The URL can be used to link to this page

2021-10-06 - Planning and Zoning Commission - Agenda Packet M . Meetingof the Village of Buffalo Grove Fifty Rauppto Grove, Blvd g Buffalo Grove,IL 60089-2100 µ' Planning and Zoning Commission Phone:847-459-2500 Regular Meeti ng October 6, 2021 at 7:30 PM I. Call to Order II. Public Hearings/Items For Consideration 1. Consider a Variation for a Proposed Sunroom Addition,Which Would Encroach into the Rear Setback 61 Somerset Dr. (Trustee Pike)(Staff Contact: Nicole Woods) 2. Consider a Variation for an Existing Driveway to Exceed Max Front Yard Coverage at 811 Summer Court (Trustee Johnson)(Staff Contact: Nicole Woods) 3. Consider Approval for(1)an Amendment to Planned Development Ordinance 93-45, as Amended;(2)a Final Plat of Subdivision; (3)a Rezoning to a B3 Planned Business District; (4)Approval of a Vacation;(5)a Preliminary Plan;and (6)with Zoning and Sign Variations at201 &241 N Milwaukee Rd (Trustee Pike) (Staff Contact: Nicole Woods) III. Regular Meeting A. Other Matters for Discussion B. Approval of Minutes 1. Planning and Zoning Commission -Regular Meeting-Sep 15, 2021 7:30 PM C. Chairman's Report D. Committee and Liaison Reports E. Staff Report/Future Agenda Schedule F. Public Comments and Questions IV. Adjournment The Planning and Zoning Commission will make every effort to accommodate all items on the agenda by 10:30 p.m. The Board, does, however, reserve the right to defer consideration of matters to another meeting should the discussion run past 10:30 p.m. The Village of Buffalo Grove, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting orhave questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities, contact the ADA Coordinator at 459-2525 to allow the Village to make reasonable accommodations for those persons. 2.1 ........................................T ............................... Action Item : Consider a Variation for a Proposed Sunroom Addition, Which Would Encroach into the Rear Setback 61 Somerset Dr. .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Recommendation of Action Staff recommends approval,subject to the conditions in the attached staff report. The Petitioner is seeking to construct a sunroom in the rear yard of their property at 61 Somerset Dr.The Petitioner is requesting for a variation to the Zoning Code, Section 17.40 to allow the proposed sunroom to encroach into rear yard setback. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff Report (DOCX) • Plan Set (PDF) Trustee Liaison Staff Contact Pike Nicole Woods, Community Development Wed nesd ay,October6 2021 Updated: 10/1/2021 2:02 PM Page 1 Packet Pg. 2 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE Il g PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT i MEETING DATE: October 6,2021 0 m N L SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION: 61 Somerset Dr E 0 CD PETITIONER: Harold Harris m U PREPARED BY: RatiAkash,Village Planner a� REQUEST: A variation for the proposed sunroom addition which encroaches d into the rearyard setbackof the subject property. m EXSITING LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is improved with a single-family home currently o zoned 116-A. Ul G1 t COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The approved Village Comprehensive Plan calls for this property U and the immediate neighborhood to be single-family detached. ° c w •s PROJECT BACKGROUND The Petitioner is requesting a variation for the purpose of constructing the proposed sunroom addition o which encroaches into the rearyard setbackof the subject property.The R6-A Zoning Code requires a 30' rearyard setback,and hence a variation is required to install the sunroom addition. a E 0 PLANNING&ZONING ANALYSIS o c 0 • ' /%i The proposed sunroom addition /,�� cn will be located in the rear yard of the subject property. o , b • The subject property has and/i'/% existing deck in the rear yard; the proposed sunroom will be a separate addition north of they deck. ;�. % F, 0 r • This proposed sunroom addition o CL I %/// width with is a total area of 154 measures 14 in length and 11 in �,,,/i, ,� �% square feet. co • This expanded sunroom addition will encroach 6'intothe required 30' rearyard setback. E s • The proposed sunroom addition will be located approximately 25'from the rear property line. a Packet Pg. 3 2.1.a • The Planning and Zoning Commission is allowed to grant i sunroom additions which encroach up to 33% into the depth of the required rear yard depth of the setback. In „f. °' this case,the proposed sunroom rear yard encroachment of 6'constitutes 20%of the required 30' rearyard setback 0 and meets the requirement. Variations requested A rear yard variation from Section 1 7.40.020from the Buffalo d Grove Zoning Code to allow the encroachment of a sunroom ci addition. d z The following is a recently approved setback variations for rear yard setback variations: c 0 c Address RearYard Sun room addition Percentage encroachment Setback encroachment U 67 W Fabish 30' 5'-4" 18% o 425 Mayfair 40' 13'-4" 33% w 860 Holly Stone Lane 40' 10, 33% 958 Parker Lane 40' 5'-6' 17% 2324 Acorn Place 40' 12' 30% c �a Q DEPARTMENTAL REVIEWS E Village Department Comments o Engineering The Village Engineer has reviewed the proposed sunroom addition,and does not have any engineering concerns with the location of the proposed sunroom. c w c 0 SURROUNDING PROPERTYOWNERSZ. Pursuant to Village Code, the contiguous property owners were notified and a public hearing sign was posted on the subject property.The posting of the public hearing sign and the mailed notifications were ca completed within the prescribed timeframe as required.As of the date of this Staff Report, the Village has received one call inquiring about the proposed rearyard setback variation, however no objections were v, c expressed. 0 STANDARDS 0 0 CL The Planning & Zoning Commission is authorized to grant variations of the Zoning Code based on the following criteria: �a 1. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; 2. The proposed variation will not alter the essential character ofthe neighborhood; a 3. There are practical difficulties or particular hardships in carrying out the strict letter of this t Chapterwhich difficulties or hardships have not been created by the person presently having an interest in the property; and, a Packet Pg. 4 2.1.a 4. The proposed variation will not be detrimentaIto the public health safety and welfare. L The petitioner has provided a written response to the standards for a variation which are included in o 2 this packet. y L d E STAFF RECOMMENDATION o Village staff recommends approval for the purpose of constructing a sunroom addition that would encroach 6'into the rearyard setback: Y U 1) The proposed sunroom addition shall be installed in accordance with the documents and plans N submitted as part of this petition. d ACTION REQUESTED d z The Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) shall open the public hearing and take public testimony c concerning the variation.The PZC shall make a final decision on whether or not to approve the variation. c .y G1 Suggested PZC Motion PZC moves to grant a variation to Section 17.40 of the Buffalo Grove Zoning Code to allow for a proposed o sunroom addition in the rear yard which encroaches 6'into the required rear yard setback on the subject property. The sunroom shall be constructed in accordance with the documents and plans submitted as part w s of this petition. c 0 �a Q E O 0 L L Q W O yr R L L d .y C O U O CL a� �a c d E t v a Packet Pg. 5 2.1.b August 18, 2021 a� E Village of Buffalo Grove �0 Department of Building and Zoning Fifty Raupp Blvd Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 cu RE: Addition co cu Planning & Zoning Commission: cu Since the beginning of the Coronavirus Pandemic, we have been sheltering at home. o We spend a considerable amount of time in the house and plan to be for a while longer in hopes of staying healthy. I have seen new projects built throughout the village. These include screened porches as well as three- and four-season sunrooms. This c would be a good way to bring the outdoors inside my home and add space to relax. w I would like to start construction on a year-round sunroom but with tight backyard space a variance would be required to receive further consideration for permit approval. c Response to Standards 1. Our plight or predicament is shared by most homeowners in that due to the pandemic our activities are greatly curtailed and opportunities to get out of the o house are limited. People are making long put off improvements to their homes o c and backyards to improve their quality of life. cn 2. Our project will fit right in with the essential character of the neighborhood as this �o is a common and popular addition to its homes. It will enhance the architectural appeal and make the property more desirable. It will be constructed with material o that match the existing construction in like kind and quality. 3. The practical difficulty is that the location at the rear of the house where the > addition can fit is the exterior wall of the dining room. The addition would encroach roughly 6' into the required 30' rear yard. o 4. The proposed variation will be designed by an architect licensed only for the o purpose of protecting the public health, safety, and welfare. cu cn c co Sincerely, °' c _ U Harold and Judy Harris `t Packet Pg. 6 (-j(3 josimoS Ig)joeqjaS jeeH eqj ojul sapeoj0u3 4ol4M luoll!ppV moojunS e J01 U0!IeIJeA e JOPISUOO) IDS veld:IU0Wq3eIIV a. VALAUT? OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS: LOT IS IN BLOCK 8 IN HIGHLAND POINT UNIT No. 4, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH, RANGE II EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED APRIL, 6, 1978 AS DOCUMENT 1908341, IN LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. J) r 4,, kl\i 1 3D10UNDRiEver StE ENGItNEERING 4 COUNTY STATE OFOF ILLIKANNOEIS ss ree Dundee, Ill, 60118 PHILIP K, REHOUSE Dated35-1596 1 hereby certify that I have surveyed the Scale c--,' Olt,P, *z(P,, DUNDEE,ILL above described Property and t hat the Order DELANTY & LAMBERIS fill plat hereon drawn correctly represents Owner 13ROCK LA said survey. Atlas 43113313 Job H 19227M Illinois land surveyor .4 35-1596 Judy and Harold Harris, 61 Somerset Ln, BG Response hmStandards � 1' The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; Your Evidentiary Statement: — rn ' � Our plight or predicament ksone shared by many homeowners. Due to the cu/onavinuspomjemioour activities have been greatly curtailed and opportunities 1m safely spend time out of the house are limited. Homeowners are adding comfortable living space to improve their quality of life and are making long m delayed improvements to their homes and backyards. � o � 2' The proposed variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; — Your Evidentiary Statement: Our project will fit the essential character of the neighborhood as this is a popular and sought-after m addition to many area homes. |t will enhance the architectural appeal of our home and make the property more desirable. It will be constructed with materials that match our existing construction in like ^� kind and quality. — 3' There are practical difficulties or particular hardships in carrying out the strict letter of this Chapter which difficulties or hardships have not been created by the person ^� presently having an interest in the property; and, Your Evidentiary Statement: � m The practical difficulty is that the location at the rear of our home where the addition can fit, sharing the outside wall of the dining room, would encroach roughly 8' into the required 30' rear yard. This is due to our tight backyard space which is much wider than itisdeep. m 4' The proposed variation will not bm detrimental to the public health safety and welfare. Your Evidentiary Statement: 0 .. � � Granting the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the ordinance. |t will not ba injurious to other property within the area. |t will ba screened byo five-foot board on board cedar CL fence and a row of Arborvitae that already reach seven to ten feet tall. 4al4M `uoi�ipp�y uaooaung a ao� uoi�aiaan a aapisuo�) fag ue�d :�uauaya��y , N r r / ✓ r /pl r r I l � G r r i I f r a x l� r //i/ ,s"i i//Hlrrr✓1%OJl`;', � t "�y�1 )ivi. i ✓ r//c/i�� f y 1� r r W� �4 rd r ! r Vlrl r »SFr„� �rvl d'�'��„or?",'%��r�r y!�Y�r i,�',Y 1, 'II �%r� / ' i��i„ �� f� �ai�,s, l, rr "✓�" � /w;; I t �%� �,' a: r ,,. '„ M�J„� �i vJ)�Ol� � , ,✓r r'r r= � r by@�� , �� % i� � rr�,,; �n!rou,; wl J �a✓✓r r rc i;� ,� rl,r� r �1 /Ir,�i� r J «IW ;��,� '„ ,41 �J / � � ;.' 1� r f„„w � ��!�'�tillr�� U,J�r "�� r o ro �, ✓ "� i � r �W r r Cfl�rr �!�� jr l � (,/ ly �% � !y v� � i r � Jar �✓ �y�r � I �y, i li Jl �'iIW:��1 r1�Y','9'"��Y V�r 1 �i„«^�r Ir�J ", i�%r r �°J� /� �" iha�j U�,, Yrjl ! �r ' �J ��, r �i I 'v r✓, i1 J�Uw'I�� r��iY�L✓)U;lrsl✓ai/o��mm�rl9 �( JV(�, ///�� llffrr«�/IJ J I�? f � r ��Ippp ,il., ,6, ' (/ 4 l�� % � % J � � r �fl�N�� q0r v�`�/� ✓ I � iol �� a�W� �� r/ Sri r,or9lL a /��Jj� � ✓ I� ��r" r � i � i '�11„Y,�'� � I� mVI��✓ � r � �r,+tr9vrM✓ul/u✓rt✓�/ / � /1,✓ �� rr/, ,L Y�Yr.✓ay✓/rri9��r I / � I //�l" / F � �»saN�lo�,l�rl�ir!% i J I ✓r�1 J !� � �y a ��if�f��' ��I'" �� D Y ��yy1��wu�H)yyy1y1y1➢1y��IIWI��k�➢�>U� '� / „�� i�, r ter., ` wooaun a .ao uoileiae a as isuo Iag ueld :luaus oeUv � yoiyM uoi�ippb� S � n p. �) 4 a , as f r 1 " �Ir'�,inj,llYjilllllU��NWrr/i l ((�� imouu>x 1, ...... J /F I I�I��'r111111J � ,�II YY .,iYiY'"Y 1 II. J� 4, � 1 Ali KII)IIIIIrl Pon, V r "lg i, / /Va u , 6 rrWo J Glv, ' % r / i ( ✓hqa'„ r cC, A // GI �l / rmh'e I, il„ Ili lll� Ali r% %�ii�0 ll! 4il „v a V 8 a I rJ G /1 r r� 1 i I r llu�l a"Nll/ r r rllw v"°mw ' Al rro",!'u %/ i y II II / I �!I ^III I 1 I rf //r 7 fr OF V� f / la2 m 1 I 2.2 ........................................T ............................... Action Item : Consider a Variation for an Existing Driveway to Exceed Max Front Yard Coverage at 811 Summer Court .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Recommendation of Action Village Staff recommends denial of the variation. The petitioner, Ornis Mala, recently expanded his driveway at 811 Summer Court without applying for a permit. After an inspection was conducted on site, it was found that the existing driveway expansion does not comply with the drainage pattern and exceeds the maximum 40%front yard coverage of approved impervious surfaces. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff Report (DOCX) • Plan Set (PDF) Trustee Liaison Staff Contact Johnson Nicole Woods, Community Development Wed nesd ay,October6 2021 Updated: 10/1/2021 2:17 PM Pagel Packet Pg. 11 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE Il g PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: October 6,2021 0 U L SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION: 811 Summer Ct E PETITIONER: Ornis Mala N co PREPARED BY: RatiAkash,Village Planner a� a� ca REQUEST: A variation to allow for an existing driveway to exceed the 40% of front yard coverage maximum. 0 c.> L R EXSITING LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is improved with a single-family home currently zoned R3. ° U_ x COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The approved Village Comprehensive Plan calls for this property and the immediate neighborhood to be single family detached. a� x w 0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 3 The petitioner, Ornis Mala recently expanded their driveway on the IF, south without applying for a permit, c and after receiving a stop work An order notice from the Village prior x to when the concrete was poured. �,�//� 0 The Petitioner applied for a permit and a variance after the driveway '� A% expansion work was completed.The 2 i <C existing driveway expansion "i exceeds the required 40%front yard L_ coverage. As a result, a variation is w" a required. 0 After an inspection was conducted ., on site, it was found that the existing �� CL 0 driveway expansion does not comply with the drainage pattern. ;f , w Since then, the Petitioner has worked with the Village Staff and agreed to remove a portion of the driveway on the easement and repour it to be in compliance with the existing drainage pattern in the easement. £ z c� a Packet Pg. 12 2.2.a PLANNING&ZONING ANALYSIS History of Events 0 1. On J une 14,2021,a stop work order notice was given to kr p v the Petitioner at 811 Summer Ct after a receiving a " ro° fl9, complaint. When this stop work order was delivered "' E the concrete was not poured on the existing driveway , P4� °` co expansion. o-" ao M 2. The Petitioner came to the Village and applied for a ¢�f a, M.Ty�, c permit and a variance after the driveway was poured L and the driveway expansion was completed. " �� o 3. After review, it was found that the existing driveway exceeds the required 40%front yard coverage. c 0 L 4. After an inspection was conducted, it was found the driveway was not in compliance with the U- existing drainage pattern of the site. x �a 5. This item is being continued from the September 15, 2021 Public Hearing date. (D 0 x w 6. The Petitioner has agreed to re-pour part of the concrete,to address the engineering issues. 0 �a Summary of the Changes • The existing driveway expansion has been extended on the south portion of driveway. Pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance, the w~mug maximum permitted front yard coverage must be 40%, the property is allowed up to approximately 804 square feet of �u impervious coverage for their driveway and walkways. �� ,,;,� w i = M L • The existing driveway expansion on the south of the driveway ,0 measures 60squarefeet in total. o • The total impervious surface in the front yard measures 45.12%. The total impervious surface exceeds the permissible 40% front , � yard coverage by 5.12%. • The approximate area of the driveway on the easement, which �� / 0 pp Y requires the grade changes is 25 square feet.It must be noted that v even if this portion of the driveway is removed,a variance is still required as it still will exceed the 0 40%. Q- • In the petitioner's response to standards,the petitioner claims that the unique circumstances for this variation is that the fence door opening requires ground support. y c a� • Upon reviewing this proposal, staff found that the fence 6' tall fence on the subject property, E s which also is not a permitted fence. Building and zoning staff will review this fence and other improvements and modifications made to this subject property without a permit. a Packet Pg. 13 2.2.a Variation Requested A front yard coverage variation from Section 17.36 from the Buffalo Grove Zoning Code states that the maximum of 40% of the required front yard area may be covered by approved paved and impervious 0 surfaces including driveways and walkways. v L c� G DEPARTMENTAL REVIEWS Village Department Comments N Engineering The Engineer has reviewed the existing driveway expansion and the Go attached memo that show concerns with grading in the easement. It must be noted that the Petitioner has agreed to re-pour the concrete to meet the grading requirements. L d 0 t� SURROUNDING PROPERTYOWNERS Pursuant to Village Code, the contiguous property owners were notified and a public hearing sign was posted on the subject property.The posting of the public hearing sign and the mailed notifications were o completed within the prescribed timeframe as required.As of the date of this Staff Report,two calls were x received, however no objections were raised. cd a� STANDARDS The Planning & Zoning Commission is authorized to grant variations to the regulations of the Zoning w Ordinance based upon findings of fact which are made based upon evidence presented at the hearing ° that: ra 3 m 1. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; o 2. The proposed variation will not alter the essential characterofthe neighborhood; a� c 3. There are practical difficulties or particular hardships in carrying out the strict letter of this y Chapterwhich difficulties or hardships have not been created by the person presently having an w interest in the property; and, c 4. The proposed variation will not be detrimentalto the public health safetyand welfare. o c The petitioner has provided a response to the standards. g ca •L STAFF RECOMMENDATION j Village Staff recommends denial of the variation to allow the existing driveway expansion that would L exceed the required front yard coverage by 5.12%as staff feels the petitioner does not adequately meet a the variation standards. 0 U ACTION REQUESTED The Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) shall reopen the public hearing and take public testimony CL 0 concerning the request.The PZC shall make a recommendation to the Village Board. w �a Suggested PZC Motion in PZC moves to grant denial of the variation which would allow existing driveway expansion that would exceed the required front yard coverage by 5.12%based on failure to meet the variation standards. E s �a a Packet Pg. 14 From: 0nnisMa|a Address:811 Summer Ct, Buffalo Grove |L6OUQ9 To: Planning 0'Zoning Commission,Village of Buffalo Grove CO To Whom |t May Concern: 1� We are trying to add an additional section to the sidewalk,to the right-hand side of the house (looking from the fron1).The measurements are displayed in the attached file.The reason for this addition |s because we have fixed the fence doors three times since we purchased the house in 2018, because the 0 doors hang luce after we open them, and the bottom does not touch the concrete no longer. 2 � Therefore,we had the company that maintains our yard prepare the drawing for us. 11 |f you have any other questions, please let usknoxw| — LU eis Mala 0 LU CL Packet Pg. IS � � -,6 ah e, 1 -. / - I- -i- - ;J tN. - " I / . OBOJBAO:) PABA IUOJ=l XEW POBOX3 04 AEMBA1.1a BURSIX3 U8 JOI U011BUCA E-IOPISUO:D) JOS veld :4uqwLj3eJJV o- V) Q . k) jL oll 01 st AWROVED RPOSE: -------------- ZO ING REVIEW DATE BY: ENGINEERING REVIEW' DATE BY, 2 1 r 1 /r la r ✓f 2.2.b 0.4 / sn 1 � R Jjl r r � i�>>-ri+�n�oP�r�ur�a�mma�yimn��;'nY�erd�iri9�%�r'Trr9�r'd�r/;�u�uiulYly,�iyNy9mtmw�9�, If 1 yyYl i ✓/i%��/�///fii/��f/J��//1�/�/✓ y I I / / / %✓fmJJ)%�' /J f /i(rJi�l�ff/O/l��ll��/��°>a1//-; / "M Y rr J�✓.. ,%J,'6�110�1',�r��ll��Y I/F�/��1�/�%1'r!� ';'r'`;y r I". i i ' "" ems�kr,r,,,,�lr/c�lli�i'�'✓"r/��J�� ,�'��„o, /7%//�r �/J��, ",,,,,!,%%/i, ��f//��fJ�",y�� { li��',.j w M i I. W ///i/dl� �/ a✓�/ /i�i% % /rP,r / fii/✓ i I r w - ":, /✓ y,„ �"�, � /✓ i/1rr / //� / /i r /ir r Gr9 /1ll '�ii'i4 ro✓fii-t y /✓ /�/ /-,,, ,, r��rlillu r I� ///y rti��uw%'��lA%9/ / / / r/ rri //„ �' ✓/ ✓ii°�/✓r /�✓N/✓✓h/ r%✓��..✓++�r✓, �.,,.,, �� %i�/ � lei ✓!� � �Ir / rY✓'/ ��/ /fl�yPr�/ tre fl � ✓ �" w � �'„" � I / n�,/ r / ✓ �/ � p"�r l�/j1/Li/ �a / "y+:✓ n7M1� npa«� �� 'SUN � /✓ �.: M/F/lll� /✓:ti"it f/ i/✓ /i yl r r / /r/✓ ✓ / ,'rolr9/ �/ / ✓a 9 r I I � �1 ✓ r if r % ///l/ ci r ;r err / fr✓9r ifr+irsn,° ' r" _'�. , /�r G� �/ �h/i/ ,.w .. u /7%?ry/ �✓„ � l/fii ,/n,;; / / ✓�� r�6�lYr ff'r��y��/ r�� r �// t „,,,,,, "% � '":" ,,, ";f✓',��rl�� / I5y�„✓p��"��l�m ✓ ?�y"f��,l 9i�� r�� j. /rJ �s�1141��""^",%✓/�r,' rAW �' 1%//✓ „ ?✓' � 1 6w'✓ /r ;" /��Fi m" f�/ �! I� ✓ ✓�J 'tiff a"' ;uiu+ „"me ' ,,,f, ///��F� W�/J/� � / / /I �I// i//�,'*!' �,c h//i✓,�l J✓l/�f�; // �„117h"„�"m �r /� �///n / / / lr r r�r�� ,, ✓ r1W/l�X r ,," a'�. � /� y�✓ir "'au �Q U� I �'S t✓ , ✓' r / ✓f�%/ CAI yY" * ;"„ /, a%✓��yr ✓r" °' ,,,/;; ">"" F ,";;' ri iL' /� ✓fl/i�9�� "�( / / i ei% rr//�✓//i � �> a�✓ i t �/r / � °�t""i J, I�//fii �yi✓��w "fir' / // �nY'a �J//i/� ✓ / / ,., 1, ✓ ,// /�'�," ,,.... � y.'!,,;,, ",",�"� //Jy, �i/r '�rl/� rah %'/ % ✓ ��` !� /� "l ii� �� /��f�f/ e �� „� / /, ;��`` ,/,;,,;,� � �.�, �� /�u✓% ✓'r�>p�v� �m�ir ��;I //fii%/ l� !. / ��/yfy)�/ I/P✓/ //rU Y��l // r//✓ / /J/ir1✓'� �Dl/ /� ��, i, ��ru�/��'ruY y�';��y{f� </✓' � %�l�?�/ rD y ' r "� //f'�"'I ill%�"� Iwo, ii/�1�� p� M}/ ref%� �0�/� ✓5)�� ff6u P �i Il� r / / / � " ��/� /✓�llll r j �� rl'Jlll//��j�� / ///% / r n 4 r t ✓ ' r r/ �� y n I✓/ r �1 rI/iN ✓. ✓////�/%' /�F/1�///r ✓ ^ 'w.w,1✓ '�' // r � / 96/ � l��i B° i �'G'�r j.. f�Sn'".,,J I �✓ r�il' ,Ji %/ / ✓ / ✓�'r �/ // r �l//�/ // J, / �, � 'S/ r ii�rDi �� i��II rr � � / /✓j�..✓ s ✓ r, / / ///I / ✓l/Nr � r yr t ✓✓ //�J/ i ? /i/JV'G,l'' f%% / / ,fir/ r/��.✓ % bW` '"�ri//„i„� r✓ ,1 it//✓ / r//„"; � ;; r dGr/ �u' OY/.✓i;!"'✓J� ' II „� ��I '� ��lJf�i l��i�// f�Y�r /r a/e/� / /uw � / ,+/i a ✓/ r��; !P//1 r � 41 +`/a r/ r i"ii l /li / d / Vie/ i / ✓ r r ` ✓ � � „ I rf�✓r,; Alr Jp/rat / /� 1//v"/ ✓j /r�/,"/✓✓,,, /!i r/.1� t / " /r /� ,✓. i'i<,��/(// r✓J,r/�1�1 i � i �,,; ��g�✓ �' J � r (/ / / two ✓ / / / � /�' r�/ / ✓/r✓r // r-: „/,firrrc u i ,✓�l I r,�� '� �� .� t,%Nlf'r�l IJ �'✓ / r/l�//; ✓ ///�/ / �/�".l .irf'�i'��i/iF�1/� �r r ��/:'af/// ,,, ,�,n, // l✓ ',,; %�i'�� I af ,,/1/ ,,//1i'/i,. //✓,.,�. /,./ / F/ / //iiil,/y,"�'/�d/��^�J"a/J �/ ,r �'/ r ✓ / ';,,,/'�%�i""�✓ r: /I/ .r�` ;/k,�%�/I�f�� Iti�: .., /r rll�j✓✓. �J// N.( / Irr/ r / rI% r fr ",% /� r l �✓,,, �+. /✓JJ �i�� :� r I/✓Jl/ l r✓ f / r "l>r / :h r/i ��itrr 'r r � ✓/✓ ",, %� ✓�J/,,, /;✓t r:. �f / .x�, i, /��.r/�/ / r✓✓/� ry / ��t n�/%�//, �^t/l/ /, :.; ,✓/ �r�',;.'l / ,r .; rr // '/ ,:,� Jur x 1 ",..1+4 ,/;,t. J �J 11 .9, //1, /f,//t ✓i fi ;lf /I ✓ / /i1 %i FrylJ/1 /s // r // I ,,.,. tie/. e/ y r1 / ;.,,, I ,r ,;; ✓ t i ,./� ��11/'�l(✓, ,;/"� i„✓�;/,/T✓� ;Jrai �f/ ;:. K//�y.//✓✓J fii° rr/ 1 /� r ci ///,f ✓ r'J . r/� ✓-. ' r,r,�.' ir, y.... �A �� / 1 f,�l1 I �1. / ✓ / 9//i l..rr r. lJ�/// ., r „✓. .:, / �. // a ;rl✓F'J ni� '✓/!/�� r �„ ✓ ��r,�r19:: ✓ G I f ,.. 1„/ r� / ,r„ R ,-.� ,a.. r:,A, i // �., .//r 1 (/..��f,;, r ',aa „� ",.;r,J'l �f.. y d r.r///1 Yr /Jr„ 1 / y / o /u, W r %, ,,,,1„wur;,✓ ,/.. rJf / ! / r.. ,7 r �� f 1,/i ��r/ /l7,^G�/i .,,�,lr ll ,..� />✓��;:, ✓,,,,,/ ✓ ✓. ✓ ✓/j.Jr riA' ✓ y ! /,.-; rl / / ,/o,�� r <Jr;, nd //��,�/////`I 1 , uJH i / r✓l/'J fii "r,1/, �,, /ir✓ /.Jr/ i ✓ r ✓ J' ;/ / / r T u i. ar,;.. /✓, f ;, ��,4f'i1,r�`//rG� „� '/ 1 � P y n///K ✓ rl ✓// r /;/ ✓ ,/ / ( (f r /r.. r<y a r � +r 9"r9�.�� 1.;I�,�V//i�/ i ';.✓'r,„y � r ,,,c ./,./.,r i,. r /J/ � r,,, ;/ /„/rJ, n / r/r% ,. I / /n„„ r�i/ ,,,.:/; r. -»/. r•'1 ,ti y r�� 1 r. � ,,. r /+/ l / „-: ✓✓ / ✓ "✓ ,,,!, ..�., l' ,.r, ,,, rJ N.. r ,. .,,. x ✓ r./��,,./Jir, ,�,�J� �/:, -1f. /, �.,r,/�A.,,, r.. / Irlr e �/ it,,, / /, /� ^,.//, ✓ 1 ✓l zr✓„Pl ,�i r ,� k!. / / „�,/./„ L9Y l.:" e Y�,.ri✓ // v, ,,; G d� t -.,.. �, F.G, „"" ,," ,,,,; r r, ,,,,0 .,'N! .. .r �/� �/// ,,,. ,n, r r, l / / ,: .; a.. �r"``rt..1 r r,,: r,.r ,,,: ✓%� .�.. �, ..r �d. r P -rti,, /. /r,*,,. ,f,( ,. 1/�� r r ,f r.,. ,.n / f/ 0 / u r /I / / r7A ..., ✓�/ / ��/ /r ,,.A V/. �, .,✓'� l / r;", r rr ✓ e x� /r ,,...<; r;, �,rr, ,�" „� � riri r, r/r r7T,./ r / :,.., t .r:/ r..r //'. a✓ ,,,�,.� r �,t.. r'r ,�,,.; �/ �,., ,,,,✓rr r ,✓.,(/ "l r, --Je / „, ,� ,.9. ✓ ✓:.. F % .../✓f/ // r✓t ,✓"fii ,,��,"F....r rr,,,;„,,,,, .. ,7Vi / ✓^�i,".,,,� GO ...rl. r �/ {n.,. ! i l!'. r ,-. ur ;,:. / „�rl',r PkIP w:r /„ ,, .✓�/ /. , (�".' /� ,, ,. / ,:,r,,,..li ✓ _,t., /i y.. rrr�. 1' /;,,✓ r rl Jr °, ✓ .✓ r ,,�'"i r,r/ 4 ,,.,/ ry ��d ,,,"w'r r„ �✓+7;/;-"r.2//r llmp J ,r✓. ,.;', ��Jw.(( r...,p n/� rGr .✓ o✓/ l / F/ / r / ,, ,, �� ,� ,,; /��i� r t;�, ✓n, ,r I ,,<: ", /„�%,.r! / ,,," ..//✓ r r ✓f ✓... �+l ,;, rlry�� / / /l t r r ,: q ,/ ,.:h.I ;", ✓, ,,. / ,..I�/%! / r,l� ✓ ,: ;�� ,✓./✓gin / /< „;. "I/ � r.r, m/ r, :; ✓ / .�'r � r,,,...1 „e ;" / ,.;//� ✓ � ", /„ r�,,.� /,,,. ,., r� v,r�„� ��i /r. l 12,J P ,r„ Irl P,.,, ��'�a rri l l ri r,Fr Yl �, /S✓ r ✓ ,r„ ,�/ // . ",.i �,., ,.,y..F /./ r fi,,,. I r ..� � rJ,.".. �' �s.,,.„ J✓ 1.,//l �,r 9r -/ r / ✓�,„. ," r." ,",,:. ✓ �r%/Gill c:,a r� ��T./Y a� r i ,,: a ✓'i„Y✓✓w/ri� I?�,. �'",vr i,,. .�,..PI. „✓/�r,./ I / r. -r/. rI r fi ✓r I!/Y rr ,,./a./ '" "; -,;., i ✓, n„�/Ja f�f 9�i,,.., .,,, ,,, r�� (r„� ,r1/✓ /",,,�/ f�( I; r f;J✓,✓i J/ / "t 1�/ J`r/J,..✓ G,:' ini(/;r r:/�lJ' rrr� ' q,., ,� fob, l Nl G .;/ � .,�/,f <, i�y"rr%✓ ✓�✓.rJ� u t r/.,, Gr „<, :��r, r..,r,,,, ;,,,�/ %✓e. r��Yd;,//i/ ��I!n ;... l ✓,,.n- ��. r t r �'i!'rl>,; � ,.i,! o,,, n ,✓c'r I✓' �✓;�('.1,� ,lr•+J,r"',r„�l�Y �✓/1( ,J ly/ ,l u":✓. / A ;s,;b r /.r /,r ,�,�,; /41�.:,�// I i�.r3' / ... r,�✓', � i'/�J,F�r-//�!,R ;r' ,>� //ir �.. � 3�":�i7 ��r or% r A'�3a/✓�'.a /✓ ✓.. ��% r/1 ,er M -/ „s;-„ ,,, / �./r( / � �.. 6�✓�/,: r.e�. �„ ;�';�",>, �e' A d ji,✓1,��n/ �lr J�-, �..� �� 'J,h1lb G .✓l r�'�'✓, ,,. /fir li��r9 x�/ /✓ i v r ;�q y; ✓,/✓ J„/1 r �,!� �ir�t m,,u, r ✓�„ r4,v:� 1 I✓✓ � / / ✓.,�� v%4 rJ IX"✓e ✓, Z r r✓'o �.Ji :.l l✓../ r,✓,� �r. /rr ./r, /r �G, r r., I 1 r„m"i r r( ✓r /l,✓U/i>/..✓ r�' (�:✓ �' ,rr 1 J y,rJ r ".:. ",'r „ rota ,qy:.., ll, l pr,<�„ �" f.,"d r /;,,„:� � .r r /a�i;✓ r; ✓,�y off j �% �✓�F�rl / Jr r`"/{G/ ✓ /� 1"/ // r r ";: J(I .Y�+ f, dxuv „n� fG�,,,;�, r n r � � , ✓l/�Ir/ rl f✓n m� +rhr J ra"� r rt;, 4 ✓,, l/ r 9 , ;✓ri;,," �l, � ✓ � I ,�, ;, ,!i i/,�Y� r�,i,l la„�I' r!, ��',,, d///3' � v '✓/�l .�.�+rf��'�J�r rr;jr o ✓;�,f� /� ✓ I r,✓r/�,";rr��». ✓d ,. ��i ''!, �r,rr �//J vn,r / °� J,�f�ap�rfll r"II�/� iY�,� � /f��"��, �J /`�f y �✓JJ ,/r:/.,1 r.�,,,c, �� n,,✓:.,�r ,r"r::;��rJ Jfiipl Ga,,;: Y u,�i:ry I .� l,r ✓'`ti�'.n^l fir✓",",� n" / I r:, / r.-rdt "l/ ,� „r, it r ,✓ ,,��71„a„�✓ ,,;: / `�, �i ,✓ / r;, „ �„G94'r✓ v¢„➢ a/r" ..Nr✓..aj r� / ;,,:4 ?�'I)u..�' J/ Y 11 /r/'�G��,...,r,�la r �"�/,1/'/ l„f. ✓,2rr)/;.✓. $�Jd ,✓ ,dn �R, f, ,,., ,,, ✓, °,;. � :",t✓1,� r,°;�' crr/h✓,�✓�J rf9 lrr„!J��»' �..n 1��b J/n�n��t r✓/e�'Ns"'dp rJ �;� ✓cfl "/:i. 1 � „< ,,,,, `�, ' !nrr r �JJ1;l✓ Grr'!f'yi.�;; ✓Gnr n � "ifl/.4 r/1� r✓r.;/ rz f�"✓. -✓//� /.. ,r / r f 1,r ',."r , ,� &"N ,,. / �j /✓<.,+/"I/� c ,�:„/ („"-. r. � 1 f.,r:J /�zfo��,/.;flnr'$sN�Y w't ( rf;. / / F r IJ � 1.. e"!�/✓v�rf✓.. ,r; `r ;i ';:"`„ r //G�/ ra�keoae....ty ;,' tl '�/N AYE/s ✓rri/�P✓� ,��li re'r r,,,s ✓ fb �� 1 �J"or, /✓/ /�✓"r�X're'd .5!/,�;w ,V� 1�, / r )/ / /„ r;..✓,.n,,nU��r i-:, ,,, ✓,,, ,,,,. ," r/ / ;�,,;, ✓1G ;'%,/.r /- ✓ �,�� r„y u/l 1(„ � /frv.✓✓a />v (r ✓ f�'rl ry J � tiw j ✓ r.. rr ,,": e 1P�Rge�1 r r,�.c. q .r�✓/'?%,"`;v,a, s�+%®�rr�tii'r/i,�.�'/��nr��.�YF�'��,r'�r��,r'�,e//r wry/,✓ uk d�e,a,ar�.ar7`�b�t/e„:v,v r/ .L. dlh„y ✓, "�..i �,Po.a:, ,,.;J,�✓�,✓`% ,. o>, ;l� I,,.,,I✓",;>;'. F1140 2.2.b C� F^A, ffI//I// �flfN j e61/ lfp / i w� ✓✓'.,�/ � � r � �� err, ,`e �� ..., l ,�F ':.�},g'« r��f E�+A yM+ F'� �, li I I I � �� :�`�HI IIIIIII � I ... �'u ✓ � ih i r i �/ r ''F� '�'�W',;/r �9/ if A I f s" s rr/✓ ,,, /2/ / i>A � �Uo�fki a/ ;f%j), ��t��hWV((�l�l 'wraov ............� /�/la/,� I /h��1r//Irdf,��r'YIYJy,non. ✓a e a Mgffi ��J E 4 �p rr/r�r%ri/%i/ i�i /i'�/!/:% w / �l�i !�/�i,✓/ �/ /ii ,// !/%%yi ',r/ „! f ' ��, I / !a r,lr r„n'/ �� !.//✓ /a /!✓� /f�0,. /u//!/i/fi .r/�(l �/ � lli;.,% ll�r� /�1+; „�.,,,,�,,,,, r/ r.,,, / � ✓ /i r . /i // /� �, //�,/ii r,a,,,fir,//, /�/„„ !� l,,�i,/„ /��,lily ! /✓✓ /i /.. ��/✓//, ,�. 1.,n ! �/rl �// 9../ !.�/ '�J,i< /. ..14�1 !J / rr.. .!. ,!✓%! /! �-/, .//.,i �,G.//r /ryir / �.�%/,rl�,A �✓r ln,//r./� .r.,!„i 1��, „„ll ✓r ,,,,, , //�. !.!✓'// !.l/./! / ,/ i.//r/// li.,.ri-/r,�„ �'//,. � �r ✓iit ��1, l �q.� ✓i�n, T/ri( .+ -,,, ,i,✓_,l ru/,�,n rn r✓l.,, ,!r.,,lr-r /��'/ ll <./�/A /� e.!r ✓,.1, � ��..�l �..� ,�'� ll.a � � !/ l/r Jrr, f 4 all /,i G,(/ir ,� ,/i//i !, ✓/ /,,,/„/ /,r /,li .gill , � r�,,, I,.. ,.,ir., 11,�. .....,;�! i.✓ ,l ,// /� ,��/.r ✓/ fl .li. �� rr / ,r,..f�; -. /iJ, /.� />�!/,r, , ,nJ , /!✓r 1, !,//f/ r,rr/„ vli, t� ,.,1✓rf �,, , � / %�„ /e ✓,r,, , ✓y � � � ,/,, �,r,,,t /� r to � ✓,,,/� F /./ �.�/r/, a l� ✓a. r lr. - /¢ -r Sri/, J�.r„n,� � �r,rl�✓!�/ �1,,�� ,f�,.U✓.. ,„ / �/�1 mr r ! :� I�/ ��„' :,,, r. 4 FIIN„r J. / ,rl�/ � n,n. 1 / „�,r lei ,1pli,!l. � ,/„) I✓t r, ,, ..fll�. /.J /I//✓i.,, //, lrr ) ./�! / ,1n/. f F.a� r �„/.✓.��,�, ,.,f l l/ / ./. 4� ,,,,,',r' ss„ „!, r✓/a&w��r / /c /,�r ✓/. 1, Arf r ,,,,r`ti ,� pi,/ /, �! !„ // /, i,� r;�;r, r r// r /,. l �!/�� //'.rI'., ✓,! �A .r/ �.,� r./� L /� ��. r- rii. r �./ ,lr..l. / ., ',,.,, --, ,,,;',, r�i,�� /�/�✓,. „l,,,�„r � < ,l 1 / ,lon „�,� f, / tiilF / �/� l ,r,lal !.�l, 1/!� ,,!/r. ✓� � .. ,i, i r ✓ r !f,,� � � rill rl. ,e /� .,,, ,,,,,, >;>,;;, ",,,, rf /r,,, ,,. ,..,rr ,!. r„11 �r,�, i r� r !� nl I � �r/iln l�r r/✓,�„/l., Err,r„ ,�„ � !, ri1 r/ // � /%!, ll�u /� / !� ✓ l � �rn! „��,/� �,v � ! ,rr !A lr/l l !r ! cr ,, zlr,�/.. r �llr/,�11/F fl,l✓/ � /./ 1 %.r,/ ..� I.I ,./� J rl'I � l /, „'.� r��,.�1.(, �,rf !c ,� ,,,, /,, / ! r.///� n/�,. ,,.r, .I�rl � 1 �� lni J,r, i, r � /,l� � /,Yv H.1. J/ irr/, ��f ,,,/ /l l�A✓I, �/� / �, /r� ,/ /„I !� 0 ! 1l ,1,r l G I � rr i l.,,, ��. �/, ✓, �. �� ,A,i ,�, 1. �i I ! !/ Ai o��l/r � l� /./ F,�. ,.,r, � r i J/ /.. l,� l � ✓�:/3 l, l li, n l i � i r � ,., ,, i r 0 /� / �r, ,.,� r ,r,,,. ir.,i, ! ,✓ ,, r,�� /:)f, ril, . :// ,� ./� /1�, ,tip ,p' , �/ ,�, �,�11 �/,, r. , , /, /I✓ ,/r � ///�,/ l/., �„J l /1 /!a r� l„ r ,, o, � r/ ,<„ 1 it r r/,� // /i r i� p �,, 1 ✓/1 ,l, �,, /�/ ✓, � / /, it ,', <. ,,� lI �, !r, r %.l r.,/r,,d b,, 0�✓n � �1 r,%✓ ,i. <� /�. ) � ,//� r„ !,. 1Yr .� .,,..! ,r ..I /,7, ,,,, ,.,,, ,,,, „,,,,,,, ,,,,,, ,.,.,m r/„� /l „� � ,�'N, IrP ,,. � 11 nr.r. ,/�� .�. � ! ✓,,,1 ��/. ��/ ,.I / ,A✓� i 'I, f, � r!,�, r.G% n l��,i J� �7�� l r� m„r,.,.�IG, „��i r f� / /r 7! i I,.,� A' �, r✓ Pi, 1,J rr � F r /i ,-!/I+<i:.lhly ✓i,v ,,,a � 1, ,,pf„ ! � .,�„: ,l ,//�, �� /,�� r, ✓% nr ,r��,�,r � I /i a / r, „J �1'v;� ,��il /r` „��)! fr ,I� .ar�y l ! �� >/ ,li 1.,. ,r .� �,,,,,.r,!,�,��/1 c r ,.J /✓ ,�� ,..v ��9 rf�. / /r .,✓�/� !/ r.,lr /, ,r r��%��r ,��,l ,, ! n ��r A, �,r„.1, .�„ V / � „+r ,/. i ✓1.. �"JAJ ,!, le�� /, ,,�., ,1 ,!/ ! r .,,r,., � „F' �.,,�„ 4f�,1. w�/, /.,i//ll !v r�. rl / ,.lr, ✓ E:x%til/l�/ ,e ! .,/ / / � � ��! A ! 1 r.,r, n0, ,� ti /. r,„ 1 � �i✓ /��r/%lip � r/r/w �i� / 1, �,l „� / � ,, �?� ,,,�/r/,/�, r, U/, ,./ / i�, ,,/l / ,,. r ,p�< !r /. n ,. ,r � ,//,�., ti » � .� � ,,, J 1, ✓l�! ,�<I .,l ,v /��, (.I°7A/��i/��.��i��i//G//��r, �%J��YII7�b�IL�IIr/r6Glvr,��r��a?t`li��i�� f�f,.�J,�,r.ryr��(s>�1��4/lla✓��✓,,,�A/YII��r�l vr,.ril,�/l�,ii.�...,,GY�I�,�J/„/�..,,/rI,A,G,��t,�...,✓.r� ;9,,,I.i LI�I�(IOi��vl.. , VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE Field Inspection Report 847-45 -2530 Gate Company Game Permit ## Address 0 - Type of Inspection „ 4) __ - -- -- E I ate pflar)), M c # Comment „. Date (n Co LL f L o r ti x n, -------------- „ r e x W x a i P > > E r x w c L O �L •y O U m N c c� a c a� E Inspection: ❑ Passed ( Failed ❑ Call for re-inspection $__ fee due prior to re-inspection Q Inspector Date of Inspection m Builder/Occupant Signature Inspector Date of Re-Inspection Builder/Occupant Signature Packet Pg. 19 2.2.b Response to Standards The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; 0 Your Evidentiary Statement: Ci m Correct. It is because the fence doors open hanging each time. Because of the weight of E the door, not being able to land on concrete, or hard surface, it causes damages and cn necessity to change doors or fix them constantly. CO �a The proposed variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; 0 �a L Your Evidentiary Statement: > 0 U Not by any means. I have actually spoken to the neighbours, but it's not visible in any way, and does not change the landscape, look and feel and it is absolutely not noticeable. c 0 L LL X There are practical difficulties or particular hardships in carrying out the strict letter of this Chapter which difficulties or hardships have not been created by the person presently having an interest in the property;and, aD Your Evidentiary Statement: 0 x w 0 No, issues have not been created by a person. �a 3 m •L The proposed variation will not be detrimental to the public health safety and welfare. a� Your Evidentiary Statement: N X W No it will not have any effect on the public health and safety and welfare. r- M L 0 r- 0 L L 0 .N 0 U d c M a c a� E s a Packet Pg. 20 2.2.b Ujui �°o�i III o VILLAGE G 0 U MEMORANDUM L 0 E E DATE: September 7, 2021 cn TO: Rati Akash, Village Planner 00 FROM: Ted Sianis, Civil Engineer II �a L SUBJECT: 811 Summer Court— Driveway Extension/Sidewalk > U L The Engineering Department received a request to inspect/verify grading for a driveway extension adjacent to the driveway serving 811 Summer Court. This work was performed without a permit and permitted post o construction. Upon inspection, the newly poured concrete does not comply with Village code. The driveway LL extension has slightly raised the grade through a portion of the property where a drainage easement exists. There are three scenarios available to rectify this issue. The homeowner at 811 Summer Court may: a� 1. Remove the portion of concrete driveway extension within the easement and regrade adjacent to the remaining concrete; w 2. Remove the new concrete in its entirety; or 3. Replace the concrete within the easement, lowering the new concrete to meet the previously existing grade. Enclosed with this memo are: p a� 1. The plat that was submitted with the permit post construction which shows the Engineering y Department comments for the work, and a circled area where the new concrete does not meet X Village Code. w 2. A picture illustrating the grade change. 3. Aerial pictures illustrating additional unpermitted fence replacement. o c 0 ca •L c� co L .N 0 U d c �a a c a� E s a Packet Pg. 21 14� - 't , :, "'9� Ol p o' V) 00 b `a 9�s I 0 OtA 0 E E NO I-P co C7 (yjAk > 0 0 LL x It's LU 0 (mu be tm x LU �' Vs 0 0 APPROVED RPOSE: cn M Z IN G REVIEW DATE BY: E ENGINEERING REVIEW' DATE BY: Packet Pg. 22 2.2.b New lJn®perm tt � J u J F n Lw tion IE Co r l Change in grad Approx. 4 inche� O ,r IIIOII�I��Y�) � �,IJ// rrr�i ii y ,/(G rr�I�iaii ,,, iaaa/�/ ✓„ � �� /� Ir ir�/r / /liipiah�Mr/ i rr�r r LL fl r�ir'/Frr ,JIB fOIU (r��i spil f,///Jj/r�J%G��rll�f�rl�� s�,l >1 a �� P r ��r/�/U riN ��Fr✓r l�/ �l, LU p 3 hr/ >C W a Vs L �L L .N p U d c (a a c a� E s a Packet Pg. 23 a6e.iano3 paeA luoa=l xeW p003x3 0;AeMQAIJ(3 6ui;six3 ue aol uoi}eiaen a.aapisu0D) JOS ueld :;uewLj3e}}br IRT N N � a aD a J Z � 3 v r umVpppiilll .y a V '��( VVVVIO, iti �pu i I V — �� i:, uuulmuu I� w iik�� i i� i I Illfi i /m 9 W m- c „e � v -0 oQ r; & co LO CD ;a .r 4 6 [3 C C P ai fl�jr / v llrrGr mrr — ro — ° o � r �i/iiri r (D o� C �l,� l/// ��',v,' ✓N/yN/r�„ rir e1'r��r�ii�rir, 'f 2.3 ........................................ � ............................... � m Action Item : Consider Approval for(1)an Amendment to Planned Development Ordinance 9345, as Amended; (2)a Final Plat of Subdivision; (3)a Rezoning to a B3 Planned Business District; (4) Approval of a Vacation; (5)a Preliminary Plan; and (6)with Zoning and Sign Variations at 201 &241 N Milwaukee Rd .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Recommendation of Action Staff recommends approval,subject to the conditions in the attached staff report. Christian Kalischefski and Frank Petrich with WT Group on behalf of Speedway at 201 N Milwaukee is seeking to acquire and demolish the existing 2-story office building to the north (251 N Milwaukee)and construct a new largergas station on the entire site.The proposed Speedway expansion will include the construction of a new auto fuel canopy, commercial fueling lanes,and a convenience store.The petitioner has requested approval for(1)an amendment to Planned Development Ordinance 93-45, as amended; (2) a final Plat of Subdivision; (3)a rezoning to a B3 Planned Business District; (4)approval of a vacation of a portion of the alley depicted on the plat of vacation;(5)a Preliminary Plan; and (6)with zoning and sign variations at 201 N Milwaukee Rd and 241 N Milwaukee Rd. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff Report-Speedway (DOCX) • Plan Set (PDF) Trustee Liaison Staff Contact Pike Nicole Woods, Community Development Wed nesd ay,October 6, 2021 Updated: 10/1/2021 2:43 PM Page 1 Packet Pg. 25 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE Il g PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT N 06 T" MEETING DATE: October 6,2021 N N G1 S U BJ ECT PRO PE RTY LO CATI 0 N: 201 N Milwaukee Rd and 241 N Milwaukee Rd c •L PETITIONER: Christian Kalischefski and Frank Petrich with WT Group on behalf > of Speedway a PREPARED BY: RatiAkash,Village Planner E L a REQUEST: Petition to the Village of Buffalo Grove for approval of an c expansion to Speedway which includes the construction of a new auto fuel canopy, commercial fueling lanes, and a convenience store. The petitioner has requested the following: (1) an amendment to Planned Development Ordinance 93-45, as N amended; (2) a final Plat of Subdivision; (3) a rezoning to a B3 Planned Business District;(4)approval of a vacation of a portion of the alley depicted on the plat of vacation; (5) a Preliminary Plan; and (6)with zoning and sign variations. a� 0 EXSITING LAND USEAND ZONING: 201 N Milwaukee Rd,Zoned B3 Planned Business District c c� a 241 N Milwaukee Rd,Zoned RE Residential District COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The approved Village Comprehensive Plan calls for this Q property to be Industrial. Q. Q. a L PROJECT BACKGROUND � �� Christian Kalischefski and Frank Petrich with WT Group on behalf of Speedway at 201 N ` 1,; t � � v Milwaukee is seeking to acquire and demolish the existing 2-story office building to the north (251 N Milwaukee) and r CL construct a new larger gas station on the entiresite.Theirgoal is todevelopa sitethat o CL provides better flow for both passenger (auto) and commercial vehicles. co The proposed Speedway expansion will include the construction of a new auto fuel E canopy, commercial fueling lanes, and a �� '��' U Q Packet Pg. 26 2.3.a convenience store.The petitioner has requested the following: (1) An amendment to Planned Development Ordinance 93-45; 06 (2) A final Plat of Subdivision; c N (3) A rezoning to a B3 Planned Business District; (4) An approval of a vacation of a portion of the alley depicted on the plat of vacation; (5) A Preliminary Plan; •L (6) With zoning and sign variations listed part of this petition: j Zoning Variations a. Encroachment into the required 25' landscape setback along the Public Right of Way a RiverwalkRd and Milwaukee Ave. E b. Allow for an accessory structure(canopy)to be present in-between building and right-of-way m along RiverwalkDrand Milwaukee Ave. a Sign Variations o a. Allow for two additional wall signs on the auto fuel canopy that exceeds the required width of a wall sign and a wall sign's location not facing the right-of-way. > b. Allow for a wall sign on the commercial fuel canopy, which is not facing the right-of-way. as c 0 N PLANNING &ZONING ANALYSIS Workshop History This concept plan for the Speedway Expansion had originally been heard before the Village Board on June cn 21, 2020 and was referred tothe Planning &Zoning Commission(PZC).Subsequent to the Board meeting, > d the PZC held one workshop on July 21, 2021 to review the concept plans. Since the workshops were c conducted, Speedway has worked to address the PZC comments,and provided detailed plans requested for signage, landscaping as well as the traffic analysis report. c Site Plan E Q • The existing Speedway at 201 Milwaukee is seeking to acquire and demolish the office building located on the parcel to Q north at 241 Milwaukee Road. • The proposed site comprising of both the p p p g parcels measures approximately 3.47l�j��% W �` �t o acres. 1� • The subject property will include a new expanded convenience, with an auto fuel canopy on the west of the convenience .�x ,5. ' � �� '" � CL 0 store and the commercial fuel canopy east of convenience store. o CL • The auto fuel canopy along Milwaukee Ave has 20 fuel dispensers. • The auto fuel canopy measures approximately 6,132 square feet in area and measures 20,4, in height. • The commercial fuel canopy along N Riverwalk Drive comprises of a two-lane access with 3 dispenser pumps in total utilized by trucks. °1 E • The commercial fuel canopy measures approximately 1,750square feet in area and measures 20,4, U in height. `d Q Packet Pg. 27 2.3.a • The convenience store measures 4,608 squarefeet and measures 23'-6"in height. • Speedway auto and commercial fuel canopy and the convenience store will be operated 24 hours all N seven days of the week, and will employ in total 15-20 employees through various shifts during the 06 day and night. N a� c Video Gaming L State Statute > Pursuant to State Statute, should Speedway proceed with the concept, they would qualify as a "Truck Stop" since they are greaterthan3-acres and sell morethan 10,000gallons of diesel per month.Speedway £ will not be providing truck stop amenities such as showers, laundry, a sit down restaurant, etc. The L acquisition of the parcel to the north is what would allow for them to meet the land size requirements. a One key difference from bars/restaurants with video gaming is that state classified truck stops with o .. gaming are permitted to operate machines 24 hours/day. Furthermore,they are not required to sell liquor ca for on-site consumption. Lastly, they may be permitted up to ten video gaming machines versus the > maximum six for a bar/restaurant. Staff has reviewed our Gaming regulations and found that the site c would be permitted to operatethe gaming machines,subject to the approval of the Village Board as part m of their zoning petition. Parking& Traffic vENWA The site consists o our LK separate curb cuts to allow FL �� access tothe proposed site along Milwaukee Ave, Riverwalk Dr and N " E Riverwalk Dr. • Along Milwaukee Ave, two ' a curb cuts are being �' w r, .. proposed. The one to the south will allow for right-in u right-out auto circulation o movement. The second r curb cut to the North will — -- 3 YRWAIRL£E AVENUE(ROUT£A£) allow for full access �� «,.. movement for both auto a and truck circulation to the site. y • Along Riverwalk Dr, a curb cut is being proposed to allow for auto entering and exiting the site and trucks to exit the site. C • Along N Riverwalk Dr, a curb cut is being proposed to allow for full access movement for both auto and truck circulation to the site. • The petitioner has provided a traffic analysis from KLOA who have indicated that the existing traffic facilities can accommodatethe development. • The project will include 23 parking spaces found south and west of the convenience store, and the E z auto fuel canopy provides for 20 parking spaces whilefueling.The Speedway development meets the U Code for parking. Q Packet Pg. 28 2.3.a Plat of Vacation N • As part of the request,Speedway is seeking that the Village vacate a parcel part of 241 Milwaukee Rd 06 property. It appears that when the office building was constructed in the County, a portion of the old N alley was never vacated. • Staff supports the request to vacate the property. • The petitioner has also provided a plat of vacation for this subject property. Plat of Subdivision • The existing site consists of 2 parcels for the subject property at 201 Milwaukee Road and 241 a Milwaukee Road. £ • As part of their request, the petitioner is proposing a final plat of subdivision to consolidate two . a parcels into one lot and retainthe 201 Milwaukee Rd Address. c • As a condition of approval,the final plat shall be revised in a manner acceptable to the Village. ca Stormwater > • Engineering has reviewed the stormwater report and has requested further clarification on how the c stormwater in the south portion is connected to detention basin in the northeast corner of the site; m responses and updates to the stormwater report will be submitted in their final engineering plans to the Village. • The preliminary engineering plans as proposed have been reviewed by the Village Engineer. As a condition of approval, final engineering will have to be submitted in a manner acceptable to the Village. d 0 c Landscaping a • The Petitioner has provided a landscape plan showing new and existing landscaping throughout the development. E • The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum 25' landscape setback along Milwaukee Avenue and Q RiverwalkDrive. The Petitioner's plans show a 12' landscape maintained along Milwaukee Ave and N a Riverwalk Dr,thereby a variation is required. Q a • The Petitioner has included that the reduction in landscaping is accounted for having the auto and commercial fuel canopy between convenience store building and the public right of way. • The Village Forester has reviewed the landscape plan and does not have any concerns with the c proposed and existing landscaping. v ca Building Elevations 3 • The proposed 23'-6"tall convenience store building is centrally located on the Speedway site and is a comprised of brick masonry. 0 • The auto and commercial fuel canopies are painted the Speedway conventional gray and red and measure 20'-4"in height. C Signage Freestanding Ground Sign • Speedway is retaining the original Speedway Ground Sign in the same location which was approved as part of the Ordinance No. 2013-70. U Q Packet Pg. 29 2.3.a Building Sign • The proposed sign on the convenience store meets Code. N 06 Auto fuel(wall) canopy N • Speedway has proposed 4 canopy signs on the auto fuel canopy. • The two logo signs on the east and west elevations of the auto fuel canopy meet Code. • The two'Speedway'signs on the north and south elevations of the autofuel canopy require a variation for the width of the sign. In addition the sign on the north elevation requires a > variation for location as it does not face a right-of-way. • The 'Speedway'sign measures 15'-9"in width; and exceeds the maximum allowable width of a the sign by 6'-6". E L a Commercial fuel(wall) canopy c • Speedway is proposing two logo signs on the commercial fuel canopy. 0 p Y• p p g g g pY• �. • The two logo sign on the south elevation of the commercial fuel canopy requires a variation for the location as it does not face a right-of-way. > • The two logo signs meet all sign requirements for height,area and width of the sign. c 0 N d Billboard Sign • There is a large commercial billboard sign located on the northern portion of the property, which Staff is recommending removal. VARIATIONS 0 c Zoning Ordinance a 0 The following is a summary of the requested Zoning Ordinance variations reflected in the plan: M E Q A Variation to Section 17.32.020 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow an accessory structure in the front and side yards as depicted on the Preliminary Plan a Per the Zoning Ordinance, any accessorystructure (canopy)cannot be located closer to the front lot line Q than the principal building. Since the auto and commercial fuel canopies are located between the main building (convenience store) and the roads (Milwaukee Ave and N Riverwalk Drive), the variation is c required.Staff notes that this is a common variation for all gas station requests and finds that the variation �? is warranted. >, ca 3 A Variation to Section 17.36.040 of the Zoning Ordinance to reduce the landscape setback of 25'to 12' along N Riverwalk Dr and Milwaukee Ave CL y Per the Zoning Ordinance, a landscape setback of 25' has to be maintained along public right of ways which in this case is Milwaukee Ave and N Riverwalk Dr. Speedway has a 12' landscape setback along N 0 CL RiverwalkDrand Milwaukee Ave. For comparative purposes,the existing Speedwayparking lot is setback approximately 10' from the Riverwalk Drive at its closest point and approximately 6' from Milwaukee. Furthermore,the existing office building's parking lot is up to the lot line. c a� E z U �a Q Packet Pg. 30 2.3.a Signage Auto Fuel Canopy Sign 06 a) A Variation to Chapter 14.16 of the Sign Codefor the location of the canopy sign;and, N b) A Variation to Chapter 14.16 of the Sign Code to exceed the maximum allowable width of the sign. a� c Commercial Fuel Canopy •L a) A Variation to Chapter 14.16 of the Sign Codefor the location of the canopy sign;and, > c �a DEPARTMENTAL REVIEWS a E Village Department Comments a Engineering The Engineering Department has reviewed the engineering plans and c .. has no specific comments or concerns regarding the engineering plans. ca Landscaping The Village Forester has reviewed the landscape plan and has no concerns with the proposed landscaping. m Fire Department The Fire Department has reviewed the proposed plans and does not have any objections. a� 0 SURROUNDING PROPERTYOWNERS Pursuant to Village Code, the contiguous property owners were notified, and a public hearing sign was a posted on the subject property.The posting of the public hearing sign and the mailed notifications were completed within the prescribed timeframe as required.As of the date of this report,the Village received E E three calls of which two of the callers had no issues. In addition, the property owner of the subject Q property at 301 N Riverwalk Dr has appointed Teska Associates who have provided comments based on a the drawings submitted which is attached as part of this packet. Speedway has provided a response to Q each of the listed comments also attached to this packet. .N STANDARDS 0 c� Variations The following arethe applicable standards fora variations requested: m m 1. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under cQ' the conditions allowed by the regulations of the zoning district in which it is located except in the case of residential zoning districts; CL 0 aD 2. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; 3. The proposed variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. a� E Petitioner has provided a response to the Standards U Q Packet Pg. 31 2.3.a Signs The Planning &Zoning Commission is authorized to make a recommendation to the Village Board for a N variation to the Sign Code based on the following criteria: 06 0 N A. Except for Prohibited signs (Chapter 14.32), the Village Planning & Zoning Commission may 4i a) recommend approval or disapproval of a variance from the provisions or requirements of this c Title subject to the following: •L 1. The literal interpretation and strict application of the provisions and requirements of this Title > would cause undue and unnecessary hardships tothe sign user because of unique or unusual c conditions pertaining to the specific building, parcel or property in question; and a 2. The granting of the requested variance would not be materially detrimental to the property £ owners in the vicinity; and m 3. The unusual conditions applying to the specific property do not apply generally to other a properties in the Village;and c .. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the purpose of this Title pursuant to Section 14.04.020 ca ai c B. Where there is insufficient evidence, in the opinion of the Planning & Zoning Commission, to 0 support a finding under subsection (A), but some hardship does exist, the Planning & Zoning Commission may consider the requirement fulfilled if: 1. The proposed signage is of particularlygood design and in particularly good taste;and 2. The entire site has been or will be particularlywell landscaped. co a� Petitioner has provided a response to the Signage Standards c a 0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of an amendment to Planned Development Ordinance 93-45; A final Plat of E Q Subdivision; A rezoning to a B3 Planned Business District; An approval of a vacation of a portion of the alley depicted on the plat of vacation;A Preliminary Plan; with zoning and sign variations listed part of this a a petition L d 1. The proposed development shall be developed in substantial conformance to the plans attached c as part of the petition. c� 2. Afinal plat of subdivision shall be revised in a manner acceptable tothe Village as required. 3 m 3. Afinal plat of vacation shall be revised in a manner acceptable tothe Village as required. C 4. Final Engineering plans and stormwater report shall be revised in a manner acceptable to the o CL Village as required. (D 5. Any directional or incidental sign added to the sign package provided shall be reviewed administratively by Staff. c a� 6. The existing billboard sign on the northern portion of the site prior to the issuance of a site E z development permit. U �a Q Packet Pg. 32 2.3.a ACTION REQUESTED N The Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) shall open the public hearing and take public testimony 06 concerning the request.The PZC shall make a recommendation to the Village Board. N a� Suggested PZC Motion PZC moves to grant approval of an amendment to Planned Development Ordinance 93-45,A final Plat of Subdivision; A rezoning to a B3 Planned Business District;An approval of a vacation of a portion of the > alley depicted on the plat of vacation;A Preliminary Plan; with zoning and sign variations listed part of this _� petition. The proposed development shall be developed in substantial conformance to the plans attached a E as part of the petition.A final plat of subdivision shall be revised in a manner acceptable to the Village as L required. Final Engineering plans and stormwater report shall be revised in a manner acceptable to the a Village as required.Any directional or incidental sign added to the sign package provided shall be reviewed c .. administratively by Staff. Billboard sign on the northern portion of the site shall be removed once Speedway begins improvements on the site. > as c O N d 3 G1 C a 0 E Q a a a L d .N 0 V 3 m m a y 0 Q 0 C d E t V O r� r� Q Packet Pg. 33 2.3.b SPEEDWAY #7649 201 N Milwaukee Ave, Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 Project Narrative August 13, 2021 m CD The existing Speedway site is located at 201 N Milwaukee Ave in the Village of Buffalo Grove, IL. The proposed development will include purchasing +/- 1.526 acres of land to the north that is currently office 3 buildings. Speedway will combine that property with their existing+/- 1.955 acres to allow them to redevelop the site for a total of+/- 3.481 acres. The onsite improvements will include the 4,600 sqft Speedway Retail store with an increased footprint, updated amenities, fresh food, a 10 dispenser Starter Gate Auto Canopy, 06 2 Commercial Fueling Lanes (CFL) Canopy, one goal post ID sign and other typical site improvements. Speedway is proposing to have video gaming at this location. The minimum lot area required for video gaming at a truck stop location is 3 acres. Even though Speedway would be classified as a truck stop, a L Speedway will not be providing in store truck stop amenities such as showers, laundry, a sit down restaurant, etc. Speedway is known for hiring and promoting from local communities. This facility would provide 15-20 c �a employment opportunities for the local individuals. Speedway makes a commitment to the local community a not only through employment but also through charitable giving and even with the materials used to build E the facility. The Retail store is a masonry bearing building with the latest in consumer driven technology. a The current Speedway is zoned B-3 (Planned Business Center District). The northern parcel is currently zoned R-E (One Family Dwelling District). The purchased parcel will be rezoned to B-3 (Planned Business Center District) and then combined to the current Speedway parcel. The underlying ordinances will then have to be ti amended for the Plat of Subdivision. c N G1 The site would consist of four separate curb cuts to allow access to the proposed site. Along Milwaukee Ave, two curb cuts are being proposed. First one will allow for right in right out auto circulation movement. The second curb cut will allow for full access movement for both auto and truck circulation to the site. Along cn Riverwalk Dr, a curb cut is being proposed to allow for auto entering and exiting the site and trucks to exit the site. Along N Riverwalk Dr, a curb cut is being proposed to allow for full access movement for both auto and truck circulation to the site. ii O E a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d c �a a c a� E s U a Packet Pg. 34 ...... O IN iota+z n d ...d n �o as na s a d...a v v a ) s a lo.wy=env ..... ......... ... . ^�\ ramN + �suo.i o„ a a� _ pn n _ I.I Nf10)INHI r dno j V {0V{{NfIVM IIIN a-ilnN M.�� w„w w .Ltt ;*mpaads r x df1021J 1M NV Id II IS d(,)10) . ......... �H1d�Nl D�} �Pb�p{ aye'✓ /G2 I k i + W // Olt � 2 I � d +dIr+ayN � w I ---A--ld-11-d—1— Al.... Md 4-1-11 3AV]]MnVMlln HibON 11,1AND oivjjf)o oing M3N C3 Ids 9J Poa„ SNOIIVAT� 110,�O ............. ;*Mp lamfir. ..� .... �''// �1��, N C ��"� y Q. o. E p r111111111141 E t e JOIN ,k/////////////I .............�cii NO "Mill" All z z �,�1;yF 1 > j /a I I � � /�a v � �''� j 11' I�!// � W KI 1 J : J l W u j LWLUJ LU LU w j " f S yi LU /�� /� t r / 1�,I 1,� Gdti�'1¢x f if f/ ��r', r` II � � / � �� z s & IF,; PAN 9111 R 0111,1PAR, A ANN, Of p, fffffff,fff,ffjj 1.4 All, I J as (aaa w�ozxws:�a=�e�,en•��a w�ia,e•�onr�rn•a�a�aa•,.�ca�s•,.aa�eie a,awv:i.�aM,aais�e�l,as aria ry n 3 � z 41 z g w Ili G� i a3d.�3 —� z"ll.. .r s.. d,3om ■ / I I m II 1 I 1 ea I I I I \ la I I�I I xl 1 ICI �I I � I = Q a O I J II I J� W it I - � Qm I Q I 0 W I I I I 0 OW I I h 00 =�m w o Q oae 11 w 0� ^ IQ I n �o WY7L sae w a s p � I e N 7L89 N 0 �o w � Q LL goo Y� o c n � W3a., ;a� ►- mVW7 0 a J 'off" ac Ljj CL Qo VI pz �s M om � m / to a s & w mN I o I co „RJ E0.99 N rao� ^ a ¢.o �a3e 33d3 a ag ,SB'6Zl 3 „2P,fl.R9 N _w - o o li 'HnS H12/ON N7YM 2/3r1/2l P - L 107 �rr�.w u 2.3.b BUFFALO VVId i� Iiilrrg„p'dNmI,NIng II N, au°tment Fdty-Onic R wrpp 1"Ivd F Fax R47 537 58,A5 3 �a 3 de d&whi,II°II..... A kd Ev7VJ�ncer H Prt...^d7VYPbu-l4, Ipq 4°V!j_!rye"3�,':�1 d'pG�plp�"IV„ll1 kld . 04 06 r Q September 27, 2021 d Frank Petrich, P.E. c Project Designer, WT Group c° •L 2675 Pratum Avenue Hoffman Estates, IL 60192 ca Re: Preliminary Engineering Submittal -Speedway(201 N Milwaukee Ave.) a E Dear Mr. Petrich: i a The Village's Engineering Department received and reviewed engineering drawings, plat of subdivision, o stormwater report, cost estimate, and P.E. calculation submitted digitally on September 13, 2021 for the ca Speedway development project at 201 N. Milwaukee Ave. in the Columbian Gardens/EMRO subdivisions. Below are comments that shall be addressed prior to the next submittal and/or issuance of any Village permits. 0 N General � 1. Enclosed is a draft Development Improvement Agreement(DIA). The Developer will be required to execute and submit the DIA including; M a. A Letter of Credit ($662,314.00). cn b. Engineering review and inspection fees ($19,844.00). c. A cash deposit ($6,690.00). p 2. Plat of Subdivision: c a. Please add the Corporate Authority's Certificate (can be found at the end of Chapter 16 in a our municipal code). 0 3. Please provide a WDO permit application for review and execution by the Village Enforcement M officer. E 4. Please provide the offsite improvement plans for review. a 5. Village Exhibits still missing from plans. Enclosed are PDF's of the required Village Exhibits. a a Plan Sheets CD (Demolition Plan) a 1. The building being demolished at 251 N. Milwaukee is believed to have one Village water c connection and one private water well. If the water well still exists, it will need to be properly v abandoned. 2. Enclosed is the Village's GIS record of the location of the water service connection to building 251 N. Milwaukee. This may not be the actual location; however, no water services are shown on the demo plan for the 251 building. Please add removal of the water service to the demo plan. a CS (Plot/Dimension Plan) 1. The Village requires Neenah or EJ Ironworks ADA panels(brick red/colonial red). Do not mix/match E manufacturers as the colors are slightly different. U 2. Please eliminate unused pavement sections from the legend. Q OP A wp4 ~ An Internationally Accredited Public Works Agency Since 2004 Packet Pg. 38 2.3.b BUFFALO G'ROVE CG (Grading Plan) 1. Shorten/lower 5'-6'+ tall mounds to 3' above the top of curb. 2. Define the 100-year storm overland flow route(s). 3 �a CE (SWPP Plans) 3 1. SE/SC will be required on the west side of IL-21. Not sure if you were going to show on this set of plans, or offsite plans. 2. Add inlet protection to the storm structures along Riverwalk Drive immediately south of the 06 proposed Riverwalk Drive construction entrance. c 3. Both CE sheets drawing no.'s are CE. Please update the drawing no. on the second sheet to CE1. N 4. The concrete washout detail is very faint on sheet CE1. c CU (Piping & Utilities Plan) c° •L 1. Two consecutive sanitary sewer cleanouts are not allowed per code. If one clean out is insufficient, please add another sanitary structure. 2. Crossing X1 has 4" of separation between pipes. Have pipe material thicknesses been accounted 2 for? a 3. Please replace the existing storm inlet at the NE speedway entrance with a catch basin. E 4. Pipe crossing X7 shall be placed in casing or WMQ pipe utilized for the storm sewer. a 5. Are the ADS inlet filters shown on page CU1 permanent or to be utilized for SE/SC purposes? 6. If an irrigation system is incorporated into the project, a separate Building Department permit will c be required prior to system installation. ca 7. Maximum structure riser ring height allowed is 2 courses at 6". Please update details on CUD-1. 8. Eliminate the last five rows of pipe specifications on CUD-1. ti c STD-CPC-1 (Pavement and Curbing Details) N 1. Please remove the cold weather curb installation detail. °1 2. Update pavement berm detail to show 3:1 max slope. SLorinwater Management t serf 1. Please confirm use of the ISWS Bulletin 75 rainfall data. 2. It appears Area 11 and 12 do not connect to the proposed detention basin. How is this unrestricted p flow accounted for? c 3. It appears storm sewers 2-5 surcharge during the 10-year event. Please size these accordingly to a convey the 10-year storm within the pipe. o M E If there are any additional questions, please feel free to call me at (847)459-2532. a L Sincerely, C L 101 Ted Sianis, P.E. v Civil Engineer II m G:\ENGINEER\Developments\Speedway\Engineering\2021.09.13_Plan Submittal\LET T Petri ch_Speedway_Review_09-27- 2021.docx a c a� E s U a wp4 ^ ~ An Internationally Accredited Public Works Agency Since 2004 Packet Pg. 39 `ueld uailaad `uoi}eaen`auoz8U `nipgng `na(3 ueld o;pwV:lnaddd aapisuo3) ;ag ueld :;uQWLIOe;;d C ri N � a aD a v .y v m v v � °' J z N n 0 N o v � va •� a c a 3�ywa « �a v r My •� ov oa gv � o W y 41 lot ¢ c m a a o m m v a d E.9+ c a ooe � v v o � o a M�" C c O wp� 1 % M r Q O " vo/ILn a° 00 o� a , Es v« a � o a yy� 5 0 c�,.�N� o m r° Q v Q o o ZOO v IL Q � _ � k ii 3Aon o-Ane dnoq) ...... 3/1V 13=171i'ON I K MOW 'd71 Q 9 q AUt ;*MP49 49 dS F Wd 101MR10 4 2 AWN, 1Y 11 um -mmHg Yli HWHIN 1=9U to; 1 Ho Him 1% oiIII �E xi LM . ------—-—-—- A// A>0 VAN Y�Q IY A [,L_ N ilk 11 41 J�q 111111111 A low 1A MA Amos 44 W f I A 'A l'i i!1n; in i il-Er" i Ppa „ (aaa w�ozxwz� e n as caps�aa-ee a.awv—v,aa—,l.as-re.rvawy - xaw.as,o. wxw m.vu..w.v.a.,�. ...F i.ma w . ..F ll'3AObO Oltl33H9 O o dnVj�! x v'- A1Nf103 3NV] i/ i�oMeuop ", 3GV 33Nnuim HAON WZ O �.�1� ��'��// �s ddind-3d �I !oN�Lui S Nddd NoisNING HE 2M C G I < -•q'� dG I M e m II a IIcn z I a I. o 1 E U z C Q r 3 1 41 L � 8 $ o H k — ■ O 1 �I 2 a o o,Es Q A� -- - 8 I �} I t�I � I I I �I I al g � I i i 3 1 i YN 33 -N A, dnojE) c-9 mpeedS MOM ,— A '_;� N AL dn op 9 ALAM V]d 9NIM19 Oak OUR oH 1 P OHIO o V 1 1 No mu Imp NkY MI HOUR NWH CA 'log k,V A cr <1 11T. . . nq D awl SmAmAngs L N MIN NUNN ME I Is 1111111110 011 ion 11 m 777vI <1 ...IW l----P-A--ld-11-d--la ozaa Al.... 0Md-i 1-1i...1)1-1 d 4-1-11 mr oi(r, ..... N:Ty .",41ilU �u dnoi 7� OVER AUt ;*mpeeft do 09JUM NAdo MAIM NOU11110d d1iftWiS Met J All Ail NK v U " M CA I I W A NOY R 1 Hun I Q &A 0 nun'in-IN�1 Uw w C) ✓ 1-7 J% cg 41 ism .......... ee nH 707747 ID74 Ell TUE. OCT ...IW lOL8LUZ---A--ld-11-d—1— Al.... 0Md 4-1-11 ii 3Aon oi-ne ....... ...... AIAj ;* ood -noD—dno. m YN 11— A, A VGffi-3b dnoND im S11illin EN ldld llltll',A`,—A v d M 3 q3 -H M t P -- ------ ... N2t WE s 5 a. 2 2 2 2 2 2 wdw �4, 1� A,A ON W HID J; �z n,M %uuI ji am, V dn 'M; as Z-P i SIT o 4 -�Jfl i0 qw! �,i 1� , , 'T It - W4 ccm. zi I-M UT �D I j A—, 0-1-11W lOL8LUZ s --A I-ld-111-d Al'- 011-ld-1 1-1-,,ld ............ NnoD-i no-jo YN li— Im ;*mpoodS oim-3�1 -7 SIVAG NVId Xilllin V/10TWOOFF, O six.- t P 9Luj Lu cc "tlj 0 Ljtlj�I z 0 N.�`L LL, ITI, ................................................... HM cz LLI M S2 > uj E cc > LLI uj uj 0-1-11W lOL8LUZ s --A I-ld-111-d Al'- 011-ld-1 1-1 d NnoD'I-3i I—N 1(1, dnojE) ....... ...... G ;*mpaeft ALA NVId NOUVIA3813 dnoNED)Im tu Ul 1:2 0. (aaH...1W lOiaLUZ--P-A--ld-11-d Al.... Md of 1-14-1-1...1)1-1 ue'd 4-1-11 adu ps zo his 9 2 IL U 1 1 w a Sow hill: Nil 5m o o' NIS 11 1 Lu A ......... na folmol 0 41--, Q kit !j RR 1N 1 m 52 id; j!4 SQ! Saar it i t. J 1!45,IHI AL 12 40 no !I OUR Saj Z as I His MOM Pho 1 A I Egg 1 HOW I M 1 0 111 all J1 Oul as o0 h! oil R 'IN PH WON Elm 0 r aa�3 a o�m� a � w � aoLL o �=aw a oLL I out w in p .�=o a� "o LL� lua A 'o UP o 0 0 % 1 1 1 L ---------if Q !me wr 10 L"o pp a t ri 107 Wp. € URI m 1 um 10 Lw oil 1 .*Gwi Ir FFJ 0-Im /_ y [L .w,zaag#— ------------ ---------- II --- (DIE!PIP limp wqjr �- - z twwi 'Gn-'H-L&ON>17VM�:GAIv III (r i IO, �©, ...IW --P-A--ld-11-d Al.... Md 4-1-11 pq LU 1 fA v CL 01 LU 4z:) CAP SAS a 1 was As UH -ROei HIRE 4 i 57V q,fi op o p-R I Oslo BERRI ji- MM, �7 ---A--ld-11-d—1—n Al.... Md 4-1-11 6N, 41'r LU ...... CLL Lu2E j o aA� FZ� - � - o o e ' �s"° r.�.,1� f�� g^s ,�..�9—a°�>. y�, I�' jN/8/ .}� IY .. � �`�` f JD V ------------- ----------- --- --------- ------- 4*1 ------------ "Lu 4to rr UA �!tu, cc ---------------— 4A ------------------------------------------------------------- --- ——————— Oil ...IW --P-A--Id-11-d Al.... Md 4-1-11 F77. Lu dab Nam - rj)1. uW pia \Q low <Z=) I-x CI) n illS�� o� LL p 5i log! > 'g A m W ping WF 1 W owl v Q-1 ANIAVM Nor y JE IN INN RI INI HI SI HH' P ;a w il " , . ... .... ... I--- R mu in im MI j 1 -- - --- ---- - --- --- --- -- - tha � aaaaa - -- 3S A3HO 3 ............./............................ ........... 4 A a <Q a <0 A I aa a--ld-'P-:l-lVI-P!--D) d ill",' 7'1,'T?w, dna� inNIAV JiNnaill HiKN M �o M3N iz Q�6 vwl Nql§ &mpea dS Nol' NVI d 3dVOSONVI dnomE).Lm l6 U 6 Nncp i - ----- - — -----—————-——- --7f — -- ——— —---—-- - -----——-- 0 o�� m ox� z--- 0 - ----——---— 0 ---------- --------------------- -------------------- --------------- .......... A cl LU LLJ LLJ Ix Alk, �2 -�t a--ld-'P-:l-lVI-P!--D) d ill",' NIX 3f1N3AY mAmllh HiWN IDZ M3N &mpoodS NVId 3dVOS4NVI dnomE).Lm so w ivnid]DNOO a- a tf -a- :7 R a zt� -a a at att - at a z2--- -t �--aa Ta aT -a E�a -�m a= ----- -------- - ---------- -- ------- --- C/:) c5 zg --a 2n --t t LL. -a t --t a --2 _z� a- a a a -a 0000 - aE a �pt LU 9 nt -a _-a a a �a--t a t Ps t t t �-H- IN -f zE U3 a t --=";a T LU a - a ---t -��a- moo 0 -- t t t a at-a- n--t �:2 --- --- a�o U3 ----------- t --- --- -----pa= ata±------- ------------ ---------------- --------------------------- z�ai t 7 ---4K a ta t�a t -a _-z- tfa -a a— a --2-a T ZZ -�t al� t � a a- -a---- ------ LZ a (Nlz --- --- ----- - --- ----`�- ,-a --- -------- --- - ----- -- R --I----��---= - - - - 9 1_-:5- -- -. =-� --a---- 4-��a�----- ----- ----�; - - 4 8 ----- - --- -- cz ;fG-- 9------------ Q—---------------- G-t- a--ld-'P-:l-lVI-P!--D) d ill",' NIX 3f1N3AY mAmllh HiWN IDZ M3N &mpeadS NVId 3dVOS4NVI dnomE).Lm so w ivnid]DNOO sk� o - Q'I - igda U:) I----- -- HN; ------00 0--- --- ---- ----- -- ------ �lz Za LU C/3 LU LIZ Ta t tE- g g g �E Tt --- --- - �tt -- ------ --- ------ - ---------- ----- - -- ----- ------- - ------- z9 LZ T T-- tf ----- ----- - ---- -- --- -- -- a--ld-'P-:l-lVI-P!--D) d ill",' NIX 3f1N3AY mAmllh HiWN IDZ M3N &mpeadS NVId 3dVOS4NVI dnomE).Lm so w ivnid]DNOO t ET a 2 A Ra ZA �2 �a T� U3 RK m Z C-) LU LU �-p i��- -E- -- ---------- ---------- - Z. -4 --4 E Vuu 2.3.b WII'Giiirou�p 1E.i.ira uineeiriiin - IDesigin - ns ul[bin CD Estimated Population Equivalent for Speedway#7649 - Buffalo Grove, IL 3 The following population information is the anticipated loading produced by the N development: Ta 0 N • Estimated vehicles served per day is 250. For purposes of this calculation, it is assumed the service station will produce a flow of 5 Gallons /Vehicle / Day. •L • Estimated employees is 5. For purposes of this calculation, it is assumed the > service station will produce a flow of 20 Gallons / Employee / Day. a. • New total flow expected is 250 Vehicles x 5 Gallons / Vehicle / Day + 5 E Employees x 20 Gallons / Employee / Day = 1250 GPD + 100 GPD = 1350 GPD a EF • Estimated Population equivalent is 1350 GPD / 100 GPD / PE = 13.5 - 14 PE U M • Estimated BOD .Population equivalent is 017 x 14 PE = 2.38 BOD PE p q 6 C 0 • Estimated Suspended Solids PE is 0.20 x 14 PE = 2.80 Suspended Solids PE as 0 a. 0 E a L Q 'Z Q L a (n C 0 U d C �a a C a) E s U a 2675 Praturn Avenue 22I.29 333 ineeirilinq wiiith '"Iir:a°'iisii in, III'°'Ia°ace& I'°'k'a.^,sii ir°u. Hoffman lEstates,IIL 60192 wteroghneeriirrg.corn Packet Pg. 56 (aaa i.w�ozxws:�a=�e�,en•�va w�ia,e•�ovr�rn•a�a�aa•,vca�s•,.aa�eie a,amv:i.�aM,aais�e°I,as�ria� v nv _ z m Z Z Z Z N wall A _ - � ,z � f tt � w 1 SHUT y R 2 - 17o t " any lot to not 7 is w { Li a j I II P omm . I p I o n (aaynemiyy LOZYVOL:smueuen'uwa AI-'- -1d P—Mdy IIIu )IS ewd'Iuaw4aw�V 0 too oil 1 MOT m N �O 4 LL �n J 0 � � W m W a rn Z r 4 � 0 V i p 1 i gAT high! AN mum 49a i ., r � Z = M1 9Z i ry d E Ve /�� Z jul •!Y!N!N!Y r � �: U` S 3 3 u d 4 p 4 ggpp pp RpY �II r.. , E - - - - rn @ a p•� q ON i ti Z A O s J = 4 � V - m dd W gve- ., AlP'-ld P—Mdy III-)IS-d 'MfN cm cc r I t1i I 1 11, AI-'--1d P—_III-)IS-d HE- \ /; �\ —�2NWE, �«\ \ \ ///; \\ \ cm (aaynem�_yy LOZYVOL:smueuen'uwa wpa,d'uaneaen aua,ay AlPq 'n ueld P—Mdy IIIu )IS ewd'Iuaw4aw�V 0 MfN cm m N J m i II 1, �f 1 I cc J, fill �..n / _w_.___aw___ \ j \ `} cm ° - - �.�: ay \ <� w � . . \\ \ � \ (aaa I.w�ozxwz:�a=�e�,en•�va w!la,e•��vr=rn•a�=�aa•��ca�s'�aa�ele a\awv:I�+aM,aals�e�l\as�rla\� v nv !n „ OD NN ui - - APE _ w c � '" -----'_ _ r �r i_--- ..... � G _ 'T- en-_---_-- �em3d — � / -_ _ ��— ♦ x i it ■ \ L_J L J �N it I Z I I I I a 1 I 1 I 3@ a I LLB O -W - H - �` I JO s ; I d re Y n o a I N = w Q o 6 w vvv vv i 2 Z —LL LL W� w Wm � o a s9 m m Q - 0 m .e e \ f Wm m W �eN co I— o a� od I \\Av\V o c \ I I o 1 I \ z h o T L- --- - I J to mo n �� I i ry Qa w „ 0 dew W 'I v i p „ v Ok N n e, 3 „90,00.99 N �- o 3 „2P,fl.99 N d - 0-0 H12/OAI)lWMN3i1/N O - 107 I�(3 W �F He Wg 21 W!- i-n H, co Np" .-I I -d—MM-E CO) LL LU III QO - _ �3 LL LL zp LU Lu LU U E .. ,p d- g JL 2! -o-W I E 0-1-11W Ii—A I-Id-111-d Al.... 11-1d-1 dnaig ]AV iwvwim HiKN IOZ �2 En ;*mpoodS aline M3N dnozj6lih AlNnoo�Nvi Hiaoe - ------ -- -- 2 s 9�- ----- ----- --- ----- ----- A-41&a ft tt Ix tu rc uu" a . -------------------- 0-1-11W --A 1-ld-111-d Al....—11-ld-1 .4 dnaigAAlNnNvKioo3 ;*mpoodS ]Vi(1wvwim HiN N[OZ aline M3 dnoz6lih o 3" Li cl� ro C) CD m CD CD C-1 � 'c .............. oo LC) .............. .............. z z 9T-O" CD III............ ILL.] 9 3 CD _F CD -,C tj LJ >< Z E� 0 CD El El U) _j 0- o CD op m 1, II - IV U) 9 9 CD CD X-O" 0-1-11W --A I-ld-111-d Al....—11-ld-1 —14.4 V1,11.111, —P I, AINnoo�Nvi dnaig ]AV iwvwim HiKN IOZ ;*mpoodS (11 fIS M3N dnozj6lih Z_. Z_ "L-Z � 12 ow Lo 11 CD CD cn 0-1-11W --A I-ld-111-d Al....—11-ld-1 —14.4 V1,11.111, —P I, AINnoo�Nvi dnaig ]AV iwvwim HiKN IOZ ;*mpoodS T (11 fIS M3N dnozj6lih C) C-) CD Q �LLj w CD_ —j u C) C-) 2 C= o D L,j j LL-j 110 ol 4,0-.t7 ol o ..0-1 o ol CD C) o CD IW LLJ> C-)LLj —j LE —j L�j. .. . c--) ................ uD L-,) CC W O w. cro - ------------ zo e 4,0 .1 400"......................................................................................4o VEM NN'17Giiirou��p ,In 4ieeriln -Il esigi n-Coinsukiing m a� Cominty 06 llll yy o N u u � � L 0 N awl; n .w 3 co Speedway #7649 o IF,, ,,,,,B a li III a 1 North I%WaLlkee Ave o l:..3ouIIlab Grove, IIIIIIIiIndis 60089 E III... Group P ur j c t MID21100065CL L L t ss Nq uJ 4f ® 0 DAMES GLASCOTT062 , �w m a r r .... .... ....... .. 7SW c llI11in o I s IF. ..I[::::... I iceinse Igo, 062 063362 1 .1...30... 021 a 2675 Praturn Avenue 224.293.6333 imgillrmeeirliing with III'.liirec'iisk°)Irn, III��"alace& Hoffman Estates,IL 60192 wtengineering,curn Packet Pg. 69 2.3.b Speedway#7649— Re-Build— Buffalo Grove, IL Table of Contents ➢ Project Narrative ➢ Maps 3 o Location Map o USGS Topo Map o NRCS Soils Map N o U.S. Fish and Wildlife Wetland Map o o FIRM Panel 17097CO266K N d V ➢ Existing Condition Calculations o Curve Number Calculation o o Time of Concentration Calculation o TR-20 Model a E ➢ Proposed Condition Calculations o Curve Number Calculation a o Restrictor Release Rate Calculation c o Stormwater Volume Summary o TR-20 Model o Water Quality Treatment Volume Summary o Lake County Runoff Volume Reduction 0 o Overflow Weir Calculation ■ TR-20 Model > ■ Overflow Weir Calculation co ➢ Storm Sewer Calculations o Hydraflow Storm Sewer Capacity Calculations ➢ Appendix . o EX-1 .0: Existing Condition Exhibit M o EX-2.0: Proposed Condition Exhibit a o EX-3.0: Storm Sewer Area Exhibit > L Q Q Q L a N c 0 U d co c ca a c a� ;_ z a WT Group Project# D21 DODGE Packet Pg. 70 2.3.b Speedway#7649—Re-Build— Buffalo Grove, IL Project Narrative Project Scope of Work: Speedway is seeking to build a new gas station with a 4,600 square foot convenience 3 store building, new fueling canopy with ten (10) dispensers, a new two (2) lane 3 commercial fueling canopy, twenty-five (25) parking spaces, drive aisles, a new trash — enclosure, one (1) new driveway connection to North Riverwalk Drive, one (1) new driveway connection to Riverwalk Drive, two (2) new driveway connections to 06 Milwaukee Avenue (Route 45), one (1) above-ground detention basin, and associated o utilities located at 201 North Milwaukee Avenue in Buffalo Grove, Illinois. N N d V Existing Conditions: The total contiguous property area is 3.28 acres. The existing site consists of an existing commercial building and Speedway gas station that will be demolished as part > of the improvements. a E Per FIRM #17097CO266K, a portion of the property is located within Zone X. Per US Fish and Wildlife maps, there are no existing wetlands on the site. Per NRCS soil survey a data, the existing soil is classified as hydrologic soil group B. Hydrologic soil group C c will be used in proposed condition calculations. Stormwater Improvements: The purpose of this Stormwater Management Report is to demonstrate that the site is N conformance with Lake County Watershed Development Ordinance (WDO). The total on-site project area that will be disturbed is approximately 3.28 acres. The allowable release for the project area was determined based on the existing flow tributary to the existing storm structure #44 at the north side of the property on North Riverwalk Drive (Existing Area 2). In order to not exceed the existing flow to the existing storm sewer, the total allowable release rate from the basin will be 0.46 cfs and 1.36 cfs c for the 2-year 24-hour and 100-year 24-hour storm events respectively. The proposed flow to the southeast and west will be reduced as well. a L Stormwater Detention Requirements: a Per the Lake County WDO, stormwater detention is not required if less than 1 acre of a L new impervious area is added after 1992. The impervious area on the site is reduced a from 2.356 acre to 1.90 acres for a total reduction of 0.456 acres. An above ground r_ detention basin, located northeast of the proposed convenience store building, is proposed to match the existing release rate of the site and the water quality requirements of the Lake County WDO. Total volume provided within the new above co ground detention basin is approximately 0.3091 ac-ft. Stormwater discharge from the detention basin will be restricted by two orifice restrictors with a 4.15-inch diameter a orifice opening for the 2-year storm event and 4.15-inch diameter orifice opening for the 100-year storm event in order to maintain existing release rates. The restrictors are E located within Storm Structure 2 located southeast of the above ground detention basin. a WT Group Project# D21 0006-5 Packet Pg. 71 2.3.b Speedway#7649—Re-Build— Buffalo Grove, IL The runoff discharges from Structure 2 and into the existing storm sewer on North Riverwalk Drive, which ultimately drains to the northeast. The high water level (HWL) for the 2-year and 100-year storm events is 643.18' and 644.72' respectively. 3 In addition, water quality treatment volume has been provided based on the requirement of 0.01 inch of runoff for every 1% of impervious surface area which equals 0.092 ac-ft N required. Approximately 0.106 ac-ft of volume will be provided below the outlet and 06 between elevations of 642.00' and 643.00' in the proposed pond. N N d A TR20 model was created to determine the peak critical duration 100-year flow in order to size the overflow weir. The results are as follows: 7 lit NIMBI On-site Area 2 1 00- ear, 0.5-hour 15.35 cfs a E The overflow weir wall will be set at 644.75' in the outlet control structure. This a peak flow can be passed over the 6' wide overflow weir with a depth of 0.84', c resulting in a high water elevation of 645.59'. Hydrocarbon Removal Technology: > The inlets that collect runoff tributary to detention basin will be fitted with Flexstorm pure c permanent inlet protection to absorb hydrocarbons. Detention Basin is a wetland bottom basin and the Lake County Stormwater Management Commission accepts wetland basins as hydrocarbon removal technology. The area tributary to detention basin is a gas station and hydrocarbon removal technology will be provided via a Hydro- International First Defense Treatment Unit. 0 Runoff Volume Reduction; Runoff volume reduction is accomplished in accordance with the WDO Section 503.01 . as follows: 1. The existing channel/drainageway at the northeast corner of the site along North a Riverwalk Drive and at the east side of the site along Riverwalk Drive will be preserved. 