Loading...
2017-09-06 - Planning and Zoning Commission - Agenda Packet Meeting of the Village of Buffalo Grove Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting September 6, 2017 at 7:30 PM Fifty Raupp Blvd Buffalo Grove, IL 60089-2100 Phone: 847-459-2500 I. Call to Order II. Public Hearings/Items For Consideration 1. Consider a Variation for a Fence in the Corner Side Yard at 1309 Madison Drive (Trustee Ottenheimer) (Staff Contact: Brian Sheehan) 2. Consider an Amendment to Ordinance 97-80 for an Existing Cell Tower at 351 Hastings (Trustee Stein) (Staff Contact: Brian Sheehan) III. Regular Meeting A. Other Matters for Discussion B. Approval of Minutes 1. Planning and Zoning Commission - Regular Meeting - Aug 16, 2017 7:30 PM C. Chairman's Report D. Committee and Liaison Reports E. Staff Report/Future Agenda Schedule F. Public Comments and Questions IV. Adjournment The Planning and Zoning Commission will make every effort to accommodate all items on the agenda by 10:30 p.m. The Board, does, however, reserve the right to defer consideration of matters to another meeting should the discussion run past 10:30 p.m. The Village of Buffalo Grove, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities, contact the ADA Coordinator at 459-2525 to allow the Village to make reasonable accommodations for those persons. Updated: 8/31/2017 10:00 AM Page 1 Action Item : Consider a Variation for a Fence in the Corner Side Yard at 1309 Madison Drive Recommendation of Action Staff recommends approval. The Petitioner, Thomas Chester, is proposing to install a four (4) foot wood picket fence that will extend beyond the building setback line encroaching into the corner side yard setback along Madison Drive. Section 15.20.040.B. of the Village Fence Code requires a 30 foot setback for corner lots. Therefore, a variation is required. ATTACHMENTS:  Staff Report (DOCX)  Fence Detail (PDF)  Plat of Survey (PDF)  Petitioners Letter (PDF)  Standards (PDF) Trustee Liaison Staff Contact Ottenheimer Brian Sheehan, Community Development Wednesday, September 6, 2017 2.1 Packet Pg. 2 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 6, 2017 SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION: 1309 Madison Drive PETITIONER: Thomas Chester PREPARED BY: Brian Sheehan, Building Commissioner REQUEST: A variation to install a four (4) foot wood picket fence beyond the building setback line in the corner side yard along Madison Drive. EXSITING LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is improved with a single family home currently zoned R4. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The approved Village Comprehensive Plan calls for this property and the immediate neighborhood to be single family detached PROJECT BACKGROUND The Petitioner, Thomas Chester, is proposing to install a four (4) foot wood picket fence that will extend beyond the building setback line encroaching into the corner side yard setback along Madison Drive. Section 15.20.040.B. of the Village Fence Code requires a 30 foot setback for corner lots. Therefore, a variation is required. PLANNING & ZONING ANALYSIS  The petitioner is proposing to install a four (4) foot wood picket fence that would extend beyond the building setback line.  The fence would extend approximately 15 feet from the home and into the corner side yard setback along Madison Drive.  The minimum corner side yard setback in the R4 zoning district is 30 feet.  The proposed fence would maintain a setback of seventeen feet (17’) from the sidewalk.  Currently there is a property in the vicinity of this property (211 Thompson Blvd.) that has been granted a variance for a similar fence encroaching into the corner side yard. 2.1.a Packet Pg. 3 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( 2 0 5 2 : C o n s i d e r a V a r i a t i o n f o r a F e n c e i n t h e C o r n e r S i d e Y a r d a t 1 3 0 9 M a d i s o n D r i v e ) DEPARTMENTAL REVIEWS Village Department Comments Engineering The Village Engineer has reviewed the proposed fence location and does not have any engineering or line of sight concerns or objections with the proposed height and location of this fence. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Village Code, the contiguous property owners were notified and a public hearing sign was posted on the subject property. The posting of the public hearing sign and the mailed notifications were completed within the prescribed timeframe as required. As of the date of this Staff Report the Village has not received any calls or concerns regarding this variance request. STANDARDS The Planning & Zoning Commission is authorized to grant variations of the Fence Code based on the following criteria: 1. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; 2. The proposed variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; 3. There are practical difficulties or particular hardships in carrying out the strict letter of this Chapter which difficulties or hardships have not been created by the person presently having an interest in the property; and, 4. The proposed variation will not be detrimental to the public health safety and welfare. The petitioner has provided responses to the standards for a variation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the fence variation. