Loading...
2006-06-21 - Plan Commission - Minutes Board or Commission: ❑ Plan Commission Document Type: ❑A e g nda 0 Minutes Meeting ate: 06/21/2006 Type of Meeting: PUBLIC HEARING BUFFALO GROVE PLAN COMMISSION June 21, 2006 Buffalo Grove Fitness Center (Busch Grove Community Park) 601 Deerfield Parkway, Buffalo Grove, Illinois Chairman Ottenheimer called the hearing to order at 7:30 p.m. in the Village Council Chambers, Buffalo Grove Municipal Building, 50 Raupp Boulevard, Buffalo Grove, Illinois. Chairman Ottenheimer read the Notice of Public Hearing as published in the Buffalo Grove Daily Herald, explained the procedure to be followed for the public hearing, and swore in all persons who wished to give testimony. Commissioners present: Chairman Ottenheimer Mr. Smith Ms. Bocek Ms. Kenski-Sroka Mr. Khan Mr. Teplinsky Mr. Stark Mr. Cohn Mr. Podber Commissioners absent: None Also Present: Mr. Michael Rylko, Executive Director, Buffalo Grove Park District Ms. Kathleen Lenzmeier, Director Buffalo Grove Fitness Center Ms. Catherine Burnham, Operational Marketing Manager, Buffalo Grove Fitness Center Ms. Kathleen Elliott, Tressler, Soderstrong, Maloney & Priess Village Trustee Jeffrey Braiman Mr. William Raysa, Village Attorney Mr. Robert Pfeil, Village Planner The following exhibits were presented by the petitioner at the public hearing: Exhibit A: Construction Plan, undated Exhibit B: Floor Plan Exhibit C: Letters of support from residents Exhibit D: Accredited facilities and spa certifications Exhibit E: Memorandum from Mr. Robert Pfeil to the Plan Commission dated June 16, 2006 Mr. Michael Rylko reviewed the existing construction plan noting it is enclosing the infill area to expand their kids' club for the fitness center. The addition is about 8, 500 square feet which is made up of a sport specific training room, a Pilates room, yoga room and the day spa which consists of mechanical space, seven treatment rooms and a lobby area. He noted the Buffalo Grove Park District owns the Buffalo Grove Fitness Center and has a management service agreement with the Northwest Community Health Care. He stated the petitioner is requesting an amendment to the Special Use for additional services for the Vitality Spa. Mr. Rylko noted the fitness center is in its sixth year of operation and they have run massage services since day one at the facility and they now want to expand those services. He stated the facility is approximately 72,000 square feet; the addition is 8,500 square feet. Ms. Kathy Lenzmeier stated their intent with the proposed spa is to complement the variety of fitness opportunities with additional services that are designed to improve health and wellness. She noted it is their desire to offer services that promote therapeutic healing as a priority as opposed to beauty and cosmetic enhancement She stated evidence from government bodies within the fitness industry cite spa services as one of the fastest growing industries. This streak of popularity and growth has continued to explode and educated consumers are concerned about improving their fitness and realize the benefits of the spa environment. Ms. Lenzmeier stated many health care based clubs have pursued such additions to their menus and have been successful with integrating services that are supported by the medical industry as healing therapies. She stated they are currently in the process of designing the spa services they intend to offer at the Vitality Spa. The menu of services that have been included in the report that was distributed to the Board have been carefully selected and analyzed to ensure that they are therapeutic in nature and that they are supported by the hospital as legitimate wellness services. Ms. Lenzmeier stated they consider the menu of services to be a strong blend of body treatment, healing therapies and skin modalities. Vitality Spa employees will be required to maintain their Illinois state license and certifications for their therapeutic areas of expertise. Employees will also be required to maintain a current health care provider's CPR and AED certification. Additionally they must complete a comprehensive safety training program, including blood born pathogens training. A clinical level of hygiene will always be maintained Ms. Lenzmeier stated they are sure that with the addition of this spa and such therapeutic services, the Buffalo Grove Fitness Center will emerge as a unique and popular destination to achieve the best in fitness health and wellness. Ms. Lenzmeier stated they would like to stress that they intend to be very different than some of the local providers in the fact that everything they will be using is non-acidic. The therapies are definitely based for wellness purposes. It will be a facility that a person who may need better foot care or sports foot care can come and be assured that they will be in a clinical based environment that is well maintained. Ms. Lenzmeier stated they put the information out to their membership and received over 100 supportive letters, e-mails and signed petitions from Buffalo Grove based residents. Commissioner Teplinsky asked what the difference is between a therapeutic manicure or pedicure versus a cosmetic manicure or pedicure. Ms. Lenzmeier stated this spa has investigated products that are non-acidic in nature which means