2017-06-21 - Planning and Zoning Commission - Agenda Packet
Meeting of the Village of Buffalo Grove
Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting
June 21, 2017 at 7:30 PM
Fifty Raupp Blvd
Buffalo Grove, IL 60089-2100
Phone: 847-459-2500
I. Call to Order
II. Public Hearings/Items For Consideration
1. Proposed Link Crossing Subdivision (Request to Continue to July 19, 2017) (Trustee
Ottenheimer) (Staff Contact: Chris Stilling)
2. Consider Variations to the Sign Code for the Four Points by Sheraton on 900 West Lake
Cook Road (Trustee Stein) (Staff Contact: Brian Sheehan)
III. Regular Meeting
A. Other Matters for Discussion
B. Approval of Minutes
1. Planning and Zoning Commission - Regular Meeting - May 17, 2017 7:30 PM
C. Chairman's Report
D. Committee and Liaison Reports
E. Staff Report/Future Agenda Schedule
F. Public Comments and Questions
IV. Adjournment
The Planning and Zoning Commission will make every effort to accommodate all items on the
agenda by 10:30 p.m. The Board, does, however, reserve the right to defer consideration of
matters to another meeting should the discussion run past 10:30 p.m.
The Village of Buffalo Grove, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that
persons with disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or
participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities,
contact the ADA Coordinator at 459-2525 to allow the Village to make reasonable
accommodations for those persons.
Updated: 6/16/2017 10:32 AM Page 1
Action Item : Proposed Link Crossing Subdivision (Request to
Continue to July 19, 2017)
Recommendation of Action
The PZC shall reopen the public hearing and continue it to the July 19, 2017 PZC meeting.
K. Hovnanian Homes (KHov) is proposing a residential development called Link Crossing that would be
located on approximately 50 acres at the southeast corner of Buffalo Grove Road and Brandywyn Lane.
This proposal has been under review by the Village's Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) as it
proceeds through the PZC's Public Hearing process. The project has been reviewed over the course of
two public hearings (April 5th and April 19th) as well as the May 16th neighborhood meeting. As a result
of the various meetings and feedback, KHov has requested to continue the June 21, 2017 Public Hearing
for the Link Crossing Project to the July 19, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting at 7:30 pm at
Village Hall. The continuance will allow them additional time to make changes to the proposed plan. In
addition to providing the Village a letter requesting a continuance to July 19th, KHov has also sent out the
attached letter to adjacent residents as well as other interested parties who have provided them their
contact information.
ATTACHMENTS:
Continue Memo (DOCX)
Hearing Continuation 06.14.17 (PDF)
Link Crossing Notice to Neighbors Sent 06-09-17 (PDF)
Trustee Liaison Staff Contact
Ottenheimer Chris Stilling, Community Development
Wednesday, June 21, 2017
2.1
Packet Pg. 2
Page 1 of 1
VILLAGE OF
BUFFALO GROVE
DATE: June 16, 2017
TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Christopher Stilling, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Proposed 50 acre Residential Development at 16802 W Aptakisic Road (Link
Farm)
K. Hovnanian Homes (KHov) continues to refine their project in light of the feedback received
from the April 5th and 19thPZC public hearing meetings as well as the May 16th neighborhood
meeting. As a result of the various meetings and feedback, KHov has requested to continue the
June 21, 2017 Public Hearing for the Link Crossing Project to the July 19, 2017 Planning and
Zoning Commission Meeting at 7:30 pm at Village Hall. The continuance will allow them
additional time to make changes to the proposed plan. In addition to providing the Village a
letter requesting a continuance to July 19th, KHov has also sent out the attached letter to
adjacent residents as well as other interested parties who have provided them their contact
information.
2.1.a
Packet Pg. 3
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
M
e
m
o
(
1
9
8
8
:
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
L
i
n
k
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
S
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
(
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
t
o
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
J
u
l
y
1
9
,
2
0
1
7
)
)
2.