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) shall open the public hearing and take public testimony concerning the variation. The PZC shall make a final decision on whether or not to approve the variation. 2.1.a Packet Pg. 4 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( 2 0 5 2 : C o n s i d e r a V a r i a t i o n f o r a F e n c e i n t h e C o r n e r S i d e Y a r d a t 1 3 0 9 M a d i s o n D r i v e ) 2.1.b Packet Pg. 5 At t a c h m e n t : F e n c e D e t a i l ( 2 0 5 2 : C o n s i d e r a V a r i a t i o n f o r a F e n c e i n t h e C o r n e r S i d e Y a r d a t 1 3 0 9 M a d i s o n D r i v e ) 2.1.c Packet Pg. 6 At t a c h m e n t : P l a t o f S u r v e y ( 2 0 5 2 : C o n s i d e r a V a r i a t i o n f o r a F e n c e i n t h e C o r n e r S i d e Y a r d a t 1 3 0 9 M a d i s o n D r i v e ) 2.1.d Packet Pg. 7 At t a c h m e n t : P e t i t i o n e r s L e t t e r ( 2 0 5 2 : C o n s i d e r a V a r i a t i o n f o r a F e n c e i n t h e C o r n e r S i d e Y a r d a t 1 3 0 9 M a d i s o n D r i v e ) 1 Julie C Kamka From:Tj Chester <tjc1999@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, August 16, 2017 4:30 PM To:Julie C Kamka Subject:Re: Additional Information Julie, The proposed variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood: The selected fence is similar in style to many neighbors in and around the subdivision. Several neighbors also have fences closer to the sidewalk than this request. The fence will be approximately 15 feet from the house and at least 17 feet from the sidewalk. Thanks! -Thomas Chester Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Julie C Kamka <jkamka@vbg.org> wrote: Mr. Chester, Also please provide the distance the fence will extend from the house and the distance off the sidewalk. Thank you. Julie Kamka Julie Kamka Deputy Village Clerk/ICC Certified Permit Technician Village of Buffalo Grove 847-459-2500 2.1.e Packet Pg. 8 At t a c h m e n t : S t a n d a r d s ( 2 0 5 2 : C o n s i d e r a V a r i a t i o n f o r a F e n c e i n t h e C o r n e r S i d e Y a r d a t 1 3 0 9 M a d i s o n D r i v e ) Updated: 8/31/2017 4:06 PM Page 1 Action Item : Consider an Amendment to Ordinance 97-80 for an Existing Cell Tower at 351 Hastings Recommendation of Action Staff recommends approval On October 20, 1997, the Village of Buffalo Grove Village Board approved Ordinance 97 -80, which allowed an existing communications monopole to remain on the property as part of the annexation. Subsequently, Ordinance 97-80 was amended by Ordinances 2000-54 and 2008-60, which allowed the co-location of additional antenna's and ground equipment on the monopole and property respectively. The petitioner, Tony Phillips, SAC Wireless, LLC on behalf of Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC is requesting an amendment to allow the installation of an additional antenna and ground equipment to the existing communications tower located on the subject property. Therefore, an amendment to the Ordinance is required. ATTACHMENTS:  Staff Report (DOCX)  Project Plans (PDF)  Aerial (PDF)  Ordinance 97-80 (PDF)  Ordinance 2000-054 (PDF)  Ordinance 2008-060 (PDF) Trustee Liaison Staff Contact Stein Brian Sheehan, Community Development Wednesday, September 6, 2017 2.2 Packet Pg. 9 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 6, 2017 SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION: 351 Hastings PETITIONER: Tony Phillips, SAC Wireless, LLC on behalf of Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC PREPARED BY: Brian Sheehan, Building Commissioner REQUEST: Amendment to Ordinance 97-80 to allow modifications to an existing communications tower. EXSITING LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is improved with a single-story building and an existing communications tower in the “I” - Industrial Zoning District. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The 2009 Village Comprehensive Plan calls for this property to be Industrial. PROJECT BACKGROUND On October 20, 1997, the Village of Buffalo Grove Village Board approved Ordinance 97-80, which allowed an existing communications monopole to remain on the property as part of the annexation. Subsequently, Ordinance 97-80 was amended by Ordinances 2000-54 and 2008-60, which allowed the co-location of additional antenna’s and ground equipment on the monopole and property respectively. The petitioner, Tony Phillips, SAC Wireless, LLC on behalf of Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC is requesting an amendment to allow the installation of an additional antenna and ground equipment to the existing communications tower located on the subject property. Therefore, an amendment to the Ordinance is required. PLANNING & ZONING ANALYSIS The following is an analysis of their request:  The existing 148’ high monopole was previously approved by the Village Board in 1997 as part of an annexation agreement.  