Loading...
2010-10-06 - Appearance Review Team - Minutes Board orCommission: ❑Appearance Review Team Document Type: 0 A e g nda 0 Minutes Meeting ate: 10/06/2010 Type of Meeting: ❑ Regular Meeting ART (Appearance Review Team) Meeting OCTOBER 6, 2010 50 LAKE COOK ROAD, CIRCLE K WALL SIGN; SIGN BANDS AND CHANGEABLE COPY GROUND SIGN PRESENT Carol Berman, Deputy Building Commissioner/Administration Brian Sheehan, Deputy Building Commissioner/Operations Robert Pfeil, Village Planner Joe Wallace, Plan Examiner Bruce Entman, ZBA Chairman Auna Foote, Corporate Identification Solutions PROPOSAL Request is being made by Corporate Identification Solutions, 5308 N. Northwest Highway, Chicago, Illinois 60630 on behalf of RDK Ventures, LLC d/b/a Circle K, 50 W. Lake Cook Road, for variance of Sign Code, Section 14.20.030, pertaining to Business Districts; Section 14.20.070, pertaining to Grounds Signs; Section 14.20.080, pertaining to Wall Sign; and Section 14.40.025, pertaining to Changeable Copy Signs, for the purpose of installing red sign bands on the front and sides of the building; and to reface the existing changeable copy ground sign. Mrs. Berman asked if Shell will remain. Ms. Foote advised that Circle K is responsible for the food and convenience portions. Shell is maintaining control of the gasoline. Mr. Sheehan asked if the Shell logo will remain on the canopy. Ms. Foote advised that the logo will remain. Mr. Sheehan advised that advertising is not permitted on the ground sign in regards to the Polar Pop panel. Ms. Foote stated that the Polar Pop panel is similar to the V-Power panel that currently exists. Ch. Entman stated that when these signs were reviewed years ago the Zoning Board liked the minimal copy. Mr. Sheehan stated that he does not have any issues with the signs except for the advertising. He recommended changing that panel to something more generic such as Food Mart or something similar. Mr. Pfeil asked if these will be the first LED gas price signs in the Village. Mr. Sheehan stated that this will be the first LED gas price sign. The pricing appears to be appropriate in size and falls within the scope of the size that is being currently reviewed in the sign code committee. RECOMMENDATION ART recommends approval of the proposed wall sign, sign bands and ground sign subject to the advertising being removed from the ground sign. Board orCommission: ❑Appearance Review Team Document Type: 0 A e g nda 0 Minutes Meeting ate: 10/06/2010 Type of Meeting: ❑ Regular Meeting ART (Appearance Review Team) Meeting OCTOBER 6, 2010 1200 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS ROAD, CIRCLE K WALL SIGNS AND CHANGEABLE COPY GROUND SIGNS PRESENT Carol Berman, Deputy Building Commissioner/Administration Brian Sheehan, Deputy Building Commissioner/Operations Robert Pfeil, Village Planner Joe Wallace, Plan Examiner Bruce Entman, ZBA Chairman Auna Foote, Corporate Identification Solutions PROPOSAL Request is being made by Corporate Identification Solutions, 5308 N. Northwest Highway, Chicago, Illinois 60630 on behalf of RDK Ventures, LLC d/b/a Circle K, 1200 Arlington Heights Road, for variance of Sign Code, Section 14.20.030, pertaining to Business Districts; Section 14.20.070, pertaining to Grounds Signs; Section 14.20.080, pertaining to Wall Signs; and Section 14.40.025, pertaining to Changeable Copy Signs, for the purpose of installing two (2) additional wall signs on the north elevation of the building one (1) of which will be a changeable copy wall sign; to install two (2) additional wall signs on the east elevation of the building; installing two (2)wall signs on the car wash building; and to reface the three (3) existing changeable copy ground signs that are all within two hundred fifty (250) feet of each other and on the same parcel. Mrs. Berman inquired about the eighteen (18) foot spanner board wall sign. Ms. Foote explained that they are proposing to use that sign for advertising specials. It will have panels that can be changed. Mr. Sheehan advised that there is currently a Food Mart sign there now. Mr. Sheehan stated that the proposed sign package is for wall signs and the three (3) ground signs. He asked about the other directional signs on the property. Ms. Foote stated that they are only requesting the signs for Circle K. They have no dealing with the McDonalds and their signs. Mr. Sheehan stated that he would like to see what type of sign