moodhe added that the petitioner needs to keep those residents in mind. Com. Goldspiel asked about the original anchor tenant in that center, Kohl’s grocery store. He then asked the Mr. Dewhirst about the approximate number of customers and the peak hours of operation. Mr. Dewhirst reviewed the peak hours of use; Monday through Friday between 4:00 PM and 7:30 PM and 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM on the weekends during group exercise classes with 2.3.e Packet Pg. 109 At t a c h m e n t : A p r i l 3 , 2 0 1 9 P Z C M i n u t e s ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) 04/3/2019 approximately 220-250 people. Com. Goldspiel asked if there will be one-on-one classes offered. Mr. Dewhirst responded yes. Com. Goldspiel asked about class sizes. Mr. Dewhirst responded between 20-30 people per class. Com. Goldspiel asked about the size of the proposed swimming pool. Mr. Dewhirst advised it would be a typical size lap pool, between 2,600 and 3,000 square feet. Com. Goldspiel asked about the customers that use the facility overnight. Mr. Dewhirst responded that overnight usage is approximately 10% of their total customers. Com. Goldspiel believes that building is well suited for the proposed use. Com. Lesser also believes that this is an excellent use for the location and property. He asked how many 24 Hour Fitness locations there are nationwide. Mr. Dewhirst responded about 450. Com. Lesser asked if this location would be similar to other locations. Mr. Dewhirst responded yes. Com. Lesser recommends presenting the use information at the public hearing. Com. Cohn agrees with the previous comments and asked about the retail component compared to the rest of the center. Mr. Dewhirst explained that the retail is an ancillary use. They sell t-shirts and fitness accessories. The retail is important but modest. Mr. Vittore added that Svigos is looking to hire Jones Lang LaSalle to market and attract tenants that would complement the fitness use. Com. Khan advised that there is another 24 hour fitness center not too far from this location and asked what the membership structure looks like. Mr. Dewhirst explained that competition is very intense. The industry has grown over the last 20 years. 24 Hour Fitness is classified as a mid-tier with monthly membership fees ranging between $40.00 and $45.00, which includes all amenities. Com. Khan asked if it is worth the expenses to have the center open 24 hours a day. Mr. Dewhirst responded that it is absolutely important to their brand and history of the company. 92% of their 450 locations are open 24 hours a day. They offer this for 3rd shit workers. Com. Moodhe asked about the proposed west elevation improvements and height. Mr. DeMuth explained that the overall height on the west elevation will only increase approximately 6’ to 7’ above the current west elevation height. Com. Moodhe commented on the type of tenant he would like to see in the corner tenant space and would like a large outdoor seating area. He asked about parking for a fitness center use. Mr. Vittore responded that he agrees park ing is a concern. 24 Hour Fitness does not want to over-park the lot. The lot has a large amount of parking on the east of the building. Ch. Cesario stated that the brochure provided helped him understand the company and use. This would be a good use for this center. He asked about other possible tenants for the center. Mr. Vittore would like to get this approved first before marketing to other potential tenants. Com. Goldspiel asked about the water supply to the building. Mr. Vittore responded they already have the proper size water service. Com. Goldspiel asked about water saving measures. Mr. Dewhirst explained that there will be devices throughout the system. Com. Goldspiel compared the difference between facilities with pools and those without. 2.3.e Packet Pg. 110 At t a c h m e n t : A p r i l 3 , 2 0 1 9 P Z C M i n u t e s ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) 04/3/2019 Mr. Freedman will work with staff to address the stated concerns before coming back for the public hearing. Com. Cohn thinks this is an attractive project and nice re-development of an almost vacant building. Public Comments and Questions None. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:14 PM Chris Stilling APPROVED BY ME THIS 3rd DAY OF April , 2019 2.3.e Packet Pg. 111 At t a c h m e n t : A p r i l 3 , 2 0 1 9 P Z C M i n u t e s ( C o n s i d e r a R e z o n i n g a n d P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h e C a m b r i d g e C o m m o n s S h o p p i n g C e n t e r ) 07/17/2019 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 50 RAUPP BOULEVARD, BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 17, 2019 Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 7:33 PM by Chairman Frank Cesario Public Hearings/Items For Consideration 1. Consider a Variation for a Fence at 302 Ronnie Drive (Trustee Weidenfeld) (Staff Contact: Chris Stilling) Mr. and Ms. Prasad were sworn in. Mr. Prasad explained their variation request to install a 5 foot board-on-board fence, which encroaches into the corner