2003-02-05 - Plan Commission - Minutes Board or Commission: ❑ Plan Commission
Document Type: 0 A e
g nda 0 Minutes
Meeting ate: 02/05/2003
Type of Meeting: ❑ Regular Meeting
REGULAR MEETING
BUFFALO GROVE PLAN COMMISSION
February 5, 2003
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago (JFMC),
Annexation with zoning in the R-1 District with a
Special Use and Preliminary Plan for a community services
Facility, 16638 Brockman Avenue—Workshop #1
Chicago Indoor Racing,Approval of a Special Use for a
Recreational facility in the Industrial District, 301 Hastings
Drive (General Binding Corporation property)—Workshop #1
Chairman Ottenheimer called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. in the Village Council Chambers,
Buffalo Grove Municipal Building, 50 Raupp Boulevard, Buffalo Grove, Illinois.
Commissioners present: Chairman Ottenheimer
Mr. Samuels
Mr. Smith
Ms. Bocek
Ms. Kenski-Sroka
Mr. Khan
Mr. Teplinsky
Mr. Billiter
Mr. Stark
Commissioners absent: None
Also present: Mr. Richard Wexler, Lord, Bissel & Brook
Ms. Robin Stein, JFMC
Mr. Ric Katz, JFMC
Mr. Georges Brown, Chicago Indoor Racing
Mr. Anthony Stewart, Chicago Indoor Racing
Mr. Steven W. Roys, KJW Engineering Consultants
Ms. Laura Young, Griskelis, Young, Harrell
Mr. John Graziano, Graystar
Mr. Vic Filippini, Allen & Knight
Ms. DeAnn Glover, Village Trustee
Mr. Robert Pfeil, Village Planner
Mr. Greg Summers, Associate Village Planner
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Moved by Commissioner Kenski-Sroka, seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve the
minutes of the public hearing of November 20, 2002. All Commissioners were in favor of the
motion and the motion passed unanimously with Commissioners Bocek and Teplinsky
abstaining.
Moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Kenski-Sroka to approve the
minutes of the regular meeting of November 20, 2002. All Commissioners were in favor of the
motion and the motion passed unanimously with Commissioners Bocek and Teplinsky
abstaining.
Moved by Commission Smith, seconded by Commissioner Kenski-Sroka to approve the minutes
of the public hearing of December 18, 2002. All Commissioners were in favor of the motion and
the motion passed unanimously.
Moved by Commissioner Billiter, seconded by Commissioner Kenski-Sroka to approve the
minutes of the regular meeting of December 18, 2002. All Commissioners were in favor of the
motion and the motion passed unanimously.
COMMITTEE AND LIAISON REPORTS
Commissioner Smith stated he attended the Village Board meeting on January 20, 2003 where
the board denied the Prestige Leasing project. There was also a referral of the Jewish Federation
proposed Response Center as well as a referral for a building at the Covington Office Plaza
adjacent to the Fifth Third Bank by Groundwork, Ltd.
Commissioner Kenski-Sroka attended the Village Board meeting on February 3, 2003 where the
Board asked that their appreciation be conveyed to the Plan Commission for a job well done on
the Riverwalk North project, which project was approved by the Board.
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO (JFMC), ANNEXATION WITH
ZONING IN THE R-1 DISTRICT WITH A SPECIAL USE AND PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR
A COMMUNITY SERVICES FACILITY, 16638 BROCKMAN AVENUE—WORKSHOP 91
Mr. Richard Wexler stated he represents the JFMC Facilities Corporation, which is a
not-for-profit corporation that was created by the Jewish Federation in 1986. Its purpose was to
consolidate the ownership and management of all the Jewish Federation and its agencies land
and facilities to achieve some economies of scale and to introduce some modern concepts of
management. The Facilities Corporation is presenting its proposal on a single lot in
unincorporated Lake County immediately contiguous to the Village's corporate limits on
Brockman Avenue, presently occupied by a vacated single family residence which the Jewish
Federation proposes to redevelop with a building that will be used for its Response Center. The
Response Center is a multi-agency facility, which is essentially a counseling center to
accommodate teens and families of all religions for counseling purposes in the area of family and
child growth issues. He stated they propose to develop this property with a building to be in
keeping with the single-family residences surrounding it. Inside this building would be offices
for counseling and consultation with physicians who would be on the premises from time to
time. He stated they would provide the requisite off street parking pursuant to the Village codes
as well as the landscaping and other buffers to assure the neighbors.