Pursuant to the conditions of Ordinance 97-80, any additional equipment on the tower requires Village approval.  In 2000 and 2008, the Village approved amendments to the Ordinance allowing for 2 additional antennas.  The petitioner is proposing a new antenna on the monopole tower.  The antenna will be smaller than the other antennas as shown on the attached plans.  There will also be some ancillary ground equipment within the existing enclosure currently on the site. 2.2.a Packet Pg. 10 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s )  Overall, staff finds that the proposed new antenna is consistent with the existing equipment and therefore supports the request. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEWS Village Department Comments Engineering The Village Engineer has reviewed the plans and does not have any engineering concerns with the proposed improvements. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Village Code, the surrounding property owners within 250’ were notified and a public hearing sign was posted on the subject property. The posting of the public hearing sign and the mailed notifications were completed within the prescribed timeframe as required. As of the date of this Staff Report, staff has received 1 inquiry from a tenant within the building seeking information on the public hearing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of an amendment to Ordinance 97-80, as amended by Ordinances 2000-54 and 2008-60 to allow modifications to an existing communications tower and ground equipment at 351 Hastings Drive. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) shall open the public hearing and take public testimony concerning the special use and accompanying variations. The PZC shall make a recommendation to the Village Board concerning the request. 2.2.a Packet Pg. 11 At t a c h m e n t : S t a f f R e p o r t ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.b Packet Pg. 12 At t a c h m e n t : P r o j e c t P l a n s ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.b Packet Pg. 13 At t a c h m e n t : P r o j e c t P l a n s ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.b Packet Pg. 14 At t a c h m e n t : P r o j e c t P l a n s ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.b Packet Pg. 15 At t a c h m e n t : P r o j e c t P l a n s ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.b Packet Pg. 16 At t a c h m e n t : P r o j e c t P l a n s ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.b Packet Pg. 17 At t a c h m e n t : P r o j e c t P l a n s ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.b Packet Pg. 18 At t a c h m e n t : P r o j e c t P l a n s ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.b Packet Pg. 19 At t a c h m e n t : P r o j e c t P l a n s ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.b Packet Pg. 20 At t a c h m e n t : P r o j e c t P l a n s ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.c Packet Pg. 21 At t a c h m e n t : A e r i a l ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 2.2.c Packet Pg. 22 At t a c h m e n t : A e r i a l ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 2.2.d Packet Pg. 23 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 24 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 25 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 26 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 27 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 28 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 29 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 30 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 31 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 32 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 33 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 34 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 35 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 36 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 37 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 38 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 39 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 40 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 41 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 42 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.d Packet Pg. 43 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.e Packet Pg. 44 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 0 - 0 5 4 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.e Packet Pg. 45 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 0 - 0 5 4 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.e Packet Pg. 46 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 0 - 0 5 4 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.e Packet Pg. 47 