Loading...
2000-12-04 - Village Board Regular Meeting - Agenda Packet VILLAGE OF VILLAGE OF NAuffalo BUFFALO GROVE Gram tT, Fifty Raupp Blvd. Meeting of the Village of Buffalo Grove Board of Trustees Buffalo Grove,IL 60089-2196 Regular Meeting Phone 847-459-2500 9 g Fax 847-459-0332 December 4, 2000 7:30 PM I. Call to Order II. Pledge of Allegiance Ill. Roll Call IV. Approval of Minutes A. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the President and Board of Trustees held on November 20, 2000 B. Summary of the Meeting of the Village Board Committee of the Whole V. Approval of Warrant A. Warrant #923 VI. Village President Report VII. Reports from the Trustees VIII. Village Manager's Report A. Report on Evaluation of Alternate Residential Area All-Way Stop Warrants IX. Special Business A. Public Hearing: Cook County Truth In Taxation Act--Village of Buffalo Grove Calendar 2000 Tax Levy (Trustee Marienthal) X. Questions from the Audience Discussion on questions from the audience will be limited to 10 minutes. Presentations before the Village Board should be scheduled through the Village Manager's Office five days prior to each meeting. XI. Consent Agenda All items listed on the Consent Agenda, which are available in this room this evening, are considered to be routine by the Village Board and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Board member or citizen so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the General Order of Business and considered after all other Regular Agenda items. (Attached). XII. Ordinances and Resolutions A. Ordinance No. 2000- An Ordinance for the Levy and Collection of Taxes for the Fiscal Year Commencing on the 1st Day of May, 2000 and Ending on the 30th Day of April, 2001. (Trustee Marienthal) B. Ordinance No. 2000- An Ordinance Adding Chapter 3.60 to the Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Code in Connection with Rights and Responsibilities Related to Locally Imposed and Administered Taxes of the Village of Buffalo Grove, � � a Illinois (Trustee Marienthal) C. Ordinance 2000 -_Approving an amendment to the Planned Unit Development for the Praedium Development commercial building, 25-55 Buffalo Grove Road, in the B-5 District (Trustee Hendricks) D. Resolution No. 2000- Requesting the County of Cook not to Collect the Loss in Collection on Taxable Property in the Village of Buffalo Grove. (Trustee Glover) E. Resolution No. 2000- Requesting the County of Lake not to Collect the Loss in Collection on Taxable Property in the Village of Buffalo Grove. (Trustee Glover) F. Ordinance 2000 - Approving the 17th Amendment to the Buffalo Grove Town Center Planned Unit Development concerning Culver's Restaurant and the Belmont Village assisted living facility (Trustee Berman) XIII. Old Business XIV. New Business A. Presentation on Agenda: Fiscal Year 2001-2002 budget for Central Garage. (Trustee Marienthal) B. Presentation on Agenda: Capital Improvement Program FY 2001/2 - 2005/6 Presentation (Trustee Berman) C. Referral: Pre-application Conference: Proposed Storage Mart facility, southeast corner of Prairie Rd/Half Day Rd, annexation with Industrial zoning (Trustee Berman) XV. Executive Session XVI. Adjournment: Approximately 10:30 p.m. The Village Board will make every effort to accommodate all items on the agenda by 10:30 p.m. The Board, does, however, reserve the right to defer consideration of matters to another meeting should the discussion run past 10:30 p.m. The Village of Buffalo Grove, in compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities, contact the ADA Coordinator at 459-2518 to allow the Village to make reasonable accommodations for those persons. Corgi Agenda December 4, 2000 7:30 PM XI. Ordinances and Resolutions A. Resolution for Agenda: Resolution No. 2000- A Resolution Regarding Corporate Personal Property Replacement Tax Distribution-2000 (Trustee Mailenttial) RECOMMENDATION: Approve by motion. SUMMARY: Required to be adopted on an annual basis,the Village is reconfirming through this Resolution that it has complied with the.Illinois Revenue Act in the receipt and distribution of such funds in 2000. B. Resolution for Agenda: Resolution No. 2000- Approving Grant Agreement v1-12403(1,between the Village of Buffalo Grove and the Illinois Department of Commerce and Comity Affairs. The grant is for$50,000 erosion control (Trustee Marienthal) RECOMMENDATION: Approve by motion. SUMMARY: The Grant Agreement was approved at the 11/20 Village Board: Meeting, the attached Resolution is also required. The Resolution approve*errant Agreement 01-124039, between the Village of Buffalo Grove and the fill Department of Commerce and Community Affairs. The grant Is for$50,000 fOr erosion control. C. Resolution for Agenda: Resolution No. 2000- Approving Grant Agreement.01-124039, IN3tween the Village of Buffalo Grove and the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs. The grant is for$25,000 for the assessment and purchase of 12 document imaging devices and a file server. (Trustee Marithal) RECOMMENDATION Approve by motion. SUMMARY: The Grant Agreement was approved at the 11/20 Village Board Meeting, the attached Resolution is also required.The Resolution approves Agreement 01-124040, between the Village of Buffalo Grove and the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs. The grant Is $25.4)002*two assessment and purchase of 12 document imaging device and a life setwir. D. Resolution for Agenda: Resolution No. 2000- Approving Grant Agreement 00-127184, between the Village of Buffalo Grove:and the Illinois Department of Commerce and COrrrrnunity Affairs. The grant is for$50,000 for an enhanced wireless communication network. RECOMMENDATION: Approve by motion. SUMMARY: The Grant Agreement was approved at the 11/20'Village Board Meeting, the attached Resolution is also required. The Resolution approves Grant Agreement 00-127184, between the Village of Buffalo Grove and the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs. The grant is for$50,000 for an enhanced wireless communication network. New Business E. Acceptance: Town Center Tax Increment Financing Area Annual Report (Trustee Marienthal) RECOMMENDATION: Approve by motion. .,- SUMMARY: The Report has been distributed as required and itPrifSvSnted as a matter of information and to provide for the necessary public oversight and dkitclosure requirements. F. Aft : Buffalo Grove Town Center Annual Accounting (Trustee Berman) RECOMMENDATION: Approve by moticm. SUMMARY: The accounting has been completed and sufficient funds are of hand to pay principal and interest for the specified bond year;thereby permitting eCeeuat credits. G. Proclamation on Agenda: Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month RECOMMENDATION:Approve by motion. SUMMARY: Proclaiming December 2000 as`"Drurnk and Drugged Driving` - Prevention Month in Buffalo Grove:" Old Business None { { Meeting of the Village of Buffalo Grove Board of Trustees Regular Meeting December 4, 2000 7:30 PM I. Call to Order II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Roll Call IV. Approval of Minutes V. Approval of Warrant VI. Village President Report VII. Reports from the Trustees Vill. Village Manager's Report IX. Special Business X. Questions from the Audience Discussion on questions from the audience will be limited to 10 minutes. Presentations before the Village Board should be scheduled through the Village Manager's Office five days prior to each meeting. XI. Consent Agenda None XII. Ordinances and Resolutions XIII. Old Business XIV. New Business XV. Executive Session XVI. Adjournment: Approximately 10.30 p.m. The Village Board will make every effort to accommodate all items on the agenda by 10.30 p.m. The Board, does, however, reserve the right to defer consideration of matters to another meeting should the discussion run past 10.30 p.m. The Village of Buffalo Grove, in compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities, contact the ADA Coordinator at 459-2518 to allow the Village to make reasonable accommodations for those persons. Consent Agenda December 4, 2000 7:30 PM XI. Ordinances and Resolutions None New Business None Old Business None i 11032 11/20/2000 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE VILLAGE BOARD OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS 50 RAUPPBOULEVAR_D,BUFFALO GROVE ]LLINOIS ON MONDAY NOVEMBER 20,2000 CALL TO ORDER President Hartstein called the meeting to order at 7:37 P.M. Those present stood and pledged allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL Roll call indicated the following present: President Hartstein;Trustees Marienthal,Braiman,Glover,Berman. Trustee Hendricks was absent. Trustee Johnson arrived at 9:30 P.M. Also present were: William Balling,Village Manager;William Raysa,Village Attorney;William Brimm,Assistant Village Manager/Finance Director;Scott Anderson,Assistant Finance Director;Art Malinowski,Human Resources Director;Robert Giddens,MIS Director;Robert Pfeil,Village Planner;Richard Kuenkler,Village Engineer; Carmen Molinaro,Director of Golf Operations;and Joseph Tenerelli,Village Treasurer. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Moved by Marienthal,seconded by Berman,to approve the minutes of the November 6,2000 Regular Meeting. Upon roll call,Trustees voted as follows: AYES: 4—Marienthal,Braiman,Glover,Berman NAYS: 0—None ABSENT: 2—Hendricks,Johnson Motion declared carried. WARRANT#922 Mr.Tenerelli read Warrant#922. Moved by Braiman,seconded by Glover,to approve Warrant#922 in the amount of $1,100,152.47,authorizing payment of bills listed. Upon roll call,Trustees voted as follows: AYES: 4—Marienthal,Braiman,Glover,Berman NAYS: 0—None ABSENT: 2—Hendricks,Johnson Motion declared carried. MILL CREEK PARK President Hartstein noted that the Village had secured$26,000 in grant money for playground equipment and underlayment as part of the Illinois First Program;he thanked State Senator David Sullivan for his efforts in obtaining this money for the Village. COMMUNITY THANKSGIVING SERVICE President Hartstein thanked everyone involved in the Community Thanksgiving Service held this past Sunday evening. MANAGEMENT REPORT Mr.Balling noted the submission of the Management Report for October,2000;there were no questions on same. GOLF BUDGET PRESENTATION Mr.Balling noted that the presentation of the FY2001 Golf Budget will be at the end of the meeting this evening. 10133 11/20/2000 FY2000-2001 SIX-MONTH FINANCIAL REPORT Mr.Brimm briefly reviewed the status of the FY 2000-2001 six-month financial report,details of which are contained in his memo to Mr.Balling of November 7,2000. FUTURE AGENDA Mr.Balling noted that there will be a Committee of the Whole workshop on traffic management issues on Monday, November 27,2000 r✓ SAVED BY THE BELT Sgt.Husak thanked the Village Board for their ongoing commitment to traffic safety efforts,enabling the Police Department in continuing to be a leader in traffic safety throughout the state and the nation. Sgt.Husak then reviewed several accidents in which those wearing their seat belts were saved from serious injury;he then presented Saved by the Belt awards to each of those involved in the crashes. The Police Department sponsored coloring contests for school-age children to remind them of the need to always wear their seat belts;Sgt.Husak then presented$50 U.S. Savings bonds donated by First Midwest Bank to the winners of those coloring contests. CITIZEN'S FIRE ACADEMY Chief Allenspach reviewed the Citizen's Fire Academy and introduced each of the graduates. President Hartstein and Chief Allenspach presented certificates to the graduates as they were congratulated by the audience and the Board. PUBLIC HEARING—VOICE STREAM President Hartstein called the Public Hearing to order at 7:55 P.M.,and swore in the following people to give testimony: Charity Sullivan,Aaron Knight and Paul Bongaarts from VoiceStream Wireless. Ms.Sullivan presented a brief background on VoiceStream Wireless. In answer to a question from Trustee Berman,Ms. Sullivan confirmed that the 100'monopole will allow them adequate coverage to meet their needs in this area;they are not opposed to providing co-location on the tower. Trustee Braiman stated that he wants to delete Exhibit D from the Annexation Amendment to be sure that there is no confusion as to ever extending permission for the 140'tower,and Mr.Knight confirmed that they have no interest now or in the future for multiple poles at this property. Mr.Balling reviewed the vacation of the right-of-way on Estonian. President Hartstein asked if there were any other public bodies that wished to comment;there were none. Matthew Eisenstein,representing the Meadowlake Homeowners Association in Riverwoods,stated that they do not want this tower;they are concerned with setting a precedent;the tower is not attractive;they do not believe that it �. benefits anyone but the property owner. Rob Sherman,Buffalo Grove resident,stated that there are two towers in his neighborhood and they are really not an intrusion and do not impact the neighborhood. Plan Commissioner Smith stated that the Plan Commission was comfortable with the 100'tower. Mr.Raysa pointed out that the purpose of this Public Hearing is to review that certain proposed amendment to that Annexation Agreement for the Cotey property entitled VoiceStream Wireless;the draft before the Village Board and 11034 11/20/2000 the public tonight is dated 11/20/00 in the upper left-hand corner. In addition,there has been presented to the Board by means of Mr.Pfeil's memo dated November 20,2000 a certain letter from David A.Kuenkle&Associates dated November 10,2000 of another matter before the Public Hearing of a Federal Communications Commission radio station authorization and exhibits to the Agreement. At 8:17 P.M.,President Hartstein continued the Public Hearing until later on in the meeting. QUESTIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE Michael Rubin,395 Newtown,voiced concern with placement of the eastbound stop signs on Newtown Drive as he believes they are dangerously close to Weiland Road and present a potential congestion problem at peak travel times;he also believes the signs are too close to his driveway. Irwin Silver,415 Newtown,supports Mr.Rubin's comments,and added that cut-through traffic is a major concern; he supports delay of the stop sign installation. Todd Lesser,Newtown resident,does not believe the stop sign installation should be deferred,since there already has been full discussion on the issue. Moved by Braiman,seconded by Marienthal,to defer installation of all stop signs at the intersection of Newtown and Parkchester until after the November 27,2000 Board Meeting. Upon roll call,Trustees voted as follows: AYES: 4—Marienthal,Braiman,Glover,Berman NAYS: 0—None ABSENT: 2—Hendricks,Johnson Motion declared carried. Barbara Quinlan,Crossings resident,stated that the corner of Arlington Heights Road and Route 83 is a real traffic hazard,particularly during rush hour,and asked that this be evaluated by the Village. CONSENT AGENDA President Hartstein explained the Consent Agenda,stating that any member of the audience or the Board could request that an item be removed for full discussion;there were no such requests. President Hartstein then read a brief synopsis of each of the items on the Consent Agenda. Moved by Glover,seconded by Berman to approve the Consent Agenda. RESOLUTION NO.2000-54—ICMA Health Plan Motion to adopt the ICMA Retirement Corporation's VantageCare Retiree Health Savings Plan. COMPUTER ROUTER/SWITCH—Award of Bid Motion to award the bid for computer router/switch. FY 1999/2000 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Motion to accept the FY 1999/2000 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. PRAIRIE GROVE SUBDIVISION INITIAL ACCEPTANCE Motion to approve the Prairie Grove Subdivision Initial Acceptance. PRAIRIE PLACE SUBDIVISION INITIAL ACCEPTANCE Motion to approve the Prairie place Subdivision Initial Acceptance. 11035 11/20/2000 MIRIELLE PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION WARRANTY DEEDS Motion to accept the Warranty Deed for Outlots A,B,C,E,F,G&H in the Mirielle Phase 2 Subdivision: Developer donation by Town and Country Homes(Pinnacle Corporation)of stormwater management parcels and future road parcels. GRANT AGREEMENT FROM ILLINOIS DEPARATMENT OF COMMERCE&COMMUNITY AFFAIRS Motion to approve Grant Agreement No.01-124039,between the Village of Buffalo Grove and the Illinois Department of Commerce&Community Affairs. The grant is for$50,000 for erosion control. GRANT AGREEMENT FROM ILLINOIS DEPARATMENT OF COMMERCE&COMMUNITY AFFAIRS Motion to approve Grant Agreement No.01-124040,between the Village of Buffalo Grove and the Illinois Department of Commerce&Community Affairs. The grant is for$25,000 for the assessment and purchase of 12 document imaging devices and a file server. GRANT AGREEMENT FROM ILLINOIS DEPARATMENT OF COMMERCE&COMMUNITY AFFAIRS Motion to approve Grant Agreement No.01-127184,between the Village of Buffalo Grove and the Illinois Department of Commerce&Community Affairs. The grant is for$50,000 for an enhanced wireless communication network. Upon roll call,Trustees voted as follows: AYES: 4—Marienthal,Braiman,Glover,Berman NAYS: 0—None ABSENT: 2—Hendricks,Johnson Motion declared carried. ORDINANCE#2000-66—COTEY TOWER Moved by Berman,seconded by Braiman,to pass Ordinance#2000-66,approving an amendment to the Annexation Agreement for the Cotey property concerning construction of a wireless communications tower by VoiceStream Wireless,northeast comer of Milwaukee Avenue/Estonian Lane,subject to the changes to the draft amendment to the Annexation Agreement requested earlier during the Public Hearing. President Hartstein closed the Public Hearing at 8:44 P.M. Upon roll call,Trustees voted as follows on the motion: AYES: 5—Marienthal,Braiman,Glover,Berman,President Hartstein NAYS: 0—None ABSENT: 2—Hendricks,Johnson Motion declared carried. BELMONT/CULVER'S Moved by Berman,seconded by Marienthal,to pass Ordinance#2000-67,approving the 17`h Amendment to the Buffalo Grove Town Center Planned Unit Development concerning Culver's Restaurant and the Belmont Village assisted living facility. Mike Werchek,Culver's,made a presentation to the Board,details of which are contained in the Village Board Meeting Agenda Item Overview;he referred to the Site Plan and the Landscape Plan during his presentation. i 11036 11/20/2000 Discussion took place with regard to various details of the proposal. Diane Garber,Cherbourg resident,stated that the data submitted by the developer is inaccurate. Hal Frank, representing the developer,stated that he appreciates Ms.Garber's concerns;he respects her right to disagree,but stated that their data is correct,and they would not be proceeding with a multi-million dollar development if they did not believe the market existed. Moved by Glover,seconded by Braiman,defer action on the proposed ordinance and to direct staff to finalize the ordinance encompassing the new framework with regard to the two six-month time frames. Upon roll call,Trustees voted as follows: AYES: 4—Marienthal,Braiman,Glover,Berman NAYS: 0—None ABSENT: 2—Hendricks,Johnson Jerry Levy,President of Town Place Association,thinks the process has been good,but they are concerned about the traffic flow on Town Place Parkway;they believe Village has tried very hard to address their concerns. President Hartstein said this issue might be brought up at next week's traffic meeting. Plan Commissioner Eric Smith stated there was a separate full Public Hearing on Belmont and Culver's;the issues raised by Ms.Garber were taken into consideration,and there was a unanimous positive recommendation by the Plan Commission. President Hartstein stated that staff will prepare an ordinance for the next meeting,and he thanked both Belmont and Culver's for their cooperation in working with the community. ORDINANCE#2000-67—HINES LUMBER Moved by Marienthal,seconded by Braiman,to pass Ordinance#2000-67,an ordinance approving an Agreement with Edward Hines Lumber Company. Upon roll call,Trustees voted as follows: AYES: 4—Marienthal,Braiman,Glover,Berman NAYS: 0—None ABSENT: 2—Hendricks,Johnson Motion declared carried. Trustee Johnson arrived at this time. GIAMETTA PROPERTY Mr.Balling reviewed the request for annexation in the Residential Estate District for the Giametta property,22953- 22981 Prairie Road,Prairie View,details of which are contained ih the Village Board Meeting Agenda Item Overview. Mike Sieman reviewed the request of the petitioners,Filippo and Salvatrice Giametta;he asked that there be a uniform annexation agreement among the property owners President Hartstein asked if there was any objection to the petitioner moving forward with the request for annexation;there was no objection. GOLF BUDGET Mr.Balling reviewed his Fiscal 2001 Golf Budget Message sent to the Board and dated November 15,2000. Mr.Anderson reviewed the revenues and expenditures for both tho Buffalo Grove Golf Course and the Arboretum Golf Course. Mr.Molinaro and Mr.Anderson proceeded to answer questions from the Board. i 11037 11/20/2000 Mr.Molinaro reviewed details of his marketing plan for the 2001 year. Mr.Balling noted that the final budget will be brought back to the Board at the first meeting in December. EXECUTIVE MEETING Moved by Johnson,seconded by Glover,to move to Executive Meeting to discuss Personnel. Upon roll call, Trustees voted as follows: AYES: 5—Marienthal,Braiman,Glover,Berman,Johnson NAYS: 0—None ABSENT: 1 —Hendricks Motion declared carried. The Board moved to Executive Meeting from 10:31-11:45 P.M. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Braiman,seconded by Berman,to adjourn the meeting. Upon voice vote,the motion was unanimously declared carried. The meeting was adjourned at 11:45 P.M. Janet M. Sirabian,Village Clerk APPROVED BY ME THIS DAY OF ,2000. Village President I SUMMARY OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE OF THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES,VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE,ILLINOIS HELD ON MONDAY,NOVEMBER 27,2000, AT THE VILLAGE HALL,_5_01&UPP BOULEVARD B O GROVE,ELIMMIS CALL TO ORDER President Hartstein called the meeting to order at 7:33 P.M. ROLL CALL Roll call indicated the following present:President Hartstein;Trustees Marienthal,Braiman,Hendricks,Glover, Berman and Johnson. Also present were: William Balling,Village Manager;William Raya,Village Attorney;Ghida Sahyouni,Assistant Village Manager;Gregory Boysen,Director of Public Works;Robert Pfeil,Village Planner;Richard Kuenkler, Aeft Village Engineer;Police Chief McCann;Police Sgt.Husak;and Fire Chief Allenspach. lam LOCAL TRAFFIC MAN G E�,.MENT Mr.Ballingreviewed the agenda for this evening, ,g erring,and introduced Robert Andres P.E.representing Civiltech CUDEngineering,Inc.who will present a Local Traffic Management Workshop. The presentation will address local traffic concerns,driver behavior,traffic cahning tools,legal authority/liability,emergency response and related items. Discussion by the Board followed on possible solutions to various problem areas in the Village. ADJOURNMENT �4 Moved by Braiman,seconded by Berman,to adjourn the meeting. Upon voice vote,the motion was unanimously declared carried. The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 P.M. Q Janet M. Sirabian,Village Clerk APPROVED BY ME THIS DAY OF ,2000. Village President Board Agenda Item Submittal VIII-A Requested By: Gregory P Boysen Entered By: Linda J Miller Agenda Item Title: Report on Evaluation of Alternate Residential Area All-Way Stop Warrants Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: 11/30/2000 12/04/2000 0 Consent Agenda PW 0 Regular Agenda 0 None Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? board? 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 NO funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. SUBJECT: Follow-up Activities to 11/27/00 Traffic Management Workshop I am writing in follow-up to the items you requested in your 11/28/00 memo which transmitted a copy of the document entitled "Warrants for All Way Stops in Residential Neighborhood," which was discussed at the 11/27/00 Traffic Management Workshop and noted as being in use in Naperville. Applicability to Buffalo Grove of Naperville Warrants for All-Way Stops in Residential Neighborhoods As noted in Steve Husak's attached 11/29/00 memo and discussions with Village Engineer Dick Kuenkler, it is our opinion that the Naperville procedure would be applicable to Buffalo Grove. In speaking to Mr. John Lomas of the Naperville traffic engineering staff, I learned that their street classification system would identify streets like Newtown and Horatio as "residential connectors" instead of"collectors" and their criteria would be applicable to the most recently discussed areas. Results of"Scoring" Newtown Drive Intersections at Horatio and Parkchester As you requested, a scoring of the two intersections which recently had all-way stop ordinances approved was done using the Naperville system. Neither of these intersections have the 500 point minimum score required to warrant all-way stop installations under the Naperville system. As denoted on the attached scoring sheets, the Newtown and Horatio intersection has a score of 26 and the Newtown and Parkchester intersection has a negative score value. It does not appear that any reasonable adjustment to the Naperville scoring method could be made that would result in these two intersections being warranted, with any reasonable degree of limitation to nearly all other intersections in the Village. For background, scoring is also attached for the more recently installed residential area all-way stop intersections of Thompson and Brandywyn, which scored 552 and Horatio and Armstrong, which scored 514. Evaluation of Potential Cut-Through Traffic Rerouting Concerning the potential rerouting of cut-through traffic, I would agree with the criteria for projecting rerouting which was noted by Mr. Andres of Civiltech, which is the minimization of total travel time. I would, therefore, anticipate that if traffic were discouraged from Newtown, streets which represent a less time consuming alternate route, such as the streets running directly between Horatio and Weiland which are to the south of Newtown, would be more likely to be the chosen route of"cut-through" trips rather than Parkchester, which would require a more time consuming route going north and then south to complete the east-west trip between Weiland and Horatio. Guidelines for Evaluating Engineered Traffic Calming Measures We are now collecting copies of established procedures which are used by other agencies and will soon be providing a recommendation for procedures to be used in Buffalo Grove. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please let me know. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files (Nib a I Tway 1.pdf E] al Iway2.pdf Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: To: Greg Boysen From: Steve Husak Date: November 29, 2000 Subject: Warroints for All-Way Stops in Residential Neighborhoods I have read through the information provided regarding the City of Naperville's use; of local warrants for tlu:placement of stop signs in residential areas. The point system that they have in place appears to be a good one. The eleven factors include a combination of vehicle and pedestrian volume, crash experience, and other hazards. These factors have values assigned to them and must add up to 500 points for an all-way stop warrant to be approved. Applying this system to the Newtown area brings up some interesting points. • The Naperville system explains that "This procedure is not applicable if one of the streets of the inte-rsection is a collector or arterial street as identified in the City's Master Thoroug4fare Plan." Newtown Drive is a collector street and therefore, any intersection along it would not be considered for evaluation. Allowing traffic to flow along collector streets is reasonable, and reinforces the idea of only placing stop signs where they are justified. • Applying the general data I have for Newtown Drive to the Naperville system does not result in many points being awarded. The speeds are not that high. It is not a sc400l walking route, however, there is a park nearby. There have riot been any right angle crashes in the area(and very few other types of crashes). There are not any site obstructions or unusual hazards in the area Traffic volumes appear to be low, and may even result in subtractions. If the standards were changed so much that Newtown Drive is justified, I would think that almost any resident ial/co Hector intersection would also be justified. All-way stops have been requested in other residential areas(Apple Hill & Madiera, Twin Oaks & Sheridan). These have also been near parks, but have had very low traffic volume. Stop signs have not been justified in the past,and I do not think they would be justified with this system either. There have been requests in the area of Ivy Hall School, along Ivy Hall LanIt. These requests are for one-way stops at T-intersections, not all-way stops. The concerns usually stem from the volume of school children walking to Ivy Hall School when there is also a large number of vehicles in the area. I don't know if the numbers would add up,but they would probably be higher than Newtown Drive. I spoke to Sergeant Jim Bedell, the Traffic Division Supevisor with the Naperville Police Department about their local standards. He advised me that the system works well. The locations that have added up to 500 points have been justified. He told me that they receive approximately twenty requests a month. He also told me that the vast majority do not add up to the 500 points. He also indicated that the same areas come up repeatedly. He advised me that they would not assess an area more than once a year. Sergeant Bedell advised me that they are currently experimenting with traffic circles. He said it appears the circles that have been placed at uncontrolled intersections have slowed traffic,however the circles placed at four-way stop intersections have not had any effect. He told me that Naperville did experiment with speed humps, but that they were removed after a fire truck was damaged driving over one. I am certainly in favor of using the Naperville system, or something very similar to it. I would not be in favor of a system that is vague or utilizes subjective factors to justify stop signs. I believe that stop signs should not be used as an attempt to slow traffic. Respectfully submitted, Sergeant Steve Husak Traffic Unit C: Chief McCann Commander Balinski Dick Kuenkler Aw ww w anwwuuuwwuw.�ruwavwwwwrwwrtvww wrww.w„x „�; rmr «rr mrrrw nr uouwwaanwnwumQa r wuw r < Appendix #1 611 -92 Toward determining the appropriate type of traffic control for the intersection of residential streets, a worksheet that comprehensively address the concerns of residents has been developed. This Residential All-Way top Warrant Worksheet is li l iau f stree� rThis procedure is.not to be applied to,the intersection of a(residential street with a collector or arterial street as identified in the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan. DATA F.KM FA T 1. Functional classification and designation of intersecting streets as residential with speed limits not greater than 30 m.p.h. STOP -- This procedure is not applicable if one of the streets of the intersection is a collector or arterial street as identified in the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan 2. Highest measured average of vehicle speed (85th percentile and upper limit of 10 mile per hour pace) of the four approaches. n 0 points for 15.0 to 32.5 mph ---- ----- 25 points for 32.6 to 37.5 mph 60 points for 37.6 to 42.5 mph '"-"- 120 points for 42.6 to 50.0 mph+ Subtotal for Factor 2 3. Safe Walking School Route - - Go to (b) in this section if intersection is currently protected 00 by adult school crossing guard a. Numbers of Walking School Children on Safe Walking School Pedestrian Route (Highest crossing 1 hour period/average day) 7 1 .. 'u'aNega'. fuNUWu41WWN6WuuWUWUWUVWaNUVWW1uWtl ivvv mr.WYbr14W mrrrrxmrm a. olefdetltl lffrtll r rmrrrt 2 points for each elementary school child crossing the intersection (separate from pedestrians as applied under Factor 4) ---- .'(WN 1 point for each Junior Highsc ho ol child crossing the intersection (separate from pedestrians as applied under Factor 4) "'"- --- by Proximity of Intersection to School 200 points if intersection is primary walking school route crossing Al an elementary or junior high school) 100 points if intersection is adjacent to an elementary or junior high school but is not t the primary crossing intersection Al the school) Subtotai for Factor 3 -----�-- 4, PedestriansB'Lryg ists (other than sicho l), 1 point for each pedestrian/bicyclist crossing the intersection per average hour of highest four hours (weekdays - Monday through Friday ----- ------ 2 points for each pedestrian/bicyclist younger than 13 crossing the intersection per average hour of highest two hours) ""-- 50 points for each visually/physically/ aurally impaired pedestrian with special needs crossing the intersection per average hour of the highest two hours ----- '--- 10 points for each approach without a sidewalk ----- ------ Subtotal for Factor 4 -'----' 8 . A, xoMwdnawi&.w.W rrrrrm l FhPlrtf mnm �ifillrtrtrtrtrtrt frt 6VA .. 5.' Traffic crash experience and types of crashes 75 points for each right angle collision during the last 12 months correctable by all-way stop control 20 points for each collision other than right angle as noted above Subtotal for Factor 5 6. Sight obstructions and adequacy of sight distance - The lowest of the Critical Ap proarh Speeds off, each approach 20 points per C.A.S. less than 20 mph ----- or 50 points per C.A.S. less than 10 mph ---'- -"-- or 75 points per C.A.S. less than 5 mph ----- '-"' Subtotal l for Factor 6 - 7. Unexpected and unusual traffic hazards and their proximity to a residential intersection 20 points for any bridge/underpass within 1 block 50 points points for any at-grade railroad crossings Within 300 feet 50 points for any curve/hill within 300 feet which restricts view of the intersection -""- 25 - 50 points for any other unique situation not noted above (unusual geometric , human factors, etc) Subtotal for Factor 7 " 9 8. Proximity of parks, churches, libraries, shopping centers, bus stops, YMCAs, swim racket clubs, 25 points for each adjacent (or within 300 feet) public use facility D Subtotal for Factor 8 9. Current conditions of the intersection, the approaching streets, their width, presence of shoulders and their width, street lighting, parking 25 points for street width < 22 feet ---- ---- If street width > 36 feet Jote #1: Stop control of any approach wider than 36 feet will experience operational problems and present a special hazard. 15 points for street approaches with ✓ roll curbs ---- w 20 points for no street lighting ---- "-� 10 points for on-Street parking within 50 feet on any of approach ---- Subtotal for Factor 9 10. Traffic volumes a. Total of all approach traffic volumes 1 point for each vehicle approaching Jy� Z` - intersection during average hour of r 8 hours of an average weekday b. Adjustment for unequal approach volumes Subtract following points for unequal approach volumes (total of minor street less than average of 160 vehicles per hr): 0 points for minor volume greater than 160 ---- -- 50 points for minor volumes of 120 to 159 ---- --- to 100 points for minor volumes of 100 to 119 ---- ---- 120 points for minor volumes of 75 to 99 150 points for minor volumes of 40 to 74 -- Subtotal for Factor 10 11. Adjacent All-W'ay Stops Subtract 100 points if any adjacent intersection has all-way stop or signal control Subtract 50 points if any adjacent intersection stops or yields same street Subtotal for Factor 11 TOTAL POINTS OF FACTORS Recommend Residential All-Way Stop Control as Warranted if sum exceeds 500 points) 11 Appendix 11 6-11 -92 - Toward determining the appropriate type of traffic control for the intersection of residential svteu, a worksheet that comprehensively address the concerns of residents has been developed. This Pea" tial Al-Wa ° Stoo Warrant Workshaart ISi This pr c I str el in, owl I s mastew Thoroughfam Plan. DATA CC ww��+.--��^^pp i� 1. Functional classification and designation of intersecting streets as residential with speed limits not greater than 30 m.p.h. STOP — This procedure is not applicable if one of the streets of the intersection is a collector or arterial street as identified in the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan 2. Highest measured average of vehicle speed (85th percentile and upper limit of 10 miles�� per hour pace) of the Ip ch ,.� 0 points for 15.0 to 32.5 0 po .� — 25 points for 32.6 to 37.5 mph _ 60 points for 37.6 to 42.5 mph 1 120 points for 42.6 to 50.0 mph+ Subtotal for Factor 2 3. Safe Walking School Route - - Go to (b) in this section if intersection is currently protected by adult school crossing guard a. Numbers of Walking School Children on Safe Walking School Pedestrian Route (Highest crossing 1 hour period/average day) 7 . I ,,. wo.w,wda , mwwrrwwwnr rmo�aMmsrrww.uwwww,waww uNeuN xouowu���m ,,, 2 points for each elementary school child crossing the intersection Q (separate from pedestrians as applied �^ under Factor 4) 1 point for each Junior Nigh school child crossing the Intersection ,lied (separate from pedestrians as app under Factor 4) b, Proximity of Intersection to School 200 points if intersection is primary O walking school route crossing It an elementary or junior high school) 100 points if intersection is adjacent to an elementary or junior high school D but is not the primary crossing intersection gl the school) Subtotal for Factor 3 4. Pp O ri n i Ivc (other than school) 1 point for each pedestrian/bicyclist crossing the intersection per average hour of highest four hours y) (weekdays - Monday through 2 points for each 3 cc ossi g � yclist younger than intersection per average ---- hour of highest two hours) 50 points for each visuallylphysically/ aurally impairedneeds crossing the ins to s special ne ection per average hour of the highest two hours 10 points for each approach without a sidewalk Subtotal for Factor 4 8 ' s ' � 1 f r: rsrrr««« wv'a4W400 'WUWUWUWUWUWUWrrrtrrtrrtrrtrrtrrtrrtrrtrrtrrtrrtrrtrrtrrtrrtVilFrpµ�q 4irrtPWYOWUd4. frtfrtfrtY'l ll' kru�d''tuffff! wdwd�W5iN44W rrPm lfAONo uR6Jw0uNu dAfd (lRlGlaa'✓w✓WW.WawY emlFR!! «e omar««o,. 