1990-04-25 - Plan Commission - Minutes SPECIAL MEETING
BUFFALO GROVE PLAN COMMISSION
Fire Station No. 27
Carlyle Unit 2
National Gymnastics Academy
April 25, 1990
`./ Chairman Sheldon called the Special Meeting to order at 7 : 31 P.M. in
the Municipal Building, 50 Raupp Boulevard, Buffalo Grove , Illinois .
Commissioners Present: Chairman Sheldon
Mr. Goldspiel
Mr. Krug
Mr. Rhodes
Ms. Howard
Mr. Braiman
Mr. Rubin
Mr. Charlette
Commissioners Absent : Mr. Rosenston
Also Present : Mr. Lawrence Freedman
Mr. Edward Schwartz
Mr. William Balling , Village Manager
Chief Thomas Allenspach, Buffalo Grove Fire
Department
Mr. Robert Andres , Civil Tech Engineering
Mr. Frank Childers, G&C Consulting Engineers
Mr. Robert Sebak, Harris & Kwasek
Architechts
Mr. Kenneth Lattanzi , McLennan & Thebault
Mr. John R. Thebault , McLennan & Thebault
Ms. Mary Jo Burke , National Gymnastics
Academy
Mr. Nick Burke
Mr. Richard Kuenkler, Village Engineer
Mr. Robert Pfeil , Village Planner
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Moved by Commissioner Krug, seconded by Commissioner Braiman, to
approve the minutes of the Public Hearing of March 28 , 1990 , as
amended. All Commissioners were in favor with Commissioner Rhodes
abstaining , and the motion carried.
Buffalo Grove Plan Commission-Special Meeting-April 25 , 1990-Page 1
Moved by Commissioner Charlette , seconded by Commissioner Howard,
to approve the minutes of the Special Meeting of March 28 , 1990 , as
amended. All Commissioners were in favor with Commissioner Rhodes
abstaning , and the motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Rhodes , seconded by Commissioner Howard, to
approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 4 , 1990 , as
amended. All Commissioners were in favor and the motion carried.
COMMITTEE AND LIAISON REPORTS - None
FIRE STATION NO. 27, Route 22/Easton Avenue
Mr. William Balling , Village Manager, appeared before the Commission
and explained the history of fire service development in the Village .
He stated the original fire service plan contemplated two station
sites with an annual review of activities and service levels to
determine further need. In 1985 and 1986 the Village approved
annexation of the Fiore property and reservd a 2-acre site at
Highway 22 for the option of future station site use . In 1990
calls and run times were studied to determine if a northern district
station would be warranted based on growth in that part of the
Village . Final recommendations were that a third station be planned
and operational by 1991 .
Mr. Balling stated the plan for the design, technology and equipment
of the proposed station were tailored to the needs of the Village
now and for the future with the capacity for expansion planned into
the building . He stated the design both architecturally and from a
land use and environmental point of view is sensitive to the times .
Mr. Balling indicated the current plan presented is for a site of
84 , 000 sq. ft . but it is anticipated that because of potential
problems on the eastern portion of the site in order to protect
drainage they will be seeking an agreement with the Zale group for
additional land use and will present a plan for a site of
approximately 2 . 44 acres where the lot itself will be 55 ft . wider
and the building will be more westerly oriented.
Mr. Balling reviewed the surrounding land uses being primarily
residential and open space. There is multi-family to the south, a
wetlands open space on the east , residential to the north,
environmentally protected area northwesterly with some single family
homes , and industrial zoned to the west with plans for more office-
type use than industrial .
Mr. Balling stated the firm of McLennan & Thebault was selected
because they could provide the custom concept and design adopted for
Buffalo Grove Plan Commission-Special Meeting-April 25 , 1990-Page 2
the project with appropriate cost control and ability to meet the
timing objective of having the station operational by 4/15/91 .
Chief Allenspach then appeared and in response to previous inquiries
by the Commission presented a brochure explaining a piece of
equipment called a quint which will ultimately be acquired for the
proposed station. He stated the quint will operate as both a truck
and engine and will carry paramedic and rescue equipment as well .
The cost will be over $300 , 000.
