The URL can be used to link to this page

2021-12-15 - Planning and Zoning Commission - Agenda Packet m' Meetingof the Village of Buffalo Grove Fifty Rauppburp Blvd g Buffalo Grove,IL 60089-2100 Planning and Zoning Commission Phone:847-459-2500 Regular Meeti ng December 15, 2021 at 7:30 PM I. Call to Order II. Public Hearings/Items For Consideration 1. Consider Approval of Rezoning,Special Use fora PUD, Prelim Plan, Plat of Sub,and Variations fora New Development at 16051 Deerfield (Trustee Pike)(Staff Contact: Nicole Woods) III. Regular Meeting A. Other Matters for Discussion 1. Workshop-Proposed Redevelopment of Town Center at Northwest Corner of Lake Cook Rd and McHenry Rd (Trustee Johnson)(Staff Contact: Nicole Woods) B. Approval of Minutes C. Chairman's Report D. Committee and Liaison Reports E. Staff Report/Future Agenda Schedule F. Public Comments and Questions IV. Adjournment The Planning and Zoning Commission will make every effort to accommodate all items on the agenda by 10:30 p.m. The Board, does, however, reserve the right to defer consideration of matters to another meeting should the discussion run past 10:30 p.m. V. Action Items The Village of Buffalo Grove, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities, contact the ADA Coordinator at 459-2525 to allow the Village to make reasonable accommodations for those persons. 2.1 ........................................ � ............................... � m Action Item : Consider Approval of Rezoning,Special Use for a PUD, Prelim Plan, Plat of Sub,and Variations for a New Development at 16051 Deerfield .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Recommendation of Action Staff recommends approval,subject to the conditions in the attached staff report. MZ Capital Partners(MZ)is the contract purchaser of the unincorporated 8.98 acre industrial property located at 16051 Deerfield Parkway. The existing property is improved with an older industrial building with a mix of uses. The proposed multi-family development will include 6 apartment buildings for a total of 120 apartment units, and will also include a clubhouse and swimming in this development. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff Report (DOCX) • Plan Set (PDF) Trustee Liaison Staff Contact Pike Nicole Woods, Community Development Wednesday, December 15, 2021 Updated: 12/10/2021 2:17 PM Page 1 Packet Pg. 2 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: December 15, 2021 a� SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION: 16051 DEERFIELD PKWY G LO 0 PETITIONER: MZ Capita I Acquisitions, LLC ca PREPARED BY: Rati Akash, Village Planner ca REQUEST: Petition to the Village of Buffalo Grove for a rezoning to R9 w Multiple-Family District along with a special usefor a Residential L Planned Unit Development,approval of a Preliminary Plan, and a > Plat of Subdivision with the following variations tothe Zoning and Sign Ordinance. co 0 EXSITING LAND USE AND ZONING: The subject property is zoned Warehouse/Distribution in unincorporated Lake County. a c ca COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The 2009 Village Comprehensive Plan calls for the property to a be single family detached. E L a Background y MZ Capital Partners (MZ) is the contract purchaser of the unincorporated 8.98 j I acre industrial property located at o dai,vDriuti9Joq�i ff/r lira 16051 Deerfield Parkway. The existing property is improved with an older %f 0 industrial building with a mix of uses. 1�1 //�ii %j � 1, y Q The proposed multi-family developmentCL will comprise of 6 apartment buildings of a total of 120 apartment units, and will also include a clubhouse and 0 swimming in this development. The � c� Petitioner has requested for the 0 following: CL 1. Rezoning to R9 Multiple-Family District 2. A special use for a Residential Planned Unit Development 3. Approval of a Preliminary Plan with the following variations to the Zoning and Sign Ordinance: _ m s Zoning Variations a. Variation to Section 17.20 allowing for private streets as depicted on the plans submitted as a part of the petition. Packet Pg. 3 2.1.a b. Variation to Section 17.28 reducing the required perimeters etbackas depicted on the plans submitted as part of the petition. c. Variation to Section 17.28 reducing the minimum building separations as depicted on the plans submitted as part of the petition. d. Variationto Section 17.40.050 decreasing the minimum front yard, interior side yard, corner °1 0 side yard,and rearyard setbacks as depicted on the plans submitted as part of the petition. LO 0 W Sign Variations e. Variation to Chapter 14.16 to allow for aground sign encroaching into the required front yard d setback and exceeding the size of the sign. �a L O W PLANNING &ZONING ANALYSIS L M Meetings to Date Village Board Referral On June 21, 2021, the developer presented an overview of the concept plan to the Village Board for o the proposed multi-family development at 16051 Deerfield Parkway. o a During the Village Board meeting, the Trustees discussed the cross-access with the adjoining 2 Industrial site and to provide landscaping backing up to the homes along Marvins Way and Horatio a E Blvd. The Trustees were supportive of the use and density of the proposed multi-family development. -@ L a PZC Concept Workshop Prior to scheduling for a public hearing, on August 4, 2021, the PZC facilitated a workshop to review y 0 the concept plan. a ai During the workshop, the PZC provided feedback on the concept plan particularly on topics such as o N cross access, landscaping, parking and traffic, existing cell towers, school district impact study and pedestrian walkways. Overall, the PZC were supportive of the concept plan, density, and use of the o proposed multi-family development. 0 L Proposed Plan CL C • MZ is proposing a residential development consisting of a mix of six two-story multi-family buildings with 20 units in each building. N O • The proposed development would consist of a total of 120 units (13.36 units/acre density). v 0 • The development would also include a clubhouse with a swimming pool on the northeast m portion of the property. �a • The proposed apartment buildings including the clubhouse would be approximately 34.9' c high at the peak. The proposed height is similar to two-story single-family homes. m i= �a a Packet Pg. 4 2.1.a The apartment buildings would be setback �f � ��, 'HFj Mf IN from between 45i-50i from the southern lot line ^ (adjacent residential on Horatio Blvd) 43' - 45' yfi Z from the west property line (adjacent to Marvin s Way) and approximately 25 from the propertyCD line on the east. LO to • There are 2 existing homes on Marvin's Way that �,i,�,a��l �, t � would back up to the proposed units. Based on �� ,l »� ��rf �%„ � > the current plan those homes would be setback approximately 65 from the proposed units. rr r IA ail%%°i j r Jjl av �d: i / i ;' cC • There are also another 6 homes alongHoratio ��'�%�� ,,, ; bo l� � > that would back up to the development. At the 1 closest point, those homes would be setback approximately 75' from the nearest unit. j 2009 Comprehensive Plan/Zoning /ii/�� The Villages Comprehensive Plan identifies the entire � �� rU,I",, T, , ro ar, '1 � yi f /,�f d site to be multiple-family housing with a density of 10-15 j/ t ff,�/yfy qg j units/acre given the proximity to the existing Metra // i„ r�rrrrrrippip�rprrrrrprrrr�rr r�'ii�arrrrrrrtfrorrmu�»fAinr» r ri///%� /%/; Station. As proposed, the protect would be 13.36 units/acre. Overall, staff finds that the proposed project �11�1��lill would meet the recommendations of the comprehensive plan. Furthermore, the density is similar to the o a Windbrooke Apartments directly to the north. R 10, o Planned Unit Development PUD j(Wrmryi�ma MNOy The petitioner MZ is requesting a special usefor a planned 0 unit development (PUD) given the nature of the proposed > development. The apartment buildings most closely align �,,, o ail with the R-9 zoning district, and hence the subject _ '``` CL r�Inliiflnllll�l(II�I�CIIIiIi ;,, "' a property will be rezoned to R9 Multi-family district. L a� Transportation c • The main access to the development would be from Deerfield Road. All roads within the ci proposed development would be private. 0 a m • The new road would cross through the existing ComEd right-of-way. MZ has received a consent letter from ComEd regarding the realignment of the new access road. At the request of the Village, the developer is proposing an emergency access connection to the east. This N access drive would only be accessible by emergency personnel. This access drive would connect to the existing access drive for the industrial building to the east. �a a Packet Pg. 5 2.1.a Parking • The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 218 parking spaces for multi-family projects. aD • The developer is proposing a total of 263 parking spaces. This includes 60 garage spaces a� integrated into each building. Overall, Staff finds that the proposed concept plan meets Code °1 0 requirements. LO W Existing Cell Tower The property currently has an existing 108' monopole cell tower with 2 antennas located along the d east side of the site. According to the developer, the current property owner has multiple long-term �a leases on the tower. Due to the current leases,the developer has indicated that the tower cannot be c removed as part of the development. Therefore, the developer has designed their site around the L existing tower. The nearest unit is approximately 60' from the base of the tower. MZ has proposed > screening and enhancements to the existing fencing and landscaping of the cell tower, and additionally provided a paved access road for servicing the cell tower as needed. w 0 Landscaping At the request of the Village, MZ is proposing to remove all existing landscaping which are invasive, a non-native species, and at the end of their life span. The proposed landscaping will all be native species and will mature into full-grown trees to provide effective screening and longevity. The Village a Forester has reviewed the landscape plans and was pleased with both the proposed landscape E materials and locations. a MZ conducted a Neighborhood Meeting on Thursday, November 18. MZ and received positive y feedback from the two families attended the meeting. Prior to the meeting, MZ sent out notices M regarding the Neighborhood Meeting and provided them with their contact information. To this date, a ai MZ has not received any calls from the neighbors with any complaints regarding the proposed a 0 landscaping. 4- 0 School District & Fiscal Impacts E MZ has conducted a fiscal impact analysis which has been shared with the school districts (School o District 102 Elementary and School District 125 Stevenson). As part of the analysis, the proposed a project will have minimal impact on the school district based on the majority of homes (108 2. L apartment units) in this development being one- and two-bedroom homes and studio apartments for rent, remaining (12 apartment units) being three-bedroom apartments. In turn, this proposed c apartment development will provide good revenue to the school district. t� Utilities/Site Engineering m The proposed development would meet all the Village's utility requirements. The development would connect to existing utilities located within the area and the Village has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed density. N c m As for stormwater, the development would meet both the Village and Lake County's stormwater E requirements. Detention will be provided in the northwest portion of the site.The proposed plans, if approved, will be subject to final engineering review and approval. a Packet Pg. 6 2.1.a Signage MZ is proposing a ground sign (identification sign) to be located in the north side (front) of the subject property setback approximately 2' from the property line. This ground sign is an identification sign in the R9 Residential district which requires to setback a minimum of 25' from the property line. The `- aD present identification sign encroaches approximately 23' into the front yard setback. CD 0 LO The identifications signs require the size to be 32' in total area, the proposed identification measures a total of 60' in area, and hence exceeds the size of the sign by 28'. Apart from the variance required for the encroachment into the front yard setback and the size of the sign, this identification sign d meets all the sign requirements. �a L W L ZONING & SIGN VARIATIONS > Zoning Ordinance 1. Variation to Section 17.20 allowing for private streets as depicted on the plans submitted as- pa t of the petition. o The proposed apartment development has private streets within the development which o require a variance. The request to have private streets in developments this size and scope is a typical. �a a E 2. Variation to Section 17.28 reducing the required perimeter setback as depicted on the plans L submitted as part of the petition. a The Village's PUD standards require a minimum perimeter setback of 35' or height of the g q p g vj building (whichever is greater). In applying this standard, the proposed plan would meet the setbacks along both Marvins Way and Horatio Blvd, however the building residence #3 is a setback approximately 25' from the property line on the east and hence requires a variance. The property on the east is an industrial building which is setback approximately 76' from the N property, with a total of approximately 101' from the residence #3 on the west. 0 3. Variation to Section 17.28 reducing the minimum building separations as depicted on the 0 L plans submitted as part of the petition. a a The minimum distance required in the PUD between the building structures facing one a a� another is 50',in the case of the building residence #5 and #6 in the south is separated by 40' at the closest point, and hence requires a variance. c U The minimum distance required in the PUD between the building structures side by side with o windows is 24' in the case of the building residence #3 and #4 is separated by 21' at the closest Q- m point, and hence requires a variance. These variations are common in comparable residential developments and allow for additional buffer along the perimeter. c 4. Variation to Section 1Z40 decreasing the minimum front yard, interior side yard, corner side � yard and rear yard setbacks as depicted on the plans submitted as part of the petition. �a a Packet Pg. 7 2.1.a The Village code requires a 25' front yard setback in the R9 District.The apartment residence is setback approximately 20' from the sidewalk, and hence requires a variance to encroach 5' into front yard setback. 2 a� a� Signage 5. Variation to Chapter 14.16 to allow for a ground sign encroaching into the required front yard `" 0 setback and exceeding the size of the sign. The proposed identification sign encroaches approximately 23' into the 25' front yard d setback. This identification sign measures 60 square feet and exceeds the square footage of �a the area of the sign by 28 square feet. It is seen in large residential developments; ground c w signs are generally over 60 square feet in area such as the recently approved Link Crossing development. > Cd DEPARTMENTAL REVIEWS w 0 Village Department Comments a Engineering The Village Engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and does not c �a have any objections. The proposed plans, if approved, will be a subject to final engineering review and approval. E L a Landscaping The Village Forester has reviewed the landscape plan and has no concerns with the proposed landscaping. vi 0 Fire Department The Fire Department has reviewed the proposed plans and does not a have any objections. 0 N G1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS 0 Pursuant to Village Code, the contiguous property owners were notified, and a public hearing sign was o posted on the subject property.The posting of the public hearing sign and the mailed notifications were Q, completed within the prescribed timeframe as required.As of the date of this report,the Village received a has one call however, no issues were raised with the proposed apartment development. a, .y STANDARDS o Variations v The following arethe applicable standards for the variations requested: o a m 1. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations of the zoning district in which it is located except in N the case of residential zoning districts; ; c m 2. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; �a 3. The proposed variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. a Packet Pg. 8 2.1.a Petitioner has provided a response to the Standards Signs The Planning &Zoning Commission is authorized to make a recommendation to the Village Board for a °1 g g variation to the Sign Code based on the following criteria: CD LO A. Except for Prohibited signs (Chapter 14.32), the Village Planning & Zoning Commission may o recommend approval or disapproval of a variance from the provisions or requirements of this Title subject to the following: 0 1. The literal interpretation and strict application of the provisions and requirements of this Title d would cause undue and unnecessary hardships tothe sign user because of unique or unusual ra L conditions pertaining to the specific building, parcel or property in question; and ,o 2. The granting of the requested variance would not be materially detrimental to the property owners in the vicinity; and > 3. The unusual conditions applying to the specific property do not apply generally to other properties in the Village;and ' 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the purpose of this Title pursuant to 0 Section 14.04.020 a B. Where there is insufficient evidence, in the opinion of the Planning & Zoning Commission, to support a finding under subsection (A), but some hardship does exist, the Planning & Zoning a Commission may consider the requirement fulfilled if: E L 1. The proposed signage is of particularlygood design and in particularly good taste;and a 2. The entire site has been or will be particularlywell landscaped. vi Petitioner has provided a response to the Signage Standards ❑ a STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the R9 Multiple-Family District along with a special use for a 0 N G1 Residential Planned Unit Development and approval of Plat of Subdivision and Preliminary Plan with variations, subject tothe following conditions: 0 0 1. The proposed development shall substantially conform to the plans submitted as part of this a petition. a L .y 2. The Developer shall make the necessary cash in lieu of land donation in accordance with Title 19 c of Village Code. v 0 a CD 3. Final engineering shall be subject to the review and approval of the Village. �a 4. Final landscape plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Village. N c m 5. The Developer shall pay an annexation fee of$1500 per residential unit. E �a 6. The final plat of subdivision shall be revised in a manner acceptable to the Village. a Packet Pg. 9 2.1.a 7. The Developer shall submit a plat of annexation in a manner acceptable to the Village. aD 8. Prior to the start of construction, a cross access easement agreement with the property owner to a� the eastshall be submitted in a manner and form acceptable to the Village. o LO 0 9. The existing cell tower shall be considered legal non-conforming and shall not be improved or expanded upon unless approved by the Village in accordance with Chapter 17.34 of the Buffalo `6 Grove Zoning Ordinance. Should the existing cell tower not be operated for a continuous period o of six months, it shall be considered abandoned and shall be removed in accordance with Chapter c 17.34 of the Buffalo Grove Zoning Ordinance. L ca 10. The Developer shall enter into an annexation agreement in a form and manner acceptable to the Village. At a minimum, the agreement shall incorporate the conditions of the staff report and any j other conditions deemed necessary by the Village. o co a c ACTION REQUESTED 2 The Planning &Zoning Commission (PZC) shall reopen the public hearing and take public testimony a E and the PZC shall then make a recommendation to the Village Board. L a Suggested Motion Staff recommends approval of the R9 Multiple-Family District along with a special use for a Residential y 0 Planned Unit Development and approval of a Plat of Subdivision and Preliminary Plan with variations, a subject to the conditions outlined in the staff report. ai a O N G1 O O L Q Q a L .y O U O m ca N c 1= t �a Q Packet Pg. 10 2.1.b E3MZ Capital Partners Private Equity Real Estate Investment Northbrook based MZ Capital Partners, an award winning national multifamily development firm, proposes to redevelop the current site with a high-end luxury low density rental apartment community.The proposed townhome-style apartments consist of 120 units contained in 6 low-rise LO two-story buildings,with 250 parking spaces.Additionally,an amenity rich curated clubhouse would contain a leasing center/management office,top of the line fitness center,work from home private suites,and a resort style swimming pool and deck.The well landscaped lush treed and aesthetically d pleasing site plan and elevation renderings are provided for further context. ca L MZ Capital Partners has been recognized as one of the fastest growing private companies in `~ L American by INC Magazine by inclusion of the INC 500 list and was recognized as the Best Place to > Work in the multifamily business by the National Apartment Association. The firm develops and owns multifamily properties nationwide, however, corporate offices are based in Illinois and 3 company principals were born and raised and continue to reside in the Chicago area.The company o brochure is attached for an overview of further background and experience. o a c The site was identified for purchase and redevelopment due to the positive demographics and p p pa increasing demand for high end rentals within the Buffalo Grove market and the desire of MZ E Capital principals to proudly develop a showplace community within their own community and a a short ride from their office and homes.The submarket proximate to the site and the close proximity to the Sid Mathias Buffalo Grove Metra stop serve as major drivers of rental demand for the vi location. D a ai The proposed community, intentionally is designed in a two-story townhome like suburban design o N rather than the more common 21s' century suburban garden style bulk three story construction concepts typically built. The building heights are consistent with the single-family residential o property heights that adjoin the site.While the Buffalo Grove Code set back requirement is 35'from > 0 adjacent lots,the entire South property line proposed set back has been increased by an additional Q, a 11'to 15' for a total setback of between 46' to 50'. Furthermore, landscaping has been greatly a L enhanced throughout the proposed community as shown on the site plan. In particular, more robust landscaping has been added along the property site lines to the South and West as an = 0 additional buffer between the adjacent residential properties. c� CD Outreach and agreement with the adjacent industrial property owner has occurred and the concept y c of an emergency access road between the adjoining properties has been agreed to. Initial a communication with ComEd regarding moving of the existing right of way easement for entry to }; c the site to the area shown on the proposed site plan has been made and we are confident of our m 1= ability to get sign off on the proposal with ComEd as part of the zoning and annexation process.Our �a professional team, engineering, and legal representatives have dealt with ComEd in the past on Q similar issues and we are confident in a favorable conclusion. The proposed redevelopment is low density by today's development standards as well as compared to surrounding existing Buffalo Grove multifamily use sites. Packet Pg. 11 2.1.b The existing multifamily site across the street, commonly known as Windbrooke Crossing, with the street address 1160 Windbrooke is 13.78 acres and holds 236 apartments. (13.78 dwellings per acre) The next closest multifamily use to the proposed new development site is the Wheatlands located just east at 1200 Deerfield Parkway. That site is 17.61 acres and holds 352 apartments. (19.98 dwellings per acre) °1 a� The proposed site development concept plan is on 8.98 net acres holding 120 units, is less dense o than the two nearby multifamily approved and built developments and, subjectively, is a much LO 0 more aesthetically pleasing upscale proposal. (13.36 dwellings units per acre). It is believed that the proposed low-density development will improve the community, provide for o the increased need for high end luxury rental housing near transit within Buffalo Grove, and ca L significantly enhance the site as compared to the current use. L M otS w 0 41 M a c �a a E L a vi 0 a ai c O N G1 w O R O L Q Q Q L .y C 0 U d c M a c m i= �a Q 400 Skokie Blvd. Suite 580 Northbrook, IL 60062 847.714.1818 mzcapitalpartners.com Packet Pg. 12 2.1.b UIUIM IMMIIMMMI� IfgN0011111pMIMIMMMI1 � � �IIIII MZ Capital Partners lA Private Equity Real Estate Investment W cu co a October 25, 2021 06 Ms. Rati Akash = Village Planner, Community Development Village of Buffalo Grove 50 Raupp Boulevard a. Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 a. Re: 16051 Deerfield Pkwy. Comments from PZC Concept Meeting 8/4/21 E P a Dear Rati: (6 We wish to address the comments from the PZC Concept Review Meeting held on August 4, CL 2021 as follows: c a N Existing Cell Tower Distance and Aesthetics a Cell Towers are considered public utilities under the Illinois Messages Act 55 ILCS 5/5-12001.1.1 and are permitted by right in all zoning districts. Regulation of cell towners, including public ° a CL safety issues, rests at the federal level with the FCC. cu The subject property cell tower is located over 59 feet from the closest proposed residential v building on the site. v MZ Capital Partners site and landscape plan for the proposed development includes a major can' aesthetic enhancement to the screening and buffers that currently exist around the fencing and o base of the existing cell tower as well as the installation of a dedicated paved access road for °' the servicing and maintenance of the cell tower. E U t0 Screening from Adjacent Properties Packet Pg. 13 2.1.b The proposed landscape plan provides for both a new 6-foot fence and new landscaping as a screen between adjacent properties. In addition to landscaping and trees throughout the property, the new landscape plan includes the addition of 55 Evergreen Trees of 6' in height at installation and 10 Canopy Trees between the property and the adjacent single family home ; parcels. In addition, the entire site will be heavily landscaped and the intensive commercial/industrial use, which includes truck trailer storage, will be changed to lower a intensity two story residential. The existing industrial building, with deferred maintenance CD issues, will be demolished and replaced with brand new two-story residential structures consistent with the height of a single-family home. The closest lot line distance from a new ; proposed low-rise residential building to an adjacent existing single-family home will be from a between 43 feet and 50 feet exceeding the minimum Buffalo Grove code set back requirement of 30 feet. The existing electrical substation in the adjacent Commonwealth Edison right of way is screened with shrubs and bushes. > 06 School District Impact cn a The independently prepared school impact study furnished in connection with the proposal indicates a minimal impact on both school districts as a result of the proposed development. a. Furthermore, the study indicates a very substantial positive school district fiscal impact based o upon the projected increase in real estate taxes vs. the cost of educating the projected small °- incremental number of school attendees. E a Parking-Traffic � cra a The proposed project plan exceeds Buffalo Grove requirements for on-site parking spaces for a a 120-unit apartment community and was found by the independent traffic/parking consultant to be more than adequate. In addition, the consultant traffic report prepared indicates a minimal N effect on traffic ion the adjacent roadways as a result of the proposed development. a Additional Parcel on Deerfield Parkway > a a CL The proposed development plan calls for the use of this additional parcel for a monument sign identifying the property. The proposed signage specifications and rendering has been submitted for approval as part of the proposed development. a U New Roads within the ro ert cu cn All roads within the property will be private and will be maintained by the property owner. o There will be no HOA as the community will be a single owner 120-unit apartment rental °: community. u IE U t0 Water and Sewer Q Packet Pg. 14 2.1.b Water and sewer taps will be completed with the immediately adjacent industrial property to the east via an easement. Existing Trees cu cu MZ Capital Partners has spent considerable time on developing a landscape plan in close a consultation with Buffalo Grove staff and the Landscape Architect. The proposed plan does not o include keeping the existing trees as a result of Buffalo Grove staffs recommendation against W the advisability of keeping the existing, poor condition low probability of continued longevity > and health, trees in place. a co Pedestrian Walkways �o Walkways within the proposed development plan have been enhanced to include a pedestrian «s walkway connecting the property to the existing adjacent bicycle patch which provides pedestrian access to the nearby Metra station. o co Environmental/Energyjmpa.ct cL co Planning for the future, the development parking lot and garages will have underground wiring °- for electric vehicle charging stations. The building will be constructed to the highest energy E standards of the International Energy Code using high efficiency HVAC systems, energy star a appliances, and other environmentally sound construction materials. The building will be built to an energy efficient standard enabling receipt of industry energy efficient designations as well a as an energy savings federal income tax credit pursuant to section 4L of the Internal Revenue CL Service Code. c a N We look forward to continuing to work with you and staff cooperatively on bringing this exciting project to fruition. Please let us hear from you if you need any additional information a or with any questions or comments. a a Very truly yours, °' cu c a U Brad Zaransky Principal 0 c co a. c cu E U t0 Packet Pg. IS 0 ALTA / NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY QZ aca SCALE:I' EE0 1I EX ' \ \\ Op E=11n1 meaionry NN IIFouo,E —,11crw or Trvc III. o E,, Zvi ePILLv¢n e.rn RFcoHoen.EUNr zeouasE�ix Ti�o�wnicn \Le Al III 11.111X -I T ro«ovn uxu u e kaer,6 w IIII ,,s� Tae a, -- oa •zs �I TIA PARC E so�meo�eov,..L rive,oerrcmLxer G oGioEER 9J A.�UOGJM T 1&f6981 N uHE wuNrv. V PT PI i�wuau. \ a w p e romPn ey '� 'w P�nRt oFnr TIN o ��o o ti _ �II o,z � .11 T 1211 �a«o� Tz�s ,—As EooNMLNT F � � Ty �\ �A�X, J I \ LOCATION MAP o PT.PARCELI r z E_ Qa,,, E,,l I —I z �,w. d, aP I IIEIA1d,tiI-- „ ��;��ll Ep1 e11 �a��desa e �aaE,eEare��o„aa,�,.re,a,e, �� m„mm/ � 3 c o�L��men20ozr n,i,uuronx oral iw,.rao,oaaesoo n,w„n an ooio m na,o / wi,n msped Io scneauie a o,xeia caw,utmw�t W,a _ oe Lea Here are , anq xea .o-Te. Fuwom N.No.ZIa]889-Tlirse am nu Dlo,lablo LOT B v 0 0 o IIRI xona W 1H2f 20 v -T1 N°`=a°naW' ;e°l='=no ,lw Po`a .III To .1E. "NN,ammwms��osaam,�o ...........ao ee•so•g14"W 4 6 w„ aw„e ,ne��,_Tne �r�,.��Ea�,��en mz TA sa "F got 9, 90.. nor so fs= �, ,r�wt re J�„5,o aE—„am ti�� a TEE �o�a,a,o �� 1.1v 11 zuz o LESEaoE o d� 1,��aar a „�E--h I. T1,novo " 11 171171 L 1-1 o.an e.11 Ha 11-12, _ L��,e, , — ORHAEGER ENGINEERING LT EXPIRES 11-3-2 , m d O P,I N�55-228-400-014 7-300-005 PLAT OF ANNEXATION SHEET I OF 2 To THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE SCALE 1' =50' —D—E- 47--�—K—K&7-* Rena F.v[Grp 7,14 5 85'3�'2�E Lat 2 tat A GP 1.1 ITAA C-TIFFAGES1 DCARTER CA EFClI.R 11,1.011-11 U..RlP A AT A RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIVAR,AND OF THE SOUTHEA A QUARTER OF SECTION 28 TOMSHIP 43 NORTH,RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIS 111-11111111MAN,DE 11RIKEIIAE E BOMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO JOSEPH E ER(BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 28—IN BOOK-P OF DEEDS PAGE TO 011.11 AN A�N..ITI�4.�.4.Fl�IT NT.�ATF N P A 14F IS ..T"CT - HE DOZE` --lEI LOT 5 O?1'ZAI D GGT ON I R NO ON .D�IGTGIISS .T4SlSlA R ER NORTH PARALLEL NTH THE EAST UND OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF K THENI CH C OF STI STI K C T 28 TO THE SOUTH OF LAND CONVEYED TO CHARLES WSCHMAN BYEO DEED RECORDED MAI 11,1171 11 BOOK BE If DEEDS PAGE 474);THE(AS NCE EASTERLY ON SAID DEED LINE TG A POINT ON A LINE 140 58 FEET EAST OF AND F IEEI AIALLL A' L N'"C.All LOT I THE A.FIT F.1GNN%LINE IE FR`S "B"ANY 1ART"THEREOP'LT,IALLN N HE IA T IN AT THE" "A"'I �'.NNVE`YE.T.'A.'STE P D.ANl 1`��,GEED 'I RECORDE"D TUNE K ,N BOND oPOFDEDO PAGE IC)NN SAID IXT POINT IS 14058FELl EAST AD 11414 lEtNORTIE1 THE SOUTHWEST CREEP OF E SECTION 27 THENCEN NORTH ALONG ID Y A 14 I�ITI ME I'l GAI�TAXF'"'EAEOT A RI G AT ANGLE S TO AN D PARALLEL FINFT I ON E A IN F I DISTANCE 1 14 LET N L BEG INNING OF THIS D ESCR'PT'ON THENCE PATTIMMEDTERL,122 RE FEET TO A MARVINS I AOINT ON THE SOUTH IF NE IF IA.1.111A.TO..— IS...A.(AS A DEED A CORDED MAY 11 1878 IN BOOK E5 Of DEEDS PAGE 474)INFIGH POINT IS WA Y CHARLES SISCHMAN DEED LINE,THENCE EAST At-ONG CHARLES WISCHMAN DEED 399 31 FEET WEST FROM THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 28 AS MEASURED ALONG Y LINE 34—FEBT,I HENCE EXCH FEACI ARLY GBA 47 FEE]10 A 11 INT "S FEET A z 'T I IA "G;G AT LLI 7 PAT F'NAUFTI.ATTH' 'VET TNALF A'T,PART THEREOF N AN A,CE FEET B H F E=O DGlTN.l.WG'�AA SO TA.A CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF 81 IN SftBEEN DT KATE SEPTEMBER 27COUNTY,1913 A D RECORDED OCTOBER AS U 1 16-1,IN LAKE LN LNOM 1,1 A 4 W �8,6 A ,A, ........... . arc.... ...... PAP C H E�T E A E T I T E I Lot A Loi 11 to 12 aso "aLot 11 cot BS —R.-B-1—ATE H 0 R A T I 0 B L V D ."H'Y'TLA..F AN MA H IN IRIORIA IN11F O�,—I�DTIIIR,- N' N1, L" "RACP nEN,nr 11 AD 'UP Ll I PlI�IAIE -I `PfP�IHI H= (TS NO —TH -1 IV...........jk� 111—ILINNA BE EXPIRES 11-SP-22 11,14-11 F09HAEGER ENGINEEsurveyors --l-engineers d — O N��IPLAT TO7-400-014 FINAL PLAT I5-2)-500-014 SHEET OF 2 SO 100 A STE' KAvNo LAN.sunverons OFESTTAARW °HAUMBUHG I`50173 D E E R F I E L D PARKWAY HEH�A 11111A11 "'TO'zT ARL THS SUA_R A'LTUO a SCALE:I"=50' 5 BS 18.33'III E 33 rcc,a a ° � 34' ?],iL' \ 7, o\oUTLOT A 3 ° Q a s I I � — I L JI a \ I � N.E.A. Ew N LLi LOT N No�E�ame�,Nea _ ° I � I I I I N.E.A. I I I ry I vl I J N.E.A.J I � — I N.E.A. LOT s I I J I �I c ,ry NI o Ior s I I I MA RVINS o= WAY o a I II E. .E.A N A N Im I I I I° I I of I ----- -- ---tee�`5 8'Sg'84'WO as �cP863 — °T a.�°iee etor 91aso N°dot 905 cN°ot 89 cot BS 93 12 I H 0 R A T I 0 B L V D r111o�ro11 11 0HAEGER ENGINEERING consulting engineers land surveyors O N L.I PLAT TO7-00-0305 FINAL PLAT I5-2-00-014 SHEET SEE 2 LLD PRE GO 100 EAST STATE PARKWAv N. TWEPGARREENDYINEERING,LUG LAN.GursvEr.Rs OF III EAST STATE °HAUMHURG IL°°„3 D E E R F I E L D PARKWAY PREPAREDFOR'P 61 OFT E THIRD PRNG A MERD�N(AKECOUNTYITTTN NGSPIT i BANA11,L„ ACT SEND SUBSEQUENT TAX BILLS TO a 5® SCALE:1'=50' DRAIrvncE STATEMENT STATE OF ILLINOIS ) STATE OF u LINO N Isl s. Iss COUNTY OF COOK ) COUNTY OF LAME ) USES AN'`R—E'THERE N GET FIRTH ANG-11 HERESY ACKNOWLEDGE ANN LEE 11 THAT ..IT ..'All IATFEM All .I BE ,.GTE.IN THE ADOPT TH.SAME'FREE THE STYLE AS.TITLE THER.WN NO CATED ...ETY OF AGI.N NO LAND."Ell I SUCH CONCENTRATIONS AD MAY'A" VILLAGE PRESIDENT DAMAGE TO THE ADJOINING PROPERTY PRIALSE OF I HE G.NPTR.I,I N OF TH 1� THE EASEMENT 111VICING WF—ARE ITATED IN TIER ATANIIRI FIRM WEIRD VILLAGE ALERI G ATTACHED HERETO DIED THIS DAY OF—,20 ALSO HIS I S TO CERTIFY I FA I THE PROPERTY—SAUDI CEO AFO=AND. T,T AID YELE, SAN VSU LIE. PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE BY,—REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO OWNERS ENTIRELY WITIIIN THE UMirs OF sGP.1I A STRIcrs. STATE OF FIRMS IS DATEor v ADLAI ESTEVENSONHs01zs COUNTYOFLAI<E jOWNER OR ATTORNEY FROVE CARS AN.LIKE COUNTY FULD'. KATE.THIS PAY IF UUCRMAR ATTEST SECRETARY NOTARY CERTIFICATE OF STATE OFIUINOIs 1 VILLAGE EIGINEERs CERTIFICATE E. RUNs1 courvrr cLERrcscERnHcnrE Iss STATE OF IU,INOS( STATE I ISs COUNTY OF 000rc I 1SS COUNTY OF IAlE) COUNTY of lacE THE srarE AFORESAID,Do nEREev cEanfv rear 11 ANT FOR SAND COUNTY INAPPROVED EY'THE VILucE ENCI VEER OP THE vILLACE OF UUfPAto GROVE,COON INO n'REST CERTIF cNERR o L I:E courvr ulNOls (TInE)of AND LAKE couN'rv, IUINas. DATED CURRENT cENERA�THAT THTAKES,ERE DeuNouErvT GENERAL TnxEs,urvPAlo WITNESS MY HAND AND NOTANIAL$FAIL THUS DAY OF FILLARY PUBLIC BY: VILLAGE C.LLECI.Nl CERTIFICATE LAKE COUNTY CLERK MY COMMISSION EXPIRES „tare OF IUINO15 1 SS cOUNtt CIF IArce 1 NO UNPAINE F SPECIALASSESTHATSMENTS DUE AGAINS THENPROPERTYTDESGRIEEO IN THE PLAT HEREIN DRAWN PROFESSIONAL ANTHDRIZATION GENERAL VILLAGE EASEMENT PROVISIONS DATED AT BUFFALO GROVE COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES ILLINOS,DATED THR AREAS FUR AAUH_TED iOAN E,+TURN..EWER AD U DRAINAGE la HERESY REERVEU STATE OF ILLIN Is) ILLAOE OF e..FALB GROVE VILLAGE COLLECTOR COUMr OF CCU✓.jss U FOR INDPQAES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED I IF—Al A ILINT,A ALITAISION11 SURS-1 IF III STATE IF THAIII A I IF FF THE—.A.TMN TO MAINTAIN AN.A:FAR UK STORM SA*AR AND DRAINAGE GROVEF S S 0ll U OR ZED AGENT11111 DO FINELY ATO LACE S JOCULGENT OF RECOFC MAT, IF I I CUT N THE Y RECORUERC UFF CE N MY N NDEpUMP ENCE W TH THE UPON THE� NTOYT"P`AIll lVl'GRANTEE IAI L I"'ON IN'11,N"EVER TFE AN EASEMENT FOR SERVIN:THE SU�BUlOSNVGy%CSF0TVHF�PIROPERTY WITH AIDS .111IN .I" ,AN.E W T T THE FEAR WRITT N CONSENT EL ECTRIS AND COMMUNICATION SERVI G I BE R CFO ANDGRSNTED To AT&T COMMUNICATIONS REPLACE,STAILEIENT,INTOCATE AID FEWONF,FROM TIME TO TIRE,'ILE GUYS 'NETS SIR AT"-FACILITIES FEEL I A.L—ON-III I UNDERGROUND TRANSMISSION ANN GMTERY UPON THE G.RFACE AD THE PROPERTY A -77" LOTS I AND I AND TIE EASEMENT IN..... ELEMENTS',TOGETHER WITH THE CGHTS TO INSTALL NE.UIRED AERVA STATE OF IIAINOIu AN IEIENT FOR SERVING I'- AND OLD ME FLY III 'IN IDEA ON AND COMMUNICATION6 6ERVICF IS HERESYUNIX' IF—H LOT COUNTY OF C,GTJN RESERVED FOR AND GRANTED TO AREA 11 AIRASIGICILIMET TI 111,TRIM ON PAYING TPERS FUELED,ECUTS ANN VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE AS MAY BE REASONABLY RGENISED INCIDENT I.THE IIGNTI HEREIN GIVEN ANN FAIR B E TH, OFF NO s DEC G-NNIN F I U"R-NG- SIR USER THE 1111IRTY WITH I LIT I I AND I WITIOUT THE PRICE WRITTEN TGANSMITON ANN DISTRIBITRAN OF FIECTRICITY SOUNDS AND SIGNALS CONCERT OF CRAFTE'S 'TER IN' QUARTER OF SECTION 27 POWNjUP 4C NORTH N—NO BUT NOT US TIED TO TELEVISRH DATA AND RADIO AGNALS AND GRADE OF THE SUBDIVIDED PROPERTY SHALL'IT BE ETTERRE 1.A MA NER SO AID "NGEE'l'.M CAT"TT'O"'.P."PN"A.�"T'�',"AN.�A'�``F�'".FSTl`TEAS)' COMMUNICATION IN UNDER ACROSS ALONG AID UPON THE SURFACE OF I HE 70 INTERFERE WITH THE PROPER OPERATION AID MAINTENARCE THER�No .1fill F�I GA . IS N US 1,EA I XE HIS RIGHT TO "' INSTALL RECURRED SERVICE CONNECTIONS UNDER THE SURFACE OF EACH LOT TO THE"IF-"COMMON ELEMENTS"SHALL HAVE THE MEANING SET FORTH FOR SUCH COMMENCING AT THE NOFTHEASi CORNER OF THE LINK CUNVEYED To JUSEPH AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME.SERVE IMPROVEMENTS TUEREGN TIE RIGHT TO CUT,TRIM 01 REMOVE TREES TERM I THE ONDOMINiUM PROPERTY ACT,CHAPTER LR)85 ILG�60G/2(01,AS IANIAI DEED RECURDED JUNE 16,1B51,IN1UUR"P"OF DEEDS,PA GE 1a1VJHIOH "INT EEFT OF GRANT.IIl.T OWNER,UPUN tNRITTENREOUEST. GRANTEES AT COST OF THE OF SE NOR SO F AN IN I INSONY "THIN" MANNER$0 AS TO INTERFERE WITH THE PROPER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE EA9EERLDT IT SaED OEEDYLINE T.A P.IMT.N 6A LINE 19056 FEET EAST OFAND THEREOF. EG FSPi03EC AND REMOVAL IF AD A.AND APIURTEAIN.GS FOR THE PURPOSE IF TO I..P.INT'IF 'ERVN'ALL AREA'T GET I FLSUN 'HAS'I O TRACT COMRM(eNFL'EAS S OEEI17 I"EVETHER.'ED JUNET28O1 BRN .51 RIN F THE IF THE EASEMENTSRESERVEDANUGRANTETHERESY. GH WILL INTERFERE WITH THE 1COWMCH oINT Is iaGSa FEET EAST AND 13a 6a FEET N RLN EASEMENTS APPROVED AND ACCEPTED AT&T COMMUNICATION., AN µs SY DEEPRECORDEDMAYIF NENDa]6)WHICH P""IG APPRILATI BY HIM DAY OF IF IIS 11 FEEL TOM III EAST LIKE.1 VA D'PC II.N 21 IN.11CA.0 ALONG OR I COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY NG) ND FEET NORTH OF THE PCINT IF U-NN GANAL9O THAT`PART THEREOF APPROVED BY—THMI OF—2F ��I'N`VEYEX TI TIE IINNUY IF TAPE BY INSTRICENI DATED IEITEISEI 21 I'll AID A AND GDINTS Cs 20610 ai ET sOF CHANGEE0-J AGENCY(FEMAI 1-CARE CANTY ILL NO S,THE ANREPY SHOWN AN.GESGR,SEE HEREON IS `\V>atl�'d/i gLI E.OUTSIDE.THEo.a/o ANNUAL GRANGE.fLGODvta DMA . AS AREA5 DETERMINED TO CLIFFi SCHA-SURG,ILUNOIG VT. 2 —1 t+ RY ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO.3695 "ATT��nllrv� EXPIRES 11-30-22 F09HAEGER ENGINEERING consulting engineers Rand surveyors (PlaiI 4909E le nad a Jo}'aen g`qnS io leld`ueld mgaJd"n'S and`auozab;o lenojddy japisuoo) PS ueld:luauagaeAtl n N >Q�Z �c d NOVO13S >Q ofLIM v ItiL ov93s OW MIS LL!L U` m aW leis ww o p a 1: MW 0-,ZV J lL J r.L� .0-,dt �....,, < LLJ ILL LL Q�p m w r W z Y � 1 I w f� W , f i �f / r, Ili i��iii�iioi�ib�i��,✓�� , 1 r �1 1 E III ffi "0 CL LLI Ln a : u o�I J,VMN,yy� Cl'I31J2133C1 (PIai)aaa 4909E le Aad a Jol'aeA g`qnS io leld`ueld mgaJd"n'S and`auozab;o lenojddy jap!suoo) laS ueld:luauagaeAtl n N >Q�Z � d ray Y LL O_ � u Ir Q J O OJ a 10 w w LL D J LLI m wz LL ry w w 0 GVAmou Oli"OH loo „I f�, r i / J / LLJ Z �I z it 0 I , AVMNNydOl313i1330 LJ H Ln F- 1� . LLJ V 7 Z O .I Z (Plai)aaa 4909E le nad a Jo}'aen g'gnS io leld`ueld mgaJd"n'S and'auozab;o lenojddy japisuoo) laS ueld:luauagaeAtl n N >Q�Z � d Ir Q J O OJ a w w LL J w m LU z LL 0 / V u,� J�prrw, �uu � II i / 7 r LLI /�� i 0 (Plai)aaa 4909E le nad a Jo}'aen g`qnS io leld`ueld mgaJd"n'S and`auozab;o lenojddy jap!suoo) lag ueld:luauagaeAtl n N >Q�Z � d raM Y LL O_ �7 u Ir Q J O OJ a w w LL J w m LU z LL LU w I k /// j/ 1 LLI F a P � r 4 L.LJ // i (Plai)aaa 4909E le nad a Jo}'aen g`qnS io leld`ueld mgaJd"n'S and`auozab;o lenojddy japisuoo) laS veld:luauagaeAtl n Q Z � a Q v i... 10 " Q J O O a w X w LL I � I1 III IC :I� �z� LL w w 0 I IIJ � � �7 �E-IJI 1 i ..:I F I 1 li Ifl Li LJ. .,.I, I L.... o �' �. i �.. J o LJ M J W J n E 11 EL W Ja W o M (PlaijJaaa 4909E le nad a Jo}'aen g`qnS io leld`ueld mgaJd"n'S and`auozab;o lenojddy japisuoo) PS veld:luauagaeAtl n N lay Q�Z j it EE F tia u;a coQ w YF w LL LU Z m Et l w w �wwww�wa� El D __L_�ll I E_,L ...I� ...� Il I El ]I L �La LL II � �L E I ... z - o r I w J UL 1i ' j S Ell III iL."II� pin l Z III o w ............................................................................................. (Plaipaaa 490%le nad a Jo}'aen g`qnS io leld`ueld wgaJd"n'S and`auozab;o lenojddy japisuoo) laS ueld:luawgaelly n N N n ➢di�} a W o Y a. 14 w¢ z mS� W m U w W K a ti Z O E � w Q } r U p H Z U Z 2-0- O¢ O Q S m d U d a 16G//IGO///ld7Gr+l:DID vwnnrr�;a +'�w�.w.onwY:pv Af IVf 6w'IAnYxlP7lIL%R� arrow aiw :z ^n .wY l/O//////✓rt I zlo .......... >'A �m�ir tv f/ll fif „cr � J1dPPflr � / f/%//1 i�lfifii/-O ai/�/9rr✓4 Aar�r r 'm N 42 n/r,V I > m rnra�,cvr ii r. � z w .. o wawG U N Q m Z O O >m d U 2 II IIII!.w-.1'VIMwy lUl j 11 ', LL� APN llU 9 e r f I � � f f f W Y f i I C�OZZ ZQK Z}Q Z H p W Z Z 14:; U Z 0 O w w Z4 0 p w 3 I I 08 Q O K0 O Q IIIII � ,,,,r I mmdUd �mdUd (Pig!)Agga 4909E JBAaa e JOJ'JeA'R'qnS 10 leld'"eld w!IgJd"n's and'OUOZO?j 10 jeAojddVj9p!suoo) PS ueld:IugwqOellV >->- <=�z > OI 2E LLI 0 a. < F 0 o -j LU > < 10 ��X LLI LL LL D LLB LU z LL LU w I- 9Y C-5 J z z �p 0 E E LL- ? w m ZLLJ C14 �O-,O Ao..j z II LLJ 4 uj i\i z LD 'z z LL- ? LU L WE V, �Ql 110 CL 7'Fm, ocs LLJ A4 ,9 a "�,ena a"s.. 1 a a a a dr > > �Vu ur,r� (P Y O l 4 m r /ir �1��/r��//,//71 r {r' /�irr�� r i J%/ ;; ..r.. I ar ru �✓ ri s r t /�,✓1,r�Vrov �j m�/� r r� „%/ b /// `rr�l�/%r /�ri rrri iu rilrlrlr/ �� r. . I r, `r r N r 'r/bl p �y��,�lV,g�r✓��rj ��rf� - �� 1 f f r (/�r z rl rje Na�� ///�, // r/i ro r„ ar✓ram�mr� �u✓ar�r wl�.,l�rr //////r rL u� / G��fiJ p r � r/ f � hJ��mvoDm r///�D/'r9rnvr'>Di71G7PIP9Ju�or �rrr �%r W it{Mi %✓i/iiJ / 11 ,.. II I;rrJ r r %�rii � ri / ,r r�, Y j// rF /r/ rr !ro !' � m I�, 1 r / ///o / 1 / �/// !/1y rri�✓ / 7 p LLB r r W � � U) �� Yr��FU✓ v r / „� w ��r 1, / J / LL r r � r o W � W 1 iir% 00 O 2i w O dVM)4UVd a131d2133U, r ;mPr �I (� z 9i�1J� 1� — J Jr w V �� r O LL�m LL Of C7 _O < �yyl � lil / j (� J 1 1 �!✓/ G 00 lay a osue a I na ass a a d a s ��=aw v a aW r, a weuv Ld '� " WWII / « r �,� 'rowF I ' +J��GI%/ ✓✓r j��G✓(N`J��% , y r +�Gyi r i / VS r �� r/i rr %%.l rr/� rr/!'/,,,,� ✓ ,,r,;,,,,;` � rr� /(r1',✓/ ✓,�T% �f� '�� l.�%/�r�,`, far/��, ✓i O //G��rl o�i f j ar//✓1 /i �//r "/ //%// /� r11r/riri r /rl ✓ i �t r� � , y!� % fi �� ur�!(%l�Gowfdolr�ralr/�✓rllcrturl� � J lG/ria✓i"rrsl��i�la✓i�w��r�/rim/r�/i/dOi��/UGJUi/. , r /�� ;; tu Vrr%;/,�V , t niiiii�'� �r�mrr�r��/vT��rnnn^ /j rim�vm+H>9>mra^a1�1i7��ri�r yb�ir�/Iv,�/r1>�lnlnir�`l- ✓/ 1 ��, ,n. ��1 �W � '��drrrra✓/Gdw�✓/:rll�ucl�t�.�w.ff1(� /f� r rj" r ❑ rO / I %. ,j� � �. � V� / r�/ ✓ /irrr r r LU ��i ✓ ,r Jr 1i /u/,//lii � /�rrr�// //�/ r a /1 '//�j/ � � / �i rr�/ / /1 nrrrmr r r✓ V�,��r��J�� //ii ,,,. I// ,., /`� � ,f u/r/ ¢rG.m/��ll/!