5, Traffic crash experience and types Of crashes 75 points for each right nihs corrgle eision ctable Q during the last 12 by all-way stop control 20 points for each collision other than d right angle as noted above Subtotal for Factor 5 6, Sight obstructions and adequacy of sight distance - The lowest of the Critical Approach Speeds of each approach +' _f 3d 20 points per C.A.S. less than 20 mph or 50 points per C.A.S. less than 10 mph or --- 75 points per C.A.S. less than 5 mph Subtotal for Factor 6 7, Unexpected and unusual traffic hazards and their proximity to a residential intersection 20 points for any bridge/underpass within 1 block 50 points for any at-grade railroad crossings within 300 feet 50 points for any curve/hill within 300 feet which restricts view of the intersection 25 - 50 points for any other unique situation not fa n above unusual - geometncs, Subtotal for Factor 7 9 g, proximity of parks,churches, libraries, shopping conters, bus stops, YMCAs, swim & racket clubs, points for each adjacent .� 25 po nt (or within 300 feet) public use facility Subtotal for Factor 8 - g. Current conditions of the intersection, the approaching f houlde su nd their widtts, their h. presence o street lighting, parking O 25 points for street width < 22 feet If street width > 36 feet wider Notes Stop control of any approach than 36 feet will experience special hazard. _ problems and present a spec street approaches 15 o�nts fors with --_ roll curbs _-- 20 points for no street lighting 10 oints for on-Street parking within ✓ 10 50 feet on any of approach L Subtotal for Factor 9 10. Traffic volumes a. Total of all approach traffic volumes 1 point for each vehicle approaching oh intersection during average hour of 8 hours of an average weekday b. Adjustment for unequal approach volumes Subtract following points for unequal ' approach volumes (total of minor street less than average of 160 vehicles per hr : 0 points for minor volume g 50 points for minor volumes of 120 to 159 10 1 ,�... '� a'udRprtpry�6ui69r0W0W0WWWWW0W0W0W0W0WtlW0YAW0WrNiluWUWUWUWUWUWu0fu11NNNV nYml !rt lrtrtf f fff rtrnrtrn u'GI�IYRR� N46'urtrtrt NNa NUm9�rtNu pl Av1uuN uf4 J f46N!ai16w00�wu0JUN0 rrr rmr r�x w� 100 points for minor volumes of 100 to 119 ---- _�: 120 points for minor volumes of 75 to 99 150 points for minor volumes of 40 to 74 - Subtotal for Factor 10 - Stops 11. Adjacent All Way s P Subtract 100 points if any adjacent /v O intersection has all-waY --- stop or signal control Subtract 50 points if any adjacent intersection stops or yields same street Subtotal for Factor 11 _. TOTAL POINTS OF FACTORS L Recommend Residential All-Way Stop Control as Warranted if sum exceeds 500 points) 11 � i Appendix #f1 6-11 -92 - Toward determining the appropriate type of traffic control for the intersection of residential streets, a worksheet that comprehensively address the concerns of residents has been developed. r This,R#sWontial .Wey S109 Warrant Worksheet is p . ahLgff_hZL 'This procedure is m to ba r e��tial t aof VWWmeet as identified in the City' Master Thoroughfare Plan. DATA EAOM 1. Functional classification and designation of intersecting streets as residential with speed limits not greater than 30 m.p.h. STOP — This procedure is not applicable if one of the streets of the intersection is a collector or arterial street as Thoroughfare identified in the City's Master Plan 2. Highest measured average of vehicle speed �S percentile and upper limit of 10 mile v� C (85th p �M per hour pace) of the four ap roache el 0 points for 15.0 to 32.5 mph 25 points for 32.6 to 37.5 mph _. 60 points for 37.6 to 42.5 mph _ 120 points for 42.6 to 50.0 mph+ Subtotal for Factor 2 3. Safe Walking School Route - - Go to (b) in this section if intersection is currently protected by adult scho L cro Wluard qe-11� dren a. Numbers of Walking School Safe Walking School Pedestrian n Route (Highest crossing 1 hour period/average day) 7 ,.�,, o wuuuw.urwrwurwwrw ,ww� �aw,w.ow�wwrmu �ra r r� «uow n 2 points for each elementary school child crossing the intersection (separate from pedestrians as applied under Factor 4) 1 point for each Junior High school child crossing the intersection (separate from pedestrians as applied ----- ..... under Factor 4) b. proximity of Intersection to School 200 points if intersection is primary walking school route crossing Al an elementary or junior high school) 100 points if intersection is adjacent to an elementary or junior high school but is not the prirnary crossing intersection 8I the school) O Subtotal for Factor 3 4. � p ri n i li (other than school) 1 point for each pedestrian/bicyclist crossing the intersection per average hour of highest four hours (weekdays - Monday through Friday) 2 points for each pedestrian/bicyclist younger than 13 crossing the intersection per average hour of highest two hours) 50 points for each visualiy/physically/ aurally impaired pedestrian with special needs crossing the intersection .� per average hour of the highest two hours 10 points for each approach without a sidewalk Subtotal for Factor 4 8 1 rmrr rr mmr�.awwr✓wu+rumrrtrr�uaartaerwrrurm+wwuiwuad,rtrrtnmwrrtuauuwif�wvswrwaaw woww wwW mwnmo wrrummnmomw ww.,wwww.w.aw� err.;wu www� ate.,., 5. Traffic crash experience and types of crashes 75 points for each right angle collision during the last 12 months correctableby all-way stop control 20 points for each collision other than -� ----- right angle as noted above Subtotal for Factor 5 6. Sight obstructions and adequacy of sight distance - The lowest of the Critical Approach Speeds of each approach 3_0 3030 - - 20 points per C.A.S. less than 20 mph or 50 points per C.A.S. less than 10 mph or 75 points per C.A.S. less than 5 mph Subtotal for Factor 6 ~ 7. Unexpected and unusual traffic hazards and their proximity to a residential intersection 20 points for any bridge/underpass within 1 block 50 points for any at-grade railroa4l crossings within 300 feet 50 points for any curve/hill wi hin N x d 300 feet which restricts view of �i J the intersection 25 - 50 points for any other unique situation not noted above (unusual geometrics, human factors, etc) Subtotal for Factor 7 1 9 i 8, Proximity of parks, churches, libraries, shopping centers, bus stops, YMCAs, swim & racket clubs, 25 points for each adjacent (or within •---- 300 feet) public use facility Subtotal for Factor 8 9. Current conditions of the intersection, the approaching streets, their width, presence of shoulders and their width, street lighting, parking 25 points for street width < 22 feet If street width > 36 feet wider Not_ Stop control of any approach than 36 feet will experience operational problems and present a special hazard. 15 points for street approaches with roll curbs -•-- 20 points for no street lighting 10 points for on-Street parking within 50 feet on any of approach _ Subtotal for Factor 9 10. Traffic volumes roach traffic voiu a. Total of all appJ0 1 point for each vehicle approaching intersection during average hour of 8 hours of an average weekday b. Adjustment for unequal approach volumes Subtract following points for unequal approach volumes (total of minor street less than average of 160 vehicles per hr): ✓ 0 points for minor volume greater than 160 --_ 50 points for minor volumes of 120 to 159 i 10 100 points for minor volumes of 100 to 119 -•-- ___ 120 points for minor volumes of 75 to 99 ---- "" 150 points for minor volumes of 40 to 74 ---- :�' Subtotal for Factor 10 11. Adjacent All-Way Stops Subtract 100 points if any adjacent intersection has all-way stop or signal control Subtract 50 points if any adjacent intersection stops or yields same -_._ •_ street Q Subtotal for Factor 11 TOTAL POINTS OF FACTORS Recommend Residential All-Way Stop Control as Warranted if sum exceeds 500 points) 11 I ..................... Appendix #1 6-11 -92 Toward determining the appropriate type of traffic control for the intersection of residential street$, a woftheet that comprehensively address the concerns of residents has been developed. I This ReWential All-WaY Stop WO(Yanit Workshas r t 13 1 1 1 1 : I 1 11 1 , MgALgg hgUL This pplled to 041 teclof of, gnaf4j street as idientif*d in tN1 OWS M&SW Thoroughfare Pt&n- DATA E"T I Functional classification and designation of intersecting streets as residential with speed limits not greater than 30 m.p.h. STOP — This procedure is not applicable if one of the streets of the intersection is a collector or arterial street as identified in the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan 2. Highest measured average of vehicle speed (85th percentile and upper limit of 10 mile C� per hour pace) of the four approaches. 0 points for 15.0 to 32.5 mph TO 25 points for 32.6 to 37.5 mph 60 points for 37.6 to 42.5 mph 120 points for 42.6 to 50.0 mph+ Subtotal for Factor 2 3. Safe Walking School Route - • Go to (b) in this section if intersection is currently protected 0 by adult school crossing guard a. Numbers of Walking School hildren on Safe Walking School PedestriCan Route (Highest crossing 1 hour period/average day) 7 2 points for each elementary school (WO child child crossing the intersection (separate from pedestrians as applied under Factor 4) 1 point for each Junior Nigh school child crossing the intersection (separate from pedestrians as applied under Factor 4) b, Proximity of Intersection to School 200 points if intersection is primary walking school route crossing at an elementary or junior high school) 100 points if intersection is adjacent to an elementary or junior high school but is not the primary crossing intersection Al the school) �- Subtotal for Factor 3 4 pgde jtr►i nc�Qicyclists (other thanM4W"O 1 point for each pedestrian/bicyclist crossing the intersection per average hour of highest four hours (weekdays - Monday through Friday) 2 points for each pedestrian/bicyclist younger than 13 crossing the intersection per average hour of highest two hours) 50 points for each visualEy/physically/ aurally impaired pedestrian with special needs crossing the intersection per average hour of the highest two hours 10 points for each approach without a sidewalk Subtotal for Factor 4 8 nii GAOU4 W.4WdWr:415N'WWW. IVNA(fKfnrtrtrtrtAlrtl iui%9P rn'hn mrcrdr � R WaJ MrArttiPrt 4P 4P 4P 4Po'uNWfiFfwOd04 f G(ale(aall(6RdlrtGR4W9!(.NRX04fYrt°4NWdOW� nm vn. 5 . Traffic crash experience and types of crashes 75 points for each right angle collision during the last 12 months correctable by all-way stop control 20 points for each collision other than -� right angle as noted above Subtotal for Factor 5 6. Sight obstructions and adequacy of sight distance - The lowest of the Critical Aroach Speeds off each approach 20 points per C.A.S. less than 20 mph or 50 points per C.A.S. less than 10 mph or 75 points per C.A.S. less than 5 mph 0 Subtotal for Factor 6 ' 7. Unexpected and unusual traffic hazards and their proximity to a residential intersection 20 points for any bridge/underpass within 1 block 50 points for any at-grade railroad crossings within 300 feet ' 50 points for any curve/hill within 300 feet which restricts view of the intersection 25 - 50 points for any other unique situation not noted above (unusual geometrics, human factors, etc) Subtotal for Factor 7 9 .. nnrr. rOSAWV 4WdauliWl4WiWWl4 YM'ItlXIfNMfNMXMNxrvrvrvry '':' - u'ONJR 6.ry rrvMrrrrrrrrrrrrrimmlryNirvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrrvrvry rrrrvr Nmrc' n rn r m!!ll(rt rrr«lrrtrrtmr rrr GURur man 8. Proximity of parks, churches, libraries, shopping centers, bus stops, YMCAs, swim & racket clubs, 25 points for each adjacent (or within ----- 300 feet) public use facility Subtotal for Factor 8 9. Current conditions of the intersection, the approaching streets, their width, presence of shoulders and their width, street lighting, parking 25 points for street width 36 < 22 feet -- - If street width �nrider N •# Stop control of any approach than 36 feet will experience operational problems and present a special hazard. Owl 15 points for street approaches with ✓ 7 roll curbs 20 points for no street lighting 10 points for on-Street parking within ✓ 50 feet on any of approach Subtotal for Factor 9 10. Traffic volumes a. Total of all approach traffic volumes ' 1 point for each vehicle approaching � (� intersection during average hour of 6 / 8 hours of an average weekday b. Adjustment for unequal approach volumes Subtract following points for unequal �2 t approach volumes (total of minor street less than average of 160 vehicles per hr): - 0 points for minor volume greater o 1 t n 60 -� 50 points for minor volumes o 10 t j i r„ "' wwaMoouo ouwHH�e�ma�a�a�a�a�a�a�✓rtwrtwrtwwe�fi.rvwwwwrwaawdwavmarav rrrrt rtrt rr rrrr rrtrt rrt xo wo mm�mn nm rnrvrvrrvrrvrrrrrrrrrrrmnrvrvry rtrtrt rtrt rtrtfrtGr� ............ f ummN�'A rro rrua 100 points for minor volumes of 100 to 119 •--- 120 points for minor volumes of 75 to 99 --•- 150 points for minor volumes of 40 to 74 -••- _ - Subtotal for Factor 10 11 . Adjacent All-Way Stops Subtract 100 points if any adjacent intersection has all-way stop or signal control Subtract 50 points if any adjacent intersection stops or yields same -� street Subtotal for Factor 11 - TOTAL POINTS OF FACTORS Recommend Residential All-Way Stop Control as Warranted if sum exceeds 500 points) it TO: Q@ftk% ': BOYSEN FROM: WILLIAM R. BALLING DATE: NOVEMBER 28, 2000 ZZ L'BJEC'T: LOCAL WARRANT STANDARDS FOR NEWTOWN STOP SIGNS Greg, we have much to do and little time to do it regarding a recommendation from you concerning establishing local warrant standards for stop sign placement, evaluating the Naperville ordinance as a model. Here is what I need by close of business Wednesday: 1. Staff evaluation of the relevance and scoring scenarios for the Naperville ordinance as it applies to Buffalo Grove. Include comments from Leo and Dick in your report. 2. Score each of the stop signs recently approved for Newtown Drive against the Naperville standard to see if they would qualify for placement under the :Naperville ordinance. If you do not have all the data necessary, i.e., license plate census, estimate generously using what Police data is mailable. If they don't qualify, what modifications would you make to the standards to mare them qualify and what would be the effect in your opinion on other intersections in the Village. 3. While the emphasis seems to be collector streets and measures to discourage cut through traffic, local streets should not be ignored. For example, if cut through traffic was discouraged from Newtown, would some of it find its way to Parkchester Drive. 4. Later, but soon thereafter, I will need a recommendation on guidelines for evaluating engineered traffic calming measures. Emphasis should be on "knob outs- and traffic directors (circles, etc.) but pavement modifications (ramps) should not be ignored. From Bob Andres, get hold of the Portland and Seattle procedures for handling requests, guidelines or warrants for installation. See what is pertinent to Buffalo Grove and provide our assessment and recommendation. Include all staff comments for this phase of the project. I am asking Ghida to convene an IMT to formulate the recommendation. Communities should be contacted to gain the benefit of their experience, including Chicago, NWMC communities, Chevy Chase, MD, etc. Thanks. WILLIAM k. BALLING Village Manager WRB/em cc: Ghida Sahyouni cc: Leo McCann cc: Richard Kuenkler „,,,.r:r mr wnrnw w anarwnurwuuwaw wwrwwwewwmwrurwfQrfQww. ruauirmraaw+wrarwrwwrw.rw.rw.uta.a.aazwwuawawraa2raa:rrunmw�wama.,,., ,,,www.,;w✓rt� s,r an”." ,,".` e```�, n. �. 7.1.92 ITE DISTRICT IV CONFERENCE Warrants for All-Way Stops in Residential Neighborhoods Fred Ranck, P.E., Member of the Institute 'There must be something out there that is better than these 4-w8y stop warrants from the Manual. They do not address any of the concerns our residents have for the safety of their children walking to school, fa their own safety as pedestrians and cyclists in their own neighborhoods, the real problems of inadequate sight distance, of hills, curves, the lack of sidewalks, the presence of parks, schools, swimming pools, not do they do anything about the number one problem we have -speeding. These 4- way stop warrants may have been fine for rural roads in Montana at the time of WWII, but they sure don't meet the needs of a modern suburban community.' City Councilman Tenison, July 1991. I. INTRODUCTION: In less than a 12 month period in 1990 and 1991, the City of Naperville received requests from homeowners associations and residents for installation of all-way stop control at more than 120 intersections. Each of the two City Council meetings per month featured group after group of residents each seeking the "holy grail of neighborhood traffic safety" by getting "their' four-way stop installation(s). Naperville is a fast growing suburban community of 92,000 residents at the west end of the East-West Research Corridor running west along 1-88 through DuPage County from the City of Chicago. Population just after WWII was 13,000. Naperville has a strong mix of Major office research facilities with several strong commercial centers and more than 44,000 residences, 28 elementary and middle schools, two major high schools, and two commuter stations on METRA. Naperville also has 92 homeowners associations, the majority of which are quite active in securing services and changes to benefit their neighborhoods. Naperville enjoys its role as a leader in the suburban Chicago area. The Riverwalk along the west branch of the DuPage River flowing through the City is known throughout the region for its artful park setting through the old downtown. Naperville pioneered municipal recycling. it is one of two cities in Illinois to have its own Traffic Impact Fee Program. In the mid 1970's, a City wide review of existing all-way stop intersections was carried out, resulting in the downgrading from all-way stop control to two-way stop 1 i control of more than 25 intersections. The focus at that time was that many of these all-way stops were no longer needed due to changes in traffic patterns and the removal of unneeded stops would reduce traffic delay. At this point in time, summer of 1992, of the City's 2003 intersections, 70 are traffic signal controlled, 78 are all- way stop controlled, 793 are two-stop controlled or yield controlled, and 800 are Cul- de-Sac intersections. 11. DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL ALL-WAY STOP WARRANT: In the summer of 1991, City Council appointed a committee of representatives of homeowners associations, of the Council itself and from the City's Transportation Advisory Board (Appointed by Council to review and act on all traffic issues and requests in the same manner as a Plan Commission for development) to seek out, identify "new" expertise and procedures beyond the current all-way stop warrants as set forth in the Illinois and National MUTCD. This committee was identified as the Residential Stop Sign Review Panel. In terms of the legal standing of such an effort, the City Attorney rendered an opinion in July of 1991 that "City Council, pursuant to its home rule authority, authorize four- way stop signs in such a way that is not inconsistent with the State warrant requirements and which promotes the public health, safety and welfare." Letters of Invitation were sent to 29 traffic engineers and traffic engineering consulting firms across the country inviting them to submit their experience and expertise toward the development of warrants for stop control in residential neighborhoods, as well as how they would carry out this work for the City of Naperville and an estimate of the expected cost. Thirteen written responses and four verbal responses were received for a total of seventeen responses. Five (5) professional traffic engineering firms submitted detailed proposals suitable for review by the City toward the selection of a consultant should the City decide to proceed. Many firms declined to carry out this professional traffic engineering work which they feel would be outside the laws and statutes of the State of Illinois. The Residential Stop Sign Review Panel requested that two firms present their ideas and expertise. Upon completion of the extensive presentations,the committee choose to press on with the task themselves in light of the lack of any new directions being presented and asked staff of the City's Traffic Engineering and Safety Division to assist in developing of a new approach to residential traffic control beyond the current criteria in the National and Illinois Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways The Residential Stop Sign Review Panel compiled an extensive listing of the concerns in the neighborhoods about traffic and traffic safety in their meetings. Slowing traffic, protecting walking children in their trips to school, to parks, and keeping traffic out of the neighborhoods were among these concerns. With the technical assistance of 2 DOT staff, the factors and criteria that should be included in any consideration of a residential intersection toward identifying the appropriate and safest form of traffic control were: 1 . Pedestrians/bicyclists- Numbers of young pedestrians, older adults, and visually/physically/audibly impaired pedestrians, presence/lack of sidewalks a. Age 13 and younger b. Age 13 - 60 C. Age 60 + 2. Safe Walking School Route - Numbers of crossing school children (Elementary School and Junior High), presence lack of sidewalks 3. Speed of traffic on all approaches 4. Cut-through traffic 5. Traffic crash experience and types of crashes, 6. Sight obstructions and sight distance adequacy (Critical Approach Speeds) for all quadrants, 7. Unexpected and unusual traffic hazards and their proximity to the residential intersection, such as: location of bridges and underpasses, railroad crossings, location of curves, hills, positive guidance checklist and analysis, 8. conflict analysis (observation of near misses), human factors observational analysis, 9. location of parks, swim and racket clubs, churches, shopping centers, 10. Current conditions of the intersection, the approaching streets, their width, presence of shoulders and their width, street lighting, parking 11 . traffic volumes including approach volumes by turning movement and presence of pedestrians, stopped delay times 12. functional classification and designation as a collector or arterial street. These twelve (12) factors were viewed as going far beyond the two (2) specific criteria of approach traffic volume and traffic accidents contained in the all-way stop warrant of the MUTCD and incorporated the additional traffic concerns judged important by Naperville residents. The criteria contained in the MUTCD All-Way Stop Warrant require satisfaction of one of the following three minimum requirements based upon traffic engineering study; f. Where a traffic signal is warranted and urgently needed for safety and operational reasons, all-way stop control is warranted as an interim measure while the construction of the signals is taking place. 2. Substantial traffic volumes of nearly equal amount on two intersecting streets - a total approach volume fall approaches) of 500 vehicles per 3 r: uaav4ddff6 rWdWBdWGSGWIWIrrtYF/i4'w;4N„'dwl✓w.MANNWFVXs'a4wiNSWauf?wLdn'oW;Nx4dF0.NkWMfHfiiNHfimmmimnnrvfidrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvdrvrvdrvrrvrry rrvrd'd nwwsasw'(rt Wrtrrtl m ewwwYrtlrtw umw4 rtWMrtrG mwwarmr Jfi, fu NaNONMr�Frrtl�.QrQrQrQr aMwa . hour for any eight hours of an average weekday, and 3. A major traffic accident problem correctable by installation of all-way stop control, such as right-angle and left-turning accidents - 5 reported accidents of this type in a 12 month period. Examination of the MUTCD warrant criteria notes that the first two requirements focus on"assignment of right-of-way"for an intersection toward addressing excessive delay for the two-way stop controlled approach. The application of All-way stop control is to equally provide for the interchange of two streets with nearly equal and substantial volume. Some experienced professional traffic engineers have incorporated pedestrian and speed considerations into the decision making process for all-way stops, but the warrants themselves as set forth in the MUTCD have not been modified or updated in decades. It is of interest to note that "increasing safety" and "slowing traffic" are not cited as outcomes of the current all-way stop warrants. In fact, the actual experience in Naperville for the last several years for the 4-way stop controlled intersections is at odds with this premise in that 4-way stop intersections have more traffic accidents than do the two-way stop controlled ones. Toward the development of a new approach that comprehensively takes into account and quantifies measurable traffic and roadway factors, the Residential Stop Sign Review Panel grouped the concerns that they felt should be included and any determination of stop control. This process was carried out in a like manner to the process that traffic engineers have used over the years of applying "professional engineering judgment" to application of the standards of the Manual, wherein the standards of the Manual are the end-point of the process, but the guidelines to establish a "starting point". The concept was to utilize the "systems warrant" approach in the Manual for traffic signals, a proven process of many years, as a methodology to expanding an all-way stop warrant to take in other factors beyond a single volume condition and an accident condition. In fact, there are eleven (11) warrants for installation of traffic signals in comparison to only one for all-way stops. Three (3) are based upon traffic volumes, two (2) on delay of traffic on the minor approach, one for school crossings, one for pedestrian crossings, one for accident experience, and three with progressive movement, traffic signal systems, and combination of warrants. Meeting the minimum conditions for any individual warrant, say for a school crossing, satisfies the "warrant" for a traffic signal. And additionally, satisfaction of 80 percent of the minimum conditions of Volume Warrant 1 or Interruption of Traffic Warrant II in combination with satisfaction of most of the minimum conditions of any of the other warrants. It is this "combination" aspect of the warranting of traffic signals that is absent from the warranting of all-way stop control. j 4 rrc rmmm'aware mmw.wwwwam �a�anwarw�rwuaaw,,rwrawewwm.w-.w.w.a,mawuuxuw,.,� rrrr r r wn+udaraawwuwtmwrwwawuawNawNawNawNawNa mruurram✓s�+mar ,,. The methodology for a "combination of warrants" approach to all-way stops is to be comprised of the following components: 1 . satisfaction of 80 percent of the minimum approach traffic volume conditions of the current MUTCD (500 vehicles per hour), ie., an average traffic volume of all approaches to exceed 400 vehicles per hour for any eight hours of an average weekday. 2. satisfaction of 80 percent of the minimum approach traffic volume from the sum of the minor approaches (200 vehicles per hour), ie., an average of 160 vehicles per hour for any eight hours of an average weekday. Additionally, under MUTCD Warrant II and IX, X, and Xl, other combinations of total traffic and minor street approach volumes are used, with a basic underlying relationship of the less the traffic level of the minor approach, the more the minimum level of traffic on the major approach. 3. satisfaction of the school component of the overall warrant be by location as the primary crossing location for the school that does not have an adult crossing guard. However, the location of the primary crossing for an elementary or middle school is not sufficient by itself to warrant an all-way stop; at least 60 percent of the satisfaction of the warrant for an all-way stop must come from volume and other conditions. 4. presence of adjacent all-way stops or traffic signal control would be included in the process by assignment of penalty points. 5. the methodology would applied to the intersection of residential streets only. For intersections involving collector and arterial streets as identified in the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan, the regular MUTCD warrants would be applied. Based upon these premises, each of 12 factor groups identified by the Residential Stop Sign Review Panel were to be added to the decision making process toward determining the appropriate and safest form of traffic control for a residential intersection. The difficulty at that point lay in how to integrate one factor with the others into the total determination, which was addressed by combining the input of each of the 12 identified factors is a "point system" which provides for the input of each concern toward combining their cumulative effect. With this approach, a basic factor, such as volume or accidents, if severe enough, could warrant all-way stop control, while a combination of factors, if their magnitude was high enough, could combine to warrant an all-way stop. This approach was to specifically incorporates 5 .,, � rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrr r wrw U waw.aw.awawauwr;�m rr rrt r rode w rr Min mo raaaaaaa c,,rr dv-a „ each of the factors that residents and homeowner's associations have cited as "absent" from the process as they see it now. With technical assistance from staff of the Traffic Engineering and Safety Division and input from the technical publications of the Transportation Research Board and ITE on the safety impacts of roadway features, a preliminary residential all-way stop warrant was developed in September and October of 1991 . This preliminary warrant was reviewed in detail by the panel and their comments and concerns were incorporated into the warrant. The Residential Stop Sign Review Panel concluded their work in November and reported their recommendations for a new RESIDENTIAL ALL-WAY STOP WARRANT to Council. III. RESIDENTIAL ALL-WAY STOP WARRANT: Under the operating rules of Council, the work of the Panel was forwarded to the City's Transportation Advisory Board for their review and action. TAB carried out an extensive examination of the candidate warrant, reviewing in detail the mechanics of the warrant and how it applied to intersections currently under study. In their monthly meetings and in a special workshop in early June, TAB suggested adjustments to the candidate warrant, as well as discarding of the factors for speed limits on the approaches as the City of Naperville uses a uniform 30 m.p.h. for residential streets in accordance with Illinois statutory provisions, but retaining use of data on actual speeds of traffic. At this point in time, the candidate warrant has been prepared in a finalized form and for action by the Transportation Advisory Board at their July 11 meeting. A copy of the warrant in this form is attached to this paper as Appendix #1. Appendix #2 details a sample determination for a request with very low traffic data. Appendix #3 details a sample determination for a former all-way stop converted to two-way stop control some 6 years ago for which residents have again sought an all-way stop. Appendix #4 details a sample determination for a two-way stop at the primary crossing location of a middle school (east-west) and which is a north-south crossing on the Safe Walking School Pedestrian Route Plan for an elementary school. 6 I i Appendix #t1 6-11 -92 RESIDENTI L Toward determining the appropriate type of traffic control for the intersection of residential streets, a worksheet that comprehensively ad�dress the concerns of residents has been developed. This Residential All-Way Stop Warrant Worksheet is vvjI iThjs procedureis not to be spoied to,the intersection off a residential street with a collector or anerial street as idemdfiW in the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan. FACTOR DATA FCMB 1 . Functional classification and designation of intersecting streets as residential with speed limits not greater than 30 m.p.h. STOP -- This procedure is not applicable if one of the streets of the intersection is a collector or arterial street as identified in the City's Faster Thoroughfare Plan 2. Highest measured average of vehicle speed (85th percentile and upper limit of 10 mile per hour pace) of the four approaches. 0 points for 15.0 to 32.5 mph ----- ---- 25 points for 32.6 to 37.5 mph ---- ---- 60 points for 37.6 to 42.5 mph ----- ---� 120 points for 42.6 to 50.0 mph+ ----- ---� Subtotal for Factor 2 ------ 3. Safe Walking School Route - - Go to (b) in this section if intersection is currently protected by adult school crossing guard a. Numbers of Walking School Children on Safe Walking School Pedestrian Route (Highest crossing 1 hour period/average day) 7 2 points for each elementary school child crossing the intersection (separate from pedestrians as applied under Factor 4) "'-- 1 point for each Junior High school child crossing the intersection (separate from pedestrians as applied under Factor 4) --"- ---'- b. Proximity of Intersection to School 200 points if intersection is primary walking school route crossing 11 an elementary or junior high school) ---- -"" 100 points if intersection is adjacent to an elementary or junior high school but is not the primary crossing intersection al the school) ---- '--- Subtotal for Factor 3 "-"-"-- 4. PedestriansBicyclists (other than school) 1 point for each pedestrian/bicyclist crossing the intersection per average hour of highest four hours (weekdays - Monday through Friday) 2 points for each pedestrian/bicyclist younger than 13 crossing the intersection per average hour of highest two hours) 50 points for each visually/physically/ aurally impaired pedestrian with special needs crossing the intersection per average hour of the highest two hours ----- "--- 10 points for each approach without a sidewalk "---- Subtotal for Factor 4 8 i ,a r nr rrr'rrww�wmrwrrawwrwrarrtwrrtwaarrturawwrwwruur.«rnmmmrrtrwwrwrurrtrrtram,mrrtoououwmwumu;.urwnudr ,;w,w,.riw ' rr r rrr rwra G. 5. Traffic crash experience and types of crashes 75 points for each right angle collision during the last 12 months correctable by all-way stop control --- "'-- 20 points for each collision other than right angle as noted above ----- Subtotal for Factor 5 6. Sight obstructions and adequacy of sight distance - The lowest of the Critical Approach Speeds of each approach -----, ------, -----, ----- 20 points per C.A.S. less than 20 mph ----- ---'- or 50 points per C.A.S. less than 10 mph ----- or 75 points per C.A.S. less than 5 mph ----- ----- Subtotal for Factor 6 7. Unexpected and unusual traffic hazards and their proximity to a residential intersection 20 points for any bridge/underpass within 1 block 50 points for any at-grade railroad crossings within 300 feet 50 points for any curve/hill within 300 feet which restricts view of the intersection 25 - 50 points for any other unique situation not noted above (unusual geometrics, human factors, etc) Subtotal for Factor 7 9 8. Proximity of parks, churches, libraries, shopping centers, bus stops, YMCAs, swim & racket clubs, 25 points for each adjacent (or within 300 feet) public use facility Subtotal for Factor 8 -----" 9. Current conditions of the intersection, the approaching streets, their width, presence of shoulders and their width, street lighting, parking 25 points for street width < 22 feet ---- '"� If street width > 36 feet Note 11: Stop control of any approach wider than 36 feet will experience operational problems and present a special hazard. 15 points for street approaches with -_ roll curbs - 20 points for no street lighting 10 points for on-Street parking within 50 feet on any of approach --� "--- Subtotal for Factor 9 "---- 10. Traffic volumes a. Total of all approach traffic volumes 1 point for each vehicle approaching intersection during average hour of 8 hours of an average weekday b. Adjustment for unequal approach volumes Subtract following points for unequal approach volumes (total of minor street less than average of 160 vehicles per hr): 0 points for minor volume greater than 160 ---- ---" 50 points for minor volumes of 120 to 159 -- ---- 10 1 � 1 � „xa rann�awwwwwarrmwruuruuruwuwrwwm enwwruwwJwau;mr rrumrwrwrwrw wau euoururiruxrawwuuuxrtrxaa rtrtm m r as raam r. a unmmmmrr m✓.uwxw,m.wmwsmar rwa wM�:,.wwaao a 100 points for minor volumes of 100 to 119 ---- ---- 120 points for miner volumes of 75 to 99 -•-- ---- 150 points for minor volumes of 40 to 74 ---- - - - - Subtotal for Factor 10 11. Adjacent All-Way Stops Subtract 100 points if any adjacent intersection has all-way stop or signal control Subtract 50 points if any adjacent intersection stops or yields same street Subtotal for Factor 11 TOTAL POINTS OF FACTORS Recommend Residential All-Way Stop Control as Warranted if sum exceeds 500 points) ii 1 r nTlm rtrtrtlF' 4NulrtR4furt(uN N96�4Wo-9WbwNNN4NNNGNkGGNGNkkGkfl�YmrArrrmirvrvrvdhryrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvry rvrvrvrvry(('!lff ll lf„fwWQRRRf flrtf rt(rc/rt(uc amruam04/W' aRmaNW " aWTr r@lvT rzu�2 Appendix #2 6-11 -92 Toward determining the appropriate type of traffic control for the intersection of residential streets, a worksheet that comprehensively address the concerns of residents has been developed. This. Resi4ential All-Way Stop Warrant Worksheet is applicable tg th intsr , i r i n ' r n n miles aer hour. This procedure is not to be applied to the intersec of a reside al stt t a collector or arterial street as identified in the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan. FACTOR DATA POIRM 1 . Functional classification and designation VrS 7- b t v E 9�- of intersecting streets as residential with speed limits not greater than 30 m.p.h. �SOu7N� STOP -- This procedure is not applicable if one of the streets of the intersection is a collector or arterial street as identified in the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan 2. Highest measured average of vehicle speed (85th percentile and upper limit of 10 mile per hour pace) of the four approaches. 0 points for 15.0 to 32.5 mph -- 25 points for 32.6 to 37.5 mph ----- --"- 60 points for 37.6 to 42.5 mph ----- 120 points for 42.6 to 50.0 mph+ ----- Subtotal for Factor 2 I Safe Walking School Route - - Go to (b) in this section if intersection is currently protected by adult school crossing guard a. Numbers of Walking School Children on Safe Walking School Pedestrian Route (Highest crossing 1 hour period/average day) 12 ' I „F', «rrrrnJn rur ruauirm rmo uruou u uumramaawUauN�QmQQmQmQNQmQmQm�ss. wrauaow,ro o r, „�. 