panels they would be using for the for spanner board wall sign. He does not believe that they need that sign. They could accomplish the advertising with window signs. Mr. Wallace added that the existing Food Mart would be more beneficial than the spanner board wall sign. Mrs. Berman also has an issue with the spanner board wall signs. She does not want to allow that sign to be open-ended and used for whatever purpose they want. Mr. Sheehan confirmed that the ground sign boxes will remain the same and only some of the panels will be changed. Mr. Wallace inquired as to how many wall signs are being proposed. Mr. Sheehan advised that two (2) wall signs facing Arlington Heights Road and one (1) wall sign and spanner board would face McHenry Road. Ch. Entman advised that there will be discussion at the Zoning Board meeting concerning the need for the number of wall signs being requested. Mr. Sheehan advised Ms. Foote that it would be in their best interest to have a representative from Circle K present at the Zoning Board meeting to answer questions. Ms. Foote stated that she will ask but cannot guarantee that representative will be there as Circle K is based out of Columbus, Indiana. Ms. Foote advised that she will provide samples of the panels for the spanner board. RECOMMENDATION Three (3) proposed Changeable Copy Ground Signs The ART has determined that the appearance of the ground signs as proposed meet the criteria set forth in the Village of Buffalo Grove Appearance Plan and are in harmony with the building and are compatible with the surrounding area. The request for the variance from the sign code will be heard at the October 19, 2010 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. Two (2) proposed Wall Signs located on the car wash building The ART has determined that the appearance of the car wash signs as proposed meet the criteria set forth in the Village of Buffalo Grove Appearance Plan and are in harmony with the building and are compatible with the surrounding area. Three (3) proposed Wall Signs The ART has determined that the appearance of the wall signs as proposed do not meet the criteria set forth in the Village of Buffalo Grove Appearance Plan and are not in harmony with the building due to the number of signs currently in place. This includes the three (3) proposed Circle K wall signs; two (2)wall signs facing Arlington Heights Road and one (1)wall sign facing McHenry Road. The ART recommends that the petitioner providing documentation/information supporting the need for the number of proposed wall signs to the ZBA. The request for the variance from the sign code will be heard at the October 19, 2010 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. Spanner Board Wall Sign The ART has determined that the appearance of the proposed eighteen (18) foot long changeable copy wall sign as presented is not recommended and recommends that the existing Food Mart wall sign remain. The request for the variance from the sign code will be heard at the October 19, 2010 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. Board orCommission: ❑Appearance Review Team Document Type: 0 A e g nda 0 Minutes Meeting ate: 10/06/2010 Type of Meeting: ❑ Regular Meeting ART (Appearance Review Team) Meeting OCTOBER 6, 2010 201 BUFFALO GROVE ROAD, DEERFIELDS BAKERY CHANGEABLE COPY MENU BOARD GROUND SIGN AND UNIFORM SIGN PACKAGE PRESENT Carol Berman, Deputy Building Commissioner/Administration Brian Sheehan, Deputy Building Commissioner/Operations Robert Pfeil, Village Planner Joe Wallace, Plan Examiner Bruce Entman, ZBA Chairman Tim Schmitt, Deerfields Bakery PROPOSAL Request is being made by Deerfields Bakery, 201 Buffalo Grove Road, for variance of Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.44.060.E.6, pertaining to Signs; and Sign Code, Section 14.40.025, pertaining to Changeable Copy Signs, for the purpose of allowing more than one (1) ground sign on the parcel and to allow a changeable copy menu board ground sign on the property. They are also looking to reface the existing wall sign, reface the existing ground sign and to install two (2) directional signs. Mr. Schmitt explained that they are looking to create a more uniform professional look to the property. The process started with the installation of the changeable copy menu board ground sign for the drive-thru. The drive-thru was part of the original design of the building but was never