The URL can be used to link to this page

2022-01-18 - Ordinance 2022-012 - AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS - 15989 AND 16051 DEERFIELD PARKWAY ORDINANCE NO. 2022-012 AN ORDINANCE ANVIENDING THE COIMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VIIL,LAGE OF 13WETALO GROVE ILLIN0IS 15989 AND 16051 DEERFIELD PARKWAY WHEREAS,the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule Unit by virtue of the Illinois Constitution of 1970; and WHEREAS,the property legally described in Exhibit A hereto was annexed to the Village of Buffalo Grove by Ordinance No. 2022-011 pursuant to a written Annexation Agreement dated January 18, 2022 and approved by the Village by Ordinance No. 2022-010("Annexation Agreement"); and WHEREAS, MZ Capital Acquisitions, LLC an Illinois limited liability company ("Applicant") applied for a zoning map amendment and a special use for a residential planned unit development; and WHEREAS, notice of public hearing for a map amendment and a special use with variations for a planned unit development has been given and a public hearing was held on December 15, 2021 before the Village of Buffalo Grove Planning&Zoning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE,COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES,ILLINOIS: Section 1. Ma Amendment S ecial Use and Variations.A zoning map amendment from R-E One-Family Residential District to the R9 Multiple-Family Residential District is granted for the property described in Exhibit A("Property"). The Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Buffalo Grove, Cook and Lake Counties, Illinois as amended and the Village's Official Zoning Map is hereby further amended to reflect the zoning districts for the Property. A special use for a Residential Planned Unit Development is granted for the Property. The special use shall run with the use and not with the land.The following variations for the Property are also hereby granted: a. Variation to Section 17.20 of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby granted allowing for private streets as depicted on the Preliminary Plan; and b. Variation to Section 17.28.050 is hereby granted reducing the required perimeter setback as depicted as depicted on the Preliminary Plan; and c. Variation to Section 17.28.050 is hereby granted reducing the minimum building separations as depicted on the Preliminary Plan; and d. Variation to Section 17.40.040 of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby granted decreasing the minimum front yard, interior side yard, corner side yard and rear yard setbacks as depicted on the Preliminary Plan; and e. Variation to Chapter 14.16.010 of the Sign Ordinance is hereby granted for a ground sign encroaching into the required front yard setback and exceeding the minimum size requirements. Section 2.General Conditions. Development and use of the Property shall be in compliance with 1 the Annexation Agreement and in accordance with the plan set in Exhibit B. Unless otherwise expressly provided for in the Annexation Agreement, or otherwise expressly approved by the Village Board, the Property shall be subject to and maintained in accordance with Buffalo Grove Municipal Code. Section: .Specific Conditions. The Special Use for a Residential Planned Unit development shall have the same conditions and obligations agreed to in the Annexation Agreement which shall survive the expiration of the Annexation Agreement and remain in effect unless modified by agreement or by law. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after its passage and approval according to law. This Ordinance shall not be codified. AYES: —Stein Ottenheimer W6denf Johnson Pike NAYES: ( None ABSENT: I Smith PASSED: January t8,� APPROVED; Januar J 8 02 . APPROVED: Beve4SussmVillage President ATTEST: Janet a ral-�ian,Village Clerk This document was prepared by: Christopher Stilling Deputy Village Manager Village of Buffalo Grove 50 Raupp Boulevard Buffalo Grove, IL60089 2 Mail to: Village Clerk Village of Buffalo Grove 50 Raupp Boulevard Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 3 EXHIBIT A Legal Description PARCEL 1: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO JOSEPH GANIER (BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 28, 1851, IN BOOK "P" OF DEEDS, PAGE 10) WHICH POINT IS 140.58 FEET EAST AND 134.64 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27; RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES WEST 486.33 FEET; THENCE HN NE OF LANDORTH LCONVEYED TO CHARLES LEL WITH THE EAST LINE WISCCHMAN (ASF THE UBYHDEED EAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28 TO THE SO RECORDED MAY 11, 1878 IN BOOK 66 OF DEEDS, PAGE 474);THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID DEED LINE TO A POINT ON A LINE 140.58 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 27;THENCE SOUTH 1021.29 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (EXCEPT ANY PART THEREOF FALLING IN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT:COMMENCING ATTHE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO JOSEPH GANIER (BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 28, 1851, IN BOOK P OF DEEDS, PAGE 10) WHICH POINT I 140.58 FEET EAST AND 134.64 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27;THENCE NORTH ALONG A LINE 140.58 FEET EAST OF, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 27, A DISTANCE OF 564 FEET FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 722.06 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LAND CONVEYED TO CHARLES WISCHMAN (AS BY DEED RECORDED MAY 11, 1878 IN BOOK 66 OF DEEDS, PAGE 474)WHICH POINT IS 399.31 FEET WEST FROM THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 28 AS MEASURED ALONG CHARLES WISCHMAN DEED LINE; THENCE EAST ALONG CHARLES WISCHMAN DEED LINE 340.83 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 266.47 FEET TO A POINT 140.58 FEET EAST OF MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 27 AND 281.29 FEET NORTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING), AND ALSO THAT PART THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF LAKE BY INSTRUMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 27, 1973 AND RECORDED OCTOBER 1, 1973 AS DOCUMENT 1636981, IN LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. 4 EXHIBIT B Plan Set 5 MZ Capital Partners Private Equity Real Estate Investment Northbrook based MZ Capital Partners, an award winning national multifamily development firm, proposes to redevelop the current site with a high-end luxury low density rental apartment community.The proposed townhome-style apartments consist of 120 units contained in 6 low-rise two-story buildings,with 250 parking spaces.Additionally,an amenity rich curated clubhouse would contain a leasing center/management office,top of the line fitness center,work from home private suites,and a resort style swimming pool and deck.The well landscaped lush treed and aesthetically pleasing site plan and elevation renderings are provided for further context. MZ Capital Partners has been recognized as one of the fastest growing private companies in American by INC Magazine by inclusion of the INC 500 list and was recognized as the Best Place to Work in the multifamily business by the National Apartment Association. The firm develops and owns multifamily properties nationwide, however, corporate offices are based in Illinois and company principals were born and raised and continue to reside in the Chicago area.The company brochure is attached for an overview of further background and experience. The site was identified for purchase and redevelopment due to the positive demographics and increasing demand for high end rentals within the Buffalo Grove market and the desire of MZ Capital principals to proudly develop a showplace community within their own community and a short ride from their office and homes.The submarket proximate to the site and the close proximity to the Sid Mathias Buffalo Grove Metra stop serve as major drivers of rental demand for the location. The proposed community, intentionally is designed in a two-story townhome like suburban design rather than the more common 215t century suburban garden style bulk three story construction concepts typically built. The building heights are consistent with the single-family residential property heights that adjoin the site,While the Buffalo Grove Code set back requirement is 5'frorn adjacent lots,the entire South property line proposed set back has been increased by an,additional,, 1.1,to 15, for a total setback of between 6' to 50 Furthermore, landscaping has been greatly enhanced throughout the proposed community as shown on the site plan, in particular, more robust landscaping has been added along the property site lines to the South and West as an additional buffer between the adjacent residential properties. Outreach and agreement with the adjacent industrial property owner has occurred and the concept of an emergency access goad between the adjoining properties has been agreed to. Initial communication with ComEd regarding moving of the existing right of way easement for entry to the site to the area shown on the proposed site plan has been made and we are confident of our ability to get sign off on the proposal with ComEd as part of the zoning and annexation process.Our professional team, engineering, and legal representatives have dealt with ComEd in the past on similar issues and we are confident in a favorable conclusion. The proposed redevelopment is low density by today's development standards as well as compared to surrounding existing Buffalo Grove multifamily use sites. The existing multifamily site across the street, commonly known as Windbrooke Crossing,with the street address 1160 Windbrooke is 13.78 acres and holds 236 apartments. (13.78 dwellings per acre) The next closest multifamily use to the proposed new development site is the Wheatlands located just east at 1200 Deerfield Parkway. That site is 17.61 acres and holds 352 apartments. (19.98 dwellings per acre) The proposed site development concept plan is on 8.98 net acres holding 120 units, is less dense than the two nearby multifamily approved and built developments and, subjectively, is a much more aesthetically pleasing upscale proposal. (13.36 dwellings units per acre). It is believed that the proposed low-density development will improve the community, provide for the increased need for high end luxury rental housing near transit within Buffalo Grove, and significantly enhance the site as compared to the current use. 400 Skokie Blvd.Suite 580 Northbrook, IL 60062 847.714.1818 mzcapitalpartners.com MZ Capital Partners Private Equity Real Estate Investment October 25, 2021 Ms. Rat! Akash Village Planner, Community Development Village of Buffalo Grove 50 Raupp Boulevard Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 Re: 16051 Deerfield Pkwy. Comments from PZC Concept Meeting 8/4/21 Dear Rati: We wish to address the comments from the PZC Concept Review Meeting held on August 4, 2021 as follows: F'xi tin Celli±ewer Distance and Aesthetics Cell Towers are considered public utilities under the Illinois Messages Act 55 ILCS 5/5-12001.1.1 and are permitted by right in all zoning districts. Regulation of cell towners, including public safety issues, rests at the federal level with the FCC. The subject property cell tower is located over 59 feet from the closest proposed residential building on the site. MZ Capital Partners site and landscape plan for the proposed development includes a major aesthetic enhancement to the screening and buffers that currently exist around the fencing and base of the existing cell tower as well as the installation of a dedicated paved access road for the servicing and maintenance of the cell tower. Screenin from Ad�"acent pro ertis The proposed landscape plan provides for both a new 6-foot fence and new landscaping as a screen between adjacent properties. In addition to landscaping and trees throughout the property,the new landscape plan includes the addition of 55 Evergreen Trees of 6' in height at installation and 10 Canopy Trees between the property and the adjacent single family home parcels. In addition,the entire site will be heavily landscaped and the intensive commercial/industrial use, which includes truck trailer storage, will be changed to lower intensity two story residential. The existing industrial building, with deferred maintenance issues, will be demolished and replaced with brand new two-story residential structures consistent with the height of a single-family home. The closest lot line distance from a new proposed low-rise residential building to an adjacent existing single-family home will be from between 43 feet and 50 feet exceeding the minimum Buffalo Grove code set back requirement of 30 feet. The existing electrical substation in the adjacent Commonwealth Edison right of way is screened with shrubs and bushes. ql ool [district Irn act The independently prepared school impact study furnished in connection with the proposal indicates a minimal impact on both school districts as a result of the proposed development. Furthermore,the study indicates a very substantial positive school district fiscal impact based upon the projected increase in real estate taxes vs. the cost of educating the projected small incremental number of school attendees. Markin -Traffic The proposed project plan exceeds Buffalo Grove requirements for on-site parking spaces for a 120-unit apartment community and was found by the independent traffic/parking consultant to be more than adequate. In addition, the consultant traffic report prepared indicates a minimal effect on traffic ion the adjacent roadways as a result of the proposed development. .Additional parcel on 'Deerfield Parkway The proposed development plan calls for the use of this additional parcel for a monument sign identifying the property. The proposed signage specifications and rendering has been submitted for approval as part of the proposed development. Ue,wRoads wIthi thh o ert All roads within the property will be private and will be maintained by the property owner. There will be no HOA as the community will be a single owner 120-unit apartment rental community. " dater and Sewer Water and sewer taps will be completed with the immediately adjacent industrial property to the east via an easement. l xistir r es MZ Capital Partners has spent considerable time on developing a landscape plan in close consultation with Buffalo Grove staff and the Landscape Architect.The proposed plan does not include keeping the existing trees as a result of Buffalo Grove staffs recommendation against the advisability of keeping the existing, poor condition low probability of continued longevity and health,trees in place. Pedestrian WalkWy Walkways within the proposed development plan have been enhanced to include a pedestrian walkway connecting the property to the existing adjacent bicycle patch which provides pedestrian access to the nearby Metra station. Envirtnental Energy Itil Planning for the future,the development parking lot and garages will have underground wiring for electric vehicle charging stations.The building will be constructed to the highest energy standards of the International Energy Code using high efficiency HVAC systems, energy star appliances, and other environmentally sound construction Materials.The building will be built to an energy efficient standard enabling receipt of industry energy efficient designations as well as an energy savings federal income tax credit pursuant to section 4L of the Internal Revenue Service Code. We look forward to continuing to work with you and staff cooperatively on bringing this exciting project to fruition. Please let us hear from you if you need any additional information or with any questions or comments. Very truly yours, Brad Zaransky Principal ALTA / NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY „ m M k m c +m.m w«<. r ro ro rw m wro,w ro w * a! a 99 spa. „n. ?ra W W. . k 3 .` ", wb�w 1' "•ry p "rv`"'w wu wa roro Owl, .�" d 1 klR A &nµ ' �Wr, w, "', rdaly i. � I i aan,rowssa r tire rmrcr�w 1 m�.x m+mwma� x� »r rr�rumwn$ iW.„,.. , Y✓ ,� �'� .,.,�.�� In;uY�i dpF Y A P wad N W gp6f w J q 1 p M. iyy w ° �a ti.ws 0. �.WxANro wKaW V �X Y �� iMIFi „ I M "a W. M I m �m� 1 h f ¢0 g) 1 x I f h 1 kI r 1 '•. L eiaaaw am, .. . � I f^^'r I'Al r^f::l....f f• j , J h ww w d r N ro ZZ I a ti q, _ e �4 M I rWs "°vo a I "'fr' e ror 1 , m � w - u C ... w- _..... � m. GIEIfRM a A „ l I vua»q I ad n..ayaa u PLAT OF ANNEXATION To THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE SCALE 1" 50' R--4,,, Yf ............ "WhIA41 O,Zlg�'01 FAC10- 0 W4� P.—MAID in-c"I N.114 u,"ItIA'd 11. 1 V. 1'- 1 1 OP, ali 1 5 NIM, a d",fil ip, ul M11110 IN, corlmi'v pkill ww 1- 0 M I W.4 10 1,114 W M A".;7 ov, M.—a kii, 990 V 0.9uM 1, "1 10 pour MARVINS .1 if'k V1, WAY " I W4 I olle, A"fVNf6 t II .......... H 0 R A T 1 0 8 L V D ............... R,1,110AIOGER ENGINEERINii 1FINAL PLAT �.IA'.L©£R GNCIMF.':EHIYiu I.d..0 •• r o- 'wwMe%n lsrn�—wa m��ay�wo l.s'a�n:suH�revo��e OF DEERFIELD PARKWAY Ire - r a.tt nw m um � t m'r�a aJ,�mu s �rvuc i2.f p n�"w°ml by ^m arwce n ens. v 1 :ail >7 _ 6 6 ns pppp "\^ II � APB •. l � AI hW x r � h I. 1n I n ^u I � r L d A 1 i �w. 4 I V I a � f MARVIN5 r E X WAY r� z f j w i i r _. ..... .. �. . .., ,. H O R A T l 0 8 L V D 7 EI EGER ENGINEERING FINAL PLAT OF MY IAl I DEERFIELD PARKWAY 0, 0' �7. vl�11111—"O m—lv�� M'10 ....11 E.1 11 "'1 �1,1"I'll -1-14 F remmwls7i I -5 M'"Im-NIA"W m—.0 Iki IMt I'd m,"q wAo laxn mum AM1Ma'l1T .......... n Oy ------------- 'lF1 0", -------------- 1F., AD Ill cnm, 00 IAKA ii -- 1-111...61 11lliq—k Io cl.K h A M,,r Ag INP OF ........... ,flout ca5rc. g='" wi j,MY I— V'I"I A14 1.11M. 11.11—S DA1.1-1 ..........k"o'............................... IL sn ug"lu" wmzz O.1m,—11�-1 VIM 1-1111m. 'I a 411-1*1-111 1 IWIIIC W.�v on olow"'r'g— .1-oN ItY 111m�to 1111.4.11D 1-111-M.71- 1.�..... WX— wma, —TI... mll-11 Mit tlX MIMil", w 11111 'VO. 1.W I —X—I Ul— ,a rw ulvllat� rm.,o 'ag,0 —1� wo, Pol 'K "m 0." 11 1W11— vol �z _M6 mi.k"W"O—M.. l—'V" I"mv, —Y"m 1,4 1"*1 I'M "= zm imp"I mww —Vol,w""M l.k tic ov.08P` '" ": .,rr i 4-7"1 lf�f� Aw —gl,'0 "Amo It,A wo 1� lo 'A I."I,' m.- Will 4 WN-1 1�10`vm IA 6 Oak. I,—.o I'm"I I& W �i�Q"K I wx t'.15"I q -.W.A l�I-llw� .0,,N 1 11-11*1.1 MmIx.o' Ai�px. w. Owh=1A.—I ol'11110.. 11,NO V-1 &"Kv Yd 114 I*RKk.M Al WIN-1 1%1 14.0=lkQ It, nmr b —Mu,w,V k. i ............... vMIl M"'Mmn .1,V� "I-I 1*41 �.ll4 o x." 0 0'wa &mzm N 141111 li'd .M."".. '.01,Uil.11,11.1 4:10 1. 10 HNIMMI- q twA',q, IU a, "VW ---------- A& .11 IAD V—o r U 1111N."l- 10M,q 61 III'alm— Ana Vi'll' V, 1%wlMlo WWI, IW t0m. M. ie"AtIll —------. ... I. 3 ............a ---------------ww .... Q4,HAEGIR ENGINEERING 4VA QIS CIW6 N�ll1 THIN eo �1449 . n �_ �� ,�. l/_ . .�/, 11 � �, � I 40 I ox Al �ll 000 ell, ifoul 1,.......... ji, CL LLJ ? AVIol la II f. OVA-ARM MACH ........... .......... 77 IT 'a Y 4 [..� cgl j PY V LLJ Qll� if AVMNUVd MIAN330 LLJ I �l Ln: LIJ, u ry In j ��a k a l� /ir r� v m, 1,4 A1 j/if'. �� gar e bwa i j� ,w dRa�.:":,^ ;,.�rd ry rvr 9nR9kn�" Nt LLI ............ �Il(l a LL r• mwwu� r f r9 ,41 RIP F uuuum r r,. �n�9 f Irr�IIrvII� Yh�r rar r AJi11rt o r I(� r'r✓1€, w "ate LU W LU '' j . ` _ a�, J .. _ ..... -17 ........... ............ 46, i m. �....� 1 LJ, ......... � m W W ! 1 .. mm ,� M� ... w 1 O M LL. M i ;. rD 1 1 � 6` I1� .... . r �l MC F- 11 I j �.. ✓" I P h i w 1 w a � w � wiz; n�u Cp xa Sm 91 ra� �r c�3 C_Y " .N r d Y 0 g VJC ,r�l IJ Hill, LLJ C14 La I LO . ......... I A t"- Ji z LU .......... . ........ c-L rra/y / / 7�///i// r ✓i d�'"�l /r ',, 'Yj„`' /,�� / r�y�l„�uiJ ,P �% a '', /� ll� i �nr rr�n Y ` / %r/1/j�/j Y '�/�" � �,� � I ��✓ VIA,naN� 1 �� 1(r l �� r, , ----- MAN, T ,1"tf:i% /y f ours'rrl Y I,r °dY171, rr h5,77 /i/��li/'�d�/��„� rA ,'Y f ;" r r,�'' �r;l° ,,f;rrr,,,. ,,;r;r,,,;~•w«�r%r r 4 'r I �''t� �i I , g„ lli", n / �� r � n� �I''l/ �� l�r ' l� ',"�' r- 1 �� 1r t•�'-..u.,- 1' Ifln� � r %%%i ! ///i%/p//i// r'; f, -- �1i1 y�r fr✓,r r)� � r! r I i / r ru rr!y u /%% L it s son s y / I /9 ) r�'r�/ / Pp i /rJ G J� r l d �r!r Il ! Qui J i p �r �V d / / ,, �N�;i 1 J///„/r f1/ / r i'� �/ it �:a „, „r% ai IG / ,✓, /i r G / I//��/�,l�j�d��j f / l�/////,� r r,/ rr/ �'i'r�r �% / "' 'y f��1� • ,�`m� / �„�,�,,k 9,�i P�y�, �y� LL 1 �y///l/r!ru'rr✓hiuvr�,mcrldiOY,UI 1 i �i'( 0 � \\ �1IJ1�1 II;.�I ��, I � �r�I(�r%�� lr) � 1 �1� ✓1 !0/ r /.�a� 0] IbM1Iaf/ %"l/%/ /, IAI, fNprmdf/I / rmr %(9 y/I% 0 W /r p /rrraarnrN!Ytr1»Ylliulflla/Gi///G'%,r 9i w uD � Pd YVLry/ A Z J/Ji///"'(p91�pf '�� r l err. ail �Y l�liJl„%Gy01ri+YlUGy�rG�l��(I/al(l��l�fVlf(�I`?Niliww .. N(�1�'�r. �,Gr/% �14 el �)rrr ri. O J Ir l /G 1( mriyW$BP �; r rliaGo, rnr� � � ) .,tll�lll irrr;rr Q > lJir�ii/ „' „, ,, O LL !Of Z � lCOO 4nrlwYlillIB piii,v, Q �,�� ,,Iniir, N o' ✓� rrl;%c 11 r„ /� ,� �/�` //� �� %/ /rri ��/��%�; I� a�%i�//ll�)i�� CC � x�lr,,,, r✓ 1' �r �/ , I��"/�, /// /„;��f�// //�" ///yiprr Gay° ' m Epp r rii% �f�' �'�J�/ rf i ��u„� /f�r�!ti�i//�%Y��/��r��n` ✓fir//ir,:„ r�/J/� 'w..,."�" %i/// , ro I '9/i / y �v'✓rw,r .. ,r F" J > Qi� / �, // r�.- /f+ rJ I��...... rrr / ✓i / i r I Wd +V I r N J nm�✓'7"� k��r�^^^a��i,�� ;� �� ,'?'��,�,;,,..�.u,�Y7�tl+r�� +�y�,f. r ��' ��a „//. rr a gag I /l� � ,# � �N �-�r— //r�° Y 1, //�� Y i✓.; +n ra�„ I� � / ice'. d '�/ r rr r rrr ii// ✓J�'//� Irr r ri � J/ , , // r "'� dill � r w^+ u � r 1 % i /✓� ✓ r ' /ir rr r r l l Mly oj I 09 ij // ylfp 00L � Mi!, �� !0! + � ❑ 31' ` r''✓r+ngkrY��n�A�� riipii "� ��"al!� "" d j f 1 ��'"""""��"�"",I�r !!!�rir // � + � r Z ✓ unr "«v,�two '�r� rr/9 i /'/' r'r� i/ ✓I/ J r 0" 1,rf W V3 WOX ,r✓/.,,u �. l+r'1' Q J "'��1�Ir Jr// � ,,�°r "w�,/✓rr//Y�mM,r.. � �, f ��Yr(��brp�r//�/ � _�....{ �r� ,,, � :. �r,i,, r t'�1, � ��: � If f��rr, � JI /✓ i .,.,,,,_� ,r,�-�;�� rig!. ^' ,," I ' ` g J��,��,f✓,,�f'%��✓ �e, "� i'/r ri/ii//jj i�%� �n� ,.g', .,... n,rr�� -...,. g, .r � �� "N ,: rr ✓ Ir+ �) ,// �,a 1 r /i% 1/i� l ar 1 r r , Vf lrr �✓a nr� '�/� ✓9� //// �%ir ,,;r ✓/r1, n 7M- 'a ,%+�" o� �j „ /�r Il� gI IY! f�/Jr gl�r 'if f.Y r//%�r YI'k �/�� 'flr'� /, rri! �iI✓/ lrrrr � /!� r� rgJFi%/�igy///lr rat✓��ofVl / � I/ �Nr �„ r�ri r r � (Bfb � L.L g��✓i � y,�� rJ'lu /raJrwY �� f ��j r//�� Arun�, r �l r i i�/i� 1, �� r I✓�gl l�l%/%�r�r✓iru�� +,r/ �� r� u u �rr� I� � ,�r( ivr/� �%, °� % ( r �s Jri✓r%'�N �;;a�l ��/nr' Ir a,�„� �/��M g `� �l r N ✓'`a` r J�Y'Y u nyr� r� �.J�iyl%ylrri'111! I:.."t�� '� Il�+1 U +fir' rrr/�,,,/ I ✓iIV,+ �'r,, :. V U O/ ui ('✓'� ��r�� J �� ?,eJ,�a / r i 1' Ig'�n��l lei�lrlrr% l s *, � � ✓ Hi g+ p/rn � �.t I �9ri ✓ ai� �� Yl' �� „�..Y 1 � r '1��1�Il�g/aG� rP ^�,.' "",` f ar r5 J". r r a r/r II rift U J, ✓ Y r h�f "� i r�✓ � J �� r rr Y✓ %i, // Ir � r t I r,ru! r 1 � "�� I '1� f r � � � o,�r='r i i�' i r`";;`r�rrr 1�r�g�%rtll��ur ✓prrr �< � ti Q > 00 C7 O LL g/ ri i%�I✓"rl/rrr f,N !i � �..,., � ,,.. �I��'W��/�� „e„t�!7,�r' �� ,�I�u�/,/,�/r�/�� G/llll�/�+�iu9°hiLP„tr✓rr„+rau,u,� ,..M..w.,,_. _. t L u `LU a L ti�Nk � Z Us z a w r f; U Q. LL V IW m a z Z g 0 2 IL j O U) �W �z Q co 0" ju X-51 O LL _J LLLL LU LU CL N z W o Q w N U w w w w w Q w > z z Ld try > ul y > a LL 0 lo LLB m o O N LL w LL LU `+ 2 i I Q W ,7 C t W LL L LU - z r a2 0 F- a 0 �r LL ui oitgt U r �M LL i J LU > w 7 = N 2 m ~ N w LLI w m dW nnO// w W ^ O V Z � J �,,`l t" t LL o LL r 0 m J N LL .IV. Z;T.......... LU cr IX WW f CO LL o w m LL F LL LL o= 1O mi C � W U w U CO cr z ' w U 4> J LPL IN &k. N UJLL - NU LU Diw + 2 ' ; W 0 may! C7,z Ld > �2 L.L D Q m N "- m �j rl z LU W W ~ Luz UJI LL a c7 w Q , W } O LU LL �%) �� ¢ LL LLo Lij ,�0 m iYr GL�,U m ui ILL += W CO G Z o U L J Q ( N CIL ui N " / W " 00 W Z N L — W +_ O ,J ' Q w u— °LL 0 c) DM U i Q NILL ILL C m G m O O au E Y W LL TM TM p o rya cn ' n a � uro" a Uz ii w �r U W af W H Nrc ly z LLI .2 W J Q W Z ZW� Q �zL � Z Z W �'U LO � CL❑Y � r a¢ aN - JI _J Q 2 2 11,, L Ir �Z I F- 7 w 0 LL f 1, 0 2 'i afF0 W Qf/ =m O mi W 0 /I ~ ci xlxirrfli7l!""J""`x�eirr.'u` '� W w 0 W p""If UJ LL j � ZW re �, n Of m WW W qa 1 LLd � O O U / llyU�O W i)i pr r ❑= W W V: ! r Z w LL O � �/"ii A��/9 jJl � w w � ¢s m �Dy x ,rtv r .1� 0 Q r 'a 0 w � .� 6 p ��r �Yr 4 P P d / _U w ao 1�� 11'�1f� O J C9 rTMrrr O❑ } ��, o .aa(f'rt m 6t /� a TM % ` w❑`° F W W / w,ry O .,rab ! �-- ❑ ��nrY>.�"linP�79j7'�dP f'� LL / rof u,lo it° a7 Z {, � U m Brad zaransky From: Jeff Heine <jeff.heine@daveyutility.com> Sent: Friday,October 29, 2021 2:02 PM To: Brad,Zaransky Subject: FW:2021-08031 Site Plan_921 01 1.pdf Brad: I just want to confirm that per our follow-up with Stacey Dahlberg at ComEd Real Estate Department this week,all of our required documents and submissions are complete with ComEd.The preliminary approval is in the process of going to final and I do not except any further issues. Thanks Jeff Heine Director of Sales Davey Utility Services,Inc. Cell:224-290-4247 off: 630-879-8148 Fax:630-879-8149 �!Yg, J9 This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Davey Utility Services proprietary information,which is privileged, confidential,or subject to copyright belonging to Davey Utility Services, !nc. This e-mail is intended soleare ly for the use of - ou hereb the individual or entity to which it is addressed, if you are not the intended recipient of this e mail,y y of not attchments to notified that any dissemination,distribution,copying,oI'action taken in relation to the contents this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. if you have received this e-mail in error, please notify athe sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout.Thank You. From:Jeff Heine Sent:Thursday,August 5,20211:58 PM To: Brad Zaransky<brad @mizcapit�a,lpa rtners.com> Cc:Nick Davey<nick.davey@daveyutility Xom>; Michael Zaransky<mhz@mzcapitalpartners.com> SubjectI, RL 2021-0,803 Site Plan_921011.pcif Brad, I said yes,somewhere along We made it!!!! They did ask about an extra point of egress tilatattaches to the bike bath, the line we would put an additional pedestrian entrance if that is what it takes. The below drawing sliowing the sidewalk off ComEd property was sufficient for their needs, For YoUr Official record I have included a screenshot of 1. their preliminary approval that includes all the provisions we went over along the way. I have requested to start the process with Stacey and asked her to provide a list of what we need to commence. I will be in touch as soon as I can with this info. Thanks From:Lesnick,Rebecca Lilovich:(ComEd) sent:Thursday,August 5,20211:29 PM To:Jeff Heine<jeff.heine@daveyutility.com> Cc:Diaz,Anthony:(ComEd)>,Dahlberg,stacey:(ComEd) Subject:RE:Buffalo Grove Jeff, Understood,thank you_ From discussion we have had on this project so far,it appears that Transmission's concerns will be met with your most recent proposed layout This includes the 1. Would both gates be identical in access method? Yes For instance,if a pinllockbox is at one location,or a manned booth,etc,—will all portions of the de Yr-S 2, Now would pedestrian Paffic be h andletf itvrough these gale.? I i ry fi & ,,r 6ral'r ,F ,rc+:.IBuyM,'rrrix,t H,ul Oar Dt.,n'tir.t'r N Il ri; �If V r6V x l 3, Please cortifirnr that the easerrtent language wtllr the business owner;at secondary access will be revased art either case(whethergated or root to reflle,l P aroergenoy access- it is ah everyday access point Per our discussion a, That the entrance is raot nllerely for ) a b, To include the cneatlott of a permaner4 driveway in sorne fashion iror"a lute gate to Commerce Dr.confirmed ComEd M11 request a copy of the relevant sectaor's of the easernendv'proposed easement prior to ouf approval. Pfease ensure that you are able,to provide a copy of the easernenl(relevant portions)with the neighboring landowner when submitting your request to ComEd ' through ComEd Real Estate,...as we have previously discussed, Thank you, Rebecca Lesnick, P.E. Right of way Engineer I Transmtsion I.Mes Engineering ComEd 12 Lincoln Center,Oak D arogK lefrace,IL 60181 j 9 ,.. Jeff Heine Director of Sales Davey Utility Services, Inc. Cell.-7 4- 0-4d 7 pOff:63ry -879-8148 Fax: 630-879-8149 i.e ft..�Ie I Bt�.�. Et �M'.-��ll 1lfl .._,..i.lr pi 2 Jeff,he / 'N This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Davey Utility Services proprietary information,which is privileged, confidential,or subject to copyright belonging to Davey Utility Services, inc. This e-mail is intended ovely r oeyr the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed.if you are not the intended recipient of this a-mall„y notified that any dissemination,distribution,copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout.Thank You. 3 U .ire . rrwa may,�.nm -. (. .: UJO (ems 111 m� sau&za�eaideJzuu 133HS 2i3A0O MOHID 0 wwi ne r '` o uw s0 + ''�. .r `yea i J i,^� ei 2' Iu0 ..r..".: Xk. h.J'"k c A"k MV y.... K"I t r t fr �" �x urY Li UYQJ t. r_D al) t.„ 9 J fY al. 7a �' 4, ! l P t 9.kk a aaM 1 i c a at W, m we r b� ry ru. bii �i c cY tl 6 w as v r up ,., f"d. taa rnI to lusaat et O ¢e3I f ✓„J 0..`# Ndl 9,� Mr6 p/'p j✓"J d Y "9 dR w" 44I I1 � 6� M fw# N '? p,..,R.4 i b tlm3,.IR Bar S�) &d (7 f Ca ev Nw .. LL 00 C OW / ca , 101 may( /1/ V W vV of w 'i _I / CD o LL w LL " M. s + � r yr � , t' �, � 1 ��, tl v��bl�lr �0r�, Ell LU 1 !7d_ rthLY� f s ui ZEI u A F i dts a n� LU ZO N0I1I10IN34 _ -anc��a:. '8 SNOIlI4N00 nllir�`<rs U.Inv Y'" '�,� � rl da wyy� $Ya'• � � im ��"n �m�' � '�'W'9�4�a" i mum We oil kw y 9a , ua Im r�v��h'� �r"k WHO` Z . t w E� O q •. O ' W+ 1 gig r� Ire r a I wo Rod� � �� ,i�'� �Run I Is �� gig p� � P�� r,; fy S k, 0�� P�H� "' Y' Q Will ki mop, L� � e w� x� w �� , pp"�Nt�i CM �,��"! 'fi4� �F� � n. � I 1 �c ��,'�",�i,�� w w� t s ; � i..� ";� d .111Him,, x ,o GQ-) re) r��r)�Ga��w7 rarl..." Y� 071Y1'dPr 9"�41fkE PiyYVF5fA08 i..� /^" C, x " A Qg p t, " a ir PRO Ul ANN ut 71, a a � N ..a r a u in raC; I "�wr^ ,.�u^ �""�,�^.^� *r^w xe�✓w*+,, w^yww✓+,ww^,r�r�^�,d !�,„ 6� f Y,p 1T M �r a p; Y x., y f 1 i d Poue''�YbYR�S 1 c H«<A w o NVId LIJ� a� ed lealde�zw ..� I � 311S 1�b213AO , C r '9 n w �4 ,, F --1 °'� � � � `U` ry �� r vlr �i W �} � ( 7✓ I �:�j�I I �a ��r r' � I" � Jli I (� � � i n I Ix I' �' W a I"s !n U r lip 1 Iz K �S �' W Ate �' � 1!'•M ,r rs�� r- f ) YA � Q flf ` Romp 7 ca '3 ca e]Wtl3 i nop cu,v wj rN 7 1 {CY 1 i d C e 1 Y W ,,,, ,,:AV1N.NIftNN'li P G I )f m rr � ................. ...... Al � �� µWf d 'P 10 ° qrF3WN 1 CICtl II"� ( ti N 70 yy'Y J Aml.rtarda Mwv np MAu�x x,aa9 - �" '7fir" > �•,•"•••"'.—, wx w,„.xxwr" -w"2w,�„r nr�ww amw«f�nw Ni�*w'we+w rw.r m'.':�,^"!�umUvx"wu mrw ;',.w�rr;m w mmwmm.'w�+w,. � � " MY - wuww�me.nr�'x5y.,j(mmx;•' wwn n nmmwx x4r yx '^ ' nm v ry nmu FU vmY ww 4A.N romF WA Mi 5¢n pnJyuyA�}�K.T.O"xw,.7w�i;wrvr. �r4bxrt'.5w{yx 4 rqy N` -1d MIS � n:lip ,:r,w .. .�.nu,aowyica��':37unu r w r " ll �� _ �, ly' � � Y � 4 lilt KRIM 3 N (JC7C�G;iG"IlJ'�.�1.14't!�',r7t17 .. ... .._.. W � .. zMI,raris3M ANMra.G.'<ouv fWr u` 71 —w „— w, J1 �, �° a E�� i d' ' l � rim NH, k"N ,7......,.-rmm~zm _',a: r 1 .��.,�,,, 01 ..J� t ,r , w m d -777 � e ::..r. _. e A, e ...