2 points for each elementary school child crossing the intersection (separate from pedestrians as applied )Q Q under Factor 4) < 1 point for each Junior High school child crossing the intersection (separate from pedestrians as applied under Factor 4) b. Proximity of Intersection to School 200 points if intersection is primary walking school route crossing Al an O elementary or junior high school) ---- ----- 100 points if intersection is adjacent to an elementary or junior high school but is not the primary crossing _ O intersection Al the school) --- ---” Subtotal for Factor 3 4. Pedestrians/Bicyclists (other than school) 1 point for each pedestrian/bicyclist crossing the intersection per average hour of highest four hours (weekdays - Monday through Friday) 2 points for each pedestrian/bicyclist younger than 13 crossing the intersection per average _ O hour of highest two hours) -�- -""- 50 points for each visually/physically/ aurally impaired pedestrian with special needs crossing the intersection per average hour of the highest two hours ----- ---- 10 points for each approach without a sidewalk ------ Subtotal for Factor 4 /-y 13 ,,;. ruumu+ruvor aururrt uruJur r r rr u w rrrofwMfinNNNNAWwJN�w4W4MNuf1uARftaRfuL�WW4WSiWfartrartra4NAXGdnYwddMF%MNM11111111mmmNw'mmm'm'n mirvry rvrvrvrvrvrvry rmmmrrrrrrrrrrvrm rnrrrrn rn rn rnnn rn r� wt,�,� l auadulrtrt6GFraPucaGWAdP1kEW6C1fwa AWOdWOdW000000wNiarwuwwrwaruml lRlrw.w.wwwQwm'wrtwr?rw.wanta lrArTIT .um,aw w000W„. 5. Traffic crash experience and types of crashes 75 points for each right angle collision during the last 12 months correctable 0 by all-way stop control 20 points for each collision other than Q right angle as noted above Subtotal for Factor 5 _----- 6. Sight obstructions and adequacy of sight distance - The lowest of the Critical Approach Speeds of each approach 20 points per C.A.S. less than 20 mph or ----- ----- 50 points per C.A.S. less than 10 mph or 75 points per C.A.S. less than 5 mph ----- ----- Subtotal for Factor 6 •�Q 7. Unexpected and unusual traffic hazards and their proximity to a residential intersection 20 points for any bridge/underpass within ._ 1 block 50 points for any at-grade railroad crossings within 300 feet ----- ----- 50 points for any curve/hill within 300 feet which restricts view of the intersection ----- ----- 25 - 50 points for any other unique situation not noted above (unusual Q geometrics, human factors, etc ----- ----- Subtotal for Factor 7 '--'-' 14 i � ✓ fffAOwJON✓xONA' u4Wkwan.w�;rtMw'Y..wwwfaNi" 8. Proximity of parks, churches, libraries, shopping centers, bus stops, YMCAs, swim & racket clubs, 25 points for each adjacent (or within D Q 300 feet) public use facility '--- "- Subtotal for Factor 8 9. Current conditions of the intersection, the approaching streets, their width, presence of shoulders and their width, street lighting, parking 25 points for street width < 22 feet If street width > 36 feet N # • Stop control of any approach wider than 36 feet will experience operational problems and present a special hazard. 15 points for street approaches with y C roll curbs _ Q 20 points for no street lighting ---- 10 points for on-Street parking within _ d 50 feet on any of approach Subtotal for Factor 9 ----- 10. Traffic volumes a. Total of all approach traffic volumes 1 point for each vehicle approaching intersection during average hour of 8 hours of an average weekday --- "-"- b. Adjustment for unequal approach volumes Subtract following points for unequal O approach volumes (total of minor street less than average of 160 vehicles per hr): 0 points for minor volume greater than 160 ---- ---- 50 points for minor volumes of 120 to 159 ---- ---- 1 xniiiru WpAWO lW.Wk✓aWW4w6l4x�d uWs114AW6VFWWW✓' 'W' .rtFrlewexwwwtuuW✓/vwrWI(dAN GdrctldNddF4(A06WWKrN6YWO wuYSNeHW mmmmr r o✓✓ u 100 points for minor volumes of 100 to 119 ---- ---- 120 points for minor volumes of 75 to 99 150 points for minor volumes of 40 to 74 /i4 q0 --- Subtotal for Factor 10 11 . Adjacent All-Way Stops Subtract 100 points if any adjacent intersection has all-way O stop or signal control - Subtract 50 points if any adjacent intersection stops or yields same — Q street Subtotal for Factor 11 TOTAL POINTS OF FACTORS — _ Recommend Residential All-Way Stop Control as Warranted if sum exceeds 500 points) 16 „ux mowm'o '� ww,wrurnwoiuwu reuurrrrcra”' r� rrrrw� .mFrr�wuwuwrwrwawwwwrvww;,w.„-yaw awx «rrrrrra aria rQUA r. U d o ra ,; Appendix #3 6-11 -92 WORKSHEET Toward determining the appropriate type of traffic control for the intersection of residential streets, a worksheet that comprehensively address the concerns of residents has been developed. This Residential ,All-Way Stop Warrant Worksheet is A991JUDII I r r is procedure is not tal be apPhod to the inter n a residential a h a or aerial street as identified in the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan. FACTOR DATA EKM 1. Functional classification and designation 4: Ytyr/° of intersecting streets as residential with NA4 )e A C speed limits not greater than 30 m.p.h. STOP -- This procedure is not applicable if one of the streets of the intersection is a collector or arterial street as identified in the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan 2. Highest measured average of vehicle speed (85th percentile and upper limit of 10 mile per hour pace) of the four approaches. 0 points for 15.0 to 32.5 mph 25 points for 32.6 to 37.5 mph 60 points for 37.6 to 42.5 mph 120 points for 42.6 to 50.0 mph+ ---- Subtotal for Factor 2 3. Safe Walking School Route - - Go to (b) in this section if intersection is currently protected by adult school crossing guard a. Numbers of Walking School Children on Safe Walking School Pedestrian Route (Highest crossing 1 hour period/average day) l 17 l � rr nu' ruauaaaanwrw,wwawawawawawawawaw nxav,wwwama ,umr urcrcrc urrukukukumd�arw* uu mo uua morva mo✓� rrrrareru ,,,,. 2 points for each elementary school child crossing the intersection (separate from pedestrians as applied under Factor 4) 1 point for each Junior High school child crossing the intersection (separate from pedestrians as applied under Factor 4) b. Proximity of Intersection to School 200 points if intersection is primary walking school route crossing 11 an — elementary or junior high school) 100 points if intersection is adjacent to an elementary or junior high school but is not the primary crossing — intersection Al the school) Subtotal for Factor 3 -�-u 4. Pedestrians/BicyCr s (ether than school) 1 point for each pedestrian/bicyclist crossing the intersection per average hour of highest four hours 2 (weekdays - Monday through Friday) ---""- 2 points for each pedestrian/bicyclist younger than 13 crossing the intersection per average hour of highest two hours) --"- 50 points for each visually/physically/ aurally impaired pedestrian with special needs crossing the intersection per average hour of the highest two hours 10 points for each approach without a -r ---� sidewalk Subtotal for Factor 4Z 18 i I n omou4r4r4r4wM4uduwewa UWIkWPwAWK/!H NAI.aWUdNfW ttttttttn F rt rtrtrtrtrtrtrt mr raa rarfu trtu rtrt aFur�4tTwdMur(dllW(r✓kW6ifR64'{fRdll+.d.Wd1MlIrtRl'd rtN6Fr0l ............. umrrr 5. Traffic crash experience and types of crashes 75 points for each right angle collision during the last 12 months correctable 2 A5700 by all-way stop control 20 points for each collision other than right angle as noted above ""' Subtotal for Factor 5 6. Sight obstructions and'adequacy of sight distance - The lowest of the Critical Approach Speeds of each approach -- j2i!�_ d 20 points per C.A.S. less than 20 mph -- or ----- ----- 50 points per C.A.S. less than 10 mph or 75 points per C.A.S. less than 5 mph 20 Subtotal for Factor 6 7. Unexpected and unusual traffic hazards and their proximity to a residential intersection 20 points for any bridge/underpass within 1 block 50 points for any at-grade railroad O crossings within 300 6fe� "---- 50 points for any curvewithin 300 feet which restricts view of C SO the intersection ----- ----- 25 - 50 points for any other unique situation not noted above (unusual geometrics, human factors, etc) '�-- S� Subtotal for Factor 7 j 9 z«.✓c,�uww�x vvvvvvv rrrrtrrr«rrrrrrrrrrr rrrawwrwr�'wrrtauaurwrtwu ruwuuw ,.,wu aaa raa¢wr¢wmwuowuowuw,,.«onmowu wo�u�wow x n � m ,.., 8. Proximity of parks, churches, libraries, shopping centers, bus stops, YMCAs, swim & racket clubs, 25 points for each adjacent (or within _ 300 feet) public use facility ---- 0 Subtotal for Factor 8 ------ 9. Current conditions of the intersection, the approaching streets, their width, presence of shoulders and their width, street lighting, parking 25 points for street width < 22 feet ---- If street width > 36 feet Note #h Stop control of any approach wider than 36 feet will experience operational problems and present a special hazard. 15 points for street approaches with �r �/t S _ roll curbs _ 20 points for no street lighting ---- 10 points for on-Street parking within 50 feet on any of approach Subtotal for Factor 9 10. Traffic volumes a. Total of all approach traffic volumes 1 point for each vehicle approaching intersection during average hour of a 8 hours of an average weekday ---- -""- b. Adjustment for unequal approach volumes Subtract following points for unequal �a approach volumes (total of minor street less than average of 160 vehicles per hr): 0 points for minor volume greater than 160 ---- ---- 50 points for minor volumes of 120 to 159 ---- -"- 20 i ,e.rr:dr. rtrrtdJNvwNNNN' 'NWdldGtlQIdONJNJNald.. A4wuJ�w�WNWnf fffRkk JWf rvfrvrvry Nrvrvrvrvrvrvrvry rvdrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rnmrc rmn mm�r rnr YJJJ(JJrc nJ!(JRJr IN lPrt dlJN!!l Rmmrmm NrlrlrrJJJN dIrTTl�rtrtJJlFlllllnrt(dwwWaGdNNNNNNIRrtN(rtINNNJN JdfdldN(«Mls'�wd NGJI NrtaUJ�1d1W rrtNrRuNfduSJl 4 2JaGd�rJ lffTT JRferoouOAJJRRRRRR,JAPe NUNUNJa'dWwXwu�w. 100 points for minor volumes of 100 to 119 ---- ---- 120 points for minor volumes of 75 to 99 �y _� 150 points for minor volumes of 40 to 74 Subtotal for Factor 10 3 11. Adjacent All-Way Stops Subtract 100 points if any adjacent intersection has all-way stop or signal control Subtract 50 points if any adjacent intersection stops or yields same street Subtotal for Factor 11 TOTAL POINTS OF FACTORS Recommend Residential All-Way Stop Control as Warranted if sum exceeds 500 points) 21 1 . ';:au rmww'ao!mwwfwwv 'wQ wifw*f "" "'"" u0 rtmWNsflwu0WWYWW4WHkyulmHrvhr'mFJ;mk,Nb4,NlWMhfhRrrvWbwr m orii Appendix *4 6-11 -92 Toward determining the appropriate type of traffic control for the intersection of resi dential ntioI streets, a worksheet that comprehensively address the concerns of residents has been developed" This Residential All-Way Stop Warrant Worksheet is I" 1 in r N h 11 i m This procedure is not to be applied to the intersection o1 a residential 31roet with a collector or arterial street as identified in the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan. MUM DATA BOM 1. Functional classification and designation k' t✓E-k ©fl )e z)e 1 e of intersecting streets as residential with 54 )k 6 4 K R� speed limits not greater than 30 m.p.h. STOP -- This procedure is not applicable if one of the streets of the intersection is a collector or arterial street as identified in the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan 2. Highest measured average of vehicle speed (85th percentile and upper limit of 10 mile per hour pace) of the four approaches. 0 points for 15.0 to 32.5 mph 30 25 points for 32.6 to 37.5 mph --'-' 60 points for 37.6 to 42.5 mph 120 points for 42.6 to 50.0 mph+ ----- ----- Subtotal for Factor 2 I Safe Walking School Route - - Go to (b) in this section if intersection is currently protected by adult school crossing guard a. Numbers of Walking School Children on Safe Walking School Pedestrian Route (Highest crossing 1 hour period/average day) 22 ,.r n awwGr(rteFww !4lrtlrtloNNNoW?w;rWJw.44N44NWNWNWNWNWNOWdNNWNWNaWaGWW�NNNNNfWN&,VCUS "" rtr m!(d ma Wrtrm rtrtrtB a6uWortf,12N RrGU RraRrrtlmMa44444 G41rtrmilal lalu«rtrrtu:, ' 2 points for each elementary school child crossing the intersection (separate from pedestrians as applied under Factor ) ''-" 1 point for each Junio igh school child crossing the intersection (separate from pedestrians as applied s- �- under Factor 4) --- "---- b. Proximity of Intersection to School 200 points if intersection is primary VX walking school route crossing Al an �/ - .200 elementary or junior high school) f 100 points if intersection is adjacent to an elementary or junior high school but is not the primary crossing intersection 11 the school) ,V Subtotal for Factor 3 71 4. Pedestrians/Bicyclists (other than school) 1 point for each pedestrian/bicyclist crossing the intersection per - average hour of highest four hours (weekdays - Monday through Friday) ----- 2 points for each pedestrian/bicyclist younger than 13 crossing the intersection per average �— a hour of highest two hours) ----- --� 50 points for each visually/physically/ aurally impaired pedestrian with special needs crossing the intersection Q per average hour of the highest two hours 10 points for each approach without a a sidewalk ----- 9 Subtotal for Factor 4 ------- 23 ,rc , R r«rrrrr«wrwc'rrrriwrrtur unwououououououououououoMwweruuerwau✓«✓m n yr ..r«rr�r rt rrn nrtrtrer«rr«rr«««mruru nrnrnrr«�✓,«m<r,wwa rM r;u�A,rrruara«,u�aumo «wrav«u aaaaawA wwc- 5. Traffic crash experience and types of crashes 75 points for each right angle collision during the last 12 months correctable by all-way stop control 20 points for each collision other than _ p right angle as noted above --- Subtotal for Factor 5 6. Sight obstructions and adequacy of sight distance - The lowest of the Critical Approach Speeds of each approach -- o 20 points per C.A.S. less than 20 mph ----- ----- or ----- ----- 50 points per C.A.S. less than 10 mph or ----- ----- 75 points per C.A.S. less than 5 mph Subtotal for Factor 6 7. Unexpected and unusual traffic hazards and their proximity to a residential intersection 20 points for any bridge/underpass within 1 block 50 points for any at-grade railroad _ O crossings within 300 feet ----- ----- 50 points for any curve/hill within 300 feet which restricts view of the intersection 25 - 50 points for any other unique situation not noted above (unusual geometrics, human factors, etc) ----- ----- Subtotal for Factor 7 24 i � rnsx'eo' uuuax "" "'rwrm'rwwWWwwW4Nlta U.O.U. WOWOWOWMOOOOWWW.WNWIN aVWJVi44ffNi4Vvu.N mr rtrR rtrrrtrrtrrrrt a4A0til d rrvrmmmmnmrvrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr nmm mm ............... FrFFrrrrrrtarl aura rurrtmmMrq rua ruuuuuu rua ruur rt 1 8. Proximity of parks, churches, libraries, shopping centers, bus stops, YMCA's, swim & racket clubs, 25 points for each adjacent (or within 2 s 300 feet) public use facility ---- ""'-" r? Subtotal for Factor 8 9. Current conditions of the intersection, the approaching streets, their width, presence of shoulders and their width, street lighting, parking 25 points for street width < 22 feet If street width > 36 feet Note #1: Stop control of any approach wider than 36 feet will experience operational problems and present a special hazard. 15 points for street approaches with roll curbs / Q 20 points for no street lighting ---- '-"- 10 points for on-Street parking within _ p 50 feet on any of approach ---- """- Subtotal for Factor 9 10. Traffic volumes a. Total of all approach traffic volumes 1 point for each vehicle approaching intersection during average hour of 8 hours of an average weekday (� _-- b. Adjustment for unequal approach volume pl, Subtract following points for unequal approach volumes (total of minor street less than average of 160 vehicles per r): 0 points for minor volume greater than 160 ---- 50 points for minor volumes of 120 to 159 ---- --- 25 100 points for minor volumes of 100 to 119 120 points for minor volumes of 75 to 99 150 points for minor volumes of 40 to 74 ---- - - - - 2 Subtotal for Factor 10 11. Adjacent All-Way Stops Subtract 100 points if any adjacent intersection has all-way — p stop or signal control Subtract 50 points if any adjacent intersection stops or yields same O street O Subtotal for Factor 11 ----- TOTAL POINTS OF FACTORS _�j%, Recommend Residential All-Way Stop Control as Warranted if sum exceeds 500 points) ye no 26 f Board Agenda Item Submittal Ix-A Requested By: William H Brimm Entered By: William H Brimm Agenda Item Title: Cook County Truth In Taxation Act-Public Hearing-Village of Buffalo Grove Calendar 2000 Tax Levy Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: 0 Consent Agenda 11/13/2000 12/04/2000 0 Regular Agenda Finance&GS 0 None Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? board? 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 NO funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. On December 4,2000 during what is known as "Tax Week" in Cook County,the Village will be required to hold a public hearing on its intent to adopt a tax levy for 2000,to be collected in calendar 2001. The determination that a hearing would be necessary occurred on October 6,2000. The Village will request a total of$7,215,545 in Corporate and Special Purpose levies,which in the Village's case are to fund employer obligations for pension (IMRF,Police and Fire). The extension, plus previously adopted abatements for the like levies in 1999,totaled $6,967,379 for an increase of 3.56% Other comments are applicable to Village debt service levies that fall outside of the hearing discloure but are incorporated into the body of the notice. Those will be discussed at the time of the public hearing. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files u . truthtaxes.pdf Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: TO: William R. Balling FROM: William H. Brimm DATE: November 13, 2000 SUBJECT: Truth In Taxation-Analysis On October 6, 2000, the President and Board of Trustees were notified that a determination had been made that the proposed property tax levy for 2000 for Corporate, Special Purpose and Pension levies would exceed the final tax year 1999 extensions for the like levies by an amount greater than 105% of those extensions. Based on that determination alone, a public hearing would be required under the Truth In Taxation Act (the "Act") regarding an intent to adopt a levy in the amounts originally noted in that determination. However, the Cook County Truth In Taxation Act requires a notice and hearing requirement regardless of how the estimated levy will compare to the prior year's extension, whether positive or negative. The levies to be proposed are $7,215,545 versus final 1999 extensions, plus abatement credits of $145,000, of $6, 967,379, for an increase of 3.56%. The detailed changes are as follows: 2000 Request 1999 Extension Change Corporate $5,060,860 $4, 820, 127 2.34 Abatement 125, 000 I.M.R.F. 734,700 722,810 ( 1.09) Abatement 20,000 Police Pension 655,827 645,409 1.61 Fire Pension 764, 158 634,033 20.52 Total $7,215,545 $6, 967,379 3.56 The intent of the Acts is not to include debt service levies as part of the public hearing process. Those levies, while disclosed against the tax year 1999 extensions as part of the public notice, will be discussed within the full context of the levy ordinance. The following is a summary of the changes that have been incorporated into the development of the subject levies for tax year 2000 consideration. Corporate Fund: The requested tax levy provides for an increase of 2.34% from the final tax year 1999 extension, net of abatement. This change is in line with the October 1, 2000 revision to the Long Range Fiscal Plan which is based on growth factors that include population served, anticipated changes in price and cost trends as measured by the Consumer Price Index, and budgetary expenditures per capita, both in current and constant dollars. In terms of a dollar change, the proposed levy would provide $240,733 in growth for use within the Corporate Fund. The Long Range Fiscal Plan is revised twice annually. The first is for tax levy determination purposes with the second for establishing certain budgetary planning targets. The growth target for tax year 2000 was 4.99% over the final tax year 1999 extension, prior to the impact of adding back the value of abatements considered in that year. Illinois Municipal Retirement Pond: This levy is to fund the calendar, 2001 estimated employer costs for IMRF, FICA and Medicare benefits provided on a mandatory basis for all eligible employees, which include a select base of employees within the police and fire service. The levy is $11,890 over the final 1999 extension after abatement consideration. That abatement was equal to $20,000, which when added back, produces a proposed levy that is 1.09% lower than that extended in tax year 1999. The change is due to the net effect of a combination of higher base salaries for employees that are members of the IMRF system, offset by a lower employer percentage of payroll burden due from the Village as part of its employers obligation. It should be noted that the employer obligations have increased overall from an historic perspective for both IMRF and FICA due to changes in mandatory benefits offered despite employer's contributions that have declined (as represented by the total percentage of wages subject to the assessment for pension and FICA/Medicare) over the last several years. The same is true for those sworn fire and police employees covered by Medicare benefits although employer contribution rates have remained static at 1.45% since the mandatory extension of that program. In addition, the Village's salary base continues to expand due to new hiring and progression through the salary plan; these employee benefits are in fact tied to salary. Employer rates over the past five years have been as follows: Payroll Year n4" FI Total Change 2001 5.87% 7.65% 13.52 ( .32%) 2000 6.19 7.65 13.84 ( 1.51%) 1999 7.70 7.65 15.35 ( 1.89%) 1998 7.99 7.65 15.64 ( 2.68%) 1997 8.42 7.65 16.07 ( 1.53%) While levy trends have been upward, past rate reductions are attributable to changes in the method of funding the actuarial liability of the Village's fund at IMRF. Recent changes in the pension code have permitted a longer window to amortize an unfunded actuarial liability which is having a tendency to lower an employer's obligation to IMRF. Additionally, continued strong investment returns for the Fund as a whole have further mitigated the Village's contribution requirements. Polioe Pension rand: The proposed levy is 1.61% over the extension for tax year 1999. The levy for 2000 was prepared by Hewitt Associates, this levy being based on the local fund performance and assumptions. The proposed levy accommodates benefits due to member police officers, providing further for a larger membership and salary base in the actuarial period under consideration. Also, with the increase in paid retirees, the employer's obligation for unfunded actuarial liabilities has increased also leading to a greater portion of the total levy committed to clearing that liability. In terms of levy-to-levy change, the proposal is 4.22% over the final 1999 request. Fire Pension Fund: The proposed levy is 20.52% over the tax year 1999 extension. This levy was also prepared by Hewitt Associates in a manner comparable to that proposed for the Police Pension Fund levy. The increased levy is to accommodate the expanded actuarial requirements of the Fund, based on salary, in order to accommodate benefits due along with added membership that impacts the eventual assumed benefits for Fund members. In addition, a series of recent benefit enhancements approved by the Illinois General Assembly have added to the cost of benefits, which is reflective in the proposed levy. An analysis is provided that details the Village's Truth In Taxation history since the tax year 1987 extension and tax year 1988. Historically, the Village has seen, on a compounded annual percentage basis, the Corporate, Special Purpose and Pension levies grow 8.15% annually over the period. Individually, the Corporate levy, has grown by 6.77% annually, while mandatory pension levies for IMRF, Police Pension and Fire Pension have increased by 3.99%, 16.03% and 21.25%, respectively. Upon passage of the levy, the required hearing certifications will be file in both Cook and Lake County. William H. Bri tm VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE TRUTH-IN-TAXATION HISTORY TEN YEAR ANALYSIS-TAX YEAR 1988-2000(AS PROPOSED) TAXYEAR CORPORATE PERCENT IMRF PERCENT POLICE PERCENT FIRE PERCENT TOTAL LEVY/ PERCENT LEVY CHANGE LEVY CHANGE PENSION LEVY CHANGE PENSION LEVY CHANGE EXTENSION CHANGE 1987 EXT 2,187,212 - 244,642 - 101,096 - 62,043 - 2,594,993 - 1988 LEV 2,307,165 5.48% 326,442 33.44% 110,185 8.99% 75,674 21.97% 2,819,466 8.65% 1988 EXT 2,293,940 - 321,001 - 111,843 - 76,210 - 2,802,994 - 1989 LEV 2,417,980 5.41% 426,656 32.91% 132,205 18.21% 85,192 11.79% 3,062,033 9.24% 1989 EXT 2,430,373 - 428,482 - 137,521 - 89,662 - 3,086,038 - 1990 LEV 2,610,487 7.41% 477,443 11.43% 150,857 9.70% 79,951 -10.83% 3,318,738 7.54% 1990 EXT 2,684,433 - 494,520 - 155,410 - 84,497 - 3,418,860 - 1991 LEV 3,404,331 26.82% 566,616 14.58% 173,284 11.50% 109,622 29.73% 4,253,853 24.42% 1991 EXT 3,425,733 - 573,887 - 180,328 - 118,488 - 4,298,436 - 1992 LEV 3,587,219 4.71% 571,443 -0.43% 257,401 42.74% 254,529 114.81% 4,670,592 8.66% 1992 EXT 3,526,113 - 561,709 - 253,016 - 250,193 - 4,591,031 - 1993 LEV 3,705,753 5.09% 610,592 8.70% 298,951 18.15% 286,362 14.46% 4,901,658 6.77% 1993 EXT 3,787,339 - 631,304 - 308,241 - 304,953 - 5,031,837 - 1994 LEV 3,972,919 4.90% 636,416 0.81% 333,892 8.32% 333,458 9.35% 5,276,685 4.87% 1994 EXT 3,959,402 - 643,232 - 334,735 - 334,626 - 5,271,995 - 1995 LEV 4,150,245 4.82% 659,799 2.58% 410,040 22.50% 403,027 20.44% 5,623,111 6.66% 1995 EXT 4,342,376 - 696,954 - 438,194 - 430,328 - 5,907,852 - 1996 LVY 4,519,040 4.07% 682,007 -2.14% 505,370 15.33% 491,014 14.10% 6,197,431 4.90% 1996 EXT 4,283,815 - 659,507 - 505,879 - 495,241 - 5,944,442 - 1997 LVY 4,508,010 5.23% 701,528 6.37% 498,270 -1.50% 528,855 6.79% 6,236,663 4.92% 1997 EXT 4,525,407 - 714,158 - 506,000 - 528,456 - 6,274,021 - 1998 LVY 4,735,790 4.65% 717,360 0.45% 572,291 13.10% 581,173 9.98% 6,606,614 5.30% 1998 EXT 4,604,735 - 715,439 - 585,020 - 595,165 - 6,500,359 - 1999 LVY 4,813,942 4.54% 719,070 0.51% 629,247 7.56% 617,992 3.84% 6,780,251 4.31% 1999 EXT 4,945,127 - 742,810 - 645,409 - 634,033 - 6,967,379 - 2000 LVY 5,060,860 2.34% 734,700 -1.09% 655,827 1.61% 764,158 20.52% 7,215,545 3.56% COMPOUNDED ANNUAL GROWTH IN TAX LEVIES-1988 THROUGH 2O00: 6.77% 6.99% 16.03% 21.25% 8.15% Notice of Proposed Property Tax Levy for the Village of Buffalo Grove I. A public hearing to approve a proposed property tax levy for the Village of Buffalo Grove for 2000 will be held on Monday, December 4th, 2000 at 7:30 p.m. at the Village Hall, 50 Raupp Boulevard, Buffalo Grove, Illinois. Any person desiring to appear at the public hearing and present testimony to the Village may contact Janet M. Sirabian, Village Clerk at 50 Raupp Boulevard, Buffalo Grove, Illinois at 847-459-2500. II. The corporate and special purpose property taxes extended or abated for 1999 were $6, 967,379 The proposed corporate and special purpose property taxes to be levied for 2000 are $7,215,545. This represents a 3.56% increase over the previous year. III. The property taxes extended for debt service and public commission leases for 1999 were $562, 853. The estimated property taxes to be levied for debt service and public building commission leases for 2000 are $1,749,308. This represents a 210.79% increase over the previous year. IV. Total property taxes extended or abated for 1999 were $7,530,232. The estimated total property taxes to be levied for 2000 are $8, 964,853. This represents a 19.05% increase over the previous year. This hearing is open to the public. The President and Board of Trustees of the Village will cause an explanation for the proposed levy and shall permit persons desiring to be heard an opportunity to present testimony within a reasonable time limit as the Board may determine. Dated this day of November, 2000 Janet M. Sirabian Village Clerk TO: William R. Balling FROM: William H. Brimm DATE: December 1, 2000 SUBJECT: Truth In Taxation- Compliance Certification Section 200/18-90 of the Truth In Taxation Act (the "Act") requires that "the presiding officer of the corporate authority" shall certify that the Village has complied with certain provisions of the Act. The provisions that must be complied with (Sections 200/18-60 through 200/18-85 of the Act) are summarized as follows: Section 200/18-60, Sets forth the requirements of the corporate authorities to determine the amount of funds to be raised by taxation for the particular tax year under consideration. This must be done no less than twenty (20) days prior to the adoption of the levy. The Village Board was notified on October 4, 1999 as to the amount to be raised by taxation subject to the constraints of the Act. Section 200/18-65. States that until it has complied with the notice and hearing provisions of the Act, no taxing district shall levy an amount of property taxes which is more that 105% of the amount which was extended, or estimated to be extended, in the prior tax year. Section 200/18-70. States the requirements that must be followed if the estimate presented per Section 200/18-60 is 105% of the prior tax years extension. In that case, the corporate authorities shall give public notice of, and hold a public hearing on, its intent to adopt a levy in the amount which is more than 105% of the prior years extension. The requirements and specifics relative to the public notice and hearing called for under the Act are also noted. Section 200/18-75. Sets the public notice requirements if the final tax levy as adopted differs from what was originally proposed and published. Sections 200/18-80 and 18-85. These sections contain the form of notice and in part set forth certain public hearing disclosure requirements. Additionally, since the Village has the power to levy taxes in Cook County, Division 2.1, Sections 200/18-101.1 through 200/18-101.60 (Cook County Truth In Taxation) also apply. This is legislation approved as part of Public Act 91-523. Generally, all of the cites noted above apply under the Act. The major -exceptions are that all levies, regardless of percentage change over the prior year's extension, are subject to notice and hearing requirement. Additionally, hearings are to take place on specified dates depending on the nature of the taxing body; for villages, the first Monday in December. Two Certificates of Compliance are attached for the Village President's signature to be affixed to the levy submittal after the tax levy is adopted. L-J U L LA- William H. Brimm czRTIFIcATz OF com mIANCE COOK COUNTY TRUTH IN TAXATION ACT TRUTH IN TAXATION ACT I, Elliott Hartstein, duly qualified and presiding officer of the Village of Buffalo Grove, Cook and Lake Counties, Illinois, do hereby certify that the 2000 Tax Levy Ordinance of said Village of Buffalo Grove attached hereto was adopted in full compliance with the provisions of Sections 200/18-60 through 200/18-85 of the Illinois Truth In Taxation Act, as amended. In addition, I do hereby certify that the Village of Buffalo Grove is in full compliance with the provisions of Division 2.1, Sections 200/18-101.1 through 200/18-101.45 of the Cook County Truth In Taxation Act. (All in Chapter 35 ILCS) In Witness, Whereof, I have placed my official signature on this the day of December, 2000. Elliott Hartstein Village President ATTEST: Village Clerk C$RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE COOK COUNTY TRUTH IN TAX&TION ACT TRUTH IN TAMION ACT I, Elliott Hartstein, duly qualified and presiding officer of the Village of Buffalo Grove, Cook and Lake Counties, Illinois, do hereby certify that the 2000 Tax Levy Ordinance of said Village of Buffalo Grove attached hereto was adopted in full compliance with the provisions of Sections 200/18-60 through 200/18-85 of the Illinois Truth In Taxation Act, as amended. In addition, I do hereby certify that the Village of Buffalo Grove is in full compliance with the provisions of Division 2.1, Sections 200/18-101.1 through 200/18-101.45 of the Cook County Truth In Taxation Act. (All in Chapter 35 ILCS) In Witness, Whereof, I have placed my official signature on this the day of December, 2000. Elliott Hartstein Village President ATTEST: Village Clerk Board Agenda Item Submittal XI-A Requested By: William H Brimm Entered By: William H Brimm Agenda Item Title: Resolution No.2000- A Resolution Regarding Corporate Personal Property Replacement Tax Distribution-2000 Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: 0 Consent Agenda 11/27/2000 12/04/2000 0 Regular Agenda Finance&GS 0 None Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? board? 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 NO funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. The Resolution,which applies to calendar,2000,is required to be adopted on an annual basis as a part of a past settlement of a class action suit brought by Cook County regarding the use of Corporate Personal Property Replacement Tax proceeds in conformance with the Illinois Revenue Act. The Village is reconfirming through this Resolution that it has complied with the Act in the receipt and distribution of such funds in 2000. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files a cpprtax.pdf Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: TO: William R. Balling FROM: William H. Brimm DATE: November 27, 2000 SUBJECT: Corporate Personal Property Replacement Taxes Use Resolution, 2000 Attached, please find a Resolution to be adopted by the Village Board regarding the use of Corporate Personal Property Replacement Taxes. The Resolution, which applies to calendar, 2000, is required to be adopted on an annual basis as part of a past settlement fo a class action suit brought by the Cook County State's Attorney regarding the use of such tax proceeds by receiving taxing agencies in conformance with the Illinois Revenue Act. The Village is reconfirming, by this Resolution, that it has complied with the Act in the distribution and receipt of such funds in 2000. The Village has continually applied the receipt of all replacement tax revenue as required by the Act and will continue to do so. This permits in part pension levies to be maintained at the lowest level in that receipts are applied against the employer's obligation for pension payments. In no case will a surplus of funds exist due to the receipt of Corporate Personal Property Replacement Taxes. William H. Brimm RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION REGARDING CORPORATE PERSONAL PROPERTY RZPIA 3=M TAR DISTRIBUTION - 2000 WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove has received $17,483.77 in distributions of Corporate Personal Property Replacement Tax revenues from the State of Illinois during calendar year 2000; and WHEREAS, said distribution was not in excess of what had been estimated to have been received during the calendar year; and WHEREAS, a question has arisen with respect to whether said receipts of Corporate Personal Property Replacement Taxes resulted in a surplus of. funds that are "available for the payment of any debt, obligation, liability, operation, fund or account or any purpose" within the meaning of Section 157 (a) of the Revenue Act of Illinois. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS that: SECTION 1. It is hereby found and declared that the amount of Corporate Personal Property Replacement Taxes actually received by the Village of Buffalo Grove during calendar 2000 has not caused a surplus "available for any debt, obligation, liability, operation, fund or account or any purpose" within the meaning of Section 157 (a) of the Revenue Act of Illinois such that the Village is required to adopt an ordinance either reducing or abating the tax levy of the Village of Buffalo Grove for calendar 2000 or requiring that any such surplus be shown as available for appropriation and expenditure in the upcoming fiscal year. SECTION 2. The Village Clerk is hereby directed to file certified copies of this Resolution with the Cook County Clerk. AYES• NAYES• ABSENT: PASSED• 2000. APPROVED• 2000. APPROVED: Village President ATTEST: Village Clerk Board Agenda Item Submittal XI-B Requested By: Ghida Sahyouni Entered By: Ghida Sahyouni Agenda Item Title: Resolution No.2000-_Approving Grant Agreement 01-124039, between the Village of Buffalo Grove and the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs. The grant is for$50,000 erosion control. Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: 11/29/2000 12/04/2000 0 Consent Agenda OVM 0 Regular Agenda 0 None Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? board? 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 NO funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. The Grant Agreement was approved at the 11/20 Village Board Meeting, the attached Resolution is also required. The Grant Agreement is between the Village of Buffalo Grove and the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs; $50,000 for erosion control. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files ErosionReso.doc Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: i Approved By: Published to Web: RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - A Resolution approving the Grant Agreement 01-124039 between the Village of Buffalo Grove and The State of Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs for an erosion control project. WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule Unit pursuant to the Illinois Constitution of 1970; and, WHEREAS, the Village plans to control erosion along the banks and bridges of Buffalo Creek as well as improving the aesthetics of the area and quality of the creek; and WHEREAS, erosion control is needed along the bridges and banks of the creek in order to reduce the risk of structural failure of the five bridges; and WHEREAS, approval of Grant Agreement 01-124039 ($50,000) is required in order to receive the Illinois First funding for this project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Buffalo Grove, Cook and Lake Counties, Illinois, as follows: 1. The Grant Agreement with the State of Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs is hereby approved. 