1
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
4
Attachment: Hearing Continuation 06.14.17 (1988 : Proposed Link Crossing Subdivision (Request to
2.
1
.
c
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
5
Attachment: Link Crossing Notice to Neighbors Sent 06-09-17 (1988 : Proposed Link Crossing
Updated: 6/16/2017 11:30 AM Page 1
Action Item : Consider Variations to the Sign Code for the Four
Points by Sheraton on 900 West Lake Cook Road
Recommendation of Action
Staff recommends approval of the two requested variations, subject to the condition that the proposed
signs are in installed in accordance to the attached plans.
The petitioner, Four Points by Sheraton on 900 West Lake Cook Road, is seeking two variations related
to signage. The first variation is to move its existing ground sign off -premise to the vacant parcel just
south of their existing property. The second variation is to replace the existing wall sign with a new sign
that would exceed the maximum area allowed by the code.
ATTACHMENTS:
Staff Report (DOCX)
Aerial (PDF)
Site Plan/Plat of Survey (PDF)
Sign Drawings (PDF)
Petitioners Letter (PDF)
Authorization Letter (PDF)
Hamilton Approval Letter (PDF)
Trustee Liaison Staff Contact
Stein Brian Sheehan, Community Development
Wednesday, June 21, 2017
2.2
Packet Pg. 6
VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: June 21, 2017
SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION: 900 West Lake Cook Road
PETITIONER: David Steiner on behalf of Lake County Hospitality, LLC D/B/A
Four Points by Sheraton.
PREPARED BY: Brian Sheehan, Building Commissioner
REQUEST: A variation to allow an off-permise ground sign and a variation
to allow a wall sign to exceed the maximum size (area).
EXSITING LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is improved with an existing building and is zoned
B-3.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The 2009 Comprehensive Plan calls for this property to be
commercial.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The petitioner, Four Points by Sheraton on 900 West Lake Cook Road, is seeking two variations related
to signage. The first variation is to move its existing ground sign off-premise to the vacant parcel just
south of their existing property. The second variation is to replace the existing wall sign with a new sign
that would exceed the maximum area allowed by the code.
PLANNING & ZONING ANALYSIS
Off-Site Ground Sign
The existing ground sign is a double-faced sign constructed of aluminum
with routed graphics and white acrylic letters. It is 15 feet tall and 7 feet 4
inches wide and 52.5 square feet in area. The ground sign is internally lit.
As shown on the site plans, the existing sign, which was recently
constructed, is located at the southwest corner of the parking lot, right on
the edge of the property. Following the construction of this sign, the
petitioner noted that the location does not provide adequate visibility to
Lake Cook Road, especially those traveling west on Lake Cook. As a result,
the petitioner is seeking to relocate the sign on a vacant outlot owned by Hamilton Partners. Hamilton
Partners has provided a letter expressing their consent to relocate the pylon sign to their property. The
proposed location would provide enhanced visibility to east and west-bound travelers on Lake Cook
Road.
2.2.a
Packet Pg. 7
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
9
8
9
:
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
V
a
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
i
g
n
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
F
o
u
r
P
o
i
n
t
s
b
y
S
h
e
r
a
t
o
n
o
n
9
0
0
W
e
s
t
L
a
k
e
C
o
o
k
R
o
a
d
)
Wall Sign
Currently the Four Points Sheraton has a nylon sign on the porte
cochere facing west. The petitioner woud like to replace this with a
new sign fabricated from aluminum letters with clear acrylic faces.
The proposed wall sign would be 5 feet 8.4 inches tall and 8 feet 8.6
inches wide or 50.3 square feet in area. It would identify the name
of the business and be internally lit with LED lighting.
The proposed sign would cover approximately 50% of the wall sign
background, while the Village’s code allows a maximum of 20%. The
proposed wall sign’s limited visibility to westbound Lake Cook Road travelers and the importance of sign
visibility to the business, provide strong rationale for relief to this Village’ standard. Furthermore, the
sign is constructed with individual letters, which would allow the building to still be visible.