✓rrdl//d�r✓ �iG��ilt�llGrG;u�� ,, � r� �/rci✓firer "/ /%, ,'; /, ��, `,..,.,. ;,/�J // 1, // �n9171/ '91�J' ( , Z w �ri„JiiG ri%��//� / ✓ � rn 1 r + i�//%/%///✓ lr+ �j /////iii// r/ I �fij� /��j i r ❑ p r/ J155M/ / rr r/rrir✓✓lU,✓Jr/� ✓// � Q l/ LU %rEj U IT / //�� r l r r yor / ✓/ ✓✓✓ia✓% / l / r/ i ; UJ �� e�'�y��fl�� I ✓��'VV^'yV�))�4 � �//i/ %///�i� r,i, G, 1 7%/V �I'"' ill d /i✓�1�� VV s�' ��i � iiiii/%/ I J �/I r 1 V�� ,lhryf /r 1/ �+✓J / n✓ '�� ' �/rite 1 � / l y I / ' WWII/PI✓Urm r�l�N��jl�I�I + � r� // ��I J /ail I�� rfi tl'6irfiG�Vil'j�li�V��J J ✓I I h r ��s 16i,,.� / ") r�� /i f��lk r Jpv"ar➢l�Jj�ri��cG l� r i Q j�➢, �r ,Y� ��f pj��{Jrlficx�ri 17 fija rrrl/+ r ,,,, jar, II f ,j r� y��y„ �GJ 1��i,aV�p✓Ih r � a�i/� /i IC/ _ > 00 O 2i LU yr J4�J1✓ " - r r p � � . �i ��✓ � % I ��if�/fir � r 1 w Q ,% 1 ( i r rl'fi 1 i /� l /rrr�rJt f' ✓J° L% 0 C7 � � O y 21' r r Jf l 3a � 0 la,. a ,o1,ena a.s cored-edw,„dn S ad a v a ,W -ld:l---lV l' / 6 � ~ % /i II W �4 J 04 .J Q + s_ e e e w K LU a u i J Qa W. LL " p tl k tl j//"0 w x o d 0 Q W T U v J ee . .� //l/ w J O D w % O- Z LL o %� LU %! J LL 10 LU w %/r w W O Z Q LU W O 00 W 00 i > W CDZ � ✓ � // w m O w L.L , f + 2 O a w LL a 0 la,. a ,o1,ena a.s cored-edw,,,dn S ad a v a aWI-$-ld:l---lV l' / 6 LL ~ ! /i II W �4 J 04 .J Q + s_ mto LU @ tl e k � 6 AN % LU Q �@ / ( LL / LL p tl LLB of Q r/ ii/ of O of O /i Z O LL cD LU arrr /r " 'N / LL LL F W 2 wLLI O Z QLU w U /�r/fir/ LU 00 W O 2i> W i > w O fn V Z J IL i / //%" LLJ v M O LL it + � a O G ........ �,,............. ;.� ;,:i a m m 0 lai=w�a a�osare.me,�nena'a 1reia�eiaw�,i„d..nsana W ms-ld:m,w -lV V nW LL N jf "T dw wu , w Lu z / LJ c O z W % p Q U W Cf) @ � wf IPA W LL 2 LL o F M 1 LL LL W ��r %G W +2 / /or W (q 'i� d U) LLI e u e Z p U �W^ LL /%i/rill NN W w w oDrr > m O 2i LU v i t /�/ ,' 0/ > �i,� C3 W / " CD z p w LL O Of f/ CD N 00 uu- 00 0 lai=w�a a�osare.me,�nena'a 1reia�eiaw�,i„d..nsana W ms-ld:m,w -lV V nW LL N jf "T dw , w w z / � w >- Of o Of zz w Q i ii C7 LU L fj LU LL %jr %�� LL LL LLI LL N /%% / Q + 2 ,-;a jig/ w CO i e u a j d U)/V �i r G�j'i/,- � LL1 U FLU LL NN W w > m O 2i LU v i t /�/ ,' 0/ > �i,� C3 w / " CD z p Qw LL o it CD m 0 lai=w�a��os�re.me,nena'a 1reia�eiaw�,i„d..nsana W ms-ld:m,w -lV 2 i $ lIl 13 W Z III r n, a w �., Q o N LL W J = 0 � J Q = W Z W = Z , .. '. � ww Q � ((( W O J H U 0 N a r = Q J W LL ~>w' LLI a: 4 ap= LLO � h 0 W � N . = O u W 0 L // L W > 00 % "flNl Ii I IL d p 2i LU V z LL W W Z a o W W _ LL Q / O (D � wLD Q LL o — W ww O p W i _ Ir U w m p z W �n p W o z m Q i r W o oc W Q Z Q Q co LL w U m LL �o u m 2.1.b Brad Zaransk From: Jeff Heine <jeff.heine@daveyutility.com> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 2:02 PM To: Brad Zaransky Subject: FW: 2021-0803 Site Plan_921011.pdf cu cu Brad: n 0 cfl I just want to confirm that per our follow-up with Stacey Dahlberg at ComEd Real Estate Department this week, all of our required documents and submissions are complete with ComEd.The preliminary approval is in the process of going to > final and I do not except any further issues. co a Thanks co Jeff Heine 06 Director of Sales s6 Davey Utility Services, Inc. Cell: 224-290-4247 Off: 630-879-8148 Fax: 630-879-8149 0 Jeff hei e aye y�►t�!� y r rrCL c co CL CL C] CL d N CU CC This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Davey Utility Services proprietary information, which is privileged, o confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Davey Utility Services, inc. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail,you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to C this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout.Thank You. c a U From:Jeff Heine a, cn Sent:Thursday,August 5, 2021 1:58 PM To: Brad Zaransky<brad@mzcapitalpartners.com> CL Cc: Nick Davey<nick.davey@daveyutility.com>; Michael Zaransky<mhz@mzcapitalpartners.com> c Subject: RE: 2021-0803 Site Plan_921011.pdf U Brad, We made it!!!! They did ask about an extra point of egress that attaches to the bike bath, I said yes, somewhere along Q the line we would put an additional pedestrian entrance if that is what it takes. The below drawing showing the sidewalk off ComEd property was sufficient for their needs. For your official record I have included a screenshot of Packet Pg. 35 2.1.b their preliminary approval that includes all the provisions we went over along the way. I have requested to start the process with Stacey and asked her to provide a list of what we need to commence. I will be in touch as soon as I can with this info. Thanks a� From:Lesnick,Rebecca Lilovich:(ComEd) ; Sent:Thursday,August 5,2021 1:29 PM To:Jeff Heine<jeff.heine@daveyutility.com> p Cc:Diaz,Anthony:(ComEd)>;Dahlberg,Stacey:(ComEd) Subject:RE:Buffalo Grove a to Jeff, ro Understood,thank you. From discussion we have had on this project so far,it appears that Transmission's concerns will be met with your most recent proposed layout This includes the d v- 1. Would both gates be identical in access method? "r"rs For instance,if a pin/lockbox is at one location,or a manned booth,etc.—will all portions of the de , P g g p tw .grtr:��r�"w'arlks armA pede nan access V" nwr ¢ruufuaad ted or r+m1q d, i 2. How would pedestrian traffic be handled through these gates? N ee�aua aara d v„urrceQ: �:�aeoedu¢ " 06 3. Please confirm that the easement language with the business owner at secondary access will be revised in either case(whether gated or not)to reflect tt .6 a. That the entrance is not merely for emergency access—it is an everyday access point per our discussion, cmffiumu d t j b. To include the creation of a permanent driveway in some fashion from the gate to Commerce Dr.r:on(irmer ComEd will request a copy of the relevant sections of the easement/proposed easement prior to our approval. 0 ro Please ensure that you are able to provide a copy of the easement(relevant portions)with the neighboring landowner when submitting your request to ComEd CL through ComEd Real Estate,as we have previously discussed. r0 Thank you, CL E Rebecca Lesnick, P.E. Right of Way Engineer I Transmission Lines Engineering CL CoimlEd 12 Lincoln Center,Oakbrook Terrace,IL 60181 fl1 CL C5 tlS > ium*am N a 0 d<o rMO O r / CIL CIL d r 11l l l� , a fl1 c ro Jeff Heine °' Director of Sales cu Davey Utility Services, Inc. _ Cell: 224-290-4247 Off: 630-879-8148 Fax: 630-879-8149 J ff...IJ�:'j�tteL qyp yM. J„)-n Q 2 Packet Pg. 36 2.1.b oJeff,tie idIe' cal y y tljityY. to wn ai of 1��o16r+ � LO CO C4 e- t0 This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Davey Utility Services proprietary information,which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Davey Utility Services, inc. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of co the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby ,o notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender > immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout.Thank You. 06 si cn 0 co a. c co a. E a tra a ai c 0 N CU fY v- 0 co 0 a a Q cu c 0 U cu U1 c co CL c 0 E U t0 Q 3 Packet Pg. 37 A9 3Ltl0 SNOISN3N 'eN MLL li/BZ/�l S1N3VYN0�3.111 i;ed''ezde�zw 133HS 213AOO n�iwv�aAil�nw <� o +�H�AaIjj!A ® 3AMJD mv33ne zw m v z O J J O Q W m U Z Z Z w ❑ = J Q Q Q ❑ 06 � W ¢ � d d d ❑ z ¢ C7apwwwz 0 z Q U d z J J ¢ Q Q (n Q C6 H J d Z } K a. (!1 (n H ~ ❑ a ❑ z z ~ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O w w 0Lu � ¢ ¢ P- z z Y 0 0 0 ¢ ¢ w J W U fn O U` d a ❑ ¢ a U U U J J J a u) 0 J ¢ Q c[ J � � J a a ❑ z z J ❑ ❑ Q F K z Q J J ❑ Q z Z Q } } O O Q w w U \T L W H = a a w = ❑ ❑ F F fn In W' (!) W W W W Q Q W J J_ W O O W F Q ❑ L O X > O > K W' > F F d' d' > W W Q J rnU W Ocn 15 U OC7007 ❑ w W W O ❑ ❑ J N �5 E f� 3 Z L O N U U 0 U � (n U U U 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U J J J J ry ui J O 00 lQ Pll � D�d�v� �r/POOH OI //� Q CO io, / fr;ii„v W CL V Z > �rr r/rrry/aim r�/ff�lrroril� �r / U r l // ��/y✓�w��/ _ Z C'6 0 01. W LU ✓la or/9// /oir %/ / 9)�// /r/. z O LL Z J ray, W J w D r m LL W LL 0 os M o N o � 3� O p mog� n ry �� 3 _ v�i -am�� 75 � U�^= -mpkUz az9�aaass Z 3�3mQ m m m '.�°Ja pa al�w��a� z~mma W a wv lad •a. ��o� a� rc J�omr� m�r �F ar IRN4.w� 4a3Hwc�iM i� . Q Z 0 O Z V a z a io N o R ad zm ns ad a Q �H,, Z- 99%Y oy� o�No W J a o eN o �mm "ad 'SggaN Q u` Jib In N` Jim Ji F �QmiN� mwJd �m lQa U' a m� $ - m� m4 V am=M S��s - it PEN N W <g & o &'two . w ��o W wo^am m wa �zm9w�ww ®o oaon odon� nm one'^ y� F wo- �w^mm J J_ wnoa� wnoa� rnwnoa� wnoa� aymmm mN LLsm �mo� Pa F a�mz a�mz a4�z a�mz '^�"a� oz . E�o�'°'a� R s R R '+:.+nn•.m vwD:wDx wul w xuwl xoxx'..a nw�I..�=m..r va:�.x xa a w.w va won�wxw ww.wwr.�:�.�w nw:o.,oiw w r•.u..w a•u :w w'��a x°vim�r�¢ewe oc w ow�winle uxw oa��e�id�uT•�wo Y�rwo nwrv�w"an uaw werzN.�sxTn��en A9 3Ltl0 SN°ISN3N 'eN MLL li/BZ/°l S1N3YIN°�3.111 NOIlIlOW3a ;'e de�z� 'R SNOUIGNOJ n�iwv�i1�nw a nl H � � ® JNIlSIX3 3AMJD mv33ne zw m U ¢ fiaR € Mill �r�ry W �m �� a�.� g� �� ❑ ill €¢ s s o'b�k�� , �H We a M n� �Wa $s" esea3wN. Z € ° �a wff.p a w Oo Z s>a� Oy5 €"_, I Y j�= el s a g. gaY=an�e'a-@ ' HiaoN d a s tl=_ .. fi 3 6 S G Nz a ia8'`�= 3 k J aWe " e ■ ' a e g s s, eaa� a= ge Z �� _ c € age€ � q2 B $=a e " " " .os=��sH ��'s�§ea�sn"1 : :: �� a €Y a e as € �` s= as �e�"<e _ ��,oWg=°= Z 4 s Og I'a�= � � N r��` � ° a a<d Wff�"9a.'s°e R= 141,41H = �a g ��a � �� s=� a <� �W H �sn, a o = V. _ � <= % B �a € � `=°ei egg. € PH � 'e � gWan�� a° s_,�� €s a3 e�� , F § �Ba m a= � a :: RE=gyy se" o �� pi_ # O w €€ ' asG � $ 8l a� R a ° W9�m n@anc We " a a t ' � #z�� ge s W s g,�c` � � q �� a en e�e ,al �e�a Q Ws F OFF MID, O a €°� a s 4 e ai s �e+t . a° ca` F a , g F a . a ❑ 6ea 6�°e ER�B=H �g3�: �'y8 RE,! :�� s�=, 8E `eu5a$ a , sad a" Q _ e m a § §� $€ 3�3§qeq a�Q g $ qg° 11 � apg�sjp1s 4s a ��a u Ili g �8 �7 Ra ffi e gF,4 3 �, ��$ @'d 3 " �W',`"`3d8 ffi `�§§ d •/\�� 1 1i Il93 < UH 4 bk a !z k76 Bz � tltl 85a�k�94 4tlEB6� 3z�3 i�tl 3X n S6 AR �:'E�6 c�m�Y 000 O 000000 Faw aNvAnnoa O11VMOH L oizc F w 4m �W a� �gRg I go II Mw Oo U ^ 88�..... S B8 I AtlM SNIAMtlW z I M1I � r � I z pt _ e OJO1SS�J\\ � "Y I I c G 2"z�.. It\\ �. �gZgg�{�LQ�fs� ♦ Y 3 I ♦ L�ii �'Giy ♦ I Q ♦ I \\ O ♦LL t .•'! � Po is AVMMMVd O'73fdL330 i O { r' O i R s R R +,+nn>o..e rwD�x wul w xwl xulw•a cw�I..�=m..r va wr.x wa a wxw v�wonoww,ww.wwr.��w nw wD.,oiw w r•.u wm�a�+v°W»ii ua m w co r roumm s swuurro oxusw iA�ewd�uT•�wo Y�rwo nwrv�w"an uaw wev�N.�sxTn��en A9 3Ltl0 SNOISN3N 'eN MLL li/BZ/�l S1N3VYN00 3.111 NV_1d a`�z;ed`;ezde�zw 311S_ VZtGAO n�Dmviinw +�H��I�!� ® 3noao o�vaana zw �m W Z # yga w x H @ W W =11 F � Z yl 9a E W Q �; III— E z —III o sSB ZIP m III H� Bea C� a a Q =III " � a =I w= y g Boo B @ ays d L @a� e Q� 3 aR a4 ff�g W z W € � a ff a $ W H. o6sba �a a q B y ha9 v' ono e W aavn31nOS 01MOH _miulamrasoxn� _"`�—� — n Nova3s aw — _ �I I �nvc- w �� E39N3a15321 638N3a saa I- o� w, i �Ili __ Avm smnavw f w a o= � I & I s3aN�a saa �I \ 4 w i!" I H50 m. � n W� 1 lml g n 4 4\ 4 I 1 1 I I G 39N391S3a I I I z o p sgg m 4 �I al w \MH I 3�s �m �o _ II unWnute ti ,m AVMMaVd � " bl31jFJ33Q - �.,,,,, Y O G R s n R hl+nn=...e r��x Wul w xwl.�xw.a cw�I..�=m..r�w.x xa a wxw v=�n�wxw wn...wwr.i�w nw�.,r,�w w r.=u...a :wm-m+'vw'wwiz imz roe.o on av�v ne"rnv""`i,o a�wo�ir�ur'•a=o rrno='ru.�w"w uaw.eerzti r�'"slmn'�en A9 3Ltl0 —Is— 'aN MLL li/BZ/�l S1N3YIN0�3.11IA s _ J i g d%_A3;rv; a`�z;ed';ezde�zw NV-1d 3iIS uJOH<((AaIjj!A ® 3AMJD mv33ne zw m �o w CO NiaoN W - ~ w s 5 wE _ � 00000000000000 Z'EO 133HS 33S-3NIIHOIVIN ——— " 7 s7aN3a— 1 I ° I - sl ` 9 � I G33N301Saa j �� I I � e e a o I I o z wN� w a� I €@B alp o L ='w a sl q 8 ' I �b - - --------- -------------------- I R s R R '+a+nn�...e rwD wax auI w xwI xulw•a cw�I..�=m.n va wax xa a w.w v�won�wxw ww.wwv.wow nw wD.,oiw w r•.u..w a.u w �';�a�v �r��I inc oc w �n as"x�s irAl�ewd�uT•�wo Y�rwo nwrvlw"an uaw werzN.�sxTn��en a Inns a .,.,.a I'sI"I qa I.,.. d l q— Aa 3Ltl0 SNOISN3N 'eN MLL li/BZ/�l S1H3nN0�3.111 s d%_A3;rv; a`�z;ed';ezde�zw Nbld 311S n�iwv�i°l�nw <� $ ri uJOH<((AaIjj!A ® 3AMJD mv33ne zw m c CO HiaoN w W � a �e � e � W10 wE _ 00000000000000 o21VA3inoa oI1VUGH 2 n �� — — _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ —_-- j- wrnsn I nn nv mre sc ' ` I i I I I 31 I I i I yx. I I I I 'I I iuo oz�ao'i�z 3a I I v 3�N3a saa I° I dli I E3�N3015 I I� dl °I IA u:I I I�I 02 I i I I i a fi 5 15 y I a o S wa< 3 2 9 I _____ ______ _ I ♦n�naoisz I o f I i s3oN3953a I � I I i I I I I I I I I I I - I I I S III Y I I \ I IL Jr I s3aNaoisaa I I .�, aoisz VC3 133HS 33S-3NnHO1Hw R s R R �+.I+nn•.m rwD mx wul w xuwl xow..a ww�I..�=m..r va wr.x xa a w.w v�won�wxw ww.ww.��w nw wD.,oiw w r•.u..w a.u ww vw'x��a°�v mesa Ka sc w m as"x�s irAl�ewd�uT•�wo Y�rwo nwrvlw"an uaw werzN.�sxTn�w�en A9 3Ltl0 SNOISN3N 'eN MLL li/BZ/�l S1N3YIN00 3.111 NV-ld a'Nz,ed ez,de�zw 'M'02i a3W00 n�Dmviinw U +�H��I�!� ® 3noao o�vaana zw �Vz m _�o w all �w H1210N v / o \ BB� U m m r tl / pg .. I z � as � I e 19i11i11 !#dU _ -- DD mw � m AVMNNvd Ol31db33O 9 m O w o O _ p K m yo Z oO ¢> m Q �m 7 h +.I+nn•.m rwD�x wul w xwl xulw•a cw�I..�=m..r va wr.x xa a w.w v�won�wxw ww.wwr.��w nw wD.,oiw w r•.u..w a•u »nr�ol° •+r�.z�iwc roc w E r�r wNvna v o ao�9wuNUT•a�o�r�e-+m=i=uw�l"m maw werzN.�sxTn��en Aa 3Ltl0 SNOISN3N 'eN MLL li/BZ/�l S1N3YIN0�3.111 Nt/�d JNIad2iJ a`�'z,ed`;ezde zw A-11wv� +"H#(AaIw!)I ® ��b2i3/�O 3AMJID mv33ne zA m U ¢ cn � ab aka 6k B Z W a e Os €ffaM � LLJ ' � k � � � a NiaoN Z s B£ � € � J = kekksk € k8g ¢ (D °s � �P- '0 C� ee � e � s eem OW H c 30 � � Q i b olvA3inoa DII e as w w I �s3DN3lrll6atl , bapIQ30193if ; I �� ,. u U z g o 1 F iLl 1 1 1 u - _AVM SNIAWW >�f I « I �. .. r fy 4'. Ilx ly -I' I I I 83�H3a s3a I FtTn 13 S�J� III ♦ > > m< I .t \\� 4� I I I I IND \m I t3�rv3ols3a � NI iG`' { y ----- -- ----- rc I � V \ $ tl I� II I 6B a J i i_ AtlMJluJvd ol3MiL330 rG,v r 0 00 rc R s N R +.I+nn•.m rwD�x wul w xwl xulw•a cw�I..�=m..r va wr.x xa a w.w v�won�wxw ww.wwr.��w nw wD.,oiw w r•.u..w a•u vwiw xi��r�x ime vc w on av�xiu"oxu�ro oih�ewd�uT•�wo Y�rwo nwrv�w"an uaw werzN.�sxTn��en A9 3LY0 SNOISN3N 'eN MLL li/BZ/�l S1N3YIN00 3.11IA sd _ J i g%_A3;rv;. ;'e de:)zvq NV/ d JNIGVHO !A n�iwv�aAil�nw <� $ U +"H#(AaIw ® 3AMJD mv33ne zw m w m H1aON Z't O 133HS 33S-3NPHOIVw I I I aN µDiaz ho R LLLJ I fi18d J�\\OJO \\\ I 939N305da \ ♦ uc m€ae I I ♦ Ilm \ v ,la It eu> I = + I — v �r w a a a�N3ais3d � n ecerr ��ace v oeti Gre e a u �\ ee9 i ilea 3 \ 89B eea m Im yy m m e m 6 $ C m e m a I p��C � RFs�sell eom as I 0 1 ` l l - AVA"Nvd p131i833a O m.+mn•.m rwD.mx mp w xwl xulw•a cw ml..�=m..r va m.x xa a w.w vim wonmwxw ww.wwr.��m�.mw nw wD.,oiw w r•.u..w a•u w m'w�i x°vim•+r�z iw�roc so �ri w�xiN"wl�mw�i^rA�ewd�uT•�wo Y�rwo nwrv�w"an uaw werzN.�sxTn��en LL Isee a .,.,.a I'sI"I qa d A9 3LY0 SNOISN3N 'eN MLL li/BZ/LLl S1H3vIN00 3.111 a'pad'lslde:)zW NV/ d JNI(WHO !A +"H#(AaIw ® 3AMJD mv33ne zw m c w m H1210N aNVA31MB OIIVUGH rc ixlaEv3 x3 / ' — rvr�— r � ♦xercieY3 AlnLLn arAM &ss oNlm re.x . v[v —1.._.I — — v 1 I I I I gg I � � j �2 E3oN30 s3a � I R� 939N3ai93b' � I l w etv S ows a E ee — E R — —I YI xz I � — _ aI I 00 «e � m p x a naouz '. I I 1 93aN3a 63i1 I €3g3$ RR: I I I r ____ I J. __- I e<e w III III I (� � I \J�J \\ I + I �8 930 301S3a \\ o--L_______ _ ______ I 1 1 __J-L____________ I'VO 133HS 33S-3WNO-LVw R s R R '+a+nn�...e wa wax avl w xuwl xow..a cw�I..�=m.n va wax xa a w.w v�won�wxw ww.wwv.wow nw wD.,oiw w r•.u..w a•u .xme'o�i xv°��r�x imv vc w m w�xiN"wl�mw�i^rA�ewd�uT•�wo Y�rwo nwrvlw"an uaw wev�N.�sxTn��en A9 3LY0 SNOISN3N 'eN MLL li/BZ/�l S1N3VYN0�3.111 NV-ld a`�z;ed`;ezde�zw .11l�llfl�lbb�n0 n�iwv�il�nw LO U +�H�AaIjj!A ® IAOID OIIIIIa zw m pInd In WHO IN I i. F• iastl�a 3 � 3 F 'am 's o Z o e 9 4 3 Lu F— Mpg z lw20 m �0 4 s a€ '€'" � �Ma�w E F 3" �a € n� �s �mdg �5 � = e � ns F ❑ e �£ a>i� a' a damn R a �m mlw_ umvA3lnos ouvaoH $d z d g WR w g m �""j_ = - - - � - - I I I I Bg �W ,o�� I�� e3aN3als3a � 3aN3ms3a i o s III c AVM SNIA>JtlW 9 gg gg S. i_ VI oa < I zoo I I I I I I Fo r `a I I I d `�JJbr�� I� • I I Al W 'z l III I G W g� ---- I w m m� a I w \ \ a s � \ ---- - AVMJREWd Ol31dN334 ,,,,,,� ,'.•,'� °•^.• o / R s R R +.I+nn•.m rwD�x wul w xuwl 1�•a cw�I..�=m..r va wr.x xa a w.w v�won�wxw ww.wwM-��w nw wD.,oiw w r•.u..w a•u wam'�h�+°v�•+rie i�..ce rc w o»u a ui�un sA�ewd�uT•�wo Y�rwo nwrv�w"an uaw werzN.�sxTn��en A9 3Ltl0 SNOISN3N 'aN MLL li/BZ/�l S1N3YIN00 3.111 _ J i g sNtl%c3;rv;N a`.i;edede�zw NV .11llllfl n�lwv�ail�nw <� $ U +�H�AaIjj!A ® 3AMJD mv33ne zw m w m H1 ON w N� Z'S0133HS 33S 3NIlHOlVIN ——— i————————— .71 � I 6 E --- \ -- -- FT>� n � s— \\ its: I — e • ,o III ` I I I b� V • x a u n ga ; m `� •= ff� o" vl M SA — I I I I 8 � ; • V I �Ta�� L3'JN30153iJ ; ,' I II` N b ` V w � o ♦ m U Y \\ N U F w I� wU ZZ� ww Y � Y W layJ �/ w 000 o s oo w i ow°Jo3 w m I r / a \ R I I 61 I w ye � o €W I \ b 0 (n @I � 8$ ♦ a I \ ��ga .♦ I O Z Lu ul, _a ♦`♦`♦ I U AtlMNNVd Ol31dy330 _. e c• �,,:: ` W j♦♦•`;``; Z O PE Lu Y Ig > I o �Ig ,off R s R R '+a+nn�...e rwD wax aul w xwl xulw•a cw�I..�=m.n va wax xa a w.w v�won�wxw ww.wwv.wow nw wD.,oiw w r•.u..w a•u vwl'r•M xv�r�.��ii«sc w Aso r�raviru un�un isAl�ewd�uT•�wo Y�rwo nwrvlw"an uaw werzN.�sxTn��en A9 3Ltla —Is— 'eN MLL li/BZ/xl S1H3nN00 3.111 a`.i;edezde�zw NV .11llllfl n�iwv�i1�nw <� Isi +�H�AaIjj!A ® 3AMJD mv33ne zw m v LL m � W ^ a �. LL 3�O $ LL 0 O Lu a_ p 7 I J_ m Q G I F ,.-. k In II I I I I V I F Z I z aa.g 3R 3 O Sea z BggB ,_ < Ix W a 3 sB H ba I aNVA3lnoa OIIVNOH fJ w 0 fi a3ure 3nxaxn a — ——————————— �------ — ————— —I _.. Lt I I I j I I I x l I I I Lt riaoie, i � I I s �bg z I I �3aN3a saa k' qq I I R gg 3C m bwi I � I x x wrc B£ mO ai l 'w boo i gR opal a V > > > G < < d i I 19 g pWp I v I ��ii I I f e z epa ' ———————— ————— ———— ——— ———— w \L___________ �tL_ I_ �___ Ham_ _______________ I_L_____ V93 133HS 33S-3NIlHO1Hw R s R R +m+mn•.m rwD.mx mp w xuwl 1�•a mw�I..�=m..r va m.x xa a w.w vim mnmwxw ww.wwr.��.mw nw wD.,miw w r•.u..w a•u »n�ol° •+r�.zmiwc roc w c°�°wmvna A�uun��mwuNUT•a�o�r�e-+gym=i=uw�I"m maw werzN.�sxTn��en A9 3Ltl0 SNDISN3N 'mN MLL LL/BZ/Dl S1N3PNDD 3DYT1N � _ IJ i g�r a iISIHX3 JNIN2jni sa'a xe'd;exd�zw 1i�fl2il 32i1� AIiWv3 -4 AiiInW tlJtiH�(c1(d�tul� x ® 3AMJD mv33ns zw � U w m H1210N K W Z iaw Q K ________________________________ I I I I I I I I Sp89 3�3 I I P6C9 add I I I 11 N(1 DZ ATJOISZ I I 11Nft Dz-A801SZ I it i £3�N301S3?J i i h3�N301S32i it - - ------ ------ - ---I --- - ------ ------ - -- AVM SNIAUVW I I I a I w z ,a -- ------- — — ------ K m W I I I - � S FL9 add I I I I 11NI1pE naolez 'I I 9 3DN30IS321 I g I I W w I Vow I W'�1O IIIIIIII I I 0.—:� 0`a SLC9-3dd / I I I 1INn DZ AbDLSZ I ------ - - ------- --' I I _I I it - ------ = I I ,w - - I LnulDz-Aaoiez '. '.I I -�-i .� I L 3�N30IS321 I � I I I aza t�O m m U m Z (n � Q m Z � QQ I V -fib I i ao° NA I I IMF I �p� I s sassso- m -- AVM14UVd Ol31dN33d Qz , oy wvPsery Pn emx mP w uwu 1mVIM ea PP ae vPPeeeev Pm.mx veP a�muw Pn mnmvnwm w wY1P xemmev mm ro nmiP w rm P emw w ae u wN ml e e o�,�Ya xll—.4,IM'K Z oW My wNOlm.vrWL w o'pVaYrPNMnlaugyiwt\"qpb\r�uWy�:mu�yD:wwi4oa An 3Ltl0 SNOISN3N '°N MLL li/BZ/f)l S1N3YIN0�3.111 Nt/�d 102J1N00 a`�z;ed`ezde�zw!A NOISOH3 3A n�iwv�il�nw U +"H#(AaIw ® MJD mv33ne zwsag m W �a�6=N i.- eR� $ a a m Yg� � e�� a �a€ r a as �$Ja €5 =a� �g s Yee H ek n n<a �� bi�A° a�� a a� '6's e p sae � �= a s a�$W ��' $_ �mo§ eam € ��R Sam y@a19E <� �� a �o Z e$ $ �o,� Y=€aG gg § � e ' �r; g8 , N4"kbt ��" S�,gCzm3 = J 9 ow-, A �__NaA a g� : m € Y' tl g iE=� �i p E SW ° a � i=1E1m1. § a lg IgIgp In 1€ 5l S n e 50� MI"'I a`s miX din 6 33a °� a€ HiaoN �' .$ or _ € �� S°g= � �g WWp ==a a-� � W n z='e III <e€ €em � � g ' a�� of a ' ff a �; a g° in $ n° w°- 1 €a ae 's, o Y H ° a � a $ �$ aa A =a°$ $4` _ 3s p =as Y agnq�p as _ a= € u, _ € I'M e e & Ah Z P 1, es aW x €ga = a g �a�WY 'i $ €@ca ¢ W _ p �W �; �W$ she a _¢ v ga RUN, €ii n - a�a a as U �a Q$Ygg.net �¢6 g i s ;€ K RUN � i�'a ? 11 G:�� a a& �oW goo ��a� as ° a5 og m $W € ski°= d aw a� a"e �m s ag< a oam _ u A Z VIEW sy< o a asa gia $ € s€ $s"e pe El 1p%u II gi 1$'- �= pe as ain a A:q- IMF! O € ad a a $ $ a gpgcegmgBgr aa,= n� $ Q=��a ie �a= e' eaa�� =8iWm a asS '` a e � 3 aa < s�$€.a p €a n�a � �ff as ig$8� �Es '. @eo k dog 3a$e i oa ; �� Y ° i &�� 19 e€ gije 1a$� n a �a €tls. Y Re e�3�" a e $ Ya ° 3"e8a£$ p� €ea a ea gg< $uia lid a a€s w °� 1 �a �s o �g �: a° 's y sus a u . Ides psi 4 e�� $ g,ei i 5. a 5o§ s � s As a :6 WIND H €1h to — Bs2'Y _5 AR ah. a >I W 5 � 5 5 5 5 5 � dod z�z� a o 0 0$ a GNVA31noe oI1VNOH J E 6 a 3 N s @ W= _ ° w O m ® ® ® O ® ® ® 9 r L,® - a ° q ® ®®� Ilu I;I a p ',.. �it I e3aNa 3a vs�Halsya I m l AVM SNIANtlVi 8 1 OU e—ul0 a e $gg y$ r y < r a'paFa p � w jig I - li -- ——- - sg ag e1 e4 y�Fu 1S N' as I I —_� ___ li i� I d 2 �� I I I I a I I I I 4 I I I I n I I I r . zgisz I I �\� __ I I LaaN3alsaa I�I � a ® l k y L4 I ` a of IIIWIWIIl1 — --- � - AVMN,41Vd w Y p rc 7 +.+nn•.m rwD�x wul w xwl xulw•a cw�I..�=m..r va wr.x xa a wzw v�won�wxw ww.wwr.��w nw wD.,oiw w r•.u..w >a. �:nyw�zwxar°ww�x iwz az so ora�a�rnwr°iw"w�wm cv�9wuNUT�zwo�r�e-+m=i=uw�l"m maw werzN.�msxTn��en I—q- 3.111 N—�I= SW130 lsl!d �O2JiNOO 3AMJD MVJine zA UJOH<((Aapjj.rA ... NOISOH3 qU 9 a o, —--—------ n j z o z- an N Bg z 20 -m -' �w w w o N. Roll o pg Vill I'M -Z .2 o E E lo A9 3Ltl0 SNDISN3M 'oN w.i �a/ea/o� ur�PNDD 3Dmu, �_ _ NV-1d=sd% 3s^;. s'a xe'd'{exd�zw 3dVOSONVI ��iwv3Ail�nw "r g� o llb2i3n0 3AMJD mv33ns zw � H1210N Q I I N w I r w I " tl I I7 roh 111111111114 f � �.• I I A � )I s rc A � I i I) I oy wageoery vwD eux wul w xwu 1zVIM ea PP ae vPgeenv Po wex wq a wxP Po eun�wwo wx�wPP xeuimp„P uo wmiP w -1— uiaep3 M u w —3a d mono a4l I wv�'x xPxma�Mll v4TNeeiend�uTugoo Y�T«Ao wY�Yiwlb MaaaP�V.3lT9w\�M�++o+i4oa A9 3Ltl0 SNDISN3M 'oN w.i �a/ea/ol ur�PNDD 3Dmtn q_ _ NV-1d ss xe% 39x�3N sAau;aed lel!deZ) 3dVOSONdl g aA�IWd�„All�nW <w 4311Vi3a 3AMJD mv33ns zw � -mo W w U Q o 0 0 0 T11133HS 33S-3NPHOIVW I pJ. y7 I \ I � F _ Q v ppg I I I I 711 to I III \ I I v A III I 4 I � I I I ,I ` I I I 6 l I I E � F 7s v A l I _ I I , e vx; II - AVM>INVd Ol31d,,330 o„+wn".•.a ve�x wul w xwu PwIP ea PP a1'n14�Y P.wAx wP a uonw P.wn."ww.wn�w"x.xeuimp„w uo wmlP w wPf 4+w1 xa uiap3 lima u Po mw 3amann annin I w I n.v�'x xPxma�Mll vlTNooend�uTugoo Y�T«w wYYiwlb MaaaP�V.3lT9w\M�++o+i4oa A9 3Ltl0 SNDISN3M 'oN w.i �a/ea/o� ur�PNDD 3Dmu, �_ _ NV-1d=s d% 3s^;. ='a xaad;edddZ) 3dVOSONdl g ��iwv3Ail�nw "r � ry_ 4311b 13a 3AMJD mv33ns zw W m Z�Z - H1210N T — U Q o 0 0 0 �wz ' BS8 �wp i! q + - - - �.i J TFP- -- - - _ _- - -- - I I'ry ill i i Mi ll. I I � I I , 77) ----- I w 4 za � I • I + � Ef I I \y I I C8 • v =w.. " ' If l l I I N� t -- C L1133HS 33S-3NI1HOlVW oy wageoery vwD eux wul w xwu 1zVIM ea PP ae vPgeenv Po wex wq a wxP Po eun�ww.wx�wPP xeuimp„P uo wmiP w www+w'xa �weo3�[i Po ne'N xv2an mnuo i'4l I wv�'x vPxma�Mll v4TNeeie�wdluTuq:o Y�T«Ao wY�YiwIP�MaaaP�V.3lT9w\�M�++o+i4oa ..... .. S-llV13(l ' I,"d (INV 6310N �Il wv 9 C'q UJOH*A3"IN 3AMJD mvAzins zN -J 3dVOSONVI �j . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 0 G)O%(D O%c D� C) �Po 0 ' 0 <�E ri 1, 6. Z. z ooQ z —Z < < ;Z- z HO Z- �z 7-, -,w RE < 7-,, -z' 1,wz 6 w< z z I-z z-z 7. ,z 'g <E -,w 2t0 5w- zo 'o 'o < W L z WE -W I,- < 1.2 ZO 's E0 w- z Z,t w <W 2g R. z 'w 0 oa W.-0 N z < I Z� �ww z -W Iz w 'o o < Lu I�F- -- < -W-" - - --W ,W. mw o�a 'Z w< w 1, Iz -�-> U. 0 C) < -<,. FE 'Z2 M w 02, Iz < EE 0 , ", I Z z E z 1, Lw Q 6 - 1 1. Iz .1 2.1.b Division of Transportation . n Shane E. Schneider, P.E. Director of Transportation/County Engineer 600 West Winchester Road Libertyville,Illinois 60048-1381 Phone 847 377 7400 :2 Fax 847 984 5888 0 .E G1 September 10, 2021 0 LO Engineering Review 1 0 MZ Capital Acquisitions, LLC Deerfield Parkway > MAJACC-051812-2021 a L 0 Ms. Emma Albers, PE, PTOE L Kimley-Horn and Associates > 4201 Winfield Road Suite 600 Warrenville, IL 60555 `D w 0 41 M a Dear Ms. Albers: a Review has been made of the application, geometry and traffic study submitted for the proposed multi- family development on the south side of Deerfield Road in the Village of Buffalo Grove. The following a comments are made: vi 1. As the engineering plans are developed, there will be facility and utility permits required for the work within the right-of-way of Deerfield Parkway. a 2. We have no comments on the traffic study. 3. We have no further comments on the geometric plan. N 4. The engineering plans should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the Lake County IX Highway Access and Use Ordinance and the corresponding Technical Reference Manual. 0 Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at 847-377-7450. L Q Q Sincerely, .y 13 et-Sy A. 0 U Betsy A. Duckert, PE in Manager of Permitting M a Cc: Brad Zaransky, MZ Capital Acquisitions Luay Aboona, KLOA E Darren Monico, Village of Buffalo Grove o Q lh.r„Cr,,i)i"It nlr,, ;i:1"i 11,Ixr�rr,4u011 Packet Pg. 57 2.1.b a� ;E a� a� G 0 to ca d 16051 Deerfield Parkway Apartments w Buffalo Grove, IL L Fiscal Impact Report 0) w 0 a c ca a E November 5, 2021 a vi 0 a ai c O N G1 4- 0 R O L a a Prepared for L MZ Capital Partners O U d BY a. co Johnson Research Group, Inc. s v �a Q Packet Pg. 58 2.1.b Contents 1 Executive Summary............................................................................................................................... 1 2 Introduction...........................................................................................................................................3 0 2.1 The Project.......................................................................................................................................3 a� a� 3 Student Population Estimates...............................................................................................................4 0 3.1 Methodology....................................................................................................................................4 c W 3.2 Student Population Estimates .........................................................................................................4 4 Methodology for Estimating Revenue Generation...............................................................................5 0 4.1 Property Tax Revenue......................................................................................................................5 ca L W 4.2 Evidenced Based Funding Formula..................................................................................................7 , L 5 Fiscal Impact—School District 102........................................................................................................7 > ad 5.1 District 102 Revenues......................................................................................................................7 5.1.1 Property Tax Revenues ...........................................................................................................7 w 0 41 5.1.2School District Impact Fees.....................................................................................................7 0 a 5.1.3 Evidence Based Funding Revenues.........................................................................................8 5.2 District 102 Expenditures.................................................................................................................8 a 5.3 Net Fiscal Impact..............................................................................................................................9 L a 6 Fiscal Impact—High School District 125..............................................................................................11 6.1 District 125 Revenues 11 y 0 6.1.1 Property Tax Revenues .........................................................................................................11 a ai 6.1.2School District Impact Fees...................................................................................................11 0 N 0 6.1.3 Evidence Based Funding Revenues.......................................................................................11 a 0 6.2 District 125 Expenditures...............................................................................................................12 - 6.3 Net Fiscal Impact to District 125....................................................................................................13 0a a Q L Fables N 1. MZ Capital Partners Development- Unit Mix and Rent 0 2. Estimated Number of Public School Age Children by School District v 3. Net Increase in Property Tax for School Districts 4. School Impact Fee Calculation for District 102 5. District 102 Per Capita Tuition Charge— Base vs.Adjusted a 6. Project Fiscal Impact on School District 102 c m 7. School Impact Fee Calculation for District 125 E t 8. District 125 Per Capita Tuition Charge— Base vs.Adjusted 9. Project Fiscal Impact on School District 125 Q Packet Pg. 59 2.1.b MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report I 11:..:.xecu-flve Surnimalry Introduction Johnson Research Group, Inc. (JRG) was engaged by MZ Capital Partners to prepare an estimate ❑ of the fiscal impacts of their proposed development, a proposed 120-unit residential c development in the Village of Buffalo Grove (the "Village"). The study addresses the net fiscal impacts to the two local school districts: d • Aptakisic-Tripp Elementary School District 102; and • Stevenson High School District 125 w L ca The Project The proposed residential development is located at 16051 Deerfield Parkway in Buffalo Grove cn within walking distance of the Buffalo Grove Metra Station. The apartment development o consists of a three-story apartment development with an outdoor pool with expansive deck, ii high-end clubhouse with demonstration kitchen, state of the art fitness center, multiple lounges and work spaces, and on-site maintenance and management. The bedroom mix and a average rents are presented below: E L a MZ Capital Partners Development- Unit Mix and Rent M Unit Size (bedrooms) No. of Units Rent Studio 12 $1,700 a. ai 1 Bedroom 36 $1,800 N 2 Bedroom 60 $2,400 3 Bedroom 12 $2,700 0 Tota 1 120 L Q Q Q Student Population Estimates .y Based on the application of demographic multipliers, it is estimated that approximately 16 Pre- 0 school and elementary school age students are likely to attend District 102 schools and v approximately 4 high school age children will attend the District 125 high school. Due to the y large proportion of smaller units in the Project, the bulk of the students are generated by the two- and three-bedroom units. Studio and one-bedroom units represent 40% of the units a proposed by MZ Capital but make up less than 1% of the total public school age students. c Net Fiscal Impact Key impacts of the new development, which are also inputs to the estimates of the fiscal Q impacts of the Project, are as follows: 1 Packet Pg. 60 2.1.b MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report • It is estimated that the 120 households will generate 20 students: 16 (preK-8) and 4 (9-12). • The Project will increase the equalized assessed value (EAV) of the property from approximately aD $806,820 to$7,999,992,generating an increase in annual property taxes of approximately $665,410 following stabilization. °1 a� ❑ • The fiscal impact on the school districts will be positive: LO 0 o Elementary School District 102 will see additional net revenue of$250,431 per year following stabilization,with total net revenues of$2,216,814 by 2033; and o High School District 125 will see additional net revenue of$214,580 per year following stabilization, with total net revenues of$1,899,465 by 2033. ca L O W L W O }1 M a c �a a E L a vi ❑ a ai c O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c M a c �a Q 2 Packet Pg. 61 2.1.b MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report 2 III Introduction Johnson Research Group, Inc. (JRG) was engaged by MZ Capital Partners to prepare an estimate o of the fiscal impacts of their proposed development, a proposed 120-unit residential LO development in the Village of Buffalo Grove (the "Village"). The study addresses the net fiscal o impacts to the two local school districts: d • Aptakisic-Tripp Elementary School District 102; and • Stevenson High School District 125 ,o L ca 2„1 i...lhe Pro pect ad The proposed residential development is located at 16051 Deerfield Parkway in Buffalo Grove 3 within walking distance of the Buffalo Grove Metra Station. The apartment development w consists of a three-story apartment development with an outdoor pool with expansive deck, 41 high-end clubhouse with demonstration kitchen, state of the art fitness center, multiple a lounges and workspaces, and on-site maintenance and management. The bedroom mix and average rents are presented below: a E Z Table 1. MZ Capital Partners Development- Unit Mix and Rent a Unit Size (bedrooms) No. of Units Rent y 0 Studio 12 $1,700 a 1 Bedroom 36 $1,800 0 2 Bedroom 60 $2,400 0 3 Bedroom 12 $2,700 0 Total 120 > 0 L Q Q Consistent with other fiscal impact analyses, the impacts are presented in today's dollars Q L (2021), rather than inflated dollars over a ten-year period. The fiscal impacts are presented for the first year the Project is fully occupied. Because JRG's estimates are in uninflated dollars, c every year after this first year will have the same impact as this first year. �? Q c a c m �a Q 3 Packet Pg. 62 2.1.b MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report Student PopuIII ti in Estimates 1:1.. Methodology The student estimates were calculated using residential demographic multipliers obtained from Buffalo Grove Municipal Code Title 19, Chapter 19.01, Section 0501 (the "Multipliers") and are differentiated by housing type and housing size (bedrooms). Multipliers are provided for all LO c to Public School Age Children (SAC) and organized by grade groups that allow for tabulating by different school levels such as pre-school, elementary,junior high, and high school. For purposes of this study, estimates were aggregated for the elementary school level (Pre-school - o Grade 8) and high school level (Grades 9— 12). 0 12 w L Student IPopuiai lion Estimates > Based on the Multipliers, the analysis in the following table demonstrates that approximately 16 elementary school age students are likely to attend District 102 schools and approximately 4 cn high school age children will attend the District 125 high school. Based on the large proportion o of smaller units, the bulk of the students are generated by the two- and three-bedroom units. o Studio and one-bedroom units represent 40% of the units proposed by MZ Capital but make up 0. less than 1% of the total public school age students. a E Presented below and detailed in the Appendix are the Total Public School Age Children that can L be expected to be generated by the proposed MZ Capital Partners residential development. a ui Table 2. Estimated Number of Public School Age Children by School District Proposed Public School Age Children a ai MZ Capital MF Project Total Units ES D102 HS D125 0 d Studio 12 - - 0 1 Bedroom 36 0.1 - 2 Bedrooms 60 10.5 2.8 0 L Q Q 3 Bedrooms 12 4.9 1.4 Q L Totals 120 15.5 4.2 .y C O U d c co a. c m �a Q 1 Buffalo Grove demographic multipliers are based on Illinois School Consulting Service/Associated Municipal Consultants, Inc. (1996) 4 Packet Pg. 63 2.1.b MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report 4, IN/le-thodoIllogy for Estimating I n Generation 4. 1.. l3r°operty I... x IR v riu a Annual property tax collections estimated to be generated by the Project are based on the assumptions described below. The Developer provided the assumptions about the ❑ Development components, quantities, rent levels, construction timing and leasing absorption c timing. JRG gathered all other relevant information from the following sources: Lake County Assessor, Lake County Treasurer, Costar, and Apartments.com web site. `6 d Property Tax Calculation. The formula for calculation of property taxes is as follows: 0 w L Property Tax = FMV x 33.33% assessment rate x Equalization Factor x tax rate FMV is abbreviation for Assessor's Fair Market Value Assessor's Fair Market Value (FMV). The Project's FMV was estimated based on a review of (n w the assessed values and EAV of comparable developments in Lake County within 8 miles of the 0 41 subject site. The closest two developments are The Wheatlands at 1225 Deerfield Parkway, (i and Windbrooke at 1160 Windbrooke Drive, but both of these are very old and not truly comparable to the proposed development. The Wheatlands was built in 1994 and has a estimated average rent per unit of$1,690 and Windbrooke Apartments was built in 1986, E renovated in 2016, with estimated average rent per unit of$1,710. L a The best three comparable developments are the i) Arrive Town Center at 1220 E Route 45, ii) (n Milton Luxury Apartments at 1155 Museum Boulevard, and iii) The Altworth at Melody Farm at D 1111 N Milwaukee Avenue (all in Vernon Hills). The estimated average rent per unit is $2,235 a at Arrive, $2,278 at Milton, and $2,890 at Altworth, as compared to the subject property's o estimated initial rent per unit of$2,330. 4- 0 Arrive has 2021 FMV of$213,500/unit, Milton has 2021 FMV of$200,700/unit, and Altworth's 2021 FMV is $281,100. Arrive has 11,600 square feet of commercial space, so adjusting for that 0 L yields an estimated FMV of$198,400/unit. CL C L a) Conclusion: JRG estimates the Project will be assessed with an FMV of approximately$200,000 N per unit, or the rounded off average of the best two comparable developments (Arrive and 0 Milton). v a� State Equalization Factor. The State Equalization Factor for Lake County is usually 1.0 and is assumed to remain at 1.00 for purposes of these estimates. a. c 0 Tax Rates. For purposes of these estimates, the most recent actual tax rates (2020) for each E taxing district are utilized and held constant in all future years. The tax rates for assessment year 2020, payable in 2021, were as follows: Q 5 Packet Pg. 64 2.1.b MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report • Aptakisic Tripp Elementary School District#102 3.481509% • Stevenson High School District#125 2.983112% aD Inflation. For purposes of these estimates, no inflation in property valuation is assumed to be consistent with the impact analysis standard approach, but note that apartment values are o typically assumed to grow at a modest rate near 2.0% per year. c Fully Assessed Taxes. Based on these assumptions, the Project's 120 units will have a total EAV o of$7,999,992 (in 2021 assessment year basis). o ca L Partial Assessment in Lease Up Period. The Project is estimated to be completed by August ,o 2023, with leasing and occupancy of 9 units per month from August 2023 through September 2024 when all units will be leased and occupied. Therefore in assessment years 2023 and 2024 > the Project will not yet be fully assessed, estimated at 19% of full FMV for 2023 and 81% of full FMV for 2024 based on weighted average occupancy and land values. (n w 0 Base Level Taxes. The total 2020 EAV of the two parcels (15-28-400-014 and 15-27-300-005) of a the project site is 806,820. Thus the 2021 Base level taxes are $28,090 for District 102 and $24,068 for District 125. a E Net Increase in Property Tax Revenue. The annual net property tax impact is based on the a Project's estimated annual property tax minus the Base Level Taxes. In the Project's first fully assessed year, 2025, the net increase in property taxes above the base level is $250,431 for ui District 102 and $214,580 for District 125. The total increase in property taxes of the first ten M years of the Project is $2,216,814 for District 102 and $1,899,465 for District 125, as shown in a the table below (see the Appendix for more detailed tables). o N G1 Table 3. Net Increase in Property Tax for School Districts — Assessment Collection Net Increase in Property Tax Year Year ES District 102 HS District 125 0 L 2023 2024 $16,318 $13,982 Q' a 2024 2025 $197,048 $168,839 Q L 2025 2026 $250,431 $214,580 0 2026 2027 $250,431 $214,580 2027 2028 $250,431 $214,580 0 U 2028 2029 $250,431 $214,580 2029 2030 $250,431 $214,580 d 2030 2031 $250,431 $214,580 2031 2032 $250,431 $214,580 a 2032 2033 $250,431 $214,580 Total first 10 years $2,216,814 $1,899,465 t v �a Q 6 Packet Pg. 65 2.1.b MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report 42 l::.: iidenced Based I1::::und11n9 Il::::orrnulln State funding for Illinois school changed significantly beginning in FY18 with the introduction of Evidence-Based Funding (EBF), which combines a Base Amount of aid for each school district AD and an additional amount, called Tier Funding, that considers the amount of local resources to achieve an adequate level of funding per student. The Base Amount for a school district is o determined by adding the prior year's Base Amount to the prior year's Tier Funding amount. LO The estimates for both Elementary School District 102 and High School District 125 presented below rely on figures from the Illinois State Board of Education ("ISBE") for State Fiscal Year 2022, which provides funding for the 2021-22 school year. The Base Amount and Tier Amount d are combined and presented as a single amount. The same amount is held constant for all M future years. c w L R � � III h � District ad The Project is located in Elementary School District 102. As presented in Section 1.0, the Project is estimated to generate approximately 16 public elementary school age students when (n w the Project is fully completed and occupied. Sections 5.1 and 5.2 show the estimates of the 0 41 annual additional revenues and additional operating costs associated with the Project. Table 5 ii is a summary of the estimated additional revenue and operating costs. a 5. IDistrict 102 Revenues E aD L a 5.1.1 Property Tax Revenues vi Currently the development site generates approximately $28,090 in property tax revenues for o District 102. Upon the completion and full occupancy of the Project, the EAV of the site will a increase by$7,193,172 to $7,999,922, resulting in an increase in annual property tax revenues for SD 102 of approximately$250,431 in collection year 2026 following stabilization, assuming a d tax rate of 3.481509% (2020 tax rate). 0 5.1.2 School District Impact Fees o The Village of Buffalo Grove imposes impact fees on new developments. A certain amount of CL C those fees are conveyed to the school districts based on the type of development and the unit mix. The table below shows the calculation of fees for District 102. The total fees are included N as revenues for District 102 in Section 5.3 Net Fiscal Impact Analysis. 0 U d c co a c m �a Q 7 Packet Pg. 66 2.1.b MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report Table 4. School Impact Fee Calculation for District 102 Unit Size Impact Fee 0 (bedrooms) No. of Units per Unit' Total Fees 0 Studio 12 $0.00 $0.00 0 1 Bedroom 36 $10.11 $363.96 � 0 2 Bedroom 60 $431.08 $25,864.80 3 Bedroom 12 $1,205.17 $14,462.04 > d Total 120 $40,690.80 in ca L 'Source: Village of Buffalo Grove ,o L ca 5.1.3 Evidence Based Funding Revenues For FY22, District 102 is projected to receive $1,767,110 in Base Funding and $64,382 in Tier 3 Funding for a Gross State Contribution of$1,831,491. As noted above, the FY22 Gross State o Contribution will form the Base Amount for FY23. Using the Average Student Enrollment figure o of 2,411.10 from the EBF formula, this comes out to $743 per student. Based on this per capita a figure, the Project could generate an additional $11,888 per year of Evidence Base Funding for District 102 with the addition of 16 elementary school aged children from the Project. a E L 5.2 Il:As rict 102 Expen&tuires a With the additional enrollment of 16 students, the Project could increase expenses for District vi 102 by as much as $227,248 per year or$14,203 per student. This amount is based on the Per Capita Tuition Charge of$15,346 that District 102 calculates for ISBE but excludes certain a administrative expenses that would not be expected to increase with addition of so few students. N 4- Table 4 below compares the Base Per Capita Tuition Charge calculation reported to ISBE and ° the Adjusted Per Capita Tuition Charge used in this study. o L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c co a. c �a Q 8 Packet Pg. 67 2.1.b MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report Table 5. District 102 Per Capita Tuition Charge—Base vs.Adjusted Base Calculation Adjusted Calculation FY20 Expenditures aD Education Fund $33,508,854 $33,508,854 Operations and Maintenance $5,185,581 $5,185,581 Debt Service Fund $866,068 $866,068 Transportation Fund $1,755,400 $1,755,400 c Municipal Retirement/Social Security Fund $1,171,479 $1,171,479 tO Tort Immunity Fund $343,994 $343,994 a Total Expenditures $42,831,376 $42,831,376 d Less Revenues/Expenditures Not Applicable to C Operating Expense of Regular Program $6,167,920 $6,167,920 L ca Regular Operating Expenditures 36,663,456 36,663,456 ad Offsetting Revenues $3,019,173 $3,019,173 Net Operating Revenues $33,544,283 $33,644,283 3 w O Depreciation Allowance $3,357,108 $3,357,108 0 a Total Allowance for Tuition Computation $37,001,391 $37,001,391 a Adjustments for Certain Expenditures Not Expected E to Increase from Development .,@ Less Support Services General Administration 0 $1,051,210 a Less Support Services School Administration 0 $1,704,911 Net Adjustments 0 $2,756,121 N ❑ Total Allowance for Tuition Computation $37,001,391 $34,245,270 a ai c Average Daily Attendance 2,411.10 2,411.10 0 N G1 Per Capita Tuition Charge $15,346 $14,203 0 Additional School Age Children 16 16 0 L Q Total Per Capita Tuition Charge from Additional Q School Age Children $245,536 $227,248 Source: District 102 FY20 Annual Financial Report y c O U 53 Net Fisc;all lrnpact Q As demonstrated in Table 9 below, over the next 10 years, incremental revenues generated by (n c the project are expected to exceed additional operating expenses by$522,736. Following a Project stabilization in 2025 incremental property taxes are projected to be $250,431 compared ; to annual expenses of$227,248. These revenues combined with additional State Aid will result in annual net revenues of$35,071 per year for District 102. �a Q 9 Packet Pg. 68 naa a JOJ'aen 19 `qnS jo ;eld `ueld ualla.id "n'g and `auozaIJ 10 lenoaddV aaplsuoa) ;aS ueld :;uauayoellV $ nj LL u o � r, mi Ili Ln Ili lri vi Ili Ili rq m N m m m m m m m N d a V> V> rl V� Vt Va Vt t VI Vt Vl 1n1 a+ £ t -tn y c V E v Q d n, occ CD 0 00 00 0o co 00 00 00 00 a v a m c d Vl -LaVl � a lzr a -;I, 'T a o0 U O N N N N N N N N N m O Q Y O '}, r- n n n n n n n n n O f+ V N N N N N N N N N rl a-.. F : L C. N N N N N N N N 00 x Q1 W Q aU E U , C O aJ M m m M m 0 M m 0 M m Q C f0 ar o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q lL O. y.. N N N N . N N N N N N G N O Q f6 u Vl N O i al 7 V>• t/} V} V} V} V} V} V} V} th -Ln Q +_ Q X N U w N � Q �n O O O lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD E a, a z � z O ++ N O m 00 rl O m m O M m m O of dl 1-1M rl rl rl 1-1rl 1-11-1N v m o m m M m m M m r1 f0 O lD I, O N N N N N N N O V L Cil rI4 lb lD lD rD (D lD lD rn OF > V} V)• th t/} to th V} V} V? V} N ? 