Loading...
2019-03-20 - Planning and Zoning Commission - Agenda Packet Meeting of the Village of Buffalo Grove Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting March 20, 2019 at 7:30 PM Fifty Raupp Blvd Buffalo Grove, IL 60089-2100 Phone: 847-459-2500 I. Call to Order II. Public Hearings/Items For Consideration 1. Consider an Amendment to Ordinance 2009-15, Which Adopted the “Village Comprehensive Plan Update 2009” as Amended by Ordinance 2018-24 by Adding Thereto the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan (Trustee Smith) (Staff Contact: Chris Stilling) III. Regular Meeting A. Other Matters for Discussion B. Approval of Minutes 1. Planning and Zoning Commission - Special Meeting - Feb 13, 2019 7:30 PM C. Chairman's Report D. Committee and Liaison Reports E. Staff Report/Future Agenda Schedule F. Public Comments and Questions IV. Adjournment The Planning and Zoning Commission will make every effort to accommodate all items on the agenda by 10:30 p.m. The Board, does, however, reserve the right to defer consideration of matters to another meeting should the discussion run past 10:30 p.m. The Village of Buffalo Grove, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities, contact the ADA Coordinator at 459-2525 to allow the Village to make reasonable accommodations for those persons. Updated: 3/15/2019 9:21 AM Page 1 Action Item : Consider an Amendment to Ordinance 2009-15, Which Adopted the “Village Comprehensive Plan Update 2009” as Amended by Ordinance 2018-24 by Adding Thereto the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan Recommendation of Action Staff recommends approval of an amendment to Ordinance 2009-15, which adopted the Village Comprehensive Plan Update 2009 as amended by Ordinance 2018-24 by adding thereto the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan. Over the last several years, the Prairie View Metra Station Area has experienced growth, including new developments such as Easton Station, and Prairie Landing Townhomes, as well as a variety of properties that are being marketed for sale. This growth prompted the Village to recognize that a plan may be necessary to help guide future growth and development in this area. Consequently, in 2018 the Village of Buffalo Grove kicked of the Prairie View Metra Station Area to establish a long-term (15-20 year) vision and plan for the Metra Area. The Plan includes market, real estate, environmental, land use, transportation, and community engagement elements. Additional information can be found in the attached staff report. ATTACHMENTS:  Staff Report (DOCX)  Draft Plan (PDF)  Link to Draft Plan (DOCX)  Zoning Map (PDF) Trustee Liaison Staff Contact Smith Chris Stilling, Community Development Wednesday, March 20, 2019 2.1 Packet Pg. 2 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: March 20, 2019 SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION: Prairie View Metra Station Area PETITIONER: Village of Buffalo Grove PREPARED BY: Nicole Woods, Principal Planner REQUEST: Petition to the Village of Buffalo Grove for an amendment to Ordinance 2009-15, which adopted the “Village Comprehensive Plan Update 2009” as amended by Ordinance 2018-24 by adding thereto the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan. EXSITING LAND USE AND ZONING: The Prairie View Metra Station Area has multiple land uses including residential, commercial, office, light industrial, vacant, and government. It currently retains a variety of zones including but not limited to B3, R2, R8, R9, and I. Land within the Prairie View Metra Station Area includes parcels that are unincorporated Lake County. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The approved Village Comprehensive Plan calls for this corridor to be a variety of uses including mixed-use, residential planned development (6 units an acre) and single family detached, and commercial. PLAN BACKGROUND Over the last several years, the Prairie View Metra Station Area has experienced growth, including new developments such as Easton Station, and Prairie Landing Townhomes, as well as a variety of properties that are being marketed for sale. This growth prompted the Village to recognize that a plan may be necessary to help guide future growth and development in this area. Consequently, in 2018 the Village of Buffalo Grove kicked of the Prairie View Metra Station Area to establish a long-term (15-20 year) vision and plan for the Metra Area. The Plan includes market, real estate, environmental, land use, transportation, and community engagement elements. The Prairie View Metra Station Area roughly covers 128 acres and is centered around the Prairie View Metra Station. This encompasses land on both the east and west sides of Main Street that includes Noah’s Landing, Prairie Landing, Easton Station residential developments; and other businesses, and homes in the unincorporated Vernon Township. A vacant 40 acre parcel just southeast of Port Clinton and Prairie Roads marks the northern edges of the study area while the vacant triangle parcel southeast of Half Day and Prairie Roads denotes the southern edge. 2.1.a Packet Pg. 3 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) The Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan process was divided into Four Stages (Project Initiation; Data Collection, Land Use and Market Assessment; Draft Station Area Plan; and Final Station Area Plan). This phased- approach was designed to include input from the project’s steering committee as well as Village residents, local officials, business owners, and other stakeholders. On March 4, 2019 at the Village’s Committee of the Whole Meeting (COW), the project team presented the Draft Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan and the Prairie View Metra Station Area Summary Video. This presentation kicked-off the final steps of the including the Public Comment Period, the Refinement Period, and then adoption as an Amendment to the 2009 Comprehensive Plan. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT From the onset, Buffalo Grove wanted the vision and plan for the Prairie View Metra Station Area to be derived by the community. Public engagement was important part of the plan’s development and over 250 members of the community participated in the process. The following summarizes the main community engagement activities.  Steering Committee- The project team worked with the Village to establish the plan’s steering committee, which consisted of a diverse representation of stakeholders with various backgrounds and expertise. These leaders include business owners, residents, property owners, community leaders as well as representatives Vernon Township, Lincolnshire Prairie View School District #103, and Metra. The steering committee met several times over the course of the project and provided meaningful guidance as the plan progressed.  Public Open Houses- Two Village-wide open houses were held to gather valuable input from the community on their issues, ideas, and future vision for the Prairie View Metra Station Area. During both meetings, the project team utilized videos, posters, survey forms, and face-to face-engagement to communicate the project’s progress, vision, as well as gather feedback. All pubic open houses and meetings were advertised through several communication outlets including the project’s e-mail list. By the end of the project, approximately 325 people had signed up for the project e-mail list.  Online Forum/Surveys- For those who were unable to attend the open houses, the project team hosted meeting materials, presentations, and feedback/survey forums on the project website.  Key Person Interviews- The project team also held a series of key person interviews early on in the project. These key person interviews included property owners and businesses along with other stakeholders in the area including but not exclusive to: Michael Kollman from Wexler/Kollman Architecture, Stevenson High School, and the Fiore family. 2.1.a Packet Pg. 4 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) SUMMARY OF THE DRAFT PLAN This draft plan is intended to provide a cohesive vision and plan for the neighborhood that will guide the future development in this area. Chapter 1: Introduction An overview of the Prairie View Area including the history of the area, the local context, project schedule and public engagement activities conducted over the course of the project. Chapter 2: Principles and Concepts The project team distilled and translated the main outreach findings into meaningful principles that steered the development of the Plan. This chapter also highlights the concepts that contribute to the vision. Chapter 3: Land Use and Development The Land Use and Development chapter looks at the overall vision in terms of Land Use and Development. It lays out a future land use for the entire corridor, examines existing typologies and character, and density, and also discusses character and identity. The chapter also highlights the three key sub-areas or redevelopment sites: North Subarea (residential), Central Subarea (neighborhood core – mixed use), and South Subarea (some mixed use with residential). Chapter 4: Transportation and Infrastructure This chapter presents the overall vision in terms of Transportation and Infrastructure. It looks at improving the existing street networks, building new streets, as well as applying best practices in terms of shared parking, and parking requirements. The plan also outlines ideas to enhance bicycle and pedestrian connectivity and key intersections. Chapter 5: Open Space and Sustainability This chapter presents the overall vision in terms of Open Space and Sustainability. It focuses on integrating landscaping and open space into streetscape and site design. The chapter also outlines green infrastructure tools that provide an alternative to traditional “grey” stormwater management methods. Chapter 6: Implementation The Implementation Chapter provides a series of recommendations, and action steps for the Village to undertake to achieve the vision and goals of the Plan. These recommendations and action steps are grouped under four main categories: 1. Village Commitment The Village of Buffalo Grove should provide its commitment and support to the Plan by undertaking regulatory, communication, and planning initiatives as well as anticipate and support infrastructure improvements that create an enhanced network throughout the Prairie View Metra Station Area. 2. Leverage Market Opportunities The Village of Buffalo Grove should leverage market opportunities to spur development/redevelopment within the Station Area Plan that aligns with the Plan. 2.1.a Packet Pg. 5 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) •Engage Community and Property Owners •Amend Comprehensive Plan and Boundary Agreeement •Support Future Annexation •Amend Zoning Regulations •Improve Road Network •Capital Improvement Planning VILLAGE COMMITMENT •Market the Plan •Explore Incentives •Target Compatible Businesses LEVERAGE MARKET OPPORTUNITIES •Expand Walkability •Improve Bicycle Accessibility •Collaborate to Improve Metra Train's Ridership and Service •Optimize Open Space •Encourage Sustainable Practices ENHANCE SUSTAINABILITY AND QUALITY OF LIFE •Create Unified Streetscape Design •Incorporate Civic, Community, and Art users •Establish a Brand CREATE CORRIDOR IDENTITY AND BRAND 3. Create Neighborhood Identify and Brand Create an authentic identity and brand for the area that reflects the history, character and uses in the area. 4. Enhance Sustainability and Quality of Life The Village of Buffalo Grove should look to promote sustainability and quality of life in the Prairie View Area. A detailed list of action steps associated with each of these categories is provided in the attached draft Plan. Staff has provided the below infographic, which highlights the key action steps. ADOPTION AS PART OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Staff recommends the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan be adopted as an amendment to the 2009 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is considered framework and guide for the Village over a Draft Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan - Key Action Steps for Implementation 2.1.a Packet Pg. 6 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) 15-20 year period. Comprehensive plans are to be flexible and adaptable to changing conditions and a municipality can choose to update its plan or a part of its plan at any time to match the local needs, interests or opportunities. Adopting the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan as part of Buffalo Grove’s Comprehensive Plan will ensure consistency and clarity amongst documents intended to guide long- term planning and development. As the Village looks to undergo a new Comprehensive Plan in the near future, Buffalo Grove will weave the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan’s vision and recommendations into the new plan. NEXT STEPS The final steps of the project are outlined below: Public Comment Period (March 5th- April 4th) The public comment period stretches from March 5th to April 4th. Within this period there are multiple opportunities for the public and Village Board to participate in viewing and providing feedback on the Plan:  Online Viewing and Feedback. During the public comment period, the public will be invited to view the draft plan and provide comments online via the project webpage.  Draft Plan Open House Sessions. The public is also invited to view the plan, ask questions, and provide any feedback in-person with Village staff during scheduled Open House Sessions as well as by appointment. Visual aids as well as copies of the draft Plan will be available during these sessions. All Open House Sessions and other meetings will occur at Village Hall. Staff is proposing the following Open House Sessions at Village Hall: The Open House Sessions are as follows: o Wednesday, March 13th 7:00 am – 9:00 am(already completed) o Monday, March 25th 4:00 pm – 6:00 pm  Public Hearing. The public has also been invited to provide comments on the plan during this public hearing forum. Refinement Period (April 4th- April 10th) After the Public Comment Period, the project team will look to review and incorporate the feedback into the plan. This refinement period will stretch from April 4th until April 10th. Plan Approval and Amendment to the Village’s Comprehensive Plan (April 15th) Staff is proposing that final Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan will be presented to the Village Board at their meeting on April 15, 2019. This action will include an Ordinance adopting the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan as a component and update to the Village’s 2009 Comprehensive Plan. PUBLIC COMMENTS The Village has posted notification in the newspaper. It has also advertised this public hearing and other opportunities to participate in the Public Comment period through various communication outlets. As of this date, staff has received some inquiries about various aspects 2.1.a Packet Pg. 7 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) of the plan. Many have expressed general support and some have questions regarding the plan’s timeframe. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of an amendment to Ordinance 2009-15, which adopted the “Village Comprehensive Plan Update 2009” as amended by Ordinance 2018-24 by adding thereto the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) shall open the public hearing and take public testimony. The PZC shall then make a recommendation to the Village Board. 2.1.a Packet Pg. 8 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Draft Plan Village of Buffalo Grove Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan February 2019 DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 9 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) 01 Introduction 4 02 Principles & Concepts 20 03 Land Use & Development 28 04 Transportation & Infrastructure Plan 48 05 Open Space & Sustainability 62 06 Implementation 66 A Appendix 74 Table of Contents DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 10 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Steering Committee Eric Smith, Trustee, Village of Buffalo Grove Board Daniel Didech/Jonathan Altenberg, Supervisor, Vernon Township Patrick Palbicke, Assistant Superintendent for Business at Lincolnshire Prairie View District #103 Allison Buchwach, Senior Planner, Metra Kyle Olson, Resident, Village of Buffalo Grove Frank Cesario, Chair, Village of Buffalo Grove Planning and Zoning Commission Bill Hoffman, Resident and business owner, Village of Buffalo Grove Jim Kedroski, Local builder and resident, Village of Buffalo Grove Village of Buffalo Grove Dane Bragg, Village Manager Jenny Maltas, Deputy Village Manager Chris Stilling, Community Development Director Nicole Woods, Principal Planner Rati Akash, Village Planner Darren Monico, Village Engineer Consultant Team Acknowledgments DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 11 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Introduction The Prairie View Metra Station Area is an asset to the Village of Buffalo Grove. A cohesive vision for this area can unlock its potential by providing a framework for future development. The Station Area is primarily made up of residential, commercial, retail, and institutional uses. There are underutilized parcels and unincorporated land that have both economic development and quality of life potential. A diversity of tenancies ranging from scrap metal to landscape supplies, from healthcare to residential, from school and church facilities to an active retail center. The immediate station area is surrounded by residential development made up of primarily single- family homes with adjacent local small businesses. An historic mixed-use hamlet adds character and context to the study area. Improving connectivity between the Prairie View Metra Station, businesses along Half Day Road, adjacent residential properties and commercial businesses that make up the Station Area can attract more investment. The planning process focused on making an authentic destination in Buffalo Grove by defining the critical elements that make up the Station Area and then drawing upon those elements to make a cohesive and legible environment that is attractive to investors and developers. By leveraging the strengths of the Station Area – proximity to regional transportation and roadway systems, connectivity to regional trail systems, access to natural resource amenities such as the nearby Forest Preserve District lands, established neighborhoods with historical characters, and a variety of retail, civic, commercial, religious and institutional businesses – the Prairie View Metra Station Area can fulfill its potential. 1 4 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 12 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Local and regional plans served as a framework and guidance to the development of the Prairie View Station Area Plan. These plans include: •Buffalo Grove Lake Cook Corridor Market Study and Plan (2018) •Buffalo Grove Economic Development Strategic Plan (2015) •Buffalo Grove Annexation Strategy and Plan (2016) •Buffalo Grove 2018-2023 Strategic Plan (2018) •Buffalo Grove Homes for a Changing Region (2013) •Buffalo Grove Comprehensive Plan (2009) •Buffalo Grove Transit Station Areas Plan(2007) •Lake County Strategic Plan (2017) •Lake County Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (2013) •CMAP Go To 2040 (2010)/On To 2050 (2018) The vision and planning framework for the Prairie View Station Area integrate future land use, economic development and multimodal transportation planning strategies. This plan serves as the Village’s official policy and development guide for the area and will assist the Village in making informed decisions that best serve residents needs in the community over the next 15 to 20 years. The Plan was created to achieve the following objectives: •Objective 1: Provide a Framework for the Community’s Aspirations •Objective 2: Integrate Previous Plans to Strengthen Community Identity •Objective 3: Support Activation of the Station Area •Objective 4: Build Consensus through Outreach with Key Stakeholders HOW TO USE THIS PLAN The Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan establishes policies that will guide the physical development of the Prairie View Metra Station Area. These policies are vital in supporting the Village’s staff, elected and appointed officials, and the public in their ability to review and evaluate future projects, development, and land annexation. The Plan can serve as a marketing tool to highlight the Village and the Prairie View Metra Station Area’s unique assets and economic advantages within the Chicagoland region. It can also be used to support applications for grants and to demonstrate that future projects align with the Village’s larger, holistic strategy and developmental vision rather than stand-alone efforts. Introduction 5DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 13 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) HISTORY OF PRAIRIE VIEW The original homes of Prairie View were mostly established in a piecemeal fashion along Easton Avenue during the late 19th century and early 1980s. At that time, Prairie View had an old train station that was named after the “Soo Line,” a passenger rail line that served Prairie View residents but was discontinued in the early 1960s. This structure was torn down and was replaced with the present Prairie View Metra Station in 1996. At that time, the Prairie View Metra Station did not look “new,” as its architecture was intended to have the same architectural style as the residences in the Prairie View community. Prairie View was also home to the Vernon American Legion Post 1247 (presently at 16595 Easton Avenue). However, aging veterans and declining membership prompted the relocation of this service. Instead of leaving this historic building to neglect, local architects rehabilitated the building into a modern office building. Over time, the area in and around Prairie View was slowly annexed by adjacent municipalities, including the Village of Buffalo Grove and Lincolnshire. This trend has resulted in northern Prairie View being landlocked by incorporated lands. As a result, newer and more contemporary residential developments are being developed. There is also a boundary agreement between the Village of Buffalo Grove and Lincolnshire that affects 40 acres of land near Prairie Road. Past news article showing the current and previous train station in Prairie View. Past news article showing a rendering of the rehabilitated Vernon Legion Post 1247 building, which currently houses office and wellness uses. A map showing Prairie View’s parcels and development in the 19th Century. 