Loading...
2011-12-06 - Appearance Review Team - Minutes Board or Commission: ❑Appearance Review Team Document Type: ❑A e g nda 0 Minutes Meeting ate: 12/06/2011 Type of Meeting: ❑ Regular Meeting ART (Appearance Review Team) Meeting December 6, 2011 1190 MCHENRY ROAD, BMO HARRIS BANK SIGN CODE VARIATION — REPLACE THE EXISTING GROUND SIGN PRESENT Brian Sheehan, Deputy Building Commissioner/Operations Carol Berman, Deputy Building Commissioner/Administration Robert Pfeil, Village Planner Joseph Wallace, Plan Examiner Lawrence Steingold, ZBA Commissioner Ms. Diana Roberts, Icon Identity Solutions PROPOSAL Request is being made by Icon Identity Solutions, 1418 Elmhurst Road, Elk Grove Village, Illinois 60007 on behalf of BMO Harris Bank, 1190 McHenry Road, for variance of Sign Code, Section 14.20.030, pertaining to Business Districts; and Section 14.20.070, pertaining to Ground Signs, for the purpose of replacing the existing ground sign that is located closer to the property line than permitted. Mr. Sheehan noted that the public hearing notice published indicates that the ground is to be refaced when in fact the ground sign is to be replaced with a new ground sign. This is a Scribner's error and should not effect the petition, but he will confirm with the Village Attorney. Mr. Sheehan also noted that the existing ground sign appears to be thirteen (13) feet in height and the new ground sign is being proposed at eighteen (18) feet in height. The setback distance of both the existing ground sign and the new proposed ground sign must be verified. Ms. Roberts explained that the colors of the proposed ground sign coincide with the new branding image for BMO Harris Bank. There are only a few approved sign packages for ground signs. In Illinois, this is the first round of bank conversions. She is not sure if the conversions have occurred in other areas. Mr. Sheehan confirmed with Ms. Roberts that the existing ground will be replaced with the proposed ground sign. Mr. Sheehan requested that a corrected Plat of Survey be submitted showing the correct dimensions of the proposed ground sign to the property line. The sign rendering shows the existing ground sign is setback ten (10) feet from the center base of the sign to an unknown location. The setback distance must be measured from the leading edge of the sign to the property line. Mr. Sheehan believes that the proposed new ground sign is oversized for the location. He advised Ms. Roberts that she may want provide additional size options for the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA). The ZBA typically recommends ground sign heights to be approximately twelve (12) to fifteen (15) feet in height. The sign code is at the tail end of being re-written with a 15 foot restriction. He suggested either having a representative from BMO Harris Bank present at the ZBA public hearing, or having authorization from BMO Harris Bank allowing her to make modifications concerning the height of the proposed ground sign. Without that ability the ZBA can only vote on what is proposed or table the matter to a future date, having this ability can help to expedite the ZBA process. Com. Steingold agrees with Mr. Sheehan concerning the height of the proposed ground sign. Ms. Roberts stated that it appears that the setback dimensions noted in the sign renderings submitted with the variation application is not correct. She will provide a corrected sign drawing and will verify the setback of both the existing ground sign and the proposed ground sign and will provide a corrected Plat of Survey prior to the ZBA public hearing. Mrs. Berman inquired if a representative from BMO Harris Bank usually attends the public hearings. Ms. Roberts stated that typically a representative is not present. However, she will request that a representative attend the upcoming public hearing, or provide her with direction as to what options they would be willing to accept. Mr. Sheehan stated that Sign #3 in the sign rendering is different from the previously approved signs at 500 Half Day Road. Ms. Roberts advised that Sign #3 is a different sign and that the wall signs at the 500 Half Day Road location are all channel letter wall signs. Mr. Sheehan confirmed with Ms. Roberts that the proposed signs are back lit. Ms. Roberts stated that the proposed signs are back lit. Mrs. Berman stated that she prefers a more subtle appearance but she has no issues with the colors of the proposed signs. Com. Steingold inquired about the hours of illumination of the current and proposed signs. Ms. Roberts stated that she is not sure of the hours of illumination for the existing signs and assumes that the hours will remain the same. Mr. Sheehan requested that Ms. Roberts provide the hours of illumination for the existing and proposed signs and also confirm if just the copy and logo will be illuminated on the ground sign. Mr. Pfeil stated that if the new ground sign would be located closer to the property and higher than the existing ground sign it would be problematic. Ms. Roberts stated that she will inquire about going with a smaller, more proportionate ground sign. Mrs. Berman advised that the landscaping would need to be restored around the base of the ground sign after the installation of a new ground sign. Mrs. Berman also requested that a full size copy of a corrected Plat of Survey be provided. There were no additional questions or comments from the ART members. RECOMMENDATION The ART has determined that the appearance of Sign#2 and Sign #3 as proposed meets the criteria set forth in the Village of Buffalo Grove Appearance Plan and is in harmony with the building and is compatible with the surrounding area. The ART believes the eighteen foot high ground sign as submitted is too large for the location served, but will withhold any recommendation concerning proposed Sign #1 (ground sign) until the following information has been provided: 1. The correct location and setback of the existing ground sign; and 2. The correct location and setback of the proposed ground sign; 3. The hours of illumination for both the existing and proposed signs; and 4. The type of illumination; full sign face or copy and logo only. This request is scheduled to appear before the ZBA on Tuesday, December 20, 2011. Prepared by: Julie Kamka Building & Zoning Department Board or Commission: ❑Appearance Review Team Document Type: 0 A e g nda 0 Minutes Meeting ate: 12/06/2011 Type of Meeting: ❑ Regular Meeting ART (Appearance Review Team) Meeting DECEMBER 6, 2011 130 PINYON PINE COURT NORTH, SEXNER RESIDENCE ATTACHED GARAGE ADDITION IN THE SIDE YARD AND LAUNDRY ROOM ADDITION ON THE REAR OF THE HOME PRESENT Brian Sheehan, Deputy Building Commissioner/Operations Carol Berman, Deputy Building Commissioner/Administration Robert Pfeil, Village Planner Joseph Wallace, Plan Examiner Lawrence Steingold, ZBA Commissioner PROPOSAL Request is being made by Mitchell and Carol Sexner, 130 Pinyon Pine Court North, for variance of Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.40.020, pertaining to Area Height, Bulk and Placement Regulations, for the purpose of constructing an attached garage addition that would encroach a distance of two feet four inches (2'4") into the required nine foot (9') side yard setback. The homeowner is also proposing to construct a mudroom addition onto the rear of the home. This addition does not require a variance. The materials are to match the existing construction in like kind and quality. There were no additional questions or comments from the ART members. RECOMMENDATION The ART has determined that the appearance of the two (2) additions as proposed meets the criteria set forth in the Village of Buffalo Grove Appearance Plan and is in harmony with the building and is compatible with the surrounding area. This request is scheduled to appear before the ZBA on Tuesday, December 20, 2011. Prepared by: Julie Kamka Building & Zoning Department