2. Infiltration and storage characteristics of the site are increased with the proposed a wetland bottom detention basin. a 3. The wetland bottom detention basin provides water quality and volume en reduction. G U 4. The requirements of the Lake County Stormwater ordinance, an Aqua Swirl , Treatment Unit proposed downstream of the above-ground detention basin in provides water quality and volume reduction a The minimum RVR quantitative standard shall be volume achieved utilizing applicable RVR credits, as determined by the applicant and approved by the Enforcement Officer, ;_ based on the maximum extent practicable, for the development. In accordance with the a WT Group Project# D21 Packet Pg. 72 2.3.b Speedway#7649—Re-Build— Buffalo Grove, IL WDO Section 503.02 B. RVR Credits, the following may be used alone or in combination to meet the RVR quantity requirement: 1. Detention Facility Credit — The wetland bottom detention basin provides 0.106 ac-ft of storage below the primary outlets. 50% of RVR Quantity. 2. Native Vegetation Cover Credit — The detention basin is designed with native vegetation cover with will assist in infiltration and absorption of runoff. In 3 addition, the buffers along the wetlands have established native vegetation. 3. Water Quality Treatment Credit — The detention basin meets the Water N Quality Treatment Volume requirements. 100% of RVR Quantity. 06 0 N Runoff Volume Reduction Hierarchy: 1. The existing drainage way is preserved. 2. Native plantings are proposed for the detention basin. 3. The site has been designed around the natural features of the site. > Temporary Best Manaqement Practices: a During construction, several erosion control devices and features will be used to E minimize sediment from leaving the site. These include a gravel construction entrance, a silt fence, flexstorm catch-it inlet protection devices, and seeding and erosion control c blankets. ° Permanent Best Management Practices: > In order to meet the post construction requirements of the Lake County Stormwater c ordinance, a Hydro-International First Defense Treatment Unit will be installed downstream of the detention system and restrictor structure. Storm Sewers: CO All new storm sewers tributary to the new detention basin were designed to pass the 10- year event using Hydraflow software. Storm sewer calculations for the 10-year storm o are enclosed. a Conclusion: ° 0 The proposed improvements will meet Lake County and the Village of Buffalo Grove a detention and infiltration requirements. L Q Q Q L a N c 0 U d CO c ca a c a� ;_ z a WT Group Project# D21 0006-5 Packet Pg. 73 2.3.b Speedway#7649—Re-Build— Buffalo Grove, IL Maps ➢ Location Map IF ➢ USGS Topo Map ➢ NRCS Soils Map 3 ➢ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Wetland Map ➢ FIRM Panel 17097CO266K N 06 O N N d V C > C a E L a 0 c� c� ai c 0 N G1 7 CO C a 0 E a L Q Q Q L a N c 0 U d CO c ca a c 0 ;_ z a WT Group Project# D21 Packet Pg. 74 2.3.b Speedway#7649—Re-Build— Buffalo Grove, IL Location Map 3 N 06 O N N d V C > C a E L a 0 c� c� ai c 0 N G1 7 CO C a 0 E a L Q Q Q L a N c 0 U d CO c ca a c 0 ;_ z a WT Group Project# D21 Packet Pg. 75 2.3.b Go:- le MapS 201 Milwaukee Ave vy (D 3 04 , N c ram, c� L cxg„//rJo N' -�i //,//�x7�' , ,�„l�/I l�yl% ///� irrr ,l�i.J,r, / ,�ii .. ii ;/i p,x✓„ r.rl � ,r J'," J�P flft i�� P�%'z' � x. a it✓� /�� ' E i O U M Imagery©2021 Maxar Technologies,U.S.Geological Survey,USDA Farm Service Agency,Map data©2021 500 ft > G1 C O N G1 I , 1 CO a. nr rsM umuuia,awhn!w k (al(W /NE/ /��' ' fl l O %(( itrT`' E a 201 Milwaukee Ave i •z CL 0 �. Directions Saves Nearby Send Lo yo uir Shaire � O IFylhicvirner V d 201 Milwaukee Ave, Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 c �a a 534M+JJ Buffalo Grove, Illinois C a) E Photos U a Packet Pg. 76 2.3.b Speedway#7649—Re-Build— Buffalo Grove, IL USGS Topo Map 3 N 06 O N N d V C > C a E L a 0 c� c� ai c 0 N G1 7 CO C a 0 E a L Q Q Q L a N c 0 U d CO c ca a c 0 ;_ z a WT Group Project# D21 Packet Pg. 77 The National Map Advanced Viewer Cq 06 CN % > Vs E �2 ,oj a. Project Location .0 U KV i�.'4 MC > 0 f A N 4, ...... ...... ..................... .......... `7- ............ ...................... EL CL CL f % (D 9/7/2021, 12:43:12 PM 1:9,028 M 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 mi Normal Intermediate Contours 1 1 E 0 0.07 0.15 0.3 km U Normal Index Contours USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset National Land Cover Database,National Structures Dataset,and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S.Census IPacket Pg. 78 2.3.b Speedway#7649—Re-Build— Buffalo Grove, IL NRCS Soils Map 3 N 06 O N N d V C > C a E L a 0 c� c� ai c 0 N G1 7 CO C a 0 E a L Q Q Q L a N c 0 U d CO c ca a c 0 ;_ z a WT Group Project# D21 Packet Pg. 79 2.3.b Hydrologic Soil Group—Lake County, Illinois 3 (Speedway Buffalo Grove) In F, 424230 424260 424290 424320 424350 424380 424410 42°9'29"N r r��p / 42°9'29"N F CD a E c %1 45 C r� V /f D 7 r � a •L CL G / / C , d 42'9'20"N �, i 1 N, „, ,.,..�" 42°9'20"N E 424230 424260 424290 424320 424350 424380 424410 L U 3 3 <C Map Scale:1:1,350 if printed on A portrait(8.5"x 11")sheet Q Meters O N o 20 40 80 120 Feet 0 50 100 200 A 300 Map projection:Web Mercator Comer coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 16N WGS84 LJJSl)A Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey P Packet Pg. 80 `ueld uailaad `uoi}eaen`auoz8U `nipgng `na(3 ueld o;pwV:lnaddd aapisuo3) ;ag ueld :;uQWLIOe;;d ri co N a aD a .a w 7 N m i N N @ N I 3 d m o a� m o m -0 a� o U >, O Q U Cam) O a 76 ON N O C E N o E ° E Q o E � a) =° N o Q N - m Z m °' ( m m o c ^ a) m a) .5 L)i m - o m E E ai Q m ° � m N s U) E C: m Q m O-� °� e0 Q y U o 0 3 L N Co m N 3 m C� o r m °� o L 3 y a) Z q E N O 3 N � m o N � � m -a m N 3 -o " o Cc p !E 'Q 3 N E U w m o a�mi ❑ .o N @ t 3 L m o m U m CL L a) L N 4 C Q N m U) C a) C N N 4 LL 7 N E N 0 m U O ` ° m C a) _ 0 m Q Q m OmYQ Q om ooL 5 0 -20 En teYm ;' N 0 Q3 LENma` 2 Z a 6 � ° Lm mo - m a) m o -a o ILE o 5 TS Qo m o N ooca.. o m N E 0NE Q m aQ O m am° mEm .o Z E c° a oQ 7D 'c yam� 0 a .o c N Q > > o m � 5 ° 2 � N o a m Q o c M m N o m w -° @ 0 Q m 4 `m � o ° Q m cn miEo aE � cnm E @ � � � 'i >' � o nm - E boo E � � N ` � ° 'oc oom0Y o > LQ cQ6o m LPL ° o ° N m E w a N c 2 °- m to a>) E o o 'Q m C CV E c6 7 Q N m m Q Q.m m 0 7 y y — O O ._ a) 70O U O a) p >Q)) p m O N � U 'o j 'o N m CN p m N > W E — U N a E U) > U 2 Q'o Q m H O U) (n (n r ❑ N H U N O C = T a) Cc)) p (n (D o Y O (n J > Q CO O O N O Q O 70 > � U N m O a) N C T6 L U) Q o U t 6 c o 2 y 0 N a O a O O O L Z o O E o d d' O R >, ❑ y — U U U 0 Z U) O CC Q O m c Z E3 E3 E3 ® LL Q y � W W J IL Q R R 0 0 � C C N O O O O O y OJ N y a) R O C O a m Q IL a m U U ❑ Z o, Q a m Z m U U ❑ M m Q m y c c y - -C a) Q U) N Cl) V) 7 O N � la d 7 N r c l6 O Z U �It� 2.3.b Hydrologic Soil Group—Lake County, Illinois Speedway Buffalo Grove Hydrologic Soil Group 3 Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI N 06 325A Dresden silt loam,0 to 2 B 2.5 49.9% c percent slopes N 325B Dresden silt loam,2 to 4 B 2.5 50.1% d percent slopes v c cC Totals for Area of Interest 5.0 100.0% 2 ca > C Description a E Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the a soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive c precipitation from long-duration storms. �a The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D)and > three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: 0 N Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential)when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. co Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These o consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. a. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. 0 0 Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist a chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of i CL water transmission. a L Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential)when a thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay 0 U layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. Cn If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is M a for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. E Rating Options a Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition LJJSl)A Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/8/2021 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 Packet Pg. 82 2.3.b Hydrologic Soil Group—Lake County, Illinois Speedway Buffalo Grove Component Percent Cutoff.- None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher �a 3 N 06 O N fA d V C cC > C a E L a 0 c� ai c 0 N G1 7 CO d C a O E a L Q Q Q L a .y C 0 U d to c �a a c a� z a LJJSl)A Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/8/2021 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 Packet Pg. 83 2.3.b Speedway#7649—Re-Build— Buffalo Grove, IL U.S. Fish and Wildlife Wetland Map 3 N 06 O N N d V C > C a E L a 0 c� c� ai c 0 N G1 7 CO C a 0 E a L Q Q Q L a N c 0 U d CO c ca a c 0 ;_ z a WT Group Project# D21 Packet Pg. 84 `ueld tu'IOJd `uoi}eaen`auoz8U `nipgng `na(3 ueld o;pwV:lnaddd aapisuo3) ;ag ueld :;uQWLj3e;;d co w � a w N N � w _O N LL N d CO U c4 2 a U T U�97, 0 W � . W Jf f mow¢ � a W ; `o a Vi@ U� U (B 0 m C m c g C d.-- U m U N D (6 y L (z C " z 0 G N � H✓i� �// „a raj J�� rY "IPIr�'/✓ � ...� � I o Ally J� y ✓ 'ilf r r� Ili1 1f1e,� P vu 4 E O O W LL d �� pPo � rrv' irll f6 f6 f6 N / J wwidll,, k �If � i /�4 M r O N N p i r i rs r E 1 ♦5 y m @ e� 1 _0 _0 / N m m W W U) 2.3.b Speedway#7649—Re-Build— Buffalo Grove, IL FIRM Panel 17097CO266K 3 N 06 O N N d V C > C a E L a 0 c� c� ai c 0 N G1 7 CO C a 0 E a L Q Q Q L a N c 0 U d CO c ca a c 0 ;_ z a WT Group Project# D21 Packet Pg. 86 `ueld uailaad `uoi}eaen`auoz8U `nipgng `na(3 ueld o;pwV:lnaddd aapisuo3) ;ag ueld :;uQwLI3e;;d '3 J f6 N _. 00 v- M wCu cu N gLLa0aoZ wLLm>Nc n amc_ QmnmA'o OLLc �3iam 0 s3 mo a m N E ama�N = ¢Oo> temu� n mo c N E 0mO. a a.o 0 m O o mm OO o cc c 'a cc a O O oc o '6Am0 'a N N cu., O o o a ° O 'a 2 N � N N— c o O 4) '° m Om OO N wOO o O i teN O = 3 O O A.O ° aa cm w Eai o �Ea LL 3 w°o m ° > °N o o o E O N E-0 a. -0 0 ° w m o Nag ° °° u x (n u moc 0 z o m. >m 0 0 °te �,LL >> EEmac?oLL 0 a a O m m ° o N z o ° � m0 m am N N Oo Q m o 6 m n >cm LL Zo ° o y ° °om C. c m o a - m aN a 3c Ecam N oN°2ON> m 0 Cuo o c -N 0 ? m Om E + Q ON 'O'a m Um C.) m a. x 0 Z ( O Ly { NV1C+ ' J _ � °c.m 3 cN � 3moo > QEmEN G 'n O"o O xO w m N Z 1 N 8 'a m N m LL O O m N J N 4) m E O ' 8 z O 12 u a O. Ow Ow w �� 2� w 00EN C Cu Cu Cu . E� � o" T _ m qq N w I- Z a_O y >, "°m o s d '^ a,N. N c o O LL Q W Q Q Z i- p i- Qa m m _°o'c >'+�. °� m ca c.a a. 0 w v E m a o a E E o c 02 m t cm 4 w LL :E m= aa) ta mta W0 P-0Pic Pm 3 -a F TE c aw �LL O �O , cw (O r I Ar� 1 ,v U o 13 . , s (D Itz Nkn' W O i ' a N ni iir�a it rr�� ,E Wj/ r CL ✓, % O 1 _ l r r gm mill/ 75 a r/' 1U Ms F LJL O m r r✓ i/ }I �� ) i 11 0 y//1 ' �jO� O "iw^ N a� I , I O LO ff Sze «r! A N ��r/ r � �r � r ✓ '�� 1 �j ff /ii �i✓i/Ir' �, Jiro i�'1 r f/�� ' � K.l.l � r i oaf awl 1 or 1 " ! t 4 lir. I O LO O LO W 4 1� 2.3.b Speedway#7649—Re-Build— Buffalo Grove, IL Existing Condition Calculations ➢ Curve Number Calculation IF ➢ Time of Concentration Calculation ➢ TR-20 Model 3 N 06 O N N d V C An > C a E L a 0 c� c� ai c 0 N G1 7 CO C a 0 E a L Q Q Q L a N c 0 U d CO c ca a c a� ;_ z a WT Group Project# D21 Packet Pg. 88 2.3.b JPG SPW Buffalo Grove Existing Condition Lake County, Illinois d G1 Sub-Area Land Use and Curve Number Details 7 tC 3 Sub-Area Hydrologic Sub-Area Curve Identifier Land Use Soil Area Number Group (so) N 06 Area 1 Open space; grass cover > 75 (good) B .268 61 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways B .594 98 N Total Area / Weighted Curve Number 86 86 d cC Area 2 Open space; grass cover > 750 (good) B .61 61 L cC Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways B 1.6 98 > C Total Area / Weighted Curve Number 2.21 88 M E Area 3 Open space; grass cover > 75° (good) B .049 61 — Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways B .162 98 L. Total Area / Weighted Curve Number .21 89 E 0 M v G1 C O N G1 7 N d C a O E a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d c �a a c a� E s U a WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/7/2021 12:55:21 PM Packet Pg. 89 2.3.b JPG SPW Buffalo Grove Existing Condition Lake County, Illinois d G1 Sub-Area Time of Concentration Details 7 tC 3 Sub-Area Flow Mannings's End Wetted Travel Identifier/ Length Slope n Area Perimeter Velocity Time (ft) (ft/ft) (sq ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) 04 Area 1 T_ SHEET 100 0.0189 0.011 0.020 N SHALLOW 40 0.0189 0.050 0.005 fA d Time of Concentration 0.1 v C •L cC Area 2 > SHEET 100 0.0105 0.240 0.301 SHALLOW 190 0.0137 0.050 0.028 cC a Time of Concentration .329 E L Area 3 d SHEET 21 0.0340 0.240 0.054 C SHALLOW 19 0.0153 0.025 0.002 C Time of Concentration 0.1 M G1 C O N G1 7 N d C a O E a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d c �a FL c a� E s U a WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/7/2021 12:55:21 PM Packet Pg. 90 2.3.b WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List C:\Users\dkamysz\WinTR-20 version 1.11.11\SPWBG_EX.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.11 0 0 .01 0 d Speedway Buffalo Grove, IL - Existing Conditions (D 7 SUB-AREA: Area 01 OUTLET 0.0013437586. 0.167 YN NN 3 Area 02 OUTLET 0.0034531388. 0.329 YN NN Area 03 OUTLET 0.0003281389. 0.167 YN NN N 06 T_ STORM ANALYSIS: G N 10OY24H 8.57 24 Hour 2 2Y24H 3.34 24 Hour 2 N d V C cC RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION: 48 Hour 2.4 0. .0231 .0479 .0712 .0978 a .1253 .1523 .1791 .2033 .2283 E .2541 .2835 .3125 .3390 .3633 .3861 .4124 .4508 .5129 .5931 d .6919 .8005 .8971 .9604 1.00 24 Hour 1.2 C 0. .0205 .0431 .0667 .0912 C .1171 .1936 .1691 .1964 .2278 � .2633 .3093 .3635 .4392 .5211 v .6102 .6989 .7819 .8492 .8974 > .9311 .9534 .9706 .9856 1.00 18 Hour 0.9 0. .0205 .0431 .0667 .0912 O .1171 .1436 .1691 .1964 .2278 y .2633 .3093 .3635 .4392 .5211 .6102 .6989 .7819 .8492 .8974 j .9311 .9534 .9706 .9856 1.00 :a 12 Hour 0.6 0. .0229 .0482 .0778 .1133 .1579 .2139 .2841 .3644 .4529 co .5435 .6238 .6976 .7548 .8038 > .8470 .8781 .9022 .9217 .9381 .9529 .9657 .9774 .9884 1.00 6 Hour 0.3 cC 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 d .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 O .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 Q 3 Hour 0.15 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 > i .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 Q .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 C .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 41 2 Hours 0.10 a 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 O .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 V .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 1 Hour 0.05 U) 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 C .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 d .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 ++ .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 0) 0) 0.5 Hour 0.025 E 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 L .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 V ns .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 ++', .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 Q .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 Packet Pg. 91 2.3.b 72 Hour 3.6 0. .0231 .0479 .0712 .0978 .1253 .1523 .1791 .2033 .2283 _ .2541 .2835 .3125 .3390 .3633 d .3861 .4124 .4508 .5129 .5931 CD .6919 .8005 .8971 .9604 1.00 M 0.25 Hour .0125 3 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 _ .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 06 N 0.17 Hour 0.0085 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 N .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 N Q) .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 0.08 Hour 0.004 i 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 ; .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 a 120 Hour 6. E 0. .0231 .0479 .0712 .0978 .1253 .1523 .1791 .2033 .2283 d .2541 .2835 .3125 .3390 .3633 .3861 .4124 .4508 .5129 .5931 C .6919 .8005 .8971 .9604 1.00 290 Hour 12. M 0. .0231 .0479 .0712 .0978 v .1253 .1523 .1791 .2033 .2283 > .2541 .2835 .3125 .3390 .3633 .3861 .4124 .4508 .5129 .5931 .6919 .8005 .9604 1.00 N W GLOBAL OUTPUT: 2 .01 0.1 YNNNN YNNNNN 7 VERIFICATION: N DATA PREP Y Y Y Y PROCESSING Y Y Y C WinTR-20 Printed Page File End of Input Data List M a Speedway Buffalo Grove, IL - Existing Conditions p r� Name of printed page file: C:\Users\dkamysz\WinTR-20 version 1.11.11\SPWBG_EX.out Q STORM IOOY24H > i Q Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Q Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Q Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) 41 a Area 01 0.001 6.882 19.20 0.52 387.94 Area 02 0.003 7.125 19.21 1.36 392.90 G Area 03 0.328E-03 7.211 19.20 0.13 395.65 V OUTLET 0.005 7.067 19.20 2.01 391.77 .. r� d STORM 2Y24H C Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ to Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate d Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) G1 Area 01 0.001 1.945 19.21 0.17 126.84 E Area 02 0.003 2.121 19.23 0.46 133.16 L Area 03 0.328E-03 1.917 19.21 0.04 136.86 V ns OUTLET 0.005 2.062 19.22 0.68 131.72 ++', Q WinTR-20 Version 1.11 Page 1 06/14/2021 11:21 Packet Pg. 92 2.3.b Speedway Buffalo Grove, IL - Existing Conditions Area or Drainage ----------- Peak Flow by Storm ----------- Reach Area Alternate 100Y24H 2Y24H d Identifier (sq mi) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 7 Area 01 0.001 0.52 0.17 Area 02 0.003 1.36 0.46 3 Area 03 0.328E-03 0.13 0.04 OUTLET 0.005 2.01 0.68 N 06 O N fA d V C cC > C a E L a 0 c� U ai c 0 N G1 7 N d C a 0 a L Q Q Q L a WinTR-20 Version 1.11 Page 2 06/14/2021 11:21 5 O U d c �a a c a� E s U M a Packet Pg. 93 2.3.b Speedway#7649—Re-Build— Buffalo Grove, IL Proposed Condition Calculations ➢ Curve Number Calculation IF ➢ Restrictor Release Rate Calculation ➢ Stormwater Volume Summary 3 ➢ TR-20 Model — ➢ Water Quality Treatment Volume Summary ➢ Lake County Runoff Volume Reduction N 06 ➢ Overflow Weir Calculation o o TR-20 Model N o Overflow Weir Calculation •L a E L a 0 c� c� ai c 0 N G1 7 C0 C a 0 E a L Q Q a L a N c 0 U d c ca a c a� ;_ z a WT Group Project# D21 Packet Pg. 94 2.3.b JPG SPW Buffalo Grove Proposed Condition Lake County, Illinois d G1 Sub-Area Land Use and Curve Number Details 7 tC 3 Sub-Area Hydrologic Sub-Area Curve Identifier Land Use Soil Area Number Group (ac) N 06 Area 1 Open space; grass cover > 75 (good) C .42 74 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways C .38 98 N Total Area / Weighted Curve Number .8 85 d cC Area 2 Open space; grass cover > 750 (good) C .96 74 L cC Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways C 1.52 98 > C Total Area / Weighted Curve Number 2.48 89 M E L a O c� U ti c O N G1 7 N d C a O M E a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d c �a a c a� E s U a WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/7/2021 1:05:22 PM Packet Pg. 95 2.3.b Wl"'Giiiroqp CIVIL ENGINEERING PROJECT NAME: Speedway# 2675 PRATUM AVENUE PROJECT NUMBER: D2100065 En ii mei iiirn -ICD u n-Consulting HOFFMAN ESTATES, IL 60192 LOCATION: Buffalo Grove, IL (224) 293-6333 DATE: 9/1/2021 WWW„W'FI:::::INGIIIN1:::::1:::::I::111ING„COIM BY: DAK .............................................................................................................................................................. a� ALLOWABLE RELEASE RATE AND 3 DETENTION POND RESTRICTOR CALCULATIONS DISTURBED 2 YEAR 3 DIA. = 2 x Q 06 Cx3.14x 2xGxH N G = 32.2 FT/S 2 c c>s Q(basin) = 0.45 CFS C = 0.61 c�a a HWL ELEV. = 643.20 FEET E ORIFICE INV. = 642.10 FEET i a EF H = 0.93 FEET c� DIA. 4.18 INCHES > USE 4.15 INCH RESTRICTOR 0 N G1 DETENTION POND RESTRICTOR CALCULATIONS DISTURBED 100 YEAR > DIA. = 2 x Q Cx3.14x 2xGxH c G = 32.2 FT/S 2 a. 0 Q(basin) = 1.35 CFS E a C = 0.61 i CL a HWL ELEV. = 645.00 FEET a a� ORIFICE INV. = 643.20 FEET a .y C H = 1.63 FEET Q (2YR RESTRICTOR AT 100 YR HWL)= 0.76 CFS il) c ca NET QALLOWABLE= 0.59 CFS a c a� DIA. 4.17 INCHES z USE 4.15 INCH RESTRICTOR a Packet Pg. 96 `ueld wllaad `uol;eoen`auoz8N `nlpgns `nad ueld o; pwV:lnaddV aaplsuoo) ;as ueld :;u8ua43e44V M c" a a� d *k o �. Ln y m � w _ = a '0 0 O NO x cc x 0 O 49 N Y C3 O 0 S. N 3 Q O x U x cn o m c, o V N N W Z W H (n N x (n Q m O m Q N N w W N w z a w co w = °� Cl) cn w Z:pc x U 0[ x — U V Z O m U LL LwL z U LL LL z LLI H J } N T OO x N T w O W N N O T N N O so d 0 m x 0 Q Q Q m IL a a > a M _ M = R o O O o oC oC a J dII I I Q O II I II Q } o Z LL M LL C3 C7 U C, N Ov o r r, v rn Z J N o N N coCO LO Q LL o m V Co V V L`LJ F V o M V O r 0 0 0 o O r LU C N G .V. O C! c LL O F V O Co N CO O M In In N N O O O O Q LLI W r O N aLL cn o O W w V W J rz a co w Z W W LJJ N H �:JJ O Q M a Q IL oc W ~ c� C3 0 orr- Mvv zMwMr" c) o °' vC) ° LO 0 H (o I l a d Q Z , N:.::. � � o00000 Wm Q OMi W d N ... co U) = OC J LL „� w w % W ON x >- fr Ir U N S "'a > Q 2 ; U m N u l Illlllo O � Q U' ulllllllllll Z w moon O 1 O J z N u 000io W 2 O = r LL J O Q LL LL O J ~ wm UII�II � w o O o = N U d J ooNo � o N M CM V V U] III"� �U C = V V (o V (o Itmmmmcom �U u,rA,ii I a %md mlla d %gmoeA`uoz N `PgnS eeQ umd m Pm¥:lAj dd¥,em suoo) mS um d uem43B n¥ m � m \ a L k 2 § \ \ \ \ d k 28«@� 4D CD _ \[2&% � zw 7 „ � ■ woes ! o zu \a W § § A A§ { £ £ » »z o / \ § § M � § m m m a CL § ) K 2 « 0 P » » £ £ 0co k , r , § ■ ( E � \ \ \ \ \ \ Q @ r co R & ca _ _ _ _ G © / / § § § 0 - a § ) w� 2 3w ) w ■ § j $ §WC) o � z ¥R ƒ E0.MM _ { / eLL &3\ ~ f om= 5a / , 2 @ N @ m @ , \ � � ) � 3 w ^ /> r r / 2.3.b WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List C:\Users\dkamysz\WinTR-20 version 1.11.11\SPWBG_PR3.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.11 0 0 .01 0 d Speedway Buffalo Grove, IL - Proposed Conditions (D 7 SUB-AREA: Area 01 OUTLET 0.00125 85. 0.167 YN NN 3 Area 02 TO BASIN 0.003875 89. 0.167 YN NN STREAM REACH: TO BASIN OUTLET STRUC 01 YN NNN 06 N O N STORM ANALYSIS: 10OY24H 8.57 24 Hour 2 N d 2Y24H 3.34 24 Hour 2 cC •L STRUCTURE RATING: ; STRUC 01 642.10 642.10 0. 0. 643.00 0.3921 0.001 643.15 0.9927 0.0249 a 644.00 0.9684 0.1375 E 645.00 1.3459 0.3091 i a RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION: C rr 48 Hour 2.9 � 0. .0231 .0479 .0712 .0978 v .1253 .1523 .1791 .2033 .2283 > .2541 .2835 .3125 .3390 .3633 .3861 .4124 .4508 .5129 .5931 .6919 .8005 .8971 .9604 1.00 N 24 Hour 1.2 y 0. .0205 .0431 .0667 .0912 .1171 .1436 .1691 .1964 .2278 j .2633 .3093 .3635 .4392 .5211 :a .6102 .6989 .7819 .8492 .8974 .9311 .9534 .9706 .9856 1.00 18 Hour 0.9 N 0. .0205 .0431 .0667 .0912 > .1171 .1436 .1691 .1964 .2278 .2633 .3093 .3635 .4392 .5211 .6102 .6989 .7819 .8492 .8974 cC .9311 .9534 .9706 .9856 1.00 d 12 Hour 0.6 p 0. .0229 .0482 .0778 .1133 .1579 .2139 .2841 .3644 .4529 .5435 .6238 .6976 .7548 .8038 Q .8470 .8781 .9022 .9217 .9381 .9529 .9657 .9774 .9884 1.00 > i 6 Hour 0.3 Q 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 C .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 41 .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 a .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 3 Hour 0.15 G 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 V .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 .. .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 f� .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 C 2 Hours 0.10 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 d .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 ++ .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 4) 4) .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 E .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 L 1 Hour 0.05 V ns 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 ++', .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 Q .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 Packet Pg. 99 2.3.b .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 0.5 Hour 0.025 _ 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 d .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 CD .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 M .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 3 .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 -_ 72 Hour 3.6 0. .0231 .0479 .0712 .0978 .1253 .1523 .1791 .2033 .2283 .2541 .2835 .3125 .3390 .3633 06 N .3861 .4124 .4508 .5129 .5931 .6919 .8005 .8971 .9604 1.00 G N 0.25 Hour .0125 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 N d .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 cs .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 i .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 ; 0.17 Hour 0.0085 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 a .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 E .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 0.08 Hour 0.004 L 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 d .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 C .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 C .8790 .8997 .9117 .9270 .9903 O .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 v O 120 Hour 6. > 0. .0231 .0479 .0712 .0978 .1253 .1523 .1791 .2033 .2283 .2541 .2835 .3125 .3390 .3633 N .3861 .4124 .4508 .5129 .5931 y .6919 .8005 .8971 .9604 1.00 240 Hour 12. j 0. .0231 .0479 .0712 .0978 :a .1253 .1523 .1791 .2033 .2283 .2541 .2835 .3125 .3390 .3633 O .3861 .4124 .4508 .5129 .5931 N .6919 .8005 .9604 1.00 d C GLOBAL OUTPUT: M 2 .01 0.1 YNNNN YNNNNN d O VERIFICATION: DATA PREP Y Y Y Y Q PROCESSING Y Y Y L Q Q WinTR-20 Printed Page File End of Input Data List Q L Speedway Buffalo Grove, IL - Proposed Conditions a .y Name of printed page file: G C:\Users\dkamysz\WinTR-20 version 1.11.11\SPWBG_PR3.out V STORM 10OY24H Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ C Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) d Area 02 0.004 7.246 19.20 1.53 395.65 G1 TO BASIN 0.004 Upstream 7.246 19.20 1.53 395.65 E TO BASIN 0.004 Downstream 7.246 644.72 20.57 1.24 320.40 L Area 01 0.001 6.761 19.21 0.48 385.02 V O OUTLET 0.005 7.128 20.41 1.69 330.38 ++', Q STORM 2Y24H Packet Pg. 100 2.3.b Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) F Area 02 0.004 2.208 19.21 0.53 136.86 7 TO BASIN 0.004 Upstream 2.208 19.21 0.53 136.86 TO BASIN 0.004 Downstream 2.208 643.18 20.52 0.46 119.12 3 Area 01 0.001 1.861 19.21 0.15 123.37 OUTLET 0.005 2.123 20.42 0.61 119.07 N 06 WinTR-20 Version 1.11 Page 1 09/03/2021 11:57 G N Speedway Buffalo Grove, IL - Proposed Conditions d V Area or Drainage ----------- Peak Flow by Storm ----------- cC Reach Area Alternate 10OY24H 2Y24H i Identifier (sq mi) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) ; Area 01 0.001 0.48 0.15 Area 02 0.004 1.53 0.53 TO BASIN 0.004 1.53 0.53 a DOWNSTREAM 1.24 0.46 E OUTLET 0.005 1.69 0.61 L a 0 c� U ai c 0 N G) 7 N d C a 0 E a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d c �a a c a) E s U n: WinTR-20 Version 1.11 Page 2 09/03/2021 11:57 Q Packet Pg. 101 2.3.b wrGoup CIVIL ENGINEERING PROJECT NAME:SPW Buffalo Grove Ir 2675 PRATUM AVENUE PROJECT NUMBER:D2100065 HOFFMAN ESTATES,IL 60192 LOCATION:Buffalo Grove,IL _ Il:ingiineeriin,y C)eAgim,CatrmhInrg(224)293-6333 DATE:9/1/2021 WWW.WTENGINEERING.COM BY:DAK d G1 Lake County Reauired Volume Control Storage 3 tC 3 Drainage Area: 3.28 acres C Proposed Impervious Area: 82,764 ft' e 1.90 ac Percent Impervious: 58 % N Requirement of 0.01 inch of runoff for every 1%of impervious surface area: 0.58 inch 06 r O Runoff Volume to Detain: 0.092 ac-ft N 3995 cf N d VOLUME CONTROL RESERVOIR VOLUME V C Provided Volume Control StorageL ELEVATION AREA INCR.STORAGE VOLUME CUMULATIVE STORAGE VOLUME ; 643.00 5,273 SO.FT. 4,607 CU.FT. 4,607 CU.FT.OR 0.106 AC-FT 642.00 3,940 SQ.FT. (B a TOTAL POND V643.00= 4,607 ft0 E OR 0.106 ao-ft L a 0 c� U ti c 0 N W 7 N d C FL 0 E a L Q Q a L a .y C 0 U d c �a FL c a� E s U a Packet Pg. 102 `1,1e1d wllOJd `uoi;eoen`auozGN `Aipgng `Aad ueld o; pwV:jAjddV japisuo0) ;ag ueld :;u8ua43e44v M � o M r N >31 Appendix O: Runoff Volume Reduction d �wxq p, f � U7 v A mr � O "q C w O .e.........m + . .. 4�X C7 4J O d n o ......... .... C f � m m' M144 JI C O � d i � w 3 g — w p' xa uw �r u� m an 'i H H cr r d �� In "I r onloIlooI Cn IDa r rj r O_ 00 M N E Q- [[p�� {] C7 47 S7 .�; .-I .-i PV'., Cwl f41 [�'N CC1 fll rtB' if1 4P] � CSC C7 i/M FT v/ O p � o 0 0 o 6 f3 iW �d µ •� � W Q V > II O A L L � � LL co LCD+ � 00 M > ONF- LAKE COUNTY WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE 0-1 2.3.b Speedway#7649—Re-Build— Buffalo Grove, IL Overflow Weir Calculation ➢ TR-20 Model ➢ Overflow Weir Calculation 3 N 06 O N N d V C > C a E L a 0 c� c� ai c 0 N G1 7 C0 C a 0 E a L Q Q Q L a N c 0 U d c ca a c a� ;_ z a WT Group Project# D21 Packet Pg. 104 2.3.b WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List C:\Users\dkamysz\WinTR-20 version 1.11.11\SPWBG_OFR.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.11 0 0 .01 0 d Speedway Buffalo Grove, IL - Proposed Conditions - Overland Flood Route (D 7 SUB-AREA: Area 01 OUTLET 0.00125 85. 0.167 YN NN 3 Area 02 OUTLET 0.003875 89. 0.167 YN NN N 06 STORM ANALYSIS: 100Y24H 8.57 24 Hour 2 C4 10OY18H 8.06 18 Hour 2 10OY12H 7.46 12 Hour 2 N d 100Y6H 6.43 6 Hour 2 100Y3H 5.49 3 Hour 2 100Y2H 4.97 2 Hours 2 i 10OYlH 4.03 1 Hour 2 ; 100Y.5H 3.17 0.5 Hour 2 100Y.25H 2.32 0.25 Hour 2 100Y.17H 1.80 0.17 Hour 2 100Y.08H 1.03 0.08 Hour 2 a 10OY48H 9.28 48 Hour 2 E i a 0 RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION: � 48 Hour 2.4 v 0. .0231 .0479 .0712 .0978 > .1253 .1523 .1791 .2033 .2283 .2541 .2835 .3125 .3390 .3633 .3861 .4124 .4508 .5129 .5931 0 .6919 .8005 .8971 .9604 1.00 y 24 Hour 1.2 0. .0205 .0431 .0667 .0912 j .1171 .1436 .1691 .1964 .2278 :a .2633 .3093 .3635 .4392 .5211 .6102 .6989 .7819 .8492 .8974 .9311 .9534 .9706 .9856 1.00 co 18 Hour 0.9 0. .0205 .0431 .0667 .0912 .1171 .1436 .1691 .1964 .2278 .2633 .3093 .3635 .4392 .5211 cC .6102 .6989 .7819 .8492 .8974 d .9311 .9534 .9706 .9856 1.00 0 12 Hour 0.6 0. .0229 .0482 .0778 .1133 .1579 .2139 .2841 .3644 .4529 Q .5435 .6238 .6976 .7548 .8038 .8470 .8781 .9022 .9217 .9381 > i .9529 .9657 .9774 .9884 1.00 Q 6 Hour 0.3 Q 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 Q .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 41 .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 a .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 0 3 Hour 0.15 V 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 f� .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 C .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 2 Hours 0.10 d 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 ++ .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 G1 .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 L .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 V ns 1 Hour 0.05 ++', 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 Q .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 Packet Pg. 105 2.3.b .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 _ 0.5 Hour 0.025 d 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 CD .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 M .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 3 .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 -_ .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 72 Hour 3.6 0. .0231 .0479 .0712 .0978 .1253 .1523 .1791 .2033 .2283 06 N .2541 .2835 .3125 .3390 .3633 .3861 .4124 .4508 .5129 .5931 G N .6919 .8005 .8971 .9604 1.00 0.25 Hour .0125 N d 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 i .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 ; .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 0.17 Hour 0.0085 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 a .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 E .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 .@ .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 L. 0.08 Hour 0.004 0. .0836 .1773 .2811 .3833 E .4745 .5550 .6225 .6722 .7082 C .7417 .7697 .7981 .8255 .8518 M .8740 .8947 .9117 .9270 .9403 M .9536 .9656 .9774 .9885 1.00 > 120 Hour 6. 0. .0231 .0479 .0712 .0978 O .1253 .1523 .1791 .2033 .2283 N .2541 .2835 .3125 .3390 .3633 y .3861 .4124 .4508 .5129 .5931 .6919 .8005 .8971 .9604 1.00 j 240 Hour 12. 'a 0. .0231 .0479 .0712 .0978 .1253 .1523 .1791 .2033 .2283 O .2541 .2835 .3125 .3390 .3633 N .3861 .4124 .4508 .5129 .5931 .6919 .8005 .9604 1.00 d C GLOBAL OUTPUT: d 2 .01 0.1 YNNNN YNNNNN O r� VERIFICATION: Q DATA PREP Y Y Y Y PROCESSING Y Y Y > i Q Q Q WinTR-20 Printed Page File End of Input Data List 41 a Speedway Buffalo Grove, IL - Proposed Conditions - Overland Flood Route O Name of printed page file: V C:\Users\dkamysz\WinTR-20 version 1.11.11\SPWBG_OFR.out ... d STORM 10OY24H C Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate d Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) G1 Area 01 0.001 6.761 19.21 0.48 385.02 E Area 02 0.004 7.246 19.20 1.53 395.65 L OUTLET 0.005 7.128 19.20 2.01 393.05 V n3 STORM 10OY18H Q Packet Pg. 106 2.3.b Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) d Area 01 0.001 6.269 14.41 0.60 479.49 CD Area 02 0.004 6.745 14.40 1.91 494.18 M OUTLET 0.005 6.629 14.40 2.51 490.59 3 STORM 10OY12H Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ N Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate 06 Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) O N Area 01 0.001 5.692 6.01 0.81 647.04 Area 02 0.004 6.157 6.01 2.64 680.61 N d OUTLET 0.005 6.044 6.01 3.45 672.42 C cC STORM 100Y6H Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) a Area 01 0.001 4.709 1.24 1.35 1081.40 E Area 02 0.004 5.153 1.23 4.66 1202.89 OUTLET 0.005 5.044 1.23 6.01 1173.06 d STORM 100Y3H C O Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ M Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate V M Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) > QT Area 01 0.001 3.823 0.79 2.10 1680.68 a Area 02 0.004 4.242 0.67 7.42 1913.86 0 OUTLET 0.005 4.140 0.67 9.50 1854.45 y STORM 10OY2H 7 WinTR-20 Version 1.11 Page 1 09/03/2021 11:59 N d C n3 a 0 >3 E a L Q Q Q L a .y C 0 U d Cn c �a a c a) E s U 0 a Packet Pg. 107 2.3.b Speedway Buffalo Grove, IL - Proposed Conditions - Overland Flood Route Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate d Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) CD 7 Area 01 0.001 3.340 0.56 2.69 2153.37 Area 02 0.004 3.743 0.52 9.52 2457.20 3 OUTLET 0.005 3.645 0.53 12.20 2380.50 STORM 10OYlH N 06 Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ G Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate N Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) N d Area 01 0.001 2.484 0.37 3.65 2918.89 Area 02 0.004 2.851 0.35 13.24 3415.65 OUTLET 0.005 2.762 0.35 16.87 3292.05 i STORM 100Y.SH C Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate a Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) E Area 01 0.001 1.731 0.24 4.05 3241.03 i Area 02 0.004 2.054 0.23 15.35 3961.74 d OUTLET 0.005 1.975 0.24 19.40 3785.24 C O STORM 100Y.25H M V M Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) O Area 01 0.001 1.036 0.20 3.46 2765.36 y Area 02 0.004 1.298 0.19 13.69 3533.46 OUTLET 0.005 1.235 0.19 17.13 3343.37 j STORM 100Y.17H 7 Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ N Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) C Area 01 0.001 0.652 0.19 2.64 2113.95 fC Area 02 0.004 0.865 0.18 10.91 2814.26 d OUTLET 0.005 0.813 0.18 13.54 2641.10 O r� STORM 100Y.08H E Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Q Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate > i Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) Q Q Area 01 0.001 0.187 0.15 0.99 793.69 Q Area 02 0.004 0.304 0.15 4.94 1275.12 L G) a_ WinTR-20 Version 1.11 Page 2 09/03/2021 11:59 5 C O U d c M a c a� E s U ns a Packet Pg. 108 2.3.b Speedway Buffalo Grove, IL - Proposed Conditions - Overland Flood Route Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate d Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) CD 7 OUTLET 0.005 0.275 0.15 5.93 1156.18 3 STORM 10OY48H Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ N Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate 06 Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) O N Area 01 0.001 7.443 50.40 0.33 260.05 Area 02 0.004 7.945 50.40 1.03 265.07 N d OUTLET 0.005 7.822 50.40 1.35 263.84 C cC •L cC > C cC a E L a 0 c� U ai c 0 N W 7 N d C a 0 E a L Q Q Q L a_ WinTR-20 Version 1.11 Page 3 09/03/2021 11:59 5 C O U d c �a a c a� E s U nz a Packet Pg. 109 2.3.b Speedway Buffalo Grove, IL - Proposed Conditions - Overland Flood Route Area or Drainage ----------- Peak Flow by Storm ----------- Reach Area Alternate 10OY24H 100YISH 100Y12H 100Y6H 100Y3H d Identifier (sq mi) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (D 7 Area 01 0.001 0.48 0.60 0.81 1.35 2.10 Area 02 0.004 1.53 1.91 2.64 4.66 7.42 3 OUTLET 0.005 2.01 2.51 3.45 6.01 9.50 Area or Drainage ----------- Peak Flow by Storm ----------- Reach Area Alternate 100Y2H 10OYlH 100Y.5H 100Y.25H 100Y.17H 06 N Identifier (sq mi) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) O N Area 01 0.001 2.69 3.65 4.05 3.46 2.64 Area 02 0.004 9.52 13.24 15.35 13.69 10.91 N d OUTLET 0.005 12.20 16.87 19.40 17.13 13.54 C cC Area or Drainage ----------- Peak Flow by Storm ----------- i Reach Area Alternate 100Y.08H 10OY48H ; Identifier (sq mi) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) C Area 01 0.001 0.99 0.33 Area 02 0.004 4.94 1.03 a OUTLET 0.005 5.93 1.35 E L a 0 c� U M ai c 0 N G1 7 N d C a 0 E a L Q Q Q L 0) M _ WinTR-20 Version 1.11 Page 4 09/03/2021 11:59 5 C O U d c M a c a� E s U a Packet Pg. 110 Weir Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk®AutoCAD®Civil 3D®by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday,Sep 9 2021 Overflow Weir Wall in Outlet Control Structure Rectangular Weir Highlighted Crest = Sharp Depth (ft) = 0.84 3 Bottom Length (ft) = 6.00 Q (cfs) = 15.35 Total Depth (ft) = 1.00 Area (sqft) = 5.03 N Velocity (ft/s) = 3.05 06 Calculations Top Width (ft) = 6.00 N Weir Coeff. Cw = 3.33 Compute by: Known Q Known Q (cfs) = 15.35 c a E i a 0 c� U Depth (ft) Overflow Weir Wall in Outlet Control Structure Deptl- o N G1 2.00 2.00 7 N d 1.50 1.50 ca a 0 f i L = 645.59' a rl 1.00 1.00 i w Q- Q. d a_ 'lA C 0.50 0.50 ° U O=t?io eir El 64 .7 a 0.00 0.00 c E s U Q -0.50 -0.50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Weir W.S. Packet Pg. 111 2.3.b Speedway#7649—Re-Build— Buffalo Grove, IL Storm Sewer Calculations ➢ Hydraflow Storm Sewer Capacity Calculations 3 N 06 O N N d V C > C a E L a 0 c� c� ai c 0 N G1 7 CO C a 0 E a L Q Q Q L a N c 0 U d CO c ca a c a� ;_ z a WT Group Project# D21 Packet Pg. 112 `ueld wllGJd 'u011eOeA 'GuOzGN 'AlpqnS 'AOa veld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) IOS ueld :luOw43eljV co Ci C*4 of O 0) 0 r02) E:3 z 0 00 0 4- 0 (D 4.0 x (9-L) - adicSO 04 Cl) E E 0 U) w i 7 N `ueld uailaad `uai even `auazaN `nipgnS `nad veld 01 puad:lnaddV aapisuao) has ueld :;uOw4 a;;d M oU U v v v v v v ci o ci o ci ci CV U Ry) a 0�f U M M O Qy O O O O O U oc� ci o 0 0 0 0 o a U O O O O O O N O _N (Lj a M M O O) 0 o 0 0 o o o ai orM o`fio ti C9 v o U Cn m O c m m v v O Q �, 0 0 0 0 0 0 y co co o v v ._ .0 tom- 00 O CM V V M u O rP LO N O' > O O O .- O �- (D o. .� V M CO E U U. .U... CO t` It Cl) N Cl) � Z y Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) > Q' O O O O O O c d o 0 0 0 6 6 y c 00 00 to to N N y y 00 00 t2 Ln N N J R 0 m M (O (77 N LO V .U... t` (O Cl) M N O (0 U N L V V V V V V U ui M to O V 19 >- di 'E O O O O �- O ~ I I U = I- I` (D LO LO LO Q E fLj Q � M Cl? O a' G x O O O O O O U co rn 3 0 U co 0 c af6i ci v L�2 t2 v �2 + 0 Q ci o o o o 0, E m - o o O O o o m $ o 0 0 0 0 o U) J Vtn7 W O t- � Vw LL h N O? 5 ) 00 W 6 00 6 O v E II C D � 0 LL O c) U C O N M V (O F- O o Q J Z n. Z -F---F-- E `ueld wllGJd 'u011eOeA 'GuOzGN 'AlpqnS 'AOa veld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) jes ueld :luOw43ellV Ci C14 rsi CL CL O (D E z:3 (D E LO LO LO LO LO LO E p c 0 0 0 0 0 0 3: p p p p p p 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0 0 9 U� 9 9 N IT LO LO w LO 'IT 'IT 'IT 'IT 'IT 'IT (0 (D (0 (D (D (D 0 CL (q C) to CO 4 v- U) (0 'IT 'IT 'IT 'I L�)T 'IT L6 (0 (D (0 (D (D (0 IT E c 0 0 U0 0tl- 0 U0 E � : C� � mu coo coo coo coo coo coo 'S U) w t, Lo t, m — 0 t,: r t,: r 06 06 'IT 'IT 'IT 'IT c i Dui (0 (D'IT (0 ('ITD (0 (0 E m .2 '2 E 0 N M rt N U) Z =3 0 F- U- 0 Cj ui (0 LO (C) (0 N ui - o 04 0 � N i `ueld wllGJd `uOileOen `auOza� `nipgnc� `nad veld O puad:�nadd�/aapisu0�) ;8S ueld :;uOw4 e;;d w "N N O ? � OOW aJO >. O DO O M 0) N N U) O U) (n O U a u) N (6 V V V V (6 N W O C O O O O C CF) a V m - V > v- c N (n M N �7' O O N Q �.