0n � C >` C o O O O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 w 00 +' n V} Vl• V} 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 rl C lA Q 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 N w Q O ate+ ri ri ri ri ri ri ri M aJ C rl rl rl rl rl rl rl 00 L 3 N +�+ V? t/? V? V? t/). V} V} V? LL > O tA O O a v u ~ 6 V1 Q y 1 tQj to V>• tn• to t/t t/r iR to yr to p : y O 0 o ri u E a, Q. v 3 o o O O Q0D - - D W - Q v L0 E E a' y � L N 7 w u m u _ 3 u r0 fC Z Vf a .o H O ? .� (J Ly cc f. O O O CD O CD O CD O f0 L) F �..1 00 +� m t/T V? V} V} o t V} V? VT VT VT m (U N f6 U C t CC. ' a+ N Q C LL f t O U Q o 00 00 1-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -, -1 a if• rl It M M M M M M m M rl u (� Gl m O 't Zt Zt It It 00 a) y x = lD I� O O O O O O O O lD cn C j cp rl Ql Ill Ill Ln Ill Ill Ln Ln Ill .-I c0 O O F , 1-1 N N N fV N N fV N N � U >' � o to t/r t/> vt V> to +N v v v s � aJ w o a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ajcu Ql Ql Ql Ol Ql Ql Ol Q1 Ql Ql Q1 y_, O O O CD O O O O O O u Om Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln m l7 a1 N rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl N O f0 w00 m 00 00 m 00 00 m 00 00 C C F m m m m m m m m m m m o o4,� E c O n O O a L f0 aj cu O 00 O N N N N N N N N cn N v I, 00 ci c-I c-I ci c-I c-I c-I ci O f0 N al > 00 Q1 M M M M M M M M N Q Q lD Ill m m m m m m m of ate+ QJ O' ++ aJ lIJ lD c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I m C C C Vf al Lr r- n n n n n n n (IiC O a1 C V Vt• V} V} V} V} V} V} V} Vt• X -O -0 -6 aJ N X -0 O ~ 0 O M Ill lD I, M M O ci N '+-M i >` .2 .2 , m y N O O O O O O O O O O O N aJ ro Q 16 u ~ _ >^ N N N N N N N N N N N } fl_ aJ a1 u m ate+ C D Vl to Q ? �. in i > N M IZT Ln lD I- w m O ci N aO+ c-I N m 'T Ln lD d J QJ M N N N N N N N N M M M O di O O O O O O O O O O O m z 2 H >' N N N N N N N N N N N G H 2.1.b MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report III°°iii, 11I 111him Ill figh Schoolll 11INstilrict 12 The Project is located in High School District 125. As presented in Section 1.0, the Project is aD estimated to generate approximately 4 public high school age students when the Project is fully completed and occupied. Sections 6.1 and 6.2 show the estimates of the annual additional o revenues and additional operating costs associated with the Project. Table 7 is a summary of LO the estimated additional revenue and operating costs. o 6.1. I)iistiriict :12 11:1evenues �a L 6.1.1 Property Tax Revenues w L Currently the development site generates approximately $24,068 in property tax revenues for District 125. Upon the completion and full occupancy of the Project, the EAV of the site will increase by$7,193,172 to $7,999,922, resulting in an increase in annual property tax revenues 3 for District 125 of approximately $214,580 in collection year 2026 following stabilization, o assuming a tax rate of 2.983112% (2020 tax rate). a 6.1.2 School District Impact Fees a As noted above, the Village of Buffalo Grove imposes impact fees on new developments, with a E certain amount of those fees conveyed to the school districts based on the type of .L development and the unit mix. The table below shows the calculation of fees for District 125. a The total fees are included as revenues for District 102 in Section 6.3 Net Fiscal Impact Analysis. vi ❑ Table 7. School Impact Fee Calculation for District 125 a Unit Size Impact Fee c (bedrooms) No. of Units per Unit Total Fees d Studio 12 $0.00 $0.00 0 1 Bedroom 36 $3.04 $109.44 0 2 Bedroom 60 $140.00 $8,400.00 a a 3 Bedroom 12 $359.13 $4,309.56 a a� Total 120 $12,819.00 N C O U 6.1.3 Evidence Based Funding Revenues , For FY22, District 125 is projected to receive $2,556,879 in Base Funding and $4,594 in Tier y c Funding for a Gross State Contribution of$2,561,473. As noted above, the FY22 Gross State Contribution will form the Base Amount for FY23. Using the Average Student Enrollment of a 4,303.50 from the EBF formula, this averages out to $595 per student. Based on this per capita figure, the Project could generate an additional $2,381 per year of Evidence Base Funding for District 125. Q 11 Packet Pg. 70 2.1.b MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report 2 Il::A tiriict 12.5 I[:::xlpenMuir , With the additional enrollment of 4 students, the Project could increase expenses for District 125 by as much as $88,672 per year or $22,168 per student. This amount is based on the Per Capita Tuition Charge of$22,619 that District 125 calculates for ISBE but excludes certain AD administrative expenses that would not be expected to increase with addition of so few o students. LO The table below compares the Base Per Capita Tuition Charge calculation reported to ISBE and the Adjusted Per Capita Tuition Charge used in this study. > in �a L O W L M W O 4+ M a c �a a E L a vi ❑ a ai c O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c M a c I= �a Q 12 Packet Pg. 71 2.1.b MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report Table 8. District 125 Per Capita Tuition Charge—Base vs.Adjusted Base Calculation Adjusted Calculation FY20 Expenditures aD Education Fund $90,977,440 $90,977,440 Operations and Maintenance $30,260,433 $30,260,433 Debt Service Fund $4,903,485 $4,903,485 LO Transportation Fund $5,023,678 $5,023,678 c Municipal Retirement/Social Security Fund $3,311,865 $3,311,865 tO Tort Immunity Fund $370,333 $370,333 a Total Expenditures $134,847,234 $134,847,234 d ca Less Revenues/Expenditures Not Applicable to C Operating Expense of Regular Program $93,806,955 $93,806,955 L ca Regular Operating Expenditures $10,259,857 $10,259,857 ad Offsetting Revenues Net Operating Revenues $83,547,098 $83,547,098 3 w 0 Depreciation Allowance $8,204,101 $8,204,101 a Total Allowance for Tuition Computation $91,751,199 $91,751,199 c �a a Adjustments for Certain Expenditures Not E Expected to Increase from Development Less Support Services General Administration 0 $760,312 a Less Support Services School Administration 0 $1,071,718 Net Adjustments 0 $1,832,030 ui ❑ Total Allowance for Tuition Computation $91,751,199 $89,919,169 a ai _ Average Daily Attendance 4,056.30 4,056.30 0 d Per Capita Tuition Charge $22,619 $22,168 0 Additional School Age Children 4 4 0 L Q CL Total Per Capita Tuition Charge from Additional Q School Age Children $90,476 $88,672 Source: SD 125 FY20 Annual Financial Report y 0 U 63 INet Il::::iiscM limpact to I[.Astiriiet :::L25 rt, Q As demonstrated in Table 9 below, over the next 10 years, incremental revenues generated by (n _ the project are expected to exceed additional operating expenses by$1,219,574. Following 1° a. Project stabilization in 2025 incremental property taxes are projected to be $214,580 compared ; to annual expenses of$88,672. These revenues combined with additional State Aid will result in annual net revenues of$128,289 per year for District 125. �a Q 13 Packet Pg. 72 naa a JOJ'aen 19 LgnS jo ;eld `ueld ualla.id "n'g and `auozaIJ 10 lenoaddV aaplsuoa) ;aS ueld :;uauayoellV u M Ol W a N N N N N N N Ln nj LL u r,i co 00 m 00 00 00 00 w 00 00 of m •--I —1 LO N N N N N N N N rl d G t/} t/} rl c-I rl rl rl c-I rl rl c-I N th t/} -L} t/} t/} -L} to t/? V"} rj Ev a p cc O O O N N N N N N N N W m U — O O vOi l0 lD lD l0 LO LO t0 i0 M Q1 Q am-� •� 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 We 2 Q O u y 00 m 00 00 m 00 00 00 O a E r -a i O. yr 'vr vt v} N K vi to N Q W U (U C O � (U L a0 W 00 W W 00 W 00 00 W W p, Q aJ lD lD lfl lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD Q W �G D- ++ •--I rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl cu N N N N N N N N N N N Q 76 r u N N N N N N N N N N N tnh -Ln to tn. -Ln in -Ln -Ln to t/} -L? CL to U a W � a cu 01 z aci Z o Ol N Ol O rl rl rl rl rl rl .-i O N rl W M W lD lD lD lD lfl lD lD In N M Ol 00 Ln 01 Ol a cl a (7l cr 01 (a 3 N M W lD lD lD lD LD lD lD 00 N aj O a1 t/} U} r i N N N N N N N N 0) �• r > tn. tn. vi to vi -L . to tn. tn. 0n w .3 o � "O 0 O O 0 r1 -1 ci c-I ci ci ci ko O � Q v� to try t/� m m m 00 m m ai C N N N N N N N w j r m to t/? V/ t/} to t/- -Ln .-1 -O O V �* Y U � @ 'O a Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O C a1 L Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln cu 0) v to to to tn• to t/t V� to to Ln to 3 vu m 3 a p - N LOu cu C Q v 0LA N 3 O O O 0 q* It- IZT �T �t lzr CL m =l t y c u CO -0U to E z uu N M C aJ O 3 aJ ,n O 3 Z O j a u H C �. O1 O O O O O O O O O O 01 aj m m O *' m y 00 t/> to to to to to t/> to t/t t/> W ai •Q C L M a) N N a-• �' a1 U O N a Q o N rn O o o O o o O o Ln aj LM C) m m m m m m m m ad m o v N L 7 v ni 00 � a a v v v cn r'I aJ _ r-I 0 rl r c c r c c cn w Q on Gr ; t/} rl N N N N N N N N a0 •� -L4 t/? t/? -L4 t/? th -L? aJ m ++ ++ ui 0_lo — O N aJ 8 O ° -p o o o c a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C7 cu N N N N N N N N N N N •L m m OY rl rl r-1 rl rl c-1 c-1 rl c-1 c-1 rl y p- -O N ° Q O m rl m m p� m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m p O 4; Cl)s w w ao 00 00 m co co mo a V x Q1 Q1 al Ol Q1 Q1 Q1 Ql O1 c1 Ql C C V) N N N N N N N N N N N O i O O a1 m m 6 N O N T m N E 40 O W O N N N N N N N N ' (a C ll W (u 4J CL E i W to ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci X ; _0 -a 0 a) V)- Ln r- n n n n n n n gym,, > a1 y5 O' C 4/1• '{/� V? {/� 'VT i/} i/? t/} i/} o Ln N a1 N X -0o — ru H C) m , a) CO C N H LL C > :+ O m + m N N N N N rlJ N N OM M M M } CL v al i G7 m y ar CDO C) O O 0 O O O O O x O m m m V •O r C } N N N N N N N N N N N — — C o Ln Ln Q — Q) rl N M zzi- Ln LD a�+ O L L N M t- Ln LO l- w m O ci N m N N N N N N N N M M M z C aJ O O O O O O O O O O O m a x } N N N N N N N N N N N C r 2.1.b MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report Appendix aD Table A-1: Student Generation Estimates o LO Table A-2: Assumptions for Estimating Incremental Revenue Table A-3: Preliminary Estimated Incremental Property Taxes > in ca L O W L M W O 4+ M a c �a a E L a vi ❑ a ai c O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c M a c �a Q Packet Pg. 74 n Qe,o'eA 19 MnS jo ml `and m!ad `n'S and `uo eIJ 10 le odd¥aemsuoo) ps ueld :4u8wt43ejjv LO W a. \ a R § � q L , o rq e kli § � J : � o e V) « m 2 m , e / a LA � Q � 0 o e y o % E u L$ CD /\ / \ f / $ MO CO e o 0 0 0 [ = e \ = R q e z a� m \ m m 0 0 \ � a & & % o m m » k ° o o rlj m 2 e G 2 / o § m m % o o 00 E 4-1 2 o e m 2 m m R � x \ \ / / % / # CO e o e e e 2 g C k tu ° ° g @ _ 9 E \ / L. o a m « \ \ g e o � L.0 IT • w o o o 2 E / \ d a d a m & g Ln G 3 \ E kL Q = e � 3 u o m c w e m : L ' j § / / \ \ 2 / kQ Ln > o 0 0 0 / » c m § # d e e d ± § 2 m u % \ 0 k3 - 'n y § 2 q S q q [ CL a) M ƒ _0 U . z G ° � ■ I \ \ u E § $ \ \ � ± 2 2 2 LU / § § § \ / o o � N k Z M \ \ / \ � 2 k 2 2 2 \ @ � m ¢ _ _ _ _ ) m m m m ) a m w w 6 eC"i m » w (A _ m m » n Qe,o'eA 19 MnS jo ml `and m!ad `n'S and `uo eIJ 10 |e odd¥aemsuoo) ps ueld :4u8wt43ejjv m W � j CN m a \ } - 2 } § 0 2 \ / o g % j ® 0 _ - - g \ � L k co CN 3 ® - \W E � ; \ { \ § \ " j \ / r_ C e E J / § % § ° ^ y > \ Li > « ) ±m e g o ± - o - \ 7 J 0 j ~ w a G G (A § / % � ± CL \ # 0 m \ % g 6 = S E f \ % o \ )) § \ a 5 j = 3 > E [ >- CL \ \ § \ \ / \ \ / 9 G \ x 2 % / @ 9 g a a ° ° } § / / y 9 \ \ - » \ \ E ~ / / { 3 % co 0 .n \ § \ \LA } a cr � 2 2 j / § / \ ~ S = e E ( j ® § % ƒ E a ( ƒ k cn r \ E a \ 2 \ 2 $ § k o Ln o ) , / @ & CL § o ) \ ) _ a \ \ \ \ q ) \ / � \ \ \ \ \ \ a U ( � $ E - % 0- , m \ \ \ } \ % 2 o k _ k f \ / / / \ § \ § f � 2 § \ / \ § \ ] \ § \ \ ƒ t / § 2 ± 0 / 2 Q e k / § ± , J naa a JOJ'aen+g `qnS jo ;eld `ueld ualla.id "n'g and `auozaIJ 10 lenoaddV aaplsuoa) ;aS ueld :;uauayoejjv n N � a d Y N N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V M 00 00 00 00 W W W y QI 00 Lr Lr Lr Lr Lr Lr Lr In a > N O eI m x 00 00 ,� ,� N ti ti ti ti ti x 0 .� i m m m m m m m m Q N p � N a � � W GJ — OV1 l0 c-I o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I V N l0 lD lD W W W W W b0 i V1 lD l0 l0 lD lD lD l0 l0 00 ` N Z tw m a 00 00 00 00 00 W CO CO CO CO CO DJ of N u w w w w w w w w I- I- I- I- I- L O O O O O O O O O O O O O i In Z V V V V � -t� -zt N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W4 N X A 2 T w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln Q = O O O O O O O O O O O O O � 2 i N 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 W a _ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C u, N � W m t?V}V}V}V}N N N N N N N N C l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 lD lD lD t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 �..� V a a a a a a a a a a a a a C LA 00 •N n n n n n n n n cu e`a 'v i y 00 O N N N N N N N N Q N > n 00 c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I Q Q 00 Ol m m m m m m m m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn O °1 0 Z U L+ 0 y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � N N N N N N N N N N N N N J > 00 00 00 00 00 o0 o0 o0 o0 W W W W l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 lD lD lD l0 l0 C N � 07 07 07 00 00 00 W � W W W W W C r-I m O O O O m O N N N N N N N N Q M l0 O1 L.L 00 00 00 v C C C C C 0 01 l0 l � � � � � � � O x f6 �6 w w w V1 to 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 01 ~ ? FO O O n to 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 01 01 Q1 N _ W 00 00 00 N V O1 01 01 01 01 01 01 Il (.1 .N r-i �o ri ri r r r r r r v ++ Y � to N y Q 0 0 0 M O '6 O oc ooc ooc . m v m d C) C) C) N c O c N W 000 000 000 .� s ao fl C W O V cu 00 O ., v v 'o L C ' V7 l0 cl cl cl cl cl O1 O1 c' Q V C N u'i l0 Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol O1 O1 01 N Y N I� l0 Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol C N N Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol O1 O1 N N E L cu CL O m >VI a f6 T � v E O C c c o v kn = „c-, N M c Ln �o n 00 W �. V f0 N N N N N N N N N M M M M V -6 u im Qj Gl w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 3 ' C T N N N N tV N N N N N N N N O V O CM Y uCL L C m N E O O c r`c 75 ar G ti L CU E O --� N M 7 In w n 00 01 O --� N } UJ d W N m N N N N tV N N N N N m m m Q m > w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -6 N N T N N N N N N N N N N N N N F 6 4 N Q 0 C m O 2 y O c-I tV m � In W n W Ol O� - z 'V H r-I 7 } 0 n 2.1.b t �IIII �Iut Illllllll�lllllllllqulllllllllllll�lll�llllllltlllllllllllltllll III � �� I hum uo mlq m uu uuul iu V'��I' aD zE IIIII G1 Im ]low �mm� � � Vie ��I IIUv I ❑ O O d ca L m ' O a 0 M N Y�➢ a i O O O rl L CL CL Prepared For: = 0 U MZ Capital Partners ;, Private Equity Real Estate Investment � co a i t! Sarni, O !6 E �a Q Packet Pg. 78 2.1.b 1. Introduction CD This report summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for a proposed residential o development to be located on the south side of Deerfield Parkway east of its intersection with Weiland Road in Buffalo Grove,Illinois. As proposed,the site will be developed to provide a high- to end rental apartment community with six buildings totaling 120 units. Access to the site will be provided via a full movement access drive on Deerfield Parkway aligned opposite Windbrooke d Drive. An emergency access drive will also be provided to the east. ❑ �a L The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development will have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed 06 development. 3 w Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an ° aerial view of the site area. a c The sections of this report present the following: a E Existing roadway conditions a A description of the proposed development Directional distribution of the development traffic (n « Vehicle trip generation for the development ❑ Future traffic conditions including access to the development a Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours o Recommendations with respect to adequacy of the site access and adjacent roadway system d Traffic capacity analyses were conducted for the weekday morning and weekday evening peak ° hours for the following conditions: o L Q Q I. Existing Condition - Analyzes the capacity of the existing roadway system using existing Q L peak hour traffic volumes in the surrounding area. .y C 2. Future Condition — Analyzes the projected traffic volumes which includes the existing v traffic volumes increased by an ambient area growth factor(growth not attributable to any , particular development) and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed subject in development. a c �a Q Packet Pg. 79 2.1.b �r�ni I1�<<!ris,11 ; eider Ir(ItIse S, f d,,sri�asri f`a�itr r dr F��mq fcddA G .-. o� Timm furl&m Icr Pavilwin G1 onV� � N va�aBAI , 0 L D II°A RM �. "APLLAGE Q AAIPd ifkj is.fr not LA c, q;70i6'(.arm Rork flrr�l °;u:k-nrorV O a rr L[A e G4ruf9v c Grove Nq��'�y Cvlafi I raru,�sl�r � � tl na rft�lcf l`B"), Dom Me[d Fkvw^q — � fl,rkdkyrv* lSede(Riol GI1[fYN_ I� 13]iaR f,1dI i�°D� 4 ti7�r � rar*6r��p�_ far¢wli f �riartttat�i. ,iJe 6 al e V111a Arw �r v, r r to L FGFI-} 1n i7F�ro'' ° Vi�urePuaBe,€w� vre rrlMViirrrapiCv i 7 Park SITE „N w ` a Flar cppy Il lfs roq m 01 f � f�� P a. — �ulr,. E P'� ( L AF utb sP'Bli a (hgrr„I� rC'xrruiu4 ;"",,,f 9;ratl[�krwYr�,v¢tff forF,C�+_ llp�y of f6,�M�Vgi,^: f,l ;",pr Ind'r;iQ"'� � a Site Location Figure 1 C N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c co a c m �a Q Packet Pg. 80 2.1.b r LO fil 1f rn U > r L c r, 4 /«/ W l n / O a. r o , m a E — �,,;, r l a �r turn - n r � 0 Aerial View of Site Figure 2 a ai c O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c co a c m E �a (-;rove' Illinois 3 Q Packet Pg. 81 2.1.b 2. Existing Conditions as Existing transportation conditions in the vicinity of the site were documented based on field visits conducted by KLOA, Inc. in order to obtain a database for projecting future conditions. The o following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, physical characteristics LO of the area roadway system including lane usage and traffic control devices and existing peak hour traffic volumes. Site Location o �a L The site is located on the south side of Deerfield Parkway (Lake County Route 47) east of its w intersection with Weiland Road (Lake County Route 17). The site is currently developed with an office building and storage yard occupied by Concrete Erectors. The access drive for Concrete 06 Erectors is located approximately 790 feet east of Weiland Road and approximately 225 feet west of Windbrooke Drive. Area land uses in the vicinity of the site are primarily residential and cn commercial and include the Windbrooke Crossing apartments to the immediate north. To the east o are the Illinois Masonry Corporation,a ComEd substation,Buffalo Grove Park-N-Ride lot,Buffalo a Grove Transportation Center, and Perfect Power Inc. To the south are single-family homes and to the west is Huntington Bank and Revere Electric Supply. In addition, a bike path under the a jurisdiction of the Buffalo Grove Park District is located near the site. The bike path crosses E Deerfield Parkway approximately 90 feet west of the Concrete Erectors access drive. The bike path provides connections for pedestrians and cyclists to Aptakisic Junior High School to the north a and the Buffalo Grove Transportation Center to the east. The north end of the site access drive is crossed by overhead power transmission wires owned by ComEd. o a Existing o dway System Characteristics 0 N The characteristics of the existing roadways near the development are described below. Figure 3 illustrates the existing roadway characteristics. o Deerfield Parkway (Lake County Route 47) is an east-west roadway with a five-lane cross section o CL that in the vicinity of the site provides two lanes in each direction divided by a landscaped median. a At its signalized intersection with Weiland Road, Deerfield Parkway provides an exclusive left- Q L turn lane, an exclusive through lane, a shared through/right-turn lane, and a high-visibility crosswalk on both approaches. At its unsignalized intersection with the Concrete Erectors access c drive, Deerfield Parkway provides an exclusive through lane and a shared through/right-turn lane U on the eastbound approach and a shared left-turn/through lane and an exclusive through lane on the westbound approach. At its unsignalized intersection with Windbrooke Drive, Deerfield c Parkway provides an exclusive left-turn lane and two through lanes on the eastbound approach and an exclusive through lane and a shared through/right-turn lane on the westbound approach. At its signalized intersection with Commerce Court, Deerfield Parkway provides an exclusive left- turn lane, two through lanes, and an exclusive right-turn lane on the eastbound approach and an exclusive left-turn lane, an exclusive through lane, and a shared through/right-turn lane on the westbound approach. Deerfield Parkway provides high visibility crosswalks on both legs of its Q intersection with Commerce Court. Packet Pg. 82 no(3 a J0J 'aen T `qnS jo }eld `ueld ualload "n'S and `auozaa 10 lenoaddd ioplsuoo) }oS ueld :;uouayoejjv M co N M a.a� CE ti 2 NpR M LL a 8 N yyQ W � R = N f " 0 „ @ N q! ! � Y I�.M AI 0 O fi w.. J z 0 Rl + �a�� v CD Q rr ILL, ��❑ "mm a � Illf'I IIII Kl � 0 I11f co RF�c� ES it 0 ME U 0 +� •L J a ozz Cr L LAB oocr DRIVE 1 t t (� zn .� Ul 3 m 0 ill ll I11Ru Ln x t LLJ 0 UPI v Z J a C� F- cn w w •• t O w J fn LL N — r— Q C } LU O FETE] dP0' 1000' r— "" W z ❑cr o- S u N �,�, - a- J Z J O N ; � Q � z 2 0 m ooz � ROAD ..•. - v o w J rn z o w > —► �uRI Hun �r�r' ❑o z w LL U) 0 o > U N j w Q Q O w = Hcn-j 0 o H 0- U oz2 L co p �t� w cn rn cn = zoo ca C7 J a o LL 3 ¢a — .I 0 W� 0� x �oN o C) o a a) CO tY 2.1.b Deerfield Parkway is under the jurisdiction of the Lake County Division of Transportation (LCDOT), is classified as a minor arterial by the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), carries an Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)volume of 21,700 (IDOT AADT 2019), and has a posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour. AD `E as Weiland Road (Lake County Route 17) is a north-south roadway that in the vicinity of the site o provides two through lanes in each direction.At its signalized intersection with Deerfield Parkway, LO Weiland Road provides an exclusive left-turn lane, an exclusive through lane, and a combined to through/right-turn lane on the southbound approach and an exclusive left-turn lane, two exclusive through lanes, and an exclusive right-turn lane on the northbound approach. Weiland Road d provides high visibility crosswalks on both legs of its intersection with Deerfield Parkway. Weiland Road is under the jurisdiction of LCDOT but is maintained by the Village of Buffalo c Grove and is classified a major collector by IDOT. Weiland Road carries an Annual Average Daily L Traffic (AADT) volume of 11,600 (IDOT AADT 2019) north of Deerfield Parkway and a volume > of 15,000 (IDOT AADT 2019) south of Deerfield Parkway. The posted speed limit is 40 miles per hour, with a school zone speed limit of 25 miles per hour north of the intersection with Deerfield Parkway for Aptakisic Junior High School. o 41 M It should be noted that according to Lake County's 2016-2021 Proposed Highway Improvement a Program, Weiland Road is to be widened from two lanes to four lanes between Lake Cook Road and Aptakisic Road. Once completed, two through lanes in each direction will be provided a continuously between Lake Cook Road and Aptakisic Road. Construction is scheduled to be E completed in 2021. a Commerce Court is a north-south local roadway that generally provides one lane in each direction (n and extends from its intersection with Deerfield Parkway to its dead-end approximately one-third o of a mile south of Deerfield Parkway. At its signalized intersection with Deerfield Parkway, a Commerce Court provides an exclusive left-turn lane, a shared left-turn/through lane, and an c exclusive right-turn lane on the northbound approach and an exclusive left-turn lane and a shared d through/right-turn lane on the southbound approach. Commerce Court provides high visibility crosswalks on both legs of its intersection with Deerfield Parkway. Commerce Court is under the ° jurisdiction of the Village of Buffalo Grove, carries an ADT volume of 2,665 vehicles as reported o by LCDOT in 2013, and has a posted speed limit of 30 mph. a a a Windbrooke Drive is a north-south local roadway that provides access to the Windbrooke Crossing apartments on the north side of Deerfield Parkway. At its unsignalized intersection with Deerfield y Parkway,Windbrooke Drive provides a combined left-turn/right-turn lane under stop sign control. v Windbrooke Drive is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Buffalo Grove, has a posted speed limit of 20 mph, and parking is prohibited on both sides of the street. c Public Transportation a c The area is served by two modes of public transportation, Metra commuter rail and the Pace Bus E system. All public transportation service in the immediate vicinity of the site arrives at the Buffalo Grove Transportation Center, which incorporates the Buffalo Grove Park-N-Ride lot as one of its Q amenities along with bike racks. The Buffalo Grove Transportation Center is approximately one- quarter mile away from the site via Deerfield Parkway or the bike path adjacent to the site. Packet Pg. 84 2.1.b The following summarizes the public transportation services provided to the area: The Buffalo Grove Metra Station is located east of the site and provides weekday rail service on the North Central Service line between Antioch, Illinois and Union Station in AD tE Chicago. The Buffalo Grove stop acts as a terminus and originating point for select trains. The far-south end of the platform is approximately 1800 feet from the site via the bike path. o Due to COVID-19, Metra is currently running reduced service and a revised schedule. As L, of July 2021, the line provides six inbound trains and six outbound trains daily. The first to inbound train departs Antioch at 5:20 A.M., with the last train departing from Buffalo Grove at 4:10 P.M. The first outbound train departs Chicago's Union Station at 7:10 A.M. d with the last train departing at 6:00 P.M. Approximately two inbound trains cross Deerfield Parkway during the morning peak hour and approximately one outbound train crosses c Deerfield Parkway during the evening peak hour.The gates at the train tracks remain closed for approximately 70 seconds for an inbound train and approximately 130 seconds for an > outbound train. A reference of past timetables (pre-COVID-19) shows 11 inbound trains and 11 outbound trains daily, with three inbound trains crossing Deerfield Parkway during the morning peak hour and one inbound and three outbound trains crossing Deerfield o Parkway during the evening peak hour. Buffalo Grove is the most-trafficked station on the North Central Service. a c �a Pace Bus Route 234— Wheeling-Des Plaines runs from Des Plaines to Wheeling with rush a hour service to Buffalo Grove. This line provides weekday service between the Des Plaines E Metra station and Strong/Milwaukee in Wheeling with rush hour service extending to the I- Buffalo Grove Transportation Center in Buffalo Grove. The nearest bus stops are located in the southeast and southwest corners of the intersection of Deerfield Parkway with Commerce Court. The Wheeling Metra station, Randhurst Mall, Mt. Prospect Metra station, Cumberland Metra station, Des Plaines Metra station, Buffalo Grove Park-N-Ride a lot, and Buffalo Grove Metra station are all served by this route. c 0 N 0 Pace Bus Route 272—Milwaukee Avenue North runs along U.S. Route 45 and Illinois State Route 21 with a stop for both directions on selective weekday runs at the Buffalo Grove 0 Transportation Center,which is the nearest bus stop to the site. This line provides weekday o service between the Golf Mill Shopping Center in Niles and Hawthorne Mall in Vernon a Hills. The Buffalo Grove Park-N-Ride lot,Buffalo Grove Metra station,Chicago Executive Q Airport, Golf Mill Shopping Center, and Westfield Hawthorn Mall are served by this route. .y C Pace Bus Route 626— Skokie-Buffalo Grove Limited runs along I-94, Lake Cook Road, 0 Milwaukee Avenue, and Barclay Boulevard with a stop for both directions at the Buffalo , Grove Transportation Center, which is the nearest bus stop to the site. This line provides in weekday service from Lincolnshire Corporate Center to the Dempster-Skokie CTA Yellow Line station. The Dempster-Skokie Yellow Line CTA station, Lake Cook Road Metra a station,Northbrook Court, and the Buffalo Grove Park-N-Ride lot are served by this route. All of the roads within the immediate area generally have sidewalks on both sides of the road with the exception of Commerce Court, which only has sidewalks on the east side of the road. Q Packet Pg. 85 2.1.b Existing Traffic Volumes In order to determine current traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, KLOA, Inc. conducted peak period traffic counts using Miovision Scout Video Collection Units on Wednesday, June 30, 2021, during the weekday morning (7:00 A.M. to 9:00 A.M.) and weekday evening (4:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M.)peak periods at the following intersections: o LO Deerfield Parkway with Weiland Road to Deerfield Parkway with Commerce Court o d The results of the traffic counts showed that the weekday morning peak hour of traffic occurs from 7:45 A.M. to 8:45 A.M. and the weekday evening peak hour of traffic occurs from 4:30 P.M. to c 5:30 P.M. Copies of the traffic count summary sheets are included in the Appendix. L �a These counts were supplemented with counts previously conducted at the intersection of Deerfield Parkway with Windbrooke Drive and Deerfield Parkway with the Concrete Erectors Drive in 2016 that were adjusted to reflect 2021 traffic conditions. o 41 M Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is anticipated that the traffic volumes in the area are not a representative of typical conditions. As such, the traffic counts taken in 2021 were adjusted to represent the normal traffic conditions. Referencing the previously conducted counts in 2016 and a the IDOT two-way counts from 2019 on Deerfield Parkway, it was determined that the morning and evening peak hour volumes taken in 2021 were an average twenty five percent less than they a would be under normal conditions. As such, the morning and evening peak hour counts were increased twenty five percent. Figure 4 illustrates the Year 2021 base traffic volumes. (6 0 a ai c O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c co a c �a Q 'ne nd °r. 4 s lerdia D°) loom eal Packet Pg. 86 na(3 a aoJ 'aen T `qnS jo leld (ueld uallaad "n'S and `auozaa 10 lenoaddd aaplsuo0) }aS ueld :;uQwLI3ejjv co N E a a o a " tiF�% Q CC _ G N � Cl ice" (N � � J O a c_ Z O�O � 0 g Q�; L 11 (35) �-- 0 (1) > 1 �► ,�- 9 (76) o 0 Y Y 4 (16) -? C o w w T r* cMMF w 0 (0) -► pU Rc w 4 (38) -i o N Rj• �` ao N._Ln O O ti O O N (L) E 2 O U cB WIN L DRIVE v^ o M N m rn` QN L12 (1) o j �► i- 3 (4) ns f- � o N` ro� O ti r; p� C c, ��f1 }> ^� �� R 2 1 0 L 240 (201) a) L �W l ♦- 256 (256) a o E O ROAD p 50 q24) 39 (6) --� t it 0 o - 30 (20) _w m — — • v o0i "z > 94 (81) --� cn W_ o ai LD 165 (276) --► 1 (r u, > � o 65 (201) o ^_ 0 o w Q N, ko — W Of cn w a)a CO o 2.1.b Crash Analysis KLOA, Inc. obtained crash data' from IDOT for the most recent available five years (2016 to 2020) for the intersections of Deerfield Parkway with Weiland Road, Deerfield Parkway with ; Commerce Court, and Deerfield Parkway with Windbrooke Drive. The crash data for the intersection of Deerfield Parkway with Weiland Road is summarized in Table 1. A review of the crash data indicated that only seven crashes occurred at the intersection of Deerfield Parkway with LO c Commerce Court and eight crashes occurred at the intersection of Deerfield Parkway with Windbrooke Drive between 2016 and 2020. Additionally, it should be noted that no fatalities were reported at these intersections. o �a L Table 1 O w DEERFIELD PARKWAY WITH WEILAND ROAD—CRASH SUMMARY Type of Crash Frequency otS Year Rear Angle Pedestrian Object Sideswipe Turning Other Total co End 4-- 0 2016 0 0 0 6 2 1 0 9 a. 2017 0 0 0 4 2 3 0 9 a 2018 0 0 0 11 0 8 0 19 E 2019 0 0 0 9 2 9 0 20 L a 2020 1 0 1 4 2 3 0 11 Total 1 0 1 34 8 24 0 68 a Average <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 6.8 1.6 4.8 <1.0 13.6 c O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y _ O U d _ co a. m s t IDOT DISCLAIMER:The motor vehicle crash data referenced herein was provided by the Illinois Department of Transportation. Any conclusions drawn from analysis of the aforementioned data are the sole responsibility of the data recipient(s).Additionally, Q for coding years 2015 to present,the Bureau of Data Collection uses the exact latitude/longitude supplied by the investigating law enforcement agency to locate crashes.Therefore,location data may vary in previous years since data prior to 2015 was physically located by bureau personnel. Hqlffilo Grow" Illinois 10 Packet Pg. 88 2.1.b 3. Traffic Characteristics of the Proposed P9Y9WPW9W CD In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional o distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. LO 0 Proposed. Site and Development Plan As proposed, the plans call for developing a high-end rental apartment complex on the site with o 120 units in six buildings. Access to the proposed development will be provided via a full movement access drive off Deerfield Parkway aligned opposite Windbrooke Drive. The access w drive should provide one inbound lane and two outbound lanes, with outbound movements under stop-sign control. An additional access drive for emergency vehicles along the north edge of the 06 site should provide a connection with the adjacent property to the east occupied by Perfect Power Inc. The existing bike path will remain at its current location and will provide the residents of the (n proposed development with non-motorized connections to the Buffalo Grove Transportation o Center. Furthermore, as part of the proposed development, the existing curb cut serving Concrete ii Erectors will be eliminated. A copy of the preliminary site plan depicting the proposed development and access is included in the Appendix. ii E Directional 1 istri ution L a The directions from which residents of the proposed development will approach and depart the site were estimated based on existing travel patterns, as determined from the traffic counts. Figure o 5 illustrates the directional distribution of the development-generated traffic. as ai Estimated Site Traffic Generation N The volume of traffic generated be the proposed apartment development was estimated using data o published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE) Trip Generation Manual, l Oth Edition. The "Multifamily Housing (Low Rise)" (Land-Use Code 220) was used. Table 2 illustrates the P vehicle trips anticipated for this development. �- a L Table 2 ESTIMATED SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES c MorningITE Weekday U Land 1 . .r Pe aourk a> our c TotalUse Code Type/Size In Out Total In out Total In Out �o a 220 ( 20 Units) 13 44 57 43 26 69 433 433 866 �a Q Packet Pg. 89 Ao(3 a J0J 'aen T `qnS jo 1e1d `ueld w118ad "n'S and `ouozoa 10 Ienoaddd ioplsuo0) }oS ueld :;uouayoejjv rn N E a LL Ln 8 Z R o i N y,. F- LU r b� �z (V a yLLJO J z U) Z LU Z U C, UJ zz NN r (D w v! UJ C CO cMMF NZo o 0 m c co 0 �L A Q A NQ c WI� w BR E DRIVEw ww o W o A m � m m m m m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . w 0 M O N .T O 15% 0-.C: E L N 0 - ROAD . . a) ,o — 15% o-' Q` Lz r wa 0 U.3 � a� c� aYp LU LU N a) CO tY 2.1.b 4. Projected Traffic Conditions as The total projected traffic volumes include the existing traffic volumes, increase in background traffic due to growth, and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed subject o development. LO 0 0 Development ent Traffic Assipmetit The estimated weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway system in accordance with the c previously described directional distribution (Figure 5). The total new traffic assignment for the L residential development is illustrated in Figure 6. > Background Traffic C"onditiotis w O The existing traffic volumes (Figure 4) were increased by a regional growth factor to account for o the increase in existing traffic related to regional growth in the area (i.e., not attributable to any a particular planned development). As per Lake County's Highway Access and Use Ordinance, the existing volumes were increased by three percent for two years for a total of six percent. Figure 7 a illustrates the Year 2023 no-build traffic volumes. E L a Total Projected. Traffic Volumes v� The development-generated traffic (Figure 6) was added to the existing traffic volumes increased M by a regional growth factor to determine the Year 2023 total projected traffic volumes, as a illustrated in Figure 8. o N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y C 0 U d c M a c �a Q Packet Pg. 91 Ao(3 a aoJ 'aen T `qnS jo }eld `ueld ualload "n'S and `auozaa 10 lenoaddd ioplsuo0) }oS ueld :;uouayoejjv � N c d CD m CENT ti _ m NORLL a yati�r� N yyQ W � R CC _ G N V Cl x fi � U') 6 J z cm Z:) Z:) Y t tl N 0 0 CO LLIY Y Q Q t ,y� LU o 0- co�RRc o Q CL J i N 00 00 r� ® a) to L22 (13) A of WI N j— 22 (13) c? DRIVE �ww 0 W U� a) tD A a_ a c L A W Q o Qt� Lo ~ '� �► E c E L N L 2 (6) 0 ROAD , , — 1 (6) > > 0 o Q M C6 ow o U.3 a) m W ir cn w a a) COo 0� Aa(3 a aoJ 'aen T LgnS jo }eld `ueld ua118ad "n'S and `auozaa 10 lenoaddd aaplsuo0) }aS ueld :;uQwLI3ejjv � M M d CD m CENT ti _ m NORLL a yatiAl"'I w, o N yyQ W � R CC _ G Cl 9 Lf) Cl *4 m(� N k'Fir, 6 y Y � 12 (37) �-- 0 (1) > 1 �► ,`- 10 (81) o 0 Y Y 4 (17) -? C o w w T r* cMMF o 0 (0) -► pU Rc w 4 (40) �V N �MLLo O O 0o O O U a) E O U 4- C6 s_ WIN � DRIVE Ln m co o N Z L 13 (1) (Y) j �► i- 3 c41 0 t_� C6 O� LT� Ln m A R QRrn W coN L 254 (213) ao o ♦— 271 (271) 00 C EL N j 53 113U t w m o ROAD Q !o a — 100 (86) —�175 w Ln ? ai 69 (213) o cc to Wa c o U. � a) m �Y NLLn W a a) CO o Aa(3 a J0J 'aen T `qnS jo }eld `ueld w118ad "n'S and `auozaa 10 lenoaddd aaplsuo0) }aS ueld :;uQwLI3ejjv rn W c c4 a F- NORMLLa o � 8 W C S N 9 k l!7 O m f OP O k'Fir, �. Lr) o z a " Co; L 12 (37) �-- 0 (1) > 1 �► ,`- 10 (81) o 0 Y Y 4 (17) C o w w T r* cMMF w o c01 —► °v �'� o Q 4 (401 -i =�c u, RT F J CL d'N �� O O E O o > co U ►� L 22 (13) 0 (0) 22 (13) DRIVE ` 41 (6) e � 1 (+ W •o 0 (0) --► N M ® L 32 (21) � tied �® 0 M N m m O L M W�M Ln �in f L 256 (219) 1 ♦— 271 (271) E 0 E L N j- 53 (131) 0 o - ROAD a) - • •101 (9 ) > a)-� 175 (293) -► p o o f 69 (213) c o U.3oCD Nm �Y Nun W cn w a a) CO o 2.1.b 5. Traffic Analysis and 1 CD The following provides an evaluation conducted for the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours.The analysis includes conducting capacity analyses to determine how well the roadway o system and access drives are projected to operate and whether any roadway improvements or LO modification are required. 0 Traffic Analyses Roadway and adjacent or nearby intersection analyses were performed for the weekday morning, c and weekday evening peak hours for the existing (Year 2021), no-build (Year 2023), and future projected (Year 2023) traffic volumes. > otS The traffic analyses were performed using the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 01 Edition and analyzed using the w Synchro/SimTraffic 11 computer software. The analyses for signalized intersections were 41 accomplished utilizing actual cycle lengths,phasings, and offsets. a c �a The analyses for the unsignalized intersections determine the average control delay to vehicles at a an intersection. Control delay is the elapsed time from a vehicle joining the queue at a stop sign 9 CD (includes the time required to decelerate to a stop) until its departure from the stop sign and I- resumption of free flow speed. The methodology analyzes each intersection approach controlled by a stop sign and considers traffic volumes on all approaches and lane characteristics. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, ❑a which is assigned a letter from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service d and the corresponding control delay for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections are included in the Appendix of this report. o Summaries of the traffic analysis results showing the level of service and overall intersection delay Q. L (measured in seconds) for the existing, no-build, and Year 2023 total projected conditions are Q presented in Tables 3, 4, and 5, respectively. A discussion of the intersections follows. Summary sheets for the capacity analyses are included in the Appendix y 0 U d _ co a _ m �a Rqll�do Grove, Illinois 17 Q Packet Pg. 95 2.1.b Table 3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS —YEAR 2021 BASE CONDITIONS MorningWeekday Peak Hour Peak Houra� Intersection1 Delay LOSDelay ❑ Deerfield Parkway with Weiland Road' to • Overall C 31.6 C 29.7 • Eastbound Approach C 32.0 C 30.2 d • Westbound Approach C 22.2 C 27.0 L • Northbound Approach C 34.8 C 29.3 L �a • Southbound Approach D 37.2 D 37.7 Deerfield Parkway with Commerce Court' w • Overall A 4.1 B 14.2 41 M • Eastbound Approach A 3.6 A 9.1 a c • �a Westbound Approach A 4.8 B 14.2 a E • Northbound Approach C 23.6 D 39.5 . a • Southbound Approach C 25.6 B 16.3 Deerfield Parkway with Windbrooke Drive o • Southbound Approach C 19.3 D 29.0 a ai • c Eastbound Left Turn A 8.4 C 22.1 N as Deerfield Parkway with Concrete Erectors Access Drive o Northbound Approach D 26.6 C 22.6 0 L Westbound Left Turn C 16.9 A 8.9 a LOS—Level of Service 1 —Signalized Intersection a) Delay is measured in seconds 2—Two-Way Stop Controlled N C O U d c co a c �a Q Packet Pg. 96 2.1.b Table 4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS —YEAR 2023 NO-BUILD CONDITIONS MorningWeekday Peak Hour Peak Houra� Intersection1 Delay LOSDelay ❑ Deerfield Parkway with Weiland Road' to • Overall D 36.5 D 38.2 • Eastbound Approach D 40.1 C 33.7 d • Westbound Approach C 23.7 D 42.8 L • Northbound Approach D 35.8 C 29.9 L • Southbound Approach D 37.3 D 38.5 Deerfield Parkway with Commerce Court' w • Overall A 5.7 B 17.8 41 M • Eastbound Approach A 5.3 B 15.3 a c • �a Westbound Approach A 6.0 B 17.6 a E • Northbound Approach C 23.8 D 39.8 . a • Southbound Approach C 25.6 B 16.5 Deerfield Parkway with Windbrooke Drive o • Southbound Approach C 20.9 D 33.8 a ai • c Eastbound Left Turn A 8.5 D 25.2 N d Deerfield Parkway with Concrete Erectors Access Drive o Northbound Approach D 29.1 D 28.3 0 L Westbound Left Turn C 18.3 B 10.0 a LOS—Level of Service I —Signalized Intersection a) Delay is measured in seconds 2—Two-Way Stop Controlled N C O U d c co a c �a Q Packet Pg. 97 2.1.b Table 4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS —YEAR 2023 PROJECTED CONDITIONS MorningWeekday Peak Hour Peak Houra� Intersection1 Delay LOSDelay ❑ Deerfield Parkway with Weiland Road' to • Overall D 37.3 D 38.1 • Eastbound Approach D 41.6 C 34.1 d • Westbound Approach C 24.1 D 42.6 L • Northbound Approach D 35.8 C 30.1 L �a • Southbound Approach D 37.2 D 38.5 Deerfield Parkway with Commerce Court' w • Overall A 5.7 B 17.9 41 M • Eastbound Approach A 5.4 B 15.3 a c • �a Westbound Approach A 6.1 B 17.7 a E • Northbound Approach C 23.8 D 40.1 . a • Southbound Approach C 25.6 B 16.5 Deerfield Parkway with Windbrooke Drive o Northbound Approach F 99+ F 99+ a ai c Southbound Approach F 71.5 F 99+ N Eastbound Left Turn A 8.9 C 21.8 0 Westbound Left Turn C 17.1 B 10.4 0 L LOS—Level of Service 1 —Signalized Intersection CL Delay is measured in seconds. 