2. The Village Manager is authorized and directed to execute the agreement on behalf of the Village of Buffalo Grove. AYES: NAYES: ABSENT: PASSED: 12000 APPROVED: 12000 Approved: Village President Attest: Village Clerk Board Agenda Item Submittal XI-C Requested By: Ghida Sahyouni Entered By: Ghida Sahyouni Agenda Item Title: Resolution No.2000- Approving Grant Agreement 01-124040,between the Village of Buffalo Grove and the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs. The grant is for$25,000 for the assessment and purchase of 12 document imaging devices and a file server. Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: 11/29/2000 12/04/2000 0 Consent Agenda OVM 0 Regular Agenda 0 None Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? board? 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 NO funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. The Grant Agreement was approved at the 11/20 Village Board Meeting, the attached Resolution is also required. The Grant Agreement is between the Village of Buffalo Grove and the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs; $25,000 for the assessment and purchase of 12 document imaging devices and a file server. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files ImageReso.doc Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - A Resolution approving the Grant Agreement 01-124040 between the Village of Buffalo Grove and The State of Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs for the assessment and purchase of 12 document imaging devices and a file server. WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule Unit pursuant to the Illinois Constitution of 1970; and, WHEREAS, the Village plans to develop and employ a paperless document management system reducing the paper flow and increasing the level of efficiency; and WHEREAS, approval of Grant Agreement 01-124040 ($25,000) is required in order to receive the Illinois First funding for this project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Buffalo Grove, Cook and Lake Counties, Illinois, as follows: 1. The Grant Agreement with the State of Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs is hereby approved. 2. The Village Manager is authorized and directed to execute the agreement on behalf of the Village of Buffalo Grove. AYES: NAYES: ABSENT: PASSED: 12000 APPROVED: 12000 Approved: Village President Attest: Village Clerk Board Agenda Item Submittal XI-D Requested By: Ghida Sahyouni Entered By: Ghida Sahyouni Agenda Item Title: Resolution No.2000- Approving Grant Agreement 00-127184, between the Village of Buffalo Grove and the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs. The grant is for$50,000 for an enhanced wireless communication network. Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: 11/29/2000 12/04/2000 0 Consent Agenda OVM 0 Regular Agenda 0 None Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? board? 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 NO funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. The Grant Agreement was approved at the 11/20 Village Board Meeting, the attached Resolution is also required. The Grant Agreement is between the Village of Buffalo Grove and the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs; $50,000 for an enhanced wireless communication network. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files E3 WirelessReso.doc Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - A Resolution approving the Grant Agreement 00-127184 between the Village of Buffalo Grove and The State of Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs for an enhanced wireless communication network. WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule Unit pursuant to the Illinois Constitution of 1970; and, WHEREAS, the Village plans to expand its wireless communication network to include the Buffalo Grove Park District, local school district and local community organizations; and WHEREAS, the project will allow for teleconferencing, enhanced joint training opportunities, and a reduction in paperwork processing; and WHEREAS, approval of Grant Agreement 00-127184 ($50,000) is required in order to receive the Illinois First funding for this project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Buffalo Grove, Cook and Lake Counties, Illinois, as follows: 1. The Grant Agreement with the State of Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs is hereby approved. 2. The Village Manager is authorized and directed to execute the agreement on behalf of the Village of Buffalo Grove. AYES: NAYES: ABSENT: PASSED: 12000 APPROVED: 12000 Approved: Village President Attest: Village Clerk Board Agenda Item Submittal XI-E Requested By: William H Brimm Entered By: William H Brimm Agenda Item Title: Town Center Tax Increment Financing Area Annual Report Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: 0 Consent Agenda 11/29/2000 12/04/2000 0 Regular Agenda Finance&GS 0 None Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? board? 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 NO funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. The Village is required to prepare and submit to the Illinois State Comptroller's Office as well as those taxing districts participating in the TIF structure, an Annual Report of activity as defined in the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act. The attached Report contains all information required and in the format recently implemented as of April 30,2000. The Report has been distributed as required and is presented as a matter of information and to provide for the necessary public oversight and disclosure requirements. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files tifannua.pdf Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: TO: William R. Balling FROM: William H. Brimm DATE: November 29, 2000 SUBJECT: Town Center Tax Increment Financing Area Annual Report Chapter 65, Section 5/11-74.4-8a(6), of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, known in part as the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act requires that an Annual Report of activity within a local tax increment financing area be submitted to the Illinois Department of Revenue within six months of the close of the fiscal year. In addition to the Department of Revenue submittal, the Report must be submitted to all taxing bodies in which the redevelopment project area is located that would be impacted by any change in annual activities within the defined area. Attached, for presentation and acceptance by the President and Board of Trustees is a copy of the Annual Report that will be submitted to the Illinois Department of Revenue on November 29, 2000 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2000. The Report is in a format required by Public Acts 91-474 and 91-478, as amended. That Act required a greater level of reporting detail, along with certifications as to compliance with the intent of the Act. Additionally, the advisory submittal to affected agencies was clarified in the Act and the Report has been forwarded to all taxing districts that were part of the 1986 public hearing requirements, which also includes those districts that were a party to the 1993 amendatory actions to the original Redevelopment Plan and Project. Upon acceptance, this Report will be filed as a matter of public record for the Buffalo Grove Town Center Tax Increment Financing Area. LAJ William H. BriPm In conformance with Chapter 65, Division 5/11-74.4 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, known as the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, specifically Section 5/11-74.4-8a(6) , and further to support the requirements of the Comptroller's Annual Tax Increment Finance Report, the Village of Buffalo Grove submits the following information relative to its tax increment financing area established on November 3, 1986. This Report is submitted as of the end of the Village's fiscal year ended April 30, 2000 and responds to information requested in Section 2 of the Report. The following commentary deals on a section-by-section basis with the informational requirements of the Act and Section 2. Any Amendments to the Redevelopment Plan. the RedevelgMmt Project Area or the State Sales Tax Boundary: The original Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project was approved by the corporate authorities as part of a series of ordinances adopted on November 3, 1986. On November 1, 1993, Ordinance No. 93-88 was adopted and the original Redevelopment Plan and Project was amended as follows: A. The completion date of the Redevelopment Project will be changed from December 1, 1989 to December 30, 2005. B. The final maturity of all indebtedness incurred by the Village will be changed from December 1, 1996 to December 30, 2005. C. The Redevelopment Plan and Project will be amended to increase the level of project costs from $7.0 to $11.2 million. From that date through April 30, 2000, there have not been any further changes or amendments to the original plan or project or the originally defined tax increment area. Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the Village: A certification dated October 1, 2000, from Elliott Hartstein, Village President, is included. Opinion of Legal Counsel: An opinion dated October 1, 2000, from Village Attorney, William G. Raysa is included and deals with local compliance with the terms and conditions of the TIF area as it relates to the Act. Activities Undertaken in FUrtheranc-.e of the Objectives of the Redevelopaent Plan: The goals and objectives adopted November 3, 1986 and as amended on November 1, 1993, were continued during the fiscal period. Rescription of Proverty Purchased, Disposed of or Redeveloped by the Village W:Lthin the Redevelopment Project/State Sales Tax Area: There was no property acquired, disposed and/or redeveloped by the Village in the year ended April 30, 2000. Analysis of Special Tax Allocation Fund and the Uses of Funds Received: Two internal funds were established to account for activities associated with the project for both capital/project and debt service expenditures at the time when the original bonds were issued in 1987. In addition, each fund was further distinguished due to the fact that a portion of the financing proceeds were non- taxable revenue bonds with a smaller portion taxable revenue bonds. When the issue was restructured in FY 1995-1996, the original funding designations were closed and remaining funds transferred to accounts established for the new issue. The restructuring bonds were issued in three series of bonds on December 4, 1995 with a the new accounting structure then put in place. Debt was again restructured in FY 1999-2000 with prior funding designations maintained. The attached detail discloses the requirements of the Act as it applies to the receipt and use of funds within the Special Tax Allocation Fund. The ending balances are designated to pay for debt service and other related charges, such as trustee and paying agent fees during the defined and amended project development period on revenue bonds outstanding. There is currently no surplus as defined by the Act held by the Village. Contracts with TIF Advisors and Consultants: The Village has not entered into any contracts with entities or person for advisory or consulting services financed by tax increment revenues as authorized by the Act. RRports Submitted by the Joint Review Board: The Joint Review Board met as required by the Act on August 18, 1999. A copy of the minutes from that meeting are included with the Report. Obligations Issued by the Village Tax Increment Allocation Revenue Bond obligations, in both a taxable and non-taxable series, were issued by the Village on June 30, 1987. All enabling ordinances and resolutions were submitted to the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs on July 7, 1987. Those bonds were restructured and refunded on December 4, 1995 through tender by the owner. An additional $750,000 was placed privately with Simon Property Group, Inc. as part of that transaction. No further debt has been issued since that date and no further debt is authorized for issuance by the Village. All debt service in FY 1999-2000 was made in a timely manner as agreed to by all parties to the transaction based on the full level of incremental tax revenues available at the time of payment. Audited Financial State mts of the Special Tax Allocation Thad: The debt service fund established for the tax increment financing area project was audited as part of the Village's overall audit process. The audit was conducted by the Village's independent auditing firm, Pandolfi, Topolsky & Weiss & Co., LLP as of April 30, 2000, following generally accepted accounting and auditing standards and practices. Copies of the appropriate pages of the Village's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report that deal in any way with the tax increment financing area are attached. Certified Audit Report: An Auditor's Opinion Letter prepared by the Village's independent auditors, Pandolfi, Topolsky & Weiss & Co., LLP dated September 15, 2000, is attached. This Letter notes the compliance relative to Section 5/11- 74.4-3 (q) of the Act. The Letter deals with all statutory issues for the period May 1, 1999 through April 30, 2000. J1 ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT COMPTROLLER' OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER DANIEL W. HYNES Oriel W.BM Name of Municipality: City of Buffalo Grove Unit Code: 016/075/32 County: COOK; Lake Reporting Fiscal Year: 2000 Basis of Accounting: Accrual/Modified Fiscal Year End: 4/30/2000 First Name: William Last Name: Brimm Address: 50 Raupp Blvd Title: Assistant Village Manager Telephone: (847)459-2609 City: Buffalo Grove Zip: 60089 E-Mail: wbrimm@vbg.org I attest to the best of my knowledge, this report of the redevelopment project areas in: Village of Buffalo Grove is complete and accurate at the end of this reporting fiscal year under 65 ILCS 5/11-74 et. seq. t,A),c,GtW",,. l )il�,r Written signature o TIF Administrator Date Section 1 (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (1.5) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (1.5)*) Name of Redevelopment Project Area Date Date Designated Terminated Village of Buffalo Grove Town Center Tax Increment Allocation District November 3, N/A 1986 *All statutory citations refer to one of two sections of the Illinois Municipal Code: the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act[65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3 et. seq.]or the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law[65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-10 et. seq.] SECTION 2 [Sections 2 through 5 must be completed for each redevelopment project area listed in Section 1.] Name of Redevelopment Project Area: Buffalo Grove Town Center Primary Use of Redevelopment Project Area*: Residential/Commercial/Office If"Combination/Mixed"List Component Types: Under which section of the Illinois Municipal Code was Redevelopment Project Area designated? (check one): Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act X Industrial Jobs Recovery Law Attached Separately Electronic Mailed Not File Document Applicable Any amendments to the redevelopment plan, the redevelopment project area, or the State Sales Tax Boundary[65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (1)and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (1)] X Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the municipality that the municipality has complied with all of the requirements of the Act during the preceding fiscal year [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (3)and 5/11-74.6-22 (d)(3)] X Opinion of legal counsel that municipality is in compliance with the Act[65 ILCS 5/11- 74.4-5(d) (4)and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (4)] 11 X Statement setting forth all activities undertaken in furtherance of the objectives of the redevelopment plan, including any project implemented in the preceding fiscal year and a description of the activities undertaken [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (A and B) and 5/11-74.6-22(d) (7) (A and B)] X A description of any agreements entered into by the municipality with regard to the disposition or redevelopment of any property within the redevelopment project area or the area within the State Sales Tax Boundary [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (C) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (C)] X Additional information on the use of all funds received under this Division and steps taken by the municipality to achieve the objectives of the redevelopment plan [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d)(7) (D)and 5/11-74.6-22 (d)(7) (D)] X Information regarding contracts that TIF advisors or consultants have entered into with entities or persons receiving payments financed by tax increment revenues produced by the same TIF[65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (E)and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (E)] X Any reports submitted to the municipality by the joint review board [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4- 5(d) (7)(F)and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (F)] X Copies of official statements in regard to any obligations issued by municipality [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (8) (A)and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (8) (A)] X Analysis prepared by financial advisor or underwriter setting forth the nature and term of obligation and projected debt service including required reserves and debt coverage [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (8) (B) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (8) (B)] X Certified audit report reviewing compliance with the Act if cumulative total in fund is $100,000 or more as set forth in 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (2), 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (9), 5/11- 74.6-22 (d) (2) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (9). 111 X *Types include: Central Business District, Retail, Other Commercial, Industrial, Residential, and Combination/Mixed. TIFSEC2_8.xls; Section 2 SECTION 3.2-165 ILCS 6/11-74.4-5(d)(b)and 651LCS 6111-74.6-22(d)(5)) ITEMIZED UST OF ALL EXPENDITURES FROM THE SPECIAL TAX ALLOCATION FUND (by category of permissible redevelopment cost,amounts expended during reporting period) Please see Instructions for amounts>1115,000. Category of Pertnlesible Redevelopment Cost[65 ILCS 5111-74.4-3(q)and 651LCS 5111-74.640(o)] R rtln Flecal Year 1.Costs of studies,administration and professional services—Subsections 1 and o 1 6 2.Cost of market sites—Subsections 1.8 and o 1.6 6 3. Property assembly, demolition, site preparation and environmental site improvement costs. Subsection 2, 0 2 and o 3 S 4.Costs of rehabilitation,reconstruction,repair or remodeling and replacement of existing publi buildings.Subsection 3 and o 4 S 5.Costs of construction of public works and improvements.Subsection 4 and o 5 $ TIFSEC2 8.xis;Section 3.2 SECTION 3.2-(65 ILCS 5111-74."(d)(5)and 65 ILCS 5111-74.6-22(d)(5)) ITEMIZED LIST OF ALL EXPENDITURES FROM THE SPECIAL TAX ALLOCATION FUND (by category of permissible redevelopment cost,amounts expended during reporting period) Please sae instructions Tor amounts>$5,000. Category of Permissible Redevelopment Cost[65 ILCS 6111-74.4-3(q)and 65 ILCS 5111-74.6-10(o)) n Fiscal Year 6.Costs of removing contaminants required by environmental laws or rules(oX6)-Industrial Job Recovery TIFs ONLY S 7.Cost of job training and retraining,including'Welfare to work"programs Subsection(q)(5),(o)(7 and o 12 S B.Financing costs.Subsection 6 and o(8) Payment of Bonded Principal 1987-2000 1,365,000 Payment of Interest Due 1987-2000 9,886.322 Paying ent Fees 1987-2000 49.218 $ 11,300,540 9.Approved capital costs.Subsection 7 and o 9 $ 10.Cost of Reimbursing school districts for their increased costs caused by TIF assisted housing Subsection 7.5 -Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment TIFs ONLY s TIFSEC2_8.xls;Section 3.2 SECTION 3.2-(65 ILCS 5M1-74.4.E(d)(5)and 65 ILCS 5111-74.6-22(d)(5)) ITEMIZED LIST OF ALL EXPENDITURES FROM THE SPECIAL TAX ALLOCATION FUND (by category of permissible redevelopment cost,amounts expended during reporting period) Please sae instructions for amounts>$5,000. Category of Permissible Redevelopment Cost[65 ILCS 5111-74.4-3(q)and 651LCS 5111-74.6-10(on Fiscal Year 11.Relocation costs.Subsection 8 and o 10 S 12.Payments in lieu of taxes.Subsection 9 and o 11 S 13. Costs of job training,retraining advanced vocational or career education provided by othef taxing bodies.Subsection 10 and o 12 S 14. Costs of reimbursing private developers for interest expenses incurred on a redeveloprnent projects.Subsection 11 A-E and o 13 A-E S 15.Costs of constriction of new housing units for low income and very low-income households. Subsection 11 F -Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment TIFs ONLY S TIFSEC2_8.xls;Section 3.2 SECTION 3.2-(65 ILCS 5M 1-74.4.5(d)(6)and 65 ILCS 5H 1-74.6-22(d)(5)) ITEMIZED LIST OF ALL EXPENDITURES FROM THE SPECIAL TAX ALLOCATION FUND (by category of permissible redevelopment cost,amounts expended during reporting period) Please see instructions for amounts>$5,000. Category of Permissible Redevelopment Cost[65 ILCS 5111-74.4-3(q)and 66ILCS 5H7-74.6-10(o)) n Flseal Year 16.Cost of day care services and operational costs of day care centers.Subsection(q)(11.5)-T Increment Allocation Redevelopemtn TIFs ONLY 7 $ TOTAL ITEMIZED EXPENDITURES Is 11,300,640 TIFSEC2_8.xls;Section 3.2 SECTION 3.1 -(65 ILCS 6/11-74.4-5(d)(5)and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22(d)(5)) Provide an analysis of the special tax allocation fund. Reporting Year Cumulative Fund Balance at Beginning of Reporting Period $ 545,835 Revenue/Cash Receipts Deposited in Fund During Reporting FY: of Total Property Tax Increment $ 847,921 $ 6,709,712 54.79% State Sales Tax Increment $ 156,278 $ 1,165,360 9.52% Local Sales Tax Increment $ 120,064 $ 992,080 8.10% State Utility Tax Increment $ - $ - 0.00% Local Utility Tax Increment $ - $ - 0.00% Interest $ 48,354 $ 1,583,703 12.93% Land/Building Sale Proceeds $ - $ - 0.00% Bond Proceeds $ - $ 1,781,658 14.55% Transfers from Municipal Sources $ - $ 14,155 0.12% Private Sources $ - $ - 0.00% Other(identify source ) [if multiple other sources, attach schedule] $ - $ - 0.00% Total Amount Deposited in Special Tax Allocation Fund During Reporting Period $ 1,172,617 Cumulative Total Revenues/Cash Receipts $ 12,246,668 100% Total Expenditures/Cash Disbursements(Carried forward from Section 3.2) $ 11,30075 0- NET INCOME/CASH RECEIPTS OVER/(UNDER)CASH DISBURSEMENTS $ 946,128 FUND BALANCE, END OF REPORTING PERIOD $ 1,491,963 TIFSEC2_8.xls; Section 3.1 SECTION 3.3-(65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5(d)(5)65 ILCS 11-74.6-22(d)(5)) Breakdown of the Balance in the Special Tax Allocation Fund At the End of the Reporting Period (66 ILCS 5111-74.4-5(d)(5)(D)and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22(d)(5)(D)) FUND BALANCE, END OF REPORTING PERIOD r$ 1,491,963 Amount of Original Issuance Amount Designated 1. Description of Debt Obligations Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds-Series 1999A $ 4,150,000 $ 1,360,263 Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds-Series 1999B $ 750,000 $ 63,700 Tax Allocation Revenue Bondes-Series 1999C $ 3,400,000 $ 68,000 Total Amount Designated for Obligations $ 8,300,000 1 $ 1,491,963 2. Description of Project Costs to be Paid Total Amount Designated for Project Costs ET-7- TOTAL AMOUNT DESIGNATED 1 $ 1,491,9631 SURPLUS-/(DEFICIT) E- (0) * NOTE: If a surplus is calculated, the municpality may be required to repay the amount to overlapping taxing districts(See instructions and statutes) TIFSEC2_8.xls; Section 3.3 SECTION 4 [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5(d)(6)and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22(d)(6)] Provide a description of all property purchased by the municipality during the reporting fiscal year within the redevelopment project area. Property Acquired by the Municipality Within the Redevelopment Project Area Property (1): N/A Street address Approximate size or description of property: Purchase price: Seller of property: Property (2): Street address Approximate size or description of property: Purchase price: Seller of property: Property (3): Street address Approximate size or description of property: Purchase price: Seller of property: Property (4): Street address Approximate size or description of property: Purchase price: Seller of property: TIFSEC2_8.xls; Section 4 SECTION 5-65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5(d)(7) (G)and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22(d) (7)(G) Please include a brief description of each project. Estimated Investment for Subsequent Fiscal Total Estimated to 11/1/99 to Date Year Complete Project TOTAL: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) $ - $ - $ - Public Investment Undertaken $ - $ - $ - Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 1: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 ==mom 0 Project 2: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 3: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 4: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 5: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 6: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 TIFSEC2_8.xls; Section 5 SECTION 5-65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5(d)(7)(G)and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22(d)(7)(G) Please include a brief description of each project. Estimated Investment for Subsequent Fiscal Total Estimated to 11/1/99 to Date Year Complete Project Project 7: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 8: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 91 Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 10: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 11: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 12: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 13: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 TIFSEC2_8.xls; Section 5 SECTION 5-65 ILCS 5111-74.4-5(d)(7)(G)and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22(d)(7)(G) Please include a brief description of each project. Estimated Investment for Subsequent Fiscal Total Estimated to 1111199 to Date Year Complete Project Project 14: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 15: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 16: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 17: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 18: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 19: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 20: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 TIFSEC2_8.xls; Section 5 SECTION 5-65 ILCS 5111-74.4-5(d)(7)(G)and 65 ILCS 5111-74.6-22(d)(7)(G) Please include a brief description of each project. Estimated Investment for Subsequent Fiscal Total Estimated to 1111199 to Date Year Complete Project Project 21: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 22: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 23: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 24: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 Project 25: Private Investment Undertaken (See Instructions) Public Investment Undertaken Ratio of Private/Public Invesment 0 0 TIFSEC2_8.xls; Section 5 Optional: Information in the following sections is not required by law, but would be helpful in evaluating the performance of TIF in Illinois. SECTION 6 Provide the base EAV(at the time of designation)and the EAV for the year reported for the redevelopment project area Year redevelopment project area was Reporting Fiscal Year designated Base EAV EAV 1986 $ 435,632 $ 14,666,208 List all overlapping tax districts in the redevelopment project area. If overlapping taxing district received a surplus, list the surplus. Surplus Distributed from redevelopment Overlapping Taxing District project area to overlapping districts County of Lake $ takisic-Tripp Community Cons. Dist#102 $ - Adlai E.Stevenson High School Dist#125 $ Lake County Community College Dist#532 $ Vernon Area Public Library District $ Vernon Township $ Buffalo Grove Park District $ Indian Trails Public Library District $ $ $ - $ SECTION 7 Provide information about job creation and retention Description and Type Number of Jobs Number of Jobs (Temporary or Retained Created Permanent)of Jobs Total Salaries Paid SECTION 8 Provide a general description of the redevelopment project area using only major boundaries: Triangle shaped parcel-east Illinois Route 83;west-Buffalo Grove Road;South-Lake Cook Road. Lake County Buffalo Grove Attached Computer Separately Mailed Not Optional Documents File Document Applicable Legal description of redevelopment project area X Map of District X Below is listed all vendors, including other municipal funds,that were paid in excess of$5,000 during the current reporting year. Name Service Amount N/A TIFSEC2_8.xis; PAYEES Page 1 of 1 VIU AGE OF ' BUFFALO GROVE , Fifty Raupp Blvd. Buffalo Grove,IL 60089-2196 Fax 847-459-7906 Elliott Hartstein Village President 847-459-2506 October 1, 2000 847-955-1145 EHARTSTE@VBG.ORG Mr. Daniel Hynes State Comptroller 100 West Randolph St., Suite 15-500 Chicago, IL 60601 Dear Mr. Hynes: I, Elliott Hartstein, Village President of the Village of Buffalo Grove, do hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, the Village of Buffalo Grove has complied with all requirements of Chapter 65, Division 74.4 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, commonly known as the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, in the establishment and administration of our Town Center District Tax Increment Financing Area established on November 3, 1986. This certification is applicable for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2000. Sincerely, gMoe) ELLIOTT HARTSTEIN Village President E H/em RAYSA & SKELTON, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 400 - 1140 LAKE STREET OAK PARK, ILLINOIS 60301-1002 GENEVA OFFICE WILLIAM O.RAYSA 115 CAMPBELL STREET RICHARD D.SKELTON PHONE: (708) 386-7273 GENEVA.ILLINOIS 60134 FAX: (70B) 386-4253 PHONE: (630) 232-9368 FAX: (630) 232-9483 October 1, 2000 Mr. Daniel Hynes Illinois State Comptroller 100 W. Randolph Street Suite 15-500 Chicago, IL 60601 Dear Mr. Hynes: The undersigned is the Village Attorney for the Village of Buffalo Grove. It is my legal opinion as said counsel that for the fiscal year ended on April 30,2000,the Village of Buffalo Grove is in compliance with the Illinois Real Property Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (Chapter 65, Act 5, Division 74.4 of the Illinois Compiled Statues) in regards to the Town Center District Tax Increment Financing Area established on November 3, 1986. Very truly yours, William G. Raysa cc: William Balling William Brimm WGR/vas C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\Sept 00VI dept of rev bg.wpd VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE ANNUAL REPORT-TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ALLOCATION BONDS FISCAL YEAR ENDED-APRIL 30,2000 PLEDGED TAXES ACCOUNT-SERIES 1995/1999 RESTRUCTURING ISSUE: BALANCE-MAY 1,1999 675,760.45 DEPOSITS-MAY 1,1999 THROUGH APRIL 30,2000 INTEREST EARNINGS 47,951.34 INCREMENTAL PROPERTY TAXES 847,920.72 INCREMENTAL SALES TAXES 276,745.33 EXPENDITURES-MAY 1,1999 THROUGH APRIL 30,2000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS 415,000.00 INTEREST PAYMENTS 484,500.00 PAYING AGENT FEES 2,750.00 OTHER PAYMENTS 0.00 BALANCE AVAILABLE APRIL 30,2000 946,127.84 ANALYSIS OF BALANCES AVAILABLE IN SPECIAL TAX ALLOCATION FUNDS: PLEDGED TAXES ACCOUNT-SERIES 1995/1999 RESTRUCTURING ISSUE: INTEREST EARNINGS ON ALL DEPOSITS 47,558.75 INCREMENTAL PROPERTY TAXES 622,764.29 INCREMENTAL SALES TAXES 275,804.80 BALANCE AVAILABLE-,APRIL 30,2000 946,127.84 TAX INCREMENTAL ASSESSED VALUATION BY TAX YEAR: CHANGE% EXTENSION CHANGE% 1986 - - - - 1987 2,310,530 - 202,369.29 - 1988 2,320,732 0.44% 199,282.66 -1.54% 1989 4,046,262 74.35% 334,669.53 67.95% 1990 5,517,703 36.37% 427,802.49 27.83% 1991 7,168,858 29.92% 557,807.40 30.39% 1992 8,073,184 12.61% 613,677.51 10.02% 1993 8,472,051 4.94% 632,184.45 3.02% 1994 7,673,451 -9.43% 561,082.74 -11.25% 1995 9,076,616 18.29% 667,857.41 19.03% 1996 11,715,867 29.08% 830,889.29 24.41% 1997 11,640,948 -0.64% 839,428.76 1.03% 1996 11,857,854 1.86% 846,650.78 0.86% 1999 14,686,208 23.68% 1,036,460.92 22.42% ANALYSIS OF BALANCES IN SPECIAL TAX ALLOCATION FUNDS BY YEAR OF DEPOSIT: PLEDGED TAXES ACCOUNT-SERIES 1995/1999 RESTRUCTURING ISSUE: PLEDGED FOR FUTURE DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT FY 1998-1999 0.00 FY 1999-2000 946,127.84 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE TOWN CENTER TAX INCREMENT REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT JOINT REVIEW BOARD MINUTES AUGUST 18, 1999 The Village of Buffalo Grove Joint Review Board convened for the purposes of meeting the statutory obligations of Section 5/11-74.4-5(e) of the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act by holding the second annual meeting since approval of the proposed amendments to the original TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project adopted by the JRB on August 12, 1993. The Board met on August 18, 1999 in the Trustees Conference Room with the following in attendance: The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. Martha Weiss, Buffalo Grove Park District and William H. Brimm, Village of Buffalo Grove Assistant Village Manager/Director of Finance and General Services. Not in attendance but invited were the Aptakisic Tripp Community Consolidated School District #102, Adlai Stevenson High School District #125, County of Lake, Indian Trails Public Library District, Vernon Area Public Library District, Community College District #532 and the public member-at-large. The meeting was opened and the minutes for the August 14, 1996 was approved. A brief overview of the statutory purposes for the session was made for the record. Bill Brimm reviewed his memo of July 15, 1999 which summarized the current status of the redevelopment project area based on activity since the 1996 Board meeting. It was noted that activity within the District has continued over the past three years toward furthering the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan and Project. Brimm noted that all payments continue to be made to both District #102 and the Buffalo Grove Park District under the terms of the Payment Agreement which was recently amended as part of the 1999 restructuring to be an Escrow Agreement. All scheduled debt service since 1996 continues to be met on a current basis. The next scheduled payment of bond principal and interest is December 30, 1999 and at present there is sufficient funds on hand to provide for that payment. The meeting concluded with it noted that no further duty is required of the Joint Review Board to convene relative to development efforts now being considered by the Village for the Area. Being so noted, the next scheduled meeting of the Joint Review Board will not occur until August, 2002, in that the statute requires meetings every three years from this point forward to final dissolution of the Area, anticipated to occur as of December 30, 2005. The meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m. William H. Brim VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS NOTES TO GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 2000 (CONTINUED) 5. Long-Term Debt (Continued) Changes in Long-Term Debt (Continued) Balance Balance May 1. 1999 Additions Retirements Ayri130, 2000 General Long-Term Debt Account Group General Obligation Bonds $2,500,000, 4.5-5.8% General Corporate Purpose Bond Series of 1994; payable in annual installments of$5,000 to $300,000 through June 30, 2009 1,900,000 - 200,000 1,700,000 $3,000,000, 5.4-5.75% General Corporate Purpose Bond Series of 1995A; payable in annual installments of$100,000 to $300,000 through - December 30, 2014 2,900,000 100.000 2.80C.000 Total General Obligation Bonds $ 8.638 $ - $ 672,968 $ 7.965I4 Tax Increment Financing Area Bonds $5,100,000, 8.5% Tax Increment Financing Area Senior Lien Bond Series 1995-A; payable in annual installments of$270,000 to $815,000 through December 30, 2005 $ 4,150,000 $ - $4,150,000 $ - $750,000, 8.5% Tax Increment Financing Area Junior Lien Bond Series 1995-B; payable at maturity on December 30, 2005 750,000 - 750,000 - 24 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS NOTES TO GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 2000 (CONTINUED) 5. Long-Term Debt (Continued) Changes in Long-Term Debt (Continued) Balance Balance May 1, 1999 Additions Retirements April 30, 2000 General Long-Term Debt Account Group Tax Increment Financing Area Bonds $3,400,000, 7% Tax Increment Financing Area Subordinated Second Lien Bond Series 1995-C; payable at maturity on December 30, 2005 3,400,000 - 3,400,000 - $4,150,000. 