yard setback along Thompson Boulevard for the safety of their children. The petitioner added that the variation would not affect the existing 5’ - 6’ tree on their property. Com. Cesario commented on the high volume of traffic Thompson Blvd has and the fact the house is on a corner lot. Com. Weinstein asked the petitioners to describe their neighbors existing fence. The petitioners noted that their neighbors existing fence was a 6 foot wood privacy fence. Com Cesario entered the Village Staff report as exhibit one. The public hearing closed at 7:38 PM Com. Weinstein made a motion to approve the variation to install a 5 foot board-on- board fence setback 4 feet from the property line along Thompson Blvd subject to the following condition: 1. The fence shall be installed in accordance with the documents and plans submitted as part of the petition. Com. Au seconded the motion. The commissioners discussed their support for the petitioners request and commented on the standards they have developed for variations such as the one in question. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] AYES: Moodhe, Cesario, Goldspiel, Weinstein, Au, Richards ABSENT: Matthew Cohn, Zill Khan 2. Consider a Variation for a Roofed Over Porch at 406 Gregg Lane (Trustee Johnson) (Staff Contact: Chris Stilling) Tracy Riggan was sworn in. Ms. Riggan explained their proposal to make façade improvements to their home, which includes expanding the porch and extending the roof over the porch, will encroach into their front yard setback. Com. Weinstein asked the petitioner to explain why their situation was unique. 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 112 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f J u l 1 7 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) 07/17/2019 Ms. Riggan described the building setback lines and the position of the home relative to the lot lines. Ms. Riggan explained that the house is right on the building setback line. Com. Weinstein asked if the new porch would abut further than the existing porch. Ivan Tetyushev was sworn in. Mr. Tetyushev explained that roof over the porch will extend further out than the existing porch. Com. Cesario commented on the rebuilds that have been taking place in the same area as the petitioners that include second story additions and porches. Com. Au asked the petitioners to explain what they were taking from the renderings and what has going to remain the same on the home. Ms. Riggin stated the color and siding on the home will remain the same, the only difference will be the dormers. Com Cesario entered the Village Staff report as exhibit one. The public hearing closed at 7:52 PM. Com. Weinstein made a motion to approve the construction of a roofed over porch that would encroach 6’ - 6’ into the front yard setback subject to the following condition: 1. The proposed expanded roof over porch shall be in accordance with the documents and plans submitted as part of the petition. Com Moodhe seconded the motion. Com. Cesario commented that the proposed changes look very attractive and nice. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] AYES: Moodhe, Cesario, Goldspiel, Weinstein, Au, Richards ABSENT: Matthew Cohn, Zill Khan 3. Consider Approval of a Rezoning to B3 Planned Business Center District; a Special Use for a Planned Unit Development; Approval to Allow for a Health Club Greater Than 10,000 Square Feet in Area as Part of the Planned Unit Development Request; and a Preliminary Plan for the Property at 15-45 E Dundee Road, Buffalo Grove IL (Cambridge Commons Shopping Center) (Trustee Weidenfeld) (Staff Contact: Chris Stilling) Lawrence Freeman, Nick Vittore, Kenneth Demuth, Ray Dunhurst and Lynn Means were sworn in. Mr. Freeman discussed the proposal for the 24 hour fitness center at 15-45 E. Dundee Road otherwise known as the Cambridge Commons Shopping Center. Mr. Freeman explained they are request three things: (1) a rezoning to B3 Planned Business Center Development; (2) a special use for a Planned Unit Development; (3) approval to allow for a Health Club greater than 10,000 square feet in area as part of the Planned Unit Development request. Mr. Vittore explained his role in the development of the Cambridge Commons Shopping Center and provided a brief history of the property itself, as well as the proposed renovations. 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 113 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f J u l 1 7 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) 07/17/2019 Mr. Demuth discussed the site plan and elevations for the 24 hour fitness as well as the Cambridge Commons Shopping Center. The proposed changes include the removal of the wood finish and replacement with a combination of cladding and wood grain finishes, however, the east and west elevation of the building would remain the same. A new roof would also be installed. Mr. Demuth explained the new dimensions of the proposed freestanding sign, which is proposed to be smaller in height and setback further than the existing sign, all permitted within the current building code. Additionally, Mr. Demuth discussed