2010-04-12 - Finance Committee - Minutes Board or Commission: ❑ Finance Committee
Document Type: ❑A e
g nda 0 Minutes
Meeting ate: 04/12/2010
Type of Meeting: ❑ Regular Meeting
Minutes of the Finance Committee held April 12, 2010.
The meeting was called to order at 6:35 p.m. in the EOC conference room. Present were
President Hartstein, Trustees Jeff Braiman, DeAnn Glover, Jeff Berman, Steve Trilling, Lisa
Stone, Beverly Sussman, Village Clerk Jan Sirabian, and Treasurer Joseph Tenerelli. Staffs
present were Village Manager William Brimm, Deputy Village Manager Ghida Neukirch,
Finance Director Scott Anderson, Director of Public Works Greg Boysen, Information
Technology Director Robert Giddens, Village Planner Robert Pfiel, Human Resources Director
Arthur Malinowski, and Assistant Finance Director Katie Skibbe. Guests included resident
Marty Sussman along with Bob Andres, Mary Young, and Sven Zimdahl from Civiltech
Engineering, Inc, and John Beissel and Matt Vitner from Cook County Highway Department.
Lake Cook Road—Phase I Engineering Study— Delegates from Civiltech presented a status
update of the Weiland Road/Lake Cook Road Phase I Engineering Study. Currently the traffic
volume for Lake Cook Road is above the threshold. A desirable capacity for a four land
highway is 30,000 —32,000 cars per day and Lake Cook Road is currently seeing between
45,000 and 51,000 cars per day. Additionally, it takes multiple light cycles to get through
intersections in the Buffalo Grove portion of Lake Cook Road which increases cut-through
traffic and the frequency of accidents. Lake Cook Road is considered a strategic regional arterial
highway intended to supplement the interstate system and provide ways for people to travel
long-distances. There are three major needs for Lake Cook Road: improve traffic safety,
improve capacity, and reduce cut-through traffic. To meet these needs Lake Cook would need to
be expanded to six lanes. This would have an impact on adjacent property, but it is possible to
narrow each lane to eleven feet across instead of twelve feet across, which would help minimize
the impact. In some areas it is proposed that dual left turn lanes or right turn lanes are included.
The project would ideally be completed by the Cook County Highway Department by 2030.
Trustees asked whether the project can be extended past Raupp Blvd. to Arlington Heights Road,
but the Cook County Highway delegates responded that money is the biggest concern with
expanding the project. Trustee Stone asked whether we could add a pedway across Lake Cook
Road at Raupp Boulevard and a discussion ensued about the costs and potential negatives
associated with this idea. Village Manager Bill Brimm suggested that we look into crossing
signs with count-downs for pedestrians. In addition to the studies already in progress, the Cook
County Highway Department will do a highway noise level study to try to mitigate the noise
effect on adjacent properties. If the noise level will increase significantly by the expansion of
Lake Cook Road, the Cook County Highway Department may look into installing noise walls in
the residential areas. At this point, the Cook County Highway Department is giving status
updates to the Village Board and the next step will be gathering public input. It is anticipated
that the Phase I Public Hearings will occur in 2011 and at that time, it is anticipated that a
recommended alignment of Weiland Road, north of Route 83, to Buffalo Grove Road, will be
ready for a final recommendation.
Capital Asset Maintenance —Finance Director Scott Anderson gave a presentation on the
current status of several of the Village's capital assets. Current issues include leaking windows
at the Police and Fire Departments along with general wear and tear on all buildings. The
Building and Maintenance Department has done a nice job prolonging the lives of the assets.
Credit Card Acceptance —Assistant Finance Director Katie Skibbe introduced the discussion on
credit card acceptance within the Village. Currently, residents are able to pay their water bills by
check, cash, or through the automatic debit system, E-Z Pay. Accepting credit cards would
allow the Finance Department to give residents one additional option when paying their water
bill. Credit card acceptance would also increase flexibility for residents with cash-flow
problems. Trustees were interested in accepting credit card and passing along the cost of
acceptance with a convenience fee. Additionally, the Village Board was interested in accepting
credit cards over the counter at Village Hall.