`. ,>• ,,. A.YYXft%YkYWdC7'I'SI d.Yy�Nd9...— •'.� 5:,.a � d w.san """""' «m,.Rw�.w,rw w....i»«w,nA�u"*'w•nmw.Fw�'Werrwwwr rw..,SV,.wwrr ens"'.wa.w��«.r+..u�wwww w,w�wd.w.wwow..riG ,.w,na...3Y�www aM..,w.+nv „„.are asx-,+�'a xw wnrK mnnww xrrn wm�an rma wNrem'�r^m�w r'v mavw�wx ottmMtl+vmWWrmgdw. 'ur oa a sva rr �.�........_ w .� r UJO < ill dlP az NQd 3DS n HMV, H M PRI , twn �` N�Iwk I' '. aa�+rt��naa anvnow 1 ' " y�. .,. ... „�...,.. �....... —_. --- -w 7. 7YJ y ° wJ � a p _ !I 1 .d JxsW � 1 G w 7 1,1.. WON�l0liw1k „i roue 1 IV rrrn loo lolul nrw � �� —,U. sm 77 r I ff i�u�wMa" wYN�i�fV FIT; p F f I ,✓' P"�.. �17 x., �(�", i J N �..... ,,.... IA^r"�' ....... fM i --°-- _-.�,�ta:..... a I" w r El tad „_———. , � l�` - _- _r. N:V-11 u ;c M020� rr �a ¢$ Y7i@N U p^�1 "4 J v+ " " r x AW 51N , r r dF P TM d v5 A � a I p ` ;r�ww n k" rt , tl ; f w , w.�.x .M��+.•w,.,,,,,�,., „,.�.ro w w��.w�..� '�""a�wax wee uu�uww ww<,u,vaw»µwuwrr.�w�� a .v�wrewwrews.mrowr,w �,w..,w --77Wind c,NI®t/d� ' f fle.11M o m� , as �l �lt/2i3n0 n l v..i u.i inn -MOL15«it u � 3 f Y ^tl.. Lu ; W ��a �? g ; W CD �I rs� e O sPd G Wff Z ', ',r ❑YIYPfV�"4�y(y 1 CbIllYfvdtUN r t m 1 xrera SN MMN u r ��I f11 tJ t t OIj Au 1Ja� ti "" r J u N ? 111 I ' lid o a .,.,„, a rB�r � �I^ �n, "� w�I �' t a� —a✓ ,1 r� _ _ __ _ _ .N r,.. o 0.14 r 6 r "ukk la ',w.„� 1 r I r N� .., C oMv 7Yf{k14f M d w 5 �PPr �+r, a ti...Waa� � VQ o U ��;�aw l�,l �.aei. NFfld�Nf4t/�!J aura ��.�rnn UION A A„.,. J..1,d4i s 1333-—INVIK3:1"O yam, N✓1 ��i. �... � Y I 1 ' „ Mnn.w I rwnr mmw r xs� .k wn: p U5 +)pry 1 �, ✓�' � r� w., � d''� p �'�g} ..�.,n"51` I� .., � �� ,l. � � �:_� � �f � � � � ;, � 6 � ry" �' �"u"'�� 1 M N J e �IT _j r�l lull tl d f�I j i d Ip s � JJ z ws _. n „ m G 11 tit 7 w'aUaw:,ti^n �� xa,.ek w".ms��•»�a�w.rvk .a,+wwAmo .nmwarw,�..�,e�,w'� lll�H<6e��lUl� 4»� :c� rig Ndld JNIC"OI IN i :'V% w F v P F. a »� r m g4lIT 'j 1J „- , m 7 Y a � 1 r r k ..... P.'Prp..f TRHG' Y_ziS �Zd M'wo Nv mAvi i.i.invq -------Zdpazw AN XUAkw!) No S SH I A d A pump ON is J is z lip, a U: Rig Aw lull 51 ; I N I ! I !!!!1 11 oil"i HIM ! f AN I'M � MR - J 21 MPH a is R Sh l NO Ri 456" I KI JJ1PJ PHI ee tl . ...... ..... 7, MCI '77l, W_ 4 Pg 4�=a �J 01 Rio, ION vl� .............. I N., 7T z, ........... 71 7 771-1 .......... """"Most job M � - Y F NJ of e neu ox wu iriYu ui N {tu✓ �y U r A .Aron •.a.avr... Lll' � �<2aM �� a�uedie,ae�zw tfld.11llllfl n iauu4f oi... w r _ . .. .. rn civ-s-arras ir a �, U ; ��. tiJ a �Ni i cps iw��s� via� IIpI� K .. m A 4 I f {p All .� /f� IPI 4 IN ' 444k `T ✓v F f bw"2` N I M1 4 y^r J J1�-- N ` h Yr 0 E 61'A I r, r " on � ED � r^ PP r, ✓ �qp y 9 o r✓ � h,y ------ -- m� �+,pna�da'Mro¢au�rxu�u.�ra �� ,.. . Z wr, Z µ. vsr f, Vo W l II4 a A n ,v m „w ^ r H -lan 77 -Z I I "LO a UPI,'I ........ inan )l IVIAll,H I NVI-d xii s'-1'd .. I'�I I I V I Il U ---—- ------------ ....... .......... cn 0 F- It 7,� 9�4 His ICI .......... UMVIG Trl.fl QIIVnOH .......... ...................... ........... ............ .. ................................ v tl hl I+terF 14. .......... ,jj j$7 b"ll d Vql 777� ................. L ----------- --- - -- ---------------- ----- - 31,1P I, ,2 VIM . .��. ��IHX3 �dC�i �"I� f V:I 1v1'W �r r V,.IT — ....w .... .. ....... ....._.. C.17N-iC1V'^I, a o�a AVM SNIALIVW r d I p di S1 ' l o xrt�„ rtaCr w fr V , 11111,115 r k 1 v 'I -7 �,, Y �I L � / i�v ry y fiw f! it �'4 � .4 5 � � .✓ � d ... i mm." 00 i itboveoldp��ro��A� � � rr sW k 4 NV_ld-10 0 NOIS 3 umi iNO 7vra Af 7`7 Igo t ;'a do 6oll llomTi RIP lrr as ran k. op P lv, gn! Cmm 1,92 "Mi i PO fli Z . , , . — J�,4 1,r� k.Rl 1UP lz N�. I ` 0" wkk�, MINT, i p Igo, 6 19, ap. ix, Is"211 �, . g z ii 19, oil Ml Rif'; aAx If A'M U) IRA P'lsmtr Hill RUH V IN LU 0 Ifif,BY i i 10, 1 M, 0 M IVA�El 1.8 1 UY811H 1,5 C;) 0 0 ZN LU 7 w �'2=1 W V I q�f sy,.� till yi, '7 I"':"T Vil His i7 0% x" N'N IN', ............J�l OTT 71M V 71, V X i"0 n ......... r � J u a rIr � k1 M A how W Y t III I r I 0 ry ,N� ra r � IIMI��m � "d rw , r I a w,.wuti,1 r1I� a� & IR 777 . ,m, NV-ld WNV�1'�110A 3dVOSONY1 Em )�v W�I-tN .......... U 11 ILI Anil I DIN, -1-1�3AO ............ 77-777', 0, bUm U,0 (77 FN :0 gi rwT 63' zl� ........... w W wr NVId 3dVOSONVI av ujoiik�iokmuirg 91 .................. (13-11VAG 3AMk)0 Wq..Me-Zvy 421 ———————————— k < T- F 5, �Jfl 7 fll,1, & NA 1, N, IT1`11 j N d Vo NVI 1�3 ISV(i3 J �n 'mx NV-ld --—---- -1 )l 111AVA I I r1liq El �3dVOSGNV z ujqFj(<(A;qwii� e. (13-11VI30 .......... ............- .......... . .......... ............................. -- ------------ 77 IsFt z ............--� 7'1,�,',�",Il X rom -———————---— f3s Hoon . . .........................mmtc .111 OWSMON HINV��I MOHOMM mi ................ AdVOSONVI lit! f . r l t� t b OF a t liA 1 WAR lu c 1 j Vol VT t x1b Sup v tog; if; I Stop Eli, lit Wo INV 4 0 na ASH - j MA ;go DNA PIE gig K Division mTransportation �r ShsneE. Schneider. P.E. u��K�� Director mrmnspnrtaoon/CounmEngineer ' 60u West Winchester Road uuertymne.mmmusom8-em Phone mnmrpmn Fax wne8wanao September 10' 2021 Engineering Review 1 A0Z Capital Acquisitions, LILC Deerfield Parkway MAJACC-051812-2021 Ma. Emma Albers, PE' PT<JE N]m|ey-Horn and Associates 4201 Winfield Road Suite 600 VV8menviUe, |L 60555 Dear Ms. /\|benS, Review has been made of the application, geometry and traffic study submitted for the proposed multi- family development on the SoUUl side of Deerfield Road in the Village of Buffalo Grove. The following comments are rn8de- 1. As the engineering plans are developed, there will be facility and utility permits required for the work within the right-of-xV@yofDeerfield Parkway. | 2� We have no comments onthe traffic study. | � 3. VVe have OO further comments on the geometric plan. 4. The engineering plans should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the Lake County Highway Access and Use Ordinance and the corresponding Technical Reference Manual. � Should you have any questions, do not hesitate b» contact 0aot047-377-745O. � SiOCBn8|y. Betsy A. [)UCkert' PE Manager OfPermitting Co- Brad Z@nGnokx. K8Z Capital Acquisitions LuayAboon8, KL[}A Darren K8oniCO' Village of Buffalo Grove 160�51 DeerfieldParkway Apartments Buffal'o Grove, IL Fiscal Impact Report November 5, 2021 Prepared for MZ Capital Partners By Johnson Research Group, Inc. Contents 1 Executive Summary .....-............................................................ 2 Introduction 3 2.1 The Project.................... _......., ."",.,."" . ,".""......... ... .. ....... ..,.,..". ,,"".,,,. 3 3 Student Population Estimates................... .. .."..".., ...... 3.1 Methodology.....",,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,, ,°...., ,, ,.,.,, ..... .........,,.,., "". ..,....,, ........ 4 3.2 Student Population Estimates " ,.."... ...,,.,..",,, ,",.. .................. 4 4 Methodology for Estimating Revenue Generation "° ""`°5' 4.1 Property Tax Revenue................................................... ......." ... 4.2 Evidenced Based Funding Formula...,. „ ..." „,... ......", ...,",,.. .....,."7 5 Fiscal Impact—School District 102 ,.<,.,.." 7 5.1 District 102 Revenues....... ......... ...... ...... ,,,,. 7 5.1.1 Property Tax Revenues .. .."°..,,. ",,...,.. . ,""....,....,, ....,..." 5.1.2School District Impact Fees........ ,. ,T 5.1.3 Evidence Based Funding Revenues ...... ""°""""' ......8 5.2 District 102 Expenditures...",,,, ". ,,,,"...,.,"... ", 5.3 Net Fiscal Impact............................................................. .... ,..., 6 Fiscal Impact—High School District 125..................................... 6.1 District 125 Revenues........................................................... ......"„ ,.,,...." L'1 6.1.1 Property Tax Revenues . .,,,...,. ,.....,11 6.1.2 School District Impact Fees 6.1.3 Evidence Based Funding Revenues,..... .,..".° ,.,....., ........ .........' '1 6.2 District 125 Expenditures.......................... 12 6.3 Net Fiscal Impact to District 125--,-..--..„.. .... ,...,.,. 1,3 Tables 1. MZ Capital Partners Development- Unit Mix and Rent 2. Estimated Number of Public School Age Children by School District 3. Net Increase in Property Tax for School Districts 4. School Impact Fee Calculation for District 102 5. District 102 Per Capita Tuition Charge—Base vs.Adjusted 6. Project Fiscal Impact on School District 102 7. School Impact Fee Calculation for District 125 8. District 125 Per Capita Tuition Charge—Base vs.Adjusted 9. Project Fiscal Impact on School District 125 MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report 1 Executive Summary Introduction Johnson Research Group, Inc. (JRG) was engaged by IVIZ Capital Partners to prepare an estimate of the fiscal impacts of their proposed development, a proposed 120-unit residential development in the Village of Buffalo Grove (the "Village"). The study addresses the net fiscal impacts to the two local school districts: Aptakisic-Tripp Elementary School District 102; and Stevenson High School District 125 The Project The proposed residential development is located at 16051 Deerfield Parkway in Buffalo Grove within walking distance of the Buffalo Grove Metra Station. The apartment development consists of a three-story apartment development with an outdoor pool with expansive deck, high-end clubhouse with demonstration kitchen, state of the art fitness center, multiple lounges and work spaces, and on-site maintenance and management. The bedroom mix and average rents are presented below: MZ Capital Partners Development- Unit Mix and Rent Unit Size (bedrooms) No. of Units Rent Studio 12 $1,700 1 Bedroom 36 $1,800 2 Bedroom 60 $2,400 3 Bedroom 12 $2,700 Student Population Estimates Based on the application of demographic multipliers, it is estimated that approximately 16 Pre- school and elementary school age students are likely to attend District 102 schools and approximately 4 high school age children will attend the District 125 high school. Due to the large proportion of smaller units in the Project, the bulk of the students are generated by the two-and three-bedroom units. Studio and one-bedroom units represent 40%of the units proposed by IVIZ Capital but make up less than 1%of the total public school age students. Net Fiscal Impact Key impacts of the new development, which are also inputs to the estimates of the fiscal impacts of the Project, are as follows: 1 MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report It is estimated that the 120 households will generate 20 students: 16(preK-8) and 4(9-12). The Project will increase the equalized assessed value(E EC),of the property from approximately $806,820 to$7,999,992,generating an increase in annual property taxes of approximately $665,410 following stabilization. The fiscal impact on the school districts will be positive: o Elementary School District 102 will see additional net revenue of$250,431 per year following stabilization,with total net revenues of$2,216,814 by 2033;and o High School District 125 will see additional net revenue of$214,580 per year following stabilization,with total net revenues of$1,899,465 by 2033. 2 MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report 2 Introduction Johnson Research Group, Inc. (JRG) was engaged by MZ Capital Partners to prepare an estimate of the fiscal impacts of their proposed development, a proposed 120-unit residential development in the Village of Buffalo Grove (the "Village"). The study addresses the net fiscal impacts to the two local school districts: Aptakisic-Tripp Elementary School District 102; and Stevenson High School District 125 2.1 The Project The proposed residential development is located at 16051 Deerfield Parkway in Buffalo Grove within walking distance of the Buffalo Grove Metra Station. The apartment development consists of a three-story apartment development with an outdoor pool with expansive deck, high-end clubhouse with demonstration kitchen, state of the art fitness center, multiple lounges and workspaces, and on-site maintenance and management. The bedroom mix and average rents are presented below: Table 1. MZ Capital Partners Development- Unit Mix and Rent Unit Size (bedrooms) No. of Units Rent Studio 12 $1,700 1 Bedroom 36 $1,800 2 Bedroom 60 $2,400 3 Bedroom 12 $2,700 Tota I 120 �... _._...-..�. .� Consistent with other fiscal impact analyses, the impacts are presented in today's dollars (2021), ether than inflated dollars over a ten-year period. The fiscal impacts are presented for the first year the Project is fully occupied. Because JRG's estimates are in uninflated dollars every year after this first year will have the same impact as this first year, 3 mZ Capitol Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report 3 student Population EStimates S1 Methodology ' himultipliersobtainedfrorn The student estirnatesvvere calculated using residential demographic Buffalo Grove Municipal Code Tithe 19^ Chapter 19.01, Section 0501 (the "Multipliers")and are i ; Multipliers are provided for all dlff��n�|��d ��o��t��nd ��M��2e (bedrooms)., Pub[ic School Age Children ��/4�\ @�� r��ny��dbw��ade�moups that allow 6�rtabu}ating by ` (SAC) i different school levels such as pre-school, e\ernentary,jun or high,� , and high school. For purposes of this study, estimates were aggregated for the elementary school level (Pre-school Grade 8) and high school level (Grades 9-12). 32 Student' b| demonstrates thot��r��ln0�t�|y Based on the K4u|t|p|iers theana|��inthefo||oxving table ' likely o t attend District 16e\ernentarysch��! ��es1udent��re ea �i| high school age children vxi|| attend the 0 ��strictl2S �i�� s�hmo|. ��sedonthei�r�� r� on of smaller units, the bulk of the students are generated by the two- and three-bedroom units.Studio and one-bedroom units represenYS t4� of the units proposed by MZ Capital but make up less than 196of the total public school age students. Presented below and detailed in the Appendix are the Total Public School Age Children that can | be expected to be generated by the proposed MZ Capital Partners residential development. , Table 2. Estimated Number of Public School Age Children by School District MZ Capital MF Project Total Units ES D102 HS D125 ro se ect P Proposed Public School A e Children Studio 12 1 Bedroom 2 Bedrooms 1.4 Buffalo Grove demographic multipliers are based on Illinois School Consulting Service/Associated Municipal � Consultants, Inc.(1g96) MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report 4 Methodology for Estimating Revenue Generation 4.1 Property Tax Revenue Annual property tax collections estimated to be generated by the Project are based on the assumptions described below. The Developer provided the assumptions about the Development components, quantities, rent levels, construction timing and leasing absorption timing. JRG gathered all other relevant information frorn the following sources: Lake County Assessor, Lake County Treasurer, CoStar, and Apartmentsconi web site. Property Tax Calculation. The formula for calculation of property taxes is as follows: Property Tax= FMV x 33.33%assessment rate x Equalization Factor x tax rate FMV is abbreviation for Assessor's Fair Market Value Assessor's Fars Market Value(FMV). The Project's FMV was estimated based on a review of the assessed values and EA' Of comparable developments in Lake County within 8 miles of the subject site. The closest two developments are The Wheatlands at 1225 Deerfield Parkway, and Windbrooke at 1160 Windbrooke Drive, but both of these are very old and not truly comparable to the piropose,d development,The Wheatlands was built in 1.994 and has estimated average rent per unit of$1,690 and Windbrooke Apartments was built in 1986, renovated in 2016, with estimated average refit per unit of$1,710. The best three comparable developments are the i)Arrive Town Center,at 1.220 E Route 45, ii) Milton Luxury Apartments at 1155 Museum Boulevard, and iii)The Altworth at Melody Farm at 1111 N Milwaukee Avenue (all in Vernon Hills), The estimated average rent per unit is$2,235 at Arrive, $2,278 at Milton, and $2,890 at Altworth, as compared to the Subject property's estimated initial rent per unit of$2,330. Arrive has 2021 FMV of$213,500/unit, Milton has 2021 FMV of$200,700/unit, and Aftworth's 2021 FMV is $28.1.,100. Arrive has 11,600 square feet of commercial space, so adjusting for that yields an estimated FMV of$198,400/unit, Conclusion: JRG estimates the Project will be assessed with an FMV of approximately$200,000 per unit, or the rounded off average of the best two comparable developments (Arrive and Milton). State Equalization Factor. The State Equalization Factor for Lake County is usually 1.0 and is assumed to remain at 1.00 for purposes of these estimates. Tax Rates, For purposes of these estimates, the most recent actual tax rates (2020)for each taxing district are utilized and held constant in all future years. The tax rates for assessment year 2020, payable in 2021, were as follows: 5 MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report • Aptakisic Tripp Elementary School District#102 3.481509 % • Stevenson High School District#125 2.983112% Inflation. For purposes of these estimates, 0o�I"� latio„n in ro art vaivation is assumed to be consistent with the impact analysis standard approach, but note that apartment values are typically assumed to grow at a modest rate near 2.0% per year. Fully Assessed Taxes. Based on these assumptions,the Project's 120 units will have a total EAV of$7,999,992 (in 2021 assessment year basis). Partial Assessment in Lease Up Period. The Project is estimated to be completed by August 2023, with leasing and occupancy of 9 units per month from August 2023 through September 2024 when all units will be leased and occupied. Therefore in assessment years 2023 and 2024 the Project will not yet be fully assessed, estimated at 19%of full FMV for 2023 and 81%of full FMV for 2024 based on weighted average occupancy and land values. Base Level Taxes. The total 2020 EAV of the two parcels (15-28-400-014 and 15-27-300-005) of the project site is 806,820. Thus the 2021 Base level taxes are $28,090 for District 102 and $24,068 for District 125. Net Increase in Property Tax Revenue. The annual net property tax impact is based on the Project's estimated annual property tax minus the Base Level Taxes. In the Project's first fully assessed year, 2025,the net increase in property taxes above the base level is $250,431 for District 102 and $214,580 for District 125.The total increase in property taxes of the first ten years of the Project is$2,216,814 for District 102 and $1,899,465 for District 125, as shown in the table below (see the Appendix for more detailed tables). Table 3. Net Increase in Property Tax for School Districts Assessment Collection Net Increase in Property Tax ....� Year ._�.._�. Yea �.....�.r ES District 102 HS District 125... _..�.,�...�.�....��... _.. 2023 2024 $16,318 $13,982 2024 2025 $197,048 $168,839 2025 2026 $250,431 $214,580 2026 2027 $250,431 $214,580 2027 2028 $250,431 $214,580 2028 2029 $250,431 $214,580 2029 2030 $250,431 $214,580 2030 2031 $250,431 $214,580 2031 2032 $250,431 $214,580 2032 2033 $250,431 $214,580 Total first 10 years $2,216,81'4' $1,899„„465 6 MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report 4.2 Evidenced Based Funding Formula State funding for Illinois school changed significantly beginning in FY18 with the introduction o fEvidence'BasedFunding/EBF>, xhichconbinesa8aseAmountofaidforeachschoo/ district and an additional amount, called Tier Funding, that considers the amount of local resources to achieve an adequate level mf funding permtUdent. The Base Amount for a school district 8 determined by addling the prior year's Base Amount to the prior year's Tier Funding amount.The estimates�for both E[eMnentary School District 102 and High School District 125 presentedbe|ourelYOnf;gureSfnorn the |llin8i$State Board oƒEducation (,[SBEm) for State Fiscal Year which provides funding for the 2021-32 school year. The Base Amount and Tier Amount are combined and presented asa single amount. The saneanountishe)dconstantfora||fotureyears. 5 Fiscal Impact -- School District 102 The Project is located in Elementary School District 102. As presented in Section 1 [l the Project is estimated to generate ��x�m[rn�te|y�6 public ' e|enen-taryschool age students wh en thePr _ectisful|Ycomp|ekedamd occupied. SectionsS.1 and � shovthe estimates of the annual additional revenues and addit[o a,[ operating costs associated with the Project. Table 5 is a summary of the estimated additional revenue and operating costs. 5.1 District 1OZRevenues 5.1.1 Property Tax Revenues Currently the development site generates approximately��DO9O �npropertytaxrevenuesfo Distr/ct1O3. Upon the connp(e1ionand full oocupan f — ` r increase by�7,193,172to �7,9ggg�2 resulting tAeprojec� theEAVofthesite »vi|| � _ , ' n /ncrease /nannua/ propertytaxr for SO1O3ofapproxinnate/y�25O431inco// ~i - revenues ta»rateof�.4Q1SOg96 (3O2O-axr'te). ecronyear2O2Gfo||o««ingstabi|ization, assunninga 5.1.3 School District Impact Fees The Village of Buffalo Grove imposes impact fees on new deve|opnmemts A certain arnom» �t f those fees are conveyed to the school districts based on the type mf development and the uint mix. The table beloxvshoxvsthe calculation of fees for District 1O3. The total as revenues for District 102 in Section 5.3 Net Fiscal Impact Analysis. ^ ''�/ 7 MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report Table 4. School Impact Fee Calculation for District 102 Unit Size No. of UnitsImpact Fee Total Fees(bedrooms) per Unit' Studio 12 $0.00 $0.00 1 Bedroom 36 $10.11 $363.96 2 Bedroom 60 $431.08 $25,864.80 3 Bedroom �...� ....12....�... ._..�$.1'��.�.5..�17..��..._.�._�$40,690.80 ._.. Tota 1 120 'Source:Village of Buffalo Grove 5.1.3 Evidence Based Funding Revenues For FY22, District 102 is projected to receive $1,767,110 in Base Funding and $64,382 in Tier Funding for a Gross State Contribution of$1,831,491. As noted above, the FY22 Gross State Contribution will form the Base Amount for FY23, Using the Average Student Enrollment figure of 2,411.10 from the EBF formula,this comes out to $743 per student. Based on this per capita figure,the Project could generate an additional $11,888 per year of Evidence Base Funding for District 102 with the addition of 16 elementary school aged children from the Project. 5.2 District 102 Expenditures With the additional enrollment of 16 students, the Project could increase expenses for District 102 by as much as$227,248 per year or$14,203 per student. This amount is based on the Per Capita Tuition Charge of$15,346 that District 102 calculates for ISBE but excludes certain administrative expenses that would not be expected to increase with addition of so few students. Table 4 below compares the Base Per Capita Tuition Charge calculation reported to ISBE and the Adjusted Per Capita Tuition Charge used in this study. 8 MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report Table S. District 102 Per Capita Tuition Charge—Base vs.Adjustedd Base Calculation Adjusted Calculation FY20 Expenditures Education Fund $33,508,854 $33,508,854 Operations and Maintenance $5,185,581 $5,185,581 Debt Service Fund $866,068 $866,068 Transportation Fund $1,755,400 $1,755,400 Municipal Retirement/Social Security Fund $1,171,479 $1,171,479 Tort Immunity Fund $343,994 $343,994 Total Expenditures $42,831,376 $42,831,376 Less Revenues/Expenditures Not Applicable to Operating Expense of Regular Program $6,167,920 $6,167,920 Regular Operating Expenditures 36,663,456 36,663,456 Offsetting Revenues $3,019,173 $3,019,173 Net Operating Revenues $33,644,283 $33,644,283 Depreciation Allowance $3,357,108 $3,357,108 Total Allowance for Tuition Computation $37,001,391 $37,001,391 Adjustments for Certain Expenditures Not Expected to increase frorn Development Less Support Services General Administration 0 $1,051,210 Less Support Services School Administration 0 $1,704,911 Net Adjustments 0 $2,756,121 Total Allowance for Tuition Computation $37,001,391 $34,245,270 Average Daily Attendance 2,411.10 2,411.10 Per Capita Tuition Charge $15,346 $14,203 Additional School Age Children 16 16 Total Per Capita Tuition Charge from Additional School Age Children $245,536 $227,248 Source: District 102 FY20 Annual Financial Report 5.3 Net Fiscal Impact As demonstrated in Table 9 below, over the next 10 years, incremental revenues generated by the project are expected to exceed additional operating expenses by$522,736. Following Project stabilization in 2025 incremental property taxes are projected to be $250,431 compared to annual expenses of$227,248. These revenues combined with additional State Aid will result in annual net revenues of$35,071 per year for District 102. 9 � m o 1 o 0 0 0 0 0 o n N Y O lD I� M r Lr Lrl Lr Lr1 Lr Ln N D1 N m m m m M m m N a .n , to .Ln E to c - _ � c v a C Chi a cc o 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 a U 00 1 C CO in N N N N N N N N O� N A C) +'' C N N N N N N N N rl G a_ 7 0. rj a Na. `n d m M M M m m M M m m m x m 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 O o Q C a Y N N N N N N N N N N N Qui 10 C Y N OJ �--I rl �-I rl r-I c-I c-I c-I ci ri V to to to o t/)- t to t to vi to t o o U v Q x N C y3 N aQ u a E Z y Z 0 0 w w rn m rn m rn rn rn o rn 1-4 v m N y lD m O m m m m m m Mr, 7 p' N N N N N N O r C -1 m Ln w lD w lD �D lD lD O F to to to tNn tr/ to to to in m Ln N N lu� � 00 w....a..r..� 3 0 0 o O w 00 00 00 00 lD - °D ++ to to to to as o0 00 00 00 � 00 c oo � o0 00 R 00 0o N ++ Gl H c I c c r M a) C F � H H 1 00 L � ai in in in to [n ++ LL f -0 O O ',..... 4 +O+ v p u F m m m m m m m m m m m N -O -aU E C V V V V V . V V _ ad+ a a to to to to to to -o to to to to u . 3 O O toY O N l I � to N u OJ Q. 3 in C) C) O o LD LD W �D LD LD W C Q bo Y -4 rH cl H H c-I r'I Q N f0 N C O I - L C d O m U c E Z a c O c 7 ° O uc Z C N O" v m v0i toi} toi} R �.... u c o 76 - = ory a W.,.. 0 Ln y � � � F O Y N C 0J O V Q Q� u O E V j}t� C C O O � a aj - a C) 00 w,- r cI c c cI a t N to I v m m m m m M m M .� �+ ++ N +` : 0 0 0 0 �o 0 v GJ ar x c ,� rn Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln r4 > v U 4 N N N N cu c-I N N N N 1 N to 41 Q B O ~ to to in to to to t/I. to +n N C L f6 a to Oaj Ll No 0 0 o 0 0 v v o •+ m 0 0 0 C) C) m 0 0 m rn o c C7 a�i o O O O O O O O O O O 'Z O lI'1 Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln l!1 Ln Ln Ln Ln d � N O '.... ci c-I rl �-I r-I ci c-I c-I N C N ++ L 00 a0 00 W o0 00 00 00 00 00 00 X V V V � C V � V � � V � O ++ LL N F m m m m m m rn m m m cri o 0 c 0 E c o 4 v u m v �/f 7 O W O N N N N N N N N N ? m al '^ �...,., v n n n _ n +' r� 00 r1 c-I c-I e-I r-I O f9 9 t0 v @ CL '.. C . . y > 00 m m m m m M fh M M N N Q E W LD m m m m m rn rn rn rn c aJ r LD rl c-I c-I ,-I14- r1 ci ci c-I f`0 C p O) wC v a) � a Lr n � � n In u to to to to to to to ........ ....--- ...... N X L f0 C ON F O O O m � m lD I� 00 D1 O ci N m x 10 N N N N N N N m M M m } ` F w GI O O O O O O C) O O O O N N N N N N N N N X O m N N U F D_ V) V) Q C ,., Vi N M V Ln 1D rN 00 O) O N J 10 N N N N N N a M M C)O0OOOO O NNN ZG. 0) C) C) Y O x N C ` 9 ~ MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report 6 Fiscal Impact — High school District 125 The Project is located in High School District 125. As presented in Section 1.0, the Project is estimated to generate approximately 4 public high school age students when the Project is fully completed and occupied. Sections 6.1 and 6.2 show the estimates of the annual additional revenues and additional operating costs associated with the Project. Table 7 is a summary of the estimated additional revenue and operating costs. 6.1 District 125 Revenues 6.1.1 Property Tax Revenues Currently the development site generates approximately$24,068 in property tax revenues for District 125. Upon the completion and full occupancy of the Project, the EAV of the site will increase by$7,193,172 to $7,999,922, resulting in an increase in annual property tax revenues for District 125 of approximately$214,580 in collection year 2026 following stabilization,, assuming a tax rate of 2.983112% (2020 tax rate). 6.1.2 School District Impact Fees As noted above, the Village of Buffalo Grove imposes impact fees on new developments, with a certain amount of those fees conveyed to the school districts based on the type of development and the unit mix. The table below shows the calculation of fees for District 125. The total fees are included as revenues for District 102 in Section 6.3 Net Fiscal Impact Analysis. Table 7. School Impact Fee Calculation for District 125 Unit Size :NonitsImpact Fee (bedrooms) Total Fees per Unit Studio $0.00 $0.00 1 Bedroom $3.04 $109.44 2 Bedroom $140.00 $8,400.00 droom $359.13 $4,309.56 Total��M.. _..�. � .�..�a � �..�..�M... ._. .....�.12 81.... $ 9 00 6.1.3 Evidence Based Funding Revenues For FY22, District 125 is projected to receive $2,556,879 in Base Funding and $4,594 in Tier Funding for a Gross State Contribution of$2,561,473. As noted above, the FY22 Gross State Contribution will form the Base Amount for FY23. Using the Average Student Enrollment of 4,,303.50 from the EBF formula, this averages out to$595 per student. Based on this per capita figure, the Project could generate an additional $2,381 per year of Evidence Base Funding for District 125. 11 MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report 6.2 District 125 Expenditures With the additional enrollment of 4 students,the Project could increase expenses for District 125 by as much as$88,672 per year or$22,168 per student. This amount is based on the Per Capita Tuition Charge of$22,619 that District 125 calculates for ISBE but excludes certain administrative expenses that would not be expected to increase with addition of so few students. The table below compares the Base Per Capita Tuition Charge calculation reported to ISBE and the Adjusted Per Capita Tuition Charge used in this study. 12 MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report Table 8. District 125 Per Capita Tuition Charge—Base vs.Adjusted Base Calculation Adjusted Calculation FY20 Expenditures Education Fund $90,977,440 $90,977,440 Operations and Maintenance $30,260,433 $30,260,433 Debt Service Fund $4,903,485 $4,903,485 Transportation Fund $5,023,678 $5,023,678 Municipal Retirement/Social Security Fund $3,311,865 $3,311,865 Tort Immunity Fund $370,333 $370,333 Total Expenditures $134,847,234 $134,847,234 Less Revenues/Expenditures Not Applicable to Operating Expense of Regular Program $93,806,955 $93,806,955 Regular Operating Expenditures $10,259,857 $10,259,857 Offsetting Revenues Net Operating Revenues $83,547,098 $83,547,098 Depreciation Allowance $8,204,101 $8,204,101 Total Allowance for Tuition Computation $91,751,199 $91,751,199 Adjustments for Certain Expenditures Not Expected to Increase from Development Less Support Services General Administration 0 $760,312 Less Support Services School Administration 0 $1,071,718 NetAdjustments 0 $1,832,030 Total Allowance for Tuition Computation $91,751,199 $89,919,169 Average Daily Attendance 4,056.30 4,056.30 Per Capita Tuition Charge $22,619 $22,168 Additional School Age Children 4 4 Total Per Capita Tuition Charge from Additional School Age Children $90,476 $88,672 Source:SD 125 FY20 Annual Financial Report 6.3 Net Fiscal Impact to District 125 As demonstrated in Table 9 below, over the next 10 years, incremental revenues generated by the project are expected to exceed additional operating expenses by$1,219,574. Following Project stabilization in 2025 incremental property taxes are projected to be $214,580 compared to annual expenses of$88,672. These revenues combined with additional State Aid will result in annual net revenues of$128,289 per year for District 125. 