�\... O O O O O O p C _ O ^O O (n M N V O U) o N O O O O O O M O J > p) U) O U') O (O Cl? (n (n (O (O (n 'IT It W (D v m c(D c(D c(D ((D c(D '0 a0 00 (O (O O O j D 0 0 0 0 0 0 m E N U W Cl (MO W � m > G V (n d' M N M N d � U) O CL N S(D C? C? N N � 7 N ++ O O N N O N Z Q .- (D V C) tIy M J > r1 N C9 (D V V V V 'IT = d $ (D (D (D (D M L M U O (00 O? O C v 'IT It O O O O O O X C r O O O M O O 0 J am' 00 * W O .�- a) It II Q O W Um O 0 w \V O (n M N 02 (n N O p to M N () J > M V to to (O LO II Iq W (D ��'V (D (D (D (D � O U .�..r m d M O :3 tQ > D 0 0 0 0 0 0 N OCl O 00 N (P W O rn G v O) cr Cl) N Cl) �- cc E O OC (D aC 00 M N N N U 00 0 _ O p to to O O ' CL (p t` `- `- O to s W N O O a Jcc O ON O Lq O O J > to �+ E W = d $ (D (D (D (D (.0 (D in U O U O (00 (� W E G) > d' N Cl) Cl) W O ,w > (D V V V V V V Ui V c (O (O (O (O (O (O th N N s M M t- t- O O O- _ tl)M (M (O O N to V E t~ (O Cl) Cl) N 0 O w!� E `Y N a0 a0 LO LO N N Z L N U L E fJ Y� N O 2 C N M IT (n (O d Z J `veld wllsad `u0l;e3en `auazGN `nlpgnS `naa veld a; puad:lnaddV aaplsuoa) Ias ueld :;u0w43e;;d Ci C*4 rsi a w U t1f a 0 U w N c Q O Q N O = a) N O O c o ai o�m - T" .V E cn_ - m N 2 0: N a) a c c c N o m O N _ U 0 O E Q'c a) O N � rn�-a N + G � co = o E E a) w w o o .mar- m a) � w in =_-oE 3 Q- asi c E o + ai 0o O V) _ = E J N N m N y O7 O � J c c J m.� = c U m o (� > = E m c U Lu w �co E ca O c o w E A+ 2 0-2 aCo 8 "c�i Q m U c � J L .m c m"0 E c � o o w U Q. _ (D Vl An m N N m c O J O > Eau, a �� -O o' a) a) I_- co= w v, y G -O N .0.. O O N 0 � N y a) UN _ o 0 a) m m 0 a) O _ > c c O n = L oc m o m u c v m c m ca .c O m N g (� c + Z '= N -O N c N 1� = c O J m � (1) m=N CD � N r- c E > S c ui o In CD a o a) m m E Q U m �O r N Q J N N > U m Q N U N N p = .�..1 0) 0 3 °� co 0) E � � M m O ro > E a) c = o° -oc cocc E (� C Em c N cc o Uo a) N N E °J O.— O m EU J O w U) w m CL = a) .� O Q v o- c aci c Q. _ Q u = Q a CDO 3 -o 0. a) v o Q w = _ , m O m m c _ CL m Q c o U/JO 11 E m 0c cU_a m ) N E am m o _ m - oG Yc 0 a NO O c Q ° S C GN Vc m�m m E O E m Ino c x ( c Eo o mo S a) 0) - a m o oo m po c ° N o ♦./ _O Ca ca) o s m m c (m. O ) o m m xL) o o c ro -0 --E m mO co N c 'o ` � : a) N N >m a) c-- c E o o < oU a C :E c O O U) O w m .�T. m O N N 6 c V = .N N @ O C 0 U .Oc m O > O N O = y O O O N Q C C_ O N a) "�' N w a) t4 = N > tJ N w N .�. O L. O. a) a) �6 a) > 0 o a) o = oc = .mc m .mc o Z a) Z Z Z c i tom- Imo- I-o F- W F- U Fes- j H I- h N W I- U I- �i I- I- I- W F- C) N_ Cl) d' � (O r- OD 0) O N M rP N Cl)Cl) rl' Lo (O 1- 00 0') — N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T C9 U 0 0 U U U U 0 U U 0 U U U U U 0 U U U U U 0 0 `ueld wllGJd 'u011eOeA 'GuOzGN 'AlpqnS 'AOa veld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) IOS ueld :luOw43eljV co Ci C14 rsi 0 0 0 0 0 CD a) a) LO m m 3: V) V) co (D (D (0 (D (D (D (1) 0 U) LO E LO U) ino o 6,9179'JE] 'AUI ai OV9V9,11 WN 9:ul-00'60+9 BIS LO G) O —A LO Ul 09*t7t79'JEJ 'AUI ino o9,17179'jEi 'AUI 06'Lt79'13 wl J 17:ul-001 +t elS O cl. O LO Cl) O O Cl) M a) Ul 90*t7179'13 'AUI ino 5o,t7179'JE] 'AUI 0 OL'Lt79'13 wl J C :Ul o0'417+Z 81S 0 u Ul g9*CJ79'13 'AU1 0 9 LO ino 99'el79 jEi 'AUI o'? 09'Lt79'13 wli Z Ul-00'CC+I BIS O w Ul 0[*Ct7g'13 'AUI ino o 6,cj79 jEi 'AUI OL'Lt79'13 wl�J C :Ul-00'qt7+0 ejS 0LO 0 Ul 00*ZJ79'13 'AUI o9,cv9,13 TWO liepno-oo,00+o els co 0 CD m LO r- m m E (D (D (D (D (D (D 0-W CD `ueld wllGJd 'u011eOeA 'GuOzGN 'AlpqnS 'AOa veld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) IOS ueld :luOw43eljV Ci C14 rsi p 0 p 0 9 0 p 0 p 0 C?CD CL I- V- 00 LO N LO LO IT lzr a) (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (D a) 0 U) CL E 2 U) ai a) O 0 co 0 Ino 00,91,913 'AUI 0 C) 00,8t79'13 wl�J LOco 9:ul-00,917+0 els 0 d. Cl) D E !o w Ul 09*17179'13 'AUI Ino 99,cj79'13 'AU1 09*LV9'13 WI J 00,00+0 els Z 0 p 0 I?CD C6 LO N u-) U-) "T "T lzr E 0 0 (D 0 0 co a) 0 CD `ueld wllGJd 'u011eOeA 'GuOzGN 'AlpqnS 'AOa veld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) IOS ueld :luOw43eljV C*4 Ci C*4 rsi CL of CL O 67 67 (02) E :3 > z u (02) CV O (Y) Cl) E EU� w U) 0 U) U) 0 E0 4— i 7 t I -F---F-- E `ueld wllGJd 'u011 even 'GuOzGN 'AlpqnS 'AOa veld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) has 3 ueld :luOw4 elIV 0 4) 04 C4 CL 6 0 of 0 0 aa) a) 00) 0 O < 00 0 x C\! C\! 0 0 ai 0 m 0 , O� C� 3o 0 0 C\! m U) 00 'IT 0 LO Cl) 0 Cl) (D CL > rl- m 00 E m U. co 't :3 0 z -ia 4) Cl) Cl) > .2- E) iL .0 .0 (0 (D Cl? '0 0 Cl) ca C, (D E ui d) CL > r- E 0 _0 M T (D LO OL E il 00 0 a) 0 x C'� " w C U 0 0 i co rn 0 m r- 0 C� C9 <0 cq 0 cli + 0 0 (D 0 0 ujU) 0 0 c IO U) w co LL U) Cb 4 E II (D U- w 0) a) F- c 6 -6 o z a- z -i— `ueld w!IGJd 'uO!IeOeA 'GuOzGN 'A!pqnS 'AOa veld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) IOS ueld :;uOw43e;;d C*4 m 0*4 cli C4 rsi CL CL O (D O (D E LO LO 0 0 C? P 00 0 0 CY) Cl) C N c) Cl)(0 C.? 0 C6 V to U) LO C6 L6 w c Mu U) 0 U) w LL E CL U) 0 W U) E m 8 L) E 0 Cf) Z =3 —55 0 U- 0 ui ui 04 0 < S o 0 a- z -1--------F— `AlpqnS 'AOa veld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) jes 3 `ueld wllGJd 'u011eOeA 'GuOzGN ueld :luOw4 elIV co C14 C4 M 0 U) N 0 r 0 O O Q ui —0 CF) (D 0 0 > of U) C: 0 0 (Y 0 U) > CY) UJ d (D (D "a ao 0 0 (D > 0 0 04 E m > U-) Cl) U) CL m (D (0 0 0 0 E =3 z co CL C', (q 00 (D (D (D (D LO 0 O� Cl? (D > LO > (D (D 0 0 0 0 O 00 0 0 O Cl) U) OR C9 -J > C14 Cl) (D (D UJ (D (D (D 0 0 0 0 C\j (D > > E m v N 0 0 (D cl� 0 (1) 00 CL 0 0 -6 >1 .j -J > E C14 Cl) (D (D (D LLJ 0 U) () 9 CD OLO � III U) LM > LL ♦ U) ((0? ll(0� E Cl) 0 m N cli L O fJ r- CIJ a- z -i `veld wllsad `u0l;e3en `auazGN `nlpgnS `naa veld a; puad:lnaddV aaplsuoa) Ias ueld :;u0w43e;;d .Q cw Ci C*4 rsi a w U t1f a 0 U w N c Q O Q N O = a) N O O c o ai o�m - T" .V E cn_ - m N 2 0: N a) a c c c N o m O N _ U 0 O E Q'c a) O N � rn�-a N + G � co = o E E a) w w o o .mar- m a) � w in =_-oE 3 Q- asi c E o + ai 0o O V) _ = E J N N m N y O7 O � J c c J m.� = c U m o (� > = E m c U Lu w �co E ca O c o w E A+ 2 0-2 aCo 8 "c�i Q m U c � J L .m c m"0 E c � o o w U Q. _ (D Vl An m N N m c O J O > Eau, a �� -O o' a) a) I_- co= w v, y G -O N .0.. O O N 0 � N y a) UN _ o 0 a) m m 0 a) O _ > c c O n = L oc m o m u c v m c m ca .c O m N g (� c + Z '= N -O N c N 1� = c O J m � (1) m=N CD � N r- c E > S c ui o In CD a o a) m m E Q U m �O r N Q J N N > U m Q N U N N p = .�..1 0) 0 3 °� co 0) E � � M m O ro > E a) c = o° -oc cocc E (� C Em c N cc o Uo a) N N E °J O.— O m EU J O w U) w m CL = a) .� O Q v o- c aci c Q. _ Q u = Q a CDO 3 -o 0. a) v o Q w = _ , m O m m c _ CL m Q c o U/JO 11 E m 0c cU_a m ) N E am m o _ m - oG Yc 0 a NO O c Q ° S C GN Vc m�m m E O E m Ino c x ( c Eo o mo S a) 0) - a m o oo m po c ° N o ♦./ _O Ca ca) o s m m c (m. O ) o m m xL) o o c ro -0 --E m mO co N c 'o ` � : a) N N >m a) c-- c E o o < oU a C :E c O O U) O w m .�T. m O N N 6 c V = .N N @ O C 0 U .Oc m O > O N O = y O O O N Q C � N w a) = > tJ NwN O C ) O L. t > o m mo c oa 0 o a = c = I_- m .c UZ Z Z Z F = = es I- N W I- I- i I- I- I- I- I- I- W I- U j �W F- C) N_ d' � W r- M M CDN M rP N Cl)M rl' Lo (fl 1- 00 0') - N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T C9 U 0 0 U U U U 0 U U 0 U U U U U 0 U U U U U U U `veld wllsad `ual;eOen `auazGN `nlpgnS `naa veld a; puad:lnaddV aaplsuaa) Ias ueld :;uOw43e;;d .Q cw Ci C*4 rsi a w N U of N o 0 0 0 o O a U) o 0 0 0 0 0 LO LO to V rl' M (O (O (O (O (O CO LO U) r N ;np 0£'9179'13 'nul 0 00'9b9'13 wl2J d Z:ul-0079+1 BIS 0 LO N 0 O U N M a) LO I` 1 O LO o W u1 99'Zb9'13 'nul - LO lnO 99'Zti9'13 'nul N O 09'9b9'13 wl�J L. 4 :ul-00'176+0 e3S 0 a ul 00'Zb9'13 'Aul " 09'£b9'13 'PuJJ IIepno-00'00+0 ejS co �_ o 0 0 0 0 0 E > 0 co L N O W 0 CD `ueld wllGJd 'u011eOeA 'GuOzGN 'AlpqnS 'AOa veld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) IOS ueld :luOw43eljV w C*4 Ci C*4 rsi CL of 67 CL O E :3 > z U r02) 0 0 4— a 0 x w CO U) U) Lli LL Cl) E EU� CO 0 CO CO 0 E0 4— L. FL r I .- 7----T-- 'ueld wllGJd 'u011eOeA 'GuOzGN 'AlpqnS 'AOa ueld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) jes 3 ueld :luOw4 elIV C14 C4 CL (D E3 00 CL x C 0tt- 4) 0 CL > s (9 E c4 0m LL cli E > Cl) z .2L 0. r- C G) (D S .0 R 2 U?CIJ -C 0 C, ca (D L) -E d) CL > s LP E 2 1 LO OL x RE C 0 0 7 co r- o 0 2 2 f cq cli (D 0 E E } Cf) ui .2 co Cf) E ui U- a) LL L) w 0 F- c 6 a- o z z -F---F-- E `ueld wllGJd 'u011eOeA 'GuOzGN 'AlpqnS 'AOa veld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) jes ueld :luOw43ellV co C14 Ci C14 rsi iii O z:3 (D E p E LO — C 0 3: p 00 v 0 0 OC O CL O O E iR c E �o c E-u 0 ui E U- CL c mu 0 c m 6 U E o Z =3 0 LL O - 6� L) ui 04 �2 o ci a- z -1--------F— `AlpqnS 'AOa veld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) jes 3 `ueld wllGJd 'u011eOeA 'GuOzGN ueld :luOw4 elIV C14 C4 0 CL —j 0 9 00 cli 01 U) ui r 00 O 0 UJ > E > U) CL m (D 0 E =3 cli CL (l? 0 O —J > (D (D (D O (D > LO 100 0 O 67 —J > (D (D 0 UJ (D (D (D > U? CL Cl) E C14 (o > E 2 U) m v jz- 0 t7— 0 CL Cl? 0 .j —J > uj (D (D E (D N LM 9)> > U') (D 'IT x (D 0 O II cli Lq E 0 0 (D FL L `veld wllsad `u0l;e3en `auazGN `nlpgnS `naa veld a; puad:lnaddV aaplsuoa) Ias ueld :;u0w43e;;d o .Q co Ci C*4 rsi a w U t1f a 0 U w N c Q O Q N O = a) N O O c o ai o�m - T" .V E cn_ - m N 2 0: N a) a c c c N o m O N _ U 0 O E Q'c a) O N � rn�-a N + G c a = o E E m w w o � o .mar- m a) � w in =_-oE 3 c- asicoo + ai 0o O V) _ = E J N N m N y O7 O � J c c J m.� = c U m o (� > = E m c U Lu w �co E ca O c o w E A+ 2 0-2 aCo 8 "c�i Q m U c � J L .m c m"0 E c � o o w U Q. _ (D Vl An m N N m c O J O > Eau, a �� -O o' a) a) I_- co= w v, y G -O N .0.. O O N 0 � N y a) UN _ o 0 a) m m 0 a) O _ > c c O n = L ow m o m u c v m c m ca .c O m N g (� c + Z '= N -O N G N 1� = c O J m � (1) m=N CD � N r- c E > S c ui o In CD a o a) m m E Q U m �O r N Q J N N > U m Q N U N N p = .�..1 0) 0 3 °� co 0) E � � M m O ro > E a) c = o° -oc cocc E (� C Em c N cc o Uo a) N N E °J O.— O m EU J O w U) w m CL = a) .� O Q v o- c aci c Q. _ Q u = Q a CDO 3 -o 0. a) v o Q w = _ , m O m m c _ CL m Q c o U/JO 11 E3 m 0c 3 ) N E am m o _ m - oG Yc 0m a NO O c Q ° S C GN Vc m m m E O E m Ino c x ( c Eo o mo S a) 0) - a m o oo m po c ° N o ♦./ _O Ca ca) o s m m c (m. O ) o m m xL) o o c ro -0 --E m mO co N c 'o ` � : a) N N >m a) c-- c E o o < oU a C :E c O O U) O w m .�T. m O N N 6 c V = .N N @ O C 0 U .Oc m O > O N O = y O O O N Q C � N w a) = > tJ NwN O C ) O L. t > o m mo c oa 0 o a = c = I_- m .c UZ Z Z Z F = = es I- N W I- I- i I- I- I- I- I- I- W I- U j �W F- C) N_ d' � W r- M M CDN M rP N Cl)M rl' Lo (fl 1- 00 0') - N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T C9 U 0 0 U U U U 0 U U 0 U U U U U 0 U U U U U U U `veld wllsad `uOl;eOen `auOzGN `nlpgnS `naa veld O; puad:lnaddV aaplsuOa) Ias ueld :;uOw43e;;d -9 co Ci C*4 rsi a w 0 0 0 0 0 o U a) 06 to N 6� CO M � CO CO CO (0 (0 (coo f1 E o O U) ;np OL'9179'13 'nul 00'Lt79'I1 wIW "— 4 :ul 00'170+b e3S �O o O 0) O co o O o � U (0 (p N O LO O O d. O Cl) J O W ^+ N W O J a ul OZ'9b9'13 'nul 00'Lb9'13 'PUJJ IIepno-oo'o0+o els co �_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 E > 0 0 0 0 co L � co O W 0 `ueld wllGJd 'u011eOeA 'GuOzGN 'AlpqnS 'AOa veld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) IOS ueld :luOw43eljV C*4 co Ci C*4 rsi CL of CL 67 O 4- 0 (02) E :3 > z u (02) ZIN 0 Q) 0 4— a 0 x w U) L. C) Cl) E 0 E 0 4— z 6 E t (1) f I -F---F-- E and wllGJd 'u011eOeA 'GuOzGN 'AlpqnS 'AOa ueld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) jes 3 ueld :luOw4 elIV co 41i 0 0 C4 CL 0 Cl? 0 aa) ou ci x 0 ■ 0 0 r- o 0 m Cl? (0 U) C, d) LO CL > r (D E 0 z E cli :3 M LUL. S -ia 4) ce) > iL 5m — .0 .0 R ■ a 7 / \ 0 ca (D E CL d) > 0 _0 T LO OL E C 0 x 0 00 0) 0 ci 0 0 < cq 0 m (0 C14 Cl? + m 0 (D E 0 c CY) E c 6 o z z -F---F-- E `ueld wllGJd 'u011eOeA 'GuOzGN 'AlpqnS 'AOa veld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) jes ueld :luOw43ellV co Ci C14 rsi iii O z:3 (D E p E LO — 0 00 v 0 c LO O LO CL O O 0 LO E c c mu 0 E LO E c 0 m �2 E Z o z =3 0 U- 0 ui M Aui D S F- 04 o E < I o a- I z -1--------F— `AlpqnS 'AOa veld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) jes 3 `ueld wllGJd 'u011eOeA 'GuOzGN ueld :luOw4 elIV C4 0 9 a-j 0 01 U) r 0 ui -0 O > CY) W LO T UJ N (D > E m > U) CL m (D 0 4) 0 E =3 z CL —J > LO (D (D (D LO (D > LO (D 0 O O O —J > LO (D (D 0 UJ (D > C. E > E m v jz- 0 0 t7— 0 o x 0 CL .j —J > (D LO (D (D cl� LM 9) > LO > (D (D E Lq 0 L a- z `veld wllsad `u0l;e3en `auazGN `nlpgnS `naa veld a; puad:lnaddV aaplsuoa) Ias ueld :;u0w43e;;d w .Q co Ci C*4 rsi a w U t1f a 0 U w N c Q O Q N O = a) N O O c o ai o�m - T" .V E cn_ - m N 2 0: N a) a c c c N o m O N _ U 0 O E Q'c a) O N � rn�-a N + G c a = o E E m w w o � o .mar- m a) � w in =_-oE 3 c- asicoo + ai 0o O V) _ = E J N N m N y O7 O � J c c J m.� = c U m o (� > = E m c U Lu w �co E ca O c o w E A+ 2 0-2 aCo 8 "c�i Q m U c � J L .m c m"0 E c � o o w U Q. _ (D Vl An m N N m c O J O > Eau, a �� -O o' a) a) I_- co= w v, y G -O N .0.. O O N 0 � N y a) UN _ o 0 a) m m 0 a) O _ > c c O n = L ow m o m u c v m c m ca .c O m N g (� c + Z '= N -O N G N 1� = c O J m � (1) m=N CD � N r- c E > S c ui o In CD a o a) m m E Q U m �O r N Q J N N > U m Q N U N N p = .�..1 0) 0 3 °� co 0) E � � M m O ro > E a) c = o° -oc cocc E (� C Em c N cc o Uo a) N N E °J O.— O m EU J O w U) w m CL = a) .� O Q v o- c aci c Q. _ Q u = Q a CDO 3 -o 0. a) v o Q w = _ , m O m m c _ CL m Q c o U/JO 11 E3 m 0c 3 ) N E am m o _ m - oG Yc 0m a NO O c Q ° S C GN Vc m m m E O E m Ino c x ( c Eo o mo S a) 0) - a m o oo m po c ° N o ♦./ _O Ca ca) o s m m c (m. O ) o m m xL) o o c ro -0 --E m mO co N c 'o ` � : a) N N >m a) c-- c E o o < oU a C :E c O O U) O w m .�T. m O N N 6 c V = .N N @ O C 0 U .Oc m O > O N O = y O O O N Q C � N w a) = > tJ NwN O C ) O L. t > o m mo c oa 0 o a = c = I_- m .c UZ Z Z Z F = = es I- N W I- I- i I- I- I- I- I- I- W I- U j �W F- C) N_ d' � W r- M M CDN M rP N Cl)M rl' Lo (fl 1- 00 0') - N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T C9 U 0 0 U U U U 0 U U 0 U U U U U 0 U U U U U U U `ueld wllGJd 'u011eOeA 'GuOzGN 'AlpqnS 'AOa veld 01 PWV:lAjddV jop!suoo) IOS ueld :luOw43eljV co Ci C14 rsi p 0 p 0 9 0 p 0 p 0 C?CD co LO N a) (D m LO LO V) (D (D (.0 (D (D (D 0 0 a) 0 00 0 0 LO ino 9j7,9179 jEi 'AUI 99'Lt79'13 wl�J :Ul 00'et7+0 816 0 Cl) w c 9 Ul 0Z*9i79'13 'AUI 00'LV9'IB 'PUJE) liepno-oo,00+o els co 0 0 0 0 0 CD 00 LO N m (0 m U-) U-) LO "T "T lzr E 0 0 (D 0 0 co 0 2.3.b Speedway#7649—Re-Build— Buffalo Grove, IL Appendix ➢ EX-1.0: Existing Condition Exhibit IF ➢ EX-2.0: Proposed Condition Exhibit ; ➢ EX-3.0: Storm Sewer Area Exhibit 3 N 06 O N N d V C > C a E L a 0 c� c� ai c 0 N G1 7 CO C a 0 E a L Q Q Q L a N c 0 U d c ca a c a� ;_ z a WT Group Project# D21 Packet Pg. 138 -11-dua reeen ae«aaAI'-id PMdv III-)IS aaeawuaenv 11'AAO IoD dnoi I—N IT, mino M3N n >< ;*mpoodS � Lu ALA 1191HX3 NOWONOO ON Ja= 1/7 Df 'B 14 _3 fl, �Ih-. 4 c)z Lu E Q2z Df o < < jj j n, --- t UlIICIF ir E -Il I I I e" fry" e j r,;,' A'[" i "Y!LY111 i jt ct z 7, 17 I I I� I j I If 0 IN �A u/ .. � Jf ki Vij I—A-----0--ld p.,I.ddV—,)I-S--ld VAAO noj ;* d IoD 1dm 1N OZ AL pS u OWONOO MSOdOdd n, "o v U 0 U < m z w o w <5 o L w 0 z [If x IA.-A -tilas LL, H II'AAO noj ;* d IoDdm IIN R AL pS u - V3dV d]M3S NdOiS o 41 f y, 0 41 LW Lu 51 51 Xv I sP 2.3.b a� 3 III - N 06 O W N fA I�II� d V III I III� � f i 0 i C 0 J Cl) 0 .... %//�' 1 a Prepared For: i CL CL 0 M 0 C �a c 0 E z a Packet Pg. 142 2.3.b 1. Introduction F CD This report summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study 3 conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for the proposed rebuild and expansion of the existing Speedway fuel center located in the northeast corner of the intersection N of Milwaukee Avenue with Riverwalk Drive in Buffalo Grove, Illinois. The existing Speedway rs fuel center contains 16 fueling positions and an approximately 4,200 square-foot convenience N store. The plans call for expanding the site to include the vacant building to the north in order to provide four additional passenger vehicle fueling positions (totaling 20 passenger vehicle fueling positions),two truck fueling positions, and an approximately 4,600 square-foot convenience store. The existing fuel center is currently served by two restricted access drives on Milwaukee Avenue > and a full movement access drive on Riverwalk Drive.Access to the expanded site will be provided via a three-quarter movement access drive and a right-in/right-out access drive on Milwaukee a Avenue, a full movement access drive on Riverwalk Drive, and a full movement access drive on E N. Riverwalk Drive. a EF The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed expansion will have on traffic conditions in the area and determine if any roadway or U access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed > development. 0 N Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site. The sections of this report present the following: �n as Existing roadway conditions c A description of the proposed fuel center Directional distribution of the fuel center traffic a. 2 Vehicle trip generation for the fuel center M Future traffic conditions including access to the fuel center a Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours i Recommendations with respect to adequacy of the site access and adjacent roadway system C L Traffic capacity analyses were conducted for the weekday morning and weekday peak hours for the a following conditions: c U 1. Existing Conditions—Analyzes the capacity of the existing roadway system using existing peak hour traffic volumes in the surrounding area. c �a 2. No-Build Conditions—Analyzes the capacity of the existing roadway system using existing a peak hour traffic volumes increased by a regional growth factor. E 3. Projected Conditions — Analyzes the capacity of the future roadway system using the U projected traffic volumes that include the background traffic volumes, and the traffic a estimated to be generated by the proposed development. Packet Pg. 143 `ueld uailaad `uoi}eaen`auoz8U `nipgng `na(3 ueld o;pwV:lnaddd aapisuo3) ;ag ueld :;uQWLIOe;;d T N a1 a r aD Y V 10 L R 4 �m'puIf Au "I,. ............ ................... W AD W E J v n LL N �71 1 1 71) I, 1- a 11.1 PN mm, C p "wV O irxz `ueld uailaad `uoi}eaen`auoz8U `nipgng `na(3 ueld o;pwV:lnaddd aapisuo3) ;ag ueld :;uQWLIOe;;d LO N a1 a r 1v Y 11 10 N � G �r r, uluul�� i IIIV Illmi f p Apr� F / M 0 o'awla, lo rxz I o� i � r ; �g r ;I II' . y , u C �4r 2.3.b 2. Existing Conditions a� Existing transportation conditions in the vicinity of the site were documented based on field visits 3 conducted by KLOA, Inc. in order to obtain a database for projecting future conditions. The following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, physical characteristics of the area roadway system including lane usage and traffic control devices, and existing peak hour � traffic volumes. o N Site fA Nto L.,ocation v c c� The site, which is currently occupied by the existing Speedway fuel center and a vacant building, is located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Milwaukee Avenue with Riverwalk Drive c and Columbus Parkway. Land uses in the vicinity of the include Chevy Chase County Club, Mi Mexico restaurant and Beyer Dental & Associates to the west and a Shell fuel center to the south. E L Existing Roadway Systern Characteristics a 0 The characteristics of the existing roadways near the development are described below and illustrated in Figure 3. ti Milwaukee Avenue (US Route 45) is generally a north-south arterial roadway that in the vicinity c of the site provides three through lanes in each direction separated by a raised landscaped median. At its signalized intersection with Riverwalk Drive/Columbus Parkway, Milwaukee Avenue provides an exclusive left-turn lane, three through lanes, and an exclusive right-turn lane on the northbound approach and an exclusive left-turn lane, two through lanes, and a shared through/right-turn lane on the southbound approach. Both legs of the intersection provide standard style crosswalks with pedestrian countdown signals. At its unsignalized intersection with E. Chevy o Chase Drive and the parking lot access drive, Milwaukee Avenue provides a combined _a through/left-turn lane and a combined through/right-turn lane on both approaches. At its a 0 unsignalized intersection with Prague Avenue and the parking lot access drive,Milwaukee Avenue provides a combined through/left-turn lane,a through lane,and a combined through/right-turn lane E a on both approaches. At its unsignalized intersection with the Speedway gas station access drives, Milwaukee Avenue provides two through lanes and a combined through/right-turn lane on the a northbound approaches and four through lanes on the southbound approaches. It should be noted a L that Milwaukee Avenue narrows from three lanes to two lanes in the northbound direction just a south of E. Chevy Chase Drive. Milwaukee Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), is classified as a Strategic Regional Arterial (SRA), and 0 carries an Annual Average Daily Traffic(AADT)volume of approximately 36,200 vehicles(IDOT , 2019). Milwaukee Avenue has a posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour. c �a a c a� E s U 0 a Packet Pg. 146 2.3.b N NOT TO SCALE d 2CD 6 ��7 LEGEND 3 ?�O -TRAVEL LANE CI4IICAA -TRAFFIC SIGNAL CIHASIE COUN " 2 -STOP SIGN 06 "11V' CIL..NI XX -SPEED LIMIT c N - NO PARKING zE CHEV vE -STANDARD CROSSWALK pR CNpgE - LANE DROP Ir GAPS C O R I"J`O P A T ON > C to a 21 E a� i a IC C I IC`.'D IC IIA"'If" I A II1_ 2 crs U ti c 2AM-6AM ''AA d DAILY "iii S 5�p.'I�S OR I PCC 'A CU RAN1I' CPIL11 CI AA a N o' w coos o� Q. IB U'': Iw Ifs s r o C N AL & R i §N�K 4 i ASSOCIATES � SDIVERWALK CL Q R DRIVE Q mr P pFtKW AY wo ►��` N � �Fl tC :' AIIA USA S CC.II.)NAY d IIAPIf' T CACIA, C G1 E L V Speedway Expansion Buffalo Grove, Illinois Existing Roadway Characteristics ` Job No:21-143 Figure: 3 Packet Pg. 147 2.3.b Riverwalk Drive is an east-west local roadway that serves the Riverwalk office building, the 301 Riverwalk apartments, and the Shell fuel center. This roadway extends from the Lake Cook Road westbound exit ramp to Milwaukee Avenue and provides one through lane in each direction. At its signalized intersection with Milwaukee Avenue, Riverwalk Drive provides dual left-turn lanes 3 and a shared through/right-turn lane. The west leg of this intersection is Columbus Parkway,which — serves the residential homes on the west side of Milwaukee Avenue. At its signalized intersection with Milwaukee Avenue, Columbus Parkway provides an exclusive left-turn lane and a shared N through/right-turn lane. Both the east and west legs of this intersection provide standard style o crosswalks with pedestrian countdown signals. At its unsignalized intersection with N. Riverwalk Drive,Riverwalk Drive provides a combined left-turn lane/through/right-turn on both approaches. At its unsignalized intersection with the Speedway gas station access drive, Riverwalk Drive provides a combined through/left-turn lane on the eastbound approach. The westbound approach provides two through lanes and a combined through/right-turn lane. Riverwalk Drive and Columbus Parkway are under the jurisdiction of the Village of Buffalo Grove. Riverwalk Drive has a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour and Columbus Parkway has a posted speed limit of a 25 miles per hour. E L a Prague Avenue is an east-west local roadway that provides one lane in each direction. At its c unsignalized intersection with Milwaukee Avenue, Prague Avenue provides a combined left/through/right-turn lane on the eastbound approach under stop sign control. Prague Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Buffalo Grove and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per c hour. O N G1 E. Chevy Chase Drive is an east-west local roadway that provides one lane in each direction. At its unsignalized intersection with Milwaukee Avenue,E. Chevy Chase Drive provides a combined left-turn/through/right-turn lane on the eastbound approach under stop sign control. E. Chevy Chase Drive is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Buffalo Grove and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. o c N. Riverwalk Drive is a north-south local roadway that provides one lane in each direction. At its a O unsignalized intersection with Riverwalk Drive, Riverwalk Drive provides an exclusive right-turn lane and a combined through/left-turn lane on the southbound approach and a combined left- E a turn/through/right-turn lane on the northbound approach under stop sign control. N. Riverwalk Drive is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Buffalo Grove. a a L a .y C O U d c �a a c a� E s U a Packet Pg. 148 2.3.b Existing Traffic Volumes m In order to determine current traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, KLOA, Inc. conducted peak period vehicle,pedestrian, and bicycle movement traffic counts on Thursday, July 15, 2021, 3 during the weekday morning (6:30 to 9:00 A.M.) and evening (4:00 to 6:30 P.M.)peak periods at the following intersections: N s Milwaukee Avenue with Riverwalk Drive and Columbus Parkway � 0 Milwaukee Avenue with Gas Station Access Drives N d Milwaukee Avenue with Prague Avenue 0 Milwaukee Avenue with E. Chery Chase Drive s Riverwalk Drive with Gas Station Access Drive » Riverwalk Drive with N. Riverwalk Drive > c �a In order to represent normal conditions, counts along Milwaukee Avenue were compared with the a hourly counts found on the IDOT website and were therefore increased by 35 percent during the weekday morning peak hour and by 10 percent during the weekday evening peak hour. a The results of the traffic counts showed that the weekday morning peak hour of traffic occurs from 7:15 A.M. to 8:15 A.M. and the weekday evening peak hour of traffic occurs from 4:15 P.M. to U 5:15 P.M. > ti c Figure 4 illustrates the existing traffic volumes. Copies of the traffic count summary sheets are N included in the Appendix. Cr sh nalysis N KLOA, Inc. obtained crash data' from IDOT for the most recent available five years (2016 to 0 2020) for the intersections of Milwaukee Avenue with Riverwalk Drive and Columbus Parkway, Milwaukee Avenue with the gas station access drives, Milwaukee Avenue with Prague Avenue, a Milwaukee Avenue with E. Chery Chase Drive,Riverwalk Drive with the gas station access drive, ° M and Riverwalk Drive with N. Riverwalk Drive. Tables 1 through 4 summarize the crash data for a the intersections of Milwaukee Avenue with Riverwalk Drive and Columbus Parkway,Milwaukee Avenue with Prague Avenue,Milwaukee Avenue with the gas station access drive, and Riverwalk a Drive with the gas station access drive,respectively. In addition,there were seven crashes reported a at the intersection of Milwaukee Avenue with E. Chevy Chase Drive and seven crashes reported a at the intersection of Riverwalk Drive with N. Riverwalk Drive over the five-year period.A review v, of the crash data indicated that no fatalities were reported at any of the studied intersections v between 2016 and 2020. c �a a c a� ' IDOT DISCLAIMER:The motor vehicle crash data referenced herein was provided by the Illinois Department of Transportation. E Any conclusions drawn from analysis of the aforementioned data are the sole responsibility of the data recipient(s).Additionally, v for coding years 2015 to present,the Bureau of Data Collection uses the exact latitude/longitude supplied by the investigating law enforcement agency to locate crashes.Therefore,location data may vary in previous years since data prior to 2015 was physically Q located by bureau personnel. Packet Pg. 149 2.3.b N NOT TO SCALE d 2 6 ��7 LEGEND 3 N ?�O QQ -AM PEAK HOUR(7:15-8:15 AM) o p 1p�l 2 (QQ) - PM PEAK HOUR(4:15-5:15 PM) 06 ri N E S HEV� ` c E RIVE 1 ca A �� .1 Sp162 CH G oR' > ro121� � % i► a 21 �� E a� V a MILWAUKEE AVENUE @ 2 GAS STATION v S NORTH ACCESS DR U O lol > a i � 2 l0� d jai p l N GVE ? QP EN��0 1p11 a�g 3 C-1' GP c�a N a 0 No E N VIP, 2 1`O ° r 0 i8 j69) a ; + � v�N P o'er rN �!._ 20 t291 ~ 0 181 a 13 t2391 r RNERWALK a V0 c o t 31 1131 6 DRIVE Q 0 L i a t6) * (► 1� 116 1163) a l51) 1 5 t11 1 (n 11 �-i_N C gp t56) 15 t25) '�4 ' o ��" PAR►CWAY1 A-\ w q l35) � s a = � O 6' N 1l6) amid %P MILWAUKEE AVENUE @ j GAS STATION SOUTH ACCESS DR t Speedway Expansion Buffalo Grove, Illinois Year 2021 Base Traffic Volumes ` Job No:21-143 Figure: 4 Packet Pg. 150 2.3.b Table 1 MILWAUKEE AVENUE WITH RIVERWALK DRIVE AND COLUMBUS PARKWAY - CRASH SUMMARY Type of AccidentFrequency 3 ObjectYear Angle Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total N 2016 0 1 3 1 6 0 11 06 0 2017 1 0 1 3 1 0 6 N d 2018 0 1 4 2 2 0 9 c •L 2019 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 2020 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 a a. Total 1 2 9 8 11 0 31 E i Average/Year <1.0 <1.0 1.8 1.6 2.2 0 6.2 a. EF c� U Table 2 > MILWAUKEE AVENUE WITH PRAGUE AVENUE - CRASH SUMMARY 0 1 ' 1 1FrequencyN G1 ObjectYear Angle Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2016 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 (0 2017 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 c 2018 0 1 1 1 1 0 4 a. 2019 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 E 2020 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 a Total 0 1 6 5 2 0 14 a a a Average/Year 0 <1.0 1.2 1.0 <1.0 0 2.8 a .y C O U d c la a c a� E s U a Packet Pg. 151 2.3.b Table 3 MILWAUKEE AVENUE WITH GAS STATION ACCESS DRIVE - CRASH SUMMARY a� p• of Accident Frequency �a Year Angle Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2016 0 1 3 1 5 0 10 N 06 2017 o 0 1 4 1 0 6 0 N 2018 0 1 4 2 3 0 10 2019 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 L 2020 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 Total 0 2 8 9 11 0 30 a E Average/Year 0 <1.0 1.6 1.8 2.2 0 6.0 L a 0 Table 4 U RIVERWALK DRIVE WITH GAS STATION ACCESS DRIVE - CRASH SUMMARY > ti p• of d• c 0 N Year Angle Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total G1 2016 0 1 1 0 4 0 6 2017 1 0 0 2 2 0 5 as 2018 0 0 3 2 4 0 9 c 2019 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 a. 0 2020 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 a Total 2 1 4 5 11 0 23 L Q Average/Year <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.0 2.2 0 4.6 a a L a .y C O U d c �a a c a) E s U Bl,�,Ndo Grove, lllhzok� 10 Packet Pg. 152 2.3.b 3. Traffic Characteristics of the Proposed ' N aD In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to 3 determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed fuel center expansion,including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. N 06 Proposed. Site; and Expansion Plan N As indicated earlier, the plans for the rebuild and expansion of the existing fuel center call for 20 passenger vehicle fueling positions, two truck fueling positions, and an approximately 4,600 square-foot convenience store. Access to the site will be provided via the following: > c �a A proposed three-quarter movement access drive on Milwaukee Avenue to be located a approximately 435 feet north of Riverwalk Drive. This access drive, which replaces an E existing full-movement access drive, will be designed to physically restrict left-turn a movements exiting the site and will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane. _ Outbound movements should be under stop sign control. Inbound left turns will be 2 accommodated via the provision of a left-turn lane to be provided within the existing U median on Milwaukee Avenue which will be designed to provide approximately 150 feet > of storage and 145 feet of taper. The access drive will be designed to accommodate inbound truck movements. N A right-in/right-out access drive on Milwaukee Avenue to be located approximately 205 feet north of Riverwalk Drive, replacing an existing restricted access drive that is less than 100 feet north of Riverwalk Drive. This access drive will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane. Outbound movements should be under stop sign control. Left-turn o movements will be restricted via the existing raised median on Milwaukee Avenue. a An existing full movement access drive on Riverwalk Drive located approximately 265 2 feet east of Milwaukee Avenue. This access drive provides one inbound lane and one M outbound lane and will be widened to accommodate exiting truck traffic. Outbound a movements should be under stop sign control. i a a A proposed full movement access drive on N. Riverwalk Drive aligned opposite the 301 a L Riverwalk Place access drive located approximately 500 feet north of Riverwalk Drive. a This access drive will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane. Outbound c movements should be under stop sign control. c0 m It should be noted that the number of curb cuts along Milwaukee Avenue will be reduced from four to two,which will improve the traffic flow along Milwaukee Avenue.Furthermore,the design and the location of the access drives with trucks entering from Milwaukee Avenue at the three- quarter movement access drive and exiting onto Riverside Drive will minimize conflicts and interaction with passenger vehicles. s U A copy of the site plan is included in the Appendix. Q Packet Pg. 153 2.3.b Directional Distribution CD The directions from which patrons and employees of the expanded Speedway fuel center will approach and depart the site were estimated based on existing travel patterns, as determined from 3 the traffic counts. Figure 5 illustrates the directional distribution of the development-generated traffic. N 06 Peak I lose Traffic Volumes o N fA The increase in the number of peak hour trips estimated to be generated by the expansion of Speedway fuel center was based on the trip rates of the existing Speedway fuel center based on a the traffic counts conducted at the driveways serving the site. It is important to note that the trip rates observed at the existing Speedway fuel center are generally higher than the trip rates using c "Gas Station with Convenience Store" (Land-Use Code 945) found in the Institute of a Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, loth Edition., as shown in Table 5. E Therefore,the observed trip rates were utilized to estimate the increase in traffic resulting from the proposed expansion of the Speedway fuel center. Given the limited traffic generation data available for fuel stations specific to trucks, the number of peak hour truck trips estimated to be o generated by the commercial vehicle fueling positions was estimated based on a maximum possible usage of four trucks per fueling position per hour. j ti c It is also important to note that surveys conducted by ITE have shown that approximately 60 N percent of trips made to fuel centers are diverted from the existing traffic on the roadway system. � This is particularly true during the weekday morning and evening peak hours when traffic is diverted from the home-to-work and work-to-home trips (pass-by traffic). As such, the new site traffic to be generated by the fuel center was reduced by 60 percent to account for pass-by traffic. Table 5 shows the traffic for the existing Speedway fuel center. Table 6 shows the net increase of traffic for the proposed expanded Speedway fuel center. a. O E a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d c �a a c a� E s U a Packet Pg. 154 2.3.b N .� NOT TO SCALE F �p , D p� LEGEND 3 e pQ ?�O 00% -AM PERCENT DISTRIBUTION O� 2 (pp%) - PM PERCENT DISTRIBUTION N 00' - DISTANCE IN FEET 06 - PROPOSED STOP SIGN N HEV E C IE N SE op a C ® > a 21 E '0 W y a O v . C O SITE s 0 cn c^N > bi :� ca a 2 � d O N E (20/`.) a r SO a WALK Q N DRIVE Q L 5% (57.) 285, J PA AY w m .l 11 N -� to Q Q a p - O pa S E Q Speedway Expansion Buffalo Grove, Illinois Estimated Directional Distribution ` Job No:21-143 Figure: 5 Packet Pg. 155 2.3.b Table 5 PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION— EXISTING SPEEDWAY Weekday Morning Evening ca Peak Hour Peak Hour Type/SizeOut TotalOut Total N 06 KLOA Existing Speedway Fuel Center 120 143 263 134 142 276 N Counts (Counts) d ITE Gas Station with Convenience Market LUC 127 122 249 143 137 280 945 (20 positions) c Additional Trips +7 -21 -14 +9 -5 +4 a E i a Table 6 c ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION—EXPANDED SITE Weekday m MorningWeekday Evening > Peak 1c Peak Hour 0 N TotalType/Size In Out 41 Existing Speedway Fuel Center 120 143 263 134 142 276 (16 Positions) a� 0 Increased by 25 percent ISO 179 329 168 177 345 c Net Increase +30 +36 +66 +34 +35 +69 a 0 60%Pass-by Reduction -20 -20 -40 -20 -20 -40 m E Subtotal New Trips 10 16 26 14 15 29 a Truck Fueling Positions a (2 Positions) 8 8 16 8 8 16 a Additional New Trips 18 24 42 22 23 45 c U Additional Pass-By Trips 20 20 40 20 20 40 +, m c �a a c a� E s U 13qfl�do Grow, lllinok� 14 Packet Pg. 156 2.3.b 4. Projected Traffic Conditions F CD The total projected traffic volumes include the existing traffic volumes, increase in background 3 traffic due to growth,and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed expanded Speedway fuel center. N 06 Speedway Traffic Assignment N The estimated weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated by c the proposed expansion were assigned to the roadway system in accordance with the previously described directional distribution (Figure 5). Figure 6 illustrates the traffic assignment of the > additional passenger vehicle trips generated by the expansion of the Speedway fuel center and Figure 7 illustrates the traffic assignment of the additional pass-by trips generated by the proposed a expansion of the Speedway fuel center. It should be noted that the trips serving the existing E Speedway gas station were reassigned based on the new access system. a. EF Background Traffic Conditions U The existing traffic volumes (Figure 4) were increased by a regional growth factor to account for the increase in existing traffic related to regional growth in the area (i.e., not attributable to any c particular planned development). Based on 2050 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) projections provided by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) in a letter dated July 29, 2021, the existing traffic volumes were increased by an annually compounded growth rate for six years (one-year buildout plus five years) totaling one percent to represent Year 2027 no-build conditions. Figure 8 shows the Year 2027 no-build traffic conditions. A copy of the CMAP 2050 projections letter is included in the Appendix. o c Year 2027 Total Projected Traffic Conditions c M The new and pass-by development-generated traffic (Figures 6 and 7) was added to the no-build Q traffic volumes (Figure 8) to determine the Year 2027 total projected traffic volumes, which are illustrated in Figure 9. a a L a .y C O U d c �a a c a� E s U a Packet Pg. 157 2.3.b N NOT TO SCALE IF 2CD 6 ��7 LEGEND 3 7- 00 -AM PEAK HOUR(7:15-8:15 AM) 2 (00) - PM PEAK HOUR(4:15-5:15 PM) N JQ - PROPOSED STOP SIGN 06 ` N HE . . . E R •- SE pRIV \ 4 2 cH e ® ca a 21 10 E Fyn 0 a a ` a 2 y R � O o ° U � N Q N ai . C N ►� SITE ® cn � gl5� s o a 2 � . o N E N�1 ' '04eoa i r�YRWALK Q I�r3 k41 pRIVE Q 1111 , tl �► d kill. n 5 t51 1 0 L �gUS U PARKWAY w m cn a c s � a c a� E s U Q Speedway Expansion Buffalo Grove, Illinois New Trips (Additional) ` Job No:21-143 Figure: 6 Packet Pg. 158 2.3.b N NOT TO SCALE IF 2CD 6 ��7 LEGEND 3 7 00 -AM PEAK HOUR(7:15-8:15 AM) 2 (00) - PM PEAK HOUR(4:15-5:15 PM) N JQ - PROPOSED STOP SIGN 06 0 N fA HEV E C s m c N SE SRNE a 2 C 0 a 21 , E O v Q X a ti N SITE , G � ® cn . N 1r m 2� a o �- d i) E + + r Q +1 1+11 a RIVERWALK r r, �m DRIVE Q N + L �gUs +1�(1, � PARKWAY w m = cn W tC a c a� E s U Q Speedway Expansion Buffalo Grove, Illinois Pass-By Traffic Assignment (Additional) ` Job No:21-143 Figure: 7 Packet Pg. 159 2.3.b N NOT TO SCALE d 2 6 ��7 LEGEND 3 �p ?�O 00 -AM PEAK HOUR(7:15-8:15 AM) 2 %o l0� 2 (00) - PM PEAK HOUR(4:15-5:15 PM) N R� 0 1 06 ri Nar` r/ ri N HEV� CH � DRNR o AgE > ro a 21 a� i a 2 U 10> > a�N k�, A-, 0 N GVE ?P A,\ E GP c�a N a E 1`ON VIP, 2° r p i8 j69) a SSi r 0 NP w E s �— 20 t291 tg) i �� j er' SOv ) W cn r 13 t2391 r RNERWALK Q N N� t 31 1131 DRIVE Q a �+a 45 l51) 11 t25) r- N y R � c �g Y �, gp t56) 15 t25) '4 10 o P AR►CW A l a w q t35) o N s 1061 -► a�� i 10 (5) MILWAUKEE AVENUE @ GAS STATION NORTH ACCESS DR t U Speedway Expansion Buffalo Grove, Illinois No-Build Traffic Volumes ` Job No:21-143 Figure: 8 Packet Pg. 160 2.3.b N NOT TO SCALE IF 2 6 ��7 LEGEND 3 7- 00 -AM PEAK HOUR(7:15-8:15 AM) o 1p� 2 (00) - PM PEAK HOUR(4:15-5:15 PM) N k, p �pl - PROPOSED STOP SIGN 06 ri ri N fA cN SEE pRNIE 2 ® +6 g a « Wig, 21 E a�+ R� 63 a ` O U Vn ti i O « 41 SITE Al a �► �° o E a i u RIVERWALK r RIVE QD Q j N 1 t�1 (D o `► 136 t1831 5 tll) t3A1 72 t361 o M L 12 t23a1 L �gus 15 t251 —>4 �° o l► ~ P ARKW A,1 �, w '" m A c 35 t351 1 2311 a N a 89 rCOLUMBUS PARKWAY @ GAS STATION ACCESS DRIVE E t U Speedway Expansion Buffalo Grove, Illinois Total Projected Traffic Volumes ` Job No:21-143 Figure: 9 Packet Pg. 161 2.3.b 5. Traffic Analysis andRecomtnendatioq�.