6 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 14 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Aerial view of Prairie View area in 1994. | Credit: Google Earth Introduction 7DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 15 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) STUDY AREA & LOCAL CONTEXT The Prairie View Metra Station Area roughly covers 128 acres and is located in the northern part of Buffalo Grove, centered around the Prairie View Metra Station. This encompasses land on both east and west sides of Main Street that includes of Noah’s Landing, Prairie Landing, Easton Station residential developments; Woodlands Shopping Center; Sunrise Retirement facility; and other businesses, and homes in the unincorporated Vernon Township. The Stancliff property, a vacant 40 acre parcel just southeast of Port Clinton and Prairie Roads, marks the northern edges of the study area while the vacant triangle parcel southeast of Half Day and Prairie Roads denotes the southern edge. The Prairie View Metra Station area is one of two Metra stations that is located within the Village of Buffalo Grove. It has access to Half Day Road, which is a critical east-west roadway that connects residents to the regional transportation network. Buffalo Grove Road is located one-half mile west of the station, which provides residents access Interstate 94, Milwaukee Avenue (US Highway 45), and County Highway 83. The Station Area is located near prominent destinations and community facilities. These include the Arboretum Club, the Adlai E. Stevenson High School to the east, and Sullivan Woods and Peterson Woods to the north. LAKECOUNTY COOKCOUNTY L A K E M I C H I G A N Palatine NorthbrookWheeling Inverness Arlington Heights Glencoe Winnetka Northfield Barrington Prospect Heights Palatine Lake Forest Long Grove Highland Park Lake Zurich Mettawa Deerfield Mundelein Lincolnshire Deer Park Riverwoods Vernon HillsHawthorn Woods Kildeer North Barrington Wauconda 94 94294 83 21 22 68 43 43 60 68 83 53 53 59 176 12 12 41 41 14 PRAIRIE VIEW METRA STATION AREA VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE N A P P L E H I L L L N R O S L Y N L N PR A I R I E R D PARK AVE P R A I R I E R D W HALF DAY RD W PORT CLINTON RD N M A I N S T N P R A I R I E R D W EASTON AVE W BROCKMAN AVE 22 Study Area Boundary Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Boundary STUDY AREA 8 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 16 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) 1 4 3 2 APR - MAY 2018Project Initiation MAY - JUL 2018Data Collection, Land Use &Market Assessment FEB- APRIL 2019Final Station Area Plan AUG- FEB 2019Draft Station Area Plan At the onset of the project, logistics regarding schedule, milestones, data source availability, and critical issues affecting the project were established. Additionally, the consultant team, along with the Village Staff, hosted the first public workshop and an online survey to gain input from residents and stakeholders regarding the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan. Interviews were also conducted with key stakeholders. During this stage, the consultant team assessed and evaluated physical conditions of the Prairie View Metra Station Area context. Land use and zoning, current and ongoing planning activities, open space, key urban design features, utilities, strategic properties, area assets, and environmental considerations as well as vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian systems, and traffic patterns were investigated. In this phase, specific recommendations and strategies for the Prairie View Metra Station are devel- oped that incorporate best practices for transit supportive development including mixed use, increased densities, and balanced parking requirements to create an economical and vibrant environment. The Draft Plan “tests” the proposed location of recommended development sites identified in the market assessment with the vision and character goals of Buffalo Grove. The Final Plan illustrates the refinement of the project vision, development goals, transportation, market analysis, and implementation. The information gathered in Stages 1-3 is compiled and used in the Final Prairie View Station Area Plan. PROJECT SCHEDULE The planning process had four stages that created a station area plan for Prairie View. Introduction 9DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 17 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) 20192018 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP - DEC FEBJAN MAR APRAPR Interactions with the Public Steering Committee & Village Meetings Online Survey Project Website 20192018 April 12Kick-Off Meeting The project Steering Committee met to kick-off the planning process. The project Steering Committee is composed of long-time Prairie View residents, business owners, property owners, transportation agencies, Buffalo Grove staff, school representatives, and adjacent community appointed officials. During the kick-off meeting, the Steering Committee was given a presentation to orient them to the planning process, project goals and objectives, and was asked to share their vision and experience for the project area. August 2Steering Committee Meeting The project Steering Committee met with the consultant team to review the findings of the Existing Conditions Report. The meeting also included discussion in formulating a vision and goals for the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan. January 30Steering Committee Meeting This meeting focused on reviewing the draft Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan and formulated implementation strategies. FEB 21 - MAR 4Online Survey An online survey was parovided for those that could not attend Workshop #2. The survey asked respondents for their feedback regarding the vision presented. February 20Public Workshop #2 The consultant team and Village staff facilitated the second public workshop to present the vision and the draft Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan to the public. OngoingProject Website A project website was created for the project to extend the in-person public engagement and allow project stakeholders to participate in the planning process at their convenience. The website provides information on upcoming and past project events, communicates the goals and objectives of the Plan, and updates visitors on progress towards project implementation. May 29 & June 29Village-led Key Person Interviews The Village of Buffalo Grove facilitated a series of key person interviews with local residents, developers, business owners, and representatives of the Lincolnshire-Prairie View School District 103 and Stevenson District 125. May 15 - 25Online Survey An online survey was provided for those that could not attend the Workshop #1. The online survey asked participants similar questions to those discussed in the in-person workshop. May 10Public Workshop #1 On May 10th, 2018, the Village of Buffalo Grove kicked-off its 7-month process to create the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan with a public workshop held at the Arboretum Club on Half Day Road. The workshop had over 150 community members attend who had an opportunity to shape the future of the Station Area. The workshop was organized into five stations in which participants could share their vision, development preferences, and defining characteristics of the Station Area. MAR 4 - APR 5Public Comment Period The public comment period included various opportunities for the public and the Board to provide any comments on the Draft Plan. These opportunities included the Committee of the Whole, public hearing with the Planning and Zoning Commission, and other open houses. APR 15Presentation & Approval of Final Plan PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT To create the Prairie View Station Area Plan, the voices of the community needed to be heard. The public engagement process provided a variety of methods to solicit input into the planning process by understanding the public’s needs, preferences, priorities, and vision for the Prairie View Metra Station Area. 10 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 18 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) 20192018 MAYJUNJUL AUG SEP - DEC FEBJAN MAR APRAPR Interactions with the Public Steering Committee & Village Meetings Online Survey Project Website 20192018 April 12Kick-Off Meeting The project Steering Committee met to kick-off the planning process. The project Steering Committee is composed of long-time Prairie View residents, business owners, property owners, transportation agencies, Buffalo Grove staff, school representatives, and adjacent community appointed officials. During the kick-off meeting, the Steering Committee was given a presentation to orient them to the planning process, project goals and objectives, and was asked to share their vision and experience for the project area. August 2Steering Committee Meeting The project Steering Committee met with the consultant team to review the findings of the Existing Conditions Report. The meeting also included discussion in formulating a vision and goals for the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan. January 30Steering Committee Meeting This meeting focused on reviewing the draft Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan and formulated implementation strategies. FEB 21 - MAR 4Online Survey An online survey was parovided for those that could not attend Workshop #2. The survey asked respondents for their feedback regarding the vision presented. February 20Public Workshop #2 The consultant team and Village staff facilitated the second public workshop to present the vision and the draft Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan to the public. OngoingProject Website A project website was created for the project to extend the in-person public engagement and allow project stakeholders to participate in the planning process at their convenience. The website provides information on upcoming and past project events, communicates the goals and objectives of the Plan, and updates visitors on progress towards project implementation. May 29 & June 29Village-led Key Person Interviews The Village of Buffalo Grove facilitated a series of key person interviews with local residents, developers, business owners, and representatives of the Lincolnshire-Prairie View School District 103 and Stevenson District 125. May 15 - 25Online Survey An online survey was provided for those that could not attend the Workshop #1. The online survey asked participants similar questions to those discussed in the in-person workshop. May 10Public Workshop #1 On May 10th, 2018, the Village of Buffalo Grove kicked-off its 7-month process to create the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan with a public workshop held at the Arboretum Club on Half Day Road. The workshop had over 150 community members attend who had an opportunity to shape the future of the Station Area. The workshop was organized into five stations in which participants could share their vision, development preferences, and defining characteristics of the Station Area. MAR 4 - APR 5Public Comment Period The public comment period included various opportunities for the public and the Board to provide any comments on the Draft Plan. These opportunities included the Committee of the Whole, public hearing with the Planning and Zoning Commission, and other open houses. APR 15Presentation & Approval of Final Plan Introduction 11DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 19 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Land Use Patterns The Prairie View Metra Station can be characterized by three distinct zones. Land uses within these areas vary slightly, however, there are notable spatial patterns. Zone 1 Zone 1 is the area fronting W Half Day Road and west of N Main Street, in addition to the site at the southeast corner of W Half Day Road and N Prairie Road. The portion west of W Easton Ave consists of: a fire station, a medical office building, and a senior- living facility are within the Village limits. The rest of Zone 1 is within unincorporated Lake County. This area includes: a plant nursery, a scrap metal business, and single-family detached housing, which is in the southeastern portion of Zone 1. This area is currently unincorporated and is not connected to the Village’s utility infrastructure and public services. Zone 2 The second zone primarily consists of residential development east of Prairie Road and north of W Half Day Road. There is a residential subdivision that consists of townhomes. Prairie Landing Townhomes, which consists of the lots at the northeast corner of W Half Day Road and Prairie Road, is to be constructed as townhomes. 12 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 20 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Zone 3 The third zone consists of parcels on both sides of the Metra rail tracks and north of Zone 1 and 2. The west side of the tracks contains small-scale businesses along N Main Street, in addition to pockets of vacant lots. These businesses provide services and limited commercial offerings. Further west are mostly single- family detached homes within unincorporated Lake County. The Easton Station Townhomes, within the Village limits, are recent examples of more modern housing typologies coming into the community. They offer different housing types and amenities and are geared towards the changing Village demographic, in contrast to older and more suburban-style housing subdivisions, such as Noah’s Landing. To the east of the rail tracks, the land use is mostly comprised of single-family detached housing. Some of these parcels are within unincorporated Lake County. To the north, the 40-acre Stancliff Property remains mostly agricultural. This property is under a boundary agreement between the Village of Buffalo Grove and the Village of Lincolnshire. N A P P L E H I L L L N R O S L Y N L N PR A I R I E R D PARK AVE P R A I R I E R D 1S T S T 2N D S T W HALF DAY RD W PORT CLINTON RD N M A I N S T N P R A I R I E R D W EASTON AVE W BROCKMAN AVE 22 Study Area Boundary Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Boundary Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 CHARACTER ZONE Introduction 13DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 21 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Land Jurisdiction Land within the Prairie View Metra Station Area includes parcels that are incorporated into the Village of Buffalo Grove as well as unincorporated parcels. Incorporated parcels are serviced by the Village’s utility infrastructure and public service departments. The remaining parcels, including the Stancliff Property are unincorporated and are under the jurisdictional authority of Lake County. There are observable physical differences between unincorporated and incorporated areas including lack of sidewalks, lack of utility infrastructure, and fewer streetlights. Some of the unincorporated area within the Prairie View Metra Station Area, including the 40-acre Stancliff Property, is subject to the 2005 boundary agreement between the Village of Buffalo Grove and the Village of Lincolnshire. This agreement identifies future boundary lines as well as future land uses. 14 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 22 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Lincolnshire Vernon Hills Long Grove Peterson Park Adlai E. Stevenson H.S. School Yard The Arboretum Club India n C r e e k BRANDYWYN LN MI L L B R O O K D R N A P P L E H I L L L N MA D I E R A L N N P R A I R I E L N PA L A Z Z O D R CHESTNUT TER DAU L T O N D R AP P L E H I L L L N FOXFORD DR N H O T Z R D R O S L Y N L N N R A L E I G H D R ST E V E N S O N D R W HALF DAY CREEK BEND DR W H I S P E R I N G O A K S D R PR A I R I E R D C A R L Y L E L N PARK AVE W A T E R B U R Y L N CREEK VIEW DR DU N S T A N L N 1S T S T LEE LN TAYLOR CT N K I N G S T O N R O W OV E R V I E W D R 2N D S T AVALON CT P R A I R I E R D W HALF DAY RD W PORT CLINTON RD BU F F A L O G R O V E R D N M A I N S T N P R A I R I E R D N B U F F A L O G R O V E R D W EASTON AVE W BROCKMAN AVE N M A I N S T 22 22 0 500 1,000250 FeetNorth Legend Study Area Boundary Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Boundary Future annexation into Village of Buffalo Grove via Boundary Agreement Stancliff Farm (40 acres) Village of Buffalo Grove Village of Vernon Hills Village of Lincolnshire Unincorporated Lake County Prairie View Metra Station JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY Introduction 15DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 23 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Architectural Typologies & Character The overall development of the Prairie View Metra Station Area presents a cohesive and comprehensive cross section of Post-War suburban residential development in the Midwestern United States. Five Primary Typologies were observed within the six area zones defined on the adjacent map: •The American Foursquare (Early 1900s) •The Post-War Building Boom (1940s - 1970s) •The Late 20th Century Single Family Home (1980s-2000s) •The 21st Century Paired Home (1990s-2000s) •The New Urbanist Townhome (2010s)The American Foursquare @ Zone 5 The Post-War Building Boom @ Zone 4 The Late 20th Century Single Family Home @ Zone 1 & 3 The 21st Century Paired Home @ Zone 6 The New Urbanist Townhome @ Zone 2 16 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 24 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Lincolnshire Vernon Hills Long Grove Peterson Park Adlai E. Stevenson H.S. School Yard The Arboretum Club India n C r e e k BRANDYWYN LN MI L L B R O O K D R N A P P L E H I L L L N MA D I E R A L N N P R A I R I E L N PA L A Z Z O D R CHESTNUT TER DAU L T O N D R AP P L E H I L L L N FOXFORD DR N H O T Z R D R O S L Y N L N N R A L E I G H D R ST E V E N S O N D R W HALF DAY CREEK BEND DR W H I S P E R I N G O A K S D R PR A I R I E R D C A R L Y L E L N PARK AVE W A T E R B U R Y L N CREEK VIEW DR DU N S T A N L N 1S T S T LEE LN TAYLOR CT N K I N G S T O N R O W OV E R V I E W D R AVALON CT P R A I R I E R D W HALF DAY RD W PORT CLINTON RD BU F F A L O G R O V E R D N M A I N S T N P R A I R I E R D N B U F F A L O G R O V E R D W EASTON AVE N M A I N S T 22 22 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 1 0 500 1,000250 FeetNorth ARCHITECTURAL TYPOLOGY ZONES Legend Study Area Boundary Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Boundary Proposed Roadway Alignment Prairie View Metra Station North Subarea Central Subarea South Subarea Parks/Open Space Introduction 17DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 25 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Transportation Roadways and Vehicular Traffic The Prairie View Metra station is located approximately 3.5 miles west of Interstate 94. East-west access to the study area is provided by Half Day Road (IL Route 22). Located approximately one mile east of the study area, Milwaukee Avenue (IL Route 21) provides north-south access to the study area. Throughout the study area, the street system is predominantly a network of local and collector roadways with arterial roadways around the perimeter. Transit The Prairie View station serves as a key activity center for the study area. Located along the Metra North Central Service (NCS) Line, commuter rail service is provided on track owned by Canadian National Railway Company (CN). The tracks also support active freight. According to data provided by the Illinois Commerce Commission, an average of 42 daily trains, including 22 passenger trains, is reported at the at-grade crossing on Buffalo Grove Road. In addition to the Buffalo Grove Road crossing, an additional at- grade crossing is located within the study area at Half Day Road. A dedicated pedestrian crossing is also provided near the Prairie View station building. The NCS Line provides north-south commuter access between Chicago Union Station and the Village of Antioch. Monday through Friday, Metra operates a total of nine inbound trains from Prairie View to Union Station, and a total of ten outbound trains from Union Station to Prairie View. These trains also provide access between Prairie View and the O’Hare Transfer station. Weekend Metra service is not provided along the NCS Line. Prairie View is the second busiest station on the NCS Line with a total of 388 boardings (all trains). With a total of 590 boardings (all trains), Buffalo Grove is the busiest station along the NCS Line. The Prairie View Metra Station’s parking lot has a capacity for 431 spaces and it has an observed utilization of approximately 73%. A good portion of the commuter parking space are utilized by Stevenson High School students. Approximately 20 percent of commuters are dropped-off at the station. Vehicle pick-up/drop-off activity currently occurs in the commuter parking lots on both the east and west sides of the train tracks. The Prairie View station also has a significant portion of the commuters who walk to/from the station. It is important to note that approximately 20 percent of commuters using the Prairie View station walk, which is about double the percentage of commuters walking to both the Vernon Hills and Buffalo Grove stations. Fixed route bus service to the Prairie View Metra station is not currently provided. Pedestrian and Bicycle Network In general, pedestrian connectivity in the study area is discontinuous with sidewalk provided along some segments. Although the study area maintains a pedestrian-scale development pattern, infrastructure to support pedestrian activity is limited and in some cases, the built environment discourages pedestrians. The existing bicycle network provides connectivity between adjacent residential subdivisions, commercial areas (e.g., Woodland Commons), Prairie View Metra Station, area parks and recreational and institutional uses such as local parks, schools, religious facilities, and township offices. 18 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 26 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Market and Economic Assessment The Prairie View Metra Station Area has a significant demographic and market base. The population approximately a quarter of a mile from the Prairie View Metra Station, which encompasses the study area, has approximately 504 people and 200 households in 2018. The Prairie View Metra Station Area’s residential market is strong as families with children are attracted to the area’s high quality public school district. Single-family homes, condominiums, and townhomes are being quickly absorbed into the market. The Prairie View Metra Station Area’s is positioned well to offer housing typologies that are appealing to the empty-nester and millennial demographics. These demographics value walkability (especially near commercial options), open space, condominium/townhome housing products that offer little to no maintenance. Access to the Metra train station will also be one of the greatest amenities the Prairie View Metra Station area offers. The Prairie View submarket is positioned between two relatively strong retail areas. To the west of Prairie View is the Woodland Commons shopping center and to the east is the Milwaukee Road Corridor. There are also other numerous retail and shopping choices within a few miles of the Prairie View station. Based on market analyses, the area may be able to support approximately 40,000 to 50,000 square feet of retail oriented towards commuter and residential needs as well as destination businesses. With the local resident household’s higher proclivity for health and fitness activities, personal health focused businesses may find a strong niche serving highly educated commuters and nearby residents. Personal health care services such as: hair/ nail salon, day spa, fitness center, and specialty fitness. Specialty foods represent another potential retail market. Drinking/food establishments that complement other health and wellness businesses are also viable. All retail should contribute to the identity and character of the area. Introduction 19DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 27 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) 2 Principles & Concepts Developing a community-driven vision was a fundamental objective of the Plan. Consequently, the project team gathered the main findings from all the project’s outreach activities and distilled them into the plan’s principles. These principles guided the vision’s direction and development. 7 Principles Principle 1 Preservation and celebration of area’s historical character, charm and small town feel. The Prairie View area’s buildings and architecture provide a distinctive character and charm. The Plan should look to enhance and celebrate this character. Principle 2 Create a Destination and establish an identity. The Plan should look to establish the Prairie View Area as a destination and help it achieve a sense of identity. The place-making elements should be authentic and unique to the area, but support and complement the area’s context and strengths. 