Commissioner Teplinsky asked if there would be any sort of living arrangements here.
Mr. Wexler stated no. It will not be used for any overnight stays.
Commissioner Teplinsky asked what sort of professionals would be staffing the center.
Ms. Robin Stein stated they have a variety of Master's level counselors in the fields of clinical
social work, psychology, and counseling. She noted they are provided a monthly psychiatric
consultation. They also employ a number of Bachelor level preventive types of professionals
who do a lot of work in the school system.
Commissioner Teplinsky asked what sort of medical care would be given at the facility.
Ms. Stein stated it would be related to adolescent health concerns. Some of the trends they have
seen are victims of sexual assault and unhealthy dating relationships.
Commissioner Billiter asked how many people are typically seen at any one given time or the
average per day.
Ms. Stein stated in a given evening they might have 4-6 counselors during one-hour sessions.
Because they deal with an adolescent population, aged 12-20, they try to provide hours that are
convenient for that population. It usually gets a little busier around 4:00-4:30 up to about 8:00
p.m.
Commissioner Billiter noted a circular parking lot is somewhat unique which sets up a difficult
parking arrangement and leaves it open to traffic problems. If you have a peak busy time, that
arrangement would pose some difficulties.
Mr. Wexler stated they would be looking at that. He noted that most of what they present is
based upon their experience at the Skokie office and the smaller facility in Prairie View. Much
of the traffic in the Prairie View facility is walk in because of its proximity to the commuter
station and the high school.
Commissioner Billiter noted that brings about some need for sidewalks and other things that will
need to be discussed. Landscaping will be important in context with the neighbors. He noted
photographs would help to see how they are relating to the neighbors.
Commissioner Samuels asked what kind of traffic is anticipated to be generated by this sort of
proj ect.
Mr. Katz stated it will be higher than a true single family residence, but it certainly won't be
shopping center variety either.
Commissioner Samuels asked what is between the property and Main Street.
Mr. Katz noted there are two single-family residences that front Brockman. On the south side of
Brockman there are no residential lots that open to the south side of Brockman as they all face
east.
Commissioner Samuels asked how traffic here would compare to traffic engendered by a
residential day care.
Mr. Katz stated the traffic here would be less because it would be spread out over a longer time
period. In a day care facility you have a peak time when people are dropping off and another
one in the late afternoon when people pick kids up. Here there would be kids and families
coming in the late afternoon and evening hours only.
Commissioner Samuels asked what kind of daily traffic they are expecting.
Mr. Katz stated they are looking a maximum of 16 coming and going.
Commissioner Samuels asked what typical staffing is per day.
Mr. Katz said 4-6 professionals.
Ms. Stein stated their counselors might stay there for the day as well as an administrator and
perhaps an office assistant to help answer phones.
Commissioner Samuels asked what the facility in Skokie is like in terms of its location or its
proximity to either a strictly residential street or something that might be terms more of a
collector street.
Mr. Wexler stated the facility in Skokie is located in a shopping center in an office facility.
Commissioner Samuels asked if there would be any kind of daycare or outdoor activities on the
property.
Mr. Wexler stated there is a large lot with the pole barn, which would be left. It might be used
from time to time for some small group sessions. There is no external use contemplated for the
property.
Commissioner Samuels asked if the pole barn is in good condition.
Mr. Katz stated if they are going to retain and use it, they will bring it up to whatever codes are
required.
Commissioner Samuels asked if the exterior would also be improved.
Mr. Katz stated their first choice would be to leave the outside as is because it is in OK
condition.
Commissioner Samuels asked for some photos for the next meeting.
Commissioner Samuels asked if there would be any kind of outdoor activities.
Mr. Wexler noted that one should consider the external use of the property much as any other
residence in the Village would be used.
Commissioner Samuels asked if there will be active use of the yard.
Mr. Katz stated it might be used for volleyball or badminton or something of that sort.
Commissioner Samuels asked about lighting for the building and parking lot.
Mr. Katz stated it would be something that will be adequate to see where you are going but not
enough to bother anyone outside of the property.