13 Ol N 01 00 Ql Ol Ol at m 0" D1 ri oo m 0 00 m 00 OO O0 00 w n V W O1 e0 al N N N N N N N Ln N N m 00 Lr 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 m 1L u 1-1 .--I lD N N N N N N N N 'i C to L} r7 r-I c-I ci ei r-I ci �i ci N c E th C p Q N E aQ, ......... a C O O O N N N N N N N N lD n f0 <n an to n n n n n n n r n y_, A C lD lD lD lO lD lD In, ID M ''.... v p io O ....... 0o ao' 0o w w 00 w 0o cn W 00 W 00 W W w00 O ++ p E C L? in LT to L? to to to P, W U N - C p W W W W W W W 00 00 a0 00 �L Ol a X C O! lO lD lD lD lO lD lO lD lD �D lD W Q O Ol C N N N N N N N N N N N �O C #'j C 9 N N N N N N N N N N N C cto L} L) to LT L} LT to to to to x N U c uw N a ` N O O o a a c E Z a Z H O c-I c-I ci c-I r-I ci Ii O ''... oo m 00 LD w of y 00 01 W m O1 Ol Ol m a O1 D1 m ro jO N M 00 , lD lD lO lO lO W LD W 01 a+ c ri c-I 1O .-i ci ci c-I r-I r-I 1-1 ei N >, F ; in to L} Nn in IA to in to to � i to on .3 o m 0 0 0 0 r .ci r ci c c c — v �D Q to L} L} to m m m m m m m tj: t c Caj N N' N' N N N N w +' LL O1 I-' w to to to to to L} v} N O Y Y 41 v Y In Ln Ln Ln In Ln Ln to In Ln Ln O vmi rn rn m rn M rn M rn M m rn U Q In In In In In n n n n n n v u Y a cu v to Ln L? } o -Ln i : to L t } o to n in c N o a+ m > £ CAtn ¢ to m N N f0 °in O O O O V V V V V - L W U C a w c � m m c �n EZy O v V o e � c y o ' ? a U 0 ro Ol O O O O O O O O 0 0 m > Y ++ {/� L} C) kn L? in to to H OJ f0 u p, Q y mr N 00 y Y N (0 a d c c o U o_ N o E 'i Y to Y d O 0 O O O O O o Ln 0J +' to a1 m a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 �D ro Lnci 00 00 Ln n In Ln In In In Ln v m p a N x 7 cf oo C V V V V V 4 m p0 U a e-I lD e-7 e-I c-I H e-I ei H ei m C 0 a) Q C I N N N N rV N N OO O Y L 0) . th Y � LA L N _ O N O_ u o OL C N N N N N N N N N N N Q a N O m N Y -1 O m m m rn m m m m m m m p o ,v, }i v t 00 00 00 00 00 o0 00 0) 00 00 0o Y U rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn m 0. rn o 6 m c E c O O OJ N N N N N N N N N 0 w H 3 C Ln 4J >' m O }� 0 00 O N N N N N N N N O fo O f0 a U 10 to H V r r n n r n r r '� �n N i, n 00 .-i c-I ei H H H e-I c-I Y 01 CLco Y Y O) m m m m m m m m m cn o aci aci c W lO c-I c-I c-I H c-I c-I c-I c-I N "v 'O OJ > 7 7 O L L, In n n r n r r r r Y w v Y Y X Y in L) L? to L} to L} L? to O d' m In f v C N X - m U m c�wa.... o F o o c ii c m ¢ v U x m N N N N N N NM M m m O N N QJ O 0 O O O O O O O O C) X O O x Y Y F o` Vn Ln Q OL u a O1 ri N M 4 In tD 01 T T O J N m V Ln lD n 00 Ol O .-i N N z N W J O7 N N N N N N N N m M m o ar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ao O x r N N N N N N N N fV N N O m a ~ ~ MZ Capital Apartment Development Fiscal Impacts Report Appendix Table A-1: Student Generation Estimates Table A-2: Assumptions for Estimating Incremental Revenue Table A-3: Preliminary Estimated Incremental Property Taxes ri N O N m N S.. 0 00 -;t N Ln O N r•i 41 N � V N U N Ln M Di Q r-I L.f) Q) Ln N O 0 � O I W O O_ 00 N = G N i O ri m O C7 M O C) � u C Nf cu ^ O O O ri H .0 _0 r-I O O O 0 M" _ 2 C7 ri 2 ,Q o -i Ln rn Ln 00 h O O O 4 U L- ie m O m 00 r� p }�i } O O O ri M O 01 I— m � 0 0 0 0 (U �" O Ln a.+ f0 p V IIL^^ O L V In y O O Ln Ln 0 0 00 O O N rI O {r t lD 0) O r-I N M 0 i t U C h0 CA } O O -t N d0 Lai OrnO O 0 "1 E 0 L rl 0 0 0 0 m C U p L M C7 O O1 O = 'a tki 41 LL O C7 p 0 ri N o0 0 O m O O In N DD t O O1 } O O O N v N 0J ++ U = E " C91 o o o o ti w Q W ci U W D: u O LA O i (V O m .4 L C NJ •E Q Vf } 00 O O O u N O L. 0 0 0 0 N H d w L LL 4- a Q o. ° y v cu o a N J2 O m ci C7 c0 3 .v E = N LO O N O G C3 O C O 'a V ++ j �(U z CL L7 coo a u C ELn a cLa a C7 E E E W °o E E E N a Q Q a-I C O O O m N O O O O O O O aj_ O ci Q. ( ,Lu 'a -O U N m N -0J 10 i m G O. 'U m m m 7 m m m O O L 7 m T ` O H a m H LL rq N m Ln Fes- A ri N m Ln O V op Ln N N m u * N d C O n �a N v a .0 +• 3 oa c u ai > u Co d0 m IL o 0 n a1 c `0 0 N M u * O 0 ` o t 00 t o c a N on o o 0 a h ai ry N E 0 I N y� ice-' H a) m r, x M 7 N o u ON N ` NCI C) N rj O ++ 7 a! LD u N H 0 C C C. vn al C a Ln O E a p u * Q m CC O N O Q C C ( N fa LL = u N 0 aJ m 41 0C N 0 -4 u _0 00 0 w 0 N O N ON 0 N O_ �n O p u aJ *' N L E u Ln Q 3 Q o v CL e0 CL o = f0 c ai m C) ti N o\'\' C) u p U E O O N NO al a+ N N N a1LM C LN n ~ > cu E aC, a a N D a! ai fa O o\'\' o\°\° o\'\' \ a 'T Ln O O N ci O a1 GL 3 � aJ O1 N O O x O Y 00 O .4 O Ci 0 0 v ,OF c C)N c ri OLn -1 M E O E Ln 00 00 T +�� N O fV � 0) V cY1 ++ '� O O- E 00 I� N L +-' +' y Ol (Yl N N N C C N Q N p G T 0 Lfl Lf1 Q L y C Nn a a) Q _O 0a O u •n �, N o\° vOi C i u N C) m (tea C O N E a, m w al f0 � ui [L1 C O C E m Q Ou d L ti N T C o r a+ _0 N E C O ai O o N y aa) v 00 1 y a O 3 L C " E c a " ` E a i 00 a o o u � o m c7 3 E °,�' E 41 � � 4S � a, C7 d O y O v a N tz Ln O LL N vi Y •� _ ,.� i+ y,. C f0 Q H 3 C al E C C LL N aJaj OD (AO cc X O O O c O N Q 0 O a 0 O- a al ° p Q aai j N C d W -4 d O a Q � � C d a Y a r0 a; � � 0 Z v C w wai 'O C t +' on x x C — a, -p F- > z o a O n a H a u n avc z II^ N T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'N W m W W W W W W W W yp I Ql W Vl Ill In Vl Ill N to Ill Q• m d' ct eF' et d' ¢t C c4 j> H lb r-I ra e-I r°I a-I rd r-I ri f0 e-i N N N N N N N N p wl x O M 0 m m m M m m M m 0 m IO h M M M 0 Vl In 0 0 0 0 ri mN N Ill V°I Ill Idl rl N N N N N N N N Ol .N a. o 'p CL C W pl W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 py •y�j --.. Ln LD H 4 4 G# G# Gi' C¢ Z' CP CP N ` XAD M m Ill m m Vl M Il) Ill Ln U h.i r N ID ID ID ID ID W ID ID tLo a Wb ^p,� Z m ° Q W W W W W W W W W W co W M N Y ID 140"ID ID ID ID ID ID W ID lD ID L O O O O O O O O C O O S N et' et' •7 d� py in N N m p 21 N m 2 +go-a,v�.',�.vt sn ell ell yr ah an vs vl arp f- L�' O O O o 0 O 0 0 O 0 O d T Ca`iY D) Cn rn D) D) tT 0 Dl Dl D) 6) CL = o O o 0 0 o O C' o C 0 o aON p N 0 CwCb 00 00 00 DO 00 00 O0 W W 00' C�0 N N N N N N N N NIt CM N C It m W Q1'1'4A1.an all Vl Vl Vk th Vk to all to V, C 61 1D ti.D lD lD M ID M M lD M ID ID ti7.1•' a, m 'rN7 m m m m M M m m m m CYY 3 ^ lD 'Id7 ID ID ID lD 1D W lD ID lD ll MD O1 m.` M1 t, h h M1 M1 M1 h h h M1 M1 M1. N 00 Y1 C! Yl Y m� C N Q ary, 9M.'4M'h, i/1 Vl all V}1n ill iR V}all xI°9, yE W O N N N N N N N N OJ " �r h h h h h h h h o CL ` �! W Ql M M M ni'M1'1 M nl "I O Q u Q lD Ill 6) M Qi IT ®) 0) ®) 0 _ C W c$ lD ri rl e-I ei a-I H rl rb O f0 — C_ m h h h h h M1 h h. . Y y y Z u C Y m OCIO OOOOo OooO ca °_ r 4 N'. N N N N N N N N N N co C y W CKC W W W W W W W W > ID G ID lD l6 l0 ID ID W ID lD lO UD Q N {a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C3 00 W W W W W W W W OO W CD C N to d ri [� E 0 0, O W O N N N N N N N aW d •O 00 V" oc m lD a Ol cr Ol D) M N y W d'M7 W V1 lD Ol Ol Ol Dl (T (T Q1 dRA � Gl A A > ID aD ID In ID m m 0) m Dl 61 DI X fp Q O 00 O M1 ID mm 61 6) am) m Dt R8'w Y" � W'.....W W W N CY D) 61 TOl Ol Ol 6) O) YJW U rd ID M1 M1 M1 h h M1 M1 M1 (V 01 0 y O Ol yd,I O 0 I O O � CL N N 0J C p m > W W n n n v U v ID Io N o 0 0O0 m ; 'a C W ° u y a N W O N N N IN,) N N N ro"'+F M m m m t � b m ID D) M Y lD !T 61 61 D) D) D1 Ql L r W Ill lD Ol C, T D1 01 Dl Ol N aCCJ V C h 1p (T Qt T D) D) CT Ol Ol m N QI L C G1 t+ N d' T Ol Ol D1 O) C%%",M CL � E0 rl lD h h h h M1 h h h'',,,,. p m E m fY0 -0Z+ E C C O C) v ` n M 'D r• W rn o N N N N N N N N N N m u W 0 0 0 O o 0 O O 0 0 0 0 C�'> 0l '^ ? ; } N N N N N N N N N N N N r" C � O 3 0 ° — C� ro Y o u C° ® - c E u o. C C w 7 tl •` m C Q o .--I N m at M ID ri W al O P-I 2^a >' '^ C 01 0j) C -m N N N N N N N N N N m M rn-,C o oo o Oo � d >a ym rZ ry rvNNNNN N N N ry *o m 0 c a- ro ~ CU C Q v h vl p 0 Z h m O 00 f0 N O c N m e,{ Ill ID M1 00 ® p m r Y ti r � t ® / ��✓ ` ill �r r%�1f/�r%1 W�� I' mnrror�uuumrmr,�w � u e r�// r 1 1� � V i.p.` ��,r� ��1 nY tr 1� � r�i 1�'r�I t /�� r•/, 4 r p i r Prepared For: MZ Capital Partners Private Equity Real Estate Investment ;I NOWN;Ili!!1 ffl!m1goigin,111;1;� MMM fflma I 'Phis report SUMinarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic inlP act study conducted by Ker6u, Lindgren, O'llana, Aboona, Inc. (KLX)A� Inc.l for a proposed residential developinent to be located on the south side of Deerfield Parl<way east of its intersecti011 with Weiland Road in Buffalo Grove, Illinois,. As proposed,the site will be developed to provide a high- end rental apartment community with six buildings totaling 12,0 units, Access to the site will be provided via a full movement access drive oil Deerfield Parkway aligned opposite Windbrooke Drive. An ernergency access drive will also be provided to the east. The purpose()f this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development will have on traffic e(,,)ndifions in the area,and detcri-nine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed development. Figure I shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site area. The sections of this report present the following: Existing roadway conditions A description of the proposed development Directional distribution of the development traffic Vehicle trip generation for the development Future traffic conditions including access to the development • Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and weekday evening peak, hours • Recommendat ions with respect to adequacy of the site access and adjacent roadway system Traffic capacity analyses were conducted for the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours for the following conditions: I Existing Condition - Analyzes the capacity of the existing roadway system using existing peak hour traffic volumes in the surrounding area. 2. Future Condition — Analyzes the projected traffic volumes which includes the existing traffic VOIUnies increased by an ambient area growth factor(growth not attributaMe to any particular development) and the traffic esthnated to be generated by the proposed sub.JcCt development. Proj.)osed Residential Developmew Bqffalo Grove, 111inois 1 t A 010,vm4 oj� K "hoof Elk trod" i 4,6 9,N 4111,11,11P I,A SITE jokpwm",ind Site Location Figure 1 Proposed Residential Development Buffb10 Grove, l7linois 2 /a.OA y„ m � r r �U odap MNrtWVMWf Pf ' � � � W IA ) r f , r, � I III IY � a , Aerial View of Site Figure 2 1 0 Existing transportation conditions in the vicinity of the site were documented based on field visits conducted by KLOA, Inc. in order to obtain a database for projecting future conditions. The following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, physical chamewistics of the area roadway system incitiding lane Usage arld traffic control devices and existing peak hour tral"fic volunies, Site Location The site is located on the south side of Deerfield Parkway (Lake County Route 47) cast of its intersection with Weiland Road (Lake County Route 17). The site is currently developed with an oftlice building and storage yard, occupied by Concrete Erectors, The access drive for Concrete Erectors is located approximately 790: feet cast of Weiland Road and approximately 225 feet west of Windbrooke Drive, Area land uses in the vicinity of the site are primarily residential and commercial and include the Windbrooke Crossing apartments to the immediate north. To the east are the Illinois Masonry Corporation,a ComEd substation,Buffalo Grove Park-N-Ride lot,Buffalo Grove Transportation Center, and Perfect Power Inc. "J"o the SOU011 are single-family honics and to the west is Huntington Bank and Revere Electric Supply. 11i addition, a bike path under the jurisdiction of the Buffalo Grove Park District is located near the site. The bike path Crosses Deerfield Parkway approximately 90 feet west of'the Concrete Erectors access drive. 'rhe bike Path provides coil ncctiou s for pedestrians and cyclists to Aptakisic Junior-High School to the north and the Bufffilo Grove "l-ransportation Center to the east, The north end of the site access drive is crossed by overhead power transmission wires owned by ComEd. Existing Roadway System Characteristics The characteristics of the existing roadways near the development are described below. Figure 3 illustrates the existing roadway characteristics. Deerfield P�,Ohvc-O,,(Like County Route 4 7) is an east-west roadway with a,five-lane cross section that in the vicinity Ofthe site provides two lanes in each direction divided by a landscaped niedian. At its signalized intersection with Weiland Road, Deei-field Parkway provides an exclusive left- turn lane, an exclusive through lane, a shared throughlright-turn lane, and a high-visibility crosswalk on both approaches. At its unsignalized intersection with the Concrete Erectors access drive, Deerfield Parkway provides an exclusive through lane and a shared through/right-turn lane on the eastbound approach and a shared left-tUrn/through lane and an exclusive through lane on the westbound approach. At its unsignalized intersection with Windbrooke Drive, Deerfield Parkway provides an exclusive left-turn lane and two OVOUgh lanes on the eastbound approach and an CUILISive through lame and a shared thl-OUghh'ight-turn lane oil the westbound approach, At its Signalized intersection with Corrunerce Court, Deerfield Parkway provides all eXdUSiVC left- turn lane, two thr(iLigh lanes, and an exclusive right-turn lane on the eastbound approach and an exclusive left-turn lane, an exclusive through lane, and a shared through/right-turn lane on the westbound approach, DeeHlield Parkway provides high visibility crosswalks on both legs of its intersection with Commerce Court. Proposed Residential Develol)inenf Bql ,1;710 Grove, Illinois 4 KlwdAl\ > I z N 111 � �1v4 WI �... .,...� 11i f) * ,�i e^vw 4 r LL Z UL � ( �, L) 1 5 U I � � N U (0 �I L f% x �,�z^ 1! �a htlOt a t �r 1I r�,DRIVE cu r x' J _0 1 (6 O 1 � I � w d"I Q.F'b �I J '° Z Q Z F— c� S W O 3:w +� O N . � r1 a. ;,� Q ❑ } E O �' i d Z 00 C w _ �9a V G3 L-112r Q 7 Z W m Z — — N kO /v ®o ❑ U J J [0 WOw O ., w — _ _ 7) �1 W Q ¢ O ❑w Oz z s ❑ O d U OZ7 C� 0 r:;:t w w (n I Z O O uf rI r CD U :€ �ix N m Deerfield Parkway is under the jurisdiction of the Lake County Division of Transportation (LCDOT), is classified as a minor arterial by the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), carries an Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volume of 21,700(IDOT AADT 2019), and has a posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour. Weiland Road (Lake County Route 17) is a north-south roadway that in the vicinity of the site provides two through lanes in each direction.At its signalized intersection with Deerfield Parkway, Weiland Road provides an exclusive left-turn lane, an exclusive through lane, and a combined through/right-turn lane on the southbound approach and an exclusive left-turn lane, two exclusive through lanes, and an exclusive right-turn lane on the northbound approach. Weiland Road provides high visibility crosswalks on both legs of its intersection with Deerfield Parkway. Weiland Road is under the jurisdiction of LCDOT but is maintained by the Village of Buffalo Grove and is classified a major collector by IDOT. Weiland Road carries an Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)volume of 11,600 (IDOT AADT 2019)north of Deerfield Parkway and a volume of 15,000 (IDOT AADT 2019)south of Deerfield Parkway. The posted speed limit is 40 miles per hour, with a school zone speed limit of 25 miles per hour north of the intersection with Deerfield Parkway for Aptakisic Junior High School. It should be noted that according to Lake County's 2016-2021 Proposed Highway Improvement Program, Weiland Road is to be widened from two lanes to four lanes between Lake Cook Road and Aptakisic Road. Once completed, two through lanes in each direction will be provided continuously between Lake Cook Road and Aptakisic Road. Construction is scheduled to be completed in 2021. Commerce Court is a north-south local roadway that generally provides one lane in each direction and extends from its intersection with Deerfield Parkway to its dead-end approximately one-third of a mile south of Deerfield Parkway. At its signalized intersection with Deerfield Parkway, Commerce Court provides an exclusive left-turn lane, a shared left-turn/through lane, and an exclusive right-turn lane on the northbound approach and an exclusive left-turn lane and a shared through/right-turn lane on the southbound approach. Commerce Court provides high visibility crosswalks on both legs of its intersection with Deerfield Parkway. Commerce Court is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Buffalo Grove, carries an ADT volume of 2,665 vehicles as reported by LCDOT in 2013, and has a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Windbrooke Drive is a north-south local roadway that provides access to the Windbrooke Crossing apartments on the north side of Deerfield Parkway. At its unsignalized intersection with Deerfield Parkway, Windbrooke Drive provides a combined left-turn/right-turn lane under stop sign control. Windbrooke Drive is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Buffalo Grove, has a posted speed limit of 20 mph, and parking is prohibited on both sides of the street. Public Transportation The area is served by two modes of public transportation, Metra commuter rail and the Pace Bus system.All public transportation service in the immediate vicinity of the site arrives at the Buffalo Grove Transportation Center, which incorporates the Buffalo Grove Park-N-Ride lot as one of its amenities along with bike racks. The Buffalo Grove Transportation Center is approximately one- quarter mile away from the site via Deerfield Parkway or the bike path adjacent to the site. Proposed i es d'?nlial Developmeni P14 �xic =rove, Minois 6 MLCA0AJ\ The following summarizes the public transportation services provided to the area: The Buffalo Grove Metra Station is located east of the site and provides weekday rail, service on the North Central Service line between Antioch, Illinois and Union, Station in Chicago, The Buffalo Grove stop acts as a terrilinus and originating point for select trains. The far-south end of the platform is approximately 18,00 feet from the site via the bike path. Due to COVID-19, Metra is currently running reduced service and a revised schedule, As of July 2021, the line provides six inbound trains and six outbound trains daily.The first inbound train departs, Antioch at 5:20 AM., with the last train departing from Buffalo Grove at 4:10 P.M. The first outbound train departs Chicagt)'s tjjjj(,)i-j Station at 7.10 A®K' with the last train departing at 6:00 P.M. Approximately two inbound trains Cross Deerfield Parkway during the morning peak hour and approxiinately one Outbound train crosses Deerfield Parkway during tile evening peak hour,'Fhe gates at the train tracks remain closed fbr approximately 70 seconds for an inbound train and approximately 13,0 seconds far an outbound traits. A reference of past thnetables (pre-COVID-19) show; I I inbound trains and 11 outbound trains daily,with three inbound trains crossing Deerfield Parkway during the morning peak hour and one inbound and three outbound trains crossing Deerfield Parkway during the evening peak hour. BuffaloGrove is the most-trarficked station on the North Central Service. Pace Bus Route 234—Wheeling-Des Plaines runs from Des Plaines to Wheeling with rush hour service to Buffalo Grove.This line provides weekday service between the Des Plaines Metra station and Strong/Milwaukee in Wheeling with rusli hour service extending to the Buffalo Grove Transportation Center in Buffalo Grove. 1'he nearest bus stops are located in the southeast and southwest comers of the intersection of Deerfield Parkway with Commerce Court, The Wheeling Metra station, Randhurst Mall, Mt. Prospect Metra station, Cumberland Metra station, Des Plaines Metra station, Buffalo Grove Park-N-Ride lot, and Buffalo Grove Metra station are all served by this route. Pace Bus Route 272—Milwaukee Avenue Alorlh runs along US, Route 45 and Illinois State Route 21 with a stop for both directions on s al � Grove ,elective weekday runs at the Buff, o v Transportation Center,which is the nearest bus Stop to the site.Th is line provides,weekday service between the Golf Mill Shopping) (,:enter in Niles, and Hawthorne Mall in Vernon Hills.The Buffalo Grove Park-N-Ride lot,Buff' to Grove Metra station,Chicago Executive Airport,Golf Mill Shopping Center, and Westfield I lrrwtlaorn Mall are served by this route. Pace Bus Route 626 —Skokie-Buffalo Grove Undied runs along, 1-94, Lake Cook Road, Milwaukee Avenue, and Barclay Boulevard Nvith a stop ror both directions at the Buffalo Grove Transportation Center, which is the nearest bus stop to the site. This line, provides weekday service from Lincolnshire Corporate Center to the Dempster-Skokie UFA Yellow Line station. The Dempster Skokie Yellow Line CTA station, Lake Cook Road Metra station,Northbrook Court, and the Buffalo Grove Park-N-Ride lot are served by this route. All of the roads within the immediate area generally have sidewalks on both sides of the road with the exception ot'Corninerce Court, which only has sidewalks on the east side of the road. Pr ol)osed Residential Development KLOAX\ Bulfolo Grove, Illinois 7 Existing Traffic Volumes In order to determine current traffic conditions in the 'Vicinity ol'Alle site, KLOA, lnc conducted peak period traf fjc counts usil,Ig Miovisjoil Scout Video Collectiol"Units on Wednesday,June 30, 202 1, during the weekday morning(7:00 A.M. to,9:00 A.M.) and weekday evening(4:00 P,M. to 6:00 RM.) peak periods at:the following inter.scc1i()ns: Deerfield Parkway with Weiland Road Deerfield Parkway with Commerce Court The results of the traffic counts showed that the weekday morning peak hour of traffic occurs from 7:45 A.M. to 8:45 A.M. and tile weekday evening peak hour of traffic occurs rrorn 4:30 P.M. to 5:30 P.M. Copies ofthe traffic count suini-nary sheets are included in the Appendix, 111ese counts were supplemented with COUnts Pi-eViOUSly conducted at the intersection of'Deerfield I'arkway with Windbrooke Drive and Deerfield Parkway with the Concrete Erectors Drive in 2016 that were adjusted to reflect 2021 traffic conditions. Due to the COVID-19 pandernic, it is anticipated that the traffic volumes in the area are not representative ()f typical conditions. As SUCII, the trziffic counts taken in 2021 were a(,ijusted to represent the normal traffic conditions. Referencing the previously conducted counts in 2016 and the fDO'l" two-way counts from 2019 on Deerfield Parkway, it was determined that the morning and evening peak hour VOlUnles taken in 2021 were, an average tNventy five percent less than they would be under normal conditions. As such, the Morning and evening peak hour counts were increased tNventy, five percent, Figure 4 i H ustrates the Year 2021 base traffic VOILITTIeS. Resiflential Develolment ,Bif i#(h) Grove, Illinois 8 /rim Oft :- cq LO , ILL U 'o O v ch ao `? z v o =" 11 (35) 0 (1) 1 �►4 o 0 9 (76) — o Q 4 (16) w a 0 (0) J Q 4 (36) " c" � O O O O �( O E O C) CID ROOlKE F- 1 N M, W U) cz 12 (1) o 3 (4) N ��.. w,� co 1 t _ - l �1LLI W w 1 3: o }' Lu 240 (201) m0 E O 256 (256) 39 (6) , ? 00 O-c 4 9p D — 50 (124) 30 (20) — � w m — — �- — aw o 94 (81) Lu w L. 165 (276) 65 (201) —M 0 cu C a� LY �� Crash Analysis KLOA, Inc. obtained crash data' from IDOT for the most recent available five years (2016 to 20201 for the, intersections of I)ecj-field Parkway with Weiland Road, Deerfield Parkway with Coninierce Court, and Deerfield Parkway with Windbrooke Drive. The crash data for the intersection of 1)eerfield Rarkway with Weiland Road is summarized in Table 1. A review of the crash data indicated that only seven crashes occurred at the intersection of'13cerfield Parkway with Cointnerce C01.111 and eight crashes occurred at the intersection of Deerfield Parkway with Windbrooke Drive beiweeri 2016 and 20�20, Additionally, it sliould be noted that no fiatalities were reported at these intersections, Table I DEERFIELD PARKWAY WITH WEILAND ROAD—CRASH SUMMARY 2016 0 0 0 6 2 0 9 2017 0 0 0 4 2 3 0 9 2018 0 0 0 11 0 8 0 19 2019 0 0 0 9 2 9 0 20 2020 1 0 1 4 2 3 0 1.1 Total 1 0 1 34 8 24 0 68 Average <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 6.8 1.6 4.8 <1.0 13.6 a. MOT DISCLMMER l-fic c1,t(Oor vehicle crash data reverenced 11crein was provided by the Jlfinois Any 000clttsions&a,,,i)°om analysis of ahc aforeinc.nooned data are thes(aJc wsponsibifily oNhe data rceipient(s),Addiflonall�s fin-coding years 2!015 to prcscnt the Bureau or[),,ata colICCHOTI O'CS 01C CXICt lafinide/longi upp tude slied by the investigating 1,1" enformni a ceeeency to iocaic eraslws.Thereflore, location data may vary,in previousycars shice data prior to 2015 wzm physicallY' located by bureaita personnel. Proposed Residential Developmew -N4 B1?1 falo Grrove, Illinois 10 /r/mOA411�,t ® A In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to detennine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. Proposed Site and Development Plan As proposed, the plants call for developing a high-end rental apartment complex on the site with 120 units in six buildings. Access to the proposed development will be provided via a full movement access drive off Deerfield Parkway aligned opposite Windhrooke Drive. The access drive should provide one inbound lane and two outbound lanes, with outbound movements under stop-sign control. An additional access drive fbr emergency vehicles along the north edge of the site should provide a connection with t;he adjacent properly to the cast oceupied by Perfect lower Inc. The existing bike path will remain at its current location and will provide the residents of the proposed development with non-motorized connections to the 13u1`l'410 (j ove I"uanspoalation, Center. Fantheranore, as part of the proposed development, the existing curb cut serving Concrete Erectors will be eliminated. A copy of the preliminary site plan depicting the proposed. development and access is included in the Appendix. Directional Distribution The directions frown which residents of the proposed development will approach and depart the site were estimated based on existing travel patterns, as determined from, tiae traffic counts, Figure 5 illustrates the directional distribution of the development-generated traffic. Estimated Site Traffic Generation The volume of traffic generated be the proposed apartment development was estianatcd using data published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE) Trip G eration A ' n a al, 10th Edition. The "Multifamily Housing (Low Rise)" (Land-Use Code 220) was used. Table 2 illustrates the vehicle trips anticipated for this development. Table 2 ESTIMATED SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1 { { 220 Apartments ..w 866 (120 Units 57 43 26 69 433 mmmm 433mmm Prof)osed Resi(lenlizl Developynent x'Jlilo Grove, Illinois 11 140 . , LL 0 D w � .. Ln Z 0 ❑ — r O w ❑ WU Z W � , O O f 00 O m l0 C O J � i I � w uu ull� wwnwmw w m uu a wwwu •L uuuu � w uuuwww um y.+uww� Q 1 � E (0 uj0 a) ik btivM'wws NY wW ww uwww uu www w umu owwwwu mi uu N LU O r M I O 1 1 i I 1 1 ❑ a) 15®� E O mPL _ O s ROAO o —_ �—► a) > Q o (u CD LU Z Z", O O () CIO f a) m The total projected traffic volumes include the existing traffic volumes, increase in background traffic due to growth, and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed subject development. Development Traffic Assignment The estimated weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated I.iy the proposed development were assigned to the roadway system in accordance with the previotisly described directional distribution (I"igure 5). The total neNy traffic assigninent for the residential development is ilkistrated in Figure 6. Background Traffic Conditions The existing traffic volumes (Figure 4) were increased by a regional growth factor to account for the increase in existing traffic related to regional growth in the area (i.e., not atiribtitable to any partiCUlar planned development). As per I_al<e CoLinly's Highway Access and Use Ordinance,the existing volurnes were increased by three percent for two years fora total of six percent. Figure 7 illustrates the Year 2023 no-build traffic volumes. Total Projected Traffic Volumes The development-generated traffic (Figure 6) was added to the existing traffic volumes increased by a regional growth factor to determine the Year 2023 total projected traffic volumes, as illustrated in Figure 8. Proposed ResidentialDeveloprnew Rqfj do Grow, Illinois 13 KL OM `C u7 OkI LL Q IL p Vn o LO K v o O O Q Q " W W Q CL J I00 f O O co f 1 � �+ (1 Illllli�� 22 (13) P co P 1g�^a 1q p1 � l 22 (13) CD E VP 9.��„DRd4" u" i O O > U) _U wuuuu^ + RomaN iiii„„" W r' l i Y l � 1 E O 1 (6) > ai (D 0 o ;1 m U +- fir � O a) 70uj w ! N m � tr 6 : 0 I; Ln O cv 7 M p �. 0? L? 12 (37) .J 1 l►4p ® 1)(C8 o 0 z ow LLJ _. 0 4 (17) ° " LjjI 0 (0) y Q O O U) N II: E j O f I fB W'INDAROOKE �r 1J m eV 13 (1) N` 3 (4) o CO Lo l� ll r 1w, Z 1 I:. �W O 1` R W En�- 254 (213) 1 a p Eo 271 (271) t 00 Q.c ��1 53 (131) 41 (6) roc o - �rs�m L— m 100 (96) � w o 175 (293) 69 (213) a t �a CD o : Lin r— m co f e�L O jl* O m 1 u W / Q /H/ U) OILI a� o i LO o ao ui Ln o .� 12 (37) C v z = a�u� w w ® (0) z d Li uw <t n ILO AnO O CAD O O N r � J O J > ko I OI(E ........ 41 (6) f (r ��,� „mui 32 (21) cnl MAN= IL M 1 A J r 1 J �N t 256 (219) m cn 1 271 (271) o '_ ..,� o 1'75 (293) 69 Q2R3A Ln RF^ C� ens Co its �— Lp Qy CO II g DEEM= The following provides an evaluation conducted for the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours.The analysis includes conducting capacity analyses to determine how well the roadway system and access drives are projected to operate and whether any roadway improvements or modification are required. Traffic Analyses Roadway and adjacent or nearby intersection analyses were perkirmed for the weekday morning, and weekday evening peak hours for tile existing (Year 2021), no-build (Year 2023), and future projected (Year 2023)traffic volumes. The traffic analyses were performed using, the methodologies Outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Ifighitqv Cap acilyr Manual 61''' Edition and analyzed using tile Synchro/Sim"Fraffic I I COMPUter software. The analyses for signalized intersections were accomplished utilizing actual cycle lengtils, phasings, and offsets. The analyses for the unsignalized intersections determine the average control delay to vehicles at an intersection. Control delay is the elapsed time from a vehicle joining the queue at a stop sign (includes the time required to decelerate to a stop) until its departure froin the stop sign and reSUniption of free flow speed. The methodology analyzes each intersection approach controlled by a stop sign and considers traffic volumes on all approaches and lane characteristics. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter from A to F based on the average, control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. The hlighivaye Capacily Xfanual definitions for levels rat service and the corresponding control delay for signalized intersections and 'Lill signal ized intersections are included in the Appendix of this report. Surnillaries of traflk analysis results showing tile level of service and overall intersection delay (measured in seconds) for the existing, no-boild, and Year 2023 total projected conditions are presented in Tables 3, 4, and 5, respectively. A discussion of the intersections follows. Summary sheets for the capacity analyses are included in the Appendix Prol)osed Residemial L)e velopment KxWdAlsk, Bu&lo Grove, Illinois 17 Table 3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS—YEAR 2021 BASE CONDITIONS B. ,. .. .. .m., e m m Deerfield Parkway with Weiland Road' _......., Overall C 31.6 C 29.7 Eastbound Approach C 32.0 C 30.2 Westbound Approach C 22.2 C 27.0 Northbound Approach C 34.8 C 29.3 Southbound Approach D 37.2 D 37.7 Deerfield Parkway with Commerce Court' • Overall A 4.1 B 14.2 Eastbound Approach A 3.6 A 9.1 Westbound Approach A 4.8 B 14.2 Northbound Approach C 23.6 D 39.5 Southbound Approach C 25.6 B 16.3 Deerfield Parkway with Windbrooke Drive' Southbound Approach C 19.3 D 29.0 Eastbound Left Turn A 8.4 C 22.1 Deerfield Parkway with Concrete Erectors Access Drive' Northbound Approach D 26.6 C 22.6 Westbound Left Turn C 16.9 A 8.9 1: S=Level of Service 1—Si naliz w .. . i�� g ed Interse._c ti—o- n..............w _.� n___.��..._.,........._.w..�...�..............�_�...m.................�_.m.............�_............ _measured Two-Way (op Controlled Delay is measu seconds 2 Proposed Residential Develol)rnent . s s re m Bq'facaGrove, .Irois, 18 Table 4 — BUILD CONDITIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS YEAR 2023 NO- 1N Deerfield Parkway with Weiland Road' Overall D 36.5 D 38.2 Eastbound Approach D 40.1 C 33.7 Westbound Approach C 23.7 D 42.8 Northbound Approach D 35.8 C 29.9 Southbound Approach D 37.3 D 38.5 Deerfield Parkway with Commerce Court' Overall A 5.7 B 17.8 Eastbound Approach A 5.3 B 15.3 Westbound Approach A 6.0 B 17.6 Northbound Approach C 23.8 D 39.8 Southbound Approach C 25.6 B 16.5 Deerfield Parkway with Windbrooke Drivel Southbound Approach C 20.9 D 33.8 Eastbound Left Turn A 8.5 D 25.2 Deerfield Parkway with Concrete Erectors Access Drive' Northbound Approach D 29.1 D 28.3 Westbound Left Turn C 18.3 B 10.0 LOS=Level of Service - 1 Signalized Intersection S elay is measured in seconds 2-Two-Way Stop Controlled Promsed Residenlial.Developmeni KLOWh uffialo Grove, Illinois 19 Table 4 APACITY ANALY SIS RESULTS—YEAR 2023 PROJECTED CONDITIONS Deerfield Parkway with Weiland Road' . i Overall D 37.3 D 38.1 Eastbound Approach D 41.6 C 34.1 Westbound Approach C 24.1 D 42.6 Northbound Approach D 35.8 C 30.1 Southbound Approach D 37.2 D 38.5 Deerfield Parkway with Commerce Court' Overall A 5.7 B 17.9 Eastbound Approach A 5.4 B 15.3 Westbound Approach A 6.1 B 17.7 Northbound Approach C 23.8 D 40.1 Southbound Approach C 25.6 B 16.5 Deerfield Parkway with Windbrooke Drive' Northbound Approach F 99+ F 99+ Southbound Approach F 71.5 F 99+ Eastbound Left Turn A 8.9 C 21.8 Westbound Left Turn C 17.1 B 10.4 LOS Level of Service l—Signalized measured in seconds. 2—T . er Intersection Two-Way Stop Controlled Bgfft,lc) Grove, Illinois 20 Discussion and Recommendations The following summarizes how the intersections are projected to operate and identif any roadway and traffic control improvements necessary to accommodate the development traffic. Deerfield Parkway with Weiland Road The results of the capacity analyses indicate that the intersection is currently operating at Level of Service(1,,,OS)C during the weekday rrioming and weekday evening peak hours. Under year 2023 no-build conditions,the intersection is prqjected to operate at LOS 1)during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. Under projected conditions,tile intersection is projected to operate at,LOS D during the weekday morning aAnd evening peak hours. It should be noted that the proposed developinellt will only increase traffic volumes at tile intersection 'by less than olle pet-cent during both peak hours—As such, the intersection will nett be SigniflUintly affected by the traffic that will be generated by the proposed developtnent rnore than the existing pr*cted background traffic growth and delays due to the proposed developrnent will be minimal. Deerfield Parkway with Commerce Court The results of the capacity analyses indicate that the intersection is currently operating at LOS A during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS B during the weekday evening peak, hour. Under year 2023 no-build conditions,the intersection is projected to continue operating at LOS A during the weekday nioriling ur, with increases , peak hour and LOS B during the weekday evening peak ho in delays of less than four seconnds,, Under projected conditions, the intersection is projected to operate at,LOS A during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS B during the weekday evening peak hour with 95`k' percentile queues of three to four vehicles during the evening peak hour. Deerfield Parkway with Windbrooke Drive The results of the capacity analyses indicate that the southbound approach at the intersection of Deed"jeld Parkway with Windbrooke Drive currently operates at LOS C during tile weekday morning peak hour and LOS D during the weekday evening peak hour. Under year 2023 nun-build rni- conditions, the approach is projected to continue opetaling at LOS CdL r I ing tile weekday nlo peak hour and at LOS D during the weekday evening peak hour. As described earlier, access to the proposed development will be aligned opposite Windbrooke Drive. I'lle results of the capacity analyses indicate that the northbound approach will operate at LOS F during the weekday morning and evening peall, hours. It is also projected that the southbound approach will operate at LOS F during the weekday morning and evening peak hours, This LOS is typical and expected when an access drive intersects as ina�jor roadway such as Deerfield Parkway. Ftirthennore, tile, signalized intersections of Deerfield Parkway with Weiland Road and Commerce 0Urt Will provide additional gaps in the traffic strealil, which will allow for site traffir,to exit more efficiently and with lower delay, The projected 95"' percentile queues for the northbound and soullibound approaches will be three to four vehicles during both the morning and evening peak hours. Prof)osed Residenlial.Develol)rnenl 21 KLOAKN6, Bqf,f�do Grove, Illinois Per LCDOT requirements, all eastbound right-tuna 1,1,je wjj*rant and a westbOLHld ICft-JUrn, Nacre warrant analysis were conducted for 13cel-field Parkway at the proposed site access road. Based oil the analysis,, it was deter-mined that ,I westbotind left-turn lane will be warranted which all be accommodated by nioditying the existing riledian on Deerfield Parkway, Furtherrno!re, the ProJected right-tarn VOILMICS indicate that a right-foal ]are is warranted based on the westbound evening peak hotir volumes, The comparison charts for the warrant analysis figures from the Lake (11 owity Ifigh)vcjT) Access and' (Ise 7'�'Chnicaj Re rence Minual are provided in the Appendix. PPOPO'Vecl Development Bt&&) (;jy�j,e, jljijj�,ds 22 ML OW 1 i Based on the preceding analyses and recommendations, the following conclusions have been made: The traffic that will be generated by the proposed residential development can be accommodated by the existing area roadway system. The estimated development-generated traffic volumes will not be significant and will likely be further reduced by the proximity of the site to the Buffalo Grove Transportation Center. The proposed access system will be adequate and efficient in serving the proposed development traffic. westbound left-turn lane and a westbound right-turn lane are warranted at the inter section oMe rf eld Parkway witli Mlindbrooke Drive/new site access drive based on projected turning volumes. Appendix Traffic Count Summary Sheets Site Plan Level of Service Criteria Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Turn-Lane Warrant Figures Traffic Count Summary Sheets -O Y� cmo 0d a �n"w v u " N •_ p n C eU15 m o> a N Q. °0 b N o m,m c m u, tin erN W W O s PR �..µYi b N4 s^n kVWI gm 0.wY 'e',"a V 4w CS saw v as r m. Q)a) E- Y wCM m N U1 y1S elYk V u`ed {p p .7 m d: 4r �C:I m m ® Cli Z ti m O O,Z (6 p7 44"b m^ S aW -0 I'b is,1 N b„ 'Mb 0Y nr Cb m wy .- i:� pa ON a-. V ULN YW my m ay V w-a W q5 UWC/)V)Q_ N N N O m F= fJ +Y p s,"!' s v n +CM 0 v " R'.b O ^:X C;mm) m.'.A v b1 O. 0, ®•• N O N p m uy ��,tt CWnu C N Na wh u'x Pa KdN M Cob ."%9L N.'k N S ay s�cc a maCM �mw C (?p tv ` aye... m Sy tvb m' 10 p M rwWn o � TT ♦V C O O — rvti. p.,. " , °s w. CJ o ry W« ^ (0 V' CD cu "5.f ,. .. m t b'rvM t G'Y., rt CN Q N a 4 o-b Gj% V tl q a4m., d C m Gga O_LD QD Q — ra F U) -o IC` t-' o ra r� e�r .mow 0 •p..��....._d "n IN Cn o <'�r ® C r Y raUr E _rn 03 m Fy aura r.•"' guy �r m wCp uru wey ,s^w'v u ruw o aaa d� um m �t c�x m m"� m'r ,u Y"x O re RJ m N m, N . fdA N W AhY CY nyY l ¢? nib N m tl P p T a- N W LRT 1� 14Wi � 6(3 N m _v rttiN tlN RMa m x'V w f"r m r.ei 'N rt NF"ry d.W „ O tiCY W1' ro tCf a'M m �Po in z N m Mny n deY,. rv, .6 C? rcpN m P:s CA• C P,a'' C'^"1 Its �:k ps�pry nay gp R"✓ O o i u,�4 E h Fi 55u t7 N WY w N e m»wY',. v b pCa e'P x^4 auw uN u5 drrA ry ^.r uYt,. N YR! n rv. aTu �" m r+! h' iT CIY u ❑.. b rv} W m F""� mAN O � O � IAI � Ly � N a O o 'ury'M rn pmtl. CT9 p m � rya�sgn W b dwY 'R'. V d'^.tl ypg u19 i� pY N";Y p m 'O E 0 O Y:'PZD 0 5s gym' < ri a, n n p n „ii v 0 d d 0 d G O O O 9 I„�y O CS O CJ CY O O G O O KJ CY O O O O O LJ O � �' � U � ��, � LL1 �4.. 4 IO j W-- P PAN N O Itl w N I6 d N a) ® a p m cA Q7 O Mcc Z b ®Z S(If a) _ N o 0WU)U)Q. F o R Se Cr C O F N C 'S Z tPb 4R q '.n't � ! f® cu C p O ai �yj Nw.. �, t5w N UY b o in p (6 C O d9Y ." PM 4R"FM O k:A N O o O O ®� m L F. .O w O rya to r„7 o co O us x N b b C: rPol o 0 0 CII C _ C N C i, ya . /g® n. —t IA7 C �✓ gg _ O E Yemu. m N 0 a © +.,ux ran uro " O VAn, Ig t:. O. xa ma zx cro O �, o n rra o e„ro :7 0 QI— ✓w'a � N �y A.! �b �' O roN N � x O O �W fY.. fC U] N A Y d'd'J CCB r6 d"IT"1 O 4b O b.. p N 4Y4 O O M�Ya, � ryq QY.. ✓� kM 1�,, AYO w- C � k� AaIV. O � m O O O,. O LN E O b phi Y"A O e.Y O OI IX' K'"a O O e ICY n l iQ o ..J N tau p U � 'Fu a ,- g o vvl m o I- 9C W 'imi N o C4A p C 3 a @ v a eo O O N O cr E 6 6 Z O C Z 7 N� W oo<-°gym UOfcntnn- E A"y' o O o 0 0e a o ti, w"" " o o o o o o o � a IS v CD o Ra 0. �n GLL � M ,p A ry O m v ® a C � t�kr iN rp u'"• M1�Y+. O p r o a � a —O OO a [0 V N O L xw v cis Sn� 0 .7 o . o � .r�. �Wes•. ...m cu r N o. v C67 +� IT o J an C ryry Ln ki Q7 i m IX1. rc%. k *� M Y N > A rs So L- tiewo n a CD o o o F�yy^n b rn i�w ft o O o o A"3 O O O o N'A tlYY _ro � nti ❑. a a IAA LYv gj�tr 7tl f T W Cff+ YA. N y p a CF y .g r4 r ® O J � p rp o f UC. H N C5 M b• o- o °- t" r M yv. N yN W 0^5 O „nrso- m � ma VP '* W G 3 a m Y � rot pa' Ij Im, n. (0 a O Na) a) A � L qD Z O❑� � 7(�} �] J Wnt a- +'], x- ., KS » ... *ut, CS1 �XS e+A r• RCry nLW' vV'S m.. pry s'i uy k"ti m If% .,g. a �,A R.v n N V UUcn(n0 E io a �^r y It O 'o m iwp Cu d C,`N i� Cvt odk fi'J �"'� «fe N O5 no N E E E Z ` ny yiM i;"P S.°i 4 rew o 4b 'ii} o Q ci o a G c p 0 10 cu rry nCr G IO V Q O Ei cc p.+N� � Q o n .m. ... ..... !L"w G 4s i,a i,TA b mo G C�1 0 ...w" : 0.3 M6f 3 'G N'"A" uµ u0 0 P.A G .k 1"".M O.) _� �� a4w..® m v cam sv mw rc+ z�a e +,� xw• ra wa- rv- c n C tm r.Fi' N Y O Q rn f'h a ,d7 oYa a rr! p,J w>t w o o n 11 w q: cA! d+d CPa K"! �r-r 4 m vy nub rr�. „ u9 W'M hNF u�'9 t` tJ M p IX„U a. N N i Leh p1n tl;',u+ ' ro e'N oa'b xrvN! 5F9 yay atl1 N'n Y' CCW OI «Y 4+4 N r '� din XP9 C „j, eV m W of n 'o b PC �y � 4'14 M1- q dA? PYr �p �'r dS ltk P,1 O i�w �yv {y N ` FZN N PhR kY8 N i� sPY b T �� R'ti' idwi Cn ufA tD ':N N„1 WP vYk v4�y F�"A 'i6'li a- WVN �tY �M CS Wy q,. O F- "" N rc4 tl"W OI '�,Y rtre Yvp b^IM •.• u5 -;. 6aT dw# �I sMJ� �L � y.. CW 'ti" v- 2W Q 4'�' v NM11 W* I.ri % uiy Y M ed i� r M1"'A rp ww 4YP Cn *^ M1 iL9p G5 "� o E }= E .z w r 2- j- 7. C 4 <C'. *'{ F- <{ < µ *i t-,. K ® d. 4 e1 rt ❑. 01 f` ! ?n .` 9y d+u h m u. o o u ry — U) Y•- h. M.: L � O MJ 4Y 9 m er of V w tP9 YY fl FF'0 "� � �` h d ' m � � ��„�„ T_� u� a 0 0 -r 0 0 4 CJ O O O O d O O C1 O O O O CJ 6 O 83 CJ O 1C�' � m S�� a w �. fl U E M M ® ® a O O T P O a Y ft YJ ru @ d d �6 (U N QJ O N L ❑ M U F- 4"i O 4' 4o CY M UUU3(lS 4. phi 6 o p m �k7 +C5 �' ca r tl� 1(O] ti py O 00 O.4a.7 flD L UD L® C m ama air tq�} 7Cw w E O' N a a y GA N' t4 SMV fV �� s � O � O O U N u^. m vru o iy m m m m N r4 o f r my a w^r. aiti m o r o �'� 0Y - �a O 9 M O T rn c.A r",a m N > iE o 0 ,t o a� C14 m ® 8° o CO o o o 0 0 0Q c, ®y O E 0 0 c C U❑ rds u'a o o r r o oo9 23 UUCn U3d E � M1iA d FH f 'rfA. !y- '«.p�. 2 7d N. O a m O E ('7 o z m .. (0 r_ ® cmv o o cao C O J m bCi "q _O (D c [0 7 rn 0 0— 2 L E *, b I m ❑ C of w9 ccw� LO 'g'y' Cr "•� m p m •f d j �; Fm m P: ®� C a J yp C C ,... EE C N Y ® 0 W n° ❑ a �• -� Opry qM .,,..�_•,,.. 9 1 L"b IiF � m yv.�. m �� ryPA r Wtl: O 0:> � v �. C:',rrplmi (L 11tt � O d D W � � �ry u�tl9t yaa, � °"��•; � "�'.r m - r` cros Ica t^v vn"r -7 0 0 E E ¢ a``. a. n. _ Tea m.. m a.. Site i x , r a,� � i� r�r / �,r �f�l ��/ r /l�r,r�( c �,.� ✓r riri � .,,, , R l lu � l p" I 1 hr r r l r tit , rr 1, 1717, , . I'�. Q, r, I &if „r / riiia 1 r r r r r r F 1i Iowa II j r I� 11 SO 1h q p �'`''^., %�41f � 1�.,v ✓ Ir 0 /!�4, �r��Ny ( j,. +�r� 1 /jl,,. r `w,' a�, s��,r �*"flr o �, �gl I ,5-. I ��r��i,!! � ,F�/�.� ,.�„J'�'�L:.a �'� rp �J„✓�� rn rr I r � a r r /Ij rll �f G v J J r W Ln a z %! ou .. I. AVffi fVd m IL-Ha Iel CMAP 205 � Prn-* ctions Letter 4 9"0'V,rh iuu r'o.oNM Sill e#4 5 id iv 45C, � rwllVi aaid7i.Wll if! 6�:P�' Chicago Metropolitan a 454COO Agency for Planning ��l p��i��Il�� o July 29, 2021 Kelly Pachowicz Consultant Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara and Aboona, Inc. 9575 West Higgins Road Suite 400 Rosemont, IL 60018 Subject: Deerfield Parkway @ Weiland Road IDOT Dear Ms. Pachowicz In response to a request made on your behalf and dated July 29, 2021,we have developed year 2050 average daily traffic sic (ADT) projections for the subject location. 0 ADT LDeerfield MENT ... _.... ar 205Fi 27 300 OAD SEGPkwy east of eiland Rd Cu 21,700 rrent ADT e 11,600 2 d north of Deerfield Py— �eiland R eiland Rd south of Deerfield Pirw ACT ._.. ._�..... �.-... Traffic prr ;leetion's are developed using existing Af I'data provided in the request letter and the results l•orn the Jane 2021 CMAP Travel Demand Analysis.The he regional travel. model rises CMAP 2050 sociocconorrric projections and assumes the irinplernentation of the ON TO 2050 Comprefiensive Regional, Plan for the Northeastern Illinois area. The provision of this data in support of your request does not constitute a CMAP endorsement of the proposed development or any subsequent developments. If you have any questions, please call me at(312) 386-8806. Sincerely, 9— .lose Rodriguez, P,.P, AICP Senior Planner, Research &Analysis cc,,Rios4rDO � 202 cy r'rsifi'ueForecast\Liu£faloGrove\la-20-21\la-20-21.doex Level of Service Criteria LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA A Favorable progression. Most vehicles arrive during the c10 green indication and travel through the intersection without stopping. Good progression, with more vehicles stopping than for >10 -20 Level of Service A. C Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles >20 - 35 are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle)may begin to appear.Number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping. The volume-to-capacity ratio is high and either progression >35 - 55 is ineffective or the cycle length is too long.Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Progression is unfavorable.The volume-to-capacity ratio is >55 - 80 high and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. F The volume-to-capacity ratio is very higli, progression is > 0.0 very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to - clear the uee. - A 0 - 10 > 10 - 15 C > 15 - 25 >25 - 35 E > 35 - 50 F > 50 Source a.a Lzcy F .,.__ Manual 2010 _m...�........�... �. .... _ � ... �_. J ,,,,m,..,.a...... �......,�-„w.....m.�,. .....�-.,.. g Y r 2021 Base Conditions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 08/04/2021 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkwa Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(vph) 193 1422 86 108 279 79 50 256 240 94 165 65 Future Volume(vph) 193 1422 86 108 279 79 50 256 240 94 165 65 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1fin 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0 485 0 260 350 300 Storage Length(ft) 185 ® 1 1 1 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 25 Taper Length(ft) 175 110 80 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.850 0.957 Fri: 0.950 0.967 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 1787 3500 0 1671 3375 0 1770 3619 1568 1687 3255 0 Fit Permitted 0.501 0.067 0.599 0.400 Satd.Flow(perm) 942 3500 0 118 3375 0 1116 3619 15568 710 3255 Ye0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes YesSatd.Flow(RTOR) 6 34 167 46 40 40 40 Link Speed(mph) 40 640 906 Link Distance(ft) 485 782 Travel Time(s) 8.3 13.3 10.9 15.4 Confl.Peds.( mr) Confl.Bikes(#Ihr) Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 2% 6% 8% 3% 5% 2% 5% 3% 7% 7% 4% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#Ihr) 0% 0% 0% 0% Mid-Block Traffic(%) Shared Lane Traffic(®/®) 101 Lane Group Flow(vph) 208 1621 0 1+6 385 0 54 t 75 pm258+ov pm+pt 47 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm pt NA pm+p NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 56.5 8.0 50.5 8.0 53.5 8.0 8,0 45.5 Total Split(s) 20.4 55.2 14.4 49.2 14.4 27.6 14.4 22.8 36.0 Total Split(%) 17.0% 46.0% 12.0% 41.0% 12.0% 23.0% 12.0% 19.0% 30.0% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 6.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min None Min None None Min Act Effct Green(s) 75.8 62.1 72.8 60.6 26.6 16.0 32.2 33.1 21.0 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.63 0.52 0.61 0.50 0.22 0.13 0.27 0.28 0.18 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 ReportPage 1 A.M.Existing Peak Hour Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkwa 08l04l2021 v/c Ratio 0.31 0.89 0.59 0.22 0.19 0.57 0.48 0.35 0.41 Control Delay 10.2 34.$ 36.6 17.9 32.2 53.6 15.3 35.4 38.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 10.2 34.8 36.6 17.9 32.2 53.6 15.3 35.4 38.0 LOS B C D BC B D Approach Delay 32.0 22.2 34.8 Approach LS C C C 37.2 Queue Length 50th(ft) D 57 553 39 74 31 107 56 61 75 Queue Length 95th(ft) 109 #893 136 125 59 148 122 98 111 Internal Link Dist(ft) 405 702 560 Turn Bay Length(ft) 185 826 45 260 350 300 Base Capacity(vph) 726 1812 220 1720 325 636 562 352 834 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.89 0.53 0.22 0.17 0.43 0.46 0.29 0.30 rrt r dofaort"Stsrra dr Area Type Ofher Cycle Length:120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset 112(93%),Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.89 lntersection Signal Delay:31.6 Intersection LOS:C Inlersecllon Capacity Utilization 83.2% ICU Level of Service E Auaalysis Period(min) 15 # 9501 percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum alter t r cycles. Splits and Phases: 1:Weiland Road&Deerfield Parkway 03 21-162•Residential Development-Buffalo Grove A.M.Existing Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 08/04/2021 ; S a Traffic volume Configurations h 28 1 ( p ) 711 51 35 428 14 9 0 11 4 0 4 Future Volume(vph) 28 1711 51 35 428 14 9 0 11 4 0 4 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0%® 0%® 0%® 0%® Storage Length(ft) 200 210 0 0 0 170 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 115 25 25 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.995 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 1805 3725 1538 1492 3417 0 1715 1715 1214 1805 1214 0 Fit Permitted 0.472 0.071 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 897 3725 1538 111 3417 0 1715 1715 1214 1805 1214 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 118 4 118 533 Link Speed(mph) 40 40 30 25 Link Distance(ft) 696 376 375 149 Travel Time(s) 11.9 6.4 8.5 4.1 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) Confl. Bikes(#Ihr) Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 2% 5% 21% 5% 9% 0% 0% 33% 0% 0% 33% Bus Blockages(#Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#Ihr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic(%) 50% Lane Group Flow(vph) 31 1901 57 39 492 0 5 5 12 4 4 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 8 Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 8 8 8 7 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 35.0 35.0 9.0 34.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 40.0 40.0 Total Split(s) 14.0 66.0 66.0 14.0 66.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 18.0 Total Split(%) 11.7% 55.0% 55.0% 11.7% 55.0% 18.3% 18.3% 18.3% 15.0% 15.0% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 103.8 100.5 100.5 104.2 100.7 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.86 0.84 0.84 0.87 0.84 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M.Existing Peak Hour Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkwa 08/04/2021 r1A v/c Ratio 0.04 0.61 0.04 0.23 0.17 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.01 Control Delay 1.5 3.7 0.0 6.3 4.7 51.2 51.2 0.5 51.2 0.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1.5 3.7 0.0 6.3 4.7 51.2 51.2 0.5 51.2 0.0 LOS A A A A A D D A D A Approach Delay 3.6 4.8 23.6 25.6 Approach LOS A A C C Queue Length 50th(ft) 1 48 0 0 19 4 4 0 3 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) m5 163 m0 19 118 17 17 0 15 0 Internal Link Dist(ft) 616 296 295 69 Turn Bay Length( ) 200 210 170 Base Capacity(vph) 868 3120 1307 213 2868 228 228 264 180 601 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.61 0.04 0.18 0.17 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.01 IA 6"d0 "'Su"rhIaar ,� Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset:8(7%),Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.61 Intersection Signal Delay:4.1 Intersection LOS:A Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 2:Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive&Deerfield Parkwa lµ77 Z �. 05 r r�its 77 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M. Existing Peak Hour Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 08/04/2021 3: Deerfield Parkway & Windbrooke Drive ��/// „'00 is ii Int Delay,s/veh 0.7 Lane Configurations Ire Traffic Vol,vehm 11 1751 435 6 39 30 Future Vol,veh/h 11 1751 435 6 39 30 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 100 - - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 1 1 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 13 1990 494 7 44 34 Conflicting Flow All 501 0 _ 0 1519 251 Stage 1 - 498 Stage 2 1021 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 6.8 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.8 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1074 - 112 755 Stage 1 - - 582 Stage 2 - 313 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1074 111 755 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 230 - Stage 1 - - 575 Stage 2 313 -c S HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 19.3 HCM LOS C Capacity(veh/h) 1074 330 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 0.238 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.4 19.3 HCM Lane LOS A C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0•9 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report Page 1 A.M.Existing Peak Hour HCM 6th TWSC 4: Concrete Erectors Access Drive & Deerfield Parkway 08/04/2021 Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 1750 6 2 463 3 12 Future Vol, veh/h 1750 6 2 463 3 12 Conflicting Peds, /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop T Channelized None - None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 25 0 1 0 0 Mvmt Flow 1944 7 2 514 3 13 din l of , u, Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1951 0 2209 976 Stage 1 1948 Stage 2 - 261 Critical Hdwy - 4.1 6.8 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.8 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy - 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 304 39 254 Stage 1 99 Stage 2 - 765 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 304 39 254 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 86 _ Stage 1 gg - Stage 2 758 - , HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.2 26.6 HCM LOS D Capacity(veh/h) 183 - - 304 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.091 - 0.007 - HCM Control Delay(s) 26.6 - 16.9 0.1 HCM Lane LOS D C A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.3 - 0 - 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M.Existing Peak Hour Page 2 C,a cit Anal r EveningWeekday Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Park a 08/04/2021 Lane Grow BL EBT "E[§R'_ *8L, ,W13T" , WRW KBL' NB1' �,. .., NBff BL SBT.. Sl3P Lane Configurations tt I tT Traffic Volume(vph) 151 351 64 320 1310 108 124 256 201 81 276 201 Future Volume(vph) 151 351 64 320 1310 108 124 256 201 81 276 201 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 185 0 485 ®% 0 260 350 300 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 175 110 80 25 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 U5 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.977 0.989 0.850 0.937 At Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 3468 0 1805 3498 0 1787 3689 1568 1719 3349 0 Flt Permitted 0.078 0.424 0.213 0.550 Satd.Flow(perm) 145 3468 0 806 3498 0 401 3689 1568 995 3349 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 18 9 216 144 Link Speed(mph) 40 40 40 40 Link Distance(ft) 485 782 640 906 Travel Time(s) 8.3 13.3 10.9 15.4 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) Confl.Bikes(#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 3% 1% 3% 3% 5% 1% 1% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0°fin ®% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 162 446 0 344 1525 0 133 275 216 87 513 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 56.5 8.0 50.5 8.0 53.5 8.0 8.0 45.5 Total Split(s) 12.0 43.2 27.6 58.8 14.4 34.8 27.6 14.4 34.8 Total Split(%) 10.0% 36.0% 23.0% 49.0% 12.0% 29.0% 23.0% 12.0% 29.0% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2„0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 6.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min None Min None None Min Act Effct Green(s) 64.3 51.3 73.6 57.4 34.4 21.9 45.1 32.7 21.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.43 0.61 0.48 0.29 0.18 0.38 0.27 0.18 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M. Existing Peak Hour Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkway , ♦ 0810412021 tte<� ro E , r B! 4/ ,,; , ll qT I ,, ,,,,. v/c Ratio 0.74 0.30 0.54 0.91 0.58 0.41 0.30 0.27 0.73 Control Delay 46.4 24.4 12.4 30.3 39.8 44.4 3.5 30.4 39.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 46.4 24.4 12.4 30.3 39.8 44.4 3.5 30.4 39.0 LOS D C B C D D A C D Approach Delay 30.2 27.0 29.3 37.7 Approach LOS C C C D Queue Length 50th(ft) 66 111 61 581 76 100 0 49 144 Queue Length 95th( ) #228 186 149 #769 116 133 40 81 191 Internal Link Dist(ft) 405 702 560 826 Turn Bay Length( ) 185 485 2 3 Base Capacity(vph) 220 1492 697 1677 236 869 802 02 344 899 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0..74 0,30 0.49 0.91 0.56 0.32 0.27 0.25 0.57 Area Type: Other Cycle Length:120 Actuated Cycle Lengft 120 Offset,,94(78%),Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.91 Intersection Signal Delay:29.7 Intersection LO&C Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis' eHod(min)15 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1:Weiland Road&Deerfield Parkway r,irri 5 05 1+ ola ;i//%/,��,iiir/ 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M.Existing Peak Hour Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkwa 08/04/2021 . j ,;,,° I,��;; "IT ; I�VBR B T c tap Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(vph) 10 562 24 10 1643 16 76 1 35 16 0 38 Future Volume(vph) 10 562 24 10 1643 16 76 1 35 16 0 38 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 200 210 0 0 0 170 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 115 25 25 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.999 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.953 0.950 Said.Flow(prot) 1805 3689 1468 1031 3568 0 1681 1648 1369 1570 1615 0 Fit Permitted 0.071 0.410 0.950 0.953 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 135 3689 1468 445 3568 0 1681 1648 1369 1570 1615 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 118 1 118 254 Link Speed(mph) 40 40 30 25 Link Distance( ) 696 376 375 149 Travel Time(s) 11.9 6.4 8.5 4.1 Confl.Peds.(Mr) Confl.Bikes(#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 10% 75% 1% 8% 2% 100% 18% 15% 0% 0% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking ( /hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic(%) 49% Lane Group Flow(vph) 11 604 26 11 1784 0 42 41 38 17 41 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 8 Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 8 8 8 7 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 35.0 35.0 9.0 34.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 40.0 40.0 Total Split(s) 13.2 64.8 64.8 13.2 64.8 26.4 26.4 26.4 15.6 15.6 Total Split(%) 11.0% 54.0% 54.0% 11.0% 54.0% 22.0% 22.0% 22.0% 13.0% 13.0% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 89.5 87.5 87.5 89.7 87.6 10.3 10.3 10.3 9.6 9.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.75 0.73 0.73 0.75 0.73 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M.Existing Peak Hour Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield I arkwa, 0810412021 v/c Ratio 0.06 0.22 0.02 0.03 0.69 0.29 0.29 0.17 0.14 0.11 Control Delay 8.2 9.5 0.6 5.8 14.3 56.8 56.9 1.6 54.1 0.