there will be no acrylics and products are organic. It is not the kind of place to go in just to have your nails painted which will not be offered. There will only be a full therapeutic service where you actually get a massage, reflexology and the polish portion is strictly to seal the nail after the therapeutic service is done. Commissioner Teplinsky asked what other services are done along with the package and what the distinctions are. Mr. Lenzmeier stated first it is the type of products used and secondly the packages are therapeutic in nature. Commissioner Teplinsky asked what the difference is between a therapeutic manicure at the proposed spa and any other retail establishment in Buffalo Grove. Ms. Lenzmeier stated the usual retail establishment offers a 30 minute service where they file your nails, do your cuticles and polish the nails. The spa will be an hour service where they actually do reflexology, massage the hands, and exfoliation. Commissioner Teplinsky asked what kind of licenses the employees hold. Ms. Lenzmeier stated they will have to have an Illinois state license as a nail technician as well as CPR certification and AED certification and blood work pathogen training. They will also be able to provide reflexology which requires special training in that area. Commissioner Teplinsky asked if these services will be offered to members and non-members of the club. Ms. Lenzmeier stated yes. Commissioner Stark asked if there are any other parcels of land in the Village that are designated RE. Mr. Pfeil stated there are a number of properties zoned Residential Estate. Some are residential properties at the far north end of the Village and others are public uses such as Buffalo Grove High School, which is a special use. The Fitness Center is one of a number of public or quasi-public uses in the Village that are zoned in a residential classification with a special use. Commissioner Bocek stated she is trying to figure out why some of the surrounding establishments could not satisfy the proposed spa requirements, minus the organic product use. Ms. Lenzmeier stated that within the fitness center environment there are senior citizens on site, athletes on site and people who are involved in athletic sports etc. Their feet are very important to their activity and they have a much higher risk for fungal infections and diabetes among these people. Many people would feel safer coming to this kind of facility due to the higher standards and for the therapeutic nature of the services. Commissioner Cohn asked what endermology. Ms. Catherine Burnham stated it is a form of cellulite treatment. It is a patented name that refers to the actual equipment involved in cellulite reduction. Through a series of these types of treatments it will help to reduce the appearance of cellulite and the presence of cellulite. Commissioner Kenski-Sroka asked if any of these services could be classified reimbursable by either insurance or flexible spending accounts for health care. Ms. Lenzmeier stated she is not sure and they could attempt to do that on their own. Commissioner Podber asked if there is any medical condition that is actually curing any problems. Ms. Lenzmeier stated reflexology is more of a nerve massage where they actually put pressure on nerves within the foot or hands that alleviates some of the problems. These are complimentary treatments to medical services. Commissioner Podber asked Mr. Rylko who the owner is of the Vitality Spa. Mr. Rylko stated the owner of the building is Buffalo Grove Park District who is the petitioner and they are in their sixth year of a contract management service with Northwest Community Health Care. Commissioner Podber asked who would receive benefit from the fees generated by the services. Mr. Rylko stated that would be the Park District. Commissioner Podber asked what the payout rate is for Northwest Health Care. Mr. Rylko stated the way the tax law is written, they have gross revenue they have to meet in order to get a bonus. Otherwise everything is basically a straight pass through. Commissioner Podber asked what microdermabrasion is. Mr. Lenzmeier stated it is in the nature of scaring and treatment to rejuvenate damaged skin. Commissioner Podber asked what other types of endeavors the Park District would consider going into. Mr. Rylko stated for the record that any type of revenue the Park District makes off of this facility will go back into public support of programs and other facilities. Commissioner Podber asked if they are considering any other things like a branch bank or restaurant. Mr. Rylko stated there are no plans for a branch bank in the facility although they do offer a juice bar and there is a pro shop there. Commissioner Podber asked if prices will be competitive. Mr. Rylko stated yes. Commissioner Podber asked who will be paying for the overhead of the space. Mr. Rylko stated the whole facility was based on a business plan. The land was purchased through tax dollars but the facility was constructed and operates on a day to day basis through membership fees and charges so the operation and principle interest payments of the facility is paid through those fees and no tax dollars go to support the facility. Commissioner Podber asked how much will be charged for a therapeutic manicure. Ms. Lenzmeier stated