In response to another question previously presented by the
Commission regarding access from the front of the station, Chief
Allenspach stated that with the building moved further west on the
site they hope to have more room to allow them quick access to
Easton. Otherwise they will just go around from the front down 22
to Main Street and back up the east/west leg of Easton which is only
. 2 mi . more than turning onto Easton and going toward the Main
Street intersection. He noted they will work on the timing of the
light to allow them to be on the street when it changes.
Commissioner Rhodes asked about previous inquiry as to whether the
parking provided in the front of the station would be adequate. Mr.
Balling noted the front drive is available only for emergency
parking and will be posted as such. He explained the purpose of the
police desk in the front of the station and noted that that function
would not create activity whereby other cars would come to the
station to pick someone up.
In response to further inquiry, Chief Allenspach indicated visitors
would access the building from the rear where there is a doorbell to
alert that someone is present . He noted that most visitors are
expected from planned tours , and that the other two stations in the
Village have the same setup and have experienced no problems with
unauthorized parking in the front .
Brief discussion ensued regarding the parking in the back and
whether there was too much parking planned. Mr. Balling explained
they did not want to underpark the facility because there may be
some need for compensation when the building is shifted to the west ,
and also areas for recycling bins may use up some of the spaces .
Mr. John Thebault then introduced the members of his design team
present who would each make a presentation. Mr. Sebak addressed the
design of the building and location on the site noting that due to
IDOT requirements for spacing between the driveway and Easton Avenue
and tying into the signal study for the driveway, they had moved the
building 30 ft . to the west . The revised site plan was dated
4/25/90 .
Buffalo Grove Plan Commission-Special Meeting-April 25 , 1990-Page 3
Brief discussion followed regarding the further plan to adjust the
site further west and the need for that . Mr. Balling explained that
there currently exists a soggy area on the site which may be caused
simply by blocked drainage but it could possibly be determined to be
a low grade wetland area. Because of the potential to throw off
timing for the project it was decided to deal with the area as if it
were environmentally protected.
Mr. Sebak continued, noting they had left a substantial frontage
area as a buffer off of Route 22 , and left 63 ft . in the rear as a
buffer to the residential . The living area of the building will be
n the east with the apparatus and maintenance areas to the west next
to the industrial/ commercial areas. Chairman Sheldon expressed
interest in knowing how close the equipment would come to
residential areas when turning around in the back.
Mr. Sebak stated to utilize as much natural light as possible they
used sloped roofs and added high windows to let in naturl light
over the truck areas . The majority of the building will be face
brick with some cedar areas above the doors and windows .
Commissioner Goldspiel expressed concern regarding the use of cedar
detailing since they have attempted in the Village to get others to
use more fire-safe materials and it may not be an appropriate
appearance as a fire-proof statement. Explanation was presented
regarding the fire-proof nature of this detail , noting there would
be a non-combustible concrete block behind the wood.
Commissioner Goldspiel asked about emergency exits from the rear of
the building and the basement and asked if there were sufficient
emergency exits from the living area. Commissioner Krug stated
there should be an exit by the stairwell and one in the front by the
apparatus room. Mr. Balling indicated they would make thorough
review on the issue and they would propose no deviations from the
requirements .
Mr. Frank Childers explained the drainage engineering for the
stormwater and detention areas noting the stormwater area will
extend the length of Easton Avenue basically where it is now. He
stated a corrugated metal pipe had been placed under Easton to
accomodate the difference in street level and some obstruction in
the flow through there had created a damp area on the site . Sewer
and water will extend across the front of the site along Route 22 .
Chairman Sheldon asked if there were problems with putting a
basement in the facility. Mr. Childers explained that it could be
waterproofed and any damp condition should be alleviated with a
proposed underdraining system.
Buffalo Grove Plan Commission-Special Meeting-April 25 , 1990-Page 4
Commissioner Goldspiel asked if curbs and gutters and sidewalks
would be provided. Mr. Childers explained that along Easton they
would eventually be put in place but would be the responsibility of
the Zale group. He noted a reinforced concrete pipe will replace
the corrugated pipe under Easton, sized to accomodate both the
overland flow from the Zale property and the fire station' s
stormwater detention.