Commissioner Samuels stated he is trying to assess the scale of operations here because there are
ordinances that say you cannot have a business in a residential neighborhood. There is an
exception made for home daycare only.
Mr. Katz stated traffic would be higher than something entering and exiting to a main residential
street.
Mr. Robert Daniel, 75 Park Avenue, commented that the property is currently a well-maintained
single-family home that fits in with the area. He said the proposed JFMC facility would be a
more intense use with evening hours that may not fit in well with the neighborhood.
Mr. Allan Mattson indicated that he is one of the owners of the property directly east of the
JFMC site. He stated that Brockman Avenue through his property is not a dedicated street; it is
an easement that is privately owned. He said that his understanding of the easement is that it
allows access to the parcels west of his property for single-family residential uses.
Mr. Mattson commented that the proposed JFMC facility may be detrimental to the
neighborhood because of the traffic it would generate and the hours it would operate. He said
that the use does not appear to be conducive to a residential area. He inquired where Village
utilities would be brought to the site, and whether easements through private property would be
needed for the utilities.
Commissioner Khan inquired why the petitioner wants to annex to Buffalo Grove.
Mr. Katz replied that the 7FMC wants access to Village utilities.
Commissioner Khan noted that the petitioner needs to evaluate the feasibility of connecting this
property to Village utilities.
Chairman Ottenheimer summarized the status of the petition, noting that the petitioner should
clarify the street access issue, the plan for serving the site with Village utilities, and more
information concerning the proposed zoning amendment to allow this type of use in a residential
district. He indicated that for the next workshop, the petitioner should provide a landscape plan,
lighting plan, samples of proposed building materials, floor plan of the building, information
concerning the security plan and an aerial map of the site and adjacent properties. Information
concerning traffic impact should also be provided, including the number of employees, the hours
that employees would arrive at and leave the site, the number of counseling sessions per day and
the typical number of vehicles that would be at the site each day.
CHICAGO INDOOR RACING, APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE FOR A RECREATION
FACILITY IN THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, 301 HASTINGS DRIVE (GENERAL
BINDING CORPORATION PROPERTY)—WORKSHOP 91
Mr. Brown stated their proposed use is in an existing building and they do not propose making
any substantial changes to the outside. Other than re-striping the existing parking lot and
actually widening the existing brick stairway entry and including some handrails, there will be
few changes on the outside. The GBC sign will be replaced with a similarly sized sign with their
logo. He stated they would be making substantial interior changes for their intended purposes.
Mr. Stewart stated the concept of indoor racing started in Europe about twelve years ago. They
take go-carts and create a track indoors. The first tracks were very basic and were literally tracks
formed from tires. Over the years the industry matured and people realized you couldn't just
rely on the thrill of racing if you are an entertainment facility. This was especially the case when
they moved to the U.S. Therefore, the facilities became a lot more sophisticated.
Mr. Stewart stated their biggest target is corporations; team building, sales launches, sales
training, seminars, meetings, and parties. Second is consumer business. Third is the league
program. Lastly, junior leagues, where the children are taught about safety and driving first.
Mr. Stewart noted that there is a zero tolerance policy toward drinking. This is policed through
effective and strong management. The moment you walk into the building there is a desk at the
entrance and you are asked if you intend to race. Then a wristband is attached. The moment you
want to drink or are seen drinking, that wristband is cut off. You cannot go racing without a
wristband. The person at the front desk will be trained and looking to spot anyone with signs of
drinking. The second checkpoint is at the registration desk. The people there are always on the
lookout. You then go through the locker rooms into one of two briefing rooms. The staff helps
to get the equipment on and are in close proximity at that point to check for alcohol. If someone
has had or appears to have had something to drink they have the right to request them to take a
Breathalyzer test. If they refuse they are offered a raincheck and ask them to come back with an
explanation that it is for their own safety and the safety of other drivers.
Mr. Stewart noted the second floor consists of their alternative entertainment area. This is either
before or after racing. In some cases, not everyone wants to race. In some cases a corporation
may come in where 30 or so people want to race but 10 or so do not. Those people can have a
drink, shoot pool in the bar or play video games as they are proposing. They have provided a list
of the proposed video games because they are also concerned about an arcade atmosphere. He
noted they do not want a teenage hangout and noted their most profitable business is the
corporate market and corporate guests and teenagers do not go together. He noted they do not
want anyone turning up and being disappointed and having to go away so they have this area
which is something else for them to do while they wait.