the parking lot lines and the proposal to change the direction of the parking spots to help reduce any light pollution as well as their ideas on how to mitigate the light from the light poles and centering it so it does not spill over into the residential areas nearby. All materials are solid and contemporary Ms. Means discussed the traffic study performed at the site. The traffic study showed little to no impact on the adjacent properties to the development. In fact, the site will have less traffic than the former usage. Ms. Means continued to explain the flow of traffic and the minimal traffic the development will have overnight and commented that the lot has more than enough parking, more than required by Village code. Com. Moodhe thanked them for taking into consideration the lighting and the parking. Com. Moodhe suggested they look into LED lighting to minimize the light pollution, but would be an added expense. He commented that he is happy to see an improvement to the area and suggested the developers look at the demographics of the area to get a better feel for the tenants they should attract to the new development. Mr. Vittore explained to Com. Moodhe that the neighbors of the development would be a key component to the redevelopment. Com. Au asked the developer where employees would park. Com. Au expressed concern over the safety of the employees and parking in a dark area of the lot. Mr. Vittore said the employees would park in the south east corner. He noted that there are only 5 employees and their safety is a priority. He suggested that the employees who work the overnight shift may need to move their cars closer to the building. Com. Cesario brought to attention the email that was produced by a concerned resident and discussed the concerns mentioned in the email. Mr. Vittore reiterated their plans to reduce light pollution by reconfiguring the parking lot lines and their plans for monitoring overnight parking. They will have a contract with a towing company and have the employees monitor any cars that may be parked too long. Com. Cesario commented on the lot changes and the landscaping of the property, which were both a point of concern in the email to Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commissioners. Mr. Vittore explained the addition of the sidewalk to promote a walkable and welcoming feel to the development. He noted that the current landscaping is a little over grown and is looking to improve the landscape by pruning the trees and bushes as well as adding a few trees; they do not intend to remove any landscaping. Mr. Vittore commented that the owners of 24 Hour Fitness are committed to the upkeep, not only of their building, 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 114 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f J u l 1 7 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) 07/17/2019 but of the property as well. Mr. Vittore sees no issues working together with the tenants and or the neighbors on the upkeep of the landscape. Com. Cesario continued to read the list of questions and concerns from the email, and asked the developers about any issues they know of regarding water drainage and flooding as it relates to the property and the development. Com. Cesario noted that there is a pond/body of water near the property and asked if they knew who owned the pond. Mr. Vittore answered that he believes the pond/body of water is the property of the Park District and is unaware of any water drainage or flooding as it relates to the current development. As far as the new development goes, they do not intend to add any additional non-permeable surfaces that could possibly cause any flooding. Com. Goldspiel discussed the proposed lighting on the property and the subsequent light pollution that may come from the lighting. Mr. Vittore commented on LED lights, and how they are harder to contain. He mentioned that he spends a lot of time at the property observing the lights as they are now; it is not in their plans to add any additional light poles to the parking lot. He reassured the Commissioners and those in attendance, that the light pollution continues to be a priority and they have been working on creative ways to contain the lights such as different boxes. Com. Goldspiel asked about the property line and who is responsible for what when it comes to the landscape on the east side of the development. Mr. Vittore said the property line is in front of the fence and that they (the owners of the development) are responsible for the trees. Com. Weinstein asked them to bring up the parking lot plans again and reviewed the proposed changes to the direction of the parking lot line with the developers and the commissioners. Mr. Vittore discussed the traffic study that Ms. Means and her team conducted as it relates to the proposed parking lot line changes. Com. Goldspiel suggested the development team do a light study on the existing lighting at night. Com. Cesario reiterated the proposal by the petitioner, they are asking for B3 use of health club greater than 10,000 sq feet and approval of the preliminary plans. Com. Cesario entered the Staff Report as Exhibit One Com Cesario entered the email referenced throughout the meeting as Exhibit Two. Frank Sears (50 Lake Blvd, Buffalo Grove), resident at Cambridge on the Lakes was sworn in Mr. Sears explained the position of the apartment building to the subject property. Mr. Sears expressed his concerns and the importance of the landscaping, signage, lighting and the poles, is to the residents that neighbor the Cambridge Commons. He noted that - historically - the landscape has never been cared for properly and hopes that the developers and owners of the property remain true to their promise and askes staff to monitor the landscape. Lastly, he suggested the employee’s park in the South West corner so it does not disrupt the residents. 