2—Two-Way Stop Controlled Q L .y C O U d c co a c �a Q Packet Pg. 98 2.1.b Discussion and .Recommendations The following summarizes how the intersections are projected to operate and identify any roadway and traffic control improvements necessary to accommodate the development traffic. a� a� Deerfield Parkway with Weiland Road o LO 0 The results of the capacity analyses indicate that the intersection is currently operating at Level of Service(LOS) C during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. Under year 2023 0 no-build conditions,the intersection is projected to operate at LOS D during the weekday morning o and evening peak hours.Under projected conditions,the intersection is projected to operate at LOS D during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. It should be noted that the proposed ,o development will only increase traffic volumes at the intersection by less than one percent during both peak hours. As such, the intersection will not be significantly affected by the traffic that will > be generated by the proposed development more than the existing projected background traffic growth and delays due to the proposed development will be minimal. w 0 Deerfield Parkway with Commerce Court 41 o a The results of the capacity analyses indicate that the intersection is currently operating at LOS A _a during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS B during the weekday evening peak hour. Under a year 2023 no-build conditions, the intersection is projected to continue operating at LOS A during E the weekday morning peak hour and LOS B during the weekday evening peak hour,with increases a in delays of less than four seconds. Under projected conditions, the intersection is projected to M operate at LOS A during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS B during the weekday evening vi peak hour with 951"percentile queues of three to four vehicles during the evening peak hour. M a Deerfield Parkway with Windbrooke Drive o N The results of the capacity analyses indicate that the southbound approach at the intersection of Deerfield Parkway with Windbrooke Drive currently operates at LOS C during the weekday o morning peak hour and LOS D during the weekday evening peak hour. Under year 2023 no-build o conditions, the approach is projected to continue operating at LOS C during the weekday morning a peak hour and at LOS D during the weekday evening peak hour. As described earlier, access to Q the proposed development will be aligned opposite Windbrooke Drive. The results of the capacity analyses indicate that the northbound approach will operate at LOS F during the weekday morning y and evening peak hours. It is also projected that the southbound approach will operate at LOS F 0 during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. This LOS is typical and expected when an access drive intersects a major roadway such as Deerfield Parkway. Furthermore, the signalized intersections of Deerfield Parkway with Weiland Road and Commerce Court will provide additional gaps in the traffic stream, which will allow for site traffic to exit more efficiently and a with lower delay. The projected 95th percentile queues for the northbound and southbound approaches will be three to four vehicles during both the morning and evening peak hours. E �a Q "ne no'�"c' d"14'sklerdial Development Rqlffilo Grove, Illinois 21 Packet Pg. 99 2.1.b Per LCDOT requirements, an eastbound right-turn lane warrant and a westbound left-turn lane warrant analysis were conducted for Deerfield Parkway at the proposed site access road. Based on the analysis, it was determined that a westbound left-turn lane will be warranted which can be accommodated by modifying the existing median on Deerfield Parkway. Furthermore, the as projected right-turn volumes indicate that a right-turn lane is warranted based on the westbound E evening peak hour volumes. The comparison charts for the warrant analysis figures from the Lake o County Highway Access and Use Ordinance Technical Reference Manual are provided in the c Appendix. to d �a L O W L W O }1 M a c �a a E L a vi ❑ a ai c O N 0) O R O L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c co a c �a Q 'ne nd °r. 4 s lerdia D°) loom ent Packet Pg. 100 2.1.b 6 Conclusion as Based on the preceding analyses and recommendations, the following conclusions have been a� a� made: o The traffic that will be generated by the proposed residential development can be 0 accommodated by the existing area roadway system. The estimated development-generated traffic volumes will not be significant and will likely o be further reduced by the proximity of the site to the Buffalo Grove Transportation Center. 0 w The proposed access system will be adequate and efficient in serving the proposed development traffic. �s A westbound left-turn lane and a westbound right-turn lane are warranted at the intersection w of Deerfield Parkway with Windbrooke Drive/new site access drive based on projected 1 turning volumes. a c �a a E L a vi 0 a ai c O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c M a c m �a Q Packet Pg. 101 2.1.b Q ;E a) a� ❑ LO 0 to ca CO d ca L O W L Appendix a Traffic Count Summary Sheets E Site Plan Level of Service Criteria y ❑ Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets _ Turn-Lane Warrant Figures O 0 L Q Q Q L .y _ O U d _ co a E s v �a Q Packet Pg. 102 2.1.b a� ;E a� a� G 0 ca d G ca L O W L CO W O a c ca a E a. Traffic Count Summary Sheets oi 0 a ai _ O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y _ O U d _ co a m E s v �a Q Packet Pg. 103 e.ao}'aeA V `qnS jo;eld `Ueld mllaad ` n'S and `auozab 10 lenoiddV aaplsuoa) ;aS ueld :;ugmg3elly � o T ry T N I^�J M V V O V Y) LL� O N N (p N N t0 tD N 60i W r N 0 r O 1. � m � — W 3 a d N1� N OJ W M W O N N M M M N N m N M M O M O O O O � O >N O r N O (D W J (O N O M N V r r o (O W 47 V W M r r N O M d) � O 3 N F �2 ifJ i0 . C—O C)�N J lO N 0 0 W N N Q) V V r m V O N O W N M O O O 7 co N rn OO ' N UO�incoa- r L 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O p 0 0 0 O p O O.r6 O W M OJ 10 V O N r O M r O Q t2 M M M V M N � Y r� ••' 1 ) r"' � � f�l 41 I..C} ,� r� e e e e e e e e e e e a N N M �fJ V of . . . O r d of CO W 6> �O r W M r OR 01 p N 0 OJ O � =O a r 1� O� O C:) cu M r r (D N r r (D V N r N M O] N N N O O N N N O D N O O O _C) (�o �� Q 0. CD ? O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p O O O O O c) .6 V S O N O N O fi4i �_ .O� N e e a� a J� o �LO i a Y N 2 G O O N (D (O 6) (O M V O] O l0 O M (9 W O M M O O N (O 1C M (D N M OJ N N N W N pj �+j N O O M N r N O � C a m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O D N M h � 1 ,•... I�1 !"> ,✓ L1 V'J 11 dv"y e e e e e e N a a a 'a m m 2 N M m r o co co a m �n a m m o 'o co rn v r N w N Co N V r W M m N of of V r M N r N 6� M W M N O N O r O � N O F O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 9 N 3 r 3 E 2E :5 o 2 :5 o Y . . . . o . 2i :5 o o s o w m ?w m w o in o in 2 0 in o in t w o in o �n 2 0 in o in 2 � p a> " � a�� m O M O E M i K O M 7 L O 7 M O m _ r r r r O ro O ro ro O m V V V e JOI'aeA V `qnS jo;eld `Ueld mllaad ` n'S and `auozab 10 lenoiddV aaplsuoa) ;aS ueld :;ugmg3elly ,n � o T T N o 01 a d o V m a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 To m m a o a o e.ao}'aeA V `qnS jo;eld `Ueld mllaad ` n'S and `auozab 10 lenoiddV aaplsuoa) ;aS ueld :;ugmg3eljv o � o T ry T N "O in v in in N o oN rn o M N O a m ,n rn ^ N a u? o 00 � 3 a cli `n O M N O W (D N N N M M ORM M O N O O N (O M O M (6 N w 6 ❑_O co�0 J O W N N M r Or N N O O 7 )r N o rn 00t- cu UO�cncoa- 0 0 O O O O O O O � O Q H O O O M V N O a Q � o a � = 2 a N O O A O co CO co O ma 0 L O o . Z3o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o o Q cn cn o p o OR N ' J� O Yy > 'O - N - - - - (00 N O S. � O O O O M V O O O Q c rn C a G -O m ❑ L O J N N m M y h 0 0 N N t[j O p N O O O � O N N QH M N N N O O W p CO N O V M M O O O � O O a a O a 'a m _ W O CO tD N m0� � U V m m W W M W O N O O N F N N N W r M p OJ p� O O � O E 2E t o w w y H ? H m F i1J O O O O c S m j UI U U U N N O M F d O a J m 7 H @ t'H N ULL' N m r ro ro ro s c r o in ¢ m e.ao}'aeA V `qnS jo;eld `Ueld mllaad ` n'S and `auozab 10 lenoiddV aaplsuoa) ;aS ueld :;ugmg3elly ti � o T ry T O r M M O O N ~ N N ^ N O N M O N N O p ^ � — W a;g r i m cn r co m rn ry rn rn o Y 3 a d tD N r (D O r 0 O N O O p N O O O O O M N r r (D N N W c� 0 0 N O O O CO wzT N z O 0 Z V V r rn V V M V V M O (O O 7 0 .),c� J I M V N co O M M O O M O O 0 0!- cu UO�cncoa- 0 0 O O O O O O O O � O O.N M _ O In M N N N O c,� O O pV Qrj 0 0 4) O O O to a �• a° O O O C O LL [if O O M O V M (rD (ND N (rO, tO O m 0 0 NO M O p �,y O U O co x M o O CO O N M N N m N m O p O O p O p O L E o s0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o Q cn cn o p o m� rn o Y O N O O N C a G -O m N O (MO N N O O W O O l0 O M O O O N H N N N W r M 0 of O ❑ L O O M O m In O 0 0 V O O O O J W fD cD 4i N of N � p O O N O � O � O o. cn o m �n rn IR M N QH M O2 N . r. . o r V r0 O 00 O h � i — ,•... i n... e e e e e e e 1 a m o 0 Y rn N r v rn o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � N .6 0 a 'a m W ? M M M (p W N N V N 6 O 0 0 N M M M m W r O T O � O O i[J O �1J O O S t m j UI U O p N N M O F d O a J m 7 H m v v ici ui Q ~ m <� a Q c r o in ¢ m e.ao}'aeA V `qnS jo;eld `Ueld Mllaad ` n'S and `auozab 10 lenoiddV aaplsuoa) ;aS ueld :;ugMg3elly o � o N L H O� N tp N r ON N (NO N N ^ O] tp V N m M O O W N O O tM CN N v m V V V V N V V V m �n m y a CC M M m C ) 1 3 a Y a d � � r M a OQ N F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O p p o 0 0 . o . o 6 C C onz 00t— (6 L)0U)Wa- F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 o a W N a « N N 6> `m oZ L O O O O O O O O O o O o o O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 o O o O U ~ cc N V C O co �� Q O �Y sO ? O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p O O O O O c) W^^'' O C SO N N O M N N N N N pJ O N O O 90 N e e J, o �LO � a a « m � O O ❑ N N W O (O N O . . m of . m © O.O N O M r M O of N �O m i2 f� N O r O N r MO M N O Q� N N N M N N N N ill h a a Y � N N i � a 'a E _ '[ 11J � h M m W O) (O N M O �fl O M O h O] N [D � M W N O O� O � J O F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 9 N 3 r 3 E o o Y o o o s o w m1 ?w m w _ W W ro ro O m V V V V O N 6 � � O � d ~ J o 0] \' N (n~ 5 Q~ U 2 2 2 2 (7 Q o o \ � \ � e JOJ'aeA V `qnS jo;eld `Ueld mllaad ` n'S and `auozab 10 lenoiddV aaplsuoa) ;aS ueld :;ugmg3elly � o T T N o 01 a d o � a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 To m m a o a o e.ao}'aeA V `qnS jo;eld `Ueld mllaad ` n'S and `auozab 10 lenoiddV aaplsuoa) ;aS ueld :;ugmg3elly c Q T N a o L 3 d Y a d O O r M � O � � r � M chi a o O Q V1 F o 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 o o 0 M o 0 ❑� J O M c3 D O M D O Q O O 00 O 00 00 a)a(6 UUcncoa- 0 � o v Q H M M 6> O y M M pj O 00 O 00 O O � a G (� 'O N N �O O O� �p cO O M O 00 O 00 O 00 QO V/ N 7 E O i O OZ O O O O O . . p 0 O O O O (o m o O }' m v r M o y r o0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 O O co o 02 L o 0 0 m Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o Q In fQ O Q 7 0 Nc (n C p_l6 N O O O❑ M �-o m m I . M N rn M co `O °� N rn Iq v o 0 (^D ¢ O W � O y Ym a) — N O O - rn� 0 0 0 O OJ O O C a G -O m N H M W N p M a7 ❑ L ro J W W In M N ^ N W M O Q O 00 O 00 1 p r N O O � O N r O � a a Y rn M M 0 a 'a m W W V M [ND M V CO N N �O V OJ O N F O O N O N y M N 0 �O N 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 O 00 J p O � O E 2E F Q Q Q Q i1J O O O O S m j UI U U p N N m r ro ro ro in ¢ m e.ao}'aeA V `qnS jo;eld `Ueld mllaad ` n'S and `auozab 10 lenoiddV aaplsuoa) ;aS ueld :;ugmg3elly _ Q T T T N Yp N N v v in v °i o M r o 0 0 o a rn O U QR V r m N O O O M M O O 4-7 QH N O m O N N O 3 a Y a d � r o N a rn M o o �° Iq o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K o N � r � M chi a o 0 N 7 0 U J O M cm; O 00t-�cu UUcncoa- 0 F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a � o N O a LI..L O � O O ,yam E Q O O O Z co U O C N N O O t9 O C O O (o O L E O - o 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 0 0 o a a w cn o p o m� O Q� O LO �� a b J[ O 2� V N 0 0 0 O r O O O Q c rn C a G -O m 6 (O O M O O O N H N N M N Q� O O a7 ❑ L M J M N M V V r V V O O O N LQ O O � O M O O a a Y m -- rn i � N M O O O O a 'a EW ? o M r rn rn L6 r M o ro o O M N N M N l0 M O J O O O F 0 0 0 O O N 0 0 0 0 O O O O O � O E t o w w y H ? H m M O F d O a J m m v v ici ui Q ~ � m <� in ¢ m 2.1.b a� :E a� a� G LO 0 co ca a) G ca L O L V! 4- 0 i+ m a a E L Site Plan 0 a ai O N G1 O R O L Q Q a L .y _ O U d N _ a m E s �a Q Packet Pg. 112 naa a aoVaen 18 `qnS jo Wid `ueld w'18.id "n'S and `auozaa 10 jeno iddd aapisuoa) ps ueld :;uauayoejjv o I'U,IU 0 O m i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ti IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII luuuuuuuuu�ll��i��lll' DDDDD�ppppppp o � f , IIIIII�IIIIO��lllllllllllllllll a uuuuu muuuuuo I°°I°I°I°IIIIIIIII�I N� r,,, IIIIII 'I u J I I Ilululuui d6 �� p4 IIII IIIIIII III 1°Y�" � �" '�I uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiuuuuulgiiuuuuuuuuuuuuillllll°°liul......III d W r � V) d W U Z O z AVMkiIVd O131d21334 2.1.b a� ;E a� a� G 0 ca d G ca L O W L CO W O a c ca a E a. CMAP 2050 Projections Letter 0 a ai _ O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L y _ O U d c co a m E s v �a Q Packet Pg. 114 2.1.b 4313 VVe i Van&iunRn Slrmere?; Chicago Metropolitan Chita 6260 iiiiiione for Plannin cr�,"�":OkniAs ov D July 29, 2021 0 Kelly Pachowicz Consultant o to Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara and Aboona, Inc. 9575 West Higgins Road > Suite 400 0 Rosemont, IL 60018 L O W Subject: Deerfield Parkway @ Weiland Road IDOT Dear Ms. Pachowicz �n w O 41 In response to a request made on your behalf and dated July 29, 2021, we have developed a year 2050 average daily traffic (ADT)projections for the subject location. �a a ROAD SEGMENT Current ADT Year 2050 ADT E Deerfield Pkwy east of Weiland Rd 21,700 27,300 L Weiland Rd north of Deerfield Pkwy 11,600 19,100 a Weiland Rd south of Deerfield Pkwy 15,000 24,700 0 Traffic projections are developed using existing ADT data provided in the request letter a and the results from the June 2021 CMAP Travel Demand Analysis. The regional travel model uses CMAP 2050 socioeconomic projections and assumes the implementation of N the ON TO 2050 Comprehensive Regional Plan for the Northeastern Illinois area. The provision of this data in support of your request does not constitute a CMAP endorsement o of the proposed development or any subsequent developments. 0 L CL If you have any questions, please call me at (312) 386-8806. a Q L Sincerely, N O d Jose Rodriguez, PTP, AICP Senior Planner, Research &Analysis a cc:Rios(IDOT) C 2021 CY TrafficForecast\BuffaloGroveAla-20-21\1a-20-21.docx O t Q Packet Pg. 115 2.1.b a� ;E a� a� G 0 ca d G ca L O W L CO W O a c ca a E a. Level of Service Criteria 0 a ai _ O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y _ O U d _ co a m E s v �a Q Packet Pg. 116 2.1.b LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA AverageSignalized Intersections Control D Level of Service a� Interpretation • • a� G A Favorable progression. Most vehicles arrive during the <_10 green indication and travel through the intersection without 40 stopping. B Good progression, with more vehicles stopping than for >10 - 20 0 Level of Service A. 0 w C Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles >20 - 35 are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity 06 during the cycle) may begin to appear.Number of vehicles 6 stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass w through the intersection without stopping. o 41 M a D The volume-to-capacity ratio is high and either progression >35 - 55 is ineffective or the cycle length is too long. Many vehicles a stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. E L E Progression is unfavorable. The volume-to-capacity ratio is >55 - 80 high and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. o M a F The volume-to-capacity ratio is very high, progression is >80.0 very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to N clear the gueue. °1 Unsignalized Intersections o Level of Total Delayo CL A 0 - 10 C L B > 10 - 15 N C C > 15 - 25 c°� D > 25 - 35 in c E > 35 - 50 a c F > 50 E Source:Hi hwav Capacity Manual,2010. M ++ Q Packet Pg. 117 2.1.b Q ;E a) a� ❑ LO 0 to ca d ca L O W L CO W O a c ca a I- Cq,lp%acity Analysis SummaKy Sheets Weekday Morning Peak Hour — Year 2021 Base Conditions ❑ a ai _ O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y _ O U d _ co a E s v �a Q Packet Pg. 118 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/04/2021 Lane Configurations 0 0 tt r Traffic Volume(vph) 193 1422 86 108 279 79 50 256 240 94 165 65 `E Future Volume(vph) 193 1422 86 108 279 79 50 256 240 94 165 65 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 ❑ Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 c Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% to Storage Length(ft) 185 0 485 0 260 350 300 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 d Taper Length(ft) 175 110 80 25 ❑ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.991 0.967 0.850 0.957 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 > Satd. Flow(prot) 1787 3500 0 1671 3375 0 1770 3619 1568 1687 3255 0 06 At Permitted 0.501 0.067 0.599 0.400 Satd. Flow(perm) 942 3500 0 118 3375 0 1116 3619 1568 710 3255 0 w Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 6 34 167 46 M Link Speed(mph) 40 40 40 40 a Link Distance(ft) 485 782 640 906 Travel Time(s) 8.3 13.3 10.9 15.4 a Confl. Peds. (#/hr) E Confl. Bikes(#/hr) a Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ? Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 2% 6% 8% 3% 5% 2% 5% 3% 7% 7% 4% y Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Parking (#/hr) a Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% o Shared Lane Traffic(%) N Lane Group Flow(vph) 208 1621 0 116 385 0 54 275 258 101 247 0 a Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA o Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 R Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 0 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Q- a Switch Phase Q Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 56.5 8.0 50.5 8.0 53.5 8.0 8.0 45.5 y Total Split(s) 20.4 55.2 14.4 49.2 14.4 27.6 14.4 22.8 36.0 0 Total Split(%) 17.0% 46.0% 12.0% 41.0% 12.0% 23.0% 12.0% 19.0% 30.0% V Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 y Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 6.5 a Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag c Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes E Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min None Min None None Min Act Effct Green(s) 75.8 62.1 72.8 60.6 26.6 16.0 32.2 33.1 21.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 0.52 0.61 0.50 0.22 0.13 0.27 0.28 0.18 Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M. Existing Peak Hour Page 1 Packet Pg. 119 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/04/2021 v/c Ratio 0.31 0.89 0.59 0.22 0.19 0.57 0.48 0.35 0.41 :2 aD Control Delay 10.2 34.8 36.6 17.9 32.2 53.6 15.3 35.4 38.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 10.2 34.8 36.6 17.9 32.2 53.6 15.3 35.4 38.0 ❑ LOS B C D B C D B D D c Approach Delay 32.0 22.2 34.8 37.2 Approach LOS C C C D Queue Length 50th(ft) 57 553 39 74 31 107 56 61 75 > Queue Length 95th(ft) 109 #893 136 125 59 148 122 98 111 ❑ Internal Link Dist(ft) 405 702 560 826 L Turn Bay Length(ft) 185 485 260 350 300 12 Base Capacity(vph) 726 1812 220 1720 325 636 562 352 834 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.89 0.53 0.22 0.17 0.43 0.46 0.29 0.30 w o _o Area Type: Other a Cycle Length: 120 = �a Actuated Cycle Length: 120 a Offset: 112(93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green E Natural Cycle: 140 .L Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated a Maximum v/c Ratio:0.89 Intersection Signal Delay:31.6 Intersection LOS:C vi Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 a # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. N d Splits and Phases: 1:Weiland Road&Deerfield Parkway I o 01 2,R 03 T 04 > 140.0 } CL a mum .y C O U d c co a c m �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M. Existing Peak Hour Page 2 Packet Pg. 120 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/04/2021 Lane Configurations tt r Traffic Volume(vph) 28 1711 51 35 428 14 9 0 11 4 0 4 Future Volume(vph) 28 1711 51 35 428 14 9 0 11 4 0 4 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ❑ Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 c Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% to Storage Length(ft) 200 210 0 0 0 170 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 d Taper Length(ft) 215 115 25 25 ❑ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.995 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 > Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 3725 1538 1492 3417 0 1715 1715 1214 1805 1214 0 06 At Permitted 0.472 0.071 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 897 3725 1538 111 3417 0 1715 1715 1214 1805 1214 0 w Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 118 4 118 533 M Link Speed(mph) 40 40 30 25 a Link Distance(ft) 696 376 375 149 Travel Time(s) 11.9 6.4 8.5 4.1 a Confl. Peds. (#/hr) E Confl. Bikes(#/hr) a Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ? Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 2% 5% 21% 5% 9% 0% 0% 33% 0% 0% 33% y Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Parking (#/hr) a Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% c Shared Lane Traffic(%) 50% d Lane Group Flow(vph) 31 1901 57 39 492 0 5 5 12 4 4 0 a Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA o Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 R Permitted Phases 2 2 6 8 0 Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 8 8 8 7 7 Q- a Switch Phase Q Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 35.0 35.0 9.0 34.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 40.0 40.0 y Total Split(s) 14.0 66.0 66.0 14.0 66.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 18.0 0 Total Split(%) 11.7% 55.0% 55.0% 11.7% 55.0% 18.3% 18.3% 18.3% 15.0% 15.0% V Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 y Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 a Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead c Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes E Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 103.8 100.5 100.5 104.2 100.7 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.86 0.84 0.84 0.87 0.84 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M. Existing Peak Hour Page 3 Packet Pg. 121 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/04/2021 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.61 0.04 0.23 0.17 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.01 :2 aD Control Delay 1.5 3.7 0.0 6.3 4.7 51.2 51.2 0.5 51.2 0.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1.5 3.7 0.0 6.3 4.7 51.2 51.2 0.5 51.2 0.0 ❑ LOS A A A A A D D A D A c Approach Delay 3.6 4.8 23.6 25.6 Approach LOS A A C C Queue Length 50th(ft) 1 48 0 0 19 4 4 0 3 0 d Queue Length 95th(ft) m5 163 m0 19 118 17 17 0 15 0 ❑ Internal Link Dist(ft) 616 296 295 69 L Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 210 170 12 Base Capacity(vph) 868 3120 1307 213 2868 228 228 264 180 601 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.61 0.04 0.18 0.17 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.01 w o _o Area Type: Other a Cycle Length: 120 = �a Actuated Cycle Length: 120 a Offset:8(7%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green E Natural Cycle: 145 .L Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated a Maximum v/c Ratio:0.61 Intersection Signal Delay:4.1 Intersection LOS:A vi Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 a m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 0 N Splits and Phases: 2:Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive&Deerfield Parkway d o1, 02, o7 108 0 > --- 0 05 06 R a CL .y C O U d c co a c m �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M. Existing Peak Hour Page 4 Packet Pg. 122 2.1.b HCM 6th TWSC 3: Deerfield Parkway & Windbrooke Drive 08/04/2021 Int Delay,s/veh 0.7 a� a� Lane Configurations 0 Yp Traffic Vol,veh/h 11 1751 435 6 39 30 LO Future Vol,veh/h 11 1751 435 6 39 30 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None a>i Storage Length 100 - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - c Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - `~ L Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 1 1 0 0 0 06 Mvmt Flow 13 1990 494 7 44 34 41 Conflicting Flow All 501 0 - 0 1519 251 M Stage 1 - - - - 498 - a c Stage 2 - - - - 1021 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.8 6.9 a Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.8 - E Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.8 - L Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.3 a Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1074 - - - 112 755 Stage 1 - - - - 582 - y 0 Stage 2 - - - - 313 - a Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1074 - - - 111 755 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 230 - N Stage 1 - - - - 575 - Stage 2 - - - - 313 - o Q. HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 19.3 a HCM LOS C .y Capacity(veh/h) 1074 - - - 330 v HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - - 0.238 a� HCM Control Delay(s) 8.4 - - - 19.3 y c HCM Lane LOS A - - - C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.9 a c m t �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M. Existing Peak Hour Page 1 Packet Pg. 123 2.1.b HCM 6th TWSC 4: Concrete Erectors Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 08/04/2021 Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 a� a� Lane Configurations 0 t Yp Traffic Vol,veh/h 1750 6 2 463 3 12 LO Future Vol,veh/h 1750 6 2 463 3 12 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None a>i Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - c Grade,% 0 - - 0 0 - `~ L Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles,% 1 25 0 1 0 0 06 Mvmt Flow 1944 7 2 514 3 13 w 41 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1951 0 2209 976 M Stage 1 - - - - 1948 - a c Stage 2 - - - - 261 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.8 6.9 a Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.8 - E Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.8 - L Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 a Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 304 - 39 254 Stage 1 - - - - 99 - y 0 Stage 2 - - - - 765 - a Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 304 - 39 254 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 86 - N Stage 1 - - - - 99 - Stage 2 - - - - 758 - o CL HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.2 26.6 a HCM LOS D .y O Capacity(veh/h) 183 - - 304 - v HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.091 - - 0.007 - a� HCM Control Delay(s) 26.6 - - 16.9 0.1 y c HCM Lane LOS D - - C A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 0 - a c m t �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M. Existing Peak Hour Page 2 Packet Pg. 124 2.1.b Q ;E a) a� ❑ 0 d ca L O W L W O ++ m a c �a a E Ca 2%acity Analysis Summary Sheets Weekday Evening Peak Hour — Year 2021 Base Conditions y ❑ a ai _ O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y _ O U d _ co a E s v �a Q Packet Pg. 125 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/04/2021 Lane Configurations 0 0 tt r Traffic Volume(vph) 151 351 64 320 1310 108 124 256 201 81 276 201 `E Future Volume(vph) 151 351 64 320 1310 108 124 256 201 81 276 201 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 ❑ Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 c Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% to Storage Length(ft) 185 0 485 0 260 350 300 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 d Taper Length(ft) 175 110 80 25 ❑ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.977 0.989 0.850 0.937 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 > Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 3468 0 1805 3498 0 1787 3689 1568 1719 3349 0 06 At Permitted 0.078 0.424 0.213 0.550 Satd. Flow(perm) 145 3468 0 806 3498 0 401 3689 1568 995 3349 0 w Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 18 9 216 144 M Link Speed(mph) 40 40 40 40 a Link Distance(ft) 485 782 640 906 Travel Time(s) 8.3 13.3 10.9 15.4 a Confl. Peds. (#/hr) E Confl. Bikes(#/hr) a Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ? Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 3% 1% 3% 3% 5% 1% 1% y Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Parking (#/hr) a Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% o Shared Lane Traffic(%) N Lane Group Flow(vph) 162 446 0 344 1525 0 133 275 216 87 513 0 a Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA o Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 R Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 0 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Q- a Switch Phase Q Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 56.5 8.0 50.5 8.0 53.5 8.0 8.0 45.5 y Total Split(s) 12.0 43.2 27.6 58.8 14.4 34.8 27.6 14.4 34.8 0 Total Split(%) 10.0% 36.0% 23.0% 49.0% 12.0% 29.0% 23.0% 12.0% 29.0% V Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 y Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 6.5 a Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag c Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes E Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min None Min None None Min Act Effct Green(s) 64.3 51.3 73.6 57.4 34.4 21.9 45.1 32.7 21.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.43 0.61 0.48 0.29 0.18 0.38 0.27 0.18 Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M. Existing Peak Hour Page 1 Packet Pg. 126 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/04/2021 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.30 0.54 0.91 0.58 0.41 0.30 0.27 0.73 :2 aD Control Delay 46.4 24.4 12.4 30.3 39.8 44.4 3.5 30.4 39.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 46.4 24.4 12.4 30.3 39.8 44.4 3.5 30.4 39.0 ❑ LOS D C B C D D A C D c Approach Delay 30.2 27.0 29.3 37.7 Approach LOS C C C D Queue Length 50th(ft) 66 111 61 581 76 100 0 49 144 > Queue Length 95th(ft) #228 186 149 #769 116 133 40 81 191 ❑ Internal Link Dist(ft) 405 702 560 826 L Turn Bay Length(ft) 185 485 260 350 300 12 Base Capacity(vph) 220 1492 697 1677 236 869 802 344 899 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.74 0.30 0.49 0.91 0.56 0.32 0.27 0.25 0.57 w O _o Area Type: Other a Cycle Length: 120 = �a Actuated Cycle Length: 120 a Offset:94(78%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green E Natural Cycle: 140 .L Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated a Maximum v/c Ratio:0.91 Intersection Signal Delay:29.7 Intersection LOS:C vi Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 a # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. N d Splits and Phases: 1:Weiland Road&Deerfield Parkway I o 0 1 2 R 03 T 04 > } CL a 777773 .y C O U d c co a c m �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M. Existing Peak Hour Page 2 Packet Pg. 127 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/04/2021 Lane Configurations tt r Traffic Volume(vph) 10 562 24 10 1643 16 76 1 35 16 0 38 `E Future Volume(vph) 10 562 24 10 1643 16 76 1 35 16 0 38 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ❑ Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 c Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% to Storage Length(ft) 200 210 0 0 0 170 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 d Taper Length(ft) 215 115 25 25 ❑ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.999 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.953 0.950 > Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 3689 1468 1031 3568 0 1681 1648 1369 1570 1615 0 06 At Permitted 0.071 0.410 0.950 0.953 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 135 3689 1468 445 3568 0 1681 1648 1369 1570 1615 0 w Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 118 1 118 254 M Link Speed(mph) 40 40 30 25 a Link Distance(ft) 696 376 375 149 Travel Time(s) 11.9 6.4 8.5 4.1 a Confl. Peds. (#/hr) E Confl. Bikes(#/hr) a Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ? Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 10% 75% 1% 8% 2% 100% 18% 15% 0% 0% y Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Parking (#/hr) a Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% c Shared Lane Traffic(%) 49% d Lane Group Flow(vph) 11 604 26 11 1784 0 42 41 38 17 41 0 a Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA o Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 R Permitted Phases 2 2 6 8 0 Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 8 8 8 7 7 Q- a Switch Phase Q Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 35.0 35.0 9.0 34.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 40.0 40.0 y Total Split(s) 13.2 64.8 64.8 13.2 64.8 26.4 26.4 26.4 15.6 15.6 0 Total Split(%) 11.0% 54.0% 54.0% 11.0% 54.0% 22.0% 22.0% 22.0% 13.0% 13.0% V Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 y Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 a Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead c Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes E Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 89.5 87.5 87.5 89.7 87.6 10.3 10.3 10.3 9.6 9.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.75 0.73 0.73 0.75 0.73 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M. Existing Peak Hour Page 3 Packet Pg. 128 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/04/2021 v/c Ratio 0.06 0.22 0.02 0.03 0.69 0.29 0.29 0.17 0.14 0.11 :2 aD Control Delay 8.2 9.5 0.6 5.8 14.3 56.8 56.9 1.6 54.1 0.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 8.2 9.5 0.6 5.8 14.3 56.8 56.9 1.6 54.1 0.6 ❑ LOS A A A A B E E A D A c Approach Delay 9.1 14.2 39.5 16.3 Approach LOS A B D B Queue Length 50th(ft) 2 64 0 2 412 32 31 0 12 0 d Queue Length 95th(ft) ml l 202 3 8 681 71 70 0 37 0 ❑ Internal Link Dist(ft) 616 296 295 69 L Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 210 170 12 Base Capacity(vph) 229 2688 1102 379 2603 285 280 330 125 362 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.22 0.02 0.03 0.69 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.14 0.11 w o _o Area Type: Other a Cycle Length: 120 = �a Actuated Cycle Length: 120 a Offset:71 (59%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green E Natural Cycle: 145 .L Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated a Maximum v/c Ratio:0.69 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.2 Intersection LOS: B vi Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 a m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 0 N Splits and Phases: 2:Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive&Deerfield Parkway d o1 -11`02 1 *o7 L O o CL 05 ,"06,R CL L .y C O U d c co a c m �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M. Existing Peak Hour Page 4 Packet Pg. 129 2.1.b HCM 6th TWSC 3: Deerfield Parkway & Windbrooke Drive 08/04/2021 Int Delay,s/veh 0.7 a� a� Lane Configurations 0 Yp Traffic Vol,veh/h 40 590 1717 40 6 20 LO Future Vol,veh/h 40 590 1717 40 6 20 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None a>i Storage Length 100 - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - c Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - `~ L Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles,% 22 2 7 0 0 4 Mvmt Flow 42 621 1807 42 6 21 41 Conflicting Flow All 1849 0 - 0 2223 925 M Stage 1 - - - - 1828 - a c Stage 2 - - - - 395 - Critical Hdwy 4.54 - - - 6.8 6.98 a Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.8 - E Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.8 - L Follow-up Hdwy 2.42 - - - 3.5 3.34 a Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 252 - - - 38 267 Stage 1 - - - - 116 - y 0 Stage 2 - - - - 656 - a Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 252 - - - 32 267 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 83 - N Stage 1 - - - - 97 - Stage 2 - - - - 656 - o Q. HCM Control Delay,s 1.4 0 29 a HCM LOS D .y Capacity(veh/h) 252 - - - 177 v HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.167 - - - 0.155 HCM Control Delay(s) 22.1 - - - 29 y c HCM Lane LOS C - - - D HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.6 - - - 0.5 a c m t �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M. Existing Peak Hour Page 1 Packet Pg. 130 2.1.b HCM 6th TWSC 4: Concrete Erectors Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 08/04/2021 Int Delay,s/veh 0 a� a� Lane Configurations 0 t Yp Traffic Vol,veh/h 629 4 3 1734 4 1 LO Future Vol,veh/h 629 4 3 1734 4 1 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None a>i Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - c Grade,% 0 - - 0 0 - `~ L Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles,% 1 17 0 4 33 9 06 Mvmt Flow 669 4 3 1845 4 1 w 41 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 673 0 1600 337 M Stage 1 - - - - 671 - a c Stage 2 - - - - 929 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 7.46 7.08 a Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.46 - E Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.46 - L Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.83 3.39 a Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 927 - 71 639 Stage 1 - - - - 394 - y 0 Stage 2 - - - - 279 - a Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 927 - 71 639 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 180 - N Stage 1 - - - - 394 - Stage 2 - - - - 279 - o CL HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 22.6 a HCM LOS C .y O Capacity(veh/h) 210 - - 927 - v HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 - - 0.003 - a� HCM Control Delay(s) 22.6 - - 8.9 0 y c HCM Lane LOS C - - A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - a c m t �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M. Existing Peak Hour Page 2 Packet Pg. 131 2.1.b aD ;E a� a� ❑ 0 d ca L W L W O }1 m a c �a a I- Cq,lp%acity Analysis SummaLy Sheets 0. Weekday Morning Peak Hour — Year 2023 No-Build Conditions ❑ a ai c O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c co a c m E U �a Q Packet Pg. 132 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 Lane Configurations 0 0 tt r Traffic Volume(vph) 205 1507 91 114 297 84 53 271 254 100 175 69 `E Future Volume(vph) 205 1507 91 114 297 84 53 271 254 100 175 69 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 ❑ Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 c Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% to Storage Length(ft) 185 0 485 0 260 350 300 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 d Taper Length(ft) 175 110 80 25 ❑ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.991 0.967 0.850 0.958 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 > Satd. Flow(prot) 1787 3500 0 1671 3375 0 1770 3619 1568 1687 3258 0 06 At Permitted 0.483 0.068 0.590 0.381 Satd. Flow(perm) 909 3500 0 120 3375 0 1099 3619 1568 677 3258 0 w Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 6 34 159 46 M Link Speed(mph) 40 40 40 40 a Link Distance(ft) 485 782 640 906 Travel Time(s) 8.3 13.3 10.9 15.4 a Confl. Peds. (#/hr) E Confl. Bikes(#/hr) a Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ? Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 2% 6% 8% 3% 5% 2% 5% 3% 7% 7% 4% y Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Parking (#/hr) a Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% o Shared Lane Traffic(%) N Lane Group Flow(vph) 220 1718 0 123 409 0 57 291 273 108 262 0 a Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA o Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 R Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 0 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Q- a Switch Phase Q Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 56.5 8.0 50.5 8.0 53.5 8.0 8.0 45.5 y Total Split(s) 20.4 55.2 14.4 49.2 14.4 27.6 14.4 22.8 36.0 0 Total Split(%) 17.0% 46.0% 12.0% 41.0% 12.0% 23.0% 12.0% 19.0% 30.0% V Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 y Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 6.5 a Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag c Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes E Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min None Min None None Min Act Effct Green(s) 75.2 61.0 72.0 59.4 27.0 16.2 32.8 33.9 21.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 0.51 0.60 0.50 0.22 0.14 0.27 0.28 0.18 Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M. No Build 2027 Page 1 Packet Pg. 133 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 v/c Ratio 0.34 0.96 0.61 0.24 0.19 0.60 0.50 0.37 0.42 :2 aD Control Delay 10.8 43.8 39.1 19.0 31.8 53.9 17.3 35.2 38.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 10.8 43.8 39.1 19.0 31.8 53.9 17.3 35.2 38.1 ❑ LOS B D D B C D B D D c Approach Delay 40.1 23.7 35.8 37.3 Approach LOS D C D D Queue Length 50th(ft) 61 629 58 80 33 114 72 65 81 > Queue Length 95th(ft) 118 #997 145 136 61 155 139 102 116 ❑ Internal Link Dist(ft) 405 702 560 826 L Turn Bay Length(ft) 185 485 260 350 300 12 Base Capacity(vph) 704 1782 223 1687 324 636 561 352 835 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.96 0.55 0.24 0.18 0.46 0.49 0.31 0.31 w o _o Area Type: Other a Cycle Length: 120 = �a Actuated Cycle Length: 120 a Offset: 112(93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green E Natural Cycle: 150 .L Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated a Maximum v/c Ratio:0.96 Intersection Signal Delay:36.5 Intersection LOS: D vi Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 a # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. N d Splits and Phases: 1:Weiland Road&Deerfield Parkway I o 01 2,R 03 T 04 > 140.0 } CL a mum .y C O U d c co a c m �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M. No Build 2027 Page 2 Packet Pg. 134 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 Lane Configurations tt r Traffic Volume(vph) 30 1813 54 37 454 15 10 0 12 4 0 4 Future Volume(vph) 30 1813 54 37 454 15 10 0 12 4 0 4 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ❑ Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 c Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% to Storage Length(ft) 200 210 0 0 0 170 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 d Taper Length(ft) 215 115 25 25 ❑ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.995 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 > Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 3725 1538 1492 3417 0 1715 1715 1214 1805 1214 0 06 At Permitted 0.459 0.048 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 872 3725 1538 75 3417 0 1715 1715 1214 1805 1214 0 w Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 118 4 118 515 M Link Speed(mph) 40 40 30 25 a Link Distance(ft) 696 376 375 149 Travel Time(s) 11.9 6.4 8.5 4.1 a Confl. Peds. (#/hr) E Confl. Bikes(#/hr) a Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ? Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 2% 5% 21% 5% 9% 0% 0% 33% 0% 0% 33% y Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Parking (#/hr) a Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% c Shared Lane Traffic(%) 50% d Lane Group Flow(vph) 33 2014 60 41 521 0 5 6 13 4 4 0 a Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA o Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 R Permitted Phases 2 2 6 8 0 Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 8 8 8 7 7 Q- a Switch Phase Q Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 35.0 35.0 9.0 34.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 18.0 y Total Split(s) 14.0 66.0 66.0 14.0 66.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 18.0 0 Total Split(%) 11.7% 55.0% 55.0% 11.7% 55.0% 18.3% 18.3% 18.3% 15.0% 15.0% V Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 y Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 a Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead c Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes E Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 99.7 94.1 94.1 101.1 97.4 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.83 0.78 0.78 0.84 0.81 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M. No Build 2027 Page 3 Packet Pg. 135 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.69 0.05 0.30 0.19 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.01 :2 aD Control Delay 1.7 5.5 0.0 12.5 5.5 51.2 51.4 0.6 51.2 0.