8.5% Tax Increment Financing Area Town Center Bond Series 1999A; payable in annual installments of$415,000 to $815,000 through December 30, 2005 - 4,150,000 415,000 3,735,000 $750,000, 7% Tax Increment Financing Area Town Center Bond Series 199911; payable at maturity on December 30, 2005 - 750,000 - 750,000 $3,400,000,7% Tax Increment Financing Area Town Center Bond Series 1999C;payable at maturity on December 30, 2005 - 3,400,000 - 3,400•000 Total Tax Increment Financing Area Bonds $ 8-300.000 $ 8.300.000 $ 7,88LM 25 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS NOTES TO GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 2000 (CONTINUED) 5. Long-Term Debt (Continued) Advance Bond Refundings (Continued) Furthermore, in 1999, the 1996 TIF Bonds were further restructured in order to place all interest earned on bonds issued on a taxable basis as well as to eliminate a provision that had authorized for issuance up to $1,200,000 additional bonds based on development related performance. The 1996 Bonds originally totaled $9,250,000 and through paydown totaled $8,300,000 at the time of restructuring. The new bonds, like the original as well as the 1996 Bonds, are secured by the incremental property and sales tax revenue derived from within the TIF district and are not a direct obligation of the Village. As such, there is no direct economic impact to the Village due to the restructuring of this debt. 6. Employee Retirement Systems A. Illinois Municipal Retirement Plan Description The Village contributes to the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF), a defined benefit agent multiple-employer public employee retirement system that acts as a common investment and administrative agent for local governments and school districts in Illinois. All employees hired in positions that meet or exceed the prescribed annual hourly standard, except sworn police officers and firefighters, must be enrolled in IMRF as participating members. Pension benefits vest after 8 years'of service. Participating members who retire at or after age 60 with 8 years of service are entitled to an annual retirement benefit, payable monthly for life, in an amount equal to 1 2/3% of their final rate (average of the highest 48 consecutive months' earnings during the last 10 years) of earnings, for each year of credited service up to 15 years, and 2% for each year thereafter. IMRF also provides death and disability benefits. These benefit provisions and all other requirements are established by Illinois State Statute. The Village does not issue stand-alone financial reports for its participation in IMRF. However, IMRF issues a publicly available report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information for the plan as a whole, but not for individual employers. That report can be obtained from IMRF, 2211 York Road, Suite 500, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523. 29 EXHIBIT 4 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS DEBT SERVICE FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET APRIL 30, 2000 TAX INCREMENT STREET SPECIAL SERVICE FACILITIES FINANCING MAINTENANCE FUND AREA FUND DEVELOPMENT FUND AREA FUND TOTAL ASSETS Cash and Investments S 31,264 S 714,911 $ 141,889 S 946,127 S 1,834,191 Receivables: Property Taxes 163,201 1,582,371 230,353 1,036,461 3,012,386 10 i Mjnicipai Sales Tax - - - 37,663 37,663 TOTAL ASSETS S 194,465 S 2,297,282 S 372,242 S 2,020,251 S 4,884,240 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE LIABILITIES Deferred Property Taxes S 100,628 $ 891,570 S 142,159 S 528,288 S 1,662,645 TOTAL LIABILITIES 100,628 891,570 142,159 528,288 1,662,645 FUND BALANCE Reserved For Debt Service 93,837 1,405,712 230,083 1,491,963 3,221,595 TOTAL FUND BALANCE 93,837 1,405,712 230,083 1,491,963 3,221,595 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE S 194,465 S 2,297,282 S 372,242 S 2,020,251 S 4,884,240 61 EXHIBIT 5 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS DEBT SERVICE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES For The Year Ended April 30, 20M TAX INCREMENT STREET SPECIAL SERVICE FACILITIES FINANCING MAINTENANCE AINTENCE FUND AREA FUND DEVELOPMENT FIND AREA FUND TOTAL REVENUES Property Taxes S 106,792 S 1,469,413 S 1T6,�1 S 944,660 S 2,697,516 Intergovernnental - 157,167 157,167 Interes 384 52,461 2,455 51,442 106,742 t TOTAL REVENUES 107,176 1,521,874 179,106 1,153,269 2,961,425 EXPENDITURES Principsl Retirement 100,000 1,100,000 57Z,968 415,000 1,18,389, 33 Interest and Fees 162,300 449,821 290,362 457,250 , 33 7 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 262,300 1,549,821 863,330 902,250 3,577,701 Exosss (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures (155,124) (27,947) (684,224) Z51,019 (616,276) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating Transfers in 215,000 736,120 120,064 1,071,184 TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) 215,000 - 736,120 120,064 1,071,184 xcess (deficiency) of revenxx:s over 454,908 expenditures and other sources (uses) 59,876 (27,947) 51,896 371,083 Fund Balances at beginning of year 33,961 1,433,659 178,187 1,120,880 2,766,687 Fund Balances at end of year S 93,837 S 1,405,712 S 230,083 S 1,491,963 S 3,221,595 62 EXHIBIT 24 (CONTINUED) VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS Long-Term Debt Requirements General Long-Term Debt Account Group(Continued) April 30,2000 Tax Increment Tax Increment Tax Increment Total Financing Area Financing Area Financing Area Tax Increment Fiscal Series 1999A Series 1999E Series 1999C Financing Area Bonds Year Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest 2001 $ 465,000 S 297,713 $ - $ 63,750 $ - $ 68,000 $ 465,000 $ 429,463 2002 520,000 255,850 - 63,750 - 68,000 520,000 397,600 2003 580,000 209,100 - 63,750 - 68,000 580,000 340,850 2004 635,000 157,463 - 63,750 - 68,000 635,000 289,213 2005 720,000 99,876 - 63,750 - 68,000 720,000 231626 2006 815,000 34,638 750,000 31,975 3,400,000 34,000 4,965,000 100:513 $ 3,735,000 S 1,054,640 $750,000 $ 350,625 $3,400,000 $ 374,000 $ 7,885,000 $ 1,779,265 86 IPTW7 PANDOLFI, TOPOLSKI, WEISS & CO., LTD. Accountants and Management Consultants - � 2221 CAMDEN COURT;SUITE 300 OAK BROOK,HJUNOIS 60523 E-MAIL:infoQptwepacom PHONE(630)574-1040 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT FAX(630)574-s313 The Honorable Village President Members of the Board of Trustees Village of Buffalo Grove, Illinois We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the Tax Increment Financing Area Fund of the Village of Buffalo Grove, Illinois, as of and for the year ended April 30, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Village of Buffalo Grove's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statements presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positions of the Tax Increment Financing Area Fund of the Village of Buffalo Grove, Illinois, as of April 30, 2000, and the results of the Funds' operations for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. PANDOL , TO LSKI, ISS & CO., LTD. September 15, 2000 Oak Brook, Illinois 1 CHICAGO LOOP NEW YORK METROPOLITAN AREA CENTRAL ILLINOIS CHICAGO METROPOLITAN AREA INDIANA 400 N.Michigan,16-Floor 208 Greenwood Avenue 932 S.Second Street 2221 Camden Court,Suite 300 833 W.Lincoln Highway Chicago,IL 60611 Bethel,CT 06801 Springfield,II.62704 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Suite 430W Phone(312)321-0546 Phone(203)797-9681 Phone(217)744-1040 Phone(630)574-1040 Schererville,IN 46375 Fax(312)321-0481 Fax(203)744-7890 Fax(217)744-8113 Fax(630)574-8313 Phone(219)322-1099 IPT W PANDOLFI, TOPOLSKI, WEISS & CO., LTD. Accountants and Management Consultants COMPLIANCE REPORT BASED ON AN AUDIT 2221 CAMDEN COURT,SUITE 300 -- OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OAK BROOK,ILLINOIS 60523 E-MAIL:info®ptwepa.com PHONE(630)574-1040 To the Honorable Mayor FAX(630)574-8313 Members of the Board of Trustees Buffalo Grove, Illinois We have audited the financial statements of the Tax Increment Financing Area Fund of the Village of Buffalo Grove, Illinois, as of and for the year ended April 30, 2000, and have issued our report thereon dated September 15, 2000. The financial statements are the responsibility of management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the eligibility of expenditures for costs incurred incidental to the implementation of the redevelopment plan and the redevelopment projects associated with the TIF District pursuant to subsection(q) of Section 11-74.4-3 of the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and in accordance with subsection (q) of Section 11-74.4-3 of the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts, and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the Village of Buffalo Grove, TIF District, is the responsibility of management. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of the compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations to determine the government's compliance with subsection (q) of Section 11-74.4-3 of the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act. However, our objective was not to provide an opinion on overall compliance with such provisions. The results of our tests indicate that, with respect to the items tested, the Village of Buffalo Grove, Illinois, complied, in all material respects, with the provisions referred to in the preceding paragraph, and with subsection (q) of Section 11-74.4-3 of the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act. With respect to items not tested, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the Village of Buffalo Grove, Illinois, had not complied, in all material respects,with those provisions. This report is intended solely for the information and use of management and the appropriate regulatory body and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. el v PANDOLF , TO19OLSKI, WEISS & CO., LTD. September 15, 2000 Oak Brook, Illinois 2 CHICAGO LOOP NEW YORK METROPOLITAN AREA CENTRAL ILLINOIS CHICAGO METROPOLITAN AREA INDIANA 400 N.Michigan,16-Floor 208 Greenwood Avenue 932 S.Second Street 2221 Camden Court,Suite 300 833 W.Lincoln Highway Chicago,IL 60611 Bethel,CT 06801 Springfield,IL 62704 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Suite 430W Phone(312)321-0546 Phone(203)797-9681 Phone(217)744-1040 Phone(630)574-1040 Schererville,IN 46375 Fax(312)321-0481 Fax(203)744-7890 Fax(217)744-8113 Fax(630)574-8313 Phone(219)322-1099 STATEMENT 1 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS TAX INCREMENT FINANCING AREA BALANCE SHEET APRIL 30, 2000 ASSETS Cash and Investments S 946,127 Receivables: Property Taxes 1,036,461 Nunicipal Sales Tax 37,663 TOTAL ASSETS $ 2,020,251 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE LIABILITIES Deferred Property Taxes S 528,288 TOTAL LIABILITIES 528,288 FUND BALANCE -- Reserved For Debt Service 1,491,963 TOTAL FUND BALANCE 1,491,963 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE 8 2,020,251 3 STATEMENT 2 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS TAX INCREMENT FINANCING AREA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE For the Year Ended April 30, 2000 REVENUES Property Taxes S 944,660 Intergovernmental 157,167 Interest 51,442 TOTAL REVENUES 1,153,269 EXPENDITURES Principal Retirement 415,000 Interest and Fees 487,250 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 902,250 _ Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures 251,019 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) - Operating Transfers In 120,064 TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) 120,064 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures and other sources (uses) 371,083 Fund Balance at beginning of year 1,120,880 Fund Balance at end of year E 1,491,963 4 Board Agenda Item Submittal XI-F Requested By: William H Brimm Entered By: William H Brimm Agenda Item Title: Buffalo Grove Town Center Annual Accounting Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: 0 Consent Agenda 11/20/2000 12/04/2000 0 Regular Agenda Finance&GS 0 None Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? board? 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 NO funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. Annually the Village is required to perform an accounting of funds maintained by the trustee as required per Section 9 (b) of the Ordinance No. 99-27 that authorized the issuance of tax allocation revenue bonds. The intent of this accounting is to determine that sufficient funds are on hand in the Senior Lien Principal and Interest Account for the December 30th scheduled debt service payment as well as identifying whether any excess funds exist within that account that may permit the call and redemption of any outstanding bonds as permitted under the Ordinance. In the immediate case, the current accounting is for the bond year of December 30, 2000 to December 30, 2001. A comparison is made between the debt service obligations of that period against the funds estimated to be on hand after debt service and other obligations due on December 30, 2000 have been paid. Based on the attached findings, the bond trustee has been advised that the funds on hand will be in excess of the amount necessary to pay principal and interest for the bond year 12/30/00 through 12/30/01 and therefore account credits permitted under the bond ordinance can occur. The flow of funds will permit an optional redemption of $300, 000 in Senior Lien Bonds to be chosen in lot by the trustee. It is anticipated that additional incremental property and sales taxes will be received by the Village during the next accounting period. The intent of the ordinance is to provide, at minimum, 1-times coverage at the time a bond year is initiated before any uses permitted within the bond ordinance are undertaken. If such funds in excess of one-times coverage exist, another optional redemption will be made. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files tifannua.pdf Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: TO: William R. Balling FROM: William H. Brimm DATE: November 21, 2000 SUBJECT: TIF Annual Accounting Annually as of December 1st, the Village is required to perform an accounting of funds maintained by the trustee as required per Section 9(b) of the Ordinance No. 99-27 that authorized the issuance of various series of tax allocation revenue bonds. The intent of this accounting is to determine that sufficient funds are on hand in the Senior Lien Principal and Interest Account for the December 30th scheduled debt service payment as well as identifying whether any excess funds exist within that account that may permit the call and redemption of any outstanding bonds as permitted under the Ordinance. In the immediate case, the current accounting is for the bond year of December 30, 2000 to December 30, 2001. A comparison is made between the debt service obligations of that period against the funds estimated to be on hand after debt service and other obligations due on December 30, 2000 have been paid. Based on the attached findings, the bond trustee will be advised that the funds on hand will be in excess of the amount necessary to pay principal and interest for the bond year 12/30/00 through 12/30/01 and therefore account credits permitted under the bond ordinance shall can occur. The flow of funds will permit the optional redemption of $300,000 in Senior Lien Bonds to be chosen in lot by the trustee. It is anticipated that additional incremental property and sales taxes will be received by the Village during the next accounting period. The intent of the ordinance is to provide at minimum 1-times coverage at the time a bond year is initiated before any uses permitted within the bond ordinance are undertaken, which again would address the retirement of bonded principal. If such funds in excess of one-times coverage should exist, another optional redemption will be made. This report will be submitted to the bond trustee for verification as required. It is submitted to the Village Board as a matter of record. William H. Brimf VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE TOWN CENTER TAX INCREMENT ALLOCATION DISTRICT ANNUAL ACCOUNTING AS REQUIRED PER SECTION 9(b)OF BOND ORDINANCE BOND YEAR:DECEMBER 30,2000 TO DECEMBER 30,2001 TAX YEAR FOR ACCOUNTING:1999 COLLECTION YEAR:2000 BOND YEAR:12/30/00 TO 12/30/01 PLEDGED TAXES NECESSARY TO PAY PRINCIPAL 520,000.00 IN BOND YEAR-SERIES A PLEDGED TAXES NECESSARY TO PAY INTEREST 272,850.00 IN BOND YEAR-SERIES A TOTAL-BOND YEAR ENDED 12130/01 792,850.00 INITIAL BALANCE-BEGINNING OF BOND YEAR: 856,163.90 INCREMENTAL PROPERTY TAXES DEPOSITED TO DATE: 1,065,235.72 INCREMENTAL SALES TAXES DEPOSITED TO DATE: 300,177.29 INTEREST INCOME THROUGH 12/30100: 49,979.54 OTHER INCOME DEPOSITED TO DATE: 0.00 SUB-TOTAL 2,271,556.45 PAYMENTS IN CURRENT BOND YEAR(12/30l99-12/30/00) SCHOOL DISTRICT#102 417,400.28 BUFFALO GROVE PARK DISTRICT 125,000.00 VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE 58,958.16 TRUSTEE/PAYING AGENT FEES 2,500.00 PRINCIPAL-SERIES A 465,000.00 EXTRAORDINARY CALL-SERIES A 60,000.00 INTEREST-SERIES A 317,475.00 LESS:DISTRICT PAYMENTS-CURRENT BOND YEAR (601,358.44) INTEREST-SERIES B 63,750.00 INTEREST-SERIES C 68,000•00 SUB-TOTAL-CURRENT BOND YEAR PAYMENTS 976,725.00 BALANCE AVAILABLE-DECEMBER 30,2000 1,294,831.45 VIU AGE OF BUFFALO GROVE Fifty Raupp Blvd. Buffalo Grove,IL 60089-2196 Fax 847-459-0332 William H.Brimm Assistant Village Manager/ Finance Director 847-459-2507 December 1, 2000 Mr. Robert Selangowski American National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago 120 South LaSalle Street Chicago, Illinois 60690 Dear Bob: As required per Section 9(b) of the Village of Buffalo Grove Ordinance No. 99-27 authorizing the issuance of various series tax allocation revenue bonds, an annual accounting is to be conducted relative to the sufficiency of funds in the Senior Lien Principal and Interest Account and whether any excess within that Account will exist. This accounting, which must be performed no later than each December 1, is to determine the amount of pledged taxes necessary to pay the principal and interest requirement for the then outstanding Senior Lien bonds for the bond year commencing on the subsequent December 30th. That accounting has been prepared and is attached. The accounting is for the bond year of December 30, 2000 to December 30, 2001 and includes the principal and interest scheduled to be paid on the Series A bonds during that period. The accounting has been structured around all transactions that have either taken place or are anticipated to occur through December 30, 2000, the concluding date for the current bond year. Debt service is based on amounts that will be paid through that date and receipts reflect incremental sales and property taxes received and forwarded to your attention to date; none are anticipated to be received through 12/30. The only item known to change will be Other Income Deposited to Date on the revenue side of the equation which includes investment income for November and December. Therefore, the balance available is an estimate but assumed to be correct for the purposes of this accounting. However interest due on the current investment portfolio (as of 11/30/00) has not been included as part of Interest Income Anticipated through 12/30/00 and will be a component of the next reporting period analysis. Based on the values presented, the balance available is in excess of the amount necessary to pay principal and interest for the bond year 12/30/00 through 12/30/01. That amount is rounded to equal $300,000. In that funds are in excess of the amount necessary to pay the principal and interest requirement, the provisions of the fund transfers noted in Section 9 of the Ordinance apply. In reviewing the Ordinance, the balance required to be on deposit in the Senior Lien Reserve and Redemption Account (the subsequent fund transfer account) is $0 and based upon various ordinance restrictions and covenants, funds will flow through all other account groups into the General Account. At that point, deposits can be used for the purpose of redeeming outstanding bonds in accordance with the requirements of the bond ordinance. It is my belief from a review of the Ordinance that the optional redemption provisions apply as noted in Section 4 (ii) . This balance would permit the optional redemption of $300,000 in principal at the option of the Village on December 30, 2001 at a price of 100% or $300,000. Further, in that such a redemption would be partial for any given maturity of the Senior Lien bonds, the Village shall also, within the time parameters of Section 4 (iii) notify yourself as trustee of this fact, i.e. December 30, 2001 and $300,000 is to be redeemed. As trustee, you are to redeem by lot with notification made to the Village of those bonds so chosen for redemption. The time lines for this selection are also noted at Section 4 (iii) . I would appreciate your review of this matter in order to validate this accounting. If you are in agreement, please let me know in writing so that the requirements of this Section can become part of the record of the debt financing. Sincerely, Village of Buffalo Grove (,J L"L'C �--� William H. Brimm Director of Finance c: William G. Raysa William R. Balling Board Agenda Item Submittal XI-G Requested By: Steven D Husak Entered By: Steven D Husak Agenda Item Title: Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: 0 Consent Agenda 11/29/2000 12/04/2000 0 Regular Agenda Police 0 None Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? board? 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 NO funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. Requesting approval of the President of the Village Board for proclamation of December 2000 as 'Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month'. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Dec 3D proclamation 2000.di Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: i Published to Web: PROCLAMATION A PROCLAMATION DEDICATING DECEMBER 2000 AS DRUNK AND DRUGGED DRIVING PREVENTION MONTH WHEREAS, motor vehicle crashes kill over 40,000 people and injure three million every year, at a cost to society of some $150 billion annually; and WHEREAS, alcohol-related crashes account for approximately 38 percent of those deaths and injuries; and WHEREAS, the December holiday season is traditionally one of the most deadly times of the year for alcohol-impaired driving; and WHEREAS, for thousands of families across the nation, the December holidays bring a somber reminder of the loved ones they lost to an impaired driver during a previous holiday season or at any time during the year; and WHEREAS, community-based programs involving consumer education, effective laws, and strong police enforcement have proven to be successful in reducing impaired driving; and WHEREAS, organizations across the nation are joined with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to launch You Drink&Drive. You Lose., a national public awareness campaign and law enforcement initiative; and WHEREAS, Buffalo Grove is a partner in that effort to make our roads and streets safer; NOW, THEREFORE, I Elliott Hartstein, President of the Village of Buffalo Grove, do hereby proclaim December, 2000 as Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month in Buffalo Grove and hereby call upon all citizens, government agencies, business leaders, hospitals, schools, public and private institutions in Buffalo Grove to promote awareness of the impaired driving problem, to support programs and policies to reduce the incidence of impaired driving, to promote safer and healthier behaviors regarding the use of alcohol and other drugs, and to provide opportunities for all to participate in the You Drink&Drive. You Lose. campaign this December holiday season. Board Agenda Item Submittal xII-A Requested By: William H Brimm Entered By: William H Brimm Agenda Item Title: Ordinance No.2000- An Ordinance for the Levy and Collection of Taxes for the Fiscal Year Commencing on the 1 st Day of May,2000 and Ending on the 30th Day of April,2001. Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: ❑ Consent Agenda 11/08/2000 12/04/2000 0 Regular Agenda Finance&GS ❑ None Does this item Does this item include Specify Other: Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference ❑ Hardcopy Distribution required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? El Trustee Lounge El Clerk's Clerk's Office ❑ Other ❑ Yes 0No 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes 0No Exhibits can be accessed in: Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in ❑ Yes 0 No funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. This ordinance provides for the levy of property taxes within the Village of Buffalo Grove for extension and collection during calendar 2001. The proposed levy will be extended against all assessed and equalized real property valuation as of year-end 2000. Total property taxes levied at this time are $8,964,852.50 and compare to the 1999 levy of$9,433,325.25 in the process of final collection in both Cook and Lake Counties. These values presented are prior to the consideration of abatements adopted either in 1999 or contemplated for 2000. The levy-to-levy change is ($468,472.75), or (4.97%) from 1999 at this initial stage of the tax process. Staff will present the Levy as required under both the Illinois Truth-In-Taxation Act as well as the Cook County Truth-In-Taxation Act,which is applicable to the Village's proposed ordinance. It is anticipated that a series of tax abatement ordinances will be recommended on December 18,2000. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files u . levyord.pdf Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: TO: William R. Balling FROM: William H. Brimm DATE: September 11, 2000 SUBJECT: Property Tax Levy Ordinance Calendar, 2000 Attached, please find the Village's Property Tax Levy Ordinance for calendar, 2000, along with supporting detail, for consideration by the President and Board of Trustees. The proposed levy will be extended against all assessed and equalized real property valuation as of year-end 2000 for collection in calendar 2001. Total property taxes levied at this time are $8, 964,852.50 and compares to the 1999 levy of $9,433,325.25 in the process of final collection in both Cook and Lake Counties. These values presented are prior to the consideration of abatements adopted either in 1999 or contemplated for 2000. The levy-to-levy change is ($468,472.75) , or (4.97%) from 1999 at this initial stage of the tax process. The tax base that this levy will be extended against is estimated to be $1,106,212,493, and compares to a final 1999 valuation for tax extension purposes of $1,075,675,784, an increase of $30,536,709 or 2.84%. Tax base methodology is noted as part of the supporting detail of this Ordinance as it relates to the levels of valuation. The tax base for 1999 increased by 4.90%, attributable to continued levels of new construction in the Lake County portion of the Village combined with the impact of a stronger than anticipated increase in the Wheeling Township/Cook County assessment equalization multiplier. Individually, Lake County valuation increased by 5.22%, with Cook County valuation increasing by 3.65%. Of that change, 3.24% was due to the increase in the multiplier. Valuation estimations continue in a conservative manner in that significant incremental additions to the tax base that have occurred in the past cannot be anticipated into the future as build-out of the Village continues. Exclusive of reassessment, growth in total valuation from year-to-year has generally fallen to levels at or below 10% since tax year 1992 although the dollar changes remain significant. An overall tax base growth of less than 3% has not been experienced since 1983. The proposed levy will be extended in both Cook and Lake County based on the percentage values obtained from the ongoing property tax reapportionment study performed by the Illinois Department of Revenue for the Village. The 1999 allocations were 24.92% for Cook County and 75.08% for Lake. This compares to 22.54% and 77.46%, respectively for tax year, 1998. Based on these current allocations as certified by the Department, assumed approximate for 2000, the gross tax levy extended per $100.00 of assessed and equalized valuation would equal $.8104, which compares to an initial tax levy rate of $.8912 for 1999. Again, these are estimated gross dollar levies and rates prior to any abatement or collection adjustments. Any additional increase in assessed and equalized valuation over and above the estimate used in developing this levy will have the positive impact of lowering the final extension rates. Each individual levy will also be subject to abatement consideration as fund balances, reserves or alternative funding sources are analyzed and become measurable. Lastly, due to the fact that the levy for 1999 taxes within Lake County was over- extended (2000 collection) , a collection adjustment will be necessary for 2001, decreasing the final extension rate in that portion of the Village. The percentage of tax apportionment, as determined by the Illinois Department of Revenue, reversed year past trends and shifted burden from Lake to Cook. In 1998, as noted above, the Department determined that 22.54% of that year's levy be extended in Cook County; that percentage increased to 24.92% for 1999. This factor in and of itself lead to the over-extension of taxes in an amount equal to $170,741.42, which will be returned as a credit against this levy`s collection burden in Lake County. Valuation Determination: A conservative base of real property valuation upon which a final levy will be extended is important to the levy process. A best effort must be made to analyze current trends in changes in the tax base in order to calculate an estimated tax base at a level that does not cause the extension and collection of taxes at rates over the base non-Home-Rule limitations. Home- Rule permits an extension based on final dollars requested rather than on a maximum rate. The methodology used for both Cook and Lake Counties for 2000 is as follows: Cook County: The tax base valuation for Cook County for 2000 is estimated to be $219,376,122 versus a final 1999 base of $218,829, 049, an increase $547,073 or .25%. The year-to-year change is based on limited new construction valuations that will be added to the final 1999 base, along with ongoing property improvements that lead to increased valuation. As noted above, the tax equalization multiplier increased in 1999 from 1998 by 3.24%, a factor determining the final township as well as county valuation. This was a rather large increase and may be subject to some moderation when again reviewed by the Department of Revenue, which assigns these values. However, the final equalization factor will not be known until August, 2000 at the time final tax bills are ready for release in the County. Lake County: For Lake County, the estimate is $886,836,371 for 2000 versus $856, 846, 735 in 1999, an increase of $29, 989, 636 or 3.50%. The basis of the change is two-fold. First, all partial assessments for 1999 will become fully assessed in calendar, 2000. A review of real estate transfer tax transactions notes that new construction becoming part of the tax rolls continues to decline rapidly due to build-out combined with fewer residential permits drawn. In addition to the change to full assessment, there will be partial assessments for new and occupied residential and productive commercial and industrial structures added in calendar, 2000. The final valuation from 1998 to 1999 increased from $817,331, 677, or 5.22%, the lowest percentage increase since tax year 1982 and nearly identical to the change posted for tax year 1998. The Lake County real estate market continues to add in an incremental positive way to the overall tax base although tempered in forecasting due to an overall reduction of new construction. While growth rates are moderating due to economic and build-out constraints, it is anticipated that this value may be exceeded when the final values are released in mid-2001 if past trends of growth are any indication. Lower percentage and real dollar increases are anticipated for the future as growth opportunities begin to diminish as area build-out occurs. Working papers are attached that detail the changes noted in the narrative for 2000. Also, a table of final valuations by county and total since calendar 1968 is also attached. The methodology is consistent with prior year calculations, except for very minor data collection refinements. The final values are considered conservative but nevertheless important since Village tax rates are free from the non-Home Rule constraints and could be set at unlimited levels that could take advantage of every dollar of anticipated tax base growth. The Property Tax Levies: In calculating the specific request for the combined General Corporate Tax Levy, the following individual tax categories are considered: Corporate Crossing Guard Street Lighting E.S.D.A. Ambulance Service Police Protection Street and Bridge Fire Protection The amount of tax dollars requested for 2000 are based not only on maintaining committed levy ceilings that do not exceed limits imposed on non-Home-Rule agencies for specific levies, if applicable, but also continue to utilize the growth values of the Long Range Fiscal Plan for the Fund for the base adjustment to this year's levy. That Plan, which utilizes methodology incorporating per- capita expenditures, population growth, and inflationary trends, provides a guideline for Fund expenditure growth. These growth values will apply to the tax levies necessary to fund a portion of the Fund's expenditure base. Any deviation from the growth values of the Plan would be due to a stated budgetary or policy consideration that would warrant such a deviation. The current growth profile for FY 2001-2002, at this time, is 5.02%, and this value was used to calculate the individual Corporate levies. The final 1999 taxes as extended were utilized as the base upon which growth was established for the 2000 levy. A copy of the forecasting plan, which includes final budgetary values since FY 1987-1988, which is the basis for the tax levy determination, is attached. The combined Corporate Tax Levy requested for extension totals $5,060,840, for the above individual categories. This compares to the 1999 gross levy request of $4,813, 940 and final extension of $4, 820,127, an increase of $246, 900/5.13% and $240,713/4.99%, respectively. Pension Levies: As in prior years, three pension or Special Purpose levies will be extended as required by the Illinois Pension Code. The are for: 1. Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 2. Police Pension Fund 3. Fire Pension Fund The IMRF levy has been developed based on salary projections for calendar, 2001 for all participating (IMRF/FICA) employees other than those employed in Water and Sewer and Golf Course operating departments, along with projected salaries of non-participating (FICA only) employees. The projected salaries of Water and Sewer and Golf Course employees are deducted from the gross salary and wage projections because employer pension obligations are accounted for within those Funds as operational expenses rather than through the extension of a levy for the expense. The calendar, 2001 rate for payroll deductions for the employer share totals 13.52% of qualifying salary, a decrease from the 2000 rate of 13.84%. Salary expansion is modest, based on prior trending and adjusted for anticipated hiring trends. Any final funding deficiency will be made up with interest income and Corporate Fund operating transfers as authorized under current Corporate Fund Fund Balance policy rather than through an increase over and above the levy proposal. It is also necessary to levy for Medicare obligations for sworn police and firefighter/paramedics hired after July 1, 1987 due to legislative mandate. That rate is 1.45% of eligible salaries. As regarding the IMRF levy, that rate is reflective of a new policy adopted by the IMRF Board of Trustees for overfunded employers. In that the Village is more than 100% funded, the overfunded position will be amortized over 10 years, reducing the employer's rate of funding. This amortization option will lead to somewhat moderated rates over that period and is the result of superior investment performance by the Fund over the past few years. It should be noted that certain conditions can cause an overfunding position to change to one of underfunding. However, those are reviewed by the IMRF actuary on an annual basis in determining the final employer rate. The Police Pension Fund levy has again been independently calculated by Hewitt Associates based on an actuarial review of the Fund and its membership as of April 30, 1999. The Annual Report of Condition for the Fund has been completed and is part of this packet and was presented to the President and Board of Trustees as of April 30, 2000 with some estimates calculated for calendar 2001. The presentation of the Report is a requirement of the Pension Code and must precede to the adoption of an annual tax levy. The Fire Pension Fund levy has also been prepared based on an actuarial calculation prepared by the Hewitt Associates as of April 30, 1999, along the same criterion as the Police Pension Fund. The Annual Report of Condition for the Fund has also been completed and is also part of this packet, and was presented to the President and Board of Trustees as of April 30, 2000 with some estimates calculated for calendar 2001, as required. As with the Police Pension Fund, presentation of the Report is a requirement within the Pension Code and must precede the adoption of an annual tax levy. As part of their pension oversight activities, the Illinois Department of Insurance provides a recommended levy for local fire and police pension funds. However, the Village can utilize an independent actuarial review of the fund(s) for purposes of establishing a levy and as noted, this has been performed by Hewitt Associates. However, as of this date, the Department has not provided such a recommended levy. If past practice is any indication of what would be expected from the Department, the independent levy recommendation will provide significant tax savings for the Village while meeting the objectives of the Illinois Pension Code. The levies requested for the three pension programs total $2, 154, 685 versus $1, 966,309 levied and $2,002,252 extended in 1999, an increase of 9.58% and 7.61%, respectively. Debt Service Levies: The debt levies to be considered are for the following issues and purposes: Corporate Purpose Bonds-Series 1992-Facilities-ADA/Fire Administrative Corporate Purpose Bonds-Series 1993-A-Advance Refunding of Series 1986 and 1987 Corporate Purpose Bonds (Partial) Corporate Purpose Bonds-Series 1994-Facilities-Metra Station, Street Improvements Corporate Purpose Bonds-Series 1995-A-Road Construction and Facilities Development Corporate Purpose Bonds-Series 1998-Advance Refunding of Series 1990 Water System Revenue Bonds The total amount levied is $1,749,308 versus $2,653,076 for the 1999 levy, a decrease of $903,768 or 34.06%. Abatements adopted for credit against the 1999 debt service levies totaled $2, 114,317, or 79.69% of that period's debt service needs whose security for the payment of principal and interest is an unlimited extension of dollars needed against the tax base. It is anticipated that tax abatements will be presented for consideration after additional analysis of all levies is undertaken prior to December 31, 2000. Such consideration will be based on an analysis of debt service fund balance, operating reserves, transfers from ongoing operations, and alternative funding sources, especially from water and sewer as well as golf rates and fees. Tax Abatements: Any property tax levy can be reduced up to 100% of the original request prior to the final extension of taxes. As stated, complete and/or partial abatements will be presented for certain of the debt service levies and possibly for pension levies. Property tax abatement ordinances will be presented to the President and Board of Trustees prior to December 31, 2000. An analysis of tax abatements against the final tax levy from tax year 1980 is attached for informational purposes. The analysis notes gross levy as adopted, total abatements processed, percentage of levy, and abatement value per $100 A.E.V. Truth-in-Taxation: The Act establishing Truth-in-Taxation requires that a proper notice and hearing be conducted if the tax levy for Corporate and Special Purpose Tax Levies, as proposed, exceed the prior year's like extension by 5% or more. However, since the Village has the power to tax within Cook County, the Cook County Truth In Taxation Act will apply for 2000. That Act requires that notice and hearing occur during December, 2000 regardless of the change in the proposed levy versus the past year's extension. That hearing is scheduled for Monday, December 4, 2000 with adoption of the Ordinance also scheduled for that evening. As for the primary obligations under Truth In Taxation, the proposed levies for Corporate and Special Purpose levies total $7,215,545 compared to the final 1999 extension of $6,822,379 an increase of 5.76%. Information regarding Truth-in- Taxation is attached. The levy determination has been made by the Corporate Authorities within the parameters of the Act. Con naion: The 2000 Property Tax Levy as proposed does not contemplate any new taxes or levies. Methodology used in the Long Range Fiscal Plan was again used as the basis for expansion of certain of the Corporate Purpose tax levy requests rather than being totally a function of growth in the overall tax base. The final levy as adopted will be carefully analyzed for abatement opportunities, several of which will be processed before calendar year-end. In that abatements can be filed nearly to the time of final tax extension, the review process can be extended into the overall budgetary process in order to determine if excess finds exist to reduce the final local tax burden. As a final note, in Section 11 of the Ordinance, reference is made to the tax levy requirements for the debt service needs for Special Service Areas #1, 2 and 3. The levies required to support the principal and interest due on the limited general obligation bonds issued for infrastructure development in the special service areas total $1,688,212.50. This is a limited general obligation tax that is extended only within the defined area of the approved special service areas. i.,J V .L"-..