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
The property has been posted with the public hearing notice and the adjacent property owners have
been notified as required. To date, staff has not received any public comments concerning this variance
request.
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEWS
Village Department Comments
Engineering The Village Engineer has reviewed the proposed ground sign location and does
not have any engineering or line of sight concerns with the proposed location of
the sign. He also does not have any concern regarding the proposed wall sign.
SIGNAGE ORDIANCE VARIATIONS
The following is a summary of the two requested variations:
1. Variation to Section 14.16.070 to exceed the size limitations of the proposed wall sign.
The Village’s Sign Code allows a maximum of 20% of the wall sign background to be used for
copy when the business has a ground sign. The proposed sign is approximately 50% of the wall
sign background. Staff supports this variation due to visibility.
2. Variation to Section 14.20.100 to allow off-premise sign.
The petitioner is proposing to relocate their existing ground sign off-premise. The new location
is south of the Four Points property. Staff supports this relocation.
VARIATION STANDARDS
Pursuant to the Village Code, the Planning & Zoning Commission is authorized to make a
recommendation to the Village Board based on the following criteria:
A. Except for Prohibited signs (Chapter 14.32), the Village Planning & Zoning Commission may
recommend approval or disapproval of a variance from the provisions or requirements of this
Title subject to the following:
1. The literal interpretation and strict application of the provisions and requirements of this
Title would cause undue and unnecessary hardships to the sign user because of unique or
unusual conditions pertaining to the specific building, parcel or property in question; and
2.2.a
Packet Pg. 8
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
9
8
9
:
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
V
a
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
i
g
n
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
F
o
u
r
P
o
i
n
t
s
b
y
S
h
e
r
a
t
o
n
o
n
9
0
0
W
e
s
t
L
a
k
e
C
o
o
k
R
o
a
d
)
2. The granting of the requested variance would not be materially detrimental to the property
owners in the vicinity; and
3. The unusual conditions applying to the specific property do not apply generally to other
properties in the Village; and
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the purpose of this Title pursuant to
Section 14.04.020
B. Where there is insufficient evidence, in the opinion of the Planning & Zoning Commission, to
support a finding under subsection (A), but some hardship does exist, the Planning & Zoning
Commission may consider the requirement fulfilled if:
1. The proposed signage is of particularly good design and in particularly good taste; and
2. The entire site has been or will be particularly well landscaped.
The petitioner will respond to the standards at the public hearing.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the two requested variations, subject to the conditions that the proposed
signs are in installed in accordance to the attached plans.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) shall open the public hearing and take public testimony
concerning the two variations. The PZC shall make a recommendation to the Village Board.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Aerial photo of site
2. Application for variation
3. Plat of Survey
4. Site Plan
5. Sign plans
6. Petitioners Letter
7. Property owner approval
8. Proof of Ownership
9. Authorization letter
2.2.a
Packet Pg. 9
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
9
8
9
:
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
V
a
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
i
g
n
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
F
o
u
r
P
o
i
n
t
s
b
y
S
h
e
r
a
t
o
n
o
n
9
0
0
W
e
s
t
L
a
k
e
C
o
o
k
R
o
a
d
)
Page 1 of 1
6/15/2017https://apps.gisconsortium.org/arcgisoutput/_ags_e1ffcf2f-92b2-497c-95fb-952a7721210d....