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1.7 5.5 0.0 12.5 5.5 51.2 51.4 0.6 51.2 0.0 ❑ LOS A A A B A D D A D A c Approach Delay 5.3 6.0 23.8 25.6 Approach LOS A A C C Queue Length 50th(ft) 2 125 0 4 57 4 4 0 3 0 d Queue Length 95th(ft) m4 m191 m0 29 126 17 18 0 15 0 ❑ Internal Link Dist(ft) 616 296 295 69 L Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 210 170 12 Base Capacity(vph) 824 2920 1231 182 2775 228 228 264 180 584 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.69 0.05 0.23 0.19 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.01 w o _o Area Type: Other a Cycle Length: 120 = �a Actuated Cycle Length: 120 a Offset:8(7%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green E Natural Cycle: 115 .L Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated a Maximum v/c Ratio:0.69 Intersection Signal Delay:5.7 Intersection LOS:A vi Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 a m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 0 N Splits and Phases: 2:Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive&Deerfield Parkway d o1, 02, o7 108 0 > --- 0 05 06 R a CL .y C O U d c co a c m �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M. No Build 2027 Page 4 Packet Pg. 136 2.1.b HCM 6th TWSC 3: Deerfield Parkway & Windbrooke Drive 08/05/2021 Int Delay,s/veh 0.7 a� a� Lane Configurations 0 Yp Traffic Vol,veh/h 12 1856 462 6 41 32 LO Future Vol,veh/h 12 1856 462 6 41 32 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None a>i Storage Length 100 - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - c Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - `~ L Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 1 1 0 0 0 06 Mvmt Flow 14 2109 525 7 47 36 41 Conflicting Flow All 532 0 - 0 1612 266 M Stage 1 - - - - 529 - a c Stage 2 - - - - 1083 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.8 6.9 a Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.8 - E Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.8 - L Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.3 a Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1046 - - - 97 738 Stage 1 - - - - 561 - y 0 Stage 2 - - - - 291 - a Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1046 - - - 96 738 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 212 - N Stage 1 - - - - 554 - Stage 2 - - - - 291 - o Q. HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 20.9 a HCM LOS C .y Capacity(veh/h) 1046 - - - 308 v HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - - 0.269 a� HCM Control Delay(s) 8.5 - - - 20.9 y c HCM Lane LOS A - - - C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 1.1 a c m t �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M. No Build 2027 Page 1 Packet Pg. 137 2.1.b HCM 6th TWSC 4: Concrete Erectors Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 08/05/2021 Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 a� a� Lane Configurations 0 t Yp Traffic Vol,veh/h 1855 6 2 492 3 13 LO Future Vol,veh/h 1855 6 2 492 3 13 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None a>i Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - c Grade,% 0 - - 0 0 - `~ L Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles,% 1 25 0 1 0 0 06 Mvmt Flow 2061 7 2 547 3 14 w 41 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 2068 0 2343 1034 M Stage 1 - - - - 2065 - a c Stage 2 - - - - 278 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.8 6.9 a Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.8 - E Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.8 - L Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 a Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 273 - 31 233 Stage 1 - - - - 86 - y 0 Stage 2 - - - - 750 - a Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 273 - 31 233 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 75 - N Stage 1 - - - - 86 - Stage 2 - - - - 742 - o CL HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.2 29.1 a HCM LOS D .y O Capacity(veh/h) 167 - - 273 - v HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.106 - - 0.008 - a� HCM Control Delay(s) 29.1 - - 18.3 0.1 y c HCM Lane LOS D - - C A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - 0 - a c m t �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M. No Build 2027 Page 2 Packet Pg. 138 2.1.b a� ;E a� a� ❑ LO Q to M d ca L O W L CO W O a c ca a E Cap%acity Analysis Summary Sheets Weekday Evening Peak Hour — Year 2023 No-Build Conditions ❑ a ai _ O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L y _ O U d c co a m E s v �a Q Packet Pg. 139 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 Lane Configurations 0 0 tt r Traffic Volume(vph) 160 609 68 339 1405 114 131 271 213 86 293 213 `E Future Volume(vph) 160 609 68 339 1405 114 131 271 213 86 293 213 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 ❑ Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 c Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% to Storage Length(ft) 185 0 485 0 260 350 300 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 d Taper Length(ft) 175 110 80 25 ❑ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.985 0.989 0.850 0.937 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 > Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 3493 0 1805 3498 0 1787 3689 1568 1719 3349 0 06 At Permitted 0.083 0.254 0.199 0.526 Satd. Flow(perm) 155 3493 0 483 3498 0 374 3689 1568 952 3349 0 w Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 10 9 193 143 M Link Speed(mph) 40 40 40 40 a Link Distance(ft) 485 782 640 906 Travel Time(s) 8.3 13.3 10.9 15.4 a Confl. Peds. (#/hr) E Confl. Bikes(#/hr) a Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ? Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 3% 1% 3% 3% 5% 1% 1% y Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Parking (#/hr) a Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% o Shared Lane Traffic(%) N Lane Group Flow(vph) 172 728 0 365 1634 0 141 291 229 92 544 0 a Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA o Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 R Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 0 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Q- a Switch Phase Q Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 56.5 8.0 50.5 8.0 53.5 8.0 8.0 45.5 y Total Split(s) 12.0 43.2 27.6 58.8 14.4 34.8 27.6 14.4 34.8 0 Total Split(%) 10.0% 36.0% 23.0% 49.0% 12.0% 29.0% 23.0% 12.0% 29.0% V Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 y Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 6.5 a Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag c Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes E Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min None Min None None Min Act Effct Green(s) 62.0 48.5 72.5 55.9 35.3 22.8 47.8 33.8 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.40 0.60 0.47 0.29 0.19 0.40 0.28 0.18 Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M. No Build 2027 Page 1 Packet Pg. 140 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 t t v/c Ratio 0.75 0.51 0.74 1.00 0.62 0.42 0.31 0.28 0.74 :2 aD Control Delay 48.3 30.2 30.0 45.7 41.1 43.9 5.3 30.0 40.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 48.3 30.2 30.0 45.7 41.1 43.9 5.3 30.0 40.0 ❑ LOS D C C D D D A C D c Approach Delay 33.7 42.8 29.9 38.5 Approach LOS C D C D Queue Length 50th(ft) 73 218 106 -724 80 105 17 51 157 > Queue Length 95th(ft) #245 325 248 #863 122 141 58 84 206 ❑ Internal Link Dist(ft) 405 702 560 826 L Turn Bay Length(ft) 185 485 260 350 300 12 Base Capacity(vph) 229 1416 556 1633 233 869 799 343 899 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.75 0.51 0.66 1.00 0.61 0.33 0.29 0.27 0.61 w 0 _o Area Type: Other a Cycle Length: 120 = �a Actuated Cycle Length: 120 a Offset:94(78%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green E Natural Cycle: 150 .L Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated a Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00 Intersection Signal Delay:38.2 Intersection LOS: D vi Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period(min) 15 a Volume exceeds capacity,queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 0 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. o Splits and Phases: 1:Weiland Road&Deerfield Parkway > I 0 CL 0 1 2 R 03 T a 05 06 14po7 08 77777/11 i , N C O U d c co a c m �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M. No Build 2027 Page 2 Packet Pg. 141 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 Lane Configurations tt r Traffic Volume(vph) 11 833 25 11 1757 17 81 1 37 17 0 40 `E Future Volume(vph) 11 833 25 11 1757 17 81 1 37 17 0 40 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ❑ Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 c Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% to Storage Length(ft) 200 210 0 0 0 170 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 d Taper Length(ft) 215 115 25 25 ❑ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.999 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.953 0.950 > Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 3689 1468 1031 3568 0 1681 1650 1369 1570 1615 0 06 At Permitted 0.050 0.283 0.950 0.953 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 95 3689 1468 307 3568 0 1681 1650 1369 1570 1615 0 w Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 118 1 118 247 M Link Speed(mph) 40 40 30 25 a Link Distance(ft) 696 376 375 149 Travel Time(s) 11.9 6.4 8.5 4.1 a Confl. Peds. (#/hr) E Confl. Bikes(#/hr) a Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ? Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 10% 75% 1% 8% 2% 100% 18% 15% 0% 0% y Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Parking (#/hr) a Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% c Shared Lane Traffic(%) 49% d Lane Group Flow(vph) 12 896 27 12 1907 0 44 44 40 18 43 0 a Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA o Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 R Permitted Phases 2 2 6 8 0 Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 8 8 8 7 7 Q- a Switch Phase Q Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 35.0 35.0 9.0 34.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 40.0 40.0 y Total Split(s) 13.2 64.8 64.8 13.2 64.8 26.4 26.4 26.4 15.6 15.6 0 Total Split(%) 11.0% 54.0% 54.0% 11.0% 54.0% 22.0% 22.0% 22.0% 13.0% 13.0% V Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 y Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 a Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead c Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes E Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 88.6 85.3 85.3 88.9 85.5 10.4 10.4 10.4 9.6 9.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.71 0.71 0.74 0.71 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M. No Build 2027 Page 3 Packet Pg. 142 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 v/c Ratio 0.08 0.34 0.03 0.05 0.75 0.30 0.31 0.18 0.14 0.12 :2 aD Control Delay 12.3 15.7 1.2 6.1 17.7 57.0 57.3 1.7 54.3 0.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 12.3 15.7 1.2 6.1 17.7 57.0 57.3 1.7 54.3 0.7 ❑ LOS B B A A B E E A D A c Approach Delay 15.3 17.6 39.8 16.5 Approach LOS B B D B Queue Length 50th(ft) 2 121 0 3 473 34 34 0 13 0 d Queue Length 95th(ft) m12 342 m4 9 787 74 74 0 38 0 ❑ Internal Link Dist(ft) 616 296 295 69 L Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 210 170 12 Base Capacity(vph) 202 2623 1078 285 2543 285 280 330 125 356 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.34 0.03 0.04 0.75 0.15 0.16 0.12 0.14 0.12 w o _o Area Type: Other a Cycle Length: 120 = �a Actuated Cycle Length: 120 a Offset:71 (59%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green E Natural Cycle: 145 .L Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated a Maximum v/c Ratio:0.75 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.8 Intersection LOS: B vi Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 a m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 0 N Splits and Phases: 2:Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive&Deerfield Parkway d o1 -11`02 1 *o7 L O o CL 05 ,"06,R CL L .y C O U d c co a c m �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M. No Build 2027 Page 4 Packet Pg. 143 2.1.b HCM 6th TWSC 3: Deerfield Parkway & Windbrooke Drive 08/05/2021 Int Delay,s/veh 0.7 a� a� Lane Configurations 0 Yp Traffic Vol,veh/h 42 863 1836 42 6 21 LO Future Vol,veh/h 42 863 1836 42 6 21 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None a>i Storage Length 100 - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - c Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - `~ L Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles,% 22 2 7 0 0 4 06 Mvmt Flow 44 908 1933 44 6 22 41 Conflicting Flow All 1977 0 - 0 2497 989 M Stage 1 - - - - 1955 - a c Stage 2 - - - - 542 - Critical Hdwy 4.54 - - - 6.8 6.98 a Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.8 - E Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.8 - L Follow-up Hdwy 2.42 - - - 3.5 3.34 a Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 222 - - - 25 242 Stage 1 - - - - 99 - y 0 Stage 2 - - - - 553 - a Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 222 - - - 20 242 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 67 - N Stage 1 - - - - 79 - Stage 2 - - - - 553 - o Q. HCM Control Delay,s 1.2 0 33.8 a HCM LOS D .y Capacity(veh/h) 222 - - - 153 v HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.199 - - - 0.186 a� HCM Control Delay(s) 25.2 - - - 33.8 y c HCM Lane LOS D - - - D HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.7 - - - 0.7 a c m t �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M. No Build 2027 Page 1 Packet Pg. 144 2.1.b HCM 6th TWSC 4: Concrete Erectors Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 08/05/2021 Int Delay,s/veh 0.1 a� a� Lane Configurations 0 t Yp Traffic Vol,veh/h 904 4 3 1854 4 1 LO Future Vol,veh/h 904 4 3 1854 4 1 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None a>i Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - c Grade,% 0 - - 0 0 - `~ L Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles,% 1 17 0 4 33 9 06 Mvmt Flow 962 4 3 1972 4 1 w 41 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 966 0 1956 483 M Stage 1 - - - - 964 - a c Stage 2 - - - - 992 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 7.46 7.08 a Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.46 - E Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.46 - L Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.83 3.39 a Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 721 - 39 511 Stage 1 - - - - 266 - y 0 Stage 2 - - - - 257 - a Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 721 - 39 511 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 137 - N Stage 1 - - - - 266 - Stage 2 - - - - 257 - o CL HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 28.3 a HCM LOS D .y O Capacity(veh/h) 160 - - 721 - v HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.033 - - 0.004 - a� HCM Control Delay(s) 28.3 - - 10 0 y c HCM Lane LOS D - - B A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - a c m t �a Q 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M. No Build 2027 Page 2 Packet Pg. 145 2.1.b aD ;E a� a� ❑ 0 d ca L W L W O }1 m a c �a a E Ca 2%acity Analysis Summary Sheets 0. Weekday Morning Peak Hour — Year 2023 Projected Conditions y ❑ a ai c O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c co a c m E �a Q Packet Pg. 146 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 Lane Configurations 0 0 tt r Traffic Volume(vph) 205 1508 91 121 305 90 53 271 256 101 175 69 `E Future Volume(vph) 205 1508 91 121 305 90 53 271 256 101 175 69 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 ❑ Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 c Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% to Storage Length(ft) 185 0 485 0 260 350 300 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 d Taper Length(ft) 175 110 80 25 ❑ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.991 0.966 0.850 0.958 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 > Satd. Flow(prot) 1787 3500 0 1671 3371 0 1770 3619 1568 1687 3258 0 06 At Permitted 0.474 0.068 0.590 0.381 Satd. Flow(perm) 892 3500 0 120 3371 0 1099 3619 1568 677 3258 0 w Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 6 36 158 46 M Link Speed(mph) 40 40 40 40 a Link Distance(ft) 485 991 640 906 Travel Time(s) 8.3 16.9 10.9 15.4 a Confl. Peds. (#/hr) E Confl. Bikes(#/hr) a Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ? Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 2% 6% 8% 3% 5% 2% 5% 3% 7% 7% 4% y Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Parking (#/hr) a Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% o Shared Lane Traffic(%) N Lane Group Flow(vph) 220 1720 0 130 425 0 57 291 275 109 262 0 a Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA o Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 R Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 0 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Q- a Switch Phase Q Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 56.5 8.0 50.5 8.0 53.5 8.0 8.0 45.5 y Total Split(s) 20.4 55.2 14.4 49.2 14.4 27.6 14.4 22.8 36.0 0 Total Split(%) 17.0% 46.0% 12.0% 41.0% 12.0% 23.0% 12.0% 19.0% 30.0% V Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 y Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 6.5 a Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag c Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes E Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min None Min None None Min Act Effct Green(s) 74.8 60.6 72.3 59.3 27.0 16.2 33.2 34.0 21.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.50 0.60 0.49 0.22 0.14 0.28 0.28 0.18 Q Synchro 8 Report A.M. Future Peak Hour Page 1 Packet Pg. 147 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 v/c Ratio 0.34 0.97 0.63 0.25 0.19 0.60 0.50 0.38 0.42 :2 aD Control Delay 11.0 45.6 40.0 19.3 31.7 53.9 17.4 35.2 38.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.0 45.6 40.0 19.3 31.7 53.9 17.4 35.2 38.1 ❑ LOS B D D B C D B D D c Approach Delay 41.6 24.1 35.8 37.2 Approach LOS D C D D Queue Length 50th(ft) 61 638 63 85 33 114 73 65 81 > Queue Length 95th(ft) 119 #1000 151 143 60 155 142 103 116 ❑ Internal Link Dist(ft) 405 911 560 826 L Turn Bay Length(ft) 185 485 260 350 300 12 Base Capacity(vph) 695 1770 224 1684 324 636 562 352 835 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.97 0.58 0.25 0.18 0.46 0.49 0.31 0.31 w o _o Area Type: Other a Cycle Length: 120 = �a Actuated Cycle Length: 120 a Offset: 112(93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green E Natural Cycle: 150 .L Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated a Maximum v/c Ratio:0.97 Intersection Signal Delay:37.3 Intersection LOS: D vi Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 a # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. N d Splits and Phases: 1:Weiland Road&Deerfield Parkway I o 01 2,R 03 T 04 > } a 05 06 R 7 108 Q .y C mum U d c co a c m �a Q Synchro 8 Report A.M. Future Peak Hour Page 2 Packet Pg. 148 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 Lane Configurations tt r Traffic Volume(vph) 30 1826 54 37 461 15 10 0 12 4 0 4 Future Volume(vph) 30 1826 54 37 461 15 10 0 12 4 0 4 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ❑ Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 c Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% to Storage Length(ft) 200 210 0 0 0 170 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 d Taper Length(ft) 215 115 25 25 ❑ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.995 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 > Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 3725 1538 1492 3417 0 1715 1715 1214 1805 1214 0 06 At Permitted 0.456 0.046 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 866 3725 1538 72 3417 0 1715 1715 1214 1805 1214 0 w Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 118 4 118 511 M Link Speed(mph) 40 40 30 25 a Link Distance(ft) 696 376 375 149 Travel Time(s) 11.9 6.4 8.5 4.1 a Confl. Peds. (#/hr) E Confl. Bikes(#/hr) a Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ? Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 2% 5% 21% 5% 9% 0% 0% 33% 0% 0% 33% y Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Parking (#/hr) a Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% c Shared Lane Traffic(%) 50% d Lane Group Flow(vph) 33 2029 60 41 529 0 5 6 13 4 4 0 a Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA o Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 R Permitted Phases 2 2 6 8 0 Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 8 8 8 7 7 Q- a Switch Phase Q Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 35.0 35.0 9.0 34.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 18.0 y Total Split(s) 14.0 66.0 66.0 14.0 66.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 18.0 0 Total Split(%) 11.7% 55.0% 55.0% 11.7% 55.0% 18.3% 18.3% 18.3% 15.0% 15.0% V Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 y Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 a Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead c Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes E Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 99.7 94.1 94.1 101.1 97.4 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.83 0.78 0.78 0.84 0.81 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Q Synchro 8 Report A.M. Future Peak Hour Page 3 Packet Pg. 149 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.69 0.05 0.31 0.19 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.01 :2 aD Control Delay 1.7 5.6 0.0 13.5 5.5 51.2 51.4 0.6 51.2 0.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1.7 5.6 0.0 13.5 5.5 51.2 51.4 0.6 51.2 0.0 ❑ LOS A A A B A D D A D A c Approach Delay 5.4 6.1 23.8 25.6 Approach LOS A A C C Queue Length 50th(ft) 2 127 0 4 58 4 4 0 3 0 d Queue Length 95th(ft) m4 m192 m0 31 128 17 18 0 15 0 ❑ Internal Link Dist(ft) 616 296 295 69 L Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 210 170 12 Base Capacity(vph) 819 2920 1231 180 2775 228 228 264 180 581 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.69 0.05 0.23 0.19 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.01 w o _o Area Type: Other a Cycle Length: 120 = �a Actuated Cycle Length: 120 a Offset:8(7%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green E Natural Cycle: 115 .L Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated a Maximum v/c Ratio:0.69 Intersection Signal Delay:5.7 Intersection LOS:A vi Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 a m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 0 N Splits and Phases: 2:Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive&Deerfield Parkway d o1, 02, o7 108 0 > --- 0 05 06 R a CL .y C O U d c co a c m �a Q Synchro 8 Report A.M. Future Peak Hour Page 4 Packet Pg. 150 2.1.b HCM 6th TWSC 3: Site Access Road/Windbrooke Drive & Deerfield Parkway 08/05/2021 Int Delay,s/veh 6.6 a� a� Lane Configurationsi p Traffic Vol,veh/h 12 1847 6 7 462 6 22 0 22 41 0 32 LO Future Vol,veh/h 12 1847 6 7 462 6 22 0 22 41 0 32 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None a>i Storage Length 100 - - 100 - - - - 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - c Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - `~ L Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles,% 22 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 06 Mvmt Flow 13 1944 6 7 486 6 23 0 23 43 0 34 w O 41 Conflicting Flow All 492 0 0 1950 0 0 2230 2479 975 1501 2479 246 M Stage - - - - - - 1973 1973 - 503 503 - a c Stage 2 - - - - - - 257 506 - 998 1976 - Critical Hdwy 4.54 - - 4.1 - - 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.54 6.98 a Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.54 - E Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.54 - L Follow-up Hdwy 2.42 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4.02 3.34 a Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 939 - - 304 - - 24 30 255 86 29 748 Stage 1 - - - - - - 66 109 - 524 540 - y 0 Stage 2 - - - - - - 731 543 - 265 106 - a Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 939 - - 304 - - -22 29 255 76 28 748 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - -22 29 - 76 28 - N Stage 1 - - - - - - 65 107 - 517 528 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 682 531 - 238 105 - o O Q. HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0.3 239.8 71.5 a HCM LOS F F .y O Capacity(veh/h) 22 255 939 - - 304 - - 125 v HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.053 0.091 0.013 - - 0.024 - - 0.615 a� HCM Control Delay(s) $459.1 20.5 8.9 - - 17.1 - - 71.5 y c HCM Lane LOS F C A - - C - - F HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - 3.1 a Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined *:All major volume in platoon �a Q Synchro 8 Report A.M. Future Peak Hour Page 1 Packet Pg. 151 2.1.b a� ;E a� a� ❑ LO 0 to ca d ca L O W L CO W O a c ca a E L Capacit Analysis Summary Sheets y Weekday Evening Peak Hour — Year 2023 Projected Conditions In a ai _ O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y _ O U d _ co a m E s v �a Q Packet Pg. 152 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 Lane Configurations 0 0 tt r Traffic Volume(vph) 160 615 68 343 1393 118 131 271 219 92 293 213 `E Future Volume(vph) 160 615 68 343 1393 118 131 271 219 92 293 213 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 ❑ Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 c Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% to Storage Length(ft) 185 0 485 0 260 350 300 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 d Taper Length(ft) 175 110 80 25 ❑ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.985 0.988 0.850 0.937 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 > Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 3493 0 1805 3494 0 1787 3689 1568 1719 3349 0 06 At Permitted 0.083 0.250 0.198 0.523 Satd. Flow(perm) 155 3493 0 475 3494 0 372 3689 1568 946 3349 0 w Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 10 9 185 143 M Link Speed(mph) 40 40 40 40 a Link Distance(ft) 485 991 640 906 Travel Time(s) 8.3 16.9 10.9 15.4 a Confl. Peds. (#/hr) E Confl. Bikes(#/hr) a Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ? Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 3% 1% 3% 3% 5% 1% 1% y Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Parking (#/hr) a Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% o Shared Lane Traffic(%) N Lane Group Flow(vph) 172 734 0 369 1625 0 141 291 235 99 544 0 a Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA o Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 R Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 0 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Q- a Switch Phase Q Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 56.5 8.0 50.5 8.0 53.5 8.0 8.0 45.5 y Total Split(s) 12.0 43.2 27.6 58.8 14.4 34.8 27.6 14.4 34.8 0 Total Split(%) 10.0% 36.0% 23.0% 49.0% 12.0% 29.0% 23.0% 12.0% 29.0% V Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 y Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 6.5 a Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag c Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes E Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min None Min None None Min Act Effct Green(s) 61.7 48.1 72.6 55.9 35.1 22.6 48.0 34.0 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.40 0.60 0.47 0.29 0.19 0.40 0.28 0.18 Q Synchro 8 Report P.M. Future Peak Hour Page 1 Packet Pg. 153 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 t t v/c Ratio 0.75 0.52 0.74 1.00 0.62 0.42 0.32 0.30 0.74 :2 aD Control Delay 48.6 30.7 30.6 45.3 41.4 44.1 6.1 30.4 40.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 48.6 30.7 30.6 45.3 41.4 44.1 6.1 30.4 40.0 ❑ LOS D C C D D D A C D c Approach Delay 34.1 42.6 30.1 38.5 Approach LOS C D C D Queue Length 50th(ft) 74 222 112 -718 80 106 24 55 157 > Queue Length 95th(ft) #245 328 254 #855 122 141 65 90 206 ❑ Internal Link Dist(ft) 405 911 560 826 L Turn Bay Length(ft) 185 485 260 350 300 12 Base Capacity(vph) 228 1404 554 1630 232 869 795 342 899 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.75 0.52 0.67 1.00 0.61 0.33 0.30 0.29 0.61 w 0 _o Area Type: Other a Cycle Length: 120 = �a Actuated Cycle Length: 120 a Offset:94(78%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green E Natural Cycle: 150 .L Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated a Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00 Intersection Signal Delay:38.1 Intersection LOS: D vi Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 a Volume exceeds capacity,queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 0 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. o Splits and Phases: 1:Weiland Road&Deerfield Parkway > I 0 CL 0 1 2 R 03 T a 05 06 14po7 08 77777/11 i , N C O U d c co a c m �a Q Synchro 8 Report P.M. Future Peak Hour Page 2 Packet Pg. 154 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 Lane Configurations tt r Traffic Volume(vph) 11 846 25 11 1762 17 82 1 37 17 0 40 `E Future Volume(vph) 11 846 25 11 1762 17 82 1 37 17 0 40 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ❑ Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 c Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% to Storage Length(ft) 200 210 0 0 0 170 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 d Taper Length(ft) 215 115 25 25 ❑ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.999 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.953 0.950 > Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 3689 1468 1031 3568 0 1681 1650 1369 1570 1615 0 06 At Permitted 0.050 0.278 0.950 0.953 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 95 3689 1468 302 3568 0 1681 1650 1369 1570 1615 0 w Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 118 1 118 247 M Link Speed(mph) 40 40 30 25 a Link Distance(ft) 696 382 375 149 Travel Time(s) 11.9 6.5 8.5 4.1 a Confl. Peds. (#/hr) E Confl. Bikes(#/hr) a Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ? Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 10% 75% 1% 8% 2% 100% 18% 15% 0% 0% y Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Parking (#/hr) a Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% c Shared Lane Traffic(%) 49% d Lane Group Flow(vph) 12 910 27 12 1913 0 45 44 40 18 43 0 a Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA o Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 R Permitted Phases 2 2 6 8 0 Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 8 8 8 7 7 Q- a Switch Phase Q Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 35.0 35.0 9.0 34.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 40.0 40.0 y Total Split(s) 13.2 64.8 64.8 13.2 64.8 26.4 26.4 26.4 15.6 15.6 0 Total Split(%) 11.0% 54.0% 54.0% 11.0% 54.0% 22.0% 22.0% 22.0% 13.0% 13.0% V Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 y Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 a Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead c Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes E Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 88.6 85.3 85.3 88.9 85.5 10.4 10.4 10.4 9.6 9.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.71 0.71 0.74 0.71 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 Q Synchro 8 Report P.M. Future Peak Hour Page 3 Packet Pg. 155 2.1.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 1I08/05/2021 v/c Ratio 0.08 0.35 0.03 0.05 0.75 0.31 0.31 0.18 0.14 0.12 :2 aD Control Delay 11.6 15.7 1.0 6.1 17.8 57.2 57.3 1.7 54.3 0.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.6 15.7 1.0 6.1 17.8 57.2 57.3 1.7 54.3 0.7 ❑ LOS B B A A B E E A D A c Approach Delay 15.3 17.7 40.1 16.5 Approach LOS B B D B Queue Length 50th(ft) 2 132 0 3 476 34 34 0 13 0 d Queue Length 95th(ft) m12 345 m3 9 793 74 74 0 38 0 ❑ Internal Link Dist(ft) 616 302 295 69 L Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 210 170 12 Base Capacity(vph) 202 2623 1078 282 2543 285 280 330 125 356 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.35 0.03 0.04 0.75 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.14 0.12 w o _o Area Type: Other a Cycle Length: 120 = �a Actuated Cycle Length: 120 a Offset:71 (59%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green E Natural Cycle: 145 .L Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated a Maximum v/c Ratio:0.75 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.9 Intersection LOS: B vi Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 a m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 0 N Splits and Phases: 2:Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive&Deerfield Parkway d o1 -11`02 1 *o7 L O o CL 05 ,"06,R CL L .y C O U d c co a c m �a Q Synchro 8 Report P.M. Future Peak Hour Page 4 Packet Pg. 156 2.1.b HCM 6th TWSC 3: Site Access Road/Windbrooke Drive & Deerfield Parkway 08/05/2021 Int Delay,s/veh 5.3 a� a� Lane Configurationsi p Traffic Vol,veh/h 42 863 21 22 1820 42 13 0 13 6 0 21 LO Future Vol,veh/h 42 863 21 22 1820 42 13 0 13 6 0 21 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None a>i Storage Length 100 - - 100 - - - - 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - c Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - `~ L Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 Mvmt Flow 48 981 24 25 2068 48 15 0 15 7 0 24 w O 41 Conflicting Flow All 2116 0 0 1005 0 0 2173 3255 503 2729 3243 1058 M Stage - - - - - - 1089 1089 - 2142 2142 - a c Stage 2 - - - - - - 1084 2166 - 587 1101 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 a Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - E Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - L a Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 262 - - 697 - - 27 9 519 10 10 224 Stage 1 - - - - - - 233 294 - 51 89 - y 0 Stage 2 - - - - - - 235 87 - 468 290 - a Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 262 - - 697 - - 20 7 519 8 8 224 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 20 7 - 8 8 - N Stage 1 - - - - - - 190 240 - 42 86 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 202 84 - 371 237 - o O Q. HCM Control Delay,s 1 0.1 195 $328.7 a HCM LOS F F .y O Capacity(veh/h) 20 519 262 - - 697 - - 32 v HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.739 0.028 0.182 - - 0.036 - - 0.959 a� HCM Control Delay(s) $377.8 12.1 21.8 - - 10.4 - $328.7 y c HCM Lane LOS F B C - - B - - F HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 2 0.1 0.7 - - 0.1 - - 3.3 a Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined *:All major volume in platoon �a Q Synchro 8 Report P.M. Future Peak Hour Page 1 Packet Pg. 157 2.1.b a� ;E a� a� ❑ 0 ca d ca L O W L CO W O a c ca a E Turn Lane Warrant Figures ❑ a ai _ O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y _ O U d _ co a m E s v �a Q Packet Pg. 158 Taible 5.4 Right-Turn Lane Guidelines for Four-Lane Highways Approach Minimum Right-turn Voluirne Warranting Exclusive Lane (vph) Lane Volume AD By Posted Speed Limit (vph) 35 mph 40 mph 45 mph 50 mph 55 mph LO CD 300 75 20 400 40 40 40, 15 > 500 40 40 30 15 600 40 40 40 25 10 800 40 35 30 20 10 12,00, 25 30 20 15 10 0 1600 15 15 15 10 5 41 M 20,00 10 10 10 10 5 0. E 0. 130 a311,11 SlAbtffbapvii Arte,,6141 v❑i 45 D 4.0 35 C 0 30 'warrarite,d 25 0 ............... 2() > P 5, 115 CLCL 1 0 5, Lc.-.'t'Urr,i lwe ntit wa�1mLanucd 0 51,D IN) 150 2,(,',X,) 2,V) 300 3,50 400 1,450 M! '9s, Apteriall Vo4titTic (vehill"w1hl) 13 NI 1)e i k I o unlllr 4 CD E AM 11'ea,k I knix (23 8, 7) Packet Pg. 159 2.1.b Kimley)),)Horn CD a� a� G October 28t", 2021 �' 0 Mr. Ted Sianis, P.E. o Village of Buffalo Grove ra Fifty-One Raupp Blvd ,o Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 L �a RE: 16051 Deerfieldr 3 BuffaloMZ r Multi-Family Proposed Improvements o 41 Second Submittal 0 a. c Dear Mr. Sianis: a. E We are in response of your review comments dated October 1 St, 2021 for the proposed .L improvements for MZ Buffalo Grove Multi-Family Development project located at 16051 a. Deerfield Parkway. Below is a summary of the actions taken in response to these vi comments. o a. General Comments _ 0 1. Please provide other agency permits (i.e. IEPA NOI, Water Main, Sanitary, LCDOT, etc.). Response: IEPA NOI, watermain, and sanitary permit applications will be prepared along with final engineering at a later date. Ms. Betsy Duckert with LCDOT has 0 M reviewed the driveway geometry on Deerfield Parkway and traffic study submitted o for the proposed improvements and has no further comments on these items. This a letter, dated September 10th, 2021, is enclosed for the Village's records. a Correspondence with LCDOT will include the Village as the final engineering plans progress. v, 0 2. Please provide an Engineer's Opinion of Probably Cost EOPC with the Final Engineeringv p 9� p� Y (EOPC) submittal. Include a 10% contingency as well as an 8% increase for Letter of Credit y purposes per ordinance 16.20.130. _ Response: Comment noted— an EOPC will be prepared with the final engineering a. submittal as requested. _ 0 3. Once the Village has an EOPC, we will develop and provide you a draft Development Improvement Agreement (DIA). The Developer will be required to execute and submit the DIA including; lin Q III r 'i- Packet Pg. 160 2.1.b F"cx,<,e 2 d a. A Letter of Credit; a� b. Engineering review and inspection fees; and o c. A cash deposit (a percentage of the Letter of Credit); LO Response: Comment noted— the developer will coordinate with the Village regarding the DIA once the EOPC is prepared and provided. 4. Provide sanitary service PE calculations. o a. Additionally, you will need to reach out to the Lake County Public Works Department to determine their sanitary sewer connection fees. w Response: 120 total residential units are proposed(20 per building) and one clubhouse is proposed. Calculations are provided within this submittal which equate to a PE value of 283. An email was sent to Lake County PW on 10113121 for confirmation of the impact fee amounts. The Village has been copied on all CD correspondence. o 41 M 5. Please confirm the parking lot landscaping island requirement of 180 SF per 20 parking a spaces has been met. Response: The minimum parking lot landscaping is 1,827 SF per this requirement a with 203 surface parking spaces proposed(garage parking excluded). The enclosed E plan includes approximately 4,000 SF of landscaped parking islands. L a 6. A site benchmark will be required prior to the completion of the development to add to the Village's benchmark network. Said benchmark will need to be near Deerfield Parkway, but o not within LCDOT or ComEd ROW. We can determine proper location at completion of a development construction. Response: Comment noted — a benchmark location is proposed within the o northeastern triangle parcel (see sheet C3.0 and C3.1). Note that this location is private property. If a different location is preferred, we are happy to review and incorporate it into the final engineering plans. ° 0 7. A soil erosion and sediment control plan is required. a Response: A soil erosion and sediment control plan has been prepared and is a provided. Refer to sheet C7.0 in updated plans. .y 8. Roads including the entrance off Deerfield Parkway will be considered private roads. 0 Response: Comment noted— general note 7 on sheet C3.0 has been added to identify that all proposed roads shall be private. y c 9. Storm sewers within the subdivision within will be considered private except for the a. pond outlet(s) Response: Comment noted—general note 14 on sheet C5.0 has been added to identity that all storm sewer except the detention basin outlet will be private.A stormwater management easement will be provided over the detention basin outlet once the Final Plat of Subdivision is prepared. Q Ili �i iii r„;i P'` Packet Pg. 161 2.1.b d d Site Plans (C3.0-3.2) o LO 1. With over 109 parking spaces above and beyond code, please eliminate the 27 parking spaces along the west portion of the main roadway through the subdivision. Make this area grass parkway. > Response: Based on previous conversations, we understand that the Village will In require the parking along the main driveway be eliminated from the plan, aside from the stalls directly adjacent to the clubhouse. As requested, the revision to the site w plan is provided. Note in order to meet the parking needs of the proposed use, additional parking stalls were added north of the clubhouse and within the multi- family courts between buildings. CD 2. How will trash be handled at the clubhouse? o Response: A trash enclosure is provided on the south side of the clubhouse _M building which will allow for trash cans to be wheeled down the sidewalk by on-site a management and maintenance staff to the driveway access west of the clubhouse for pick up. a E 3. Provide sidewalk along one side of the entrance to the subdivision within the ComEd a ROW. Response: As discussed between the development group and Village staff on ui October 1S; 2021, ComEd will not allow a sidewalk adjacent to the proposed private o roadway within the ComEd ROW. To provide pedestrian connectively, a sidewalk is a provided along the western property line which connects the proposed development to the Deerfield Pwky public sidewalk. Additionally, a sidewalk is N proposed on the east side of the site, near the clubhouse, that connects to the multi- use path that runs parallel within the ComEd right-of-way. — 4. Connect/provide sidewalk from Residence 7 to the bike path along the east side of the o pond. CL Response: A carriage walk has been added which provides connection from the a L site sidewalk to the bike path within the ComEd right-of-way. .y C ComEd ROW Plan (C3.3) 1. Minimum easement width for private entrance shall extend 6' behind BOC on along y private entrance. o Response: Comment noted— currently 3'of additional easement area is a. provided beyond the proposed back of curb. This easement area has already been reviewed and generally found to be appropriate per ComEd. Revising the ingress/egress easements within the ComEd right-of-way from what is currently shown will require additional coordination and approval by ComEd. Q ili �i is 1 r„;i oPC Packet Pg. 162 2.1.b F"cx,<,e 4 d d Grading Plans (C4.0-4.2) o LO 1. How will/does this development intend to meet RVR requirements of the WDO? Response: Per the WDO, the naturalized planting detention basin proposed on the west end of the site accounts for up to 50% of the RVR quantity required. To off-set > the remaining amount, two small rain garden areas are provided on the eastern end o of the site. Rain gardens are identified as green infrastructure per the WDO (Appendix A) and therefore will be able to meet the remaining RVR requirements w associated with this development. The drainage memo has been updated with the quantities review of the RVR required and RVR volumes provided per the proposed detention basin and rain CD gardens. o 41 M 2. Please show the 100-year overland flow route. a. Response: 100-year overland flood routes are noted on the engineering plans. Refer M to the grading plan sheets C4.1 and C4.2. a E 3. Landscape buffer shall be graded to direct stormwater away from surrounding residential a developments. - Response: The area has been cleared as requested by staff. Therefore, the storm y sewer is provided within this area to capture drainage that runs off unrestricted o from the neighboring properties. This flow will be bypassed through the proposed a. detention basin which will be detailed in final engineering. 0 N Utility Plans (C5.0-5.2) 0 1. Per our Water Department, the north side proposed water main connection is a metered feed for ComEd to cool equipment. The plans show an existing valve by the existing o hydrant. This is the ComEd meter pit not a main line valve. The Village intends to continue a to bill ComEd, so design will have to accommodate this ComEd feed/meter. a L Response: Per conversations with Village Staff on 1011112021, we understand that the ComEd meter is located north and east of the site and the proposed connection will not impact metering capabilities. v 2. Both proposed water main connection points can be a sleeved connections or pressure in connections. Either way both valves need a 5' dia. manhole. Response: Comment noted — plans have been updated accordingly to show a a. sleeved connection with a 5' diameter manhole. m 1= 3. The old hydrants at the water main connection points require replacement with the new hydrants placed on the new project side of the valves for construction flushing. Q Packet Pg. 163 2.1.b d Response: Comment noted— the existing fire hydrants are noted to be removed per a� the existing conditions and demolition plan (C2.0). The proposed hydrants are o shown on the new project watermain side of the valves as requested and a detail LO for flushing is provided on the overall utility plan (C5.0). 4. Water main must be a minimum of 20' from any building foundation. > Response: The watermain routing has been revised to maintain a minimum o separation of 20' from all proposed building foundations. Refer to the utility plan (sheets C5.1 and C5.2); note that the watermain west of Buildings 5 and 6 has been w eliminated. Fire hydrants are proposed with 150' long leads to provide adequate coverage as discussed on 10/1112021. 5. Storm sewer shall be a minimum of 12" per the WDO. cn Response: Comment noted— all storm sewer will be designed to be 12"minimum. o 41 M a Plats a a E 1. Cross access easements necessary for connection to Commerce Ct. Response: Comment noted— the plat will include a cross access easement within a. the parking lot from the subject site property line to the Commerce Ct right-of-way. vi 2. Please provide a 10' public utility easement surrounding the exterior lot lines. M Response: Comment noted—a 10'wide P.U.E. will be provided around the perimeter a. of the site as shown in the engineering and Plat of Subdivision. Please also note o that a blanket easement covers the majority of the site with non-easement areas a ("NEAs") encapsulating the proposed building foundations. 0 3. Please provide a plat of annexation, plat of subdivision, and cross access easement plat. 'o Response: Comment noted—the requested plats are included forreview, apart from Q. the cross-access easement plat. That plat will be prepared with final. a Q L 4. After review and approval of all plats, you will be required to provide mylar copies of each N plat for execution and recording (to be recorded by developer) in Lake County. c Response: Comment noted— mylar copies of the final plats will be prepared a� 5. Add a note regarding "storm water infrastructure maintenance activity and responsibility language is located within the approved stormwater management report" to the plat of M subdivision. a Response: The note provided will be added to the Plat of Subdivision. 