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 8.2 9.5 0.6 5.8 14.3 56.8 56.9 1.6 54.1 0.6 LOS A A A A B E E A D A Approach Delay 9.1 14.2 39.5 16.3 Approach LOS A B D B Queue Length 50th(ft) 2 64 0 2 412 32 31 0 12 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) ml l 202 3 8 681 71 70 0 37 0 Internal Link Dist(ft) 616 296 295 69 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 210 170 Base Capacity(vph) 229 2688 1102 379 2603 285 280 330 125 362 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.22 0.02 0.03 0.69 0,15 0,15 0,12 0,14 011 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Offset;71 (59%),Referenced to phase 2:E TL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.69 Intersection Signal Delay:14,2 Intersection LOS:B Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min)15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 2:Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive&Deerfield Parka 4*0 a44, 01 2 7 s� , of rt %, 5 � MET✓//I/;////ii 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M.Existing Peak Hour Page 4 Deerfield rkmall & Windbrooke Drive08/04/2021 I ego 01 ,, Int Delay,s/veh 0.7 d`96 : F ,.'"E§ S „VET'.,S°BL , Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 40 590 1717 40 6 20 Future Vol,veh/h 40 590 1717 40 6 20 Conflicting Peds, r 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop T Cnnelize - None - None - None Storage Length 100 - - 0 _ Vh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 9 Heavy Vehicles,% 22 2 7 0 0 4 vt Flow 42 61 107 42 6 21 Conflicting Flow All 1849 10 0 2223 925 Stage 1 - - - 12 - Stage 2 - - 395 - Critical Hdwy 4.54 - 6.8 6.98 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.8 - ritical Hdwy Stg2 - 5.8 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.42 - 3.5 3.34 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 252 - 38 267 Stage 1 - 116 - Stage 2 - - 656 - Platoon blocked,% ov Cap-1 Maneuver 252 - - 32 267 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver _ 83 - Stage 1 - - 97 - Stage 2 - 656 - HCM Control Delay,s 1.4 0 29 HCM LOS D Mlnor tune/Ma! 1 v 1 (L T wa' CBI 1 Capacity(veh/ ) 252 177 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.167 0.155 HCM Control Delay(s) 2 .1 - 2 HCM Lane LOS C - D HCM 9 t %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0.5 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M.Existing Peak Hour Page 1 08/0 /2021 : Concrete Erectorsrive & Deerfieldr aV 11 Int Delay,slveh 0 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,vehm 629 4 3 1734 4 1 Future Vol,vehlh 629 4 3 1734 4 1 Con ictin es, !hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop T Channelized None None - None Storage Length - "' 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles,% 1 17 0 4 33 9 vt Flow 669 4 3 185 4 1 1, ot4 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 673 0 16600 337 Stage' Stage 2 - 929 - Critical Hdwy 4e1 7.46 7.08 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.46 - Critical Hdwy St 6.46 - Follow-up Hdwy 2,2 3.83 3.39 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 927 71 6 39 Stage 1 - 394 - Stage 2 - _ 279 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 927 71 639 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 180 Stage 1 394 Stage 2 - 279 - HCM Coi�leol Delay,s , 0 0 2Z6 HCM LOS C aaci 'veku/11} HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.025 - 0.003 C Control l (s} 2 . - 0 HCM Lane LOS C - A A HCM 95th%tile Q(ve ) 0.1 - Synchro 8 Report 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Page 2 P.M.Existing Peak Hour car�2SO23N I M g I��e t S o-Build Conditions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 08/05/2021 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkwa Lane Configurations ` I Traffic Volume(vph) 205 1507 91 114 297 84 53 271 254 100 175 69 Future Volume(vph) 205 1507 91 114 297 84 53 271 254 100 175 69 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length(ft) 185 0 485 0 260 350 300 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 Taper Length(ft) 175 110 80 25 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 0,95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.850 0.958 Frt 0.991 0.967 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 1787 3500 0 1671 3375 0 1770 3619 1568 1687 3258 0 Fit Permitted 0.483 0.068 0.590 Satd.Flow(perm) 909 3500 0 120 3375 0 1099 3619 156e8 677 3258 Yes Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 6 34 159 46 Link Speed(mph) 40 40 40 40 Link Distance(ft) 485 782 640 906 Travel Time(s) 8.3 13.3 10.9 15.4 Confl.Peds.( /hr) Confl.Bikes(#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 2% 6% 8% 3% 5% 2% 5% 3% 7% 7% 4% Bus Blockages( /hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking ( /hr) ®% 0% 0% 0% Mid-Block Tragic(%) Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 220 1718 0 123 409 0 57 291 273 108 262 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 56.5 8.0 50.5 8.0 53.5 8.0 8.0 45.5 Total Split(s) 20.4 55.2 14.4 49.2 14.4 27.6 14.4 22.8 36.0 Total Split(%) 17.0% 46.0% 12.0% 41.0% 12.0% 23.0% 12.0% 19.0% 30.0% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 6.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min None Min None None Min Act Effct Green(s) 75.2 61.0 72.0 59.4 27.0 16.2 32.8 33.9 21.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 0.51 0.60 0.50 0.22 0.14 0.27 0.28 0.18 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report Page 1 A.M.No Build 2027 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkwa 08/05/2021 4,- v/c Ratio 0.34 0.96 0.61 0.24 0.19 0.60 0.50 0.37 0.42 Control Delay 10.8 43.8 39.1 19.0 31.8 53.9 17.3 35.2 38.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 10.8 43.8 39.1 19.0 31.8 53.9 17.3 35.2 38.1 LOS B D D B C D B D D Approach Delay 40.1 23.7 35.8 37.3 Approach LOS D C D Queue Length 50th(ft) 61 629 58 80 33 114 72 65 81 Queue Length 95th( ) 118 #997 145 136 61 155 139 102 116 Internal Link Dist(ft) 405 702 560 826 Turn Bay Length(ft) 185 485 260 350 300 Base Capacity(vph) 704 1782 223 1687 324 636 561 352 835 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.96 0.55 0.24 0.18 0.46 0.49 0.31 031 (frstljrt Area Type: Other Cycle Length:120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset 112(93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green Natural Cycle:150 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.96 Interse0on Signal Delay 36.5 Intersection LOS:D Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(mice)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds caaclly,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycle Splits and Phases: 1:Weiland Road&Deerfield Pack^ ay 1 12 R 05 06 t� / i i �7 0 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove A.M.No Build 2027 Synchro 8 Report Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 08/05/2021 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Palva --► " ... �f f f Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(vph) 30 1813 54 37 454 15 10 0 12 4 0 4 Future Volume(vph) 30 1813 54 37 454 15 10 0 12 4 0 4 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 200 210 0 0 0 170 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 Taper Length(ft) 215 115 25 25 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Fri 0.850 0.995 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 1805 3725 1538 1492 3417 0 0 715 1715 0 950 1214 ®8805 1214 0 Fit Permitted 0.459 0.048 Satd.Flow(perm) 872 3725 1538 75 3417 0 1715 1715 1214 1805.950 1214 Yes Right Turn on Red Yes Yes YesSatd.Flow(RTOR) 118 4 118 515 Link Speed(mph) 40 40 30 25 Link Distance(ft) 696 376 375 14 Travel Time(s) 11.9 6.4 8.5 4.1 Confl.Peds.(#Ihr) Confl.Bikes(#Ihr) Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 2% 5% 21% 5% 9% 0% 0% 33% 0% 0% 33% Bus Blockages(#Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#Ihr) 0% Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% ®% ®% 0 Shared Lane Traffic(%) 50/° Lane Group Flow(vph) 33 2014 60 41 521 0 5 6 13 4 4 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 8 8 8 7 7 Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 35.0 35.0 9.0 34.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 18.0 Total Split(s) 14.0 66.0 66.0 14.0 66.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 18.0 Total Split(%) 11.7% 55.0% 55.0% 11.7% 55.0% 18.3% 18.3% 18.3% 15.0% 15.0% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 99.7 94.1 94.1 101.1 97.4 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.83 0.78 0.78 0.84 0.81 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M.No Build 2027 Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkwa 08/05/2021 Iall �rottBR II ', v/c Ratio 0.04 0.69 0.05 0.30 0.19 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.01 Control Delay Queue Dela 1.7 5.5 0.0 12.5 5.5 51.2 51.4 0.6 51.2 0.0 y 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 5.5 0.0 12.5 5.5 51.2 51.4 0.6 51.2 0.0 LOS A A A B A D D A D A Approach Delay 5.3 6.0 23.8 25.6 Approach LOS A A C C Queue Length 50th(ft) 2 125 0 4 57 4 4 0 3 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) m4 m191 m0 29 126 17 18 0 15 0 Internal Link Dist(ft) 616 296 295 69 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 210 170 Base Capacity(vph) 824 2920 1231 182 2775 228 228 264 180 584 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.69 0.05 0.23 0.19 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.01 11et ;apko' %t uM� ";. Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset:8(7d"X°),Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green Natural Cycle:115 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.69 Intersection Sigma Delay:53 Intersection LO&A Intersection Capacity U iliz atlon 79.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min)15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. SpKs and Phases: 2:Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive&Deerfield ParkYwa -4010 2 7 5 11 06 i rl 21-162-Residential Development Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M. No Build 2027 Page 4 HCM t Deerfield r i BrookeDriveo810512021 Int Delay,slveh 0.7 Lane Traffic Vol,v ehlh Configurations 12 1856 462 6 41 32 Future Vol,vehlh 12 156 462 6 41 32 Conflicting Peds, mr 0 0 0 a 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop T Cannelize - None - None - None Storage Length 100 - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 1 1 0 0 0 vt Flow 14 2109 525 7 47 36 � 11t01" orb a"5y2 , Mlto5 ; Conflicting Flow All 532 0 0 1612 266 Stage 1 - - 529 - Stage 2 - 1083 - Crical Hdwy 4,1 6.8 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.8 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.8 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 106 97 738 Stage 1 - - 561 - Stage 2 291 - Platoon blocked,% ov Cap-1 Maneuver 106 96 738 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 212 - Stage 1 - _ 55 - Stage 2 - 291 T�apl�i ;... HCM Control Delay,s 01 0 20.9 HCM LOS C ( 11pr;li ttel `ol;ld1t, Sl SOT LI ; BLn1 Cap,acily(vela/h) 1046 308 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.013 - 0.269 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.5 20.9 HCM Lane LOS A - C HCIA 951h` file O(veh) 0 1.1 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M.No Build 2027 Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Concrete Erectors Access Drive & Deerfield Parkwa 08/05/2021 . Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 ieltt ,1 � H Lane Configurations ;. . Traffic Vol,veh/h 1855 6 2 492 3 13 Future Vol,veh/h 1855 6 2 492 3 13 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length - - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles,% 1 25 0 1 0 0 Mvmt Flow 2061 7 2 547 3 14 2` ; Mot e, r Conflicting Flow All 0 0 2068 0 2343 1034 Stage 1 - 2065 - Stage 2 278 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 6.8 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.8 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 273 31 233 Stage 1 _ 86 - Stage 2 750 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 273 31 233 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 75 - Stage 1 88 - Stage 2 742 - .., HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.2 29.1 HCM LOS D G 5 P' " mi R; Capacity(veh/h) 167 "— HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.106 0.008 - HCM Control Delay(s) 29.1 18.3 0.1 HCM Lane LOS D - - C A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report A.M. No Build 2027 Page 2 Weekday Evening Peak Hour — Year 3 No-Build Conditions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkwa 08/05/2021 art ti` E � � � Ia "AST, `t ;,. L,. 1 II T " `q T BI Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(vph) 160 609 68 339 1405 114 131 271 213 86 293 213 Future Volume(vph) 160 609 68 339 1405 114 131 271 213 86 293 213 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 '1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length(ft) 185 0 485 0 260 350 300 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 175 110 80 25 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.985 0.989 0.850 0.937 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 3493 0 1805 3498 0 177 3689 1568 1719 3349 0 Fit Permitted 0.083 0.254 0.199 0.526 Satd.Flow(perm) 155 3493 0 43 3498 0 374 3689 1568 952 3349 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow( TO ) 10 9 193 143 Link Speed(mph) 40 40 40 40 Link Distance(ft) 485 782 640 906 Travel Time(s) 8.3 13.3 10.9 15.4 Confl.Peds.( /hr) Confl.Bikes(#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(°/®} 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 3% 1% 3% 3% 5% 1% 1% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking ( /hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 172 728 0 365 1634 0 141 291 229 92 544 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA p +ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 56.5 8.0 50.5 8.0 53.5 8.0 8.0 45.5 Total Split(s) 12.0 43.2 27.6 58.8 14.4 34.8 27.6 14.4 34.8 Total Split(%) 10.0% 36.0% 23.0% 49.0% 12.0% 29.0% 23.0% 12.0% 29.0% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 6.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min None Min None None Min Act Effct Green(s) 62.0 48.5 72.5 55.9 35.3 22.8 47.8 33.8 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.40 0.60 0.47 0.29 0.19 0.40 0.28 0.18 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M.No Build 2027 Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkwa o810512021 R� ,,,,,,N BR , v/c Ratio 0.75 0.51 0.74 1.00 0.62 0.42 0.31 0.28 0.74 Control Delay 48.3 30.2 30.0 45.7 41.1 43.9 5.3 30.0 40.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 48.3 30.2 30.0 45.7 41.1 43.9 5.3 30.0 40.0 LOS D C C D D D A C D Approach Delay 33.7 42.8 29.9 38.5 Approach LOS C D C D Queue Length 50th(ft) 73 218 106 -724 80 105 17 51 157 Queue Length 95th(ft) #245 325 248 #863 122 141 58 84 206 Internal Link Dist(ft) 405 702 560 826 Turn Bay Length(ft) 185 485 260 350 300 Base Capacity(vph) 229 1416 556 1633 233 869 799 343 899 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.75 0.51 0.66 1.00 0.61 0.33 0.29 0.27 0.61 r Area Type: Other Cycle Length:120 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Olfset;94(18%),Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:W TL,Start of Green Natural Cycle:150 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maxlmurn We Ratio.1.00 InterseclOn Signal Delay:38.2 Intersection LOS:D Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period(min)15 Volume exceeds capacity,queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Slits and d Phases: 1:Weiland Road&Deerfield Par may Oro 91ii tt" 0 " aim, ,,. -, ,,.,,, - ,.,,.� ,,... ,�,.,i, �.�� ,�✓//��i ,�i /, ///��/ii///%%/�%�'�% " 1. 1*0 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M.No Build 2027 Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkwa 08/05/2021 -- r W i,,,'`Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(vph) 11 833 25 11 1757 17 81 1 37 17 0 40 Future Volume(vph) 11 833 25 11 1757 17 81 1 37 17 0 40 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(°/®) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length(ft) 200 210 0 0 0 170 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 115 25 25 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.999 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.953 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 1805 3689 1468 1031 3568 0 1681 1650 1369 1570 1615 0 Fit Permitted 0.050 0.283 0.950 0.953 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 95 3689 1468 307 3568 0 1681 1650 1369 1570 1615 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 118 1 118 247 Link Speed(mph) 40 40 30 25 Link Distance(ft) 696 376 375 149 Travel Time(s) 11.9 6.4 8.5 41 Confl.Peds.( /hr) Confl.Bikes(#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 10% 75% 1% 8% 2% 100% 18% 15% 0% 0% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking ( /hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% ° ° Shared Lane Traffic(%) 49% Lane Group Flow(vph) 12 896 27 12 1907 0 44 44 40 18 43 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 8 Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 8 8 8 7 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 35.0 35.0 9.0 34.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 40.0 40.0 Total Split(s) 13.2 64.8 64.8 13.2 64.8 26.4 26.4 26.4 15.6 15.6 Total Split(%) 11.0% 54.0% 54.0% 11.0% 54.0% 22.0% 22.0% 22.0% 13.0% 13.0% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 88.6 85.3 85.3 88.9 85.5 10.4 10.4 10.4 9.6 9.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.71 0.71 0.74 0.71 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report P.M.No Build 2027 Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 08/05/2021 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkwa 1amt , rp f, vlc Ratio 0.08 0.34 0.03 0.05 0.75 0.30 0.31 0.18 0.14 0.12 Control Delay 12.3 15.7 1.2 6.1 17.7 57.0 57.3 1.7 54.3 0.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 12.3 15.7 1.2 6.1 17.7 57.0 57.3 1.7 54.3 0.7 LOS B B A A B E E A D A Approach Delay 15.3 17.6 39.8 16.5 Approach LOS B B D B Queue Length 50th(ft) 2 121 0 3 473 34 34 0 13 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) m12 342 m4 9 296 74 295 0 3 69 Internal Link Dist(ft) 616 296 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 210 170 Base Capacity(vph) 202 2623 1078 285 2543 285 280 330 125 356 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.34 0.03 0.04 0.75 0,15 0.,16 0.12 0.14 0,12 Wwr*�On"' 0,01 Area Type: Other Cycle Length:120 Actuated Cyde Length:120 Offset 71 (59%),Referenced to phase 2:E TL and 6:W TL,Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum vic Ratio;035 Intersection Signal Delay: '17,8 Intersection LO&B Intersecton capacity Utilization 68.0% ICU Leval of Service C Analysis Period(min)15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases 2:Commerce CourtlRexam Access Drive&Deerfield i ,rkwa ' NO 7777ME:1 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report Page 4 P.M.No Build 2027 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Deerfield Parkway & Windbrooke Drive 08/05/2021 Int Delay,s/veh 0.7 Lane Configurations ~ ��,, Traffic Vol,veh/h 42 863 1836 42 6 21 Future Vol,veh/h 42 863 1836 42 6 21 Conflicting Peds, /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop T Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 100 - - 0 Veh un Med%an Glorage,# - 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour factor 9°6 95 95 95 95, 95 Heavy Vehicles,% 22 2 7 0 0 4. Mvrnt How 44 908 1933 44 6, 22 0 or�il� i„� , ; ,Winer „ Conflicting Flow All 1977 0 0 2497 989 Stage 1 - - 1955 - Stage 2 - 542 - Critical Hdwy 4.54 - 6.8 6.98 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.8 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 _ Follow-up Hdwy 2.42 - 3.5 3.34 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 222 - 25 242 Stage 1 99 _ Stage 2 - 553 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 222 - 20 242 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 67 _ Stage 1 79 _ Stage 2 553 - Via. .,,,, . �R HCM Control Delay,s 1.2 0 33.8 HCM LOS D llvtb( L F� RRSBir� Capacity(veh/h) 222 - 153 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.199 0.186 HCM Control Delay(s) 25.2 - 33.8 HCM Lane LOS D D HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.7 - 0.7 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove P.M.No Build 2027 Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Concrete Erectors Access Drive & Deerfield Parkwa o810512021 „ .... , Int Delay,slveh 0.1 Lane Configurations ItI4 4t Y Traffic Vol,vehlh 904 4 3 1854 4 1 Future Vol,vehlh 904 4 3 1854 4 1 Conflicting Peds,#mr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles,% 1 17 0 4 33 9 Mvmt Flow 962 4 3 1972 4 1 MMo�. - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 966 0 1956 483 Stage 1 - 964 - Stage 2 992 Critical Hdwy 4.1 7.46 7.08 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 s TM - 6.46 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.83 3.39 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 721 39 511 Stage 1 - 266 Stage 2 257 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 721 39 511 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 137 - Stage 1 266 Stage 2 - 257 HCM a Control Delay,s 0 0 28.3 HCM LOS D .... Capacity(vehlh) 160 - 721 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.033 - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay(s) 28.3 - 10 0 HCM Lane LOS D - B A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0 - 21-162-Residential Development-Buffalo Grove Synchro 8 Report Page 2 P.M.No Build 2027 Conditions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 08/05/2021 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkwal Lane Configurations '� Traffic Volume(vph} 205 1508 91 121 305 90 53 271 256 101 175 69 Future Volume(vph) 205 1508 91 121 305 90 53 271 256 101 175 69 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0 485 0 260 350 300 185 Storage Length(ft) 0 1 1 1 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 25 Taper Length(ft) 175 110 80 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.966 0.850 0.958 Frt 0.991 0.950 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 1787 3500 0 1671 3371 0 1770 3619 1568 ®668871 3258 0 Fit Permitted 0.474 0.068 0.590 Satd.Flow(perm) 892 3500 0 120 3371 Yes 1099 3619 1556e8 677 3258 Ye0 Right Turn on Red Yes 46 6 36 158 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 40 40 40 Link Speed(mph) 40 906 485 991 640 Link Distance(ft) 16.9 10.9 15.4 Travel Time(s) 8.3 Confl.Peds.(#Ihr) Confl.Bikes(#Ihr) Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 100 3 0.93 0.93 100% 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% % 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 2% 6% 8% 3% 5% 2% 5% 3%® 7% 7% 4% Bus Blockages(#Ihr) 0 0 0 0 Parking (#Ihr) 0% 0% 0% Mid-Block Traffic(%) ®% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 220 1720 0 130 425 ® 0 m+ t NA pm+ov pm++pt NA Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA p p 3 8 1 7 4 Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 2 6 g 8 4 Permitted Phases 1 6 3 g 1 7 4 Detector Phase 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 56.5 8.0 50.5 8.0 53.5 8.0 8.0 45.5 Total Split(s) 20.4 55.2 14.4 49.2 14.4 27.6 14.4 22.8 36.0 Total Split(%) 17.0% 46.0% 12.0% 41.0% 12.0% 23.0% 12.0% 19.0% 30.0% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 6.5 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min None Min None None Min Act Effct Green(s) 74.8 60.6 72.3 59.3 27.0 16.2 33.2 34.0 21.7 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.62 0.50 0.60 0.49 0.22 0.14 0.28 0.28 0.18 Synchro 8 Report Page 1 A.M.Future Peak Hour Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1, Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkwa 08/05/2021 Now v/c Ratio 0.34 0.97 0.63 0.25 0.19 0.60 0.50 0.38 0.42 Control Delay 11.0 45.6 40.0 19.3 31.7 53.9 17.4 35.2 38.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.0 45.6 40.0 19.3 31.7 53.9 LO 17.4 35.2 38.1 D D B C 0 B D D Approach Delay 41.6 24.1 Approach LS 35.8 37.2 C Queue Length 50th(ft) 61 638 63 85 33 114 73 65 81 Queue Length 95th(ft) 119 #1000 151 143 60 155 142 103 116 Internal Link Dist(ft) 405 911 560 Turn Bay Length( ) 15 485 826 224 1684 324 63 Base Capacity(vph) 695 1770 260 352 62 3 835 0 562 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.97 0.58 0.25 0.18 0.46 0.49 0.31 0,31 ql1 l cIf q1 Ui M l Area Type: Other Cycle Length:120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset 112(93%)„Referenced to phase 2:E TL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.97 Intersection Sgial Delay:37.3 Intersection LOSS: IntersectiOn Capacity Ulllixation 86.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capaclly,queue may be longer. Queue shown is max"rnum after tvvo ay�,los. Splits and Phases. 1:Weiland Road&Deerfield Parkway IW t ,, ;;�✓1/Jiffs %�/i%��%/Gii��/%i//,/,,, /// ii%%/jai///i/%'i/ii%%//�% 4 5 06 A.M.Future Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 08105/2021 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parana 4__ . � aq E, Lane Configurations 4 Traffic volume(vph) 30 1826 54 37 461 15 10 0 12 4 ® 4 Future Volume(vph) 30 1826 54 37 461 15 10 0 12 4 0 Ideal Flow(vphp1) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 ®% 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% ® p 170 ® 0 Storage Length(ft) 200 210 0 0 1 I 1 0 Storage Lanes N 25 Taper Length(ft) 215 1 25 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.0000 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.850 0.850 Fri: 0.950 0.995 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Fit Protected 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 1805 3725 1538 1492 3417 0 1715 1715 0 950 0 950 1214 ®8805 1214 0 50 Fit Permitted 0.456 0.046 FitPeritted(perm) 866 3725 1538 72 3417 0 1715 1715 1214 Yes 1805 1214 Satd.Flow Yes Right Turn on Red Yes Yes 118 4 118 511 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 40 30 25 376 375 Link Speed(mph) 696 40 149 Link Distance(ft) 6 4 8.5 4.1 Travel Time(s) 11.9 Confl.Peds.( Ihr) Confl.Bikes(#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 2% 5% 21% 5% 9% 0% 0% 33% 0% 0% 33% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking ( /hr) 0% 0®/0 0% Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% Shared Lane Traffic(%) 50% 6 13 4 4 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 33 2029 60 41 529 ® Split t NA Perm Split NA Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA P 8 7 7 Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 2 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 8 g g 7 7 Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 22.0 22.0 2z 0 18.0 18.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 35.0 35.0 9.0 34.0 Total Split(s) 14.0 66.0 66.0 14.0 66.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 18.0 Total Split(%) 11.7% 55.0% 55.0% 11.7% 55.0% 18.3% 18.3% 18.3% 15.0% 15.0% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 .0 .0.0.0.0 0 0 0 0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 .0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6..0 0.0 0.0 0 Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min None None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 99.7 94.1 94.1 101.1 97.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.83 0.78 0.78 0.84 0.81 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Synchro 8 Report Page 3 A.M.Future Peak Hour Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Par kw 08/05/2021 I.00 nSrou S f` , 13L „ IT; ItSI I 5 v/c Ratio0.69 0.05 0.31 0.19 Control Delay 1,7 5.6 0.0 13.5 5.9 0'� 0.0 Queue Delay0.5 51.2 51.4 0.6 51.2 0.0 Total Delay 1.7 5.6 0.0 13.5 5.5 0.0 0.0 .0 .0 0.0 LO 51.2 51.4 0.6 51.2 0.0 A Approach Delay 5.4 A D 23 8 A 6 Approach LOS A A A 25.6 C Queue Length 50th(ft) 2 127 C 0 4 58 4 4 0 3 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) m4 m192 m0 31 128 17 18 0 15 0 Internal Link Dist(ft) 616 296 Turnay Length( ) 200 295 69 210 170 Base Capacity(vph) 819 2920 1231 180 2775 228 228 264 180 581 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.69 0.05 0.23 0.19 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.01 pIr : trd0 qua Area Type Other Cycle Length:120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset 8(7%),Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green Natural Cycle:115 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.69 intersection Signal Delay.5.7" Intersection W&A Intersection CaPacity Utilization 79.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis.Period(min)15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 2:Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive&Deerfield Parkwa W Ia „ .., ,,,t ✓<'<. ,,,,,,,,% ; %/i � i"�,r�(ii%//�O/vie r s, A.M. Future Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 3: it Access o i n roo riveDeerfieldS rk a 0810512021 int Delay,slveh 6 6 . ..,, Covtnu T, � �S ;$6 . SSR: ... L ��5�;. �" 0"�ST`:; 5�1, � b�SL.,NB Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,vehlh 12 1847 6 7 462 6 22 0 22 41 0 32 Future.Vol,veWh 12 1847 6 7 462 6 22 0 22 41 0 32 Contlicling Reds„Air 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RI Channellzed _ None - - None - - None - None Storage Length 100 - 100 - _ 0 _ - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles,% 22 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 vmtFlow 13 1944 6 7 486 6 23 0 23 43 0 34 066 .. Conflicting Flow All 492 0 0 1950 0 0 2230 2479 975 1501 2479 246 Stage1 - - • - - 1973 1973 - 503 503 Stage 2 - - 257 506 - 998 1976 Critical Hdwy 4.54 4.1 - 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.54 6. 8 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.54 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 _ - 6.5 6.5 - 6.5 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.42 - 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4.02 3.34 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 939 - 304 P24 30 255 86 29 748 Stage - - - 66 109 - 524 540 Stage 2 - - 71 5 - 265 10 Platoon blocked,% ov Cap-1 Maneuver 939 304 - - -22 29 255 76 28 748 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -22 29 - 76 28 Stage 1 - _ 65 107 - 517 528 Stage 2 682 531 - 238 105 ..... . aclr;,d,F; ,,, �,�..:. ,SS ;; WB HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0.3 239.8 71.5 HCM LOS F F N ,. !r7i7i7l l Or Mil; t ft fMlS tt2; BL FST E'S 8S S �, plh 22 26 939 304 - - 125C Ratlo Iw053 0.09I 0.0'13 0.024 - 0.615 Delay jsa $459"l 20.5 8.9 - 17.1 - 71.5S F C A C - - F 1-IcM g5th%tile C(veh) 3 0.3 0 0.1 3.1 Volume exceeds capacity :Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined *'All major volume in platoon Synchro 8 Report Page 1 A.M.Future Peak Hour t Weekday Evening o - Year 2023 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 08/05/2021 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield Parkwa Lane Configurations1 ' Traffic Volume(vph) 160 615 68 343 1393 118 131 271 219 92 293 213 Future Volume(vph) 160 615 68 343 1393 118 131 271 219 92 293 213 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0 260 350 300 0 Storage Length(ft) 185 0 485 1 1 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 Taper Length(ft) 175 110 80 25 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.850 0.937 Frt 0.985 0.988 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 3493 0 1805 3494 0 0178878 3689 1568 1719 0 523 3349 0 Flt Permitted 0.083 0.250 Satd.Flow(perm) 155 3493 0 475 3494 0 372 3689 1568 946 3349 Ye0s Right Turn on Red Yes Yes YesSatd.Flow(RTOR) 10 9 185 143 40 40 40 Link Speed(mph) 40 640 906 Link Distance(ft) 485 991 Travel Time(s) 8.3 16.9 10.9 15.4 Confl.Peds.