Further discussion followed regarding the detention pond and
`./ maintenance of it, noting that the release to the drain had been
clogged but was now repaired. Chairman Sheldon inquired about
resopnsibility for future maintenance of the drain and pond area.
In response to a question from Commissioner Goldspiel , Mr. Childers
commented on the impact of the development of the Zale property and
compensation taken into account in the piping and draining from the
site . Mr. Childers stated he does not feel there will be any
appreciable increase in the amoung of standing water as a result of
deveopment in the area.
Commissioner Goldspiel asked when improvements along Easton would be
made and confirmed that replacement of the metal pipe under Easton
was part of the fire station development process.
Mr. Andres addressed the issue of signalization for the driveway.
He stated because fo the volume of traffic on Route 22 the Village
wantted to provide a signal at the driveway for safe egress from the
station. Mr. Andres stated they had met with IDOT regarding the
appropriate location which could not be too close to the
intersection. With the building moved further west as previously
explained, the driveway is now further from Easton and should be in
an appropriate location for a signal .
Mr. Andres stated the operation of the signal would be manual push
button from inside the station and would display a yellow clearance
interval , an all-red clearance interval and then green. The button
would be adjustable for time signals relating to the type of
equipment leaving .
Mr. Andres stated the design of the signal would accommodate future
widening of Route 22 .
With regard to concerns relating to stacking along Easton Avenue ,
Mr. Andres indicated that if the building moves further west as
planned it would improve the situation along Easton regarding
stacking. Commissioner Rhodes asked if striping in the roadway was
beneficial to preventing stack-up and blocking of the exit from the
station.
Buffalo Grove Plan Commission-Special Meeting-April 25 , 1990-Page 5
Commissioner Rhodes then asked for confirmation that the annexation
agreement from Zale provides for the installation of sidewalks along
Easton. Commissioner Briaman asked for assurance regarding
development of curbs as well and inquired about responsibility for
street lights .
Commissioner Braiman inquired about the location of HVAC units ,
which Mr. Balling indicated would be in the basement as would all
mechanical equipment .
Commissioner Braiman also asked about setbacks and whether
requirements would change as the property to the west is developed.
Mr. Pfeil explained no change in setback requirements would occur.
Commissioner Krug asked about the impact of moving the driveway
further west on the potential development of industrial/office space
to the west .
Commissioner Charlette inquired about security for the building.
Chief Allenspach indicated that the back door is locked at all
times. Access to the front door is made through a punch pad, and
the bay doors automatically cose and lock upon leaving on a call .
Commissioner Braiman expressed concern regarding noise intrusion
upon the neighboring residents when the bay doors are open and calls
can be heard from the speakers .
Commissioner Braiman then asked about future expansion of the
facility and what that would entail to be certain it was adequately
provided for. Chief Allenspach stated the extra half-bay is the
contemplated expansion to accommodate additional equipment to meet
future needs .
Mr. Thebault commented briefly on landscape plans stating they had
attempted to minimize sight line problems along Route 22 by holding
back landscaping in that area. Commissioner Braiman asked if a
variation would be sought for eliminating landscaping in that area.
Mr. Balling stated they would replace any eliminated trees on the
site elsewhere. Chairman Sheldon asked to be advised regarding
nursery stock located on or allocated for this property. Mr. Pfeil
explained a tree survey was not required because it is not a natural
site.
CARLYLE UNIT Prairie Road/Brandywyn Lane
Mr. Freedman indicated they had prepared an alternate plan to what
had previously been presented showing an R-2 and R-3 mix for the
development (Plan B dated 4/5/90 ) . The original plan showed only R-
2 development (Plan A) .
Buffalo Grove Plan Commission-Special Meeting-April 25 , 1990-Page 6
Mr. Schwartz stated the original Carlyle 1 development is a 32-lot
subdivision with a combination of R-2/R-3 zoning. The gross density
is 1 . 88 dwelling units per acre. In Carlyle 2 they have attempted
to mirror the same road pattern with a loop system through cul-de-
sacs backing onto Prairie Avenue . There will be no access to
Prairie but somewhere in the southwestern portion of the development
there will be a point of access for future extension of the
residential road.