20 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 28 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Principle 3 Incorporate and leverage the area’s greatest assets. The neighborhood has access to various amenities, assets, and resources including the Prairie View Train Station, Vernon Township, and Stevenson High School. The plan should look to build off these assets as they provide additional means of vibrancy and character. Principle 4 Provide residential options that accommodate the changing demographics. The Plan should look to provide residential options that can accommodate the needs of the area’s emerging demographics which include millennials, young families, baby boomers, and empty nesters. Principle 5 Look to add neighborhood and convenience commercial establishments. The Plan should include neighborhood and convenience commercial development that can be supported in todays’ retail market as well and leverage the area’s pedestrian traffic. Principle 6 Enhance the connectivity of the area – roads, train, bike paths, and pedestrian. Emphasis on walkability. The Plan should look to expand the neighborhood’s connectivity to, from, and within the neighborhood. This accessibility should be examined for all modes of transportation but there should be an emphasis on walkability. Principle 7 Incorporate open space and environmental sustainability. The Plan should look to preserve and celebrate the natural environment in the area by incorporating open space and other sustainability initiatives. Principles & Concepts 21DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 29 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) KEY PLAN CONCEPTS The following highlights potential concepts the Village of Buffalo Grove may consider in implementing the goals and strategies of the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan. They can also serve as discussion points between the Village and stakeholders in regards to the Plan’s goals and strategies. Unique Businesses in Prairie View Changing Trends and Retailers’ Health Clinics Consumer’s behavior in approaching their health and wellness has shifted over the years. In the past, this mostly involved people having regularly scheduled doctor’s visit and exercise and a mindful diet. With the proliferation of easily accessible information, consumers are beginning to engage more in “self-care” to meet their health goals in a more personal and meaningful ways, in addition to avoiding chronic diseases, that annual check-ups could not. Additionally, the growth of sales and manufacturing has been sluggish at best over the past few years. According to Neilsen’s Health and Wellness 2020 Report, the sales are forecasted to grow by only 0.9 percent. These trends present an opportunity for retailers to impact consumers’ lives by supporting consumer’s medical needs. The Prairie View Metra Station Area currently has an underutilized medical office space, which presents an opportunity to attract contemporary medical and wellness-focused tenants. In recent years, many retailers have prioritized healthy foods in the center of their store to emphasize the notion of healthy eating and established health clinics to provide consumers’ guidance at a more personal level. In fact, Accenture projected there would be an increase of at least 2,800 in-store retail clinics in the U.S. by the end of 2017. This would equate to about 47 percent increase from 2014. This demonstrates that there is a growing acceptance among consumers in regard to the clinics’ ease of access and convenience. Source: https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2017/capitalizing-on- health-and-wellness-trends.html Local food Incubator The concept of food incubator began in the 1960s as a mean to spur economic development in the U.S. Food incubator take in specialty food entrepreneurs and provide them a shared and low- cost commercial kitchen space, in addition to education, for them to make a profit in producing, selling, packaging, and marketing their food products. These spaces provide a stepping stone for food entrepreneurs in establishing and selling their brand and food to the larger market. They also provide a supportive environment where each entrepreneur learns the business insight they need on accounting, sales, and marketing. Source: https://www.eater.com/2016/2/26/11110808/food-incubator-accelerator- small-business 22 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 30 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Shop Local In many cities, success and vitality are integrally linked to the economic health of local businesses which are the foundation of the local economy and serve the needs of residents and visitors alike. Because local owners live in the community they do business in, they are free to make decisions based on local needs rather than corporate policies handed down from decision-makers far removed. Additionally, studies have shown that independent, local owners spend more money at other local businesses creating a “multiplier effect”- money recirculates within the community rather than “leaking out” to remote corporate headquarters or a centralized purchasing department. Listed below are reasons why locally- owned businesses are good for a city’s long-term viability. Buy Local - Support Yourself: Several studies have shown that when you buy from an independent, locally owned business, rather than a nationally owned businesses, significantly more of your money is used to make purchases from other local businesses and service providers, and farms. “For every $100 spent in locally owned independent stores, $68 returns to the community through taxes, payroll, and other expenditures. If you spend that in a national chain, only $43 stays here. Spend it online and nothing comes home.” Support Community Groups: Non-profit organizations receive an average 250% more support from smaller locally owned businesses than they do from national businesses. Keep The Community Unique: Where you shop, where you eat and have fun - all of it makes your community home. The one-of-a- kind businesses are an integral part of the distinctive character of Burlington. Tourism also increases as visitors seek out destinations that offer them the sense of being someplace, not just anyplace. Reduce Environmental Impact: Locally-owned businesses can make more local purchases requiring less transportation and contributing less to sprawl, congestion, habitat loss and pollution. Create More Good Jobs: Small locally-owned businesses are the largest employers nationally offering jobs to residents. Get Better Service: Locally-owned businesses often hire people with a better understanding of the products they are selling and take more time to get to know customers. Invest In Community: Locally-owned businesses have owners and employees who live in the community, are less likely to leave, and are vested in the community’s future. Put Your Taxes To Good Use: Local businesses in town centers require comparatively little infrastructure investment and make more efficient use of public services as compared to nationally owned stores entering the community. Buy What You Want, Not What Someone Wants You To Buy: A multitude of small businesses, each selecting products based not on a national sales plan but on their own interests and the needs of their local customers, guarantees a much broader range of product choices. Encourage Local Prosperity: A growing body of economic research shows that in an increasingly homogenized world, entrepreneurs and skilled workers are more likely to invest and settle in communities that preserve their one-of-a-kind businesses and distinctive character. Source: http://www.sbnportland.org/ Principles & Concepts 23DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 31 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Example of an in-law unit that is above a detached garage. Source: https://www.theplancollection.com/garage-apartments-house-plans Non-Traditional Housing Aging In Place The US Census estimates that between 2005 and 2020: •Population aged between 50 and 64 will increase by 21 percent. •Population aged 65 or older will increase by 33 percent. •Population aged under 50 will increase by only 4 percent. This can be attributed to the 72 million baby boomers going through their life cycle in conjunction with a profound increase in life expectancies. In Buffalo Grove, about 23 percent of the Village’s population is aged between 50 and 64 years old in 2016. This indicates that there would be a significant increase in population aged 65 and above in the coming years. These trends demonstrate that aging in place is becoming a more critical issue for the Village to tackle as its population ages. It is important for the Village to allow innovative land uses to allow its elderly population to independently live in their homes and community safely and comfortably, regardless of their socio-economic background. Multi-Generational Housing The US Census showed that 18.1% of the U.S. population (57 million Americans) lived in multi-generational households in 2012. This is double the number of such household in 1980. This growth spiked during the Great Recession of 2007-2009 and continued to grow, despite at a slower pace, during the post-recession period. Racial and ethnic minorities are more likely to live in a multi-generational family, which has been increasing since the 1970s. The Pew Research Center founded that Asians are most likely of all minority groups to live in multi-generational arrangements. In2016, the Asian population consists of 19 percent of the total population in the Village of Buffalo Grove. There are various reasons for this phenomenon. Young adults are marrying in later stages and staying in school longer. This contributes to an increasing share of young adults living with their parents. Declining employment and wages may also undermine adults’ ability to live independently. Many existing residential units in the Village of Buffalo Grove are designed for single-generation living, and this issue came up in previous Steering Committee meetings and the public workshop. There is an interest to promote new housing types that are conducive to multi-generational living. The following are design and housing examples that promote such concepts. Source: Pew Research Center | http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/07/17/in- post-recession-era-young-adults-drive-continuing-rise-in-multi-generational-living/ Design Features of a Multi-Generational Housing •Multiple Masters: Multi-generational homes may require a second master bedroom, preferably on the first-floor, to provide better access and privacy for older parents. This also give them a sense of privacy in a shared home. •Suite Addition: One of the best ways to make multi- generational housing work is to construct an in-law suite/ apartment with a separate kitchenette and entrance (see In-Law Units / Carriage House for greater detail). The feasibility this feature will depend on zoning restrictions. •Versatile Living Room: Multi-generational housing can either feature segregated living room or a large space with appropriate amenities to enable different generations to coexist. An example is to install shelving/storage units in the living room to help keep the space free from toys and clutter, which can pose a safety issue to seniors. •Flex Space: Rooms should be designed to be adaptable for various uses. For example, an underutilized living room can be repurposed into a home office, then an in-law suite, then a space for a young adult who decided to move home, and then an entertainment space. •Universal Design / Open Access: This works in tandem with flexible spaces to create environment that all persons can use. Examples of universal design include wide-enough hallways to accommodate a wheelchair and zero-entry threshold to accommodate people with physical disabilities. Source: https://www.bsbdesign.com/five-essentials-multigenerational-home-design- interior-designer-cook/ & http://www.morseconstructions.com/blog/key-features-of- multi-generational-homes 24 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 32 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) In-law units can be designed to conform to existing development’s character. Source: http://www.verseksmsek.com/ In-Law Units / Carriage Housing Also known as granny flats, in-law units are apartments that are an accessory to a primary residence. They have their own entrance, kitchen, bedroom, and living area. In-law units are typically situated above the garage of the primary residence or an as a separate structure in the primary residence’s rear lawn. The unit is not rented out. Rather, it is occupied by the primary residence’s guest or relative. In-Law units could provide benefits to the community, homeowners, families, and elderly alike. Having in-law units increases the number of persons per households in existing residential neighborhoods. This reduces the need for municipalities to extend utilities and services. This option helps municipalities increase their diversity of housing options at moderate pricing points without requiring local funding. Having in-law units enables the elderly population to independently remain in the community and to have continued to access to nearby community amenities. Currently, municipalities may have regulations pertaining to what certain relatives and guests can live there and whether rents may be charged. The Village of Buffalo Grove’s Zoning Ordinance currently does not permit residential uses on accessory dwelling units (see 17.12.005 - Accessory building or structure in the Village’s Municipal Code). The Village should evaluate its permitting and regulatory process to see how its neighborhoods can accommodate in-law units in a fashion that they would contribute to the neighborhood’s sense of place. Temporary Art Installations Pilot art installation programs enhance the public realm, create interim uses for vacant lots and underutilized space, and transform urban space into art. Temporary installations may include parklets and plazas, window clings in vacant storefronts, public sculpture, or community-led and built gardens. The act of improvising and proactively reinvigorating the public realm, is also known as a Pop-up or Tactical Urbanism. These DIY sessions are intended to be place-based and neighborhood specific. Temporary art installations are relatively low-budget and are not generally capital intensive. They are opportunities for community members to participate in the improvement of their neighborhood. Based on the character of Prairie View, events and programs can be created in coordination with property and business owners to ensure they gain greater exposure from the events. Opportunities for these urban interventions include: •Window decals/window clings •Temporary stages •Urban gardens •Parklets/Plazas •Food Trucks •Music •Art Walk •Temporary art installations An example photo of a parklet. Source: Flickr / Steve Chou An example photo of a pop-up gathering space. Source: Flickr / Kent State University Principles & Concepts 25DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 33 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Source: http://api.ning.com Urban Tree Canopy Urban Tree Canopy (UTC) is defined as the layer of leaves, branches, and stems of trees that cover an area when viewed from above. It is useful in absorbing rainfall that would otherwise run off on a paved surface, picking up pollutants along the way, and be transported to the local storm drainage system. UTC provides many benefits to the Prairie View community. This includes: reducing urban heat island effect, increasing property values and energy savings, reducing air pollution, and promoting aesthetic benefits. Enhancing UTC in a community, such as street tree planting, is a crucial first step in seeking improvements to green infrastructure. A concentration of street trees can contribute to a greater concentration of UTC in Prairie View. Street trees are often thought of as a liability to maintenance. However, a Modesto, California study revealed that the asphalt on streets shaded by large canopy tree lasts longer than that on unshaded streets, reducing maintenance costs by sixty percent over thirty years.1 1 McPherson, E. Gregory, and Jules Muchnick. (2005). Effects of Street Tree Shade on Asphalt Concrete Pavement Performance. Journal of Arboriculture, 31(6), 303-310. Energy Savings for Homeowners Illinois Homeowner Performance (IHP) with ENERGY STAR This program aims to assist Illinois homeowners and property owners to reduce their energy costs and improve their homes’ comfort, safety, durability, and property value. This is achieved when homeowners work with IHP-qualified contractors to adopt a “whole-home” approach when improving the home’s energy efficiency. A “whole-home” approach is defined as accounting for the entire home and all its systems when evaluating their performance and prescribing remedies. After completing the improvements, the homeowner receives a Certification of Completion that documents the improvement and investment the homeowner has made. Illinois’s multiple listing services (MLS) and the Midwest Real Estate Data (MRED) recognize this program, which enables homeowners to display their certification when they list their home on the market. Similar certification programs in other regions have shown that homeowners with similar certifications were able to sell their homes faster and/or an increased price point. Eligibility •Single-family home, townhome, or individual condo in a building of 4 or fewer units with heating and/or cooling equipment specific to the individual unit •A building of 4 or fewer units with shared heating and/ or cooling equipment may also be eligible if the upgrade addresses the building as a whole* •The building’s original construction must be completed prior to audit (that is, IHP is only applicable to existing homes, not new construction) •The home must be located within ComEd, Nicor Gas, Peoples Gas, and North Shore Gas utilities. Source: http://www.illinoishomeperformance.org/what-is-ihp 26 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 34 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) This page is intentionally left blank. Principles & Concepts 27DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 35 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Land Use & Development LAND USE The Land Use and Development Chapter is intended to guide the Village’s land use and development decisions to be consistent with the Village’s long-term vision and strategic goals. The land use plan will designate desired land uses within the Prairie View Metra Station Area, including the three subareas. These subareas are situated within unincorporated Lake County parcels, including the 40-acre Stancliff Property. To promote cohesive and legible development of the Prairie View Metra Station Area these parcels will require incorporation into municipal boundaries. This is critical to ensure redevelopment within the subareas and the Station Area fall under a comprehensive vision and have similar access to the Village’ infrastructure and services. The following describes the three subareas the Plan has designated. 3 28 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 36 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) North Subarea The North Subarea consists of the 40-acre Stancliff Property. It is envisioned that future development in this area accommodate compact single-family detached and attached housing and incorporate sustainable strategies. Central Subarea This subarea contains unincorporated Lake County Parcels west of the Prairie View Metra Station and north of Half Day Rd. There will be a variety of housing choices within this subarea, and commerical activiities are hosted within mixed-use buildings fronting N Main Street. Streetscpe improvements, with corner plazas at Easton Ave. and N Main St. will welcome Metra Commuters into the Station Area. South Subarea The South Subarea will accommodate a corner mixed-use building with gateway signage and plaza at the southwest of Half Day Rd. and N Prairie Rd. Stacked townhomes and stormwater detention areas are located throughout this subarea. The roadway entryway into the South Subarea will align with the existing Willow Parkway. N A P P L E H I L L L N R O S L Y N L N PR A I R I E R D PARK AVE P R A I R I E R D 1S T S T W HALF DAY RD W PORT CLINTON RD N M A I N S T N P R A I R I E R D W EASTON AVE W BROCKMAN AVE 22 Study Area Boundary Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Boundary North Subarea Central Subarea South Subarea REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY SITES Land Use & Development 29DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 37 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Land Use Designations Single-Family Detached This land use designation consists of single-family detached homes. This is the predominant existing land use surrounding the Prairie View Metra Station Area. The Plan calls for this use to be concentrated at Brockman Avenue and at the North Subarea. The character of single-family detached neighborhoods includes a variety of architectural style, including the American Foursquare and the Late 20th Century Single-Family Homes, on suburban street networks. Single-Family Attached Single-family attached residential typically consists of townhomes. These units are horizontally connected but have separate entrances from the public street and sidewalk. This land use is prevalent within and around the North (including Stancliff Property), Central (including Brockman Avenue), and South Subarea. The Plan calls for a planned expansion of the newly-constructed Easton Station townhomes on Easton Avenue. The existing townhomes at Waterbury Place is a good model for future single-family attached developments. Multi-Family Residential Multi-family residential areas include apartment/condominium buildings where units share a common entrance or hallway. The future land use plan envisions an additional multi-family building along W Half Day Road and mixed-use buildings with upper-floor multifamily units along N Main Street. Commercial Commercial includes general retail, dining, and services that are tailored to the local customer base. The plan suggests incorporating all future commercial space within mixed-use buildings. Office The office building at 150 W Half Day Road currently houses medical uses. To help bolster occupancy, the building should look into accommodating non-traditional medical uses, such as wellness and health businesses. Mixed-Use The intersection of W Half Day Road and N Main Street and N Main Street across the Prairie View Metra Station are intended to be an attractive, pedestrian-scaled, and mixed-use environment. Desired ground-floor land uses include retail, restaurants, personal services, offices, and wellness and health establishments. Upper- floor uses can consist of multi-family units. A 4-acre mixed-use building is located at the northwest corner of N Main Street and W Half Day Road. Education Stevenson High School is located east of the Prairie View Metra Station and can be accessed from W Half Day Road and Stevenson Drive. Being a reputable high school, it has attracted many families to move into the Village of Buffalo Grove. There are also opportunities to improve and increase connections between neighborhoods around the Prairie View Metra Station Area and the Stevenson High School. Religious The Westminster Reformed Presbyterian Church (16670 W Easton Avenue) is the only religious land use within the Prairie View Metra Station Area. It provides important functions that serve nearby residents and features a distinct architectural character that is desired in future developments in Prairie View. Government The Village’s Fire Station 27 is a government land use located at the northwest corner of W Half Day Road and Easton Avenue. The fire station is shown to remain. Parks / Open Space This land use designation includes an athletic field operated by the Vernon Township and future open space, which accommodate both active and passive recreation. These spaces also include tot lots, central green space with year-round programming, and stormwater detention area. Where possible, connections to parks and open space should be strengthened through the development of pedestrian and bike trails that provide safe passage into the surrounding neighborhoods and commercial areas. 