Electronic Payment Kiosks at Metra Station —Finance Director Scott Anderson introduced the
discussion on investing in electronic payment stations at the Metra Station. In 2010, there was a
huge push to get everyone to use a bi-monthly parking passes to help mitigate the issues
surrounding daily parkers and compliance. The utilization of parking passes has increased, but
the Finance Department continues to have issues with daily parkers. With the current system it
is very difficult to see if people have paid the full amount of$1.75. People who do not pay are
given a ticket, but the Finance Department frequently receives calls from people claiming they
paid for the wrong spot. When this happens there is no way to determine if the person paid or
not. Using electronic payment kiosks would give the Finance Department better control over the
cash being received at the Metra Parking lot. The kiosks would be located close to the station
and some of the payment kiosks have the ability to accept credit cards. Daily parkers who call
the Village claiming to have paid would need to have a paid receipt for their ticket to be revoked.
Trustees were in favor of moving ahead and speaking with vendors to determine the cost of this
project. Also, trustee's suggested we look at allowing advertisements on the back of the receipts
to help defray the cost.
Replacement of the Telephone System— Information Technology Director Robert Giddens
gave a presentation on the replacement of the telephone system. The current telephone system is
twenty years old and quickly reaching its useful service life. The Village Board had previously
authorized a waiver of bid for proposals for the replacement of the Village's telephone system,
but the project was deferred due to the economic downturn. Currently, the staff has identified
three possible options to deal with the phone system. Option one: do nothing. The system still
works but there are no legitimate sources for components as hardware fails. The village is
currently replacing components in the secondary market. Option two: replace the entire phone
system as planned. This would be add a cost of about$200,000 to $250,000. Option three:
Divide the project into two phases and only update the infrastructure now. Trustee Sussman
questioned how long option three would last the Village and Robert said it was unknown, but it
would offer less downtime if something broke than if we choose option one and stay with the
current system as is. There was concern that if the Village pursued option #3 (phased in
replacement) was there any exposure to obsolescence of technology (wasted money). Robert
stated that by replacing the infrastructure first we could easily build upon that base and not have
any duplication of expenditures. Option#3 would accomplish the same task of replacing the
entire system while delaying expenditures over two to three fiscal years. The trustees discussed
the importance of having a good phone system and the importance of communication with
residents. Scott Anderson mentioned that if the board chooses to replace the entire phone system
it would be a draw down on fund balance reserve as we cannot fund the project out of current
revenues. Robert Giddens mentioned that we might be able to work out a payment plan with the
vendor as Cisco is currently offering 0%financing for new projects. The board was interested in
finding out about financing options for replacing the entire system, but were in support of
moving forward with option three in the meantime.
Constructing a Performance Arts Facility —Resident Marty Sussman gave a presentation on the
possibility of constructing a performance arts facility in Buffalo Grove. This would be a joint
venture between the Village, Park District, and Library. Trustee Berman mentioned that this
subject has come up several times over the past three years, but he felt that if we were to move
forward with this project he would want to go to the public and ask if they are really in favor of
this prof ect. Trustee Braiman wanted to know whether the Park District is willing to be a partner
in this process or whether they just want us to finance the project. Mr. Sussman said that while
this project will cost money, this project will also make money and we need some places for kids
to be. He also said that there is a lot of talent in Buffalo Grove and a lot of people who would
like to get involved. A question was asked about preliminary numbers on what the project
would cost now, but since we are only in the beginning discussions no numbers have been
generated yet. Trustee Braiman mentioned that the public said they didn't want to pay for it
three times and the Park District tried to get around that by getting the Village to pay for it and
further, it this concept were to move ahead in some way, the public should be asked, maybe in
the form of a non-binding referendum, whether they would support the project, with a clear
understanding as to what the potential costs may be, on a recurring basis. President Hartstein
strongly suggested that if this project were to move forward, there should be a program to
develop public/private partnerships.