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 0 - 0 5 4 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.f Packet Pg. 48 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 8 - 0 6 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.f Packet Pg. 49 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 8 - 0 6 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 2.2.f Packet Pg. 50 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e 2 0 0 8 - 0 6 0 ( 2 0 5 3 : C o n s i d e r a n A m e n d m e n t t o O r d i n a n c e 9 7 - 8 0 f o r a n E x i s t i n g C e l l T o w e r a t 3 5 1 H a s t i n g s ) 08/16/2017 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 50 RAUPP BOULEVARD, BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 16, 2017 Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 7:34 PM by Commissioner Eric Smith Public Hearings/Items For Consideration 1. Proposed Link Crossing Subdivision (Request to Continue to October 4, 2017) (Trustee Ottenheimer) (Staff Contact: Chris Stilling) Moved by Com. Cesario, seconded by Com. Khan, to table the public hearing until the October 4, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting to be held at 7:30 PM in the Jeffrey S. Braiman Council Chambers. RESULT: TABLED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Frank Cesario, Commissioner SECONDER: Zill Khan, Commissioner AYES: Smith, Moodhe, Cesario, Goldspiel, Khan, Au ABSENT: Matthew Cohn, Scott Lesser, Mitchell Weinstein Regular Meeting Other Matters for Discussion 1. CMAP’s ON TO 2050 Comprehensive Regional Plan Discussion (Trustee Stein) (Staff Contact: Chris Stilling) Ms. Woods explained that Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) is the official regional planning organization for the northeastern Illinois counties of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Kendall, Lake, McHenry, and Will. Along with its partners, the agency is currently developing a new comprehensive regional plan for the Chicago metro area called ON TO 2050. An integral aspect of the plan is gaining perspectives from stakeholders on how the region should look in 2015. Consequently, CMAP is generating discussions regarding macro trends that will shape the region’s future. Jane Grover, CMAP was present. Ms. Grover provided a copy of the previous GO TO 2040 plan to the Commissioners and provided a present ation. During the presentation the Commissioners, staff and members of the audience were asked several survey questions and the results were discussed. 2. Recreational Vehicle (RV) Parking in Residential Districts (Trustee Stein) (Staff Contact: Chris Stilling) Mr. Stilling advised that the Village’s Zoning Ordinance provides for regulations associated with the parking and storage of RVs in residential zoning districts. Recently, staff has received a few complaints from residents concerned that the Village’s parking regulations for RVs are too permissive. The residents have requested that the Village consider amending its Ordinance to provide for greater restrictions to minimize the visual impact of RVs in a residential district. As a result, staff is seeking the PZC’s input on possible future amendments to our regulations. 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 51 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f A u g 1 6 , 2 0 1 7 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) 08/16/2017 The Village’s Zoning Ordinance defines RVs as any vehicle or boat originally designed or permanently converted and primarily used for living quarters, recreation, or for human habitation and not used as a commercial vehicle to include, but not limited to the following: boats and trailers; campers; travel trailers; truck camper; and mobile home or van. Section 17.36.030H.2 of the Zoning Ordinance regulates the storage and placement of RVs in residential zoning districts. To summarize, the Village allows for the year-round parking and storage of up to 2 RVs on a single-family lot. This includes the ability to park an RV in the front driveway, side and/or rear yard. The RV shall not exceed thirty-five feet (35’) in length, ten feet (10’) in height and eight feet (8’) in width. The Ordinance also prohibits RVs to be used as sleeping quarters. From an enforcement perspective, staff has not had many issues with our regulations. While staff is unaware of the total number of RVs stored in Buffalo Grove, staff does have some concerns about developing more restrictive regulations. Specifically, staff is concerned that stricter regulations could create a financial impact on existing residents who have conformed to our current code. Ch. Smith asked if staff knew how many RVs may be in the Village. Mr. Stilling advised that they do not know and most issues are isolated with about three to four inquiries a year. Com. Moodhe asked if there has been a dramatic increase in complaints or did staff just decide to address the issue. Mr. Stilling said staff decided to address the issue. Com. Moodhe asked if