30 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 38 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Lincolnshire Vernon Hills Long Grove Peterson Park Adlai E. Stevenson H.S. School Yard The Arboretum Club India n C r e e k BRANDYWYN LN MI L L B R O O K D R N A P P L E H I L L L N MA D I E R A L N N P R A I R I E L N PA L A Z Z O D R CHESTNUT TER DAU L T O N D R AP P L E H I L L L N FOXFORD DR N H O T Z R D R O S L Y N L N N R A L E I G H D R ST E V E N S O N D R W HALF DAY CREEK BEND DR W H I S P E R I N G O A K S D R PR A I R I E R D C A R L Y L E L N PARK AVE W A T E R B U R Y L N CREEK VIEW DR DU N S T A N L N 1S T S T LEE LN TAYLOR CT N K I N G S T O N R O W OV E R V I E W D R AVALON CT P R A I R I E R D W HALF DAY RD W PORT CLINTON RD BU F F A L O G R O V E R D N M A I N S T N P R A I R I E R D N B U F F A L O G R O V E R D W EASTON AVE N M A I N S T 22 22 0 500 1,000250 FeetNorth Legend Study Area Boundary Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Boundary Proposed Roadway Alignment Prairie View Metra Station North Subarea Central Subarea South Subarea Single-Family Detached Single-Family Attached (ex: townhomes/rowhomes) Multi-Family (ex: condominiums) Commercial Mixed-use Office Education Governmnet Religious Parks/Open Space Transportation FUTURE LAND USE Land Use & Development 31DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 39 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) This page is intentionally left blank. 32 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 40 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) North Subarea South Subarea Central Subarea W HALF DAY RD NEW STREET 1S T S T N P R A I R I E R D PR A I R I E R D PORT CLINTON RD W E A S T O N A V E W EASTON AVE N M A I N S T 22 M E T R A N O R T H C E N T R A L S E R V I C E 0 100 400300200 feet North SUBAREASOVERVIEW The Prairie View Metra Station vision has been designed to guide the Village in making land use and development decisions. As a long-term vision, it is specific enough to provide a clear picture of Corridor’s future. However, it also needs to be flexible enough to respond to changing market demands and needs. Consequently, the vision presents general parameters not the exact specifications of the type of character of development that could occur. The vision includes three subareas: North Subarea, Central Subarea, and South Subarea. Prairie View Metra Station Land Use & Development 33DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 41 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) ALLEY ALLEY ALLEY ALLEY AL L E Y AL L E Y NEW STREET NEW STREET NEW STREET NE W S T R E E T NEW STREET NE W S T R E E T PR A I R I E R D W PORT CLINTON RD 0 10050 200 feet North The 40-acre former Stancliff property is located in the north section of the Prairie View Station Area. Residential units are clustered around green space which is connected throughout the whole development. The detention pond in the north east corner of the site is an amenity and includes native plantings and a walking trail. The development is organized around a large, central park that can be programmed with seasonal events for residents. NORTH SUBAREASITE PLAN Total Housing Units: 131 units Townhome/Rowhome: 58 units Single-Family Detached: 73 units Parks/Open Space: 554,853 SF (12.7 acres) Nature-based public open space with stormwater detention Single-family detached housing with detached garage Public open space / neighborhood park Rear alley Townhomes/ Rowhomes Public open space Access point Access point Access point Townhomes/ Rowhomes 34 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 42 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) ALLEY ALLEY ALLEY ALLEY AL L E Y AL L E Y W PORT CLINTON RD NEW STREET NEW STREET NEW STREET NE W S T R E E T NEW STREET NE W S T R E E T PR A I R I E R D 0 10050 200 feet North Legend Single-Family Detached Single-Family Attached (Townhome/Rowhome) Parks/Open Space NORTH SUBAREALAND USE PLAN The primary land use is residential. Single family attached residential units are located along Prairie Road and are buffered by a planted parkway. The remainder of the residential units on the interior of the site are single family detached units. Land Use & Development 35DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 43 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) NORTH SUBAREACENTRAL PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PERSPECTIVE The north subarea is organized around a central green space that can be used for community programming. This gathering space adds amenity to the development and captures the identity of the community through integration of naturalized landscapes and diverse plantings. Residential units in the north subarea are clustered around shared open space. A variety of residential units including townhomes, single family home and attached rowhomes are located in the development. Higher density development along Prairie Road and Port Clinton Road is buffered by parkway plantings. A continuous trail system through the development encourages recreational walking and biking. 36 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 44 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) NORTH SUBAREACROSS SECTIONS 60’ ROW 52’ ROW 1 2 1 2 Land Use & Development 37DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 45 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) W HALF DAY RD NEW STREET NEW STREET 1S T S T PR A I R I E R D N M A I N S T W EASTON AVE W E A S T O N A V E 22 0 10050 200 feet North The Central Subarea Plan is the gateway to the Prairie View Station Area. The intersection of Main Street and Half Day Road includes a large mixed-use building and gateway elements that identify the entry into the development. Character defining elements of the development include public plazas adjacent to the Prairie View Metra Station that are flexible spaces for seasonal programming. Smaller scale residential development on the west side of the site acts as a transition and buffer from more intense residential and mixed uses along Main Street. CENTRAL SUBAREASITE PLAN Total Housing Units: 434 units Townhome/Rowhome: 87 units Single-Family Detached: 15 units Multi-Family Units: 332 units Commercial: 35,000 SF Parks/Open Space: 106,118 SF (2.4 acres) Existing Easton Station Townhomes 4-story multi-family building Public open space Parking & amenity deck Townhome/ Rowhome Stormwater detention Access to existing road New sidewalk Extend 1st St to access W Half Day Rd Existing Church Single-family detached housing with detached garages Townhome/ Rowhome Mixed-use building 4-story mixed use building Ground- floor retail Corner gateway signage Public plaza Mixed-use building Prairie View Metra Station Gateway plaza Vernon Legion Post 1247 building Townhome/Rowhome 38 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 46 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) W HALF DAY RD W EASTON AVE W BROCKMAN AVE NEW STREET NEW STREET 1S T S T W E A S T O N A V E PR A I R I E R D N M A I N S T 22 0 10050 200 feet North Legend Single-Family Detached Single-Family Attached (Townhome/Rowhome) Multi-Family Mixed-Use (Ground-floor Commercial with Multi-Family) Parks/Open Space Religious Existing Buildings CENTRAL SUBAREALAND USE PLAN Retail development is located in high visibility areas along major arterials. Residential land uses become less dense towards the western portion of the site and act as a transition to existing neighborhoods. A variety of open space types and locations encourages recreation and offers additional potential for public gatherings throughout the subarea. Land Use & Development 39DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 47 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) CENTRAL SUBAREAEASTON STREET ENTRYWAY PERSPECTIVE The Easton Street gateway is framed by two public plazas that can be programmed with seasonal events. Gateway elements identify this public gathering space as one of importance in the community. An enhanced streetscape along Main Street and Easton provide a highly amenitized public realm and encourage walking or cycling in the development. The landscape buffer along Main Street provides protection for pedestrians from car traffic. Gateway elements identify entry into the Prairie View development, add to its unique character, and create a sense of arrival for residents and visitors to the area. 40 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 48 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) CENTRAL SUBAREAN HALF DAY RD GATEWAY PERSPECTIVE The corner of North Main Street and Half Day Road is an important intersection and gateway into the Prairie View Station Area. The intersection marks a transition of character between the major arterial of Half Day Road and the Station Area district. Discovery of Prairie View’s unique character can be experienced at this intersection and movement along North Main Street. This also provides opportunities for native habitat for pollinators and green infrastructure elements to facilitate development. The sidewalk network is extended along Half Day Road to ensure continuity of the pedestrian framework. Half D a y R o a d Main Str e e t Land Use & Development 41DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 49 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) CENTRAL SUBAREACROSS SECTIONS 60’ ROW 60’ ROW 50’ ROW 1 2 3 1 2 3 42 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 50 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) W HALF DAY RD NEW STREETWILLOW PKWY N E W S T R E E T N P R A I R I E R D 22 0 10050 200 feet North SOUTH SUBAREASITE PLAN The South Subarea is made up of primarily townhomes. The roadway framework and composition of the buildings takes its cues from adjacent developments of similar building typology. A main entrance off of Prairie Road leads to a central traffic island and access to the residential portion of the site. The north corner of the site including the intersection of Prairie Road and Half Day Road is occupied by a mixed use building with retail on the first floor. A public plaza is located in the northwest corner of the site and provides outdoor cafe seating and event space for seasonal programming. Total Housing Units: 103 units Townhome/Rowhome: 64 units Multi-Family Units: 39 unit Commercial: 16,000 SF Parks/Open Space: 17,681 SF (0.4 acres) Townhome/ Rowhome Access is aligned with Willow Pkwy Stormwater detention basin Access to adjacent subdivision Rear alley Traffic circle Mixed-use building Stormwater detention basin Loading / drop-off area Public open space Corner plaza with gateway signage Land Use & Development 43DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 51 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) W HALF DAY RD NEW STREET N E W S T R E E T N P R A I R I E R D WILLOW PKWY 22 0 10050 200 feet North Legend Single-Family Attached (Townhome/Rowhome) Mixed-Use (Ground-floor Commercial with Multi-Family) Parks/Open Space SOUTH SUBAREALAND USE PLAN Land uses for the South Subarea are primarily single-family residential with the exception of the north corner of the site which is occupied by mixed-use. Open space is distributed throughout the site and offers amenity and pubic open space to residents. 44 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 52 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) SOUTH SUBAREAENTRY GATEWAY PERSPECTIVE The traffic circle that intersects the new streets is the focal point in the South Subarea. Diverse planting and a gateway signage are planted on the traffic circle to give signify entry into the South Subarea Townhomes and are oriented towards the traffic circle with ample front yard. Street trees are planted throughout the roadways to provide residents a sense of enclosure and act as buffer between pedestrians and vehicles. Land Use & Development 45DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 53 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) SOUTH SUBAREACROSS SECTION 1 1 46 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 54 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) SUBAREASSUMMARYSite Data & Estimated Fiscal Impact North Subarea Central Subarea South Subarea Total Commercial Space N/A Commercial Space 35,000 SF Commercial Space 16,000 SF Commercial Space 51,000 SF Residential 131 units Residential 434 units Residential 103 units Residential 668 units Retail Sales N/A Retail Sales $10.1 M Retail Sales $4.6 M Retail Sales $14.7 M Market Value $60 M Market Value $70 M Market Value $20 M Market Value $150 M Land Use & Development 47DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 55 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Transportation & Infrastructure Plan 4 CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY As part of the implementation of the Prairie View Station Area Plan, opportunities to enhance the multimodal transportation network have been identified. These improvements enhance access and circulation options for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles throughout the station area through a more interconnected network of streets, sidewalks, and trails that link homes, businesses, recreation/open space, the Metra station, and nearby institutional uses. Furthermore, the multimodal transportation improvements seek to support the overall redevelopment goals, preserve the character and scale of the neighborhood, create a sustainable network, and enhance resident’s quality of life. Street Network Improvements The Prairie View Station Area Plan provides for an interconnected grid street network. The future streets would be designed to Village standards and would include pedestrian accommodations. A summary of the future street network is outlined below. Easton Avenue This existing east-west street would be improved to Village standards with a 60-foot right-of-way. The recommended cross- section includes a single travel lane in each direction, on-street parking on one side of the street, curb, gutter, and a 15-foot pedestrian zone to include sidewalks and parkway landscaping. Because of its role in connecting the residential area to the Prairie View Metra Station, Easton Avenue should be a priority street for pedestrian improvements. 48 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 56 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Main Street This street will continue to serve as a primary north-south route through the study area. The redevelopment concept introduces curb and gutter on the west side of the street and creates a continuous sidewalk in order to enhance pedestrian safety and comfort. Commuter parking would continue to be provided on the east side of the street. On the west side of the street, the existing perpendicular parking would be removed and and the street would be aligned with commercial buildings. Half Day Road This street would continue to be the primary east-west arterial with two travel lanes in each direction and exclusive left-turn lanes provided at key intersections. Based on the existing cross-section, limited improvements were identified for Half Day Road; however, as the roadway is under IDOT jurisdiction, right-of-way permits will be required for any work within the right-of-way, including access modifications and new crosswalks/sidewalks. The future intersection of Half Day Road/1st Street will be subject to IDOT review and approval. Prairie Road The concept plan identified for the North Subarea will be connected to the Prairie View Metra Station via Prairie Road; therefore, pedestrian improvements along this street should be prioritized. Continuous sidewalk should be provided on both sides of Prairie Road between Port Clinton Road and Half Day Road. With the development concept identified for the North Subarea, access is contemplated via a new roadway aligned opposite Roslyn Lane, and an additional site access approximately 450 feet to the south. In addition, connectivity would also be provided via Port Clinton Road. Based on the average daily traffic (ADT) volume of 6,400 on Prairie Road, a new southbound left-turn lane is anticipated on Prairie Road at Roslyn Lane/Future Site Access. The existing striped median would be restriped to accommodate the left-turn lane. Transportation & Infrastructure Plan 49DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 57 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) New Streets Future completion of the grid street network would provide for an intuitive circulation pattern, distribute traffic volumes, and create an efficient development layout. Pedestrian-scaled design should be incorporated in order to promote a walkable character and support active transportation as a viable option for residents. A summary of the new streets planned for the Prairie View study area is outlined below. 1st Street Within the Central Subarea, 1st Street would be relocated to the east in order to create a redevelopment opportunity site on the northwest quadrant of Main Street/Easton Avenue. Relocated 1st Street would align with the existing stub street on the south side of Easton Avenue and provide connectivity between Brockman Avenue and Half Day Road. 1st Street would be improved to Village standards with a 60-foot right-of-way and a recommended cross-section including a single travel lane in each direction, on-street parking on one side of the street, curb, gutter, and a 12-foot pedestrian zone to accommodate sidewalks and parkway landscaping. South of the Central Subarea’s New Street, 1st Street’s drive lanes will become narrower, resulting in a 50-foot- right-of-way. New Street A new east-west street is recommended south of Easton Avenue (referred to as “New Street” for purposes of this study). A reduced cross-section should be considered in order to optimize the Central Subarea for redevelopment. Based on the Central Subarea plan, the street should be designed to prioritize pedestrians with an approximately 15-foot pedestrian zone to include sidewalks and parkway landscaping. On-street parking is recommended on one side of the street in order to provide short-term parking and loading zones supporting the adjacent residential and commercial uses. Site Design Considerations In addition to the improvements identified for the public right- of-way, site design should consider opportunities to support the transportation network and facilitate on-site access and circulation. Key site design considerations for the study area are outlined below. Access Management Where feasible, commercial driveways should be consolidated to reduce vehicle conflicts with pedestrians and bicyclists, particularly along Main Street. As redevelopment occurs in the Central Subarea, opportunities to provide cross-access between properties and facilitate internal site circulation should be explored. Provision of shared parking that serves multiple uses, in combination with cross-access, should also be considered. Loading Activity As commercial and mixed-use (re)development occurs within the Central Subarea and South Subarea, consideration should be given to the access and circulation for service/delivery truck loading activity. To the extent possible, consolidated delivery truck loading areas and dumpsters should be provided. Consolidated dumpsters should be provided in order to minimize the number of collection sites and reduce truck activity. 50 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 58 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Lincolnshire Vernon Hills Long Grove Peterson Park Adlai E. Stevenson H.S. School Yard The Arboretum Club In di a n 22 22 0 500 1,000250 FeetNorth Legend FUTURE ROADWAY NETWORK Key Intersection Existing Sidewalk Shared Use Path Future Sidewalk Existing Street Future Street W HALF DAY RD W PORT CLINTON RD UB LAFF G O EVOR DR N M A I N S T DR EIRIARP N DR EVORG OLAFFUB N W EASTON AVE N M A I N S T BRANDYWYN LN R D K O ORB L LIM N APP L E H I L L L N MA NL AREI D P N N L EIRIAR PALA ZZO D R CHESTNUT TER D A U L T O N D R N L L LI H E L P PA FOXFORD DR N HOTZ RD R O S L Y N L N N R A L E I G H D R S R D N OSNEVET W H AL F D AY CREEK BEND DR W H I S P E R I N G O A K S D R EIRIAR P DR C A R L Y L E L N PARK AVE W A T E R B U R Y L N CREEK VIEW DR NL NATSNU D TS TS1 LEE LN TAYLOR CT N W OR N OTS GNIK O R D WEIVREV AVALON CT P R A I R I E R D Study Area Boundary Municipal Boundary Incorporated Area within the Study Area Boundary Uncorporated Area within the Study Area Boundary Metra Train Station Transportation & Infrastructure Plan 51DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 59 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Parking In order to support existing and future commercial uses in the Prairie View study area, and to continue to support commuters at the Metra Station, the Village should continue to work with property owners and developers to identify site-specific parking solutions. To the extent possible and where appropriate, the Village should work with property owners and developers to identify opportunities for consolidated, shared parking. A summary of future parking conditions in the Prairie View Station Area is outlined below. Commuter Parking Commuter parking should continue to be provided for the Prairie View Metra Station. Based on the 2016 Origin-Destination Survey completed by Metra, approximately 55 percent of commuters at the Prairie View Metra Station drive alone. While existing parking utilization data suggests approximately 74 percent of the spaces are occupied, this data reflects shared use of the daily fee spaces by Stevenson High School students. As (re)development occurs in the Prairie View Station Area and with any future changes to Metra ridership, commuter parking utilization should continue to be monitored and rebalanced in partnership with Metra and Vernon Township. During off-peak commute periods, commuter parking should serve overflow parking needs for Prairie View Station Area businesses, such as restaurants, shopping, and entertainment uses, that experience peak parking demand that is complementary to commuter parking patterns. During evenings and weekends, opportunities to utilize the commuter parking lots for community programming and special events (e.g., farmer’s market) should be explored. The Village should continue to coordinate with Vernon Township in order to optimize the existing commuter parking supply and existing infrastructure. (Re)development Parking Requirements The parking supply provided for future mixed-use and residential developments should reflect the (re)development’s proximity to the Prairie View Metra Station and the multimodal nature of resident commuting patterns. While the proposed parking supply should reflect the unique characteristics of the proposed (re)development, data from the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) Access & Parking Strategies for Transit-Oriented Development should be consulted as a resource for Village review and approval of proposed parking conditions. According to the RTA, a reduced parking ratio of 0.5 to 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit may be appropriate for multi-family residential developments in TOD areas. For any duplex, townhome, or multi-family residential development, consideration should be given to the supply and location of guest parking. Residential guest parking may be accommodated on-site or alternatively designated on-street parking spaces may be provided. Due to the proximity to the Metra Station and the future pedestrian and bicycle network, future residents are anticipated to rely on active transportation (e.g., walk, bike) and transit; and therefore, parking requirements for future (re)development should be adjusted to reflect the transit-supportive and walkable nature of the Prairie View Station Area. 52 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 60 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) On-Street Parking On-street parking should be provided adjacent to commercial and mixed-use developments. These parking spaces should be time restricted in order to promote healthy turnover of spaces for customer and visitor convenience. Employee parking should be prohibited on-street unless otherwise permitted by the Village while customer/visitor parking availability is prioritized. As (re) development occurs in the Central Subarea, the Village should explore opportunities to create short-term parking opportunities (e.g., 15-minute parking spaces for pick-up/drop-off activity) and loading zones in order to provide parking options for quick convenience-oriented trips and curbside loading activities for transportation network companies (TNCs), such as Uber and Lyft. Pedestrian Improvements In