The orignal development was 17 acres and Carlyle 2 is planned for
19 . 5 acres . Plan B with R-2/R-3 development provides for 43 lots
with a density of 2 dwelling units per acre which compares to 35
lots on R-2 development. Plan B proposes an R-2 transition area to
the west with the remainder being R-3 on the cul-de-sac lots.
Discussion followed regarding the effect of lot sizes on the selling
pricess of the homes . Mr. Schwartz indicated the smaller lots sell
the fastest . In response to a question from Commissioer Braiman,
Mr. Schwartz indicated he would not be selling off any of the lots .
Commissioner Krug stated he had envisioned more R-2 lots in the
combination of R-2 and R-3 development, however he believes Plan B
is better than straight R-2 development. Commissioner Charlette
noted he had originally suggested the R-2 be located to the west and
to the north and in the circle area, which would give them 8 or 9
more R-2 units .
Commissioner Goldspiel expressed concern with determining the best
location for the street to the south as it might fit with the
developing neighborhood to the south and west . Mr. Freedman said
because the property is owned by various people they cannot
determine how it might develop. Mr. Pfeil recognized that the
developer should not have the burden for developing a plan for the
entire area, but with the Village Engineer and staff a sketch of how
they would eventually go into the collector street and a plan for a
stormwater management system should be developed.
Discussion followed regarding where a street would stub at the south
end of the property. Mr. Pfeil noted the stormwater detention is
probably now in the correct location but the Village Engineer has
indicated it may ultimately be shifted westward to create a larger
regional facility and a road would then be created where the current
stormwater detention is shown. Commissioner Braiman noted ti would
`-/ be best to create a right-of-way in the current detention area to
allow for this expansion. Commissioner Goldspiel suggested that
rather than leave the detention piece as a stub road, it be created
as a piece of park as access to the bigger park which would be part
of the larger detention area, and have a stub road next to it . He
Buffalo Grove Plan Commission-Special Meeting-April 25 , 1990-Page 7
noted he prefers the road alignment in Plan B because with the road
west rather than centrally located it gives more flexibility to
other pieces of property that may come in.
Commissioner Braiman commented that because of the importance of
properly stubbing the road along the side of the detention area he
would be favorable toward a variation if necessary for an additional
lot or two to permit that .
Commissioner Goldspiel asked what treatment would be provided in the
rear yards of the homes backing onto Prairie. Mr. Schwartz stated
they do not usually put in fences but would provide berming if
requested, and homeowners may choose to install their own fences .
Mr. Schwartz noted that in the northeast corner they would not be
able to berm because of the trees. Mr. Pfeil noted a tree survey
needed to be provided.
Commissioner Goldspiel commented that it should be a priority to
avoid solid fence lines along busy streets and noted the attractive
treatment of the multi-family area to th south. He suggested the
possibility of establishing a fence line along which homeowners
could fence if desired but which would be broken up by clusters of
trees or greenery intermingled along the bike path. Mr. Schwartz
stated that maintenance of an area past a fence becomes a problem if
there is a tree line. Chairman Sheldon noted a bermed area is not
as much of a maintenance problem.
Commissioner Howard also expressed concern regarding screening the
homes along Prairie , preferring some sort of berming.
Commissioner Rhodes concurred with concern regarding fence lines on
Prairie but noted fences would be necessary for families with
children.
Commissioner Braiman asked if the Park District had reviewed the
plan. Mr. Pfeil noted they had but had no comments at present.
Commissioner Goldspiel suggested the importance of advising them of
the contemplated consolidation of detention areas and linking roads
to the south and west.
Mr. George Sperless , Jr. , whose property is across the street ,
commented that he likes the road moved to the west and would like to
see good quality fences along Prairie for screening.
NATIONAL GYMNASTICS ACADEMY, 1000 Asbury Drive (Arbor Creek)
Ms . Mary Jo Burke addressed the Commisison and presented an overview
of her business . Classes are designed for age groups from preschool
ages 2-5 through ages 6-18 with older students grouped by ability.