1= s v �a Q Packet Pg. 164 2.1.b d 6. Enclosed is the Village standard easement language and signature blocks. Response: Thank you for providing— the Village's standard language and signature o blocks will be added to the Plat of Subdivision. LO Stormwater Management Report (SWMR) d 1. Please provide a stormwater management report. Response: Kimley-Horn will provide a full all-encompassing stormwater c management report with final engineering which will meet Lake County standards. L For preliminary engineering, a memorandum with supporting exhibits is provided identifying that the INDO requirements are being met and the enclosed plan is �s feasible in regards to stormwater management. The memo originally provided has 3 been updated accordingly per the comments provided herein. cn w 0 41 2. Hydrocarbon removal technology will be required per the WDO. a Response: Kimley-Horn will review all options and provide details at final engineering; however, this requirement has been noted in the enclosed drainage a memo along with the possible solution of utilizing snouts and bio-skirt products(or E approved equals) in the storm sewer manholes to collect hydrocarbons prior to L discharging into the detention basin. a 3. Confirm design utilizes ISWS Bulletin 75 Rainfall data. y Response: The latest WDO is dated 1011312020. "Appendix 1:Rainfall Depth Duration a Frequency Tables for Lake County"from the INDO refers to ISWS Bulletin 75. This a; rainfall data was utilized in sizing the required detention per I/VDO standards. o N G1 4. Include private stormwater infrastructure maintenance activity and responsibility language o post development completion. - Response: Comment noted— this information and language will be provided in the o stormwater management report to be provided at Final Engineering. a a L 5. When final engineering is ready, please submit a completed Lake County Watershed Development Ordinance permit. Response: Comment noted — a Lake County WDO permit application will be 0 provided along with final engineering for Village review. , a� Landscaping Review a. Please note in ordinance 16.50.120 Landscaping, we are not allowing Maples and Honey Locust to be planted at this time due that our current populations of these species are very E high. Q Packet Pg. 165 2.1.b d 1 recommend the following species as alternatives to the Maple and Honey Locust proposed a� in this plan: o • Swamp White Oak LO • Chinkapin Oak • Bald Cypress • Dawn Redwood > • Kentucky Coffeetree o • Yellowood L • Fort McNair Horse Chestnut w • Turkish Filbert Response: Comment noted— the Maples and Honey Locusts have been replaced with alternative species provided. w O We trust these responses and the description of changes above adequately address your 41 o comments. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact a me at 331-425-8039. a Sincerely, E L a a Ryan Martin Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. N Phone: 331-425-8039 Email: ryan.martin(aD-kimley-horn.com o CC: Brad Zaransky, MZ Capital Partners P Rob Costello, Torch Architects CL a Scott Willson, Kimley-Horn Q L Amanda Folta, Kimley-Horn .y _ O U d _ M a 1= s v �a Q Packet Pg. 166 2.1.b Klmley)Morn CD MEMORANDUM a� G To: Mr. Ted Sianis, PE LO Village of Buffalo Grove 50 Raupp Boulevard Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 `6 d From: Scott Willson, PE ca Ryan Martin, PE c Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. `~ L ca IRevision (Date: Octobeir 28111 2021 (Note all revisions from oriigiinall meirrno indicated iin blue) otS Original Date: September 2nd, 2021 j w 0 Re: Proposed DeerfieldParkway Multi-Family l a Deerfield rkway& Windbrooke Drive Village of Buffalorove, Lae Co., I `—° a E L Introduction a Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., serves as the engineering consultant for MZ Capital Partners, who is proposing to develop a multi-family community with six residential buildings (120 total units, two-story), a y clubhouse, private parking and a stormwater detention basin. The sitework includes demolition of an M existing building and surrounding parking, tree removal, grading, storm sewer, water, sanitary sewer, and a paving installation. o N The site is located south of Deerfield Parkway and the Apartments at Windbrooke Crossing, southwest of an existing ComEd substation and transmission right-of-way,west of a commercial building, north of the o single-family homes adjacent to Horatio Boulevard, and east of single-family homes within the Sterling Creek Subdivision and an existing commercial building. 0 L Q Q The site is 8.90-acres (which does not include the ComEd right-of-way)and contains an existing Q L industrial/commercial building surrounded by vegetation. A cell tower is located along the eastern property line, which is proposed to remain. y 0 Aptakisic Creek conveys drainage from the south to the north and is located directly west of the project �? site's western property line. Per the enclosed FEMA Floodplain Map, the creek identifies a base flood elevation of 668 prior to conveyance through an existing box culvert within the Deerfield Parkway right-of- y way. _ a The proposed development will meet the requirements identified in the Village of Buffalo Grove code and c Lake County SMC Watershed Development Ordinance (WDO), latest edition. E t Existing Conditions Q Packet Pg. 167 2.1.b Klmley)Morn 'age 2 a� Drainage is generally conveyed across the site from east to west towards Aptakisic Creek, which will be maintained in the proposed condition. The site is mostly pervious with overgrown vegetation, aside from G the aforementioned concrete building and surrounding parking lot and material storage yard. There is currently no storm sewer or stormwater detention provided on the subject site. 0 An existing 30'wide buffer area is present along the south and southwest property lines adjacent to the a neighboring single-family residential lots. This vegetated area will remain and the limits of disturbance will largely avoid any vegetation clearing as identified in the proposed grading and landscape plans. ca L The enclosed Wetland Report prepared by Christopher B Burke Engineering identifies an existing isolated w wetland. This wetland is approximately 0.14 acres. Portions of the wetland will be impacted and mitigated per Lake County WDO and Village of Buffalo Grove requirements. > Proposed Conditions 3 The existing building and parking lot will be removed and tree clearing will be necessary as part of the o proposed improvements. a A curve number calculation is provided based on the proposed site plan which identifies how much of the site will be impervious (i.e. roofs, parking lot and drive aisles, and sidewalks)in the final condition. This 2 calculation was then used to calculate the required 2-year and 100-year detention volumes as identified in a E Appendix K of the Lake County WDO. The nomograph identifies that 4.10 ac-ft of volume will be required for the 100-year event and the detention basin identified in the plans provides a volume of 4.80 ac-ft. a Two separate outlet pipes will be provided in order to meet the County requirement for releasing 0.04 cfs/acre in the 2-year and 0.15 cfs/acre in the 100-year event.A 200-foot wide emergency overflow weir p will be provided along the west side of the basin which will handle any storm events greater than the 100- =a year. The overflow weir, along with the controlled outlet pipes, will convey flows directly to Aptakisic Creek ai by discharging at grade just east of the property boundary. The outlet will discharge above the base flood o elevation (BFE)of the existing off-site floodway/floodplain, therefore no tailwater condition will need to be considered. 0 (Runoff Vollii. me Reduction (IRVIR)„ o L 1Fhe naturalized detention basin will provide one foot of vollurne below the pipe outlet to meet the Cou ulnty"s CL C IRVIF� ('"runoff volume redu.uctiion")irequiirernents, f his is acceptable with an efficiency of 50a/o. 1f the irernain�iing L vollume will The handled via two proposed rain gardens on the east side of the siite. IF."er the VV'I:::)O, rain gairdens are defined as green infrastructure and therefore can be credited up to the full 100%. _ 0 U II he total) RVIFZ vollume required its calculated as follows (per"Appendix 0"of the WIDO): d RVR Quantiry1"rainfall depth x runolfcoeff eceent 0,9S x total larr erviraus area � co a c m E as Q ICI �IIII illlllin Packet Pg. 168 2.1.b Klmley)Morn 'age 3 CD t he total) net new impervious area is 4.86 acres, equating to a irequired RVR quantity of 16,760 cubic feet or 0.355 ac ft . "It"'hiis summary of the two rain gardens and naturalized basin area its as follows:: � Facility Area (Sq., IFt) Efficiency moll (Cub. Ft.) @ 1' Depthc Detention IBasin 29,593 50% 14,797 (North Rain Garden 757 100% 757 � South Rain Gairderii 1„452 100% 1,452 G ll"otall IRVIR Volume Provided 1-7,006 ca L O W INote that underdraiins wilt be provided for the detention (basin as irequired per the WDO. Il he final) detains L and desiigr of the proposed rain gardens wilt be prcviided of final ang iin eeriing ca > otS IHydrocarlboin Removal: 3 t'he WE)O indicates hydrocarbon irernovall is required for the proposed development provided more than 25 0 parking stalls wilt be added to the site flhan in the current condition, t lhiis required irernovall wilt be handled o uf'ullixirng snouts and bio skirts within the storm sewer system to eliminate hydrocarbons piriior to reaching the a pirop(.:)sed stornnwater detention basin, "'1"hese products wilt be specified at final) engineering and indicated � on the plans accordingly. a E Final design and confirmation of capacity for the proposed on-site storm sewer will be completed with final L engineering. The storm sewer will be designed to handle the 10-year storm event and overland flood a routes will be designed to accommodate 100-year rainfall. Attachments • Location Map a • FEMA Floodplain Map • Site Curve Number Calculation N • Stormwater Detention Nomograph (Appendix K from Lake County WDO) • Detention Basin Stage Storage Calculation 0 • Wetland Reports and assessments by others - 0 L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c co a c �a Q ICI �IIII illlllin Packet Pg. 169 y (Plawaaa L90%le nap a Jo;'aen g'gnS;o 3eld'ueld mllaad''n'S and'auozaa;o lenoiddy aaplsuo3) 3aS ueld:luamgoeUV o Q Z£SLa n e isi i ust mu is uvua a i mnaaavm wu� w r 'ONI'S3LVIOOSSY aNV N80H—A31WIM BIOZ OO 2]U�J1VVt1aUNIN1'Zs A/VV1d U I�I�tl��U m r `� �•J•l•NI z a I d` A -IVI213V 0 z � fry o r b�! U F— LU _Q U O�l i of CL 0 1 ' i Me c, %r x r f J y N 1 v l , no(3 a JOI •aen V `qnS to }eld `ueid w'IOJd "n'S and `ouozoa 10 lenoaddd iopisuoo) }oS ueld :;uouayoePV o g _ _ W _ — _ C N— � m m'a a) u�d N y U ,� 2 2.,.. f6 s_n T N Z c �s m� ... o s J .a x m m� oNOm.- � r N a ° "D M � , jE o m o N c ro caN o a tc c°n o ocac> E g m oo ° a. c ati. .o o m O E q o 0 o moo Uoas E NNc N:o d > a O O �' x M c c C N'6 o Q y a5 Q N r LL O N Q 4`'i O F O O f6 o O J '6 O O N °L O ate..t .O nA. ca i+ � W �' A N a>'� C o LL. Y O 4) N c i N O a5 m O V ^�" O N A W'6 O O 2 o v y m c> � a o � R o N _o c S °o s ' ° m m > E 6p oma ">c A° Y M ° a s ° m c R u m LL N E LL 3 w m c Q o N Na N �a m E ai o E m a LL m 0o U � c£ ox ° ca m ? N o a>i o a" c LL > 3 £ moo 'o i>¢ a 0 cro � o 0 0 xa"' u- m= o aOi z° °o E o ° o u 0 w -o m U ¢ ns c o o m aNi W 'o'5 M ° m c°> > d p as q o �. N y c o m o c O c U s R .0 0 c m N a ns 0 .a 0 0, c 0 LL > >N d �? Z m:>'W O O C N O 2. 0 0-� g O O O F O t/> F O N .r0. N A R N Q O O 'r O O N O LL O f6 O U 4) N > N O fA In O V m 0 Q T > ip a3 '00 KV N O O.f6' 0 0 q m m ¢ �> U 3 3 0 o c y m LL o is a> UT ;ao m o. .0'3 N. m c m� a m a C. m nsa> ns m ns m o a °? m N a m - .o `� p a ¢ > N N> 0c a0> 00 0 ry o �> > 2 2 > o ns E o :no Mn c>._ a c -c N a> o n m o 0� o a> } o m o > o c Z Q' O O'6 f6 LL U Q J Q Q W Q U J U ? U m{ J U (. x 0 Z O ( Q. zm,O E> LL. J °_ yam 3 ON � 3:�q -D >0a E N G O O x O W Z 1 N 8O.R N m LL O N J N 4)O m E O '6z O 'ap a O. 2 w O< w �� ' 2 W 0o Co Co Co Ea s tmZ0 - 0o" T _ ¢ OJ m qNq N LU I-= Z a_o 0 "a m o s a> '^ 0.. 0 o LLQ W Q Q Zi- pi- Qa ns" m m _°o >+�F= °> ns c�aa0 a. O WV Ema � ooc> Eoc 02 mm 4 Qm Q O W O m LL Q t.'40 c�i o ca�= E au) t ba m cba uN- w N WOO ~O o m m 3 -.0 a °LL 0 J N axx+ �LL O CN r 4z! , i ON O t b Po N °1N Imld„ ^ a> vL ��wrv74 Nr10v�91)' �� la��/r r 0 0 '' % � '� ,'/� t �Y�i� � ryahr, Jan 1 � r LL 1 l r r � o o m cam 1ST o%, r i, l r, I a r w rc � a Ir 1ri N t4 1 � r �X � ICJ T a I / i O / All �,y�i4 ia✓m 1 N Irvr i O � ar / r a o � r II-}..II y ��'� �l�i�1fNYtl�Yfn4ssisn><ii � . o r �� Ii9 i ,r44,.��4 ° �JI p n O _ ,4, P °"�'" "'ll� LO N Z ON N O 2.1.b MZ Capital Partners-Deerfield Pkwy Multi-Family 9/2/2021 E:xpoct Morro, f_xporionco Bettor. � Total Disturbed Area (acres): 8.90 Proposed Development o Runoff Coefficients LO Surface Type Runoff Area Product Coefficient (acres) (Rc x A) Impervious area (Roads, roofs, sidewalks, etc.) 0.90 4.86 4.37 > Pervious area (Greenspace) 0.45 4.04 1.82 p Total = 8.90 6.19 L Composite Runoff Coefficient= 0.70 L ca otS Proposed Development W w Curve Number(CN) o 41 Area Product M Surface Type Curve Number a acres CN x A Impervious area (Roads, roofs, sidewalks, etc.) 98 4.86 476 `—° a Pervious area (Greenspace; Good Condition >75%Grass) 74 4.04 299 E Total = 8.90 775 L Composite Curve Number= 87 a Note: Curve Numbers identified per TR-55 Table 2-2a. c� 0 a _ O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y _ O U d _ co a 1= s v �a Q Page 1 Packet Pg. 172 ABa IF J0J'JBA 19 'qnS jo 4101d 'ueld 111118-id "n's and '8U0Z8jj 10 j8AOjddV jap!suoo) ps Lield :4u8wt438jjV Appendix K: Detention Volume Versus Curve Number cc cr) --------------- ---------------- ------ ------- ------------------------------------------ ccy)6 ----------------------- (3) U ............................ M Ln Ln ro 0 w > II .... ........ cu 0 0 LLJ 0c) M ........... 0 ---- ------- --- ---------------- w Um ------------------------ --- -------------- ------ LU ........... ca U) z .... ................. ........... .......... ...... ..... Lr) 00 Uj as z w z Uj Ln w w > Z C) w W LLJ D 00 U > U- w U. :D C) 0 c:) LIJ a) T- ------------- -- ----- ---- ----- ------- -------------- I--- ------ ------ z w L- z cc c\1 ct U LL z W 4- LL LA C) U Ln W 1* < C < CD C) < LO M 11 < Qj cli LL 11 ----------- < < ------------------CL - L 0 < < Qj > T I f CD fV ....... ........................................... .... .1.................... .............................................................. ........ ........................ ..... ................ ............ j�j U-) lD Uf rV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31d:)V/13-311:)V 3wni0AN011N313aV3)JV11Nn LAKE COUNTY WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE K-1 2.1.b basin Fxarvct Marr,,F:xperirrrc.t:BtPr. 41 It POND: Detention Pond 0 a) JOB NO. 268045000 Side Slopes PROJECT: MZ Buffalo Grove 1 i° 0 FILE: 4 tO DATE: 9/2/2021 a d Detention Basin Stage Storage L O W Area Average Incremental Cummulative Cummulative L Elevation Area Storage Storage Storage > (ft) (ft�) (ftt) (ft^3) (ft^3) (ac-ft) 668.5 25,197 0 0.000 w 27017.500 27017.50 O 669.5 28,838 27017.5 0.62 a 30772.500 30772.50 c 670.5 32,707 57790.00 1.33 33874.500 33874.50 671.5 35,042 91664.50 2.10 E 36231.000 36231.00 a 672.5 37,420 127895.50 2.94 - 38631.000 38631.00 673.5 39,842 166526.50 3.82 p 42625.500 42625.50 M a 674.5 45,409 209152.00 4.80 c 0 N G1 Total Volume Provided (100-yr): 4.80 ac-ft 0 Total volume required per Lake County WDO Appendix K is 4.10 ac-ft(therefore detention o basin provides adequate volume per stormwater ordinance requirements). A dual restrictor Q, will be utilized and designed in final engineering in order to meet the allowable 2-year and a 100-year release rates. .y C O U d c co a c m 1= �a Q Page 1 Packet Pg. 174 2.1.b June 18, 2021 0 0 16051 DEERFIELD PARKWAY 0 0 w WETLAND ASSESSMENT w Buffalo Grove, Illinois M a CBBEL Project No. 150489.00015 c �a a E a vi 0 M a ai c O N G1 O R O Q. CL Q G1 N C O U c M u�un a u 3 CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD a 9575 WEST HIGGINS ROAD,SUITE 600. Rosemont, IL 60018 Packet Pg. 175 2.1.b PARKWAY, BUFFALO GROVE, IL 9111111111911111minllI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................1 G WOUS/Wetland Summary Table:........................................................................................................1 c METHODOLOGY.....................................................................................................................................1 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.............................................................................................................................2 > STUDYAREA...........................................................................................................................................2 ca L EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS...................................................................................................................2 W L ca Wetland1..............................................................................................................................................3 > otS REFERENCE MATERIALS.................................................................................................................................3 LOCATIONMAP.....................................................................................................................................3 w 0 41 NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY.........................................................................................................3 0 a LAKE COUNTY WETLAND INVENTORY...................................................................................................4 �a SOILSURVEY..........................................................................................................................................4 a E UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY..................................................................................................4 y L FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP..............................................................................................................4 a APPENDIXA—EXHIBITS..................................................................................................................................A cri ❑ APPENDIX B—FLORISTIC INVENTORIES.........................................................................................................B a APPENDIX C—SITE PHOTOGRAPHS................................................................................................................0 0 APPENDIXD—DATA FORMS......................................................................................................................... D 0 0 L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c co a c m �a 103 Packet Pg. 176 2.1.b EXECU FIVE IU On May 27, 2021, Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. (CBBEL) staff completed a wetland assessment of a study area located at 16051 Deerfield Parkway using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: LO Midwest Region (August 2010). One (1) wetland was delineated within the study area. Aerial photographs depicting the location and boundaries of the identified wetlands are found on Exhibit 8 in Appendix A. Representative photographs are included in Appendix C. > Information collected from the field investigation is listed in the USACE Data Forms found in ca Appendix D. c w L Wetlandv Native Mean Delineated Area Data Points Community Type Native FQAI j C-Value 0 Wetland 1 1A Wooded 2.09 9.81 a depression a. �a The Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest L Region (August 2010), identifies the mandatory technical criteria for wetland identification. The a three essential characteristics of a jurisdictional wetland are hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils vi and wetland hydrology as described below: a Hydrophytic Vegetation:The hydrophytic vegetation criterion is based on a separation of plants into five basic groups: 0 d (1) Obligate wetland plants (OBL) almost always occur (estimated probability>99%) in 0 wetlands under natural conditions; (2) Facultative wetland plants (FACW) usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 0 a 67-99%), but occasionally are found in non-wetlands; a L (3) Facultative plants (FAC) are equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands .y (estimated probability 34-66%); c U (4) Facultative upland plants(FACU) usually occur in non-wetlands(estimated probability , Q 67-99%), but occasionally are found in wetlands; and (n c �o (5) Obligate upland plants(UPL)almost always occur(estimated probability>99%) in non- a wetlands under natural conditions. c m Four procedures completed in the following order are used to determine if hydrophytic vegetation is present: �u� a u 1 1 Packet Pg. 177 2.1.b 1) Rapid Test: The Rapid Test for hydrophytic vegetation is met if all dominant species across all strata are OBL or FACW, or a combination of the two based on a visual assessment. a� 2) Dominance Test: Using the 50/20 Rule, if greater than 50%of the plants present are FAC, a� FACW, or OBL, the subject area meets the hydrophytic vegetation criterion. LO o 3) Prevalence Index: Each plant species in a sampling plot is assigned a numeric value (OBL=1; FACW=2; FAC=3; FACU=4; UPL=5). Based on the sampling data, the absolute cover is calculated for each species in each stratum and using the specified formula, if d the Prevalence Index is 3 or less, hydrophytic vegetation is present. ca L 4) Morphological Adaptations: Various species may develop physical characteristics after growing in wetland areas such as multi-stemmed trunks, shallow roots and buttressed stems. Hydrophytic vegetation is present if an adaptation is observed in more than 50% 06 of FACU species growing in an area that contains hydric soil and wetland hydrology. 3 Hydric Soils: Hydric soils are defined in the manual as "soils that are saturated,flooded or ponded o 41 long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part." Field o a indicators of hydric soil are found in the NTCHS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service 2006b or current version). a Wetland Hydrology: The wetland hydrology criterion is often the most difficult to determine. E Z Typically,the presence of water for a portion of the growing season creates anaerobic conditions. a Anaerobic conditions lead to the prevalence of wetland plants. Morphological adaptations of plants, drift lines and watermarks are examples of wetland hydrology field indicators. o Waters of the United States: Waters of the United States (waters) are defined as the ordinary a ai high-water mark (OHWM) in non-tidal waters, provided the jurisdiction is not extended by the o presence of wetlands. The OHWM refers to the line established by the fluctuations of water. These fluctuations can be indicated by physical characteristics such as a clear, natural line o impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in the character of the soil, destruction of terrestrial vegetation, or the presence of litter and debris.Waters are typically not vegetated.They typically ° a area located below the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of a creek, stream, river or lake. a There are exceptions to this generalization. .y C O r L D DISCUSSION U_ d c a The study area shown in Exhibit 1 of Appendix A is located south of Deerfield Parkway, east of Weiland Road in Buffalo Grove, Lake County, Illinois. m 1= �a At the time of the visit,the study area consisted of an occupied commercial building with access road 103 and material storage lot,a cell tower, scrub shrub woodland and a wooded depressional pocket wetland. Packet Pg. 178 2.1.b We-land I Wetland 1, characterized by Data Point 1A in Appendix D, consisted of a wooded depressional pocket wetland. Photographs of the wetland are included in Appendix C. aD Vegetation: At the time of the field investigation, the dominant species included silver maple (Acer saccharinum), cottonwood (Populus deltoides), moneywort (Lysimachia nummularia) and o riverbank grape (Vitis riparia). The complete wetland floristic inventory for the wetland area is c in Appendix B. tO Hydrology: At the time of the field visit, hydrology was indicated by evidence of ponding > including water lines, sediment deposits and unvegetated concave surface. ca L Soils: Soils are mapped as Pella silty clay loam, a hydric soil type in Lake County, Illinois. Hydric soils were confirmed in the field by the observation of low chroma colors and reduced matrices. otS w O 41 The following reference materials were reviewed and used to assist in the wetland field o a reconnaissance. They are included as Exhibits 1-6. �a a The study area is located south of Deerfield Parkway, east of Weiland Road in Buffalo Grove, a Lake County, Illinois (Exhibit 1). Geographically, the study area is located in Section 28,Township 43 North, and Range 11 East of the 3rd Principal Meridian (42.169326°N; - 87.946272°W). y 0 a The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) for the Wheeling Quadrangle (1983), as shown on Exhibit O N 2, indicates no wetland is mapped within the study area.The NWI serves only as a large-scale guide and actual wetland locations and types often vary from that mapped. ° 0 L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c co a c I= VV� a 3 03 mug Packet Pg. 179 2.1.b II....AIKE COUN I WETLAND IIIN II:::IIN II OIRY The Lake County Wetland Inventory for Vernon Township (2002), as shown on Exhibit 3, indicates wetland is mapped within the study area.The Lake County Wetland Inventory serves only as a local guide and actual wetland locations and types often vary from that mapped. ;D a� a� S uL SURVEY LO The Soil Survey of Lake County, Illinois (2013) was reviewed to determine the location of hydric soils within the study area (Exhibit 4). The following soil types are mapped within the study area: d 146A - ELLIOTT SILT LOAM 153A - PELLA SILTY CLAY LOAM, HYDRIC 223B - VARNA SILT LOAM 442A - MUNDELEIN SILT LOAM otS 531B - MARKHAM SILT LOAM 3 531C2 - MARKHAM SILT LOAM, ERODED w O 41 UINIIT II::) STATES II:..:.. 7II....S GII IL "�U1RVIl:::::X a I The United States Geological Survey (USGS), Wheeling Quadrangle (1993) was reviewed to determine historic local drainage patterns (Exhibit 5).The USGS indicates that surface runoff a E from the study area drains towards the west and lies within the watershed of the Des Plaines CD L River. a vi If=II.... II::) II ITV S U If IN II::::: l- TII::::: I A IP ❑ The Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was reviewed to determine the location of regulatory a floodplain within the study area (Exhibit 6). The presence of floodplain can be indicative of o wetland hydrology. The FIRM indicates 100-year regulatory floodplain and floodway is mapped d immediately west of the study area. o 0 L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c �o 4 a I= �a Q Packet Pg. 180 ❑ LO 0 w ca otS ca .a. a. E a. ❑ vi a. ai N 0) 0 p Q. CL 2. 0 a. E A Packet Pg. 181 UN A rnf f Rd, 2.1.b 1 inch= 1,000 feet „MCA h ,4 (J "1 .. a ..., F W r 1, �+ er. xigy{K c., fk rir�ara.J _.._.. _' ❑ I',11 vvro W Ix r' STUDY AREA otS I � Mf ° FL n e J . C.A1 %' ^JiL mr a E ON" J 0, AA ..vsA sd h Sul rv+c l7a � u fr t El �„kdf„k 4i ... _... Itrtf�ur rakA IyfFWF t,r f � ❑ r J,hJrm r--; d _ I ti N s r.ir�amr�a � G1 „ .....i d �N _ I' I aY, nr^ __ �h, v°(1'k�,ne o o n°v I Ptiv J uw; ^dux dY la w O (I p, 2 1 7 CL dir Jll!'PVW@db'� L Q JG ^ NO(W, .r4r41o,O W P,fp.I:rlgel Ord r.". ti L I 41N :. O ,. c. w. i Lr,c+I J,I„e V PA I r, A "I Vr J"'1 1 a.A-,, IMr J "I A 1 yr Ci n a LN ftt^a Pkf 4 J i r 1 ^, e � Ao� W o E Sources. Esri, HERE,�Ga'rr"I , USGS,Intermap,INCREMENT P, v z NRCan, Esri Japan, METI,Esri China(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri +� Th ail n N n r Map contributors.an heGISUser Q a CLIENT: TITLE: NCBBEL# 15-0489.00015 LOCATION MAP DATE: 6/2/2021 Z � : 1"=1,ODD' x w CHRISTOPHER B.BURKE Engineering,Ltd. DSGN. SCALE DWN. KEK I USER: I kkopija Y 9575 W. Higgins Road,Suite 600, Rosemont,Illinois 60018(847)823-0500 CHKD. TJK I PLOT DATE: 1 6/4/2021 packet pg. 182 a FILE NAME: 1150489.00015 LOC Q NOTE:TAKEN FROM THE NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY(NWI),WHEELING QUADRANGLE(1983) eer 1 inch= 150 feet NO WETLAND MAPPED %///%��//�/ /%r r ,,,,,,,,°�((di(nf��+I rr ,N 'i �( dll'm�;,�// ✓r k,,r„��,, ,�,�%; � �� i � i//��1J s�%;;i ��.��; l'" o- ' i��1��V��+ � �, nst �il ii'c, �''I� *"�„ �%i,,,„`��IIt171�i�k+hylll°I��l 1 ��:' a "�✓i � �� j G_1 ZE 7lr lam,-: f/',J, r„r /f �„ ,,,,, ,, r,,. �� dri �l! %% � 1�.*� ✓/ Jl�'l !..l l�._ .,VNK' „�„��.. 1,,;I),r er,x r//, l i:r ,:J I rri� ,l;, .r ,... vul „✓I r /� � , r -.w, � �i %!%%✓r �f.r � � i l�!,„,,, I r� �r��r 'ir, �grill�G-,„ 1 / !%,', G I r,� ❑ -%rr '� •�� u�;o !/�,. �'� ,D::,, � ;' /G��r�>.:::,.� riy �;� �Il��r�ilii�i/� / r',.. <, y /..;l:;ru �,,',��, �� 1J�//�i v��,r � ,,,„.;� �"'� , ��y ,, /„u,�,1 „,, r ,,ri, � ri✓r ..li// ail � r; it 1 ( l�/°iii � ��- � � � r,G !% 1, , Tr �iu,>�/,„ y /, ��; r✓ic„ :/ ' f,„�i/ /r ,,,, � � 1 r� r/ri�a/„ Ir �/, LA A..,, ..,,, 'l/1�1�/,,!1 �(' I r ""^�II >/ I ',. ��,,. 'r',�� ✓�/lr �1i/ r�� rr��% C r r � I r i ✓/; / ,r�j/i r�,�% J/ r r,/ e r r l r /�� % STUDY AREA /,�; ,,�' ;l /%�,r� M %/ l/ l,� o o. ,, � ./rr, r ,,; 'i /l. ,✓/ I cu/ � .'ll ,y r�, ,,, ,( l,c,,,.r�/1r r „a�>/�p, r / i /� .,�� /;r i ,� n, ,it „ „r,rr �.,. o p1.,,�r �y/�f ��// r -:,.�i ri% ,.,.✓ ,a:.,/ x ✓ ..,, n//I,.,�� / li, r; �, � � i � � � � Ali G /� ,,✓ r %� / i/ ,,, ,a� iJ� � ll il//a ii� r� � ,,,I ri �, „✓r �I r r/ l� � i f r,� Jl.,� ! /,,.�„ ,�, i �, G �� .111 W - ;r. ;e„' U ai i '!/�`� / .n,,., ,l ,r „.�, :.✓r/ �; / „f r,, ,"�Nr6I ,/n6�,/, ,.., -.; rr s; r l� y l (/��fb�rtia�.w,,,. r ? .�/.r�.; ~4 %f�i/„n<, ,� fa„��;%� �,.., /� ✓ 1��' u /r/%i� ,rN % ��-r r ,,, w ,1 �%, /w ,1, � ,n�y� y,,,;/r/�i /-„�„✓r� ;;,,,/ � , � � ///f�� /��j C f✓, >,�;/ r ,,,,�-,,✓ Il ,n r�„Jrr� �"rw, �s y ,_ / �/lr -�,rn � ay r, /� I,,r,// " ,,, )v rflrt✓,,, Yl /�� //„/,., P ,1 r(=„ „rGr ra; �, �,„ � / imwr,.,~ai r � ✓/4 �;� �f � r � %/ � r `""� �". �,� r �:%✓l(�" �,Is;��l r,�� l y'„ �/i I i �/,' � ��h.,�1i//��/ /��///i��ni� � „��' i�ri l%/..,, / l �;- fC ,/� y '1 ✓/l�,�y� i?r,,�l�r, �" � �.. N 1�,. � �ls /� 'N' r r/r %�a� I �� '!y �rr� % '.� ��i��rl1Y; �'`vr,,,- ,��, o, ��/,,, �:s/ � r /,.. �r,��, �. /ir/ri„ ,JG„a(,�1-%/% �r,,; '„ ,,, i, r rr ✓„ �i- ,/ �l; � �;.,,,i, s1,,, � rr „r'�' �� Ol�✓ ! �o,�/�llll ��ixr,,, (f��rr.,�,�, i u��,j�� ,u,i�,l/ r� �rw i7�, (��,. �'.l� � ��i////,, fj/ a t+l�r � ,,�� ?��,�� ,.,,� ✓ w'u"r r 1 � w( r /�l' w r ; fir" oiy�V,rti,�;' r J 4 a. rv�/ �� ,✓ ,, ,� �, J /� l;/{ -rr��'''� ,� ,rani �/ii i�I, � Q % r, l° �,i. ;:;i'' �' � ,�1�� r/��1%r//0 ,�i rh. �� j ,;� �ri� � �//�i r/��:r!�� ✓ �r�i,. i �% ;� ;,;:h �" � �1.. l ✓,F(�f(x�tl :,I,; r° '°,�, lLr �� 'a'✓ ( �r y p„,,� � r % „ i� /,.!4�,iv 6 u., _,y�r „✓, ,.. I, �' r /r �.� „ w, ..!'. ,�r, / ,ixv, ° ,,,";ti"s ,�ii/ ' y ..' �!r:�l !��I i��l//I L J��'� r�/��// ;{( rjJ;; j�� „,� , � rl� ,� ,u; ;r � ((„ , „ �� u '�„!'� /✓ �� r/�� V �sl�/ %� i f�,��,f o/'? d �1 �P, � 9� � r d� r , „�r�+✓( � � ✓111;'�i� rij��r✓Yti Ise N �,9� %�1 ��,r� r :t�fr ��q'irl �i,��%b"�, Mr qi 'i ;.r��i i, ,r % �;,�� J% r�� j� ❑Yn I; ii 41 m iI P ;� h,., �( - ,w ,a: I r..d, J'' ivd; y � ' iu � �< iir �,aJ�� iu�.., �� /r✓ii ,Y� //f �J Y r�l� r i� ��° r r�u;'.�/l//yr+l�w� dflli�� (,i'�� ✓l (� r ��, r°� l�; wf*�f� „ ( � `' r "/ �l `iiw, tiP�; ;r��ll�+l 0 a i�, (l( P r 'Z�", 197r'�,,,✓r! ��'" r�r iii/, I i^i.� OOa �r J/�a /r// ;'i, : l %`,',. .( Nl y./u t/ry-%%I'� '�hr,✓:� 7%r %� ., J;,y ��1� �, i;; 0 r,. r s f J ,,,?,r% ill Y�% r `J rr; ��l/ %'f �fI✓; ii,r, I/rr,�,� G,� r/ ��%/ J4 Ia/��, /r/�a'' wll r' ° �.. s;7wl..t�.fir' .11 � a(„y rr,/ lll(;': fir,✓,� -J f;. r�;G viJ �Ja W°.%��(r� f re > U�/ ,iv�� ✓if)lni ,,,i ,,r^ �!rs /l / /.J >� r:.f s, � �G% /,,� % �'�/% ��l iU✓1 t�li�" llirrl;� w ,r,j Jr� f �� l I%; I I Irr / lif/!, /l % ✓i a ,f - r O I✓ �jf l;�% � � p i �/�' r r �( I I�/ �i��/i 11�XN l Q. �c I / r sip � 'f '� �v�� 1 : ., �,w, �i �; si/� � ✓''Jr� A� �/�///�.�� fill� CL - ,, it ,r /� lit / � ' ��t!s r�� ✓�,, �, �� r i�� /%��/ ,�,, � �,a � , v w, ��. %J�% ��,„�,,. r ✓l lin,f, � �,r.''/ ,� PC /% 1 tl � i, ((��'�, ��.s. � � � ,h q iKYJ'ff � �,U,y V r 1, I E "' � >i.� a1 'l,/y;rir< r„ ,�', r ,1�/,�� . :,�+I%�„i�(ri�`u/./„��fic;l�( ,1l% Jr�(wv,�o� �'a; 1/� J /,•�`'J�r//�i �1/%/� r ri J,li %, J �a�k,�s. ;,r �% �� ,✓�', I/�/i'Q/ y�% � �i%l//la,�� /r/ 10 r d j ,,,r%„ r /i i /✓l r ��r � � ,�1, �i�lr,,r ✓, �l/ ,�/Tr r// e i �s�'s,� ( �i%//,%i/,/ �' l� l'kY%`r �' '�it. i✓ t; :j l Nr��,�a, l q ..�( ,,,�,, s%;r��, �>, r // r �.�, a ✓r C r�... ? ar ✓.all ��1 p,rG, �, ' ,,�l,, €„,,, ,t 4 I h i', ,/%i F/ i, �1 %„ i o„„r ,/ ,,, D r �l �rl � �r n�,l ��,1/0 /'�r ,,, y! , rrrj✓ � ,� !�+1� ;; i 1 , , ��lrGv/� „e�, � (D I%//� J% :, lir ,� i L Y �� r l'�� of fr , 10Yf,Wi.l��%, r r ��f'1i,/i'„; ��i///i r /Jnl✓r%✓'' r; wmw �1� ri/ M o 1,,,, 'ate,, - ,,;' EsrIHERE,Ga�emin' (c).OpenStreetMap,co�ntnbutors Copyright nearmap, , z ,;' 1 r r✓ors��.ri ,r ,grr/D' si �;lll�/!1'x, YI,"'l/ iN!p';, - r +aoraJil,a 201 a CLIENT: TITLE: oCBBEL# 15-0489.00015 0 Kimley�>>Horn NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY DATE: 6/2/2021 z a z DSGN. SCALE: 1"=150' CHRISTOPHER B.BURKE Engineering, Ltd. DWN. KEK USER: kkopija ffB9575 W. Higgins Road,Suite 600, Rosemont, Illinois 60018(847)823-0500 CHKD. TJK PLOT DATE: 6/4/2021 Packet Pg. 183 it FILE NAME: 150489.00015_NWI NOTE:TAKEN FROM THE LAKE COUNTY WETLAND INVENTORY(LCWI),VERNON TOWNSHIP(2002) 2.1.b ee, 1 inch= 150 feet . Legend NON WETLANC WETLAND 9I�� r�91��Y �J)Jin`if rrr Y'r , �� rill N i,�� rV /�,;',✓ � aJ„ l �-,,. � � r/'/�� Pr/�lyr�//rn, �/r�,v/9 ,��lJ�tr�i, � //� ,,,✓� r,✓ 1��,�;. ;yr � r � I � ,,,;%r %/r/ij r.,u��,'///;�„- r j/ih'��,,,,,,a - "� ''I �l; a � I ) rr,<I✓/ ,ani yr�ArcR ✓ r�✓ �r /� ,.', r/ rir 1/�/i�r<l9/ii ��'i/ / w G„ ,,r;ll,r / , i r�i /� ��///�%l/! r , �/� �; rlr,g„�r/✓J,�i 3; fl/r-"� ff ' �/ �i%l � , �✓ �r I//r��//��/�� r °),, c-„ �J1;" / �✓',r/ �r/i/ "' ✓ r ,rr/r /�r! l� r /i +;�i'rr/m�.. ��"N� LO LA �,�j rrr ��YY��// + UI G „- ✓ rl v i r r /Y� r l�ilJ/'rrr//I / O r';.,f//� ;�trf cr✓%.. 1. 1„ ��l�,r', v 1 m, /fjr�'/ P r` �� /! .,��%(/ r �'lrrfJ�r/��,'/,/�/%(rar `� tp ` s r ,r 'JJ ,<,�' ' �pi�Yyr l-: fljf'"" ,r' �' hC�% � ��m//r r% - �l✓��fr/rr/, � r�i f,,;: ++ li/l c , did, 7�rr ✓rr✓�i"�! it ii ` 1.' STUDY ' "/li ,r � rr 1 ' yi.j ! !"„ e. rrr r lr✓�l�f� �� f�'. I rri � i%. 1✓! l,% '' � r ,r1 rir„r , ,� a �l,/�� ,�%, �'%�°%% rl� mi.. I / r �/�1,1;G, c �� rr �11 , ��,/ �i lirir, �// o�� ❑r r r � 1 r,!r,.�rl„/� ,,rY+ /( �.; a /!�1�rr /r �� ✓drri,/� � r „r<, rif ll r, irl !/// llirr�� r, „/ r, ✓ / �, i, / r �1 rr / G, r%r ' `, �` y ;r ,�r,;; ,,< rr r, ;- ),arr f �dJ l,f� rr � '� ei /r � ,,ifv�r// r r; ✓ar/ r �,-�� .ram � ,C ,,,u '/��l� r, m' , /�J y D', % �%(�� ✓/�% �/ O /,- ,;� /� /' /;� 7 �;,' '/ �, ��/�,rfi rri;f �' rrr��✓%t m�� r � �SJ�fa /�j i � r r, /100 'i f, i ,r, ✓ i'--%l,�i l�/i�i'/ rJr I r /iiiG / '�;l / u , ' r � ,,ii , �'� � /� � l � r ��0.1 r r!r r �/ L, r�� 7��v ri ' � p r it %; r // I ri/, y%/ 1 � // MR. < �c f / t a�<i O�o� �r f +. / d m r / � ' ✓m /ai ✓ � ro r� , r'j� / l/� '„ /ri//� t i, >�'' %i:; rr;l �✓ , �9//r � w'l/l�J�d,,��,M' e�"' J f�� ;i arc i�Vr ��Jr/ ,r't'� ��i d r JI — f�!' x-, a. a. T i�r� 'T' r,r rm� i / �� ✓ rr I r�fyr` / N s /rill jP� ✓( r i�/ i,r; � r� G�'�i� � r'i1f, I� r i �/ /�! �� O i., / A.` I � r/', V-,.;� ir:f,% �.,,.Il� ,,� r „r;' jrr�'��/ ,:%✓r ,�r��%�� k +�� r ✓��)l>iva �V ' , ,, nr< r' -11�1�� '��i 1 /r/r' 1<,, ili�l r�fti�l,'r � �� r< /N,%� 'r. 11 i 1 > O CL CL / � r D�,. F, 1 �,�+, w N <,I ,'li ✓f r r ��'� �� I ) I' 1 ! //'j r slr( ��i// �%i,-,%. fl�lr r/„ ✓r I II II/ .iiJP I a� ` ' ;�/ r yo; f„J�n / I� �r�' %/� '� r� � 1 r r r, ✓r� �i, J �f '!d I V. '1' % /�i ✓i/��'�alg/// 'f ��, pp � O — )� ri � �r,., ,,,, r� // roo<, fl //��il� r r l f� ✓ G1 � ra:::;�,r s,,,.:, '„ ,: o rrr. ✓ ,,,„<,r �, „"; r nam / mrrrlr,�W raJ Nil/,:;i « l ,..,i�I �i ,�NI/ ' /ilia ,r ii,' ,< ,,, !�: ,,, -,..rrr ;rr �' <mi y//'i ,%rir //,//ir ✓l� r„ '� r r, ;' rv)rri �r �, �%r!� ✓i/,r !..r;,; ii/' � r ///raj /!/r1/� �I,.. �'�, �,1�� r a ` �r,. �i �! ��%; � /, vi � !�� Iv°� �� //r'r✓✓ �,1,` «;. m�, I;r�.. //� �,., iii � r�/,^I�il��ji �iv .� C o,'�� r j s,Jl %, <,�/,^rW r,;; :' ',� wr � ✓/ r�/�,i r/ n s �/ � //�i/�/� 'iP�<r %,,, /i r, r,l �VJ✓ l ��frr / %/// /ai EL� r ✓r °u � r l I�#� �ir / r rrr r /�✓/i/ r r ua'° it ++ l; 1 0 r„ r, n'Y / , G I urr,a ,/r !V, ,, °�___.r�l ��j ,�� itl, r. >µ 1" -,r,� �.//, /.,i � ?., I ��.... rr,- ,.. ../ ,�' rr<, :; ,.... r c./,,,,r✓��✓/i�r/&�, �- !. D o r%�. 41 r kd'z IJI,1 �/ .a � frr,, µuro � r%r (0 ESrI, HERE,Ga�emin I(c)rOpenStreetMap co�ntrlbutorsrCopynght nearmap a CLIENT: TITLE: oCBBEL# 15-0489.00015 0 Kimley�>>Horn LAKE COUNTY WETLAND INVENTORY DATE: 6/2/2021 z a z DSGN. SCALE: 1"=150' CHRISTOPHER B.BURKE Engineering, Ltd. DWN. KEK USER: kkopija 9575 W. Higgins Road,Suite 600, Rosemont, Illinois 60018(847)823-0500 CHKD. TJK PLOT DATE: 6/4/2021 Packet Pg. 184 d FILE NAME: 159489.00915_LCWI Q NOTE:TAKEN FROM THE SOIL SURVEY OF LAKE COUNTY,ILLINOIS(2013) eer 1 inch= 150 feet LEGEND r'rlp/r// r////; r/ %/ ✓'' F, r r ,✓ i if/i/%i/;/ %% ///' � � /// y / Oi r� JJIf,�„✓l� 1/ /l/7 /f/II/ / , 146A- ELLIOTT SILT LOAM 153A- PELLA SILTY CLAY LOAM,HYDRIC u, �(" ��%y��//��III/iPf�J ��rr�l✓;% I I I' � i Jr�%u�or/ � 223B - VARNA SILT LOAM 531B - MARKHAM SILT LOAM 531C2 - MARKHAM SILT LOAM,ERODED �t At, II „, �Idl�irlu � lll�C0161f�1�1111�� //„ r /1 , J rr 11ri� J �iJ14s11J a, wk WIN;— , %% .� ri r„u1•�F r. I V '�'rr///�% �t r� ,°.::!1 F,,,`r/ ': ,,/, � � n ,..; NI�IW�� 11 ,p. '' Ni yj `� ;.,/��%r rlr�✓,J .,., °'U,% �... ,t ?'( 1�. "� ✓ 1r//r//r/1 /!r"./`��i/c rj r� ,r� N Ilf�a�yi/Yir �, � 9 � ��, ,- � ru,ncr2rrr,,li- ryp V11#( re ��"'—.,. � Y`✓�%� /�r'�%/,/v I+; 'o/r„y �' ,"� � ..%� rl/// /� -�%��/,1Y�/// //r��//'„„'ir'; �/(rr/✓,' ��I�L��{, r7 ,;,, i� ❑ u' /a > rr I/I Y� v ,,.e., � / /r%r%i/Y. ,,.a�P ( .,� „i; c .;r „/rh r✓ ...,� /, ..,ii� � G�.f�r�i ,//„r�, ,i ,.,, /� r r.,r r� i y� //,r,,, �, /D /1♦l rr; /1, /, / ,r�!r ,,,r, / fj Ir � d yl /,✓ .,. „�, , ,, a/a i .� ��,�ii, ,r'r n ,,//rr ,l . ,,/a f(/% /, ��/,i/ / %r>r „r, i, ,. f,,; 1r rl L>r,/�l�✓ y� l „� / „ ,; r, / ;,,,r,;u�/,/ r ,,✓„,,,�„� ,o o>/� /„�„ r /✓, i I,� r I i„ ;' J r, ,� v. 7. r,/.,rr,�r �/ Q/,./ r(,r, rt ;/ //� .„ r r ,,../ / ,/r��/ � ��a r , '/, ,.,.II %,; ..rrr ,, :r, r,... � ✓�r,11�i�rkVs;... //a�/ %r..:i 1 I / ,,;� r,,,r,,,, G, r r rY ly,,, ;,,,ri a,./ �rr�o ,,ir� A ,:�; � r 1 ! ., r ✓ / /Jlryyj,� ✓ , rr �r0i�,l i// /"''' ��ri��lY ,� //i�� « w r,� ✓auk + �',.% P 1 / ,r' g ,r.. ,l , r i sr�r, r/i✓a. / //i rrl r `'. rll>; ,llr/', I,,, /r(; -r ,MP..,. i r%r,r, ,,,,� � +E;-, ✓r^r�'<; ,� ✓ 'o` IY';r r i', r '/,r r, u �L r� / rijii��,` / v rr f � � vr; �� ra //� rr r lii r ' i N "" r9� ✓� /i / ✓ i/,^ I, %i/ y ,r, a.. n//;y � %'r� ,i✓r�'�1� 223B �r r/ t a��l� °� e= �r: �, �i/,� ,, � I'r, �'� — J d rYlHrl�r,l�� l� �; / ll,� /ri„ I; ;/ / �� a r, ltlf '�✓' � I, a. %'/��„ ��,I✓ r+, o,�: ! /,.. 1 /f}'i /irr //rim„ ,//i-� //a/ '' 9 , r r nii�'; >� �,� I7 10'1Y,�ni' ✓n III,, /,1�f dr � �/�,� /a�>.� �� m1WJ6'l� /j - ��i ;l l�t ✓ /::. r 4/; r � I " �� .V 7 r �' 1 tr��^ r�::� ,II rl �� , r: ,� Yf�r,,,�", r% ��r / � /� ❑%>�tr J/ y �w "_ ,.(////?!. I n , r r, 'N✓ ��„, �Y r) t ;��r`i! / /� l�'r,Y l%� r 'JI ,✓ ,f 'r. l �, 7 ��I, wry r %' --^ J! ;;. r u y r 1 �1�� ❑ r/�l�/> } ll„ r' ° 'I! /r-, �f! � '/ r I � r "l,P � �� '�' � V� ri}'' ��Or%!I U"�� ❑ d ftrl�/ r r I j✓I �/ AIN//r,�IWirr L"%b ,r Y" +w y /l �ri� � , , r ��/�,r, rr...d r �YJ l -. ra D","rv"i/ i�i/r/ !,z, // r�/.. ,/; ,1 f ,✓ , . /.. r 4 IIP ,,///f, I I //1r/�Ilf/��/ rr ��"�l✓'. � I ,< �»% ;%� � � 1i53A► I +,,,1 ;" � , llfi it j�� ,/. /�� o , "� /r ✓41 (e, �l f' /%,i ,; / /f % /rrr, 1 N ,,P'„ r �)� ,,, � � �, r,;r lli� rrr rr r�/,,. ,'I;��1.r, +t �, �• ��///�/�/�ri'r ,a /�i �In'� I�,. /; G J,� 1„' r�i/�✓/�l lY� /i/ °I I%✓/r '% � � �'��, ,a� � r�r/l' lP -r, ,r ,�(VI 1,,,, r, rrr' r, v �, � }�,,Jl`,,� r ,/ yl ✓,l V ,,;err�� r-Id, �� +r, ./ J: Y // I yi /r I✓ ,,d r� / r/. ,/ `r r• „� / 9� ko.� Y, '� >1 ,I GrIr��,w � �j�.;jj` ✓� ya ��rr ,,�,./, „/ ri�A „�r rl/ f�� ! ' m lr1 r/rn, f l i r c L CL CL ! % F✓ NIII�r, � lG� ,.,� r.% 0 / , I ;i �.;� , J�%r �rf�l/�r IW 1!!i $�� k ''°III FI%�, ( ,, ��r // ;'6r r ( '',u r r ' 'u` 1 (✓/ r I ljr ! 1„ P ,r�!f�r/- I i = 0 1 IIY r„ a �„„ r i, / r.V I �J/'ri�,, r r r l� ✓a r!� r, dory, 'fir / ', i, /iio //i 1„ J �'r°y r r;` ?, � n. ;., r,, c,,,v'�s ,�a r ,,, ,,:-, ,' ! rl... Y , rl,,m �/rr. i �(,rr, �/i�,rrs- �/;✓ II/,, ,/�. > /��l , r f � /�f„ r (�r , �k; // /- i r�. / I /,r��/✓i/�/i r )�I C o t , r�// r��i; ,r �n ��'a 1 la/ i; �I��In r r �" 1/v � �!!„ r ✓ %�f c%,, �c f�>�N,rr,,, m h!r ,,,r j �,/, ' '�1 �/�'J/ /�/e r,,,,1 ,� r r�..))A,�i;,r/ 1 r !'✓, " „✓ ,rr%/�/ / ✓f �} o (//r;r! i!„y' ,, a,0/D �1 Iff ru%Jrr; V(F If /P ✓i%;ri iir N V sri HERE Galrm n�'V c 'O� e E nStreetMa-f co`ntnbutorsCo"'ri"`ht near �a� y,'l,mrrircibii of //� r, =�`�' arm, ,,rrr r ii 201�5 �JIMTIly, (l�aiyp;'"L ,r a CLIENT: TITLE: oCBBEL# 15-0489.00015 0 Kimley�>>Horn SOIL SURVEY DATE: 6/2/2021 z Q z DSGN. SCALE: 1"=150' CHRISTOPHER B.BURKE Engineering, Ltd. DWN. KEK I I USER: kkopija 9575 W. Higgins Road,Suite 600, Rosemont, Illinois 60018(847)823-0500 CHKD. TJK PLOT DATE: 6/4/2021 Packet Pg. 185 d FILE NAME: 159489.00015_SOILS 2.1.b NOTE:TAKEN FROM THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY(USGS),WHEELING QUADRANGLE(1993) Fee+ 1 inch= 1,000 feet tE LO s„�,xr � ��,i f + " / % F l / � J � I f�% V '�� / I�l II JVVf➢( �/ fr 1 � + � �llil o � fir,/ I >Y /�� I f l/ � �, - �� 1 '''' �� I IN ❑ ' r i l' Ijllllli /n � I�, �'I/ �J`+, ".p I ,�rvH f ( �j�'I //�/,llff(,'�I�+ l�� /io, � � �" %l r / �r +. / ❑ O 4. M FL II i ijjal �larr�4;' III tl»�{pl, iaolil�i� � ll�uuulllll / nnnum /i 1 /i I, F E / JJ 0110fWI," .� L. CL CL / / 1 I J r o a r11 //11 uno /i i E a CLIENT: TITLE: NCBBEL# 15-0489.00015 Kirnley>MornUNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DATE: 6/2/2021 a Z i DSGN. SCALE: 1-1,000 CHRISTOPHER B.BURKE Engineering,Ltd. DWN. KEK USER: kk—ii. FIV 9575 W. Higgins Road,Suite 600, Rosemont,Illinois 60018(847)823-0500 CHKD. TJK PLOT DATE: 6/4/2021 packet Pg. 186 d FILE NAME 1150489.00015_USGS NOTE:TAKEN FROM THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP(FIRM),LAKE COUNTY AND INCORPORATED AREAS, 0 0 2.1.b ILLINOIS,MAP NUMBER 17097CO262K,EFFECTIVE DATE:SEPTEMBER 18,2013 Fee` 1 inch= 150 feet . Legend 100 YEAR FLOODPLAI(` FLOODWAY t.. !�� "" /%%G//a�%/ y I1�P,li-7"iMIiP��j ��!,/�/��( �j •r � %��1�' /n�t9�/ ��i/r ,,; � ,,,� i!.�� f'��;,,, /ti' 1 r�/�/l r��r� •/i "1° "/r�� j"/i ��I)��'1� Imai G1 ,,,,/ ,�� ,,.,,;.... ', ! :%, 0 ��fr "r„� I w"� II I i/ ,,y a�� ,,,ru/J�u1 f/ nir// lr �r%,��/��!i `., _, 0,' ��.�r J C l I✓ �, �dircR'�.. p,�. f ;/,'�„� l�"rr / ��. ,/�a,H,;i�y/1// /,r rt frir� �% �f' %�J,�r, � � �1p f%%%%:. /;�„/� ❑ STUDY /1/1// / f YY /, ,,,/ � ❑r /J //,r ,,;,, ,r ¢ r � .c d .�; ay ,i„✓l /i/ r� / � :/ I - ii,,.r� /�/ ,, ,,, r,,,_ ,.,. ,,.. ✓ ,.. .ji -:�- !. 1% ,a /...>/.,, /a, ,,.._,?r b !,,�, ,.,, „, // a„..� of f0 , O / ll �' r,/ !r!� / /r N�,f; // hl''' Y ,> ,,„� /,;�n , �,i�/, ✓„/�//r' r, „,d. i ,.ir... 1 // f,S; / %,,„r ✓.,N /'`n r''!� {.{{€, ;,,, ,,r� /1-,. �� i, �z.//r�a.:li'/ r,/�� ,//u�(% ,:. ,,,,, J/�/, ,�,,,,/r ou I ' "A AN I /lff. / ;,', /�f✓1 l� l a rrl, ,,tlll 4G,. �f' Li.o,,,, 4 f , r � ,.; ✓�,,T/��)r % ��h�� ff/f yww�,// ( Il/ ,; l„r,,, �iy�y�T', I r�,, ,,,r�l/' r� A l( a. d a. ,%r� �� r rr„ ,r,,."/ I (�,:✓F �//,.. ,,, rj::/ /?„� P �, T%ir ./a- ;�/ ,:.. r �,q,'-/ �4 ,.; ,✓/h` rh `.r ,' ,i;' �/,1,e �f � ✓/�/% oar// ,/�/ /�/ / /� o,/ II 1 � " f , r — 1. /G/ii9 '„�Fr""Y,,",, ;//, ,/9//, aof r. �.�✓ r �,l ""I wr�' e ur', !e' /,au%i� �4./* -,r, N/ r II d O v N d r , :, „' £ )iy i' r, e;,- rrf,;' ; � i, :� "rl %`,',. .( , Nl yyd r/ry-/!I'� '�>�',✓ 1.7Ir %a �.,�:. urr , /� I �, i;;. O r r rii�„ ',� �' '.r' r, a r „ ✓ / ?,!I r,rl; „ / � ,,,��1, ,al/,a��ra ,,,I f, / �, �� d > CL Q ' i ir A q ,,,",F' i�r O r a E rr , �� ,;! �, , ,r��i/' 1�: . :, �„��rYi,�/ /.;�/rr,I ,1ri /,/��,�� I;� f� � �/;r%ii// /ro •r /,,,.. J /i /el r r�! � fl �iVl✓r % ,(l� �1�rr,% e -% i u � �r,;r�/ " r, ,,/i%%%/ /, '�w,; ,y�' d m m v O %//,// � a l�, ,�f .. 1 l•, Y r,;; � l,r/r, q, r/r ,�,/ ,r;,'/'' i' /r ,,%��/ //,',r./�, n /o..r.. /i„ far,, EsrlHERE,Ga�emin I(c)/OpenStreetMaprco�ntnbutors Copyright nearmap a CLIENT: TITLE: oCBBEL# 15-0489.00015 0 Kimley�>>Horn FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP DATE: 6/2/2021 z Q z DSGN. SCALE: 1"=150' CHRISTOPHER B.BURKE Engineering, Ltd. DWN. KEK USER: kkopija 9575 W. Higgins Road,Suite 600, Rosemont, Illinois 60018(847)823-0500 CHKD. TJK PLOT DATE: 6/4/2021 packet Pg. 187 d FILE NAME: 150489.00015_FIRM 2.1.b NOTE:AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH TAKEN FROM NEARMAP,DATED:MARCH 12,2021 eel 1 inch= 150 feet . ��//��/j/ii � :�� (t(b1�AlT��1I / � r'r 'M i �^( � ,�..a%%l,,,,,, ✓i k r ^,. �r/ � i� ��,/)11J='�isi, �..�. G, vrAD ��%,,,,`��IItb971�1111hylJki��l�1Y1I1111Y,?� � a � �✓i / � ��r i�� ' 'D/„ 1��i ,,,1,�. �'wi61Y0i�1(�r, 14�'iJ��)��I ��Idf � � ' ;,- �'. ( �f6i,��L'�!��l��l�li�'(V�.I��U�q��VV�' ,,,,, „ r rir/rri✓/ � /r ✓ r y ,�/ I� / i u /��r � r//�i. ,.; ,., I/�, !�! -�✓ r,� ,:./,r- %/ti;� � r / rl �ii J /!Jfl / /.. � �l'II�i ./!r �J � �� 1��. ,..I � VNKPo`H�u �� 41 viPlrclirlrt�du nPrrnrrr��Jurcrc.. r / ,.�,_,.„rJ, ! � j/G✓.( �'r(. r I, I ��/r ,,, �! �1+�r r r° �/!f�(JG„n,,, ,,. 11 1�� G T /�� ", -� m ;o /�;,,;✓ 1;;;... r i lY/iJ��"�,,-,, !i/t ?;<�''�"If�GrJr o i ,�, � s 1 I. �/ � 1 � �/ J r ,,fir, -„ �..ly;-K,, ,M" , ; �. � fin, r 1 ;m /, � !/!r //r/r aii r /1 ( J �r°°��i,�/��J�/ , ❑ �r Oi,'.. / i. r /i 1f%/ ✓ !„ ,1� /�,,,�� i,, rf,r/��, / ':a ;: f� // ra/<..rJ r�� ,r / LA r �✓ ",,, ,;,�^r J%/I /,,!'/!; .� 4 "ill ,, � / ,;, � `n;�%'/ �rfl% �� r �� / O i �/�l%, 11 (r/ /�ir� ;:. �, '',�"r ii � !. i /l /r 9, ✓;/'/;�l/ �l��r�rr%lJlr�; ,,.` AREA J / ,r I!'r�r r�. c, ra r,;r r, ', ,r r,..rr/, /ri,� ,,,r� r,,,, ✓ ,„",,, r / �r J�ii/ „/ r /r N /�, .� ll/ ,./� / r, ✓/� ✓r�f�,1f ,, ,. � r, ,, r. ,o.:r, �..,. ,% o e „': ',,, ./ I n7,�,�l�.l,.. ,y/�f ,�/ ,,, f .r %,// >a ,,.,,a r,,,,,-, ✓ ,�1/ ,/ / r�� /, ri < )� ✓, � ,I °r� ruY is r,r 1� ,.ri // /,,r„ //// � ��l l �Ir'; it //,C .,,,I, ,/l ,� ,,, ', r r ..ir, l 1r r�Ulll/b�rrca a <, �. / ,i/l, rr ,/ „-, r ,,,:,, i /J�/r I/ ✓ /�/.; „f /,, :.