��N a� The following provides an evaluation conducted for the weekday morning and weekday evening 3 peak hours. The analysis includes conducting capacity analyses to determine how well the roadway system and access drives are projected to operate and whether any roadway N improvements or modifications are required. rs 0 N ]Crallic Analyses � c Roadway and adjacent or nearby intersection analyses were performed for the weekday morning and weekday peak hours for the base (Year 2021), Year 2027 no-build, and Year 2027 total > projected traffic volumes. a The traffic analyses were performed using the methodologies outlined in the Transportation E Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 6t'' Edition and analyzed using a Synchro/SimTraffic 11 software. The analysis for the traffic-signal controlled intersection of c Milwaukee Avenue with Riverwalk Drive and Columbus Parkway was accomplished using actual cycle lengths, phasings, and offsets to determine the average overall vehicle delay and levels of M service. > ti c 0 The analyses for the unsignalized intersections determine the average control delay to vehicles at an intersection. Control delay is the elapsed time from a vehicle joining the queue at a stop sign (includes the time required to decelerate to a stop) until its departure from the stop sign and resumption of free flow speed. The methodology analyzes each intersection approach controlled cn by a stop sign and considers traffic volumes on all approaches and lane characteristics. as 0 The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles a passing through the intersection. The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service M and the corresponding control delay for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections are E included in the Appendix of this report. i Q Summaries of the traffic analysis results showing the level of service and overall intersection delay a (measured in seconds) for the Year 2021 base, Year 2027 no-build, and Year 2027 total projected conditions are presented in Tables 7 through 10. A discussion of each intersection follows. v, Summary sheets for the capacity analyses are included in the Appendix. 0 m c �a a c a� E s U a Packet Pg. 162 `ueld wllOJd `uoi}eaen`auoz8U `nipgng `na(3 ueld o;pwV:lnaddd.lapisuo3) ;ag ueld :;uQWLIOe;;d T N >31 a r aD Y V 00 I I I I I I z M � - - - oc oc 7t O O Vj O H W `n kn �n `� �n �n `n -� M l� Ln Ln Z Ln L Ln Lr) W I I I I I I W W W W W W W Wa, Q � 44 Ln in � Vl M � V 1 M V 1 00 O v �) kn W W W W W W H WC� WM Wog WM Wog WM in t` I-n E U A-i A-i A-i N_ }+ 2.3.b Table 8 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS —YEAR 2021 BASE CONDITIONS —UNSIGNALIZED m Weekday1Weekday Peak Hour1 t3C 3 IntersectionDelay LOS Delay Milwaukee Avenue with E. Chevy Chase Drive/Parking Lot N 06 • Northbound Left Turns B 13.4 B 14.3 0 N • Eastbound Approach C 22.2 F 99+ Milwaukee Avenue with Prague Avenue • Northbound Left Turns C 23.5 C 24.9 • Eastbound Approach C 18.1 C 21.8 • Westbound Approach C 17.7 A 0.1 a. E • Southbound Left Turns A 0.1 A 0.1 a Milwaukee Avenue with Gas Station Northern Access Drive = 0 Westbound Approach C 22.3 C 24.1 U Milwaukee Avenue with Gas Station Southern Access Drive > • Westbound Approach C 18.4 C 20.8 c Riverwalk Drive with Gas Station Access Drive • Eastbound Left Turns A 8.9 A 9.6 • Southbound Approach A 9.9 B 10.6 N Riverwalk Drive with N. Riverwalk Drive and Shell Access Drive > a� Northbound Approach A 9.6 B 11.5 Eastbound Left Turns A 7.3 A 7.7 a. 0 Westbound Left Turns A 0.1 A 7.3 Southbound Approach A 8.5 A 9.6 a LOS=Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. a Q L a .y C 0 U d c �a a c a� E s U 0 Q Packet Pg. 164 2.3.b Table 9 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS —NO BUILD CONDITIONS —UNSIGNALIZED Weekday1Weekday Peak Hour1 t3C 3 IntersectionDelay LOS Delay Milwaukee Avenue with E. Chevy Chase Drive/Parking Lot N 06 • Northbound Left Turns B 13.5 B 14.5 0 N • Eastbound Approach C 22.5 F 99+ Milwaukee Avenue with Prague Avenue • Northbound Left Turns C 23.8 D 25.4 • Eastbound Approach C 18.3 C 22.0 • Westbound Approach C 17.8 A 0.1 a. E • Southbound Left Turns A 0.1 A 0.1 a Milwaukee Avenue with Fuel Center Northern Access Drive = 0 Westbound Approach C 22.5 C 24.3 U Milwaukee Avenue with Fuel Center Southern Access Drive > • Westbound Approach C 18.5 C 21.0 c Riverwalk Drive with Fuel Center Access Drive • Eastbound Left Turns A 8.9 A 9.6 • Southbound Approach A 9.9 B 10.6 N Riverwalk Drive with N. Riverwalk Drive and Shell Access Drive > a� Northbound Approach A 9.6 B 11.5 Eastbound Left Turns A 7.3 A 7.7 a. 0 Westbound Left Turns A 0.1 A 7.3 Southbound Approach A 8.5 A 9.6 a LOS=Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. a Q L a .y C 0 U d c �a a c a� E s U 0 Q Packet Pg. 165 2.3.b Table 10 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS —PROJECTED CONDITIONS —UNSIGNALIZED Weekday1Weekday Peak Hour1 t3C 3 IntersectionDelay LOS Delay Milwaukee Avenue with E. Chevy Chase Drive/Parking Lot N 06 • Northbound Left Turns B 13.6 B 14.5 0 N • Eastbound Approach C 22.8 F 99+ Milwaukee Avenue with Prague Avenue • Northbound Left Turns C 23.2 C 24.6 • Eastbound Approach C 18.0 C 21.6 Milwaukee Avenue with Proposed Right-In/Right-Out Access Drive a. E Westbound Approach C 20.5 C 21.6 a Milwaukee Avenue with Proposed Three-Quarter Access Drive = O • Westbound Approach C 19.2 C 24.8 • Southbound Left Turns C 22.1 D 31.8 > Riverwalk Drive with Fuel Center Access Drive c • Eastbound Left Turns A 8.9 A 9.5 • Southbound Approach B 10.1 B 10.8 Riverwalk Drive with N. Riverwalk Drive and Shell Access Drive Northbound Approach A 9.7 B 11.6 Eastbound Left Turns A 7.3 A 7.7 c Westbound Left Turns A 0.1 A 7.3 a. O Southbound Approach A 8.6 A 9.7 LOS=Level of Service E a Delay is measured in seconds. L Q IZ a L a .y C O U d c �a a c a� E s U a Packet Pg. 166 2.3.b Discussion and Recommendations The following summarizes how the intersections are projected to operate and identifies any CD roadway and traffic control improvements necessary to accommodate the expansion-generated 3 traffic. — Milwaukee Avenue with Rivez^walk Drive and Columbus Parkway 04 0 The results of the capacity analysis indicate that overall this intersection currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) B during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. The eastbound and a westbound approaches are operating at LOS E during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. The northbound and southbound approaches currently operate at LOS B or better during both peak hours. c �a Under Year 2027 no-build conditions, this intersection will continue to operate at LOS B during a the weekday morning and evening peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. All E approaches will operate at the same existing levels of service during both peak hours with increases a in delay of less than one second. c Under Year 2027 total projected conditions, this intersection will continue to operate at the same existing level of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. All approaches will continue to operate at the same existing levels of service during both peak c hours with increases in delay of less than one second. In addition, the westbound approach will 0 experience 951"percentile queues of approximately 90 feet during the weekday morning peak hour and 185 feet during the weekday evening peak hour and, as such, the westbound queues will generally not extend to or past the access drive serving the Speedway fuel center. Overall, the proposed expansion of the Speedway fuel center is only projected to consist of less than one percent of the total traffic traversing this intersection during the weekday morning and evening o peak hours. As such, this intersection has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic _a projected to be generated by the proposed fuel center. a 0 Milwaukee Avenue with E. Chevy Chase Drive/Parking Lot E a The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the northbound left-turn movements are operating a at LOS B during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. In addition, the eastbound a L approach currently operates at LOS C during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS F during a the weekday evening peak hour. This is normal and expected when a minor road intersects a major road such as Milwaukee Avenue. 0 U Under Year 2027 no-build conditions, the northbound left-turn movements and the eastbound in approach will continue to operate at the same levels of service during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. a c as E s U 0 a Packet Pg. 167 2.3.b Under Year 2027 total projected conditions, the northbound left-turn movements and the eastbound approach will continue to operate at the same levels of service during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. Overall,the traffic (D that will be generated by the proposed fuel center will have a limited impact on the operations of 3 this intersection. — Milwaukee Avenue with Prague Avenue N 0 The results of the capacity analysis indicate that all movements and approaches are operating at LOS C or better during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. c Under Year 2027 no-build conditions, the northbound left-turn movements will operate at LOS C during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS D during the weekday evening peak hour. In addition, all of the other movements and approaches will continue to operate at the same levels of _C service during both peak hours. a Under Year 2027 total projected conditions, all movements will operate at LOS C during the a weekday morning and evening peak hours. Overall, the traffic that will be generated by the c proposed gas station will have a limited impact on the operations of this intersection. U Milwaukee Avenue with Speedway Fuel Center Might-InlRight-Out Access Drive c 0 The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the outbound movements are operating at LOS C during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. Under Year 2027 no-build conditions,the outbound movements will operate at LOS C during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. 0 As previously indicated, the existing right-in/right-out access drive that is less than 100 feet north _a of Riverwalk Drive will be relocated approximately 205 feet north of Riverwalk Drive. Under a 0 Year 2027 total projected conditions, the outbound movements will continue to operate at LOS C M during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. As such, the Speedway access drive will be E adequate in accommodating the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed expansion and a > will ensure efficient and flexible access is provided. a a L Milwaukee Avenue with the Proposed speedway Fuel Center Three-Quarter Access Drive a .y C The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the outbound movements will operate at LOS C 0 during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with 95th percentile queues of one to two , vehicles. In addition, the southbound left-turn movements will operate at LOS C during the in weekday morning peak hour and LOS D during the weekday evening peak hour with 95th percentile queues of one to two vehicles that will be accommodated by the proposed southbound a exclusive left-turn lane which will provide 150 feet of storage length. As such, the Speedway access drives will be adequate in accommodating the traffic estimated to be generated by the s proposed Speedway fuel center and will ensure efficient and flexible access is provided. U a Packet Pg. 168 2.3.b Riverwalk Drive with N. Riverwalk Drive and Shell Access Drive The results of the capacity analysis indicate that all movements and approaches are operating at LOS B or better during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. 3 Under Year 2027 no-build conditions, all movements and approaches will continue to operate at the same existing levels of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one N 06 second. 0 N Under Year 2027 total projected conditions, all movements and approaches will continue to a operate at the same levels of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. c a E L a 0 c� U ti c 0 N G1 7 N d C a 0 E a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d c M a c a) E s U a Packet Pg. 169 2.3.b 1 Conclusion F aD Based on the preceding analyses and recommendations, the following conclusions have been 3 made: N The traffic projected to be generated by the proposed expansion of the Speedway fuel 06 center will be reduced due to the volume of pass-by traffic. N d The net increase in traffic resulting from the proposed expansion will not be significant c and can be accommodated by the existing roadway system. The proposed access system will ensure that flexible access is provided for traffic entering and exiting the site and will maximize the separation between passenger vehicles and truck a traffic. E L a The number of curb cuts along Milwaukee Avenue will be reduced from four to two,which c will improve the traffic flow along Milwaukee Avenue. U M The design and the location of the access drives with trucks entering from Milwaukee Avenue at the three-quarter movement access drive and exiting onto Riverside Drive will c minimize conflicts and interaction with passenger vehicles. a� 0 c a O E a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d c �a a c a� E s U a Packet Pg. 170 2.3.b a� ca 3 N 06 O N N d V C AD > C a E .i Appendix Traffic Count Summary Sheets N Site Plan CMAP Projections Letter Level of Service Criteria 0 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets a. E a L Q Q Q L a .N c 0 U d c M a c a� z a Packet Pg. 171 2.3.b m a� ca 3 N 06 T- O N N d V C An R > C a E L a 0 c� c� ai c 0 N G1 Traffic Count Summary Sheets 0 a 0 a L Q Q Q L a N c 0 U d c ca a c a� z a Packet Pg. 172 `ueld uailaad `uoi}eaen`auoz8U `nipgng `na(3 ueld o;pwV:lnaddd aapisuo3) ;ag ueld :;uQWLIOe;;d T N a1 a r a Ilu n o > $ e w 0 IIII 0 o 0 0 0 -o o o o w o m 0 o o o o o f o 0 fi o 0 o 0 IV�i `ueld wila.ad `uoi;eDen`auozaa `nipgng `naa ueld o;pLuV:InaddV japisuoa) ;ag ueld :;uauayoelIv M T O N o r w m r co o m Yn ro o Nm m o m ao u� a r M s o rn rn M a co H O M� 01 V INp ili N (O V O� O V CO M V O (gyp (�O N p�j r O N N W V a W O of N V N V m r (O V Ln r r (O N M V M O O <p O Q) Y N z 0 ai o o N 4? Y � Z -6 Q ] O 2 M M (D O � W � � N r (D � � r (O Mo M M O f0 N r O � � (6 l] CO O W N V OJ V OJ r CO V �n r r (D N M V M O) O m Q Z M U _ a) z m 0 -t- m z U0(ncoa- m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m co m m co o rn co Q Ccl O O OU a — co �p U Q t m� z° � z cn c 0 o 0 G 2 - - - - W O> N co � � � m o' M o ro o N o � � m v m u = C N M N N N OJ N N N N O1 M M M T M M M N M M pOj N W O r N N N O m oc .Ern E� i WtY v F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 H O O (2 M 62 N N O O N <p r O M r N r M V O M O V O M ¢ N a o` Vl J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O y U �6 'E i + 76 y6 Y6 0 3 F 3 W M O M O M7t tK O M O M O , o J \ m m @ N (6 !6 O r r r r O o.] N of of O m V V V V In In lA In O O O N p F o N OY 2 2 2 2 2 0 ¢ 61 C U � o ¢ `ueld wila.ad `uoi;eDen`auozaa `nipgng `naa ueld o;pLuV:InaddV japisuoa) ;ag ueld :;uauayoelIv ,n M T N 01 0 a m a co 0 0 co 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O O N O O O � O cs � O O th O O O Y � � a m m K o w � of m 6 0 � N 9 ' a r m a o m o mqd milmd 'UoIIE Je'Duoa `p nS %aaugd mPmdl ddVa msuoo) IDS ugd :IUmmL13 e!! v m / W / cq - C - 2 ) 2 ] - a cQ \ § $ _ _ _ _ , . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . ƒ / _ f E ! ; / z ) { / ! § & 2 ( \ \ \) ) on _ =$ o�` / % 3KG\/ « � _ $ : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . \ 0a \ aw }\ = : � m = : , a) 6, m7 )\ > a 2 : ] :E - �\ 2 /COD 6 $ I } ° \ o m Lo a) \ ) 0 g 2! .§ , \ : � _ : \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 751 mqd milmd 'UoIIE Je'Duoa `p nS %aaugd mPmdl ddVj msuoo) IDS ugd :IUmmL13 e!! v / Wa. / - C - 2 ) 2 ] - a \ § $ _ _ _ _ , . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . ƒ / _ f E ! ;9� / onz ) { / % [ [ § $ / ) \ \ / ° =>C) 3KG\/ � { o © � $ : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . / _ \ � a \ )\ ] : :E - / -� \ $ I } ° \ f/ (� \ ) )\ g .§ , \ � { \ \ \ 75 `ueld wila.ad `uoi;eDen`auozaa `nipgng `naa ueld o;pLuV:InaddV japisuoa) ;ag ueld :;uauayoelIv co M N T N . V (p r N . W O tD M M W N W rq W r r W tND N W r O O LSJ a U °_l6 O N �J,J O.o 0 . N W O � .3 a O O o (j O "O O� O O O O O O O M N N O �(l N O M O N O N O O N O 6 O Q N Y '° 3 Z r� 0 Z Zo �Z C fOn()�N J o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o r O co Ru UUcncoa- Fo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N r N In O O O N N (O N O O O W M W n W N -° rn O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° c K Y =O LN N N N O N N N N WM OM- MM OM W Z Z �2 O � L2 O � M C� � U l V (O U co O O O ++ E o 2.5 lm�V ? o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o N o o o o o M o o M o o o N (6 d' C O 2 C 2 a o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O (�OOQ O Q F 0) � 11 c� oo a 000 LO E�; i m y rn o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y O V O CC o 0 m " m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a x J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O D -O a 01 N O N O O N m K U ° a � m w o o U F o 0 w N O 0 0 0 O O O M W O N N N N ry p N 0 0 0 J M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O p 0 O O E o o o Y 1 1 o o S o s o w w w ?w O �f] O ifl i O O i[J T O N O 5 j M O M O M cy O M O InO Q O _ f0 (O O I� rr r O W W W W O m V V V V O . . . . O W W J \° m \' N u~ c c III c `ueld wila.ad `uoi;eDen`auozaa `nipgng `naa ueld o;pLuV:InaddV japisuoa) ;ag ueld :;uauayoelIv T a m o � a o � o 0 0 o o o o , o o , o 0 0 o o , o 0 0 o � o 0 0 o � o 0 0 o o , o o , o o , o o , o o , o � o 0 0 o � o 0 0 o � o 0 0 o o , 0 o a Q m o a `ueld wila.ad `uoi;eDen`auozaa `nipgng `naa ueld o;pLuV:InaddV japisuoa) ;ag ueld :;uauayoelIv c co M T m N H w N v ° o a rn ry M a o a T V N N N 00 m N O O M N O > � — W L W QH N N M N O m O M M O .3 a O O00 O 6 O 00 O 00 O 3 N N M W Z O W O O O Z F N N M N O 6�J O O m r M M O M Zo O�Z 0 7 co O� o O L!_ (6 UUcncoa- 0 � o O.O M NN ti Ocl� O N M N N O N O O O QF— N N N N y p m M M M O Lo a �^ o O r L Z O O N M _ M D) r r o CO CO ONJ, O) N M M O O A Z H N N N N O) V O 47 m 1_ CcaO O U U O U C O 3 co O O O O O O O OO N O L 0 V Q o N 2 y M ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o O) cn 00_ � Q F o fi4+ O) C rn Yyr. > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o OI _ O Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O LL r O O O L O J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O D O QH o N v r o y co � o o y o 0 0 0 0 ° a fr o o 0 0 0 U ° a � � m o w o 0 0 U F o 0 0 w o M o 0 N O O O ry D O O O O O O O J p O � O F j UI U U p N N <�F � ain Q m `ueld wila.ad `uoi;eDen`auozaa `nipgng `naa ueld o;pLuV:InaddV japisuoa) ;ag ueld :;uauayoelIv -q co M T N H v v ro v m o rn M a o I� > O O N Qr1 N O N M O a � — W L W QH M M M M V W m m 0 M O O O V .3 a O O 6 O 6 O 6 O O 3 Z O O Z F o L N w .. Z� O�Z 0 y()�O J o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o 7 co O� o O L!_ (6 UUcncoa- 0 F o 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 p o � o rn Q H O (O O clO p O N OJ (O h O O V M M O O N O O a �^ o LL O Lo r Z O N . W m O c0 c0 W M V d) N W CO h O O Z H M M M QOJ N p m O O N O CcaO C O U —o m � co 0 Q V V Q o N 2 y M ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o O N O_ Q F o fi4+ a7 C rn a� .M' � o� In o Y� � ; y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o OI _ O Y O O O O O O p 0 0 O O O O d F- . O O O L O J O O O O O p 0 0 0 O O O O O O � O O a 00 01 ef p 0 O) O M O O O U ° a � � m o w o 0 00 U F o 0 0 w o N o 0 N M W M N O V M O 0 0 0 O O O O O J M O O � O �IJ O O O O S m j UI t'U U p N N H m v v a ici Q ~ m <, c r `-' o in ¢ m `ueld wila.ad `uoi;eDen`auozaa `nipgng `naa ueld o;pLuV:InaddV japisuoa) ;ag ueld :;uauayoelIv N co M _ T N J H (rD N O> (OD (OD o O O N o r N M m N N OOi m M N (M�J W tp N r ^ Q M V r M V (O LLJ 4'1 N (9 N r r r r r r r r (D (9 N p� O N 1. U — W 7 Q� � Y L I.i co U N 1 � ny � ••, r^t i i'„'.t e Y Y r:'.Y i r• r_1 y •1 ", e e e e e e e a 7 N O z f- 3 U O O 2 W r N O N (O O o 0 0 0 O Ol V N In V N M N N (O W N VJ i r O r O N W p V O r In V (O r CO V In M V M In O O o o M Q QNj U w Z r M N N N M N M N M M M M M M M M M M N Z OQZ C C),. (1) N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O U(n(nd r. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c0 O O O O O O O O N � ir Y =O N � Z i N N O (NO r N M (NO o Q) V N N W N N O N N (OD (NO W OJ O) o O W r 0 O U cc Z r N N N M O N N N N M M M M M N p�j V O O �p U co C N @O O"= m(�-�d1 m O O o O O . O . O O o 0 0 o N v o 0 0 o 0 0 0 . o o o o o Q 7 (D O 2 y > o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O � C fi4± 07= c O 0) o ¢] �> —M ap O O O O O N O N O 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . O M O O M O O (O O o 0 0 0 0 0 � ¢H ' JLO O� 0)1,- LO L m O O O O O N O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O O N O O In rj O 0 0 0 0 0 o J d D) r G N Y � O O N a m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o o o o m � � F N O OI N ry a W i o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H o J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W O O O O O O N U l6 @ N + N @ YO o N 7 M o 7 M O 7 M d' O 7 M 7t O 7 M O p m N O O O r r r r O ro [O of of O J \ p] _ o In � a `ueld wila.ad `uoi;eDen`auozaa `nipgng `naa ueld o;pLuV:InaddV japisuoa) ;ag ueld :;uauayoelIv M co T a m o � a moo M o � m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y � w 3 0 K m m m a Q a m o 0 mqd milmd 'UoIIE Je'Duoa `p nS %aaugd mPmdl ddVa msuoo) IDS ugd :IUmmL13 e!! v � co / - 04 ) \ $ § \ 2R . ' \ w2G ; ; ; = % � � a. \ \ a. $ } ) : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . co � - > / / ) z c § ; § ;{n 7/ 2 /onz \/)\ � 1 . . . . . _ « �) ) _ \ = g {/ \ - D \ )\ }\ \ } \� � n C3 - �\ CN $ I { f\ §e E ` ) m\ § i )a 2! 2 : E7 = ƒ : 2 : = = = : _ : _ = 2 , / \ } \ \ \ � \ � � � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ mqd milmd 'UoIIE Je'Duoa `p nS %aaugd mPmdl ddVa msuoo) IDS ugd :IUmmL13 e!! v LO 04 / co - } \ E / / 3 ) \ / w2R2J « = % a. \ \ / a. co } ) : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . - > / / ) z c § ; § ;{� / 2 7 /onz \/)\ � 1 . . . . . _ � LO �) ) _ \ Ca 2 \ \ )\ }\ \ M C3 - �\ /\ $ I { f\ §e E ` )a 2! 2 : E7 = ƒ= 2 , / = = = = = 22 \ = . = . _ . _ . _ . . . \ 76 � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ `ueld uailaad `uoi}eaen`auoz8U `nipgng `na(3 ueld o;pwV:lnaddd aapisuo3) ;ag ueld :;uQWLIOe;;d T N a1 a r a a e� 0 oa o 0 m o m , o . i3o �a m Mo f 0 o , o a o 0 00 2.3.b m a� 3 3 N 06 T- O N N G1 t� C 'i R > C a E L a c 0 ca ai c 0 N d Site Plan 3 N 0 C R a 0 E a L Q Q a L 4) .y 0 U c ca a a� E s ca Q Packet Pg. 187 (991nemillN 67ZRWZ:s93uu!JUA'u9ld w!l8Jd'UORe39A'auOz8N'AlpqnS'Aaa uuld of pmV:lAjddVjaplsuoo) IDS uEld:Iuawq eliv dnoj 17" 1 ANnoo 3ntl 3311111111 I—N I cr, alino M31N ALA 46 646 i� NV]d NOISN]Vlla iLA jl `6,A'M.I iL _0 R E U) LU LU tu al F C, LU -tu Gig"Q $4 2.3.b m a� �a 3 N 06 T- O N N d V C R > C a E L a c 0 c� c� ai c 0 N G1 CMAP Projections Letter 0 a 0 a L Q Q Q L a .N c 0 U CO c ca a c a� E z ca a Packet Pg. 189 2.3.b 4313 VVe i Van&iunRn Slrmere?; Chicago Metropolitan p Iiiiiii Agency for Planning cinap OkniAsgov July 29, 2021 g Elise Purguette Traffic Engineer 06 Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara and Aboona, Inc. N 9575 West Higgins Road Suite 400 c Rosemont, IL 60018 •L �a Subject: Milwaukee Avenue @ Riverwalk Drive/Columbus Parkway IDOT a E Dear Ms. Purguette: a In response to a request made on your behalf and dated July 29, 2021, we have developed 2 year 2050 average daily traffic (ADT)projections for the subject location. U ROAD SEGMENT Current ADT Year 2050 ADT Milwaukee Ave, @ Riverwalk Dr/Columbus Pkwy 36,200 37,600 d Traffic projections are developed using existing ADT data provided in the request letter and the results from the June 2021 CMAP Travel Demand Analysis. The regional travel model uses CMAP 2050 socioeconomic projections and assumes the implementation of the ON TO 2050 Comprehensive Regional Plan for the Northeastern Illinois area. The o provision of this data in support of your request does not constitute a CMAP endorsement of the proposed development or any subsequent developments. a 0 If you have any questions, please call me at(312) 386-8806. a Sincerely, CL CL a N Jose Rodriguez, PTP, AICP c Senior Planner, Research &Analysis v cc:Rios(IDOT) 2021 CY TrafFicForecast\BuffaloGroveua-19-21ua-19-21.docx C a c a� E s U 0 a Packet Pg. 190 2.3.b m a� ca 3 N 06 T- O N N d V C An R > C a E L a 0 c� c� ai c 0 N G1 Level of Service Criteria 0 a 0 a L Q Q Q L a N c 0 U d c ca a c a� E z �a a Packet Pg. 191 2.3.b LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA m Signalized a� Average • • Level of Delay Service 3 Interpretation • per vehicle) A Favorable progression. Most vehicles arrive during the <_10 N green indication and travel through the intersection without Ors stopping. N B Good progression, with more vehicles stopping than for >10 - 20 Level of Service A. �a C Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles >20 - 35 are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity a during the cycle)may begin to appear. Number of vehicles E stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping. 0 D The volume-to-capacity ratio is high and either progression >35 - 55 U is ineffective or the cycle length is too long. Many vehicles > stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. c 0 N 0 E Progression is unfavorable. The volume-to-capacity ratio is >55 - 80 high and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. F The volume-to-capacity ratio is very high, progression is >80.0 0 very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the gueue. a 0 Unsignalized Intersections Level of • D- Q A 0 - 10 i Q Q B > 10 - 15 Q L a C > 15 - 25 c 0 U_ D > 25 - 35 0 E > 35 - 50 a a F > 50 c a� Source:Highway Ca aci ,Manual,2010. t , v Q Packet Pg. 192 2.3.b a� �a 3 N 06 T- O N fA d V C cC > C a E L a 0 m u m ti c Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Base Weekday Morning co 0 a 0 m E a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d CD c �a a c a� E s u a Packet Pg. 193 2.3.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Milwaukee Avenue & Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive 1I08/02/2021 a� Lane Configurations i ttt r t Traffic Volume(vph) 4 1 10 116 0 37 5 1342 94 40 1378 0 3 Future Volume(vph) 4 1 10 116 0 37 5 1342 94 40 1378 0 g Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900, Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 A Grade(%)' 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 Storage Length(ft) 235 0 0 0 165 265 200 0 N Storage Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 1 1'' 0 d Taper Length(ft) 95 90 155 180 c Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 100 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 c° Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.862 0.850 0.850 c Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 2 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 1638 0 3155 1495 0 1805 5151 1495 1770 5103 0 a At Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.157 0.147 E Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 1638 0 3155 1495 0 298 5151 1495 274 5103 0 a Right Turn on Red No No No No = Satd. Flow(RTOR) ° Link Speed(mph) 25 30 40 40 Link Distance(ft) 634 265 497 188 j Travel Time(s) 17.3 6.0 8.5 3.2 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) c Confl. Bikes(#/hr) (D Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% l l% 0% 8% 0% 6% 8% 2% 7% 2% ° Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 4 12 0 123 39 0 5 1428 100 43 1466 0 a Turn Type; Prot NA Prot NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA ° Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 Q Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 > i Switch Phase a a Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 3.0 15.0 4.0 3.0 15.0 Q Minimum Split(s) 9.5 53.0 9.5 49.0 9.5 38.0 9.5 9.5I 31.0 Total Split(s) 9.5 53.0 13.0 56.5 9.5 49.5 13.0 9.5 49.5 y Total Split,(%) 7.6% 42.4°% 10.4% 45.2% 7.6% 39.6% 10.4% 7.6% 39.6% 0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 U All-Red Time(s) 10 1.5 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.5 1.0 0.5' 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 45 6.0 4.5 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.5 4.0; 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag a Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes c Recall Mode None None None None None C-Min None None C-Min E E Act Effct Green(s) 5.0 8.2 11,0 13.4 95.9 89.4 105.4 99.2> 95.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.77 0.72 0.84 0.79 0.77 Q 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 194 2.3.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Milwaukee Avenue & Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive 1I08/02/2021 CD v/c Ratio 0.06 0.11 0.45 0.24 0.02 0.39 0.08 0.15 0.38 Control Delay 59.5 57.2 59.1 52.5 4.8 8.8 2.0 5.2 6.5 3 Queue Delay 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 g Total Delay 59.5 57.2 59.1 52.5 4.8 8.8 2.0 5.2 6.5 LOS E E E D A A A A A N Approach Delay 57.8 57.5 8.4 6.5 Approach LOS E E A A N Queue Length 50th(ft) 3 9 49 30 1 128 6 4 81 Queue Length 95th(ft) 16 31 80 64 5 257 18 20 257 c Internal Link Dist(ft) 554 185 417 108 c° •L Turn Bay Length(ft) 235 165 265 200 Base Capacity(vph) 72 615 276 603 296 3682 1260 292 3907 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.02 0.45 0.06 0.02 0.39 0.08 0.15 0.38 i a O Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 125 M Actuated Cycle Length: 125 > Offset:21;(17%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL,Start of Green c Natural Cycle: 110 N Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.45 > Intersection Signal Delay: 10.2 Intersection LOS:B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.9% ICU Level of Service A N Analysis Period(min) 15 d 0 Splits and Phases: 1: Milwaukee Avenue&Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive c 0 0 ; 4 003 a O II E 105 t 06 LR 07 08 a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d c �a a c a� E s U a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 195 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 2: Milwaukee Avenue & E. Chevy Chase Drive/Parking Lot 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.7 3 �a Lane Configurationsi Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 0 6 0 0 0 15 1369 0 0 1412 2 N Future Vol,veh/h 1 0 6 0 0 0 15 1369 0 0 1412 2 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free N RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 1 - - 1 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93` 93 93 93 93 93 93 93' 93 93 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 6 0 a Mumt Flow 1 0 6 0 0 0 16 1472 0 0 1518 " 2 E L 71 I' +N1+ + f1 1111 Nf1 ','EEC � C Conflicting Flow All 2287 3023 760 2263 3024 736 1520 0 0 1472 0 0 2 Stage 1 1519 1519 1504 1504 - - - - - - Stage 2 768 1504 - 759 1520 - - - - - - j Critical Hdwy 7.5 6.5 7.24: 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.47 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 22 13 317 23 13 366 445 - 464 - - Stage 1 127 183 - 130 186 - - - - - - Stage 2 365 186 -i 369 183 - - - - - - N Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 19 10 317 19 10 366 445 - 464 - - o Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 75 79 - 79 76 - - - - - - - c�a Stage 1 102 183 104 149 - - - - - - - a Stage 2 293 149 - 361 183 - - - - - - - ° 0 m E HCM Control Delay,s 22.2 0 1.4 0 a HCM LOS C A a L N Capacity(veh/h) 445 - - 217 - 464 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.036 - - 0.035 - - - - HCM Control Delay(s) 13.4 1.3 - 22.2 0 0 - HCM Lane LOS B A - C A A - - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.1 - 0.1 - 0 a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 196 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 3: Milwaukee Avenue & Prague Avenue /Parking Lot 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 3 �a Lane Configurations 0 40 2 Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 1382 6 0 1415 3 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 1382 5 0 1415 3 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free N RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 " 87 ° ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 a Mumt Flow 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 1589 6 0; 1626 3 E L 71 I' +N1+ + f1 1111 Nf1 ','EEC � C Conflicting Flow All 2266 3225 815 2244 3223 798 1629 0 0 1595 0 0 2 Stage 1 1628 1628 1594 1594 - - - - - - Stage 2 638 1597 - 650 1629 - - - - - - j Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 7.1 6.4 6.5 7.1 5.3 - - 5.3' - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 7.3 5.5 - 7.3 5.5 - - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.7 5.5 - 6.7 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.8 4 3.9 3.8 4 3.9 3.1 - - 3.1 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 44 10 279 46 10 286 196 - - 204 - - Stage 1 73 162 - 77 168 - - - - - - - Stage 2 397 168 -i 391 162 - - - - - N Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 92 10 279 44 10 286 196 - 204 - - o Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 42 10 - 44 10 - - - - - - - c�a Stage 1 70 162 - 74 160 - - - - - - - a Stage 2 376 160 386 162 - - - - - - - ° 0 m E HCM Control Delay,s 18.1 17.7 0.4 0 a HCM LOS C C a L N Capacity(veh/h) 196 - - 279 286 204 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.012 0.008 - - - HCM Control Delay(s) 23.5 0.4 - 18.1 17.7 0 - HCM Lane LOS C A - C C A - - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0 - 0 0 0 a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 197 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 4: Milwaukee Avenue & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.5 3 �a Lane Configurations r tO ttt Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 50 1338 18 0 1064 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 50 1338 18 0 1064 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 > Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 20 6 6 0 5 a Mumt Flow 0 57 1520 20 0 1209 E L C Conflicting Flow All - 770 0 0 - - ° Stage 1 - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.6 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy - 4.1 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver i 0 265 - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 - Stage 2 i 0 - - - 0 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 265 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 - - - - - a Stage 2 - - - - - - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 22.3 0 0 a HCM LOS C a L N C Capacity(veh/h) - -i 265 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.214 - HCM Control Delay(s) - - 22.3 - HCM Lane LOS - C - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) - 0.8 - � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 198 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 5: Milwaukee Avenue & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.1 3 �a Lane Configurations r tO ttt Traffic Vol,veh/h i 0 10 1346 37 0 1064 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 10 1346 37 0 1064 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 > Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 20 6 14 3 7 a Mumt Flow 0 11 1432 39 0 1132 E L C Conflicting Flow All - 736 0 0 - - ° Stage 1 - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.6 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy - 4.1 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver i 0 280 - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 - Stage 2 i 0 - - - 0 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 280 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 - - - - - a Stage 2 - - - - - - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 18.4 0 0 a HCM LOS C a L N C Capacity(veh/h) - -i 280 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.038 - HCM Control Delay(s) - - 18.4 - HCM Lane LOS - C - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) - 0.1 - � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 199 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 6: Riverwalk Drive & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 3.9 3 �a Lane Configurations +' t Traffic Vol,veh/h 45 90 73 20 1 80 N Future Vol,veh/h 45 90 73 20 1 80 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 24 0 11 6 0 14 a Mumt Flow 48 96 78 21 1 85 E L C Conflicting Flow All 99 0 - 0 281 50 ° Stage 1 - - - i 89 - Stage 2 - - - - 192 - j Critical Hdwy 5.66 - - 6.05 7.31 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.6 - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - ; 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.328 - - - 3.65 4.033 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 969 - - - 707 829 Stage 1 - - - 876 - Stage 2 - - - - 814 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 969 - - - 670 829 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 670 coo Stage 1 - - - 830 - a Stage 2 - - - - 814 - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 3 0 9.9 a HCM LOS A Q L N C Capacity(veh/h) 969 - - - 827 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.049 - - - 0.104 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.9 0 - - 9.9 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A ° HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.2 - - 0.3 � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 200 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 7: Shell Access Drive/N Riverwalk Drive & Riverwalk Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 3.1 3 �a Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h i 5 71 15 0 35 0 36 0 1 0 0 22 N Future Vol,veh/h 5 71 15 0 35 0 36 0 1 0 0 22 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - 105 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Mumt Flow 5 76 16 0 37 0 38 0 1 0 0 23 E L C Conflicting Flow All 37 0 0 92 0 0 143 131 84 132 139 37 ° Stage 1 - - - - - 94 94 - 37 37 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 49 37 - 95 102 - j Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1587 - -; 1515 ! - - 831 763 981 845 756 1041 Stage - - - - - 918 821 - 984 868 - Stage 2 - - - - - 969 868 917 815 - N Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1587 - - 1515 - - 810 761 981 842 754 1041 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 810 761 842 754 c�a Stage 1 - - - - - 915 819 - 981 868 - a Stage 2 - - - - - - 947 868 - 913 813 - ° 0 m E HCM Control Delay,s 0.4 0 9.6 8.5 a HCM LOS A A Q L N, C Capacity(veh/h) 814 1587' - - 1515 - - - 1041 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.048 0.003 - - - - - - 0.022 U HCM Control Delay(s) 9.6 7.3' 0 - 0 - - 0 8.5' HCM Lane LOS A A A - A - - A A ° HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 201 2.3.b a� �a 3 N 06 T- O N fA d V C cC > C a E L a 0 m u m ti c Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Base Weekday Evening co 0 a 0 m E a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d CD c �a a c a� E s u a Packet Pg. 202 2.3.