Employee Fringe Benefit Review —Village Manager Bill Brimm gave a presentation on
employee fringe benefits. In regards to the deferred compensation plan Trustee Braiman said
that the program was originally instituted in 1999 when the board was trying to increase benefits
for government employees who weren't paid well and that isn't the case anymore. Government
employees are paid better and the Village no longer has the means to pay into employee's
deferred compensation plans anymore. Trustee Braiman suggested the Village cut this program
in half. Trustee Trilling said that the pension arrangement that the Village already has with the
employees far exceeds the normal pension employees could expect to receive in the public sector
and for that reason he doesn't feel it's necessary. President Hartstein wanted to see where we
were money wise at the end of the year before making any decisions. Village Manager Bill
Brimm made a suggestion to the board that they let the program run in 2010, cut it in half in
2011, and eliminate it in 2012. Trustee Stone commented that when the economy is bad perks
such as deferred compensation should be frozen. Trustee Glover mentioned that we don't
necessarily need to reinstate this program when things get better.
In regards to the tuition reimbursement program, Trustee Glover questioned whether there are
requirements for service after receiving tuition reimbursement and Human Resources Director
Art Malinowski replied that there were no such requirements in the current plan. President
Hartstein recommended the policy provide some conditions for some period of time or a payback
period if employees choose to leave. Trustee Trilling asked who has left the Village after
receiving their tuition reimbursement and Art said there was one person who had left. Trustee
Trilling said he felt this was a great program and a good way to advance employee careers.
Trustee Sussman said she couldn't support this program right now because residents can't afford
to send their own kids to college and the Village is giving away resident money to pay for other
people's college. Trustee Braimen said that he supports tuition reimbursement for master's level
courses only. Trustee Stone said we should freeze the program until the economy gets better.
Trustee Berman asked the other trustees if they were willing to invest in the staff in the same
way they are willing to invest in the phone system. He then suggested we reduce the budget
amount next year and add a percentage of reimbursement up to the NIU amount. Trustees were
in agreement to reduce the amount of tuition reimbursement paid.
The auto allowance program was then brought up by Trustee Braimen. He said that it is
frequently mentioned that the program will go away when people retire, but no one is retiring.
Bill Brimm responded that there are only eight or nine employees left in the program. Trustee
Braimen said that while we've taken away the allowance and put it into their normal salary; this
program still needs to be completely eliminated. Brimm responded that it is not subject to cost
of living increases. Trustee Braiman suggested we freeze the program, not admit any new
members, and phase-out the program over a few years possibly 50% in 2011 and gone in 2012.
Trustee Braimen also brought up the amount of health insurance premiums employees are
charged saying that if nothing else we need to make concessions in the new contract. Village
Manager responded that 2012 is when the new fire union contract is up and insurance cannot be
discussed before then unless mutually agreed upon by all parties.
First Quarter Performance —Finance Director Scott Anderson gave a presentation on first
quarter 2010 performance. First quarter revenue is lagging for property taxes (10.4%), real
estate transfer tax (12.2%), utility tax (14.2%) and telecommunications tax (22.8%). Revenues
attaining the benchmark include sales taxes, building and engineering fees, income tax, food and
beverage tax, and police and fire revenue.
III. Old Business
Review of New Position Classification and Compensation Plan —Village Manager Bill Brimm
reiterated what was discussed at the previous Finance Committee meeting and discussed the
status of the new position classification and compensation plan. The last piece of the plan is the
performance evaluation tool which is currently under construction.
Consideration of Gotf Subsidy for Open Space Concept —Village Manager Bill Brimm
discussed a one cent property tax increase to help support golf operations. This increase would
never exceed one cent and would always be subject to prior year's performance. Additionally,
should the performance exceed expectations, the one cent increase would be abated.