(Mr) Confl.Bikes(#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 3% 1% 3% 3% 5% 1% 1% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) ° 0% 0% Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic(%) 99 Lane Group Flow(vph) 172 734 0 369 1625 0 141 t 91 pm235+ov pm+pt 44 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm pt NA p p NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 56.5 8.0 50.5 8.0 53.5 8.0 8.0 45.5 Total Split(s) 12.0 43.2 27.6 58.8 14.4 34.8 27.6 14.4 34.8 Total Split(%) 10.0% 36.0% 23.0% 49.0% 12.0% 29.0% 23.0% 12.0% 29,0% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 6.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min None Min None None Min Act Effct Green(s) 61.7 48.1 72.6 55.9 35.1 22.6 48.0 34.0 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.40 0.60 0.47 0.29 0.19 0.40 0.28 0.18 Synchro 8 Report Page 1 P.M.Future Peak Hour Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Weiland Road & Deerfield ParkwIR a o8/0512021 Li: G. 1tX v/c Ratio Sl 0.75 0.52 0.74 1.00 0.62 0.42 0.32 0.3 0.7 Control Delay 48.6 30.7 30.6 45.3 41.4 44.1 6.1 30.4 40.0 Queue delay 0. 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total delay 48.6 30.7 30.6 45.3 41.4 44.1 6.1 30.4 40.0 L C A C Approach Delay 34.1 42.6 30.1 38.5 Approach L C D C D Queue Length 50th(ft) 74 222 112 -718 80 106 24 55 157 Queue Length 95th(ft) #245 328 254 #855 122 141 65 90 26 Internal Link Dist(ft) 405 911 560 Turnay Length(ft) 185 826 4 260 350 30 Base Capacity(vph) 228 1404 554 1630 232 869 795 342 899 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.75 0.52 0.67 1.00 0.61 0.33 0.30 0.29 0.61 drdttstg9:°56t „ , w. Area Type: Other Cycle Length:120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offsev 94(78%),Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green Natural Cycles 150 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00 Interseclion Signal Delay°381 Intersection LOS.D Intersection Capacity IUtililation 90.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(n*)15 Volume exceeds capacity,queue as theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 9 rth percentile voluaw exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown rs Maximum after two cycles, Splits,and Phases: 1:Weiland Road&Deerfield Parkway r P T P.M. Future Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkwa o8105/2021 " ' Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(vph) 11 846 25 11 1762 17 82 1 37 17 0 40 Future Volume(vph) 11 846 25 11 1762 17 82 1 37 17 0 40 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 200 210 0 0 0 170 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 115 25 25 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Fr{ 0.850 0.999 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.953 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 1805 3689 1468 1031 3568 0 1681 1650 1369 1570 1615 0 Fit Permitted 0.050 0.278 0.950 0.953 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 95 3689 1468 302 3568 0 1681 1650 1369 1570 1615 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 118 1 118 247 Link Speed(mph) 40 40 30 25 Link Distance(ft) 696 382 375 149 Travel Time(s) 11.9 6.5 8.5 4.1 Confl.Peds.( mr) Confl.Bikes(#Ihr) Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 10% 75% 1% 8% 2% 100% 18% 15% 0% 0% Bus Blockages(#Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking ( /hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic(%) 49®/° Lane Group Flow(vph) 12 910 27 12 1913 0 45 44 40 18 43 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Split NA Perm Split N Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 7 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 8 Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 8 8 8 7 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 35.0 35.0 9.0 34.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 40.0 40.0 Total Split(s) 13.2 64.8 64.8 13.2 64.8 26.4 26.4 26.4 15.6 15.6 Total Split(%) 11.0% 54.0% 54.0% 11.0% 54.0% 22.0% 22.0% 22.0% 13.0% 13.0% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 88.6 85.3 85.3 88.9 85.5 10.4 10.4 10.4 9.6 9.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.71 0.71 0.74 0.71 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 Synchro 8 Report P.M.Future Peak Hour Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive & Deerfield Parkwa 08/05/2021 at1 t1,r & v/c Ratio 0.08 0.35 0.03 0.05 0.75 0.31 0.31 0.18 0.14 0.12 Control Delay 11.6 15.7 1.0 6.1 17.8 57.2 57.3 1.7 54.3 0.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.6 15.7 1.0 6.1 17.8 57.2 57.3 1.7 54.3 0.7 LOS B B A A B E E A D A Approach Delay 15.3 17.7 40.1 16,5 Approach LOS B B D B Queue Length 50th(ft) 2 132 0 3 476 34 34 0 13 0 Queue Length 95th( ) m12 345 m3 9 793 74 74 0 38 0 Internal Link Dist(ft) 616 302 295 69 Turn Bay Length( ) 200 210 170 Base Capacity(vph) 202 2623 1078 282 2543 285 280 330 125 356 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.35 0.03 0.04 035 0.16 0A6 0.12 0.14 0.12 Area Type: Other Cycle Length. 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Ofls'0 71 (59%),Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL,Start of Green Natural Cycle:145 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.75 Intersection Signal Delay: 17,9 Intersection trO& Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.2% ICU Level of Service C Anatysis Period(min)15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 2:Commerce Court/Rexam Access Drive&Deerfield Parkway Q i //iii�rii/// rr 05 1 p � . Synchro 8 Report P.M.Future Peak Hour Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Site Access RoadMindbrooke Drive & Deerfield Parkwa 08/05/2021 Int Delay,s/veh 5.3 _. . °f ; 1 Lane Configurations 41� Traffic Vol,veh/h 42 863 21 22 1820 42 13 0 13 6 0 21 Future Vol,veh/h 42 863 21 22 1820 42 13 0 13 6 0 21 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None None None - None Storage Length 100 100 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 0 _ 0 Grade,% - 0 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 48 981 24 25 2068 48 15 0 15 7 0 24 Conflicting Flow All 2116 0 0 1005 0 0 2173 3255 503 2729 3243 1058 Stage 1 _ - - - 1089 1089 - 2142 2142 Stage 2 _ - 1084 2166 - 587 1101 Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 _ - 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 262 697 27 9 519 10 10 224 Stage 1 - - - 233 294 - 51 89 - Stage 2 _ _ 235 87 468 290 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 262 - 697 20 7 519 8 8 224 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 20 7 - 8 8 Stage - - - 190 240 - 42 86 Stage 2 - 202 84 - 371 237 - I , HCM Control Delay,s 1 0.1 195 $328.7 HCM LOS F F l pp t t q a� ct1l' l L b Ld iL...... f`` 4k„" BL1 .Sl Capacity(veh/h) 20 519 262 697 - 32 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.739 0.028 0.182 0.036 - 0.959 HCM Control Delay(s) $377.8 12.1 21.8 - 10.4 -$328.7 HCM Lane LOS F B C _ B F HCM 95th°/stile Q(veh) 2 0.1 0.7 0.1 - 3.3 oVolume exceeds capacity $:Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined *:All major volume in platoon Synchro 8 Report P.M. Future Peak Hour Page 1 Turn Lane Warrant FigLires Table 5.4 Right-Turn Lane Guidelines for Four-Lane Highways Minimum Right-turn Volume WarrantingExclusive Lane (vp Approach r35 - .. h) PP Lane Volume By posted Speed Limit (vph) h 45 m.....� .. .. mph 4..�....... F55 mph 0 mph p 50 mph �..�- _. 300�, 75 .. 40 IT 15..... 400 40 40 50.0 .. 40 40 30 15 600 40 40 40 25 10 ...... �800 40 35 30 20 10 ..15 .. .�.. ..�10 .. 1200WWWm 1600 15 _ 15 15 10 2000 10 10 10 10 5 Urban aNI, �� mFour 40 35 I " , //fil✓lGAI/t/✓llJ/!✓✓/®Yt Vt/fl idl Ill✓A/ !:✓!kG IA/'PlaR ll✓61P/! sYk"0.91r/'tY nln d.Aa✓/( Y/(l,IJ RK 'i5J 1C' kll!!/N EE<!(N/✓JlX/J Xf(..YNlil✓✓<YYlY 14ll N 20 15 u m15 1 w N1u mia II Illatiie rolt wzi, m I) Peak Hour (942, 22) NBN �>fl,,,,,, r October 28th, 2021 Mr. Ted Sianis, P.E. Village of Buffalo Grove Fifty-One Raupp Blvd Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 RE: 16051 Deerfield Parkway 7 Buffalo Grove Multi-Family Development Proposed Improvements Second Submittal Dear Mr. Sianis: We are in response of your review comments dated October 1 It, 2021 for the proposed improvements for MZ Buffalo Grove Multi-Family Development project located at 16051 Deerfield Parkway. Below is a summary of the actions taken in response to these comments. aqmag�q e 1. Ple ase provide other agency permits (i.e. IEPA N09,, Water Make, Sanitary, LCDOT, eta;.). Response: iEP 1 0i, watermain, and sanitary PeIermit applications will be prepared along with final engineering at a later date. ill's. SetsY Ouc ert with LC1 OT has reviewed the driveway geometry on Deerfield Pat*wasy and traffic study submitted for the proposed improvements and has no further cotrrrnents on these iterns, This letter, dated' Septennber° 101h, 2021, is enclosed for the Village's records, Correspondence with LCDOT will include the tfillage as the final engineering plans progress. 2. Please provide an Engineer's Opinion of Probably Cost(EOPC)with the Final Engineering submittal. Include a 10% contingency as well as an 8% increase for Letter of Credit purposes per ordinance 16.20.130. Response: Comment noted— an EOPC will be prepared with the final engineering submittal as requested. 3• Once the Village has an EOPC, we will develop and provide you a draft Development lmprovernent Agreement (DI A). The Developer will be reguked to execute and submit the DIA Including;; i )))l lairn ,,oPc a. A Letter of Credit; b. Engineering review and inspection fees; and c. A cash deposit(a percentage of the Letter of Credit); Response:: Comment noted— the developer will coordinate with the Village regarding the DIA once the EO3PC is prepared and provided. 4. Provide sanitary service PE calculations. a. Additionally, you will need to reach out to the Lake County Public Works Department to determine their sanitary sewer connection fees. Response: 120 total residential units are proposed(30 per building) and one clubhouse is proposed. Calculations are provided within this submittal which equate to a PE value of 233. An email was sent"to Lake County!PW on 10113121 for confirmation of the impact fee amounts. The Village has been copied on all correspondence. 5. Please confirm the parking lot landscaping island requirement of 180 SF per 20 parking spaces has been met. Response: The ininirnurn parking lot landscaping is 1,827 SF per this requirement with 203 surface parking spaces proposed(garage parking excluded")'. The enclosed plan includes approximately 4,000 SF of landscaped parking islands. 6. A site benchmark will be required prior to the completion of the development to add to the Village's benchmark network. Said benchmark will need to be near Deerfield Parkway, but not within LCDOT or ComEd ROW. We can determine proper location at completion of development construction. Response: Comment noted — a benchmark location is proposed within the northeastern triangle parcel (see sheet C3.0 and C3.1). Note that this location is private property. If a different location is preferred, we are happy to review and Incorporate it into the final engineering plans. 7. A soul erosion and sediment control plan is required. Response: A soil erosion and sediment control plan has been prepared and is provided. Refer to sheet C7.0 in updated plans. 8. Roads including the entrance off Deerfield Parkway will be considered private roads. Response: Comment noted— general note 7 on sheet C3.0 has been added to identify that all proposed roads shall be private. 9. Storm sewers within the subdivision within will be considered private except for the pond outlet(s) Response: Comment noted—general note 14 on sheet C5.0 has been added to identity that all storm sewer except the detention basin outlet will be private.A stormwater management easement will be provided over the detention basin outlet once the Final Plat of Subdivision is prepared. II II �I Khley> r 1. With over 109 parking spaces above and beyond code, please eliminate the 27 parking spaces along the west portion of the main roadway through the subdivision. Make this area grass parkway. Response: Based on previous conversations, we understand that the Village will require the parking along the main driveway be eliminated from the plan, aside from the stalls directly adjacent to the clubhouse. As requested, the revision to the site plan is provided. Note in order to meet the parking needs of the proposed use, additional parking stalls were added north of the clubhouse and within the multi- family courts between buildings. 2. How will trash be handled at the clubhouse? Response: A trash enclosure is provided on the south side of the clubhouse building which will allow for trash cans to be wheeled down the sidewalk by on-site management and maintenance staff to the driveway access west of the clubhouse for pick up. 3. Provide sidewalk along one side of the entrance to the subdivision within the ComEd ROW. Response: As discussed between the development group and Village staff on October "' 2021, ComEd will not allow a sidewalk adjacent to the proposed private roadway within the ComEd ROW. To provide pedestrian connectively, a sidewalk is provided along the western property lime which connects the proposed development to the Deerfield l wky public sidewalk. Additionally, a sidewalk is proposed on the east side of the site,near the clubhouse, that connects to the multi- use path that runs parallel within the ComEd right-of-way. 4. Connect/provide sidewalk from Residence 7 to the bike path along the east side of the pond. Response: A carriage walk has been added which provides connection from the site sidewalk to the bike path within the ComEd right-of-way. ComEd ROW Plan C3w3 1. Minimum easement width for private entrance shall extend 6' behind BOC on along private entrance. Response: Comment noted- currently Yofadditional easement area is provided beyond the proposed back of curb, This easement area has already been reviewed and generally found to be appropriate per ComEd. Revising the ingress/egress easements within the ComEd right-of-way from what is currently shown will require additional coordination and approval by ComEd. ��lli �l 1_ il�Nti� E w m Kimley)))Horn GradLing PlansJC4,0-4--21 1. How will/does this development intend to meet RVR requirements of the WDO�'? Response: Per the WDO, the naturalized planting detention basin proposed on the west end of the site accounts for up to 50% of the RVR quantity required. To off-set the remaining amount, two small rain garden areas are provided on the eastern end of the site. Rain gardens are identified as green infrastructure per the WDO (Appendix A) and therefore will be able to meet the remaining RVR requirements associated with this development. The drainage memo has been updated with the quantities review of the RVR required and RVR volumes provided per the proposed detention basin and rain gardens. 2. Please show the 1 00-year overland flow route. Response: 100-year overland flood routes are noted on the engineering plans. Refer to the grading,plan sheets C4.1' and C4,2. 3. Landscape buffer shall be graded to direct stormwater away from surrounding residential developments. Response: The area has been cleared as requested by staff. Therefore, the storm sewer is provided within this area to capture drainage that runs off unrestricted from the neighboring properties, This flow will be bypassed through the proposed detention basin which will be detailed in final engineering. UtIJILtI Plans LC5.0-_6.21 1. per our Water Department, the north side proposed water main connection is a metered feed for Co Ed to cool equip nent The plans show an existing valve by the existing hydrant. This is the ConlEd rneter pit not a main line valve, The Village intends to;continue to bill CornEd, so design will have to accornmodate this ComEd feed/meter. Response: Per conversations with Village Staff on 1011112021, we understand that the ComEd meter is located north and east of the,site and the proposed connection will not impact metering capabilities. 2. Both proposed water main connection points can be a sleeved connections or pressure connections. Either way both valves need a 5' dia, manhole, Response: Comment rioted — plans have been updated accordingly to show a sleeved connection with a 5' diameter manhole. 3. The old hydrants at the water main connection points require replacement with the new hydrants placed on the new project side of the valves for construction flushing. Kimley)))Horn Response: Comment noted—the existing tire hydrants are noted to be removed per the existing conditions and demolition plane C2.0). The Proposed hydrants are shown on the new project watermain side of the valves as requested and a detail for flushing is provided on the overall utility plan (C5.0). 4. Water main must be a minimum of 20' from any building foundation. Response: The watermain routing has been revised to maintain a minimum separation, of 20' from all proposed building foundations, Refer to the utility plan (sheets C5.1 and C6.2);note that the watermain West of Buildings 5 and 6 has been eliminated. Fire hydrants are Proposed with 150' long leads to Provide adequate coverage as discussed on 1011112021. 5. Storni sewer shall be a minimum of 12" per the WDO. Response: Comment noted— all storm sewer will be designed to be 12"minimum. Plats I. Cross access easements necessary for Connection to Cornmerce Ct. Response: Comment noted— the plat Will h7clude, a cross access easement within the parking lot from the subject site Property line to the Commerce Ct right-of-way'. 2. Please provide a 10' public utility easement surf-OUnding the exteriol lot Pones. Response: Comment noted—a 10'wide P.U.E. will be provided around the perimeter of the site as shown in the engineering and Plat of Subdivision. Ptease also note that a blanket easement covers the majority of the site with non-easement areas ("NEAs") encapsulating the proposed building foundations, 3. Please provide a plat of annexafion, plat of Subdivision, and cross access easement plat. Response: Comment noted—the requested'plats are included for review, apart from the cross-access easement plat. That plat will be prepared with finaL 4. After review and approval of all plats, YOU will be required to provide mylar copies of each plat for execution and recording (to be recorded by developer) in Lake County, Response: Comment noted—mylar copies of the final plats will be prepared 5. Add a note regarding "storm water infraStFUCtUre maintenance activity and responsibility larIgUage is located within the approved stormwater management report" to the plat of subdivision, Response: The note provided will be added to the Plat of Subdivision. 1 �O � 1111MIzzli-11111, 6� !MMEMEMEMEMMaMMM )))H Page 6 Kimleyorn 6. Enclosed is the Vifiage standard easement language and signature blocks. Response: Thank you for providing the Village's standard language and signature blocks will be added to the Flat of Subdivision. erectstormwater Tana BeRort L SWMRI 1 Please provide a stormwater management report. Response,: Kimle Horn will provide a full all-encompassing stormwater management report with final engineering which will meet Lake County standards. For preliminary engineering, a memorandum with supporting exhibits is provided identifying that the WDO requirements are being met and the enclosed plan is feasible in regards to stormwater management. The memo originally provided h'as been updated accordingly per the comments provided herein. 2. Hydrocarbon removal technology wffl be required per the WDO,. Response: Kiniley-Horn will review all options and provide details at final engineering; however, this requirement has been noted in the enclosed drainage memo along with the possible solution of utilizing snouts and bio-skirt products(or approved equals) in the storm sewer manholes to collect hydrocarbons prior to discharging into the detention basin. 3. Confirrn, design utilizes ISWS Bulletin 75 rainfall data. Response: The latest WD�O is dated 1'011312020� "Appendix 1:Raintall Depth Duration Frequency Tables for Lake County" from the WDO reh?rs to ISWS Bulletin 75. This rainfall data was utilized in sizing the required detention per WDO standards. 4. Include private stormwater infrastructure maintenance activity and responsibility language post development completion. Response: Comment noted— this information and language will be provided in the stormwater management report to be provided at Final Engineering. 5. When final engineering is ready, please submit a completed Lake County Watershed Development Ordinance permit. Response: Comment noted — a Lake County WDO permit application will be provided along with final engineering for Village review. Candace ire Review Please note in ordinance 16.50.120 Landscaping, we are not allowing Maples and Honey Locust to be planted at this time due that our current populations of these species are very high. iiiml,ri 3�mim I recommend the following species as alternatives to the Maple and Honey Locust proposed in this plan: • Swamp White Oak • Chinkapin Oak • Bald Cypress • Dawn Redwood • Kentucky Coffeetree • Yellowood • Fort McNair Horse Chestnut • Turkish Filbert Response: Comment noted— the Maples and Honey Locusts have been replaced with alternative species provided. We tftlSt these responses and the description of changes above adequately address your comments,, If you have any questions or require any additional information, pNease contact me at , 3 -42 - 03g. Sincerely, Ryan Martin Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Phone: 331-425-8039 Email �as°a aaI, -tare a L�K� �._ CC: Brad Zaransky, MZ Capital Partners Rob Costello, Torch Architects Scott Willson, Kimley-Horn Amanda Folta, Kimley-Horn �� 0��0� @�`�� N �� 0N MEMORANDUM To: Mr.Ted Sionio. PE Village of Buffalo Grove 5URauppBoulevard Buffalo Grove, |LOU08Q Fnom� Scott VViUUamn, �::IIE _ Ryan Marfim. �E KinmUey-1onm and Associates, Unc. Revision Date October 2@m. 2O21 (Note aQ revisions from original memo indicated indue) Original Date: September 2nu. 2021 Re: Proposed Deerfield Parkway / Multi-Family Development Deerfield Parkway& WindbmmokeDriwe Village of Buffalo Grove, Lake Co., 8L � Introduction ' Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., serves as the engineering consultant for MZ Capital Partners,who is proposing to develop o multi-family community with six residential buildings (120toto|unitn,two-story), a | clubhouse, private parking and a stormwater detention basin.The sitework includes demolition of an / existing building and surrounding parking,tree removal, grading, storm sewer,water, sanitary sewer, and | paving installation. The site is located south of Deerfield Parkway and the Apartments at Windbrooke Crossing, southwest of � an existing ComEd substation and transmission right-of-way,west of a commercial building, north of the single-family homes adjacent to Horatio Boulevard, and east of single-family homes within the Sterling � Creek Subdivision and mn existing commercial building. ` The site is 8.90-acres (which does not include the ComEd right-of-way)and contains an existing industrial/commercial building surrounded by vegetation.A cell tower is located along the eastern property |ine, which is proposed 0oremain. Aptakisic Creek conveys drainage from the south to the north and is located directly west of the project site's western property line. Per the enclosed FEMA Floodplain Map,the creek identifies a base flood elevation of 668 prior to conveyance through an existing box culvert within the Deerfield Parkway right-of- way. . The proposed development will meet the requirements identified in the Village of Buffalo Grove code and Lake County GMC Watershed Development Ordinance ( VDO). latest edition. Existing Conditions Klmley)M()rn 2 Drainage is generally conveyed across the site from east to west towards Aptakisic Creek,which will be maintained in the proposed condition. The site is mostly pervious with overgrown vegetation, aside from the aforementioned concrete building and surrounding parking lot and material storage yard.There is currently no storm sewer or stormwater detention provided on the subject site. An existing 30'wide buffer area is present along the south and southwest property lines adjacent to the neighboring single-family residential lots.This vegetated area will remain and the limits of disturbance will largely avoid any vegetation clearing as identified in the proposed grading and landscape plans. The enclosed Wetland Report prepared by Christopher B Burke Engineering identifies an existing isolated wetland.This wetland is approximately 0.14 acres. Portions of the wetland will be impacted and mitigated per Lake County WDO and Village of Buffalo Grove requirements. Proposed Conditions The existing building and parking lot will be removed and tree clearing will be necessary as part of the proposed improvements. A curve number calculation is provided based on the proposed site plan which identifies how much of the site will be impervious (i.e. roofs, parking lot and drive aisles, and sidewalks) in the final condition.This calculation was then used to calculate the required 2-year and 100-year detention volumes as identified in Appendix K of the Lake County WDO.The nomograph identifies that 4.10 ac-ft of volume will be required for the 100-year event and the detention basin identified in the plans provides a volume of 4.80 ac-ft. Two separate outlet pipes will be provided in order to meet the County requirement for releasing 0.04 cfs/acre in the 2-year and 0.15 cfs/acre in the 100-year event.A 200-foot wide emergency overflow weir will be provided along the west side of the basin which will handle any storm events greater than the 100- year.The overflow weir, along with the controlled outlet pipes,will convey flows directly to Aptakisic Creek by discharging at grade just east of the property boundary.The outlet will discharge above the base flood elevation (BFE) of the existing off-site floodway/floodplain,therefore no tailwater condition will need to be considered. Ruinoff VoWirurie Reduction (1F?VR,): li7v of dCtE:uu9nuau��i Ilu° p f grim et ffie f ouuu° y'o ( iru.unna� �� soon navillll Iniaanaiapr�,one-Foot of avaapuuinia� fna�^�raao Ifuc� �ni ur nuu.u9.1�A fvp �in iniQufuunaa p f ard1u rrie, iedu.ua,fiioi�n'")� requuiiv,rn nfs, II ds is aaa CE.Ipvp�nNe v dth�-a effiv,irriaia, od MIX,, l lliie reimainiiriff naaYpa.un e u HII be handled nJaa f„6vo parop:7osni d iraaiiin gairdens on the east air e of�Viie siLe Il Ier the WDO, n-auru gardens are defined as girc in iin'fuaasftiriuc u.uirau,and tlhivllefo can he creditEud up fua Ule fu.ulp f p:'D0%. _II he faatM FRM' •f bvolu.iirna, H.(fu.ulii-ed is calkA,u laated as follows (p eir `AIlap)E„,n.ia x f;f'" of plhie WDO): FfY1'ff fianv.raa¢u,Yr f° rain faf@ r'ofath n v unoff v-wa]f r'riarnt(ff i)FIO a:i"ot a.f h-nparv.Wous m co Kimley*Horn Page 3 The tota0 net inew uirnpervrous area is 4,86 acres, equating to a required RVIR quantity of 16,760 Gulbic feet (or 0,385 ac ft), 1f�his sumirriary of the two varn gardens and naturalized basin area'is as foflows: Fa&iUlty Area (Sq. F:t) Efficiency Vol (Cub,. 1::'t,.)@V Depth [".)etendon Bas�irr 297593 5 0",,o 14,79 7 North Rain Garden 75-7 10 0 11�1k '757 South Rain(3arden 1,452 100% 1,452 "I"otal l:ZVR VOWIrrie PircivWod 17,006 Note that n..iinderdiraua ns will be provided for the detention basiii u as u equired per the WDO,The final detafls and c1esign of the proposed rain gardens will Ibe provided at finM engineenng. Hydrocarbon lReirri oval I anv k nr0rrd inrficates lnrdu re,vvnlir,u rernovali is required for the provided rm'.)re than 25 parking stWls wifl be added to the site Wiall in Oie cw-reril,conffifion "I his raf,,juired rea,ijovaGv,,Ml be haint.fled jtaizirig snows ard b O-SI�,ijjsvvjffiin ffie sewt�°,r systern to el4i-di-ete by r,'J or,,,w bons pror to re,wNnq fl'ie PPDl°,)os�ec,;i sl,ornnvvate dirzdlenliori I"hese rffodLicts,QOH be specified aj floc erigineer0q and indicated on the Ipllains accoifdingiy. Final design and confiraiafion of c,apacqy for the proposed oin-site stoirrn sewer wfll Ibe cLompleted wrath final engineeiring, The storni sewer will be designed to handle the 10 year storm,event and overland flood routes will be design m designed to accomodate 1010-year rainfali, Attachments * Location Map a FEMA Floodplain Map I*, Site Curve Number Calculation * Stormwater Detention Nomograph (Appendix K from Lake County WDO) * Detention Basin Stage Storage Calculation * Welland Reports and assessments by others mim ..... ._ .. Wda;1"Nkb 1-4TIMW'gY,MM VV' 40P-M�3NOHd .W.�...__-._..".,..... ..��.._......�_. ...... .....�..-._.,.._...�...-a.._.. _.....,..._.....—,....._...�.......�,..,.�........._,_.__ z¢ 9 1 lsn'Or: vrs gvMaN 3 IM-4 M tact 68009 J 3nOaJ Oldddn8 to aqv N60tu hMMA 1M t tv, a❑351ooa8aNIM'8 AMSId a131da33a m UJOH(((AalwDIl S'1'N) o ddW IVRAb' r 0 z �aa 1, o �r 1% p I I n 4 dry ` M 4� , U F- LU a n LG l M %el r ,e i, u, j„ you �i i , 0 MYd Ay�� bi ! r, �v y W U @ N % a C @ _ M11C!.IC1 N N a o � ti @ � o N o N P m m o c °'-" 3 ti E t- c a no r,,,,,a N' �•� 2 F LL a .c i c � o O � @ ._ - `o O r. � a m � m ❑ >, a � �n r � m o i,� ayy OS m O @ w a m O '� Q 8 O= 'G Wei. >a _ r@ �` •. a7F iM 0.Yy. o c U s o in w e a cD 1% a, c w a ® O O ~ O m ❑ ». a o f O@ t` ti o " m o nn m n is > Na 3 zw _ c o ? iof0 0@ J U Q J Q Q W H U J U U W J U W T ❑ Z .. W rr- @ ul "( ', v c Xa' z% O � @ O C ,' w IIINUI IIIIIFII 'Mw d O N ti O o w Q In QZwF- w w O Q Qw � um oo y N o @n-✓m�, L-' =O O H mO c d d w N w O ~ d d S O I�r�(�))�1` D��ii �' ��, „/I 1 r // l r� � rHrirr� Nf�;�s��"✓r��f,'r,., �� '�lnn,'' O 411170, {y m .,�° riliG,, � if�: /j/f/ rll o ��''1`4'rl��r✓'' � / �� °' �" IV i '� ��r 11 � � � / ��, � CD S CD 140 r f % u. 1 / ncD cl r� CD C4CD LO "/ii i /✓lam r Yr Lq,j �� l '" r r r, r , �j lr%,; /,�I 'H' ' � " „fir r //rCD Sm ��//sir /i r✓/// � /� � '� '' ��l% / ,. //,,��%r �'�G"1,,:�. r� � %�cr �.� 'r "`i�l�+4 r Q o n� ��Y„�, - ,,,, .,'l ° �,,i�, 1)y l /..��; ,,,/ !u r- l� � a r I'"/"JT�gnGo%gj�a r, % '�➢,,,r i��/ LO N 7Nr i LLJ / LL 'r .• r�r ur,„ e ,-,tr ,a/i/ap/i��% ��I% ,.. _ 4l? 41 MZ Capital Partners-Deerfield Pkwy Multi-Family .i l ) r 9/2/2021 Expect More.Experience Beheir, Total Disturbed Area (acres): 8.90 Proposed Development Runoff Coefficients Surface Type Runoff Area Product Coefficient (acres) (Rc x Al Impervious area (Roads, roofs,sidewalks,etc.) 0.90 4.86 A 0-7 Pervious area (Greenspace) 0.45 4.04 1.82 Total= 8.90 6.19 Composite Runoff Coefficient= 0.70 Proposed Development Curve Number(CN) Surface Type Curve Number Area Product acres CN x A' Impervious area (loads, roofs,sidewalks, etc.) 98 4.86 476 Pervious area (Greenspace; Good Condition>75%Grass) 74 4.04 299 Total_ 8.90 775 Composite Curve Number= 87 Note: Curve Numbers identified per TR-55 Table 2-2a. Page 1 Appendix K: Detention Volume Versus Curve Number y WLn ,._. L � a W a, 1 v UJ co J o � C) I I F— v S.. � •..