2.2.b
Packet Pg. 10
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
e
r
i
a
l
(
1
9
8
9
:
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
V
a
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
i
g
n
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
F
o
u
r
P
o
i
n
t
s
b
y
S
h
e
r
a
t
o
n
o
n
9
0
0
W
e
s
t
L
a
k
e
C
o
o
k
R
o
a
d
)
2.2.c
Packet Pg. 11
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
i
t
e
P
l
a
n
/
P
l
a
t
o
f
S
u
r
v
e
y
(
1
9
8
9
:
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
V
a
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
i
g
n
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
F
o
u
r
P
o
i
n
t
s
b
y
S
h
e
r
a
t
o
n
o
n
9
0
0
W
e
s
t
L
a
k
e
C
o
o
k
2.2.d
Packet Pg. 12
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
i
g
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
(
1
9
8
9
:
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
V
a
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
i
g
n
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
F
o
u
r
P
o
i
n
t
s
b
y
S
h
e
r
a
t
o
n
o
n
9
0
0
W
e
s
t
L
a
k
e
C
o
o
k
R
o
a
d
)
2.2.d
Packet Pg. 13
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
i
g
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
(
1
9
8
9
:
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
V
a
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
i
g
n
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
F
o
u
r
P
o
i
n
t
s
b
y
S
h
e
r
a
t
o
n
o
n
9
0
0
W
e
s
t
L
a
k
e
C
o
o
k
R
o
a
d
)
2.2.d
Packet Pg. 14
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
i
g
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
(
1
9
8
9
:
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
V
a
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
i
g
n
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
F
o
u
r
P
o
i
n
t
s
b
y
S
h
e
r
a
t
o
n
o
n
9
0
0
W
e
s
t
L
a
k
e
C
o
o
k
R
o
a
d
)
2.2.d
Packet Pg. 15
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
i
g
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
(
1
9
8
9
:
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
V
a
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
i
g
n
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
F
o
u
r
P
o
i
n
t
s
b
y
S
h
e
r
a
t
o
n
o
n
9
0
0
W
e
s
t
L
a
k
e
C
o
o
k
R
o
a
d
)
2.2.e
Packet Pg. 16
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
e
t
i
t
i
o
n
e
r
s
L
e
t
t
e
r
(
1
9
8
9
:
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
V
a
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
i
g
n
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
F
o
u
r
P
o
i
n
t
s
b
y
S
h
e
r
a
t
o
n
o
n
9
0
0
W
e
s
t
L
a
k
e
C
o
o
k
R
o
a
d
)
2.2.f
Packet Pg. 17
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
L
e
t
t
e
r
(
1
9
8
9
:
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
V
a
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
i
g
n
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
F
o
u
r
P
o
i
n
t
s
b
y
S
h
e
r
a
t
o
n
o
n
9
0
0
W
e
s
t
L
a
k
e
C
o
o
k
R
o
a
d
)
2.2.g
Packet Pg. 18
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
a
m
i
l
t
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
L
e
t
t
e
r
(
1
9
8
9
:
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
V
a
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
i
g
n
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
F
o
u
r
P
o
i
n
t
s
b
y
S
h
e
r
a
t
o
n
o
n
9
0
0
W
e
s
t
L
a
k
e
C
o
o
k
Buffalo Grove Planning & Zoning Commission – Public Hearing – May 17, 2017 Page 1
Village of Buffalo Grove
Planning & Zoning Commission
Public Hearing
Date: May 17, 2017 Location: Village Hall
Chairman Smith called the hearing to order at 7:30pm in the Village Council Chambers,
Buffalo Grove Municipal Building, 50 Raupp Boulevard, Buffalo Grove, Illinois.
Roll Call
Present: Commissioners Au, Cesario, Cohn, Goldspiel, Khan, Weinstein and
Chairman Smith
Absent: Commissioners Lesser and Moodhe
Also Present: Mr. Brian Sheehan, Village Planner; Mr. William Raysa, Village
Attorney; Ms. Nicole Woods, Village Planner; Mr. Christopher Stilling,
Community Development Director
Subject: Proposed Link Crossing Subdivision
Commissioner Cesario moved to continue the item for a proposed Link Crossing
Subdivision to June 21, 2017. Commissioner Kahn seconded the motion. Motion Carried
Unanimously.
Subject: Variation to Install an 8 Foot Solid Wood Fence for 790 Woodhollow Lane
Chairman Smith swore in those testifying in the case.