their menu of services has not been completed at this time. However, it will definitely be competitive with any other facility of this nature and they plan to give members a discount. Commissioner Podber asked if the Park District pays sales tax. Mr. Rylko stated yes. Commissioner Podber asked if the e would be sales taxes associated with the manicures. Mr. Rylko stated the products being sold would incur sales taxes. Commissioner Podber asked how this product fits in to the scope of what the Park District wants to do and the mission statement. Mr. Rylko stated it fits in with servicing the community and the members in order to be competitive with surrounding medical based fitness centers that offer these spa types of facilities. Commissioner Podber asked what other types of services might be fair game for the Park District to offer. Mr. Rylko stated some day they might like to offer a community center, batting cages and an aquatic facility. All of these are in their long range strategic plan. Commissioner Smith asked why the acupuncture is being offered in the spa as opposed to the physical therapy area. Ms. Lenzmeier stated physical therapy requires a doctor's referral and acupuncture does not. A person can just make that conscious choice to go on their own accord to receive those services. Commissioner Smith stated in his opinion health and wellness and spas and vanity in general have come a long way and he feels all these services fit into that and he does not have a problem with any of the services. If you look at other spas in Buffalo Grove most of them offer a variety of these types of items and services so as far as zoning it fits into this facility. Commissioner Stark asked if these services were always planned for from the inception of the fitness center. Mr. Rylko stated no but that it was a suggestion from membership feedback. Commissioner Cohn asked how responses from the membership were solicited for this proposal. Ms. Lenzmeier stated they actually put a list of the proposed services at the front desk and people on their own stopped to fill out their support. It was actually only out for 24 hours and the level of support in just those 24 hours was amazing. People who saw that took their time to provide the e-mails sent to us Commissioner Cohn asked if there was any negative feedback from anyone about the proposal. Ms. Lenzmeier stated no. Mr. Rylko stated no. Commissioner Cohn asked if they had solicited any feedback from the community at large. Ms. Lenzmeier stated no. Commissioner Cohn read one example of comments from e-mails in support of the proposed services. He stated his only concern from such response was whether people really understood what is being offered and the distinction between the types of hand and foot care provided here being therapeutic. He asked if the membership actually understands that what will be offered is actually different from what can be received from the community at large. Ms. Lenzmeier stated there are probably some people who do not understand at this point in time but they will once they experience the service. Commissioner Cohn stated his only concern is that some people will think they are getting the same type of services here as in all other places. He stated he does not want this to be competition for people who do something different someplace else and he hopes they make sure the membership understands that. Chairman Ottenheimer asked if a therapeutic manicure is more expensive than a regular manicure in general. Ms. Lenzmeier stated yes. In comparison to other salons that might offer that as an alternative then no. Commissioner Cohn asked what recourse the Village has if down the road it appears that this is less therapeutic and more cosmetic and complaints come in from businesses in the community. Mr. Pfeil stated the ordinance would be specific in terms of addressing issues of concern to the Plan Commission that are included in the recommendation for the Village Board to consider. He stated the ordinance would need to have specific language concerning the allowed uses. If the proposed additional spa services are allowed by ordinance, the Village would monitor the facility to ensure compliance. There being no further comments or questions from anyone else present, Chairman Ottenheimer closed the public hearing at 8:22 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Fay Rubin, Recording Secretary APPROVED BY: LESTER OTTENHEIMER, Chair Board or Commission: ❑ Plan Commission Document Type: 0 A e g nda 0 Minutes Meeting ate: 06/21/2006 Type of Meeting: ❑ Regular Meeting REGULAR MEETING BUFFALO GROVE PLAN COMMISSION June 21, 2006 Buffalo Grove Fitness Center, 601 Deerfield Parkway— Consideration Of amendment of special use concerning services provided at the facility Discussion of Village Comprehensive Plan—RTAP/TOD project Review of conceptual plans for the Prairie View area—follow up To June 7, 2006 public input meeting Chairman Ottenheimer called the meeting to order at 8:22 p.m. in the Village Council Chambers, Buffalo Grove Municipal Building, 50 Raupp Boulevard, Buffalo Grove, Illinois. Commissioners present: Chairman Ottenheimer Mr. Smith Ms. Bocek Ms. Kenski-Sroka Mr. Khan Mr. Teplinsky Mr. Stark Mr. Cohn Mr. Podber Commissioners absent: None Also present: Mr. Michael Rylko, Executive