�yidl ,/,6,/,�, :,� j' ,, r,r; a y r (��.. u,,, ? �/.r„ �� ;/fYi/„n<, ,� r Vjr��,l 1i //// ✓1�� i,r .r ,"rr, /;� hlf waY/ti /�✓J( /�M1'i„r/< /)Yl ri � r , ri/ sr� � ,,, /r, ,% , -,.��r ,v,;.� ! ,� r" ,,'� r 'n irc, lyi,,,%%rl�✓ rJ�.rr l��l;�� ,!;. r fl / ,`s %l ��` lJ// o„ ,�,� � i! ,� 1, % ,� ✓� ,r, �,,;,r,; m, ,� / �oLvr„� ��a,11 l//1//,r� �,%';�/�ii j,�r I/o i/lj' �r "� Jj�. ��!lf��jf i��Jl�� /I / r l i llii, �rr � ;N'��/� r/r ' � '��',, �! � �/ 'it ✓j'�k,/f,, ,,,, ,. �".,,,,/,�r�/i. 1�/,:.,,, iJ ,. r , ,/,... �i'-'..�✓,'" /i„ //,ji/ ;.o, 1, ..), y, �A �� /✓ r. r%/ �-,' //i f O 40 rt%/ .rrr, C, r✓, J doh 1G/i �iri,,/,r ri�>J /, i,,, ,�..I�1 �i�, ,r, ++ a. %„' ��j/il,; f � r �'//� �� I�� i✓ ' ��,1 ✓!/ ram, � n I�; ri �� ,�� C a IIII r q� ll/1 N �',. L /� l�; Jr��VY�,�� r"„��I// ✓r rJfil�� ,ii ' i,r/I%�� °y w; "1"il' � r �, e � r �� 14./U„ r lflr'� � -%,; !1/, ,( �r l�" � � "e„' N ,�d 1 � r ✓„�li « "/%i,J'I l �f"� ,�� r 1J/, '%j' �f��"< / rkg��l� idu rr�r„I 1.:r luF I it l'" R � l�� ✓ ��r/�i�/�� ❑ 1V',,; �Yr. �,, � � /✓� I „ ��,�� WETLAND 1��„ � ��, � r � / � �;' // � � /� r / i �/IY %�� :�''w i v,l ', rJf.t�ri/ i�n il,y� r�,. J� i ,/y, r � ///r F�, fr/i �✓i��rJr if I�lr�i �� / N D �,'r P� �y u,#�I 9, 1/' r,,„- (G �� rll ir/J'/ �, � rrl�ll4 ❑ '��J�fjj %! ulrr,///„ �( �, .r;�' u� i rf;'� ✓u' ,r / °�' /'o ✓ r;�ir'/i rJ,l d �rl r/l„r �rl, r�l i�� yi�h ��I � / � 1�� / 0. i ��% I;, 1� ��// /N,,, �i ✓ � �k( ry �� rri; ^ rr i / �, � r /l/�% ., I� � N r%/ i r �„�,: rJj Ir;; r✓Y„ '+t i1Juwj J. ,yl�� p �"d( �r � ,� � urr////f� /i/%r/:' I 4) O i ,,, � v. 6.;r,.. �. ,,, rrvr�l✓r /"'i r ,rl�i rrti��, �,� (;,-rl�, � � �✓'%i r' lr �f./� !' i /�� , air U ✓�)lnu„ li„:„ �4rr t 4 1rr� 4;-,oJ O CL Q- r // �V� p� i I Wr%✓ i / � h l r ,r lldd � �r�i / r� � G1 ;%r /% ,/,,l / ;r "'' i %�Ni�r ✓l2r r9 i J,;�l "�;;- �r „i: Y �� % r jl ��%��'/(w/ �"� � C ,l a r!, i er,,,..: 'l �u">"''�," ,J�,, ; , ohm r,, � � �, � /, (°, til ^i,✓;. / t yl 1 I „� l is �t�ii/ /rrr//i/l ri..- ,r,m,,,, E i Y ?r ,. %�i,. =.:,„„Cx ! r�� l� i,�-t„�iRl:,ri�„ ✓ /�/„/„//r ,�i ".,. , ,, ,,,.,��,/� IP 1 ��///r, �1��, � /r�i,L/;r „on„ rrr r l i r r,�/%r' l%///�' �� l ,°,r,Jil�✓,�', ��'r' � '� ,r�� :; ff j r //r, Jr,. j�°j v' it//%„ /�� re�� (, �l f.�l�� f ,r r„r ��m �/ �yF1YNf! ry ✓�I ,r; I ,.fir air/"�//..: 'r/, ,; �,,i ,l ,rr/%/I! ,,,,,r,r ��r � ;,'/ � '�, ,,,,,, ��d- "%', r '. ✓ ire'. ,1�� -�''f��%';" 11(�or �; rirr', %/lr>(�,. ,, �rz„i� � l� 1 L ^� U✓ 11: ��dr� / i � �i r u1 � �7i ��rrrf�� `I !�; d v (D o G�rrrir, o -��,!� /�� lr ,..:.; i /0/.,,/ rl I/I✓ „„ / �� YI l%,"r, � � �� r �'" �,, � �� Xl�;/„/," �/ ! ��/�r r,/O� !l�� /r/ fir,, 1 rwm��%11 r /�i ESrI, HERE,Gar,min' (c)/OpenStreetMap contnbuto,'rs//Copyright nearmap 1-'r r ror��r./i r rrrrrrp' !i i;,r. Dr r L' iN!T,, r �+aoraJili rc �,r�rr, ��N�., i a CLIENT: TITLE: APPROXIMATE CBBEL# 15-0489.00015 oi � o DATE: 6/2/2021 z WETLAND DELINEATION Q z DSGN. SCALE: 1"=150' CHRISTOPHER B.BURKE Engineering, Ltd. DWN. KEK USER: kkopija 47 ffB9575 W. Higgins Road,Suite 600, Rosemont, Illinois 60018(847)823-0500 CHKD. TJK PLOT DATE: 6/7/2021 packet F 188 d FILE NAME: 150489.00015_AWD 2.1.b a� a� a� ❑ LO 0 d ca 0 w L ca otS w 0 41 a c �a a E a vi ❑ M a ai c O N 0) O R O Q. CL Q G1 N C 0 U d c �o a c m �a Q B �� Packet Pg. 189 2.1.b SITE:Wetland 1 LOCALE:Buffalo Grove BY:T.Kehoe CONSERVATISM- BASED ADDITIONAL METRICS METRICS y G1 MEAN C SPECIES RICHNESS ❑ (NATIVE SPECIES) 2.09 (ALL) 32 O MEAN C SPECIES RICHNESS to (ALL SPECIES) 1.44 (NATIVE) 22 MEAN C (NATIVE TREES) 0.33 %NON-NATIVE 0.31 > d MEAN C WET INDICATOR ❑ (NATIVE SHRUBS) 2.50 (ALL) -0.41 f0 MEAN C C (NATIVE WET INDICATOR w HERBACEOUS) 2.33 (NATIVE) -0.36 L FQAI %HYDROPHYTE (NATIVE SPECIES) 9.81 (MIDWEST) 0.84 p2S FQAI %NATIVE (ALL SPECIES) 8.13 PERENNIAL 0.59 ADJUSTED FQAI 17.34 %NATIVE ANNUAL 0.09 3 C VALUE 0 0.44 %ANNUAL 0.13 w %C VALUE 1-3 0.38 %PERENNIAL 0.84 O %C VALUE 4-6 0.19 +' %C VALUE 7-10 0.00 a c M a SPECIES NAME MIDWEST WET E SPECIES (NWPL/ SPECIES COMMON WET NC-NE WET INDICATOR .L ACRONYM MOHLENBROCK) (SYNONYM) NAME C VALUE INDICATOR INDICATOR (NUMERIC) HABIT DURATION NATIVITY d Acer negundo var. N aceneg Acer negundo violaceum Ash-Leaf Maple 0 FAC FAC 0 Tree Perennial Native Acer ❑ acesai Acer saccharinum saccharinum Silver Maple 1 FACW FACW -1 Tree Perennial Native d ALLIARIA allpet Alliaria petiolata PETIOLATA Garlic-Mustard 0 FAC FACU 0 Forb Biennial Adventive d ALNUS ainglu Alnus glutinosa GLUTINOSA European Alder 0 FACW FACW -1 Tree Perennial Adventive O N Bidens 0) bidfro Bidens frondosa frondosa Devil's-Pitchfork 1 FACW FACW -1 Forb Annual Native Carex cxcris Carex cristatella cristatella Crested Sedge 4 FACW FACW -1 Sedge Perennial Native O Carex ; cxvulp Carex vulpinoidea vulpinoidea Common Fox Sedge 2 FACW OBL -1 Sedge Perennial Native O Corpus L stolonifera; CL CL Cornus Q baileyi; L Cornus G1 corsto Cornus alba sericea Red Osier 5 FACW FACW -1 Shrub Perennial Native Cornus = corrac Corpus racemosa racemosa Gray Dogwood 1 FAC FAC 0 Shrub Perennial Native O Echinochloa crus- Echinochloa Large Barnyard U echcru galli crusgalli Grass 0 FACW FAC -1 Grass Annual Native r. Epilobium Epilobium Purple-Leaf epicol coloratura coloratura Willowherb 3 OBL OBL -2 Forb Perennial Native 4) Galium galapa Galium aparine spurium Sticky-Willy 0 FACU FACU 1 Forb Annual Native t0 Geum d geucan Geum canadense canadense White Avens 1 FAC FAC 0 Forb Perennial Native Hydrophyllu +' Hydrophyllum m O O hydvir virginianum virginianum Shawnee-Salad 5 FAC FAC 0 Forb Perennial Native LONICERA L lontat Lonicera tatarica TATARICA Twinsisters 0 FACU FACU 1 Shrub Perennial Adventive Lysimachia LYSIMACHIA Q lysnum nummularia NUMMULARIA Creeping-Jenny 0 FACW FACW -1 Forb Perennial Adventive LYTH RU M lytsal Lythrum salicaria SALICARIA Purple Loosestrife 0 OBL OBL -2 Forb Perennial Adventive Packet Pg. 190 2.1.b MORUS ALBA VAR. moralb Morus alba TATARICA White Mulberry 0 FAC FACU 0 Tree Perennial Adventive Parthenociss Parthenocissus us parqui quinquefolia quinquefolia Virginia-Creeper 4 FACU FACU 1 Vine Perennial Native POLYGONUM polper Persicaria maculosa PERSICARIA Lady's-Thumb 0 FACW FAC -1 Forb Annual Adventive PHALARIS Phalaris ARUNDINACE phaaru arundinacea A Reed Canary Grass 0 FACW FACW -1 Grass Perennial Adventive y Phragmites Q australis ssp. Phragmites PHRAUSM americanus americanus Common Reed 3 FACW FACW -1 Grass Perennial Native Populus Eastern Lf) O popdel Populus deltoides deltoides Cottonwood 0 FAC FAC 0 Tree Perennial Native to RHAMNUS European T_ rhacat Rhamnus cathartica CATHARTICA Buckthorn 0 FAC FAC 0 Shrub Perennial Adventive *' Ribes Missouri > rib mis Ribes missouriense missouriense Gooseberry 2 UPL UPL 2 Shrub Perennial Native d Rudbeckia Green-Head ❑ rudlac Rudbeckia laciniata laciniata Coneflower 4 FACW FACW -1 Forb Perennial Native f0 salint Salix interior Salix interior Sandbar Willow 2 FACW FACW -1 Shrub Perennial Native L SOLANUM Climbing w soldul Solarium dulcamara DULCAMARA Nightshade 0 FAC FAC 0 Vine Perennial Adventive L Solidago (C solalt Solidago altissima altissima Tall Goldenrod 1 FACU FACU 1 Forb Perennial Native > Toxicodendron Rhus p2j rhurad radicans radicans Eastern Poison-Ivy 2 FAC FAC 0 Vine Perennial Native Verbena 3 verhas Verbena hastata hastata Sim pler's-Joy 4 FACW FACW -1 Forb Perennial Native w Vitis riparia O vitrip Vitis riparia var.syrticola River-Bank Grape 1 FACW FAC -1 Vine Perennial Native +' t0 a c M FL E L a vi ❑ a ai c O N 0) O R O L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c co a c m �a Q Packet Pg. 191 2.1.b APPENDIX ............. S1,,,,,I1,,,.E PHo rOGRAPI,,,,I S a� a� a� ❑ LO 0 d ca 0 w L ca otS w 0 41 a c �a a E a vi ❑ M a ai c O N 0) O R O Q. CL Q G1 N C 0 U d c �o a c m �a Q C Packet Pg. 192 2.1.b G1 a� ❑ LO W y, IeP 0 � OWk ✓,fir x �� W r ry g u v M " i E �m O 41 PHOTO 1. Wetland 1 - looking south (Data point 1A in center) a E N a. a i N G1 O J � L Q W " Q , > cq jai a O ' g f pp 6Po i ww 41 h � a PHOTO 2. Wetland 1 - looking southwest(Data point 1 B in background) _ m E t �a Client: Kimley-Horn Q CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. Project: 16051 Deerfield Parkway, Buffalo Grove,IL 9575 W Higgins Road,Suite 600 Rosemont, Illinois 60018 Tel(847)823-0500 Fax(847)823-0520 Date: May 27,2021 Exhibit 8 Packet Pg. 193 2.1.b a� a� a� ❑ LO 0 0 d ca 0 w L ca otS w O 0 a c �a a E a vi ❑ M a ai c O N 0) O O Q. CL Q G1 N C 0 U d c �o a c �a Q D Packet Pg. 194 2.1.b WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region Project/Site Deerfield Parkway Property City/County: Buffalo Grove/Lake Sampling Date: 05/27/2021 Applicant/Owner: Kimley-Horn State: IL Sampling Point: 1A Investigator(s): Thomas Kehoe Section,Township, Range: Section 28, T43N, R11E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): depresional Local relief(concave, convex, none): concave Slope(%): Lat: 42.1692 Long: -87.9469 Datum: WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name Pella silty clay loam VWI Classification: not applicable aD Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) aa) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" in Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes c SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetlani Y Wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: ca L Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) W L to 06 VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. 3 Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet w Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species � 1 Acer saccharinum 60 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 7 (A) M 2 Po ulus deltoides 40 Y FAC a p Total Number of Dominant � 3 Species Across all Strata: 7 (B) to 4 Percent of Dominant Species d 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 100 =Total Cover a Saplinq/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartics 20 Y FAC Total %Cover of: N 2 Alnus glutinosa 10 Y FACW OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 0 3 Cornus racemosa 10 Y FACW FACW species 120 x 2= 240 a 4 FAC species 60 x 3= 180 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 40 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 y Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 180 (A) 420 (B) W 1 Lysimachia nummularia 40 Y FACW Prevalence Index= B/A= 2.33 0 2 > 0 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: L- CL 4 _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation CL Q 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is 153.0" N 7 Morphogical adaptations'(provide C 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a U 9 _separate sheet) rt, 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' fn 40 =Total Cover (explain) to Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be d 1 Vitis riparia 20 Y FACW present,unless disturbed or problematic +' c 2 Hydrophytic 20 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Q US Amy Corps of Engineers Mid Packet Pg. 195 2.1.b SOIL Sampling Point: 1A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-20 10YR 2/1 90 5YR 5/8 10 C PL silty clay loam a� a� a� ❑ ul 0 *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. *Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix d Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _Histisol (Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) _Histic Epipedon (A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) `~ L Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) > _Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _2 cm Muck(A10) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Other(explain in remarks) _Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) w _Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand 1 _Sand Muck Mineral S1 X Redox Depressions F8 hydrology must be resent, unless disturbed or M Y Y ( ) p O Y 9Y P a _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): �a M Type: Hydric soil present? Y E Depth(inches): a� L Remarks: a N ❑ a HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: N Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) W Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(136) O High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(1314) Drainage Patterns(1310) R Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) > O X Water Marks(131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Q. Sediment Deposits(132) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Q- Drift Deposits(133) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) a L Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(135) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) y Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) Thin Muck Surface(C7) p X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _Gauge or Well Data(D9) V 7—Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: y Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No Depth(inches): hydrology a Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): present? Y (includes capillary fringe) m Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: t v �a Remarks: Q US Army Corps of Engineers Midwe Packet Pg. 196 2.1.b WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region Project/Site Deerfield Parkway Property City/County: Buffalo Grove/Lake Sampling Date: 05/27/2021 Applicant/Owner: Kimley-Horn State: IL Sampling Point: 1B Investigator(s): Thomas Kehoe Section,Township, Range: Section 28, T43N, R11E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief(concave, convex, none): concave Slope(%): Lat: 42.1688 Long: -87.9469 Datum: WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name Pella silty clay loam VWI Classification: not applicable aD Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) aa) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" in Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes c SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetlani N Wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: ca L Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) W L to 06 VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. 3 Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet w Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species � 1 Acer negundo 60 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) M a 2 Total Number of Dominant C 3 Species Across all Strata: 5 (B) to 4 Percent of Dominant Species d 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 80.00% (A/B) 60 =Total Cover L a Saplinq/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartics 70 Y FAC Total %Cover of: N 2 Lonicera tatarica 30 Y FACU OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 0 3 FACW species 100 x 2= 200 a 4 FAC species 70 x 3= 210 5 FACU species 30 x 4= 120 0 100 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 y Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 200 (A) 530 (B) W 1 Alliaria petiolata 40 Y FACW Prevalence Index= B/A= 2.65 0 2 > 0 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: L- CL 4 _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation CL Q 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is 153.0" N 7 Morphogical adaptations'(provide C 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a U 9 _separate sheet) rt, 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' fn 40 =Total Cover (explain) to Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be d 1 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 20 Y FAC present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 20 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Q US Amy Corps of Engineers Mid Packet Pg. 197 2.1.b SOIL Sampling Point: 1B Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-11 10YR 4/1 100 silt loam 11-20 2.5Y 5/4 100 silty clay loam a� a� a� ❑ ul 0 *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. *Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix d Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _Histisol (Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) _Histic Epipedon (A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) `~ L Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) > _Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _2 cm Muck(A10) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Other(explain in remarks) _Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) w _Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand 1 _Sand Muck Mineral S1 Redox Depressions F8 hydrology must be resent, unless disturbed or M Y Y ( ) p O Y 9Y P a _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): �a M Type: Hydric soil present? N E Depth(inches): a� L Remarks: a N ❑ a HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: N Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) W Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(136) O High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(1314) Drainage Patterns(1310) R Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) > O Water Marks(131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Q. Sediment Deposits(132) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Q- Drift Deposits(133) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) a L Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(135) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) y Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) Thin Muck Surface(C7) p Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _Gauge or Well Data(D9) V Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: y Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No Depth(inches): hydrology a Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): present? N (includes capillary fringe) m Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: t v �a Remarks: Q US Army Corps of Engineers Midwe Packet Pg. 198 A9 3Ltl0 SNDISN3N 'mN MLL LL/BZ/Dl S1N3PNDD 3DYT1N � _ IJ i�r aiISIHX3 JNIN2jni sa'a xe'd;exd�zw 1i�fl2il 32i1� AIiWv3 -4 AiiInW _ tlJtiH�(c1(d�tul� x ® 3AMJD mv33ns zw � U w m H1210N K W Z iaw Q K ________________________________ I I I I I I I I Sp89 3�3 I I P6C9 add I I I 11 N(1 DZ ATJOISZ I I 11Nft Dz-A801SZ I it i £3�N301S3?J i i h3�N301S32i it - - ------ ------ - ---I --- - ------ ------ - -- AVM SNIAUVW I I I a I w z ,a -- ------- - - ------ K m W I I I - � S FL9 add I I I I 11NI1pE naolez 'I I 9 3DN30IS321 I g I I W w I Vow I W'�1O IIIIIIII I I 0.—:� SLL9-add I / I I I 1INn DZ AbDLSZ I ------ - - ------- --' I I _I I it - ------ = I I ,w - - I I g I i sLLe-ddd '; I LnulDz-Aaoiez '. '.I I -�-i .� I L 3�N30IS321 I � I I I aza t�O m m U m Z (n � Q m Z � QQ I V -fib I i ao° NA I I IMF I �p� I s sassso- m -- AVM14UVd Ol31dN33d Qz , oy wvPsery Pn emx mP w uwu 1mVIM ea PP ae vPPeeeev Pm.mx veP a�muw Pn mnmvnwm w wY1P xemmev mm ro nmiP w rm P emw w ae u wN ml e e o�,�Ya xll-.4,IM'K Z oW My wNOlm.vrWL w o'pVaYrPNMnlaugyiwt\"qpb\r�uWy�:mu�yD:ww 1— 2.1.b aD a� a� G October 28t", 2021 c Ms. Rati Akash > Village of Buffalo Grove o Fifty-One Raupp Blvd L Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 ,o L ca RE. 16051 Deerfield ParkwayotS BuffaloMZ rove Multi-Family vl ProposedImprovements ' Fire Department Reviewo 41 M Dear Ms. Akash: a c �a We have reviewed the site plan in more detail and softened curve radii in order to promote ease of a fire truck access to the extents possible. An AutoTurn exhibit has been prepared dated 10/28/2021 E and is enclosed for review. L a Please note that the aforementioned software is generally conservative and there are no instances vi shown where the fire truck path extends beyond the pavement into the landscaped or parking areas. p Additionally, site plan revisions required by Planning and Engineering have been addressed in this a latest submittal and standards identified in the Village Ordinance are being met regarding driveway widths and pavement radii. Lastly, the geometry for the access along Deerfield Parkway has been 0 reviewed and approved by the Lake County DOT. 0 Thank you for your time -we look forward to future discussions. Please reach out if you have any initial comments or questions. o a a Q Sincerely, .y C C Ryan Martin a Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ; Phone: 331-425-8039 m Email: ryan.martin(cD-kimley-horn.com E t �a Q ICI �I�I Ill�i � �� - ® '®.• . . . AM 7 Packet Pg. 200 2.1.b REQUEST FOR SIGN VARIANCES FOR 16051 DEERFIELD PARKWAY Applicant is requesting the following variances from the provisions of the Buffalo Grove a Sign Code: as 0 1. A variance from the requirements of Section 14.16.010B to permit a double-faced monument sign not exceeding 60 square feet in area on each side thereof, in lieu of the to required 32 square feet area requirement. 2. A variance from the requirements of Section 14.16.060 E to permit a ground sign to be > located approximately 2 feet from the public right of way in the front yard setback area. L O The requested variances are being sought because the location of the subject property on a L heavily traveled road such as Deerfield Parkway and in proximity to the Commonwealth Eddison > right of way lines, would render a sign in compliance with the size and location requirements permitted under the Buffalo Grove Sign Code ineffective to provide visible and adequate identification of the subject property, thereby imposing an unnecessary hardship on Applicant. o Furthermore, the granting of the requested variances will not be materially detrimental to the o property owners in the vicinity subject property as the size and location of the proposed sign is in a keeping with similar signs in the vicinity of the subject property. The conditions justifying Applicant's request are unusual based upon the unique situation a involving the Commonwealth Eddison lines and are not generally applicable to other properties E in the Village. The granting of the variances will also not be contrary to the purpose of the a Buffalo Grove Sign Code, Section 14.04.020 of which specifically recognizes the need for adequate business identification and advertising of communication and further authorizes the use v� of signs visible from public rights of way, particularly allowing and promoting optimum conditions for meeting the sign user's needs so long as they are compatible with their a surroundings and are properly designed. o N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c M a c �a Q Packet Pg. 201 2.1.b RESPONSE TO STANDARDS IN REQUEST FOR VARIATIONS FOR 16051 Deerfield Pkwv Applicant is requesting the following variances from the provisions of the Buffalo GrovetE a Zoning Ordinance: as ❑ a. Variation to Section 17.20 allowing for private streets as depicted on the plans submitted. LO b. Variation to Section 17.28 reducing the required perimeter setback as depicted on the plans to submitted. c. Variation to Section 17.28 reducing the minimum building separations as depicted on the d plans submitted. d. Variation to Section 17.40.050 decreasing the minimum front yard, interior side yard, c corner side yard and rear yard setbacks as depicted on the plans submitted. L �a All of the foregoing variations essentially seek relief from the bulk regulations of the Zoning Ordinance to accommodate the proposed plan. Specifically, Applicant addresses the required Standards for such variations as follows: o 41 M 1. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; a c �a The size and the configuration of the subject property, and the location of the a Commonwealth Edison right-of-way thereon, prevent the subject property from being developed E in an economically feasible manner unless variations are granted with regard to a number of bulk a regulations in order to allow the location of the propped multi-family buildings at the requested density. Specifically with respect to the request for private streets, if the setbacks and rights of v� way for dedicated streets were to be maintained, the developable area of the property would be ❑ reduced such that the property could not be developed as proposed. The size and configuration of a the subject property and the existence of the Commonwealth Edison right-of-way are unique c circumstances to the subject property and are not generally applicable to other properties in the N Village. 0 2. The proposed variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; 'o L Q The proposed variations will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. If the a requested variations are granted, Applicant will be able to develop the property at a proposed density of 3.36 DU. The essential character of the neighborhood is commercial and industrial with some multi-family residential located on the north side of Deerfield Parkway in the Windbrooke 0 U Crossing Development. Applicant's proposed density will be comparable to, and in fact less than, , the density of the Windbrooke Crossing Development, which is 3.87 DU. in c �o 3. There are practical difficulties or particular hardships in carrying out the strict letter a of this Chapter which difficulties or hardships have not been created by the person presently having an interest in the property; and, E �a The subject property cannot be developed pursuant to the proposed site plan with the Q density required to achieve economic viability without the granting of the requested Packet Pg. 202 2.1.b variations. This is a result of practical difficulties with respect to the size and configuration of the subject property and the location of the Commonwealth Edison right-of-way. None of these conditions have not been created by Applicant. aD 4. The proposed variation will not be detrimental to the public health safety and welfare. as 0 Inasmuch the proposed variations would result in a development which is both L, comparable and complementary to other properties in the vicinity of the of the subject property, to and particularly that of the only other multi-family development in close proximity, namely Windbrooke Crossing, the proposed variations will not be detrimental to the public health, > safely, and welfare. �a L O W L M W O ++ M a c �a a E L a vi 0 a ai c O N G1 O R O L Q Q Q L .y C O U d c co a c m E �a Q Packet Pg. 203 Information Item :Workshop-Proposed Redevelopment of Town Center at Northwest Corner of Lake Cook Rd and McHenry Rd Recommendation of Action Both staff and the Developer are seeking the PZC'S thoughts and comments concerning the plan. Kensington Development Partners(Kensington)has entered into a contract to purchase and redevelop the existing 20-acre Town Center at northwest corner of Lake Cook Road and Route 83. On November 1st the Village Board approved a Memorandum of Understanding(MOU)with Kensington, which identified the plan,land uses, development,phasing,and financial obligations of a Redevelopment Agreement/RO/A. The K4{}U serves aa the framework for the overall plan. During the November 1st Board meeting, the Village Board also referred the project tothnP|anning&Zoning Commission for review. The property in currently improved with a 194,000 square foot Town Center commercial shopping center. The Kensington plan looks to redevelop the 20+ acre property with anew nationally recognized grocery store, retail, restaurants and luxury multi-family residential.The proposed projectimp|emontathevision that was established through the Buffalo Grove 2018 Lake Cook Corridor Market Study and Plan. ° Staff Memo (OC)CX) * Attachment A: Chapter 17.44.060B-5 Town Center Planned Zoning District (O{}CX) * Plan Set (POF) Trustee Liaison Staff Contact Johnson Nicole Woods, Community Development 3.A.1.a 71 VILA-AGE, OF MEMORANDUM DATE: December 10,2021 O O TO: Planning &Zoning Commission v m FROM: Nicole Woods, Director of Community Development J O L SUBJ ECT: Workshop-Proposed Kensington Redevelopment c L O U BACKGROUND y Kensington Development Partners (Kensington) has entered into a contract to purchase and 3 redevelop the existing 20-acre Town Center at northwest corner of Lake Cook Road and Route 83. In July 2020, Kensington went under contract with the Town Center owners to purchase the property. Z Since that time, Kensington and the Village have been refining the plan and negotiating a public- private partnership. On November 1st the Village Board approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Kensington, which identified the plan, land uses, development, phasing, and financial U obligations of a Redevelopment Agreement (RDA). The MOU serves as the framework for the overall 3 plan. During the November 15t Board meeting, the Village Board also referred the project to the 0 Planning & Zoning Commission for review. o The property is currently improved with a 194,000 Flo ; E square foot Town Center commercial shopping �' �u CL center. The Kensington's plan looks to redevelop > the 20+ acre property with a new nationally % 0 recognized grocery store, retail, restaurants and ail 6 luxury multi-family residential. The proposed tir O project implements the vision that was established �,,� � a through the Village's 2018 Lake Cook Corridor �i�';�'j1 o Market Study and Plan. CL O Prior tothe required public hearing, the developer is seeking comments from the PZC regarding their , plans. The following memorandum provides a brief � summary of the proposed project, the Lake Cook E Market Study and Plan, and next steps in the development process. The developer will provide the PZC with a more detailed presentation of their plan in February. y c d E t a Page 1 of 8 Packet Pg. 205 3.A.1.a LAKE COOK CORRIDOR MARKET STUDY AND PLAN The Town Center Shopping Center is located in the "western bookend" of the larger 475-acre Lake Cook Corridor. Generally bound by Arlington Heights Road, Old Checker Road, Buffalo Grove Road, IL c -83/McHenry Road and the Lake Cook Road, the Corridor is considered a significant asset to Buffalo Grove. It is home to commercial and office centers, residential developments, religious institutions, civic facilities, as well as parks and open space. All of these uses and development provide local c character and culture to the community. The Lake Cook Corridor also serves as an important gateway into Buffalo Grove as Lake Cook Road connects Buffalo Grove to local roads as well as to a larger Y regional network of expressways, highways, and roads. With approximately 40,000 vehicles traveling 00 on it per da Lake Cook is one the most utilized roads in the region. v p Y, g� m J Although the Corridor has historically served as an important source of revenue and vitality for the o Village, it has been facing several challenges over the past several years. Regional and national shifts in market, demographic, housing, lifestyle, and travel and consumption patterns have contributed to 0 the Corridor's outdated development. v N G1 In recognition of both the Corridor's significance and its challenges, Buffalo Grove kicked-off the Lake Cook Corridor Market Study and Plan project in 2016 to establish a long-term (15-20 year) vision for 0 the Corridor. The project's goal was to identify how the Village can best reposition the Lake Cook Corridor to optimize its growth potential to improve the community's identity, vitality, and fiscal a_ sustainability. 0 U c The resulting product, the Lake Cook Corridor Market Study and Plan (LCCP), represents a o community-driven vision and plan for the Corridor. It was a created through an intense public process that successfully achieved broad consensus in BG about the Corridor's future though engaging several hundred stakeholders via public meetings, workshops, open houses, and online surveys. In 2018, the E Buffalo Grove adopted the LCCP as component to the Village's Comprehensive Plan. o d The proposed Kensington Redevelopment project implements several elements of the LCCP. For the d purposes of the Planning and Zoning Commission's review of the project, these elements can be boiled down into two key themes. The first theme relates to the timing of the Kensington Redevelopment. LCCP outlines a general order of potential development projects based on market o CL demands and overall community priorities. Stage 1 includes the redevelopment of Town Center. As c Kensington's proposal is the first redevelopment project in the Corridor since LCCP's adoption, the a proposed project implements LCCP's recommended sequencing and thereby addresses the o community's top priority. Equally important, it will also serve as a catalyst for continued Y redevelopment throughout the Corridor. 0 The second theme relates to how the proposed project implements the LCCP's vision for the Town 0 E Center area. In exploring this theme, it is important to note that the LCCP is a framework plan, not a 0 specific development or construction plan. Imagery and plans featured in the LCCP were meant to provide examples and ideas of how these principles and concepts could be implemented, not exact t° specifications for development. Consequently, future redevelopment, such as the Kensington Redevelopment should be expected to embrace and implement the vison's main concepts and E principles. a Page 2 of 8 Packet Pg. 206 3.A.1.a LCCP's vision for the Town Center area was totransform the existing shopping center into a walkable and active mixed-use Village Center for the community to stroll, shop and dine. Kensington Redevelopment project upholds the LCCP's general vision and implements key concepts from the c plan asfurther discussed below. c PROPOSED KENSINGONT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Kensington's proposal looks to redevelop the 20+ acre Town Center property into with a new Y nationally recognized grocery store, retail, restaurants and luxury multi-family residential. The °o proposal looks to accomplish this project in two main phases. J M.- O Z JI f O O p ++ Phase 1 o/;i //a C The first phase of the project looks ,/�f��,,/r ,,, II � a O to redevelop the southern and central sections of the site. A new s� 37,500 square foot nationally recognized grocery store that will be located at the southern end of the o CL site and will serve as a primary O anchor. While Kensington has an , agreement with the grocer tenant, o they are unable to disclose their Y name at this time. o Proposed Grocer that will anchor the redevelopsmentsite 3: As part of Phase 1, Kensington has partnered with Urban Street Group who will be developing a 7- O E story (85' high), 285-unit high-end apartment building with 18,000 square feet of commercial space aD on the ground floor. The ground floor commercial will include a sit-down restaurant at the building's w M southeast corner. The apartment building is classified as "next generation" and offers an amenity- y rich, convenience-filled environment. The building will be served by a parking garage located to the north of the building, which will provide 546 private spaces for the residents. °1 E t a Page 3 of 8 Packet Pg. 207 3.A.1.a Overall, Phase 1 features more than 65,000 square feet of retail and c restaurants scattered throughout the i site, including multiple outlots. Kensington is currently negotiating a lease with Guzman Y Gomez Mexican Restaurant to occupy one of the new S outlots. ° A half-acre "Central Park" will sit in the middle of the site and can be `��w� '"r, Ilr 11°�rt,�l � r O programmed for concerts, the arts and Proposed luxury apartments with groundfloor retail anddining other civic events. The retail areas as c well as the central park will be served by approximately 800 surface parking spaces. Kensington is v also exploring overflow parking areas to help accommodate larger parking demands. 3 The overall investment of Phase 1 will exceed $150M. O Phase 2 Z 0 As part of the MOU, Kensington will be required to either revitalize or redevelop the area north of (D Old Checker. They have indicated preserving the existing center in the short-term as it is necessary to accommodate existing tenants to be relocated from Phase 1. As part of their initial plans, v c Kensington will update the facade of the center to match Phase 1 as shown below. o /� 1l� r f P / Q i =r d N O of Q. O a Q. Phase 2 oftheProposedRedevelopment looks to Revitalize or Redevelop theArea NorthofOld Checker s N Y L 0 At this time, Kensington just has a contract to purchase the Town Center property. The existing 3: Boston Market, Burger King and Bowlero are not part of the redevelopment concept as they are O E separately owned parcels. w �a Relation with Surrounding Development y The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding uses and development. As further discussed below, the site lies within the greater Town Center area bound by Buffalo Grove Road, II °1 E Route 83, and Lake Cook Road. This area,which is zoned B-5 Town Center Planned District, is intended to be a pedestrian-oriented central district. From a land use perspective, Kensington Redevelopment `6 a Page 4 of 8 Packet Pg. 208 3.A.1.a complements and integrates with the surrounding uses and developments, which include residential, office, and commercial developments along with open space. Furthermore, the existing linkages within the greater Town Center area also provide important connections to, from, and within the c proposed plan and surrounding area to help generate synergy. Accessibility and Parking c The Kensington development will be largely accessible at the various existing points including two along Route 83 and one along Lake Cook Road. Other existing minor access points include those Y provided via east-west local roads stemming from Buffalo Grove Road. The proposed plan shows 00 functional circulation patterns within the site. J The Kensington Redevelopment features a pedestrian network within the site. All developments, .- outlots, and other uses are connected via a network of sidewalks and crosswalks. Pedestrian and bicyclists will benefit from such infrastructure and amenities. 0 U Parking for the development will be provided via a parking garage and surface parking. The parking 3 garage will offer 546 private space for the residents of the multi-family building. At the same time, there will be approximately 800 surface parking spaces for the commercial area. As part of the Zoning 0 process, staff and the development team will evaluate the required number of parking spaces. Overall, given the complementary uses and diversity in peak demands, staff believes sufficient parking is being provided. 0 U c Stormwater and Related Infrastructure and Utilities o As the proposed project is a redevelopment, and not a greenfield development, much of the stormwater and related infrastructure and utilities are already in place. In terms of stormwater, the ° Kensington Development will retain the exiting dentition system and ponds in the site but will actually E decrease the amount if impervious surface, thereby improving the capacity for stormwater. Sanitary o sewer infrastructure is in place and the developer will be working with the Buffalo Grove's engineers and Lake County to ensure sufficient capacity is provided for increased use due to the significant d residential component. Water connection and service to the site and residential component is feasible. d 0 a 0 L IMPLEMENATION OFTHE LAKE COOK CORRIDOR PLAN a The Kensington Redevelopment embraces LCCP's vison to transform the Town Center area into an o active mixed-use Village Center for the community to stroll, shop, and dine active by implementing Y key concepts laid out in the visioning document. 0 1. Key Concept: An active mixed-use Village Center 0 At its core, the proposed Kensington Redevelopment looks to create the lively mixed-use CD Village Center called for in the LCCP. The proposed plan shows a mix of uses that would w include retail, restaurant, grocery, open space and residential. These uses, particularly the t° grocer, who will anchor the development, will attract residents and visitors and achieve the desired level of activity outlined in the Lake Cook Corridor Plan. ° E t a Page 5 of 8 Packet Pg. 209 3.A.1.a Furthermore, the development's design and site configuration will also create a sense of vibrancy by featuring a seven-story apartment building in the center of the development. The height and density of the residential building with balconies and other elevated outdoor c amenities provide a visual symbol of energy as well as presence to all those who visit. The building's ground floor retail and corner sit-down restaurants which can spill out into the sidewalk further activate the new Main Street while the proposed park can offer add to the c vibrancy. 2. Key concept: Reflect Market Realities 00 Current market realities are reflected in the proposed plan's uses as well as the general site design and configuration. The proposed grocer offers an innovative format to meet the J demands of today's market and consumer. At the same time, the plan shows high-end luxury o apartments with numerous amenities and conveniences. This type of housing is in high demand and has demonstrated high absorption rates across the region and country indicating 0 the country's changing demographics and lifestyle preferences. Moreover, the site's v orientation towards IL-83 is a result of the market demand for commercial tenants to have ayi high visibility while the surface parking spaces located throughout the site also reflect the demand for direct access to commercial uses. 0 z �o 3. Key concept: Pedestrian-Friendly The plan intends to be pedestrian-friendly in both the accessibility network as well as in 0 building design. Sidewalks and crosswalks provide connectivity for pedestrians across the v c entire site. These pedestrian paths as well as the site's compactness allow the apartment o dwellers both in the new development as well as in the nearby Town Place and Turnberry to shop, dine, and spend an afternoon in the park — all without stepping foot into their car. ° Additional the development exhibits features oriented towards the pedestrian such as the E apartment building's ground-floor retail and restaurants and the half-acre park—all of which o are meant to encourage visitors to spend time walking around the area and enjoy its offerings. d 4. Key Concept: Improved connectivity and multi-modal accessibility The proposed plan will improve overall circulation in the Town Center development. The geometry of the site as well as existing street grid, places limitations as to how access to, o CL from, and within the site can be accomplished, but the proposed plan does show enhanced c circulation patterns and multi-modal access including pedestrians and bicycles. a Q. 0 5. Key Concept: New publicly accessible public open space Y Kensington Redevelopment looks to implement this key concept with the proposed half-acre 0 central park with a bandshell. Such a park could be activated with the civic and cultural events 3: including concerts and performances. This park will also have a multimodal connection to the 0 E nearby Rotary Green and other parks, offering a larger network of parks and open space. 0 w 6. Key Concept: A new established identity for the Village CO The LCCP discusses the importance of establishing a new identity for the Village via the redevelopment of the Town Center area. Building off of the new NCH development along 0 E Lake Cook Road, the proposed development does represent a new chapter in Buffalo Grove's development and identify. These newer, taller, and modern developments clustered together a Page 6 of 8 Packet Pg. 210 3.A.1.a in a compact site design development that features open space and walkability can provide an overall sense of community and place. c 7. Key Concept 7:Sensitive to area's existing environmental features Kensington Redevelopment is sensitive to the area's existing environmental features. The proposed plan does not infringe on existing stormwater dentition ponds and shrinks the c impervious coverage from the existing development, thereby reducing run-off. B-5 ZONING AND PARKING VARIATIONS o The Kensington Redevelopment is in the B-5 Town Center Planned Zoning District, which is a unique district in the Village and is bound by Buffalo Grove Road, Route 83, and Lake Cook Road. The district J is intended to create a pedestrian-oriented central district. In this sense, the district allows for variety o of uses, development, bulk and height standards, and other elements that would be appropriate and created a walkable, central district. The B-5 district stresses harmonious and coordinated design 0 amongst the developments. v N G1 The B-5 District is an appropriate zoning district for Kensington Redevelopment to retain, as the proposed redevelopment is largely aligned with the B-5 district's intent, uses, and standards. Some 0 amendments to the zoning district will be required to accommodate this development. These include an update the B-5 District's Town Center Land Use Map, which divides the Town Center area into various subdistricts (residential subdistrict, commercial/recreation, etc). Such districts will have to be ° redrawn and reclassified. The corresponding bulk and density requirements for each of those v c subdistricts will also have to be further reviewed and modified. Such modifications modernize the 3 0 zoning district while preserving its original purpose. 