Tae Kim (petitioner) presented his case for variation.
Chairman Smith entered the four photos into the record as Exhibit One.
Commissioner Cesario said that two neighbors to this property already had eight-foot
wood fences; also another close property has one as well.
Commissioner Goldspiel asked about the height of the property. Mr. Kim confirmed his
property did sit higher than neighboring properties.
No public comment was entered. Public hearing was closed.
Chairman Weinstein made a motion to grant a variation to install an 8 foot solid wood
fence along the rear property line at the address 790 Woodhollow Lane. Commissioner
Kahn seconded the motion.
3.B.1
Packet Pg. 19
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
1
7
,
2
0
1
7
7
:
3
0
P
M
(
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
2
Aye: Au, Cesario, Cohn, Goldspiel, Khan, Weinstein, Smith
Nay: None
Abstain: None
The motion carried 7:0:0.
Subject: Special Use for a Child Day Care Home at 303 Gardenia Drive
Chairman Smith swore in those testifying in the case.
Elena Lewis had been operating a day care at another address in the Village and has the
appropriate licenses. She had since relocated to the new address and all appropriate
inspections and licenses had been completed.
There was some discussion regarding whether the family was also residing in this home.
Commissioner Au said that her parents resided nearby so chose to abstain.
Commissioner Weinstein asked if there had been any complaints at the other location.
Mr. Sheehan said that when the previous location was first started, there was a parking
complaint that was resolved. Since that, no other complaints had been received.
Commissioner Weinstein asked if this was the primary residence, and it was confirmed
that it was. Commissioner Weinstein asked if Ms. Lewis and her spouse were both listed
on the lease, and it was confirmed that they were. Commissioner Weinstein requested that
a copy of that lease be provided. Mr. Stilling said that, if approved, a copy of the lease
would be included before being forwarded to the Board.
Commissioner Weinstein asked for a general explanation of the daily in -and-out
procedures of the day care. The DCFS license allowed for eight children; however, Mrs.
Lewis currently had two full-time children and a few part-time. The earliest drop off was
7:30am, and the latest pick-up was 6:00pm.
Commissioner Goldspiel asked about a fenced play area. Mr. Lewis explained where this
was on the property, and Mr. Sheehan confirmed that this passed the Village inspection.
Commissioner Khan asked for verification that at any given time, the number of children
would not exceed eight. This was confirmed. Commissioner Khan asked if there was any
assistance during this time or if Mrs. Lewis was the only provider. Mr. Lewis said that a
music teacher would sometimes come in for a couple of hours during the week.
Chairman Smith asked if there were any other day cares like this in the area. Mr. Sheehan
said that there was not in the immediate area.
Commissioner Cesario asked what the age ranges of the children to be cared for at this
daycare. Mrs. Lewis said that the age ranges were between two and five.
3.B.1
Packet Pg. 20
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
1
7
,
2
0
1
7
7
:
3
0
P
M
(
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
Buffalo Grove Planning & Zoning Commission – Public Hearing – May 17, 2017 Page 3
A member of the public said that the public notice sign fell in the rain. However, he also
wanted to ensure that this was a primary residence and that people were not converting
residential property to a commercial building.
Commissioner Weinstein asked about the special use criteria. He asked the petitioner to
address the special use criteria, specifically if the subject establishment would serve the
public convenience at the location of the property and if the maintenance or operation of
the special use would be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals,
comfort or general welfare. He did not believe this would be a problem with a child care
facility. Commissioner Weinstein asked about the location and size of the special use and
if there was adequate street access – as well as if this was in harmony with the
surrounding district. Mr. Lewis confirmed this. Commissioner Weinstein asked if the
special use would be injurious to the use or enjoyment of neighboring properties; it
would not. Commissioner Weinstein said the other criteria was standard for residential
use.
Chairman Smith entered Mr. Sheehan’s staff report into the record as Exhibit One.