Direct, Buffalo Grove Park District Ms. Kathleen Elliott, Tressler, Soderstrom, Maloney & Priess Ms. Kathleen Lenzmeier, Director of Buffalo Grove Fitness Center Ms. Catherine Burnham, Operation Marketing Manager of Buffalo Grove Fitness Center Mr. William Raysa, Village Attorney Mr. Robert Pfeil, Village Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES Moved by Commissioner Cohn, seconded by Commissioner Khan to approve the minutes of the public hearing of May 17, 2006. All Commissioners were in favor of the motion and the motion passed unanimously with Commissioners Smith, Bocek, Kenski-Sroka and Teplinsky abstaining. Moved by Commissioner Teplinsky, seconded by Commissioner Cohn to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of May 17, 2006. All Commissioners were in favor of the motion and the motion passed unanimously with Commissioners Smith, Bocek, Kenski-Sroka and Teplinsky abstaining. COMMITTEE AND LIAISON REPORTS Commissioner Bocek stated she attended the Village Board meeting on June 5, 2006 and stated the following items were discussed: 1. New Trustee liaisons to the Plan Commission are Braiman, Kahn, and Rubin 2. Four parcels were annexed into Buffalo Grove from the Ward property; two on Brockmann and two on Prairie Road 3. Approval of the special use daycare at 619 Cobblestone Lane 4. Discussion of looking into the process of actually renewing the special uses to see if they should be renewed and ultimately unanimously approved BUFFALO GROVE FITNESS CENTER, 601 DEERFIELD PARKWAY— CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT OF SPECIAL USE CONCERNING SERVICES PROVIDED AT THE FACILITY Moved by Commissioner Teplinsky, seconded by Commissioner Kenski-Sroka to recommend approval to the Village Board of the Park District's petition for amendment of a Special Use in the R-E District concerning the services provided in the Fitness Center, specifically the proposal involving personal care services including microdermabrasion, therapeutic manicure, therapeutic pedicure and acupuncture being offered in addition to the activities originally approved for the health and fitness center by Ordinance 97-108. Commissioner Podber stated he is opposed to the motion and he is disturbed with the fact that the Park District will clearly be competing with business members in this community and other communities and he does not see that as a role of a governmental body. He is also disturbed that the Park District wants to continue expanding. He does not see spa services as a function of the Park District. He also is disturbed that the Park District is infringing on the roles of business people who create businesses that generate value for the community and themselves. Commissioner Kenski-Sroka stated she feels the proposal has shown that other competing health centers in the suburban areas of Chicago provide the same services. She also feels their analysis of services provided by the salons located in Buffalo Grove indicate they will not be in competition for these types of services and frankly she feels the Park District is in the business of health and fitness. The association with Northwest Community Hospital is eminently acceptable in her view and she will support the petition. Commissioner Teplinsky stated the Park District is not just in the business of health and fitness. They are also in the food business where they offer concessions at the parks and they also offer clothing at the health and fitness center. In other words, they do and offer many things that do not involve lifting weights or running on a treadmill and that does not make it inconsistent with the purpose of being at the facility. He stated he is not at all disturbed by any kind of competitive aspect of this with respect to existing businesses because he does think what will be offered is unique and falls within his definition as to what a park district should be offering and he will vote in favor of this proposal. Commissioner Bocek stated she also understands the benefit of the proposed services and how they relate to health and fitness. She said she does not, however, want to hear a year from now that services such as haircuts are now necessary because head massages are already offered. She noted her only real objection is the nail polishing which should only be in conjunction with the whole therapeutic aspect of services. Commissioner Khan stated that he feels competition is always good for the general public. He stated he is not opposed to the Park District getting diversification in what they do and he will support the proposal. Commissioner Podber responded to Commissioner Khan and noted that the health center offering these services is anti-competitive. There are several health clubs and spas that are privately owned and these will be in essence competing with a governmental agency. If the Park District loses money they may close up shop but they are not going out of business. They can squeeze private businesses. Commissioner Stark stated he likes the fact that the Park District is not segregating services for members versus non-members. He further noted it is a person's choice to being a member in the fitness center and the proposal is just a part of that whole experience. He stated the proposed therapeutic services are a totally different service and he will