Commissioner Samuels asked what type of experience or monitoring or prohibitions are in place
for gambling or redemption type of games.
Mr. Stewart stated they have never had any type of gambling. He stated he feels the redemption
games are awful and they would have no issue with not being allowed to have them. He noted
they had been included on the list because they had been told that people like them. He stated to
them it is an alternative form of entertainment to provide to people while they are not doing
anything.
Mr. Brown stated there must be some form of alternative entertainment. He stated they would be
sub-contracting out the entire vending area. If it were up to him and Mr. Stewart they would not
have any redemption games. The vending company likes to send out what is most profitable.
Therefore, it will take some negotiation, although this facility should be profitable enough for the
vending companies to give them what they want.
Commissioner Samuels asked if the racing itself fosters gambling among patrons, especially with
league competitions.
Mr. Stewart stated to the best of his knowledge he has never seen any gambling. He stated it is
something they would positively discourage. From the league perspective, there is a level of
camaraderie that is more of a social thing.
Mr. Brown stated from a customer's point of view there is betting in terms of winner buys the
beer or lunch. However, there is no actual monetary betting.
Commissioner Samuels asked if the carts and equipment are essentially the same as the outdoor
facilities and he asked about the recent accident in which a child was killed riding on their
mother's lap.
Mr. Stewart stated the carts are essentially strengthened racing cars. He noted he is familiar with
the accident mentioned and stated those carts were single seat occupancy vehicles. The child on
the mother's lap actually impaired the mother's ability to control the vehicle. When she hit
something the child was between the mother and the steering wheel and became the human
airbag.
Mr. Stewart stated they have single seat occupancy vehicles. Only one person is allowed in and
that person is in a race suit and helmet and has neck collar on. In addition they go through a
safety briefing. The only time a child gets anywhere near the car is after they have taken the
two-day course for children.
Commissioner Samuels asked if there is some kind of override control that allows them to stop
the car remotely.
Mr. Stewart stated they can actually slow the car down individually or all the cars can be slowed
down and they can shut the whole thing down.
Commissioner Samuels asked if the speed is slower when children race.
Mr. Stewart stated they have different fleets of cars. The cars are governed and limited, but they
have never had to use that governing device. They have found the children understand and abide
by the rules.
Commissioner Samuels asked if there is any indication that having young children participate in
the league fosters or results in any type of more aggressive driving patterns.
Mr. Stewart stated it is exactly the reverse. Racing is a non-contact sport and one must be very
delicate behind the wheel of a racing car. Smooth movements are necessary and this teaches
children to be controlled and disciplined. Throughout the two-day course they learn the
consequences of going over the limit.
Commissioner Bocek asked how exhaust fumes are handled.
Mr. Stewart stated they pump in fresh air from the top and they exhaust the fumes to the side of
the building. This creates a continuous flow of air. They have a system that can complete the
required number of air changes every hour and will meet OSHA standards. They also have
carbon monoxide readers that they can constantly monitor. At any time the fire chief has the
authority to come in and look at the readings.
Commissioner Teplinsky asked what it is about Buffalo Grove that leads the petitioner to belief
that this is going to be a very successful business here.
Mr. Stewart stated they look at the demographics; the number of corporations within a 20 mile
radius, the number of residences within that radius, ease of access. They were also encouraged
by the fact that the town of Buffalo Grove was actively looking for ways of bringing new types
of uses to commercial areas to generate more revenue.
Mr. Brown stated Buffalo Grove is the center of the universe as far as demographics if Chicago
is not counted.
Commissioner Teplinsky asked what the cost is to participate in the racing.
Mr. Stewart stated you would typically pay a $10 fee for a day license or $25 for an annual
license. A single race then costs $25.
Chairman Ottenheimer asked if you have to race or if you can just come in.
Mr. Stewart stated you do not have to race, you can just go upstairs and have snacks or drinks,
etc.
Mr. Brown stated on weekends when teenagers come in, there will be some system in place
where there will be a cover charge that is credited toward a race where you basically price them
out of coming in to hang out.
Commissioner Samuels asked if there are grandstands.
Mr. Stewart stated there is a viewing gallery.