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 115 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f J u l 1 7 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) 07/17/2019 Mr. Sears continued to speak about the landscape, specifically the trees. He commented that during the summer the trees provide coverage from light, however during the winter, the trees don’t have leaves and will no longer provide coverage. Com. Moodhe verified with the developers that the proposed signage is smaller and setback further than the current signage. Mr. Freeman answered yes. The proposed freestanding sign will be small and setback further than the current sign. Florin Coles and Chuck Freedman were sworn in. Mr. Coles is a resident and the HOA President of Cambridge on the Lakes. Chuck Freedman is a current resident and past President of Cambridge on the Lakes. Mr. Coles I speaking as a resident and on behalf of the residents that reside at Cambridge on the Lakes. Mr. Freedman noted that the HOA redid the lights in the parking lot at Cambridge on the Lake with the neighbors in mind and hopes the developers do the same. Mr. Freedman commented on the drainage issues they have been experiencing due to the changing weather patterns and asked staff to look into the mitigation of the lakes in that area. Additionally, the tree line on the east is over grown and needs attention by both parties to provide a solid light and sound barrier to the neighbors. Mr. Coles thanked staff for distributing the email and the commissioners for asking the questions, as well as the developers for providing answers. Mr. Coles asked for clarification on a few items that were outlined in Exhibit Two. The first was in regards to the light pollution. Mr. Coals asked if the owners/developers had a schedule in mind for when the lights would be dimmed or turned off in the parking lot and or building on the east side. The second was regarding the tree line. Mr. Coles said he is definitely in favor of working together on the tree line, however, they expect maintenance of the trees. Mr. Vittore answered that they do not have a schedule for the dimming of the lights yet, however, they believe this will be an easy problem to solve. In regards to the trees, he understands that it needs some work. Mr. Vittore noted that the tenants of 24 Hour Fitness will be very concerned about the site being a presentable center for their business. Com. Au asked staff if they could look into the drainage of the pond/lake near the two properties. Deputy Village Manager Chris Stilling said he will speak with the Public Works Department and the Park District about the drainage in that area. Mr. Stilling noted that the hearing for the proposed development will continue into the next meeting. Com. Weinstein made motion to continue the public hearing to the next regular scheduled Planning and Zoning meeting at 7:30 on August 7, 2019 located at Village Hall. Com. Moodhe seconded the motion. 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 116 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f J u l 1 7 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) 07/17/2019 RESULT: TABLED [UNANIMOUS] AYES: Moodhe, Cesario, Goldspiel, Weinstein, Au, Richards ABSENT: Matthew Cohn, Zill Khan Regular Meeting Other Matters for Discussion None Approval of Minutes 1. Planning and Zoning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 19, 2019 7:30 PM Fix slop to slope and year to yard RESULT: ACCEPTED [UNANIMOUS] AYES: Moodhe, Cesario, Goldspiel, W einstein, Au, Richards ABSENT: Matthew Cohn, Zill Khan Chairman's Report Com. Cesario asked if the Commissioners would be willing to share contact information with each other to ensure they have a quorum on meeting nights. Committee and Liaison Reports Com. Cesario attended the last scheduled Board Meeting and discussed Link Crossing development and the land banking finance they are moving forward with. Staff Report/Future Agenda Schedule Nicole discussed a tentative timeline for Ratio and the Comprehensive Plan kick-off. Public Comments and Questions None Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:10 PM Chris Stilling APPROVED BY ME THIS 17th DAY OF July , 2019 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 117 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f J u l 1 7 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s )