support the proposal. Commissioner Cohn stated there is always something the government can do that private businesses can also do and the question is where to draw the line. He feels the park district is within the box of what they do here and the services they offer fit within the scope of what they are doing and that they are not competing too far with business within the community who are offering the same services and he will be supporting the proposal. Chairman Ottenheimer suggested that Commissioners should keep in mind that the Plan Commission's responsibility is to review zoning and site plan issues. Commissioner Podber asked Mr. Raysa if it is possible for the Plan Commission to hear testimony who are not here who may be directly competing with the Buffalo Grove Fitness Center. Mr. Raysa noted that the public hearing has been concluded. If other testimony is to be presented on this petition, a new hearing would be necessary. Commissioner Podber stated he feels that only one side of the story has been told and in the interests of our community he would like to see someone from the Chamber of Commerce or other avenues to attend the Village Board meeting. Chairman Ottenheimer stated that Commissioner Podber could make a motion to table the vote for purposes of publishing another hearing to consider more evidence. Commissioner Podber stated he is not inclined to do that. Mr. Raysa noted when the Village Board considers the Plan Commission recommendation and an ordinance amending the special use, it will be at an open public meeting. Commissioner Smith stated the proposed services do fit in with the Fitness Center's scope of activities, and the additional services are consistent with the property's zoning. He noted he understands what Commissioner Podber is saying and agrees to some extent. However, when he looks at the services already being provided by the fitness center he realizes they are already in competition with a lot of businesses in town, and the proposed uses would basically add therapeutic manicures and pedicures. He does not see the concern about competition with various nail salons and other businesses, since there is already competition among these businesses. Commissioner Podber asked what is to stop the Park District from eventually asking for chiropractors to be allowed at the Fitness Center. They would not have overhead like the private sector and therein lies his concern. Chairman Ottenheimer called for a vote on the motion and the vote was as follows: AYES: Smith, Bocek, Kenski-Sroka, Khan, Teplinsky, Stark, Cohn, Ottenheimer NAYS: Podber ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The motion passed 8 to 1. DISCUSSION OF VILLAGE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN— RTAP/TOD PROJECT — REVIEW OF CONCEPTUAL PLANS FOR THE PRAIRIE VIEW AREA — FOLLOW UP TO JUNE 7, 2006 PUBLIC INPUT MEETING Mr. Pfeil noted that there was a meeting on June 7, 2006 which was very crowded, and tonight is meant to be a follow up. Two concept plans have been drafted: Plan A and Plan B. Mr. Pfeil noted that the overall planning area extends from Route 22 at Main Street north to the Stancliff property at Port Clinton Road. Plan A is the less intense proposal. The Stancliff property would be single-family detached. Just south of the Stancliff property, single-family attached units are proposed along the east side Prairie Road. The property abutting the Noah's Landing townhomes is designated for single-family attached. At the southeast corner of Route 22/Prairie Road single-family attached units are proposed. He noted that this is a departure from previous planning for this property, which focused on commercial redevelopment. Mr. Pfeil noted that in the Main Street area of Prairie View, a retail/office development is proposed for the northwest corner of Route 22/Main Street on parcels currently occupied by a the metal recycling facility and the C.J. Fiore Nursery. Along Easton Avenue "teardown residential infill" is proposed on the south side of Easton. If property owners are interested in removing the existing structures and constructing new housing, this activity would be encouraged by the plan. He noted that the Village is not proposing to acquire properties; the private real estate market will determine the timing of redevelopment. West of Main Street north of Easton Avenue, the plan proposes a "village retail" concept with shops on either side of the street and some single-family attached near the area north of Brockman Avenue. Mr. Pfeil explained that concept Plan B approaches the property at Main Street and Route 22 differently. A mixed-use development with retailing and residential is proposed. Along First Street a mix of residential and commercial is proposed, notably on the west side of First Street. A greater residential intensity is proposed on the east side of Prairie Road north of Route 22. The Stancliff property is designated for residential, but specific residential types are not addressed. The parcels abutting Noah's Landing are designated for a mix of residential and commercial, which is not intended to be high-intensity. The property at the southeast corner of f Route 22 and Prairie Rd is planned for a mix of multi-family residential and some type of commercial use. Ms. Dellinger stated that one thing that concerns