Buffalo Grove Plan Commission-Special Meeting-April 25 , 19
90-Page 1990 Page 8
Ms. Burke indicated they had selected Buffalo Grove because it
is a link between Lake and Cook County, there is a growing youth
population and there is no comparable facility in the area. Ms.
Burke stated that in addition to classes they plan to have both male
and female competitive teams.
Ms . Burke indicated business hours would be 9: 00 A.M. to 9 : 00 P.M.
Preschool classes would be generally held from 9 :00 A.M. to 11 : 45
A.M. with some in the afternoon. Each of these classes is 45
minutes . She stated parking requirements had been established as
comparable to a dance school and it was determined they would need
10-12 spaces per hour for the daytime period. For evening peak
business hours after 5 : 00 P.M. it was determined they would need 10-
15 spaces per hour. They have been allocated 20 parking spaces .
Ms. Burke stated there would be no outdoor use of their facility and
due to safety and insurance regulations no children would be allowed
outside with-out an adult .
Ms . Burke indicated they will be working cooperatively with the
staff and coaches at community grade schools and high schools as
well as with the Park District to try to develop a feeder program
into the high schools to create competitive teams . She stated they
would not be able to hold competitive meets of over 40 competitors
in their facility. Competitive meets are held on the weekends ,
generally on Sundays .
Chairman Sheldon iquired about licensing and certification from
professional organizations . Ms. Burke stated they are professional
members of the United States Gymnastics Federation and also have
safety certification regarding basic safety of the sport , but noted
no specific certifications are required for licensing of this
business other than those under local ordinances because their
business is not classified as a school .
Chairman Sheldon then inquired about insurance procedures for
students. Mr. Burke explained an annual fee is paid by the students
and insurance for them is provided to the club by the parent
organization and students are thereby covered for liability.
In response to further questions, Ms . Burke stated class costs would
be $65 for preschool classes for 8 weeks and $60-$75 for the one-
hour classes for older students . Student/teacher ratios would be 8
to 1 with a ratio of 6 to 1 for the preschool classes.
Commissioner Rubin asked if their program was similar to that at the
American Gymnastics Academy. Ms. Burke stated it was comparable but
their preschool program utilizes different focus and equipment .
Commissioner Rubin also suggested they look into cooperative
programs with local SRA' s ( special recreation associations ) .
Buffalo Grove Plan Commission-Special Meeting-April 25 , 1990-Page 9
Commissioner Rubin asked if any food service would be provided and
Ms . Burke stated they would have only vending machines .
In response to another question from Commissioner Rubin, Ms. Burke
indicated that there will not be a doctor on the premises but once
their business is established their insurance companies will work
with the paramedic staffs to determine how emergencies and injuries
should be handled.
Ms . Burke advised that she had previously been women' s head coach at
the United States Gymnastics Training Center in Lake Zurich and left
to pursue this opportunity.
Commissioner Rubin asked if they had done marketing studies to
determine feasibility in the area and why they had selected an
industrial park location. Mr. Burke explained that they needed a
relatively high income area to make the facility viable and had
selected Buffalo Grove based on factors previously mentioned. He
further explained that because of the nature of the sport and
equipment it was difficult to find an xisting building with high
ceilings other than an industrial/warehouse type area and building .
Commissioner Rhodes expressed concern with medical safety. Ms .
Burke stated that although they are not required to have their staff
safety certified they will be doing that with at least one staff
person EMT certified.
Commissioner Howard questioned whether the allocated 20 spaces would
be adequate . Ms . Burke stated that the only time there would
potentially be a problem would be after 5 : 00 P.M. when the other
businesses in the complex would be closed and additional parking
would be available . Mr. Burke stated that with regard to traffic
safety by the building , the peak business hours would be after
businesses were closed so traffic would not be heavy. During the
daytime when there may be truck traffic is when preschool classes
are held and no preschool students are allowed off the premises
without an adult .
Commissioner Howard inquired about the composition of the 12 , 000 sq.
ft . gym area. Ms . Burke advised they will be having a foam padded
pit area where they can use every piece of apparatus .
Commissioner Braiman asked if there was any other zoning area where
such a facility could be located other than as a special use . Mr.