„... / William H. Brimy ORDINANCE NO. 2000- AN ORDINANCE FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR C004ENCING ON THE 1ST DAY OF MAY, 2000 AND ENDING ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL, 2001 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, COUNTIES OF COOK AND LAKE, ILLINOIS, A HOME-RULE COMMUNITY: SECTION 1. That there be and is hereby levied upon all the taxable property within the corporate limits of said Village of Buffalo Grove, Counties of Cook and Lake, State of Illinois, the total sum of Eight Million Nine Hundred Sixty- Four Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty-Two Dollars and Fifty Cents ($8,964,852.50) for the following specific purposes and for the fiscal year commending May 1, 2000 and ending April 30, 2001. SECTION 2. General Corporate Tax. A tax is hereby imposed for the General Corporate purposes in this Village in the amount of Five Million Sixty Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty Dollars ($5,060, 840.00) spread equally over the value, as assessed and equalized by the Department of Revenue of all the taxable property within the corporate limits therein. SECTION 3. Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund Tax. A further tax is hereby imposed for the purpose of Village retirement in this Village in the amount of Seven Hundred Thirty-Four Thousand Seven Hunderd Dollars ($734,700.00) spread equally over the value, as assessed and equalized by the Department of Revenue of all taxable property therein, all in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 40, Section 5/7-171 of the Illinois Pension Code. SECTION 4. Facilities Development Debt Service Fund. A further tax is hereby imposed for the repayment of the Corporate Purpose General Obligation Bonds, Series 1992, bond principal and interest in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Nine Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($259,100.00) spread equally over the value, as assessed and equalized by the Department of Revenue of all taxable property therein, all in accordance with Chapter 65, Section 5/8-4-25 of the Illinois Municipal Code and by adoption of Ordinance No. 92-75 SECTION 5. Police Pension Fund. A further tax is hereby imposed for the purpose of continuing to provide a Police Pension Fund in this Village in the amount of Six Hundred Fifty-Five Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty-Seven Dollars ($655,827.00) spread equally over the value, as assessed and equalized by the Department of Revenue of all the taxable property therein all in accordance with the provision of Chapter 40, Section 5/3-125 of the Illinois Pension Code. SECTION 6. Firefiahter's Pension Fund. A further tax is hereby imposed for the purpose of continuing to provide a Firemen's Pension Fund in this Village in the amount of Seven Hundred Sixty-Four Thousand One Hundred Fifty-Eight Dollars ($764, 158.00) spread equally over the value, as assessed and equalized by the Department of Revenue of all the taxable property therein, all in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 40, Section 5/4-118 of the Illinois Pension Code. SECTION 7. Corporate Purpose General Obligation Bonds-Series 1993-A. A further tax is hereby imposed for the retirement of Corporate Purpose General Obligation Bonds, bond principal and interest, in the amount of Six Hundred Ninety-Nine Thousand Three Hundred Seven Dollars and 50 Cents ($699,307.50) spread equally over the value, assessed and equalized by the Department of Revenue of all taxable property therein, all in accordance with Chapter 65, Section 5/8-4-25 of the Illinois Municipal Code and by adoption of Ordinance No. 93-18. SECTION 8. Corporate Purpose General Obligation Bonds-Series 1994. A further tax is hereby imposed for the retirement of Corporate Purpose General Obligation Bonds, bond principal and interest, in the amount of Two Hundred Thirty-Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars ($239, 925.00) spread equally over the value, assessed and equalized by the Department of Revenue of all taxable property therein, all in accordance with Chapter 65, Section 5/8-4-25 of the Illinois Municipal Code and by adoption of Ordinance No. 94-25. SECTION 9. Corporate Purpose General Obligation Bonds-Series 1995-A. A further tax is hereby imposed for the retirement of Corporate Purpose General Obligation Bonds, bond principal and interest, in the amount of Two Hundred Forty-Six Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($246, 100.00) spread equally over the value, assessed and equalized by the Department of Revenue of all taxable property therein, all in accordance with Chapter 65, Section 5/8-4-25 of the Illinois Municipal Code and by adoption of Ordinance No. 95-32. SECTION 10. Corporate Purpose General Obligation Bonds-Series 1998. A further tax is hereby imposed for the retirement of Corporate Purpose General Obligation Bonds, bond principal and interest, in the amount of Three Hundred Four Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy-Five Dollars ($304,875.00) spread equally over the value, assessed and equalized by the Department of Revenue of all taxable property therein, all in accordance with Chapter 65, Section 5/8-4-25 of the Illinois Municipal Code and by adoption of Ordinance No. 98-82. SECTION 11. A further tax is hereby levied for the retirement of principal and interest on Special Service Area General Obligation Bonds, in the amount of One Million Six Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Twelve Dollars and Fifty Cents ($1, 688,212.50) spread equally over the value, assessed and equalized by the Department of Revenue of all taxable property only within Village of Buffalo Grove Special Service Areas No. 1, 2, and No. 3 all in accordance with Chapter 35, Section 235/4 of the Illinois Revenue Code and by adoption of Ordinance Nos. 91-41, No. 94-10, and No. 93-78, respectively. LEVIED FUNDS General Corporate $ 5,060,860.00 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 734,700.00 Facilities Development Debt Service-Series 1992 259,100.00 Police Pension Fund 655,827.00 Firefighter's Pension Fund 764,158.00 Corporate Purpose General Obligation Bonds: Series 1993-A (Arboretum & Facilities 699,307.50 Refunding) Series 1994 239, 925.00 Series 1995-A 246,100.00 Series 1998 (Water Refunding) 304,875.00 Sub Total-Village Direct Tax Levies $ 8, 964,852.50 Special Service Areas #1, 2 and 3 1,688,212.50 Grand Total-Tax Levy $10, 653,065.00 SECTION 12. The Clerk of said Village of Buffalo Grove, Illinois is hereby authorized to file a copy of this Ordinance, duly certified, along with any statutory representations or certifications, with the County Clerk of Cook County, Illinois, and the County Clerk of Lake County, Illinois, within the time limit prescribed by law. SECTION 13. If any item or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of such item or the remaining portion of this Ordinance. ,SECTION 14. Detailed Appropriations by line item for the fiscal year commending on the 1st day of May, 2000 and ending on the 30th day of April, 2001, along with corresponding levy by Fund are attached as Exhibit "A" to this Ordinance. SECTION 15. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval and recording, as prescribed by law. This Ordinance shall not be codified. AYES• NAYES: ABSENT: PASSED this day of 2000. APPROVED this day of 2000. Village President ATTEST: Village Clerk EXHIBIT "A" VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE APPROPRIATION/LEVY May 1, 2000-April 30, 2001 CORPORATE FUND APPROPRIATION LEVY Legislative Salaries-Elected Officials $ 33,000 Salaries-Part-Time 300 Dues & Memberships 28,500 Professional Training 3,000 Telephone 2,000 Travel 1,500 Subscriptions & Publications 100 Supplies-Office 1,000 Reception & Community Affairs 4,500 Plan Commission 5,000 Blood Commission 150 Fire & Police Commission 8,000 Buffalo Grove Days 12,000 Other Boards & Commissions 11,000 Office Furniture & Equipment 1,500 Cable Television Programming 25,750 Consulting Fees-Other 17,500 Senior Citizen Taxi Cab Subsidies 2,500 All Other Expenses 2,500 Total Appropriated Funds-Legislative $ 159,800 Office of Village Manager Salaries-Full-Time $ 500,000 Salaries-Part-Time 13,000 Premium Pay-Longevity 1,500 Group Medical Insurance 46,000 Professional Training 8, 000 Dues & Memberships 5,100 Telephone 4,200 Tuition Reimbursement 1,250 Travel 2,500 Per Diem Allowance 4, 650 Maintenance Contracts 100 Printing 5,000 Newsletter 27,500 Supplies-Office 1,550 Subscriptions & Publications 1,300 Unemployment Insurance 560 ICMA/RC Deferred Compensation 9,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Dept Equipment 750 Gasoline 900 Maintenance & Repairs-Parts 400 Maintenance & Repairs-Labor 700 Overhead 1,000 Contractual Auto Services 1, 600 Office Furniture & Equipment 1, 600 Reserve for Capital Replacement 0 Reserve for Computer Replacement 0 Operating Equipment-Department 0 All Other Expenses 6,500 1 Total Appropriated Funds-Office of Village Manager $ 644, 660 Management Information Systems $ 186,000 Salaries-Full-Time 0 Salaries-Part-Time Salaries-Seasonal 3,500 Premium Pay-Longevity 200 19,500 Group Medical Insurance Professional Training 9,500 Dues & Memberships 200 ,200 Telephone 1 Travel 35,250 0 Per Diem Allowance 000 Maintenance Contracts ,250 22 Subscriptions & Publications 000 Computer Services , 350 Supplies-Office 240 Unemployment Insurance 5 7 Maintenance & Repairs-Dept Equipment 0 0 Gasoline Maintenance & Repairs-Parts 0 Maintenance & Repairs-Labor 0 0 Overhead ,500 Office Furniture 7 Office Equipment 8,500 4 Reserve for Computer Replacement , 00 5 All Other Expenses $ 00 Total Appropriated Funds-Management Information Services $ 360, 640 Finance and General Services $ 480,000 Salaries-Full-Time 17,250 Salaries-Overtime Salaries-Part-Time 85, 4 0 00 2, Premium Pay-Longevity 250 Group Medical Insurance , 00 5 0 Professional Training ,700 Dues & Memberships 2, Telephone 6 ,000 5,000 Postage 3,000 Travel 900 Reception & Community Affairs 1,200 Per Diem Allowance 9,400 Maintenance Contracts 22,000 Printing Audit Fees 27, 00 7 Equipment Rental 00 Supplies-Office 2 ,500 2 Subscriptions & Publications ,100 345 Risk Management Pool , 00 8 Unemployment Insurance 00 ICMA/RC Deferred Compensation 4,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Dept Equipment 2,500 Gasoline 0 Maintenance & Repairs-Parts 0 Maintenance & Repairs-Labor 0 Overhead 0 Contractual Auto Services 0 Office Furniture & Equipment 5,500 Reserve for Capital Replacement 0 Operating Equipment-Department 500 2 Reserve for Computer Replacement 2,400 Consulting Fees-All Other 43,000 IRMA Deductibles 2,000 All Other Expenses 2,000 Total Appropriated Funds-Finance and General Services $ 1, 182,100 Legal Services Retainer Fee $ 46,800 Prosecutor Fee 46,250 Attorney Fees 65, 000 Recording Fees 1,100 Legal Notices 7,000 Litigation Fees 60,000 Special Counsel 17,500 Legal Reimbursables 7,000 Messenger Fees 1,000 Total Appropriated Funds-Legal Services $ 251, 650 Fire Services Salaries-Full-Time $ 2 ,000 Salaries-Overtime 219,000 Salaries-Part-Time 30,000 Special Duty Pay 5,500 Salaries-Sworn 3, 950,000 Premium Pay-Longevity 17, 900 Group Medical Insurance 520,000 Professional Training 38,000 Dues & Memberships 8,000 Clothing Allowance 29,000 Safety Equipment 20,000 Telephone 28,000 Tuition Reimbursements 8,700 Travel 9,750 Per Diem Allowance 3, 600 Maintenance Contracts 11,500 Printing 6,250 Equipment Rental 14,500 Supplies-Office 8,700 Supplies-All Other 26,000 Subscriptions & Publications 4,300 Unemployment Insurance 5,280 ICMA/RC Deferred Compensation 8,000 Chemicals & Fertilizers 100 Small Equipment, Tools & Hardware 16,500 Maintenance & Repairs-Buildings & Facilities 6,800 Maintenance & Repairs-Dept Equipment 29,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Radios 100 Gasoline 4, 600 Diesel Fuel 18,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Parts 24,300 Maintenance & Repairs-Labor 35,500 Lubricants 800 Overhead 38,400 Body Work 6,800 Contractual Auto Services 19,000 Automobiles & Trucks 500 Office Furniture & Equipment 2,600 Operating Equipment-Department 82,000 Reserve for Capital Replacement 227,500 Reserve for Computer Replacement 5,000 3 Building/Public Ground Improvements 2,000 Northwest Central Dispatch 105,000 IRMA Deductibles 7,000 NWCH Administration Fees 4,000 All Other Expenses 47,000 Total Appropriated Ponds-Dire Services $ 5, 906,480 Police Services Salaries-Full-Time $ 444,000 Salaries-Overtime 416,000 Salaries-Part-Time 248,000 Special Duty Pay 80,000 Salaries-Sworn 4,780,000 Premium Pay-Longevity 23,500 Group Medical Insurance 600,000 Professional Training 39,200 Dues & Memberships 3,000 Clothing Allowance 30,000 Uniform Maintenance 28,500 Recruit Uniforms 6,500 Tuition Reimbursement 21,000 Telephone 55,000 Travel 5,500 Per Diem Allowance 2,100 Physical Fitness Equipment 4,000 Equipment Rental-Communications 8,300 Printing-Patrol 100 Printing-F.O.S.G. 100 Printing-Staff 11,300 Supplies-Patrol/F.O.S.G. 12,500 Supplies-Communications/Records 16,000 Supplies-O.C.O.P./Training 14,500 Supplies-Detention/CP-CR 9,500 Subscriptions & Publications 2,200 Recruitment 2,500 Unemployment Insurance 7,000 ICMA/RC Deferred Compensation 8,500 Retainer Fee 400 Operating Equipment-Patrol/F.O.S.G. 2,500 Operating Equipment-Other 5,000 Operating Equipment-Records 2, 100 Operating Equipment-Communications 2,000 Safety Equipment-Patrol/F.O.S.G. 20,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Department Equipment 100 Maintenance & Repairs-Radios 15,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Mobile Data Terminals 3,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Patrol Equipment 5,000 Maintenance & Repairs-F.O.S.G. Equipment 600 Maintenance & Repairs-Staff Equipment 20,250 Gasoline 64,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Parts 32,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Labor 70,000 Overhead 82,000 Body Work 3,000 Contractual Auto Services 17,500 Automobiles & Trucks 500 Office Equipment 23,500 Operating Equipment-Department 18,000 Operating Equipment-Patrol 8,000 Operating Equipment-Staff 750 4 Reserve for Capital Replacement 53,000 Reserve for Computer Replacement 24,000 Vehicle Safety Equipment 14,500 Northwest Central Dispatch 254,000 Omni House 95,500 Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority 20,000 Care of Prisoners 1,750 Animal Care 6,000 Commission on Accreditation 3, 600 Northern Illinois Crime Lab 43,500 NIPAS 6,000 IRMA Deductibles 8,000 All Other Expenses 13,000 Total Appropriated Ponds-Police Services $ 7,808,850 Building & Zoning Salaries-Full-Time $ 530,000 Salaries-Overtime 6,500 Salaries-Part-Time 41,500 Premium Pay-Longevity 2,200 Group Medical Insurance 89,000 Professional Training 5,100 Dues & Memberships 1,400 Clothing Allowance 1,700 Tuition Reimbursement 100 Safety Equipment 200 Telephone 10,500 Travel 5,300 Reception & Community Affairs 800 Per Diem Allowance 1,500 Maintenance Contracts 38,500 Printing 4,500 Equipment Rental 150 Supplies-Office 6,000 Subscriptions & Publications 2,000 Unemployment Insurance 800 ICMA/RC Deferred Compensation 2,250 Small Equipment, Tools & Hardware 1,200 Maintenance & Repairs-Dept Equipment 2,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Radios 700 Gasoline 3,500 Maintenance & Repairs-Parts 1,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Labor 3,100 Overhead 3,800 Contractual Auto Services 2,200 Office Furniture & Equipment 500 Operating Equipment-Department 500 Reserve for Capital Replacement 1,000 Reserve for Computer Replacement 1 000 Consulting Fees-All Other 34,000 Exterminating Services 1,750 IRMA Deductibles 1,000 All Other Expenses 1,500 Total Appropriated Funds-Building & Zoning $ 808,250 Engineering Services Salaries-Full-Time $ 399,000 Salaries-Overtime 800 Salaries-Part-Time 53,000 Premium Pay-Longevity 2, 600 5 Group Medical Insurance 43, 600 Professional Training 7,000 Dues & Memberships 850 Clothing Allowance 400 Safety Equipment 600 Telephone 6,300 Travel 100 Per Diem Allowance 350 Computer Services 1,500 Printing 6,500 Supplies-Office 3,750 Supplies-All Other 1,700 Subscriptions & Publications 1,100 Unemployment Insurance 480 ICMA/RC Deferred Compensation 2,750 Small Equipment, Tools & Hardware 800 Maintenance & Repairs-Dept Equipment 3,700 Maintenance & Repairs-Radios 350 Gasoline 2,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Parts 1,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Labor 1,200 Overhead 1,200 Contractual Auto Services 1,700 Office Furniture & Equipment 500 Operating Equipment-Department 1,100 Reserve for Capital Replacement 8,000 Reserve for Computer Replacement 200 Consulting Fees-Plan & Design 15,000 All Other Expenses 250 Total Appropriated runds-Engineering Services $ 569,380 Building Services/Street Lighting Salaries-Full-Time $ 24 ,000 5 Salaries-Overtime , 10000 Salaries-Part-Time Premium Pay-Longevity ,300 Group Medical Insurance 34, 600 Professional Training 1, 00 5 Dues & Memberships 00 Clothing Allowance 550 0 Uniform Rental 1, 900 Safety Equipment 90 ICMA/RC Deferred Compensation 400 Telephone 900 Maintenance Contracts 125,000 Equipment Rental 1,200 Supplies-Office 400 Supplies-All Other 13,500 Subscriptions & Publications 400 Unemployment Insurance 320 Electric-Facilities 1,000 Gas-Facilities 25,000 Small Equipment, Tools & Hardware 600 Electric-Street Lights 80,000 Gas-Street Lights 3,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Street Lights 160,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Buildings & Grounds 22,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Dept Equipment 800 Maintenance & Repairs-Radios 100 Gasoline 150 6 Diesel Fuel 1,700 Maintenance & Repairs-Parts 2,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Labor 4,700 Overhead 5, 100 Contractual Auto Services 2,000 Operating Equipment-Department 3,000 Reserve for Capital Replacement 18,700 Reserve for Computer Replacement 1,100 Public Grounds Improvements 1,000 All Other Expenses 1,000 Total Appropriated Funds-Building Services/Street Lighting $ 763,520 Street operations i Maintenance Salaries-Full-Time $ 501,000 Salaries-Overtime 63,000 Salaries-Part-Time 100 Premium Pay-Longevity 3,400 Group Medical Insurance 71,400 Training 2,500 Dues & Memberships 500 Clothing Allowance 1,500 Uniform Rental 4,300 Safety Equipment 800 ICMA/RC Deferred Compensation 650 Telephone 1,100 Maintenance Contracts 70,500 Equipment Rental 1,000 Supplies-Office 400 Supplies-All Other 6,000 Subscriptions & Publications 150 Unemployment Insurance 720 Snow & Ice Control Mix 125,000 Traffic & Street Signs 70,000 Small Equipment, Tools & Hardware 2,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Sidewalks, Curbs & Bikepaths 305,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Storm Sewers 5,500 Maintenance & Repairs-Streets & Highways 47,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Dept Equipment 8,500 Maintenance & Repairs-Radios 1,000 Gasoline 750 Diesel Fuel 9,900 Maintenance & Repairs-Parts 17,500 Maintenance & Repairs-Labor 24,400 Lubricants 1,000 Overhead 29,000 Contractual Auto Services 14,000 Operating Equipment-Department 2,000 Reserve for Capital Replacement 81,000 Reserve for Computer Replacement 1,100 Building Improvements 500 Sidewalk & Bikepath Construction 100 IRMA Deductibles 3,000 All Other Expenses 500 Total Appropriated Funds-Street Operations $ 1,477,770 Public Works Management i Administration Salaries-Full-Time $ 240,000 Salaries-Overtime 300 Salaries-Part-Time 32,000 Premium Pay-Longevity 2, 100 7 Group Medical Insurance 53,000 Professional Training 6,250 Dues & Memberships 3,000 Clothing Allowance 300 Safety Equipment 400 Telephone 3,500 Travel 300 Supplies-Office 5,350 Subscriptions & Publications 1,500 Unemployment Insurance 480 ICMA/RC Deferred Compensation 3,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Dept Equipment 3, 600 Gasoline 900 Maintenance & Repairs-Parts 400 Maintenance & Repairs-Labor 1,000 Overhead 1,000 Contractual Auto Services 1, 600 Office Furniture & Equipment 14,500 Reserve for Capital Replacement 2,700 Reserve for Computer Replacement 700 All Other Expenses 500 Total Appropriated Funds-Public Works Management $ 378,380 & Administration Forestry/Parkway/Landscape Maintenance Salaries-Full-Time $ 514,000 Salaries-Overtime , 00 Salaries-Part-Time 42,500 Premium Pay-Longevity 2,200 6 Group Medical Insurance ,500 2 Professional Training ,7500 Dues & Memberships 900 Clothing Allowance , 5 4 Uniform Rental , 00 Safety Equipment 650 0 ICMA/RC Deferred Compensation 500 1 Telephone 250 Maintenance Contracts ,00 1 0 Equipment Rental , 400 5 Supplies-Office 5,500 Supplies-All Other , 150 Subscriptions & Publications 0 8 Unemployment Insurance 0 9 Chemicals & Fertilizers , 0 650 Small Equipment, Tools & Hardware 65 Maintenance & Repairs-Parkway Trees 20,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Dept Equipment 800 Maintenance & Repairs-Radios 650 Gasoline 1,300 Diesel Fuel 8,900 Maintenance & Repairs-Parts 10,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Labor 23,000 Lubricants 650 Overhead 26,000 Contractual Auto Services 4,000 Office Furniture 500 Operating Equipment-Department 5,000 Reserve for Capital Replacement 54,000 Reserve for Computer Replacement 1,000 All Other Expenses 11000 8 Total Appropriated Funds-Forestry/Parkmay/Landscape $ 831,350 Maintenance Emergency Services & Disaster Agency Salaries-Part-Time $ 25,000 Professional Training 3,500 Dues & Memberships 200 Telephone 1,800 Computer Services 100 Supplies-Office 150 Subscriptions & Publications 650 Maintenance & Repairs-Dept Equipment 4,500 Maintenance & Repairs-Radios 4,250 Gasoline 300 Maintenance & Repairs-Parts 400 Maintenance & Repairs-Labor 600 Overhead 650 Contractual Services 1,200 Operating Equipment-Department 3,500 Reserve for Capital Replacement 7,000 All Other Expenses 600 Total Appropriated Funds-Emergency Services s Disaster $ 54,400 Agency Transfer Non-Operating Transfer to Debt Service Fund $ 650,000 Transfer to IMRF Fund 20,000 Transfer to Capital Projects Fund 900,000 Transfer to Motor Fuel Tax Fund 50,000 Transfer to Arboretum Golf Course Fund 100,000 Transfer to Refuse Service Fund 75,000 Transfer to Buffalo Grove Golf Club 40,000 All Other Expenses 110,000 Total Appropriated Funds-Transfer Non-Operating $ 1, 945,000 Total Appropriated Funds-Corporate Fund $23,142,230 Total Levied Fund-Corporate Fund $ 5,060,860 �IATER�iORR3 & SEWERAGE FUND Water Operating Salaries-Full-Time $ 380,000 Salaries-Overtime 21,000 Salaries-Part-Time 52,000 Premium Pay-Longevity 1,500 Group Medical Insurance 49,000 Professional Training 5,000 Dues & Memberships 400 Clothing Allowance 1,750 Uniform Rental 3,300 Safety Equipment 5, 100 ICMA/RC Deferred Compensation 425 Telephone 6,400 Maintenance Contracts 11,000 Printing 8,500 Fiscal Agent Fees 6,000 Equipment Rental 800 Supplies-Office 400 Supplies-All Other 2,700 Risk Management Pool 125,000 9 Unemployment Insurance 640 Employer's Contributions-Pension 35,000 Electric-Water & Sewer 150,000 Gas-Water & Sewer 3,000 Water Sample Analysis 10,000 Water Meters 35,000 Chemicals & Fertilizers 9,500 Small Equipment, Tools & Hardware 1,100 Maintenance & Repairs-Well Equipment 10,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Mains & Services 7,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Water Meters 8,500 Maintenance & Repairs-Reservoirs 7,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Hydrants & Valves 10,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Pumping Stations 2,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Department Equipment 1,500 Maintenance & Repairs-Radios 450 Gasoline 2,500 Diesel Fuel 4,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Parts 7,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Labor 12, 600 Lubricants 1,000 Overhead 15,500 Contractual Auto Services 2,500 Operating Equipment-Department 1, 000 Reserve for Capital Replacement 47,800 Reserve for Computer Replacement 1,800 Reserve for Well Improvements 6,000 System Improvements 90,000 Recapture Payments 275,000 Transfer to Corporate Fund 477, 900 IRMA Deductibles 2,000 Northwest Water Commission 1,250,000 All Other Expenses 300 Total ]appropriated Lands-Water Operating $ 3,167,865 Sewer Operating Salaries-Full-Time $ 165,000 Salaries-Overtime 12,200 Salaries-Part-Time 100 Premium Pay-Longevity 1,000 Group Medical Insurance 26,000 Professional Training 2, 000 Clothing Allowance 500 Uniform Rental 1,500 Safety Equipment 6,000 ICMA/RC Deferred Compensation 200 Telephone 9,500 Maintenance Contracts 7,000 Equipment Rental 9,000 Subscriptions & Publications 100 Supplies-Office 400 Supplies-All Other 600 Risk Management Pool 40,000 Unemployment Insurance 240 Employer's Contributions-Pension 14,000 Electric-Water & Sewer 45,000 Lake County Sewer Tap-on Fees 160,000 Lake County Treatment Fee 2,250,000 Small Equipment, Tools & Hardware 500 Maintenance & Repairs-Storm & Sanitary Sewers 2,500 10 Maintenance & Repairs-Lift Stations 9,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Department Equipment 7,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Radios 250 Gasoline 300 Diesel Fuel 3,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Parts 3,500 Maintenance & Repairs-Labor 6,700 Lubricants 300 Overhead 7,500 Contractual Auto Services 1,750 Operating Equipment-Department 9,500 Reserve for Capital Replacement 24,800 System Improvements 108,000 IRMA Deductibles 1,000 All Other Expenses 300 Total Appropriated Funds-Sewer Operating $ 2, 936,240 Total Appropriated lands-Waterworks s Sewerage Lund $ 6,104,105 Total Levied Bonds-Naterworks & Sewerage Elrod $ 0 ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RLTIREMENT FUND Employers Contribution-FICA $ 333,000 Employers Contribution-Medicare 170,000 Employers Contribution-IMRF 305,000 Total Appropriated funds-Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund $ 808,000 Total Levied Funds-Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund $ 734,700 PARKING LOT FUND Salaries-Full Time $ 1,000 Salaries- Part-Time 5,250 Employer's Contribution-FICA 350 Employer's Contribution-Medicare 100 Telephone 1,000 Maintenance Contracts 10,000 Supplies-All Other 1,500 Tenant & Landlord Policies 3,500 Traffic & Street Signs 1,000 Chemicals & Fertilizers 5,000 Electric-Parking Lot 11,000 Facilities-Gas 1,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Parking Lot 1,200 Maintenance & Repairs-Parking Lot Lights 2,500 Maintenance & Repairs-Buildings & Facilities 8,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Parkway Trees 1,500 Lease Payments 60,000 Pace Parking Lot Fees 21,500 All Other Expenses $ 500 Total Appropriated Funds-Parking Lot Fund $ 135, 900 Total Levied rands-Parking Lot Fund $ 0 MOTOR FUEL TAR FUND Street Maintenance & Reconstruction $ 1,201,250 Total Appropriated Bonds-Motor Fuel Tax Fund $ 1,201,250 Total Levied rands-Motor Fuel Tax Land $ 0 CAPITAL PROJECTS rUND-FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT Police Headquarters Improvement $ 30,000 PSC Storage Addition/Yard Improvements 600,000 Municipal Parking Facility Maintenance 24,000 Metra Parking Lot Expansion 125,000 IL Route 83 Bikepath Overpass 140,000 11 Buffalo Grove Road/Thompson Blvd Signal 230,000 Photocopier Upgrade 23,000 Building Sprinkler System Improvements 63,000 Wireless Data Network 55, 000 Council Chamber A/V System $ 26,000 Total Appropriated Funds-Capital Projects Fund-Facilities $ 1,316,000 Development Total Levied Funds-Capital Projects Fund-Facilities $ 0 Development CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND-CONTRACTUAL STREET MAINTENANCE Transfer to Debt Service Fund $ 1, 000 Lake-Cook/Milwaukee Int. Improvement 35,000 Port Clinton Road/Prairie Road Intersection Improvement 1, 660,000 Busch Pkwy/Deerfield Pkwy Intersection Improvement 95,000 Illinois Rt 83 Street Improvement 30,000 Lake-Cook/Wisconsin Central Bike Path 600,000 Weiland Road/Pauline Avenue Intersection Improvement 365,000 Total Appropriated Funds-Capital Projects Fund-Contractual $ 2,786,000 Street Maintenance Total Levied Funds-Capital Projects Fund-Contractual $ 0 Street Maintenance CONTRACTUAL STREET MAINTENANCE DEBT SERVICE FUND Principal Payments-G.O. Bonds $ 200,000 Interest Payments-G.O. Bonds 160,000 Total Appropriated Funds-Contractual Street Maintenance $ 360,000 Debt Service Fund Total Levied Funds-Contractual Street Maintenance $ 246, 100 Debt Service Fund SPECIAL SERVICE AREA DEBT SERVICE FUND Interest Payments-G.O. Bonds $ 1, 185,000 Principal Payments-G.O. Bonds 460,000 Fiscal Agents Fees 5,000 Total Appropriated Funds-Special Service Area Debt Service Fund $ 1, 650,000 Total Levied Funds-Special Service Area Debt Service Fund $ 1, 688,213 FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND Principal Payments-G.O. Bonds $ 442, 000 Interest Payments-G.O. Bonds 265,000 Fiscal Agents Fees 6,500 Total Appropriated Funds-Facilities Development Debt $ 758,500 Service Fund Total Levied Funds-Facilities Development Debt $ 798,888 Service Fund TAR INCREMENT FINANCING AREA DEBT SERVICE FUND Interest Payments-T.I.F. Revenue Bonds $ 450, 000 Principal Payments-T.I.F. Revenue Bonds 465, 000 Principal Payments-T.I.F. Bonds-Advance Call 65,000 Fiscal Agents Fees 10.000 Total Appropriated Funds-Tax Increment Financing Area $ 990,000 Debt Service Fund Total Levied Fund-Tax Increment Financing Area $ 0 Debt Service Fund 12 POLICE PENSION FUND Transfer to Reserve for Future Obligations $ 1,275,000 All Other Expenses 34,000 Pension Fund Obligations-Police 510,000 Total Appropriated Funds-Police Pension Fund $ 1,819,000 Total Levied Funds-Police Pension Fund $ 655,827 FIRE PENSION rum Transfer to Reserve for Future Obligations $ 1,235,000 All Other Expenses 20,000 Pension Fund Obligations-Fire 65,000 Total Appropriated Funds-tire Pension Fund $ 1,320,000 Total Levied rands-Fire Pension Fund $ 764,158 CENTRAL GARAGE FUND Salaries-Full-Time $ 295,000 Salaries-Overtime 5,000 Premium Pay-Longevity 800 Group Medical Insurance 40,000 Professional Training 1,800 Dues & Memberships 250 Clothing Allowance 900 Uniform Rental 2,500 Safety Equipment 600 Telephone 1,300 Travel 50 Maintenance Contracts 20,500 Equipment Rental 700 Printing 100 Supplies-Office 400 Supplies-All Other 7,500 Subscriptions & Publications 3, 600 Unemployment Insurance 400 Small Equipment, Tools & Hardware 1,100 Maintenance & Repairs-Dept Equipment 700 Maintenance & Repairs-Radios 100 Gasoline 85,000 Diesel Fuel 46,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Parts 103,000 Maintenance & Repairs-Labor 1,400 Lubricants 6,000 Contractual Auto Services 61,000 Operating Equipment-Department 5,000 Reserve for Capital Replacement 415,000 IRMA Deductible Reimbursement 2,000 All Other Expenses 250 Total Appropriated Funds-Central Garage Fund $ 1,107, 950 Total Levied Funds-Central Garage Fund $ 0 CORPORATE PURPOSE BOND PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST Principal Payments-G.O. Bonds 300,000 Interest Payments-G.O. Bonds 15,000 Total Appropriated Funds-Corporate Purpose Bond Principal $ 315,000 and Interest Total Levied rands-Corporate Purpose Bond Principal $ 304,875 and Interest 13 REFUSE SERVICE FUND Transfer to SWANCC $ 1,300,000 Total Appropriated Funds-Refuse Service Fund $ 1,300,000 Total Levied Funds-Refuse Service Fund $ 0 ARBORETUM GOLF COURSE FUND Principal Payments-G.O. Bonds $ 285,600 Interest Payments-G.O. Bonds 108,705 Total Appropriated Funds-Arboretum Golf Course Fund $ 394,305 Total Levied Funds-Arboretum Golf Course Fund $ 399,444 TOTAL APPROPRIATED FUNDS Corporate Fund $23, 142,230 Waterworks and Sewerage Fund 6,104, 105 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 808,000 Parking Lot Fund 135,000 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 1,201,250 Capital Projects Fund-Facilities Development 1,316,000 Capital Projects Fund-Contractual Street Maintenance 2,786,000 Contractual Street Maintenance Debt Service Fund 360,000 Special Service Area Debt Service Fund 1,650,000 Facilities Development Debt Service Fund 758,500 Tax Increment Financing Area Debt Service Fund 990,000 Police Pension Fund 1,819,000 Fire Pension Fund 1,320,000 Central Garage Fund 1,107,950 Corporate Purpose Bond Principal and Interest 315,000 Arboretum Golf Course Fund 394,305 Refuse Service Fund 1,300,000 Grand Total Appropriations $45,507,340 TOTAL LEVIED FUNDS Corporate Fund $ 5,060,860 Waterworks and Sewerage Fund 0 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 734,700 Parking Lot Fund 0 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 0 Capital Projects Fund-Facilities Development 0 Capital Projects Fund-Contractual Street Maintenance 0 Contractual Street Maintenance Debt Service Fund 246,100 Special Service Area Debt Service Fund 1, 688,213 Facilities Development Debt Service Fund 798,888 Tax Increment Financing Area Debt Service Fund 0 Police Pension Fund 655,827 Fire Pension Fund 764,158 Central Garage Fund 0 Corporate Purpose Bond Principal and Interest 304,875 Arboretum Golf Course Fund 399,444 Refuse Service Fund 0 Grand Total Levied Funds $10, 653,065 14 Board Agenda Item Submittal xII-B Requested By: William H Brimm Entered By: William H Brimm Agenda Item Title: Ordinance No.2000- An Ordinance Adding Chapter 3.60 to the Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Code in Connection with Rights and Responsibilities Related to Locally Imposed and Administered Taxes of the Village of Buffalo Grove, Illinois Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: 0 Consent Agenda 11/22/2000 12/04/2000 0 Regular Agenda Finance&GS 0 None Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? board? 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 No funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. During the last legislative session,the Local Government Taxpayers' Bill of Rights Act was passed, effective January 1,2001. All units of government in the State are required to adopt an ordinance that is consistent with the provisions of the Act. The limitations provided by the Act take precedence over any provision of any local tax ordinance previously adopted or to be adopted. The Act applies to locally imposed home rule and non-home-rule taxes. The ordinance presented for consideration has been developed by the Illinois Municipal League and establishes those rights and obligations of taxpayers and local government toward each other. In addition to the ordinance, a copy of Senate Bill 1440 is included for reference purposes. The ordinance will be codified within the Village's Municipal Code. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Ij OrdAmend360.pdf Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: ORDINANCE NO. 2000- AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 3.60 TO THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE IN CONNECTION WITH RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES RELATED TO LOCALLY IMPOSED AND ADMINISTERED TARES OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, the State of Illinois pursuant to the Local Government Taxpayers' Bill of Rights Act, 50 ILCS 45/1 et.seq. , has determined it reasonable and necessary to create the Local Government Taxpayers' Bill of Rights Act; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Taxpayers' Bill of Rights Act requires that a municipality adopt tax processes and procedures to provide all necessary due process rights to a taxpayer in the collection and enforcement of local tax laws; and WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove, Illinois (the "Village") has determined it reasonable and necessary to establish certain procedures in regard to locally imposed and administered taxes. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, IN THE EXERCISE OF ITS HOME RULE POWERS as follows: Section 1. There is hereby added Chapter 3. 60, Local Government Taxpayers' Bill of Rights, to the Village of Buffalo Grove Municipal Code, which is to read as follows: CHAPTER 3. 60 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AX AY RS' BILL OF RIGHTS ACT Section 3. 60.010 Title Section 3. 60.020 Scope Section 3. 60.030 Definitions Section 3.60.040 Notices Section 3. 60.050 Late Payment Section 3. 60. 060 Payment Section 3. 60.070 Certain Credits and Refunds Section 3. 60. 080 Audit Procedure Section 3. 60.090 Appeal Section 3. 60. 100 Hearing Section 3. 60. 110 Interest and Penalties Section 3. 60. 120 Abatement Section 3. 60. 130 Installment Contracts Section 3. 60. 140 Statute of Limitations Section 3. 60.150 Voluntary Disclosure Section 3. 60. 160 Publication of Tax Ordinance Section 3. 60. 170 Internal Review Section 3. 60.010, Title. This Chapter shall be known as, and may be cited as, the "Locally 1 Imposed and Administered Tax Rights and Responsibility Chapter. " Section 3. 60.020, Scone. The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to the Village' s procedures in connection with all of the Village' s locally imposed and administered taxes. Section 3. 60.030, Definitions. Certain words or terms herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them as follows: "Act" means the "Local Government Taxpayers' Bill of Rights Act. " "Corporate Authorities" means the Village' s President and Board of Trustees. "Locally imposed and administered tax" or "tax" means each tax imposed by the Village that is collected or administered by the Village not an agency or department of the State. It does not include any taxes imposed upon real property under the Property Tax Code or fees collected by the Village other than infrastructure maintenance fees. "Local tax administrator", the Village' s Director of Finance and General Services, is charged with the administration and collection of the locally imposed and administered taxes, including staff, employees or agents to the extent they are authorized by the local tax administrator to act in the local tax administrator' s stead. The local tax administrator shall have the authority to implement the terms of this Chapter to give full effect to this Chapter. The exercise of such authority by the local tax administrator shall not be inconsistent with this Chapter and the Act. "Village" means the Village of Buffalo Grove, Illinois. "Notice" means each audit notice, collection notice or other similar notice or communication in connection with each of the Village' s locally imposed and administered taxes. "Tax ordinance" means each ordinance adopted by the Village that imposes any locally imposed and administered tax. "Taxpayer" means any person required to pay any locally imposed and administered tax and generally includes the person upon whom the legal incidence of such tax is placed and with respect to consumer taxes includes the business or entity required to collect and pay the locally imposed and administered tax to the Village. Section 3. 60. 040, Notices. Unless otherwise provided, whenever notice is required to be given, 2 the notice is to be in writing mailed not less than seven (7) calendar days prior to the day fixed for any applicable hearing, audit or other scheduled act of the local tax administrator. The notice shall be sent by the local tax administrator as follows: (1) First class or express mail, or overnight mail, addressed to the persons concerned at the persons' last known address, or (2) Personal service or delivery. Section 3. 60.050, Late Payment. Any notice, payment, remittance or other filing required to be made to the Village pursuant to any tax ordinance shall be considered late unless it is (a) physically received by the Village on or before the due date, or (b) received in an envelope or other container displaying a valid, readable U.S. Postmark dated on or before the due date, properly addressed to the Village, with adequate postage prepaid. Section 3. 60. 060, Payment. Any payment or remittance received for a tax period shall be applied in the following order: (1) first to the tax due for the applicable period; (2) second to the interest due for the applicable period; and (3) third to the penalty for the applicable period. Section 3. 60.070, Certain Credits and Refunds. A. The Village shall not refund or credit any taxes voluntarily paid without written protest at the time of payment in the event that a locally imposed and administered tax is declared invalidly enacted or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction. However, a taxpayer shall not be deemed to have paid the tax voluntarily if the taxpayer lacked knowledge of the facts upon which to protest the taxes at the time of payment or if the taxpayer paid the taxes under duress. B. The statute of limitations on a claim for credit or refund shall be two (2) years after the end of the calendar year in which payment in error was made. The Village shall not grant a credit or refund of locally imposed and administered taxes, interest, or penalties to a person who has not paid the amounts directly to the Village. C. The procedure for claiming a credit or refund of locally imposed and administered taxes, interest or penalties paid in error shall be as follows: 1. The taxpayer shall submit to the local tax administrator in writing a claim for credit or refund together with a statement specifying: a. the name of the locally imposed and administered tax subject to the claim; 3 b. the tax period for the locally imposed and administered tax subject to the claim; c. the date of the tax payment subject to the claim and the canceled check or receipt for the payment; d. the taxpayer's recalculation, accompanied by an amended or revised tax return, in connection with the claim; and e. a request for either a refund or a credit in connection with the claim to be applied to the amount of tax, interest and penalties overpaid, and, as applicable, related interest on the amount overpaid; provided, however, that there shall be no refund and only a credit given in the event the taxpayer owes any monies to the Village. 2. Within ten (10) days of the receipt by the local tax administrator of any claim for a refund or credit, the local tax administrator shall either: a. grant the claim; or b. deny the claim, in whole or in part, together with a statement as to the reason for the denial or the partial grant and denial. 3. In the event the local tax administrator grants, in whole or in part, a claim for refund or credit, the amount of the grant for refund or credit shall bear interest at the rate of five (5%) percent per annum, based on a year of 365 days and the number of days elapsed, from the date of the overpayment to the date of mailing of a refund check or the grant of a credit. Section 3. 60.080, Audit Procedure. Any request for proposed audit pursuant to any local administered tax shall comply with the notice requirements of this Chapter. A. Each notice of audit shall contain the following information: l.the tax; 2.the time period of the audit; and 3. a brief description of the books and records to be made available for the auditor. B. Any audit shall be conducted during normal business hours and if the date and time selected by the local tax administrator is not agreeable to the taxpayer, another date and time may be requested by the taxpayer within thirty (30) days after the originally designated audit and during normal business hours. C. The taxpayer may request an extension of time to have an audit conducted. The audit shall be conducted not less than seven (7) nor more than thirty (30) days from the date the notice is given, unless the taxpayer and the local tax administrator agreed to some other 4 convenient time. In the event taxpayer is unable to comply with the audit on the date in question, the taxpayer may request another date within the thirty (30) days, approved in writing, that is convenient to the taxpayer and the local tax administrator. D. Every taxpayer shall keep accurate books and records of the taxpayer' s business or activities, including original source documents and books of entry denoting the transactions which had given rise or may have given rise to any tax liability, exemption or deduction. All books shall be kept in the English language and shall be subject to and available for inspection by the Village. E. It is the duty and responsibility of every taxpayer to make available its books and records for inspection by the Village. If the taxpayer or tax collector fails to provide the documents necessary for audit within the time provided, the local tax administrator may issue a tax determination and assessment based on the tax administrator' s determination of the best estimate of the taxpayer' s tax liability. F. If an audit determines there has been an overpayment of a locally imposed and administered tax as a result of the audit, written notice of the amount of overpayment shall be given to the taxpayer within thirty (30) days of the Village' s determination of the amount of overpayment. G. In the event a tax payment was submitted to the incorrect local governmental entity, the local tax administrator shall notify the local governmental entity imposing such tax. Section 3. 60.090, Appeal. A. The local tax administrator shall send written notice to a taxpayer upon the local tax administrator's issuance of a protestable notice of tax due, a bill, a claim denial, or a notice of claim reduction regarding any tax. The notice shall include the following information: 1. the reason for the assessment; 2 . the amount of the tax liability proposed; 3. the procedure for appealing the assessment; and 4. the obligations of the Village during the audit, appeal, refund and collection process. B. A taxpayer who receives written notice from the local tax administrator of a determination of tax due or assessment may file with the local tax administrator a written protest and petition for hearing, setting forth the basis of the taxpayer's request for a hearing. The written protest and petition for hearing must be filed with the local tax administrator within forty-five (45) days of receipt of the written notice of the tax determination and assessment. 5 C. If a timely written notice and petition for hearing is filed, the local tax administrator shall fix the time and place for hearing and shall give written notice to the taxpayer. The hearing shall be scheduled for a date within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the written protest and petition for hearing, unless the taxpayer requests a later date convenient to all parties. D. If a written protest and petition for hearing is not filed within the forty-five (45) day period, the tax determination, audit or assessment shall become a final bill due and owing without further notice. E. Upon the showing of reasonable cause by the taxpayer and the full payment of the contested tax liability along with interest accrued as of the due date of the tax, the local tax administrator may reopen or extend the time for filing a written protest and petition for hearing. In no event shall the time for filing a written protest and petition for hearing be reopened or extended for more than ninety (90) days after the expiration of the forty-five day period. Section 3. 60.100, Hearing. A. Whenever a taxpayer or a tax collector has filed a timely written protest and petition for hearing under Section 3. 60. 090, the local tax administrator shall conduct a hearing regarding any appeal. B. No continuances shall be granted except in cases where a continuance is absolutely necessary to protect the rights of the taxpayer. Lack of preparation shall not be grounds for a continuance. Any continuance granted shall not exceed fourteen (14) days. C. At the hearing the local tax administrator shall preside and shall hear testimony and accept any evidence relevant to the tax determination, audit or assessment. The strict rules of evidence applicable to judicial proceedings shall not apply. D. At the conclusion of the hearing, the local tax administrator shall make a written determination on the basis of the evidence presented at the hearing. The taxpayer or tax collector shall be provided with a copy of the written decision. Section 3. 60. 110, Interest and Penalties. In the event a determination has been made that a tax is due and owing, through audit, assessment or other bill sent, the tax must be paid within the time frame otherwise indicated. A. Interest. The Village hereby provides for the amount of interest to be assessed on a late payment, underpayment, or nonpayment of the tax, to be ten percent (10.00 0) per annum, based on a year of 365 days and the number of days elapsed. B. Late Filing and Payment Penalties. If a tax return is not filed within the time and manner provided by the controlling tax ordinance, a late filing penalty, of five percent (5s) of the amount of tax required to be shown as due on a return shall be imposed; and a late 6 payment penalty of five percent (5%) of the tax due shall be imposed. If no return is filed within the time or manner provided by the controlling tax ordinance and prior to the Village issuing a notice of tax delinquency or notice of tax liability, then a failure to file penalty shall be assessed equal to ten percent (100) of the total tax due for the applicable reporting period for which the return was required to be filed. A late filing or payment penalty shall not apply if a failure to file penalty is imposed by the controlling ordinance. Section 3. 60. 120, Abatement. The local tax administrator shall have the authority to waive or abate any late filing penalty, late payment penalty or failure to file penalty if the local tax administrator shall determine reasonable cause exists for delay or failure to make a filing. Section 3. 60.130, Installment Con ra s. The Village may enter into an installment contract with the taxpayer for the payment of taxes under the controlling tax ordinance. The local tax administrator may not cancel any installment contract so entered unless the taxpayer fails to pay any amount due and owing. Upon written notice by the local tax administrator that the payment is thirty (30) delinquent, the taxpayer shall have ten (10) working days to cure any delinquency. If the taxpayer fails to cure the delinquency within the ten (10) working day period or fails to demonstrate good faith in restructuring the installment contract with the local administrator, the installment contract shall be canceled without further notice to the taxpayer. Section 3. 60. 140, Statute of Limitations. The Village, through the local tax administrator, shall review all tax returns in a prompt and timely manner and inform taxpayers of any amounts due and owing. The taxpayer shall have forty-five (45) days after receiving notice of the reviewed tax returns to make any request for refund or provide any tax still due and owing. A. No determination of tax due and owing may be issued more than 2 years after the end of the calendar year for which the return for the applicable period was filed or for the calendar year in which the return for the applicable period was due, whichever occurs later. B. If any tax return is not filed or if during any 4-year period for which a notice of tax determination or assessment may be issued by the Village, the tax paid was less than 75% of the tax due, the statute of limitations shall be six (6) years maximum after the end of the calendar year in which return for the applicable period was due or end of the calendar year in which the return for the applicable period was filed. C. No statute of limitations shall apply if a fraudulent tax return was filed by the taxpayer. 7 Section 3. 60.150, Voluntary Disclosure. For any locally imposed and administered tax for which a taxpayer has not received a written notice of an audit, investigation, or assessment from the local tax administrator, a taxpayer is entitled to file an application with the local tax administrator for a voluntary disclosure of the tax due. A taxpayer filing a voluntary disclosure application must agree to pay the amount of tax due, along with interest of one percent (1%) per month, for all periods prior to the filing of the application but not more than four (4) years before the date of filing the application. A taxpayer filing a valid voluntary disclosure application may not be liable for any additional tax, interest, or penalty for any period before the date the application was filed. However, if the taxpayer incorrectly determined and underpaid the amount of tax due, the taxpayer is liable for the underpaid tax along with applicable interest on the underpaid tax, unless the underpayment was the result of fraud on the part of the taxpayer, in which case the application shall be deemed invalid and void. The payment of tax and interest must be made by no later than ninety (90) days after the filing of the voluntary disclosure application or the date agreed to by the local tax administrator. However, any additional amounts owed as a result of an underpayment of tax and interest previously paid under this Section must be paid within ninety (90) days after a final determination and the exhaustion of all appeals of the additional amount owed or the date agreed to by the local tax administrator, whichever is longer. Section 3. 60. 160, Publication of Tax Ordinance. Any locally administered tax ordinance shall be published via normal or standard publishing requirements. The posting of a tax ordinance on the Internet shall satisfy the publication requirements. Copies of all tax ordinances shall be made available to the public upon request at the Village Clerk's office. Section 3. 60. 170, Internal Review. The local tax administrator shall establish an internal review procedure regarding any liens filed against any taxpayers for unpaid taxes. Upon a determination by the local tax administrator that the lien is valid, the lien shall remain in full force and effect. If the lien is determined to be improper, the local tax administrator shall: A. timely remove the lien at the Village' s expense; B. correct the taxpayer' s credit record; and C. correct any public disclosure of the improperly imposed lien. Section 2. Application. This ordinance shall be liberally construed and administered to supplement all of the Village' s tax ordinances. To the extent that any tax ordinance is in conflict with or inconsistent with this ordinance, this ordinance shall be controlling. 8 Section 3. Severability. If any section, paragraph or provision of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. Section 4. Effectivp Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect January 1, 2001 and after passage, approval and publication. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ADOPTED: , 2000. APPROVED: 2000. PUBLISHED: , 2000. APPROVED: Village President ATTEST: Village Clerk I 9 Board Agenda Item Submittal xII-C Requested By: Robert E Pfeil Entered By: Robert E Pfeil Agenda Item Title: Ordinance 2000-_Approving an amendment to the Planned Unit Development for the Praedium Development commercial building,25-55 Buffalo Grove Road,in the B-5 District Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: 0 Consent Agenda 11/29/2000 12/04/2000 0 Regular Agenda Planning 0 None Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? board? 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 No funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. The Plan Commission reviewed the proposed changes on November 1 and November 15. The Commission concurred that it is acceptable to allow a modification to the floor plan for six tenants instead of four. The Commission reviewed several proposed building elevations. The Commission recommends approval of the attached drawing providing higher facade elements in the center and at the ends of the building. The draft minutes of the Plan Commission meetings are not yet available. The draft ordinance and exhibits are attached. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files 0- PUDAMEND. df �I Amend EXH B_C.pdf Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: 11/29/2000 ORDINANCE NO. 2000 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE FOR THE PRAEDIUM COMMERCIAL BUILDING, 25-55 BUFFALO GROVE ROAD IN THE B-5 DISTRICT, VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule Unit by virtue of the Illinois Constitution of 1970; and, WHEREAS, Praedium Development, L.L.C. (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), is the Owner of the property (hereinafter referred to as the "Property") described in EXHIBIT A attached hereto, which exhibit is made a part hereof, and which real estate is within the corporate limits of the Village; and, WHEREAS, the Property is zoned in the B-5 Planned Business Center District pursuant to Ordinance 2000-7 dated January 24,2000, and said Ordinance approved Exhibit C dated January 14, 2000 depicting four tenant spaces in the commercial building of 7,386 square feet and Exhibit E dated January 10, 2000 depicting elevations of said building; and, WHEREAS,Praedium Development proposes to construct six tenant spaces instead of four spaces as depicted on EXHIBIT B attached hereto and to modify the west elevation of the commercial building as depicted on EXHIBIT C attached hereto; and, WHEREAS, Praedium Development requests the Village's approval of an amendment to Ordinance 2000-7 to make said changes to the approved floor plan and approved building elevations pursuant to the following exhibits: EXHIBIT A Legal Description EXHIBIT B Floor Plan (Sheet A.2) dated as last revised October 18, 2000 by Adime' Design/Architecture Incorporated 2 EXHIBIT C Exterior Elevations (Sheet A.4 ) dated as last revised November 11, 2000 by Adime' Design/Architecture Incorporated WHEREAS, the Buffalo Grove Plan Commission reviewed the proposed change in the floor plan to allow six tenant lease spaces and the proposed change in the west elevation of the building, and the Plan Commission recommends approval of said changes pursuant to the exhibits attached hereto; and, WHEREAS, the President and Village Board of Trustees after due and careful consideration have concluded that the development of the Property on the terms and conditions herein set forth would enable the Village to control development of the area and would serve the best interests of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS: Section 1. This Ordinance is made pursuant to and in accordance with the Village's Zoning Ordinance, Development Ordinance, and the Village's Home Rule powers. The preceding whereas clauses are hereby made a part of this Ordinance. Section 2. The Corporate Authorities hereby adopt a proper, valid and binding ordinance amending the Praedium Planned Unit Development and approving EXHIBITS B and C attached hereto. All provisions and conditions of Ordinance 2000-7 not specifically modified by this Ordinance remain in effect. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after its passage and approval. This Ordinance shall not be codified. AYES: NAYES: ABSENT: PASSED: APPROVED: ATTEST: APPROVED: 3 Village Clerk ELLIOTT HARTSTEIN, Village President PREPARED BY:Robert E.Pfeil,Village Planner Village of Buffalo Grove MAIL TO: Village Clerk Village of Buffalo Grove 50 Raupp Boulevard Buffalo Grove,IL 60089 4 EXHIBIT A Praedium Development Commercial building, 25-55 Buffalo Grove Road Lot 2 of the Walgreens Buffalo Grove Resubdivision, being a subdivision of part of the southwest quarter of Section 33, Township 43 North and part of the northwest quarter of Section 3, Township 42 North, Range I I East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Lake County, Illinois. NMI!! sm am111101111" NMI EMUII j ° II ice':; o MUNI! NOW NMI' 0 Mail NMI:! sm: NMI Emil' 0 0 Flo I =- ° '� now •'' .�.: I .r,''r ,I , I II`I II II III I�j ':II IIrr II II ! ;.;IIII.. 0�11111 illllllllllllll ° i11111111111111111111 �� o ca ea I ° .� il!/,1111111111111111 ..... .............._...._.........�.....,_..._....__�......__�.,,,,_��...V.._,_� e lr11111111111111111111 '.. ....�. L�10101011111001111101 ca `'� � ° ° �S�CIOI�IIl11�111011C11 � 1�1111111]1111111111 1 � • i1111111�1111111111111 :� I ��_ ,J o i1111111►,, 11111111 a :� -ill 1111]�0111�111�11 ��� I�ICIG111110011�IIC1 AF - -- -- . . CI�ICIIJIIOIII�IICII - � � o '"'fCaO�CCI1110001Da1aC1 ► � ' p '�®ICICICLIIIIO�II�CCCI --z_., ° ° i�"'"dC101C1�1110111C11C11 � , e _0��0�@011100110110@I a � ° ' a> ,l as 000000000i100001Io01I00 `� ° ° Ilo ooIa1101�II11Illll 000 00 lioDOOR lll llH ° aoll000 11111111111GIIII �IIIII�I II;I01111 II��I ©III�III II IIupI� IIIII 0cool 0001�01BII�IIINo 0 III oil IIB�IIoilpoll Ill 0 0 001! Do lot 101 IWORS WON No 10 . I RISE Moll 000010001000 �a 0111111111l�H®9919 ILIA -I 0 Moll Ill IoIN0a���� = Board Agenda Item Submittal xII-D Requested By: William H Brimm Entered By: William H Brimm Agenda Item Title: Resolution No.2000- Requesting the County of Cook not to Collect the Loss in Collection on Taxable Property in the Village of Buffalo Grove. Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: 0 Consent Agenda 11/08/2000 12/04/2000 0 Regular Agenda Finance&GS 0 None Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? board? 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 NO funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. The County Clerks in both Cook and Lake County have statutory authority to increase local tax levies in order to offset losses due to non-collection of property taxes within the counties under their responsibility. In Cook,the increase can equal 3%of corporate purpose and pension levies with an additional 5%for debt principal and interest levies. In Lake County,the authority is similar,but not as broad. The only levies that can be increased are for bonded principal and interest,which are increased by only 2%. Using the last complete tax data available which is 1999 for both Cook and Lake,approximately$64,960 would have been levied over and above our actual request to compensate for losses in the collection effort. This is equal to .88%of net taxes as levied in both counties for the 1999 tax year. The Village has the option,through the adoption of a resolution,to direct the County Clerks not to collect this additional tax from local property owners. This same action has been taken in both Cook and Lake Counties for several tax year,although the final collection history for the 1999 tax extensions will not be available until early-2001. It has been determined that with the Village's collection history in Cook County (99.41%from the 1989 levy)and in Lake County (100.12%for the same period),combined with the proceeds of the Corporate Personal Property Replacement Tax and other revenues,that justification exists to request eliminate of this additional taxation over and above our original Tax Levy Ordinance,net of abatements. The Tax Levy Ordinance for 2000 will not include any cost of collection due to extension losses. Future collection history versus levy will continue to be analyzed to determine if there will ever be a need to re-institute the supplemental levies. For tax year 2000,Resolutions have been prepared for Village Board consideration in a manner comparable to what has been the practice in prior years. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files costcoll.pdf Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: TO: William R. Balling FROM: William H. Brimm DATE: August 29, 2000 SUBJECT: 2000 Property Tax Levy Ordinance Cook and Lake County Cost of Collection The County Clerks in both Cook and Lake County have statutory authority to increase local tax levies in order to offset losses due to non-collection of property taxes within the counties under their responsibility. In Cook, the increase can equal 3% of corporate purpose and pension levies with an additional 5% for debt principal and interest levies. In Lake County, the authority is similar, but not as broad. The only levies that can be increased are for bonded principal and interest, which are increased by only 2%. Using the last complete tax data available which is 1999 for both Cook and Lake, approximately $64,960 would have been levied over and above our actual request to compensate for losses in the collection effort. This is equal to .88% of net taxes as levied in both counties for the 1999 tax year. The Village has the option, through the adoption of a resolution, to direct the County Clerks not to collect this additional tax from local property owners. This same action has been taken in both Cook and Lake Counties for several tax year, although the final collection history for the 1999 tax extensions will not be available until early-2001. It has been determined that with the Village's collection history in Cook County (99.41% from the 1989 levy) and in Lake County (100.12% for the same period) , combined with the proceeds of the Corporate Personal Property Replacement Tax and other revenues, that justification exists to request eliminate of this additional taxation over and above our original Tax Levy Ordinance, net of abatements. The Tax Levy Ordinance for 2000 will not include any cost of collection due to extension losses. Future collection history versus levy will continue to be analyzed to determine if there will ever be a need to re-institute the supplemental levies. For tax year 2000, Resolutions have been prepared for Village Board consideration in a manner comparable to what has been the practice in prior years. For additional information on this matter, the attached collection analysis showing overall collection versus levy history for the Village since tax year 1977 is prepared for review to support the statistical methodology behind this proposal. vJ wt'. William H. Brimm RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF COOK NOT TO COLLECT THE LOSS IN COLLECTION ON TAXABLE PROPERTY IN THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove has experienced a high level of property tax collections from its residential and commercial property in Cook County as verified by audit and collection procedures; and WHEREAS, the County of Cook has made it a policy to extend additional amounts over and above the annual tax levy requests of the Village of Buffalo Grove in order to offset any loss in collection of the tax levy; and WHEREAS, those additional taxes will not be needed by the Village of Buffalo Grove to perform its operational, pension and debt service responsibilities to its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, that: SECTION 1. The County Clerk of Cook County is hereby directed not to levy the customary percentage amounts for loss and collection as part of the extension of those levies requested by the Village of Buffalo Grove in its 2000 Tax Levy Ordinance upon all taxable property within the Cook County boundaries of the Village. SECTION 2. The Village Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Resolution to the County Clerk of Cook County. AYES: NAYES: ABSENT: PASSED: ,2000.APPROVED: ,2000 Village President ATTEST: Village Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF LAKE NOT TO COLLECT THE LOSS IN COLLECTION ON TAXABLE PROPERTY IN THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove has experienced a high level of property tax collections from its residential and commercial property in Lake County as verified by audit and collection procedures; and WHEREAS, the County of Lake has made it a policy to extend additional amounts over and above the annual tax levy requests of the Village of Buffalo Grove in order to offset any loss in collection of the tax levy; and WHEREAS, those additional taxes will not be needed by the Village of Buffalo Grove to perform its operational, pension and debt service responsibilities to its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, that: SECTION 1. The County Clerk of Lake County is hereby directed not to levy the customary percentage amounts for loss and collection as part of the extension of those levies requested by the Village of Buffalo Grove in its 2000 Tax Levy Ordinance upon all taxable property within the Lake County boundaries of the Village. SECTION 2. The Village Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Resolution to the County Clerk of Lake County. AYES: NAPES: ABSENT: PASSED: ,2000.APPROVED: ,2000. Village President ATTEST: Village Clerk VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE PROPERTY TAX COLLECTION HISTORY TAX RATES,TAX LEVIES,AND TAX COLLECTIONS LAKE COUNTY COOK COUNTY TAX FISCAL TAX TAXES TAXES % TAX TAXES TAXES % TOTAL YEAR YEAR RATE EXTENDED COLLECTED COLLECTEt RATE EXTENDED COLLECTED COLLECTED COLLECTED 1977 1979 0.680 227,927.00 227,989.00 100.03% 0.815 445,112.00 420,284.26 94.42% 96.32% 1978 1980 0.670 333,126.00 328,192.00 98.52% 0.852 486,057.00 485,733.36 99.93% 99.36% 1979 1981 0.661 435,129.00 424,251.00 97.50% 0.741 429,997.00 425,083.21 98.86% 98.17% 1980 1982 1.160 942,927.00 933,398.00 98.99% 1.041 786,529.73 764,492.95 99.73% 99.32% 1981 1983 1.246 1,076,709.00 1,073,887.00 99.74% 1.298 1,028,867.18 1,008,068.98 97.98% 98.88% 1982 1984 1.064 954,484.00 952,573.00 99.80% 1.322 1,124,464.00 1,113,133.36 98.99% 99.36% 1983 1985 1.570 1,494,891.00 1,478,297.00 98.89% 1.985 1,612,841.20 1,612,212.76 99.96% 99.45% 1984 1988 1.681 1,762,461.00 1,759,475.80 99.83% 1.977 1,804,427.29 1,804,218.70 99.99% 99.91% 1985 1987 1.581 1,965,438.59 1,960,347.56 99.74% 1.906 1,729,719.47 1,727,184.81 99.85% 99.79% 1906 1988 1.395 2,160,094.01 2,173,978.85 100.64% 1.782 1,705,603.75 1,684,197.92 98.74% 99.81% 1987 1989 1.147 2,353,670.86 2,347,383.55 99.73% 1.561 1,569,282.46 1,573,907.18 100.29% 99.96% 1988 1990 1.050 2,748,750.89 2,745,057.59 99.87% 1.448 1,524,735.91 1,525,729.85 100.07% 99.94% 1989 1991 1.024 3,420,451.23 3,415,560.73 99.86% 1.085 1,423,549.73 1,415,549.48 99.44% 99.73% 1990 1992 0.855 3,502,680.62 3,492,932.69 99.72% 0.959 1,405,703.83 1,394,831.77 99.23% 99.58% 1991 1903 0.882 4,230,474.91 4,228,993.97 99.96% 1.161 1,732,297.47 1,712,766.71 98.87% 99.65% 1992 1994 0.815 4,266,113.25 4,262,316.00 99.91% 0.907 1,595,695.86 1,587,796.73 99.50% 99.80% 1993 1995 0,793 4,562,819.21 4,555,177.82 99.83% 0.883 1,556,321.97 1,545,180.44 99.28% 99.69% 1904 1996 0.749 4,580,375.84 4.583,121.28 100.08% 0.895 1,539,328.60 1,530,376.50 99.42% 99.90% 1995 1997 0.726 4,855,828.18 4,876,310.65 100.42% 0.803 1,553,927.30 1,547,737.98 99.60% 100.22% 1996 1998 0.687 5,029,696.43 5,056,372.01 100.53% 0.785 1,533,649.87 1,521,294.01 99.19% 100.22% 1997 1999 0.675 5,198,349.44 5,224,400.83 100.50% 0.763 1,487,165.76 1,486,512.66 99.96% 100.38% 1998 2000 0.648 5,276,869.28 5,283,750.90 100,13% 0.719 1,516,118.00 1,511,325.08 99.68% 100.03% 1999 2001 0.653 5,595,209.20 2,906,113.00 51.94% 0.818 1,787,763.00 758 894.27 42.45% 49.64% TOTAL 65,974,675.94 6409,880.23 95.99% 31,359,148.38 30,156,512.97 96.16% 96.05% TOTALS-LAST TEN FINAL TAX YEARS-89 THRU 98 44,923,858.39 44,978,936.88 100.12% 15,343,758.39 15,253,371.36 99.41% 99.94% Board Agenda Item Submittal XII-E Requested By: William H Brimm Entered By: Phillip W Versten Agenda Item Title: Resolution No.2000- Requesting the County of Lake not to Collect the Loss in Collection on Taxable Property in the Village of Buffalo Grove. Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: 0 Consent Agenda 11/30/2000 12/04/2000 0 Regular Agenda Finance&GS 0 None Does this item Does this item include Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? board? 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No 0 Yes 0No Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 NO funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. See cover memo from Item XII. D. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Ij costcollake.pdf Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF LAKE NOT TO COLLECT THE LOSS IN COLLECTION ON TAXABLE PROPERTY IN THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove has experienced a high level of property tax collections from its residential and commercial property in Lake County as verified by audit and collection procedures; and WHEREAS, the County of Lake has made it a policy to extend additional amounts over and above the annual tax levy requests of the Village of Buffalo Grove in order to offset any loss in collection of the tax levy; and WHEREAS, those additional taxes will not be needed by the Village of Buffalo Grove to perform its operational, pension and debt service responsibilities to its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, that: SECTION 1. The County Clerk of Lake County is hereby directed not to levy the customary percentage amounts for loss and collection as part of the extension of those levies requested by the Village of Buffalo Grove in its 2000 Tax Levy Ordinance upon all taxable property within the Lake County boundaries of the Village. SECTION 2. The Village Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Resolution to the County Clerk of Lake County. AYES: NAPES: ABSENT: PASSED: ,2000.APPROVED: ,2000. Village President ATTEST: Village Clerk Board Agenda Item Submittal xII-F Requested By: Robert E Pfeil Entered By: Robert E Pfeil Agenda Item Title: Ordinance 2000-_Approving the 17th Amendment to the Buffalo Grove Town Center Planned Unit Development concerning Culver's Restaurant and the Belmont Village assisted living facility Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: ❑ Consent Agenda 11/30/2000 12/04/2000 0 Regular Agenda Planning 0 None Does this item Does this item include Specify Other: Will AV equipment be Type ofAV Needed: relate to another additional reference ❑ Hardcopy Distribution required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? � Trustee Lounge El Clerk's El Video Clerk's Office ❑ Computer El Other El Doc Camera 0 Yes 0 No 0 Yes 0 No 0 Yes 0 No El Easel Exhibits can be accessed in: ❑ Other Floor plans concerning phasing for Belmont Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in 0 Yes 0 No funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. The revised draft ordinance amending the Planned Unit Development for the Culver's restaurant and the Belmont Village assisted living facility is attached. The draft incorporates the items discussed by the Village Board at the meeting on November 20. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files E] ORD 11302000.pdf Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: 11/30/00 ORDINANCE 2000- SEVENTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE TOWN CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE BELMONT VILLAGE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AND CULVER'S RESTAURANT (Parcel of 6.12 acres north of Town Place Circle/Parkway between Buffalo Grove Road and Illinois Route 83) An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No.2000-43 entitled "Sixteenth Amendment to the Town Center Planned Unit Development Ordinance, Belmont Village Assisted Living Facility for the elderly and commercial outlot" WITNES SETH: WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule Unit by virtue of the provisions of the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970; and, WHEREAS, Buffalo Grove Joint Venture, an Indiana General Partnership (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"), is the owner and BelmontCorp, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Developer"), is the contract purchaser of a certain tract of property (hereinafter referred to as the "Property") comprising approximately 6.12 acres legally described and identified in the legal description which is attached hereto as EXHIBIT A, which exhibit is made a part hereof and which real estate is within the corporate limits of the Village; and, WHEREAS, the Property has been further defined in the legal descriptions attached hereto as EXHIBIT A-1, which exhibit is made a part hereof, to identify Parcel A (4.5 acres proposed for the Belmont Village Assisted Living Facility) and Parcel B (1.62-acre "Outlot" proposed for commercial/restaurant use); and, WHEREAS, the Property was zoned as part of the Office Sub-District of the B-5 Town Center Planned Unit Development District by Ordinance 86-61, dated November 3, 1986; and, WHEREAS, the Property was zoned as part of the Commercial/Recreational Sub-District of the B-5 Town Center Planned Unit Development District by Ordinance 97-22, dated March 3, 1997; and, 2 WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village (sometimes hereinafter referred to as the "Corporate Authorities"), on August 7, 2000, adopted Ordinance 2000-43, which redesignated Parcel A (4.5 acres) of the Property to the Residential Sub-District of the B-5 Town Center Planned Unit Development District and approved a Preliminary Plan for the Property, including variations from the Village Development Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance, subject to: (i) the conditions contained in said Ordinance 2000-43; (ii) compliance with all applicable ordinances of the Village of Buffalo Grove as amended from time to time; (iii) the condition that the Property be developed in accordance with the Preliminary Site Plan attached to Ordinance 2000-43 as EXHIBITS C and D (hereinafter referred to as the "Preliminary Site Plan") and the other exhibits attached to said Ordinance 2000-43; and (iv) the requirements set forth in said Ordinance 2000-43 with respect to the development of Parcel B (Outlot); and, WHEREAS, the Developer proposes to construct a 158-unit assisted living facility (hereinafter referred to as the "Assisted Living Facility") on Parcel A pursuant to the Preliminary Site Plan, approved as EXHIBIT C to Ordinance 2000-43 and the Preliminary Engineering Plan approved as EXHIBIT D to Ordinance 2000-43; and, WHEREAS, a condition of Section 4. of Ordinance 2000-43 is that Parcel B of the Property (the "Outlot") be improved with a Culver's restaurant (hereinafter referred to as the "Restaurant") or other commercial use approved by the Corporate Authorities having a floor area not to exceed 8,000 square feet, that the developer of the Restaurant apply for and obtain preliminary plan and development plan approval from the Corporate Authorities in accordance with the Village Zoning Ordinance and Village Development Ordinance prior to commencing construction of the Restaurant and that the developer of the Outlot submit a detailed site plan and engineering plan to the Village for review by the Plan Commission and approval by the Corporate Authorities, as required by the Village Zoning Ordinance and Village Development Ordinance prior to commencing construction of the Restaurant; and, WHEREAS, Merit Enterprises, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Outlot Developer"), in furtherance of the development of the Outlot and the construction of the Restaurant, has 3 submitted to the Village the following plans (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Culver's Preliminary Plans"): Preliminary Plan dated as last revised August 16, 2000 attached hereto as EXHIBIT D, Preliminary Engineering Plan dated as last revised August 21, 2000 attached hereto as EXHIBIT E, and all other exhibits attached hereto or incorporated by reference herein; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to due notice and advertisement, the Plan Commission of the Village has held a public hearing and made its recommendations pursuant to the requested approvals of the Culver's Preliminary Plans; and, WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have determined and hereby find that the Culver's Preliminary Plans conform to the requirements of Ordinance 2000-43 and all applicable provisions of the Village Zoning Ordinance and Village Development Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the Developer, subsequent to the date of adoption of Ordinance 2000-43, has submitted to the Village a phasing plan (proposing construction of 122 units in phase 1 and 36 units in phase 2) for the construction of the Assisted Living Facility, a copy of which is attached hereto as EXHIBIT B and made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the "Phasing Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities, after due and careful consideration, have determined that it would serve the best interests of the Village to approve the Culver's Preliminary Plans, to provide for the Developer's construction of the Assisted Living Facility in two phases as set forth on the Phasing Plan, and to amend the provisions of Ordinance 2000-43 in the manner hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS AS FOLLOWS: 1. Applicable Law. This Ordinance is made pursuant to and in accordance with the Village Zoning Ordinance, Village Development Ordinance and the Village's powers as a Home Rule Unit of government. The preceding whereas clauses are hereby made a part of this Ordinance. 4 2. Approval of Culver's Preliminary Plans. The Corporate Authorities hereby approve (i) a Special Use for the Culver's restaurant with a drive-through facility on Parcel B and (ii) the Culver's Preliminary Plans pursuant to the provisions of the Village Development Ordinance and Ordinance 2000-43. The Corporate Authorities agree to approve a Development Plan (including a plat of subdivision) for the development of the Outlot and the construction of the Restaurant based on final versions of the Culver's Preliminary Site Plan and the Culver's Preliminary Engineering Plan provided that the Culver's Development Plan shall: (A) conform to the approved Culver's Preliminary Plans (EXHIBITS D and E), and (B) conform to the terms of this Ordinance, Ordinance 2000-43 and all applicable Village Ordinances as amended from time to time, and (C) conform to the approved Development Improvement Agreement(EXHIBIT C) as amended from time to time. 3. Approval of Phasing _Plan. The Corporate Authorities hereby approve the Phasing Plan proposing construction of 122 units in phase 1 and 36 units in phase 2 as depicted on EXHIBIT B attached hereto pursuant to the provisions of the Village Development Ordinance. The Developer agrees to construct the Assisted Living Facility in two phases, as set forth on the Phasing Plan, provided, however, that the Developer shall have the right to construct the Assisted Living Facility in a single phase if the Corporate Authorities subsequently approve such single phase construction, which approval shall not require an amendment to this Ordinance, Ordinance 2000-43 or Ordinance 86-61. 4. Conditions for Construction of Assisted Living Facility and Restaurant. As conditions precedent to the issuance of building permits for both the Developer's construction of the Assisted Living Facility on Parcel A pursuant to the Development Plan referenced in Paragraph 3 of Ordinance 2000-43 and for the Outlot Developer's construction of the Restaurant on Parcel B pursuant to the Culver's Final Plans, either the Developer or the Outlot Developer shall have first secured (unless the Corporate Authorities shall have waived the same as conditions precedent): (i) a permit from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency ("IEPA") 5 to relocate the sanitary sewer that presently exists on Parcel B so that the Restaurant can be constructed in the manner depicted on the Culver's Preliminary Site Plan, (ii) in the event the Developer and the Outlot Developer are unable to secure such permit from the IEPA, approval by the Corporate Authorities of a revised preliminary site plan and a revised preliminary engineering plan for the Restaurant that does not require the relocation of said sanitary sewer, and (iii) the Illinois Department of Transportation ("IDOT") permit referenced in Paragraph 21(N) of Ordinance 2000-43 approving the final intersection design plans for the IL Route 83 (McHenry Road) point of access into the Property depicted on the Preliminary Plans. The Developer and/or the Outlot Developer shall apply to the IEPA and to IDOT for issuance of the aforesaid permits within six (6) months of the date of this Ordinance and thereafter diligently pursue the issuance of such permits by such state agencies. If the Developer and/or the Outlot Developer are unable to secure the aforesaid permit from the IEPA and the Corporate Authorities have failed to approve the aforesaid revised preliminary site plan and revised preliminary engineering plan for the Restaurant and as a result thereof the Outlot Developer elects not to acquire title to the Outlot, then the Developer, at the request of the Corporate Authorities (provided the Corporate Authorities have not approved an alternate commercial use for the Outlot) and as a condition precedent to the issuance of building permits for the construction of the Assisted Living Facility, shall cause fee simple title to the Outlot to be conveyed to the Village and the Village shall be entitled to facilitate the development of the Outlot to offset the financial impact on the Village that will result from the construction of the Assisted Living Facility on Parcel A of the Property. 5. Construction of Assisted Living Facility. Paragraph 21(0) of Ordinance 2000-43 is hereby amended to provide that the Developer shall commence construction of the Assisted Living Facility within six (6) months of the latter to occur of(i) the date the last of the conditions precedent set forth in Paragraph 4. above have been satisfied, or (ii) the date of approval of the Development Plan referenced in Paragraph 3. of Ordinance 2000-43, except that the Corporate 6 Authorities may extend said six (6) month time frame without an amendment to this Ordinance, Ordinance 2000-43 or Ordinance 86-61. In the event that the Belmont Village Assisted Living Facility is not constructed, or if said facility is constructed and then ceases to operate for a period of one year, then Parcel A shall revert to the office Sub-district of the B-5 District as set forth in Ordinance 86-61. Said reversion shall take effect only after an affirmative vote of a majority of the Corporate Authorities. 6. Conditions for the Restaurant. Paragraph 5 of Ordinance 2000-43 is hereby amended to read as follows: The Outlot Developer shall apply to the Village for approval of the Culver's Final Plans within six (6) months of the date of this Ordinance and commence construction of the Restaurant within six (6) months of the latter to occur of: (i) the date the last of the conditions precedent set forth in Paragraph 4. above have been satisfied, or (ii) the date of the Village's approval of the Culver's Final Plans, except that the Corporate Authorities may extend said six (6) month time frames without amendment to this Ordinance, Ordinance 2000-43 or Ordinance 86-61. In the event the Outlot Developer fails to obtain a certificate of occupancy and fails to open for business as a restaurant within six (6) months after the date of the issuance of the first Village permit for construction of the Restaurant building, and the Corporate Authorities have not approved another use of the Outlot proposed by Developer, then the Outlot Developer (or the Developer if the Outlot Developer does not then own fee simple title to the Outlot), at the request of the Corporate Authorities, shall cause fee simple title to the Outlot to be conveyed to the Village (free of any liens or encumbrances) and the Village shall be entitled to facilitate the development of the Outlot to offset the financial impact on the Village that will result from the construction of the Assisted Living Facility on Parcel A of the Property. Uses allowed on the Outlot shall be compatible with adjacent residential areas as determined by the Village, and said uses shall not include gas stations, automotive repair and maintenance operations, equipment rental operations, dry cleaning establishments or public utility structures. 7 7. Compliance with Applicable Ordinances. The Developer and the Outlot Developer will comply with all ordinances of the Village as amended from time to time in the development of the Property, provided that all new ordinances, amendments, rules and regulations relating to zoning, building and subdivision of land adopted after the date of Ordinance 2000-43 shall not be applied to the Property in an arbitrary or discriminatory manner but shall be equally applicable to all property similarly zoned and situated. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Village shall not apply new ordinances or regulations to the Property to the extent that the ordinances or regulations will prevent development of the Property as set forth in the Preliminary Plan approved by Ordinance 2000-43 or as set forth in the Culver's Preliminary Plans approved by this Ordinance. 8. Amendment of Culver's Preliminary Plans. If the Outlot Developer desires to make changes in the Culver's Preliminary Plans, as herein approved, the parties agree that such changes in the Culver's Preliminary Plans will require, if the Village so determines, the submission of amended plats or plans, together with proper supporting documentation, to the Village Plan Commission and/or the Corporate Authorities to consider such changes to this Ordinance. The Corporate Authorities may, in their sole discretion, require additional public hearings and may review the commitments of record contained in this Ordinance, including but not limited to fees, prior to final consideration of any change in the Culver's Preliminary Plans. The Village Manager is hereby authorized to approve such minor changes as he deems appropriate, provided that no such changes increase the total ground area covered by buildings by more than two (2)percent. 9. Exhibits. The following EXHIBITS, some of which were presented in testimony given by the Outlot Developer or other witnesses during the hearings held before the Plan Commission and the Corporate Authorities prior to the execution of this Ordinance, are hereby incorporated by reference herein, made a part hereof and designated as shown below. This Ordinance, together with copies of all EXHIBITS, shall be kept on file with the Village Clerk and be available for inspection by the parties hereto. 8 EXHIBIT A Legal Description EXHIBIT A-1 Legal Description — Parcel A (Assisted Living) and Parcel B (Outlot) EXHIBIT B Phasing plan for Belmont Village Assisted Living facility dated as received November 16, 2000 proposing 122 units in phase 1 and 36 units in phase 2 EXHIBIT C Culver's Development Improvement Agreement (draft form, not executed) EXHIBIT D Culver's Preliminary Plan (Conceptual Site Plan) dated as last revised August 16, 2000 by Allen L. Krawcower and Associates EXHIBIT E Culver's Preliminary Engineering Plan dated as last revised August 21, 2000 by Cowhey Gudmundson Leder, Ltd. EXHIBIT F Master Landscape Plan dated August 11, 2000 by Hohlfelder Landscaping EXHIBIT G Culver's Architectural Elevations dated November 10, 2000 prepared by Richard L. Johnson Associates, Inc. EXHIBIT H Color rendering (1 lxl7-inch) of Culver's restaurant EXHIBIT I Material List for Culver's Restaurant, Rte 83 Buffalo Grove (no date) EXHIBIT J Culver's floor plan (llxl7-inch) dated as last revised December 12, 1999 by Koziol Engineering Services 10. Facilitation of Development. Time is of the essence of this Ordinance, and all parties will make every reasonable effort to expedite the subject matters hereof. It is further understood and agreed that the successful consummation of this Ordinance and the development of the Property is in the best interests of all the parties and requires their continued cooperation. The Developer and the Outlot Developer do hereby evidence their intention to fully comply with all Village requirements, their willingness to discuss any matters of mutual interest that may 9 arise, and their willingness to assist the Village to the fullest extent possible. The Village does hereby evidence its intent to always cooperate in the resolution of mutual problems and its willingness to facilitate the development of the Property, as contemplated by the provisions of this Ordinance. 11. Enforceability of the Ordinance. This Ordinance shall be enforceable in any court of competent jurisdiction by any of the parties or by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the performance of the conditions herein described. If any provision of this Ordinance is held invalid, such provisions shall be deemed to be excised herefrom and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 12. Binding Effect of Ordinance. This Ordinance shall be binding upon the Property, the parties hereto and their respective grantees, successors and assigns. 13. Corporate Capacities. The parties acknowledge and agree that the individuals that are members of the group constituting the Corporate Authorities are enacting this Ordinance in their official capacities as members of such group and shall have no personal liability in their individual capacities. 14. Litigation._ A. The Outlot Developer, at its cost, shall be responsible for any litigation that may arise as a result of the development of the Outlot or the construction of the Restaurant. The Outlot Developer shall cooperate with the Village in said litigation, but the Outlot Developer's counsel will have principal responsibility for such litigation. B. The Outlot Developer shall reimburse the Village for reasonable attorneys' fees, expenses and costs incurred by the Village resulting from litigation relating to the development of the Outlot, the construction of the Restaurant or the enforcement of any terms of this Ordinance upon a default by the Outlot Developer or its grantees, successors or assigns. C. The Outlot Developer hereby indemnifies and holds the Village harmless from any actions or causes of action that may arise as a result of development activities for which the Outlot Developer is responsible. 10 15. Special Conditions. A. The following variation to the Village Zoning Ordinance is hereby granted for Parcel B (the Outlot): Section 17.44.060.D.I j. —to allow a paved area to encroach into the required 20-foot landscaped buffer area along Illinois Route 83 as depicted in EXHIBIT D attached hereto. B. The Preliminary Plan (EXHIBIT D) and Preliminary Engineering Plan (EXHIBIT E) shall be revised as approved by the Village concerning the following items: 1. The pedestrian crosswalk between the Belmont site (Parcel A) and the Culver's site (Parcel B) shall be re-located to the intersection at Town Place Parkway. 2. The triangular curbed island and curbing recommended by the Village traffic consultant as set forth in the memo dated August 31, 2000 from Thomas Adomshick of James J. Benes and Associates, shall be installed adjacent to the entry to the Culver's drive- through lane as approved by the Village Engineer. 3. An accessible travel path shall be provided from the sidewalk adjacent to Parcel B to the entrance to the Culver's restaurant. The location of said travel path is subject to approval by the Village. C. A final landscaping plan for Parcel B shall be submitted for review and approval by the Village Forester. Additional landscape screening shall be provided along the west side of the site if determined to be feasible by the Village Forester. D. If the Village determines that the lane markings for the intersection of the access road and IL Route 83 need to be modified to properly control traffic movements, the Village shall have the right to make said modifications pursuant to authorization from the Illinois Department of Transportation. E. The Culver's restaurant shall minimize sound and odor impacts on adjacent properties. Sound from speakers and similar equipment shall not be audible beyond the lot lines of Parcel B. If the Village determines that signs are necessary to control sound from vehicles on Parcel B, the Outlot Developer shall install said signs at the direction of the Village. Cooking processes, storage of supplies and materials and waste management shall be managed to minimize any odors from affecting properties adjacent to Parcel B. In the event that the Village determines that odors from the Culver's restaurant are present on adjacent properties, the Outlot Developer shall mitigate odors immediately as directed by the Village. 11 F. The gates on the trash dumpster enclosure shall remain closed except when the area is being serviced or when refuse is being deposited therein. G. Deliveries and pick-ups of supplies, and the hours of operation for the Culver's restaurant shall be scheduled to be compatible with adjacent residential areas. If the Village determines that a formal schedule is necessary to ensure compatibility with adjacent residential areas, Outlot Developer shall submit a written schedule for review and approval by the Corporate Authorities. Refuse service for Parcel B shall be scheduled to occur between 7:00 AM and 5:00 PM only. H. Notwithstanding EXHIBIT H hereto, the color of the awnings shall be slate/gray blue as approved by the Village, and there shall be no color striping on the Restaurant building. L Signage depicted on the attached EXHIBITS is not approved by this Ordinance. Said Signage or other identification element and final landscaping plans for the Property are subject to review and approval by the Corporate Authorities, and said plans shall be submitted for review prior to application for a building permit. J. The Outlot Developer shall submit a plan concerning all outdoor lights proposed for Parcel B (the Outlot), including the height and type of fixtures and daily schedule of illumination of the parking areas and exterior of the Restaurant. Said plan shall be submitted at the time of submittal of the Culver's Final Plans and said plan shall be subject to approval by the Corporate Authorities. K. During the period of construction of the Restaurant and the related Parcel B (Outlot) site improvements, construction vehicles and equipment shall enter and exit the Property from Illinois Route 83 and Buffalo Grove Road, not Town Place Circle or Town Place Parkway. L. The provisions of Ordinance 86-61 and Ordinance 2000-43 remain in full force and effect for the Property unless specifically modified by this Ordinance. 15. Effect. This Ordinance shall be full force and effect from and after its passage and approval. This Ordinance shall not be codified. AYES: NAYES: 12 ABSENT: PASSED: APPROVED: ATTEST: APPROVED: Village Clerk Village President Prepared by: William G. Raysa, Village Attorney Raysa& Skelton, P.C. 1140 Lake Street, Suite 400 Oak Park, IL 60301-1002 Mail to: Village Clerk Village of Buffalo Grove 50 Raupp Boulevard Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 Board Agenda Item Submittal xIv A Requested By: Raymond O Rigsby Entered By: Raymond O Rigsby Agenda Item Title: Fiscal Year 2001-2002 budget for Central Garage. Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: 11/29/2000 12/04/2000 ❑ Consent Agenda PW ❑ Regular Agenda ❑ None Does this item Does this item include Specify Other: Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference ❑ Hardcopy Distribution required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? El Trustee Lounge El Clerk's Clerk's Office ❑ Other ❑ Yes 0No 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes 0No Exhibits can be accessed in: Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in ❑ Yes 0 No funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. Attached is a copy of the fiscal year 2001-2002 budget for Central Garage for your review and comment. The Central Garage program is an internal service fund which receives revenue through vehicle and equipment service. It is presented at this time to allow the Village President and Board of Trustees to comment before the maintenance costs are distributed to the other departments for their use in preparing their budgets . Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: Board Agenda Item Submittal xIv B Requested By: Scott D Anderson Entered By: Scott D Anderson Agenda Item Title: Capital Improvement Program FY 2001/2-2005/6 Presentation Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: ❑ Consent Agenda 11/29/2000 12/04/2000 0 Regular Agenda Finance&GS ❑ None Does this item Does this item include Specify Other: Will AV equipment be relate to another additional reference ❑ Hardcopy Distribution required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? El Trustee Lounge El Clerk's Clerk's Office ❑ Other ❑ Yes 0No 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes 0No Exhibits can be accessed in: Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in ❑ Yes 0 No funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. This document contains those projects identified as part of the update of the Village's Capital Improvement Plan for the five-year period beginning May 1, 2001 and ending April 30, 2006. This submittal initiates the review and adoption process for the updated Plan.Those projects identified for FY 2001-2002 will be incorporated into the upcoming annual operating budget should the Village Board concur with those projects presented. The Capital Improvement Plan is intended to be a decision-making tool for both staff and the Village Board to weigh the operational need for capital requests against the ability to finance those projects. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: Board Agenda Item Submittal xIV C Requested By: Robert E Pfeil Entered By: Robert E Pfeil Agenda Item Title: Pre-application Conference: Proposed Storage Mart facility,southeast corner of Prairie Rd/Half Day Rd,annexation with Industrial zoning Date Submitted: Meeting Date Agenda Place Requested: Requested: Department: ❑ Consent Agenda 11/29/2000 12/04/2000 0 Regular Agenda Planning ❑ None Does this item Does this item include Specify Other: Will AV equipment be Type ofAV Needed: relate to another additional reference ❑ Hardcopy Distribution required to present item on the info separate from the this item to the agenda? Board packet? El Trustee Lounge El Clerk's El Video Clerk's Office ❑ Computer El Other ❑ Doc Camera ❑ Yes 0 No 0 Yes ❑ No 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Easel Exhibits can be accessed in: ❑ Other Item Description Will this action involve an expenditure in ❑ Yes 0 No funds? Additional Notes regarding Expenditures: Type the body of the cover memo here. Requests cannot be submitted if this field is blank. Cris Burnam of Storage Mart has submitted the attached letter and related materials concerning the proposed Storage Mart facility. The site is a 4.27-acre parcel at the southeast corner of Prairie Road and Route 22 (Half Day Road). The property is zoned Estate by Lake County. The Village's Comprehensive Plan designates the site for commercial development. The proposed building would be three stories with a total floor area of 109,947 square feet, including a retail area of 1,150 square feet and a caretaker's dwelling of 1,200 square feet. Industrial zoning is the most appropriate designation for the facility. The Powernail property, east of the Wisconsin Central railroad tracks, is zoned Industrial. The dwelling unit and the retail use would require approval as Special Uses in the Industrial District. Dedication for right-of-way and the wetlands on the property reduce the available site area to 3.15 acres. The developer indicates that variations would be requested to allow parking in the 50-foot setback along Prairie Road, and to allow a slight encroachment of the circulation lane in the south yard. Access would be provided by a driveway on Prairie Road in the south portion of the site. This access point will require approval by the Lake County Department of Transportation. Ideally, the access would align with Willow Parkway on the west side of Prairie Road, but the Storage Mart site does not extend far enough south to accomplish this alignment. There may be an opportunity to modify the access in the future if the property south of the site becomes available. Although the Village's Comprehensive Plan designates the property for commercial development, I think the proposed facility is an appropriate use. The site has limited feasibility for retail development because of the constrained access and the extent of the wetlands. The storage facility will have a very light traffic impact, and the site plan incorporates the existing wetland. A location map, the developer's letter and site plan and the building rendering are attached. Letter-Sized Legal-Sized Ledger-Sized Odd-Sized Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Attached Files Location Ma 64.pdf Letter Plan.pdf BldgElev.pdf Approval Section: Name: Date and Time: Submitted By: Pre-Approved By: Approved By: Published to Web: • • • - Mart November 22, 2000 Mr. Bob Pfeil Village Planner Village of Buffalo Grove 50 Raupp Blvd. Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 Dear Mr. Pfeil, Thank you for meeting with me and exploring StorageMart's request to construct a new self storage facility at the intersection of Prairie Road and Route 22 in unincorporated Lake County, IL. StorageMart is in the business of developing the most modern, high security storage complexes in the country. Over the past 27 years, our company has acquired or developed over 275 storage facilities in 25 states. As we have seen the storage industry mature, we have discovered that the old fashioned"metal sheds" featured at many properties are obsolete, and when storing their personal treasures, consumers are demanding many more amenities and a much more upscale environment. Out of this trend, our new super store concept has evolved. Our new Buffalo Grove store will have a controlled entry system, and each unit will be alarmed. Much of the facility will be temperature controlled, and a video surveillance system will monitor the complex. Our store even features a wine cellar for serious collectors that have no more room in their home cellars. Our 1,500 square foot"office"is actually a retail store that will carry the same items as a Container Store or Hold Everything retail outlet, along with other moving supplies and moving services. StorageMart will also provide copy and fax services, along with Federal Express and UPS drop off services. In short,we aim to be the super store for self-storage. To attract the kind of customers we need, StorageMart must have a visible location and high quality construction. We believe the Route 22 corridor is a perfect location, and that the enclosed rendering of our new store easily meet these criteria. We would like for the Village to consider allowing us to annex the property into Buffalo Grove with an industrial zoning that would permit the construction of our new super store. Here are the basics of our plan: Property- 22825 Prairie Rd., Prairie View, IL; the site currently contains 4.27 acres, but after contemplated road widening has occurred the site will contain approximately 3.15 acres. The site is also heavily encumbered by wetlands. The eastern boundary adjoins railroad tracks and industrial zoned land in the Village of Lincolnshire. To the P.O. Box U • Columbia, MO 65205 • 573-449-0091 • 573-874-1857(Fax) • www.storage-mart.com south are small residential homes that are either rental property or owner occupied. To the west is multifamily and to the north are Route 22 and the Metra Station. Construction- The property would have a single 3 story building that is completely enclosed. The building would be constructed of steel frame and masonry type construction. All visible exterior surfaces are made of a combination of brick, cast limestone and e.f.i.s. materials. Water detention is provided for on site. All fencing is of wrought iron or masonry products. The building faces Prairie Road and has a clock tower creating an architecturally interesting fagade based upon a"Federalist"motif. Size- The buildings contains a total of 109,947 square feet,with 623 units, a 1,150 square feet of office retail, and a 1,200 square feet Caretaker's dwelling. Overall,there will be a F.A.R. of.80,which is in keeping with the Village's requirements. Landscaping- A detailed landscaping plan would be developed for the Village's approval. Customer Base-We project that 85% of our customers will be residential homeowners or apartment dwellers. The balance of users will be commercial tenants such as medical or legal offices for file storage, retailers for excess inventory or salespeople (all users are strictly limited to storage use only; materials stored must be nonhazardous). Overall, 65% of all of our customers are typically female, thus making security and aesthetics very important. Traffic Creation- Self-storage has been proven to be one of the lowest generators of traffic when considering land use. According to the Institute of Traffic Engineers, Trip Generation, 6th Edition, a storage property of approximately 500 units will generate between 100 and 125 vehicle trips per day, as compared to a 100,000 sgft light industrial building generating 700 trips per day and a 1,100 trips per day for an office building of similar size. Use of Village Services-Due to low traffic generation,minimal water and sewerage needs and being a non-intensive use in general, StorageMart will place very minimal demands upon municipal services as compared to almost any other type of use. Tax Revenue- We project that the annual real estate taxes generated by this property will be between$100,000 and$125,000 when completed. Sales Tax- Our retail store should sell between$85,000 and $100,000 in new merchandise. At a rate of 1% of sales going to the Village, our facility would generate $850 to $1,000 in annual revenue for the Village Variances Requested- Our goal was to eliminate the need to request any variances from Village code. However, due to the complex issues presented by the wetlands on the site and in our preliminary dealings with the Lake County Department of Transportation,we must obtain a variance to allow 19 parking spaces and associated driveways within the front setback of the tract. In addition, there is a minor encroachment of paving in the southern side set back area. In conclusion, StorageMart's plan is a very benign use for the.land that will put few burdens on the Village for future services. The above information is provided to help guide your discussion on our proposal. We are certainly willing to consider any suggestions; it is our hope to work with the Village to formulate a plan that will become a long-term asset to the community. If any questions arise,please contact me at your convenience. Sind - J Cris Burnam President Warburg-StorageMart Partners cc Larry Freedman _N 88'54'35'M 174.24' STATE ROUTE"22" w v o 3 O v'DD EXISTWO EOOE OF PA%—CMENT O — OA f-ma � D -A p'p�1 3yi \ u m q — O `r O� �+ V0- cccm I I 4 3* c I 27, 0ace TH ma' Y/ m / >v a0 xo zLCn > m \ D � 1Z j r olz 0o O ol ox m � ♦ p' V X W W r OS D U) pp V Sti H O Z'OO �I O 5d O S i w fD a Lo II m Pw om rn D>Ln O� -I II u� mA I �L,) -n \ DO > � G O I O ?s � N p N 84 50'56"E 41 92 B ^� , r �yf I f� r, IC �pd III �I. LM 20 i CD cm M"m Lm /i 10 CL CO: O 2i0 Y1002i8LLIW OOSZ � OSSZ O O za01- 2a41- 2a@]- 2411- -2,- N 2469 2459 2449 439 24� 2a07 NT MADIERA LN N � a4046 a2�36 2a2a26 2323�� CJ �C 2a2429 D 3838] O ozzOd y 2201 U P`�'o-b �a2426 �a2416 2a0408 3239 LZ� L/ O 0 0 0 0 0 Q ,L22 e N cu z 2197 / V3 - 2793 �g8 —An 2180 2189 APPLE HILL a 2770 o LN A �� Z�� �� �S� 2785 3 22 244 N N N N N N �'L6-238Z c°Ji L160 2191 CD 2500 2°� �2ti o zz m M M 2177 U- 2560 CVO 3' a ro ro �"'6 N N m 2173 O VJ 2570 2 �u �u N ai ai N N N N N N O Q 2550 0 5o CHAMBOURDoDR o 00 o 0 0 0 0 2 69 2165 C\ O \ O V O \ O �� \ v d N Ncv c� N � O O O \ \\ 9o2z UO O N o00 �� o NN \ � \A V A � �V � N N w F6z���� M O o � A 881Z ro ro ro oz v V CD A \ 9g1a � a M dWVbIW 0 28zz O � O V A \ lb �� \ \ A MHO NOEVAV O \ � N � O 08IZ OL Id V A V A 2L[Z ZLIZ \ 9LId VLIZ z O M] � a�l II�llv2ld O \ 1 �co "� 3 �\ ��, 6 00 o� l � o C7 BSZZ OV N w l - 09Zd 90 TER 91 N a m o v LI Z9ZZ 90Z o 0 0 0 0 \ \ N N N N N LOZ O A \ M 82 M 9H N N N N N N \ O a a m 6Z r�i 80Z o WRIo HT 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 \ V A \ ro SF o m z 660Z OOIZ o \ z N 2 o 6 �u F 90I7, O 906Z Z V A \ O� O o Z ZIIZ EbOZ ~ m > M o EZIZ RZIZ E90Z = O N01SV3 6zMFRIFIANI WAY O 66 n m 6g `0 0 2336 \ 2 �m 2334 gIZ3 2316 2302 \ V A \ V A O 2332 023Z ���u 2330 2232 2312 90 V O V O O 0