utilized. They wanted to utilize the drive-thru as a convenience for their customers. In addition, they would also like to update their signage as they are outdated and they would like to include the drive-thru language on the signs. The existing directional sign at the drive-thru entrance was in disrepair and was removed. They are planning on replacing the removed sign with a new directional sign and adding a second directional sign at the main entrance to the parking lot. The existing wall and ground sign will only be refaced. The current wall and ground sign copy have a different font. In the time since he has taken over he has cleaned up the property and removed some of the landscaping that was creating a safety hazard and impacting visibility. Mr. Pfeil advised that the annexation agreement for the property included an approved landscaping plan. The Village will need to review that landscaping plan with the Village Forrester. It is possible that some of the landscaping removed will need to be replaced. Mr. Schmitt advised that the landscaping that was removed was very over-grown. He will replace any if necessary. He believes that the landscaping looks better than what it previously did. He worked with Joe Arizzi to make sure that the grass was maintained in the rear and near the detention area. The pond and the fountain were removed as they no longer functioned properly. Ch. Entman confirmed that the only new signage being added are the directional signs and the menu board. Mr. Pfeil asked if there are drive-thru's at the other Deerfields locations. Mr. Schmitt advised that this is the only location with a drive-thru. He does not believe that it will be overly busy but they want it to be used. Mr. Pfeil asked if they are trying to compete with other fast food restaurants. Mr. Schmitt advised that they are. Mr. Pfeil asked how long it takes to get through the drive-thru. Mr. Schmitt stated that it takes approximately ninety (90) seconds from the time of order until the customer receives their order. Mrs. Berman asked if the menu board is already installed. Mr. Schmitt advised that it is installed. Mrs. Berman asked about the location of the menu board. Mr. Schmitt described the location of the menu board. Mrs. Berman asked if the Deerfields logo is currently on the ground and wall sign. Mr. Schmitt advised that the current signs have the logo. Mrs. Berman asked if there were any objections from the ART concerning the directional signs or the face changes to the existing wall and ground sign. There were none. Mrs. Berman asked Mr. Wallace about the size of the menu board. Mr. Wallace stated that the menu board is no larger than other menu boards at other locations. Mr. Schmitt added that the menu board is illuminated (back lit). Mr. Pfeil asked if Mr. Schmitt was planning on putting promotional signs on the menu board. Mr. Schmitt advised that he would apply for temporary sign permits. Ch. Entman stated that size is always an issue. He inquired about the height of the directional signs. Mr. Schmitt stated that the Ordinance allows for four(4) foot tall and six(6) square feet of area. He asked if the height included the pole. Mr. Sheehan stated that four(4) foot height would be for the sign itself and not include the poles. Mr. Sheehan stated that the signs seem to gel. The menu board is interior and blocked by landscaping. Mr. Schmitt described the location of the menu board. Due to the brick on the building, the sign sneaks up on you as you pull in the drive-thru aisle. He may add directional arrows to the payment to assist drivers. Mr. Sheehan stated that since the variance request is for a changeable copy sign, he could use a panel or two to promote specials. That would fall under the scope of the variance as temporary sign permits are not given for the purpose of promotional signs on Menu Boards. There were no additional questions or comments. RECOMMENDATION The ART has determined that the appearance of the signs as proposed meet the criteria set forth in the Village of Buffalo Grove Appearance Plan and are in harmony with the building and are compatible with the surrounding area. The request for the variance from the sign code will be heard at the October 19, 2010 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. Board orCommission: ❑Appearance Review Team Document Type: 0 A e g nda 0 Minutes Meeting ate: 10/06/2010 Type of Meeting: ❑ Regular Meeting ART (Appearance Review Team) Meeting OCTOBER 6, 2010 600 BUFFALO GROVE ROAD, INDECK ENERGY SERVICES FOR RENT, SALE, LEASE SIGN TO REMAIN BEYOND THE PERMITTED TIME PERIOD PRESENT Carol Berman, Deputy Building Commissioner/Administration Robert Pfeil, Village Planner Joe Wallace, Plan Examiner Bruce Entman, ZBA Chairman Dick McCarty, Imperial Leasing PROPOSAL Request is being made by Indeck Energy Services, Inc., 600 Buffalo Grove Road, for variance of Sign Code, Section 14.32.040, pertaining to For Rent, Sale, Lease Signs, for the purpose of allowing the existing for rent, sale, lease sign to remain beyond the permitted time period. Mr. McCarty advised that they are not making any changes to the existing sign. Mrs. Berman inquired as to how much square feet is currently available. Mr. McCarty advised that there is currently 10,000 square feet. There were no issues with the sign. RECOMMENDATION ART recommends approval of the existing for rent, sale, lease sign to remain beyond the permitted period. Board orCommission: ❑Appearance Review Team Document Type: 0 A e g nda 0 Minutes Meeting ate: 10/06/2010 Type of Meeting: ❑ Regular Meeting ART (Appearance Review Team) Meeting OCTOBER 6, 2010 1141 MCHENRY ROAD, SUITE 110, LLOYD MANDEL LEVAYAH FUNERALS DEVIATION TO THE SPOERLEIN COMMONS SHOPPING CENTER SIGN CRITERIA PRESENT Carol Berman, Deputy Building Commissioner/Administration Brian Sheehan, Deputy Building Commissioner/Operations Robert Pfeil, Village Planner Joe Wallace, Plan Examiner Bruce Entman, ZBA Chairman PROPOSAL Request is being made by Spoerlein Commons Shopping Center on behalf of Lloyd Mandel Levayah Funerals, 1141 McHenry Road, Suite 110, for Deviation to the Spoerlein Commons Shopping Center Sign Criteria to allow a wall sign that exceeds twenty four(24) inches in height. The proposed wall sign will be three (3) feet six(6) inches tall. Mr. Sheehan stated that this location does not face the roadway. The size is proportionate to the building. He doe not have any issues. Mrs. Berman stated that it is not a big sign. She does not have any issues. RECOMMENDATION ART recommends approval of the proposed wall sign to be three (3) feet six(6) inches in height. Board orCommission: ❑Appearance Review Team Document Type: 0 A e g nda 0 Minutes Meeting ate: 10/06/2010 Type of Meeting: ❑ Regular Meeting ART (Appearance Review Team) Meeting OCTOBER 6, 2010 Miller Residence—81 Fabish Court Single Family Home (Fire Repair) PRESENT Carol Berman, Deputy Building Commissioner/Administration Brian Sheehan, Deputy Building Commissioner/Operations Robert Pfeil, Village Planner Joe Wallace, Plan Examiner Bruce Entman, ZBA Chairman PROPOSAL Request is being made by Groundwork, Ltd. On behalf of Mr. Miller, 81 Fabish Court. The home was damaged by fire and needs to completely rebuilt. The home will be rebuilt as it previously existed. Material samples of the existing siding, roofing and brick were submitted. There were no issues. RECOMMENDATION ART recommends approval subject to the following: 1. Materials to match the existing construction in like kind and quality. Board orCommission: ❑Appearance Review Team Document Type: 0 A e g nda 0 Minutes Meeting ate: 10/06/2010 Type of Meeting: ❑ Regular Meeting ART (Appearance Review Team) Meeting OCTOBER 6, 2010 Bozic Residence—750 Twisted Oak Lane Second Story Addition PRESENT Carol Berman, Deputy Building Commissioner/Administration Brian Sheehan, Deputy Building Commissioner/Operations Robert Pfeil, Village Planner Joe Wallace, Plan Examiner Bruce Entman, ZBA Chairman PROPOSAL Request is being made by Mrs. Bozic, 750 Twisted Oak Lane, to construct a second story addition over the existing garage. Proposed elevations were submitted. Material samples were not submitted. Photographs of the existing home show that the siding has been removed from the entire house. The photographs also show only two (2) possibly three (3) columns in the front. It appears as if one (1) of the columns has been removed. It will be verified with the homeowner that the siding will match on the entire home and the roof shingles on the addition will match the existing. Mr. Sheehan stated that currently there is a flat roof over the garage. The addition will be an improvement. RECOMMENDATION ART recommends approval subject to the following: 1. Materials to match the existing construction in like kind and quality; 2. The missing column in the front will be replaced.