Chairman Ottenheimer asked about hours of operation.
Mr. Stewart noted they are open 7 days of the week. Typically hours are 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
during the week. On Thursday they might stretch it to 11:00 p.m. On Friday it would be to
midnight and Sunday it is back to 10:00 p.m. The only other time to be open in the morning or
lunchtime would be for a corporate affair.
Chairman Ottenheimer asked about having a birthday party.
Mr. Stewart stated after 8:00 p.m. no one under 21 is allowed in. The only exception might be a
private function such as a birthday party and if someone is under 21 they could go into the
function room but not into the bar area.
Chairman Ottenheimer asked what the largest corporate group the facility would allow.
Mr. Stewart stated the facility holds approximately 200 people. But the corporation would have
had to buy out the whole facility. Normally a typical function is between 30-50 people.
Commissioner Stark asked for clarification of 18 year olds and under.
Mr. Stewart stated anyone under 18 years of age is not allowed.
Commissioner Stark asked where fuel would be stored.
Mr. Stewart stated in an external tank outside in 250 or 500 gallon tank with all the requisite fire
prevention systems. They will either have a caddy or more typically a fuel line.
Mr. Brown stated from a business perspective zero tolerance makes the insurance much cheaper.
Commissioner Stark noted there is some concern relative to aggressive driving after racing. He
stated he called the police department in Braintree to ask if there have been any problems with
aggressive driving after the fact or any alcohol related driving and he could not come up with
anything.
Commissioner Kenski-Sroka asked how the facility will be staffed for security to handle the
Friday and Saturday night crowd.
Mr. Stewart stated they will have an off duty police officer in full uniform. This is what they
have been using in Braintree and they have never had to use them.
Chairman Ottenheimer asked for details on the restaurant.
Mr. Stewart stated they have a relationship with a local vendor who will be the food and catering
partner. The food is typically easy food; burgers, hot dogs, pizza. In terms of catering it is
whatever the company wants, but still tends to be easy foods.
Commissioner Billiter stated he would like a breakdown of the square footage for each of the
different venues. This would help to understand what percentage of what activity is going on
and the relationships of those activities. It would also aid other departments when it comes time
to giving permits.
Mr. Stewart reviewed the preliminary plans and the square footage.
Commissioner Billiter asked if everything is covered as far as making sure the site is within all
easements and restrictions to cover all these different uses.
Mr. Pfeil stated the zoning mechanism for this is a special use and it is actually a multi-faceted
special use because it has retail, restaurant and video game elements. It is, however, primarily a
recreation use, which can be permitted in the Industrial District as a special use similar to the
Twin Rinks Ice Pavilion and Buffalo Grove Gymnastics. He noted that the room for video games
and other amusement devices, with more than eight games, is beyond what the Zoning
Ordinance allows in any district other than the B-5 Town Center District.
Chairman Ottenheimer asked if this would require an amendment to the code.
Mr. Pfeil stated yes.
Mr. Stewart stated the breakdown information is within the packet provided to the commission.
Commissioner Billiter asked about safety inspections. He also inquired concerning how the
support columns for the building would be protected.
Mr. Stewart the Illinois Department of Labor actually has standards that govern this type of
racing and they will actually be adopting a slightly stricter standard that is already the law in
Massachusetts. He said that appropriate barriers and padding would shield the support columns
from damage.
Mr. Brown stated Mr. Stewart actually wrote the code for Massachusetts. He noted that if
someone were to go through the barrier and hits anything hard enough to cause structural
damage, the least of their worries would be the building coming down.
Mr. Brown stated the carts have a short-lived life and you are cycling through them. He stated
they will be starting out with a flat track with barriers, but just like Great America updates are
made to the track and during that process you end up replacing everything.
Commissioner Billiter stated he is just looking to have some kind of record on paper to show
what is actually being done legally.
Mr. Stewart stated the Illinois Department of Labor has the authority to inspect the facility.
Commissioner Samuels asked if there are insurance requirements and can they be made part of
any permitting or licensing.
Mr. Stewart stated insurance is typically $1,000,000 minimum per car.
Commissioner Samuels asked who is there to make sure that the insurance stays in force.
Mr. Brown stated he is as an investor and part of the investor's limited liability corporation
agreement is that there be ridiculous insurance in place.