general, pedestrian connectivity in the study area is discontinuous with sidewalk provided along some segments. The Village should prioritize continuous sidewalk through the study area as part of future (re)development. As property is (re)developed, the Village should require installation of continuous sidewalk across the property frontage, and as appropriate, to complete nearby gaps or connections. Alternatively, a fee-in-lieu contribution should be provided as part of the (re)development in order to allow the Village to install the sidewalk at a later date as part of a comprehensive roadway improvement project. A continuous sidewalk network will improve access and overall connectivity for pedestrians. Sidewalk gaps should be filled with a minimum five-foot wide sidewalk. A landscaped parkway should be provided in order to buffer pedestrians from the adjacent street. In order to prioritize pedestrians in the study area, sidewalks should be delineated through access driveways. Redevelopment should incorporate new sidewalk installation at gap locations. In addition to new sidewalk, site design should consider opportunities for pedestrian accommodations, including sidewalk connections between the public sidewalk and the commercial or mixed-use development and outdoor seating areas or amenitized public places (e.g., parks, open spaces, plazas, courtyards, streetscape, etc.). Buildings should be positioned to define the street edge and incorporate pedestrian-scaled architectural details in order to enhance pedestrian safety and comfort. Pedestrian improvements should also be provided at key intersections within the study area in order to enhance mobility, safety, and comfort. A summary of the pedestrian improvements identified for intersections within the study area are summarized in the following sections: Transportation & Infrastructure Plan 53DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 61 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Main Street / Easton Avenue This intersection will continue to serve as a key gateway to the Prairie View area. Based on its adjacency to the Metra Station and close proximity to the residential and commercial uses planned in the area, striped crosswalks should be provided on both the north and south legs of Main Street at its intersection with Easton Avenue. In tandem with the crosswalks, a curb bump-out should be provided on the eastside of the street in order to reduce the crossing distance and improve visibility between pedestrians and motorists. The curb bump-out introduces an opportunity to provide a landscaped area further enhancing this intersection as a gateway. Additional intersection improvements include raising the intersection to slow traffic and emphasize the pedestrian environment and to incorporate an enhanced intersection paving treatment that improves the character, differentiates the intersections as a focal point, and contributes to the gateway opportunity. A summary of the recommended improvements is highlighted in the adjacent graphic. () 54 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 62 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Prairie Road / Port Clinton Road A striped crosswalk is recommended on Prairie Road at its intersection with Port Clinton Road. With the shared-use path on the south side of Port Clinton Road, the crosswalk would enhance connectivity and increase motorist awareness of pedestrian and bicyclist activity. Existing utilities on the southwest corner of Prairie Road/Port Clinton Road would require relocation in order to accommodate the sidewalk connection to the crosswalk. Additional crosswalks have been identified for the vicinity of the intersection in order to increase mobility and connectivity for existing and future area residents. A summary of the recommended crosswalk enhancements is depicted in the adjacent graphic. Transportation & Infrastructure Plan 55DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 63 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Half Day Road / Main Street / Prairie Road The southeast quadrant has been identified as a redevelopment opportunity site. In order to facilitate pedestrian connectivity between North Prairie Road and the Prairie View Metra Station and Central Subarea, adding a striped crosswalk is recommended on the east leg of Half Day Road/Main Street/Prairie Road. High- visibility crosswalks are recommended on all four legs of this intersection. Based on the size of this intersection, a channelized island is recommended for the northbound right-turn movement in order to reduce new crosswalk distances and provide a pedestrian refuge area to/from the southeast corner of the intersection. Bicycle Improvements The Village of Buffalo Grove has an extensive bicycle path network. In the vicinity of the study area, existing bicycle paths are provided on Port Clinton Road, Half Day Road, Buffalo Grove Road, Main Street, and Prairie Road. The existing bicycle paths will remain with the proposed improvements to the area. As part of the planned improvements the existing shared-use path on the north segment of Main Street should be extended south to Half Day Road. In addition, a shared-use path should be provided on the south side of Port Clinton Road across the Stancliff Property frontage. In order to facilitate bicycle connectivity to the future redevelopment areas, site design should consider connections to the bicycle network and provide for convenient on-site bicycle parking. 56 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 64 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Lincolnshire Vernon Hills Long Grove Peterson Park Adlai E. Stevenson H.S. School Yard The Arboretum Club In di a n BRANDYWYN LN R D K O ORB L LIM N APP L E H I L L L N MA NL AREI D P N N L EIRIAR PALA ZZO D R CHESTNUT TER D A U L T O N D R N L L LI H E L P PA FOXFORD DR N HOTZ RD R O S L Y N L N N R A L E I G H D R S R D N OSNEVET CREEK BEND DR W H I S P E R I N G O A K S D R EIRIAR P DR C A R L Y L E L N PARK AVE W A T E R B U R Y L N CREEK VIEW DR NL NATSNU D TS TS1 LEE LN TAYLOR CT N W OR N OTS GNIK O R D WEIVREV AVALON CT P R A I R I E R D W HALF DAY RD W PORT CLINTON RD UB LAFF G O EVOR DR N M A I N S T DR EIRIARP N DR EVORG OLAFFUB N W EASTON AVE N M A I N S T 22 22 0 500 1,000250 FeetNorth Legend FUTURE BICYCLE PATH NETWORK Study Area Boundary Municipal Boundary Proposed Roadway Alignment Prairie View Metra Station N Prairie Road Existing Bicycle Path Planned Bicycle Path Planned Shared-Use Path Transportation & Infrastructure Plan 57DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 65 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) ENTRY NODES & GATEWAY Gateways into the Prairie View Station Area communicate to visitors that they have arrived in an environment that values pedestrians and supports a high-quality multi-modal environment. The proposed gateways at the Prairie View Station area are at the following intersections: • W Half Day Road and N Main Street • N Main Street and N Buffalo Grove Road • W Half Day Road Willow Parkway These intersections are considered entry points into Prairie View. Smaller, neighborhood-scale retail/commercial development is proposed along N Main Street with a transition into more residential land uses at W Easton Avenue and W Brockman Avenue. Gateway signage should be designed to provide a sense of arrival and sense of place. WAYFINDING A legible environment helps orient travelers and communicates organization and structure in Prairie View. Wayfinding includes environmental signage and cues in the physical design of the public realm that support users comfortable navigation of a specific place. In addition, the road design helps travelers navigate through the different land uses to support ease of circulation. Public art can be installed at key locations to give residents and visitors orientation and educational information about their location relative to the Prairie View Station Area. Wayfinding signage can be installed at appropriate locations within and around Prairie View, in coordination with gateway signage, to communicate major destinations to travelers, parking lots, bicycle routes, and trails nearby. The wayfinding signage should conform to a uniform design standard. Wayfinding best practices include: •Provide a minimum amount of information on a sign. •Mapping on the sign should be simplified. •Present information logically. •Use fonts and graphic elements that are easy to read. Bold colors and simple text are encouraged. •Place so the view of the sign is not obstructed by other elements. •Be sure that signs are mounted, they have font sizes and information that are appropriate to the mounting height. •Locate signs ahead of where turns need to be made. •The overall system must be cohesive. Source: City of Madras & brewpublic.com Source: Flickr | Jimmy Emerson, DVM Source: https://bestoklahomahomes.com Source: Flickr / Robb Edge Source: Flickr / Amy Smith Source: Corbin Designs 58 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 66 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Lincolnshire Vernon Hills Long Grove Peterson Park Adlai E. Stevenson H.S. School Yard The Arboretum Club India n C r e e k BRANDYWYN LN MI L L B R O O K D R N A P P L E H I L L L N MA D I E R A L N N P R A I R I E L N PA L A Z Z O D R CHESTNUT TER DAU L T O N D R AP P L E H I L L L N FOXFORD DR N H O T Z R D R O S L Y N L N N R A L E I G H D R ST E V E N S O N D R W HALF DAY CREEK BEND DR W H I S P E R I N G O A K S D R PR A I R I E R D C A R L Y L E L N PARK AVE W A T E R B U R Y L N CREEK VIEW DR DU N S T A N L N 1S T S T LEE LN TAYLOR CT N K I N G S T O N R O W OV E R V I E W D R AVALON CT P R A I R I E R D W HALF DAY RD W PORT CLINTON RD BU F F A L O G R O V E R D N M A I N S T N P R A I R I E R D N B U F F A L O G R O V E R D W EASTON AVE N M A I N S T 22 22 0 500 1,000250 FeetNorth Legend Study Area Boundary Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Boundary Prairie View Metra Station North Subarea Central Subarea South Subarea Gateway Signage Wayfinding GATEWAY & WAYFINDING Transportation & Infrastructure Plan 59DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 67 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) INFRASTRUCTURE The Village currently operates and maintains a vast network of public infrastructure, including stormwater, utilities, roadways, and sidewalks. In order to accommodate the future (re)development opportunities identified for the Prairie View Station Area, the existing infrastructure network will be expanded. A comprehensive plan to address future infrastructure construction, operation, and maintenance is recommended. A comprehensive plan will 1) provide for a connected system; 2) minimize disruptions to existing residents and commuters; and 3) optimize use of Village funds for capital improvements, operations, and maintenance. Stormwater Future (re)development in the Prairie View Station Area will be subject to the Village of Buffalo Grove Development Ordinance and the Lake County Watershed Development Ordinance. Based on a review of topographical data available from Lake County, potential areas to be allocated for stormwater management have been incorporated into the concept plans for the Central Subarea, North Subarea, and South Subarea. The specific dimensions and design details for the stormwater management facilities will be subject to Village review as part of the (re)development plan. Maintenance of the future public stormwater infrastructure is anticipated to be managed through the Village’s Stormwater Management System. Under the Stormwater Management System (effective January 1, 2016), the Village would collect a bi-monthly Stormwater Utility Fee. The fee is based on the parcel size, land use, impervious area, and the funds required to maintain and update the stormwater infrastructure. Through this system, the Village would operate and maintain existing and future stormwater infrastructure including, but not limited to, storm drains, pipes, ditches, curbs, gutters, culverts and open stream channels. Public Utilities The Village of Buffalo Grove currently operates and maintains the following water and sanitary systems: •136 miles of sanitary sewer pipe, force mains, manholes, catch basins, and inlets •12 sanitary lift stations •Water supply from Lake Michigan, purchased from Evanston and delivered through the Northwest Water Commission •4 emergency back-up aquifer wells As (re)development is proposed within the Prairie View Station Area, the Village will require abatement of existing well(s) and septic systems (as applicable) and connection to the Village’s water and sanitary system. Under the Village’s current practice, the developer would be obligated to extend the water and sanitary mains and provide a service connection(s) to the subject (re)development site. Based on the infrastructure currently available in the Prairie View Station Area, extension of existing water and sanitary mains may be extensive. Phased (re)development may provide for reduced utility extension costs and minimize disturbance to area residents. In order to plan for future (re)development in the Prairie View Station Area, a comprehensive assessment of existing and future water and sanitary sewer capacity is recommended in order to determine future system needs. The analysis of future conditions should reflect the anticipated residential and commercial densities shown on the concept plans prepared for the Central Subarea, North Subarea, and South Subarea. Based on a previous analysis completed in 2006 by Hancock Engineering, sanitary sewer extension is anticipated as follows: •Central Subarea – Extend sanitary sewer on Easton Lane north of Half Day Road and/or the sewer at the intersection of Half Day Road/Willow Parkway •North Subarea – Extend existing sanitary sewer from Roslyn Lane •South Subarea – Extend sanitary sewer from intersection of Prairie Road/Willow Parkway 60 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 68 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Private Utilities As (re)development plans are reviewed for the Prairie View Station Area, the Village should work in coordination with property owners, developers, and utility companies to bury existing overhead utility lines. The Village should continue to review the placement of transformers and switch boxes in order to minimize their appearance. Transportation The existing and future multimodal transportation network will be designed to support the needs of residents, businesses, commuters, and visitors within the Prairie View Station Area. Multimodal improvements identified for the study area are defined earlier in this chapter. Dedication of right-of-way will be required in order to accommodate the future roadways, including but not limited to 1st Avenue and New Street. As (re)development proposals are submitted to the Village, right-of-way dedication should be required in order to complete the 60-foot cross-section where applicable. Installation of the streets, sidewalk, and parkway should be designed and constructed in coordination with public utilities. Implementation Several options exist for infrastructure investments in the Prairie View Station Area. Based on the significant infrastructure needs in the study area, a comprehensive approach to design and construction should be considered as properties are assembled. In order to provide for a comprehensive approach to infrastructure implementation, the following financing options could be considered by the Village: •Impact Fees – An impact fee is a charge assessed by a public agency against new (re)development that generates revenue to fund the master improvements or recover capital costs. •Bonds – A bond may be assessed for future public improvements. Note that the assessment of an impact fee is one way to repay the bond. A bond could also be repaid through implementation of an increased utility fee on a monthly utility bill or through a utility rate increase. •Special Service Area (SSA) – A special service area is a taxing mechanism that can be used to fund a range of infrastructure improvements and services (e.g., storm sewers, sanitary sewers, roadway improvements, sidewalks, curbs, lighting, etc.) in a defined geographic area. •Tax Increment Financing (TIF) – This financing tool allocates future increases in property taxes within a defined area to pay for local capital improvements. All property within the TIF district is subject to the tax based on a common rate. Establishment of a TIF district does not increase property taxes; this tool reallocates how taxes are used. TIF funds may be allocated to public improvements (e.g., roadways, streetscape) and development activity (e.g., property assembly or land acquisition). •Recapture Agreements – Through the use of recapture agreements, the Village could require a developer to pay for the extension of public infrastructure necessary to support the proposed (re)development. If the infrastructure serves additional users associated with the future (re)development of adjacent property, a recapture agreement is executed. Based on the recapture agreement, the developer would be reimbursed for a pro rata portion of the improvement cost. Recapture agreements are an effective tool to manage the overall cost of public infrastructure; however, the upfront cost to the developer may be an obstacle to initiating (re) development within the Prairie View Station Area. Transportation & Infrastructure Plan 61DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 69 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Open Space & Sustainability 5 Sustainable strategies are incorporated in each subarea and project theme to ensure the longevity, health and wellness of Prairie View and its residents. Strategies include social, economic and physical opportunities to lower costs, create value and maintain a high quality of life for residents. Efficient utilization of the area’s resources contributes to the character and identity of Prairie View. Open space is prioritized in greenfield areas, utilized as functional green infrastructure where detention is required, and incorporated into developments as a public space amenity. LANDSCAPE & STREETSCAPE DESIGN STRATEGY Based on the input received throughout the planning process, there is a strong desire to incorporate the natural elements of Prairie View and promote the concept of a conservation community. The landscape and streetscape strategy responds to this desire with the incorporation of landscaped parkways on existing and proposed streets within the Prairie View Metra Station Area. The reduction of curb-cuts provides longer stretches of uninterrupted and planted parkway without impeding vision or safety of travelers. 62 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 70 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Additional street trees can be planted to increase Prairie View’s existing tree canopy and will include both ornamental and shade trees. Integration of green infrastructure projects, such as rain gardens and stormwater planters, can be accommodated as part of the Village’s larger environmental and green infrastructure strategy. Areas of proposed stormwater detention can include additional green infrastructure elements to mitigate runoff and flooding problems as well as incorporating special planting palettes to differentiate these places. Open Space & Sustainable Strategies 63DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 71 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Raingardens Rain gardens, also known as bioretention or bioinfiltration, are designed to divert a portion of the initial runoff from the storm sewer system and allow it to reenter the system through an underdrain or leave the system at a designed infiltration rate. They are shallow depressions with engineered soils and various deep-rooted plantings and usually include an overflow to the storm sewer system. Bioswales Bioswales serve a combination of infiltration and conveyance functions. Unlike traditional drainage swales or ditches, they include significant vegetation as well as engineering soils to slow the conveyance rate of runoff so that some of the runoff can be infiltrated or removed through evapotranspiration prior to entering the storm sewer system. Bioswales fit well in longer, linear spaces. Stormwater Planters Stormwater planters are considered urban rain gardens by the EPA. They include engineered soils and overflow piping systems, but they are designed as streetscape elements. The soil level is lower than the sidewalk and street curb so that runoff can be collected and detained in the planter. GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE TOOLS Green infrastructure tools assist with stormwater management by slowing the rate of runoff into the stormwater sewer system as well as contributing to improved water quality through natural filtration of runoff. Rain gardens, bioswales, stormwater planters, water harvesting, and permeable pavement are the possible green infrastructure tools identified in this Plan. Other tools may be selected in the future as conditions and needs change. The tools vary in their purpose, design, requirements, and costs. Parameters that need to be considered when choosing the appropriate tool include: Source: Flickr/Center for Neighborhood TechnologySource: Flickr/cara ruppertSource: Flickr/MSU Infrastructure Planning and Facilities Facility Information Services 64 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 72 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Permeable Pavers Permeable pavement allows infiltration of rainwater through the pavement. This lowers the amount of runoff that is delivered to the storm sewer system. Permeable pavement can include paver systems, porous asphalt, or pervious concrete. Water Harvesting Water harvesting practices promote productive reuse of rainwater by capturing and storing rainwater on- site for a variety of uses, such as toilet flushing and irrigation. Water harvesting can be achieved by either downspout disconnection or installing rain barrels. The former involves diverting runoff from the roof to on to the property’s yard for irrigation. The latter involves capturing and storing rainwater Tree Planting Tree planting provides a multitude of benefits, in terms of both a tree-by-tree basis and of larger scale like an urban tree forest. Trees assist in reducing stormwater runoff by intercepting rainfall and help soil better store rainwater. It also can assist in groundwater recharge. When trees are properly placed, they can provide shade, which helps reduce energy consumption to cool a home, and they can block winds that increase the need for indoor heating. Trees are vital carbon sinks, absorbing carbon dioxide and air pollutants. Source: Flickr/Stanley ZimnySource: Flickr/Craig TSource: Flickr/Philadelphia Water Department Open Space & Sustainable Strategies 65DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 73 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Implementation 6 To implement the Vision set forth in the Plan, the Village should undertake the following recommendations and action steps. These recommendations and action steps can be grouped under four main categories: •Village Commitment •Leverage Market Opportunities •Create a Neighborhood Identity and Brand •Enhance Sustainability and Quality of Life VILLAGE COMMITMENT The Village of Buffalo Grove should provide its commitment and support to the Plan by undertaking regulatory, communication, and planning initiatives as well as anticipate and support infrastructure improvements that create an enhanced network throughout the Prairie View Metra Station Area. 66 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 74 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Recommendation 1: Continue to engage with the Buffalo Grove community, property owners, and other stakeholders about the Plan. Action Steps: A. Make the plan available online and advertise the availability and contact information of Village staff to address questions and comments. B. Meet with residents, businesses, key property owners, Vernon Township, Metra, Lake County, institutions, and others in the Prairie View Area to review the Plan, discuss future improvements, considerations, and work together