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Milwaukee Avenue & Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive 1I08/02/2021 a� Lane Configurations i ttt r t Traffic Volume(vph) 35 6 5 163 6 131 40 1499 48 53 1559 6 3 Future Volume(vph) 35 6 5 163 6 131 40 1499 48 53 1559 6 g Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900, Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 A Grade(%)' 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 Storage Length(ft) 235 0 0 0 165 265 200 0 N Storage Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 1 1'' 0 d Taper Length(ft) 95 90 155 180 c Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 100 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 c° Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.937 0.857 0.850 0.999 c Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 2 Satd. Flow(prot) i 1805 1780 0 3467 1598 0 1805 5250 1583 1719 5296 0 a At Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.094 0.103 E Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 1780 0 3467 1598 0 179 5250 1583 186 5296 0 i a Right Turn on Red No No No No = Satd. Flow(RTOR) ° Link Speed(mph) 25 30 40 40 Link Distance(ft) 634 265 497 188 j Travel Time(s) 17.3 6.0 8.5 3.2 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) c Confl. Bikes(#/hr) (D Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 2% 0% 4% 2% 5% 3% 0% ° Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 38 12 0 177 149 0 43 1629 52 58 1702 0 a Turn Type; Prot NA Prot NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA ° Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 2 6' Q Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 > i Switch Phase a a Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 3.0 15.0 4.0 3.0 15.0 Q Minimum Split(s) 9.5 53.0 9.5 49.0 9.5 38.0 9.5 9.5I 31.0 Total Split(s) 11.4 53.0 14.0 55.6 9.5 53.5 14.0 9.5 53.5 y Total Split,(%) 8.8% 40.8°% 10.8°% 42.8% 7.3% 41.2% 10.8% 7.3% 41.2% 0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 U All-Red Time(s) 10 1.5 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.5 1.0 0.5' 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 45 6.0 4.5 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.5 4.0; 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag a Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes c Recall Mode None None None None None C-Min None None C-Min E E Act Effct Green(s) 6.6 8.2 23A 18.6 88.6 81.2 109.7 89.6 81.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.06 0.18 0.14 0.68 0.62 0.84 0.69 0.63 ° Q 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 203 2.3.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Milwaukee Avenue & Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive 1I08/02/2021 CD v/c Ratio 0.42 0.11 0.28 0.65 0.21 0.50 0.04 0.27 0.51 Control Delay 73.6 59.6 47.0 65.5 10.0 15.9 2.1 10.7 15.7 3 Queue Delay 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 g Total Delay 73.6 59.6 47.0 65.5 10.0 15.9 2.1 10.7 15.7 LOS E E D E A B A B B N Approach Delay 70.3 55.5 15.3 15.6 Approach LOS E E B B N Queue Length 50th(ft) 32 10 61 120 10 280 4 14 295 d Queue Length 95th(ft) 70 31 102 184 27 383 10 34i 396 c Internal Link Dist(ft) 554 185 417 108 c° •L Turn Bay Length(ft) 235 165 265 200 Base Capacity(vph) 95 643 624 609 203 3278 1335 211 3328 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.02 0.28 0.24 0.21 0.50 0.04 0.27 0.51 i a O Area Type: Other Cycle Length:130 M Actuated Cycle Length: 130 > Offset:60(46%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL,Start of Green c Natural Cycle: 110 N Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.65 > Intersection Signal Delay: 19.5 Intersection LOS:B Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.9% ICU Level of Service B N Analysis Period(min) 15 d 0 Splits and Phases: 1: Milwaukee Avenue&Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive c 0�1 -10'04 f O3 a. I E 05 7 6 R. 0 03 a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d c �a a c a� E s U a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 204 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 2: Milwaukee Avenue & E. Chevy Chase Drive/Parking Lot 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 4.5 3 �a Lane Configurationsi Traffic Vol,veh/h 13 0 27 0 0 0 16 1668 0 0 1592 8 N Future Vol,veh/h 13 0 27 0 0 0 16 1668 0 0 1592 8 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free N RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 1 - - 1 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 a Mumt Flow 13 0 28 0 0 0 16 1702 0 0 1624 8 E L 71 I' +N1+ + f1 1111 Nf1 ','EEC � C Conflicting Flow All 2511 3362 816 2546 3366 851 1632 0 0 1702 0 0 2 Stage 1 1628 1628 1734 1734 - - - - - - Stage 2 883 1734 - 812 1632 - - - - - - j Critical Hdwy 7.5 6.5 6.98 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.34 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 15 8 316 14 8 308 403 - 379 - - Stage 1 108 162 - 93 144 - - - - - - Stage 2 311 144 -i 343 161 - - - - - - N Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver M 6 2 316' 5 2 308 403 - 379 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 22 29 22 29__ Stage 1 29 162 25 39 - - - - - - a Stage 2 84 39 313 161 - - - - - - - ° M E HCM Control Delay,s 151 0 5.2 0 a HCM LOS F A Q L N Capacity(veh/h) 403 - - 59 - 379 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 - - 0.692 - - - - HCM Control Delay(s) 14.3 5.1 - 151 0 0 - HCM Lane LOS B A - F A A - - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.1 - - 2.9 - 0 a c Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined *:All major volume in platoon E U ° Q 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 205 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 3: Milwaukee Avenue & Prague Avenue /Parking Lot 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 2.7 3 �a Lane Configurations 0 40 2 Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 1684 0 0 1615 4 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 1684 0 0 1615 4 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free N RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96i 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 a Mumt Flow 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 1754 0 0 1682 4 E L 71 I' +N1+ + f1 1111 Nf1 ','EEC � C Conflicting Flow All 2392 3444 843 2433 3446 877 1686 0 0 1754 0 0 2 Stage 1 1684 1684 1760 1760 - - - - - - Stage 2 708 1760 - 673 1686 - - - - - - j Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 7.76' 6.4 _ 6.5 7.1 5.3 - - 5.3 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 7.3 5.5 - 7.3 5.5 - - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.7 5.5 - 6.7 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.8 4 4.23 3.8 4 3.9 3.1 - - 3.1 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 37 7 218 35 7 254 184 - - 170 - - Stage 1 67 152 - 59 139 - - - - - - - Stage 2 360 139 -i 378 152 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 18 3 218 17 3 254 184 - - 170; - - o Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 18 3 17 3 Stage 1 24 152 21 50 - - - - - - a Stage 2 130 50 373 152 - - - - - - - ° 0 m E HCM Control Delay,s 21.8 0 5.3 0 a HCM LOS C A a L N Capacity(veh/h) 184 - - 218 - 170 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - - 0.014 - - - - HCM Control Delay(s) 24.9 5.3 - 21.8 0 0 - HCM Lane LOS C A - C A A - - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.1 - 0 - 0 a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 206 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 4: Milwaukee Avenue & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.5 3 �a Lane Configurations r tO ttt Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 62 1625 2 0 1216 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 62 1625 2 0 1216 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 > Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 5 4 0 0 3 a Mumt Flow 0 65 1711 2 0 1280 E L C Conflicting Flow All - 857 0 0 - - ° Stage 1 - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.2 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.95 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver i 0 253 - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 - Stage 2 i 0 - - - 0 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 253 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 - - - - - a Stage 2 - - - - - - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 24.1 0 0 a HCM LOS C a L N C Capacity(veh/h) - -i 253 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.258 - HCM Control Delay(s) - -` 24.1 - HCM Lane LOS - C - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) - 1 - � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 207 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 5: Milwaukee Avenue & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.1 3 �a Lane Configurations r tO ttt Traffic Vol,veh/h i 0 14 1613 52 0 1216 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 14 1613 52 0 1216 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 > Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 4 4 0 3 a Mumt Flow 0 10 1753 57 0 1322 E L C Conflicting Flow All - 905 0 0 - - ° Stage 1 - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.9 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver i 0 243 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 - Stage 2 i 0 - - - 0 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 243 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 - - - - - a Stage 2 - - - - - - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 20.8 0 0 a HCM LOS C a L N C Capacity(veh/h) - -i 243 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.063 - HCM Control Delay(s) - -` 20.8 - HCM Lane LOS - C - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) - 0.2 - � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 208 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 6: Riverwalk Drive & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 2.7 3 �a Lane Configurations +' t Traffic Vol,veh/h 51 56 239 29 5 61 N Future Vol,veh/h 51 56 239 29 5 61 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 40 3 4 0 0 a Mumt Flow 58 64 272 33 6 69 E L C Conflicting Flow All 305 0 - 0 469 153 ° Stage 1 - - - i 289 - Stage 2 - - - - 180 - j Critical Hdwy 5.3 - - 6.05 7.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.6 - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - ; 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.1 - - - 3.65 3.9 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 843 - - - 563 741 Stage 1 - - - 670 - Stage 2 - - - - 824 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-I Maneuver 843 - - - 523 741 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 523 - c�a Stage 1 - - - 622 - a Stage 2 - - - - 824 - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 4.6 0 10.6 a HCM LOS B Q L N C Capacity(veh/h) 843 - - - 718 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.069 - - - 0.104 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.6 0 - - 10.6 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B ° HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.2 - - 0.3 � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 209 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 7: Shell Access Drive/N Riverwalk Drive & Riverwalk Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 3.1 3 �a Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 11 25 25 8 189 8 67 1 2 1'' 0 12 N Future Vol,veh/h 11 25 25 8 189 8 67 1 2 1 0 12 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - 105 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 " 88 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 40 4 0 3 13 0 0 0 0 0 8 a Mumt Flow 13 28 28 9 215 9 76 1 2 1' 0 14 E L C Conflicting Flow All 224 0 0 56 0 0 313 310 42 308 320 220 ° Stage 1 - - - - - 68 68 - 238 238 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 245 242 - 70 82 - j Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.28 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.372 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 - -i 1562 - - 643 608 1034 648' 600 ' 805 Stage - - - - - 947 842 - 770 712 - Stage 2 - - - - - 763 709 945 831 - N Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 -i 1562 - - 624 598 1034 637 590 805 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 624 598 - 637 590 - c�a Stage 1 - - - - - 938 834 - 762 707 - a Stage 2 - - - - - - 745 704 - 932 823 - ° 0 m E HCM Control Delay,s 1.4 0.3 11.5 9.6 a HCM LOS B A Q L N, C Capacity(veh/h) 631 1357 - - 1562 - - 637 805 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.126 0.009 - - 0.006 - - 0.002 0.017 U HCM Control Delay(s) 11.5 7.7 0 - 7.3 0 - 10.7 9.5 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B A ° HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.4 0 - - 0 - - 0 0.1 � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2021 Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 210 2.3.b a� �a 3 N 06 T_ O N fA d V C cC > C a E L a 0 m U m ti c Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets No-Build Weekday Morning co 0 a 0 m E a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d CD c M a c a� E s U a Packet Pg. 211 2.3.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Milwaukee Avenue & Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive 1I08/02/2021 a� Lane Configurations i ttt r t Traffic Volume(vph) 4 1 10 116 0 37 5 1355 'f 94 40 1392 0 3 Future Volume(vph) 4 1 10 116 0 37 5 1355 94 40 1392 0 g Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900, Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 A Grade(%)' 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 Storage Length(ft) 235 0 0 0 165 265 200 0 N Storage Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 1 1'' 0 d Taper Length(ft) 95 90 155 180 c Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 100 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 c° Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.862 0.850 0.850 c Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 2 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 1638 0 3155 1495 0 1805 5151 1495 1770 5103 0 a At Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.154 0.144 E Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 1638 0 3155 1495 0 293 5151 1495 268'! 5103 0 a Right Turn on Red No No No No = Satd. Flow(RTOR) ° Link Speed(mph) 25 30 40 40 Link Distance(ft) 634 265 497 188 j Travel Time(s) 17.3 6.0 8.5 3.2 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) c Confl. Bikes(#/hr) (D Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% l l% 0% 8% 0% 6% 8% 2% 7% 2% ° Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 4 12 0 123 39 0 5 1441 100 43 1481 0 a Turn Type; Prot NA Prot NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA ° Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 Q Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 > i Switch Phase a a Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 3.0 15.0 4.0 3.0 15.0 Q Minimum Split(s) 9.5 53.0 9.5 49.0 9.5 38.0 9.5 9.5I 31.0 Total Split(s) 9.5 53.0 13.0 56.5 9.5 49.5 13.0 9.5 49.5 y Total Split,(%) 7.6% 42.4°% 10.4% 45.2% 7.6% 39.6% 10.4% 7.6% 39.6% 0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 U All-Red Time(s) 10 1.5 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.5 1.0 0.5' 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 45 6.0 4.5 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.5 4.0; 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag a Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes c Recall Mode None None None None None C-Min None None C-Min E E Act Effct Green(s) 5.0 8.2 11,0 13.4 95.9 89.4 105.4 99.2> 95.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.77 0.72 0.84 0.79 0.77 Q 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 212 2.3.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Milwaukee Avenue & Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive 1I08/02/2021 CD v/c Ratio 0.06 0.11 0.45 0.24 0.02 0.39 0.08 0.15 0.38 Control Delay 59.5 57.2 59.1 52.5 4.8 8.9 2.0 5.2 6.6 3 Queue Delay 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 g Total Delay 59.5 57.2 59.1 52.5 4.8 8.9 2.0 5.2 6.6 LOS E E E D A A A A A N Approach Delay 57.8 57.5 8.4 6.5 Approach LOS E E A A N Queue Length 50th(ft) 3 9 49 30 1 130 6 4 83 Queue Length 95th(ft) 16 31 80 64 5 260 18 20 261 c Internal Link Dist(ft) 554 185 417 108 c° •L Turn Bay Length(ft) 235 165 265 200 Base Capacity(vph) 72 615 276 603 292 3682 1260 287 3907 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.02 0.45 0.06 0.02 0.39 0.08 0.15 0.38 i a O Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 125 M Actuated Cycle Length: 125 > Offset:21;(17%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL,Start of Green c Natural Cycle: 110 N Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.45 > Intersection Signal Delay: 10.2 Intersection LOS:B Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.2% ICU Level of Service A N Analysis Period(min) 15 d 0 Splits and Phases: 1: Milwaukee Avenue&Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive c 0 0 ; 4 003 a O II E 105 t 06 LR 07 08 a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d c �a a c a� E s U a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 213 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 2: Milwaukee Avenue & E. Chevy Chase Drive/Parking Lot 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.8 3 �a Lane Configurationsi Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 0 6 0 0 0 15 1382 0 0 1426 2 N Future Vol,veh/h 1 0 6 0 0 0 15 1382 0 0 1426 2 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free N RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 1 - - 1 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93` 93 93 93 93 93 93 93' 93 93 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 6 0 a Mumt Flow 1 0 6 0 0 0 16 1486 0 0 1533 2 E L 71 I' +N1+ + f1 1111 Nf1 ','EEC � C Conflicting Flow All 2309 3052 768 2285 3053 743 1535 0 0 1486 0 0 2 Stage 1 1534 1534 1518 1518 - - - - - - Stage 2 775 1518 - 767 1535 - - - - - - j Critical Hdwy 7.5 6.5 7.24: 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.47 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 21 13 313 22 13 362 439 - 458 - - Stage 1 124 180 - 127 183 - - - - - - Stage 2 361 183 -i 365 180 - - - - - N Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 18 10 313 18 10 362 439 - 458 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 73 78 - 76 75 - - - - - - - c�a Stage 1 98 180 100 145 - - - - - - - a Stage 2 286 145 - 357 180 - - - - - - - ° 0 m E HCM Control Delay,s 22.5 0 1.5 0 a HCM LOS C A a L N Capacity(veh/h) 439 - - 213 - 458 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.037 - - 0.035 - - - - HCM Control Delay(s) 13.5 1.4 - 22.5 0 0 - HCM Lane LOS B A - C A A - - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.1 - 0.1 - 0 a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 214 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 3: Milwaukee Avenue & Prague Avenue /Parking Lot 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 3 �a Lane Configurations 0 40 2 Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 1395 6 0 1429 3 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 1395 5 0 1429 3 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free N RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 " 87 ° ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 a Mumt Flow 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 1603 6 0 1643 3 E L 71 I' +N1+ + f1 1111 Nf1 ','EEC � C Conflicting Flow All 2288 3256 823 2265 3254 805 1646 0 0 1609 0 0 2 Stage 1 1645 1645 1608 1608 - - - - - - Stage 2 643 1611 - 657 1646 - - - - - - j Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 7.1 6.4 6.5 7.1 5.3 - - 5.3' - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 7.3 5.5 - 7.3 5.5 - - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.7 5.5 - 6.7 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.8 4 3.9 3.8 4 3.9 3.1 - - 3.1 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 43 9 275 44 9 283 193 - 201'' - - Stage 1 71 159 - 76 166 - - - - - - - Stage 2 394 165 -i 387 159 - - - - - - N Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 41 9 275 42 9 283 193 - 201'' - - o Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 41 9 42 9 Stage 1 68 159 72 ; 158 - - - - - - a Stage 2 372 157 382 159 - - - - - - - ° 0 m E HCM Control Delay,s 18.3 17.8 0.4 0 a HCM LOS C C a L N Capacity(veh/h) 193 - - 275 283 201 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.013 0.008 - - - HCM Control Delay(s) 23.8 0.4 - 18.3 17.8 0 - HCM Lane LOS C A - C C A - - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0 - 0 0 0 a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 215 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 4: Milwaukee Avenue & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.5 3 �a Lane Configurations r tO ttt Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 50 1351 18 0 1074 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 50 1351 18 0 1074 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 > Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 20 6 6 0 5 a Mumt Flow 0 57 1535 20 0 1220 E L C Conflicting Flow All - 778 0 0 - - ° Stage 1 - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.6 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy - 4.1 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver i 0 262 - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 - Stage 2 i 0 - - - 0 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 262 - - - - o Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - a Stage 2 - - - - - - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 22.5 0 0 a HCM LOS C a L N C Capacity(veh/h) - -i 262 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.217 - HCM Control Delay(s) - - 22.5 - HCM Lane LOS - C - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) - 0.8 - � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 216 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 5: Milwaukee Avenue & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.1 3 �a Lane Configurations r tO ttt Traffic Vol,veh/h i 0 10 1359 37 0 1074 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 10 1359 37 0 1074 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 > Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 20 6 14 3 7 a Mumt Flow 0 11 1446 39 0 1143 E L C Conflicting Flow All - 743 0 0 - - ° Stage 1 - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.6 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy - 4.1 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver i 0 277 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 - Stage 2 i 0 - - - 0 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 277 - - - - o Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 - - - - - a Stage 2 - - - - - - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 18.5 0 0 a HCM LOS C a L N C Capacity(veh/h) - -i 277 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.038 - HCM Control Delay(s) - -` 18.5 - HCM Lane LOS - C - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) - 0.1 - � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 217 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 6: Riverwalk Drive & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 3.9 3 �a Lane Configurations +' t Traffic Vol,veh/h 45 90 73 20 1 80 N Future Vol,veh/h 45 90 73 20 1 80 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 24 0 11 6 0 14 a Mumt Flow 48 96 78 21 1 85 E L C Conflicting Flow All 99 0 - 0 281 50 ° Stage 1 - - - i 89 - Stage 2 - - - - 192 - j Critical Hdwy 5.66 - - 6.05 7.31 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.6 - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - ; 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.328 - - - 3.65 4.033 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 969 - - - 707 829 Stage 1 - - - 876 - Stage 2 - - - - 814 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 969 - - - 670 829 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 670 coo Stage 1 - - - 830 - a Stage 2 - - - - 814 - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 3 0 9.9 a HCM LOS A Q L N C Capacity(veh/h) 969 - - - 827 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.049 - - - 0.104 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.9 0 - - 9.9 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A ° HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.2 - - 0.3 � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 218 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 7: Shell Access Drive/N Riverwalk Drive & Riverwalk Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 3.1 3 �a Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h i 5 71 15 0 35 0 36 0 1 0 0 22 N Future Vol,veh/h 5 71 15 0 35 0 36 0 1 0 0 22 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - 105 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Mumt Flow 5 76 16 0 37 0 38 0 1 0 0 23 E L C Conflicting Flow All 37 0 0 92 0 0 143 131 84 132 139 37 ° Stage 1 - - - - - 94 94 - 37 37 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 49 37 - 95 102 - j Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1587 - -; 1515 ! - - 831 763 981 845 756 1041 Stage - - - - - 918 821 - 984 868 - Stage 2 - - - - - 969 868 917 815 - N Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1587 - - 1515 - - 810 761 981 842 754 1041 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 810 761 842 754 c�a Stage 1 - - - - - 915 819 - 981 868 - a Stage 2 - - - - - - 947 868 - 913 813 - ° 0 m E HCM Control Delay,s 0.4 0 9.6 8.5 a HCM LOS A A Q L N, C Capacity(veh/h) 814 1587' - - 1515 - - - 1041 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.048 0.003 - - - - - - 0.022 U HCM Control Delay(s) 9.6 7.3' 0 - 0 - - 0 8.5' HCM Lane LOS A A A - A - - A A ° HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 219 2.3.b a� �a 3 N 06 T_ O N fA d V C cC > C a E L a 0 m U m ti c Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets No-Build Weekday Evening co 0 a 0 m E a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d CD c M a c a� E s U a Packet Pg. 220 2.3.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Milwaukee Avenue & Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive 1I08/02/2021 a� Lane Configurations i ttt r t Traffic Volume(vph) 35 6 5 163 6 131 40 1514 48 53 1575 6 3 Future Volume(vph) 35 6 5 163 6 131 40 1514 48 53 1575 6 g Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900, Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 A Grade(%)' 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 Storage Length(ft) 235 0 0 0 165 265 200 0 N Storage Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 1 1'' 0 d Taper Length(ft) 95 90 155 180 c Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 100 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 c° Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.937 0.857 0.850 0.999 c Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 2 Satd. Flow(prot) i 1805 1780 0 3467 1598 0 1805 5250 1583 1719 5296 0 a At Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.092 0.101 E Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 1780 0 3467 1598 0 175 5250 1583 183 5296 0 i a Right Turn on Red No No No No = Satd. Flow(RTOR) ° Link Speed(mph) 25 30 40 40 Link Distance(ft) 634 265 497 188 j Travel Time(s) 17.3 6.0 8.5 3.2 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) c Confl. Bikes(#/hr) (D Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 2% 0% 4% 2% 5% 3% 0% ° Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 38 12 0 177 149 0 43 1646 52 58 1719 0 a Turn Type; Prot NA Prot NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA ° Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 Q Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 > i Switch Phase a a Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 3.0 15.0 4.0 3.0 15.0 Q Minimum Split(s) 9.5 53.0 9.5 49.0 9.5 38.0 9.5 9.5I 31.0 Total Split(s) 11.4 53.0 14.0 55.6 9.5 53.5 14.0 9.5 53.5 y Total Split,(%) 8.8% 40.8°% 10.8°% 42.8% 7.3% 41.2% 10.8% 7.3% 41.2% 0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 U All-Red Time(s) 10 1.5 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.5 1.0 0.5' 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 45 6.0 4.5 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.5 4.0; 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag a Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes c Recall Mode None None None None None C-Min None None C-Min E E Act Effct Green(s) 6.6 8.2 23A 18.6 88.6 81.2 109.7 89.6 81.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.06 0.18 0.14 0.68 0.62 0.84 0.69 0.63 ° Q 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 221 2.3.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Milwaukee Avenue & Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive 1I08/02/2021 CD v/c Ratio 0.42 0.11 0.28 0.65 0.21 0.50 0.04 0.28 0.52 Control Delay 73.6 59.6 47.0 65.5 10.1 15.9 2.1 10.7 15.8 3 Queue Delay 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 g Total Delay 73.6 59.6 47.0 65.5 10.1 15.9 2.1 10.7 15.8 LOS E E D E B B A B B N Approach Delay 70.3 55.5 15.4 15.7 Approach LOS E E B B N Queue Length 50th(ft) 32 10 61 120 10 284 4 14 299 d Queue Length 95th(ft) 70 31 102 184 27 388 10 34i 401 c Internal Link Dist(ft) 554 185 417 108 c° •L Turn Bay Length(ft) 235 165 265 200 Base Capacity(vph) 95 643 624 609 200 3278 1335 209 3328 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.02 0.28 0.24 0.21 0.50 0.04 0.28 0.52 i a O Area Type: Other Cycle Length:130 M Actuated Cycle Length: 130 > Offset:60(46%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL,Start of Green c Natural Cycle: 110 N Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.65 > Intersection Signal Delay: 19.6 Intersection LOS:B Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B N Analysis Period(min) 15 d 0 Splits and Phases: 1: Milwaukee Avenue&Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive c 0�1 -10'04 f O3 a. I E 05 7 6 R. 0 03 a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d c �a a c a� E s U a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 222 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 2: Milwaukee Avenue & E. Chevy Chase Drive/Parking Lot 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 9.3 3 �a Lane Configurationsi Traffic Vol,veh/h 13 0 27 0 0 0 16 1683 0 0 1608 8 N Future Vol,veh/h 13 0 27 0 0 0 16 1683 0 0 1608 8 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 1 - - 1 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 a Mumt Flow 13 0 28 0 0 0 16 1717 0 0 1641 8 E L 71 I' +N1+ + f1 1111 Nf1 ','EEC � C Conflicting Flow All 2536 3394 825 2570 3398 859 1649 0 0 1717 0 0 2 Stage 1 1645 1645 1749 1749 - - - - - - Stage 2 891 1749 - 821 1649 - - - - - - j Critical Hdwy 7.5 6.5 6.98 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.34 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 14 8 312 13 8 304 397 - 374' - - Stage 1 106 159 - 91 141 - - - - - - Stage 2 308 141 -i 339 158 - - - - - - N Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -4 1 312 3 1 304 397 - 374 - - o Mov Cap-2 Maneuver -10 14 10 14___ Stage 1 -13 159 11 17 - - - - - - a Stage 2 38 17 309 158 - - - - - - - ° M E HCM Control Delay,s$515.8 0 6.3 0 a HCM LOS F A Q L N Capacity(veh/h) 397 - - 29 - 374 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 - - 1.407 - - - - HCM Control Delay(s) 14.5 6.2 -$,515.8 0 0 - - HCM Lane LOS B A - F A A - - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.1 - - 4.7 - 0 a c Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined *:All major volume in platoon E U ° Q 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 223 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 3: Milwaukee Avenue & Prague Avenue /Parking Lot 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 4.2 3 �a Lane Configurations 0 40 2 Traffic Vol,veh/h i 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 1699 0 0 1631 4 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 1699 0 0 1631 4 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free N RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96i 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 a Mumt Flow 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 1770 0 0 1699 4 E L 71 I' +N1+ + f1 1111 Nf1 ','EEC � C Conflicting Flow All 2415 3477 852 2456 3479 885 1703 0 0 1770 0 0 2 Stage 1 1701 1701 1776 1776 - - - - - - Stage 2 714 1776 - 680 1703 - - - - - - j Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 7.76' 6.4 _ 6.5 7.1 5.3 - - 5.3 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 7.3 5.5 - 7.3 5.5 - - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.7 5.5 - 6.7 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.8 4 4.23 3.8 4 3.9 3.1 - - 3.1 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 36 7 215 34 7 251 180 - 167 - - Stage 1 65 149 - 57 137 - - - - - - - Stage 2 357 137 -i 375 149 - - - - - - N Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 2 0 215' 2 0 251 180 - 167 - - o Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 2 0 2 0 Stage 1 0 149 0 1 - - - - - - a Stage 2 2 1 370 149 - - - - - - - ° m E HCM Control Delay,s 22 0 8.3 0 a HCM LOS C A a L N Capacity(veh/h) 180 - - 215 - 167 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - - 0.015 - - - - HCM Control Delay(s) 25.4 8.3 - 22 0 0 - HCM Lane LOS D A - C A A - - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.1 - 0 - 0 a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 224 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 4: Milwaukee Avenue & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.5 3 �a Lane Configurations r tO ttt Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 62 1640 2 0 1226 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 62 1640 2 0 1226 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 > Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 5 4 0 0 3 a Mumt Flow 0 65 1726 2 0 1291 E L C Conflicting Flow All - 864 0 0 - - ° Stage 1 - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.2 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.95 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver i 0 251 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 - Stage 2 i 0 - - - 0 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 251 - - - - o Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 - - - - - a Stage 2 - - - - - - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 24.3 0 0 a HCM LOS C a L N C Capacity(veh/h) - -i 251 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.26 - HCM Control Delay(s) - -` 24.3 - HCM Lane LOS - C - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) - 1 - � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 225 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 5: Milwaukee Avenue & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.1 3 �a Lane Configurations r tO ttt Traffic Vol,veh/h i 0 14 1628 52 0 1226 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 14 1628 52 0 1226 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 > Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 4 4 0 3 a Mumt Flow 0 10 1770 57 0 1333 E L C Conflicting Flow All - 914 0 0 - - ° Stage 1 - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.9 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver i 0 240 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 - Stage 2 i 0 - - - 0 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 240 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 - - - - - a Stage 2 - - - - - - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 21 0 0 a HCM LOS C a L N C Capacity(veh/h) - -i 240 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.063 - HCM Control Delay(s) - - 21 - HCM Lane LOS - C - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) - 0.2 - � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 226 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 6: Riverwalk Drive & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 2.7 3 �a Lane Configurations +' t Traffic Vol,veh/h 51 56 239 29 5 61 N Future Vol,veh/h 51 56 239 29 5 61 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 40 3 4 0 0 a Mumt Flow 58 64 272 33 6 69 E L C Conflicting Flow All 305 0 - 0 469 153 ° Stage 1 - - - i 289 - Stage 2 - - - - 180 - j Critical Hdwy 5.3 - - 6.05 7.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.6 - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - ; 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.1 - - - 3.65 3.9 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 843 - - - 563 741 Stage 1 - - - 670 - Stage 2 - - - - 824 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-I Maneuver 843 - - - 523 741 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 523 - c�a Stage 1 - - - 622 - a Stage 2 - - - - 824 - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 4.6 0 10.6 a HCM LOS B Q L N C Capacity(veh/h) 843 - - - 718 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.069 - - - 0.104 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.6 0 - - 10.6 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B ° HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.2 - - 0.3 � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 227 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 7: Shell Access Drive/N Riverwalk Drive & Riverwalk Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 3.1 3 �a Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 11 25 25 8 189 8 67 1 2 1'' 0 12 N Future Vol,veh/h 11 25 25 8 189 8 67 1 2 1 0 12 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - 105 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 " 88 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 40 4 0 3 13 0 0 0 0 0 8 a Mumt Flow 13 28 28 9 215 9 76 1 2 1' 0 14 E L C Conflicting Flow All 224 0 0 56 0 0 313 310 42 308 320 220 ° Stage 1 - - - - - 68 68 - 238 238 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 245 242 - 70 82 - j Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.28 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.372 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 - -i 1562 - - 643 608 1034 648' 600 ' 805 Stage - - - - - 947 842 - 770 712 - Stage 2 - - - - - 763 709 945 831 - N Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 -i 1562 - - 624 598 1034 637 590 805 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 624 598 - 637 590 - c�a Stage 1 - - - - - 938 834 - 762 707 - a Stage 2 - - - - - - 745 704 - 932 823 - ° 0 m E HCM Control Delay,s 1.4 0.3 11.5 9.6 a HCM LOS B A Q L N, C Capacity(veh/h) 631 1357 - - 1562 - - 637 805 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.126 0.009 - - 0.006 - - 0.002 0.017 U HCM Control Delay(s) 11.5 7.7 0 - 7.3 0 - 10.7 9.5 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B A ° HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.4 0 - - 0 - - 0 0.1 � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 No Build Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 228 2.3.b a� �a 3 N 06 T- O N fA d V C cC > C a E L a 0 m u m ti c Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Projected Weekday Morning 0 a 0 m E a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d CD c �a a c a) E s u a Packet Pg. 229 2.3.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Milwaukee Avenue & Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive 1I08/02/2021 a� Lane Configurations i ttt r t Traffic Volume(vph) 4 2 10 136 1 37 5 1360 98 24i 1383 0 3 Future Volume(vph) 4 2 10 136 1 37 5 1360 98 24 1383 0 g Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900, Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 A Grade(%)' 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 Storage Length(ft) 235 0 0 0 165 265 0 0 N Storage Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 1 1'' 0 d Taper Length(ft) 95 90 155 180 c Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 100 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 c° Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.873 0.854 0.850 c Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 2 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 1659 0 3155 1505 0 1805 5151 1495 1770 5103 0 a At Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.153 0.146 E Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 1659 0 3155 1505 0 291 5151 1495 272 5103 0 a Right Turn on Red No No No No = Satd. Flow(RTOR) ° Link Speed(mph) 25 30 40 40 Link Distance(ft) 634 265 497 207 j Travel Time(s) 17.3 6.0 8.5 3.5 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) c Confl. Bikes(#/hr) (D Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% l l% 0% 8% 0% 6% 8% 2% 7% 2% ° Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 4 13 0 145 40 0 5 1447 104 26 1471 0 a Turn Type; Prot NA Prot NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA ° Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 Q Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 > i Switch Phase a a Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 3.0 15.0 4.0 3.0 15.0 Q Minimum Split(s) 9.5 53.0 9.5 49.0 9.5 38.0 9.5 9.5I 31.0 Total Split(s) 9.5 53.0 13.0 56.5 9.5 49.5 13.0 9.5 49.5 y Total Split,(%) 7.6% 42.4°% 10.4% 45.2% 7.6% 39.6% 10.4% 7.6% 39.6% 0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 U All-Red Time(s) 10 1.5 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.5 1.0 0.5' 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 45 6.0 4.5 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.5 4.0; 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag a Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes c Recall Mode None None None None None C-Min None None C-Min E E Act Effct Green(s) 50 8.3 11.5 13.9 96.4 91.0 108.5 98.6 95.