A neighbor requested that people not park along the curve of the road for safety purposes.
Mr. Lewis said that parking would take place on the driveway.
Public hearing was closed.
Chairman Weinstein moved for positive recommendation to the Village Board for a
Special Use for a Child Day Care Home within the R-9 Residential Zoning District at the
address 303 Gardenia Drive, Buffalo Grove – subject to the following conditions:
1. The petitioner complies to both the Special Use standards of Section 17.28.040
and Child Day Care Homes Standards in Section 17.28.060 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
2. The special use for Child Day Care Home is granted to Elena Lewis and does not
run with the land.
3. Special Use granted to Elena Lewis is assignable to subsequent petitioners
seeking assignment of this Special Use as follows:
a. Upon application of a petitioner seeking assignment of this Special Use,
the corporate authorities in their sole discretion may refer said application
of assignment to the appropriation commission or commissions for a
public hearing or may hold a public hearing with the Village Board;
b. Such assignment will only be valid only under a proper, valid and binding
ordinance by the corporate authorities granting said assignment which
may be granted or denied for any reason
4. A copy of the lease be provided to the Village.
5. The proof of ownership by the homeowner, Tiffany Schneider, be provided.
Commissioner Cesario seconded.
Aye: Cesario, Cohn, Goldspiel, Khan, Weinstein, Smith
3.B.1
Packet Pg. 21
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
1
7
,
2
0
1
7
7
:
3
0
P
M
(
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
4
Nay: None
Abstain: Au
The motion carried 6:0:1.
Subject: Variation to the Sign Code for Multiple Wall Signs at 350 McHenry Road
Chairman Smith swore in those testifying in the case.
Mr. Sheehan reviewed the case, and Ron Meyer (Meyer Signs) reviewed the request.
Commissioner Goldspiel asked several questions pertaining to the sign placement and
materials. Mr. Meyer reviewed this. Commissioner Goldspiel asked about the monument
sign. Mr. Meyer said that this would stay. Commissioner Goldspiel asked how the
monument fit into this, and Mr. Sheehan said that this had previously been approved
without any variances. Mr. Stilling clarified that the wall signs and monument signs were
counted separately (i.e. a maximum number of wall signs and a maximum amount of
monument signs).
Commissioner Cesario asked what entity was the petitioner. Mr. Sheehan said that the
ownership of the property was BW Bowling Properties LP, and they gave permission to
Leiserv to petition for a variation as well as for Meyer Signs to petition to submit the
details needed on their behalf. It was confirmed that this information had been received
by Staff. Commissioner Cesario asked about the height change. Mr. Meyer reviewed this
and said that the increase in height was less than two feet. The rest of the dimensions of
the sign were the same as what it was replacing.
Commissioner Au asked about the sign replacing the Tavern 45 as she did not believe that
the Tavern 45 sign had been entirely back lit. She asked if the new “Bowl” sign would be
glowing and if this would be problematic for neighboring residents.
Chairman Smith entered Mr. Sheehan’s staff memo into the record as Exhibit One.
Jim Rourke (President of the Association) said that the residents had a concern about the
signs being lit until midnight or later. He wanted to ask about the possibility of having a
timer on the sign that would turn the lighted sign off or be dimmed - after 10pm. Mr.
Stilling asked if the sign there currently causes problems. Mr. Rourke said that the
existing sign currently is further west, and he was not sure what the brightness
comparison would be. Mr. Stilling suggested the petitioner further examine the current
lumen of the sign and look into creating a new sign does not exceed this lumen. There
was some discussion regarding being unsure of the previous sign as it had since been
taken down.
Commissioner Goldspiel felt that the large “Bowl” sign should match the neighboring
signs. He thought that the big backlit white space could be too bright.
3.B.1
Packet Pg. 22
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
1
7
,
2
0
1
7
7
:
3
0
P
M
(
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
Buffalo Grove Planning & Zoning Commission – Public Hearing – May 17, 2017 Page 5
Commissioner Cesario suggested adding a stipulation about the Village having the right
to reduce the brightness. It might not have to be utilized, and Mr. Rourke said he would
be agreeable to this. He was just concerned about the late hours and the bright side.