for a shared future. Recommendation 2: Integrate the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan into long-term planning documents including the comprehensive plan and the Lincolnshire/Buffalo Grove Boundary Agreement. Action Steps: A. Amend Buffalo Grove’s current Comprehensive Plan (2009) with the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan. B. Integrate the Prairie View Metra Station Area Plan as part of the forthcoming Comprehensive Plan and establish the Prairie View Metra Station Area as one of the several key sub-areas in the community. C. Revisit the Lincolnshire/Buffalo Grove Boundary Agreement with the Village of Lincolnshire and update the agreement to reflect the vision set forth in the Plan. Recommendation 3: Explore policies to support and advance future annexation opportunities. Action Steps: A. Identify and prioritize development sites that can encourage the extension of utilities to help reduce the utility connections for existing residential parcels. B. Promote the expansion of Village utilities to encourage annexation into the Village. Explore tools such as special service areas to help offset the costs of extending utilities into the unincorporated areas. C. Determine alternate sites for existing businesses that may want to relocate to other locations in the nearby area Fiscal Impact 67DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 75 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Recommendation 4: Explore amending zoning and associated building and design regulations to help achieve the vision. Action Steps: A. Consider amendments to the zoning ordinance or utilize existing zoning tools to help implement the Vision. Specific actions may include: A1. Considering a form-based code or form-based elements. A2. Introducing overlay zones and/or creating a better defined Planned Unit of Development (PUD). A3. Incorporating multi-generational housing elements such as accessory dwelling units as well as aging in place. B. Align vision with current parking standards. Specific actions may include: B1. Evaluate and potentially modify parking minimum requirements to align with the Plan. B2. Partner with Vernon Township to explore potential shared parking opportunities the Prairie View Metra Station. B3. Identify opportunities for complementary or alternate uses of the commuter parking lots during non-peak commuter periods (e.g., farmer’s market, neighborhood festival, shared parking for nearby restaurants and businesses). C. Review and potentially modify the sign code to ensure consistency with the Plan. Recommendation 5: Support an improved road network. Action Steps: A. Review development and redevelopment plans for the inclusion of an improved road network consistent with the Plan. B. Explore jurisdictional options for the ownership. C. Ensure future development provides the necessary right-of- way (ROW) dedication needed to accommodate for future improvements. D. Monitor changes in emerging technology, policy, and requirements related to autonomous vehicles and use of shared mobility options to inform design of (re)development and both public and private infrastructure. Recommendation 6: Plan and Budget for Capital Improvements. Action Steps: A. Modify and update, as needed, the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to reflect infrastructure needs as outlined in the Plan. B. Perform financial analysis to determine potential options for funding improvements. Options may include but not exclusive to pay- as-you go, debt financing, payment-in-kind. 68 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 76 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) LEVERAGE MARKET OPPORTUNITIES The Village of Buffalo Grove should leverage market opportunities to spur development/redevelopment within the Station Area Plan that aligns with the Plan. Recommendation 7: Communicate and market the Plan to the development community to convey Buffalo Grove’s vision and commitment to the area’s future. Action Steps: A. Continue to meet with those interested in selling and redeveloping the properties in the area and present and discuss the Plan. B. Target brokers and other representatives who could best understand and deliver the character and residential and retail needs unique to this area. Look to attract neighborhood-scaled commercial and retail uses. C. Showcase the Plan at developer industry events. Recommendation 8: Explore Economic Development Incentives. Development/redevelopment sites may have challenges that require economic development incentives to encourage development based upon fiscal impact and return on investment analyses. If appropriate, Buffalo Grove should explore such opportunities and size them appropriately. A list of common economic development incentive tools includes: Common Economic Development Incentives •Tax-Increment Financing (TIF) District •Special Service Area (SSA) •Business District (BD) •Property Tax Abatement •Sales-Tax Sharing Action Steps: A. Evaluate the need and potential for economic development incentives to facilitate projects that implement the vision and ensure market competitiveness. B. Consider conducting feasibility studies for specific economic development tools including but not limited to Tax-Increment Financing (TIF) District and/or Business District. C. Establish a team that would include legal, financial, and development specializations to carry out the evaluation and development (if needed) of incentives. Recommendation 9: Target retail and restaurant businesses and other services that are compatible with the vision for Prairie View Area and are suitable for its market. Action Steps: A. Target retail and restaurant neighborhood businesses that are oriented towards commuter and residential needs as well as destination businesses. Potential niches could be towards health and fitness – particularly women-focused wellness, specialty foods, local food incubators, as well as other drinks and food establishments. B. Work collaboratively with neighborhood businesses on leveraging existing assets such as nearby Stevenson High School, which allows open campus during lunch hours for upper grades and is an employment center. Fiscal Impact 69DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 77 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) CREATE NEIGHBORHOOD IDENTITY AND BRAND Create an authentic identity and brand for the area that reflects the history, character and uses in the area. Recommendation 10: Draw upon the area’s history to help establish an identity and “sense of place.” Action Steps: A. Explore retaining existing buildings such as the Westminster Reformed Presbyterian Church and former Vernon Legion Post 1247 Building. B. Utilize the historical architecture as an inspiration for design and character for future buildings and development, wayfinding, and branding. C. Consider providing an indoor or outdoor dedicated space that would be devoted to showcasing the Prairie View’s history. Recommendation 11: Create a Prominent Unified Streetscape and Design. Action Steps: A. Explore developing unified design criteria for the area and incorporating the recommendations into Buffalo Grove’s Appearance Plan. This should include design guidelines illustrating the Village’s desired architectural characteristics of non-residential and residential buildings which can be inspired by the area’s historical buildings. B. Review the future plans for the inclusion of landscaping, lighting, benches, gateway signage, and wayfinding signage that provide a unified design. Recommendation 12: Incorporate civic, community, institutional and art in spaces that can enhance the identity and local culture of the Prairie View Metra Station Area. Action Steps: A. Work with Stevenson High School on utilizing space in the Prairie View Area for academic, extracurricular, and/or administrative purposes. B. Collaborate with Buffalo Grove Park District and Vernon Township to program and activate open spaces and plazas. C. Explore opportunities to display public art to help activate public spaces through collaboration with local partners. Recommendation 13: Establish a Brand for the Prairie View Metra Station Area. Action Steps: A. Develop a brand for the Corridor that would represent its uses and importance to the Village. B. Integrate this brand throughout the Corridor especially in signage and other gateway features a well as in marketing materials. 70 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 78 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) ENHANCE SUSTAINABILITY AND QUALITY OF LIFE The Village of Buffalo Grove should look to promote sustainability and quality of life in the Prairie View Area. Recommendation 14: Enhance the Area’s Walkability. Action Steps: A. Review all future plans for an inclusion of a comprehensive sidewalk/pedestrian path system that connects to the surrounding neighborhoods and the Village’s larger sidewalk network. B. Develop a unified streetscape treatment within the Corridor consisting of evenly spaced right-of-way trees, pedestrian scale lighting, shrubbery and hedges, flower beds, way-finding signage, and other pedestrian- oriented improvements. C. Strengthen and enhance crosswalks throughout the area to improve pedestrian orientation and safety. D. Emphasize active transportation and transit-supportive design as part of Village review of future (re)development concept plans (e.g., curbside designations, pedestrian-scale character.) Recommendation 15: Improve Bicycle Accessibility. Action Steps: A. Ensure all proposed plans complete the existing bicycle network in the Prairie View Metra Station Area and connect with larger existing bicycle networks, parking, and other infrastructure. B. Provide appropriate signage and maps to for trail connections and networks. Recommendation 16: Collaborate with partners on improving the Metra North Central Service (NCS) line’s ridership and frequency of service. Action Steps: A. Continue to serve on the Steering Committee for the RTA Community Planning Program North Central Service Corridor Analysis and Implementation Plan. This Plan, which is guided by a steering committee of municipalities along the NCS line, aims to identify the major investments needed to accommodate more service along the NCS line. B. Educate businesses and residents about transportation connections from the Prairie View Metra Train to places of residence or employment, which includes shuttle services such as Transportation Management Association of Lake-Cook Shuttle Bug, Chariot Shuttle as well as carpooling options such as SPLT and Pace Vanpool. Recommendation 17: Optimize open space opportunities as they arise. Action Steps: A. As redevelopment and development occurs, look for development plans to provide open space, in large open parks, tot lots, small plazas, and/or other types of open space. B. Work collaboratively with partners such as Vernon Township, Buffalo Grove Park District, and Stevenson High School, on ideas for shared open spaces and programming. Recommendation 18: Encourage sustainable development, stormwater management and other best practices. Action Steps: A. Promote energy efficiency programs such as Illinois Homeowner Performance with ENERGY STAR and Come Ed’s Net Metering. B. Encourage green infrastructure as a strategy for stormwater management with a focus on detention areas, parks, and right of way plantings. C. Select a landscaping and planting palette that is representative of plant types that thrive in the Midwest and are low-maintenance. Fiscal Impact 71DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 79 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) VILLAGE COMMITMENT ENHANCE SUSTAINABILITY AND QUALITY OF LIFE LEVERAGE MARKET OPPORTUNITIES CREATE A NEIGHBORHOOD IDENTITY AND BRAND •Engage Community and Property Owners •Amend Comprehensive Plan and Boundary Agreement •Support Future Annexation •Amend Zoning Regulations •Improve Road Network •Capital Improvement Planning •Enhance Street Grid •Market Plan •Explore Incentives •Target compatible businesses •Expand Walkability •Improve Bicycle Accessibility •Collaborate to improve Metra Train Service •Optimize open space •Encourage sustainable practices •Create Unified Streetscape and Building Design •Incorporate Civic, Community, and Art Uses •Establish Brand 72 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 80 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) This page is intentionally left blank. Fiscal Impact 73DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 81 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Appendices A Architectural Typology Analysis 71 Steering Committee (August 2, 2018) Meeting Summary 77 Workshop 1 Summary 83 Steering Committee / Kick-Off (April 12, 2018) Meeting Summary 89 74 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 82 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) TYPOLOGY #1: THE AMERICAN FOURSQUARE Location: Zone 5 Uses: Residential, Commercial FEATURES The American Foursquare is one of the most dominant styles of home from the early 20th century. These homes feature a compact, square plan, are two-and-a-half stories in height, and topped with a simple roof accentuated by a central dormer. These houses developed in reaction to the overly ornate Victorian homes of the late 1800s and escew excess detail in favor of handcrafted “craftsman” woodwork. Years Constructed: circa 1890 - 1930 Construction Type: Wood Framed or Brick Exterior Materials: Wood Siding, Brick or Stucco Use: Single Family Residential, later Commercial Height: Two and a half Stories Parking: One-Two Cars, Detached, in rear (potentially added later) Special Features: Front Porch (potentially enclosed for addition) Hip Roof Punched Windows Center Dormer Front Porch Raised Entry Wood Siding, Brick or Stucco 4 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review Architectural Typology Analysis Appendices 75DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 83 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) TYPOLOGY #2: POST-WAR BUILDING BOOM Location: Zone 4 Uses: Residential FEATURES The suburban building boom following World War II established the ranch-style house, and its variants the Raised Ranch and Split-Level as the dominant housing styles of the latter half of the 20th century. Its long, low profile reflected American desires for wide-open spaces, with an open layout that embraces a more informal living style. The “model home” design method allowed for rapid construction to suit soaring demand. Years Constructed: circa 1940s - 1970s Construction Type: Wood Framed Exterior Materials: Limited Brick, Wood or Aluminum Siding Use: Single Family Residential Height: One Story, One-and-a Half Stories Parking: One-Two Cars, Attached, in Front / Detached, in Rear Special Features: Raised Ranch / Split Level allowed for large windows into basement levels, Bay Windows, Picture Windows Gabled Roof Attached Garage Picture Window Level Entry One-and-a-Half Stories Punched Windows with Faux Shutters Limited Brick Wood or Alum Siding Architectural Typologies Report 5DRAFT For Review 76 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 84 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) TYPOLOGY #2: POST-WAR BUILDING BOOM Location: Zone 4 Uses: Residential FEATURES The suburban building boom following World War II established the ranch-style house, and its variants the Raised Ranch and Split-Level as the dominant housing styles of the latter half of the 20th century. Its long, low profile reflected American desires for wide-open spaces, with an open layout that embraces a more informal living style. The “model home” design method allowed for rapid construction to suit soaring demand. Years Constructed: circa 1940s - 1970s Construction Type: Wood Framed Exterior Materials: Limited Brick, Wood or Aluminum Siding Use: Single Family Residential Height: One Story, One-and-a Half Stories Parking: One-Two Cars, Attached, in Front / Detached, in Rear Special Features: Raised Ranch / Split Level allowed for large windows into basement levels, Bay Windows, Picture Windows Gabled Roof Attached Garage Picture Window Level Entry One-and-a-Half Stories Punched Windows with Faux Shutters Limited Brick Wood or Alum Siding Architectural Typologies Report 5DRAFT For Review Appendices 77DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 85 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) TYPOLOGY #3: LATE 20TH CENTURY SINGLE FAMILY HOME Locations: Zone 1. Zone 3 Uses: Residential FEATURES Towards the end of the 20st century and into the 21st century, residential construction turned toward a contemporary version of American Revivalism known as Neo-Eclecticism. These homes combine a wide array of decorative techniques from an assortment of traditional styles, resulting in a more complex aesthetic than the simple post-war residence. Much of the revivalist elements are exclusively decorative, while the informal, casual interiors and construction methods of the American Ranch remain. Highly pitched, complex roofs often combine a variety of styles and features including gables, hips, dormers, and special accents. Years Constructed: circa 1980s - 2000s Construction Type: Wood Framed Exterior Materials: Brick, Stone, Vinyl Siding, EIFS Use: Single Family Residential Height: One - Two Stories Parking: Two-Three Cars, Attached, Front or Side Special Features: Complex Rooflines, Dormers, Prominent Entrance Multi-Gabled Roof Front-loaded Multi-Story Entry Bay Window Faux Shutters Large Windows 6 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 78 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 86 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) TYPOLOGY #4: 21ST CENTURY PAIRED HOME Locations: Zone 6 Uses: Residential FEATURES The 21st Century has seen a revision on the Neo-Eclectic Single Family Home that focuses on smaller living and reduced maintenance, popular with both “Empty Nest”-ers and young families with fewer children. Many of the styles and features of the larger sibling remain, but with two units combined into a single structure, separated by a party wall. Smaller lot sizes over increased density and walkability, with less lawn area to maintain. Often part of a larger planned development, greater aesthetic harmony exists across several homes Years Constructed: circa 2000s Construction Type: Wood Framed Exterior Materials: Brick, Stone, Vinyl Siding, EIFS Use: Multi-Family Residential Height: One - Two Stories Parking: Four Cars, Attached, Front (2 per unit) Special Features: Complex Rooflines, Dormers, Prominent Entrance Complex Rooflines Defined Entrance Large Windows Hip Roof Cross Gable Front-loaded Architectural Typologies Report 7DRAFT For Review Appendices 79DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 87 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) TYPOLOGY #5: NEW URBANIST TOWNHOME Locations: Zone 2 Uses: Residential FEATURES Continuing the trend towards denser living and less emphasis on the automobile, this model crafts a next iteration of the 21st century duplex, combining 5-6 units into a single structure. Parking is moved to the rear of the house, offering a more traditional curb appear less dominated by the car. Arranged to emphasis walkability, the houses are sited closer to the street, and consistent aesthetics across entire neighborhoods offers a picturesque, traditional scene. Years Constructed: circa 2010s Construction Type: Wood Framed Exterior Materials: Brick, Stone, Vinyl Siding, EIFS Use: Multi-Family Residential Height: One - Two Stories Parking: Two Cars, Attached, Rear Special Features: Rear patio framed by attached garages, visual consistency. Complex Rooflines Defined Entrance with Front Porch Large Windows Rear-loaded 8 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 80 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 88 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e )      |||                                                        Steering Committee (August 2, 2018) Meeting Summary Appendices 81DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 89 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e )                                                         82 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 90 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e )      Appendices 83DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 91 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e )     84 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 92 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) MEETING SUMMARY Architecture Preservation Interior Design Landscape Architecture Urban Planning & Design RATIO Architects, Inc. RATIOdesign.com 30 West Monroe Street, Suite 500 Chicago, Illinois 60603 312.465.2359 Chicago, IL Indianapolis, IN Champaign, IL Raleigh, NC To: Project Team, Village of Buffalo Grove RATIO Project No.: 18021 Date: May 30, 2018 Subject: Prairie View Metra Station Plan – Public Workshop #1 Outreach Summary On May 10, 2018, the RATIO team and Village of Buffalo Grove planning staff hosted a workshop to solicit public input on the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of the area surrounding the Prairie View Metra Station. This is the first public workshop for the Prairie View Metra Station Plan and was held at the Arboretum Club (401 Half Day Rd, Buffalo Grove, IL 60089). Over 90 participants attended, including: residents, stakeholders, business leaders, Steering Committee members, Village staff, and elected and appointed Village officials. The workshop was structured as an informal interactive event. The workshop consisted of five stations where participants shared their thoughts and opinions during the 2-hour workshop. These stations were designed to optimize input from the public, while gaining meaningful input into preferences and address concerns. The five stations included: •Station 1 – Welcome •Station 2 – Visioning •Station 3 – Be the Planner •Station 4 – Area Destinations •Station 5 – What Makes A Great Place? The results and input gathered from the public pertaining to each station are summarized in the following sections. Station 1 - Welcome The first station included a staffed sign-in and welcome table. Participants then proceeded to watch a brief presentation that was displayed on a monitor. The presentation provided an overview of the planning process and the public workshop, in addition to the purpose of the Prairie View Metra Station Plan. Snacks and refreshments for participants to enjoy were provided. Workshop 1 Meeting Summary Appendices 85DRAFTFor Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 93 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Prairie View Metra Station Plan - Workshop 1 Summary Page 2 May 30, 2018 Station 2 – Visioning The second station was a topical visioning exercise that was designed to create a vision statement for the Station Plan. Participants were engaged in an activity where a series of cards with various images were available at the station for review. Participants picked a card that symbolizes their vision for the Prairie View Metra Station area. After selecting the card, each participant spoke with the facilitator and other participants about their vision for the Prairie View Metra Station area. The consultant staff facilitated this exercise and recorded the results on a flipchart. The bullet points below are the participant’s vision for the Prairie View Metra Station area that were recorded on the flipchart (the numbers next to each vision indicates how many times a vision was repeated by multiple participants): 3 Votes Restaurant Café/Bakery Quaint/charming 2 Votes Smaller scale development / keep area density Add sidewalks Natural landscapes More shops – boutiques (unique) Better train service 1 Vote Add weekend train service Walkable Unique homes Improved streetscape Shopping School capacity Reuse of homes Preserve Prairie View No parking (students) No noxious (industrial) uses No junkyard No condos More parks and gardens 1 Vote, cont. More homeowners More compact Main St. needs traffic-calming Complete the last mile -> train to home Keep SFH in boundary agreement Keep historic homes Inclusive of township Improve traffic flow (Eastbound on Rte 22) Ice cream shop Higher home values Greenery Future