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.77 0.73 0.87 0.79 0.76 ° Q 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 230 2.3.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Milwaukee Avenue & Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive 1I08/02/2021 CD v/c Ratio 0.06 0.12 0.50 0.24 0.02 0.39 0.08 0.09 0.38 Control Delay 59.5 57.3 59.9 51.6 5.2 8.5 1.9 5.1 6.8 3 Queue Delay 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 g Total Delay 59.5 57.3 59.9 51.6 5.2 8.5 1.9 5.1 6.8 LOS E E E D A A A A A N Approach Delay 57.8 58.1 8.1 6.8 Approach LOS E E A A N Queue Length 50th(ft) 3 10 58 31 1 130 6 3 82 d Queue Length 95th(ft) 16 32 91 64 5 265 19 15 266 c Internal Link Dist(ft) 554 185 417 127 c° •L Turn Bay Length(ft) 235 165 265 Base Capacity(vph) 72 623 289 608 292 3750 1297 286 3886 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.02 0.50 0.07 0.02 0.39 0.08 0.09 0.38 i a O Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 125 M Actuated Cycle Length: 125 > Offset:21;(17%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL,Start of Green c Natural Cycle: 110 N Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.50 > Intersection Signal Delay: 10.6 Intersection LOS:B Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.9% ICU Level of Service A N Analysis Period(min) 15 d 0 Splits and Phases: 1: Milwaukee Avenue&Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive c 0 o ; 4 003 a O II E 1 e5 t 06 LR e7 08 a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d c �a a c a� E s U a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 231 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 2: Milwaukee Avenue & E. Chevy Chase Drive/Parking Lot 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.8 3 �a Lane Configurationsi Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 0 6 0 0 0 15 1398 0 0 1431 2 N Future Vol,veh/h 1 0 6 0 0 0 15 1398 0 0 1431 2 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free N RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 1 - - 1 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93` 93 93 93 93 93 93 93' 93 93 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 6 0 a Mumt Flow 1 0 6 0 0 0 16 1503 0 0 1539 2 E L 71 I' +N1+ + f1 1111 Nf1 ','EEC � C Conflicting Flow All 2324 3075 771 2305 3076 752 1541 0 0 1503 0 0 2 Stage 1 1540 1540 1535 1535 - - - - - - Stage 2 784 1535 - 770 1541 - - - - - - j Critical Hdwy 7.5 6.5 7.24: 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.47 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 20 12 312 21 12 357 437 - 452' - - Stage 1 123 179 - 124 180 - - - - - - Stage 2 357 180 -i 364 179 - - - - - - N Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 17 9 312 17 9 357 437 - 452 - - o Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 71 76 73 73__ Stage 1 96 179 96 140 - - - - - - a Stage 2 278 140 356 179 - - - - - - - ° 0 m E HCM Control Delay,s 22.8 0 1.6 0; a HCM LOS C A a L N Capacity(veh/h) 437 - - 210 - 452 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.037 - - 0.036 - - - - HCM Control Delay(s) 13.6 1.5 - 22.8 0 0 - HCM Lane LOS B A - C A A - - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.1 - 0.1 - 0 a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 232 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 3: Milwaukee Avenue & Prague Avenue 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 3 �a Lane Configurations y 4t+ t Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 3 1 1374 1404 3 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 3 1 1374 1404 3 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 - Grade,% 0 - - 0 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 6 6 0 a Mumt Flow 0 3 1 1579 1614 3 E L C Conflicting Flow All 2250 809 1617 0 - 0 ° Stage 1 1616 - - - - Stage 2 634 - - - Critical Hdwy 5.7 7.1 6.3 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.8 3.9 3.1 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 70 281 199 - - - Stage 1 102 - - - - - Stage 2 452 - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 67 281 199 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 67 Stage 1 98 - - - - a Stage 2 452 - - - - - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 18 0.3 0 a HCM LOS C a L C Capacity(veh/h) 199 -i 281 - - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.012 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 23.2 0.3 18 - - HCM Lane LOS C A C - - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0 0 - - � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 233 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 4: Milwaukee Avenue & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 3 �a Lane Configurations r tO ttt Traffic Vol,veh/h i 0 19 1356 45 0 1055 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 19 1356 45 0 1055 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 > Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 20 6 6 0 5 a Mumt Flow 0 22 1541 51 0 1199 E L C Conflicting Flow All - 796 0 0 - - ° Stage 1 - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.6 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy - 4.1 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver i 0 254 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 - Stage 2 i 0 - - - 0 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 254 - - - - o Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 - - - - - a Stage 2 - - - - - - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 20.5 0 0 a HCM LOS C a L N C Capacity(veh/h) - -i 254 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.085 - HCM Control Delay(s) - - 20.5 - HCM Lane LOS - C - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) - 0.3 - � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 234 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 5: Milwaukee Avenue & Three Quarter Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.7 3 �a Lane Configurations r tO ttt Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 63 1350 24 30 1407 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 63 1350 24 30 1407 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - 0 - 150 - Veh in Median Storage,# 1 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 > Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 6 0 0 6 a Mumt Flow 0 66 1421 i 25 32 1481 E L C Conflicting Flow All - 723 0 0 1446 0 ° Stage 1 - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - j Critical Hdwy - 7.1 - 5.3 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.9 - - 3.1 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 320 - 242 - Stage 1 0 - - - - Stage 2 i 0 - - - - - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 320 - - 242 - o Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 - - - - - a Stage 2 - - - - - - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 19.2 0 0.5 a HCM LOS C a L N C Capacity(veh/h) - -i 320 242 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.207 0.13 - HCM Control Delay(s) - -` 19.2 22.1 - HCM Lane LOS - C C - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) - 0.8 0.4 - � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 235 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 6: Riverwalk Drive & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 4.2 3 �a Lane Configurations +' t Traffic Vol,veh/h 35 89 72 24 3 102 N Future Vol,veh/h 35 89 72 24 3 102 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 24 0 11 6 0 14 a Mumt Flow 37 95 77 26 3 109 E L C Conflicting Flow All 103 0 - 0 259 52 ° Stage 1 - - - i 90 - Stage 2 - - - - 169 - j Critical Hdwy 5.66 - - 6.05 7.31 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.6 - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - ; 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.328 - - - 3.65 4.033 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 965 - - - 726 827 Stage 1 - - - 875 - Stage 2 - - - 833 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 965 - - - 697 827 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 697 coo Stage 1 - - - 840 - a Stage 2 - - - - 833 - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 25 0 10.1 a HCM LOS B Q L N C Capacity(veh/h) 965 - - - 823 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 - - - 0.136 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.9 0 - - 10.1 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B ° HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.1 - - 0.5 � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 236 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 7: Shell Access Drive/N Riverwalk Drive & Riverwalk Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 3.1 3 �a Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h i 5 72 15 0 38 0 36 0 1 0 0 22 N Future Vol,veh/h 5 72 15 0 38 0 36 0 1 0 0 22 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - 105 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Mumt Flow 5 77 16 0 40 0 38 0 1 0 0 23 E L C Conflicting Flow All 40 0 0 93 0 0 147 135 85 136 143 40 ° Stage 1 - - - - - 95 95 - 40 40 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 52 40 - 96 103 - j Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1583 - -i 1514 - - 826 760 980 840 752 1037 Stage - - - - - 917 820 - 980 866 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 966 866 916 814 - N Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1583 - -i 1514 - - 805 758 980 837 750 1037 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 805 758 837 750 Stage 1 - - - - - - 914 818 - 977 866 - a Stage 2 - - - - - - 944 866 - 912 812 - ° 0 m E HCM Control Delay,s 0.4 0 9.7 8.6 a HCM LOS A A Q L N, C Capacity(veh/h) 809 1583 - - 1514 - - - 1037 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.049 0.003 - - - - - - 0.023 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.7 7.3' 0 - 0 - - 0 8.6 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A - - A A ° HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday AM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 237 2.3.b a� �a 3 N 06 T- O N fA d V C cC > C a E L a 0 m u m ti c Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Projected Weekday Evening 0 a 0 m a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d CD c �a a c a) E s u a Packet Pg. 238 2.3.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Milwaukee Avenue & Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive 1I08/02/2021 a� Lane Configurations i ttt r t Traffic Volume(vph) 35 7 5 183 7 131 40 1519 52 31'' 1566 6 3 Future Volume(vph) 35 7 5 183 7 131 40 1519 52 31 1566 6 g Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900, Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 A Grade(%)' 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 Storage Length(ft) 235 0 0 0 165 265 0 0 N Storage Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 1 1'' 0 d Taper Length(ft) 95 90 155 180 c Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 100 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 c° Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.942 0.858 0.850 0.999 c Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 2 Satd. Flow(prot) i 1805 1790 0 3467 1600 0 1805 5250 1583 1719 5296 0 a At Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.091 0.105 E Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 1790 0 3467 1600 0 173 5250 1583 190 5296 0 i a Right Turn on Red No No No No = Satd. Flow(RTOR) ° Link Speed(mph) 25 30 40 40 Link Distance(ft) 634 265 497 207 j Travel Time(s) 17.3 6.0 8.5 3.5 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) c Confl. Bikes(#/hr) (D Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 2% 0% 4% 2% 5% 3% 0% ° Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 38 13 0 199 150 0 43 1651 57 34 1709 0 a Turn Type; Prot NA Prot NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA ° Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 Q Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 > i Switch Phase a a Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 3.0 15.0 4.0 3.0 15.0 Q Minimum Split(s) 9.5 53.0 9.5 49.0 9.5 38.0 9.5 9.5I 31.0 Total Split(s) 11.4 53.0 14.0 55.6 9.5 53.5 14.0 9.5 53.5 y Total Split,(%) 8.8% 40.8°% 10.8°% 42.8% 7.3% 41.2% 10.8% 7.3% 41.2% 0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 U All-Red Time(s) 10 1.5 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.5 1.0 0.5' 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 45 6.0 4.5 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.5 4.0; 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag a Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes c Recall Mode None None None None None C-Min None None C-Min E E Act Effct Green(s) 6.6 8.2 23A 18.6 90.0 83.8 113.2 88.9' 81.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.06 0.18 0.14 0.69 0.64 0.87 0.68 0.63 ° Q 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 239 2.3.b Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Milwaukee Avenue & Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive 1I08/02/2021 CD v/c Ratio 0.42 0.12 0.32 0.66 0.21 0.49 0.04 0.17 0.51 Control Delay 73.6 59.6 47.6 65.5 10.0 14.6 1.9 9.4 15.8 3 Queue Delay 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 g Total Delay 73.6 59.6 47.6 65.5 10.0 14.6 1.9 9.4 15.8 LOS E E D E A B A A B N Approach Delay 70.0 55.3 14.1 15.7 Approach LOS E E B B N Queue Length 50th(ft) 32 11 70 121 10 283 4 8 298 d Queue Length 95th(ft) 70 33 113 184 27 379 11 23 399 c Internal Link Dist(ft) 554 185 417 127 c° •L Turn Bay Length(ft) 235 165 265 Base Capacity(vph) 95 647 624 610 201 3382 1378 204 3325 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.02 0.32 0.25 0.21 0.49 0.04 0.17 0.51 i a O Area Type: Other Cycle Length:130 M Actuated Cycle Length: 130 > Offset:60(46%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL,Start of Green c Natural Cycle: 110 N Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.66 > Intersection Signal Delay: 19.2 Intersection LOS:B Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.9% ICU Level of Service B N Analysis Period(min) 15 d 0 Splits and Phases: 1: Milwaukee Avenue&Columbus Parkway/Riverwalk Drive c I E 05 7 6 R. 0 03 a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d c �a a c a� E s U a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 240 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 2: Milwaukee Avenue & E. Chevy Chase Drive/Parking Lot 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 3.7 3 �a Lane Configurationsi Traffic Vol,veh/h 13 0 27 0 0 0 16 1695 0 0 1616 8 N Future Vol,veh/h 13 0 27 0 0 0 16 1695 0 0 1616 8 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 1 - - 1 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 a Mumt Flow 13 0 28 0 0 0 16 1730 0 0 1649 8 E L 71 I' +N1+ + f1 1111 Nf1 ','EEC � C Conflicting Flow All 2550 3415 829 2587 3419 865 1657 0 0 1730 0 0 2 Stage 1 1653 1653 1762 1762 - - - - - - Stage 2 897 1762 - 825 1657 - - - - - - j Critical Hdwy 7.5 6.5 6.98 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.34 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 14 7 310 13 7 301 394 - 370 - - Stage 1 105 157 - 89 139 - - - - - - Stage 2 305 139 -i 337 157 - - - - - N Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 310 - 0 301 394 - 370 - - o Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 62 0 Stage 1 105 157 89 0 - - - - - - a Stage 2 - 0 307 157 - - - - - - - ° 0 m E HCM Control Delay,s 0 7.2 0 a HCM LOS - A Q L N Capacity(veh/h) 394 - - - 370 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 - - - - - - - HCM Control Delay(s) 14.5 7.1 - - 0 0 - HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.1 - - - 0 a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 241 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 3: Milwaukee Avenue & Prague Avenue 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 1.4 3 �a Lane Configurations y 4t+ t Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 3 3 1646 1600 4 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 3 3 1646 1600 4 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 - Grade,% 0 - - 0 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96i 96 96 96 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 33 0 4 3 0 a Mumt Flow 0 3 3 1715 1667 4 E L C Conflicting Flow All 2361 836 1671 0 - 0 ° Stage 1 1669 - - - - Stage 2 692 - - - Critical Hdwy 5.7 7.76 5.3 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.8 4.23 3.1 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 61 220 187; - - - Stage 1 94 - - - - - Stage 2 421 - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 40 220 187 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 40 Stage 1 62 - - - - a Stage 2 421 - - - - - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 21.6 2.8 0 a HCM LOS C a L C Capacity(veh/h) 187 -i 220 - - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - 0.014 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 24.6 2.8 21.6 - - HCM Lane LOS C A C - - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.1 0 - - � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 242 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 4: Milwaukee Avenue & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 3 �a Lane Configurations r tO ttt Traffic Vol,veh/h i 0 24 1625 60 0 1202 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 24 1625 60 0 1202 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 > Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 5 4 0 0 3 a Mumt Flow 0 25 1711 63 0 1265 E L C Conflicting Flow All - 887 0 0 - - ° Stage 1 - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.2 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.95 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver i 0 242 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 - Stage 2 i 0 - - - 0 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 242 - - - - o Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 - - - - - a Stage 2 - - - - - - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 21.6 0 0 a HCM LOS C a L N C Capacity(veh/h) - -i 242 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.104 - HCM Control Delay(s) - -` 21.6 - HCM Lane LOS - C - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) - 0.3 - � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 243 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 5: Milwaukee Avenue & Three Quarter Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 0.9 3 �a Lane Configurations r tO ttt Traffic Vol,veh/h i 0 73 1638 8 39 1604 N Future Vol,veh/h 0 73 1638 8 39 1604 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - 0 - 150 - Veh in Median Storage,# 1 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 > Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 4 0 0 3 a Mumt Flow 0 77 1724 8 41 1688 E L C Conflicting Flow All - 866 0 0 1732 0 ° Stage 1 - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - j Critical Hdwy - 7.1 - 5.3 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.9 - - 3.1 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver i 0 258 - - 175 - Stage 1 0 - - - Stage 2 i 0 - - - - - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 258 - - 175 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 - - - - - a Stage 2 - - - - - - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 24.8 0 0.8 a HCM LOS C a L N C Capacity(veh/h) - -i 258 i 175 - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.298 0.235 - HCM Control Delay(s) - -` 24.8 31.8 - HCM Lane LOS - C D - c HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) - - 1.2 0.9 - � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 244 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 6: Riverwalk Drive & Gas Station Access Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 2.9 3 �a Lane Configurations +' t Traffic Vol,veh/h 35 55 238 34 7 83 N Future Vol,veh/h 35 55 238 34 7 83 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None N d Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 40 3 4 0 0 a Mumt Flow 40 63 270 39 8 94 E L C Conflicting Flow All 309 0 - 0 433 155 ° Stage 1 - - - i 290 - Stage 2 - - - - 143 - j Critical Hdwy 5.3 - - 6.05 7.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.6 - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - ; 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.1 - - - 3.65 3.9 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 839 - - 589 739 Stage 1 - - - 669 - Stage 2 - - - - 855 - N Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 839 - - - 560 739 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 560 coo Stage 1 - - - 636 - a Stage 2 - - - - 855 - ° E HCM Control Delay,s 3.7 0 10.8 a HCM LOS B Q L N C Capacity(veh/h) 839 - - - 721 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.047 - - - 0.142 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.5 0 - - 10.8 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B ° HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.1 - - 0.5 � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 245 2.3.b HCM 6th TWSC 7: Shell Access Drive/N Riverwalk Drive & Riverwalk Drive 08/02/2021 m aD Int Delay,s/veh 3.1 3 �a Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 11 26 25 8 193 8 67 1 2 1'' 0 12 N Future Vol,veh/h 11 26 25 8 193 8 67 1 2 1 0 12 06 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None ° Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - 105 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - > Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 " 88 ca Heavy Vehicles,% 0 40 4 0 3 13 0 0 0 0 0 8 a Mumt Flow 13 30 28 9 219 9 76 1 2 1' 0 14 E L C Conflicting Flow All 228 0 0 58 0 0 319 316 44 314 326 224 ° Stage 1 - - - - - 70 70 - 242 242 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 249 246 - 72 84 - j Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.28 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - c Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.372 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1352 - -i 1559 - - 638 603 1032 643 596 801 Stage - - - - - 945 841 - 766 709 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 759 706 943 829 - N Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1352 - -i 1559 - - 619 593 1032 632 586 801 0 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 619 593 632 586 Stage 1 - - - - - 936 833 - 758 704 - a Stage 2 - - - - - - 741 701 - 930 821 - ° 0 m E HCM Control Delay,s 1.4 0.3 11.6 9.7 a HCM LOS B A Q L N, C Capacity(veh/h) 626 1352 - - 1559 - - 632 801 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.127 0.009 - - 0.006 - - 0.002 0.017 HCM Control Delay(s) 11.6 7.7 0 - 7.3 0 - 10.7 9.6 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B A ° HCM 95th%tile Q(ueh) 0.4 0 - - 0 - - 0 0.1 � a c a� E s U ° a 21-143 Speedway Rebuild-Buffalo Grove Synchro 11 Report Year 2027 Total Weekday PM Peak Hour Packet Pg. 246 CIVIL ENGINEERING NAME: Speedway Wli'G JECT III 2675 PRATUM AVENUEVISION PROJJEOCT NUMBER: D2100065 Buffalo fiii'u1ueirGu� IC:�euini Counsu�lhp:uu�a HOFFMAN ESTATES,IL 60192 LOCATION: Buffalo Grove,IL (224)293-6333 BY: JPG W W W.WTENGINEERING.COM DATE: 09/10/21 Speedway- Buffalo Grove, IL ENGINEERS OPINION OF PROBABLE COST SCOPE-STORM SEWER QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST TOTAL COST 7 tC 3 6"PVC SDR 26 221.00 L.F. $18.00 $3,978.00 6"PVC C-900 102.00 L.F. $20.00 $2,040.00 N 06 0 12"R.C.P.STORM SEWER 527.00 L.F. $27.00 $14,229.00 N iA d 15"R.C.P.STORM SEWER 284.00 L.F. $32.00 $9,088.00 •L ca 18"R.C.P.STORM SEWER 129.00 L.F. $35.00 $4,515.00 > C to 12"CONCRETE FLARED END SECTION 5.00 EA. $500.00 $2,500.00 a E 18"CONCRETE FLARED END SECTION 1.00 EA. $750.00 $750.00 .i a EF HYDRO INTERNATIONAL WATER QUALITY UNIT 1.00 EA. $10,000.00 $10,000.00 O ce v 48"PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE 4.00 EA. $2,000.00 $8,000.00 ti 48"PRECAST CONCRETE HEAVY DUTY CATCH BASIN 2.00 EA. $2,250.00 $4,500.00 0 O N G1 24"PRECAST CONCRETE YARD DRAIN 1.00 EA. $750.00 $750.00 :a CLEANOUT 21.00 EA. $100.00 $2,100.00 7 co 72"PRECAST CONCRETE CATCH BASIN WITH RESTRICTOR 1.00 EA. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 d ENVIRONMENTAL CATCH BASIN 1.00 EA. $2,750.00 $2,750.00 c�C a CORE DRILL EXISTING STRUCTURE AND CONNECT NEW STORM SEWER 1.00 EA. $350.00 $350.00 m E TOTAL STORM SEWER COST= $62,450.00 Q L Q Q SCOPE-SOIL EROSION CONTROL QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST TOTAL COST Q L EROSION CONTROL BLANKET(DS75)/RESTORATION 6221.00 S.Y. $2.00 $12,442.00 a N C EROSION CONTROL BLANKET(SC150)/RESTORATION 586.00 S.Y. $3.00 $1,758.00 (j RIP RAP 46.00 S.Y. $10.00 $460.00 C SILT FENCE 1665.00 L.F. $3.00 $4,995.00 tC a CATCH ALL INLET PROTECTION 15.00 EA. $100.00 $1,500.00 G1 CONCRETE WASHOUT 1.00 EA. $250.00 $250.00 E L U CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 120.00 S.Y. $10.00 $1,200.00 Q TOTAL SOIL EROSION CONTROL COST= $22,605.00 Packet Pg. 247 SCOPE-SITE IMPROVEMENTS QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST TOTAL COS NEW NORMAL STRENGTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT 3018.00 S.Y. $30.00 $90,540.00 NEW HIGH STRENGTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT 2888.00 S.Y. $35.00 $101,080.00 PAVEMENT STRIPING 1.00 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 d (1 5"CONCRETE PAVEMENT 353.00 S.Y. $40.00 $14,120.00 3 tC 3 6"CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1260.00 S.Y. $45.00 $56,700.00 8"CONCRETE PAVEMENT 2081.00 S.Y. $60.00 $124,860.00 06 N 0 ROADWAY CONCRETE PAVEMENT(MILWUAKEE AVE) 205.00 S.Y. $75.00 $15,375.00 N iA d 1-3/4"MILL AND OVERLAY 353.00 S.Y. $18.00 $6,354.00 cC •L ca BARRIER CURB 1826.00 L.F. $18.00 $32,868.00 > C B6.12 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 322.00 L.F. $22.00 $7,084.00 2 a B6.24 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 203.00 L.F. $28.00 $5,684.00 E L DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP 328.00 S.F. $25.00 $8,200.00 d E O TOTAL SITE IMPROVEMENTS COST= $457,665.00 u ti SCOPE-WATER QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST TOTAL COST 0 O N G1 2"TYPE K COPPER WATER 192.00 L.F. $20.00 $3,840.00 B-BOX 1.00 EA. $500.00 $500.00 'a 7 co TOTAL WATER COST= $4,340.00 c SCOPE-SANITARY SEWER QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST TOTAL COST a O 6"PVC SDR 26 32.00 L.F. $18.00 $576.00 8"PVC SDR 26 288.00 L.F. $22.00 $6,336.00 a 48"PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE 2.00 EA. $2,500.00 $5,000.00 Q Q GREASE TRAP 1.00 EA. $7,500.00 $7,500.00 a L CONCRETE PIPE ENCASEMENT 24.00 L.F. $20.00 $480.00 a N C O TOTAL SANITARY SEWER COST= $19,892.00 V m co SUBTOTAL= $566,952.00 18%CONTINGENCY AND L.O.C._ $102,051.36 a TOTAL= $669,003.36 a� E t u a Packet Pg. 248 P T �T uuu.3.b '1971-2021 Group CD CD �a September 10,2021 3 Village of Buffalo Grove N Engineering Department 06 Fifty One Raupp Blvd. C14 Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 c cs Attn: Mr.Ted Sianis- P.E. •L ca isi_ iniis.."�.ybg c�.irg > c ca Re: Zoning Submittal-Speedway(201 N Milwaukee Ave.) a Review Letter No.:1 E WTCE Project No.: D2100065 a Dear Mr.Sianis: 4 c� U Listed below in bold are our responses to comments from your E-mailed letter dated August 26, 2021. > ti c General N G1 1. Please provide any necessary other agency permits. This project will require an IEPA NPDES approval,and a permit from IDOT.These approvals cn will be forwarded upon receipt. 0 c 2. Please provide a stormwater management report. a 0 A Stormwater Management Report for this project is included within this submittal. E a 3. Building demolition will require a separate demolition permit through the Village.This form can > be found on our Building/Zoning website. a a L It is our understanding that this is being coordinated separately with the Village,and that this 0 a comment is not applicable at this time. 0 U 4. Please add a demolition plan, soil erosion/sediment control plan, and details to the plan set. a. Enclosed are the Village standard details/exhibits for inclusion. c (a The Demolition Plan,Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan,and applicable detail a sheets have been added to the plan set.The provided Village standard details and c exhibits have been added. E E s U 0 a Packet Pg. 249 y u u uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu 2.3.b 5. Final plan set will require PE stamp. The enclosed plan set has been signed and sealed. �a 6. When Village Engineering Department approval is provided for the development,two (2) paper 3 full size plan sets will be required for the Engineering Department. N Understood. 06 0 N 7. If flood plain maps will be modified by development, please complete a CLOMR now, or a LOMR at the completion of the project to update the flood plain maps for the site. •L No floodplain maps will be modified by this development as no 100 year floodplain > encroaches on the property. a 8. Please provide an Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost (EOPC). Include a 10%contingency as E well as an 8% increase for Letter of Credit purposes per ordinance 16.20.130. a EF An Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost is included within this submittal. 0 c� U 9. Once the Village has an EOPC, we will develop and provide you a draft Development > Improvement Agreement (DIA).The Developer will be required to execute and submit the DIA c including; 0 a. A Letter of Credit Understood. b. Engineering review and inspection fees 0 c Understood. a 0 c. A cash deposit E a Understood. L Q Q 10. Plat of Subdivision: Q L a. Please add the County Clerk's Certificate (can be found in our municipal code). 0 a .y C The County Clerk's Certificate has been added to the Plat of Subdivision included 0 U within this submittal. m 11. Plat of Easement: _ �a a. Create public utility easements to cover proposed water main, storm sewer, and a sanitary service lateral. i. Easement provisions provided in the enclosed document. E s U The proposed easements have been added to the Plat of Subdivision per a direction received from the Village of Buffalo Grove. 2 Packet Pg. 250 y u u uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu 2.3.b b. Add storm water infrastructure maintenance activity and responsibility language. 3 This language has been added to the Plat of Subdivision included in this submittal. N c. Provide restrictions on the plat for the proposed comp. storage areas. 06 0 N No compensatory storage is required for the proposed improvements. d c d. After review and approval of a plat of easement,you will be required to provide mylar copies of the plat for execution and recording(to be recorded by developer) in Lake > County. ca a Understood. E L 12. Provide sanitary service PE calculation. a EF The sanitary sewer population equivalent calculations are included within this submittal. U �a Plan Sheets c 0 N CS (Plot Plan) 1. Please verify pavement designs are adequate for the proposed use. The proposed pavement designs are adequate for the proposed use based on Speedway's cn national standards and history with thousands of sites using these designs. 0 c 2. Please add sidewalk along North Riverwalk Drive. a 0 Per your email to Frank Petrich dated September 1, 2021,this will no longer be required due to the presence of mature trees within the ROW along North Riverwalk Drive. E a CG (Grading Plan) a 1. Shorten/lower 6'+tall mounds. a L a The mounds on the site have been lowered to reduce the proposed heights below 6'as shown on the revised Grading Plan,sheet CG. 0 U 2. Add/define 100-year storm overland flow route(s). c �a The 100-year overland flow route is shown on the Grading Plan, sheet CG. a c a� E s U a Packet Pg. 251 y u u uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu 2.3.b CU (Piping& Utilities Plan) 1. For your information, the Village's streetlights currently powered from existing transformer on site. CD �a Understood. 3 2. Storm/Sanitary/Water infrastructure will require easements. � N 06 Easements for the storm, sanitary,and water improvements have been provided on the Plat N of Subdivision,which is included within this submittal. c 3. Based on site grading, Structure#10 shall also be an oil/water separator structure. ca The structure south of the canopy,which is now Structure#11, has been changed to be an CF environmental catch basin as shown. Please note that we have also added Flexstorm Pure a Permanent Inlet Protection devices to all open rim structures in the paved areas to further E treat site runoff for any hydrocarbons. a 4. Please confirm rip rap is sized appropriately at NE corner of site. O c� U The proposed rip rap has been appropriately sized based on the discharge pipe size and the > discharge location configuration. c 0 N 5. Per Village code, HDPE pipe is not permitted for storm sewer. The proposed storm sewers have been changed from HDPE to RCP as shown on the revised Piping and Utilities Plan,sheet CU. cn a� 0 Respectfully Submitted, � The W-T Group, LLC c E L Jim Glascott, PE CPESC a a Project Manager,Civil Engineering a L a y C O U d c M a c a� E s U a 4 Packet Pg. 252 2.3.b SPEEDWAY #7649 201 N Milwaukee Ave, Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 Response to Standards September 20, 2021 m a� Variations ' �a 3 1. A variance request to reduce the landscape setback of 25'-0"to 12'-0"along N Riverwalk Dr and Milwaukee Ave. N 06 a. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations of the zoning district in which it is located except in the case of residential zoning N districts; N d i. This variance is being requested due to the locations of the Auto Canopy and the CFL Canopy need c to be placed in a safe location to allow for proper site circulation. If the canopies were located to 'a obtain the required landscape setback, the onsite circulation would be compromised from the > safety standpoint and would discourage costumers from using the site. Hence the site could not yield a reasonable return. a E b. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; i a i. The variance is being requested due to the nature of the fueling center and to provide a safe = environment for the workers and costumers. ° ii. In addition, the site is bounded by streets on three sides. This limits the east/west dimension U of the site and therefore necessitates the need for the variance. > ti c c. The proposed variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. d i. The variance is being requested due to the nature of the fueling center and to provide a safe environment for the workers and costumers. Please note that the variance is only being requested at the areas directly adjacent to the canopies, all other areas hence the majority of the site exceed the landscape requirement of 25'-0". Therefore,the essential character of the N neighborhood will be enhanced. 0 c 2. A variance request to allow for an accessory structure of the Auto Canopy and CFL Canopy to be in between the a main building and ROW of N Riverwalk Dr and Milwaukee Ave. o a. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions a allowed by the regulations of the zoning district in which it is located except in the case of residential zoning districts; a a i. This variance is being requested to allow for the fueling canopies to be located in front of the a L convenience store for the safe circulation and visibility by the costumer as they are traveling down a the roadway and entering the site. Canopies at fueling locations need to be seen by the costumer in order to yield a reasonable return. �j m b. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; v� i. The variance is being requested due to the nature of the fueling center and to provide a safe environment for the workers and costumers. a ii. In addition, the site is bounded by streets on three sides. Thus necessitating the need for the r- canopies to be between the main building and the ROW. E s U c. The proposed variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. a i. The variance is being requested due to the nature of the fueling center and to provide a safe environment for the workers and costumers and will not have an adverse effect on the neighboring properties. Packet Pg. 253 2.3.b Sign Variations 1. A variance request to allow for (2) additional wall signs on top of the (2) allowed to total (4) for the proposed Auto Canopy which will not exceed the total allowable 288 sgft limit. a. The literal interpretation and strict application of the provisions or requirements of this Title would cause undue and unnecessary hardships to the sign user because of unique or unusual conditions pertaining to the 3 specific building, parcel or property in question. 3 i. Speedway is built around automobile and truck traffic. The variance is being requested due to the nature of the location being at a signalized intersection and Speedway providing the right amount of signage to allow the costumer to see the signs at a safe 06 distance for them to maneuver safely into the site and also around the site once they N have entered. The variance will allow Speedway to have (4) wall signs on the auto canopy which will all not exceed the total allowable 288 sgft limit. The current site has (5) wall signs on the auto canopy and Speedway will be reducing that amount to (4) for T the auto canopy along N Milwaukee Ave. > c ca b. The granting of the requested variance would not be materially detrimental to the property owners in the 0- vicinity; E i. The variance is being requested due to the nature of the fueling center and to provide a safe i a environment for the workers and costumers and will not have an adverse effect on the = neighboring properties. ii. Speedway will be reducing(1) sign from the auto canopy from (5)to (4)wall signs. c. The unusual conditions applying to the specific property do not apply generally to the other properties in the Village; d i. The unusual condition is that this location has costumers traveling towards the site from (4) directions. The (4) directions each require a sign. >_ d. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the purpose of this Title pursuant to Section 14.04.020. CO i. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the ordinance in that only 218.5 sqft of wall signage is being requested verses the 288 sgft allowed. Therefore, 69.5 sgft of signage is not c being used in order to get the right amount of signs for the auto canopy. a 0 2. A variance request to allow the location of signage C1 ("Speedway"channel letters on North elevation)and C4 M ("S" Badge on the East elevation)to be placed on the auto canopy elevations not facing a public right of way. a a. The literal interpretation and strict application of the provisions or requirements of this Title would cause undue and unnecessary hardships to the sign user because of unique or unusual conditions pertaining to the a specific building, parcel or property in question. Q L i. The variance is being requested due to the nature of the location being at a signalized intersection a and Speedway placing the right amount of signage at 90 degrees to the flow of traffic to allow the costumer to see the signs at a safe distance for them to maneuver safely into the site and also 0 around the site once they have entered. +, m W b. The granting of the requested variance would not be materially detrimental to the property owners in the vicinity; a i. The variance is being requested due to the nature of the fueling center and to provide a safe environment for the workers and costumers and will not have an adverse effect on the E neighboring properties. ii. Speedway will be reducing(1) sign from the auto canopy from (5)to (4)wall signs. a Packet Pg. 254 2.3.b c. The unusual conditions applying to the specific property do not apply generally to the other properties in the Village; i. The unusual condition is that this location has costumers traveling towards the site from (4) directions. The (2) signs needing a variance are 90 degrees to (2) or the (4)traffic directions. m d. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the purpose of this Title pursuant to Section 14.04.020. i. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the ordinance in that only 218.5 sqft of wall 3 signage is being requested verses the 288 sqft allowed. Therefore, 69.5 sqft of signage is not being used in order to place the signage in the correct locations. N 3. A variance request to allow for the "Speedway" channel letters on the north / south elevations of the Auto c Canopy to exceed the 1/3 length and 1/2 height requirement and to allow for the"S" badge on the east/west N elevations of the auto canopy to exceed the 1/2 height requirement to match the existing channel letters and badge sizes currently onsite. _ a. The literal interpretation and strict application of the provisions or requirements of this Title would cause 2 undue and unnecessary hardships to the sign user because of unique or unusual conditions pertaining to the > specific building, parcel or property in question. C i. The variance will allow Speedway to display their name and logo which will match the existing a onsite signage style and size on all sides of the canopy faces that face each direction of the traffic a� traveling along Milwaukee Ave and Riverwalk Dr. The proposed size of the signs allows the a costumer to see the signs at a safe distance. c 0 c� b. The granting of the requested variance would not be materially detrimental to the property owners in the vicinity; > i. The proposed variance will allow for safely recognized signage and yet does not exceed the c maximum allowable signage. Therefore,the variance will not be detrimental to the adjacent N property owners. c. The unusual conditions applying to the specific property do not apply generally to the other properties in the Village; i. The unusual condition is that this location has costumers traveling towards the site from (4) o directions. The signs needing the variance are 90 degrees to the traffic directions and provide recognition from a safe distance. a 0 d. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the purpose of this Title pursuant to Section 14.04.020. i. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the ordinance in that only 218.5 sqft of wall Q signage is being requested verses the 288 sqft allowed. Therefore, 69.5 sqft of signage is not i being used in order to allow for the placement of the safely sized signage. a Q L 4. A variance request to allow the location of signage C5 ("S" badge on North elevation) to be placed on the CFL a canopy elevation not facing a public right of way. c a. The literal interpretation and strict application of the provisions or requirements of this Title would cause c) undue and unnecessary hardships to the sign user because of unique or unusual conditions pertaining to the specific building, parcel or property in question. i. The unique condition is that the location of the (C5) sign needs to be 90 degrees towards the 2 traffic flow. a c a� b. The granting of the requested variance would not be materially detrimental to the property owners in the s vicinity; U i. The granting of this variance will allow for a safe condition. Therefore,will not be materially a detrimental to the adjacent property owners. Please note,that if the sign was placed on the allowable side of the canopy, it would be facing directly to residential property. Packet Pg. 255 2.3.b c. The unusual conditions applying to the specific property do not apply generally to the other properties in the Village; i. The unusual condition is that this location has costumers traveling towards the site from (4) directions. The signs needing the variance are 90 degrees to the traffic directions and provide recognition from a safe distance. m a� d. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the purpose of this Title pursuant to Section 14.04.020. 3 i. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the ordinance in that only 218.5 sqft of wall signage is being requested verses the 288 sqft allowed. Therefore, 69.5 sqft of signage is not being used in order to allow for the proper placement of the sign. 06 5. A variance request to allow for the "S" badge on the north/south elevations of the CFL Canopy to exceed the N 1/2 height requirement to match the existing badge size currently onsite. a. The literal interpretation and strict application of the provisions or requirements of this Title would cause undue and unnecessary hardships to the sign user because of unique or unusual conditions pertaining to the specific building, parcel or property in question. > EF i. The variance will allow Speedway to display their logo which will match the existing onsite signage R style and size on the canopy faces that face each direction of the traffic traveling along North Riverwalk Dr and Riverwalk Dr. The proposed size of the signs allows the costumer to see the — a� signs at a safe distance. a b. The granting of the requested variance would not be materially detrimental to the property owners in the •° vicinity; i. The proposed variance will allow for safely recognized signage and yet does not exceed the > maximum allowable signage. Therefore,the variance will not be detrimental to the adjacent c property owners. N c. The unusual conditions applying to the specific property do not apply generally to the other properties in the Village; CO i. The unusual condition is that this location has costumers traveling towards the site from (2) directions. The signs needing the variance are 90 degrees to the traffic directions and provide o recognition from a safe distance. a d. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the purpose of this Title pursuant to Section 14.04.020. o i. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the ordinance in that only 218.5 sqft of wall 0 signage is being requested verses the 288 sqft allowed. Therefore, 69.5 sqft of signage is not Q being used in order to allow for the placement of the safely sized signage. i CL a Q L a y C O U d Cn c M a c a� E z Q Packet Pg. 256 2.3.b �a teska 3 September 30, 2021 N 06 Ms. Rati Akash c N Village Planner d Village of Buffalo Grove 50 Raup Boulevard L ca Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 > c ca RE: Review of Proposed Speedway Planned Development Applications—Buffalo Grove a E Dear Ms. Akash, a Thank you for this opportunity to provide comments and questions regarding the proposed Planned C Development amendment and related variations for an expanded Speedway located on properties at U M 201 N Milwaukee Avenue and 241 N. Milwaukee Avenue. I am writing on behalf of Mr. Bill Johnson and > other owners with interest in properties located directly east of the proposed development across N. c Riverwalk Drive. Plans are still being formulated, but their intent is to develop those properties for d multiple family dwellings. While the gas station is an existing use,the expanded facility presents several potential adverse impacts on existing and anticipated future residential uses,which can be mitigated as part of the Village's application review process. N Having examined the zoning application materials at the Village Hall,we have a few questions and concerns regarding the Speedway development, and appreciate additional information you can provide 0 about them. We also welcome these items being considered by the Plan Commission in reviewing the a Speedway proposal. Our questions and concerns focus around the four points described below. M Questions and Comments a The variation requested to reduce the landscape setback from 25' to 12' along N. Riverwalk Drive is a concerning as it reduces landscaped area in which to buffer existing (301 Riverwalk Place) and future a residential uses from operation of the gas station and associated activities. Primary concerns relate to a light and noise impacts from the gas station operations, particularly the trucks that will be using the diesel pumps on the east side of the site. ° U Question 1: How can the landscape area along N. Riverwalk Drive be enlarged and/or enhanced to mitigate light and noise impacts from the gas station. a • The landscape plan indicates the existing trees on the east side will remain—during summer c months, these will provide some visual screen of the station (similar tree cover does not appear to extent north to where the office building is currently located). However,the greater concern are impacts headlights and noise from the trucks will have on adjacent residential uses. The reduced landscape buffer limits understory plantings that could deflect or absorb this noise and a teska associates inc 627 Grove Street,Evanston,Illinois,60201 office 847 869-201 S www.Te-skaAssociates.com Packet Pg. 257 2.3.b :IIage J2 headlights. Based on current use of the site, it can be expected that this use will include early morning visits by local landscape contractors.Addition shrubs and evergreen landscaping should be included in this area to reduce the potential noise and light impacts year-round. Noise impacts might be aggravated not just by direct noise, but truck noise echoing off of the main 3 building. If adequate landscaping cannot be provided in the reduced area, a privacy fence or wall along the east property line should be considered. N Question 2: Can the N. Riverwalk Drive Curb Cut be eliminated from the proposal. 06 0 N • There is no description of the need for this curb cut in the traffic study and the turning template iri included in the packet does not indicate that driveway being used for access.The elevations indicate a sign on the south side of the canopy for the diesel pumps being for exiting. Does this c° •L mean that the trucks southbound from Milwaukee Avenue are expected to access the site from > N. Riverwalk Drive and this driveway? If so,this will increase the traffic and noise impacts on properties to the east. Understandably, without that driveway,trucks would have to circulate a around the building to access the diesel pumps. While inconvenient, it would very much reduce E the light, noise and traffic impacts on properties to the east, particularly during the morning a hours when landscaping vehicles use the pumps. c Question 3: What additional business operations will be associated with the facility and how will U potential adverse impacts on nearby residential uses be address? > ti c • Information from a previous presentation by the applicant and questions of the Village indicated N that the proposal may include: 1) 10 video game machines, 2) 24 hour operation, 3) expanded alcohol package store liquor sales area, and 4) on premises dining. Are these still part of the plan? If so, what limitations and controls on these activities(especially as they relate to 24 hour operations of gaming and liquor sales) are anticipated to be included in the approval ordinance N mitigate noise, light, and late night activity that will impact existing and anticipated residential o uses to the east. In addition, as the use will technically be designated as a truck stop,will c ° limitations on additional activities related to such uses but not common for local commercial a districts (overnight truck parking, showers, etc) being prevented through the approval ° 0 ordinance? E a Question 4: Can signage be reduced to mitigate impacts on properties to the east? i a a • The elevations and variation information provided indicate limited signage on the east fagade of a L the building and canopy. From the elevations is it not clear if the diesel canopy will have signage a on the east fagade, but as it would face residential uses,that would seem unnecessary. Similarly, we would question whether the changeable copy sign on the eastern fagade (facing residential 0 uses) is necessary given the limited number of fueling pumps there. Site enhancements: in considering the questions raised here, we offer a few ideas for = �a enhancements to the proposed site that would mitigate impacts on existing and future residential a uses to the east. c a� E • Remove the curb cut along North Riverwalk Drive. • Place a privacy fence along the east side of the site and increase landscaping on the outside of the fence to screen the operation and improve the view overall. teakaasmdatesinc 627 Grove Street,Evanston,Illinois,60201 office 847 869-201 S www.Te-skaAssociates.com Packet Pg. 258 2.3.b :II a e j 3 • Increased evergreen planting should be used on the east side to improve year round buffering. • Foundation landscaping should be provided around the convenience store to create a more CD attractive site. CD • Signage and the canopy lighting should be limited on the east site of the structures and the 3 hours on which lights on the east side are illuminated (or fully illuminated) should be limited. • The site does not show any stormwater detention,which may be needed to meet drainage requirements. If so, addition of stormwater areas should not diminish the number of trees. Also, 06 to the extent possible, areas around in in the detention basins be planted with attractive,water N absorbing native plants. 6i d Thank you very much for your assistance. 2 ca c ca E Michael Blue, FAICP L Principal a 0 c� U ti c 0 N (1 r� 7 N d C a 0 E a L Q Q Q L a .y C O U d to c �a a c a) E s U teska associates inc 627 Grove Street,Evanston,Illinois,60201 office 847 869-201 S www.Te-skaAssociates.com Packet Pg. 259 2.3.b SPEEDWAY #7649 201 N Milwaukee Ave, Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 Responses to Teska Comments October 1, 2021 m a� Question 1: 3 �a • Please note the proposed development will greatly enhance the aesthetics of the area and improve land values 3 for all surrounding properties.The proposed development will be removing dated buildings, dramatically reducing the FAR development density ratio and greatly enhancing the amount of landscaping. N 06 • Please note that if the CFL canopy was not behind the building the landscape setback would still be 12'. Because the building is 87'from the property line the allowable reduction is 20' from the required 25' with a 12' N minimum. So we are not reducing below the allowable 12'. • The comment regarding evergreen landscaping is warranted and evergreen trees could be placed along the CFL c area. However, please note the existing landscaping is being greatly enhanced. • Regarding noise,the loudest noise is already in the area.Traffic noise on Milwaukee is the loudest noise in the > area. The existing site has both Auto and Truck customers.The existing canopy is 29' feet away from the property line compared to the proposed 30.5'.Therefore, the proposed new development is not changing the a use but rather it is improving onsite circulation, moving the canopy further away from the east property line and lowering the FAR development density ratio. i a • In addition,the proposed development is moving the more intense Auto use from the east portion of the site to c the farthest west portion of the site and screening the use via the proposed building from the land to the east. . �a Question 2: > • The proposed curb cut as stated is a Tertiary cut that will help the flow of onsite traffic as needed.This curb cut c 0 will be used only slightly as a relief valve.Though not the primary curb cut its use as a relief valve is very N important. • The main entrance for the CFL canopy will be off of Milwaukee and the exit will be onto Riverwalk.As stated above minimal traffic will be on North Riverwalk, and it will act as an important relief valve. co Question 3: d 0 • The only proposed additional business operation would be for the gaming. All other business operation currently c are offered on the existing site. a • There is no expanded liquor sales.The existing packaged license would continue with the new proposal. 0 • Hours of operation would continue as they are today. M E • Seating will be minimal and will not provide for full service dining. a • No typical "Truck Stop" amenities will be offered.There are no showers, no full service restaurant, and no truck Q parking let alone overnight parking. a a • Lighting would become horizontal cutoff LED luminaries; which will further enhance the safety of the proposed development. a N • AS stated above the Auto use is being placed on the west side of the site while the less intense CFL use is on the c east side.This use typically occurs during business hours. v m Question 4: Cn c • The proposed design is already requesting dramatically less si na e than what is allowed. The proposed Sign a square footage is 69.5sf less than the allowable 288sf. +: c • There is no Signage on the East side of the CFL canopy. E • According to the American Planners Association the size of the font on the proposed reader board will only be discernable by the customer at the CFL canopy.Thereby meeting the intent of the reader board. a In summary the proposed development will greatly enhance the aesthetics of the area, improve land values for all surrounding property, greatly increase and enhance the landscaping, locate the more intense Auto use to the west side of the site and provide limited signage. In short this will be a very positive improvement for the area. Packet Pg. 260 4 2.3.b 6/4/93 ORDINANCE NO. 93- 45 a0i AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS . Speedway Service Station, 923 N. Milwaukee Avenue CA WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule Unit by virtue CA of the Illinois Constitution of 1970; and, WHEREAS, the property legally described in Exhibit A hereto was annexed to the Village of Buffalo Grove by Ordinance No. 93-44 pursuant to > a written Annexation Agreement dated June 7, 1993, and approved by the o a. Village by Ordinance No. 93- 43 and, E WHEREAS, notices of public hearings for zoning and annexation on said I- a Annexation Agreement have been given and public hearings were held, o NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, COOK AND LAKE > ai COUNTIES, ILLINOIS: a N Section 1 . The Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Buffalo Grove, Cook and Lake Counties, Illinois as amended is hereby further amended by classifying the property described in Exhibit A hereto into the B-3 Planned Business Center District. Section 2. Development of the property shall be in compliance with the Annexation Agreement dated June 7, 1993, passed and approved pursuant to a a Ordinance No. 93- 43 Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after E Q its passage and approval according to law. This Ordinance shall not be CL codified. Q AYES: 4 - Marienthal, Kahn, Braiman, Hendricks NAYES: 0 - None 0 a U ABSENT: 2 - Reid, Rubin u PASSED: .Tune 7, 1993 APPROVED: June 7, 1993 0 a co ATTEST: APP a- cu E LM a U t0 Villa Clerk SI NEY . MATHIA ,*Village President Packet Pg.261 EXHIBIT cu LEGAL DESCRIPTION co Emro Marketing Company Buffalo Grove Annexation CA 06 CD Parcel I CA Lots 21 and 22 in Block 3 in Unit No. 2 of Columbian Gardens, being a Subdivision of Section 35, Township 43 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the > Plat thereof, recorded July 10, 1926 as Document 282352, in Book "P11 of Plats, page 92 in Lake County,, Illinois. E Parcel 2 -@ CL C� The Westerly 1/2 of the alley Easterly and adjoining Lot 21 in 0 Block 3, and the Easterly half of the Alley Westerly and adjoining Lot 22 in Block 3, all in Unit No. 2 of Columbian Gardens aforesaid, vacated by the instrument recorded April 3, > 1978 as Document 1907357 in Lake County, Illinois. 0 N Parcel 3 Lots 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23 , 24, 25 and 26 in Block 3 in Unit 2 of Columbian Gardens, being a Subdivision in Section 35, Township 43 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat thereof, recorded July 10, a 1926, as Document 282352 , in Book "P11 of Plats, page 92 , in Lake County, Illinois. CL 0 Parcel 4 E .5 The South Westerly half of vacated alley lying North Easterly > and adjoining Lots 14 to 20, both inclusive, in Parcel i, and CL CL the North Easterly half of the vacated alley lying South Westerly and adjoining Lots 23 and 24 , and that part lying South Westerly and adjoining and accruing Lot 25, Parcel L' vacated by the Instrument recorded April 28 , 1978 , as Document 0 1913494, in Lake County, Illinois. cu cn co CL cu Packet Pg.262 3/1.9/2013 ORDINANCE NO. 2013- 17 co AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5.20 LIQUOR CONTROLS WHEREAS,the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule Unit pursuant to the Illinois C*4 Constitution of 1970. 06 C*4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS. As follows: co Section 1. The Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Code, as amended, is further amended in TITLE 5 - BUSINESS TAXES, LICENSES AND REGULATIONS, Chapter 5.20, Liquor E Controls, by adding Section 5.20.035, "Consumption on Property," in its entirety in the manner , and form shown and inserting therein such new text in the manner and form and shown in underlined bold type below, so that said Section 5.20.035 shall hereafter provide as follows: 0 5.20.035—Consumption on Property. > ai It is unlawful for any owner or occupant of property within the Village, other than 0 N Dwellings, as defined in Chapter 17 of this Code,house trailers and mobile homes to permit alcoholic liquor to be consumed on such property without a license issued under this chapter. cn cu Section 2. The Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Code, as amended, is further amended in TITLE 5 - BUSINESS TAXES, LICENSES AND REGULATIONS, Chapter 5.20, Liquor Controls, Section 5.20.070, "License — Classifications," sub-section 5.20.070(G) (Class G 0 Licenses), by deleting the text in the manner and form shown in strikethrough type below and E inserting therein such new text in the manner and form shown in underlined bold type below, so that said Section 5.20.070(G) shall hereafter provide as follows: I- CL> CL G. Class G licenses are divided into the following classes: 2. 1. Class GI licenses, authorizing retail sales of alcoholic liquors for consumption on the 0 premises owned or leased by nonprofit or- gevefnme organizations and occupied by the licensees. Class G1 licenses shall be subject to the following conditions and limitations- to 1. Nonprofit er-ganizations: CL a. Special events sponsored by nonprofit organizations must be for the licensee's E members and their guests, #567360 Packet Pg.263 0 • b. Special events for nonmembers on the licensed premise is limited to tW&four events per calendar year, a� a� c. No event shall be longer than one continuous twenty-four hour period, 3 d. The fee for each special event license is twenty-five frftee dollars; �r 2. Class G2 licenses, authorizing retail sales of alcoholic liquors for «s consumption on the premises owned or leased by governmental organizations CD N and occupied by the licensees. Class G2 licenses shall be sub.iect to the v; cu following conditions and limitations: co a. Prearranged events sponsored by governmental organizations must include the > service of food, a b. A representative of the governmental organization must be present throughout E every such event, .@ a c. The annual fee for each license shall be one hundred dollars; o .2 �o 3. Class G3 licenses, authorizing the retail sales of alcoholic liquors for consumption on a premise owned or leased by a "for profit" organization,for a special event open to the public and sponsored by a bona fide nonprofit or o charitable organization where the sale and consumption of alcohol is incidental to a specified charitable event, shall be subiect to the following > conditions and limitations: �6 to a. Dram shop liability insurance will be provided, > cu a b. The sale and consumption of alcohol shall not be related to any commercial purpose or in connection with the sale of non-alcoholic a products or to promote the sale of non-alcoholic products. The "for ° profit" premise owner or leasee shall not conduct its regular business, ° make any sales of non-alcoholic products for profit or provide any paid ¢ services for profit during the special event, C. C. c. The fee for the special event license is twenty-five dollars, d. No event shall be longer than one continuous twenty-four hour period, o U e. The license shall be valid only for the date shown on the face of the cn license, � co L No more than 6 such licensees shall be issued per day, °' a� g_ No more than 2 such licensees shall be issued to any one location within a _ calendar year. co 2 Packet Pg.264 0 4. Class G4 licenses, authorizing the giving away of alcoholic liquors for consumption on premises of any property within the Village, other than Dwellings, as defined in Chapter 17 of this Code, house trailers and mobile Se homes for a Private Function,where attendance is by invitation only and not o open to the public, shall be subiect to the following conditions and 3 limitations: �r N 06 a. Dram shop liability insurance will be provided, 0 N b. The fee for the special event license is twenty-five dollars, U C c. No event shall be longer than one continuous twenty-four hour period, ;° co d. The license shall be valid only for the date shown on the face of the c license, Co a E e. No more than 6 such licensees shall be issued per day, a L No more than 2 such licensees shall be issued to any one licensee within a o calendar year. o U t0 CU Section 3. The Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Code, as amended, is further amended in o TITLE 5 - BUSINESS TAXES, LICENSES AND REGULATIONS, Chapter 5.20, Liquor Controls, Section 5.20.090, "License—Renewal," by inserting therein such new text in the > manner and form shown in underlined bold type below, so that said Section 5.20.090 shall hereafter provide as follows: 5.20.090—License -Renewal. a c �o A. Any licensee may renew the license at the expiration thereof; provided the a licensee is then qualified to receive a license, and the premises for which such ° renewal license is sought is suitable for such purpose. E B. No license shall be renewed unless the owner or manager of the license attends an CL annual liquor law/alcohol awareness training seminar conducted by the Village. ¢ The fee for the Village providing a make-up seminar shall not exceed five hundred dollars per licensee. ° c a C. This Section shall not apply to Class G1, G3, and G4 Liquor Licenses. t? cu cn Section 4. The Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Code, as amended, is further amended in TITLE 5 - BUSINESS TAXES, LICENSES AND REGULATIONS, Chapter 5.20, Liquor ° Controls, Section 5.20.110, "License—Term—Annual Fee Proration,"by inserting therein such new text in the manner and form shown in underlined bold type below, so that said Section = 5.20.110 shall hereafter provide as follows: c 5.20.110—License—Term—Annual fee proration. 3 Packet Pg.266 0 A. Each license shall terminate on the 30th day of April next.following its issuance. Renewal fee shall be due on or before May 1 st. In the event the application is denied, the whole fee shall be refunded. �o B. At the time application is made, the applicant shall pay the Village the sum set forth in Section 5.20.070. Notwithstanding the annual fees set forth in Section 5.20.070, if an application for a liquor license is received by the Village betweenCA 06 November 1st and April 30th of a fiscal year,the license fee shall be one-half of CD the annual fee. N �n a� C. This Section shall not apply to Class G1, G3, and G4 Liquor Licenses. co co Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and in effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. a. E AYES: 5 —Trilling, Sussman, T.erson, Stein, Ottenheimer CL NAYS: 0 -None a .2 �o U ABSENT: 1 - Berman > ai PASSED: March 18, 2013 a N CU APPROVED: March 18, 2013 PUBLISHED: March 19, 2013 cu c Approved: . a Village President ¢ ATTEST: a a Villag rk c a U cu U1 c co 11 C co E U t0 4 Packet Pg.266 23b STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ss. COUNTY OF COOK ) , CERTIFICATE I,Janet M. Sirabian, certify that I am the duly elected 06 and acting Village Clerk of the Village of Buffalo `D cv ,. Grove, Cook and Lake Counties, Illinois. I further = 1 certify that on March 18, 2013, the Corporate Authorities of the Village passed and approved > Ordinance No. 2013-17, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5.20 LIQUOR N tL n E CONTROLS OF BUFFALO GROVE M[.)NICIPAL — CODE a copy of such Ordinance was posted in and at -� c the Village Hall, commencing on March 19, 2013 1 ° � cca and continuing for at least ten days thereafter. > Copies of such Ordinance were also available for o sy public inspection upon request in the Office of N Village Clerk. �= > Dated at Buffalo Grove,Illinois,this 19th day of 1' March,2013. > % 1 E 5 � i 11 e Clerk E ` c �E cy w ( w L By f' L' U ' rr s is C L^^L � E �1 }i 'i �. i Packet Pg.267 s 3/1.9/2013 ORDINANCE NO. 2013- 17 co AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5.20 LIQUOR CONTROLS WHEREAS,the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule Unit pursuant to the Illinois C*4 Constitution of 1970. 06 V_ 40 C*4 NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS. As follows: Section L The Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Code, as amended, is further amended in TITLE 5 - BUSINESS TAXES, LICENSES AND REGULATIONS, Chapter 5.20, Liquor E Controls, by adding Section 5.20.035, "Consumption on Property," in its entirety in the manner and form shown and inserting therein such new text in the manner and form and shown in underlined bold type below, so that said Section 5.20.035 shall hereafter provide as follows: 0 5.20.035—Consumption on Property. > ai It is unlawful for any owner or occupant of property within the Village, other than 0 N Dwellings, as defined in Chapter 17 of this Code, house trailers and mobile homes to permit alcoholic liquor to be consumed on such property without a license issued under this chapter. to cu Section 2. The Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Code, as amended, is further amended in TITLE 5 - BUSINESS TAXES, LICENSES AND REGULATIONS, Chapter 5.20, Liquor Controls, Section 5.20.070, "License — Classifications," sub-section 5.20.070(G) (Class G 0 Licenses), by deleting the text in the manner and form shown in strikethrough type below and zi E inserting therein such new text in the manner and form shown in underlined bold type below, so that said Section 5.20.070(G) shall hereafter provide as follows: CL CL G. Class G licenses are divided into the following classes: 2. cu 1. Class GI licenses, authorizing retail sales of alcoholic liquors for consumption on the premises owned or leased by nonprofit or- gevemmental organizations and occupied 0 by the licensees. Class GI licenses shall be subject to the following conditions and cu limitations- co 1. Nenpfefit efganizations: CL a. Special events sponsored by nonprofit organizations must be for the licensee's E members and their guests, #567360 Packet Pg.268 2.3.b b. Special events for nonmembers on the licensed premise is limited to two four events per calendar year, cu c. No event shall be longer than one continuous twenty-four hour period, 3 d. The fee for each special event license is twenty-five fiftee dollars; �r 2. Class G2 licenses, authorizing retail sales of alcoholic liquors for 06 consumption on the premises owned or leased by governmental organizations N and occupied by the licensees. Class G2 licenses shall be subject to the v; following conditions and limitations: U C S0 a. Prearranged events sponsored by governmental organizations must include the > service of food, c �o a b. A representative of the governmental organization must be present throughout E every such event, .@ tL c. The annual fee for each license shall be one hundred dollars; o �o 3. Class G3 licenses, authorizing the retail sales of alcoholic liquors for consumption on a premise owned or leased by a "for profit" organization, for a special event opcn to the public and sponsored by a bona fide nonprofit or N charitable organization where the sale and consumption of alcohol is incidental to a specified charitable event, shall be subject to the following > conditions and limitations: �6 .rs to a: Dram shop liability insurance will be provided, > cu a b. The sale and consumption of alcohol shall not be related to any commercial purpose or in connection with the sale of non-alcoholic a products or to promote the sale of non-alcoholic products. The "for ° profit" premise owner or leasee shall not conduct its regular business, ° make any sales of non-alcoholic products for profit or provide any paid services for profit during the special event, a a c. The fee for the special event license is twenty-five dollars, d. No event shall be longer than one continuous twenty-four hour period, o U e. The license shall be valid only for the date shown on the face of the license, in co f. No more than 6 such licensees shall be issued per day, °' g. No more than 2 such licensees shall be issued to any one location within a calendar year. co 2 Packet Pg.269 s 2.3.b 4. Class G4 licenses, authorizing the giving away of alcoholic liquors for consumption on premises of any property within the Village, other than Dwellings, as defined in Chapter 17 of this Code, house trailers and mobile homes for a Private Function,where attendance is by invitation only and not open to the public, shall be subiect to the following conditions and 2 limitations: C �r N a. Dram shop liability insurance will be provided, o N b. The fee for the special event license is twenty-five dollars, U C c. No event shall be longer than one continuous twenty-four hour period, 2— co d. The license shall be valid only for the date shown on the face of the license, a. E e. No more than 6 such licensees shall be issued per day, ' -- a L No more than 2 Such licensees shall be issued to any one licensee within a a calendar year. U t0 CU Section 3. The Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Code, as amended, is further amended in N TITLE 5 - BUSINESS TAXES, LICENSES AND REGULATIONS, Chapter 5.20, Liquor Controls, Section 5.20.090, "License—Renewal,"by inserting therein such new text in the > manner and form shown in underlined bold type below, so that said Section 5.20.090 shall hereafter provide as follows: to 5.20.090—License -Renewal. c co A. Any licensee may renew the license at the expiration thereof; provided the a- licensee is then qualified to receive a license, and the premises for which such ° renewal license is sought is suitable for such purpose. B. No license shall be renewed unless the owner or manager of the license attends an CL annual liquor law/alcohol awareness training seminar conducted by the Village. ¢ The fee for the Village providing a make-up seminar shall not exceed five hundred dollars per licensee. c a C. This Section shall not apply to Class G1, G3, and G4 Liquor Licenses. t? cu to c Section 4. The Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Code, as amended, is further amended in TITLE 5 - BUSINESS TAXES, LICENSES AND REGULATIONS, Chapter 5.20, Liquor Controls, Section 5.20.110, "License—Term—Annual Fee Proration,"by inserting therein such new text in the manner and form shown in underlined bold type below, so that said Section = 5.20.110 shall hereafter provide as follows: 5.20.110—License—Term—Annual fee proration. 3 Packet Pg.270 2.3.b F. A. Each license shall terminate on the 30th day of April next.following its issuance. Renewal fee shall be due on or before May 1 st. In the event the application is denied, the whole fee shall be refunded. �o B. At the time application is made,the applicant shall pay the Village the sum set 32 forth in Section 5.20.070. Notwithstanding the annual fees set forth in Section 5.20.070, if an application for a liquor license is received by the Village between CA November 1st and April 30th of a fiscal year, the license fee shall be one-half of o the annual fee. N �n cu C. This Section shall not apply to Class G1, G3, and G4 Liquor Licenses. C co Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and in effect from and after its passage, approval o and publication. CL E AYES: 5 —Trilling, Sussman, Terson, Stein, Ottenheimer a c NAYS: 0 -None U ABSENT: 1 - Berman > i tt1 C PASSED: March 18, 2013 N a� APPROVED: March 18, 2013 .rs PUBLISHED: March 19, 2013 cu c co Approved: �- a E Village President ¢ ATTEST: CL CL Village-Clerk o U cu U1 c co CL C 0 E U t0 4 Packet Pg.271 3.B.1 09/15/2021 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 50 RAUPP BOULEVARD, BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2021 Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 7:30 PM by Chairman Frank Cesario Public Hearings/Items For Consideration 1. Consider a Variation to the Fence Code to Install a Fence in the Front Yard at 8 N Columbus Parkway. (Trustee Pike) (Staff Contact: Nicole Woods) Village Planner Akash provided background on the subject property at 8 Columbus E Parkway regarding the proposed installation of a fence in the front yard on the east side o of the property.Akash noted that the subject property abuts Mi Mexico restaurant which 'E is in the B3 planned business district. i a Ms. Mancewicz provided additional detail on their property. Ms. Mancewicz noted their Q- a reasoning for the desire to extend the fence was for safety and privacy purposes due to the proximity of the parking lot of Mi Mexico. a 0 Com. Richards asked the petitioners to describe their plan for the fence. "? ti Mr. Mancewicz referenced packet page 10 and showed the petitioners the plan for the c fence. N Li Chairperson Cesario reference packet page 7 and reiterated the petitioners plan as a explained to the Commissioners. N w Com. Richards asked the petitioners what style the fence would be. ° m Mr. Mancewicz said a solid 6 foot fence. Com. Khan asked the petitioners when they installed the other sections of the fence. ai Mr. Mancewicz said it was roughly two weeks ago. c Com. Richards asked staff if they had received any phone calls regarding the variance. m Village Planner Akash said yes, but once the variance was explained the callers were in a support of the variance. The staff report was entered as exhibit one. The public hearing closed at 7:39 PM. Com Khan made a motion to grant a variation to Section 15.20 of the Buffalo Grove Fence Code to allow a proposed 6-foot solid fence in the front yard provided the fence shall be installed in accordance with the documents and plans submitted as part of this petition. Com Richards seconded the motion Com.Au spoke in favor of the motion Chairperson Cesario spoke in favor of the motion. Packet Pg. 272 3.B.1 09/15/2021 RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] AYES: Spunt, Cesario, Khan, Au, Richards, Worlikar ABSENT: Adam Moodhe, Stephen Goldspiel, Mitchell Weinstein 2. Consider a Variation for an Existing Driveway to Exceed Max Front Yard Coverage at 811 Summer Court(Request to Continue to October 6, 2021) (Trustee Johnson) (Staff Contact: Nicole Woods) Village Planner Akash provided an explanation of the tabled public hearing item to consider a variation for an existing driveway to exceed max front yard coverage at 811 Summer Court. Deputy Community Development Director Woods explained the engineering issues that were discovered after the item was on the agenda. Woods explained that there is more work to be done by the homeowner. Com. Kahn asked how the Village found out about the driveway. o Village PlannerAkash said that there was a complaint regarding the driveway > construction. ° a a Com. Khan made a motion to table the public hearing for a variation for an existing a driveway to exceed max front yard coverage at 811 Summer Court to the October 6 Planning and Zoning Meeting. a 0 M Com. Richards seconded the motion. 04 ti RESULT: TABLED [UNANIMOUS] AYES: Spunt, Cesario, Khan, Au, Richards, Worlikar N ABSENT: Adam Moodhe, Stephen Goldspiel, Mitchell Weinstein a 0 Regular Meeting c as Other Matters for Discussion None. c Approval of Minutes Q. a� 1. Planning and Zoning Commission - Regular Meeting -Aug 18, 2021 7:30 PM a N RESULT: ACCEPTED [5 TO 0] ' AYES: Spunt, Cesario, Khan, Au, Richards c ABSTAIN: Neil Worlikar ABSENT: Adam Moodhe, Stephen Goldspiel, Mitchell Weinstein Chairman's Report None. Committee and Liaison Reports Commission spoke about the items at the last Village Board meeting. Staff Report/Future Agenda Schedule Packet Pg. 273 3.B.1 09/15/2021 Staff provided details on items coming to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Public Comments and Questions None. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 PM Chris Stilling in d c APPROVED BY ME THIS 15th DAY OF September , 2021 0 'E 0 i Q Q Q a 0 M ti N O N L T" Q 4) N w O fl1 d 7 C d v C cC CL d c.� v Q N G1 r� 7 C Packet Pg. 274