staff was leaning more towards changing the regulations for things like horse trailers or just campers. Mr. Stilling responded that the regulations would be for both - trailers and large campers. Mr. Sheehen added that staff gets calls on all sorts of vehicles, including snowmobiles with trailers. Staff will have to look at all of them. Com. Moodhe asked ho w the height is measured. Mr. Sheehan advised that these are measured from the ground up, including any appurtenances that project up on the top. Mr. Stilling would like to better define each type and create categories for them. Com. Au asked about the current regulations. Ben Ockrim, 811 Edgemere Road, is not against ownership of these types of vehicles, but believes that they should not impede on the health and safety of the residents. He has seen vehicles that are longer than 35 feet and higher than 10 feet that extend over the sidewalk when parked in a driveway. He would like to see the aesthetics addressed as well. He does not understand how it's not okay to have garbage cans in the front of your house, but it's okay to have a Mack truck parked there. He is asking for reasonable statutes to be developed. Com. Cesario believes it is important to not allow these types of vehicles to be parked indefinitely and recommended parking no more than 10 days at a time and no more than 30 days total a year. There are choices available to owners 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 52 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f A u g 1 6 , 2 0 1 7 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) 08/16/2017 that would not make it unduly burdensome. Mr. Stilling responded that a challenge is that there may be residents that have existing vehicles that are within the current regulations. Staff will need to look to consider them as well and that is why creating categories may be important. Com. Cesario is more understanding about these types of vehicles that are not visible from the street. Com. Au asked about who would police the regulations. Mr. Stilling believes it could be handled by issuing permits. Com. Moodhe agrees with Com. Cesario regarding placing time limits. He also believes that staff needs to look at the overall sizes as well. He is concerned about the number of residents that may ask for a variance if new regulations are put into place. Mr. Stilling asked Mr. Ockrim if the vehicle he is concerned with is parking in the front yard. Mr. Ockrim stated that it was stored in the side yard but then moved to the driveway. Mr. Stilling believes that it will be important to discuss categories and was asked about allowing a "grandfather" clause. He responded there would not be a "grandfather" clause. Com. Moodhe asked if permits would be required. Mr. Stilling believes that permits could be issued for storage of a vehicle. Com. Goldspiel wants staff to consider the appearance of the vehicle. Ch. Smith wants to move to more restrictive regulations. The horse trailer next to him has used the RV law to get away with staying for too many years. Com. Cesario stated that the point is to get the vehicle to move. Mr. Stilling advised that any new regulations put into place would most likely allow a timeline for compliance. He would like to re-address this issue in 30-45 days with a draft Ordinance for consideration. Approval of Minutes 1. Planning and Zoning Commission - Regular Meeting - Aug 2, 2017 7:30 PM Moved by Com. Moodhe, seconded by Com. Cesario, to approve the minutes of the August 2, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting. Com. Goldspiel asked about the language on Page 20 of the packet, the approval of the July 19, 2017 minutes. Mr. Stilling advised that the packets and the minutes are both done in the same software and it is just a technical issue. 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 53 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f A u g 1 6 , 2 0 1 7 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) 08/16/2017 RESULT: ACCEPTED [5 TO 0] AYES: Smith, Moodhe, Cesario, Goldspiel, Khan ABSTAIN: Amy Au ABSENT: Matthew Cohn, Scott Lesser, Mitchell Weinstein Chairman's Report None. Committee and Liaison Reports None. Staff Report/Future Agenda Schedule Mr. Stilling advised that there are numerous PZC items scheduled for the August 21, 2017 Village Board agenda. Mr. Stilling reviewed the items for the upcoming September 6, 2017 PZC meeting and also recommended, based upon the fact that the September 20, 2017 meeting is the start of Rosh Hashanah, the meeting be canceled. The PZC concurred. Public Comments and Questions Com. Au asked if the Village monitors social media sites. Mr. Stilling responded that the Village does. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:08 PM Chris Stilling Director of Community Development APPROVED BY ME THIS 16th DAY OF August , 2017 3.B.1 Packet Pg. 54 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f A u g 1 6 , 2 0 1 7 7 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s )