focused development Farm to table Family Evaluate historic significance Downtown needed Dark skies Cultural heritage center Creative space Country feel Connect bike paths Capitalize on train commuters Bucolic Best practices Affordable housing ($200k-$300k) 86 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 94 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Prairie View Metra Station Plan - Workshop 1 Summary Page 3 May 30, 2018 Station 3 – Be the Planner The third station invited participants to ‘Be the Planner’ for the Prairie View Metra Station area. A board was provided that showed the study area’s existing conditions. Participants were given foam blocks, which represented potential building massing, and were asked to place the blocks on the board to create their ‘vision’ of what the Prairie View Metra Station area should look like in the future. During the workshop, there were many discussions among participants regarding future (re)development within the study area. The following summarizes the main points gathered from the discussions: •Most of the participants were very vocal about opposition to development around Prairie View. Many pointed out previous plans that didn’t meet with the community’s expectations and ultimately weren’t implemented. •Prairie View has a strong identity within the community however, some participants asked the question “why do we need development or additional amenities here if I can get it in neighboring communities such as Long Grove/Lincolnshire, etc.” •Participants voiced concerns about the impact of additional development on Stevenson school. Over- crowding is perceived to be a problem at Stevenson. New development could increase pressure on this desirable resource. Existing conditions in the Prairie View Station Area •Existing traffic patterns, specifically turning movements, are problematic, particularly during rush hour. •Student traffic in and out of Stevenson creates congestion twice a day. •Neighbors have observed increased cut-through traffic in their neighborhoods from travelers wishing to avoid congestion along major arterials. •Strategies to mitigate traffic around Prairie View have created additional challenges. For example, there is no left turn permitted from Prairie Road to eastbound Half Day Road. •Current parking is a challenge at certain times of day around the Prairie House. Metra Parking is by permit, not available after hours, and participants wondered if this can be improved. What would a future Prairie View look like? •The community’s historic and unique character should remain. However, there were contradicting viewpoints. o Some participants expressed a preference for narrow roads with overhanging trees, without sidewalks. o Some participants believed there could be higher-density development around the rail line. •Main Street has potential to be a more robust commercial corridor with the following elements: o Community amenities o Experiential retail o No chain or franchise establishments o Multi-story mixed-use (not family-residential) o Walkable o Low rise, mixed use o Arts District o Restaurants (some participants asked how many the community and the market can support) o Boutique-scale retail o Experiential retail o Incubator-type commercial o Lower-scale o More affordable than luxury Appendices 87DRAFTFor Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 95 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Prairie View Metra Station Plan - Workshop 1 Summary Page 4 May 30, 2018 •Easton Road could be repositioned as a historic downtown, Long Grove type development. •Farmland should be preserved as open space, not developed. o Community asset Parkland Play fields (can never have too many) •Participants were concerned about potential for increased crime if area becomes more developed. •Need for convenience retail along Prairie Road, south of Half Day Road. •Infill is desired on existing vacant lots however, a substantial increase in density should be avoided. o Intimate scale is preferred o “Norman Rockwell” •Increased rail traffic would be a long-term win, but there are concerns about safety of the rail line. o A grade separation would be ideal o The line is a barrier between west and east Prairie View What are elements that would be positive additions to Prairie View? •An integrated neighborhood-scale park •Walking trails / pedestrian pathways •Skate park •Convenience retail, flower shop,dry cleaners, etc •Hospital or medical office •Larger scale development should be focused along Half Day Road o Scrap yard site could be a site for higher density development with parking to support the Main Street corridor 88 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 96 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Prairie View Metra Station Plan - Workshop 1 Summary Page 5 May 30, 2018 Station 4 – Area Destinations This station involved two maps where participants used colored stickers to identify destinations, gateways, and other important design features on the map. Participants were also asked to identify their homes and places they regularly frequented in the 1-mile radius. One map illustrated a ¼ mile (5-minute walking distance) and the other illustrated a ½ mile (10-minute walking distance) circle around the station area. Both map boundaries reached 1-mile from the station area. Each color sticker represented a theme, as follows: •Yellow: Home •Red: Commercial •Green: Recreational •Light Blue: Institutional The station facilitator asked the participants to write on the maps any other ideas they had that were not necessarily site-specific or represented by the colored stickers. The following graphics show the features the participants identified. Appendices 89DRAFTFor Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 97 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Prairie View Metra Station Plan - Workshop 1 Summary Page 6 May 30, 2018 90 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 98 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Prairie View Metra Station Plan - Workshop 1 Summary Page 7 May 30, 2018 Appendices 91DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 99 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) Prairie View Metra Station Plan - Workshop 1 Summary Page 8 May 30, 2018 Station 5 – What Makes A Great Place? At this station, participants selected words they felt answered the question ‘What Makes a Great Place?’. The station facilitator documented each participant’s selection. Participants were encouraged to write new words if those provided did not capture their vision. The following summary shows the descriptive words that participants selected. The number next to the words indicate the number of times a word was re-selected among different participants. Words with stars (*) are descriptive words written by participants. It should be noted that some of the words participants wrote occurred throughout public workshop. Some participants who completed the exercise earlier may not have seen some of these words. 20 Votes Walkable 15 Votes Family Friendly Dining Options 14 Votes Bike Lanes 10 Votes Festival/Events Accessible 9 Votes Safe/Protected 7 Votes Streetscape Residential Neighborhood Nature Based 6 Votes Recreation Destination 5 Votes Heart of Community Entertainment Diverse 4 Votes Retail District *Rural 3 Votes Multi-Generational Cultural Heritage Celebrate History 2 Votes *Was Affordable *Separated *Quaint *More Metra Service *Lower Taxes *It Was A Community with Roots *Better infrastructure (roadways) 1 Vote *Downsizing in the area Vibrant Public Art Convenient *Quiet *Park *Less Rules *Housing for Senior *Dark Skies 92 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 100 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e )      |||                                                                                            Steering Committee / Kick-Off Meeting (April 12, 2018) Meeting Summary Appendices 93DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 101 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e )                                                                                                            94 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 102 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e )                        •                                     •                                 •        Appendices 95DRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 103 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e )                                                                                  96 Prairie View Metra Station Area PlanDRAFT For Review 2.1.b Packet Pg. 104 At t a c h m e n t : D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) LINK TO THE DRAFT PLAN CAN BE FOUND BY CLICKING BELOW: Draft Prairie View Station Area Plan (Please note that this link is being hosted on an external website. If you are having issues viewing, please contact Community Development staff at 847-459-2530) 2.1.c Packet Pg. 105 At t a c h m e n t : L i n k t o D r a f t P l a n ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) I2 I2 B U S C H P K W Y G AIL D R J O H N S O N D R ASBURY DR LEIDER LN ALDEN LN N PRA IRIE RD PENNY LN N M A I N S T LAKE BLVD DEERFIELD PKWY LYON DR HASTINGS DR PAT TON DR N BUFFALO GROVE RD ROSE BLVD WYNGATE LN WEIDNER RD SELWYN LN COMMERCE CT MAPLE DR OLD CHECKER RD N IL ROUTE 83 PARKER LN A R B O R G A T E L N W HALF DAY RD DIANEDR IL ROUTE 22 CHECKER DR ESTONIAN LN JOEL L N RACHEL LN R I V E R W ALK DR BARCLAY BLVD CORPORATE GROVE DR W IL ROUTE 22 W BOEGER DR DUNHILL DR W DUNDEE RD N WEILAND RD GREGGLN RONNIE DR HOBSON DR S P RIN G SID E L N ACACIA TER PARK PL THORNDAL E D R TIMBERHILLRD C A S T L E W O O D L N CHATHAM CIR C H U R C H R D LAUREN LN CROFTON LN BELMAR LN CLOHESEY DR R A U P P B L V D L E H I G H L N W I N S T O N D R WOODHOLLOW LN ESSINGTON LN LIN COLN TE R INDIAN SPRING LN BELAIRE DR GLENDALE RD CHAUCER WAY D U N H A M L N B U R N T E M B E R L N HORATIOBLV D GREEN KNOLLS DR V I N T A G E L N ANTHONY RD INDIAN HILLS DR A B B O T T C T UNIVERSITY DR C O U R T LAND DR A S P E N D R NEWTOWN DR COLLEGE DR FOREST PL DOWNING RD O LDOAKDR N PET LN NEWFIELDDR B O X W O O D L N BAYBERRY DR W FABISH DR HICKORY DR REGENT DR CHEVY CHAS E D R ARMSTRONG DR FOXFORD DR CHESTNUTTER B U F FA L O G R O V E R D VILLA VERDE DR ROSEWOOD AVE B U R G E S S C I R F A I R F A X L N JORDAN TER MIRAMAR LN MARSEIL L E S C I R NA V A J O T R L CO UNTRYLN ME LIN DA LN WHITEHALL DR HIAWATHA DR SILVER ROCK LN STANFORD LN LASALLE LN PRAIRIE LN HILLDALE LN W A T E R B U R Y L N ESTATE DR C A R L Y LE LN LAMONT TER D O R N C LIF F L N LIN D EN AV E COUNTRYSIDE DR L E P A R C C I R WINDBR O O K E D R GREENRIDGE RD S N AVA J O T R L COVENTRY LN S A R A T O G A L N W E S T B O U R N E L N BLUE ASH DR KINGSBRIDGE WAY W PORT CLINTON RD F O RESTWAYDR STONEGATE RD JOSEPH CT WHITNEY LN KIN G ST O N DR P R A G U E A V E WRIGHT BLVD RIDGEFIELDLN LEXINGTON DR 1ST ST RAPHAEL AVE CROWN POINT DR COPPERWOOD DR GROVE DR T W IS T E D O A K L N BIRCHWOOD LN WESTCHESTER RD BRADLEY RD DOGW O O D T ER DEVONSHIRE RD E UNIVERSITY DR S T O N E B R I D G E L N B E R N A R D D R TAYLOR CT E COUNT RY LN TRINITY CT R O S L Y N L N E STEEPLEDR LARRAWAYDR TWIN OAK S B L V D ALSACE CIR WHITEHALL CT C R E S T VIE W T E R PLU M G R OVE CIR MAYFAIR LN MARVINS WAY N R I V E R W A L K D R MA CART HUR DR N ROAD W A Y L N DANNET RD WAKEFIELD LN H E A T H E R D O W N WAY TERRACE PL SANDHURST DR P I N E H URSTLN WOODSTONE DR SYCAMORE RD ME RIDIAN WAY RIDGEWOOD LN S H A D Y G R O VE L N M I L LERLN F R A N K L I N L N CEDARCTS MARQUETTE PL HIDDEN LAKE DR N WILLIAM AVE C H E R R Y W OOD RD K E N T L N FARRINGTON CT HIGHLAND GR OVE DR OX FORD DR BUCKINGHAM LN KATHERINE CT SUSSEX CT BANK LN E D G E M E R E RD LY O N C T I N D I A N HIL L D R LIVE O A K L N T H O R N T O N L N ASPEN CT BE ECHWOODRD SAINT MARY'S PKWY HAPSFIELD LN WOODRIDGE LN MARGATE DR N HORATIO BLVD C O L U M B U S P K W Y N FLORENCE AVE W ARLYD RD HARVARD LN ROSE C T E LARCHMONT DR D O V E R C T H O LL Y S T O N E L N CHATEAU DR OLD BARN RD COBBLESTONEL N SAYBROOK LN MARYLU LN N ELIZ ABETH AVE WHISPE R I N G O A K S D R THOMPSON BLVD RAYMOND RD DAYTON RD KRAUSE DR THORNWOOD DR MIDDLESEX CT SAXON PL RED BUD PL CHICORY LN CAMERON WAY OLD WEILAND RD GOL FVIEWTER C I R C L E D R C H A P E L O A K S D R M A N C H E S TERDR W CA N T E R B U RYLN PAULINE AVE FREMONT WAY CAMBRIDGE DR F ABISHCT OL D B ARN CT INDIAN CREEK DR COVINGTON TER L A K E V I E W D R PALMGREN CT LE JARDIN CT L O N G WOODDR DUNSTAN LN LOGSDON LN IVY HALL LN SUNRIDGE LN ARBOR CT CLARET DR M A N O R D R L A S A L L E CT KNOLLWOOD DR ETON CT EVERGREEN PL N EASTON AVE CHARLES CT ROSE CT W C U MBERLAND LN ABERDEENLN PINETRE E CIR N BLAC K T H O R N D R PA RK VIEW TER BUCKTHORN TER C H ENAULT RD MOHAWK C T C A R R Y L N ACACIACTS OLIVEHILL D R WHI T E O A K L N FO X CT W W I L L O W P K W Y EASTWOOD LN CHASE CT AMHERST CT M A D I SON CT N BEDFORD CT A C ORNPL J A C OBS CT N E W G A T E C T PROVIDENCE LN SATINWOOD T ER OLDMCHENRY R D JERSEY CT S U M M E R C T T W IN OAKS CT O RCH A R D L N B I R C H W OODCTN AVALON CT S LEE CT DARTMOUTH LN L UCINDA D R TOWNPLACE CIR COOPER CT C A R L Y LECT BENTLEYPL PIN ETREECIRS LONDON C T FOX CT E BA N Y A N TREELN BRUNSWICK DR C Y PRESSCT CHEST N U T C T W DUNDEE PKWY WE D G E WOODCT T HIS T L E CT OLD ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD S T A N T O N CT E MAGNOLIA C T E S T I L LW E L L D R ANDER S O N L N CROWNPOINTC T VERNON CT BERKLEY CT W DEPOT PL DE V O N W OO D C T SILVER L I N DENLN CT PARKSIDE DR BRITTANY LN L A W N CT KE N DALL C T WOODBURY RD B U N E S C U L N CLOVERDALE CT CAMDEN CT MAGNOLIA CT W B O RDEAUX CT W HICKORY AVE O L D A R L I N G T O N C T CAREN CT AVALON CT N RAINTREE CT FARNSWORTH LN WINDINGOAKLN A U T U M N C T HILL CT W C T S NEWPORT CT SANDHURS T C T C H E L S E Y S T SHERIDANCT A S H LA N D C T S T A N TO N CT W OAKCREE K D R W POPE BLVD BEECHWO O D C T W COTTONWOODRD BANBURY LN VILLAGE CT D ELL M O NT C T CT EUCLID CT F A R R I N G T O N D R S A T I N W O O D C T S PINYON P I N E C T N 3 T WILIG HT PASS S P RIN G SID E C T QUAKERHOLLOW CTS WAKEFIELD CT CT E DANNE T C T BRUCEWOOD DR FERNDAL E CT DAYTON CT P O R T CLINTO N C T W I N V E R R A R Y L N WIND W O O D C T CTW NORTHGATE PKWY M O R NING S I D E L N E C T W W H I S P E R I N G OAKS CT LOCKWOOD CT W S W E LLINGTONCT WHITEB R A N C H C T BORDEAUX CTE C T WILSHIRECT FRANCES CT H A Z E L W O O D T E R HARVEST CIR CT CHERBOURG DR HERITAGE PL CT 14 HACKBERR Y C T W O L D P O S T D R CT D A Y B R EAKTER C T EDENVALE DR INDIAN CREEK CT NE WFIELD CT ENGLISH O A K T E R CARLTON PL T R E E F A RM CT 5 C R A B A P P L E T E R C T DEVLIN RD MAYFLOWER CT E WEIDNER CT MAYFLOWER CT W C T N 20 CT 18 ACACIA CT N C T S KNOLLWOOD CT S THOMPSON CT 4 KNOLLWOOD CT N C T C E D A R C T N N M I L W A U K E E A V E C T E 22 MIRAMAR CT CT T O W N P L A C E P K W Y C T E CT 21 P I N Y O N P I N E C T S CT S C O M M O N W A Y CT N S C O T T I S H P I N E C T H A R RIS CT B R A N D Y W Y N C T N CHESTNUT CT E 9 C T P O RT C L I N T O N C T E C T E C T 2 CT CU MBERLAND CT CT S N B U F F A L O G R O V E R D INVERRARY LN LAKE COOK RD S H AMBLISS LN MISTY WOODS RD THOMPSONBLVD NEWGATE CT N BUFFALO GROVE RD N IL R O UTE 83 J O H N S O N D R BARCLAY BLVD JOHNSON DR GLEN D A LERD N WEILAND RD ARLINGTON HTS RD JOHNSON DR CARRIAGEWAY DR W H I T E P I N E R D WOODSTONEDR B R I S TO L LN F REMONTWAY CAREN D R CHECKER DR W DUNDEE RD AVALON DR W NICHOLS RD N B U F F A L O G R O V E R D JOHNSON DR RIVER OAKS CIR E INVERRARY LN JOHNSON DR CT INVERRARY LN LOCKWOOD DR D U N H ILL DR L A K E C O O K R D V E R N O N L N A C A C I A TER ARLINGTON HTS RD BUSCH PKWY SATINW OOD T E R MILL CREEK DR MILL CREEK D R D E E R F I ELD PKWY KNOLLWOOD DR N BUFFALO GROVE RD BERNARD DR W APTAKISIC RD M A DISON DR BARCLAY BLVD INVERRARY LN JOHNSON DR CHEVYCHASEDR HIGHLAN D G R O V E D R LN C A R L Y L E L N OLIVE HILL DR FRANKLINLN ACA CI A T E R INVERRARY LN THOMPSON BLVD W APTAKISIC RD OL D C H E C K E R R D N BUFFALO GROVE RD W PORT CLINTON RD N I L R O U T E 8 3 JOHNSON DR DEERFIELD PKWY F R E M O N T W A Y B E V ERLYLN FOREST P L VINTAGE LN BR A N D Y W Y N L N TIMBERHILLRD HOBSON DR N M C H E N R Y R D B U F F ALO GROVERD W FOX HILL DR N HORATIO BLVD E F A B I S H D R N IL ROUTE 83 ARMSTRONG DR PROVIDENCE LN DEVONSHI R E RD S H E R I D A N RD ARMSTRONGDR C O L U M B U S P K W Y JOHNSON DR RAINTR E E RD W F O X H I LL DR OAK CREEK DR PLUMGROVE CIR JOHNSON DR SATINWOOD TER W PAULINE AVE R A N C H VIEW CT O L D CHECKERRD JOHN S O N D R IN VE R R A R Y L N GARDENIA LN N BUF FALO GROVE RD S H A M B LISS LN MOHAWK LN LAKE BLVD T O U LONDR ELM W O O D DR BUCKTHORN T E R MILL CREEK DR S A N D ALWOODRD CAREN DR B R A N D Y W Y N L N LARCHMONT DR EFABISH D R CT LEXINGTONDR M I L W A U K E E A V E BR A N D Y W Y N L N G O L F V I E W T E R SHAMBLISS LN WEIDNERRD THOMPSONBLVD OLD BUFFALO GROVE RD N BUFFALO GROVE RD N I L R O U T E 8 3 COBBLER LN JOHNSON DR HIGHLANDGROVE DR HIGHLANDGROVEDR R I V E R W A L K D R AVALON DR WEIDNERRD RAUPP B LVD HIDDEN LAKE DR INVERRARY LN TOWN PLACE CIR JOR D A N T E R INVERRARY LN INVER RARY LN E FOX HI L L D R INVERRARY LN SAINT M A R Y 'S P K W Y N B U FFAL O G R O V E R D JOHNS O N D R JOHNS O N D R BURGESS CIR THOMPSON BLVD N ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD JOHNSON D R JOHNSON DR N PRA IRIE RD N BUF FALO GROVE RD S T A N T O N D R JOHNSON DR N BUF FALO GROVE RD N B U F F A L O G R O V E R D TWISTED OAK LN A C A C I A T E R COPPERWOODDR PATTON DR PARKCHESTER RD 6 B R I S T O L L N INVERRARY LNCHECKER DR RAUPP B LVD W LAKE COOK RD N PRAIRIE RD CORPORATE GROVE DR R A D C L I F F E R D B R ANDY W Y N L N JOHNSON DR WOODHOLLOW LN N ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD I N V E R R ARYLN BUTTERNUT DR AVALON DR D E E R FIE LD PKWY BRANDYWYN LN BURGESSCIR DEERFIELD PKWY INVERRARY LN DUNHILL D R GOLFVIEW TER HAWTHORNRD N B U F FA LO G R O V E R D B R A N D Y W Y N L N N WEILAND RD C A R RIA GEWAY DR E FOXHILL DR M A D I S O N D R OSAGE LN L A K EBLVD HORATIO B LVD MAYFAIR LN S N A V A J O T R L WINDSOR DR BURGESS CIR JOHNSO N D R WEIDNER RD C H A T EAU DR BERNARD DR PRAGUEAV E AVALON DR JOHNS ON DR BIR C H W O O D L N B U F F A L O G R O V E R D NE W TO W N DR D E VONSHIRE RD TOWN PLACE CIR W PORT CLINTON RD DUNDEE PKWY D A ULT O N D R TRAC E D R LAKE COOK RD WHISPERINGOAK S D R BRISTOL LN OLD OAK DR O L D W E I L A N D R D MA DIERA LN CHAMBOURD DR PALA Z Z O C T M ADIE R A C T C T N C T S PAL A Z Z O D R A P P L E H ILL LN OVERVIEW DR C T MA DIERA LN W APTAKISIC RD THOMPSON BLVD ROLLINGHILLS CT 1 7 8 LOCKWOOD DR 10 11 CT N ASPEN DR TWISTED OAK LN 12 13 C H E C K E R D R CT HASTINGS DR WOODSTONE CIR AUBURN LN LAKE COOK RD SAINT MARY'S PKWY LA K E C O O K R D BERNARD DR 16 17 CT CT 19 MAYFAIR LN HAWTHORN RDWHITE PINE RD VERNON LN CT W DUNDEE RDW DUNDEE RD BEECHWOOD RD TRACE DR GROVE DR GROVE DR STRATHMORE CT VILLA VERDE DR W BOEGER DR ARLINGTON HTS RD 23 BRENTWOOD CIR UNIVERSITY DR N BETTY DR APTAKISI C R D N M I L W A U K E E A V E DEERFIELD RD LAKE COOK RD ILRT83 HALF DAY RD APTAKISIC RD N BUF F A L O G RO V E RD IL ROUTE 53 MCHENRY RD M C H E N RYRD HALF DAY RD H A L F D A Y R D S BUFFALO GROVE RD N M I L W A U K E E A V E NWEILANDRD IL RT 83 CH EC K E R D R N B U F FALO GROVE RD W DUNDEE RD N ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD N PRAIRIE RD DEERFIELD RD S B U F F A L O G R O V E R D N ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD LAKE COOK RD DEERFIELD RD N M I L W A U K E E A V E I I R4A R4 R5A R8 R2R1 I R6A R5 I R4 R9 R6A R5A RE B5 R3 R5A R4 R9A R7 B3 R3 R8 R5 R8 R5 R2 R9 R3 R4 R9 B3 R3 R4 R9 R1 R9 R4 R4 R9 R9 R5A R9 R4 RE R9 R4 R6A B3 B3 R3 R1 R9 B3O&R R9 B3 R9 R9 R5 B3 I R4 R9A R9 R7 R3 R9 I R9 B4 R4 I R1 R3A R9 B3 R1 R9 R9 R9 R4 R4 R2 R6 O&R R3A R5 R2 R1 R5 R3 R7 R6 R8 R2 R5 B2 B2 R1 R4 R9 RE R9 R8 R7 R5 R1 B1 RE R5 B1 R5 R9 R4 B3 R8 R5 MUPD R5 B3 B2 B3 R4 R5 R9 R8 O&R R3 R6 R4 I O&R R1 B3 B1 B4 B1 B4 B3 R5 R4 B2 B3 R6 RE R3 RE B1 B3 R5A B1 R4A R4 B1 O&R R5 R3 B3 RE R8 B1 B1 RE B2 B4 R1 R3 R9 B3 R8 B1 RE B3 B1 O&R RE RE B1 R9 R1 R2 R9 B3 B1 RE RE B1 RE RE R3 B3 R5 RE RE R4A R5 R3 RE RE R8 R2 R2 R9 R6A LONG GROVE WHEELING ARLINGTON HEIGHTS VERNON HILLS LINCOLNSHIRE RIVERWOODS BUFFALO GROVE METRA STATION PRAIRIE VIEW METRA STATION Last Updated: 1/31/2018 Zoning Legend VBG_PRD.dbo.vw_DRV_Transportation_LINE Parcel_Overlay_POLY Residential District RE : One Family Dwelling District R1 : One Family Dwelling District R2 : One Family Dwelling District R3 : One Family Dwelling District """""""""""" """""""""""" """""""""""" """""""""""" """""""""""" """"""""""""R3 - A : One Family Dwelling District R4 : One Family Dwelling District R4 - A : One Family Dwelling District R5 : One Family Dwelling District R5 - A: One Family Dwelling District R6 : One Family Dwelling District R6 - A : One Family Dwelling District R7 : One and Two Family Dwelling District R8 : Multiple Family Dwelling District R9 : Multiple Family Dwelling District R9 - A : Multiple Family Dwelling District Business District B1 : Business District, Limited Retail B2 : Business District, General Retail B3 : Planned Business Center District B4 : Business Services and Wholesale District B5 : Town Center Business District Office and Industrial District I : Industrial District MUPD : Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District O & R : Office and Research District Map Legend Railroad I2 Metra Station Village Boundary Parcel Parcel_Overlay_POLY ´Village of Buffalo Grove Zoning Map 0 0.8 1.60.4 Miles PARKS APPLE HILL PARK…J 15APTAKISIC PARK…G 15BICENTENNIAL PARK…H 8BISON PARK…B 9CAMBRIDGE PARK…B 13CAMELOT CORNER PARK…H 9CANTERBURY PARK…K 11CHERBOURG PARK…F 13CHILDREN'S PARK…G 7CHURCHILLPARK…I 11COOPER PARK…D 8EMMERICH EAST PARK…D 12EMMERICH PARK…D 11GREEN LAKE PARK…G 11IVY HALL PARK…F 8KILMER PARK…C 12LIONS PARK…C 9LONGFELLOW PARK…C 8MIKE RYLKO COMMUNITY PARK…G 11MILL CREEK PARK…A 8MIRIELLE PARK…I 14NICOLE PARK…F 8NORTHWOOD PARK…E 16OLD FARM PARK…G 13PARKCHESTER PARK…F 15PRAIRIE GROVE PARK…I 13ROLLING HILLS NORTH PARK…J 10ROLLING HILLS PARK…I 10TARTAN PARK…F 14TWIN CREEKS PARK…H 11WEIDNER PARK…D 9WESTCHESTER PARK…H 12WILLOW STREAM PARK…E 10WINDSOR RIDGE PARK…C 10WINFIELD PARK…C 7WOODLAND PARK…J 10 SCHOOLS APTAKISIC JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL…G 15BUFFALO GROVE HIGH SCHOOL…C 8BUFFALO GROVE MONTESSORI SCHOOL…B 12COOPER MIDDLE SCHOOL…D 8EARL PRITCHETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL…E 15HENRY W. LONGFELLOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL…C 8IVY HALL MIDDLE SCHOOL…F 8JOYCE KILMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL…C 12MERIDIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL…I 13PRAIRIE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL…H 10SAINT MARY SCHOOL…E 12THE GROVE MONTESSORI SCHOOL…F 7TRIPP ELEMENTARY SCHOOL…F 13TWIN GROVES JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL…J 10WILLOW GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL…F 9 MUNICIPAL FACILITIESALCOTT CENTER…D 10ARBORETUM GOLF COURSE…J 12, K 10BUFFALO GROVE FIRE STATION #25…B 10BUFFALO GROVE FIRE STATION #26…G 13BUFFALO GROVE FIRE STATION #27…J 12BUFFALO GROVE GOLF COURSE…E 10BUFFALO GROVE FITNESS CENTER…G 10BUFFFALO GROVE METRA STATION…G 16RAUPP MEMORIAL MUSEUM…G 9 1ST ST…K 13AABBOTT CT…H 15ABERDEEN CT…F 13ACACIA CT N…K 9ACACIA CT S…K 9ACACIA TER…K9-10ACORN PL…J 12ALDEN LN…G 8ALSACE CIR…F 12ALSACE CT…F 12AMHERST CT…G 8ANDERSON LN…G 6ANTHONY CT…B 14ANTHONY RD…B 13-14APPLE HILL CT SOUTH…J 15APPLE HILL LN…J 14-15APPLETREE CT…E 8ARBOR CT…D 10ARBORGATE LN…E 8, F 8ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD…G 7ARLYD RD…I 14ARMSTRONG CT N…E 16ARMSTRONG DR…E 13-17ASBURY DR…H 17-18ASHFORD CT…A 10ASHLAND CT…E 8ASPEN CT…F 8ASPEN DR…F 8, G 8AUBURN LN…E 8, F 13AUTUMN CT…G 13AVALON CT N…J 14AVALON CT S…I 14AVALON DR…I 14, J 14 BBANBURY LN…G 9BANK LN…E 13BANYAN TREE LN…J 11BARCLAY BLVD…G 18, H 18BAYBERRY DR…K 10BEACON CT…A 10BEDFORD CT…G 7BEECHWOOD CT…C 9BEECHWOOD CT W…C 8BEECHWOOD RD…C 8-9BELAIRE CT…D 9BELAIRE DR…D 9BELMAR CT…G 9BELMAR LN…G 8-9BENTLEY PL…G 14-15BERKLEY CT…H 13BERNARD CT…D 8BERNARD DR…D 7-13BEVERLY LN…I 10BIRCHWOOD CT N…J 10BIRCHWOOD CT S…I 10, J 10BIRCHWOOD LN…I 10-11, J 10BLACKTHORN DR…K 12BLOSSOM CT…E 8BLUE ASH DR…K 10-11BORDEAUX CT E…H 10-11BORDEAUX CT W…H 