� v _. �� ..... . v z 00 WCC I �µ L � 1 ,, � mow......».... ...�.�.. v z z .. ? W �� > Z O LLJ .� _._ . �. .. _ _ �� o � W W 00 � U O ��.. U, .. , . .. .�.� o � ' z >- W LL ..... _� _ W � _ W , 0LO0 .. ,...... ...... ,. +' N LL �� .. �...� .m....,,. �..m�.�. o Q Q r CflO d- o � (3) [ 07 L I 6 06 m, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30V/13-30V 3wniOA N0I1N3130 V3HV 11Nn K-1 LAKE COUNTY WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE basin Kimif Florn I��„at�!F • 13�`te�dC;ion l�a.�t� _ JOB NO. ""61i045000 Side Slopes PROJECT: Any.✓I1aul°t'alo 11rovc 1 FILE: LDATE: 9/2/2021 4 Detention sin e Storage ,Area Av�o a,xc lncrenlental F"��n��n��i��'�lve Cumrranlative ElevatioiY Area Slor"w,fir e Storage 4e 1Pul tt4' oi°i 1�ae 1ty 668.5 25,197 ® O.Oa0 664.5 2$ 27017.500 270175 0 v ,$38 , 27017.5 0.62 30772.500 30772.50 670.5 n 2„707 57790.00 1.33 33874.500 33874.50 671.5 5,042 91664.50 2.10 36231.000 36231.00 672.5 37�420 127895.50 2.94 18631.000 386$1,00 673.5 3918=12 66 42625.500 =�2625sa 1 526.50 1 3.82 674.5 45,409 209152.00 4.80 Total Volume Provided (1 -ylr), al of Vraltat?V requiredperLake COUNY WDO Aljperarltx K is 4.1 ac-1al(fherefote deter°afiniia basin Prravlr:i0 s adequate a OlUrrae per re rrlrerraerrls), A dual r'estri(,tor ill be arttlrZed and desarlraed in Rar'a'aal Ofg1 i aeerin In arrl-ar 10 meet 0 We allom�able 2-year ara 'lad l.>irear r elea,se,rates. Pagel June 18, 2021 16051 DEERFIELD PARKWAY WETLAND ASSESSMENT Buffalo Grove, Illinois CBBEL Project No. 150489.00015 I CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD 9575 WEST HIGGINS ROAD,SUITE 600. Rosemont, IL60018 16051 DEERFIELD PARKWAY, BUFFALO GROVE, IL SMINNEMEMEMENNONEEM EXECUTIVESUMMARY...................................................................................................................................1 WOUS/Wetland Summary Table:........................................................................................................1 METHODOLOGY.....................................................................................................................................1 RESULTSAND DISCUSSION.............................................................................................................................2 STUDYAREA...........................................................................................................................................2 EXISTINGSITE CONDITIONS...................................................................................................................2 Wetland1............................................................................... 3 REFERENCEMATERIALS.................................................................................................................................3 LOCATIONMAP....... ., . ....... „ ....... ......... ......... . ... ..... 3 NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY.........................................................................................................3 LAKE COUNTY WETLAND INVENTORY...................................................................................................4 SOIL SURVEY............................. UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY..................................................................................................4 FLOODINSURANCE RATE MAP..............................................................................................................4 APPENDIXA—EXHIBITS..................................................................................................................................A APPENDIX B—FLORISTIC INVENTORIES .........................................................................................................B APPENDIXC—SITE PHOTOGRAPHS................................................................................................................0 APPENDIXD—DATA FORMS......................................................................................................................... D 13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On May 27, 2021, Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. (CBBEL) staff completed a wetland assessment of a study area located at 16051 Deerfield Parkway using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual; Midwest Region (August 2010).One (1)wetland was delineated within the study area. Aerial photographs depicting the location and boundaries of the identified wetlands are found on Exhibit 8 in Appendix A. Representative photographs are included in Appendix C. Information collected from the field investigation is listed in the USACE Data Forms found in Appendix D. WOOS/Wetland Summary Table: Delineated Area Data Points Community Type Native MeanC-value Native FOAI ............. pooded.. —_ Wetland 1 1A 2.09 9.81 depression METHODOLOGY The Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (August 2010), identifies the mandatory technical criteria for wetland identification.The three essential characteristics of a jurisdictional wetland are hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology as described below: t1ydro_ph�'V ems i qW:The hydrophytic vegetation criterion is based on a separation of plants into five basic groups: (1) Obligate wetland plants (OBL) almost always occur(estimated probability>99%) in wetlands under natural conditions; (2) Facultative wetland plants (FACW) usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 67-99%), but occasionally are found in non-wetlands; (3) Facultative plants (FAC) are equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands (estimated probability 34-66%); (4) Facultative upland plants(FACU)usually occur in non-wetlands(estimated probability 67-99%), but occasionally are found in wetlands;and (5)Obligate upland plants(UPL)almost always occur(estimated probability>99%)in non- wetlands under natural conditions. Four procedures completed in the following order are used to determine if hydrophytic vegetation is present: 1 �I 1) Eppid Test: The Rapid Test for hydrophytic vegetation is met if all dominant species across all strata are OBL or FACW, or a combination of the two based on a visual assessment. 2) C ona knanc Test: Using the 50/20 Rule, if greater than 50%of the plants present are FAC, FACW, or OBL, the subject area meets the hydrophytic vegetation criterion. 3) Prevalence Index: Each plant species in a sampling plot is assigned a numeric value (OBL=1; FACW=2; FAC=3; FACU=4; UPL=5). Based on the sampling data, the absolute cover is calculated for each species in each stratum and using the specified formula, if the Prevalence Index is 3 or less, hydrophytic vegetation is present. 4) for hplo ical Ada Cations: Various species may develop physical characteristics after growing in wetland areas such as multi-stemmed trunks, shallow roots and buttressed stems. Hydrophytic vegetation is present if an adaptation is observed in more than 50% of FACU species growing in an area that contains hydric soil and wetland hydrology. II 'rj oils: Hydric soils are defined in the manual as"soils that are saturated,flooded or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part." Field indicators of hydric soil are found in the NTCHS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service 2006b or current version). Wetland i �drolo The wetland hydrology criterion is often the most difficult to determine. Typically,the presence of water for a portion of the growing season creates anaerobic conditions. Anaerobic conditions lead to the prevalence of wetland plants. Morphological adaptations of plants, drift lines and watermarks are examples of wetland hydrology field indicators. Waters of the United States: Waters of the United States (waters) are defined as the ordinary high-water mark (OHWM) in non-tidal waters, provided the jurisdiction is not extended by the presence of wetlands. The OHWM refers to the line established by the fluctuations of water. These fluctuations can be indicated by physical characteristics such as a clear, natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in the character of the soil, destruction of terrestrial vegetation,or the presence of litter and debris.Waters are typically not vegetated.They typically area located below the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of a creek, stream, river or lake. There are exceptions to this generalization. STUDY RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The study area shown in Exhibit 1 of Appendix A is located south of Deerfield Parkway, east of Weiland Road in Buffalo Grove, Lake County, Illinois. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS At the time of the visit,the study area consisted of an occupied commercial building with access road and material storage lot,a cell tower,scrub shrub woodland and a wooded depressional pocket wetland. 2 Wetland 1 Wetland 1, characterized by Data Point 1A in Appendix D, consisted C. a wooded depressional pocket wetland. Photographs of the wetland are included in Appendix "fie to i�r�: At the time of the field investigation, the dominant species included silver maple (Acer soccharinum), cottonwood (populus deltoides), moneywort (Lysimachia nummularia) and riverbank grape (Vitis riparia). The complete wetland floristic inventory for the wetland area is in Appendix B. I-I�o ,:At the time of the field visit, hydrology was indicated by evidence of ponding including water lines, sediment deposits and unvegetated concave surface. ric Soils: Soils are mapped as Pella silty clay loam, ydric of locasoil chtype oma colors and reduced matdrices. soils were confirmed in the field by the observation REFERENCE MATERIALS The following reference materials were reviewed and used to assist in the wetland field reconnaissance.They are included as Exhibits 1-6. LOCATION MAP The study area is located south of Deerfield Parkway, east of Weiland Road in Buffalo Grove, Lake County, Illinois (Exhibit 1). Geographically,the study area is located in Section 28,Township 43 North, and Range 11 East of the 3`d Principal Meridian (42.169326°N;- 87.946272°W)• NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY The National Wetland Inventory(NWI)for the Wheeling Quadrangle (1983), as shown on Exhibit 2, indicates no wetland is mapped within the study area.The NWI serves only as a large-scale guide and actual wetland locations and types often vary from that mapped. 3 LAKE COUNTY WETLAND INVENTORY The Lake County Wetland Inventory for Vernon Township (2002), as shown on Exhibit 3, indicates wetland is mapped within the study area.The Lake County Wetland Inventory serves only as a local guide and actual wetland locations and types often vary from that mapped. SOIL SURVEY The Soil Survey of Lake County, Illinois (2013)was reviewed to determine the location of hydric soils within the study area (Exhibit 4).The following soil types are mapped within the study area: 146A ELLIOTT SILT LOAM 153A PELLA SILTY CLAY LOAM, HYDRIC 223E F. VARNA SILT LOAM 442A MUNDELEIN SILT LOAM 531B MARKHAM SILT LOAM 531C2 - MARKHAM SILT LOAM, ERODED UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The United States Geological Survey(USGS), 'w heeling Quadrangle (1 53)was reviewed to determine historic local drainage patterns(Exhibit 5),The USGS indicates that surface runoff from the study area drains towards the west and lies within the watershed of the Cues Plaines River, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP The flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)was reviewed to determine the location of regulatory floodplain within the study area (Exhibit 6).The presence of floodplain can be indicative of wetland hydrology.The FIRM indicates 100-year regulatory floodplain and floodway is mapped immediately west of the study area. 13 4 �uuuV""" i YYIIII�i��i INIQ��iiiiiiiiiuuuuu�u�uuuuuuuuVVVViII IIIII�II�IIIIIIII�O VVVVVVVV VVV VUUVuu VVVVVVVV V V VVVVVVV V V I A 1V a,p aoe 'rwl-Sv 2 WO 1 inch=1,000 feet U1 D "IF 6 IN STUDY AREA i:T "d 0"—fi0d 0"a", t A, 'Y'I! A, hwwfi® G.dmn J. S-fll'.'St ct m M-1,110 M D Sources:Esri I I E "Gari'r i,in,USGS,Inlermap. INCREMENT P, , " -1 NRCan,Esri Japan,METI,Esri China(Horqj Kwg),Esd Korea,Esri "'CLIf NF THLr C8BELA 15 0489 000'15_ Kimley)>M oiniri LOCATION MAP DAI E: 612.12.021 to MIN, Il SCALE 1,000' CHRISTOPHER B.BURKE Engkieering,Ltd. DVVN 17 j 9575 W,Higgins Road,Suite 600,Rosemont,Illinois 60018(847)823-0500 EX H I N, l�lm C-11 TSK I �FRTT a4JE E'MQ021 _LILr NAPAF... 1 0489,00016 NOTE:TAKEN FROM THE NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY(NWI),WHEELING QUADRANGLE(1983) 1 inch=150 feet qt NO WETLAND MAPPED ON-SITE /% i Am I ilarlV��U�ypmlM1'N � �� ,,,,, �,q„ ,„ it„,z rrr/ //rs/¢;,' "/ ii.:y. ��,j �i; )'�1111�1� /� ��J✓i �, ,/f,fl11,72✓J'I ,r1�5'.. na,rmm 1 r /cr/t � y�rr r � rrr„ � Jill (w ��4�' � �5 �(fl y r � Ow nru .1 „„p rl, )��,„ //I 1)I p rri ��'1lJY�i�91� f�tl ' � % rd�l ,�%ti� ��✓ r u, i ro ✓r,,, „ i�/ip e%,�. n ' l� i % � '1��. ° ✓ u, ✓" - J r/////, r r r(�:-a, �%nl r!+. 5"�� ) /✓//lla��T it I r "✓ i, ✓,�. 7� �/ � r '✓✓�Illf, �� j: I ( ., J�4VQI"b�mmiwv�oiiwmrutN�+f�llY7�ilfYYiriir✓r � ( F ,r y r r r, r ✓ ///' rr w ri r ✓ ��r r(I �r j' ` / r w iYl ' y% 1 ?"% ?.,'a1,� ✓ ✓j j, !; ,�r jt; ✓ Jbnj (� k �/ r/ ,�o, ,r/, /or%/, ✓l ,f%// r, )�rr!r'1'�'0,,+� � j / ' f� r �;� ��'��1�% m�bA �✓/'r� „�� 7` r l STUDY AREA 1 � l ,� li ��✓ /� 1 //r�1G�`, llAf �� - I r r �r i '� !l� i %''" / ,r ��, ,a f rrr % /✓ %%r� %/,, �r �;�' ✓✓10.r//�✓� /r r( � I,ul r�l�,. , ✓✓ it i o rr> � r��%��e, ��r� ✓�r�' r,,, ,`I� >t rl=,;�,, „:. �,, 1, �� ,. ,� �1j,. yl �/ ;r �;��,l�,/�. 1 r a. y,,,-� (✓�/I✓- „fir, 70�1 J„,,.. ./,,� �; // � rJ / r l<m ✓, �, ,, / r //r I �;. ry rT✓�1%' ,l " ru¢ ,I, ,'GI�M ✓�/ rrr: a a ti r' ,;r+;r 'iu< ', ✓�",��, /� i i i �✓ „-J;� �i 1n0iil�/,Y r�„<,ui �� ;��,,' �✓;; ��ll�i r,,, ,,�,1�,,, J»,,,✓,al,Gr M� ,,,r�' a �/ I.�� ) �'%1 2' l( r'm "'nFf➢7P!j///� / NINE`, �J r% !rf l✓, � ��i / r ,,., r� r ri RM"y rJ r�iUNIX h� r`" I /i ll �,' .. u✓ ;- ,., ��r,,✓�i� l/�i-::, °i ' ! '� //�r:% r ✓;//'�,;� � �f r>r u o 1,///; �;,�Y ov '�i'��,�,� !I, !jri/,� i�ae` �t�„� r�Y`, ' „Hr � %!� v�, y ��f:: rvt r I';,;, o..�1� r� �- %A), ✓ ,/ � i ,, I u%� N"ur�r r �rL � r � ,i 1r, %� ��o 1nJt%��? ,a�yi � �U � ilk �; ~�w� ��rl rerun y" 7�N i ,r ✓ r !( � / jai r9 0, � ✓r ll,�✓r �rc ' �% ,�/ �, ,,,, /i � jrr,,1 ��f ��,,;?;i,lv� ' ��„''�✓. ,,,,'��, � lua�yr/: �,,,, ' I y�0"rtn�=. L //��'"klrr,. N,�rli`,. „+. /////��fl �� 1 ;. rJ'''✓, h� �r( r;..,r,„� any i y, ,�'�" �';�i/ ,„ „ i r„ .Allr/'rl` uT g /�jvyl�(ji/..., ��,. ;,,�li �,�>��t" ,/� :/, r ,., ✓ Il'l'd „4z9 _,, ,.,r / ;,„� �"'`-"�'" '..,�., �, 11 ,/l ,.h� ,.� <.;1�,,ill// �.. '�r rr �� ,,, ,, r �„. II J/�y �y,-� � �:-,r�� ;�,�,✓ ��, I 1, ! %�; �^,r „rpr ��r1 E��1'1 l�;;rio%�ir„,l� iu ,�r �✓ ,r%., /.. / rtj//r�, irrr ,,,��✓' :� �� '° �Y)<,. �, ri�F��i/rrAl�)J`�%„ ' rl ��'�'� �v �/l I �l� rr /•// � �/� / e2/��o N ( ,� , )hLi /,� / 0/1 rrn�ir, iuu;„Ji„`��I�n'r/ ✓ � rri ! ;/'I;� ,! ,�W '�'� k'£ �;;'/r/ �", � �/��I;n NJ f, i/ ��Y, � /!<;r� rr;, 0 c r i v' � f „r,-n ',y 1r y-✓ Ip ��bf� �✓,o„ �, k „� r� 1„r� �J� r /dL ,,,.,,�1>(. 1';, ✓� kNL ��,:ry�V^� 1 L r Ip 1 � �1,,; r��;r�� til7� . ,PA/+� �/r 'Y"'m,.,fix, �� 7�✓�i;�re r/;,-: N�/lf �� riir��JY�, � �, ,,, ➢1'r�� 1,� � �� A' �w a k�fl� � �yg 9 v�� / �L%i, j �j�%�!f��;�%fie �"'/� �„ a// °)ii ✓ r ✓�.�°n � 0 rl �,�'�' 11p, v'1,,,,hIN,.:: L,,�I-�" �,�,,, r ,lr/,`Ti, %�',��/,�/ ✓ ,/i y%� 01 I lug- ,r, l � � kI f' � , /, r /, �Ni �/r7 prn � ( �u a �1 ttil�u`rn✓GG l///j'r Y(, 1✓ � ! r� ;N /�/ '�' �( �✓!lf//II% ,.r r�l% i Ay D//✓'�' Y1/iiirl ✓i„✓i � (f 1 „�r�/ v;�',� I .,y� /�, .v..%%/ � i ,G v;,f r/r ,fir%.. �� „ /,,,, ,,,ro %r rl„ r�/, ✓„ �,IN�/�� ,,. � r„ 1 �lr�' 'r��✓r �i;/rl� /fir/r ��llr ��%',. �r J i�, ' /l� r��, / >',�; r a,/'l ij ✓ ��Jd �i�� I i,1,I �,' �� !/� �/fir/i jri% ��, v, �11�N �4� i� 1�� ✓''rr r r �l��,,1✓1 r ✓!lo /., %�r /l l /r-; iL. r JJro! :r. r F,r ✓✓!- �(� ✓,,ar i ,. I 1 � / P'!�, �' rho! ,� � ��,�/ / � �1� 1. ,✓a;,, ; ,�,�� , �; �; f i r 1)!w r ;, , ,,,+gip � ,.,�m��, �;a,,, r I,, ,r,»r � r`G/, �, T r�rar��/�� ,,;�✓ ll� �U,✓ 1� I �%�r/�/ ✓%//,,, ✓, 1, /%r,„�y :;, ,,,..r �. „�, /., G ,,, ,e,r9)✓ ipya,:�.✓r r r�II"rr, �r1�,,:,� �i,�„y ,,/�� vl.qi� 4: < ,// ! ��/r�; ! �"'✓; �r, ,,,7: /a;'m rm ra.:-, � %,.li'.�eM�r,� �l, Il„ �� 1✓✓�; ,/� / � �,��r � r>�llir,�✓,��0 ,/..I '6 7� ✓ �u)�; ^('' : �r� ✓ i 1 ,��/L� � l� r��. i,/ f�r�%%i )��/ f�� ,�!nL ( ri�%',r�ji jr 1, r✓IrY rrt7 J �;✓r 7jp m. ) �,,�'�' !' -jf), �� I, � i ,�'., ;r��/ J ;,��W»`, �� y f �� r a , �,r �,�� - �� ,� !fir �� l '� � ;l rm j' `�� ✓r�� . �, i� �, 1 .r ' ;n'66,"»� �✓vlr�', �� "'0 f �/,a �/f T u ern r � b r �J�, ✓/ /l ,�r�ll ,' ,1 I p,9/7 e 'I'l �, �� ,ll .✓� l' �l� �I„ >!� � t f/L„ �' lI I.� �i�/� ,, rww�'/�/""" �I�� r% ,,.r; ,��' ,.1 ,t r' ,�/' / I, ,ll � rn"%l G�✓r r%il ��? ,� � �;`�' '/%%�kw ��! ✓r n y'y f� �.. /�� 1%l.. f l i 1 jo)! ✓ � J /m✓in f .I '.,tsl �/� /��- t �„ Or/ / ,' ) r a fr,;.,i„ „��, ,,;:/,�r � ', „q � 1 rrr�r rl v zJ� /1<<. °u ;f, re;�%,r r :,✓4 //lri,, r';,, ,b%,, ,o � ,,, � „✓91 r/(A �;r ri, i�/ /i1( )/ilq ;�'2,;'. � /9ri✓<,hrl�✓ ✓ � � €,'.m✓1�� !l`" y� , ✓�� Alr 1 r.% Jy 11 ir��i�,lr �� i r �� i e�� r/��,., � t// �,; �. � ,,�"b"NS4'V11'9 � l6i4Wff! ,,, rrf „x,,;,, 1 :�N�l>G, y N l�r,, V1. ,.�rY✓� r�, ✓riW; ✓,r7/'„� /�;%� �/rii ij,�,, ,,; ,� �1'r�'�, m➢�I nvr 01, r ,,a �// rY /I '�// i, �' sir'//�Y/�,� %1✓",��1 %✓i �r,% �;I % i#'`, ,Im � i',ur� � ,,/ %„, !/. ,ulJ Y� %�%✓/� rm ti �'a �/o r, �j;'/r �.�, � e; i< //i )>, � !,r/ »,� , ,/a✓Wig/,„r 1;;' /l*/ � T ra,,�ri/r, °ar '°'„�"", '� l' �', i �%/%�/ ,�,Ir r`�i; . .'1rz � r� ✓i,;,. ��, ��r rri, ��G R, ru r� ''� I�'giP p � � r j' ✓ ��, ln(/I�. i r, ✓g , a Grp^)l iflf%%,,, / �,H p i T rll I �6 t t awrn rtr, 1(y m tla ll cc m trlbaut a rr r� Irk ri �u r u, ✓ w rri r�r� ✓ / r°r CLIENT: 111"I E v" CBBEL#150489,00015 h of r NATIONAL WETLAND IIINVENTORY DAI E: 6I7.12021 DCC,N SCALE: 1 =150" EXH 2 r Higgins ( ) 6GG KEK U F:Kt: kkapija Engineering,B. FILfi NAM1ltka. 150409 •• 95 RISNTOPHER Road,SK a 600Rosemonttllllinois 60018 847 823-0500 ''�mpl�� w.wK� I�Lcrrr�Arr sr41zoz1 11-P - .00015 N\M NOTE:TAKEN FROM THE LAKE COUNTY WETLAND INVENTORY(LCWI),VERNON TOWNSHIP(2002) inch JIB 5 L feetWw / , r r egend NON WETLAND WETLAND �i I ✓fir i � ` e ��„�, t1rr��;%;�%' ,//inn 'rrrrclNJ�/�/ /! "r �rrlr /�1/�i �%% � fy1�Y ��% lI >/ 4�6G'G¢'!,NlplOikfWhlYV�a'11G"��✓iwrRr�iw'u+am�w. „�.„,,,,� „' G„ Ab IIIIYrO1 �,r��y I�� / ll rr rnvlrr r n r STUDY �1 sir � � ��1,, al� ✓ i ��r/ ?N �r a��/��„k i� rar �i roar ri i/ii rl r IF �r 1Np� 1i r dr r rr 11 r/I y f '/ �, � Irru p i ��/Ili'„^1 '�' y �� r � g„ ✓��r�i l�r r� "" fi � J r wwl s (l �,rP ✓ � / � Ili / l/%/ �%/l/r lrrrlrr r/ � , J w" �r �1 �" Ifs'. W jig ✓ % i �' krau° JJ 0. l yr, si, 4a %r A o �' %W1rr r, � a ��✓l�� ;M*'1, 5 o- 7i"" / �/�",1tor'�" ` �I�(..,(//��%/ 6,` J '. //„ W ��,(,,,a r ,,, ;/ i •�� nGm1 ii "�%r ?r^ •'�' �l ° � �/'r4 � l��,�r ,u, / /»�, „<�� airrr„� `�;;�,,1/;; �r i(�uryV, ,� Nui if IrahutcryNr� i41 rw,� idr�,. � i//,�, � ///i�iiij�//�i %" �l�r�✓ea 4«J..RE,NT. 0 11 CBBEL# 15-0489..00015 i t )AIiarn LAKE COUNTY WETLAND INVENTORY 'DaTE: 51212.021 C.'9aCN GALL tlla E! CHRISTOPHER B.BURKE Engineering, Ltd. Qm KEK USER kkopim EXH 3 9575 W. Higgins Road,Suite 600, Rosemont, Illinois 60018 847 823-0500 0m4mm r�K �" sN E; B84l5,4 rmWi ( FII NANrNk:: 1,10489,HO 65..L4i°N1 II P NOTE:TAKEN FROM THE SOIL SURVEY OF LAKE COUNTY,ILLINOIS(2013) 1 inch=150 feet W LEGEND.... A - ELLIOTT SILT LOAM ii r / ///'/1 153A - PELLA SILTY CLAY LOAM,HYDRIC ,r,. ,' i :. .- /i 223B - VARNA SILT LOAM � , �, ^� ,f�, /��; 'r % /� rli o 531B - MARKHAM SILT LOAM 531102 - MARKHAM SILT LOAM,ERODED TIN irr a,,.,, 9 � Ilum /i r r I rr IpIdRllidovw111mm AYOrIIPYrr,oArrar 1 "",1" r �llf! ,fj+I� II rI} yip, IV(IlNllllgi ��1 iy�, W m ,h .fie 'a �y% W j w STUDY or 531 C2$ / >ri/i ' r I ,.F ,af �rr��'f�/,l�,, rj'�+c,f l a ..�//' f,,Il/�h �r�;,� IJ,")1rt.F; hi,��/,. rI, ,,, ,;/,.... un/�e✓1r1,(,j�;"f„r q:r )(��ru✓�,;,,G%W 4 .'n''�% �/�,�K p a1„ , / �a'r%,�� /ni /r/(ru,,,i Nm �' 1l 1/ ,. Hrir i r I t, G/r r/ J rrr14, ,„ / 1 a 41 2 f l I v, /� �lr �r„ a�� //'r r,i J��ll; °'11 i�'� � 11 / r, ��i rrr,Y �f%/ l,�r% r, � � I r �/;'//,lr rj��a%/' r�� j wuw✓� a s>'u j1 n a,% rr N ,a..w C, �>)a `, / r, ,�,%' � '223B' � � � �� y `` I �I ✓��% „ I; �� ,��,r, ra- P v l l '!' �ti4r��r1,1� /,.. I" „ 1✓ ' I ✓ ."�, ?r tl I�rf (1 I 1 -/ r/ /�! 1 r / ,,,,„ J1� '�0� 1, �.,„'�s; d��tl` � r,1L /, r;y �., P7 � ��// l� , , lr.;�il✓�ir',;.,.; 11 � 'u( �'> r ` /'�',I Y,. 0,i. '/ 11,�'l v r� a Jll/� ��r/� /, r' ('%':✓„N W/„ � sa I � „ l „�', .,%� fN l�r�WI i ✓�' r�)� � ,��/, ul»0/ ;:� i%r i f, , 40 r, 'yk1 %w�� !,, ,r e,�,h ✓. r�, 'tr � 'L�, ,�./ fY rl„ Gw I „�r�� Ne1 r.' i;e:. r Ge,'/,(� 1�`+ �r,(14,,i" � a 1 l✓ iii/��il'+��,� ?E !,�/ r" r � r � ',/��ry/��: I� ;%/ /�r lI� 1IJr r r yJ,. % �m �, n a,�'r/,, r, I,1N�1�,,,�� (�✓�, �"� ,2 �VdN/r r, ,,. �l O I��: %////�i, , ,v !��'lr ur,}t rf r r rur/ _ %i' r ,,,, it Lul " >i61f��'/Ilkb,,,// I!>P 4��, •�C.�-t ,€ 1 r�4p +w fY 1 � �� i i' � r l p y HFRE r r ,jl,-, ,,,I, ar - � '° I „o urr � r, . "CLIENT: TITLE: CBBEL# 15-0489,00015 iP2y SOIL SURVEY DATE 6r2r2021 DSCN SCALE. 1 150v EXH 4 III CHRISTOPHER B.BURKE Engineering, Ltd. owN. KEK user. kkop]a 9575 W. Higgins Road,Suite 600, Rosemont, Illinois 60018(847)823-0500 CNKO iJK PLOrUrrE s/4rz021 ' FILE NAME; 150489 00015 SOILS 1 tllpfV 2,n. NOTE:TAKEN FROM THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY(USGS),WHEELING QUADRANGLE(1993) ` „ 1 inch=1,000 feet . I 1, f „ � l �r- 11 I i !a N I V� iu nn � I o00 I1 rlllll r / r 1 I � i i 1 V lAl 1i �u I 4.Il.,l EN'Y; #'........ 15 0469,Q0615 CF3BEI..#k � lf�° � )0' �w�°"i UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DATE: 6(7f2021 w s� DSGN SCALE, 'I -1,000,. CHRISTOPHER B.BURKE Engineering Ltd DWv KeK Lr i�: koplla EX 5 9575 W.Higgins Road,Suite 600,Rosemont,Illinois 60018(847)823-0500 PJF{K®, TA PLoT DATE: 6/4/2021 FILE NAME: 15®45S.p0015 USGS NOTE:TAKEN FROM THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP(FIRM),LAKE COUNTY AND INCORPORATED AREAS 1 inch_w ILLINOIS MAP NUMBER 17097CO262K EFFECTIVE DATE 2013 SEPTEMBER 18, / FLOODPLAIN '//�ii / / ,;;,., ,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, !j 9Gi �,�' �Irtu� �r wr.u'V111VI11�1�'�(��/� ,rl / r„� �4 ,'„»�� .. �%�;..,I(% � �� /o��i✓l/rw.,) FL60DWAY %/ ,,,,; r ,,,,,,. �� r' ry ,, � 1kL11/%///7al%�1/r 1�i/�l�'l��a�r'�i1,��,�✓��„��1 /A Ib�X"VW' 'fRil�ira�alv�+ramr�rlrosre�w�,«w.�wM.�;��,iqpp� pq�ry 1 �'7CM r )rar«rnii rl u1plN17A �' Ni1 / p!' �r rf/l,, �tf/, �f !P �� i%%/i/ './/,/// � /°rr %�1'`��1„�1��/!� f'h��i,/�, .. �"�WI'ukw�roi r�^a� lYML7wrtii�✓ru lj%/,,,c „l� ,,,; ,;, � 1..�%J / Ar1✓;';, / �� , lfn -' �i„.r „' ,; /0/ e„ ,1.r��/ ", /r�,�11,., iv/,,, �,,,✓' �a 1 i STUDY AREA r9ri°;)✓/i lJll �f/ ,I r r //A, r� ±� /� /1l%% (1j ,%�� //'° �' El� r,/�r /, 1 �iJ��a,1,'f V1/,�aM.h,�7�Csu ,�✓i% /u�f Ly( '" /, ,.�I ��1� r j� „�1111/ V p �, � A � Fw/(q A / � r,/ r-- fi � ��%�%/i/�//a��r �o ,e sG i' "�/ �'"�'r/�"� �� "4¢' I,»:l/��AA, '� � it ,,,✓- � ,1�r6; l�Lf r ,�...,/r rr �f%/ %✓i%/ �,// ° ', r % -raw .. "'"'rye F,,, tad � ,I,i,' it y ,�r ,j r,�J. ��/ � r,,/r 'i,/ ..� .� �, ,: � k fA 1. ,,,,, ,,:,, � I� r'� l7&, ..�m ;l r / *✓ �,✓!,!E ", a ,„ to�i,,,,�� ,,,,,�/ ('� , rf✓, ';,� F" , ,rn u � �C/y rur;,'" �„' lX1/ �//�� p � a J3 wr,P„. �r r. ,/�� ,///o/%%r �� r r „f ( / u✓ti,".;,r rva-�. �„ ;,p}' ,rr/ �l �1 Ifs � �� •l /, 1/�,�„ �,,r �,l,„ i //, � � ��: e„ �� f � �, Yf� � , ; �J �,�//i Ji ��a✓ ,/a! �J�/// rr „ »n ,::.. ,%�f M ,., '+,w� ,r'i y',r iG b ! � (i�a .� ,/ ��%Flo; o�/i %r��C� 1' 1 iy �// AL,% � �ir�✓�rA� 1 � ^W f /1"�f% /%", f lr r / a „ ', rl; �ii;. �I, I 1, ,ilr ,�/ � �;�' Y,' �/i/ 1, D��,,, � ✓ ? f., ,/.. ,,. .:c Y/ ,a,,-, I f ., 7.:1 r. ,,,� / or,/, /,,r, a=%' ,l/„ //rlpr rA,,,;,r �;, r% ; ,,,:i✓�11 / �//// `•, ,�� ''�,,,. m lj��; � %!„ Y J /��' ,� �it ✓r' (i/a ;✓ �;�� fj� fri�. l� (��/�✓ ,,;.: :�� 'r rw�'"I' �� (/// ;. E�1��:,� v/Ir rAJ1L�el''A ;�. r G % ri /�f ',»�n+'� 1 �? �,,..... j r �, �;w, MM duo/ ; ,I r /!✓,.; Y �� k l /� ,/ri1� �1 �. �., �- r �i o %�/ //� lirr �J,rl ql✓/ 2r kt��r /!;� ��, y,, z o r vif �� „ f �� ,"'/r! it //,r� � �"r., �llr�„ � � I�j�9vi - ,l�' ,. I ).. ✓P /%r/A////i 0/rU/�.;, ., �J r,, i ! Ld/ pe✓d �a�a' ,, 1 " r I r G/i ��/ l' I � ,,, rl ;r 11 r f rl r1, FT r t o 1 f )N,HFRE rmnn4�11�� :n� r � C opyr�gh, to 1L � 4 TITLE ,= CL..II Nr: CBBkLR 15-048960015 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP DATE 6/212021 w o, :rCvAR.hw' 1 150" Gl<Ovu3J'.:. AWN 6JK I k�� PIp� EXH 6 KEK �W+ ,, � CHRISTOPHER B.BURKE Engineering,Ltd. �� c r�uaTr. s��12��;1 9575 W. Higgins Road,Suite 600, Rosemont, Illinois 60018(847)823-0500 r'W1mF:NAME c�a1��a.tl�lall�.Rga� me, NOTE:AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH TAKEN FROM NEARMAP,DATED:MARCH 12.2021 "Q 1 inch=150 feet r / r � 1� f' rr,. ✓a // '� //� �� N� rf ti i,;,; per✓urrrar,�eaWb4!'�G'w�i�fl,"' „,. ,,,- r ,fir,�" ,�,��,r... „,;,;;�rr,i,,,,,,,, Hil war ' �/,,,i / ��(!!�!�a�',� ///ii�ir%✓l/ / y�f`�/��r lr 0IND ;i111179,i�Pi�/ 7 M1�M1tlIHb^uu�riN�uiwil&ww� r/jjr( /"�/l/fI /rra rr r��N/✓/ Al (f U'%///rri „�rr ,�� . � ✓„�� p%�/�i r ra�lwr" '.; �,a � ice; ��I� /��w�y/r ri,,,;r, err��,� Iww API �u it ��r gg/� STUDY ARE w %//;' �� , ///r ?S�/ / "'M ✓ � ri,, r �/ii y r i i*,- m 1;,. �,1 �f�/// rl �; ,lw ��, ,9�,,,j% J� ;"�n,,. „��nu"3�r�,,i��u' i'�„ '' �' ✓�; r�ir,�� / Lr� �%� H ri i,r, r''��IIr%>��. >:, ,:a a i�//. ,,' WWi .•„e W a.. l// �%�� r ;��/ � %Y !, //ii/rjii�%+�4/�w J)„ o r; r� yfr/, � r7 >`%,Y r:��(f/,/ ✓�%o;, ,;.... e ; �,I ' ,��1 � ,if��!wa� W��„ rryY �� 1„lii 1 �f%r'�5... ///1 " � >%97%i/1 '° / '" d✓ � rJ�� „ ,� �avlir'�a(a6� �N rr, r%,�f ;nrY� r � �% /i 1,/ s „a r� ,r,, ��( /m% r I, rV, (nr ';A �� ,� ✓/ it / /�//v,,,, 5 r a M r� o/ r, �rrr�i �/T<< r7 �://n h'U lj�,,,,a✓D PI76�4 ''(ur��rr �.� r/ �'�? � i i " it sp#�.a �td"�I �r�" u1�lslrl � r ' r .i� CUENT; "� iml APPROXIMATE CBBEL# 15-048900015 ETLAND DELINEATIONDATE: W2.12.021 �� CHRISTt08"HER B.BURKE IMpt¢�iKaeering, Ltd. a,�rot;�� '`�� •`"� �� w 9575 W Higgins Road,Suite 601„Rosemont,Illinois 60018(847)823-0500 as aay EXH 7 b d'dkR:h+�P,fi� H;�47dwt4 C�pu9"� Vw�LA�ifJA7 k: y�°. Illii i uu i IIIYYII�YIifi a ii i i�li i YYYYYYYYYYYYYYI i i i Illuuuuuiiiiiiiiiuuiiiii APPENDIX B - FLORISTIC INVENTORIES B SITE:Wetland I LOCALE:Buffalo Grove BY:T.Kehoe CONSERVATISM- BASED ADDITIONAL METRICS METRICS MEAN C SPECIES RICHNESS (NATIVE SPECIES) 2.09 (ALL) 32 MEAN C SPECIES RICHNESS (ALL SPECIES) 1.44 (NATIVE) 22 MEAN C (NATIVE TREES) 0.33 %NON-NATIVE 0.31 MEAN C WET INDICATOR (NATIVE SHRUBS) 2.50 (ALL) -0.41 MEAN C (NATIVE WET INDICATOR HERBACEOUS) 2.33 (NATIVE) -0.36 FQAI %HYDROPHYTE (NATIVE SPECIES) 9.81 (MIDWEST) 0.84 FQAI %NATIVE (ALL SPECIES) 8.13 PERENNIAL 0.59 ADJUSTED FQAT 17.34 %NATIVE ANNUAL 0.09 %C VALUE 0 0.44 %ANNUAL 0.13 %C VALUE 1-3 0.38 %PERENNIAL 0.84 %C VALUE 4-6 0.19 %C VALUE 7-10 0.00 SPECIES NAME MIDWEST WET SPECIES (NWPL/ SPECIES COMMON WET NC-NE WET INDICATOR ACRONYM MOHLENBROCK) (SYNONYM) NAME C VALUE INDICATOR INDICATOR (NUMERIC) HABIT DURATION NATIVITY Acer negundo var. aceneg Acer negundo violaceurn Ash-Leaf Maple 0 FAC FAC 0 Tree Perennial Native Acer acesai Acer saccharinum saccharinum Silver Maple I FACW FACW -1 Tree Perennial Native ALLIARIA allpet Alliaria petiolata PETIOLATA Garlic-Mustard 0 FAC FACU 0 Forb Biennial Adventive ALNUS ainglu Amus glutinosa GLUTINOSA European Alder 0 FACW FACW -1 Tree Perennial Adventive Bidens bidfro Bidens frondosa frondosa Devil's-Pitchfork 1 FACW FACW -1 Forb Annual Native Carex cxcris Carex cristatella cristatella Crested Sedge 4 FACW FACW -1 Sedge Perennial Native Carex cxvulp Carex vulpinoidea vulpmoidea Common Fox Sedge 2 FACW OBL -1 Sedge Perennial Native Cornus stolonifera; Comus balleyi; Connus corsto Connus alba sericea Red Osier 5 FACW FACW -1 Shrub Perennial Native Corpus corrac Connus racemosa racemosa Gray Dogwood I FAC FAC 0 Shrub Perennial Native Echmochloa crus- Echmochloa Large Barnyard echcru galli crusgalli Grass 0 FACW FAC -1 Grass Annual Native Epilobium Epilobiurn Purple-Leaf epicol coloratura coloratura Willowherb 3 OBL OBL -2 Farb Perennial Native Galiurn galapa Galiurn aparme spurium Sticky-Willy 0 FACU FACU 1 Forb Annual Native Geurn geucan Geurn canadense canadense White Avens I FAC FAC 0 Farb Perennial Native Hydrophyllu Hydrophyllurn m hydvir virginianum virginianum Shawnee-Salad 5 FAC FAC 0 Forb Perennial Native LONICERA lontat Lonicera tatarica TATARICA Twinsisters 0 FACU FACU I Shrub Perennial Adventive Lysimachia LYSIMACHIA lysnum nummularia NUMMULARIA Creeping-Jenny 0 FACW FACW -1 Farb Perennial Adventive LYTHRUM lytsal Lythrum salicaria SALICARIA Purple Loosestrife 0 OBL OBL -2 Forb Perennial Adventive MORUS ALBA VAR. 0 FAC FACU 0 Tree Perennial Adventive moralb Morus albs TATARICA White Mulberry Parthenociss Parthenocissus us 1 Vine Perennial Native Parqui quinquefolia quinquefolia Virginia-Creeper 4 FACU FACU POLYGONUM 0 FACW FAC -1 Forb Annual Adventive polper Persicaria maculosa PERSICARIA, Lady's-Thumb PHALARIS Phalaris ARUNDINACE Reed Canary Grass 0 FACW FACW -1 Grass Perennial Adventive phaaru arundinacea A Phragmites australis SsP. Phragmites 3 FACW FACW -1 Grass Perennial Native PHRAUSM americanus americanus Common Reed Populus Eastern 0 Tree Perennial Native popdel Populus deltoides delta des Cottonwood 0 FAC FAC RHAMNUS European 0 FAC FAC 0 Shrub Perennial Adventive rhacat Rhamnus cathartica CATHARTICA Buckthorn RJbes Missouri 2 UPL UPL 2 Shrub Perennial Native ribmis Ribes missourlense missouriense Gooseberry Rudbeckla Green-Head Coneflower 4 FACW FACW -1 Forb Perennial Native rudlac Rudbeckla ladniata laciniata 2 FACW FACW -1 Shrub Perennial Native salint Salix interior Salix interior Sandbar Willow SOLANUM Climbing 0 FAC FAC 0 Vine Perennial Adventive soldul Solanum dulcamara DULCAMARA Nightshade Solidago Tall Goldenrod 1 FACU FACU 1 Forb Perennial Native solalt Soliclago altissima altissima Taxicodendron Rhus 2 FAC FAC 0 Vine Perennial Native rhurad radicans radicans Eastern Poison-Ivy Verbena 4 FACW FACW -1 Forb Perennial Native verhas Verbena hastata hastata Simpler's-joy Vitis riparia 1 FACW FAC -1 Vine Perennial Native vitrip Vitis riparia var.syrticola River-Bank Grape uuuu�uiiuiuuuuuuuuuuuu�iiiuu��uuuuuuu��u��u��uuuuuuuuuu�� APPENDIX C - SITE PHOTOGRAPHS c f r � "ICY✓, � � �"t�� w rn. � kt W ,�i� i �d; �'"" �✓ �d r�`"i y�� iv�tu i qww G � � ' pa" y ^'� u+� "� tCGr✓"�a� �"a/�N� �� : l y""° iI��W�ai,�By y. ' � � � J'�>�� f .d:rWrvu'6✓ll� � w'I"^`�d�l '�, 1 P* k j4N 1 '. PHOTO 1. Wetland 1 - looking south (Data point 1A in center) w� aA GIP n '` GUI it � � w�^ �`l V` ✓�I 04 i i � t I a ✓ J n y 1 F .Np .,, ✓� d��vGZredy1^� N" "� /vw�p, i Yr��7 r Aw „w' " �;!»r.