a lot of the people that live here is that all this new development the character of Prairie View would really change. She noted they would hate to see the character of the area change with new development. She asked if there would be any way to preserve the historical character of the area. Commissioner Cohn asked what type of things defines the character of Prairie View and what could be incorporated into a development plan for Prairie View. Ms. Dellinger noted it is a very rural area and she does not know how that could be preserved with the proposed density. She said that she understands that the Metra station and double track rail line is a significant transportation facility for the area, and higher residential density is planned near the station, but the plan needs to be more pedestrian friendly. She suggested limiting the scale of some of the new developments, and not allowing the commercial portions to be dominated by retail chain stores. She said that a style and scale of development similar to downtown Long Grove would be nice. Commissioner Teplinsky noted an article in Chicago magazine about Naperville stressed the pains that were taken to preserve the look and feel of the area while building it up commercially. The buildings and footprints have been redesigned and reincorporated while preserving the character of the area. Commissioner Stark commented that the consultant working with the Village on the TOD plans is in full agreement about maintaining the character of Prairie View. Mr. Pfeil concurred that Mr. Gore of Camiros is very interested in the character issue as is the Plan Commission and the Village. He noted that some design standards and ways to incorporate architectural features to maintain appropriate scale are important, and he believes the Plan Commission will be very careful to address these concepts the planning process progresses. Ms. Barbara Murphy stated the proposed 6 dwelling unite per acre density is really way too much for the Prairie Road area. Mr. Pfeil said that Mr. Gore understands there is an intergovernmental agreement between Buffalo Grove and Lincolnshire that sets 2 units per acre as the density for the Stancliff property. If Mr. Gore recommends a higher density, then there will need to be policy discussions involving the community at large, Lincolnshire and Buffalo Grove. Commissioner Cohn asked what other things define the character of Prairie View and should be preserved. Ms. Murphy stated she likes the existing older homes with their distinctive architecture, and she prefers a lot of green area on the residential lots. She stated she is also concerned with the impact of future residential developments on the affected school districts. She said there is never enough money for the schools, and higher density will have an impact in terms of available resources to serve the increased number of students. She further noted that the new intersection configuration of the north leg of Prairie Road at Route 22 allowing only right-in, right-out turns to Route 22, will have an impact on traffic flow. Chairman Ottenheimer noted the Plan Commission shares many of these concerns, and the Commissioners are all in favor of maintaining the integrity of the architecture and the feel of Prairie View with perhaps some modernization and updates. As far as the schools are concerned, when new housing developments are proposed, the school districts are always contacted and invited to provide comments. The school districts have projections concerning student enrollment, and proposed developments are evaluated for consistency with these projections. The Plan Commission pays close attention to the impact of new residential developments on the school districts. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT—None FUTURE AGENDA SCHEDULE Mr. Pfeil said the next regular meeting is scheduled for July 5, 2006, and this meeting can be canceled since there are no projects ready for this agenda. The next meeting will be scheduled for July 19, 2006. PUBLIC COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS—None PUBLIC COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS—None STAFF REPORT—None NEW BUSINESS Commissioner Bocek noted she feels the development at the Estates of Hidden Lake does not meet the monotony code and asked what recourse there may be to rectify that issue. Mr. Pfeil said he would need to review the situation Mr. Schar, Village Building Commissioner, to evaluate the elevations and appearance of the homes that have been issued building permits. He noted that different materials and exterior elevation design elements are the most easily controlled aspects in the appearance review and permit issuance process. Color is more difficult because it cannot be controlled long term since homeowners can modify the exterior colors on a single-family home. Commissioner Bocek noted that so much time and effort was spent on this development to make sure that this does not happen and it is a shame. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Commissioner Kenski-Sroka, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried unanimously to adjourn. Chairman Ottenheimer adjourned the meeting at 9:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Fay Rubin, Recording Secretary APPROVED BY: LESTER OTTENHEIMER, Chair