10BOXWOOD LN…B 9-10BRADLEY RD…C 11BRANDYWYN CT…G 10BRANDYWYN CT N…H 10BRANDYWYN LN…G 10, H 10, I 10-11, J 12-13BRENTWOOD CIR…B 11BRISTOL LN…G 6-7BRITTANY LN…F 7BRUCEWOOD DR…D 12BRUNSWICK DR…E 13BUCKINGHAM LN…E 13BUCKTHORN CT…E 15BUCKTHORN TER…E 15-16BUNESCU CT…G 6BUNESCU LN…G 6BURNT EMBER CT…E 8BURNT EMBER LN…E 8, F 8BUSCH PKWY…G 17-20BUTTERNUT DR…K 11-12 CCAMBRIDGE DR…B 14, C 14CAMDEN CT…G 6CAMERON WAY…C 7CAREN CT…H 10CAREN DR…H 10-11CARLTON PL...F 8CARLYLE CT…J 13CARLYLE LN…J 13CARMAN AVE…F 17CARRIAGEWAY DR…A 10CARRY LN…F 9CASTLEWOOD LN…E 9, F 8-9CEDAR CT N…I 11CEDAR CT S…I 11CHAMBOURD DR…J 15CHAPEL OAKS DR…K 12CHARLES CT…B 14CHASE CT…G 6CHATEAU DR…E 11CHATHAM CIR…C 9CHAUCER WAY…H 10-9CHECKER DR…E 8-9, F 9-10, G 9-10CHECKER RD…E 7CHELSEY ST…J 14, K 14CHENAULT RD…C 11-12CHERBOURG CT N…F 12CHERBOURG CT S…F 12CHERBOURG DR…F 12CHERRYWOOD RD…D 10CHESTNUT CT E…J 13CHESTNUT CT W…J 13CHESTNUT TER…J 12-13CHEVY CHASE DR…E 21CHICORY CT…E 14-15CHICORY LN…E 14-15CHURCH RD…D 11, E 12CHURCHILL CT…G 14CIRCLE DR…E 12CLARET DR…E 11CLEARVIEW CT…G 14CLOHESEY DR…F 8CLOVERDALE CT…G 8COBBLER LN…G 14-15COBBLESTONE CT…F 14COBBLESTONE LN…F 14COLUMBUS PKWY…E 21COMMERCE CT…F 16, G 16COMMON WAY…F 12COOPER CT…G 6COPPERWOOD DR…H 12-13CORPORATE GROVE DR…G 17-18COTTONWOOD RD…D 10COUNTRY LN…D 8-9COUNTRYSIDE DR…C 6COURTLAND DR…G 8COVENTRY CT…I 11COVENTRY LN…I 10-11COVINGTON TER…B 11-12CRAB APPLE TER…J 12CRESTVIEW TER…D 12CROFTON LN…B 10CROSSFIELD CT…H 13CROWN POINT CT…F 11 CROWN POINT DR…F 11CUMBERLAND CT…G 14CUMBERLAND LN…G 14CYPRESS CT…K 9 DDANNET CT…G 9DANNET RD…G 9DARTMOUTH LN…E 16DAULTON CT…K 11DAULTON DR…K 11DAYBREAK TER…J 14DAYTON CT…G 9DAYTON RD…G 9DEERFIELD PKWY…G 10-20DELLMONT CT…G 13DEVLIN RD…G 9DEVONSHIRE RD…G 9DEVONWOOD CT…H 13DIANE DR…C 12, D 12DOGWOOD TER…E 15DORNCLIFF LN…F 9DOVER CT…I 10DOWNING RD…B 13-14DUNDEE PKWY…C 11-12DUNHAM LN…G 9DUNHILL DR…F 13DUNSTAN LN…K 11 EE CANTERBURY LN…G 14E DUNDEE RD…C 13-15E FABISH DR…G 14E FOX HILL DR…F 13-14E LAKE COOK RD…D 15-22, E 12-14EASTWOOD LN…E 16EDENVALE DR…I 14EDGEMERE RD…I 9-10ELMWOOD DR…C 10, D 10ENGLISH OAK TER…I 11ESSINGTON LN…F 9, G 9ESTATE DR…C 9, D 9ESTONIAN LN…G 21ETON CT…B 13EUCLID CT…H 12EVERGREEN PL…C 10 FFABISH CT…G 14FAIRFAX LN…G 6-7FARNSWORTH LN…G 6FARRINGTON CT…F 11FARRINGTON DR…F 10-11FERNDALE CT…E 14FOREST PL…D 12-13FORESTWAY CT…C 8FORESTWAY DR…C 8FOX CT E…F 14FOX CT W…F 13FOXFORD DR…K 11FRANCES CT…C 12, D 12FRANKLIN LN…G 7FREMONT CT E…G 7FREMONT CT W…G 7FREMONT WAY…G 6-7 GGAIL DR…G 10, H 10GARDENIA LN…F 11GLENDALE RD…C 12, D 12-13GOLFVIEW TER…C 12-13GREEN KNOLLS DR…G 10, H 10GREENRIDGE RD…B 10GREENWOOD CT…D 10GREGG LN…C 12, D 12GROVE DR…C 7 HHACKBERRY CT E…J 10HACKBERRY CT W…J 10HALF DAY RD…J 10, J 14-15HAPSFIELD LN…C 10HARRIS CT…F 11HARRIS DR…F 11, G 7HARVARD LN…B 13HARVEST CIR…G 13HASTINGS DR…E 17HASTINGS LN…E 16HAWTHORN RD…C 10-12HAZELWOOD TER…E 15, F 15HEATHERDOWN WAY…H 9-10HERITAGE PL…G 7HIAWATHA DR…C 11, D 11HICKORY DR…D 10HICKS RD…H 6HIDDEN LAKE DR…G 11-12, H 12HIGHLAND GROVE CT N…G 13HIGHLAND GROVE CT S…F 13HIGHLAND GROVE DR…F 13-14, G 13-14, H 14HILL CT E…F 14HILL CT W…F 14HILLDALE LN…G 13HOBSON DR…G 13HOLLYSTONE LN…F 9HORATIO BLVD…E 15-16, F 15 IIL ROUTE 53…H 5INDIAN CREEK CT…L 13INDIAN CREEK DR…L 13INDIAN HILL DR…D 8INDIAN HILLS DR…D 8-9INDIAN SPRING LN…F 9, G 9INVERRARY LN…E 17-21IRONWOOD CT…J 12IVY HALL LN…G 8-9 JJACOBS CT…G 12JERSEY C…H 14JOEL LN…F 15JOHNSON DR…E 17-21JORDAN TER…I 13JOSEPH CT…H 14JUNIPER CT…D 10 KKATHERINE CT…C 8KENDALL CT…G 12KENT LN…H 9KINGSBRIDGE WAY…H 9-10KINGSTON DR…K 11KNIGHT HILL CT…E 8KNOLLWOOD CT E…H 9KNOLLWOOD CT N…H 9KNOLLWOOD CT S…H 9KNOLLWOOD CT W…H 8KNOLLWOOD DR…H 8-9KRAUSE DR…F 17 LLAKE BLVD…B 13-14LAKEVIEW CT…E 11LAKEVIEW DR…E 11LAMONT TER…H 11LARCHMONT DR…H 8LARRAWAY DR…G 11 LASALLE CT…H 11LASALLE LN…H 10-11LAUREN LN…C 13, D 13LAWN CT…H 14LE JARDIN CT…E 15LE PARC CIR…E 15-16LEE CT…G 6LEHIGH LN…A 9-10, B 10LEIDER LN…H 17LEXINGTON DR…E 16LILAC LN…E 16LINCOLN TER…D 11LINDEN AVE…E 21LIVE OAK LN…J 11LOCKWOOD CT E…G 11LOCKWOOD CT W…G 11LOCKWOOD DR…G 11, H 11LOGSDON LN…H 8LONDON CT…I 10LONG BEACH DR…E 22-23LONGRIDGE CT…G 13LONGWOOD CT…C 8-9LONGWOOD DR…C 8-9LUCINDA DR…G 10LYON CT…H 10LYON DR…H 11 MMACARTHUR CT…C 11MACARTHUR DR…C 11MADIERA CT…J 15MADIERA LN…J 15MADISON CT N…H 14-15MADISON CT S…H 14MADISON DR…H 14-15MAGNOLIA CT E…J 11MAGNOLIA CT W…J 11MANCHESTER CT…E 11-12MANCHESTER DR…E 11MANOR DR…E 11-12MAPLE DR…D 10MARGATE DR…H 13-14MARQUETTE PL…E 21MARSEILLES CIR…F 12MARVINS WAY…G 15MARY BELLE CIR…E 14MARYLU LN…D 11MAYFAIR CT…C 11MAYFAIR LN…C 10-11MAYFLOWER CT E…H 9MAYFLOWER CT W…H 8MELINDA LN…D 11MERIDIAN WAY…I 13MIDDLESEX CT…B 15MILL CREEK DR…A 9-10, B 9-10MILLBROOK DR…J 16MILLER LN…B 9MILWAUKEE AVE…E 21-22, G 20MIRAMAR CT…I 14MIRAMAR LN…I 14MISTY WOODS RD…K 12MOHAWK CT…C 11MOHAWK TRL…C 12-13MORNINGSIDE LN E…G 13MORNINGSIDE LN W…G 12MULBERRY CT…C 10 NN ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD…E 7-8, F 7, G 7, H 8N BUFFALO GROVE RD…E 12, F 11-12, G 11-12, H 11-12, I 11, J10-11, K 11-12, L 13N EASTON AVE…J 12N ELIZABETH AVE …F 16N FLORENCE AVE …F 16N HORATIO BLVD …F 15N IL ROUTE 83 …F 12N MAIN ST…J 13, K 13N MCHENRY RD…E 12-13, F 11-12, G 7-10N MILWAUKEE AVE…E 22N PET LN…I 14N PRAIRIE RD…I 13, J 13N RAPHAEL AVE…F 16N RIVERWALK DR…E 22N ROADWAY LN…H 15N WEILAND RD…E 14, F 14-15, G 15, H 15N WELLINGTON CT…G 14N WILLIAM AVE…F 16NEWFIELD CT…H 12NEWFIELD DR…H 12-13NEWGATE CT…H 14-15NEWPORT CT…G 7NEWTOWN CT E…F 14NEWTOWN CT W…F 14NEWTOWN DR…F 14-15NORTHGATE PKWY…E 19 OOAK CREEK DR…C 12OLD ARLINGTON CT…B 9OLD ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD…B 9OLD BARN CT…G 12OLD BARN RD…G 12OLD CHECKER CT…E 9-10OLD CHECKER RD…E 9-13OLD MCHENRY RD…H 6OLD OAK CT…C 12OLD OAK DR…C 12-13OLD POST DR…B 10OLD WEILAND RD…H 15OLIVE HILL DR…I 13ORCHARD LN…K 13OSAGE LN…E 15OVERVIEW DR…J 14OXFORD DR…H 8 PPALAZZO CT…J 15PALAZZO DR…J 15PALMGREN CT…B 14PARK AVE…K 13PARK VIEW TER…B 11PARKCHESTER RD...F 15PARKER LN…G 8PARKSIDE DR…G 12PATTON DR…C 11PAULINE AVE…E 12-13, F 13-16PENNY LN…F 8PINEHURST LN…F 14PINETREE CIR N…G 12PINETREE CIR S…G 12PINYON PINE CT N…K 12PINYON PINE CT S…K 13PLUM GROVE CIR…D 8-9POPLAR CT…C 10PORT CLINTON CT E…L 9PORT CLINTON CT W…L 9PORT CLINTON RD…K 10-11PRAGUE AVE…E 21PRAIRIE LN…F 14PRAIRIE RD…I 13, J 13-14, K 13-14, L 13PROVIDENCE LN…G 7 QQUAKER HOLLOW CT N…H 15QUAKER HOLLOW CT S…H 15 R RACHEL LN…C 6RADCLIFFE RD…A 9, B 9RAINTREE CT…K 10RAINTREE RD…K 10RANCH VIEW CT…G 8RAPHAEL AVE…F 16RAUPP BLVD…C 11-12, D 11RAYMOND RD…E 14RED BUD PL…E 14-15RED OAK CT…C 10REGENT CT E…D 8REGENT CT W…D 8REGENT DR…C 8-9, D 8RIDGEFIELD LN…G 9RIDGEWOOD LN…E 15RIVER GROVE CT…L 14RIVER GROVE LN…L 14RIVER OAKS CIR E…L 14RIVERWALK DR…E 22ROBERTA CT…C 13ROLLING HILLS CT…H 12RONNIE DR…H 11ROSE BLVD…C 6-7ROSE CT E…C 7ROSE CT W…C 7ROSEWOOD AVE…D 11ROSLYN CT E…K 13ROSLYN LN E…K 13RUSSELLWOOD CT…G 15 SS ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD…B 7, C 7, D 7S BUFFALO GROVE RD…B 12-13, C 13, D 12-13S NAVAJO TRL…C 13, D 13S WELLINGTON CT…G 14SAINT MARY'S PKWY…D 9-13SANDALWOOD CT…K 10SANDALWOOD RD…K 10SANDHURST CT…G 13SANDHURST DR…G 13SARATOGA LN…A 9, B 9-10SATINWOOD CT N…J 11SATINWOOD CT S…J 11SATINWOOD TER…I 11, J 11SAXON PL…B 14SAYBROOK LN…G 7SCOTTISH PINE CT…K 10SELWYN LN…B 13-14SHADY GROVE LN…F 10, G 10SHAMBLISS CT…G 6SHAMBLISS LN…G 6SHERIDAN CT…I 9SHERIDAN RD…I 9-10SILVER LINDEN LN…I 11SILVER ROCK LN…F 10, G 10SOMERSET LN…F 13SPRINGSIDE CT…E 9SPRINGSIDE LN…E 9, F 9-10STANFORD LN…A 10STANTON CT E…H 14STANTON CT W…H 14STANTON DR…H 14STEEPLE DR…E 13-14STILLWELL DR…C 11STONEBRIDGE LN…B 9STONEGATE CT…D 9STONEGATE RD…D 8-9STRADFORD CIR…C 9STRATHMORE CT…C 7SUMMER CT…I 9SUNRIDGE LN…F 13SUSSEX CT…B 15SYCAMORE RD…C 10 TTAYLOR CT…J 14TERRACE PL…D 8THISTLE CT…H 14THOMPSON BLVD…H 8-15THOMPSON CT…H 10, H 13THORNAPPLE CT…E 8THORNDALE CT…E 14THORNDALE DR…F 13-14THORNTON LN…B 9THORNWOOD DR…C 10THREE STATES BLVD…B 11-12TIMBERHILL RD…D 8-9, E 8TOULON DR…F 12TOWN PLACE CIR…E 12, F 12TOWN PLACE PKWY…E 12TRACE DR…C 7TREE FARM CT…I 9TRINITY CT…B 15TROTWOOD CT…G 13TWILIGHT PASS…F 10TWIN OAKS BLVD…I 10TWIN OAKS CT…I 10TWISTED OAK LN…F 8-9 UUNIVERSITY DR…B 13-14UNNAMED…E 12, F 18-19, G 18-19, G 7, J 12 VVERNON CT…C 10-11VERNON LN…C 10-11VILLA VERDE DR…B 7VILLAGE CT…H 14VINTAGE LN…E 11 WW APTAKISIC RD…H 12-14, I 10-12, I 15W ARLYD RD…I 14W BROCKMAN AVE…K 13W CANTERBURY LN…G 13W DEPOT PL…H 15W DUNDEE RD…B 9-12, C 12-13, C 7-8W EASTON AVE…K 13W FABISH DR…G 12-13W FOX HILL DR…F 12-13W HALF DAY RD…J 11-13W LAKE COOK RD…D 10-1212, D 7-9W PAULINE AVE…E 17, F 14-16W PORT CLINTON RD…K 11-12, K 9WAINWRIGHT PKWY…C 11WAKEFIELD CT…F 13WAKEFIELD LN…F 13WATERBURY LN…J 14WEDGEWOOD CT…K 9WEIDNER CT…C 10, D 9WEIDNER RD…C 9-10, D 9, E 9WEILAND RD…H 15WESTBOURNE LN…F 9WESTCHESTER CT…G 12WESTCHESTER RD…G 12, H 12WHISPERING OAKS CT…K 12WHISPERING OAKS DR…K 12-13WHITE BRANCH CT…G 14WHITE OAK LN…K 10WHITE PINE RD…C 10WHITEHALL CT…D 8WHITEHALL DR…D 8WHITNEY LN…H 12WILDFLOWER CIR…G 12WILLOW PKWY…J 11-13WILSHIRE CT…I 9WINDBROOKE DR…G 15-16 2.1.d Packet Pg. 106 At t a c h m e n t : Z o n i n g M a p ( C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 9 - 1 5 , a s A m e n d e d b y O r d i n a n c e 2 0 1 8 - 2 4 f o r a C o m p P l a n U p d a t e ) 02/13/2019 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 50 RAUPP BOULEVARD, BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2019 Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 7:31 PM by Chairman Frank Cesario Public Hearing 1.Consider a Variation for a 6' High Fence in the Side and Rear Yard at 466 Raphael Avenue (Trustee Ottenheimer) (Staff Contact: Chris Stilling) Mr. Pawel Niedzwiedzki and his son Peter Niedzwiedzki, 466 Raphael Avenue, were present and sworn in. Mr. Niedzwiedzki explained they he and his family moved to Buffalo Grove from Texas eight years ago. His young son, Adam, has down syndrome and does not understand things they way most people do. He is requesting the variation to protect his son. His son throws toys and other things so he wants to provide safety for both his son and his neighbors. Adam loves to be outside. The proposed fence will help keep Adam's toys in the yard. The current fence is only four foot high. Adam can climb that fence and get out of the yard. Due to Adam's condition, Adam cannot communicate if he were to get out of the yard and become lost. He works as a truck driver and travels a lot. He is only home once or twice a month. His wife takes care of Adam. Adam has a difficult time understanding most things. When they take Adam out in public, they have to restrict him. They usually use a child leash. Inside the home, they have turned one if the rooms into a safe room for Adam to play in. They love their son and want him to be happy and safe. Peter added that his brother does not understand the dangers of traffic. Adam is strong and fast. The fence will be to provide safety for Adam. Com. Goldspiel asked the Petitioner why he is requesting a six foot high fence rather than a five foot high fence. Mr. Niedzwiedzki advised that Adam is eight years and growing. They moved here to provide Adam with the best schools and they plan to be here for a long time. They are investing approximately $10,000.00 to build the fence. He does not want to have to spend more money on a higher fence later. Com. Goldspiel asked why the Petitioner was requesting a vinyl fence. Mr. Niedzwiedzki explained that the current fence is a wood fence and Adam wood splinters as he would climb the fence. He would rather not have his son hurt himself. Ch. Cesario asked the Petitioner if he had spoken to his neighbors about the proposed fence. Mr. Niedzwiedzki advised that he had spoken with his neighbors and they did not have any issues. Ch. Cesario asked staff if any inquires or comments were received. Ms. Akash responded that staff received one call and one inquiry in person, neither had a concern. Com. Goldspiel asked if there will be any space located in between the proposed fence and existing fence that will remain. Mr. Niedzwiedzki responded that he hopes the neighbors on both sides decide to allow him to remove the existing fencing so there would not be fence upon fence. He will talk to his one neighbor again. He believes in the end the neighbor will agreed to have the existing fence removed. 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 107 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f F e b 1 3 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) 02/13/2019 Com. Weinstein asked the Petitioner if Adam could climb the existing four foot fence. Mr. Niedzwiedzki responded yes, the existing four foot fence is chain link and easy to climb. Com. Weinstein asked if Adam could climb the five foot located along the rear of the property. Mr. Niedzwiedzki responded yes. That fence is in bad condition but Adam climbs it. Adam is strong and will climb the fence if given the chance. The proposed vinyl fence is smooth and Adam will not be able to climb it. Ch. Cesario asked Peter Niedzwiedzki how tall he currently is. Peter responded that he is six foot one inch tall. Ch. Cesario entered the Staff Report dated February 13, 2019 as Exhibit 1. There were no additional questions or comments from the Commissioners. There were no questions or comments from the audience. The public hearing was closed at 7:47 PM. Moved by Com. Weinstein, seconded by Com. Khan, to approve the variation for the installation of a six foot solid white vinyl fence for the property at 466 Raphael Avenue, subject to the following condition: 1.The fence shall be installed in accordance with the documents and plans submitted as part of this petition. Com. Weinstein stated that the request must meet the standards, which are very clear. In this case, the hardship is unique to the owner, not the property. He inquired if a condition should be placed that the variance does not run with the land. Ch. Cesario is supportive of the request but also thinks that the variation should be limited to the owner, not the property. Com. Goldspiel asked if vinyl material is allowed pursuant to the Code. Ms. Akash responded that a variance is required due to the requested fence being a solid, six foot high fence. Vinyl material is allowed. Mr. Niedzwiedzki added that they bought this house specifically for Adam’s benefit and they anticipate that his children will continue to owner this property in the future. Mr. Brankin advised that the discussed condition may run into an enforceability issue. If the petition meets the standards, the variance should be approved subject to the petition and materials. Ch. Cesario is supportive of the request as presented. 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 108 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f F e b 1 3 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) 02/13/2019 RESULT:APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER:Mitchell Weinstein, Commissioner SECONDER:Zill Khan, Commissioner AYES:Cesario, Cohn, Goldspiel, Khan, Weinstein, Au ABSENT:Adam Moodhe, Scott Lesser III Regular Meeting Other Matters for Discussion 1.Workshop-Amendment to the Northwest Community Healthcare Site at 15 McHenry Rd and 125 E Lake Cook Road (Trustee Stein) (Staff Contact: Chris Stilling) Mr. Matt Campbell, MedProperties Group, 40 Skokie Boulevard, Northbrook, Illinois, was present and sworn in. Also present was Mr. David Dastur, Jensen & Halstead, Ltd., 820 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 850, Chicago, IL 60607; Mr. Stephen Corcoran, Eriksson Engineering Associates, Ltd., 145 Commerce Drive, Suite A, Grayslake, IL 60030; and Mr. Michael Trippiedi, Trippiedi Design, 920 Sundew Court, Aurora, IL 60504. Mr. Campbell provided a general description of the proposed redevelopment, as detailed in the Staff Report dated February 8, 2019. Mr. Dastur reviewed the details of the proposed development, including the alternative plan. Mr. Corcoran reviewed the parking study and parking variations that would be need to be requested. Mr. Trippiedi reviewed the proposed landscaping plan. Com. Goldspiel asked if additional detention will be required on the property. Mr. Campbell responded yes, additional underground detention would be provided under the parking lot. That underground detention would then tie into the existing detention basin in the wooded area. Com. Goldspiel asked if the barrel-vaulted roof would be decorative in nature. Mr. Campbell responded yes. Com. Goldspiel asked which development plan would lose the most significant trees. Mr. Campbell responded that both plans would require approximately the same amount of trees to be removed. Com. Goldspiel asked if the traffic study considered the traffic impact from the proposed retail outlot site. Mr. Stilling advised that the retail outlot site is self-contained and served by the adjacent major roadways. Staff does not have any concerns that the retail outlot will have an impact. Mr. Corcoran advised that the traffic study did not include the retail outlot. With the Lake Cook Road widening project, the entrance/exit off Lake Cook Road would be a right in/right out and would not impact traffic. Com. Goldspiel asked if that would impact the internal circulation of the site. Mr. Corcoran responded no, the retail and office building are separated to minimize impact. Com. Goldspiel asked if ambulances will be using the site. Mr. Dastur responded that an ambulance would only be called to the site if transport from the immediate care office to a hospital is needed. Ambulances would access the building at the main entrance. Com. Goldspiel asked about the number of proposed accessible parking spaces. Mr. Dastur advised that more accessible parking spaces will be provided than are required by Code. Com. Au asked if parking spaces removed pursuant to the alternative plan could be relocated along Lake Cook Road in lieu of landscaping. Mr. Dastur advised that they looked at locating parking along Lake Cook Road and found that they 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 109 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f F e b 1 3 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) 02/13/2019 would lose green space. Com. Au asked if they considered angled parking spaces. Mr. Corcoran stated that there is a twenty five foot required setback for landscaping along Lake Cook Road. Adding parking along Lake Cook would reduce that landscape setback to ten feet. Com. Cohn added that the Village Board was concerned with safety along Lake Cook Road and wanted to maintain it as green space. Com. Khan asked Mr. Corcoran which agency is the lead agency for the Lake Cook Road widening project. Mr. Corcoran responded that the lead agency is Cook County with input from other agencies. Com. Khan asked if the Lake Cook Road right-of-way has been acquired for the expansion project. Mr. Corcoran responded yes and described the property line location and setback. Com. Khan asked about the existing storm water management for the site. Mr. Corcoran advised that the existing storm water management system is located in the basin along McHenry Road. The proposed underground storage would be located under the parking lot and tie into the basin. Com. Khan asked if the underground storage was due to a change in the amount of impervious surface on the site or the new regulations. Mr. Corcoran explained that it was due to both. Com. Khan confirmed with Mr. Corcoran that no underground storm water storage would be located under the building. Com. Cohn asked the Petitioner to explain what will happen with the NCH building at 1450 Busch Parkway with the proposed development. Mr. Stilling responded to Com. Cohn’s question. Ch. Cesario stated that the Village Board also had a concern with the proposed height of the office building. He prefers the alternative plan with the further setback. He asked staff about the proposed parking. Mr. Stilling advised that staff is comfortable with the proposed parking plan. They have room to expand, if necessary. They also want to maintain as many trees as possible within the development. Lake Cook Road is a gateway into the community and this would be the first redevelopment along Lake Cook Road. Landscaping is preferred over any parking along Lake Cook Road. Ch. Cesario noted that the retail used was not included in the parking study. Mr. Stilling explained the parking requirements for a restaurant use. Ch. Cesario believes the proposed development is visually appealing. The developer has addressed the questions concerning the trees and has done a good job of preserving and adding trees to the site. Com. Weinstein agrees with Ch. Cesario regarding the setback of the proposed building. He does not have an issue with the proposed height of the building. The proposed signs will be reviewed at a later time. He asked Mr. Corcoran if the two studies used to determine the proper parking were the proper studies to use. Mr. Corcoran responded to Com. Weinstein’s question. Mr. Stilling added that the ratio used is pretty high compared to other studies and discussed the frontage requirements for signs and the proposed sign package. Com. Weinstein asked about timing for the retail building. Mr. Corcoran explained that they are working with a national retail food provider on the proposed site plan and would not anticipate any movement on that site until the end of 2020. This is due to the fact that the immediate care has to remain in operation until the new office building and immediate care office is up and running. 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 110 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f F e b 1 3 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) 02/13/2019 Ch. Cesario asked staff if there were any issues that the Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) did not address. Mr. Stilling advised that staff would like to see the following items addressed; cash in lieu of trees and cleanup of the detention basin. Com. Goldspiel asked about the adjoining property to the southeast. Mr. Stilling explained that property was acquired by the Cook County Highway Department and will be used for storm water detention for Lake Cook Road. There were no additional questions or comments from the Commissioners. Mr. Campbell thanked the PZC and will work toward preparing for the public hearing. 2.Review the 2019 Zoning Map (Trustee Ottenheimer) (Staff Contact: Chris Stilling) Mr. Stilling presented the Zoning Map to the Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC). Com. Goldspiel confirmed with Mr. Stilling that there have been no zoning actions to necessitate changes to the zoning map. Mr. Stilling advised this is for informational purposes only. Approval of Minutes 1.Planning and Zoning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jan 16, 2019 7:30 PM Moved by Com. Weinstein, seconded by Com. Khan, to approve the minutes of the January 16,2 019 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting as submitted. RESULT:ACCEPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER:Mitchell Weinstein, Commissioner SECONDER:Zill Khan, Commissioner AYES:Cesario, Cohn, Goldspiel, Khan, Weinstein, Au ABSENT:Adam Moodhe, Scott Lesser Chairman's Report None. Committee and Liason Reports Com. Cohn stated that he attended the January 22, 2019 Village Board meeting. The Board referred the NCH proposal to the PZC; approved the driveway variation for 964 Cooper Court; and approved the final plat for Link Crossing. Staff Report and Future Agenda Mr. Stilling advised that on February 19, 2019, the Village Board will hear an appeal of the RV variation denial for 156 Ironwood Court. Ch. Cesario will attend that meeting. 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 111 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f F e b 1 3 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) 02/13/2019 There are no agenda items for the March 6, 2019 PZC meeting at this time and the meeting will most likely be cancelled. The Volunteer Reception is scheduled for February 24, 2019 at 1:00 PM at the Wild Buffalo. The Prairie View Area Plan Open House is scheduled for February 20, 2019 at the Arboretum. Public Comments and Questions None. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:54 PM Chris Stilling APPROVED BY ME THIS 13th DAY OF February , 2019 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 112 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f F e b 1 3 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s )