Chairman Smith said that the Staff could work with the petitioner to come up with a
suitable solution and language to bring before the Village Board with the commission’s
recommendation.
Commissioner Weinstein asked for clarification on which sign was the one being
questioned, and it was clarified that the one that faced east was fine as it was far enough
north. Commissioner Weinstein asked if there had been any problems with the previous
Tavern 45 sign.
Mr. Stilling asked for clarification that the “Bowl” sign on the South elevation that was
furthest east was the sign being discussed. This was confirmed. Mr. Stilling asked about
having that sign dimmed to a certain number of lumens after 10pm but leaving the other
signs fully lit as needed. Staff preferred the language be specific to the “Bowl” sign; Staff
could work with the petitioner to come up with a plan that would be reasonable for all
parties. There was some discussion regarding this.
Commissioner Goldspiel said that reversing the blue and white in the signs was a good
idea that kept in character with the surrounding buildings and signs. There was some
discussion regarding this.
There was no further public comment. Public hearing was closed.
Chairman Weinstein moved for positive recommendation to the Village Board for a
Variation to allow for multiple wall signs and for one sign to exceed the maximum height
allowed at the property at 350 McHenry Road subject to the following conditions:
1. Staff will work with the petitioner regarding the sign furthest east along the south
elevation of the building for the sign to have an acceptable level of brightness as
determined by the corporate authorities.
Commissioner Cohn seconded.
Commissioner Goldspiel asked what the determination was on the color of the sign.
Chairman Smith said that this was not determined. Mr. Stilling said that this was an
option to tone the brightness to be discussed with the petitioner.
Aye: Au, Cesario, Cohn, Khan, Weinstein, Smith
Nay: Goldspiel
Abstain: None
The motion carried 6:1:0.
Subject: Special Use for a Childcare Center with Variations to the Sign Code for the
Property at 1050 Barclay
3.B.1
Packet Pg. 23
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
1
7
,
2
0
1
7
7
:
3
0
P
M
(
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
6
Chairman Smith swore in those testifying in the case.
Ed Rohn from Advanced Development Group said that Advanced was the developer for
this future Goddard School. He reviewed the case for Special Use; he believed that this
case satisfied all four of the necessary categories. He also reviewed the two sign
variances: the case for two wall signs as well as a manually changed sign.
Ms. Woods also added that Staff supports this proposed project. The site, which is in the
industrial district, is challenging for industrial development and consequently suitable for
other uses. Moreover, the petitioner’s proposed operations (parking, drop-off etc.) would
create a safe daycare for environment in that area. She reviewed the KLOA traffic study
associated with this site. There was some discussion regarding the projected level of
service and delay tables in the traffic report.
Commissioner Cesario noted that there was a pond at the east of the property.
Commissioner Cesario asked for examples of what was standard for the manual signs at a
Goddard School. Levi Otwell (Goddard Systems) gave some examples, like events.
Commissioner Cesario asked about the outdoor area and asked if there were any plans for
outdoor activities for children. Mr. Otwell explained where the three areas would be and
what ages would be used by each. There was some discussion regarding the location of
the areas and the distance from the parking. It was confirmed that at no time would
children be in the parking lot unless being dropped off or picked up by their guardians
and during the drop-off and pick-up they are being escorted by their guardians.
Commissioner Goldspiel but asked how one of the signs would be visible from
Deerfield. Mr. Rohn said that it fronts the pond, and there was nothing blocking the view
from the pond. He also said that the sign would be on the gable aspect of the roof which
would mirror the sign on the other side of the building. Commissioner Goldspeil asked
what size; Mr. Rohn said that the exact size had not been determined yet, but no variance
would be requested for the sign size. Commissioner Goldspiel also asked about the
outdoor play area and was concerned about the nearby detention ponds. He was glad to
hear that the play areas were fenced; and then the petitioner confirmed that at no time
other than drop off or pick up would the children be outside the fenced area.