0 The Village's code stipulates for proposals within the B-5 Zoning District, the Planning and Zoning d Commission should review the proposals and recommend the project for approval if the following CL 0 are met: d 0 • Effect on community—That the proposed planned unit development will not be significantly W or materially detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety or general welfare of the community. This shall include consideration of the impact of the development upon physical 0 CL development, tax base, and economic well-being of the Village; and ° a • Effect on neighborhood—That the proposed planned unit development will not be injurious L to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes y already permitted nor will it diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood; Y 0 and 3: • Effect on development of surrounding property—That the proposed planned unit ° E development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of ° surrounding property; and w �a • Adequacy of utilities and facilities—That the applicant has demonstrated that adequate y sewer and water, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities are present or will be provided; and E a Page 7 of 8 Packet Pg. 211 3.A.1.a • Adequacy of ingress and egress—That the applicant has demonstrated that adequate means of ingress and egress designed to handle the traffic contemplated are present or will be provided; and • Conformity to regulations—That the proposed planned unit development meets all the related zoning regulations. c PROCESS Y 0 Basedon the plans submitted,thefollowing approvals will be required: 0 U m • Amendment to the existing Planned Development Ordinance • Preliminary plan approval 0 • Text amendments to the B-5 Zoning District • Special use for residential/commercial/office occupancies, restaurant drive-throughs, and 0 U supermarkets y • Potential variationfor parking. 3 ACTION REQUESTED 0 z Both staff and the Developer are seeking the PZC's thoughts and comments concerning the plan. The timeframe for the project includes the Public Hearing in February and Board approval in March. c 0 ATTACHMENTS U c 3 0 • Chapter 17.44.060 B-5 Town Center Planned Zoning District -Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Code 0 c a� E a 0 d d d d w 0 a 0 L. a Q. 0 s L 0 0 E C(D C W d E t V a Page 8 of 8 Packet Pg. 212 3.A.1.b Attachment A. L _ Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Code _ 3 Title 17. Zoning- Chapter 17.44 Business District 0 1 0 17.44.060 B-5 town center planned district. a� A. The regulations set forth in this section are the district regulations of the B-5 town center planned district. E CL B. Purpose.The B-5 town center plan neddistrict is intended to provide forth e d eve lop ment of a pedestrian oriented central district.The districts h a I I bed efined as the area bounded by Lake-Cook Road on the south,IL Route 83 on the east,and Buffalo Grove Road on the west,but not including Lot 1 of the Town Center m Subdivision and that part of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 33,Township 43 North,Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian,described asfoIlows: 0 The East line of Buffalo Grove Road is considered as"DUE NORTH"forth e following courses.Beginning o at the intersection of the said east I in e of Buffalo Grove Road,be ingforty feet east of the center line thereof a and the southwesterly curved line of IL Route 83,being forty feet southwesterly of the centerlinethereof; a thence southeasterly along said southwesterly curved line of IL Route 83 convex to the southwest and having a radius of 2,904.93feet,a distance of 60.98feet to a point of reverse curve equ a Is the point of beginning of Y thistractofland;(the radiusofthe reverse curve being 25 feet and is tangent to the aforesaid east line of 0 Buffalo Grove Road):thence continuing southeasterly along the southwesterly curved line of said IL Route 83 of said radius of 2,904.93feet,ad istance of 129.85feet;thence south 47'37'East,tangent to said curve, 174.17 feetto a point,thence South 71'18'40"West,280.0 feetto a point in the aforesaid East line of N Buff a I oG rove Road;thence due north on said I in e,279.07feet to the point of curve of the aforesaid curve of p radius of 25 feet;thence northeasterly on said curve,convex to the north,ad istance of 58.88 feet to the point of beginning;in Lake County,Illinois,containing one acre. 0 The junction of IL Route 83 and Buffalo Grove Road defines its location on the north. N m C. Estab I ish me nt of Land Uses Within the Town Center.In order to classify,regulate and restrict the location of = uses and the location of buildings designated for specific uses,to regulate and limit the heightand bulk of _ buildings hereafter erected,to regu I ate and I imit by the intensity of the use of the lot area,and to regulate L and to establish public roadways,walkways and other amenities such as yards,courts and other open spaces d within the surroundings of such buildings,the Town Center is hereby divided into the following subdistricts m v listed hereinafter and indicated on the Town Center Land Use Map.(See Figure 17.44-1) _ 3 0 F- m 0 ca 0 v v T L Q t U Q _ d E s U Q _ d E Created: 2021-12-01 13:00:43 [EST] t R,1 (Supp. No.71) Q Page 1 of 14 Packet Pg. 213 3.A.1.b L .` ._.... _- ---._ __..._. ___ :r�at�e Gr�ni��C)�d�nance C"harster 17.�4 BuSinetiS 1)i5iricts V 13uff�dc� C -- 1/ Cq �� C7, H > �> K ( r rn L - �� AUn met _...__ O _ 1. r — A w u r acuxY � C Jh �nP, ..-- - O ocU�Fiec<ff` �o- h -,1 O r-,err, ✓"'1"�r 'x tl-�` ,h,�,a �4 �... 4 use;. nniYb u 1 -11_71) 11/5/90 J �� N�✓*�`,k'�`- rtNY � Y -k-rc k ll / 7 1- 1 L/1 !'J _4 Jt A._.V_.I'll 3.1&102 O N e N ��J ,"� / \ 'fah � ✓ '—rYl +? ", .�» .._- } NA C 17.44-1 Town Center La_nd 1 ise Map O L9 1. Permitted Uses. m 0 a. Residential. `a 0 v Botanical gardens. T Bus shelters. CL Multiple family dwellings. s Nursing homes. V Q Parks and playgrounds. d b. Commercial/Recreational. E s Antique shops. Artand school supplystores. Q c d E Created: 2021-12-01 13:00:43 [EST] t R,1 (Supp. No.71) Q Page 2 of 14 Packet Pg. 214 3.A.1.b L W Art galle ry. m U Auditoriums. c 3 Bakeries and confectionaries,retail. H Banks,not drive-in. 0 c Barber and beauty schools. d E a Barbershops. 0 d Beauty parlors. Bicycle and accessories sales and service store. Book stores. 0 Botanical gardens. c L Bowling alleys. a a Bus shelters. 0 N Camera and photographic supply stores. Y 0 Child care centers. China,glassware and metalware stores. Clothingstores. N 0 Coin and stamp stores. c .E Community and recreation centers. 0 Delicatessens. m c Department stores. a Dinner theaters. L d Dry goods stores. U Electrical appliance shops. 3 Floor coveringstores. 0 L9 Florist and plant shops,retail. ap 0 Furniture stores. 0 v Furriers and fur apparel stores. Gift, novelty and souvenirstores. i m Hardware stores. °- �a s Health clubs-under 10,000 square feet of total floor space. U Hobbyshops. d Home decorating. E s Hotel and motel. Jewe I ry stores. Q c d E Created: 2021-12-01 13:00:43 [EST] t R,1 (Supp. No.71) Q Page 3 of 14 Packet Pg. 215 3.A.1.b L Kitchen and bath cabinet showrooms. _ m U Leather shops. _ 3 Luggage and suitcase stores. 0 Medical appliances and supply stores. 0 c Movie and drama theaters. d E a Parks and playgrounds. 0 d Museums. Musical instrument stores. Newspaper and magazine stands. N 0 Nonacademic schools,classes and instruction 0- 0 L Office supplystores. a a Optical goods stores. 0 N Outdoor restaurants. Y 0 Outdoor theaters,festival drama,excluding movies. Paint and wall covering stores. Personal wireless communications facilities and cellular telephone facilities,including antennas,for usewith N 0 radio and/or other transmitting and receiving equipment,on public property,quasi-public property and property owned by a public utilitywhen located within a buildingor on the exterior of building,provided thatany structure or equipment mounted on a building shall be not more than fifteen feet higher than the roof of the 0 buildingor extend more than fifteenfeetfrom the sides of a building.The building-mounted facilities are subject to the provisions of the Village Appearance Plan. c c Petshops. a L Pharmacies. d Photographic studies. Lj _ Record shops. c Rectory. Restaurants,with/withoutdancingand entertainment. m 0 ca Roller and ice skating rinks. v v Savings and loan institutions,not drive-in. T Shoe repairshops. a; a Shoe stores. `d s U Specialty shops. Q Sporting goods stores. Stationery stores. s U Tailoring and dressmaking stores. Q Tennis,racquetball,handball,swimmingand other private recreational clubs. d E Created: 2021-12-01 13:00:43 [EST] t R,1 (Supp. No.71) Q Page 4 of 14 Packet Pg. 216 3.A.1.b L W Tobacco shops. m U Tool and appliance retail centers. c 3 Toy stores. 0 Travel bureaus. 0 c C. Office. d E a Banks,savings and loans,financial institutions(exclusive of drive-in facilities). 0 d Botanical gardens. Bus shelters. Business offices. 0 Medical offices,clinics and laboratories. 0- 0 L Professional offices. a a Parks and playgrounds. 0 N d. Public. Y 0 Botanical gardens. Bus shelters. L Churches,synagogues and temples. 0 Community and recreation centers. .E Libraries. 0 Parks and playgrounds. m c Postal facilities. a Public offices. L e. Special Uses.The following usesare allowed subjectto the procedure setforth in Chapter17.28. aa) U 1. Mixed occupancies:residential/commercial;residential/office; residential/commercial/office;commercial/office. 0 2. Auxiliary drive-in banking,savings and loan and financial establishments in commercial and `n office sub-districts. m 0 ca 3. Public utility facilities. v v 4. Wind energy conversion systems. is T 5. Bakery operations including production,wholesale and storage uses and drive-through a; service windowfacilitiesin the Commercial/Recreational sub-district. °- �a s 6. Funeral homesin the Commercial/Recreational sub-district. U 7. Liquor stores in the commercial/recreational sub-district. d 8. Drive-through facilities for retail uses,including restaurant drive-through facilities for E windowservice of prepared and packaged foods,in the commercial/recreational sub- U district. f6 Q 9. Supermarkets and food stores in the commercial/recreational sub-district. d E Created: 2021-12-01 13:00:43 [EST] t R,1 (Supp. No.71) Q Page 5 of 14 Packet Pg. 217 3.A.1.b L W 10. Drive-through facilities for retail pharmaciesforthe drop-off of prescription orders and m pick-up of prescription medications and over-the-counter medical items in V c commercial/recreational sub-district. 3 0 11. Family entertainment center,in the commercial/recreationalsub-district,subjectto the 1 following conditions: 0 c Security management:Thefacility,including adjacent outdoor areas,shall be managed to maintain the d E safety of customers and to avoid the creation of nuisances affecting adjacent properties and businesses.The Q- 0 Village shall be notified priorto the staging of dance parties and similar activities and special events,and specific provisions to properlymanage said events and activities shall be included in the security plan. The Local Liquor Control Commissioner shall be provided with the protocol(s)to be implemented regarding the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages within area(s) identified or setasidefor dance partiesand similar activities and specialevents.Protocol(s)shall be subjectto the Local Liquor Control Commissioner's approval. c a A security plan(including,but not by way of limitation,adult security personnel),su bjectto approval by the o Village is required priorto issuance of a certificate of occupancy.The Village may,in its discretion,from time to a time reviewthe security plan and require appropriate changes.Failure to make required changes orfailureto a 0 implement such changes to the approved securityplan may result in the revocation of the business license. y Y 12. Churches,synagogues and other places of publicworship in the commercial/recreational 0 sub-district providedthatthe special use is limited to the secondfloorarea of the building. 13. Health clubs-over 10,000squarefeet of total floor space. f. Similar and Compatible Uses.Other retail orservice uses not specifically permitted herein may be N 0 allowed if said uses are determined bythe Village Zoning Administratorto be similar to and compatible with the established uses in the B-5 District. .0 0 D. Bulk Requirements. N M 1. Any development in the district shall comply with the following minimum requirements and standards c in addition to all applicable Village ordinances: a a. The development plan shall be laid out and developed as a unit in accordancewith an integrated overall design.The location and arrangement of buildings,parking areas,walks,lighting and appurtenant facilitiesshalI be adjusted to the surrounding land uses and any part not usedfor v buildings,other structures,parking and loading areas,or access-ways shall be landscaped with grass,trees,shrubs,and pedestrian walksto create a character in total harmony with the Town 0 Center concept. ,n b. District requirements: c ca District Minimum Lot Maximum Lot Maximum Density F.A.R. Area Coverage n Residential 5 acres .35 30 DU/A 1.0 L m Commercial/ 10 acres .40 N.A. 0.5 a �a Recreational v Office 5 acres .35 N.A. 1.0 Q Public 5 acres N.A. N.A. N.A. d E s c. Mixed or separate uses may be provided within a specific district as a special use within that district provided that the separate requirements of each use are adhered to in relation to the use Q served. c d E Created: 2021-12-01 13:00:43 [EST] t R,1 (Supp. No.71) Q Page 6 of 14 Packet Pg. 218 3.A.1.b L d. Any lot zoned within the Village whether or not platted in a subdivision prior to the adoption of a m this Title,which does not meet the minimum lot area requirement as stipulated in this Title will V not be subjectto such requirement. 3 0 e. No merchandise,materials,or equipment shall be stored in any open area.The outside display and sale of liquefied petroleum gas,including propane containers,is permitted subjectto the 0 conditions and standards setforth in Section 17.44.020.D.5. d E f. All off-street parking and loading areas shall be properly illuminated in accordancewith sound c planning and engineering practices.The type of luminaries,shielding,pole height and design, uniformity ratio and the entire lighting scheme shall be in accordance with the Criteria of Appearance contained in Section 17.44.060.E.4. g. No principal building in a district otherthan residential shall exceed seventy-five feet in height; d no principal building in a residential district shall exceed one hundred feet in height;no accessory c building in any district shall exceed thirty feet in height. c L h. The specifications forthe width and surfacing of streets and highways,alleys,ways for public a utilities,for curbs,gutters,driveways,sidewalks,street lights,public parks and playgrounds, a 0 school grounds,stormwater drainage,stormwater detention and/or retention facilities,water N supply and distribution,sanitarysewers and sewage collection and treatment established by Y ordinance of the Village shall govern. 0 i. All primary light sources illuminating the buildings and the development shall be erected and maintained in accordance with acceptable engineering practices and shall be so placed,designed and used that neither the direct or reflected lighttherefrom will adversely affect surrounding N 0 property orcreate a traffic hazard.All primary lighting shall be provided in accordance with the aM Criteria of Appearance contained in Section 17.44.060.E.4. .0 0 j. No building or structure shall be erected or maintained within twenty-fivefeetof any residential N boundary line or within thirty-fivefeet of the right-of-wayof any arterial highway containing or anticipated to contain fouror more paved traffic lanes and no roadway or parking area shall be c erected or maintained within twenty feet of the right-of-wayof any arterial highway,or two a paved areas.The bufferarea shall be sodded,planted and shrubbed. k. A buffer strip not less than twenty-five feet wide shall be provided along any residential a) boundary line abutting or adjoining any boundary line of any commercial/recreational or office 0 sub-district.Such bufferstrip shall be sodded,planted and shrubbed in such manner as to form c a green area.This green area shall be bermed as defined in Section 17.44.060.E.3. 1. Public utility easements.Proposed location foreasements necessary to the development of the av propertyto be served as recommended bythe respective public utility companies shall be indicated on the plat. v v E. Criteria of Appearance. r L 1. Goals and objectives. a; a a. Excellence in design and planning,which may be achievedthrough appropriate innovation and s imaginative concepts,will be encouraged.To accomplish this,the Criteria of Appearance has V been developed forguidance to designers and planners of developments within the Town Q Center.The intent of this criteria is to produce a more logical and attractive use of one property that will be beneficial rather than detrimental to the surroundingarea and the community. E U b. The purpose of these criteria is to establish a checklist of those items which affectthe physical and visual aspect of the Town Center environment.Pertinentto appearance is the design of the Q c d E Created: 2021-12-01 13:00:43 [EST] t R,1 (Supp. No.71) Q Page 7 of 14 Packet Pg. 219 3.A.1.b L site,building and structures,planting,signs,street furniture and miscellaneous other objects m which are observed bythe public. V c C. These criteria are not intended to restrict imagination,innovation or variety,but rather to assist c in focusing on design principles which can result in creative solutions that will develop and promote a visual appearance conducive with the overall design concept of the Town Center. 0 c 2. Relationship of buildings to site and to adjoining areas. d E a a. The site shall be planned to accomplish ad esirabletransition with the streetscape,and to 0 provide forfunctional and harmonious planting,integral pedestrian movement,unobtrusive > parking areas and continuity of a total design concept. m b. Site planning in which setbacks and yards are in excess of zoning restrictions is encouraged. d C. Parking areas shall be treatedwith decorative elements,building wall extensions(screen walls), c plantings,berms or other innovative means so as to largely screen parking areas fromviewfrom c public ways. a d. The heightand scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and adjoining buildings. a 0 Spacing between buildings and heights of buildings shall be of good transitional nature. y Y e. Newly installed utility services,and service revisions necessitated by exterior alterations,shall be 0 constructed underground. f. Attractive smooth landscape transitionto adjoining propertiesshall be provided. 3. Landscapeand site treatment.Landscape elements included in the following criteria consistof all 0 forms of planting and vegetation,ground forms,rock groupings,water patterns,and all visible construction except buildings and utilitarian structures. .0 0 a. Where natural or existing topographic patternscontribute tothe beauty and utility of a IV development,they shall be preserved,enhanced and developed.Modification to topography will only be permittedwhere itcontributesto appearance oris necessitated byengineering c considerations. 2 a L b. Grades and slopes of walks,parking spaces,terraces and other paved areas shall provide an inviting and comfortable physical environment for pedestrians as well as for proper drainage. a) C. Landscape treatment shall be provided to enhance architectural features,strengthen vistas and important axis.Spectacular effects shall be reserved forspecial locations only. 0 d. Unity of design shall be achieved by repetition of certain plantvarieties and other landscape m materials,and by correlation with adjacent developments. c ca e. Plant material shall be selected for interest in its structure,texture,mass,scale,height and v seasonal color.Plants should be indigenous to the area,hearty,harmonious to the design,of good appearance and shall be approved by the Village Forester and/or Landscape Architect. r L f. In locations where plants will be susceptibleto injury by pedestrian or motortraffic,they shall be a protected by appropriate curbs,tree guards or otherdevices. s U g. Parking areas and traffic ways shall be enhanced with landscaped spaces containingstreets or Q tree groupings.Shrubs shall be used so as not to obscure vision at intersections.Parking areas in residential and office districts shall be screened from vehiculartraffic ways and pedestrian ways d by the introduction of earth berms.These berms shall be a minimum of three feet high with a maximum slope of three to one.Parking areas in commercial districts shall be screened from +o, residential and office districts as indicated above. Q c d E Created: 2021-12-01 13:00:43 [EST] t R,1 (Supp. No.71) Q Page 8 of 14 Packet Pg. 220 3.A.1.b L W (i) A I I parking areas sh a I I have internal landscaping to channel ize and define logica I areas for = m pedestrians and vehicular circulation and to provide areas for accumulation of snow. V c (i i) Interior landscaping shall account for a minimum of seven percent of the parking area.All c interior landscaping shall be protected from vehicularencroach ment by curbing or similar means and should be raised above the grade of the parking spaces. C c (iii) Space shall be provided for one tree for every forty feet of frontage or fraction thereof. d E Spacing of trees,however,shall not exceed sixty-five feet.Trees shall have a minimum c height of six feet and a minimum diameter of two and one-half inches measured one foot above grade level. h. In areas where general planting will not prosper,other materia Is such as fences,walls and pavings or wood,brick,stone,gravel and cobblesshall be used.Carefully selected plants shall be d combined with such materials where possible. c a i. Planting in rights-of-way shall be integrated into the overall landscape treatment.All right-of-way o plantings shall be approved by the agency havingjurisdictionoversaid right-of-way. a a 4. Lighting. G t N a. Exterior lighting,when used,shall enhancethe building design and the adjoining landscape. c Lighting standards and fixtures shall be of a design and size compatible with the building and 0 adjacent areas.Lighting shall be restrained in design,and excessive brightness and brilliant colors avoided.Lighting levels shall be reducedto 0.2 foot candles betweenthe hours of 11:00 p.m.a nd 7:00 a.m.where adjacentto residential districts. N 0 b. Lighting of off-street parking areas is required.Lightingused to illuminate vehiculartraffic ways shall be directed awayfrom adjoining and adjacent property,streets and other public rights-of- way.All lighting units shall be ofafull cut-off type,with a maximum pole height ofthirtyfeet. o N C. The illumination level for all off-street parking areas shall be a minimum average of one-foot- m candle maintainedto a maximum average of three-foot-candles maintained.A uniformity ratio of c four to one,or better,betweenthe averagefoot candle level and the minimum foot candle level a is also required. d. Pedestrian lighting shall be in accordance with the lightinglevels established in Table II of the v Illuminating Engineering Society's Standards for Roadway Lighting(hereby adopted by reference). Maximum pole heightshall betwelvefeet. c Luminaire,lightsourceandpoledesign shall create acontinuityandrelationshipto surroundings consistent with ,n the intentof the Town Center.Polesand luminairesselected shall bevandal resistant. av 0 e. Landscape or ground lighting shall bedesignedtoharmonizewith the overall landscapeand c lighting design.Fixtures used shall bevandal resistantand securely fastened to wiringsystem. 5. Buildingdesign. r L a. Architectural style is restricted to structures of harmonious design.Evaluationof appearanceof a Q. project shall be based on qualityof its design,creativity,innovation,continuity and relationship s to surroundings consistent with the intentof the Town Center. V Q b. Harmony in material,texture,lines,colorsand masses is required.Monotonyshall beavoided. Variation of detail,form and siting shall be used to providevisual interest. d E C. Materials shall be selected for suitability to the type of buildingsand the design in whichthey are U used. Q c d E Created: 2021-12-01 13:00:43 [EST] t R,1 (Supp. No.71) Q Page 9 of 14 Packet Pg. 221 3.A.1.b L d. The design of all buildings and structures shall address itself to the consistent and thoughtful = m design development of all surfaces of the structure and volumetric relationships,to include,but V not be limited to:general shape,form,materials,colors and appearance. 3 0 e. Mechanical equipment,antennas,towers and other utility hardware on the roof of buildings shall be screened from publicviewwith materials harmonious with the building. 0 _ f. All ground located mechanical equipment,trash receptacles and storage areas,serviceyards, d E parking areas,loadingdocks and ramps,electrical cage enclosures,electrical equipment, Q- 0 telephone equipment,incinerators and similar equipmentfor the disposal of materials,storage tanks and other areas whichtend to be unsightly shall be screened from viewfrom access streets and adjacent propertiesand the subject property by means of a fence,berm,wall or dense, opaque landscape material. d g. Exterior building lighting and signage shall be part of the architectural concept.Fixtures, c standards and all exposed accessories shall be harmonious with buildingdesign. c L h. Inappropriate,incompatible,bizarre and exoticdesignsshall be avoided. a a i. The design of all porches,balconies,patios and similaroutside spaces shall be integral to the 0 t building design and not appear as appendages. Y L 6. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture. 0 a. Miscellaneous structures include any structures,other than buildings,visiblefrom any publ is way or ways.Streetfurniture includes all objects not commonly referred to as structures and located in streets and public ways and outside buildings including but not limited to benches,bollards, 0 tree grates,kiosks,pavilions and directories. _ b. Miscellaneous structures and streetfurniture located on private property shall be designed to be _ 0 part of the architectural concept of design and landscape.Materials,scale,mass and colors shall N be compatible to,and enhance the continuity and relationship to,surroundings consistentwith the intent of the Town Centerconcept. c C. Miscellaneous structures and streetfurniture located in publicways and other public property a L shall be harmonious with design of adjacent buildings and other structures and Village landscape. d. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and streetfurniture shall meetthe criteria v applicable to site,landscape,buildings and signs. _ 3 7. Maintenance—Planning and design factors. 0 a. Continued good appearance depends upon the extent and quality of maintenance.The choice of m materials and their use,togetherwith the types of finishes and other protective measures,must be conduciveto easy maintenance and upkeep. v v b. Materials and finishes shall beselectedfortheirdurabilityand wear as well as for their beauty. T Proper measuresand devices shall be incorporated for protection againstthe elements,neglect, damage and abuse. Q. �a C. Provision forwashing and cleaning of buildings and structures,and control of dirt and refuse, V shall be included in the design.Such configurations thattend to catch and accumulate debris, Q leaves,trash,dirt and rubbish shall be avoided. d d. Through proper engineering and site grading,a parcel of land can be designed to prevent E standing water.In order to insure againstfuture accumulations of stagnantwater,careshould be U exercised in the maintenance of all drainage elements including pavement,structures and earth Q berms. _ d E Created: 2021-12-01 13:00:43 [EST] t R,1 (Supp. No.71) Q Page 10 of 14 Packet Pg. 222 3.A.1.b L 0 e. Through the careful selection of plant mate rial forth eir heartiness and appropriateness as well as m their beauty,pI anti ng areas can be maintained free of species of weeds or pI ant growth which V are noxious or detrimental to the public health.This shall include not only planting areas within 3 the property,but also those planting areas in the rights-of-way. f. In order to maintain the design character of the Town Center during construction and until the C entire area is developed,proper measures and devices must be incorporated into each developer's program to control,screen and dispose of all construction refuse associated with the a construction process. o d g. All landscapeclareas shall be providedwith an irrigation system or a readily available water supplywith at leastone outlet located withinone hundred fiftyfeetof the plant material. h. All plant material that is dead or damaged shall be replaced immediately.Plant material shall be d replaced no later than thirty days after notification by the Village of a violation of this section c when planting conditions permit,and in no event later than ninety days. c L F. Development Procedures Within the Town Center. a CL 1. Pre-application conference.Priorto filinga formal application theapplicant complywith the following: G t N a. Applicantwill contactand meetwith the Village Manager,and appropriate planning and Y engineering staff,to identify land use objectives. 0 b. The applicantwill meetwith the Corporate Authorities. .� 2. The purpose of a pre-application conference isto provide advice and assistancetothe applicant before N presentationof the preliminary plan,sothatthe applicantmaydetermine: a� a. Whetherthe proposed projectappears in general to be in compliancewith the provisions of this Title. O N b. Whetherthe proposed projectwill be in conformitywith the land use policies and objectives of m the Village,as expressed in the Town Center Land Use Map.(See Figure 17.44-1) c 3. Application. a L d a. Following the pre-application conferences,application for approval of a planned unit = development shall be filedwith the Village Clerk in accordancewith the provisions of this Title v and prior to scheduling beforethe Corporate Authorities and Planning and Zoning Commission. 3 b. Submissions.An application must be accompanied bytwenty copies of a preliminaryplan and all 0 related materials and an applicationfee. m 4. Preliminary plan. 0 a. A preliminaryplan is required of any applicantfor approval of a planned unit development.The preliminaryplan shall include,as a minimum,the following: T (i) An accurate topographic and boundaryline map of the project area and a location map CL showing its relationshipto surrounding properties within two hundred fifty feet in all directionsof said property. V (ii) An accurate legal description of the entire area within the planned unit development. Q c (iii) The pattern of public and private roads,drivewaysand parking facilities and intended d design standards. (iv) The use,type,size,arrangement and location of lots or of proposed buildings or groups of Q buildings. c d E Created: 2021-12-01 13:00:43 [EST] t R,1 (Supp. No.71) Q Page 11 of 14 Packet Pg. 223 3.A.1.b L M (v) General description of proposed landscaping. m U (vi) The location,design,height,type and level of illumination for all building and site lighting. c 3 (vii) The location of sewer and water facilities. 0 (viii) Architectural drawings and sketches iIIustratingthe design and character of proposed 0 structures.This is to inc Iudethe presentation of all materials and colors. (ix) The location and size of recreational and open space areas and areas reserved for public o uses such as schools,parks and open space to be owned and maintained by a property owners'association. (x) Existing topography and storm drainage pattern and proposed storm drainage system showing basic topographicchanges and proposed method of compliance with the Village's d stormwater detention ordinances. N 0 a (xi) Statistical data for the projectshall include: o a Gross site area, a 0 Netsite area dedicated streets and rights-of-way, N Y Green net site areas and percentages, 0 Ground coverage areas and percentages, Total building area, N Floor area ratio, 0 aM Parking ratios(with stall size and aisle indications and locations), .0 0 Loading berth requirements, N M Building heights, c c Water retention/detention plans and specifications, a L Other similar data pertinentto a comprehensive evaluation of the proposed d development. aa) U (xii) A copy of the organizational structure related to property owners'association deed 3 restrictions and provisions of services.The maintenance of common open space area and 0 of provisions relating to future use of private property(additions,expansion,changes in use)shall be fully setforth in such documents. m 0 (xiii) A statement of the applicant's plans with regardto the future selling or leasing of all or c portions of the planned unit development,such as land areas and building sites. (xiv) A development schedule inclicatingthe approximate date when construction of the r planned unit development orstagesofthe planned unit development can be expected to a; begin and be completed. C s (xv) A traffic survey settingforth and analyzingthe effects of the proposed planned unit U development.Such survey shall not be limitedto the effect on adjacent streets butshall Q extend to all of the surrounding areas affected and shall indicatethe anticipated points of d origin,the direction and volume of trafficflowto and from the planned unit development. E s (xvi) Statement of the manner,if any,in which the planned unit development varies from the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance and an explanation of the reasons for such variations. Q c d E Created: 2021-12-01 13:00:43 [EST] t R,1 (Supp. No.71) Q Page 12 of 14 Packet Pg. 224 3.A.1.b L (xvii) A tax impact report utilizing a Village approved formula. r_ m U (xviii)A market analysis,feasibility report and statement of proposed financing. c 3 (xix) Site and surrounding environs photographs. 0 b. Upon petition from the applicant,the Planning and Zoning Commission may waive 0 submission of any of the materials set forth above as required to be included within the preliminary plan except forthe development schedule(xiv.)and the statement on E CL variations(xvi.) 0 d 5. Planning and Zoning Commission Review(hereinaftercalled Commission). a. Workshop Session. (i) The Commission shall within thirty days of referral by the Corporate Authorities of a land N use plan,schedule a workshopsession for Commission and Village departmental review 0. based on a full and complete application. o a (i i) Within thirty days of the completion of the last workshop session,the Commission shall a schedule a public hearing subject to the submission of all materials pursuantto Section 0 t 16.20.030. Y L b. Public Hearing.A public hearing shall be held as setforth in Chapter 17.64. 0 c. Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. .� (i) Timing.Within thirty days after the close of the hearing,the Commission shall forward to N the Corporate Authorities a copyof their written findings alongwith a recommendation. a� (i i) Conditions.The Commission may include in the recommendation such stipulations or conditions as deemed necessaryfor the protection of the public interest. 0 N (iii) Required Findings.A planned unit development shall not be recommended for approval unless the Commission shall find the following: c Effect on community—Thatthe proposed planned unit development will not be a L significantly or materially detrimental to or endangerthe public health,safety orgeneral welfare of the community.This shall include consideration of the impact of the v development upon physical development,tax base,and economic well-being of the Village; 0 and 3 0 Effect on neighborhood—That the proposed planned unit development will not be ,~ injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity forthe av purposes already permitted norwill it diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood;and v v Effect on developmentofsurrounding property—Thatthe proposed planned unit r; T developmentwill notimpedethe normaland orderly development and improvement of surrounding property;and a �a Adequacy of utilities and facilities—Thatthe applicant has demonstrated that V adequate sewer and water,access roads,drainage and other necessary facilities are Q presentor will be provided;and d Adequacy of ingress and egress—Thatthe applicant has demonstrated that adequate E means of ingress and egress designedtohandlethetrafficcontemplated are present orwill U be provided;and Q c d E Created: 2021-12-01 13:00:43 [EST] t R,1 (Supp. No.71) Q Page 13 of 14 Packet Pg. 225 3.A.1.b L M Conformityto regulations—Thatthe proposed planned unit development meets all = m the regulationsofthisTitle. V c G. Corporate Authorities Action. c H 1. Public Hearing.A public hearing will be scheduled if necessary. c 2. Corporate Authorities Decision. a. The Corporate Authorities,after receiptof the Preliminary Plan and the recommendation of the o Commission,shall approve,with such modifications as may be consented to bythe applicant,or disapprove such preliminary plan. b. An ordinance approving and establishing a planned unit development shall specifythe zoning regulations and restrictions that will,pursuantto the development plan,apply to the planned d unit development.Such ordinance shall also specifythe conditions and restrictions that have c been imposed bythe Corporate Authorities on the planned unit development and the extent to c which the otherwise applicable district regulations have been varied or modified.When the a Planning and Zoning Commission has designated divisible geographic sections of the a development that may be developed as a unit,the ordinance may authorize the Planning and 0 t Zoning Commission to modify the schedules of development. Y L 3. Effect of Approval.Approval of a preliminaryplan shall not constitute final approval.No building permit 0 shall be issued for any structure until a development plan has beenfiled an d approved. 4. Effect of Denial.No application forapprovalof a planned unit development which is denied by the Corporate Authorities forany reason shall be resubmitted in substantiallythe same form and/or N 0 content. aM c H. Development Plan. 0 N 1. Time Limit.A development plan shall be submittedto the Commission by the applicant not laterthan M one year(or such additional time as may be authorized by motion of the Corporate Authorities),after c approval of the preliminary plan. a 2. Contents.The development plan shall contain in final form the information required in Section 16.20.060 of the Village Development Ordinance. 3. Procedure. v c a. The development plan shall be approved pursuantto Sections 16.20.070through 16.20.130of 0 the Village Development Ordinance. ,n b. Likewise,all documents,all covenants,easements,agreements and otherdocuments affecting c the planned development shall be recorded in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds of the county o in which the planned unit development is located. Nt rl- c. From time to time the applicant may make minor changes in the preliminary planssubmitted r L herein,butany such changesshall be made onlywith the approval of the Zoning Administrator CL or,upon his or her denial thereof,with the approval of the Corporate Authorities. s (Ord.2006-13§2,2006;Ord.2004-100§22,2004;Ord.2002-27§2,2002) V Q (Ord.No.2010-9,§2,2-22-2010;Ord.No.2013-8,§3,2-4-2013;Ord.No.2013-34,§1,6-17-2013;Ord.No.2014- 39,§1,5-19-2014;Ord.No.2014-43,§§32-35,6-16-2014;Ord.No.2016-008,§3,2-22-2016) E s U Q c d E Created: 2021-12-01 13:00:43 [EST] t R,1 (Supp. No.71) Q Page 14 of 14 Packet Pg. 226 3.A.1.c Development Parcel a c m x fI YM. � � � ' 1 � w � II � r / / d. All 177, r-/� r,j r li �, j �. �� r �, �G m,,yw >l / /I / q „ , 0f %i IV O ........... «wo ,rllaa «ww u ............,i i I f ? r !J#��16w �111uINVw^i .� ri uWmulu7 �,w, 0 '� � �, /✓ V �%i v r' r/ r //p r /G//� nFr�/ �/ �el1 �k�m /� �iii I . �' /r, . �/ %� r t �., / / %'//�' //� <C %llW" P { j 1 utRN j , mow' J �nwwwwwwwn ° {� % %V / i i l% ,, �, Csr'�7Y'n i %V / 4%1 O /E /, ..., !//iiaai/ a� wmo % VV IYyj% fw j '. vW r � / r% L � V go f /1/ll9a%11 1 /lil�/// /s7n71�1� WIFF ... ,....... l °c YiD/O r �l f�� d' /� j I „,,;i 1�}� j �W Qt YdWWawr Y I r 1 %r �� ul I t souwrr � 3 ` Yfgg Viii l V 15ror, jN O %;, Gj / WIC I C i �� ,.Iwnr r �/111� w� jl��/ ( �i G1 q Q 211, al oVG ,,,, d/ wwww� 9 %" i%j/j �m N "000Rry L Sul rrGl�C r�iNr;'fi.,..,,.,., wd.w,�,.�..: .../�✓rrvv�rnvyo .,,,, rm�,.wr�„p ,. "'0� ,,,, j%�� .„�,n .�� mn��/�r ,,,,,41�ru „ Y m co c cu a c a� E s ca a Packet Pg. 227 ARV 9�D1�/� �JJJ� J p� pf xmoUJ�r/ Pry „Nau, Il�/��, Or✓U//ilia ', duff � U �d�IG��II�I��D1UlUn; a N a,,,, r FEMINISMilI�'°'G o 831e-110 aauaoO;sanny}aoppNkpp^„;Te als;u83 unnol;o;uauadoIanapajj posodoad - doys�aoM) ;ag ue�d :;uauayoe;;�y � 00 " d l/%//f ill �V�VVVW�VW WYWV�VVV��V4+V J/f11A1 �! ry1JJ r s N / lrl wr n 1 rhWlwlaum w a f, ! / r N uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu ' � rrrrrrr rrrrrrrrr rrrrrrr�� rrrr w , of„rd/rww«r rill rrr ! �fVr,, w W N U Zt:.. W Cf c LJ I r n � v a y, II a I I r I VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV I { ( I / /J r / // / II�J 1, VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV II 4 IIII�V II1�I I�I;I.,,; ..I „,I c J v iJ/% i/%%i/ % fI��III,I,,'V�Ildllllarvv�,,y �1 Il1a011Y Uiiiai„ W o J ° 0 c9 a� O W �N DO c /1 r ulrvr! �/ Z"a zO a " ✓/r%/r�J6 iris! r�` / I v�� /, �f� ! P ��/�' :D — V O w t E a O c' V Li r kx o.�Q Op mw 0 = 00 Li wo r 00 J : a m N o > / / G 0 0 N o NN u,r o— /erg+ l-0 1 11 / i ✓ / % O d r=. W c m LU O° N v ra, �aUll �S7 J /� „ ,� �(h 9«ml �y{i",I�IOPyIII Ijlln,II�Ifll II �WUue r V m W v `o J Iwy r Li o V7 3o a o O 0 .� �� f / l / U W ❑ m J'° ,. y , 111,r/lJ/r7lJrr9lrr r0 v v v I I II' 0o g p0��-° 3: m "noon c r�� r uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu �9r f/�%l�r,f�i9��f� -C�1;,„J`'q VVVV uuuuuuuuu � cr— f z W/,; �n z 0 o Z %/ire flu, r 5 % ✓✓//o a/ for /q / % O w IlID- ui w a �v � Z 5 m L d Q c ❑ c > f 0 J CL Luj.� `o Z v�i.c` "y ��n Z m ° —a/r wo Do w —O'C O Imo: S O y / uu i° lu { dry( O R I 0 M W Ili H w . w . 0 . Z . w 0 0 z w %r S310N NV7d ARV 9�D1�/� f I p� p f au, Il��/�/, Or✓U//ifi� '� l � U �dIGII�I��IUIUnr 'a N ,,,, r 1� / i /',II INS°' ��/ ' o 831e-110 aauaoO;sanny}aoppNk ^„;Te als;u83 unnol;o;u�9LudoIanapajj posodoad - doys�aoM) ;ag ue�d :;uauayoe;;�y CD N N e PVC r � Q J ,� �� I 1 � Ir✓�j ;� 1 r /�� uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uu ' / r Pill; /i nor z rm«rn/ MrrN'a / « 1/�r/ �// Li fr�r � rn/, rraka�,/ r��rr«/ 2 y v / LJ w ' / Q W d //ai ///rr// r / ell 1A �� hDtVYII»a > c� v O w m �u I NN V N O W W N %r rai o r a a► �l ✓/r%/rill/ni/1 r im r° it �A %s �� /� �> uj J6 ff z c r > > W O Li J O 0 0 0 > , ¢m 0 > Web Wz a o W o �1 I IIILi 0 0 `= v LU } IA O 0 w � � O r J, l jt G / r rr 9 90rM `a I—,-w % Nm W h.-c�h W w �� ✓r lyrw,(r��6lii l�ff, z . . . . z . l//M, �tJurrr�r� r�r� j `W ui C1/ z L Kf� w 0 zw H 5 z Q� = Q o zN� wo �N w Q Z.F V-o > U o 0 o Q Imo= Ls b Ljw o O ro W M � w . w . 0 . z . a U LU Z 0 ��oG� r,,, �i � / �t�iii�lll1�11111111 , al DC S31ON NVId „831 ;o J a3 umol y;o;uauadojanapajj posodoad - dos� ua aoM) ;aS ueld :;uayoe;;�y Cl)' llaua/�;sanny}aoslN ;eaa}u Ilgr � m w!/ c.) te Ro IIIIIIIII /- �iiii, /r //�� J � nr//✓i iai ri is/�,orii 4��/i� lJ� �� i i /iii rcrrrr/l i irri r/i i V 01 ,,/f � ��` /'�irri/��.ri a/ri rii ✓ d,� l ri ., W V /��/ ✓�i/i�// r flfr / J� r iai �ri/// Q_w a r a /r� �/jr/ �/ ��/r�l flit 1( J, air ✓/, E Li X f✓U �/r / r lr �If,'rl�f!( ”' rl% ✓/ W tr°- r// W Lail o ° v W In n IIII r I f Li Li �If ' r/ i I u Z. Q v V O E O c_ W �� l / //' //✓ / , ,,,fir W cw -o Om /% ! ////,.� 'I� ✓rill //jr fj I r/% "y ��✓/cl`' „'..1rii% t l / ��/ % f�� / c9 a O E =p v U a o lilt" ! > t� . © 0 O s c I— CL /�/ / l r GG r ✓ 9 jr� W Li E O d m`o ti o W �!�//f r�� //�� r '/i fir'"y ✓ / I I V — 0 r A, /j4, 0 .% g J �'c ro-6 c7 W v W Jcr V 0 v d c J -u %lI f r rlJ ii l P /r S/ b r 0-1 ` 0 a > c Ilw..� !V�firrrl/�L J'I�l rl/Grp d�1 Ill /ililrfl�l!r'Ir 1, I— o N o O OW V ar c coWr- Nui� W W Z �� JJ/p��llii(IG�rr i cn PdVlr (raJ�VF N z L U z L,LJ % / % i pr,p riff i if Q 00 `iLzj r IWII,w. /of �i % "J� a�f /�iii��i li✓, a f- v � � LJ r a /r ! / / a ✓ / �// /i / I wM1 iiri,.;:,� �;I 1 %Ir'" W a i in c Q > > J u Z I S Z O F, W O m o J LU Q E-0 V) v U O N O > , O Q z O �m rj =m W�m L x w w c9 ZLU 0 /1r� V %i/;✓r i�yi� C7tS ' V © 0 Z W S310N NV7d /%/�Il��p� r a�e��o aauao�;sanny}aoN ;e as;ua� unnol�o;uauado�anapab pasodoad- doys�aoM) ;ag ue�d :;u8uay3e;;d r / r� wsro»rrm '/ s mrotisssrnsnw / �r /, n �ftlm��urnywvw � ' / r oaou�Wo ouwroui q r i��n, p, Wi u N�°� yvpu ivyvviviv� f O I st ovi ai/// O G 0 w d N �YYuuuuuuuuul CL m IY _ uuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuum ui � rt /IS c E c % a o am wlll'F M M / LL o U Q:0 m 0) C .y .0 7i cc r� -0 vV vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvw LL c N= a)Ie-110 aauaoo;sanny;aoN W aa;UBD umol;o;uawdolanapab posodoad - doys){aoM) ;ag ueld :;uauayoe;;t/ N U2- Lv �o ��' m¢ Y°' (n 'off , � ? N� ��@� x0000R LLLLo�� .. _ V 1 0/ i J r i/� ✓%�� GlJJ r; u�uuui f f�1 C a l o "Q a Q s c i e tl B h d 06b/" C � s roea ti]S 5£ 7 7 ° � U l' s 1 r N Q w N/ 831e-110 aauaoO;sanny;aoN ;e aa;UBD umol;o;uawdolanapab posodoad - doys){aoM) ;ag ueld :;uauayoe;;t/ r, hI� " N Q N cc 0 0 to a) v u 442 D c V to N C h M 4 CL II E _ n i o a 4 ff jp M ar IIJ w w o c IIIIIIII �" C4_ v C4 BAB-110 aauaoO;SBMLI:aoN W a24u2D uMol;o;u9wdojanapab posodoad - doys){aoM) ;ag ueld :;uauayoe;;t/ N Q + 0 � M � E d co " ++ � v U Y E f6 v o ° '3 i cc U d O o a I• , o v c tw f6 U N U 4 �lE f0 E f i i' CL s- �� t � j m MIN/1"I'll i a lbw gg PS V i y % l /' - 3 +iiiii� Q J +I + L � G O m Ilj % c Nm N 831e-110 aauaoO;sanny;aoN W aa;UBD unnol;o;uawdolanapab posodoad - doys){.aoM) ;ag ueld :;uauayoe;;t/ LO q .o � � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I © �► " , a Q r ,- C U C v N E ° , r p I I I I I I I I I I I CL t � I I I I 3 j r y r / i f r f % T( 4 J ion I I I I I I I I I n o m o a �i1 �Jl w Ipa R+uaHapy Vue rya Mead a�e�p�awo��saMyyeN le�awa�u.xel)e wawtlelanapaa pasetla�d-tleys��eMl Ia5 field:�uawyae��y i u II J � I� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII14f �i �� JJ��tt" I i i u� eilllll' 'i �r MOpON 're�7° � f f IIY I ^ J 1%� fir rp/