Commissioner Samuels stated that this is essentially an endorsement stamp on this by the Village
and how can the Village ensure the safety here.
Chairman Ottenheimer stated this was getting way beyond the realm of Plan Commission
purview in order to set or mandate that insurance be established.
Mr. Filippini stated in light of the concern and the intended operations, they would not have a
problem having a minimum insurance requirement stipulated in the Special Use permit and even
providing evidence of that insurance to the Village on an annual basis. In the event this initial
invest group does sell the facility, the Village would be well off to have that kind of stipulation
so the next operator would have the same obligation.
Commissioner Samuels stated the parking analysis brings the parking to within one space of
what the current ordinance would require. He asked what the petitioner's experience is in
Braintree in regard to parking demand.
Mr. Stewart stated they have never had a problem with parking so far. Large groups often turn
up in buses. He stated, however, they have done their study based on everyone turning up in
their own cars and assumed everything was full and determined that with re-striping, the parking
will be sufficient.
Mr. Brown noted that one of the plat surveys shows a whole bay where trucks can back up to
park and this area is not striped. They can always stripe this area if the need arose.
Commissioner Samuels asked if there is a potential for sharing for overflow parking with any
other nearby business.
Mr. Stewart stated they have not investigated that yet, however, their busy times are when the
other businesses are empty. If found to be an issue they will talk to their neighbors and make
some kind of arrangement.
Commissioner Samuels asked what the level of finish is for the various areas. He asked if the
track surface is concrete and if it is treated.
Mr. Stewart stated it is concrete and it tends to be painted.
Commissioner Samuels asked what kind of energy would be involved in a collision between one
or the carts and one of the support columns.
Mr. Stewart stated the pole couldn't be reached because there is a barrier before you get to the
pole. He noted you have the illusion of speed on the track but you are only doing about 20-22
mph. One of the aims of designing a track is to create the illusion of speed at the lowest possible
speed.
Commissioner Samuels noted he would like to know what other finish is involved in the
warehouse area for lighting, ceiling, the interior walls, etc.
Mr. Stewart stated it is typically decorated with billboards and banners and other things that
bring to mind racing. Other than that the building is as is.
Commissioner Samuels asked what the finish is like inside the conference and gaming areas.
Mr. Stewart stated the meeting rooms are very businesslike with carpeting on the floor and the
designers will create the rest.
Commissioner Smith asked how many injuries they have per year and what types of injuries are
they.
Mr. Stewart stated they in Boston they have never had anyone break a bone. Typically the worst
occurrences are difficulty breathing when overexcited, some bumps, trips and falls.
Chairman Ottenheimer stated the following items will be needed for the next workshop:
1. Samples of the materials proposed for use inside
2. Chart with breakdown of square feet for each type of use in the facility
3. Conceptual drawing of what the exterior of the building will look like
4. Representative materials or pictures of the anticipated interior
Mr. Filippini stated externally what is there is what will be proposed with the exception of a
canopy, signage and some re-striping. Internally, the finishes are being conceived at this point.
He noted he does not think they are at that point because of the uneasiness about possible
approval of such a project. Therefore, it might be premature for them to have those types of
finishes and for them to be able to make an accurate representation. The floor plans do give a
good sense of the project and the F 1 facility in Boston could act as a prototype of the types of
finishes asked for.
Chairman Ottenheimer stated it definitely would, which is why he suggested everyone take a
look at it.
Mr. Filippini stated that as to the chart they have provided it as part of the parking tab in the
booklet.
The Plan Commission agreed that the project is ready for a public hearing.
Commissioner Samuels stated he would also like to hear some more specifics about security.
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT—None
FUTURE AGENDA SCHEDULE
Mr. Pfeil stated the next meeting would be held on February 19, 2003.
PUBLIC COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS—None
STAFF REPORT—
Mr. Pfeil stated he has completed a draft of an annual report for the Plan Commission. He noted
he will send it out for review and comment and it will be on the February 19th agenda.
NEW BUSINESS—None
ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Commissioner Kenski-Sroka, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried
unanimously to adjourn. Chairman Ottenheimer adjourned the meeting at 10:02.
Respectfully submitted,
Fay Rubin, Recording Secretary
APPROVED BY:
LESTER OTTENHEIMER, Chair