Commissioner Goldspiel also asked about the shade structure on the north side. Mr. Rohr
explained that it was DCFS requirement to provide a certain amount of shade in outdoor
areas, and this was built into the structure. He reviewed the plans for this structure.
Commissioner Goldspiel also asked for more information about the toddler play area on
the south side. Mr. Rohr went over the components of this. Commissioner Goldspiel
asked about the west fenced area. Mr. Rohr said that this would be an open sodded area
for outdoor classroom. There was some further discussion regarding the entrances and
exits for these areas.
Commissioner Weinstein asked who the petitioner and projected tenant were for
clarification. Advanced Development Group was the petitioner, but the Special Use
would be awarded to the tenant – Star Kidz LLC.
3.B.1
Packet Pg. 24
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
1
7
,
2
0
1
7
7
:
3
0
P
M
(
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
Buffalo Grove Planning & Zoning Commission – Public Hearing – May 17, 2017 Page 7
Commissioner Goldspiel asked about the manual updated sign. Mr. Rohr reviewed the
sizes of the three lines and clarified that this was not backlit. Chairman Smith asked if
this was easy to do as some places did not maintain this well. Mr. Rohr said it would be
easy to change and the letters would not fall out of place easily.
There was no public comment entered.
Commissioner Au asked if any follow-up that needed to be done on this. Mr. Stilling said
that the report acknowledged the volume of traffic on Deerfield Road at peak times.
However, the timing of the scenarios do not usually factor in gaps. However, the situation
would not contribute to this.
The Special Use standards were reviewed that this facility would meet them.
The Public Hearing was closed.
Chairman Weinstein moved for positive recommendation to the Village Board for a
Variation to allow for a special use for a childcare center in the Industrial District at 1050
Barclay Blvd with variations to the Buffalo Grove Sign Code – specifically to Section
14.16.040 to allow a second wall sign and Section 14.20.080 to allow for a manual
changeable copy sign with the following conditions:
1. Proof of ownership of the property shall be provided to the Village;
2. A copy of the lease for Starkidz, LLC shall be provided to the Village;
3. Proof of Starkidz, LLC is a valid Illinois Limited Liability Company with an
assumed name of The Goddard School shall be provided to the Village;
4. A copy of the franchise agreement will be provided to the Village;
5. Starkidz, LLC will obtain a DCFS license, a copy of which will be provided to
the Village;
6. A Special Use for a child care center shall be granted to Starkidz, LLC d/b/a The
Goddard School and the special use does not run with the land;
7. The special use granted to Starkidz, LLC is assignable to subsequent petitioners
seeking assignment of this special use as follows:
a. Upon application of the petitioner seeking assignment of a special use,
the corporate authorities in their sole discretion may refer said
application of assignment to appropriate commission or commissions
for a public hearing or may hold a public hearing at the Village Board;
b. Such assignment shall be valid only upon adoption of a proper, valid
and binding ordinance by the corporate authorities granting said
assignment which may be granted or denied for any reason;
8. The proposed development shall conform to the plans presented to the PZC.
9. Any change in the ownership of Starkidz, LLC shall be subject to approval by the
Village.
Commissioner Cesario seconded.
3.B.1
Packet Pg. 25
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
1
7
,
2
0
1
7
7
:
3
0
P
M
(
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
8
Commissioner Cesario said that as a Village mixed uses of the industrial areas, and this
was not inconsistent with what had been done.
Aye: Au, Cesario, Cohn, Golspiel, Khan, Weinstein, Smith
Nay: None
Abstain: None
The motion carried 7:0:0.
The Public Hearings closed at 8:50pm
3.B.1
Packet Pg. 26
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
1
7
,
2
0
1
7
7
:
3
0
P
M
(
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)