�.J,. �"'itin.' �.a, ry PHOTO 2.Wetland 1 -looking southwest(Data point 1 B in background) Client: Kimley-Horn CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. Project: 16051 Deerfield Parkway,Buffalo Grove,IL °u4 i 9575 W Higgins Road,Suite 600 Rosemont,Illinois 60018 Tel(847)823-0500 Fax(847)823-0520 Date:May 27,2021 Exhibit 8' APPENDIX D - DATA FORMS D WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region Project/Site Deerfield Parkway Property City/County: Buffalo Grove/Lake Sampling Date: 05/27/2021 Applicant/Owner: Kimley-Horn State: IL Sampling Point: 1A Investigator(s): Thomas Kehoe Section,Township, Range: Section 28,T43N, R11E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): depresional Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave _ Slope(%): Lat: 42.1692 Long:; 87.9469 Datum: WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name Pella silty clay loam VWI Classification: not applicable Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ('If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetlani Y Wetland hydrology present? Y f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Lrgtum (Plot size: ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Acer saccharinum 60 Y FACW that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 7 (A) 2 Populus deltoides 40 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 7 (B) q Percent of Dominant Species 5 100.00% (A/B) that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100 =Total Cover Sap pgLShLq tr alurr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 20 Y FAC Total%Cover of: 2 Alnus glutinosa 10 Y FACW OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 Cornus racemosa 10 Y FACW FACW species 120 x 2= 240 4 FAC species 60 x 3= 180 5' FACU species 0 x 4= 0 40 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 180 (A) 420 (B) 1 Lysimachia nummularia 40 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.33 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is s3.0* 7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide g supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 40 =Total Cover (explain) QP �atum (Plot Sized 30 ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 Vitis riparia 20 Y FACW present,unless disturbed or problematic 2Hydrophytic 20 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point, 1A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth C a—trix B doK_Iwteatures (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-20 10YR 2/1 90 5YR 5/8 10 C PL .silty clay loam *Type:C=Concentration, D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Irrr„Iicators; Indicators for Protal'ert'rastic hdydric oiis; Histisol(Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) —Stripped Matrix(S6) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K, L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L,R) Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) 2 cm Muck(A10) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Other(explain in remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) -Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand —Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) X Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic ( Restrictive yer served). La of Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(snctaes); R markse HYDROLOGY 7WetiandHy—Hydrology Indicators: tor tn ofi re%s dur O checkTP2 ) WeconiHaeA1 toL quatic ( ) Surface s I Cracks(B6) hWtr Table _ ue u t d r ius Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(81) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots _Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(132) _(C3) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(83) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _(C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _Gauge or Well Data(D9) X Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Fre bservatuor�s, Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No Depth(inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): present? Y (includes cappllary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos,previous inspections), if available: errnarics, US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region Project/Site Deerfield Parkway Property City/County: Buffalo Grove/Lake Sampling Date: 05/27/2021 Applicant/Owner: Kimley-Horn State: IL Sampling Point: 1B Investigator(s): Thomas Kehoe Section,Township,Range: Section 28,T43N,R11E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.). terrace Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave Slope(%): Lat: 42.1688 Long: -87, 4 9 Datum: WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name Pella silty clay loam VWI Classification: not applicable Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetlarn N Wetland hydrology present? N Lfyes,optional wetland site ID; Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report,) VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet 1 irc u—In (Plot size: } %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species mmtmmnmater negundo 60 Y FACW that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 5 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 80.00% (A/B) that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 60 =Total Cover Sa Iin /S ub stratum (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 70 Y FAC Total%Cover of: 2 Lonicera tatarica 30 Y FACU OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 -_.. FACW species 100 x 2= 200 4 FAC species 70 x 3= 210 5 FACU species 30 x 4= 10 100 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 200 (A) 530 (B) 1 Alliaria petiolata 40 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.65 i 2 3' Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is<_3.0* Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 40 =Total Cover (explain) YV gpdy OnqAtLatutn (Plot SiM 30 ) "Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 20 Y FAC present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 y iMophyt _ g 20 -Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 1B Profile Description, (Describe to the depth needed to document the'indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix p ....� Redox Features. (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type*` Loc** Texture Remarks 0-11 10YR 4/1 100 silt loam 11-20 2.5Y 5/4 100 salty clay loam *THydr c=C Indntration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining„ M=Matrix yp -- p Indicators for Problematic Hydric.Solls. Histisol(Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) —Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) —Stripped Matrix(S6) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L, R) Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) _Other(explain in remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand _Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if ol�srvardp Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches). ernarks; HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators;. rim tar ( _Arq of nes w . aTI ly) .Secondary Nnodicalcrs mu umr Surface Water Al) Aquatic Fauna(B13) a m�of dwcm amd High Water Table� True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Surfac Sil C ) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots_Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils _Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) _FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) —Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) —Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Other(Explain in Remarks) F e d Obdervatiorts Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No Depth(inches): hydrology Sa;Nurafion present? Yes No X inches Depth p (inches): present. N (includes capillary frIngp) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks; US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region --------------------- o—'a In. jA MlHX3 ONINlirl]. IAM-k.)0 lv..�..jno C) ............... 4�1111,1" v ERM—l _ tevx AVM SNIAIIVLN T-1-T 1 11 f Q%,3 R Alo 3'3N3Ms:aN ---—-------- le .................4" I' 7r ............... Ll I......... r J1, lig .........f7� 111 -...---------------------- x Ilk ........... 66 z"f" lu v r ....... ....... AVM YjjVd wz Kimley)Morn October 28111, 2021 Ms. Rati Akash Village of Buffalo Grove Fifty-One Raupp Blvd Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 RE: 16051 Deerfield Parkway A47 Buffalo Grove Multi,,,Family Development Proposed Improvements Fire Department Review Dear Ms. Akash, We have reviewed the site plan in more detail and softened curve radii in order to promote ease of fire truck access to the extents possible. An AutoTurn exhibit has been prepared dated 10/28/2021 and is enclosed for review. Please note that the aforementioned software is generally conservative and there are no instances shown where the fire truck path extends beyond the pavement into the landscaped or parking areas. Additionally, site plan revisions required by Planning and Engineering have been addressed in this latest submittal and standards identified in the Village Ordinance are being met regarding driveway widths and pavement radii. Lastly, the geometry for the access along Deerfield Parkway has been reviewed and approved by the Lake County DOT. Thank you for your time-we look forward to future discussions. Please reach out if you have any initial comments or questions. Sincerely, m y� Ryan Martin Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Phone:331-425-8039 Email ryp!]La g�:firj @l�p 2,I: yhqLRj, f)af REQUEST. FOR SIGN VARIANCES FOR 16051 DEERFIELD PARKWAY Applicant is requesting the following variances from the provisions of the Buffalo Grove Sign Code: 1. A variance from the requirements of Section 14.16.01 OB to permit a double-faced monument sign not exceeding 60 square feet in area on each side thereof, in lieu of the required 32 square feet area requirement. 2. A variance from the requirements of Section 14.16.060 E to permit a ground sign to be located approximately 2 feet from the public right of way in the front yard setback area. The requested variances are being sought because the location of the subject property on a heavily traveled road such as Deerfield Parkway and in proximity to the Commonwealth Eddison right of way lines, would render a sign in compliance with the size and location requirements permitted under the Buffalo Grove Sign Code ineffective to provide visible and adequate identification of the subject property,thereby imposing an unnecessary hardship on Applicant. Furthermore, the granting of the requested variances will not be materially detrimental to the property owners in the vicinity subject property as the size and location of the proposed sign is in keeping with similar signs in the vicinity of the subject property. The conditions justifying Applicant's request are unusual based upon the unique situation involving the Commonwealth Eddison lines and are not generally applicable to other properties in the Village. The granting of the variances will also not be contrary to the purpose of the Buffalo Grove Sign Code, Section 14.04.020 of which specifically recognizes the need for adequate business identification and advertising of communication and further authorizes the use of signs visible from public rights of way, particularly allowing and promoting optimum conditions for meeting the sign user's needs so long as they are compatible with their surroundings and are properly designed. RESPONSE TO STANDARDS IN REQUEST FOR VARIATIONS FOR 1,6051 Deerfield Pk w n Applicant is requesting the following variances from the provisions of the Buffalo Grove Zoning Ordinance: a. Variation to Section 17.20 allowing for private streets as depicted on the plans submitted. b. Variation to Section 17.28 reducing the required perimeter setback as depicted on the plans submitted. c. Variation to Section 17.28 reducing the minimum building separations as depicted on the plans submitted. d. Variation to Section 17.40.050 decreasing the minimum front yard, interior side yard, corner side yard and rear yard setbacks as depicted on the plans submitted. All of the foregoing variations essentially seek relief from the bulk regulations of the Zoning Ordinance to accommodate the proposed plan. Specifically, Applicant addresses the required Standards for such variations as follows: 1. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; The size and the configuration of the subject property, and the location of the Commonwealth Edison right-of-way thereon, prevent the subject property from being developed in an economically feasible manner unless variations are granted with regard to a number of bulk regulations in order to allow the location of the propped multi-family buildings at the requested density. Specifically with respect to the request for private streets, if the setbacks and rights of way for dedicated streets were to be maintained, the developable area of the property would be reduced such that the property could not be developed as proposed. The size and configuration of the subject property and the existence of the Commonwealth Edison right-of-way are unique circumstances to the subject property and are not generally applicable to other properties in the Village. 2. The proposed variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; The proposed variations will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. If the requested variations are granted, Applicant will be able to develop the property at a proposed density of 3.36 DU. The essential character of the neighborhood is commercial and industrial with some multi-family residential located on the north side of Deerfield Parkway in the Windbrooke Crossing Development. Applicant's proposed density will be comparable to, and in fact less than, the density of the Windbrooke Crossing Development, which is 3.87 DU. 3. There are practical difficulties or particular hardships in carrying out the strict letter of this Chapter which difficulties or hardships have not been created by the person presently having an interest in the property; and, The subject property cannot be developed pursuant to the proposed site plan with the density required to achieve economic viability without the granting of the requested variations, "I'll is is a result of practical difficulties with respect to the:size and configuration of the subJect property and the location of the Conirnonwealth Edison right-of-way, None of these conditions have not been created by Applicant. 4. The proposed variation will not be detrimental to the public health safety and welfare. 1113SIll LIC11 the proposed variations Nvoul d result in a development which is both cornparable and connplernentary to other properties in the vicinity of the of the subject property, and particularly that of the only Other inulti-Fansfly developrnent in close proximityt narnely Windbrooke Crossing, the proposed variations will not be detrimental to the public health, safely, and welfare. EXHIBIT C Minutes from the 12/15/21 PZC Meeting I 6 12/15/2021 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 50 RAUPP BOULEVARD, BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2021 Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 7:30 PM by Chairman Frank Cesario 1. Consider Approval of Rezoning, Special Use for a PUD, Prelim Plan, Plat of dub, and Variations for a New Development at 16051 Deerfield (Trustee Pike) (Staff Contact: Nicole Woods) Community Development Director Nicole Woods provided an overview of the project at the subject propertyw She discussed the subject property in its entirety tend the project plan. Ms. Woods discussed the framework of the site itself and its geometry. Village Planner B"ati Akash discussed the resident meeting that was conducted and the school it-npact study.Additionally, she discussed the landscape plan the developers have tried to accomplish. Mr. Freedman, developer's attorney, noted the property is being annexed and needs to be rezoned. Mr. Mike Zaransky,founder and managing principal, gave an introduction on the firm. He discussed the intention of the site and the work that has been done with Village staff. Mr. Brad Zaransky provided detail on the proposed project, detailing the units, materials and the amenities offered to the residents who will occupy the units. Com. Worlikar asked the petitioners to walk the commissioners through page 63 and the school study that was conducted, and the factor used. Deputy Village Manager Claris Stilling responded that the forrxrula is in the Village Code, which is widely used. The numbers were shared with the school districts, and they are supportive. Com. Worlikar ask how often the multiple is updated. Community Development Director Woods said the schools are good at keeping pulse on potential impact. Deputy Village Manager Chris Stilling said that the number that is usually produced is always higher than what the turnout is. Mr. Mike Zaransky also noted that these types of 1 and 2 bedrooms don't turn out too many kids. Com. Weinstein asked the petitioner to go through the variance they are asking to. Mr. Freedman noted the responses that were provided in the staff report. Com. Weinstein asked about the perimeter setback. Mr. Mike Zaransky said it is only on the east side. Com. Weinstein asked about the private street's vs public street's 12/15/2021 Mr. Brad Zaransky said it was a product of workshop. It also reduces burden on the Village to maintain the streets. Com. Weinstein asked about the issue of the cell tower. Mr. Freeman noted it is part of a lease that they do not have the power to terminate. Com. Moodhe asked about the landscaping plan. He understands what needs to go on the subject property. He notes that his concern is the age of the trees they are planning to put. Mr. Martin discussed the diameter of the trees and will be meeting the standard. Com. Moodhe asked about the type of trees. Mr. Martin said evergreens, spruce,pine, elm, red oak, and plane tree. Community Development Director Woods said the forestry department noted these would effectively screen the site. Com. Moodhe just wanted to point out that it will take time for the trees to mature, but once they do, they will look much nicer than what is currently there. Com. Moodhe asked how long it takes for the trees to be mature. Mr. Martin said after a couple years they start to mature, and they are planted with other type to provide effective screening. Com. Moodhe asked about the style of the homes. Mr. Brad Zaransky said they are townhome style because they have their own entrance. Com. Moodhe asked how many garages. Mr. Brad Zaransky said 9. Com. Moodhe asked if the garages would be leased. Mr. Brad Zaransky said some will be attached others will be detached. Com. Moodhe asked about the turn radius of the fire apparatus. Mr. Brad Zaransky worked with the fire department and made modifications to meet their needs. Com. Moodhe asked if a lot needs to be cleaned up on the subject property before the begin. Mr. Martin noted that clay will need to be brought out to help grade the site. Com. Moodhe asked staff if they have numbers from Windbrook. Deputy Village Manager Stilling said he doesn't have the numbers in front of him, but the school said it was minimal impact. Com. Moodhe noted the number of children he saw coming from windbrook. He noted potential residents want to be in the BG school district. Deputy Village Manager Stilling noted the cost of the units. He also noted the conversations with the schools. Mr. Brad Zaransky noted that they only allow 2 people per bedroom and follow the IBC code. 12/15/2021 Com. Moodhe noted the weatlands and price points of those properties. Community Development Director Woods spoke more about the schools and their attention to undeveloped land. Com. Spunt referenced page 6 and 29.Asked if the pool changed and if the club house the some size or has change. Mr. Brad Zaransky discussed the difference Com. Spunt asked if the pool was going to be screened. Mr. Brad Zaransky said they do leave them open but do put some landscape. Com. Khan asked if there are any other developments they own that have private streets Mr. Mike Zaransky said most of them are private streets. Com. Khan said he wanted them to understand their competence in maintaining their streets. Mr. Mike Zaransky understands the responsibility of maintaining roads. Com. Kahn asked who owns water and sewer. Mr. Mike Zaransky discussed hooking into the Village water and sewer from the adjacent property.After the meter it is private and will be maintained by the property owner. Com. Kahn asked what is contained in the special use. Mr. Freedman said the special use is the development itself. Community Development Director Woods discussed the code and special use. Com. Richard referenced packet page 20. He asked how that impacts the neighboring parking. Mr. Mike Zaransky said there are a net of 3 parking spaces on the adjacent site Com. Richard asked if a traffic study was done on the other street. Deputy Village Manager Stilling said it will be gated-emergency use only. Mr. Brad Zaransky said it is existing and will be repaved Com. Worlikar asked about the sign variation and the lighting bleeding into the neighboring community. Mr. Brad Zaransky discussed the photometric plan, which showed no issues. Com. Worlikar asked about the dates they were completed. Mr. Brad Zaransky said June 301h 2021 and compared it with 2016, it was 25%less in 2021 and adjusted to meet the 2016 numbers. Chairperson Cesario asked about parking onsite. Mr. Brad Zaransky said they will meet the Village code. Chairperson Cesario asked if there were sidewalks. Mr. Brad Zaransky said yes. Chairperson Cesario noted the additional buffering of the cell tower. 12/15/2021 Mr. Martin talked about the site plan and the buffering of the cell tower as physically possible. They will be revising the fence that is currently there to provide better screening with landscape. Mr. Brad Zaransky said there is nobody who wants that cell towner gone more than the developers Chairperson Cesario talked about the 65 feet to the nearest development. All other building are further than 65 feet. Mr. Martin said DOT has fully supported the development. Staff report entered as exhibit one. Resident at 3134 Marvas Way explained they did not attend the last meeting.Asked questions regarding the development and the higher elevation of their homes. The fence does not provide screening. Construction noise and timing of the project, and height of the property. Resident at 4111 Mavens way spoke about the disruption of the development and animals. Mr. Brad Zaransky discussed start and stop times and discussed construction code. Community Development Director Woods discussed the standards that are required for construction. Mr. Brad Zaransky discussed the timing of the development. First part is to demo the existing site and the build is 12-month build. Safety is a top priority. Mr. Morin discussed the 65 feet anti'the shift of site to the east. It exceeds the minimum requirement. Mr. Morin talked about the slope. The fence will be at the properly. The buildings will be low as possible to remain aesthetically pleasing. Com. Moodhe asked about the land clearing. Mr. Brad Zaransky said they are not planning on phasing it. Com. Moodhe asked if there is away to leave some of it. Mr. Brad Zaransky doesn't see why they couldn't, but would see what the contractors have to say. Com. Spunt asked about windows and rooms. Mr. Brad Zaransky discussed the windows and the rooms. Mr. Costello discussed the window plans on the apartments. Mr. Martin also noted that they approached the Illinois department of natural resources and have discussed the site. Chairperson Cesario asked if they are comfortable with the conditions within the staff recommendation Mr. Brad Zaransky said yes. The public hearing was closed at 8:42 PM.. 12/15/2021 Com. Weinstein made a motion to approve the R9 Multiple-Family District along with a special use for a Residential Planned Unit Development and approval of a Plat of Subdivision and Preliminary Plan with variations, subject to the conditions outlined in the staff report. Com Richards seconded the motion Chairperson Cesario gave closing remarks and spoke in favor of the motion. RESUAYESLT: ..... ... ..._. ... ...... ...�.�...........� olds iel, �� APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] Moodhe, Spunt, Cesario, G p Khan, Weinstein, Richards, Worlikar ABSENT: Arn 'Au ... ... _..... w . Other Matters for Discussion 1. Workshop - Proposed Redevelopment of Town Center at Northwest Corner of Lake Cook Rd and McHenry Rd (Trustee Johnson) (Staff Contact: Nicole Woods) Community Development Director Woods introduced the redevelopment. Mr. Shodish, developer for Kensington, discussed the vision of the development and how it came together. He spoke about the legacy of Kensington and their developments over the last 15 years. He talked about the 22 acres and spoke about burger king and Boston market, and Bowlero. He believes the Bowlero will be a nice addition.John went over the development and the anchor of the grocery store which is necessary for the residential portion. Letter D is a Mexican restaurant. H is a park to active community. Behind the park is the residential development and 20 thousand sq feet of retail. He also noted phase two will house those who they want to keep for the final development while they work on construction in phase one. Mr. Wells, with Urban Street Group, discussed the residential mixed-use development. He explained the 7 story luxury apartments and 3 story parking parage. They will have a club room, coffee, sales and leasing, an amazon pick up location, room for food delivery, a dog washing station, a business center for work for home tenants, electrical vehicle charging stations, bike storage, exterior pool, gas fire features, and grilling stations. He also discussed the strong corner feature with a restaurant. Mr. Shodish talked more about the site plan and the layout of the grocer and the residential aspect. He talked about parking. The parking garage will be exclusive for residential. Chairperson Cesario referenced packet page 231. He asked about the green space. Mr.Shodish spoke to the rendering on page 231. 0.6 acers owned by the Village and the park district 12/15/2021 Chairperson Cesario referenced packet page 230. Mr. Shodish spoke to the outdated rendering on page 231.And referenced page 229. He spoke about the need for surface level parking for restaurants. Changes were based on retailer feedback. Chairperson Cesario asked about access. Mr. Shodish talked more in detail about the access, turning and signalized access points. Com. Spunt asked if old checker is going to be redone to BG road. Mr. Shodish said it is still being discussing where it starts and stops. He said the closures of the roads will still work with tenants so they can continue to operate. Com. Spunt asked about main access. Mr. Wells said old checker and buffalo grove road. Com. Moodhe wished there could be less asphalt. He noted he would rather see adding another story to the garage to make more green space. He asked about how wide the sidewalks will be to make it pedestrian friendly. Mr.Shodish said 6 to 8 feet and in some areas 10 feet. Com. Moodhe asked about outdoor dinning. Mr. Shodish said every building is programmed for outdoor seating with extra wide sidewalks. Com. Moodhe asked about Burger King and Boston Market. Mr. Shodish said right now they are not interested in selling. Com. Moodhe asked what about the other current tenants. Mr. Shodish said they are in negotiations with 7 to 8 tenants that want to stay. They see the vision. Com. Moodhe asked staff if it was already B5 zoning Deputy Village Manager Chris stilling said yes in late 80's. Com. Moodhe asked about the name of that area. Mr.Shodish said they are going through a branding approach. Com. Moodhe liked the mixed use and would like to hear the developments opinion. Mr. Shodish said it didn't work from day one. There was no anchor to the project. Com. Moodhe asked about the post office. Deputy Village Manager Stilling said they have no interest in moving. Com. Weinstein asked if it there was no Burger King and Boston Market, would there still be out lots. Mr. Shodish said the concept would be the same. 12/15/2021 Com. Weinstein asked about the roofline in phase 2. Mr.Shodish talked about the north and the short-term renovations. Com. Richards asked about the J out lot and what might end up there. Mr. Shodish said it is port of their underlying agreement with bowling alley. Noting it could be several things. Com. Richards asked if there are going to be any variations. Deputy Village Manager Chris stilling soid'most likely. They are currently going through engineering but have been focused on the site plan. Setbacks and density for the building. Com. Spunt asked about location K. Mr. Shodish talked about the building. Com. Spunt asked about the stop light. Deputy Village Manager Stilling said they are regulated by IDOT and that there will not be any more. Mr. Shodish said there is a nice dedicated left turn lane. Noting there will be a formal traffic report. Com. Khan spoke about the grocery store anchor and jewel being the competition. Mr. Shodish said that they are on a NDA with the grocer and believes that there is more competition in the trades. He spoke about the importance of the grocer to the development. Com. Khan said that another light would be nice. Maybe convenience it. Com. Worlikar referenced packet page 234. Mr. Shodish said that is an old rendering. There will be full access to 83. Chairperson Cesario said the traffic study is going to be a topic of high discussion. Com. Moodhe asked staff if the road will go through from Church. Deputy Village Manager Chris stilling said no. The development is aware of it. The developer has been in contact with the property owner. Com. Moodhe asked if we have heard from developers. Deputy Village Manager Chris Stilling said yes. Mr. Shodish said they have received multiple calls. He discussed developers desire to move into Buffalo Grove. Com. Spunt asked about the delivery truck route. Mr. Wells said it will be used for move-ins and garbage. Packages would all be through in the front. Marilyn Weissberg, a Buffalo Grove Resident talked about style of the building and believes the modern style looks cold.She hopes that the development is 12/15/2021 pretty and inviting and not dark and not overly industrial looking.A nice entrance and not to forget about the back of the building. Resident at 737 Bernard wants to make sure that the Village doesn't make the same mistakes they did in the past. tal f Minutes Chairrnq!1:§_RgpqA Chairperson Cesario deferred to the committee liaison report. C rnmi a ar�d �lals rl R'e ohs Corn Worliaker discussed the Village Board Meeting he attented and the tribute to the former Commissioner Goldspiel. Staff Re rt ' ufur a 1da �ehedule Staff discussed upcoming schedule. Public C omments and Questions a ' ur ment The meeting was adjourned at 10:10 PM Action Items Chris Stilling APPROVED BY ME THIS 15th DAY OF, eoember , 2021