Pfeil stated it would fall under allowed recreational uses in a B-2
area.
Commissioner Braiman inquired about parking in the rear of the
facility. Ms. Burke advised this would be used by staff only.
Buffalo Grove Plan Commission-Special Meeting-April 25 , 1990-Page 10
Commissioner Braiman then asked if they would have a party room.
Ms. Burke indicated one would be located in the entrance and viewing
area. No parties would be held during class hours .
In response to further questions from Commissioner Braiman regarding
adequate washroom facilities and changing space , Mr. Burke advised
that they had limited the size of the washroom space so they would
avoid students congregating there , but feel the space provided is
adequate . Ms. Burke indicated they did not want a locker room
facility because of the possibility for and incidence of theft.
The washroom will be adequate for changing, although students are
encouraged to wear gym clothes to the facility. They will be
providing 3-ft . high cubicle areas in the gym open to view for
storage of bags and other belongings .
Commissioner Goldspiel questioned whether this is an appropriate
special use in this location. He asked what pedestrian or bicycle
access would be provided to the site . Ms . Burke noted theywould
discourage students to come by bike because of the industrial area.
Mr. Burke noted that if the bike path behind the building is built
and connected to the adjacent residential area they would provide
bike racks in an indoor storage area.
Commissioner Goldspiel asked if they would be making any changes to
the building to accommodate their business . Ms . Burke stated there
would be no exterior changes to the building to maintain the
architectural integrity of the building , but they would be blocking
off from the interior one front door access since the building area
behind it would be used as office space .
Commissioner Goldspiel asked how their business would interact with
other uses in the common building unit and if any nuisance to them
would be created by this use . Mr. Burke pointed out that there is
no extensive sound system in the facility but only a low-scale
stereo system. Ms . Burke further noted that morning and day
preschool classes during business hours do not use extensive music
systems . They plan to install no additional sound-proofing
equipment and it was noted a brick block wall separates each tenant
area.
Commissioner Goldspiel then asked if there were any common tenant
use areas. Mr. Burke advised the unit is designed as self-contained
with its own control for utilities and heating.
Commissioner Goldspiel asked for information regarding experience
with similar uses in an industrial setting where people come in off
the street for occasional use . He stated he would like testimony
relating to the legal criteria for special use as to its impact on
the area and need for such a facility.
Buffalo Grove Plan Commission-Special Meeting-April 25 , 1990-Page 11
Commissioner Krug stated his concerns relate to a facility of this
type in a multi-tenant building. He indicated that exits do not
appear adequate for 40 students plus staff and possibly more on the
occasion of a special event . He noted an end unit would be more
suitable to gain an additional exit space . He further stated that
having youth populate an industrial area is undesirable.
Mr. Pfeil noted that following Police and Fire Department reviews
there may be recommendations regarding traffic and emergency exits.
Commissioner Krug suggested additional lighting may be required for
security in the area.
Commissioner Charlette requested an explanation of the four
designated office areas. Ms . Burke indicated they would be used for
one staff office, one main office, a study room for team members,
and an equpment storage room. Commissioner Charlette asked if they
would use pull-out bleacher seating for audiences at special events
or meets . Ms . Burke explained seating would be provided o folding
chairs .
Brief discussion followed regarding floor design, the potential
maximum number of people which could be present at one time , and
other similar facilities in surrounding communities .
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT - None
FUTURE AGENDA SCHEDULE
Mr. Pfeil stated the next meeting would be public hearings on
Northwest Building Material and Supply and the home day care
ordinance .
PUBLIC COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS - None
STAFF REPORT - None
ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Commissioner Braiman, seconded by Commissioner Howard, to
adjourn. All Commissioners were in favor and the motion carried.
Chairman Sheldon adjourned the meeting at 10 :48 P.M.
Respec ully Submitted,
ROSEMARY ALLEN RecordingSecretary retary
Buffalo Grove Plan Commission-Special Meeting-April 25 , 1990-Page 12
APPROVED BY:
BARBARA SHELDON, Chairman
I
it
Buffalo Grove Plan Commission-Special Meeting-April 25 , 1990-Page 13